[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[H.R. 2455 Introduced in House (IH)]
112th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2455
To prohibit any requirement of a budgetary offset for emergency
disaster assistance during 2011 and 2012.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 7, 2011
Mr. Richmond introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To prohibit any requirement of a budgetary offset for emergency
disaster assistance during 2011 and 2012.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Humanitarian Aid for Americans
Act''.
SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.
The Congress finds the following:
(1) Presidential emergency declarations trigger aid that
protects property, public health, and safety and lessens or
averts the threat of an incident becoming a catastrophic event.
(2) The number of disasters has grown on a bipartisan basis
and is a reflection of the weather events of the period: in the
1980s (1980-1989) there were 237 Presidential major disaster
declarations; in the 1990s (1990-1999) there were 460
Presidential major disaster declarations; and in the 2000s
(2000-2009) there were 561 declared disasters, an average of 56
per year during the 2000s.
(3) In 2011 alone, there have already been 48 major
disaster declarations in Texas, Iowa, Indiana, Montana,
Vermont, Massachusetts, New York, Alaska, Illinois, Minnesota,
Oklahoma, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, Mississippi,
Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas, Georgia, Alabama,
North Carolina, California, Hawaii, Wisconsin, Oregon,
Washington, New Mexico, Connecticut, New York, Utah, New
Jersey, and Maine.
(4) Historically, the Congress has recognized the
importance of retaining flexibility to provide immediate
disaster assistance, understanding that limiting its
flexibility to respond would impede the ability of the Congress
to address constituents' needs and limit its ability to fund
disaster relief, thus forcing State and local governments to
face the insurmountable challenges of rebuilding alone.
(5) Despite this history, some members of the 112th
Congress have called for offsets to any emergency aid package.
(6) Timely disaster aid allows for a humanitarian response
and a comprehensive recovery, and should not be slowed while
the Congress considers additional cuts to infrastructure,
homeland security, Medicare, education, and infant nutrition
before responding to an unforeseen disaster.
(7) For these reasons, this Act allows the Congress to be
responsive to its constituents, removing any requirement that
emergency disaster funding be offset by spending cuts.
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF REQUIREMENT OF BUDGETARY OFFSETS FOR EMERGENCY
DISASTER ASSISTANCE DURING 2011 AND 2012.
Any appropriation during calendar year 2011 or 2012 for disaster
assistance pursuant to a declaration by the President of a major
disaster or emergency under section 401 or 501 of the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170
or 5191) shall not be counted for any budgetary purpose of title III or
IV of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) or of
any rule of the House of Representatives or the Senate, and shall not
be required to be accompanied by any budgetary offset.
<all>