[House Hearing, 108 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] THE ONGOING TRAGEDY OF INTERNATIONAL SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING: AN OVERVIEW ======================================================================= HEARING before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND WELLNESS of the COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION __________ OCTOBER 29, 2003 __________ Serial No. 108-137 __________ Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house http://www.house.gov/reform ______ 93-282 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2003 ____________________________________________________________________________ For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; (202) 512�091800 Fax: (202) 512�092250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402�090001 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM TOM DAVIS, Virginia, Chairman DAN BURTON, Indiana HENRY A. WAXMAN, California CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut TOM LANTOS, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida MAJOR R. OWENS, New York JOHN M. McHUGH, New York EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York JOHN L. MICA, Florida PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York STEVEN C. LaTOURETTE, Ohio ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland DOUG OSE, California DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio RON LEWIS, Kentucky DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri CHRIS CANNON, Utah DIANE E. WATSON, California ADAM H. PUTNAM, Florida STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts EDWARD L. SCHROCK, Virginia CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, Maryland JOHN J. DUNCAN, Jr., Tennessee LINDA T. SANCHEZ, California JOHN SULLIVAN, Oklahoma C.A. ``DUTCH'' RUPPERSBERGER, NATHAN DEAL, Georgia Maryland CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania Columbia MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio JIM COOPER, Tennessee JOHN R. CARTER, Texas CHRIS BELL, Texas WILLIAM J. JANKLOW, South Dakota ------ MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont (Independent) Peter Sirh, Staff Director Melissa Wojciak, Deputy Staff Director Rob Borden, Parliamentarian Teresa Austin, Chief Clerk Philip M. Schiliro, Minority Staff Director Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman CHRIS CANNON, Utah DIANE E. WATSON, California CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida (Independent) ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland Ex Officio TOM DAVIS, Virginia HENRY A. WAXMAN, California Mark Walker, Chief of Staff Mindi Walker, Professional Staff Member Danielle Perraut, Clerk Richard Butcher, Minority Professional Staff Member C O N T E N T S ---------- Page Hearing held on October 29, 2003................................. 1 Statement of: Miller, John, Director, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, U.S. Department of State; and Kent Hill, Assistant Administrator, U.S. Agency for International Development.................................. 15 Raymond, Janice, co-executive director, Coalition Against Trafficking in Women; Andrew Johnson, Save the Children Federation; Sharon Cohn, director, Anti-Trafficking, International Justice Mission; Mohamed Mattar, co-director of the protection project, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies; and Kevin Bales, president, Free the Slaves................................. 57 Letters, statements, etc., submitted for the record by: Bales, Kevin, president, Free the Slaves, prepared statement of......................................................... 113 Burton, Hon. Dan, a Representative in Congress from the State of Indiana, prepared statement of.......................... 5 Cohn, Sharon, director, Anti-Trafficking, International Justice Mission, prepared statement of..................... 77 Cummings, Hon. Elijah E., a Representative in Congress from the State of Maryland, prepared statement of............... 123 Hill, Kent, Assistant Administrator, U.S. Agency for International Development, prepared statement of........... 26 Johnson, Andrew, Save the Children Federation, prepared statement of............................................... 69 Mattar, Mohamed, co-director of the protection project, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, prepared statement of............................. 85 Miller, John, Director, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, U.S. Department of State: Prepared statement of.................................... 18 Uzbekistan memo.......................................... 54 Raymond, Janice, co-executive director, Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, prepared statement of................ 60 Smith, Hon. Christopher H., a Representative in Congress from the State of New Jersey, prepared statement of............. 11 THE ONGOING TRAGEDY OF INTERNATIONAL SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING: AN OVERVIEW ---------- WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2003 House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness, Committee on Government Reform, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:04 p.m., in room 2154, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Dan Burton (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Present: Representatives Burton, Watson, Shays, and Smith. Staff present: Mark Walker, chief of staff; Mindi Walker and Brian Fauls, professional staff members; Nick Mutton, press secretary; Danielle Perraut, clerk; Richard Butcher, minority professional staff member; Earley Green, minority chief clerk; and Cecelia Morton, minority office manager. Mr. Burton. Good afternoon. A quorum being present, and we will have other Members coming in periodically, the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness will come to order. I ask unanimous consent that all Members' and witnesses' opening statements be included in the record and without objection, so ordered. I ask unanimous consent that all articles and extraneous or tabular material referred to be included in the record and without objection, so ordered. I ask unanimous consent that Congressmen Smith, Wolf, and Pitts, as well as any other Member wishing to serve as a member of the subcommittee for today's hearing, be permitted to sit on the dais with us and without objection, so ordered. The subcommittee is convening today to examine the atrocious practices of human trafficking and slavery around the world. It is hard to believe in the 21st century that we are even talking about this. Although many people believe that slavery and human trafficking are no longer a major problem, it is estimated that more than 27 million cases of human trafficking occur every year--27 million. This figure represents the highest concentration of slaves in the entire history of mankind. You would not believe that in the 21st century, would you? Human slavery and trafficking is a worldwide crisis that affects 116 countries, including many industrialized and developed nations like the United Kingdom and Australia. No country is immune from these illegal practices. However, every nation needs to put into place strong measures to deter and prevent these crimes against humanity. Sadly, human slavery and trafficking are booming businesses in the 21st century. According to figures released by the U.S. Department of State, it is estimated that human slaves contribute over $13 billion every year to the global economy, $7 billion of which is a direct result of the illicit sex trade alone. You know, we ought to have cameras and the media and everybody in here listening to this, because it is not a widely known fact that this is going on. Yet, they are probably listening to all kinds of other things that sound important, which really do not amount of a hill of beans, and here we have 27 million people that are slaves every year. Because of this crime's enormous profitability, slaveholders will stop at nothing to traffic as many slaves as possible. Slaveholders try and victimize innocent people into lifetimes of servitude by preying on the most economically disadvantaged members of society. These crimes lure hard-working men and woman attempting to make a better life for themselves and their loved ones. As soon as victims are deprived of the opportunity to return to their homes, they are forced into domestic servitude, sweatshop labor, prostitution and other types of compulsory labor. In addition to the millions of people who are coerced into slavery, there are many who spend most of their lives working to repay paltry debts at extreme rates of interest. According to a National Geographic article from the September 2003 issue entitled ``21st Century Slaves,'' two-thirds of the world's captive laborers, 15 to 20 million people, are debt slaves in places such as India, Bangladesh, and Nepal. These indentured servants can spend their whole lifetimes repaying debts that amount to as little as $36, because of outrageous rates of interest placed on loans; $36 and you are a slave for life. Sometimes, if the debt is large enough, it could take two or three generations of indentured family members to repay the loan; and the ever-increasing number of these economically disadvantaged individuals has created an even greater surplus of potential victims for slaveholders to exploit. While the average cost of a slave centuries ago would equate to today about $40,000, in today's dollars that same slave would sell for around $150. Think about that; it used to be $40,000 if you carried that figure and extrapolated it into our dollars today, and now it is $150. Because laborers are relatively cheap and easy to exploit, regard for the slaves' lives has greatly diminished. Slaves are being held in the most inhumane of conditions. They are not given proper shelter, medical care, or nutrition, in addition to being continuously subject to savage beatings. In the eyes of modern-day slaveholders, slaves can literally be worked to death, because the profits that they produce far outweigh the cost of just keeping them alive. Currently, the United States has measures in place to help combat trafficking in persons. On October 28, 2000, the President signed into law the ``Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-386),'' sponsored by my dear friend and colleague, Representative Chris Smith of New Jersey, who will be here in a little bit. His legislation has been very effective in combating human trafficking, and I believe that it is necessary for the House and Senate to reauthorize this most important bill as soon as possible to keep strong measures in place against human trafficking. While the United States has enacted comprehensive laws to deal with the existing human trafficking situation, many countries have laws that are not germane to address the current problems associated with these illicit activities. More than 154 countries have laws in place that minimally target trafficking by prohibiting the procurement of women and children for purposes of prostitution and forced labor. Unfortunately, most of these laws do not address modern-day trafficking concerns, and are not thoroughly enforced due to the lack of proper funding and up-to-date training of law enforcement officials. In an effort to assist in combating human trafficking on an international scale, the United States has provided financial and training assistance to less-developed countries that do not currently have the means to deter human trafficking violations. During fiscal year 2001 and 2002, the United States appropriated over $100 million for global anti-trafficking initiatives in over 50 countries to assist in the prevention and protection of trafficking victims, and to support and train international law enforcement officials. My former colleague, the Honorable John Miller, who represented the First District of Washington from 1985 to 1993 and is currently the Director of the State Department Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, is here to talk with us today about his recent travels to observe firsthand the trafficking crisis going on in the world today. He will be joined by the Honorable Kent Hill, an Assistant Administrator at the U.S. Agency for International Development, who will also testify on the human slavery in the 21st century and the U.S. Government's efforts to put an end to human slavery and trafficking practices around the globe. In addition to our Government witnesses, the subcommittee will also hear today from several experts in various form of trafficking and slavery. They are here to assist us in gaining a better understanding into the current human trafficking crisis, and how best to counteract these crimes on a global level. I look forward to hearing their testimony. Let me just say once again that I just left the International Relations Committee down the hall. We were talking about Pakistan and the terrorist threat, and what Pakistan and other countries are doing to fight it. That is very important, because terrorism is a horrible thing. We saw 3,000 people killed in one terrorist incident here in the United States, the worst attack on American citizens in the history of our country, and that is terrible. It is really terrible. But 27 million people a year around the world are becoming slaves, and not one camera is in this room. It is amazing to me. Well, it is just human beings? What the heck? Twenty-seven million--we ought to all be outraged. We ought to be raising holy hell with those countries that are allowing this to go on, and who are not doing anything about it. [The prepared statement of Hon. Dan Burton follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.001 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.002 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.003 Mr. Burton. With that, let me just say, it is nice to see my colleague Chris here with us today. Do you have an opening statement you would like to make? Mr. Shays. I do not have a written statement, Mr. Chairman. I just want to thank our witnesses, and I want to thank you for holding this hearing. I was a little concerned that there may not be many people at this hearing, because somehow, for some reason, it really has not caught the imagination of the American people. When the President talked about this issue in the United Nations, it was viewed as almost a distraction, and it struck me as an astounding thing to say. So this hearing kind of reminds me of the hearings I had on my National Security Subcommittee before September 11th. We did not have a lot of people focused on them and we had 22 hearings. There was hardly anyone from the press. But it is an issue that ultimately, I think, the President will help others to understand; and the people helping him like John and others and Kent will help the American people and the world understand. This is a huge issue, and the United States is going to play a role in it, whether or not the French give us permission. Mr. Burton. Thank you very much; I really appreciate it, Mr. Shays. Ms. Watson has joined us. Would you like to make an opening statement, Ms. Watson? Ms. Watson. I certainly would. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. According to the latest U.S. Government estimates, over 800,000 to 900,000 people worldwide are trafficked across borders each year for forced labor or sexual exploitation. Although men are also victimized, the overwhelming majority of those trafficked are women and children. Disturbingly enough, trafficking in people for prostitution, domestic servitude and forced labor is an increasing area of international criminal activity. The reasons for the increase in trafficking are many. In general, the criminal business feeds on poverty, despair, war, crisis, and ignorance. Trafficking is considered one of the largest sources of profits for organized crime, generating $7 billion to $10 billion annually, according to the United Nations' estimates. The largest number of victims are annually trafficked from Asia and the Pacific Region according to our U.S. Department of State. The growth of sex tourism in this region is one of the main contributing factors. Large-scale child prostitution occurs in many countries. Thailand, Cambodia, and the Philippines are popular travel destinations for sex tourists, including pedophiles from Europe, North America, Japan, and Australia. The former Soviet Union may be the largest new source of trafficking for prostitution and the sex industry. Other main source regions include Latin America, the Caribbean and Africa. Trafficking in children for labor is a serious African problem in Togo and Benin, as well as in Botswana, Zaire, Somalia, Ethiopia, Zambia, Nigeria, and Algeria. Victims are taken to Nigeria, Gabon, Ghana, and South Africa. Africans, especially women from Nigeria, are trafficked to Western Europe and the Middle East, and the victims usually end up in large cities, vacation and tourist areas, or near military bases, where the demand is the highest. Mr. Chairman, as you know, Congress passed the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, which strengthens many provisions of law dealing with trafficking in persons for sexual and other exploitation. The International Relations Committee has amended the act this year again; however, the main emphasis of the act is to report on and eliminate trafficking in foreign countries. As we move forward with today's hearing, Mr. Chairman, on modern day slavery, I want to ensure that we discuss the prevalence of slavery and the trafficking problem occurring through various regions of the world. I hope we also include in this discussion the trafficking and forced labor that is occurring today, right here in these United States. One example of these violations of human rights and U.S. law has been occurring in my own State, California. Border patrol agents in California have an overwhelming task in identifying illegal aliens and stemming their migration. Organized criminals are challenging law enforcement officials to meet the demand of poor Latinos and those who would exploit them. There are many human rights abuses occurring after being successfully smuggled across the border. Criminals know that an illegal alien is in a tenuous predicament that can be taken advantage of. An example of violations has been occurring in the agricultural fields; not only in my own State of California, but in Florida. On a positive note, a Florida organization called the Coalition of Immokalee Workers has been heralded for their world to address modern-day slavery. Together, they have helped liberate over 1,000 workers held against their will by employers using violence, in terms of beatings and pistol whippings, shootings, and the threat of violence. Their efforts, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Justice, has successfully helped prosecute and put trafficking organizations and employers who use these tactics to suppress immigrant farm workers behind bars. So, Mr. Chairman, I look forward to today's testimony; and I am very concerned about where we are today, in terms of this trafficking and human rights violations. I support the efforts of this subcommittee to probe into this issue. I want to commend you for staying on it. You have been characterized by your persistence and your commitment. Again, this is another demonstration of that, and I yield back my time to you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Burton. Thank you very much; I would like to clarify one thing. Ms. Watson is absolutely correct. It is 800,000 to 900,000 new slaves per year, but the total is 27 million; and 27 million is just unconscionable. Mr. Smith has just joined us. Mr. Smith, do you have an opening statement you would like to make? Mr. Smith. First of all, I want to thank the chairman for having this very important hearing. I would ask that my full statement be made a part of the record. Mr. Burton. Without objection. Mr. Smith. You know, I would say to Mr. Burton and he knows this, we sit next to each other on the International Relations Committee and work side-by-side on so many human rights issues, and this is one of them. This one certainly is at the top. I want to thank John Miller, who is doing an absolutely splendid job as head of the TIP Office. He has brought a sense of mission, a sense of that ``fire in the belly'' that this egregious practice, this modern-day slavery, has to stop, and we can take the lead in doing that. I want to thank John for his work. He works at it 24/7 and is doing a great job. As you know, Mr. Chairman, our bill, the next increment, the next updating and reforming, hopefully will be on the floor before we go out of session for this particular session on the 108th Congress; that is to say, within the next 2 weeks or so. We have been given an assurance by the leadership, and that is a comprehensive updating, fixing some of the glitches, some of that which we missed the first time around. Hopefully, it will give more tools and more appropriate and expanded tools to the TIP Office, to the State Department, and to all aspects. Let me also just briefly say, President Bush, I think, deserved high credit. Not only did he try to rally the member states at the United Nations so effectively during his speech there several weeks ago; he has done so much that has never gotten any kind of coverage the way it ought to. I was called by a reporter from the New York Times and a Post reporter. It was like, why is he doing this? I said, well, frankly, he has been doing it for some time. It has been largely ignored or not noticed the way it ought to be. His zero tolerance policy, the work that we have done as a country in South Korea, trying to mitigate the complicity, wittingly or unwittingly, of our military with those who have been coerced into prostitution in South Korea; part two of that, which is now going on the Balkans, to ensure that peace- keepers and deployments of police are absolutely on the side of protection, not on the side of complicity with trafficking; that is all coming out of the White House, the State Department and, of course, John Miller's fine office. So I think he really ought to get high marks for the work he has done. When we first proposed this bill, and it was a bipartisan bill, as you know, Mr. Burton, you were part of it; Sam Gejdenson from Connecticut, and many of us who pushed that so hard--we were met with disbelief, almost derision, even by some who should have been our allies. It took 2 years to get that bill passed. It finally was signed into law, and now it is being implemented, I think, effectively; but, of course, we can do more. So, again, I want to thank you for this opportunity to join you at this very important hearing. [The prepared statement of Hon. Christopher H. Smith follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.004 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.005 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.006 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.007 Mr. Burton. Well, we appreciate your holding hearings on this, also, in your Human Rights Subcommittee on International Relations. Mr. Miller, Mr. Kent, would you please rise, so we can swear you in. That is a common practice we have here. [Witnesses sworn.] Mr. Burton. John, you do that so well. It is like you have done that before. We will recognize you, Mr. Miller. STATEMENTS OF JOHN MILLER, DIRECTOR-OFFICE TO MONITOR AND COMBAT TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; AND KENT HILL, ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Mr. Miller. Chairman Burton, Congresswoman Watson, Congressman Shays, Congressman Smith, thank you for your kind words. But Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for holding this hearing and spotlighting what is the emerging human rights issue of the 21st century. When I served with you 10 or 12 years ago, there were many human rights issues; but I would have to say, this was not at the top of the agenda then. But we are recognizing that it belongs just there. You have a fine panel of witnesses: Kevin Bales, Mohamed Mattar, Janice Raymond, Andrew Johnson, Sharon Cole, my colleague, Kent Hill. They are all leaders in this struggle. Now I was going to talk about the statistics, the laws, the reports we put out, and I will talk a little about that at the end. But I want most of my testimony to focus on the victims. I did come back from a tour around the world, and I want to just give you three stories of victims. Because the statistics are important, but we are fighting for individual bodies and souls. Let me start off with the story of Sasha, whom I met in the Netherlands. Sasha is around 30 now. She is from the Czech Republic. She had a terrible marriage 10 years ago in the Czech Republic. Her husband beat her. She had a 2-year-old daughter. A so-called friend of the family said, oh, you can leave, go to the Netherlands, make money waiting on restaurants, get enough money to bring your daughter there. He brought her to a Czech trafficker. The Czech trafficker drove her and three other Czech woman to the Netherlands and met a Dutch trafficker. They took them to the Amsterdam red light district to a brothel and said, this is where you are going to go to work. Sasha said, no, this is not what I was told. I will not do this. They said, yes, you will, if you want your 2-year-old daughter back in the Czech Republic to live, and she did for many, many months to pay off her alleged debts, and then to get money to bring her daughter. Finally, she brought her daughter. Instead of servicing 10 or 11 men a day, it was 13 or 14 men a day. Then she gets her daughter there, and she goes to ``work'' in the night, and in the day, she comes back and she gets her daughter ready for school. She sleeps, brings her daughter back, and Sasha is in despair. She is thinking of killing her daughter and committing suicide. A miracle happened. She happened to be in a taxi 1 day. The taxi driver was nice and friendly. She blurted it all out. The taxi driver said, I am going to help. He did not go to the police. He organized a gang of young toughs. They went and confronted the two traffickers. They said, hand her over. The traffickers said, we will for $20,000 Euros. They said, no, or you will feel the pain. They handed her over on condition she not identify her traffickers. Here she is, years later. She is still in a daze when she tells me this story. She is now working a hospital, studying social work. This shows that even in a so-called advanced country like the Netherlands, there can be extensive and pernicious slavery. Second story, Thailand, in a shelter, I meet a teenage girl, Lured. She was taken from a Laotian village, promised a job, a better life; taken to Bangkok, put in an embroidery factory, sold, forced to work 12 to 14 hours a day. It was terrible conditions, no wages at all. She rebels. She is beaten as an example to the other girls. She rebels some more. They put her in a small room. The owner's son fires a BB gun into her cheek. They dump industrial chemicals on her. She, like Sasha, is one of the lucky ones. With the cooperation of NGO's, there is a raid, an escape. Sasha still has the blotches, the scars on her. She is getting counseling, plastic surgery. There was a well-publicized prosecution brought against the factory owner. She is learning skills now. I hope she will recover. Again, not from nearby; she came from another country, all the way to Bangkok. The last victim's story is Sema, who I met at St. Catherine's shelter, outside Bombay, India. Sema was brought from a rural village in India by her stepmother and her uncle to the Bombay red light district, to a brothel. While they negotiated downstairs with the brothel owner, and she could hear them, Sema was taken upstairs and raped. By the way, the price, ultimately, was $300, and of course, she was raped and raped and raped and raped. Sema, again, was one of the ``lucky ones.'' There is a raid. She ends up at this wonderful shelter, run by this NGO, St. Catherine's. The NGO's have taken the lead on this. There are so many wonderful shelters, particularly run by faith-based groups. Sister Busha is caring for her, nurturing her, and finally gets Sema to the point where sema goes with some honest police, back to the village, fingers the stepmother and the uncle and they are in jail. Again, Sema is not from another country. But notice, the slave is rarely from the location where the slavery has taken place; from a foreign country like Sasha, or in Sema's case, from a distant province. That is the pattern. That is what is happening. Slavery extends into every country in the world. Maybe there is some island paradise that I am not aware of that does not have it. But as far as I know, it goes into every country in the world. Now I do not want to leave you completely on a negative note. I want to tell you briefly some good things that have happened, and they have happened, in part, because of the legislation that you in Congress passed several years ago. You asked the State Department to evaluate other countries. You asked for an evaluation of the United States. It was done by the Justice Department. This year, you provided the threat, the possibility of sanctions. In the couple of months before our report came out in June, this report where we evaluated 120 countries--we still have not gotten them all--but the good news is, because of that law that you passed, and because of the engagement of our embassies, and because of the threat of sanctions, and because of the programs, in the 2 or 3 months before that report came out, countries around the world did more on this than I believe they had done in several years before. From the Philippines to Haiti to Burkina Faso, anti- trafficking laws were passed. There were massive arrests of traffickers from Serbia to Cambodia. Then after the report came out, and we had several countries listed at the bottom in Tier 3, they were worried that President Bush would impose sanctions. They had 3 months to shape up. We prepared plans, steps that you must do, if you want to get off the terrible Tier 3. Some of these countries were our friends and allies, like Greece and Turkey. But the interesting thing is, that in 3 months, some of these countries ran public service announcements, had their Foreign Ministers go on TV and address the nation. They set up law enforcement training courses to sensitize their law enforcement. They set up screening and referral procedures for victims, started distributing money to NGO's for shelters. They moved to have more arrests. So we were able to say, well, at least for now, you are making some significant effort, but this has to continue. We have to keep the pressure on. Congress has to keep the pressure on. The NGO's have to keep the pressure on, if we are going to make progress toward the ultimate goal, which must be the abolition of slavery in the world. Thank you for your time. [The prepared statement of Mr. Miller follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.008 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.009 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.010 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.011 Mr. Burton. Thank you. That was one of the most vivid bits of testimony that I have heard before our committee in a long time. I just wish everybody in the whole country could hear that. Congressman Smith, in this bill which we supported and I thought was very important, I had no idea that there were the number of people that were in slavery in the world, that we found out just recently. So you are to be commended for your hard work, and we appreciate your being here to talk to us today. Mr. Smith. Well, when I went around the world, I do not know how many times NGO representatives, Mr. Chairman, came up to me, even Government officials--the Government officials may have denounced the report in public. But they would come up and say, thank goodness you are doing this. If you did not take the lead, who would? Mr. Burton. Well, if we can get just a few of these people out of slavery, it is worth the effort. But hopefully, we will get them all, eventually. Dr. Hill. Mr. Hill. Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, Congressman Smith, it is good to be with you again. It is ironic, but it was in the 1980's and early 1990's that John Miller and I and Congressman Smith were engaged in a very different campaign. It had to do with religious freedom and human rights in the Soviet Union, and there has been remarkable change since that time. Who would have ever thought these years later, we would be back together, often dealing with that same part of the world? Because there is no part of the world where the percentage of the population that is being trafficked is greater. It is a different kind of human rights abuse than we ever thought would exist, but it is what we face at the present time. I am honored to be here and have the opportunity to followup on the very vivid and wonderful stories that John Miller has told that put a human face on this, because without the human face it really does not make much sense. But this really is an extraordinary tale of the sale and exploitation of human beings, and it is global in character. It is not just women or men or children. All of them are trafficked for forced labor, but a substantial part, as has been noted, are the children and are the women. In any circumstance, the traffickers breed on the poverty and the powerlessness of the victims, and the greed and the immorality of the perpetrators. This sale and this exploitation of human beings is often dominated by criminal networks. Human trafficking is highly profitable and a relatively low risk activity for the criminals involved. Like other criminal activities, it thrives within and contributes to conditions of official corruption and weak law enforcement. But here is the part that we have often forgotten. Trafficking is both a supply and a demand-driven industry. The persistent demand for cheap labor and increasingly created demand for services of prostitutes and child pornography through the Internet feed the trafficking industry. At USAID, we believe that both the conditions that lead to a supply of individuals who are vulnerable to traffickers and the attitudes of those waiting to exploit those victims sexually or economically must be addressed. We see prostitution as inherently degrading to those who are sexually exploited, and as a factor in fueling the trade in humans. Thus, we completely oppose the legalization or normalization of prostitution as a legitimate activity. To take any other position provides traffickers with an open door to trade and exploit the most vulnerable members of the human family. USAID began to mount anti-trafficking efforts in a few countries in the late 1990's. The agency now has a worldwide effort with activities in about 40 countries. USAID has made steady progress increasing the volume and the geographic coverage of its anti-trafficking assistance. Obligations in 2001 reached $6.7 million. By 2002, they had risen to $10.7 million; and this year, we expect to obligate over $15 million. The broad range of USAID development assistance programs reinforces the agency's direct anti-trafficking efforts by helping to reduce vulnerability to trafficking through activities that reduce poverty, strengthen governance and rule of law, decreasing conflict, increasing economic opportunities for woman and men, and increasing girls' access to quality education. Let me say something about the USAID policies with respect to how we do this work. In February 2003, USAID released its anti-trafficking program statement and a strategy for response, and I think you have a copy of this. I want to underline some of the principles that are in this document. First, anti-trafficking activities are focused on prevention of trafficking, protection of victims, and prosecution of those who are involved; the so-called three ``Ps.'' Development efforts that support and reinforce direct anti- trafficking activities, girls' education, reduction of violence against women, the promotion of their rights, poverty reduction, administration of justice, and refugee assistance all have to be a part of that strategy. Partnerships with organizations, whether they are domestic NGO's, international NGO's, or other countries must be a part of what we are doing to fight these victims of prostitution and trafficking. The strategy specifies how USAID will implement its activities through partnerships. In keeping with the administration's position that prostitution is degrading to women, USAID's strategy states, ``Organizations advocating prostitution as an employment choice, or which advocate or support the legalization of prostitution are not appropriate partners for USAID anti-trafficking grants or contracts. Missions will avoid contracting or assistance agreement with such organizations that are primary or sub-grantees or contractors.'' Recognizing that USAID staff or contractors may come in contact from to time to time with individuals who have been trafficked whom they cannot and should not ignore, the strategy goes on to state, ``In the course of their development work, especially with diseases and HIV/AIDS and programs like that, USAID staff and primary grantees, sub-grantees, contractors, and sub-contractors may become aware of such individuals who have been trafficked for sexual exploitation. When this occurs, USAID staff or grantees or contractors should report this information to the United States embassy officer who handles trafficking.'' Now let me just give you a few quick, selected activities, examples of the work we do to try to deal with the kinds of people that John Miller talked about. I would refer you to the written testimony, which contains considerably more detail; but let me just give you a couple of examples. In Ukraine, we have a trafficking prevention project, which addresses two key factors: the vulnerability of Ukrainian women to trafficking, and thus, it deals with economic opportunities and it deals with violence against women. There are seven regional centers throughout Ukraine that deal with this. We also, when I first got here, helped put together a film with movie stars that were recognized in Ukraine, which dramatized the stories of Sasha and others, and that communicates sometimes better than can any kind of brochure with statistics on it. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, rebel forces and militia will sometimes traffic young children and make them into soldiers and combatants. A lot of our work in some of these countries, Uganda, Congo, etc., has to do with rescuing these young people, and once we find them, trying to help rehabilitate them. In Sudan, this is a problem, where there are abductions, and we try to document and collect information on the trafficking routes and on the abductions, and try to have public awareness campaigns to try to put a stop to this. You know, one of the largest source countries for trafficking victims in the Western Hemisphere is the Dominican Republic. The USAID mission in the Dominican Republic is supporting implementation of new anti-trafficking legislation by training Justice Sector personnel and other government officials on how to deal with this problem. Brazil is another serious problem, and we work there with all these same strategies, and I could go on through the other countries, as well. But let me just say this in conclusion. USAID's commitment to fight all forms of trafficking in persons is deep and long- term. Yet, I would be less than honest if I did not tell you that the challenges ahead are very great, indeed. As I have said, this is not only a very lucrative task for criminals to be involved in, but it is still one that they do not feel much pressure to stop. We must be just as agile in shifting our strategies for continually cutting the ground out from underneath these criminals, as they are in shifting strategies to continue to deal in human misery. As President George W. Bush put it on September 23rd before the United Nations General Assembly, ``The trade in human beings for any purpose must not be allowed to thrive in our time.'' USAID is committed to playing its part in effectively combating the evil of trafficking in persons. Our success ultimately will be measured by the assistance in healing that we provide to the victims; but maybe more importantly and ultimately to the hundreds of thousands we hope to prevent from ever suffering the horrible degradation that accompanies this modern-day slavery, which is trafficking. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr. Hill follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.012 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.013 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.014 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.015 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.016 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.017 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.018 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.019 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.020 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.021 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.022 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.023 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.024 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.025 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.026 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.027 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.028 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.029 Mr. Burton. Thank you, Dr. Hill. I just have a couple of questions. You know, one of the things that we have been doing to try to get Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein is, we have offered substantial rewards for them. I understand that if you are talking about a worldwide slave problem, you are not going to be able to have huge rewards offered. But has our Government offered any kind of reward for turning in people who are in involved in major slave trading; and is that something that we might consider? Because, you know, the almighty dollar, or whatever the currency happens to be, does carry a pretty good amount of weight. If people who know of slave trading knew they could make a little bit of money out of it, they might turn some of these people in, which might put more onerous on the people who are involved in this. So has that ever been considered? Mr. Hill. I do not know that it has been considered. I do not know that it should not be considered. But I think we are also of the opinion that if we did a better job of pricking the conscience and raising the awareness of the population in general, we also might get much more involvement. But I certainly would not rule out considering that as a strategy. It does sometimes work. Mr. Burton. Well, I would like to think that the conscience of humanity would want people to turn in slave traders. But I think being realistic, there are people who would do it for money, that would not do it because their conscience did not dictate that they should get that involved. ``Money talks and baloney walks'' is a statement around many parts of Government, and I think that is one of the things that we ought to consider. Chris, when we are talking about legislative proposals, I think that is one of the things that we ought to do, to talk about our Government. When we appropriate money for this, and I think there was $100 million that has been appropriated, maybe we should suggest that part of that $100 million be used for rewards for people who turn in these people. Once you do that, once you start that procedure moving in the right direction, it probably would scare some of these people that are involved in slave trading. Ms. Watson. Would you yield, Mr. Chairman? Mr. Burton. Sure. Ms. Watson. I think I have a recommendation that if we expanded, might be effective. Would we want, in exchange for our aid, for them to sign that they will come up with law enforcement, in terms of the traffickers, to receive these moneys that you give? Mr. Burton. Well, I think that is another good idea. Ms. Watson. Yes, I just wanted to mention that. Mr. Burton. Chris is here. He is the person who has been one of the keystones of this. Maybe we should condition our foreign aid on governments doing what they can to deal with this. Mr. Smith. Well, if the gentleman would yield, your comment about--right now, if somebody turns in a terrorist, obviously, there is a rewards program. This is something we really should take a good look at, because I think it has some real merit. Right now, we use more of a stick. Although we have carrots in there, as well, the stick is that non-humanitarian aid, after this 3-year phase in, and this was the year that the sanctions regime kicked in. I think as Mr. Miller pointed out, never have we seen such a focus of mind by these foreign capitals than as the deadline for making a determination approaches. Sanctions work. You know, the best sanction, like the best military, is the one that you do not have to use, because it deterred criminal or egregious behavior. But it seems to me that we need to get this message out, not just in the trafficking area, but in all human rights law, and I see David Abramowitz is here, who was worked so closely with us on the Democratic side and Sam Gejdenson, who was the prime co-sponsor of this bill. You know, we ran into a flurry of negatives from people at the State Department and elsewhere, who did not want to name names, which the report does, and did want to have the sanctions regime. We are talking about sanctioning, which probably is the wrong word to use, withholding non-humanitarian aid to those that engage in Tier 3 type of behavior. Mr. Burton. Well, let me just say that I think that is good. I think rewards might be another tool that might be used. The last thing I would like to mention before I yield to my colleague, Ms. Watson, is the Internet. You know, a lot of the child pornography in a lot of these countries where they provide trips to places like the Philippines, where men go over there and they are involved with kids in sexual activities, it seems to me that our Government could be involved in some way in monitoring, and I know the Internet is a huge thing to deal with, but we could do it on a routine basis. If we could monitor those sites, I think it would put the fear of God into some of these people, if they knew we were going to catch them, and that we were going to insist that their governments take them to task for being involved in this slave trading. So I do not know if you are already doing that. You may be. But that is just another suggestion that comes to mind: rewards and then dealing with the Internet. Mr. Miller. They are both suggestions to be considered. It is interesting, Mr. Chairman, that you mentioned the Internet and the tourism. You are getting at the sex tourism. Mr. Burton. Yes. Mr. Miller. What really moved the President, in making his proposal at the U.N. General Assembly and pledging an additional $50 million is, he has been horrified by the sex tourism that is going on in this world that is a primary force driving child prostitution. So he wants, yes, to work on where it is happening. But he is aware that there is a demand factor, which is what you are getting, where the people are coming from through the Internet or whatever. In this coming several months, I hope that our office will try to come up with a program to address the demand side. I visited a village in Thailand where this sex tourism was going on. I talked to some of the children, and let me tell you, the so-called customers were not Thais. They were wealthy people coming from Holland, England, the United States, and Japan. Mr. Burton. Right, well, anyhow, those are just a few suggestions. You probably are way ahead of us on this issue. Mr. Miller. They are good. Mr. Burton. Mr. Shays, the vice chairman of the committee? Mr. Shays. I just would love it if you would just yield to me 1 second. Mr. Burton. Yes. Mr. Shays. I never say when I am leaving, my apologies. I have an appointment, and I am going to come back here hopefully for the second witnesses. But I feel a little guilty leaving before they have spoken, because I know they have very important things to say and on something so sensitive. I cannot change this appointment. I will be back as soon as it is over. Mr. Burton. Thank you, Mr. Shays, we appreciate that. Ms. Watson. Ms. Watson. I know that President Bush has put together a Cabinet level inter-agency task force to monitor and to combat trafficking. How can the Department of State and Congress ensure that these policies are implemented? I will just throw that out to whoever can respond. Mr. Miller. Well, Congresswoman Watson, there is an inter- agency task force. It was set up in your legislation. It was also set up in the President's Executive order implementing that legislation of last December. That task force is tentatively scheduled to meet December 8th. It has the high level representation. My office serves that task force; and one of the purposes of that task force, and another group that you set up in legislation last March, the Senior Policy Operating Group which I chair, is to bring people from all these agencies together to make sure that we are not duplicating; that we are coordinating; that we are speaking with one voice; that we are carrying out policies that the Congress and the President have set. So that is the task ahead of us. If we fail to do this in any way or you find where we are not, I hope you will personally call me and let me know. Ms. Watson. If I might respond, it seems that we are going to have to have a committed buy-in from governments of various nations. Now the Netherlands has legalized prostitution, and they are the Tier 1, and I am sure there are other countries. But a lot of the developing countries that have not need to probably come at this from a philosophical and conceptual standpoint. You know, what do you want for your children in the future, for your women, and I am sure there are young boys, as well? So would it be possible to go to the U.N. and have a specifically structured conference in one of their subcommittees on this whole idea of sex trafficking and tourism? Mr. Miller. I think it would. I like the idea of focusing on the sex tourism. Because I will tell you that we have had a lot of conferences in the general area of trafficking, and they are good. They have spotlighted the issue, but now we are at a point were we have to act. So I would want to make sure that if there was a conference, it was not just to have everybody get together and denounce sex tourism; but to make sure there is a concrete agenda and concrete steps that are going to be taken by governments to combat this. Ms. Watson. Yes, I suspect that there are many nations that consider the sex trafficking as part of their economic base and really do not want us being proactive or being effective in this area. So that is why I said we will have to come at it. We have to change the way they think about their economic development; and we have to help them to change the way they think about the treatment of their women and their children. Mr. Miller. You are so right, because this starts with public awareness. Ms. Watson. Right. Mr. Miller. I think in this country, if you raise this issue, there are probably people that would say, slavery, I thought it ended with the American Civil War. So, yes, we have to raise public awareness. We have to work with governments. You were right; once this gets to the point where it is extensive, where it is either legalized, or even if it is illegal but tolerated, and it becomes a sector of the economy and organized crime is involved, and there is huge money involved, that just increases the difficulty of the task. Ms. Watson. I think everybody in this room is in accord. We just have to be creative with how we go about finding solutions. Because it is a problem that has plagued the world for as long as man and woman have been in existence. In some way, I guess we have to model what we stand for. We have pornography all over the Internet now. You just have to turn on your TV and see that there are people from every walk of life who are practicing in this, and we are talking about going global. But we really need to start taking some very definite steps. I would think that not making foreign aid a condition of you signing off, but having people sign off that they will do all they can to curtail this practice, I think, is the way to go; not holding back humanitarian aid. Because it gets in then to something else, and we do not want to deprive people of what they really need. But I do think that part of awareness could be that they do sign a statement that they will come up with a policy over a period of time within their country to address this problem. Mr. Miller. I think that is another suggestion worth considering. The sanctions legislation does not lead to prohibiting humanitarian aid. That is excepted. Ms. Watson. Yes. Mr. Miller. But you are turning it around and putting a positive pledge spin on it, and I think that is definitely something to be considered. Ms. Watson. Thank you very much. Mr. Burton. Thank you, Ms. Watson. Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I would like to recognize a good friend and former colleague, Dick Zimmer, who is with us today, and thank you for joining us and for your work on this, as well. I would also like to say to Dr. Ken Hill that I remember fondly those many years we spend fighting religious bigotry and prejudice and discrimination, and his book, ``The Puzzle of the Soviet Church'' was a book I read and from which I learned a great deal about what was going on in what is now Russia. It was then the full Soviet Union. So thank you for your outstanding work, as well. I do have a couple of questions. Mr. Miller, you might want to respond to this. When the President took some 10 countries from Tier 2 to Tier 3, you noted and, as a matter of fact, you chronicled some of the very significant changes that were made. As you pointed out, all of a sudden there was a focus; all of a sudden, there was a flurry of activity; good, positive, new laws were enacted; crackdowns on brothels and formerly trafficked women became liberated women and the traffickers held to account. My question is--and I would ask that Mr. Miller's statement, if you have not done this already, be made a part of the record--explaining those 10 countries and why they went from Tier 2 to Tier 3, because it is encouraging, but it is only the beginning, as we all know. My concern is that this be a sustainable pressure. You know, we have seen this with many human rights issues and even hunger issues. I will never forget, after the first famine in Ethiopia, when the second famine rolled around and hundreds of thousands of people were dying, it was almost as if, well, did we not handle that issue before? People's compassion for that fatigue had been spent and they moved on to other things. I hope that we do not have that same crescendo of concern that is then dissipated through whatever. It seems to me that you have some tools at your disposal; one of them being that you can issue interim reports, as the need arises, when there is a back-sliding in the country. I hope our Ambassadors have been encouraged or even admonished to say, the pressure is not off. You know, these sanctions in Tier 3, a naming or branding can happen at any time; and certainly, if there is not sustainable and serious progress, it will happen when the next round comes around next year. We have to convey that, as much as we can, and this hearing, I think, helps to do that; that this is not going away. We are increasing, rather than decreasing. This is a winnable war, just like ending the slave trade and the famous William Wilberforce and the others who fought and ended that slave trade, because they never gave up. I think we have to have that same tenacity. So if you could touch on that, please. Second, I would ask Dr. Hill this. We have authorized levels in our new bill, and I hope it will be up next week. It provides increases in every area, including money that goes to aid for shelters and the like. Two years ago, I offered an amendment to the appropriations bill, to just meet the authorized levels of $30 million that was in the Foreign Operations bill with part of that going to shelters and overseas efforts to really help the women right where they are. It passed. It came out of conference down about $8 million; and the excuse that was given to me by Flickner, the staff director for the Foreign Operations, was that they cannot absorb it all. It was conveyed to them from AID that they cannot absorb this additional money. I said, you know, even if these funds are not obligated immediately, they can remain unobligated; and certainly we can find sufficient numbers of shelters and programs out there to absorb not just $30 million, but much, much more than that. Mr. Burton. If the gentleman would yield. Mr. Smith. Sure. Mr. Burton. You know, we talked about rewards a while ago. If they said they could not absorb the extra $8 million, why not put that into a fund saying, there is $8 million, and we will be giving $10,000 or $15,000 or whatever the amount would be, that would induce people to turn in these traffickers? It seems to me, that would not require an awful lot of effort to figure out a way to spend that. Once people find out that there is a fund set up to nail the bad guys, we will get some of the bad guys. Mr. Smith. I appreciate the comment; the point obviously being that when Charlie Flickner and others are telling me that is what they can get out of conference because there was insufficient absorption capability, I find that extremely troubling. I find it to be questionable as to its validity, as well. Maybe you want to touch on that. You know, we need to be creative. We created this law to think outside the box. We did not want to just ascribe money already spent to trafficking. We wanted to see some new money flowing in to mitigate this problem. Third, if I could, I will just take a moment and then yield, on the demand side--perhaps, Mr. Miller, you might want to touch on the outstanding work that our administration is doing to try to reign-in on military deployments, starting with South Korea and Bosnia, and efforts that are underway. We recently contacted Secretary Armitage to ask that NATO adopt such a zero tolerance policy, so that all of the peace- keepers in the U.N. ought to be doing it, as well. Finally, Mr. Miller, on Russia, Ms. Ileana, who has introduced the pending legislation--that legislation, to the best of my knowledge, still has not passed. I met up with her at a parliamentary assembly in Rome just 3 weeks ago along with Dorothy Taft, our chief of staff, and I had a long talk with her. She is running into opposition. One of the reasons why I thought Russia went from Tier 3 to Tier 2 was the pending matter of that legislation becoming law, which would have put them, at least on paper, almost identical in terms of where we are, in terms of our law. What are you hearing from Russia, if you could touch on that; and maybe Dr. Hill can answer that. Mr. Miller. OK, I think there were three questions, and two for you. Mr. Hill. Right. Mr. Miller. First, on the pressure on the 10 countries. To sustain pressure in a lot of countries, you are absolutely right. Of course, you have been a bulldog, Congressman Smith, in making sure our Government does sustain pressure. I put in front of you, or my staff did, and maybe it did not get on your seat--but we put a copy of a letter, and if you do not have it we will get it to you--that was sent to the Hill. Congressman Pitts was going to distribute it as a ``Dear Colleague.'' He asked for specific steps that were taken by each of these countries that we required. So for every country, we have listed the specific steps that they took, that justified their rising to Tier 2. But the question is, are they going to continue? One country, and I hate to single one country out, but Greece came with a rush at the last minute, the last week. So we provided that we are going to do a re-evaluation in 2 months, to make sure that all these things you did at the last minute continue. We have to do that. There is no question about. Yes, go ahead. Mr. Burton. I was going to say, would the gentleman yield on your time? One of the things that just came to mind, and this goes along with what Chris was talking about, the IMF and the World Bank, have they done anything or used their power in any way to deal with the slavery issue? Mr. Miller. I am not aware of any action, are you, Kent, of the IMF? Mr. Hill. IMF and the World Bank, you know, we contribute an awful lot to those two funds; and it seems to me that when they are granting loans to Third World countries who need the money so desperately, one of the conditions ought to be, and our members of the IMF and the World Bank should say, that one of the conditions for the loans should be that you make a concerted effort to deal with the slave trade. Mr. Miller. That is a very intriguing idea. I will take that idea back with me. I may find that they are doing more than I think. But I am not aware of their taking specific action. Mr. Hill. Where we are exerting pressure is through the EU requirement that for accession to the EU, these countries are supposed to be doing things in this. This is also supplementing the pressure from the U.S. Congress, which we are trying to get the maximum pressure out of that. So we have a little more pressure that we can apply in Eastern Europe than we do in Euro-Asia right now in the former Soviet Union. But I think any direction we can get the pressure from, we ought to activate it. Mr. Burton. If the gentleman would yield further, I think that kind of pressure is very important. But I am one of those guys that believes that money has a tremendous amount of influence on people. I could be wrong. [Laughter.] I think that if the World Bank and the IMF and our people on the boards of those institutions would say that has to be a condition for loans, it would carry a lot of weight, as well as the reward situation that we talked about. Mr. Miller. The challenge would be, of course, in drafting the condition. Mr. Burton. That should not be a problem. You know, we give money to those institutions to loan out to the rest of the world; and it seems to me it should not be any real difficulty for the Board to sit down and say, here is the requirement and then vote on it and put it into force. That is not a big issue. Mr. Miller. I will carry your idea back to the Treasury Department that deals with those organizations. Congressman Smith, I think you left us with a couple other questions. You mentioned the military, and that is an issue where you have been involved. It is regrettable, but true, that military peacekeepers, aid workers, for that matter, in post-conflict situations frequently, through participating in prostitution, contribute to the phenomenon of trafficking. Your work helped lead to an IG investigation by the Defense Department of what was going on in Korea. I think that department has undertaken a number of steps in South Korea, including putting clubs off limits, improving communications with South Korean authorities, etc. The President called for a zero tolerance policy on all Government personnel, including our contractors, and this is something that we have to enforce throughout the world. Certainly the U.S. military or any other military that we are working with should not be exempt. Mr. Hill is going to comment on Russia and maybe I will add something to that after you finish, Kent. Mr. Hill. Two points, on absorptive capacity, Charlie and I need to have a conversation about whether we could do something more with money to spend there. I think we definitely can. I think there is no question that the need is great. We were thrilled when the President made the additional commitment. We have been putting our heads together, thinking about the ways we can make a difference, so I am very committed. Let me just give you an example of the sorts of things that we could do with more money. We have shelters in different parts of the world, but a lot of times they are very short-term shelters. So a lot of times, it is not uncommon for a woman to be in a shelter and somehow, because she has no way to really escape her plight, she ends up back in the same boat again. If there was a longer term, more serious exposure to help, it would make a big difference. This could include, for example, as we are doing in Romania, for example, combining micro-enterprise work with the shelter. We can do that. The only reason we do not do it is because of lack of funds. There is a lot more that can be done on the public awareness side that I think would make a difference. There is a whole series of things that I am convinced we could successfully spend much more money on and have a bigger impact than we do at present. The Russia issue is a very interesting one. We have been following this now for about 3 or 4 years, since the first version of an anti-trafficking law surfaced. That was a very strong law. Then somehow, a weaker law got into the mix, and then a stronger law was back in. Recently, within the last few weeks, there was real concern that there was pressure building in Russia for some major weakening of the anti-trafficking law that was being considered this fall and this winter. The Ambassador, Ambassador Birchbow, was sufficiently fearful about this, that he wrote a very strong piece that was published in a Russian newspaper, in which he warned the Russian Government about the dangers of backing away from a very strong law. So we were kind of waiting to see what the next action would be. Well, the news is quite encouraging, and I have in front of me, in fact, the speech that Vladimir Putin gave in the Kremlin 2 days ago, in which he took a very strong stand. In fact, on that day, on Monday, he introduced new amendments to the law, which actually strengthen it in very significant ways. Now it is true, there was another agenda here. The agenda is, he is trying to explain to the world his actions right now against one of the wealthiest men in Russia, Horakowski, and he is trying to suggest that the rule of law is now coming into play in Russia in a much bigger and newer way. An example of that was his strong stance on anti-trafficking. Now some are suspicious that there is more going on than rule of law, when dealing with some of his opponents who support other political parties. But I do not know anybody, or very few, who do not applaud what he has done here with respect to this law. The cable that I read just this morning from Moscow suggests that there is reason to believe that by the end of this year, within just a few weeks, this new tougher law will go into effect with the President's support, and that is the word I am getting, not only from the Embassy, but from our anti-trafficking friends from the International NGO community. Mr. Miller. I am going to add one thing to that. We have been waiting for this law. This law was offered as the promised action that should keep Russia from being on Tier 3, last June. Drafts of this have been circulating now for almost a year. It was supposed to pass last June. It did not. I am delighted that President Putin, 2 days ago, made this speech; and I am delighted that he is behind it. But I think it behooves all of us to let people in Russia know how important this is to get it passed. Because the excuse that is always offered for inaction in Russia on this issue is, there is no law. President Bush took this up with President Putin at his recent meeting. When I was in Moscow, 3 weeks ago, every meeting I had, I pushed this issue. I hope they pass the law this year; and even more important, I hope they then enforce the law and throw some of these traffickers in jail and rescue some of the victims. Mr. Smith. I appreciate that very much, and thank you for that update as well as the very strong statement. If I could, Mr. Chairman, I have other questions but I will submit them. Just in answer to your earlier question, the original law does give the ability to the President to direct our Executive Directors at the IMF and other multi-lateral lending institutions to vote against and to speak out against loans to countries that are on Tier 3. But I think you asked the larger question that, as a condition or a pre-condition to getting those loans themselves, the IMF and the others ought to have a criteria that includes trafficking. I think that is very, very important. That would really send a message. Right now, we are one vote and voice, among a board that would decide a loan, and if we raised this, we could be out-voted. But you are suggesting a larger message, and I think it is a very good idea. Mr. Burton. Well, I would suggest to my colleague, if he would yield to me real quickly, that maybe we draft a letter to the IMF and the World Bank, and I am sure we could get a lot of Members of Congress to sign it and send it to them, urging them to include this in the criteria that must be used to give a loan to a Third World country from the IMF head of the World Bank. Do you have any other questions, Mr. Smith? Mr. Smith. No. Mr. Burton. Well, I want to thank you, John. Oh, do you have another question? Excuse me, I am sorry, Ms. Watson, go ahead. Ms. Watson. Mr. Chairman, thank you; this is a very personal and directed question. I had gotten a call from a constituent, but Radio-Free Europe just this week reported on Gulnora Karimova, and you might be familiar with that name. I am going to give you this memo. She is the daughter of the President of Uzbekistan, and I understand she is making a lot of money trafficking in prostitutes. Her travel agency has been awarded a monopoly on travel from Uzbekistan to Dubai. It was reported that most of the people who use this service are young Uzbeki women, who are being transported to the United Arab Emirates for purposes of prostitution. When President Bush spoke at the United Nations last month, he had strongly condemned sex trade. The priority Congress has given to the issue makes it a primary issue that we need to go after. So I would want to know what the State Department is doing about this situation in Uzbekistan, and I will give you this memo. You can respond and I will share it with my colleagues. Mr. Miller. I would appreciate that and we will get back to you. Ms. Watson. All right. [The information referred to follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.030 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.031 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.032 Mr. Burton. Well, thank you, Ms. Watson and John, my former colleague. It is nice to see you. We appreciate your enthusiasm for the position you now occupy. Dr. Hill, thank you very much for your statements, as well, and your hard work. We will look forward to working with you in the future, and we will send you a copy of our letter that we send to the IMF and the World Bank. Regarding that $8 million that they cut out because you could not use it, you let us know when that comes up again and we will see if we cannot put that in the reward fund, OK; thanks an awful lot. Our next panel is Mr. Kevin Bales. He is president of the Free the Slaves organization; Ms. Sharon Cohn, director of Anti-Trafficking, International Justice Mission; Dr. Mohamed Mattar, co-director of the Protection Project, Johns Hopkins University of Advanced International Studies; Mr. Andrew Johnson, office director, Save the Children Federation; and Dr. Janice Raymond, co-executive director of the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women. Would you gentlemen and ladies come forward and we will swear you in. Mr. Bales is on a plane right now and he will be here for the conclusion of the hearing. Could you stand up and I will swear you in. It is a common procedure we have here. [Witnesses sworn.] Mr. Burton. Do we have you in the right order: Dr. Mattar, Ms. Cohn, Mr. Johnson, and Dr. Raymond? OK, I think we probably normally start with ladies first. Is that what you prefer today? Let us start with Dr. Raymond and we will just go this way. You are recognized for 5 minutes, Doctor. STATEMENTS OF JANICE RAYMOND, CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COALITION AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN WOMEN; ANDREW JOHNSON, SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION; SHARON COHN, DIRECTOR, ANTI-TRAFFICKING, INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION; MOHAMED MATTAR, CO-DIRECTOR OF THE PROTECTION PROJECT, JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES; AND KEVIN BALES, PRESIDENT, FREE THE SLAVES Ms. Raymond. Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity of presenting testimony before this committee. To put my remarks in context, I should tell you that my organization, the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, has been working for 15 years to promote women's and children's right to be free of sexual exploitation. We have organizations in most of the major world regions, and we conducted the first U.S.-based study, funded by the National Institute of Justice, beginning in 1998, that interviewed numbers of trafficking victims. I will not go over the numbers, since many of the speakers have already addressed that, as well as you, Mr. Chairman. But I would like to say some things on the policy level. The first thing that I would like to say is that sex trafficking depends upon globalization of the sex industry. As many of us already know, globalization of the sex industry means that countries are under an illusion if they think they can address trafficking without addressing prostitution. I am going to use a term here which we use called state- sponsored prostitution. We believe that state-sponsored prostitution is a root cause of trafficking. We call legalized or regulated prostitution, state-sponsored prostitution, and many of these systems vary somewhat. But the common element, of course, is that the state becomes tolerant and accepts the system of prostitution and, in most cases, benefits from it. We have found that there is a fundamental connection between the legal recognition of prostitution industries and the increase in victims of trafficking. No where do we see this relationship more clearly than in countries advocating prostitution as an employment choice; or who foster outright legalization; or who support the decriminalization of the sex industry. The Netherlands is a case in point here. Director Miller and others have mentioned the Netherlands. One argument for legalizing prostitution in the Netherlands is that it would help end the use and abuse of desperate immigrant women who were trafficked there. But several reports have been done on the Netherlands, and it is widely now agreed that 80 percent of the women in the brothels in the Netherlands are trafficked from other countries. The Coalition Against Trafficking in Women commends the efforts of Director Miller of the Trafficking in Persons Office and his staff. He has provided much needed leadership in this position. But both he and we know that much more needs to be done. Each year, as has already been discussed, the United States has mandated under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act to provide a report on countries' efforts to combat trafficking in persons. Unfortunately, there are countries, as Congresswoman Watson has already mentioned, such as the Netherlands, and Germany is another one, that are ranked in Tier 1, the top-most category. These two countries have legalized or de-criminalized the prostitution industries. We and other NGO's have recommended that no country legalizing prostitution should be in Tier 1 because these countries have legalized brothels and pimping that contribute, in the words of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, to significant numbers of women being trafficked for sexual exploitation. So we think that needs work. We know that this is a very sensitive issue, but we are seeing this all over Europe, in particular. We are seeing this also in other countries, as well. But we are really facing a public policy crisis in terms of the trend toward legalization in other parts of the world. One other thing, Mr. Chairman, specifically that I would like to mention is the National Security Presidential Directive, which others have already mentioned, as well, stating that prostitution and related activities are inherently harmful, dehumanizing, and identifying these activities as contributing to trafficking. That policy, as we know, directs all agencies to review matters, including their grantmaking actions. We applaud this policy, but we caution that any policy is only as good as its implementation. One problem is that US NGO's supporting prostitution as work and decriminalization of the sex industry are still being funded. We understand that this takes a while. We certainly hope that we will see different action on this; but meanwhile groups and NGO's that we work with, who have submitted proposals, have not yet been funded. I did receive some good news today from Director Miller that one of those groups is being funded, and we are very grateful for that, but we think we have a ways to go in terms of the funding of groups, feminist groups, faith-based groups, who do support the Presidential directive. This, I might say, is an issue that really crosses a lot of political boundaries. So I think we have reached a point in our anti-trafficking work where in order to realize our goals of combating trafficking, we must do a lot more than issue a policy and, as the old saying goes, Government must be willing to place its money where its mouth is. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Ms. Raymond follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.033 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.034 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.035 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.036 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.037 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.038 Mr. Burton. Thank you, Dr. Raymond. Mr. Johnson, you are recognized for 5 minutes. Mr. Johnson. On behalf of Save the Children, I would like to thank the committee here today for the opportunity to speak about the global situation of children caught up in human trafficking and slavery. In my presentation today, I would like to focus on children trafficking to the sex trade and those children caught up in cycles of slavery throughout the world. You have heard from Mr. Miller about the stories of Sasha, Lured, and Sema, and I would like to talk to you about a story of my own. There was a young girl who I met 3 or 4 years ago. Her name was Sumi. She was a girl like any other at the age of 11, who had hopes and desires to be something some day, to be someone some day. But her circumstances were very different. She was born into a brothel village, and the brothel village was near hundreds of tiny sheds, in which women were kept more or less enslaved by the pimps and the brothel owners who serviced over 15 to 20 clients per day. Sumi, herself, was actually housed in the same apartment, the same small shed, in which her mother had to service her clients. So life was very difficult for her. So unlike the other stories that you see that the bondage, the slavery is generational; her mother and then Sumi. What was happening with the children is that while their mothers were being forced to work, they were out drinking, taking drugs, and then unfortunately, when the girls reached the age of 14, they would then take on the roles that their mothers had taken on, and would become enslaved with the same pimps. The people who were exploiting their mothers would then become their own. We learned of her plight and were able to establish a safe house for Sumi and 30 other children who were in this brothel village. We were able to go to the community, to go to the local schools, to ensure that she actually got the education to which she was denied through stigmatization and discrimination. Today, and I just checked the other day, she had told me 3 years ago that she wanted to be a journalist. She is top in her class right now, and today she still wants to be a journalist. So there are effective things that both Government and non- Government organizations can do to stop the cycle. You have already heard about the figures today, so I will not go into those. But to give you some background about the families and the situations that lead children to be trafficked, most trafficked children obviously come from poor families in economically disadvantaged countries of widespread poverty, where combinations of poverty, unemployment, armed violence, ethnic and racial conflicts, environmental degradation, abuse of power and corruption exist. Though boys are known to be trafficked for sexual purposes, as in general prostitution, adolescent girls represent the most significant numbers of victims. In many countries, girls' vulnerability to trafficking is due to their low status in their community. Save the Children's research displays a great variety of the ways in which traffickers operate and the conditions under which children are sexually exploited. Children are trafficked through deception, abduction, through their own choice and, in some cases, as we heard earlier today, through their care- givers selling them off. One example of our research was in Albania, and a typical form of deception is through the false offer of marriage from a trafficker. Funding from the Save the Children repatriation work with returning trafficking victims in Romania suggests that traffickers particularly target young girls, inexperienced girls, as they are regarded as the most easily manipulated. We very much welcome the steps taken by the U.S. Government to treat children who have been trafficked victims rather than offenders. Unfortunately, this approach is rare in most parts of the world. Ultimately, if detected by legal authorities, children are frequently treated as offenders rather than victims, and run the risk of arrest and deportation. I would now like to end quickly with some short recommendations. Certainly, the overall recommendation, as we have heard from the other speakers today is that child sexual slavery and trafficking must be explicitly addressed in poverty eradication efforts and macroeconomic policymaking. In international development corporations, as well as national budget allocations, a high priority shall be accorded to the prevention of child sexual exploitation; further, to increase the development of and further commitment to the funding of exit and rehabilitation programs for children exploited and trafficked for sexual purposes. We have heard about the lead that the U.S. Government has taken, and we once again support that to ensure that child victims of trafficking shall be offered support, temporary residential permits, and safe conditions for giving testimony in countries of destination. We also support the U.S. Government's continued role to ensure that countries enact legislation to ensure that their citizens, as well as temporary permanent residents, are able to be prosecuted for sexual offenses against children under 18. Second, children have the right to influence and participate in the development of solutions to problems related to sexual exploitation and abuse. Very often, they are one of the greatest sources to find out what the problems are and also what the solutions may be. Finally, the continual research and investigation on child exploitation and trafficking should be conducted in order to establish data bases which enable specific interventions. I would just like to end finally on a letter that Sumi had written to the village which she read some 2 years ago. She stated, ``I have written an open letter to you. I would like to read this letter to you. I hope that you will listen the letter. We are all children. We all have our rights. We also want to live as good citizens. We want to live with other members of society. ``I have a request to you that we also want your corporation, so that we can live like other children. My mother is a prostitute. I hate prostitution, but I love my mother. I do not want to be a prostitute. I want to grow as a big personality doing my study. Therefore, I appeal to all of you for your sincere cooperation.'' On behalf of Sumi and Save the Children, I would like to thank this committee, again, for your interest and commitment to stopping sexual trafficking and slavery. [The prepared statement of Mr. Johnson follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.039 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.040 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.041 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.042 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.043 Mr. Burton. Thank you very much, Mr. Johnson. Ms. Cohn. Ms. Cohn. Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, Mr. Smith, we are so grateful for your participation in your holding this hearing on the ongoing tragedy of international slavery and human trafficking. My name is Sharon Cohn, and I serve as senior counsel and the director of the Anti-Trafficking Operations for International Justice Mission. We believe that modern-day slavery is fatally vulnerable to the vigilant efforts of the U.S. Government and the international community to crush this trade. As Congressman Smith just said, this is a winnable war. I am grateful to the committee for the opportunity to share a little of what IJM has learned through its field experience around the world. IJM deploys criminal investigators around the world to infiltrate brothels and to use surveillance technology to document where the victims are being held, identify secure police contacts who will conduct raids with us to release the victims and arrest the perpetrators. We then coordinate the referral of these victims to appropriate after-care and support and monitor the prosecutions. IJM investigators also infiltrate industries that bond children into slavery and work with local authorities throughout Asia to break those bonds and prosecute the offenders. We have spend literally thousands of hours infiltrating the sex trafficking industry and working with Government authorities around the world to bring effective rescue to the victims and accountability to the perpetrators. Through this, I think we have gained some valuable insight into the nature of the crime, and also into its weaknesses. Due to the time constraints, I will limit my comments to sex trafficking. Mr. Chairman, you have stated the statistics that testify to the magnitude of this tragedy. The research has shown that trafficking is the third largest source of profits for organized crime after guns and drugs. How does it thrive so unhindered? Well, our experience has shown us that sex trafficking thrives because it is permitted, encouraged, tolerated, and profited by local law enforcement in countries around the world. In cities around the world, millions of women and girls are trafficked and offered to customers in the brothels. Every day, millions of customers are able to find these girls. It does no good at all for the brothel keepers to keep these girls hidden. In fact, to make money on their investment, they must hold these girls open to the public every day, continuously, over a long period of time. Obviously, therefore, the customers can find these victims whenever they want, and so can the police. How, therefore, do you possibly get away with running a sex trafficking enterprise? You do this only if it is permitted by local law enforcement. Generally, this is facilitated by bringing the police into the business, sharing the profits with them in exchange for protection, and violating the laws that are present in those countries every day. The truth is most tragically demonstrated through the lives of the victims that we have come to know and have had the privilege to assist in rescuing. I wanted to take a few minutes to tell you about a friend of mine, Simla, who was trafficked in Southeast Asia when she was 11\1/2\ years old. But since you have heard so many stories about the tragedies that befall these victims, let me say just this point. After being subjected to beatings and sexual assaults for 2\1/2\ years, I want to tell you about the worst beating that she ever received. The worst beating that she ever received, the one that made it difficult for her to walk, was a beating she received after a police officer complained that she did not smile after she was forced to have sex with him, and thus offended his ego, and the brothel keeper beat her within an inch of her life. This police officer would come to the brothel regularly to receive his payment in kind; and Simla and her friends in the brothel confirmed to us that other officers regularly visited the brothel and abused the girls. When we went to raid this particular brothel, there was a tip-off by local law enforcement and the girls were loaded into the back of a flat-bed truck and driven away. Ultimately, we were able to find the girls and Simla is now in good after- care, being provided for. Just 2 weeks ago, Mr. Chairman, I interviewed a victim who escaped from a brothel several weeks ago. She told me the story that before she escaped, two other girls had escaped from the brothel, where there were 100 girls and 30 minors. Two girls had escaped from the brothel, and the brothel keeper picked up the phone and called the police. He called the police and said that he wanted his property returned. Two hours later, those two victims were returned to the brothel, bound by rope, and beaten by the police in uniform. They pulled up in a police car and were brought to the brothel, where the brothel keeper put the other girls inside another room and shot those two victims dead. This is the complicity of local law enforcement that IJM has found in its work. Stories like this are repeated throughout the world where local law enforcement do the bidding of traffickers and brothel keepers. The fact is, without police protection, the brothel keeper simply cannot succeed; and with it, he cannot fail. Once the police switch sides, the brothel keeper is fatally vulnerable and effective law enforcement can provide rescue and secure arrests. Until they do, it is the girls that are fatally vulnerable. But in the end, it is this vulnerability of the brothel keepers that is exceptionally good news; because it means that sex trafficking is a disaster that can be prevented and that can be stopped. We saw just a glimpse of this when we were in Cambodia over the last several years. We did a 3-year investigation that ultimately found that there were at least 45 girls under the age of 14 that were being trafficked and sold every day to pedophiles, including American pedophiles, that would travel to Cambodia. Mr. Chairman, it was because of the courageous leadership of Ambassador Charles Ray in Cambodia, and his insistence that the Cambodian Government work with IJM, that we were able to rescue 37 young girls and arrest some of the perpetrators. Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to say that on October 15th, thanks to the work of the U.S. Embassy and good law enforcement, we were able to see the conviction of six traffickers and brothel keepers in Cambodia who were sentenced to terms of imprisonment from 5 to 15 years. I should say that in the courtroom, Mr. Chairman, there was half the brothel community that showed up for the trial to see whether, in fact, anybody ever gets in trouble for selling small children, the youngest of whom was 5. I can say that the conviction resulted in the brothel community looking upon their colleagues and seeing that they were sentenced to terms of imprisonment and that, in fact, the English, French, and continental newspapers published on the first page the next day that, in fact, people do go to jail for trafficking small children in Cambodia. So I want to thank this subcommittee for holding this hearing, but also commend the State Department's Trafficking In Persons department, under the leadership of Congressman Miller, that has just done a fantastic job in communicating to our embassies overseas that it is the policy of this Government, this Congress, and this administration, that it will not tolerate sex trafficking among any of the allies that we work with; and that, in fact, there are consequences for failure to act. I would encourage this subcommittee to continue to provide not only encouragement to the State Department and to the countries that it meets with; but also to provide the necessary resources to provide effective capacity building for those governments in law enforcement that are willing to, in fact, effectively combat trafficking. Thank you for your time, and I am available for questions. [The prepared statement of Ms. Cohn follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.044 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.045 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.046 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.047 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.048 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.049 Mr. Burton. Thank you, Ms. Cohn. We will have some questions for you in just a minute. Dr. Mattar. Mr. Mattar. Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the subcommittee, I am really privileged to speak to you today on the role of Government in combating the problem of trafficking in persons. First of all, let me point out that the basic duty of all states is to ensure the fundamental human rights of all citizens. The universal declaration of human rights states that no one shall be held in slavery or servitude, and that slavery and slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. However, our presence at this hearing today indicates that trafficking in persons is indeed an ongoing tragedy, and that the work has not yet done enough to protect the human rights of victims of trafficking. There have been some efforts made by governments to shift the focus from treating the traffic person as a criminal to recognizing such person as a victim. Unfortunately, many countries today still do not respect the human rights of victims of trafficking, charging them with immigration violations; detaining them in prisons; and deporting them. Governments have the responsibility to identify victims of trafficking and assist them to come forward without fear of punishment. I think the real challenge for us here in the United States, and for many other countries, is to reach victims of trafficking. The Trafficking Victims Protection Act, for instance, provides for 5,000 visas for victims of trafficking. Unfortunately, very few victims have applied for these visas. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has put in place successful programs of assistance to victims of trafficking, but I believe that we need a specific program identifying victims of trafficking around the country. Governments have also the responsibility to address the contributing factors to the trafficking infrastructure. Governments must enact economic reforms, addressing the special vulnerability of women and children. Here, I would like to urge the USAID to expand its program to address the specific problem of vulnerability, especially of women and children to trafficking. Furthermore, governments have the responsibility to enact legislation to recognize all forms of sexual exploitation as a crime, including the trafficking for the purpose of prostitution, pornography, mail order brides, and sex tourism. President Bush, in his speech to the United Nations on September 26, 2003, referring to the sex tourism industry, called upon governments to inform travelers of the harm this industry does. I urge Members of the House to pass H.R. 2620, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2003, and I want to commend Congressman Chris Smith for his excellent work that requires airlines to develop and disseminate information, alerting travelers that sex tourism is a crime. Governments have the responsibility to punish all participants involved in the trafficking scheme, including the customer and the facilitators; especially public officials who are corrupt. Unfortunately, few legal systems penalize the customer, and very few countries are willing to prosecute corrupt public officials. I urge the U.S. Department of State Office to Monitor Trafficking in Persons to take into account the link between demand in trafficking and scathing of government efforts in the annual Trafficking in Persons Report. Governments have also the responsibility to enforce laws by prosecuting cases of trafficking. To date, in many parts of the world, the rates of prosecution are rather low, very low. I urge the Department of Justice to expand its training programs on prosecuting cases of trafficking to each of the countries where the rates of prosecution are still very low, while the problem of trafficking is growing. However, it is important to reform not only the law, but also what I call the functional equivalent of the law. By that, I mean the customers, the traditions, the behavior. Countries that tolerate or accommodate or normalize prostitution should review their policies and inquire into whether such tolerance, accommodation, and normalization may contribute to rising numbers of victims of trafficking. Governments have also the responsibility to cooperate with NGO's, allowing them the freedom to work, and consult with them in taking the necessary measures to combat trafficking. Unfortunately, in many countries around the world, NGO's are not allowed the freedom to function at all. I would like to see the United States playing a more active role in promoting human rights, especially in these countries. In conclusion, I would like to report to you today that the United Nations protocol to prevent, suppress, and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, will become international law this December 2003. We needed under Article 17, 40 instruments of ratification for the protocol to enter into force. On September 26, 2003, we reached our goal. Countries that defied the protocol must now comply with its mandates. I would urge the United States to rectify the protocol. We have created international consensus as to the recognition of trafficking in persons as a human rights violation. It is now time to take serious, effective, and comprehensive measures to eliminate the ongoing tragedy of international slavery and human trafficking. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. [The prepared statement of Mr. Mattar follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.050 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.051 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.052 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.053 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.054 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.055 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.056 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.057 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.058 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.059 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.060 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.061 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.062 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.063 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.064 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.065 Mr. Burton. Thank you, Mr. Mattar. Let me start with some questions. Mr. Bales is on his way. I think he has landed now, and when we arrives we will let him make his statement. But in the interim, we will go ahead and start with questions. The votes on the floor have been postponed for awhile, so maybe we can get on with the business at hand. Ms. Cohn, you mentioned a country where the police were complicities in the prostitution, and were involved in killing two ladies that escaped from one of these dens of inequity. Can you tell us the name of that country? Ms. Cohn. Mr. Chairman, I would be eager to discuss with you or your staff any of the specifics of that case, but it is an ongoing investigation and I would be reluctant to say it publicly. Mr. Burton. I see, because you think it might endanger others that are there. Ms. Cohn. And hinder whatever further investigation against the police officers that might take place. Mr. Burton. Well, we would like to know that, if it is possible. Maybe you can give it to us in private, so that we can maybe use whatever influence we might have on our agencies to make sure that the government of that country knows of those incidents and tries to clean up the mess and bring those to justice that are involved in that. There is nothing I can think of that is worse than people who are in the position of law enforcement, who are supposed to have the public trust and the public's interests in mind, that are participating in criminal activities. We have had a case here in the United States where one man was put in jail for 30 some years for a crime he did not commit, because of FBI agents that were corrupt. One of them has been put in jail, and another one is now going to be tried for murder. So we need to clean that mess up, whether it is here in the United States or elsewhere. So if you could give us that information, we would really appreciate it. Let me ask you what kind of surveillance they use; or is that something else that you would like to keep under wraps? Ms. Cohn. Mr. Chairman, IJM's investigators are former law enforcement officers themselves from here in the United States and from around the world. They use traditional surveillance methods, including under-cover cameras and the like to show on tape that a particular victim is being offered for a particular act by a specific perpetrator. We were able actually to use that under-cover video surveillance at trial in Cambodia on October 15, and that was the only evidence used to convict the perpetrators. I would be very delighted to show you or your staff some of that video. But to protect the privacy of the victims, we were not able to show it today. Mr. Burton. Let me ask you, the victims, when given a chance to talk about their being brought into this business through slavery methods, are they willing to talk privately about it, or are they scared to death of the law enforcement? Ms. Cohn. The victims are incredibly scared of law enforcement, because they have often seen those same police officers come into the brothels and abuse them; or have come into the brothels to accept bribes. They are, however, after counseling and after care in a rehabilitative and after-care facility, willing to provide just the most extraordinary horrific stories that I have ever heard. When I get to the point where I think I have heard the worst story of what can happen to a human ever, I talk to the next girl and hear yet another story. I would add, Mr. Chairman, just because I think this is an important point with the increasing attention paid to the HIV/ AIDS global pandemic, I think it is important to note that the real brutal end cruelty of human trafficking is that these girls are dying by the thousands of HIV/AIDS, and traditional methods to prevent AIDS or to give access to these girls to HIV/AIDS prevention are not permitted, because the girls have no ability to choose their sexual partners and are not given any access to traditional preventive methods. Anecdotes tell us that about 80 percent of trafficking victims in South Asia are HIV positive upon rescue. Mr. Burton. Eighty-percent? Ms. Cohn. Eighty-percent. Mr. Burton. So not only are they penalized with a shorter life and a more difficult lifestyle because of that disease, but also they are a walking epidemic. Ms. Cohn. That is correct, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Burton. The Coalition Against Trafficking in Woman, you said 80 percent of the women in the Netherlands, according to your information, are forced into prostitution? Ms. Cohn. No, I said 80 percent of the women in prostitution in the Netherlands are from other countries. Mr. Burton. Do you have any idea of how many of those that are from other countries that are literally forced into that, or do you have any idea about that? Ms. Cohn. Well, Mr. Chairman, we do not make a distinction between forced and free, in that sense, because we believe that whether or not a person gives consent, they are still exploited. But most of these women certainly have been trafficked, in terms of coming in across the border. The problem is, as we see it, when these women are brought into a country, for example, what we have in the Netherlands now is a policy, because many Dutch women do not want to be in prostitution anymore, the Dutch Government has decided to make the market bigger by actively searching for women in prostitution, who will come into the country to service the market, basically. So this means that they are, to a certain extent, looking for women who will populate the brothels. This is conditioned on the fact, as the government says, that they will basically be independent contractors, and that they will not be forced into the trade, etc. But we know that women from different countries, whether they come from Eastern Europe, or whether they come from Asia or Latin America, do not facilitate their own migration into countries like the Netherlands and Germany. They have to be assisted in some way to do that, and that is trafficking. But what we are seeing happen is that under the aegis of this notion of voluntary trafficking, people are using terminology such as voluntary migration for sex work at this point. The trafficking is actually being redefined, because of this very phony issue of voluntariness. Mr. Burton. Thank you. Mr. Johnson, you were talking about, I cannot remember, how much the cost is. I am trying to recall the question now. My notes are not too clear. How much money would it take to help deal with the problem of these children being brought into slavery? Do you have any idea? Mr. Johnson. I think it is impossible to put an exact number on it. Mr. Burton. Well, let me ask you this, and I will ask all of you this question. I talked to Mr. Miller when he was testifying awhile ago about setting up a fund where we could give rewards to people who turn in these people who are forcing people into slavery, whether it is prostitution, child prostitution, or whatever. Do you think that would be a positive thing to do? Mr. Johnson. I think that is an important step. To answer your question, I think that money spent on prevention, in the very beginning, when you are looking at this, is very important, to engender a culture of protection within the society itself. Mr. Burton. No, I understand that prevention is very important. But I am talking about, if you are going to stop this, you are going to have to deal with the people who are forcing people into slavery, whether it is prostitution or anything else. What I am asking is, from your experience and the information that you have been given through your studies, do you think that if we set up a fund, and there was money to be given to people who turned in these people who are putting people into slavery, do you think that would be effective? Mr. Mattar. I think it is a good idea. Let me refer here to the role which NGO's play in different countries, identifying victims of trafficking and trying to work with the police and law enforcement in identifying traffickers. So I think NGO's are already playing that role, trying to help the police identify traffickers and helping the police with assisting victims. Whether rewards would be given to NGO's or individuals who would help in that process, I think it is a good idea. I am not sure how it would be implemented in a certain mechanism. Mr. Burton. Ms. Cohn. Ms. Cohn. Mr. Chairman, I think that rewards could be an effective mechanism in identifying traffickers. What we find, at least in the countries where we work in Southeast Asia though, is the traffickers are often not terribly hidden, but there is so much freedom and such a culture of impunity in their committing their crimes, that the challenge is not actually finding them or even finding the evidence of them. The challenge is getting the government to have the political will and local enforcement to have the determination to arrest and move forward in the case. I would be concerned at local law enforcement, hoping to profit from rewards and being paid to do something that their job should already be paying them to do. Mr. Burton. Well, let me just ask one more question and then I will yield to my colleague, Mr. Smith. If could get the IMF and the World Bank and these other institutions that loan money to Third World countries that are involved in this kind of activity, who wink at the law enforcement agencies that are sanctioning prostitution, do you think, if they thought their government was going to be cutoff or have their foreign and foreign assistance reduced, that would be an effective tool to get them on the stick and stop law enforcement from participating and protecting the slave traders? Ms. Cohn. I think that the U.S.'s leadership in the Trafficking Victims Protection Act demonstrates that countries do respond to the threat of losing non-humanitarian aid, and would likewise respond to concerns about other sources of funding. So, yes, I do think that might motivate them. I should say on the other side, that there are people of goodwill in all these countries, doing very good things, including members of the Government; and that it is also, I think, the responsibility of the U.S. Government to provide them resources to combat this trafficking. That should not all be the stick but, in fact, be a carrot, as well. Mr. Burton. Did you have a comment before I yield to Mr. Smith? [No response.] Mr. Burton. Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith. Thank you, Mr. Chairman; and again, I want to thank you for holding this very important hearing and for your ongoing commitment to this issue. I want to thank our panelists who are on the cutting edge and have been instrumental in motivating Congress; not just this Congress but other parliaments and Congresses around the world, to be more pro-active and, above all, to help the victims in each country. I know that the International Justice Mission and so many of you have been corroborating in the first writing of this legislation. You have provided us an enormous amount of input in the bill that hopefully will be up the floor next week. That will take us another step forward. As a matter of fact, as you know, Ms. Cohn, it was your organization that was so insistent on the police side of this, that some of the countries are maybe gaming the system. When we asked for information, not only were they rather shoddy in what they provide us, they talk about investigations and prosecutions but not convictions and sentencing. That is changed and fixed in this new piece of legislation. We also have a presumption that if they fail to cooperate with our request for data, at the Embassy and at Mr. Miller's level, we will presume that they have a bad story to tell and that it work be against them. We have to say that this is so serious to us, and hopefully it should be to you, that you risk being a Tier 3 sanctioned country going forward by your lack of responsiveness. That would be remedied in the new bill. On the police side, all of you make very good points, and Ms. Cohn, I think you make a very good point about that is the Achilles Heel of all of our efforts. If they continue their complicity, their protection, as you pointed out that despicable example of the police collecting in kind; you know, we will be at this and we will not win this. So I think police training, that is contained in the bill. But we have to get the political and all the other interested parties to take more seriously complicity by the police. I would point out and remind you, and you know it already, but in our minimum standards, certainly whether or not a country protects their victims. I say this to Mr. Johnson and you might want to respond to that, what countries, in your view, and maybe some of the more egregious ones, are not protecting their victims? Are there those that are not protecting that are on Tier 2, for example, that should be on Tier 3, because that is an essential minimum standard that was written in to the law? Everywhere we go, and I know, Mr. Miller does it, as well, and the State Department is doing it just like the NGO's, you know, it is not just prosecution. That is not enough. It has to be the concurrent, equal, if not more so, in terms of the human concern, to make sure that those victims are protected. So you might want to touch on that, as well, because you did say other nations treat victims as offenders. If there are some that are in Tier 2 or 1 that we are missing, please let us know now and perhaps by additional followup comments. You know, I have raised the issue with the Netherlands several times, including with the Chair and Office for the OSCE, which I chair. The lack of understanding that when you have, as you said, Dr. Raymond, 80 percent of the women in the Netherlands, and they are the Chair and Office at the OSCE, and speak glowingly about their efforts to mitigate trafficking. Yet, they have this, in their own back yard problem of all these foreign nationals working in their brothels, it is unclear how many of those are by force or some form of coercion are there. But certainly the exploitation is profound. I think, Mr. Chairman, and we ought to be looking at this in our own country, we certainly have a problem in places like Las Vegas. How many of those women have been trafficked? How many of those are there perhaps against their own will? I think that is ripe for investigation and, if necessary, if it yields something, prosecution. I would remind you and the members here, and the NGO's know it and Mr. Miller knows it, what led to the South Korean expose that women were being trafficked from Russia, from the Philippines under this ruse of an entertainment visa that the South Korean Government was giving out, and they were being brought into be exploited, that is gone now, I am happy to say. I would just note parenthetically that our Government and General Laporte has put 661 brothels in places off limits that previously had been permissible to go to, as a direct result of this. But they found, and a Fox reporter named Tom Merriman did the spade work on this, that all of these South Korean women were showing up in the United States, and it begged the question, where were they coming from? What was the network? This is here in the United States, so you might want to touch on that, as well, and we are running out of time. Maybe you want to touch on that, Mr. Johnson, on those who are not treating the victims as victims, but as offenders. Mr. Johnson. I think you are right in relation to what has been raised already about the training of police, in which getting the list of countries where the victims are actually treated as offenders. That is really at the local level, unless there is training to ensure that happens. That happens in my own country. There are examples, but it certainly happens much more in the developing world. One form of slavery that we have not talked about today are child soldiers; people who are forcing young boys and girls taken into conflict. We would like to talk about the women and children in the Conflict Protection Act, and we certainly thank Representative Shays for his co-sponsorship of that. Part of Save the Children's effort has been to look at a protection score card, particularly in relation to conflict, in relation to what countries they are doing in relation to protection, and we can certainly provide that to members after this hearing. I think it really is important, when you are looking at the countries, to look at the holistic nature of how we are dealing with the issue of trafficking and this culture of protection, whether it be in conflict or whether it be in a non-conflict setting. I think our earlier speakers talked about the four ``Ps.'' While law enforcement is very, very important, what one can do on the prevention side at the local level; what one can do on the recovery side; and the issue of funding is most important at those two ends. If we are able to get women and children out of these situations, then unless we can help them in recovery, then that will return back. Unless we stop the flow of these people to be manipulated, then we can keep on going. The law enforcement needs to happen, but we need to have the bookends, so to speak, of both prevention and recovery. Mr. Burton. Does anybody else have any comments they would like to make? Mr. Mattar. Very quickly, I just want to make reference to the importance of repatriation in any program of assisting victims of trafficking. What we are seeing in many countries of origin, they failed the test. They fail to accept back women in prostitution, who have been trafficked. They fail to provide them with safe return. They fail to issue for them travel documents very quickly and accept them back. You see that in the newly independent states, Central Asia. You see it in Moldavia. You see it in many countries. It think something has to be done when you talk about training programs. We have to be conscious of how to provide victims of trafficking with some kind of repatriation programs. Mr. Burton. I see Mr. Bales has arrived, but before we go to Mr. Bales, I think we will let Congressman Shays ask his questions. Mr. Shays. Mr. Chairman, I really had questions to ask, but I want Mr. Bales to go, and I have a feeling that we are going to then have to cutoff for votes. I just want to say what amazes me is, I used to look back and think, how could the world have traded in slavery? How could the civilized world have allowed it? Then there was this big debate, and ultimately, it became the ``cause celebre.'' What surprises me, and not taking my full time, I would love someone to explain to me why this is not a ``cause celebre'' with women's organizations, why it is not the ``cause celebre'' with major organizations within countries, why countries do not treat it, including the United States, as a big issue until this President launched it; why so many countries yawned when the President talked about it as a major initiative? I do not understand that part of it, and I need someone to explain that to me. If you do not know, we will leave the question hanging, and let us hear from Mr. Bales, so we can make sure his trip here was worth it. I am assuming, Mr. Chairman, that this is not the last of your hearings. Mr. Burton. No, it is not the last, but it is the first. Mr. Bales, you are recognized. Mr. Bales. Thank you so much. Mr. Shays, let me take a quick attempt to answer your question. It is the case that in the past, the movements against slavery in those times were based upon public redefinitions of the reality of slavery as a moral issue. In the past, if we go back 200 or 300 years, slavery was seen as an economic topic, not a moral topic, possibly a political question. It took the public redefining it, from being an economic activity to being a moral concern, to turn it into a political issue. Mr. Shays. What about now, then? Mr. Bales. Well, that is what happened in the past, and that is what led to our own Constitutional amendment getting rid of slavery. Today, we are faced with a situation where the morality is not doubted, but it is completely surrounded by a kind of public ignorance. I believe that, in fact, it is not a question of the fact that it is not a ``cause celebre'' into the future, but that it is not a ``cause celebre'' yet. But in fact, as the understanding of the realities of this, the horrific physical realities and also the understanding of this is what could be the fundamental moral question of the 21st century, it will become the ``cause celebre'' if that is of any use at all. But it is a very big question, indeed. Shall I proceed, sir? Mr. Burton. Yes, we have been waiting. I know that you missed your plane and you finally caught one, and we are glad you are here. So we would like to hear what you have to say, and then we will continue on with our questions. Mr. Bales. Thank you very much, and I apologize for my tardiness. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, I cannot tell you how encouraged I am that this subject has been taken up by the House Human Rights and Wellness Subcommittee. As president of Free the Slaves, as an American, like all Americans, who loathes the crime of slavery, I am excited that our political leaders are taking up the issue of modern slavery. Free the Slaves is the American sister organization of Anti-Slavery International. It is the world's oldest human rights group, formed in 1787 in order to combat the slavery of that date. We want to build a positive relationship with the Government and promise to help in any way that we can. I want to add that Free the Slaves has already worked with committed Republicans and committed Democrats on this issue, and I believe that these hearings are an indication of how this is the time to bring together and unite all sides of the aisle and all kinds of voices around the issue and against the realities of contemporary slavery. This afternoon I would like to touch on four points very briefly: the nature of modern slavery, how slavery touches our lives, the urgent need for a consistent approach to slavery by the U.S. Government and some practical suggestions about how America can use its influence to end slavery once and for all. Slavery, real slavery, has increased, and I know you have been hearing about examples of it, dramatically across the world in the last 50 years. It has grown rapidly, in part, because of the belief among the public and even governments that slavery ended in 1865 or in the 19th century. But you know, for years, I have travelled the world, meeting slaves and meeting slaveholders, and meeting those people who are fighting slavery at the grassroots. I can assure you that slavery is not dead. My conservative estimate is that there are 27 million people in the world in slavery today. Now let me be clear that I am talking about slavery; in its most basic form, the holding of a person against their will through violence, paying them nothing, and forcing them to work. It is the same basic slavery that has dogged humanity for at least 5,000 years, but today it has some pernicious modern twists. For example, and I think you mentioned this in your opening remarks, slaves are cheaper today than they have ever been in human history. Rapid population growth, combined with the impacts of modernization and globalization on the economies of the developing world, has generated a bumper crop of people vulnerable to enslavement. When government corruption, particularly police corruption, removes the protection of the state, violence can be used to turn those vulnerable people into slaves. Now this is happening around the world, and once enslaved, the victims can be transported even to those countries where the rule of law is secure. The State Department, and I am sure you have heard again today from John Miller, estimates that up to 20,000 people are brought into the United States each year. In research that we are currently carrying out for the United Nations International Labor Organization, we estimate that up to 100,000 people are currently held in situations of forced labor in America. They may be forced to work as prostitutes, or in agriculture, in sweatshops, or as domestic servants. Moreover, slave-made products flow into our homes. Despite the clear prohibition on the importation of slave-made goods in the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff legislation, which is still in force, a host of slave-made raw materials and products flow into America. A few years ago, we asked a slave newly freed on a cocoa farm in West Africa if he knew what happened to the cocoa he harvested. ``No,'' he said. Had he ever tasted chocolate? Again, he said, ``No.'' So we asked him, what would you say to those millions of people who eat the chocolate made from the cocoa you have grown in slavery? ``Tell them,'' he said, ``when they eat chocolate, they are eating my flesh.'' Now I am very happy to say that with the help of Congress, and the active and energetic participation of the chocolate industry, especially the chocolate industry of the United States, we are making enormous progress in the area of cocoa, and forced labor and slavery in cocoa. But this achievement stands alone. Slave-free trade is not yet a reality in the land of the free. So the picture is a serious one; millions of people enslaved, and both slaves and slave-made goods being bought and sold within the United States. There are, happily, several positive points. The Trafficking Victims Protection Act passed at the end of 2000 is now seen as a model for the world; and when it is amended this session, it will be an even stronger instrument against the trade in human beings. The Trafficking Office and USAID have made sizable grants having real impact in anti-slavery work abroad. The support by the American Government to the International Labor Organization, in their work to rehabilitate freed child slaves, is crucial to that effort. On the other hand, there are some serious problems. Research that we have carried out for the Department of Justice delivers one very clear message: that American law enforcement is under-resourced and uncoordinated in addressing the crime of slavery, forced labor, and the crime of human trafficking. We must adequately resource our legislation. We have to avoid the situation such as in India, a country with one of the best and most comprehensive laws against slavery on the books anywhere in the world, and many, many slaves waiting for the enforcement of that law. Confusion exists in other parts of the American Government, as well. We have had some very courageous statements by Members of Congress against slavery in parts of Africa. In the past, however, the State Department asserts that slavery has disappeared in some of those same countries. At times, it has seemed that a succession of American governments has chosen to recognize slavery according to their international political goals. Now I have to say, in the last 2 years, there has been a very distinct improvement in this. I just recently returned from Burma, and I have seen there the impact on the Government of the very clear statements by Secretary Powell about the crime of forced slavery in that country. I travel all over America talking about slavery, and I have talked about our Government's response to slavery with citizens across the country. I want to say very clearly what they want you to hear: what is morally wrong cannot be right. America must not play politics with slavery. If we are to imagine ourselves a bastion of freedom, our foreign policy must apply this principle in a way that is consistent and universal. Our belief in freedom is soiled and diminished if we condemn slavery in one country, and turn a blind eye to it in other. Happily, I think this is not fading as part of our foreign policy. At the same time, while the problem we confront is large, the obstacles are not insurmountable. Three key battles are already been won. We do not have to win the moral argument. Virtually everyone in the world agrees that slavery is wrong. Second, we do not have to win the economic argument. Ending slavery does not threaten the economic well being of any industry or any country. Third, we do not have to win the basic legal argument. Laws against slavery exist in virtually every country in the world. Because this is truly an international crime, our Government needs to press for more action within international agencies. This is not a problem of just the United States or any other single country. It is a global problem, and it needs a global cooperation. Eradicating slavery is a challenge shared by all humanity. We all know about the United Nations teams that searched for biological weapons in Iraq, and we know about international efforts to protect minorities in the Balkans. But where are the United Nations Teams to inspect and locate slavery? Where are the contingents that could protect freed slaves and help them toward reintegration in their own societies? Working together, we can verify, assist, and ensure that nations are doing all in their power to find, liberate, and rehabilitate enslaved people. Our own Government's law enforcement policy suggests other tools we could use to confront this problem of slavery worldwide. Our Department of Justice has located their anti- slavery work very soundly on the 13th Amendment. They are extremely expert, and that expertise can be shared. The cooperation, funding, and training of foreign law enforcement could be extended to help end the police corruption that supports slavery. Assets confiscated from slaveholders and traffickers could help provide desperately needed resources for the rehabilitation of freed slaves. We must remember that liberation is only the first step to freedom. It must be followed by helping ex-slaves achieve a decent independent life. In many ways, our country still suffers from a botched emancipation. Shelby Foote, the historian of our civil war, put it this way, ``Slavery was the first great sin of this Nation. The second great sin was emancipation, or rather the way it was done. The Government told four million people, 'You are free, hit the road.' Three-quarters of them could not read or write. The tiniest fraction of them had any profession that they could enter.'' We must not allow that mistake to be made again anywhere in the world, or our children and our grandchildren will still be dealing with the ugly legacy of slavery in the same way that we have to deal with it today in the United States, following our botched emancipation. Of course, there is not a single solution to slavery. Slavery is embedded in both local cultures and the global economy. But our Government has a marvelous collection of sticks and carrots that could be tailored to specific situations. We must coordinate the sticks and carrots that already exist in the hands of the State Department, the Department of Labor, and the Department of Homeland Security to a maximum effect. Many governments want to maintain ties and build a more positive image in the United States. We need to make it clear that a positive image is one that includes working actively to reduce slavery. As our Government brings its influence to bear, the rapidly growing public movement calling for action on slavery will support it. After 5,000 years, if there is coordinated and integrated leadership and effort, the eradication of slavery, I believe, is possible in the 21st century. Founded upon the primacy of individual liberty and given its role of leadership in the world, the United States could reasonably mobilize an international consensus to eradicate slavery. There is historical precedence for this. In the 19th century, the British Government led an international movement to abolish legal slavery. Britain deployed, between 1819 to 1890, a sizable naval force devoted to the interdiction of slave ships. That fleet peaked in size at 36 ships and the operation to free slaves cost the lives of nearly 2,000 of Her Majesty's sailors and marines. Compared to that grim sacrifice, the human and financial cost of eradication today would be minuscule. Recall that while 27 million is the largest number of slaves to ever live at one time, it is also the smallest proportion of the world population in slavery in human history. Note that the extremely low cost of slaves worldwide means that criminal slaveholders do not have large investments to defend. In our work with partner organizations in Northern India, we find the cost of freeing, rehabilitating, and reintegrating slaves average about $30 per family, and this does not involve paying criminals to set their slaves free. The American people and the American Government must ask this question: are we willing to live in a world with slaves? If not, we are obligated to take responsibility for things that connect us to slavery, even when those things are far away. Unless we work to understand the links that tie us to slavery and then take action to break those links, we are puppets, subject to forces we cannot or will not control. If we do not take action, we are just giving up and letting other people jerk the strings that tie us to slavery. Of course, there are many kinds of exploitation in the world, many kinds of injustice and violence to be concerned about. But slavery is exploitation, violence, and injustice, all rolled together in its most potent combination. If there is one fundamental violation of our humanity we cannot allow, it is slavery. If there is one basic truth that virtually every human being can agree on, it is that slavery must end. What good is our economic and political power if we cannot use it to free slaves? Indeed, if we cannot choose to stop slavery, how can we say that we are free? Thank you very much, sir. [The prepared statement of Mr. Bales follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.066 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.067 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.068 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.069 Mr. Burton. Thank you, Mr. Bales. Mr. Shays. Mr. Shays. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate having my time for questions. I do want to get back to a basic question. First off, I am not throwing stones, because I was not here a year ago or 2 years ago like Chris Smith and others who were very focused on this issue. But as a world community, I did find it interesting that I was having to defend why the President would take the U.N.'s time, and why in this time of great terrorism he would spend part of his speech talking about slavery. I found myself being almost amazed and offended by the questions I was getting from the news media. So first off, break down the $27 million as to, as best we know, what kinds of slavery, what is the most and so on. Who wants to start? Mr. Bales, do you want to start? Mr. Bales. The largest numbers of people in slavery are in South Asia, across North and West Africa, Central and South America, and Southeast Asia, as well. Probably the largest proportion of those are people in forms of debt bondage in South Asia, Nepal, Pakistan, and India. In part, that is simply because of the very large populations in those countries. Mr. Shays. And it is not necessarily prostitution, correct? Mr. Bales. No, sir, it is not necessarily prostitution. Mr. Shays. It can be working on the farms, working on the cocoa factories, working on the plantations, working in manufacturing, and so on. Mr. Bales. Across all of those economic sectors and many more; the only qualification would be to say that slaves are almost never used in any form of sophisticated industry plant. Mr. Shays. This does not have to be directed just to Mr. Bales since I guess you all know the answers to these questions, but I will continue with you, though. Does it tend to be mostly children? Mr. Bales. No, sir, it is a mixture of men, women, and children. We do not know what the precise proportion is. Mr. Shays. More women than men? Mr. Bales. I would suspect it is more women than men. Mr. Shays. If anybody disagrees with what is being told, I am going to assume that you all agree, unless you disagree, OK? Does anyone disagree with what Mr. Bales has said to me so far; mostly more women than men, all ages, not necessarily most in prostitution? Ms. Cohn. I agree with what Mr. Bales said. I would add only that we have seen, in some countries, whole villages bonded to a particular industry, say, the quarry industry. You will also see there that debts are inherited, so that if a child went into slavery for a $20 medical debt to get treatment for her mother, that she will be enslaved and then when she has children, her children will be enslaved when they are of working age; and then when she dies, that debt will be inherited, as well. Mr. Shays. At one point, and I do not know if you were the one who mentioned this, but the young woman, the child who lives with her mother while these sexual acts are taking place, and maybe that was you, Mr. Johnson, the child is just doing her thing or his thing, but in this case, it was a young girl. But you almost sounded like there was some ethics to it, that she did not become a prostitute at 13, but it was when she became 14. It was almost like, you mentioned at 14 she became a prostitute. Do not misunderstand it, but is there almost a gross code of ethics, even within this system? Mr. Johnson. I think in relation to that and those people who control this particular brothel, it was that age that children then were forced into prostitution. What was interesting though was that it was only until we started getting the children into school and the later of the group of children, when she turned 14 it was a pivotal moment, and she then was withdrawn from school because her mother was ill. Poverty is one of the major issues, too. It is the cycle that they are unable to get out of this situation. Mr. Shays. So the children are allowed to go to school before they become prostitutes? Mr. Johnson. Well, the intervention that we had made was that we had started working with the children, in trying to enable them to get to school. Once we realized that this young girl was being forced into prostitution, due to the poverty of her mother and she had no choice, there was much pressure brought to bear on this young girl. But the other children said, we do not want to live here anymore, which was what prompted us to then start the cycle. Then the girls were able to be removed at a distance far enough beyond the control of the pimps, but close enough that they could maintain contact with their mothers; and no girls have returned. Mr. Shays. Let me ask this question. Why does the U.N. not make this a bigger issue? I mean, this seems to me, as I said to someone in the press, like an issue no one should be able to disagree with. In effect, I said, this was really an olive branch to the U.N. to say, hey, let us find some things that we can all agree on. So were you puzzled by the reaction? First, were you happy that the President spoke out? Did you feel like there was sufficient congratulations on the part of those in our community who may not like the President for other reasons? Did you find the reaction of the U.N. satisfactory? Give me your reaction, all of you. Dr. Mattar, you may start. Mr. Mattar. I think what we are talking about here is a new international consensus, as to what we consider trafficking in persons. Let me go back to 1949. Mr. Shays. I do not know if you are answering my question. You may be, and I just may not understand it. First, I need to know, did the U.N. respond favorably, or are you saying to me they did not, but---- Mr. Mattar. No, I think the United Nations, by creating that international consensus as to what we consider trafficking in the protocol to prevent trafficking in persons, I think it created an international consensus. I think countries have to act now to do something about that. I just want to say that this month, now we had 40 deratifications of the countries that defied the protocol. That creates some kind of international consensus as to what we consider trafficking in persons. This did not exist prior to the 2000 protocol. Mr. Shays. You are helping me understand that. Maybe it is just our media. But was there great admiration for the United States? You know, when I think, why do they hate us, which is a question I do not think is a fair question; I think why does the world have contempt for us? In some cases, the contempt is because we are doing some good things. Did the rest of the world say, well, this is the reason why I want to like the United States; or did they say, the United States is butting into our affairs, bug off? I mean, I am just trying to understand. Mr. Mattar. I think countries welcome every time the United States is promoting human rights all over the world. That is how I see the role of the United States in promoting combatting trafficking in persons. Mr. Shays. Just a few more minutes, Mr. Chairman; Mr. Bales? Mr. Bales. You were asking about, how did the United Nations respond. I was in a room with representatives of six United Nations agencies when the news came that the President had made that statement in New York. I was in Southeast Asia at the time. They were overjoyed and, of course, the United Nations is no monolithic organization any more than any great governmental organization. At the grassroots, the many agencies that have to confront human trafficking, enslavement, debt bondage, and so forth, in the United Nations; they were very pleased that our President had said those things. Mr. Shays. Why did they keep it such a secret? Mr. Bales. Those are the people at the grassroots. In the same way that it is hard to get, you know, Lee Iacocca to have exactly the same message as the guy on the shop floor; it is hard for me to understand necessarily why that is the case, but it filters up and it filters down. Mr. Shays. Dr. Raymond. Ms. Raymond. Yes, our reaction also was that people within the U.N. system were very pleased, as were we, as were many other NGO's. But there was also a very negative reaction in the context of the venue that the President chose to express it. The negative reaction was basically that he was trying to soften the problem in Iraq and the issue of terrorism by basically launching that venue to discuss trafficking within that location. Mr. Shays. Was not this venue in the address of the President of the United States to the U.N. totally confined? Was he restricted to just talking about terrorism? I mean, that may have been the expectation; but good grief, he was a world leader, coming before the world community, saying we disagree here. So we disagree; but can we agree here? You have answered the question to me, but I have contempt for the reaction. Ms. Raymond. I do not disagree with what you are saying, Mr. Shays. But I am telling you what we heard. Mr. Shays. Thank you, I was shooting the messenger. I am sorry, Dr. Raymond. Ms. Raymond. But could I go back to something else that you asked about; what Mr. Bales had said earlier about the numbers in slavery and whether or not those numbers are numerically more women and children than men, for example. I would like to just take up this whole question of labor trafficking versus sex trafficking, which I did in my longer preparation and did not get a chance to say this in my restricted remarks. Obviously, these are both gross violations of human rights. But I think that unfortunately, what we are seeing now is that a number of NGO's in the human rights community are insisting that labor trafficking is the real problem, and that sex trafficking is comparatively minor; most of it being rather harmless prostitution. Now clearly, being trafficked into exploited farm work or domestic labor or other forms of bonded labor is incompatible with human rights, and it is harmful to those who are subjected to it. But I what think we have to ask here is the harm really as severe as the harm to women and girls, who are trafficked into prostitution in brothels and repeatedly subjected to intimate violation; to rape, basically? Mr. Shays. Right. Ms. Raymond. I think also ignored is the fact that many of the women trafficked for bonded labor, whether you are talking about domestic labor or whether you are talking about farm work or whatever else one is talking about, their exploitation concludes with they are being sexually exploited, as well, and is often turned into informal systems of prostitution. So I think it is very important to emphasize that. Mr. Shays. Thank you; could I just have Mr. Johnson respond, since he is a constituent, maybe? Are you from Save the Children in Westport, or are you somewhere else? Mr. Johnson. No, actually, I represent Save the Children of the United Nations, so I was around in the corridors that day. There were two questions that you asked, and maybe I can answer first the international question. Mr. Shays. The records show, though, that Save the Children is corporately headquartered in the Fourth District. [Laughter.] Mr. Johnson. Thank you; the international perspective, I think it is a big issue. To give you one example, one of the major films in Sweden last year was about the trafficking of a young girl, which challenged Sweden's notions of how it deals with this issue. But it is getting on the headlines in other media outlets. For example, there were two instances. The Child Soldiers Campaign, which was very hard, looked at children being bonded in conflict. The other was the Yokohama, the second world conference on the commercial sexual exploitation of children. So while I agree with you, we have still got a long way to go. But I think that there are many initiatives, and certainly, what the U.S. Government is doing is a great step forward and is part of a wider world movement to do something about it. So while I think sometimes the coverage is not what we would hope for, I think that there are very good signs for us taking the next big step. Certainly, what Congress is looking at right now will be part of that big momentum forward. Mr. Shays. I am going to just quickly respond to Dr. Raymond, and then thank you, Mr. Chairman. You have been very kind. I do want to agree with one point. I think that the President could have introduced it and said, I know the focus is on this. But he could have then said, while we may disagree here, could we also find ways that we can find common ground, such as--and I think there are ways that just the tone of his presentation might have taken some of that criticism that you were saying that some people had. This is a wonderful hearing to have, Mr. Chairman; thank you for doing this. Mr. Burton. We might collectively send a letter to the administration suggesting some things they might incorporate into the next human rights speech he makes before the U.N. That might he helpful. Mr. Shays. I would love to be part of that. Mr. Burton. Mr. Smith, real quickly? Mr. Smith. Thank you very much; very quickly, as a matter of fact, we have a letter going over to the President to thank him for the job that he did there. I think it was just the tip of the iceberg. It is unfortunate those who reacted negatively did not realize the comprehensiveness of what this administration is doing. You know, John Miller is a major part of that. He spoke earlier and is still here. But I really do think that our country has gotten it right and we are in the process, hopefully, of making it better. Also, just a thought, you know, we talk about the United Nations. It has its strengths and weaknesses. But one of it is, it is all a matter of priorities, it seems to me. The repleader system exists, but in order for our repleader to have access, he or she has to have the full compliance of the potentially offending country. At any step along that investigation, certain barriers can be put in place to bar their ability to find out what really is going on. But obviously, we have to keep pushing. Then there is the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, which has a lot of farcical aspects to it. It can do some good. There is no doubt about it. But it also has the terrible situation where you have rogue nations like Sudan and others. Talk about slavery; the first hearing I ever had on slavery was on the slavery that did exist and continues to exist. That was almost 10 years ago. People did not believe it. They acted as if we were making it up. We talked about Mauritania. We talked about Sudan, and even one of our former members of the International Relations Committee, Congressman Dimally, was there as the Government representative, defending Mauritania; which I found, and said so during the hearing, to be offensive. So I think very often, wittingly or unwittingly, some people are going to put themselves on the line to say, this is not as bad as you say it is. That just completely thwarts the human rights message. As human rights warriors, you work goes under-heralded, unfocused upon. The people from America would understand this. But the Valley Forge solders who were out there in the cold and just surviving and overcoming; hopefully, we can give you some implication and work side-by-side with you. Let me also say, I think a big part of the problem is in prosecutorial discretion here in the United States. Post- September 11, despite the best efforts on the part of our U.S. attorneys, they have become pre-occupied, as has the FBI, with doing things other than trafficking. But where a U.S. attorney has a heart and a mind and assets, he or she can really do a job. In my own state, and I would say to all of my colleagues, ask your U.S. attorneys, what are you doing on trafficking? I know the Attorney General, several times, has admonished his U.S. attorneys to do more. But they still have that prosecutorial discretion to pick and choose. My U.S. attorney, for example, Chis Christy, went after some Russian traffickers, liberated 30 Russian women, and he is going to get, I think, a major sentencing of those who have done it, who trafficked. He recently got one from some Mexican women, and the traffickers, three of them, got 17 to 18 years for what they did. So all of us, I think, could do more to say to the FBI and especially to Justice, this is a priority for us, and it certainly is for you. You the heros and the warriors, and we thank you so much. I join my colleagues in thanking you. [Applause.] Mr. Burton. Thank you; we really appreciate your hard work. You do not get many accolades, especially from Congressmen. So I want you to know that even though there are a few of us up here, we represent a lot more than are in this meeting today. Because of your being here today, Chris and I, and we will get Mr. Shays as well, the two Chrises and Dan, we will write some letters to some of the law enforcement people to start the ball rolling to maybe go into some of the problems that we have here in the United States regarding slavery and prostitution, which hopefully you will be proud of when we get some results. In any event, thank you for your patience. I know it has been a long day. Thank you very much for being here. I want to thank my former colleague for being here and all of the hard work you are doing; thanks an awful lot. We stand adjourned. [Whereupon, at 4:47 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned, to reconvene at the call of the Chair.] [The prepared statement of Hon. Elijah E. Cummings and additional information submitted for the hearing record follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.070 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.071 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.072 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.073 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.074 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.075 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.076 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.077 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.078 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.079 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.080 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.081 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.082 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.083 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.084 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.085 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.086 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.087 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.088 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.089 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.090 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.091 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.092 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.093 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.094 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.095 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.096 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.097 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.098 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.099 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.100 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.101 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.102 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.103 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.104 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.105 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.106 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.107 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.108 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.109 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.110 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.111 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.112 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.113 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.114 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.115 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.116 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.117 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.118 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T3282.119