[House Hearing, 112 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2012 _______________________________________________________________________ HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ________ SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho, Chairman JERRY LEWIS, California KEN CALVERT, California STEVEN C. LaTOURETTE, Ohio TOM COLE, Oklahoma JEFF FLAKE, Arizona CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia BETTY McCOLLUM, Minnesota MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York JOSE E. SERRANO, New York NOTE: Under Committee Rules, Mr. Rogers, as Chairman of the Full Committee, and Mr. Dicks, as Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, are authorized to sit as Members of all Subcommittees. David LesStrang, Darren Benjamin, Jason Gray, Erica Rhoad, and Colin Vickery, Staff Assistants ________ PART 8 Page Public Witnesses................................................. 1 Public Witnesses--Tribes and American Indian Advocacy Groups..... 273 Written Testimony from Members of Congress....................... 638 Written Testimony from Individuals and Organizations............. 644 ________ Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations PART 8--INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2012 INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2012 _______________________________________________________________________ HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ________ SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho, Chairman JERRY LEWIS, California JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia KEN CALVERT, California BETTY McCOLLUM, Minnesota STEVEN C. LaTOURETTE, Ohio MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York TOM COLE, Oklahoma JOSE E. SERRANO, New York JEFF FLAKE, Arizona CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming NOTE: Under Committee Rules, Mr. Rogers, as Chairman of the Full Committee, and Mr. Dicks, as Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, are authorized to sit as Members of all Subcommittees. David LesStrang, Darren Benjamin, Jason Gray, Erica Rhoad, and Colin Vickery, Staff Assistants ________ PART 8 Page Public Witnesses................................................. 1 Public Witnesses--Tribes and American Indian Advocacy Groups..... 273 Written Testimony from Members of Congress....................... 638 Written Testimony from Individuals and Organizations............. 644 S ________ Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ________ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 66-982 WASHINGTON : 2011 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky, Chairman C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida \1\ NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington JERRY LEWIS, California \1\ MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana JACK KINGSTON, Georgia NITA M. LOWEY, New York RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New JerseyJOSE E. SERRANO, New York TOM LATHAM, Iowa ROSA L. DeLAURO, Connecticut ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia JO ANN EMERSON, Missouri JOHN W. OLVER, Massachusetts KAY GRANGER, Texas ED PASTOR, Arizona MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina JOHN ABNEY CULBERSON, Texas MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York ANDER CRENSHAW, Florida LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California DENNY REHBERG, Montana SAM FARR, California JOHN R. CARTER, Texas JESSE L. JACKSON, Jr., Illinois RODNEY ALEXANDER, Louisiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania KEN CALVERT, California STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey JO BONNER, Alabama SANFORD D. BISHOP, Jr., Georgia STEVEN C. LaTOURETTE, Ohio BARBARA LEE, California TOM COLE, Oklahoma ADAM B. SCHIFF, California JEFF FLAKE, Arizona MICHAEL M. HONDA, California MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida BETTY McCOLLUM, Minnesota CHARLES W. DENT, Pennsylvania STEVE AUSTRIA, Ohio CYNTHIA M. LUMMIS, Wyoming TOM GRAVES, Georgia KEVIN YODER, Kansas STEVE WOMACK, Arkansas ALAN NUNNELEE, Mississippi ---------- 1}}Chairman Emeritus William B. Inglee, Clerk and Staff Director (ii) DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2012 ---------- -- -------- TESTIMONY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND OTHER INTERESTED INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS ---------- -- -------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. Mr. Simpson. Good morning, and welcome to the committee members. The Ranking Member is stuck in traffic, which is not unusual in this area, and will be a little late in coming in. Other members during the day will be in and out, that kind of stuff, but welcome to the first of two days of public witness hearings. Over the next two mornings, the subcommittee will hear from a cross-section of individuals representing a wide variety of issues addressed by this subcommittee. Each witness will be provided with five minutes to present their testimony. We have actually got the clock working today because we have to get through all of these and so you will have an idea of how much time you have. What it is, is the green light the first four minutes, yellow light for the next minute and then red light is at the end, and we have to keep testimony to that length of time so that we can get through them because at about 12:00 we have to be on the floor for the C.R. that will be coming up, and the rules of the House are that we cannot be in committee when a bill from our committee is on the floor. So we will have to adjourn by then. They say that the first votes are going to be sometime shortly after 12:00. I was going to yield to Mr. Moran for any opening remarks but he will enter those in the record. Let me also say that your full testimony will be entered into the record so I would ask you to respect the time and so forth, and as I said, members will be coming in and stepping out as they have other committee assignments and those types of things also. So welcome to all of you. Our first witness is the Hon. Glenn Thompson, Representative from Pennsylvania's 5th Congressional District. Mr. Thompson, go ahead. Thursday, April 14, 2011. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, WATER MANAGEMENT WITNESS HON. GLENN THOMPSON, A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA Mr. Thompson. Well, Chairman, it is great to be with you this morning. Thanks for the opportunity just to weigh in briefly on some issues that I think are very important for consideration. I represent, as you said, Pennsylvania 5th District, a very rural district, 22 percent of the land mass of Pennsylvania, a lot of natural resources, a lot of energy. We are real proud that 151 years ago Col. Drake sunk a well 37 feet, drilled oil commercially for the first time anywhere in the world, changed the world. Mr. Simpson. Thirty-seven feet? Mr. Thompson. Thirty-seven feet with a wooden bit. And we have a lot of those natural resources--coal, oil, natural gas, timber, timber harvesting--and a long history in the 5th District and certainly continue to be an economic engine for the region. Today, Pennsylvania has returned to our energy roots with newly realized Marcellus Shale natural gas play, and this region has already produced enormous economic benefits in my region, which has struggled tremendously to create jobs and to maintain population over the past decades. This development is not a short-term economic boom. To the contrary, the prosperity Marcellus has created will continue for generations. We have the Utica Shale under the Marcellus, another play. Upwards of 80,000 jobs have already been created in Pennsylvania as a direct result of the Marcellus Shale, and Pennsylvania estimates an additional $600 million in tax revenues alone this year. This increase in revenue will also of course increase in time, and although the production of the Marcellus is still in its infancy, it is already providing 10 percent of the entire Northeast natural gas supplies. The supplies generated from the domestic production has led to decreased commodity pricing while foreign petroleum prices continue to rise due to political turmoil in foreign lands. Now, natural gas, bear in mind, is not a world market, which means that we in the United States can control its price through simply supply and demand. It has been estimated the Marcellus output will greatly increase in coming decades, making this cleaner fuel source more affordable to our Nation's families and industries. While somebody suggested the industry requires new regulatory oversight from Congress or the EPA in particular, the fact remains that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has done a remarkable job regulating Marcellus activities through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. We have some of the toughest environmental laws in the country, and I fully support regulation of this industry by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. This subcommittee plays an important role in my district and many areas like it around the country. Therefore, I want to make the subcommittee aware of my priorities and the great needs of my district during these difficult financial times. Specifically, with the U.S. Forest Service, Allegheny National Forest, just down the road from Col. Drake's well is the Allegheny National Forest, or ANF for short. This forest nurtures the finest, most valuable hardwoods in the world, and the ANF in particular is known for its cherry. The ANF indeed is a special forest with a unique history intertwined with production of oil and natural gas and timber. It actually was an oil field before it became a national forest 87 years ago. Pump jacks are a part of its scenery. When the forest was created in 1923, mineral estates were severed from the Forest Service ownership of the surface, and this was done with the clear intention to allow timber and oil production to continue and allow for the Forest Service to oversee managed sustainable timber harvesting. Now, consequently, 93 percent of the subsurface mineral rights are still owned by the private sector, which drives the local labor market and economy. I found it frustrating to watch as the ANF struggled to perform critical functions as their budget was continually reduced as a result of Western wildfires. The FLAME Fund has been crucial in providing insulation to the budgets of our national forest, and I applaud the subcommittee for their input in the creation of the fund and support through appropriations. I can say that the fund appears to be a success because forests such as the Allegheny Forest have not been experiencing the historical difficulties wildfires have caused in the past financially. Perhaps the greatest challenge to the Forest Service continues to be unnecessary litigation that continues to hamstring the Forest Service from carrying out its basic duties. Without a doubt, we all have a duty to ensure the Forest Service is adequately performing and the legal avenue for the public to address any malfeasance must be intact. However, I strongly believe there are some outside the service as well as within who are intentionally abusing the system based on a radical environmental ideology. These legal battles often create inefficiencies and are a drain on the service's budget, staff and resources. Now, how can the Forest Service or any government agency, for that matter, do its basic job when they are incessantly involved with frivolous lawsuits? As the chairman of the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Conservation, Energy, and Forestry, I believe that there is an imperative to address these issues and respectfully request your partnership to make necessary improvements. Forest Service research stations--in addition to providing a substantial source of timber, another pillar of the Forest Service mission is to maintain forest health. Part of maintaining healthy forests is research and subsequent application. Pennsylvania and many other states have suffered devastating effects as a result of invasive species such as the gypsy moth and the emerald ash bore. I brought some along. I wish I would have brought you along one of the nice baseball bats we make with that ash too. This is the season to use those. Given the devastation that has occurred in the large regions of the country, it is critical that we continue research to establish best practices and means of combating these species in order to prevent further destruction of our forests. Fish and Wildlife Service--the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been performing excellent research in order to assist with the restoration of fish populations around the country. They made great strides in the Northeast, particularly with the Atlantic salmon, which has been devastated in recent decades, and certainly there is a research facility in Pennsylvania that is doing incredible work with salmon species as well as advanced research in fish genetics and migration patterns. And I certainly respectfully request level funding in fish and wildlife, particularly for fish-related research. And the final area has to do with Payments In Lieu of Taxes and Secure Rural Schools. Four of the 17 counties in the Pennsylvania 5th District are within the boundaries of the Allegheny National Forest. The Payments In Lieu of Tax program is essential in this region because there is little or no tax base, which means little or no tax revenue for these forested counties. PILT is a major source of funding for services such as the police force, firefighters, road construction. Similarly, Secure Rural Schools programs ensure that children who reside in these forest counties receive adequate education and therefore I respectfully request full funding for both PILT and Secure Rural Schools. I want to thank you for the opportunity to testify before the committee and I am hopeful that as we move forward that the subcommittee will recognize the balance between fiscal responsibility and continuing our federal commitments to our national forests and citizens residing in forested counties, and I would certainly be happy to answer any questions you have. I appreciate it, Chairman. Thanks. [The statement of Glenn Thompson follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.001 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.002 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.003 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thanks for your testimony. We appreciate you being here today. Some of us in the West always think that all the rural areas are in the West, but it is a learning experience for us that Pennsylvania and New York actually and other places have some very rural areas and issues that are of concern and similar to those of us in the West, so I appreciate you being here. Mr. Thompson. Well, I am a proud member of the Western Caucus. Mr. Simpson. And I appreciate it. Thank you. Mr. Thompson. Thanks, Chairman. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Next is Gregory Conrad, Executive Director of the Interstate Mining Compact Commission. Welcome. ---------- -- -------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, WATER MANAGEMENT WITNESS GREGORY CONRAD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INTERSTATE MINING COMPACT COMMISSION Mr. Conrad. Good morning. My name is Greg Conrad and I serve as Executive Director of the Interstate Mining Commission, which is a multi-state governmental organization representing the natural resource and environmental protection interests of our 24 member states who regulate the mining industry and reclaim abandoned mine lands. I am also appearing today on behalf of the National Association of Abandoned Mine Land Programs, which consists of 30 states and tribes that do the AML work. Mr. Chairman, these are tough states for state and federal budgets, and we realize the deficit reduction and spending cuts are the order of the day. As a result, some hard choices need to be made about how we spend limited dollars in an efficient and effective way. The environmental protection associated with mining operations is no exception. While we might want to run Cadillac programs that accomplish all of our goals and objectives, prioritization is the watchword of the day and we have to be mindful of every dollar that is expended on behalf of our citizenry. One of the tough choices that has to be made with respect to programs under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act is who will take the lead in implementing the act's requirements. Once we agree upon that, it is then incumbent upon both state and federal governments to prioritize funding decisions to support the lead agencies. Congress created a state primacy approach under SMCRA whereby state governments were vested with exclusive regulatory authority to operate programs for both active mining operations and AML restoration following approval of those programs by the Federal Government. The act also provides for grants to states that meet 50 percent of their program operations under Title V and 100 percent under Title IV for AML. Once again in fiscal year 2012, we are faced with a decision about the extent to which the Federal Government will support these funding commitments under SMCRA and the state lead concept for program implementation. OSM's budget proposes to move us away from those commitments and concepts. The Administration would have us believe that the Federal Government is in a better position to decide how these state programs should be run and that the states should do so with less money and more oversight. At the very same time, additional mandates and program requirements are being placed on the states through new rules, directives, guidelines and agreements among federal agencies. In this regard, I would like to submit for the record a resolution concerning state primacy adopted by IMCC at its annual meeting last week. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Mr. Conrad. Something has to give, Mr. Chairman. Either we agree to support the states as envisioned by SMCRA or we change the rules of the game. Undercutting the states through unrealistic funding restrictions that jeopardize the efficacy of state programs is no way to run a ship. States are struggling to match federal dollars and signals from the Federal Government that it is wavering in its support concerning both dollars and confidence in the states' ability to run effective regulatory and AML programs will do little to build trust. This is not the time to reverse the course that Congress has set for its support of state programs over the past few years. And in that regard, we are particularly encouraged and appreciative of the recent decisions to support state programs in the fiscal year 2011 C.R. For 2012, we urge the subcommittee to reject OSM's proposed cut of $11 million for state Title V grants and restore the grant level funding to $71 million as supported by our funding request. We also request that the subcommittee instruct OSM to pursue any cost recovery proposal with the states before utilizing it as a mechanism to offset cuts to state grant funding in its budget. OSM's proposal is completely out of touch with the realities associated with establishing or enhancing user fees. Based on a recent polling of my member states, we found that it would be difficult, if not impossible, for most states to accomplish this feat at all, much less in one fiscal year. With respect to the AML program, we face a more extreme situation. OSM is proposing to terminate the AML emergency program, eliminate funding to certified states and tribes, and completely overhaul the mechanism for distributing AML grants to the rest of the states. In doing so, OSM will totally upend the work that Congress accomplished just five years when it redesigned and reauthorized Title IV of SMCRA. That Congressional action was the result of over 10 years of effort toward developing a compromise that met the original intent of SMCRA and the needs of the affected parties. I would like to submit for the record a list of questions regarding this legislative proposal by OSM in their budget, which we believe must be answered before moving forward. The AML program has been one of the key successes of SMCRA, and based on Congressional action in 2006, it is well positioned to remain so into the future. We therefore urge the subcommittee to once again reject the Administration's proposals to undermine this vital program and to fully fund state and tribal programs and the emergency program. And in this regard, I would like to submit for the record two resolutions adopted by IMCC and the National Association of Abandoned Mine Land Programs along with a written statement from the association. Thanks for the opportunity to present our testimony. [The statement of Gregory Conrad follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.004 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.005 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.006 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.007 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, and those submissions that you requested will be taken. We appreciate it. You bring up a real challenge that we face not just in this budget but across the government in those areas where a lot of the states do programs at the direction of the Federal Government and when you start reducing funding, it affects the state programs and so we kind of pass those problems on to the states, but it is a real issue, like I say, not only through Interior but throughout the budget, and it is one of those challenges we are going to have as we write the 2012 budget. Mr. Conrad. We appreciate your support. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. We appreciate it. Next we have Tom Troxel, the Executive Director of the Intermountain Forest Association. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, WATER MANAGEMENT WITNESS TOM TROXEL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST ASSOCIATION Mr. Troxel. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My name is Tom Troxel. I am from Rapid City, South Dakota, and I am testifying today on behalf of the Federal Forest Resource Coalition. We have a crisis in our national forests. Between 60 and 80 million acres of national forest are classified at risk for a catastrophic wildfire. In addition, bark beetles have killed or damaged 40 million acres of western forest over the last 13 years and the Forest Service expects those epidemics to continue for another five to 10 years. The underlying reason is that we are harvesting only 10 percent of the annual growth on national forest timberlands, leaving the forest more and more overstocked and more susceptible to fires and insect epidemics. Research has clearly demonstrated that mechanical thinning and active forest management can reduce the size and severity of wildfires and bark beetle epidemics. Forest products companies provide the lowest cost and most effective tool for the Forest Service to improve and maintain the health of our national forests. There is a tremendous opportunity to increase proactive forest management, improve the health and resiliency of our forest, reduce the potential for catastrophic and expensive fires and insect epidemics, produce American wood products and put Americans back to work. Many rural communities close to the national forest have unemployment rates nearing 20 percent. Investing in the Forest Service's timber program is a very effective job creator, generating 16\1/2\ jobs per million board feet harvested. With the national emphasis on jobs and putting people back to work, increased management and timber outputs would provide a much-needed boost to rural America as well as improve the health and resiliency of the national forest. We have several recommendations. Our first recommendation is that you reject the proposed Integrated Resource Restoration line item. The IRR would inevitably reduce accountability for timber outputs, cost and efficiency. Further, not all forests need restoration. But even where restoration makes sense, there is no compelling reason to overhaul the Forest Service's budget structure. We recommend targets for each budget line item and an annual report from the Forest Service to the Congress on their accomplishments. We recommend increasing the fiscal 2012 program to 3 billion board feet. This would help satisfy increased demand for national forest timber, increase much- needed management of the national forest plus provide thousands of additional jobs. We recommend restoring the proposed $79 million cut to the roads budget line item and that you reject the proposal for no new road construction. We urge the committee to authorize the HFRA administrative review process for all national forest NEPA decisions as a means of increasing their efficiency. We support the Forest Service's recent proposal for a pre-decisional objection process for forest plan decisions and believe that Congress should follow suit for project NEPA decisions. We recommend restoring the proposed $9 million reduction for hazardous fuels and that 50 percent of the hazardous fuels funds be directed to non-WUI areas. We urge you to provide adequate funding for the catastrophic beetle epidemics for thinning out in front of the beetles and for tree removal and fuels reduction where trees are already dead. The Forest Service's response to the epidemics has been underfunded and mostly after the fact. And I brought you some mountain pine beetles and I brought you some bumper stickers, what we think about mountain pine beetles in the Black Hills of South Dakota. We recommend full funding for the collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Act program provided that the program is funded with new money and with a separate budget line item. Finally, considering the backlog of work on the national forest, we recommend that the proposed funding for land purchases be redirected to forest management and improving the health of the national forest. In conclusion, I would like to reiterate the opportunity to proactively improve the health and resiliency of the national forest, maintain critical forest industry infrastructure, produce American wood products, create jobs and put people back to work. Thank you very much for this opportunity to testify. I would be happy to answer your questions. [The statement of Tom Troxel follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.008 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.009 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.010 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.011 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for being here today. So the pine bark beetle epidemic has gotten worse as we have done less and less thinning of the forest and less tree removal? Mr. Troxel. Yes, sir. It is continuing to span. The epicenter was in Colorado and it is expanding from Colorado to Wyoming to South Dakota to Montana and Idaho, and it just continues to expand. Mr. Simpson. It is a real problem, and when you get out in the forest and you stand on top of a mountain and look around and look at how vast some of these forests are, trying to address it is a huge issue. Mr. Troxel. Yes, sir. Mr. Simpson. And I look out there at we call, you know, the red tree forest, and lightning comes through there and it is a tinderbox. Mr. Troxel. Right. We do not have nearly the options that we would have had if we had done some management when the forests were green but there are things we can and should be doing. All of those dead trees and all the fuels pose a real risk of catastrophic fires, and we ought to be doing everything we can now. Mr. Simpson. I had a question for years with the Forest Service, and I do not know, I am not a forester, but we put out 98 percent of all fires that start. Fires are a natural part of the ecosystem, and it makes you wonder if that builds up the fuel so much that when you do have a fire that you do not put out, all of a sudden it is a catastrophic fire. I think we need more active management of the forest. Mr. Troxel. I agree with you, and active management, in a lot of places we can do it with mechanical thinning. Some places in the back country it makes sense to do with fire. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. Jeff, do you have anything? Mr. Flake. I have the same observations that you have, particularly with respect to the ponderosa pine forest Arizona has. We have had some good management. Wally Covington at the Northern Arizona University and others have been active here, so I could not agree more. We had the Rodeo-Chediski fire a few years ago and it was far more devastating than it would have otherwise been. It was less devastating on areas, particularly on the Indian reservations, that had been better managed because some of the rules and regulations for the Forest Service were not in place on the Indian reservation. So I am one who believes in active management and allowing commercial interests where you can. That is the only way sometimes to recoup some of the money to go further into the forest like we need to. So, I am all in favor of moving ahead there. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. Thank you for being here today. Mr. Troxel. Thank you very much, Congressman. Mr. Simpson. Next we have John Shannon, National Association of State Foresters. Thursday, April 14, 2011. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, WATER MANAGEMENT WITNESS JOHN SHANNON, ARKANSAS STATE FORESTER AND VICE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE FORESTERS Mr. Shannon. Good morning, sir. I am the state forester of Arkansas. This is my first time before your subcommittee, and I did not know I was supposed to bring a bottle of dead bugs. I will be mindful of that. Mr. Simpson. They are very impressive. Mr. Shannon. If you ever invite me back---- Mr. Simpson. They will not allow me into Idaho with those. They have enough already. Mr. Shannon. We have plenty. We have southern pine beetles too. I am representing the National Association of State Foresters, and my testimony today is going to focus on our recommendations for the 2012 budget for state and private forestry. We are the champions for forestry in the country. We take care of two-thirds of America's forests, not the U.S. Forest Service. We also live in the world of reality. I have had to balance the state forestry commission budget for 17 consecutive years. You have to make some hard calls, you know. You folks are making those hard calls. We get that. So our budget proposals this time do not reflect the need for forest conservation. We are just trying to keep our noses above water. So generally we are recommending that the 2012 budget hold the line at the 2010 actual budget level. Congress has mandated that the state foresters assess our forests and identify priority issues, and we have all completed that work and we have all developed state forest action plans. It is a big country. Forests differ greatly. But as put together these plans state by state, there were five themes that were really common across the country, and I would like to walk through those because they do tie to the state and private forestry budget. First is, if we are going to conserve and manage these forests, we need to know what we are talking about, and that means we need an accurate and current forest inventory, so we are asking to hold the line at $72 million for forest inventory and analysis. The second issue is, boy, there are tremendous challenges in forest health, and that is the theme that has already developed here today, sir, so I will not review that, but we are looking again to hold the line at $60 million for cooperative forest health. The third common theme is wildfires, and although I think the public watching TV thinks these fires burn in remote, dark woods, you know, far away somewhere, we know there are scores of thousands of American communities that are at risk from these wildfires. It is not just saving the woods; it is where people live, too. So we are asking to hold the line at $110 million for state fire assistance, and I can tell you in rural states like Arkansas, that is really, really important. And we could never pay all the volunteer firefighters we have. That is an investment that really is matched tremendously at the local level. And the Forest Service has through the FLAME Act a reserve fund for paying for firefighting. It is $413 million. I hope you can maintain that fund, because if that fund is not there and the Forest Service needs more money to fight fires, you know where they are getting that money from? State and private forestry, and that has happened before and it halts work and it hurts partnerships, you know, so please keep that reserve fund at $413 million. We have got to keep forest land forested. That is not a given. States that are really growing in population have lost hundreds of thousands of acres of forestland, and forest landowners, private landowners keep their land forested only if it makes economic sense to do so. If it does not, they change their land use. And so the first step to really understand the economic development of their forestland is to have a forest stewardship plan. We provide those for the private forest landowners. So we are asking to maintain that Forest Stewardship budget at $29 million. The fifth and final common theme that arose across the country is, we need to establish and maintain forests where Americans live, which is not really in remote rural areas anymore. Most Americans live in town. And I am not just saying shade trees are pretty so we need to invest in those. There is measurable value in having a green infrastructure in America's cities and an easy one to measure is stormwater runoff, the cost control for stormwater runoff. Sir, this is the one line item where we are asking for a small increase, up to $32 million. If I can just wrap up by saying that the state foresters would really like to begin a discussion with your committee on getting us more flexibility to integrate these programs under state and private and integrate the use of the funding not to just do whatever we would like to do but to focus on the federal priorities, which are outlined in the Farm Bill, and to focus on the priorities we have identified in our state forest action plans, and if you give us more flexibility, and there is a long process to get there but if we get there, hold our feet to the fire. You ought to heighten the accountability too. You ought to require accomplishments and that we measure those accomplishments and that we report those accomplishments to you. I look forward to working with you. [The statement of John Shannon follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.012 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.013 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.014 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.015 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I look forward to working with you on that. I have always been an advocate of more flexibility for the agency, and what this committee needs to do is know what your goals are with this budget, and next year I will ask you, did you achieve those goals, if so, how, if not, why not, and those types of things. Sometimes I think we get into too much individual line item budgeting. But I appreciate your testimony, and I have seen firsthand the FMAT grants and how those help communities that would otherwise be broke. Mr. Shannon. Yes. Hold us accountable. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Next, we have Hank Kashdan, Legislative Director for the National Association of Forest Service Retirees. ---------- -- -------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, WATER MANAGEMENT WITNESS HANK KASHDAN, LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FOREST SERVICE RETIREES Mr. Kashdan. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and on behalf of the National Association of Forest Service Retirees, I really appreciate the opportunity to be here today for this public- witness hearing, and we want to especially thank you and the subcommittee for keeping the key multiple-use programs of the agency intact during your very challenging 2011 negotiations you just had, and it was very noticed and very appreciated and we thank you for that. These multiple-use programs are key to restoring the health and resiliency of America's forests and watersheds, and they are the crux of the written testimony I provided today. As Mr. Troxel, Mr. Thompson and Mr. Shannon pointed out earlier, restoring America's forests and watersheds is getting tougher and it needs even higher-priority focus, and in our review of the Administration's budget for 2012, it does not appear that that priority is coming through in the proposal. The Western Governors Association, the Government Accountability Office have all pointed out the need to increase investments in restoration activities. The Departments of Agriculture and Interior just recently issued the Cohesive Wildland Fire Strategy. In there, they cite the need to increase investments in hazardous fuels yet the Forest Service's hazardous fuels budget is reduced about $9 million. The Department of the Interior's is reduced even more than that. And you look at the roads and trails infrastructure, the two line items that are really key to funding the restoration, this key restoration activity, they are down $93.7 million from the 2010 level, and it is often unappreciated that these two line items, predominantly the roads line item, are really key to restoring watersheds, maintaining roads to standard, decommissioning roads that for environmental reasons cannot remain on the landscape or that are not needed for their original purpose anymore, ensuring access for the public, and here in the intermountain list where the beetles are causing literally thousands of trees to fall across roads and trees every day, you need a good roads budget to keep those roads open for access, for protection of the public, and it is a really critical function. So we look at the proposed Forest Service budget and see an $85 million increase in land and water conservation to support the America's Great Outdoors initiative, our conclusion is that is being proposed at the expense of these key restoration programs and so we want to encourage as some of the previous witnesses have said to keep that focus on restoration. Focusing on restoration, I want to mention the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Act. The President's budget does propose full funding for that, and we are very supportive of that. Throughout the country, we have seen very strong collaborative efforts starting to emerge. Some are fully functioning, some are emerging. I was reading about a couple in the Salmon River just the other day. You know, it was not too long ago where the widely divergent publics were only talking to each other as part of the appeals process or the litigation process. This offers an opportunity to bring those publics together, and it is showing some success. We are seeing increases in local employment, a good flow of forest products, bigger investments in recreation and some optimism in local rural communities for a good, sustainable economic future. Now, key to that landscape restoration, what we also want to note is the stewardship contracting tool. Stewardship contracting is up for expiration in 2013. If it were not for the support of the Appropriations Committees, we would not have stewardship contracting today. It has been slow in coming along but I think it is reaching critical mass and we would hope that we could continue to see your support as it goes through the authorizing process and the appropriations process. I would like to just close with something that is not in the written testimony that has got the retirees' network quite abuzz recently, and that is the issue of travel management. In February, there was an amendment that Mr. Herger offered that would prohibit the implementation and enforcement of travel management plans. We think that may have some unintended consequences that are not desirable. Sixty-eight percent of the units in the system have completed travel management plans. These could not have been done without collaboration with the motorized recreation users. To be certain, there are hot spots, there is some discontent, but for the most part, we feel that motorized recreation users are supportive of this and in fact travel management is a friend of that activity. So with that, Mr. Chairman, I see I am just about out of time so I just wanted to thank you very much for the opportunity to be here today, and we are here and ready to serve and help in any way we can. [The statement of Hank Kashdan follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.016 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.017 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.018 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.019 Mr. Simpson. We thank you, and thank you for your testimony. We look forward to working with you as we have these more challenging times with reduced budgets. We want to make sure that what we do is maintain the essential programs of the Forest Service and all of the federal agencies, so we look forward to working with you to address those kinds of things. Thank you. Mr. Kashdan. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Next, we have Jim Lighthizer, President of the Civil War Trust. How are you doing? Good to see you again. Mr. Lighthizer. Good to see you again, my friend. Mr. Simpson. You bet. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. HISTORIC PRESERVATION, ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS JIM LIGHTHIZER, PRESIDENT, CIVIL WAR TRUST Mr. Lighthizer. Mr. Chairman, I came to first thank the committee for its support of the American Battlefield Protection Program in the past years. I recognize that 2012 is going to be a difficult year for the country, not to mention the Congress, and you all have some difficult decisions and choices you have to make. As you are very much aware, Mr. Chairman, one of the differences between the land we save and the other good land that other folks save is that we save heritage land, and it is impossible to move where the great armies fought. You cannot pretend it was someplace else. In other words, history is where it happened. The other thing I would say, Mr. Chairman, it is the sesquicentennial now. It started, I guess, officially yesterday or the day before, depending on how you want to count it, and we are running out of time. As you know, what we try to save, the battlefield land we try to save, has been defined, and we estimate in the next five to 10 years it is either going to be saved or paved, so we have got to get while the getting is good, if you will. This program has been a good program. It has got metrics. You can measure its success or lack thereof. It has worked well. It is a public-private partnership. We have skin in the game, so to speak. We have to raise a dollar to get a dollar. I think it has worked very, very well for the American public because we are saving heritage. We are saving outdoor classrooms, in effect. We are preserving the land so that we can teach future generations about what made this country what it is today, which I happen to think is a pretty good country. So we thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank the committee for its past support. [The statement of Jim Lighthizer follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.020 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.021 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.022 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.023 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I appreciate the work you do. I look forward to working with you to preserve these areas. You are right. You do great work and, as you said, once you lose it, it is gone. Mr. Lighthizer. Yes, it is gone forever. You cannot get it back. Mr. Simpson. And we will get out to Antietam one of these days. Mr. Lighthizer. Please do. You know it is a standing offer. Mr. Simpson. I know. Mr. Lighthizer. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. Next we have Trace Adkins, Grammy-nominated country and western singer. How are you doing? Mr. Adkins. Fine, sir. How are you? Mr. Simpson. Welcome. Mr. Adkins. I am proud to be here. This is a sobering occasion for me. I am not used to this. Mr. Simpson. You are just talking to friends. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. HISTORIC PRESERVATION, ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS TRACE ADKINS, GRAMMY-NOMINATED COUNTRY MUSICIAN Mr. Adkins. Okay. Well, Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to speak to you. My name is Trace Adkins. I do sing country music. I am also a student of history, a descendant of a Confederate soldier who fought in the Civil War. I have visited many of these hallowed battlefields that Mr. Lighthizer spoke of, and through the preservation of these sites I was able to stand upon ground where soldiers stood and reflect on the sacrifices that were made there. I come before you today just to share my personal interest in the Civil War and why I believe it is important to preserve the last tangible links to this history, the battlefield lands where hundreds of thousands of brave soldiers, including my great-great-grandfather, fought and died. With this being the first year of the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, now I think is the opportune time to redouble efforts to further protect these hallowed grounds. I grew up in Louisiana. I now live in Nashville. So I have spent a lot of my life in close proximity to Civil War battlefields, and my interest grew out of a conversation that I had with my grandfather when I was 11, and he told me about his grandfather. He was 73 at the time, my grandfather was, and he showed me copies of letters that his grandfather had written home while he was serving, and so that piqued my interest and spurred me to become a student of history at that time. When he died 10 years later, I was 21 and I took that occasion out of an homage to him to go to Vicksburg, and I was able to stand in the trench where his grandfather, my great-great-grandfather, had been. I knew I was within 100 feet of where he had stood, and it was a spiritual moment for me. I cannot really express it any other way. I was fortunate enough to be able to go, as I said, to Vicksburg, and Vicksburg is now part of the National Park Service system and it has been well preserved, and it is a success story. There are many others, but I am fortunate to have that. The seriousness of the threat to these unique resources was brought home to me one winter day a couple of years ago. It happened to be on December 15th and I was having to go into Nashville, and I was stuck in traffic on I-65 south of town and I happened to notice that I was directly across the interstate from Overton High School. Overton High School is a school that sits on top of Overton Hill. December 15th happened to be the anniversary of the Battle of Nashville, and on December 15, 1864, it was said later about that battle that you could walk from the bottom of that hill to the top of that hill stepping on dead soldiers. It was that kind of carnage. And as I was sitting there stuck in traffic, I wondered if I were to get out of my truck right now and start knocking on people's windows and asked them if they know what happened on that hill right there 140-some-odd years ago how many of them would know, and I think it is a sad commentary that probably very few, if any of them, would have had a clue. So these historic landscapes are treasures. They are American treasures, and preserved battlefields are cultural and historic landscapes that serve as a constant reminder of the sacrifices our ancestors made to make this country what it is today. And the protection of these battlefields will leave a legacy of commitment to preservation and conservation. These lands will be open spaces for the public to enjoy preserved in their natural and pristine state. The tourism that comes from these sites, it is very important to many of these communities, and so I think that this kicks off the sesquicentennial of the Civil War and I do not think there is a better time for us, like I said, to recommit to the preservation of these sacred lands, and I appreciate you listening and for having me here today, and I really appreciate Jim Lighthizer for all the work that he does and it has been an honor for me to be associated with the Civil War Trust and all the work that they do. Thank you, sir. [The statement of Trace Adkins follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.024 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.025 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.026 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.027 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, Trace. They do good work, and I appreciate your commitment to this also. I tell people whenever they come here to Washington, people from Idaho, they always ask us where they should go and what they should visit, and I say if you have a day, go to Gettysburg but take your shoes off. Mr. Adkins. Yes. Mr. Simpson. It is one of those things that is just amazing, and there are so many of those around the West. I am just surprised that coming from Tennessee and Louisiana that you refer to this as the Civil War. Being from Idaho, you know, I have a place over in Arlington, VA, and I learned right away that there was no Civil War, there was a War of Northern Aggression. Mr. Adkins. And a war for southern independence. Mr. Simpson. That is right. Mr. Adkins. In mixed company, I try to use politically correct terms. But in conclusion, I would like to say that as a concerned citizen, I think that these Civil War battlefields serve as a monument to what happens when political wisdom fails us and our disagreements are allowed to escalate beyond reason, and I think they are horrific reminders of what could happen. I just think it is very important for us as a Nation to preserve these places. Thank you, sir. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thank you for your testimony and for being here today. I appreciate it very much. Next we have Margaret Graves, President of the Partners in Preservation. ---------- -- -------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. HISTORIC PRESERVATION, ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS MARGARET GRAVES, PRESIDENT, PARTNERS IN PRESERVATION Ms. Graves. Thank you, Chairman Simpson, for the opportunity to testify. I am Margaret Graves and I am the President in Partners in Preservation. Our prior speaker spoke about the importance of our national historic sites, and given the current budget crisis, we are at risk of losing this incredible heritage if we do not use innovative solutions like historic leases to help the National Park Service address the myriad challenges it faces as the primary steward of our historic built environment. According to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, 2,811 historic structures of national significance are in poor condition within the National Park Service system. Fiscal common sense requires the National Park Service to embrace preservation-minded partners like Partners in Preservation. The National Park Service Organic Act directs the National Park Service to conserve historic objects and to provide for their enjoyment and to conserve them for the benefit of future generations. This represents a significant challenge for the National Park Service. The National Park Service is responsible for conserving 27,000 historic structures and 84 million acres of land. Their deferred-maintenance budget is currently estimated to be $10.8 billion, $3 billion of which is for structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places. This is more than leaky rooftops. This represents the potential loss of our heritage for our children and our grandchildren. Government funds alone are insufficient to meet the challenges. Private funds are needed. Historic leases offer the opportunity to attract private capital to the Park Service's challenges. They shift the maintenance obligations to the lessee. In some cases, the lessee is required to pay rent. In some cases, the condition of the building is so poor that the lessee invests in rehabilitation in lieu of paying rent. According to an MPCA report, for fiscal year 2009, 26 parks reported leasing revenue of $4.3 million. In fiscal year 2007, 48 parks leased a total of 147 historic structures. This is just a small fraction of the structures eligible for leasing. In my written testimony, I have provided a list of the parks that have granted leases to date. As members of the Appropriations subcommittee with jurisdiction over the National Park Service budget, you have the opportunity to encourage the National Park Service to pursue more historic leases or risk the loss of future historic resources. The legal framework in place and many benefits have been recognized of historic leases, primarily that underutilized park structures are preserved and rehabilitated with private funds, costing taxpayers nothing and alleviating the burden on the National Park Service. They have been underutilized. Why? In part, because park-level superintendents have limited knowledge of historic leases and the benefits they offer. Cumberland Island National Seashore offers a textbook example of how a historic lease could preserve historic resources. On Cumberland Island, the National Park Service is responsible for the preservation of 82 individual historic structures. These range from African American chimneys left from burned slave cabins to a 22,000-square-foot mansion. They also are responsible for 47 known archaeological sites, and because Cumberland Island National Seashore is an island not connected to the mainland by a bridge, every item has to come by boat. In fiscal year 2009, the National Park Service spent $1.69 million on maintenance expenses. Approximately half of that money came from their operating budget and the other half came from one-time funds. These funds, while generous in that particular year, are likely to be reduced going forward, given the budget crisis. They have inadequate staff to accomplish all of the maintenance tasks at hand. Partners in Preservation is willing to invest approximately $1 million in the preservation of two National Register historic structures which are otherwise at risk for demolition by neglect due to lack of funding. Other structures on Cumberland Island have been demolished by neglect because of lack of money. If a historic lease is granted of these structures, it is a win-win-win, a win for the public, a win for the Park Service and a win for future generations. Our Nation's heritage is at risk of being lost if the National Park Service does not pursue historic leases more. If the National Park Service embraces historic leases and grants them more frequently, they will have had the ability to preserve far more of our history. The alternative is to leave future generations a crumbling legacy of diminished historic resources and a loss of national heritage. Thank you. [The statement of Margaret Graves follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.028 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.029 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.030 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.031 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thanks for your testimony and the work you do. We appreciate the private sector being involved in much of this. Ms. Graves. They can be a great partner. Mr. Simpson. That is right. Thank you. Next we have Trent Clark, Public Relations Affairs Director and representing the Federation of State Humanities Councils. Welcome. He is from Idaho. Imagine that. Trent and I have been friends for many, many years, and I appreciate you being here today, Trent. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. HISTORIC PRESERVATION, ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS TRENT CLARK, PUBLIC AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS DIRECTOR, FEDERATION OF STATE HUMANITIES COUNCILS Mr. Clark. Thank you very much Congressman, and let me extend to you the greetings and well wishes of the other members of the Idaho Humanities Council Board, many of whom are friends and folks you know very well. I was going to say for the benefit of the other members I might introduce myself, but as you know, I also in my day job represent Monsanto, who employs directly and indirectly roughly 3,000 Idahoans in southeast Idaho. But it is my privilege to be a volunteer on the Idaho Humanities Council. I am here today representing the state humanities council, and as that organization supporting the humanities budget request of $167.5 million for the National Endowment for the Humanities. I am here specifically to justify and explain the value that is achieved to the taxpayers out of the $47 million of that budget that is allocated to the endowment's federal- state partnership. That is the money that goes out to the 50 states and six territorial councils. In doing that, one thing I hope you do understand is, there is tremendous bang for the buck achieved when that money is distributed out across the Nation. For every federal dollar that is invested in that public federal-state partnership, there are 5\1/2\ dollars that are added then to it, so you get tremendous bang for the buck. The remaining question then is with that highly leveraged impact, what are you achieving? Well, here is my answer, and there are five specific achievements. First of all, the council programs lift our sights above the day-to-day grind to focus us on important questions like where have we been and where are we going. In Idaho, for example, we just had a council meeting where we distributed $85,000 in grants to projects all across the State of Idaho, and those range from everything like the museum up in Bonners Ferry. Have you been there, Congressman, where a local artist has painted portraits of all of the great figures of Bonners Ferry? And one can go to that museum and basically learn the history of the community just by reading the captions under all of these portraits. In Malad, we funded the Welch Festival which, as you know, is about Malad's only cultural event. I mean, it is the peak of society in Malad, Idaho. And I am really looking forward to something we just voted to fund, and that is a recollection piece on the Fort Bridger Treaty, which as, you know, Congressman, that Fort Bridger Treaty and the history of it, the three times that it was abrogated by the Federal Government and then the other three times that we as a Nation walked in and renegotiated the treaty actually explain why the culture of Fort Hall is the way that it is today, and a good recollection of that history is critical for us to understand how to deal with the Sho-Ban Nation in this day and age. So those are the kinds of things that are funded. The second achievement that we get through the council programs is a reach into communities that are remote and otherwise really difficult to penetrate with humanities content. I mentioned Malad, for instance, the fact that if it were not for our council funding we would not have a Welch Festival in Malad. In 2010, council programs reached an estimated 5,700 communities, and many of them are in these rural areas where if it were not for the council-supported projects, those projects are the communities' annual humanities education experience. Let me give you an example. The Kansas Humanities Council funded a project called Kansans Tell Their Stories, and through 64 grants in 55 different communities, the program then engaged over 314,000 Kansans in this dialog about where their history comes from, and they participated either in person or online in oral histories, research projects, museum exhibits. They even had television series, podcasts and special speaker engagements. In Kentucky, the Kentucky Chautauqua serves a very similar purpose because through that program they bring characters portraying famous historical figures into classrooms and into gatherings where they can sort of examine the history through the eyes and the minds of those particular characters. One such character, for instance, is Lt. Anna Mac Clarke--no relation of mine--but was the first African American officer to command white troops, and kids now in Kentucky are able to hear this point of view. In fact, through those presentations, 35,346 Kentucky schoolchildren have had a chance to learn a little bit about their history. Achievement three: Councils preserve and strengthen local institutions. That 5\1/2\ dollars for every dollar invested I talked about, that actually comes with tremendous grassroots outreach. It is one of the ways that Congress supports what I consider to be one of the greatest assets of the modern world, and that is that we have communities with museums and libraries, and those museums and libraries are really the source of the information for the information age. These local organizations receive a lot of their funding through the state councils, and I can give you an example of Utah where there are 255 museums where the museum curators have been able to learn interpretation and the ability to put together informative exhibits because of the Utah Council of Humanities funding. Well, I may be out of time, Congressman, but I just would like to conclude by saying that I want to confirm what the National Endowment for the Humanities Chairman Leach had to say about the mission and role of the humanities funding, and that is to inspire and sustain the essential element of a free society and self-government, which is civil discourse. As our Nation steps up to answer the challenges we face today, we will need more of that discourse, not less, and for that reason, we ask you to support us in carrying out that mission by helping us fund the very activities that uplift Americans in every corner of the Nation, in all walks of life, to focus on the humanities in their community, their state and their Nation. Thank you, Congressman. [The statement of Trent Clark follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.032 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.033 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.034 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.035 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, and thanks for your testimony. One of the concerns--I have been a fan of Jim Leach's for a long time. I have served with him here in Congress and we spent hours together talking about a variety of things, both in my office and in his, and in this C.R. that we are passing, obviously the arts and humanities got cut somewhat. We were able to prevent some of the dramatic cuts that we were fearful would happen. Is there concern that as resources go down from the state humanities councils that those grants that go to states will be reduced rather than the Washington, D.C., bureaucracy, if you want to call it that, that it will be fed back to the states, the cuts? Is there concern about that? Mr. Clark. Well, there is concern primarily because there is so much value to be achieved through the partnership process. I mean, just from the examples I have given you, Congressman, the on-the-ground effect of the National Endowment for the Humanities is so leveraged in these local grants. It would be a shame to lose that leveraging by not having those funds flow down into these small rural programs. Mr. Simpson. Thanks. Thanks for being here today, Trent. I appreciate it very much. Mr. Clark. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Next we have Dr. Michael Brintall, the President of the National Humanities Alliance. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. HISTORIC PRESERVATION, ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS MICHAEL BRINTALL, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL HUMANITIES ALLIANCE Mr. Brintall. Mr. Chairman, thank you for having me. I am here on behalf of the National Humanities Alliance. Our members are 104 scholarly associations, professional associations, institutions that represent tens of thousands of scholars, professors, curators, other professionals working in the humanities. I am the elected president. I am a political scientists and I am also the Executive Director of the American Political Science Association. We as the federation urge the subcommittee to fund the NEH at the fiscal year 2010 level of $167.5 million. Our written testimony includes some discussion of that. And in response to the points you are raising, the NEH is a small agency that does a very big job and in fact does three big jobs. We have been hearing about those here. It protects and preserves cultural resources, it facilitates broad public engagement with the Nation's heritage, and it supports basic scholarly research and education in the humanities, and that is the point I want to emphasize here, but it does all of this on a remarkably small budget, and we cannot risk cutbacks that would enfeeble any one of those activities nor I think compel a situation that would compel sacrificing one for the others. So even modest cuts can have crippling effects when they are spread across those roles. I started my career wanting to be a city planner. I thought the cities needed help. I thought the solution would be easy and that planning and civil engineering would fix things up. I went to MIT in 1968 to study city planning. As I began to study the urban issues, I discovered that urban affairs was really a humanities problem. Urban issues are grounded in neighborhoods. Sometimes they followed folk traditions. Progress required mechanisms for people to work together with civility. Everything was planned with local history. We could learn a lot from other places and times about how local government can respond creatively. So in the end, my studies shifted to humanities and social sciences with the same interest in helping cities but no longer thinking it would be easy. The humanities alert us to hard problems and then they help us to address them. As I started those studies, I happened to spend a summer on a ranch in the West, and this had a big effect on me too, and it was not Idaho, it was Montana---- Mr. Simpson. Close enough. Mr. Brintall. Close enough. Where I debated urban issues with ranchers and was schooled in values of individual responsibility and property rights, and I saw how we all have a common stake as a Nation in each other's so-called local concerns. I came away from this academic and this real-world introduction to the humanities with a deep respect for shared ideas and the gathering of evidence about them and for public engagement across the country and across diverse issues, and I realized that this individual experience that I had is what the NEH really affords the whole Nation. Public support made a big difference in those studies as they do for many scholars. I had veterans benefits, for which I am deeply grateful. I had other Federal Government support for my graduate work. I am deeply appreciative that the public had invested in the promise of my career and in turn my career as a scholar, as a teacher and as a public official has been shaped by a conviction that I was charged with a public responsibility. If the NEH is afforded the resources it needs to support new generations of scholars and teachers, I can attest that they too will repay the investment for a lifetime. The humanities are essential in their own right but they are also essential partners for economic and scientific progress and for our national security. Let me give one quick illustration. General David Petraeus holds a PhD in political science. He recently received one of the highest honors in the American Political Science Association for his career. In his remarks, he emphasized that national security is a humanities problem. He emphasizes the study of humanities for young officers around him, urging they know and study history, language, and local cultures in order to meet our contemporary national security challenges. With its broad mission, the NEH is the focal point for national attention on the role the humanities can play for the Nation, aligning scholarship and teaching with preservation and public engagement. In framing this mission, NEH Chairman Jim Leach has described the leadership role of the NEH in two important ways: that it builds infrastructure for ideas, just as we do at the National Science Foundation and with other research agencies, and it leads in the democratization of ideas, expanding scholarly knowledge of our history and culture in ways that are shared with active public engagement. We are grateful for the strong bipartisan support that this subcommittee has shown the NEH in the past, and we hope you will consider the strongest possible support for it in 2012. [The statement of Michael Brintall follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.036 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.037 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.038 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.039 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for your testimony. We will certainly look at that. As I have said many times, I am a fan of the NEH and the NEA and sometimes they need defending. I am interested, though, that you were a political science major and David Petraeus was. I was a political science major in college when I first went and I did not know what to do with political science, how I was going to make a living, so ultimately I went into dentistry and look at where I ended up. Mr. Brintall. I am glad it stuck. Mr. Simpson. It is kind of strange. You wanted to be an urban planner. My first job in politics, I was on the city council, a local city council, and you are right, that is where the rubber hits the road, and someone once advised me, if you are ever going to do anything else in politics, you have to get off the city council because if you are there long enough, you are going to make everybody mad. Thank you for being here today. We appreciate your testimony. Next we have Ken Burns, who probably needs no introduction, a famous award-winning documentary filmmaker. Just this last weekend on PBS they had your Civil War series on again that they were reshowing. It is one of the first series I ever bought when it first came out because it was such a great--if you were not a student of the Civil War before that series, you certainly made a lot of students across the country of the Civil War. And also, thank you for your series on the national parks. It is very important, and I have talked with the National Park Service and others, that we teach future generations about our national parks, where they came from and why they are there because they really are the crown jewels. So thank you for being here today. ---------- -- -------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS KEN BURNS, AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY FILMMAKER Mr. Burns. It is my pleasure, Mr. Chairman, and I thank you for the tremendous honor of having the opportunity to spend a few minutes with you today. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Mr. Burns. Let me say from the outset, as a film producer but also a father of four daughters increasingly concerned about the too-often-dangerous landscape of our popular culture that I am a passionate, lifelong supporter of the NEH and its unique role in helping to stitch our exquisite and often fragile culture together and in helping to foster creativity and scholarship and transmission of the best of that culture to future generations. Few institutions provide such a direct grassroots way for our citizens to participate in the shared glories of their common past, in the power of the priceless ideals that have animated our remarkable republic and our national life for more than 200 years and in the inspirational life of the mind and the heart that an engagement with the arts and humanities always provides. It is my wholehearted belief that anything that threatens this institution weakens our country. It is as simple as that. For more than 30 years, I have been producing historical documentary films celebrating the special messages American history continually directs our way. The subjects of these films range from the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge and the Statue of Liberty to the life of the turbulent Southern demagogue Huey Long, from the graceful architecture of the Shakers to the history of our national parks, from the sublime pleasures and unexpected lessons of our national pastime and jazz to the searing, transcendent experiences of the Civil War and the second World War, from biographies on Thomas Jefferson and Lewis and Clark to Frank Lloyd Wright, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Mark Twain. I even made a film on the history of this magnificent Capitol building and the much- maligned institution that is charged with conducting the people's business. Mr. Simpson. That would be the Senate. Mr. Burns. Throughout my professional life, I have been fortunate to work closely with the National Endowment for nearly every film that I have done. I first received an NEH grant in 1979 as I embarked on my first project for public television, that same film about the Brooklyn Bridge. At this very early stage of my professional life, the experience of competing successfully for an NEH grant helped me set high standards of excellence in filmmaking but also writing and scholarship and even budgeting. Over the years, I would apply many times to the NEH for support under a variety of projects; working with NEH staff and humanities scholars assigned to the projects ensured that my projects stayed true to rigorous intellectual standards and reached a broad, receptive audience of tens of millions of Americans. This interaction has been a powerful influence on my work. Without a doubt, my films would not have been made without the endowments. My series on the Civil War, for instance, would not have been possible without early and substantial support from the NEH, support, Mr. Chairman, which I have long ago repaid. The NEH provided one of the project's largest grants, more than a third of its budget, thereby attracting other funders. This rigorously earned imprimatur helped me to convince private foundations, corporations and other public funders that my films were worthy of their support. But above and beyond these facts, there is a larger argument to be made, one that is rooted in our Nation's history. Since the beginning of this country, our government has been involved in supporting the arts and the diffusion of knowledge, which was deemed as critical to our future as roads and dams and bridges. Early on, Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers knew that the pursuit of happiness did not mean a hedonistic search for pleasure in the marketplace of things but an active involvement of the mind in the higher aspects of human endeavor, namely education, music, the arts and history, a marketplace of ideas. Congress supported the journey of Lewis and Clark as much to explore the natural, biological, ethnographic and cultural landscape of our expanding Nation as to open up a new trading route to the Pacific. Congress supported numerous geographical, artistic, photographic and biological expeditions to nearly every corner of the developing West. Congress funded through the Farms Security Administration the work of Walker Evans and Dorothea Lange and other great photographers who captured for posterity the terrible human cost of our Depression and Dust Bowl, the latter project I am working on that just received a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. With Congress's great insight, NEH was born and grew to its startlingly effective maturity, echoing the same time-honored sense that our government has an interest in helping to sponsor communication, art and education just as it sponsors commerce. We are not talking about a free ride but a priming of the pump, a way to get the juices flowing, a collaboration between the government and the private sector, which if you will permit me, reminds me of a story. In the late 1980s, I was invited to a reception at the White House and had the great honor of meeting President Ronald Reagan. I told him I was a PBS producer working on a history of the Civil War. His eyes twinkled with a palpable delight as he recalled watching as a young boy the parades of ever-aging Union veterans marching down the main street of Dixon, Illinois, on successive Fourth of Julys. Then in almost an admonishment, he spoke to me about the need, no, the responsibility, he said, for a private sector-governmental partnership when it came to public broadcasting and the humanities. His Administration, by the way, as you know, was very supportive of these longstanding institutions. I told him that nearly a third of my budget for the Civil War series came from a large American corporation, a third from private foundations and a third from the National Endowment for the Humanities, an agency then expertly led by Lynne Cheney, the wife of our former Vice President. He smiled and held me by the shoulders the way an affectionate uncle might do and his eyes twinkled again. ``Good work,'' he said, ``I look forward to seeing your film.'' And after it was first broadcast in 1990, he sent me the loveliest of notes about how much he and Nancy had enjoyed it. Mr. Chairman, the new proposals to defund or severely cut the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowments for the Humanities and Arts will literally put us, me, out of business, period, and somewhere, I imagine, it will erase that twinkle in Ronald Reagan's eyes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for the chance to express my thoughts this morning. [The statement of Ken Burns follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.040 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.041 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.042 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.043 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, Ken. I appreciate your being here today. Thanks for your testimony. Again, thanks for the great work you have done. You, through the humanities, as you mentioned, have brought a lot of enlightenment and education to the American people. Mr. Burns. Thank you. There has been an argument in film schools about whether films actually got people to do anything, but the increased attendance at Civil War battlefields, the spike in attendance at the national parks after our series was aired after some flatlining or declining attendances is very heartening. There was a round of cuts in the early 1990s that were made in the endowments. We still received significant grants but they represented 5 or 6 percent of our budgets as opposed to a third, and so any further cuts are going to just further jeopardize our ability to communicate these, I think, important shared stories. Mr. Simpson. That is true. There were some significant cuts in the early 1990s, and if you look at it, we are barely getting back up to where we were at that time, let alone the loss that you have had over the years because it has not advanced since that time. And it is something that I know that Mr. Moran when he was chairman of the committee, Mr. Dicks when he was chairman of this committee and now I have all been concerned about and trying to make sure that both the Endowment for the Humanities and the Arts do not suffer those cutbacks that occurred because then it will be years to rebuild it again. So we are trying to do everything we can. As I said, when people come to me and ask where to go in Washington and I tell them go up to Gettysburg, I always tell them you need to either get a book or get the video of the battle to learn just a little bit about it before you go there, and when I say to them, you need to take your shoes off, they look at me kind of strange, and I say just go, you will understand, and they come back and they say I get it. Mr. Burns. And that is why the importance of saving these places and telling these stories is essential to the continuation of our republic. It is strange that the past should ensure our future but that is exactly what takes place when we celebrate these places and these moments. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. Jim. Mr. Moran. I certainly associate my thoughts with those of the chairman, and I want to again publicly thank Chairman Simpson for his advocacy of NEA and NEH in a very difficult period of time. Thank you for all the work you have done, Mr. Burns. Mr. Simpson and I think very similarly, and I have been in a little easier position. I have to tell you this is a good time when the C.R. comes on the Floor today, the reason why we have a much more reasonable level of funding for NEH and NEA is due to this gentleman right here. So he deserves a great deal of credit. And of course, his reward is the kind of product that you produce. So it is terribly important for all Americans to understand their history, understand their culture, and now that we have a sesquicentennial celebration--recognition of the Civil War is hardly a celebration, but your work is again the hallmark, the foundation that others look to for how to depict that. Almost every show I see on the Civil War, whether it is the background music or some of the photos, part of the video, they continue to refer. It is an historical reference today and will serve to be, I suspect, for the 200th recognition. Thank you, and I cannot imagine a better representative of what NEH accomplishes than your work, Mr. Burns. Mr. Burns. I thank you very much, Congressman, for those kind words, and just would repeat again what I said in my testimony which is that it was the initial grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities, fully a third of our budget, that permitted us and that rigorously earned grant to attract the corporate support, to attract the foundation support, and when we disrupt any of that fragile tripod, then we run the risk of losing the whole business. So the continued support now at 6, 7, 8 percent of our budgets is in some ways even more critical. Mr. Moran. You are doing one on the Great Depression, the Dust Bowl? Mr. Burns. We just finished one on Prohibition that enjoyed endowment support, and just have received a grant to complete a film on the Dust Bowl and are working on several other projects that I think will be of interest. Mr. Moran. Thanks, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Mr. Burns. Thank you, sir. Mr. Simpson. Next we have Ed Ayers, President of the University of Richmond, American historian, History Guys radio show personality, Digital Humanities pioneer. Anything else I should add? ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS ED AYERS, PRESIDENT OF UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND, AMERICAN HISTORIAN Mr. Ayers. No, that sounds good. All those are a little generous. As a matter of fact, I think of myself as representing sort of the everyman academic that carries on a large part of what the NEH is trying to do. My eloquent predecessors have said important things. I want to give you an image of 1985, my first NEH grant, $11,500, paid half my salary. I bought a $400 car and drove 12,000 miles from one Motel 6 to another across the American South to write a history of the people in the three generations after emancipation, and it was a finalist for the National Book Award and Pulitzer Prize a little while later. And then five years later, the NEH when nobody else thought there might actually be some use for this crazy World Wide Web thing, then only two or three years old, for education, and they funded something called the ``Valley of the Shadow: Two Communities in the American Civil War,'' about the same time that Ken Burns's series was coming out, and it is still alive 15 years later and it has reached people in Latin America, China. Millions of people every year have gone to this to actually explore history for themselves by seeing all the primary documents on that. And we are now working on a project at the University of Richmond where we are trying to make it possible to visualize what the emancipation of 4 million people actually looked like. You cannot wrap your mind around something the size of continental Europe, when did that happen, how did people become free, and so we are mapping all the progress of the Union armies and where the slave population was, documenting every instance we have of someone becoming free and putting it all in this big database. And you were kind enough to mention our radio show, ``BackStory with American History Guys,'' which just downloaded its millionth podcast, and we have only been on two and a half years, and once again the NEH stepped up when nobody else knew that there might be a market for three guys talking about American history, the issues it raises today. We just did a three-part series on the American Civil War and people called in from all the other United States and actually from abroad, because people want to talk, not just listen or watch. They want to read and discuss those things. And that is the final thing that I am doing, working with the American Library Association and the NEH to put together reading groups that will be in libraries all across the United States from my native Appalachia to the reservations of the West to inner cities all across the country, and there presenting people with the raw materials of what the Civil War was, having them figure it out for themselves. You have heard a lot about leveraging, and that is a point that I would really like to emphasize, NEH stepping up and working with the ALA to make these things possible that would not have happened otherwise. Now, I have another perspective. I was on the National Council of the Humanities starting in 2000, and over the five years I worked on the council, I read hundreds of proposals. Everything that the NEH funds and the range of what they do is really remarkable, from museum installations and television shows to editions of the Founding Fathers and teachers institutes, the amount of imagination and good will just seeing those is both heartening and heartbreaking because not many of those can be funded. This is a very rigorous process. I mean, this is like the NSF or the NIH and the amount of budgeting and documentation are acts of scholarship in themselves, and here people come together with no compensation to judge these. Then the council looked at them all, the chairman, and what I want to emphasize is that the government's money, the people's money is so carefully stewarded. People watch and think what is the return on this, and I had a chance to see what that looks like in the process of actually making. The NEH works in a remarkable way, for it leverages what you have heard about, local initiatives, local curiosity and local investment. The multiplier effect is really impressive. I have seen what it does for schools. I have seen what it does for historical societies. I have seen what it does for libraries and museums. It is a catalyst for the imagination and investment for people throughout the United States. It touches every kind of community. I have gone to tiny, little schoolhouses and talked to people where that would be the only chance they would have to have a book discussion or to talk about Ken Burn's series. The staff of the NEH stretches its dollars as far as they can possibly stretch. Something people do not realize: The United States invented the modern concept of the humanities about 100 years ago. The idea of pulling together all the studies of the human record into one place is an American invention, and from the beginning the idea was that the humanities should be useful rather than ornamental, a very American kind of cast to this, why would you want to understand these things, and very often the answer is, to foster democracy, to connect with a broad range of American people, and the NEH builds on this great tradition. I know we face great challenges including those of budgets, and we all understand the need to examine how those budgets are used. Those who invest in humanities are not asking for a large amount of money in the grand scheme of things but we do help you to sustain what is in fact one of the best investments this country has ever made. I am very grateful for the chance to speak with you today. [The statement of Ed Ayers follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.044 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.045 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for being here. We appreciate your testimony. I agree with you, it is a great investment that we make. Thank you. Mr. Moran. Excellent testimony. Thank you, Mr. Ayers. Next we have--and I am going to mispronounce this, I am sorry--Azar Nafisi. Is that right? Ms. Nafisi. Yes. Mr. Simpson. You are next. Thank you. Mr. Moran. I have actually read her book. Mr. Simpson. She is the author of ``Reading Lolita in Tehran.'' Ms. Nafisi. Yes, and I had the honor and pleasure of being with Congressman Moran when he defended culture in Iranian youth in Aspen Institution. Mr. Simpson. All right. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS AZAR NAFISI, IRANIAN EMIGRE AND AUTHOR OF ``READING LOLITA IN TEHRAN'' Ms. Nafisi. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman and Congressman Moran for giving me this rare privilege and opportunity to tell you why from the moment I left my country of birth, Iran, and came to this country I discovered the National Endowment for Humanities is a natural home for, and because I have this unique experience of living in a country where its government from its very inception 30 years ago, the Islamic Republic, waged an all-out war against individual rights and human rights in terms of an all-around assault on women, minorities and culture and alongside of it, it declared war on humanities, on culture, on imagination as sort of a part of Western conspiracy and cultural invasion by the West, especially at that time you had the honor of being the great Satan, especially invasion by America, the great Satan. And you know, in 2009, before Egypt, before Tunisia, before Libya when hundreds of thousands of Iranian people came into the streets to protest the rigged presidential elections, the assault again turned to humanities. They said that this was a Western conspiracy to lead our people astray and so they shot down all the humanities. They threatened to shut down all the humanities departments at the universities, and for all practical purposes, they have almost done that. So I often wonder when we think of Iran, we immediately think of Mr. Ahmadinejad with this sort of cynical grin, you know, as if he has just broken the neighbor's window and gotten away with it, but, you know, if you look at it through the alternative eyes of imagination, through the alternative eyes of culture, through the alternatives eyes of history, we discover not our differences but how the Iranian and the American people have in fact in common, a country with 3,000 years' history, a country that had the first constitutional revolution in Asia, a country with its women like Sojourner Truth, like Harriet Beecher Stowe, like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, for over 100 years ago fought for their rights. At the time of the revolution in 1979, Iranian women were active in all walks of life. We had two women ministers, one minister for women's affairs. My own mother was one of the first women who went into the congress in 1963, 11 years before Switzerland had given women the right to vote. So what I am trying to say, and you might say, okay, you know, what does all this have to do with humanities. I want to tell you that humanities was the first victim alongside of all this. They lowered the age of marriage from 18 to 9. They brought punishment of stoning to death for what they called the crimes of adultery and prostitution. They also excised Olive Oyl from most of the scenes in Popeye because you did not know that she was a loose woman and she was having an illicit relationship. In the same manner, they took Ophelia out of most scenes of the Russian version of Hamlet for the same reason. So you see, for me, before I came into this great country, I had already made my home through the first book that I read from America was the Wizard of Oz and Huck Finn which is still my companion and Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln and Emerson, who translated the two classics of Iranian literature, and Walt Whitman and Saul Bellow. When my children, who had watched the forbidden videos of Marx Brothers and Laurel and Hardy, when they came to this country they had already felt that home and you can see why National Endowment for Humanities was really my home. It was a place where I felt that I can continue to be part of this great country and at the same time be a citizen of the world. Like millions of people, sir, I came to this country not to fill my pockets, not to make money. I came to this country because it was founded on a dream, because it was founded on this courage to believe that what is imagined can also be actualized. You know, I think of the monuments in this great city. I think of the three monuments to the three Presidents who talked about to be enlightened means to join the great republic of humans, of Jefferson, whose Library of Congress reflects the ideals of the Declaration of Independence, of Lincoln, whose language is filled with the poetry of the Bible and Shakespeare and of Martin Luther King who on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial reignited the dream, the passion for that dream and gave his life in order to make it possible. I think of the women's movement. I think of the civil rights movement. And when I think of all of this, I think how could they be possible without our love of humanities. They tell me that at a time of economic crisis we should not talk about this. At times of economic crisis, this is what really we should be talking about, the unity, the identity, the cohesiveness, the pride of American people regardless of what ideology or political party they belong to is in this legacy and in this heritage, and that is why I want my children and my children's children to be brought up in a place where they can be both a citizen of this great country and a citizen of this world. And so for me--and I am going to finish very fast, sir, if you allow me. I brought two watches in order to finish fast and I still did not make it. So let me just go very fast. I wrote my dissertation on the proletarian writers of the 1930s, so I know that at a time of crisis, in fact through writers' projects, through federal arts projects, we might not have been able to give too much money to humanities but we certainly respected them and put them at the forefront of the struggle against the economic and political crisis, and that is what we need to do, and that is why I will read from this and end. The work of National Endowment for Humanities is vital because it keeps open the channels of debate, questioning and curiosity, because it keeps alive what we might call the democratic imagination, and now more than ever it is important for Americans to focus on our Nation's poetry and its poetic soul, on the dream that brought this Nation together to be reminded of this country's great cultural heritage. What more suitable representation of the people who came to this land from all parts of the world, bringing with them the customs and cultures of their countries of birth, hoping to create a home that can embody them all. So, sir, it is in this spirit that I ask you to ratify the budget for the National Endowment for Humanities. Thank you for your patience. [The statement of Azar Nafisi follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.046 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.047 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.048 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.049 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thank you for your testimony and for your eloquence. Ms. Nafisi. It is a pleasure. This will be my home, and this is why I am here. If it were not for Mark Twain, I do not know where I would be. Mr. Simpson. Thank you very much. We appreciate it. Jim? Mr. Moran. Yes, extraordinarily compelling statement. Thank you so much, and I think anybody listening to you understands why they really ought to read ``Reading Lolita in Teheran.'' It is so insightful. Ms. Nafisi. Thank you, sir, and I tell you, your best weapon against tyranny is not military but it is the culture of democracy, and people in Iran are going to jail and being tortured because they read Saul Bellow and Walt Whitman, so I think our children here should take a lesson from that. Mr. Moran. I wish they would. Thank you so much. Mr. Simpson. You cannot leave the room, though, until, I had a staff member that wants you to sign her book. Next we have Mark Hofflund, who is a friend of mine. I would hate to follow her. Mr. Hofflund. I tell you, Mr. Chairman, I am the son of a woman with dual citizenship. I lost her. She passed away about a year ago. And I think I heard her voice today for the first time in your testimony, so I am incredibly moved. Ms. Nafisi. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Well, thank you for being here, Mark. As you heard me say before when we were talking about the Civil War, that when people from Idaho come out to Washington they ask me where to go and I always say Gettysburg, they need to go up there and see it. Well, if any of you come to Idaho from Washington, you need to go to the Idaho Shakespeare Festival. Mark is the Managing Director of it, and we have been friends for many years and he does a fantastic job and really, summer in Boise would not be the same without the Shakespeare Festival and the work you do. He has also been on the National Endowment for the Arts Council, and we appreciate that, and thanks for being here today, Mark. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. ARTS AND HUMANITIES WITNESS MARK HOFFLUND, MANAGING DIRECTOR, IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL Mr. Hofflund. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Moran, members of the subcommittee, good morning. As Managing Director of Idaho Shakespeare Festival, Chair of the Idaho Commission on the Arts, and a board member of the National Assembly of State Arts Agencies, I wish to testify on behalf of the National Endowment for the Arts requesting $167.5 million in level funding, and to share a story you made possible. While this is an Idaho story, similar stories are found in every state. My opportunity emerged when the chairman of the NEA paid a visit to Idaho strengthening the Nation's first ongoing infrastructure for the arts, not the arts historically had been missing from our Nation. Things of beauty, culture, science, art and imagination were so ingrained in the Founders, some would say the pursuit of happiness articulated this common appreciation right after life and liberty. As for legislative infrastructure dating to the Founders, imagine for a moment what it may have been like to sign a Declaration of Independence, declare war, wage war, elect a decade of forgotten presidents under Articles of Confederation before ratifying a Constitution and electing a reluctant George Washington, not an easy first decade and one with great challenges ahead. So under the circumstances, it could seem remarkable for the founders to leave a few thoughts on the arts. Perhaps a vision for the future was provided by George Washington in words now reaching down centuries: ``The arts and sciences are essential to the prosperity of the state and to the ornament and happiness of human life. They have a primary claim to the encouragement of every lover of his country and mankind.'' In retrospect, the history of the United States is replete with public investments in art and architecture. In our day, another great general having led us through World War II signed legislation creating the National Cultural Center Act commemorated in the naming of the Kennedy Center's Eisenhower Theater. In the 1960s with the Nation enduring civil unrest not seen in a century, President Johnson created and President Nixon funded the National Endowment for the Arts. With cities smoldering, leaders being assassinated, college students rioting, some getting killed by the public servants meant to protect them, a Cold War heating up, despite all this, Roger Stevens founded and the second chairman Nancy Hanks grew the NEA in both reputation and funding, ever mindful that in dollar comparisons to our national needs for defense, for poverty programs, for health, for welfare or for education, the requirements for the arts are miniscule, as Ms. Hanks wrote. During civil famine, the seeds of a federal-state arts infrastructure sprouted like spring wheat when 55 state and territorial arts agencies began receiving grants from the NEA, and when governors and legislatures took this as incentive to multiply the funding and steer not only new cultural opportunities but greater decision-making to the regional and local levels. President Carter, Chairman Biddle and Congress strengthened the federal-state partnership, developing federal recognition of American artists through the National Heritage Awards. President Reagan, Chairman Hodsoll and Congress established the NEA Jazz Masters, the National Medal of Arts, the Mayor's Institute on City Design and a groundbreaking study on arts education called Toward Civilization. As Reagan said, we honor the arts not because we want monuments to our own civilization but because we are a free people. With this history, three succeeding Presidents, their NEA leaders and Congress navigated the most perilous times at the NEA and emerged in all three cases with an arts budget on the rise and an increasing federalism. Not only would Jane Alexander visit all 50 states under President Clinton but Dana Gioia would spend as much time traveling domestically and abroad as he spent in Washington, D.C., strategically improving the NEA under George W. Bush with reciprocal support from Congress. As Bush and Gioia left office, not only was Congress funding the NEA at greater levels and with stronger Congressional support but its opponents had changed their minds about the agency as Gioia worked throughout federal and state government to catalyze the development of artistic excellence and accessibility for millions of younger Americans, thousands of educators, scores of journalists, members of the military and their families, towns and cities across America which libraries, newspapers, schools, civic organizations, businesses and a broad section of citizen volunteers collaborated in programs ranging from the Big Read to Poetry Out Loud to Operational Homecoming to Shakespeare in American Communities, ultimately reversing a three-decade decline in American literary participation. With equality and excellence, Gioia formed partnerships in every Congressional district. The NEA is about public engagement, public education, public excellence. It neither enforces public values nor entitles public goods. It is a rare public infrastructure for which cost may be an object but not a specific requirement. The more we provide, the better we all become. In the hands of good public servants from all walks of life, it functions like the biblical talents that when not buried can be used to return manifold wealth, prosperity and national growth. Transcending factionalism, it is not about Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians or any other vein past or yet to come of the American spectrum, it is about how all of us of all faiths, backgrounds and politics best practice a culturally diverse and politically united federalism. Finally, it returns us to the roots of our Founders as an essential emblem of creating a system of self-government. We are amid such defining times today. The marks of our success will be seen in how we separate federal chaff from federal wheat and thereby fill the storehouse for future generations not with federal deficit but with federal bounty. I would humbly submit that the NEA is an agency of federal bounty and that with continued funding, thank you, Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member for your actions of the past week, people not only from Idaho, indeed, from all over America will help you fill the storehouse. Thank you, sir. [The statement of Mark Hofflund follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.050 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.051 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.052 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.053 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, Mark, for being here today. We appreciate it very much. Thanks for your testimony in support of the NEA and your history of where we have come from and what we have been through with the NEA, so I appreciate it very much. As you know, I am a fan. Mr. Hofflund. We would not be here without you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. And Mr. Moran is the same way. Jim. Mr. Moran. I cannot add to what Mike has said. Not only does he provide words of encouragement, he also walks the walk in terms of getting the money. I know that is why you are here, but these are very extraordinarily articulate and meaningful statements. We thank you. Mr. Hofflund. Thank you, sir. I will tell you that I come here at my own expense, and I am staying with a former Congressman from my district, a great admirer of you, and he asked me to please give you his highest regards, Representative Orville Hanson. He is letting me stay with him while I am in Washington, D.C. Mr. Simpson. Well, thanks for being here, and we will see you at the Shakespeare Festival. Next we have Elena Daly, Vice President of DC Affairs, Public Lands Foundation. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. BLM, PUBLIC LANDS, WILD HORSES WITNESS ELENA DALY, VICE PRESIDENT FOR DC AFFAIRS, PUBLIC LANDS FOUNDATION Ms. Daly. Good morning. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We at PLF would like to thank you for the opportunity to present your committee with our views regarding the Bureau of Land Management's budget request for fiscal year 2012. As a national nonprofit organization comprised principally of retired but still dedicated BLM employees, the PLF has a unique body of experience and expertise in the realm of natural resource management, and as retirees, we believe we offer an objective and non-bureaucratic solution to some issues, although I am feeling very bureaucratic after listening to the last very articulate panel. We support BLM and its programs but we are independent in our views and our requests, and we strive to improve the effectiveness of BLM by encouraging professionalism in its employees and increasing both public understanding and proper scientific management of public lands. Some of the most significant management challenges for the BLM stem from, as you know, particularly with Boise, rapid growth and population development in the West, the urbanization issue, and we find that with this urbanization comes increased demands on the public lands, not only for recreation but for traditional uses and products as well, and this really complicates an agency with a mission as diverse as the Bureau of Land Management. The public lands provide the Nation with opportunities for expanding the development of renewable energy as well as traditional needs for oil, natural gas, coal, non- energy minerals, grazing land and timber. Recreation, wildlife, wild horses, cultural resources and special places are also significant attributes of those lands. Management activities for BLM contribute to the vitality of state and local economies, generating an expected $4.5 billion in revenues for 2012, mostly from energy development. We also recognize that the Nation is facing some real challenges as you all look at budgets and need, and in that light, we are pleased at several of the aspects of the overall budget request. In particular, we are pleased to see increases for the National Landscape Conservation System and the processes associated with the restoration of abandoned mine lands. The NLCS is a compilation of unique and incredible landscapes designated for outstanding cultural, ecological and scientific values and range from red rock deserts, rocky coasts, deep river canyons and high mountains and arctic tundra. Management of this particular group of lands has long been underfunded. We believe the AML fee combined with the proposed budget increase will provide a process to begin reclaiming both the safety and environmental hazards that remain after 150 years of hardrock mining on millions of acres in the West. We are also pleased to see increases for land acquisition, renewable energy, the Secretary's Cooperative Landscape Conservation Initiative and Youth in the Great Outdoors, and we support the budget proposals to recoup the costs of inspection and enforcement activities for mineral leases from new fees. We are also pleased to see the Secretary's proposal to eliminate the sunset date for the Federal Land Transition Facilitation Act and to allow lands identified in newer BLM land-use plans as suitable for disposal. However, we do have a couple of concerns. One is in land- use planning. Land-use planning for BLM is foundational to decision-making. A reduction in monies to provide up-to-date plans hampers on-the-ground management because you do not have the latest information at the very time when the West is developing so rapidly. The reduction of $8.2 million in this program will have lasting impact on those lands administered by the bureau. Land-use planning is the primary tool we have for effecting long-term decision-making and giving up that opportunity gives us some concern. Alaska Conveyance--the reduction of $17 million from this program will be devastating to the BLM and Alaska and to the U.S. government's commitment to that state, to the native corporations and to individual allottees who have been waiting now over 40 years to have these land issues resolved. This would result in a 20 percent reduction in land transfer capability and a reduction in force and the loss of many of the 638 survey contracts that go to native peoples in Alaska. And everybody's favorite, wild horses and burros. We are pleased that the Administration has requested sufficient funds to support the efforts for this program but are concerned about the unsolvable issues that continue to haunt the efforts at management. We would like to see Congress step in at some point to address this through legislation so that the problems can be surmounted. We would like to see the differing opinions, whether it is the wild horse advocates, the government, ranchers, whomever those people may be, come together and really talk about what is manageable in this program and what makes sense. The funding for long-term maintenance is just not sustainable. So we hope these comments and concerns assist you. We appreciate the time and your attention. Thank you very much. [The statement of Elena Daly follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.054 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.055 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.056 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, Elena. We appreciate that. And you are right, there are several problems we have got to address, and we appreciate you being here and pointing those out. Thank you. Jim. Mr. Moran. Yes, just to thank Ms. Daly as well. She did not mention it, but she headed the National Landscape Conservation System. But we want to thank you for your leadership in that area. Mr. Simpson. Next, we have Brady Robinson, the Executive Director of Access Fund, Outdoor Alliance. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. OUTDOOR ALLIANCE WITNESS BRADY ROBINSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE ACCESS FUND, OUTDOOR ALLIANCE Mr. Robinson. Hi. Mr. Simpson. How are you doing today? Mr. Robinson. I am good. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, honorable members of the committee, and Mr. Moran, thank you for this opportunity to talk to you today. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Mr. Robinson. My name is Brady Robinson, and I am the executive director of the Access Fund. We are the national nonprofit organization dedicated to climbing and mountaineering access and conservations on the climber. We are also a founding member of the Outdoor Alliance, which is a coalition of six national member-based organizations devoted to the conservation and stewardship of our Nation's public lands and waters through responsible human-powered outdoor recreation. The Outdoor Alliance represents the interests of millions of Americans who hike, paddle, climb, mountain bike, ski, and snowshoe on our Nation's public lands and waters. Our collective direct membership is over 100,000 and we have a network of 1,400 clubs covering every state in the country. I have personally dedicated my career to getting people in the outdoors. Before coming in the Access Fund, I spent over a decade working for Outward Bound. And through my interactions with thousands of Outward Bound students, I have personally witnessed the transformation and rejuvenation that occurs when people--particularly young people--have the opportunity to unplug and connect with the outdoors. The Outdoor Alliance has extensive experience working with federal land managers across the country concerning recreation and conservation policies. Our experience shows that adequate funding for the Park Service, the Forest Service, and the BLM is required to support public access to these public lands and rivers. And while federal land managers are currently integrating recreation, conservation, and restoration programs to more effectively manage our public lands for the benefit of all Americans, it is clear that budget cuts to these agencies would mean less access to and less conservation out of our public land. Underfunded and understaffed land managers, when forced to make resource protection and visitor use decisions are more likely to close or highly restrict public access. And this problem concerns not only Outdoor Alliance members but also hunters and anglers and other user groups. My organization, the Access Group, is seen as dynamic at numerous locations across the country such as Williamson Rock and Angeles National Forest, Christmas Tree Pass at the Lake Mead National Recreation area and Castle Rocks in Idaho at the BLM Burley Field office. The Outdoor Alliance believes that with the guidance and momentum of the America's Great Outdoors Initiative, the agencies are poised, if adequately funded, to enhance the public enjoyment of high quality public lands and waters like never before. Nationwide active outdoor recreation contributes $730 billion annually to the U.S. economy and supports nearly 6.5 million jobs. Mr. Chairman, according to the Outdoor Industry Association, active outdoor recreation supports 37,000 jobs in Idaho, generates $154 million in annual state tax revenue, and produces $2.2 billion annually in retail sales and services across Idaho. That is more than five percent of the gross state product. We endorse a budget that will support this segment of our economy and adequately fund the Department of Interior and Department of Agriculture, activities that provide adequate outdoor recreation access to public lands and waters. And we offer specific budget recommendations for fiscal year 2012, which can be found in my written testimony. As an example of what can happen to public access when agencies have inadequate funding, look to the Red River Gorge in the Daniel Boone National Forest. Located in southwestern Kentucky, the Red River Gorge contains one of the largest concentrations of high-quality climbable rock in the United States and attracts visitors from around the world. However, the Forest Service does not have the resources to balance all its obligations and still provide for the proper management of these world-class climbing opportunities. Inadequate funding for environmental assessments has prevented the Forest Service from stewarding existing recreational sites and opening new sites. The Forest Service is unable to assess areas that are temporarily closed due to cultural and natural use conflicts, which results in de facto long-term closures. Climbers, mountain bikers, and other user groups bring much-needed economic activity to this rural area. Without sufficient funding, the U.S. Forest Service cannot afford to conduct the studies or administer the processes which allow for public access. As a result, would-be users, the local economy, and the natural resources themselves suffer. And unfortunately, this is all too common. The American people need open public lands for recreation in both rural and urban areas for our economy, for our physical, mental, and spiritual health, and to instill an appreciation of our beautiful lands and waters in our children. We at the Access Fund have developed positive working relationships with the agencies but we are not their apologists. We are not interested in big government bureaucracies, excessive regulation, or unneeded services. However, these agencies need basic levels of funding to fulfill their important missions. I can only imagine the incredible pressures that all of you are under to get government spending under control and I appreciate the need for austerity and for discipline. Our recommendations represent the minimum funding level we believe is necessary to keep our Nation's great outdoors open and stewarded for the benefit of the American people Thank you, Mr. Chairman and committee members, for the opportunity to appear before you today. And I stand ready to answer any questions you might have. [The statement of Brady Robinson follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.057 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.058 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.059 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.060 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. We appreciate your testimony and the work you do. Mr. Robinson. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Jim---- Mr. Moran. Another graduate of Outward Bound, which hails-- Senator Mark Udall, a former colleague, is one of your alumni I guess and the most prominent. It is a great program. Mr. Robinson. Yes. He has been very supportive. Mr. Moran. Yeah. Mr. Robinson. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Next, we have Bill Chandler, Vice President of Government Affairs for the Marine Conservation Biology Institute. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. MARINE CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE WITNESS BILL CHANDLER, VICE PRESIDENT FOR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, MARINE CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE Mr. Chandler. Good morning, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. Good morning. How are you doing? Mr. Chandler. It is a pleasure to be here, Moran, Members of the subcommittee. I represent Marine Conservation Biology Institute. It is a nonprofit conservation organization based in the Seattle, Washington area. We have been involved in the conservation of our Pacific islands and Pacific island territory since 2005. I would like to emphasize to the subcommittee that when President Bush created the four national rain monuments out there that he did during his term, he significantly increased the responsibilities of the Fish and Wildlife Service. The service now has lead responsibility or sole responsibility for about 225,000 additional square miles. Altogether, these monuments have increased the size of the refuge system by about one- third, which is sort of a startling number except, you know, they do not have billions of hunters and fishermen trying to get into the refuges out there, but it is a very large area. These monuments are home to millions and millions of seabirds, rare and abundant corals, some endangered species, and in essence they represent a beacon of what pristine ecosystems are supposed to look like for other nations of the world that are trying to restore their own highly damaged coral island systems throughout the Pacific. In other words, this is a great benchmark--and there are not many left--to show the world what these natural systems really look like and how they are supposed to function. To adequately meet its responsibilities, we estimate that the Service needs an additional $18 million but I am not going to ask for all of that today. This would allow them to do several things that are not happening right now--for example, to hire adequate management personnel, to develop plans for the monuments which are, I should point out, two years behind. They have already missed their deadline date for having the management plans prepared along with NOAA. It would enable them to procure transportation to get out to these islands. They need to keep developing plans and implementing them to restore a lot of the damage that occurred on the islands in the past from military occupations during World War II. And they need to keep the Midway Airfield open and maintained because Congress directed that they do that a number of years ago. And finally, they have to provide enforcement to these areas, consulting with the Coast Guard and NOAA in order to make sure that illegal fishing does not occur in our waters. And there is a problem in that regard. I should also say that the 18 million estimated need does not cover any damages associated with the tsunami that swept over some of these places like Midway. We are recommending in 2012 a funding level of about 9.03-- or just let us round it off to $9 million--for just the monument activities of the Service out there. And this level of funding would provide an additional $.5 million for Midway operations, which they need, and the rest would cover the following: managers for two of the monuments that do not have them now, a public planner so that they can get these management plans teed up and done, continued invasive species removal work at a 2 or 300,000 level, and most important--and what I want to emphasize this morning above all else--is travel cost to get a contractor bidding party out to two islands in the remote islands monument to prepare bids to give estimates on what it would take to get two shipwrecks off those reefs. And the problem with the shipwrecks is that they are not just sitting there. They are leaching iron. The iron is causing the explosive growth of a couple of nuisance species which are killing corals. And at Palmyra Island alone the Fish and Wildlife Service several years ago documented 250 acres of pristine corals have been killed and they are going to keep dying until they get these shipwrecks out and remove the source of the leaching iron. I have some pictures that I think most graphically show the subcommittee what has been going on there and I will give--you can just flip through these really quickly. The first one is the wreck that showed up on Kingman in 2007. It is now disintegrated and its iron parts, as I mentioned, are leaching iron into the Kingman Reef area. The second picture you see shows the Palmyra wreck, and all of that dark blue area in the field is where the corallimorph has taken over and killed the corals. And it is spreading. The next photo shows what the corallimorph looks like. It is an anemone-like species that has basically eliminated the natural corals that are there. And then finally, another shot of the devastation that is occurring. I will also point out to the subcommittee that the Fish and Wildlife Service has been aware of this problem for a number of years but has failed to act. Inaction means more corals are going to die and these monuments are going to be further degraded. We frankly find this unacceptable and we hope that the committee will give serious consideration to spurring meaningful action on this matter this year. And my conclusion after studying this for quite a bit is that the first thing that we need to do is we need to spend $60,000 or so to have the Fish and Wildlife Service fly out a team of salvage contractors so that they can go to the wrecks, figure out what it is going to take, and give the Fish and Wildlife Service an honest estimate about what it would take to move these wrecks. In conclusion, I would say that overall the Fish and Wildlife Service needs more resources to deal with their added responsibilities out here. These places are important even though people do not live on most of them. And we would hope that this would receive favorable consideration by the subcommittee. That concludes my testimony and I would be happy to answer any questions regarding this particular issue or any issue out there. [The statement of Bill Chandler follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.061 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.062 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.063 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.064 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for your testimony. I am sorry I had to step out for just a second, but it is an interesting subject that quite honestly I had not spent a lot of time thinking about. So I appreciate you bringing it to our attention. Mr. Chandler. You are quite welcome. I realize that deep blue water is not a big thing that the Fish and Wildlife Service has dealt with before, but now they have to because they have been mandated to do so by four presidential proclamations. Mr. Simpson. There is not a lot of deep blue water near Idaho. I appreciate it. Mr. Chandler. Well, you will have to get them to take you out to Midway---- Mr. Simpson. Yeah. Mr. Chandler [continuing]. Mr. Simpson. That is a fabulous trip and it will really give you real appreciation of what is going on out there and what the needs are. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. Jim, do you have anything? Mr. Moran. Just that $900 million is a lot of money. But thank you for your testimony. Mr. Chandler. Well, the 900 is for the whole refuge system---- Mr. Moran. I understand. Mr. Chandler [continuing]. Not for the monuments, sir. Mr. Moran. Right. Yeah. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Next, we have Barbara King, private citizen, BLM Land Transfers. ---------- -- -------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. BLM LAND TRANSFERS WITNESS BARBARA KING, PRIVATE CITIZEN, BLM LAND TRANSFERS Ms. King. Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you very much for the opportunity to testify this morning. My name is Barb King and I am here to testify against funding the BLM Land Exchange program until land exchange regulations regarding public notification in 43 C.F.R. Part 2200 are revised and written in plain English according to President Obama's Executive Order 13583 and the Plain Writing Act of 2010, sponsored by Congressman Moran. Based on personal experience, I speak unofficially for two groups of landowners whose property values are at risk because regulations do not specifically require mailing them BLM formal notices of an exchange. The Notice of Exchange Proposal informs the public that an exchange has progressed beyond the feasibility stage and the Notice of Decision announces the approval of an exchange in the public comment period. Interior Secretary Salazar should explain to this subcommittee why adjacent landowners to BLM properties proposed for disposal and all prospective end owners of the BLM land known to an exchange facilitator are not considered ``appropriate'' to notify in the regulations Subpart 2201 and also why BLM land managers ignore the BLM land exchange handbook, especially chapters four, five, seven, and nine relating to this notification issue. Adding these two groups of people to BLM's notification list by regulation would end the Department of Interior's systemic lack of transparency about this issue and would be in keeping with Secretary Salazar's 82-page Open Government Plan. Because of this troubling 2009 Government Accountability Office report on the program, #09-611, Congressional House Resolution 111-80 directed the Secretary to ensure that BLM's national land exchange team documents in the exchange case file the full disclosure of facilitators' contracts and related agreements. Showing his indifference to the directive, the Secretary simply reissued to BLM field officers the existing unenforceable full disclosure policy in the handbook. Failure to notify all of these parties will perpetuate BLM's longstanding problem with appraisals when a patentee resells the former BLM land at a profit at the expense of the Federal Government and other landowners. Given the news stories, the GAO reports, departmental reorganizations, and congressional inquiries for over a decade, Secretary Salazar should take every step possible to improve this program. Clearly enforcing the full disclosure policy is one of them. Since the Secretary will not do that, it should be required by regulation and the team made accountable for enforcing it. Specifically, the team should document that all prospective end owners were added to the BLM's mailing list, they were listed on appraisal request forms, the appraiser offered them equal opportunity to attend site inspections, and they received the Notice of Decision. All of this is necessary to ensure accurate appraisals, fair return to taxpayers, and a protection of private property values. I respectfully encourage members of this subcommittee and all Congressmen and Senators who advocate for land exchanges to read the GAO and House Appropriations Committee reports and then read Secretary Salazar's response to them. Having done that, I believe you will support legislation requiring these revisions. As long as this program is run with contempt for public inquiry and congressional scrutiny, it should not be funded. And that is the opinion of a taxpayer when we are looking at asking taxpayers in 50 states to fund projects in 8 states. Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you so much for this opportunity. [The statement of Barbara King follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.065 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.066 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. You posed some interesting questions that I do not have the answer to, obviously. Mr. Moran. Mr. Moran. No, I agree. Mr. Simpson. We will pose those questions to the right people. Ms. King. Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. Thank you for your testimony. Next, we have Madeleine Pickens, founder of Saving America's Mustangs. Welcome, Madeleine. ---------- -- -------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. SAVING AMERICA'S MUSTANGS WITNESS MADELEINE PICKENS, FOUNDER, SAVING AMERICA'S MUSTANGS Ms. Pickens. Thank you. I am honored, Chairman, to be here, and Congressman Moran. It is really interesting here today listening to everybody and their monuments and Fish and Wildlife. They all have so much. And I am here representing the American mustang. And it is extraordinary that we have to get a life of our own, but I think we are here. And I stand here as an immigrant to the United States. I was born in Iraq. I was fortunate because I dreamed of coming here. I fell in love with America. I used to go to movies with my father and watch westerns and I could not wait to get here. So many of you in this room were born here. You were born rich. You have a great history. I think too many of you have forgotten what it is all about. And so I present to you--I have Chief Arvol Looking Horse, 19th generation keeper of the sacred white buffalo calf pipe of the Lakota, Dakota, Nakota Nation of the Sioux, and his wife Paula, as well as Travis Jackson, Junior. And he represents the Seminole Nation from Oklahoma. We are pleased to be also accompanied by wounded Army veterans Brian Field and Clay Rankin, along with their service dogs Justice and Harley. These are some of our great American heroes. And we have Stacy Dagel here. She represents all of the American citizens who were not able to attend this hearing. And all of these special people have traveled from all over the Nation to be here in support of our wild horses. I am here to realize another dream--on behalf of our American mustang--a permanent home for them called Mustang Monument in Nevada. Wild horses and burros are unfortunately a frustration and management dilemma for the Bureau of Land Management. These wild animals were designated by Congress as living American historical symbols by the Wild Horse and Burro Act, PL 92-195. How have these national living symbols of American history been devalued as less deserving than a national historic stone monument? Why are these wild animals a frustration and dilemma to the Bureau of Land Management? It is because the multiple- use culture of the Agency encourages commercial and political interest to prevail over the interest of wild horses and burros on public lands. I am sure that if our national historic monuments or parks were managed by Bureau of Land Management, these public properties, too, would be subject to short-term commercial and political interest. Through the creation of Mustang Monument, a historic living museum, thousands of wild horses and burros could be managed by the Department of Interior with an emphasis on protection for and public interaction with these magnificent living symbols of American history. Surely this approach is in keeping with the spirit and intent of Congress. A living versus stone historic monument is a difficult concept for management. But both are equally important to sanctify and preserve our American history and culture for future generations of American people. A living monument is the missing key to the proper management of horses and burros removed from HMA areas, Horse Management Areas, which honors the intent and spirit of Congress, as ordered in PL 92-195. Over the course of the past three years, I have had numerous conversations and meetings with Bureau of Land Management Personnel in Washington and Nevada. They all agree the demand for adopting wild horses and burros is inadequate to keep up with animals gathered annually. Fertility control has its place, but it is not slowing the need to gather thousands of animals annually. The cost of confining gathered horses in feedlots is out of control. The living conditions inhumane and the Agency needs millions of dollars more each year to feed the growing herds of wild animals in captivity. And the Agency needs new authority to implement a new solution. So the existing Wild Horse and Burro Program is not sustainable. Every year the program costs the taxpayers millions of dollars more. Every year the Agency gathers thousands of horses which are not adoptable. And every GAO report on the Wild Horse and Burro Program states the same conclusion. The program needs to be fixed. We have broken out the current cost of the BLM program with a significant cost savings with my sanctuary proposal. And I believe you all have that there. With my proposal, the government stands to save $607 million. It is amazing. You know, when you gather these horses off the range and many of them are mares, they are in foal. Those babies are born in captivity. When they are born in captivity, you feed them every day hay and water. They live another 10 to 20 years. You know, people forget that. When they live on the range, they have a shorter life. But that is nature. That is how it is supposed to be. So not only have you gathered them, but you have now guaranteed yourself another 10 to 15 years of looking after them. You have got to do something about it. I have a chart here that you all have that you can take and see. Quite candidly, the leadership within the Department of Interior and Bureau of Land Management feel their hands are tied, tied by the language within the Taylor Grazing Act and Wild Horse and Burro Act. And these fine men and women are waiting for you to provide new direction and authority so they can create these public-private partnerships. Employees within the Bureau of Land Management cannot lobby Congress for this new authority but they sure would like your approval to relax the Taylor Grazing Act and the Wild Horse and Burro Act and create a new opportunity to combine large tracts of public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management with private lands as new homes for the wild horses and burros. I have discussed this plan with the BLM and they agree with the concept. Both Secretary Salazar and Director Bob Abbey have been involved working out the details to ensure the plan is ecologically sound, economically feasible, and socially attainable. And without fail, every western movie I saw as a child always had the same ending. The cowboy would rush in and save the day. It is now in your hands to be the right cowboy and turn this program around. By unanimous decision in 1971 Congress made it clear that the wild horse is an American icon and we call it the American mustang. We have with us and I have right here 72,000 emails and letters from the public stating how horrified they are with what the BLM is doing and asking for a moratorium on the roundups immediately. This volume of letters is exponentially high and needs to be justly delivered to the BLM by way of your ruling. The American public is counting on this Appropriations Committee to take action today and give our mustangs back their right to live on the range. Please remember my website everybody here, SavingAmericasMustangs.org. Join us. We have a huge army of support now and I am delighted to be here today. I know I am talking to the right cowboy. [The statement of Madeleine Pickens follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.067 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.068 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.069 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for being here, Madeleine. You know, we sat in the office and talked about this. There are, as you mentioned, challenges in doing it. The Taylor Grazing Act would need to be changed, a few things like that which this committee cannot do but the Natural Resources Committee is the one that does that work. You point out a true problem that has got to be solved. Ms. Pickens. You know we can solve it. You know we all care about the horse. Unfortunately, it got degraded to nothing. And I think together we can do this. So you know, we were broke two years ago and you came up with billions upon billions of dollars to the banks and handed it out overnight, so I am sure this is a whole lot cheaper to fix. And I have already bought land. I bought land in Nevada. We have got, you know, over half a million acres now. We just need to change it from cattle grazing to horse grazing. So you know, when we all come forward as Americans here, join us. Help us. You are the people with the voice. You can be our John Wayne. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Mr. Moran. Well, thank you, Cowboy Simpson. Ms. Pickens. It is okay. Mr. Moran. As you know, I would love to see your plan work, Ms. Pickens, and I appreciate your tenacity and your dedication to the American mustang. And we will see what we can do. Mr. Jackson. Mr. Moran. Mr. Moran. Yes, sir? Mr. Jackson. Would you honor me to say a few words, please? Mr. Moran. Mr. Simpson is the chair. Mr. Simpson. Briefly, yeah. Mr. Jackson. Okay. My name is Travis Jackson, Junior. One hundred and fifty one years ago our people were moved from the East Coast to now what is Oklahoma. It is a shame that God's creatures, your Bible, does not say anything about, you know, a difference between men. It is just God's creatures. We all have the right to live. We all have the right to survive. One hundred and fifty one years ago, someone else wanted our land and they moved it away from us. We now live in Oklahoma. But our heart is still. We believe in you. We believe in your God. Show us that we are right. Thank you, sir. Thank you very much. Mr. Simpson. Cynthia, did you have---- Mrs. Lummis. You know, I do. And Mrs. Pickens, I know that this is your raison d'etre. But I can tell you that a number of the well-meaning concepts that have been implemented by your group is damaging the grass resource that is the very lifeblood of the mustangs that you so desperately want to help. I come from a state that has a large number of these wild horses, Wyoming, and we are very reverent when it comes to the Pryor Mountain herd and other wild horse lands. But there are so many horses that they are destroying the grass resource and when the grass resource is gone, it is gone not only for the horses but for other species--mankind, elk, deer, buffalo, and other species that are integral to a vibrant ecosystem. These ecosystems are fragile. The topsoil is very thin and these horses that are not native to this land but were brought in and are feral to this land, when they are too numerous, tamp the soil down in a way that requires a change in the way the land is managed. And that is because the horse hoof is a solid hoof. The buffalo, elk, deer hoof is a split hoof. So when you have the native grazers of those lands, which are the elk, deer, buffalo, they knead the soil when they graze and walk. And horses tamp it down. So when the horses are too numerous, when it rains, they are tamping the soil and then the rain runs off. And you can look at studies of grazing ungulates that will show the damage that can be done when wild horses are too numerous. There are places in Wyoming where they are too numerous. So I appreciate your coming forward with solutions as opposed to saying the horse is more sacred than other species; therefore, we want to elevate them above all other species in terms of the management of species. But I would also argue that it is important to address these issues realistically. And the Bureau of Land Management is a land management agency. And they are looking out for the best interests of the land because the land has to be protected in order to be a vibrant resource for all species, native and feral horses as well. So I would be happy to work with you because I think some of the solutions that you have pushed thus far have been detrimental. But I also think that some of the ideas that you have going forward could be helpful. So although you and I disagree somewhat fundamentally on what should be the role of the wild horse in relation to other species, I think we can agree that the current status quo is unacceptable and that there needs to be some changes. And I hope that you would be willing to work with me. Ms. Pickens. I look forward to, actually, if you do not mind I will give you a call and I will come by because I am not quite sure what you are referring to what we do not agree with. So I am delighted to have met you today. And I will call upon you if I may, I would love to chat with you and go over the whole thing because I am very confident that there is always a solution to everything in life. I actually have a statement perpetuating the myth that wild horses are desecrating the public lands. One hundred years ago we had two million horses roaming the plains. Perhaps they could have desecrated the lands there. Today, we are left with probably 20 to 30,000 horses. There is no way, as I fly across this country every week and look below me, there is not enough of them out there to desecrate the land. Some states only have a few hundred. How could they be destroying the lands? In states like Nevada, where nearly half of the wild horses reside, allocate more than 10 to 1 acres for cows versus horses. So yet your horses bear the brunt of the myth about overgrazing and to continue to tell people that they are dying and starving when it is obvious that all gathers that nearly all the horses are in good condition is another one of those overblown statements that does not pass the straight-face test. You know, all this stuff about desecrating the land, I do not know where it came from. I have done so much research. It is just the saddest thing. And that is why I would be willing to fly out there with you and let us spend some time together and get over all of these myths. Mr. Simpson. Well, I appreciate that. And you two get together and work this out if you would because we have used much, much more than the five minutes that was accommodated. Ms. Pickens. We deserved it. Mr. Simpson. Did you have a brief statement you wanted--a brief something you wanted to say? Go ahead. Mr. Looking Horse. I am the keeper of the sacred pipe and we are from the sacred Black Hills, the heart of mother earth. We use horses in our ceremony and we have like proof that the horses were here during the dinosaur time but that we just know that people like ourselves--but we are the first nations here. We have ceremonies. We maintain the environment through our ceremonies, through our sacred sites, and we follow the animal nation. And right now the white animals are showing their sacred color, which is white, and that is why we are coming forth, stepping forward to protect the wild horses, all the horses, because in our ceremonies they are very sacred to our ceremonies and that is why I come here because we need the horses on this sacred land here. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate your testimony today. Next, we have Congressman Dan Burton from Indiana's 5th Congressional District. ---------- Thursday, April 14, 2011. BLM, WILD HORSES WITNESS HON. DAN BURTON, A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF INDIANA Mr. Burton. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, I apologize for my tardiness. I was a little late getting here so I did not hear all of Ms. Pickens' testimony. It is because I had three committee hearings at the same time. And as you know, what we try to do as Members of Congress--and I know you would appreciate this as well--is we try to make sure that Members of Congress can testify as early as possible so that they can make their other obligations in the Congress. Mr. Simpson. Yes, I know. Mr. Burton. And so I am a little disappointed that we were not able to solve that because we have got two governors sitting up in one room I am supposed to question. We have---- Mr. Simpson. Well, I apologize to the gentleman. The schedule was put out earlier. If there had been a conflict that we had known about, we would have made those arrangements. It is hard to interrupt in the middle of the scheduled hearing. But I understand your comments. Mr. Burton. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate them. I will take them into advice. Mr. Burton. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I look forward to the day that you can come before my subcommittee. Let me just say, Mr. Chairman, that there are 37,000 wild horses on BLM lands and more than 30,000 additional horses that are being held in short- and long-term holding facilities. It is costing tons of money. I think it has gone from $20 million a year to a $75 million request by the President this year. And it is going up. And as you know, we have budgetary problems and we are trying to figure out ways to economize. Now the Bureau of Land Management, after you were kind enough to allow us to have an amendment to the H.R. 1 for $2 million, it sent a message to the Bureau of Land Management. And on March the 25th, BLM issued a request for proposals to establish wild horse ecosanctuaries to be established on private lands. Now, it is interesting that Ms. Pickens has been working on this for many years and she proposed this very same program three years ago and the Bureau of Land Management turned a deaf ear and would not even talk to her about that or at least give her a fair hearing on it. And now because we have shone a little light on the subject, they are asking for almost exactly what she was proposing three years ago. She is really concerned about the wild horses and she is more than willing to put her money where her mouth is. She has bought two ranches out there and she has got permits for another 4 or 500,000 acres. And I think she stated very clearly--to answer your questions--that instead of millions of horses like we used to have on the plains, we have just maybe 30, 40,000 out there now. And for them to do damage to the ecosystem stretches credulity. And I know that many of the ranchers and others are very concerned about their cattle and their grazing lands and everything, and I think that is something that should be looked into and should be worked on. But at the same time to put these horses in pens, to move them hundreds and hundreds of miles away from their habitat to these pens and pay up to $2,500 a year per horse to take care of them when Ms. Pickens could do it for much, much less if an agreement could be reached. And in addition, she has indicated she would take steps to make sure that the herds do not expand so it would not hurt the ecosystem. And she can do that through various methods to make sure that they do not reproduce. So I will submit this for the record, Mr. Chairman, but I really believe that we are talking about something that should be dealt with. The Bureau of Land Management should deal with it. It would be economically advantageous for the United States of America because it would cost a lot less money. It would save the horses. I do not think it would damage the ecosystem. And there are people out there who are willing, in addition to Ms. Pickens, who are willing to get together with her and form associations that will pay almost all of the freight for this. So it is more of a political thing than it is a cost thing as far as to the government, other than what they are already spending, which is about $70-some million a year. And with that, I will submit the rest of my statement for the record, and if you have any questions, I would be glad to answer them for you. [The statement of Hon. Dan Burton follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.070 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.071 Mr. Simpson. Well, I appreciate that. And I appreciate your concern about what we are spending on this wild horses program. Everybody is concerned about the increased cost that we have been spending on wild horses and burros and how we can address it. And I have looked at the proposal by Ms. Pickens with some interest. There are some challenges in that it would take a change in the Taylor Grazing Act, in probably the Wild Horse and Burro Act, and those types of things, which we cannot do here. But I hope that the BLM will sit down and if they have got problems with it or questions about it, at least raise those so we will know what those issues are and maybe they can be addressed. Mr. Burton. And let me just say one more thing, Mr. Chairman. You are in a position of authority, along with Mr. Moran, and I would appreciate it if you could talk to the leadership at the Bureau of Land Management and ask them to really get serious with Ms. Pickens and take a hard look at her plan because they have just said publicly that they wanted to come up with something very similar to that. Mr. Simpson. Yeah. Mr. Burton. And try to make sure that they are willing to work with her to help solve this problem. Mr. Simpson. I have no problem doing that. I would like to know so that if--they may come up with an answer to me and I go, gee, I had not thought about that and you make absolute sense. I do not know. I would like to know what their concerns are and stuff and, you know, so I have the right answers. Mr. Burton. Okay. Mr. Simpson. Because we all want to deal with this issue that is getting more and more expensive I think and taking up a larger share of our budget. So I appreciate it and thank you for your interest in it. Mr. Burton. Thank you, sir. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Hearing will be adjourned for today. Friday, April 15, 2011. TESTIMONY OF INTERESTED INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS Mr. Simpson. The committee will come to order. I am in order, since I am the committee today. We are going to have a hectic schedule today because we are going to be interrupted by votes about every hour or so on the various budget proposals that are over there, and we just had our first vote, which is why we are five minutes late, and I talked to Mr. Moran, who is on his way to vote and he said he will be back in just a few minutes and to go ahead and start. So good morning, and welcome to a second day of public witness hearings. This morning the subcommittee will hear from a cross-section of individuals representing a wide variety of issues addressed by this subcommittee. Each witness will be provided with five minutes to present their testimony. Members will be provided an opportunity to ask questions of our witnesses, but in the interest of time, the chair would request that we keep things moving along. It is likely that we will have House floor votes but we will do the best we can to get through this morning. I am happy now to yield to my friend, Mr. Moran, who is not here. Thank you, Mr. Moran, for your opening statement. He will be back shortly. Our first witness today is Shelley Roberts, CEO of the Idaho Rural Water Association. How are you doing, Shelley? Ms. Roberts. Good. How are you? Mr. Simpson. Good. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WITNESS SHELLEY ROBERTS, CEO, IDAHO RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION Ms. Roberts. I would like to thank you and the members of the subcommittee for the opportunity to appear before you to discuss the Environmental Protection Agency's technical assistance of training and source water protection initiatives that directly benefit rural America. My name is Shelley Roberts and I am the CEO of Idaho Rural Water Association representing over 350 small and rural communities that have to comply with all EPA regulations. There are similar associations throughout all the states. Before I begin, I would like to thank you and your staff for all the support and guidance you have offered. We are very grateful. My purpose in appearing before you is to simply emphasize the importance of providing small drinking water systems training and technical assistance in complying with the ever- expanding requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Of the billions of dollars provided to EPA by the subcommittee each year, small rural communities will tell you they see and feel the most benefit from the dollars provided to rural water programs. It is simple: Small communities want to ensure quality drinking water. Local water supplies are operated by people who are locally elected and whose families drink the water every day. However, they need assistance in a form they can understand. Funding provided to rural water programs across the country and in Idaho allow for spending to be more results- oriented, non-regulatory, less bureaucratic, more effective and less expensive. Currently, 92 percent of the 50,000 community water systems in our Nation serve populations of less than 10,000. We urge you to continue funding the training and technical assistance and source water protection initiatives at the authorized level of $15 million. In Idaho, we have nearly 2,000 EPA-regulated drinking water systems of which only 20 serve populations over 10,000 people. That means that 1,947 water systems in Idaho serve small communities. There are similar comparisons on other states. I have witnessed a direct correlation between this assistance and increased compliance and sustainable activities for the utilities in Idaho. EPA has also made similar findings across the country. In the long run, water systems that are maintained and properly managed actually save the community and the Federal Government money. The Federal Government mandates operators to be certified and receive continuing education each year. The only place small communities can receive that training is through state rural water associations. Last year, Idaho Rural Water offered 38 training sessions throughout Idaho and had nearly 1,100 attendees. In your district alone, we provided training to 318 water officials representing 115 different communities. As our communities learned about the potential EPA funding cut, we had an immediate outcry from our members, community leaders and even other state and federal agencies. This stack of letters here represents just a small portion of the communities that will be adversely impacted both financially and technically as a result of loss of EPA funding this year. Our phones are ringing off the hook with people trying to enroll for classes that are being closed due to space limitations. One example of the onsite assistance Idaho Rural Water has provided occurred in Hazelton in southern Idaho. The Hazelton low-income housing facility has only 40 water connections and is typical of the over 10,000 communities assisted each year by state rural water associations. The Hazelton Housing Authority was struggling to find a licensed operator and approached Rural Water for help. Rural Water provided one-on-one personal training to help someone at the housing authority pass the test so that the small housing facility could continue to serve these families. There are many, many examples just like this where small communities turn to Rural Water to help when all other resources have been exhausted and communities are trying their best to remain in compliance with state and federal regulations. We urge you to continue to fund this small part of EPA's budget. Just one-half of 1 percent of their budget benefits thousands of communities and millions of people that depend on it for safe drinking water. Thank you for your time. [The statement of Shelley Roberts follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.072 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.073 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I appreciate your testimony. You will find, I think, that this committee and I in particular have been very supportive of the work you do and the Rural Water Association is very important to us, and the difficulty we have, as you know, has been this earmark ban. It has always been looked at as an earmark in the past, and now trying to figure out how to fund it without having it labeled an earmark is the challenge that we are having in that, but we are working on it and I will try to make sure that we continue the funding for this program so that you can do the important work you do out in the rural communities. So I appreciate it very much. Ms. Roberts. Yes, and we thank you for all your support. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Thank you. Next we have Dr. Anthony Szema, the Assistant Professor of Medicine and Surgery, Stony Brook School of Medicine. Welcome. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WITNESS DR. ANTHONY M. SZEMA, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, SUNY STONY BROOK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Mr. Szema. Thank you, Congressman Simpson, for the invitation to testify. I am Dr. Anthony Szema, the Assistant Professor of Medicine and Surgery at the State University of New York at Stony Brook School of Medicine. My board certifications are in pulmonary diseases, critical care medicine, internal medicine and clinical adult and pediatric allergy and immunology, and my undergraduate degree is in industrial and management engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York. Between 2004 and 2009, I was an NIH K08 Mentored Clinical Scientist Award recipient, and although I am chief of the allergy section at the Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Northport, New York, I am testifying today on behalf of the American Thoracic Society, which is an independently incorporated international education and research scientific society focusing on respiratory, critical care and sleep medicine. The American Thoracic Society has 14,000 members who help prevent and fight respiratory disease around the globe through research, education, patient care and advocacy initiatives. It was founded in 2005, and we want to decrease morbidity and mortality--death--from respiratory diseases, life-threatening acute illnesses and sleep-related breathing disorders. So as such, we have a keen interest in the impact that the Environmental Protection Agency's regulatory enforcement actions have on public health. I have four points. First is the EPA's standard-setting power plant air toxic rule. The EPA is in the process of setting a number of important public health standards under the auspices of the Clean Air Act. Most recently, the EPA released a proposed rule that will for the first time address toxic air pollution released from coal- and oil-fired power plants. The proposed rule will remove tons of toxic pollutants including mercury, lead, nickel, dioxins and acid gases from the air we breathe. All are known to have immediate and long-term health effects including health effects of children. Today, more than 60 percent of power plant operators have acted responsibly and installed pollution control equipment to reduce these toxic emissions. The proposed rule will require all power plants to install readily available, modern pollution control technology by 2016. The American Thoracic Society strongly supports this proposed rule and urges Congress to allow the EPA to move forward with implementation of the Power Plant Air Toxic Rule. Number two: EPA standard-setting on ozone and particulate matter. The American Thoracic Society expects the Obama Administration to release two additional important public health standards that will address ozone and particulate matter air pollution. Both these pollutants are regulated by the Clean Air Act and have a significant impact on our Nation's health. Hundreds of studies have demonstrated that exposure to ozone and particulate matter air pollution is bad for your health. These pollutants cause premature death, asthma attacks, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, ischemic heart disease exacerbations, emergency room visits, missed school and work days, and as a dentist, you know periodontal disease associated with cigarette smoking. There is conclusive research that demonstrates that the current EPA standard for ozone and particulate matter need to be tightened. We at the American Thoracic Society urge the subcommittee to recognize this important body of work and provide the EPA with the resources it needs to issue and enforce revised standards for ozone and particulate matter air pollution. Number three: EPA National Ambient Air Quality Standards monitoring. In addition to establishing standards for air pollution limits, the EPA is also charged with developing and maintaining a network of monitors which measure the level of pollution in our Nation's air. Unfortunately, we know the current monitoring is inadequate. There are not enough monitors to accurately gauge air pollution associated with highways and other areas that are congested with automobiles and this means we are underestimating the air pollution to which we are exposed and hence underappreciating the risk that air pollution poses to America's health. Fortunately, there are new technologies available including satellite monitoring, which can greatly enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the EPA's monitoring efforts. The American Thoracic Society strongly urges Congress to provide the EPA with the funding necessary to evaluate and revamp its current clean air pollution monitoring network. Number four: EPA and climate change. The American Thoracic Society is disappointed in the direction that Congress is headed when it comes to issues related to climate change. Our children and grandchildren will pay the price for Congress's inability to address climate change. Climate change will bring severe adverse human health effects. Research has demonstrated the spread of malaria to higher elevations due to rising temperatures. Studies have demonstrated that high concentrations of carbon dioxide, or CO2 gas, from higher temperatures and a length in spring season will mean a more severe prolonged allergy season, including those with allergic asthma. High temperatures will also increase heat-related deaths in both major cities and rural areas. The EPA has composed reasonable policies that would begin to address climate change. If Congress attempts to remove, delay or circumscribe the EPA's authority to address this significant public health issue, the American Thoracic Society would like to send a univocal, unambiguous message that obstructionism will only increase the problem and add to the toll on human health and raise the economic cost associated with addressing climate change. We at the American Thoracic Society also believe that the success of the EPA Clean Air Act holds valuable lessons for Congress and the EPA as well as both bodies should consider how to deal with climate change. The technology used to reduce traditional pollutants like ozone and particulate air matter can also be used to address greenhouse gas emissions. The American Thoracic Society continues to play an active role in addressing global climate change, and in May 2010 the organization hosted a workshop on the respiratory health effects of global climate change chaired by Dr. William Ron of New York University. We expect the workshop report to be finished shortly, and will provide, number one, guidance to the known and likely respiratory health effects of climate change, and number two, pose valuable research questions to further our understanding of how climate change is impacting human health. Congressman Simpson, respectfully, on behalf of the American Thoracic Society, I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the fiscal year 2012 budget of the Environmental Protection Agency before you and Congressman Moran on the Committee of Appropriations, Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. [The statement of Anthony M. Szema follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.074 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.075 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.076 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.077 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for your testimony. My guess is, just offhand, I do not know this, but my guess is just offhand, you guys did not like the dump truck of H.R. 1. Thank you for your testimony. We appreciate it. Do you have anything, Mr. Moran? Mr. Moran. No. Mr. Szema. Clean air is good, dirty air is bad. Mr. Simpson. Our next witness is Ryan Schmitt, Chairman of the Board of the National Utility Contractors Association. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WITNESS RYAN SCHMITT, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, NATIONAL UTILITY CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION (NUCA) Mr. Schmitt. Chairman Simpson, Ranking Member Moran and honorable members of the subcommittee who are here in spirit, my name is Ryan Schmitt. I am the President of Petticoat- Schmitt Civil Contractors in Jacksonville, Florida. Our company does water and sewer projects throughout northeast Florida and southeast Georgia. I appreciate the opportunity to participate in this hearing on behalf of NUCA. NUCA is the oldest and largest national trade association, representing the utility construction and excavation industries. NUCA also serves as the chair of the Clean Water Coalition, a coalition of 37 organizations representing contractors, designers, suppliers and manufacturers, labor and other organizations who support sound environmental infrastructure. I am here today to convey NUCA's support for the inclusion of $3.5 billion for the EPA's State Revolving Fund programs in the fiscal year 2012 Interior/Environment appropriations measures. Specifically, we ask the subcommittee to include $2.1 billion for the Clean Water SRF and $1.4 billion for the Drinking Water SRF. These investment levels would restore the fiscal year 2010 levels and would provide critical funding for these economically sound programs in a time when our country is in dire need of increased infrastructure investment. The construction industry continues to face the highest unemployment rates than any other industry sector. The Bureau of Labor Statistics report for March indicated unemployment in construction is now over 20 percent and over 2 million construction workers out of work. My home State of Florida has lost 350,000 construction jobs in the last five years, which represents over 52 percent of the available construction workforce. This staggering statistic has drastically affected the overall economy of our region, and this alleged turnaround that some people speak of is nowhere to be seen and we do not see it coming. It is very discouraging to continually report to my employees that we have got no upcoming work on the books. Although SRF projects are recognized for their success in enhancing public health and environmental protection, it is their economic benefits that are largely overlooked. Clean water projects help the economy by creating jobs, generating economic activity and expanding the local tax base. It is important to note that the jobs offered in this industry are good, high-paying jobs that are provided right here in America. These cannot be shipped overseas. In 2009, the Clean Water Council released a study on job creation and enhanced economic activity that comes with investment in water and wastewater. The study, titled ``Sudden Impact,'' which I have right here, shows that a $1 billion investment in water and sewer projects results in one, the creation of 27,000 new jobs with average annual earnings of over $50,000; two, total national output for demand of products and services in all industries with $3.46 billion; three, personal household income between $1.01 and $1.06 billion; and lastly, approximately $82.4 million in local and state tax revenue. The need to invest in America's underground environmental infrastructure is well known, clearly documented and has broad support. According to the EPA, $298 billion is needed in the next 20 years to support America's need for wastewater infrastructure and $334 billion over the same time period is needed for the drinking water infrastructure. You know, what is out of sight and out of mind to most people is clearly visible to NUCA members like myself, and the view from the trenches is not pleasant. Right now, my company is working on a water and sewer project just outside of downtown Jacksonville, and we happen to be working in front of a very nice restaurant, a restaurant you might visit you were dining with our mayor, as he likes to frequent this organization. Mr. Simpson. Not anymore. Mr. Schmitt. As you can see from those pictures, in this section of pipe, a water pipe, mind you, that was taken out of service that provided water to that restaurant, there was over one inch of tuberculated material built up in that existing water line. Now, fortunately, the patrons have been safe because this fine restaurant put in a filtration system for their water. However, why is it in a developed country that we have got to filter our water systems and why do countless American families who cannot afford a filtration system have to work from tuberculated water mains? Well, the answer is, they do not have to. A robust SRF program can provide the drinking water and wastewater systems that Americans deserve. A healthy SRF plays a key role in enhancing public health, safety, protecting the environment and maintaining a strong economic base. Currently, the SRF programs face just under a $1 billion cut in the 2011 Continuing Resolution and many in Congress are calling for reinstating the 2008 spending levels next year. That would mean almost $2 billion would be cut from the SRF program over two years. That is a 67 percent reduction in the Clean Water SRF and a 40 percent cut to the Drinking Water SRF since 2010. To that end, NUCA strongly encourages the subcommittee to include $2.1 billion and $1.4 billion to the Clean Water SRF and Drinking Water, SRF, respectively. Thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony for the record. [The statement of Ryan Schmitt follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.078 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.079 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.080 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.081 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.082 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.083 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.084 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for your testimony. We appreciate it very much. Surprisingly, I agree with what you said. The problem is, we have the dual problems of infrastructure needs throughout this country and not just water and sewer, but I have given the speech many times--it would take too long to give it now--but locks and dams and harbors and inland waterway maintenance, the grid system, roads and bridges, our whole infrastructure is crumbling and we have to do something about it, and we have got to find a better way to fund it. That is what I have been working on with some other members, how are we going to fund this in the future. Actually, when you look at the needs, a $1 billion cut is barely a dent in the overall needs. We have got to find a better way to address it in the future so that we have the resources to address this kind of stuff, and the reason the public does not cry out about this is that nobody thinks about it when they turn on their water tap and water comes out. They never think about how it gets there. Nobody ever thinks about what happens when they flush their toilet. So it is a big problem. I think it is the biggest challenging facing the country in the future, to tell you the truth. So I appreciate your testimony. Mr. Schmitt. Yes, I concur. The EPA is talking about $35 million a year and here we are talking about, you know, $3.5 billion a year. Mr. Simpson. That is right. Mr. Schmitt. It is a huge spread. Mr. Simpson. Yes, that is right. I appreciate it. Mr. Schmitt. Thank you for your support. Mr. Simpson. Jim. Mr. Moran. I agree with the chairman very much. It does occur to me that so many people do not mind paying $2 for a plastic bottle of bottled water when a very modest assessment on the water that they pay for from the municipal sources would enable us to rebuild our infrastructure, which is in drastic need. I do not know why we do not do that. What we have, of course, is a revolving fund. The municipalities borrow that money from the state fund and then pay it back. I said on the Floor yesterday, it is beyond me why these governors, some of them, were so critical of federal spending and support of our cuts and the revolving funds and yet it is money out of their pockets that is desperately needed to rebuild our water infrastructure. Just as we need our plumbing in our own home to be working functionally, the public's plumbing under the ground needs to be working functionally as well. This is a devastating picture, but I suspect it is not all that unique. But I agree with the chairman. We have got to figure out a better way of financing. Thank you very much for your testimony. Mr. Schmitt. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Our next witness is Richard Opper, President and Director of the Environmental Council of the States, Montana Department of Environmental Quality. Is that right? Mr. Opper. That is correct. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Mr. Opper. Good morning, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. How is the weather in Montana? Mr. Opper. It is not as much of a springtime as I am experiencing here. Mr. Simpson. Imagine that. Mr. Opper. I am finally starting to thaw out, Mr. Chairman. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WITNESS RICHARD OPPER, PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR, ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL OF THE STATES, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Mr. Opper. Good morning to you, and good morning, Representative Moran, and thank you for having me here, and as you said, I am here to testify on behalf of the states and territorial environmental agencies that are members of ECOS, the Environmental Council of States, and I am lucky to be the Director of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality. I often say Montana is the most beautiful state in the country, but you being from Idaho, you might take some exception to that. Mr. Simpson. A little bit. Mr. Opper. And I do not want to get off on the wrong foot. Mr. Moran. The only other guy I have heard say that is Rep. Rechberg. Mr. Simpson. Montana is a gorgeous, gorgeous state, and I have never understood why on the eastern part of our State of Idaho they did not just take that line and go straight north. Mr. Moran. There you go. Mr. Opper. There actually is a story about that. Mr. Simpson. I know. I know there is. Mr. Opper. The story being that we bought off the surveyors with a lot of alcohol. Mr. Moran. Is that a true story? Mr. Opper. Well, I do not know if it true or not but I am sure spreading it, and I have heard it many times. Mr. Moran. It is a gorgeous state, but Idaho is too. Mr. Simpson. They thought they were on the continental divide and they missed it. Mr. Opper. They missed it, and they missed it because they were drunk, so you know what the currency is in my state. I think I digress. I just have two points to make. They are fairly simple. One is that I think you should understand that what seems to you perhaps like cuts to EPA very often translate to cuts to the states instead. In fact, in the past we have seen as much as 105 percent of the cuts that Congress imposed on EPA came out of the portion of EPA's budget that goes to the States. Now, this current EPA has shown a willingness to share some of that pain in the budget cuts. They are absorbing some themselves, to their credit, but still, the bulk of the cuts that you impose on EPA tend to go to the states. The second point I want to make is, if you want to get the best environmental protection for the fewest number of dollars, you need to make sure that EPA can continue to fund the states to do their work, and I will explain very briefly here. So the money that you allocate to EPA really goes into a couple of pots. Some of it goes directly to EPA to fund that agency's work. Another portion of it, it varies from year to year, but it is less than half, does go to the states to enable them to do their work. As we have heard, the State and Tribal Grants program, STAG money that goes to the states really is divided into two different areas. Some of it goes into the SRF program so that we can invest in infrastructure, the kind we discussed earlier for drinking water and wastewater facilities, usually in the form of low-interest loans. The other portion of EPA's STAG budget that goes to the states is for the categorical grants that pays the states to oversee the programs that are delegated to us from the Federal Government from EPA. So, again, it is important that this categorical grant portion of EPA's budget be maintained so the states can do their work. The states do almost all of the permitting, they do almost all of the enforcement, inspections, data collection for EPA. We do almost all of it, and we do it for a reason. We do it because we are better, we are cheaper and faster than the Federal Government, and I think everybody acknowledges that including EPA. That is why they delegate so many of their programs to us. A typical federal employee makes about 50 percent more than a state employee who has similar qualifications, does the same kind of work, which begs the question, why am I working for the state. I do not know. Also, the state through their fee programs, through their general fund tend to pay about 80 percent of the programs and 20 percent comes from the Federal Government. That is a typical state. So what this means is, there are some states that are thinking of giving programs back to the Federal Government. Idaho is one of them actually. Montana has given a program back to EPA and we saw some disastrous results, which I could tell you about if we had more time. But the Federal Government really cannot afford to take these programs back because the states contribute so much. If we give it back to the Federal Government, it is going to cost the Federal Government five to six times as much to run these programs as it costs the states. It is not efficient. We are a bargain. So I am going to cut this a little bit short. You know, I am happy to answer any questions for you. The states for some reasons I cannot explain at this point for the next couple of years are probably able to absorb cuts to the SRF program or the STAG grant. The states are more able to do that than they are able to absorb cuts to the categorical grants. Any more cuts to the categorical grants are going to come at an expense to the environment. That is an important point you need to understand. Anyway, I am here to urge you to adopt EPA's 2012 budget for the sake of efficiency, for the sake of prudent management and for environmental protection. It is a good budget when it comes to the categorical grants. So that is all I have, and I am certainly available to answer any questions. [The statement of Richard Opper follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.085 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.086 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.087 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.088 Mr. Simpson. I appreciate your testimony. I have talked with Toni Hardesty out in Idaho about this same thing. Mr. Opper. I am crazy about Toni, by the way. She is marvelous. Mr. Simpson. She does a great job. And I rely on her for a lot of information about how things are working, but you are right, there are Members of Congress who are upset with EPA, that is a mild way to put it, and consequently they would like to just eliminate their budget. Unfortunately, as we discovered as we tried to put together both H.R. 1 and this latest one that we thought, you cannot do that because oftentimes you are not getting at what you want to get at. What happens is, just as you said, those cuts are passed down to the states and then those programs that actually go out and repair this kind of stuff and do the air quality monitoring, et cetera, et cetera, that is where the cuts occur, and that is what we do not want to do. So it has got to be more strategic than what some members want to do, but as you saw in the last, I guess when H.R. 1 was proposed, there were, I think it was 22 amendments or something like that that were aimed directly at the EPA that passed. I think that was a lot of venting by members that were upset with things that had happened in their region or their area or whatever, and hopefully we will be more thoughtful when we bring the Interior budget down this year, and we will certainly take into consideration your testimony and what you said, because we do not want to hurt the programs that are being done I think effectively and efficiently by the states. Mr. Opper. Well, thank you for recognizing that, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate that very much. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Jim. Mr. Moran. The testimony was very good. The conversational tone is particularly effective too, incidentally. Thank you. Mr. Opper. I know no other way. Mr. Simpson. That is the way all Montanans are. Thank you. Next is Craig---- Mr. Schiffries. Craig Schiffries. Mr. Simpson. Okay, Mr. Schiffries, Director of Geoscience Policy at Geological Society of America. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WITNESS CRAIG SCHIFFRIES, PH.D., DIRECTOR FOR GEOSCIENCE POLICY, GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA (GSA) Mr. Schiffries. Chairman Simpson, Mr. Moran, members of the subcommittee. Thank you for the opportunity to testify today about the U.S. Geological Survey. My name is Craig Schiffries and I serve as Director for Geoscience Policy at the Geological Society of America. The Geological Society of America urges Congress to appropriate at least $1.2 billion for the U.S. Geological Survey in fiscal year 2012. The USGS is one of the Nation's premier science agencies. It addresses many of society's greatest challenges including mineral and energy resources, natural hazards, climate change and water availability and quality. Quite simply, the USGS benefits every American every day. The magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan on March 11th emphatically demonstrates the value of robust natural hazards monitoring and warning systems and the need for increased funding for the USGS. Science and technology are engines of economic prosperity, environmental quality and national security. Federal investments in research pay substantial dividends. According to the National Academies report, Rising above the Gathering Storm, as much as 85 percent of the measured growth in U.S. income per capita was due to technological change. In 2010, the National Academies issued an updated report, Above the Gathering Storm Revisited, which says it would be impossible not to recognize the great difficulty of carrying out the Gathering Storm recommendations such as doubling the research budget in today's fiscal environment. However, it must be emphasized that actions such as doubling the research budget are investments that will need to be made if the Nation is to maintain economic strength to provide citizens health care, Social Security, national security and more. One seemingly relevant analogy is that a non-solution to making an overweight aircraft flightworthy is to remove an engine. Likewise, the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform headed by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson said cut and invest to promote economic growth and keep America competitive. We should cut the red tape and unproductive government spending that hinders job creation and jobs. At the same time, we must invest in education, infrastructure and high-value research and development to help our economy grow, keep us globally competitive and make it easier for businesses to create jobs. Earth science is a critical component of the overall science and technology enterprise. Strong support for earth science in general and the U.S. Geological Survey in particular are required to stimulate innovations that fuel the economy, provide security and enhance the quality of life. Science and scientific integrity advanced through the combination of two recent developments at the U.S. Department of the Interior. Secretary Salazar issued a new five-year strategic plan that for the first time elevates science to one of five mission areas for the entire department. The Interior Department also issued a comprehensive scientific integrity program. These developments are cause for optimism but the Geological Society of America expects that the elevation of science to a mission area will guide investments that are reflected in improved budget requests for the U.S. Geological Survey. The U.S. Geological Survey addresses many of society's greatest challenges, and I would like to mention just two today. A failure to prevent natural hazards from becoming natural disasters will increase future expenditures for disaster recovery and response. Recent natural disasters provide unmistakable evidence that the United States remains vulnerable to staggering losses. The magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan on March 11th, the magnitude 7.0 earthquake that killed more than 200,000 people in Haiti last year, and the small volcanic eruptions in Iceland that disrupted global air traffic last year provide compelling evidence that the United States needs to take further actions to reduce risks from natural hazards. An improved scientific understanding of geological hazards will produce future losses through better forecasts of their occurrence and magnitude. We urge Congress to increase funding for the USGS to modernize and upgrade its natural hazards monitoring and warning systems. Widespread deployment of new energy technologies can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, mitigate climate change and reduce dependence on foreign oil, and minerals and energy resources are inextricably intertwined because many new energy technologies such as wind turbines and solar cells depend on rare earth elements and other critical minerals that currently lack diversified sources of supply. China accounts for more than 95 percent of the world production of rare earth elements although it has only 36 percent of the identified world reserves, according to the USGS. A renewed federal commitment to innovative research, information and education on mineral and energy resources is needed to address these issues. President Obama's fiscal year 2012 budget request for the USGS is $1.118 billion, a decrease of $15 million, or 1.3 percent, below the USGS budget request for fiscal year 2011. Now, that is a slight increase in the total USGS budget request for fiscal year 2012 compared to the fiscal year 2010 enacted level. The 2012 budget request contains $89.1 million in budget cuts in core science programs that would be offset by increases in other areas. The proposed budget cuts would have significant negative impacts on the scientific capabilities of the USGS. Proposed reductions in the fiscal year 2012 budget request include $9.6 million for mineral resources, $8.9 million for national water quality assessment, $4.7 million for earthquake hazards. It appears that responsibilities for Landsat satellites have been transferred from NASA to USGS without a corresponding transfer of budget authority. A $48 million increase for national land imaging would be offset by decreases for core USGS programs. This trend cannot continue without compromising the mission of the U.S. Geological Survey. The Geological Society of America urges Congress to appropriate at least $1.2 billion for the USGS in fiscal year 2012. The USGS budget has been nearly stagnant in real dollars since 1996. The USGS budget for 2010 was below the USGS budget for 2001 in real dollars, and during this time natural hazards, mineral and energy resources, and water availability and quality have become increasingly important to the Nation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide testimony about the U.S. Geological Survey. The Geological Society of America is grateful to the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee for its leadership in strengthening the USGS over many years. We urge you to strengthen the USGS further again this year. I would be happy to answer any questions. [The statement of Craig Schiffries follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.089 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.090 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.091 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.092 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for your testimony. I am kind of a fan of the USGS and what they do. They are a great organization. I think they are being run well, and I was not very happy with the request in the President's budget for 2012 either, but we will be looking at it. I am concerned about the Landsat satellite and transfer, as you said, the responsibility with no money that goes along with it. We will be looking at that, and also we may have some additional responsibilities we wish for the USGS to take on, but we will not do that without corresponding resources for them to do it. Mr. Moran. I am in complete agreement with the chairman. The Landsat responsibility being shifted to USGS without an appropriate corresponding shift of financial resources was wrong, and we cannot afford these kinds of cuts to scientific research that USGS performs so ably. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. Thank you for your testimony. Mr. Schiffries. Thank you very much. Mr. Simpson. Patrick Natale, Executive Director of the American Society of Civil Engineers, as opposed to the uncivil engineers. Mr. Natale. Some engineers are not. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WITNESS PATRICK NATALE, P.E., EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Mr. Natale. Mr. Chairman, good morning, Representative Moran. It is a pleasure to be in front of Representative Moran, my Congressman. Mr. Simpson. He is mine too, actually. Although I vote in Idaho, I do live over in his district. Mr. Natale. I appreciate both of your comments, your comments that you made earlier about the importance of infrastructure. That is what ASCE has been talking about for many years. My name is Patrick Natale. I am the Executive Director of the American Society of Civil Engineers and I am a registered professional engineer in New Jersey. I actually live in New Jersey and Alexandria. I am really pleased to be talking about these issues that are before you today about EPA funding and the USGS funding. I think these are critical to our future and to the health and well-being of our citizens of this country. The concerns that we have with some of the budget cuts that are in the proposed budget could be devastating for water infrastructure, as we talked about. You heard some great examples earlier by the prior speakers. But looking at the cuts of what the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act are being reduced to $700 million and $842 million, respectively, or a cut of 66 percent in one and 39 percent in the other. That is huge cuts to critical issues that impact our health, safety and welfare, which is pretty important to all of us. Each year as we do not do something, we are making the condition worse. Infrastructure, as we wait to repair it, the conditions later on are even worse. When we did a report card in 2005, we found the needs for infrastructure to be $1.6 trillion to improve infrastructure in all areas. When we did the report card again in 2009, the price tag went up to $2.2 trillion. That was the cost of non-action or not enough action. We need to be paying attention to these critical areas, and we feel that there is a lot of data out there besides our report card. The report that was put together by the Bush Administration in 2002 looking at the need for our systems that was presented to EPA indicated that there was a need for system improvement in investment going forward. We feel that this is a time when the Federal Government needs to be stepping up participation, not reducing it. We are going backwards at a time that is critical to our success. And it is one of these things, you wait, pay now, or pay a lot more later on. We need to be paying attention to those things. We have seen reports that indicated the need for the Nation to invest $298 billion as of January 2008 in clean water needs, and we are not funding that. We have needs for replacing wastewater treatment plants. The pipes need repairing. We saw a great example of that a few moments ago. We need to buy new pipes, install new pipes, and we have to look at issues of combined stormwater, what the impacts of that are, and invest in stormwater management. What are we doing to make this a better country and keep the concerns of our citizens intact? We need to be looking at investing more money. Over the next 20 years, the numbers can be staggering, but a comment was made earlier about the bottled water versus tap water. You are paying 4,000 times the cost of bottled water to drinking water. A slight increase in funding would be very valuable to improve the quality of the supply and we could avoid some of the conditions that we have here. Our system is aging. We need to invest in that. We believe that the importance of doing this will help the citizens going forward and we can grow the Nation. We heard a lot of good examples before about the employment that is provided by doing infrastructure projects. And the thing I really like about it, they are domestic jobs when we do employment. So I think it is a really good opportunity. With the Nation facing $400 to $500 billion investment gap in wastewater and drinking water in the next 20 years, now is not the time to cut, now is the time to invest in our future, and I do not like to use the spending word, I like to use ``invest,'' because this is about investing. The infrastructure that we have built in the past, we are living off it today and we are benefiting from that. I understand the concerns that Congress has dealing with the budget gap and dealing with the deficit but it is not the time to cut back. ASCE recommends an appropriation of $2 billion for the Clean Water SRF and appropriation of $1.5 billion for the Drinking Water SRF in 2012. Now, briefly, a couple of comments on the USGS, and I think we heard some really good comments about that by the last speaker, but we really feel it is important that USGS collects a lot of important scientific data that helps us make some good decisions, us as a country, on vital water resources, prediction of earthquakes and volcanoes, and looking at other biological conditions in that country. That data is critical to help us go forward. And we heard earlier about the reductions of where they are. We believe that we ought to be maintaining the integrity of our scientific data collection so that we can improve again the quality of service. ASCE recommends that the appropriations of $1.2 billion should be in the fiscal year 2012 budget for the USGS. Mr. Chairman, that concludes my remarks. I will be glad to answer any questions. [The statement of Patrick Natale follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.093 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.094 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.095 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.096 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, Patrick. I appreciate your testimony. As we said earlier, we do not disagree with you. It is a matter of the budget deficit is real and we have to deal with that, and we have to find a better way to fund this, a long-term funding source. Mr. Natale. Absolutely. ASCE next week are putting together a group of a lot of different parties together. We are bringing labor, we are bringing environmental groups in, we are bringing the U.S. Chamber, and we are going to be doing a visioning session of what is infrastructure looking like in the future, and we think this will be really good data for the country to take a look at and where do we go from here, how do we get there, and your concerns about funding, that is one of the issues we need to talk about. There are funding opportunities but we need to be thinking out of the box and we need to break the barriers. We cannot constantly say no new income. You are not going to do it. Let's do it wisely. So we are hoping that within the next couple of weeks we will have more data to provide to the Congress so you can make some good decisions going forward. Mr. Simpson. We know that there are problems. It is trying to find an acceptable funding source. We have been working on some things which include some revenue enhancements, but I will tell you, they are not very popular, but some of the things we are going to do are not going to be very popular but it has got to be done. I appreciate it. Thank you. Jim. Mr. Moran. Put me on that bill when you are ready. And frankly, this is better testimony than we get from the agency for these programs. It brings home the need and the relative pittance that we are providing, albeit important. It does not seem as though it is an area we should be cutting, but again, I appreciate your speaking up. I wish some of the governors would speak up as much because it is money out of their pocket when we cut these programs. It is a state revolving fund. But anyway, this is very good testimony. Thank you. Mr. Natale. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. The next witness is Conrad Anker, who manages athlete programs for North Face. How are you doing? Mr. Anker. Things are well. Greetings. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Good to see you. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC LANDS, LWCF WITNESS CONRAD ANKER, MANAGES ATHLETE PROGRAMS FOR NORTH FACE, LWCF COALITION Mr. Anker. Mr. Chairman and members, thank you for the opportunity to speak on behalf of funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund. I join with the LWCF Coalition, business and civil leaders, sportsmen and recreationists, conservationists and many others across the Nation in urging you to provide vital funding for LWCF in fiscal year 2012. America can simply not afford to lose the national recreational and other public opportunities LWCF provides or the activity it injects in the American economy. This program touches every state and every American. It protects our most treasured places from our Civil War heritage at Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania to the Sawtooth National Recreation Area to the California desert, working ranches, state, local parks and trails. I am a professional mountain climber by trade. From multiple ascents to Denali, the highest point in America, to Everest, the highest point on our planet, I have experienced nature in its raw and unbridled form. I find no greater joy than being in a far and remote place preparing for a challenging ascent. I have had the good fortune to combine my personal passion for the outdoors with my career. For the past 27 years, I have worked with the North Face, an outdoor apparel equipment company based in California with annual sales of $1.4 billion and over 425 employees. We have a retail store in Boise, Idaho. Today I manage the athlete program, which encourages and supports outdoor participation. The North Face is very aware that the attributes of nature are part of our brand DNA. It is important to our industry that we have places for our customers to enjoy our products. In the past 11 years, the North Face has led Vanity Fair Corporation, the parent company, in growth. In these tough economic times when families need to cut back, people are willing to invest in outdoor recreation. Families understand that being outdoors is a wise investment that reaps benefits to their health and well-being. In turn, this spending supports jobs and drives economic vibrancy in our communities. The outdoor industry is one of America's fastest growing economic sectors. Without a metric like housing starts for the construction industry, its contributions to the health of the American economy are not widely recognized. Our industry is highly recession resistant, contributing over $730 billion to the American economy each year and generating $88 billion in annual state and federal tax revenues. Over 6.5 million American jobs are supported by the active outdoor recreation economy. The outdoor sector is a major part of the U.S. economy and America still dominates this globally and provides sustained economic growth in communities, rural and urban, across America. Whether one is climbing Mount Everest, visiting a national park, fishing a favorite stream, the personal motivation is the same. We go outdoors to challenge ourselves and to come back refreshed. Everywhere I go, I meet people who seek the connection to the outdoors to sustain and inspire them in their daily lives. Outdoor experiences inspire and nourish the human spirit. In children, these experiences foster creativity and confidence that nurture the entrepreneurial spirit and a lifetime of fitness instilled by early access to outdoor has incalculable quality of life and public health benefits to individuals and our society as a whole. Each year, the Land and Water Conservation Fund protects the integrity of our public lands. It funds the highest priority now-or-never purchases over our national parks, forests, refuges, national trails corridors and other public lands. It provides critical access to public lands and water for recreation, hunting and fishing. It leverages state and matching dollars to provide close-to-home recreation through statewide LWCF grants for parks, ball fields, trails, Forest Legacy grants, working forest and timber jobs while ensuring public access to recreation. LWCF is the only conservation offset from oil and gas drilling in federal waters. With over $6 billion annually in offshore royalties, I urge you to honor the longstanding Congressional intent to dedicate a small portion of these revenues to their intended purpose. Significant cuts to LWCF experienced in the fiscal year 2011 budget will affect outdoor recreation projects and jobs and communities across the country. Please cut in fiscal year 2012 to reverse these cuts. America's public lands heritage, be it a corner park or Yosemite, is critical to supporting the American spirit of innovation, dedication and motivation. In the words of Theodore Roosevelt, of all the questions which come before this Nation short of the actual preservation of its existence in a great war, there is none which compares in importance to the great central task of leaving this land even a better land for our descendants than it is for us. In these challenging economic times, ensuring access to the outdoors is ever more essential to maintain our quality of life and supporting our communities. LWCF is not only a wise economic investment but one that we must make for ourselves and our children. Thank you. [The statement of Conrad Anker follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.097 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.098 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.099 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.100 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thanks for your testimony. I appreciate it very much. Obviously if I did not think that outdoor recreation and the Land and Water Conservation Fund were very important, I would not live in Idaho. It does have some challenges. Some people are concerned that it is buying more land in states that are already heavily owned by the Federal Government, and that is something we have to get around. But I appreciate your testimony. Mr. Moran. I do as well, and am dropping a bill today that would charge a fee for plastic bags because they have such an adverse impact upon the environment, and the revenue would go to Land and Water Conservation Fund. I know there are other ways of finding revenue for it, but just as we do with water infrastructure, I do think we are going to have to find other sources of revenue that are directly related because Land and Water Conservation Fund is terribly important. We have $900 million in the fiscal year 2012 budget but in order to get that the administration had to squeeze money from other programs that are very important as well. But thanks for your testimony. Mr. Simpson. And I can tell you that having talked to Secretary Salazar, this is one of his top priorities, so we will work with him. Mr. Anker. Great. Addressing inholdings is a great way of making it more efficient. A copy of my book. Mr. Simpson. Okay. I appreciate it. Thank you. Mr. Moran. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Next we have Jim Blomquist, Chairman of the Board of the Wilderness Land Trust. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC LANDS WITNESS JIM BLOMQUIST, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, WILDERNESS LAND TRUST Mr. Blomquist. Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member Mr. Moran, my name is Jim Blomquist. I am a volunteer chair of the Wilderness Land Trust. Our president, it is his wife's 60th birthday and they had a longstanding commitment to go to Costa Rica, so it is hard to stand in the way of such a celebration, so I agreed to come here to Washington. We are just a small nonprofit. We have two staff and two consultants. Our board is bigger than our organization. And what we do is focus on buying from willing sellers inholdings in designated federal wilderness areas or ones that are congressionally proposed that are close to fruition. You know, we do not want to get ourselves into buying land in places that are years and years away from designation. And I am really here to thank you for in the last few years putting in a line item a fund to support inholdings acquisition. That item, having money in the budget available to agencies for them to decide which projects to go forward, but that is vital to our work. What we have learned in years of working with local landowners who would like to sell their properties that are located within wilderness areas, what we have learned is that acquisition opportunities really come sort of in a generational basis, you know, this was grandfather's land, you know, there is a lot of emotional attachment, this is the land that was, you know, in Idaho, these are lands that are originally homesteaded, and parting with those lands is not an easy decision often and it is not something that you can sit back and say oh, this will come along in a couple years when we have the money or we have, you know, people paying attention to it. And so a group like ours, you know, we try to remain close to all the people who own such lands and make it clear to them that we are available to help if they are interested in selling it and moving it into ownership by the United States, and it has really been a great benefit. A few years ago, there was no such fund. There was no such money available. It was all done through specific appropriations, and it was much more difficult to do, and we really appreciate that. What we have been asking for is a fund about $3 million to $5 million for each of the federal land management agencies, one that would include all sorts of inholdings acquisitions. We just do wilderness. But there are probably other reasons and other properties. That is what we really focus on. But we appreciate your support. We hope that you will continue in this effort in the future. It has really made a big difference in wilderness. You know, we see this effort as really keeping the promise that wilderness is. Inholdings sometimes cost agencies additional money because they have to deal with the fact that there are other landowners in the area. Landowners often become really frustrated because they have some view of what they would like to do that is really inconsistent with what the agency wants to do and it, you know, has the potential to degrade the wilderness experience, and the reason we have set aside these wilderness areas is because they provide solace and opportunity to get out by yourself. I know you are a wilderness user, you know, that you do not really get in Washington, D.C. And so when we can free a wilderness area from a potential threat of a development or land that could be developed, it really delivers that promise that wilderness has. You know, we have protected areas that are very remote that require a drive on a road miles and miles through the wilderness. There was one in California where it is a several-mile ride up to a hunting cabin. We just acquired that. We hope to be able to turn that over to the United States soon. And then we have had some that are, you know, at the beginning of the wilderness area, right at the edge of it, which would provide public access to the area and provide the best access. And so it is a range of areas, range of reasons why people sell. You know, we try not to get into the middle of the wilderness fight. That is for other people. But we try to make sure that the wilderness areas that we have are managed the best they can. So thank you very much. I really, really appreciate it. [The statement of Jim Blomquist follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.101 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.102 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.103 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.104 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I appreciate the work you do. There are some inholdings in a variety of areas that need to be taken care of, and the Owyhees that you mentioned is---- Mr. Blomquist. We own several parcels right now. Mr. Simpson. And that was an important part of the deal when they made the Owyhee Canyon lands the wilderness area that it is, but there are other areas also that are not wilderness areas. If you go down the South Fork of the Snake River in Idaho, you can imagine what it would like look had we not been able to do some land purchases along there and some conservation easements and other types of things. There would be cabins all down that. And I understand why because I would like to have one there. But you would not want to destroy what you see when you go down that, so I appreciate you. Thank you. Mr. Moran. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Next is Alan Rowsome, Director of Conservation Fund for The Wilderness Society. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND WITNESS ALAN ROWSOME, DIRECTOR OF CONSERVATION FUNDING, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY Mr. Rowsome. My name is Alan Rowsome. I am Director of Conservation Funding for The Wilderness Society, and on behalf of our 535,000 members and supporters, I would like to thank the chairman, Ranking Member Moran and the rest of the subcommittee for their efforts on the Interior/Environment budget for fiscal year 2012. I would also like to thank all your hardworking and dedicated staff for their efforts over the past several months, and we know this has been a trying time. Our fiscal situation makes yours a difficult job with very difficult choices, and we thank you for all that you do. Because these are tough times, it is critically important to make the right investments in conservation programs that support our national recreation economy and local communities all across the country while at the same time protecting our land, water and wildlife for future generations. One of the programs that best exemplifies these investments is the Land and Water Conservation Fund. It is The Wilderness Society's highest priority within the Interior budget. LWCF is paid for from offshore oil revenues but has been consistently underfunded over its 46-year history, this despite the fact that LWCF has been hugely successful in every state and every Congressional district while garnering significant bipartisan support nationwide. LWCF is a critical tool the agencies can use to maximize efficiencies and to save critical management dollars. Here are two quick examples. The acquisition of the Rocky Fork tract in Tennessee's Cherokee National Forest has reduced firefighting costs, noxious weed treatments, watershed restoration, boundary management, reduced risk of trespass and encroachment, and lowered costs from road and trailhead closure construction and maintenance. All told, these cost savings would likely amount to over 500,000 management dollars. The block of wetlands ACEC in Colorado is an example of cross-agency collaboration between BLM, the Park Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service to protect critical habitat for a number of threatened species. Acquiring this tract would help ensure that these species are kept off the endangered list, saving significant agency management dollars as well as keeping this area open to recreation and other local economic uses. These projects are examples of LWCF success that need continued investment to alleviate threats, cut costs and protect important lands and waters. We support the President's request to fully fund LWCF in 2012 and look forward to working with the committee to keep LWCF strong. And if I can make my first of probably several gratuitous pitches here, my first opportunity to witness LWCF at work was in fact on a float down the Upper Snake South Fork with members of your staff, members from Senator Crapo's and Senator Risch's staff, and what a great example of how this program can work and be successful, and there are examples of that all across the country. The Wilderness Society also urges full funding for the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Plan to support projects like the Selway Middle Fork in Idaho, which was one of the 10 projects selected last year. It is a 1.4-million-acre project that was collaboratively developed with the involvement of diverse interest groups. Restoration activities include commercial logging and community fire protection, road upgrades and decommissioning, and culvert replacement and noxious weed treatments. This project will bring 400 much-needed jobs to Idaho and provide timber to local mills. We also support the Administration's fiscal year 2012 increase of $50 million for the National Landscape Conservation System to provide for greater visitor safety and to allow for resource management work to be completed in a more timely manner at places like Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in Idaho and Canyons of the Ancients National Monument in Colorado, which hosts the highest concentration of archaeological sites in the country. We were disappointed that the fiscal year 2011 spending bill cut funding in behalf for the Forest Service's Legacy Road and Trails Remediation program. Cuts like this in the future will imperil projects like in Idaho, where tribes, advisory committees and land managers are working together to restore habitat for economically important cutthroat and steelhead trout populations. Work was performed by private contractors, creating family wage jobs and decommissioning high-risk roads helped limit both environmental damage and long-term maintenance. Also disappointing in the fiscal year 2011 budget was the inclusion of a funding limitation on the BLM's new wildland policy. We are very appreciative of the chairman's support of wilderness in Idaho and we hope to work with you to ensure this provision is not included in the fiscal year 2012 budget. Finally, TWS is a strong proponent of transitioning our country to a sustainable energy economy by developing our energy resources quickly and responsibly. We believe renewable energy is an appropriate use of the public lands when sited in areas screened for habitat, resource or cultural conflicts. This past year, the Department approved nine solar energy projects which combined will provide over 7,300 jobs. Cuts to the Department's renewable energy program would put projects and jobs at risk. We know the committee has tough decisions ahead and we appreciate all of your work on behalf of the lands, waters and wildlife that all Americans enjoy and are part of our shared heritage, so thank you for the opportunity to testify and I would be happy to take any questions you have. [The statement of Alan Rowsome follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.105 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.106 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.107 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.108 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for your testimony. I appreciate it very much. Let me just say since you mentioned the Wild Lands policy, let me give you about a two-second why the funding prohibition was included in H.R. 1. In talking with the Secretary, I understand what he is trying to do but I think it will make it more difficult to actually resolve some of the wilderness debates that are going on across the country, and I sat with the Secretary and talked to him about that. I think he was pretty well aware that this was coming. There are other members, particularly western members, who have some concerns about it. My concerns are that we need to get on with resolving some of these debates about the wilderness study area and what is going to be wilderness and what is not and all that kind of stuff which, as you know, I have been working on in Idaho, and I think putting that policy in place makes it harder to resolve those debates. So I am willing to and want to work with you to see if we can figure out a way to do this that makes sense. Mr. Rowsome. Yes, I think we would like to do that. I think there are a number of ways that we could come together and work on it along with the BLM, so I look forward to working with you. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. Thank you. Mr. Moran. As you know, we deferred to your judgment yesterday on the C.R., but I am sure we will continue to revisit the policy with regard to Wild Lands. It is good testimony. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. We were going to make everything south of the Potomac here Wild Lands but they would not go for that. Mr. Rowsome. We would support that. That would be great. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Next we have Tom Kiernan, President of the National Parks Conservation Association. How are you doing? Good to see you. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. NATIONAL PARKS AND THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE WITNESS TOM KIERNAN, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION Mr. Kiernan. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Great to be here. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Moran. It is wonderful to be here. Since 1919, NPCA has been the leading voice of the American public in protecting our national parks, so on behalf of our over 600,000 members and supporters, it is great to be here to testify. I want to first make a comment about the overarching budgetary challenges that obviously you are facing, and I want to foremost thank you. Within the budgetary constraints that you are dealing with, you have prioritized national parks and the National Park Service operating budget as best you can, and we want to applaud that. We understand that you get it about the importance of the Park Service operating budget, so thank you, and frankly, thank you for your work going forward. We know you will do the very best you can in protecting the Park Service operating budget. I also want to acknowledge within the recent budgetary challenges the shutdown, how virtually it seemed to us every article out there talking about the shutdown referred to the impact on national parks and that the parks, the Washington Monument, Grand Canyon, et cetera, would be closed. The parks are so very special, and where did President Obama go Saturday morning to say the government was at work? He was at a national park at the Lincoln Memorial, so they are very special. As Ken Burns said in his seven-part documentary, they are uniquely American, uniquely democratic. They are the soul of America. So within that context, we want to talk about the operating budget a bit more and then put in a plug for LWCF and the RTCA. The operating budget is NPCA's highest priority. You will recall well it was four, five or six years ago where the parks faced over an $800 million annual funding shortfall. We had a period at which National Park Service rangers were endangered species in our national parks. We had dirty and broken restrooms. We had visitors centers that were closed. We had dangerous roads. We had deteriorating historic artifacts. And with that backdrop, President Bush proposed the idea of a centennial initiative from 2008 through 2016. He proposed $100 million increase each year to enhance and better protect our national parks. So in fiscal year 2008, that was approved by Congress. In fiscal year 2009, another $100 million increase. In 2010, President Obama continued that proposal, and that as well was approved. As a result of those increases, we were able to see in a number of parks a return of park rangers, if you will. Just as one example in Shenandoah, their permanent staff was historically around 50. It had dropped to 26. It had been cut in half. But with those increases, it started coming back. What we want to most have happen is avoid going back to that era when we had rangers as endangered rangers and shut visitors centers. That is what we want to avoid. So going forward, we are looking for $100 million increase. We understand that that is very, very unlikely, so most importantly, we want to avoid any further cuts that would get back to a period at which you see cartoons in newspapers about the only time people seeing a park ranger is at the entrance gate taking the fee. That is what we want to avoid. In addition to the benefit for the visitors and for the parks with the operating budget, it also does lead to significant economic activity in rural America. Every dollar that is invested in the parks yields at least a $4 increase in economic activity surrounding the park. There was a recent study done that the Idaho Statesman reported on March 14th that showed at Yellowstone, over 5,000 private sector sectors outside of the park, at Craters of the Moon, over 100 jobs outside of the park, Grand Teton, over 6,000 jobs in the private sector as a result of Park Service funding and activity. So America's parks create American jobs. A third reason on the operating budget, the importance of it, is just look at the polling of the American public. A couple years ago, Harris did a poll asking the American public the most admired federal agencies. The National Park Service, the number one most admired agency by the American people ahead of the armed forces, ahead of Social Security. The American people in other polls went on to say even in the tough fiscal times that we have right now, a strong bipartisan majority, 73 percent, believe it is important that the parks are fully restored in time for their centennial in 2016. So that is our strong support for the operating budget. I do want to echo some previous testimonies on the Land and Water Conservation Fund. We do support full funding there and would just emphasize that funding of the Land and Water Conservation Fund does enable purchases from private inholders inside the parks, willing sellers. By doing that, you reduce the management burden on the national parks. It improves their ability to control invasives, to deal with wildfires, to make recreational access, and a good example that you know is the Grand Teton land exchange that is before you. By making that exchange possible, it will reduce the long-term management burden on the parks, making it more efficient and more effective. I do want to put, as I said, that plug in for some of the small programs, the Rails to Trails Conservation Assistance program, RTCA, small dollar amount, huge impact, so I would you would go for an increase there. In closing, I would just mention parks have been referred to as the 394 branch campuses of the world's greatest university. What we want to do is have a situation where that world's greatest university has the faculty that it needs. We do not want to go back to a scenario where the world's greatest university does not have faculty. So thank you very much for your great work and how much we look forward to continue working with you to protect the parks. [The statement of Tom Kiernan follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.109 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.110 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.111 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.112 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thank you for the work you do. You know I am a supporter of the parks as I think everybody on this committee, and we will do what we can. These are challenging budget times but we will do what we can to make sure that we do not go back to, as you said, a time when the rangers are endangered species. Mr. Kiernan. Exactly. Thank you very much. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Other questions? Thank you. Mr. Kiernan. Thank you very much. Mr. Simpson. Tom Cassidy, Director of Federal Land Programs for the Nature Conservancy. How are you doing, Tom? ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND WITNESS TOM CASSIDY, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL LAND PROGRAMS, THE NATURE CONSERVANCY Mr. Cassidy. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee. I appreciate this opportunity to present The Nature Conservancy's recommendations for fiscal year 2012 appropriations. The Nature Conservancy is an international nonprofit conservation organization working around the world to protect ecologically important lands and waters for nature and people. I will highlight today only a few aspects of my written testimony. Plainly, this an unusual budget year and a very challenging fiscal environment. The conservancy recognizes the need for fiscal austerity. However, we do not believe that conservation programs should suffer from disproportionate and extreme reductions. Our budget recommendations this year, and this is different, do not exceed the budget request except for a few instances in which we recommend fiscal year 2010 funding levels. We look forward to working with you, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, as you address the ongoing needs for conservation investments that are necessary to sustain our Nation's heritage of natural resources and the economic vitality of communities across the Nation. We are an enthusiastic supporter of the President's request to fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund and the mix of programs it supports. We are especially interested in the competitive stateside program and would like to acknowledge the version of this program that was proposed last year by Ranking Member Moran. We are hopeful that increased funding for LWCF can also be the catalyst for the kind of cooperative and community-based conservation programs that are called for in the President's America Great Outdoors initiative. Our priorities this year include continuing phased acquisition of projects at Hell's Canyon National Recreation Area, the Montana Legacy project and Arizona's Shield Ranch. We are also pleased to support the Administration's proposal for significant increases, for significant investments in conservation easements on the working ranches of the Flint Hills Conservation Area in Kansas and also the Rocky Mountain Front Conservation Area. Both projects exemplify landscape- scale conservation through the cost-effective means of conservation easements. This year's Forest Legacy priorities include Idaho's Boundary Connections project and continuing the phased acquisition of Kentucky's Big Rivers Corridor and New York's Follensby Pond. We also support the President's request for the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund. The conservancy and its partners have used this program to secure key habitat for numerous threatened endangered and at-risk species and thus help avoid conflicts over ESA issues. This program has been used to provide permanent habitat protection through conservation easements on high-priority private lands such as in northern Idaho's Kootenai Valley. Fish, wildlife and their habitats are and will continue to be profoundly impacted by climate change regardless of our success in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. If we are to get ahead of such change to avoid disastrous losses in critical habitat and the species that depend on that habitat, we must develop the place-based science to make informed cost-effective management investments. We welcome the President's and this committee's commitment to both the USGS Climate Science Centers and the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Now, there is one program for which we seek funding that is not in the President's budget, and that is the National Wildlife Refuge Fund, and we agree with you, Mr. Chairman, that the Administration's proposal to eliminate the discretionary funding of that program should be reversed, and we would recommend funding at the fiscal year 2010 enacted level. Now, EPA's programs make important contributions to the Nation's conservation agenda. National estuary, wetland and watershed programs protect vital resources essential to community health and economic prosperity. The agency's targeted geographic programs support scientific research, planning and cost-effective actions to improve water quality and restore aquatic ecosystems. We support the request for the water ecosystem and geographic programs including the Great Lakes, Chesapeake Bay and also Puget Sound. So thank you for the opportunity to present our recommendations, and I would be delighted to answer any questions you may have. [The statement of Tom Cassidy follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.113 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.114 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.115 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.116 Mr. Simpson. Thanks, Tom. I appreciate you being here today. We look forward to working with you as we put together the 2012 budget once we know what our numbers are going to be. I suspect they are not going to be pretty, but we look forward to working with you to make sure we address the high priorities within these agencies. Mr. Cassidy. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Moran. Thank you, and thanks for all you do, Tom, on behalf of the Nature Conservancy. It is a great organization with great people. Mr. Cassidy. Thank you, Congressman. Mr. Simpson. Next we have John Turner, past President and CEO and former Director of the Conservation Fund. How are you doing today? Mr. Turner. Good morning. Mr. Simpson. Good morning. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. THE CONSERVATION FUND WITNESS JOHN TURNER, PAST PRESIDENT AND CEO, FORMER DIRECTOR, THE CONSERVATION FUND, FWS Mr. Turner. Mr. Chairman and Congressman Moran, a long-time friend, Congresswoman Lummis, I certainly appreciate the opportunity to appear before you this morning with other colleagues from the land conservation community. I am honored to represent The Conservation Fund, a national advocacy nonprofit that has rather a unique mission statement, conservation and economic development, but with federal, state and local landowner partners we have protected some 7 million acres across this great country of ours in the last 35 years. As a native Westerner, my testimony attempts to draw attention to what are some very special projects in eastern Idaho, Montana, Wyoming with some in Texas and the Southwest, and I might interject, Mr. Chairman, you asked about the concern in the West about the expansion of federal lands. I think one excellent tool, it is my hope that this Congress could reauthorize the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act, which allows the federal agencies to take fragmented pieces of land and sell those, use those receipts to buy priority conservation lands. I would mention some other projects but as addicted fly fisherman and old river guide, I would like to draw attention this morning to three ongoing projects that are helping to protect three of the finest riparian river corridors and wild trout fishery found anywhere on the globe, and you mentioned one, Mr. Chairman, the Henry and South Fork of the Snake where a decade of work has protected some 14 miles of that great stretch. Second would be the North Platte River near Casper, Wyoming, which has more big wild trout per mile than anyplace in the country. And the third would be the Upper Snake River and associated lands in Grand Teton National Park. These are ongoing efforts where years of work have been done and we have willing landowners and great opportunity. I do want to take this opportunity to personally invite you, Mr. Chairman, or any members of the committee to come out and visit that landscape, perhaps get in a drift boat and float these wonderful river stretches. Mr. Simpson. I want to go see that one that has more trout per mile than any other stream. Are they smart trout? Mr. Turner. They are smart trout. Mr. Simpson. Uh-oh. Mr. Turner. It is certainly one of the great fisheries is the South Fork of the Snake that I am pleased to enjoy. Mr. Moran. Until Chairman Simpson gets there, and then they don't have the most trout. Mr. Simpson. It is a humbling experience to go out and try to outsmart a fish and lose. Mr. Turner. Well, thank you for sharing that resource with those of us in Wyoming as we are happy to share the Tetons with you and your constituents. Mr. Chairman, I do want to take this morning's opportunity to comment on what I think you appropriately drew attention to, the severe fiscal crisis facing this country and the daunting challenge this committee has in funding our federal need. It is my hope that we can as a Nation sustain the country's great land conservation legacy. But personally, I do not see how we can afford to sustain this great tradition without seriously addressing what Chairman Ryan calls the main drivers of our deficit challenge and these drivers, I agree, are the major entitlement programs of the country. As one of the few who might appear before you here on the panel that has finally aspired to the chronological category of senior citizen and one that believes himself to be a fiscal conservative and conservationist, I strongly support the long-term efforts to make major revisions to Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid. I simply think we must do this if we believe we can continue to invest adequately on behalf of today's and tomorrow's children in conserving watersheds, wildlife habitat, parklands, forests, outdoor recreation and working landscapes, farms and ranches and open space. As we are all aware and has been mentioned, many of these programs represent dedicated funding sources and embrace the economically sound strategy of taking revenues from our non- renewable, depletable equity base and reinvesting these receipts into renewable equities such as parklands, watersheds, wildlife resources, forests, recreation areas and working landscapes. These renewable equities then provide economic and job benefits for decades and hopefully centuries to come. In summary, Mr. Chairman, I would hope we could all agree that conserving natural landscapes and wild resources for their own intrinsic value and making these available to all our citizenry was uniquely an American idea. This wonderful legacy defines us truly as Americans. It has been one of our great gifts to the global community. With your help, it is my hope that we can continue this unsurpassed legacy for future generations. Thank you. [The statement of John Turner follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.117 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.118 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.119 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.120 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, and I will see you out on one of those streams. Mr. Turner. I look forward to joining you out on the river. Mr. Simpson. We will do it. Thank you. We next have Jeff Trandahl, the Executive Director of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Welcome back. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WITNESS JEFF TRANDAHL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION Mr. Trandahl. Thank you. It is always good to see you, and it is wonderful actually following a gentleman from Wyoming, being a boy from South Dakota, and welcome to the subcommittee. I just want to start off and say I know it has been a very bumpy ride the last couple of months for everybody here on the subcommittee and the staff, and we appreciate and we want to thank you guys because despite all the challenges out there, the best that could be done has definitely been done and, you know, there is a tough road ahead and we are all here in partnership to work with everybody to try to make it all come together. As most of you are very familiar, we are a foundation that was actually created by you, Congress, back in 1984 at a very similar financial time where the government was losing resources and the concept was to set up a foundation that could go out and privately leverage up alongside those federal resources in order to accomplish a lot of goals all of us wish to see done. I am mainly here to basically reaffirm three items in the President's budget that has come before you. One is $8.5 million in the Fish and Wildlife Service budget, $3 million in the Bureau of Land Management budget and $3 million in the Forest Service budget which would come to the foundation. By law, we are required to leverage that money at least one to one. As most of you know, we managed last year about $40 million in federal money. We leveraged it up to about $180 million. So we are actually achieving at more than a three to one. A lot of you are also familiar in terms of what we did down in the Gulf, all with 100 percent private dollars, nearly $25 million that we were able to put in during the response itself in order to prevent wildlife losses down there, which was great. The other thing I would say to the subcommittee is, I am always the optimist, and the foundation, as you know, has been growing the last five years. We have been growing roughly about 20 percent a year. And as the economy is coming back, even though the economy went down there, we continue to grow and we continue to see incredible, incredible private philanthropic dollars that are out there, and that seed money that you provide us, we feel very confident not only can we continue to build and move this thing forward but just even a few months ago I actually achieved the largest individual private contribution we have ever gotten into the foundation, and that was a $20 million gift from a private individual, and that is going to focus on a conservation need that a lot of us do not know much about which is seabirds, but they are one of the most imperiled species on earth and we have seen about a 90 percent decline in the Pacific over the last decade, and if we do not address the issue now, which the Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA clearly do not have the resources to do, it will become an enormous issue economically so that one gift we will be able to leverage into $25 million to $30 million from the foundation and hopefully we will do what we have been able to do in the past, which is to take a large environmental issue like that, check the box, get the recovery under way and everybody move forward without anything having to be disrupted. With that, I will turn it over to you to drill me with questions. [The statement of Jeff Trandahl follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.121 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.122 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.123 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, and I know that the foundation does a great job in leveraging money and getting private sources, and of course, we need a lot more of that, frankly, in a lot of different areas if we are going to fund a lot of these programs because, as you mentioned, the budget situation in this country is not pretty and is not anticipated to be pretty for a while. I appreciate it, Jeff. Thank you very much. Mr. Trandahl. And I should mention one last little thing, which is our reauthorization is up in the other committee. I am working very hard to get the committee to get it done, and we were trying to get it done in the last Congress and obviously we were not able to get it accomplished, so I am with the staff again next week and hopefully we get it on the calendar and we do not see an issue in terms of the reauthorization. Mr. Simpson. Good. Thank you. Mr. Trandahl. Thank you, gentlemen. Mr. Simpson. Next we have Gary Werner, the Executive Director of the Partnership for the National Trails System. How are you doing this morning, Gary? Mr. Werner. Fine. Mr. Simpson. Good. Mr. Werner. Good to see you again. Mr. Simpson. Good to see you. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. PUBLIC LANDS, BLM, NATIONAL PARKS WITNESS GARY WERNER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PARTNERSHIP FOR THE NATIONAL TRAILS SYSTEM Mr. Werner. And I thank you, Mr. Chairman and Congressman Moran, Congresswoman Lummis for the opportunity to testify. Just as a reminder, I have for you--as you know, I represent 35 organizations that are your partners in the grand experiment of the National Trails System, and I am here to thank you, first off, for the strong support you have provided financially to the Park Service, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management for helping to manage and administer those trails over the last dozen years or more but also the equally important guidance that you have provided at a number of junctures to the agencies about how they could be better partners. As you know, the National Trails System is a rather unique public-private venture that Congress has authorized. Over the last 40 years, you have authorized 30 National Scenic and Historic Trails that span more than 50,000 miles through 49 states, and we represent your private partners in that venture. I am happy to say that in 2010, our organizations organized, motivated and guided citizen volunteers to contribute 1.1 million hours of volunteer labor valued at over $24 million. Our organizations contributed another greater than $12 million, a total of almost $37 million of our effort for these trails. Congress was able to appropriate about $29 million to the three agencies for their part. So we are truly here as your partners with a hand out saying we are here to help. The other thing that you know is that unfortunately this wonderful system is mostly incomplete and so we need critical assistance, financial assistance in several areas. One is the operations funding for the Park Service, the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management. In our testimony, we are asking for a modest increase for each of those agencies. One of the ways that we do much of our work, and we were very happy to see that the Administration decided once again that the value of the Challenge Cost Share programs for the National Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management and the Fish and Wildlife Service is really tremendous. We over the years have worked mostly Park Service Challenge Cost Share and the leverage is supposed to be one to one. I think our average has been about three to one. We have oftentimes had projects 10 to one. It is money that, as others have said, provides seed money, gets a lot of projects done in local communities but it also provides an opportunity for the communities to come out and get involved and make their contributions. So what we are suggesting is a modest increase in the amount of money beyond what the President is asking for, of up to $4.5 million for Challenge Cost Share with $1.5 million of that coming for the National Trails System. In the past you have guided money that way toward the trails. Secondly, of equal importance, as a number of people have mentioned already, is the Land and Water Conservation Fund to complete critical gaps in the trails. We fully support the effort to try to fully fund it this year as the Administration is proposing. What we are specifically asking for is a total of about $50 million spread across the Forest Service, the Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management that would among other things help protect places like City of Rocks Reserve in Idaho and a key section of the Nez Perce Trail in Hell's Canyon, a section along the Platte River near Casper for the Oregon-California Pony Express Mormon Pioneer Trail plus others in other states. We do not have any in Virginia because the AT is complete through much of Virginia. But it is critical that you continue to support those investments and help us complete the trails. The other two things I would like to ask you about are things that do not necessarily require expending more money but they do require providing guidance to the agencies. The Bureau of Land Management budget, as you know, is divided up into sub- activity accounts. They have no sub-activity account for trails, and so to fund their efforts for the National Scenic Trails--and they have more miles of historic trails on the public land than any of the other agencies--they have to take from 18 to 20 different sub-activity accounts and it is an accounting nightmare for them, it is an accounting nightmare for us to try to match money and, you know, make things work, make plans to leverage. So we would ask you to, as I think you did last year, direct the Administration to come up with a sub- activity account for the National Trails System and for the Wild and Scenic River System. The last item I want to mention is one that came up very strongly in the last few weeks with the budget issues in fiscal year 2011, and that is the travel ceilings for the agencies. These long-distance trails spanning thousands of miles based upon relationships with many units of government and nonprofit partners require the ability to come and sit down as we are doing now face to face and talk to establish the kind of trust and ongoing partnerships. If the federal folks involved with the trails cannot travel, they quite simply cannot do the work that they need to do, and I am hoping that you might provide some guidance to the agencies that maybe the trails are different than parks that are all in one place and maybe it makes sense not to restrict travel from a park, but if you have got to trail along thousands of miles of trails, maybe you should not be held to the same standard, if you will. In closing, I want to thank you all again and I do have some additional--this is a report on some of the Challenge Cost Share programs. This is a report we have done the last several years on youth activities that we are doing in the trails systems. And finally, this is our latest national newsletter, which gives you a kind of short capsule of things that are happening along the trails across the United States. We are very proud that we are your private sector partners in a public-private venture for public benefit, and we thank you again for the longstanding support the committee has given. [The statement of Mr. Werner follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.124 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.125 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.126 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.127 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thanks for your testimony. Next we have John Calvelli, Executive Vice President of Public Affairs at the Wildlife Conservation Society. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. WILDLIFE AND WILDERNESS WITNESS JOHN CALVELLI, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY Mr. Calvelli. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member, Members of Congress. Thank you so much for giving me the opportunity to testify today. My name is John Calvelli. I am the Executive Vice President of Public Affairs at the Wildlife Conservation Society. WCS is one of those venerable institutions founded in 1895 with the help of Teddy Roosevelt as a science-based conservation organization with the mission of saving wildlife and wild places around the globe. Today WCS manages the largest network of urban wildlife parks in the United States led by our flagship, the Bronx Zoo. Our fieldwork now helps save 25 percent of the earth's biodiversity in over 60 countries around the world. I do want to make a brief note that if you are looking for dumb trout, we run the largest private protected area in Tierra del Fuego in Chile, and I, who am a terrible fisher, did catch something relatively large, so Mr. Chairman---- Mr. Simpson. It is a long ways to go. Mr. Calvelli. It is a long ways to go but they are really dumb, sir. We believe this work is necessary to protect the planet's natural capital that is the foundation of future prosperity. Today I would like to describe the critical role that domestic and international conservation play in increasing our Nation's economic and national security while reaffirming our global position as a conservation leader. WCS has been an active partner in supporting America's conservation tradition with our grant program funded by the Doris Duke Foundation, which is helping to leverage funds from the Fish and Wildlife Service's state wildlife grant. We have helped through the Doris Duke Foundation to give about $14 million to more than 46 states including Idaho--another blatant comment--on behalf of Idaho for wildlife corridor protection. WCS recommends maintaining fiscal year 2010 funding of $95 million in fiscal year 2012 for state wildlife grants. The Interior Department estimates that nature-based activities supported by federal programs like state wildlife grants could generate $14.1 billion in fiscal year 2012 for American communities. We believe that public land management should be science based with an emphasis on landscape-level conservation. WCS supports the Administration's request of $31 million for the USGS Climate Science Centers, which will bring scientists and stakeholders together to develop landscape-level management strategies. These strategies are important in balancing energy development and wildlife conservation in places like Alaska's National Petroleum Reserve. I do want to state up front that we were founded by members of the business community. We understand the importance of business. We also understand that the National Petroleum Reserve was created those many years ago to find petroleum but through fate and through nature, that area is also very important for migratory birds, and what we are looking for is some type of focus on specific areas so that we can create protected areas so that we can support subsidence hunting in the local areas, preserve important bird and mammal habitats while promoting energy development and respecting first nation practices. Conservation can bring nations together for a common cause, building diplomatic relationships and preventing conflict. The 2010 International Tiger Summit in Russia was the first ever heads of state summit dedicated to a single species that signaled a strong commitment from the international community. Just a note, there are actually more tigers in Texas than there are in the wild at this point. The Fish and Wildlife Service's Multinational Species Conservation Fund exemplifies this commitment with its Rhino-Tiger Fund, which has helped WCS develop a regionally targeted strategy to give tiger populations a chance to recover. We recommend restoring fiscal year 2010 funding levels for the Multinational Species Conservation Fund with an additional $1 million for tigers totaling $12.5 million. This program enjoys broad American constituent support with more than 50 million members of the coalition and over $25 million generated in private investments in fiscal year 2009 alone. So as you can see, these programs have great support, but more than that, they also leverage significant federal funds. Broader ecosystem protection is critical to the preservation of species. WCS recommends funding the Wildlife Without Borders program at $7.4 million of which $1 million is for the Critically Endangered Species Fund would ensure the conservation of scores of endangered birds and animals. The Forest Service International Program provides technical support in forest management in the world's most unstable regions. It also represents the U.S. forest products industry in international trade agreements and combats illegal logging, which costs American businesses $1 billion annually. WCS requests a restoration of this line item in fiscal year 2012 with funding maintained at the fiscal year 2010 level of $9.8 million. I conclude with a conservation success story thanks to America's investment in global, economic and environmental sustainability. Having endured decades of Khmer rule and significant human loss, Cambodia is moving towards stability. In 2009, WCS helped Cambodia transform a former logging concession into protection forest safeguarding threatened animals and benefiting local hunters and farmers who have retained access to the forest to balance conservation with sustainable development. We focus on law enforcement, community engagement and long-term monitoring and research while the Cambodian government targets major crimes. The Fish and Wildlife Service's initial investment has leveraged significant funding from other sources, making this project possible. Biodiversity conservation in places like Cambodia and also in places like South Sudan are integral to finding long-term solutions to reduce dependence on foreign aid and empowering its citizens to benefit from ecosystem services. Thank you for the opportunity to testify, and unfortunately, although I came here from New York, the capital of marketing, I have no materials. I saw all of our friends providing materials to you. But we are at your disposal to answer any questions, and please feel free to come for a tour of the Bronx Zoo when you are in New York next. [The statement of John Calvelli follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.128 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.129 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.130 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.131 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Questions, comments? Mr. Moran. No. Very good testimony. Excellent. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. We appreciate it. Thank you. Mr. Moran. And a great program. Mr. Simpson. Next, we have Desiree Sorenson-Groves, Vice President for Government Affairs, National Wildlife Refuge Association. Hi, how are you doing? Ms. Sorenson-Groves. I am good. How are you? Mr. Simpson. Excellent. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. WILDLIFE AND WILDERNESS WITNESS DESIREE SORENSON-GROVES, VICE PRESIDENT, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION Ms. Sorenson-Groves. So I am Desiree. I am with the National Wildlife Refuge Association and I am speaking on behalf of myself and also over 190 refuge friends organizations including Friends of Southeast Idaho Refuges, Friends of Potomac Refuges and numerous ones all over the country. We are working on Wyoming. And we also serve as the chair of the Cooperative Alliance for Refuge Enhancement. It is called CARE, a very diverse group of conservation and hunting organizations from Audubon to Ducks Unlimited to the NRA to Defenders of Wildlife, and as you can imagine, we do not agree on much. But the one thing we do agree on is refuge funding, and in fact, Chairman Simpson, you might remember a couple years ago we came in to visit you, and as we were walking past the wolf in the back of your office, you asked the folks from Defenders and the Safari Club how does that work, and you might remember the gentleman from the Safari Club looked at you and said, you know, sir, we do not agree on much but the one thing we do agree on is refuge funding, we see eye to eye. And that pretty much sums up the refuge system. It is unlikely you will find a more diverse constituency for probably any federal program. I mean, that is just the way it is. We thank you for the past increases leading up to fiscal year 2010, which is $503 million, which enabled the refuge system to emerge from dark days of refuge closing. And I have got to tell you, you know, Tom's comment about Park Service endangered species, Park Service employees, well, at the refuge system, they were extinct. So it was pretty bad, pretty dark days. And now fiscal year 2010 is the highest point in refuge funding but that is still 45 percent less than what the refuge system truly needs. The true need for the refuge system is actually $900 million annually. So they are still operating under, you know, incredible challenges. So we do not know what the fiscal year 2011 number is yet. They are still working that out. But any cut however small has a serious impact on refuges, especially when you are talking about an agency that has no fat to cut. The truth is, actually refuges need a small increase every year just to maintain what they are doing. That used to be $15 million annually. Now with the budget freeze, that has gone to $8 million, and that is our request, is an $8 million increase for fiscal year 2012. Now, we understand that that is pretty tough given these kind of times but that is not even the true need. If you look at the management capability needs from fiscal year 2010, it would be $15 million for fiscal year 2011 and then another $8 million for fiscal year 2012. So for the first time in our history as the CARE coalition, we are, in our minds, asking for a cut, and we have never done that before. That was some serious arguments around the table, let me tell you. So we know that fiscal year 2012 is going to be tough but we wanted to give you kind of a sense of what would happen on the ground, especially if you went back to fiscal year 2008 numbers. I know that is something that you guys are thinking about. Well, that is about a 20 percent in funding for the refuge system. Hundreds of staff would be eliminated. Fifty- four visitors centers would close, 11 would not open. Hunting on 48 refuges, fishing on 45 would be eliminated, and the system's inventory and monitoring program we just started would be curtailed. And that is particularly troublesome, considering when the oil spill was coming a year ago, none of the refuges-- well, none of the refuges nationwide have a comprehensive inventory. They do not know what they have. I mean, this is kind of mind-boggling because it is because of funding costs, they just do not have the ability to figure out what they have. So it is hard for them to know what they should manage more. To this date, the only refuges in the entire system, 553 refuges, that actually have a comprehensive inventory are the ones that were in the path of the oil. That is it. And if we had not had that, then when we talk about, you know, getting compensation from BP, there is no way that they could prove it. But the truth is, when it comes to that, the people who are most impacted are the users of the refuge system. Friends and volunteers provide 20 percent of all the work done on national wildlife refuges. That is the equivalent of 648 full-time staff, and that is from, you know, Fish and Wildlife Service is only--refuge system is only about 3,500 staff, so it is an enormous impact on the grounds. And those are some of the programs that will get curtailed. They are the first things to go. The other people on the ground, I wanted to bring a couple pictures. This is from Mayor Dennis Fife. He is from Brigham City, Utah, and I think this photo kind of sums it up. This is the archway and it says welcome to Brigham, gateway to the world's greatest wild bird refuge. They love their refuge. And in his words, you know, business owners in his city depend on the refuge because people use their stores, their restaurants and everything there. Doug Wood, he is a professor at--this is not Doug Wood, by the way. He is a professor at Southeastern Oklahoma State University. He uses the Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge to teach his students how to do research, his biology students, and so right here they are birding prothonotary warblers, which at this refuge are on the very edge of their range. If he was not doing this, the refuge staff would not be getting information about these species, and you know, the folks would not be learning. And then last I have Tim Reynolds. He is from Rigby, Idaho, a hunter and a bird watcher, interestingly enough, and he is really concerned about budget cuts because at the Camas Refuge, which is where he goes, it costs between $60,000 and $90,000 annually to manage the wetlands for waterfowl, and with budget cuts, the refuge system is already thinking about managing only for upland habitat, not for wetlands, so the hunting is going to go. The birds will go. So it's just one of those impacts. Refuges are economic engines in these local communities. They provide $4 in economic return for every $1 that you guys appropriate, which is pretty significant, and they are a cheap date. They only cost $3.36 per acre to manage, which is the least amount of any public land management agency. So I thank you for considering our request, and I hope all of you go to a national wildlife refuge over your recess. [The statement of Desiree Sorenson-Groves follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.132 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.133 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.134 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.135 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.136 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. We appreciate your testimony. Thanks for being here today. Mr. Moran. You got it all in. Nice job. Mr. Simpson. We have got a series of three votes. Mr. Lewis. Mr. Chairman, if you will, I am going to be running all over the place as you are, but later in testimony Mr. Moran and you will be hearing Doug Headrick from my district in southern California. He specifically will be talking about the Santa Ana sucker that you heard me chat with the Secretary about the other day. Mr. Simpson. Yes, you mentioned that sucker. Mr. Lewis. The one thing that we want to make certain is we do not go down the pathway of the pattern we experienced with the Delta smelt, and all that we can do to respond to Doug's request, I would appreciate. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Mr. Moran. I would love to hear from The Wildlife Society and the Defenders of Wildlife, but I do not know, how much time do we have? Mr. Simpson. We have got three votes. We have five minutes left in this one. Mr. Moran. Of course, that was about two minutes ago. Mr. Simpson. Yes, and then two 5-minute votes, and as soon as that 5-minute vote is over, we are probably talking about quarter til, being back here. Mr. Moran. I am not going to be able to be back. Mr. Simpson. I will be. Mr. Moran. Then okay. Mr. Simpson. We have five more people to testify, so if you will be patient with us for the next 25 minutes, 20 minutes while we go over and cast our votes for truth, justice and the American way of life. [Recess.] Mr. Simpson. Next we have Laura Bies, the Director of Government Affairs for The Wildlife Society. How are you doing today? Ms. Bies. Doing well. How are you guys? Mr. Simpson. Good. ---------- -- -------- Friday, April 15, 2011. WILDLIFE AND WILDERNESS WITNESS LAURA BIES, DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY Ms. Bies. Thank you for the opportunity to testify. My name is Laura Bies. I am the Director of Government Affairs with The Wildlife Society. We represent over 10,000 professional wildlife biologists and managers who are all dedicated to excellence in wildlife stewardship through science and education, and I talk about some of our priorities today and then obviously you can refer to my written testimony for more detail. While we fully understand the limits of the current fiscal situation, we feel Congress also has a responsibility to ensure that the investments of previous generations in wildlife management and conservation are not squandered. Our land and natural resource management agencies have built a strong foundation of responsible science-based wildlife management and conservation over the past century and they need the resources to continue this important work, especially in the face of threats such as invasive species, urban sprawl and increasing development, and climate change. Within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, one of these programs is the State and Tribal Wildlife Grants program. It is the only federal program that supports states in preventing wildlife from becoming endangered and it is also the primary program supporting the implementation of comprehensive wildlife conservation strategies or state wildlife action plans. These detailed conservation actions are needed on the ground in every state to keep common species common. We recommend that Congress appropriate $95 million for State and Tribal Wildlife grants. The National Wildlife Refuge System provides an invaluable network of lands for wildlife conservation in addition to unmatched opportunities for outdoor recreation. Many years of stagnant budgets have increased the operations and maintenance backlog of the system. Refuge visitors often show up to find visitors centers closed, hiking trails in disrepair and habitat restoration programs eliminated. As a member of CARE, the Cooperative Alliance for Refuge Enhancement, which Desiree spoke about, we recommend that Congress provide $511 million for operation maintenance of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Our Bureau of Land Management lands support over 3,000 species of wildlife, more than 300 federally proposed or listed species, and more than 1,300 sensitive plant species. However, the BLM currently only has about one biologist per 591,000 acres of land and the costs they face for endangered and threatened species recovery continue to rise. In addition, the wildlife and the threatened and endangered species management programs have been forced to pay for the compliance activities of BLM's energy, grazing and other non- wildlife-related program which erodes their ability to conduct proactive conservation activities on those lands. Given the underfunding of the BLM's wildlife programs combined with the tremendous expansion of energy development across the BLM landscape that we have seen in recent decades, we recommend funding of $40 million for BLM's wildlife management program. The Wildlife Society appreciates BLM's commitment to addressing the problems identified with wild horse and burro management on their lands. The President has requested an increase of $12 million for this program to implement a new strategy for management and also act on recommendations provided by the Inspector General. We are concerned, however, about the BLM's emphasis on fertility control and their proposal to reduce the number of horses removed from the range. Horses are already above the appropriate management levels as set by BLM in most of these areas so we feel the proposal to reduce the number of horses removed from the range is ill- conceived. The request of $75.7 million should be provided to BLM if they continue to remove these excess horses from the range and also focus additional resources on habitat restoration. Within the U.S. Geological Survey, the cooperative fish and wildlife research units play a key role in conducting research on renewable natural resource questions, expanding into education of graduate students, providing technical assistance on natural resource issues, and providing continued education for natural resource professionals like our members. In 2001, Congress fully funded these units which allowed productivity to rise to record levels. Since then, however, budgetary shortfalls have caused an erosion of available funds. This has resulted in a current staffing vacancy of nearly one-quarter of the professional workforce within those units. To fill these current vacancies, restore the seriously eroded operational funds and to enhance national program coordination, $22 million should be appropriated for the cooperative fish and wildlife research units. We appreciate the fiscal year 2010 funding of $15.1 million for the National Climate change and Wildlife Science Center. The center is going to play a really pivotal role in addressing the impacts of climate change on fish and wildlife by providing essential scientific support, and we recommend funding for this center at $25 million. Finally, we ask Congress to provide additional funding to fight white nose syndrome in bats. The current loss of bat populations from white nose syndrome is one of the most precipitous wildlife declines really in the past century in North America and would likely have significant ecological and economic impacts. We request a total funding of $11.1 million for white nose syndrome research, monitoring and response spread among the various federal agencies that are involved in this effort. Thank you for considering the views and the recommendations of the wildlife professionals and we are available to continue working with you and your staff throughout the process. [The statement of Laura Bies follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.137 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.138 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.139 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.140 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. We look forward to working with you on this and finding out what a white nose bat is. I appreciate it. Thank you. Ms. Bies. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Next, we have Mary Beth Beetham, Legislative Director of the Defenders of Wildlife. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. WILDLIFE AND WILDERNESS WITNESS MARY BETH BEETHAM, DIRECTOR OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Ms. Beetham. Thank you very much for the opportunity to testify. I really appreciate it. Defenders of Wildlife has more than 1 million members and supporters around the country, and we are dedicated to the conservation of wild animals and plants in their natural communities. Even in these challenging budget times, Defenders continues to believe that investments in the protection of wildlife are a wise choice for our Nation. To protect wildlife, its habitat must be protected, which in turn protects healthy natural systems that provide clean air, clean water, food, medicines and other products we all need to live healthy lives. Federal programs that protect imperiled species, migratory birds, refuges, forests and other lands essential to wildlife conservation, as I am sure you well know, are therefore all going to ultimately support the health and well-being of the American people. The devastating Deepwater Horizon oil spill offered a valuable but unfortunate lesson in the importance of a healthy Gulf Coast ecosystem for the families and the communities dependent upon it. Moreover, the American public cares deeply about wildlife conservation as they demonstrate by opening their pocketbooks and spending about $120 billion every year on wildlife-associated recreation. The programs that Defenders highlights in our written testimony are the ones under the subcommittee's jurisdiction that we think are the most important for wildlife conservation, and we know these are challenging budget times so we are asking that you do as much as you can to protect them. I would like to take just a few minutes to highlight what we think are some of the compelling needs just as examples. The National Wildlife Refuge System, as Desiree already mentioned, anchors our Nation's wildlife conservation efforts yet flat or declining budgets will force its return to a massive restructuring program that will harm basic functions such as restoring habitats, controlling illegal activities and invasive species, and working with visitors. The special agents of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement are on the front lines between protected plants and animals and the poachers and the smugglers who traffic in them. The annual illegal wildlife trade is valued at $10 billion annually and that is second only after the illegal trade in drugs and arms yet the special agents force currently falls 23 percent below its authorized level and even 16 percent below its previous high water mark. As our Nation pursues the needed expansion of renewable energy development, it is also important that that move forward in such a way that wildlife protections are protected and there is no net loss of any wildlife populations. Yet even for a species as iconic as the golden eagle, there is not currently enough information to ensure that wind turbines can be sited in such a way that will prevent harm. BLM and Forest Service lands, as has already just been previously said, are becoming increasingly important to the conservation of wildlife in our country, each supporting more than 3,000 species. BLM must survey at least 400 caves, which they have not even begun to do yet, for the presence or absence of bats in order to begin to address white nose syndrome, which is a devastating disease that has killed more than a million bats across the country and is continuing to spread, and why we should care about white nose syndrome? Well, bats are beneficial in many ways including as voracious eaters of insects that are pests. The Forest Service Wildlife and Fish program falls nearly $16 million below its 2001 inflation-adjusted level, so that program is having a hard time. And they also have 19 percent fewer biologists and botanists than they had in 1995. And while we support the Administration's Integrated Resource Restoration initiative, we support the stated goals of the Integrated Resource Restoration initiative. We do have concerns about the adequacy of the science-based management objectives that the agency has put forward so far and also the conservation standards that have also been put forward at this point, especially given that they plan to merge the wildlife and fisheries program into Integrated Resource Restoration. And finally, we support the Administration's continued emphasis on landscape-level conservation that is intended to build resilience to broad-scale economic stressors like climate change, drought, wildfire, invasive species and other impacts. However, as I know I have heard you say many times and we have spoken to you about this previously, we believe that these efforts really need to be effectively and efficiently coordinated and we need to make sure there is not duplication going on in order for them to be really effective, and they also really need to be lifting the boats of the basic operating programs of the agency such as providing them with the inventory and monitoring resources that they need. And the impacts, and while these landscape-level projects and conservation efforts are moving forward, the impacts of large undertakings such as the expanded development of renewable energy should be getting considered as they are planning all their landscape-level efforts, not separately. So thank you very much. We appreciate the opportunity and we look forward now that we are on to fiscal year 2012, we hope, we look forward to working with you because we know it is going to be a challenging year. [The statement of Mary Beth Beetham follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.141 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.142 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.143 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.144 Mr. Simpson. Well, thank you for your testimony, and we do look forward to working with you as we try to make a budget that makes sense with what limited resources we are going to have in this coming year. Ms. Beetham. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Nina Fascione. Is that even close? Ms. Fascione. It was very close, actually, just about right on. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Thank you, the Executive Director of the Bat Conservation International. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. WILDLIFE AND WILDERNESS WITNESS NINA FASCIONE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL Ms. Fascione. Yes, and this, sir, is, I am afraid, a dead bat with white nose syndrome, so I am here---- Mr. Simpson. It is not a white nose bat, it is white nose syndrome? Ms. Fascione. It is a fungus that is devastating bat populations in the United States. It is a newly described newly emerging disease that was first discovered outside of a cave in Albany, New York, in 2006, so it is brand new. It has killed more than a million bats by far, as you have heard, although my personal opinion is that it has destroyed at least an order of magnitude larger than that. As you can imagine, bats are hard to count and so the numbers are not accurate. Mr. Simpson. How does it kill them? Ms. Fascione. It is a cold-loving fungus that impacts hibernating bats, as they are hibernating in caves and mines in the winter, and as anybody who has ever had athlete's foot knows, when you get a fungus, it is very itchy and irritating. It wakes the bats up from hibernation. Their immune systems kick in and they start burning up their fat reserves. So these bats are waking up twice as much as they would normally without the fungus, and frankly, the cause of death is likely starvation or dehydration. It is causing strange bat behavior like bats flying around in the middle of winter when they should be hibernating or during the day, and it is killing them. It is impacting these hibernating bats. It has so far impacted nine species in 18 states. We heard this two days ago, Kentucky added to the unfortunate list of states that have white nose syndrome. In the United States, we have 46 species of bats. Twenty-five of those are hibernating species. So more than half of our bats in the United States could be impacted by this disease. And you heard my predecessor saying that scientists really are calling this the most precipitous decline in wildlife in North America. A little bit more about the economic benefits of bats. They really do provide enormous benefits to humans. They eat bugs and they happen to have a preference for bugs that eat crops, the cotton bollworm and insect pests that destroy potato, cotton and corn crops. They are enormously beneficial to farmers, and in fact, a study that came out just two weeks ago in the journal Science, a prestigious journal by really some of the Nation's top bat biologists, estimated that bats save farmers in the United States between $3.7 billion and $5.3 billion a year. With the loss of bats at this rate, farmers can start seeing impacts within the next four to five years. It is going to mean their costs go up in pesticides and obviously more pesticides means more chemicals in our environment, so it is really an unfortunate situation all around. In fact, I said the number one million is probably conservative, but if you just take that one million figure, one million bats would eat 700 tons of insects a year. Mr. Simpson. I like bats. Ms. Fascione. So two of the species that are impacted of the nine are endangered federally listed, the gray bat and Indiana bat. The gray bat in fact was doing well under the Endangered Species Act. We were working to delist it until this disease came along. Ninety percent of the gray bat population is in less than ten caves, so if those caves get hit with the fungus, they are likely goners. And these impacts of these species and other potential species that might be potentially listed could have impacts on mining, forestry, construction, transportation and even tourism, so there could be very wide- ranging impacts of possible future listings for bats or frankly cave invertebrates that are impacted with the loss of bats in the cave ecosystems. Many agencies, frankly all the agencies, have been looking at this disease because it is so far-reaching, and in fact, I brought a map to share with you as well. So the Fish and Wildlife Service has been the lead agency on this and they have been working on understanding the disease, how it spreads, surveillance, monitoring and stopping the spread, which will require public education and outreach. We are requesting $11.1 million to continue working on this disease, and we believe that this is a case of where an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure because of these economic benefits from bats and the loss which could be so devastating. The impacts are going to be at both state and federal levels. We understand this is a very tight economic time but this request is really--the agencies have been pouring funding into this already by necessity. This increase is actually just $4.8 million above what they have been doing, and again, is well worth it in the long run. So thank you very much for the opportunity to talk about this disease, and I will share these maps. One is of our current white nose syndrome range and then we just this week created a map with--the gray area is Car System in the western United States, so these are areas where bats will be hibernating. The brown area is where two of the most common species reside, which basically shows that this could spread through the entire Nation including those areas in the West, and because you said you like bats, this is the newest issue of our magazine where we highlight different species. Hopefully you think some of them are pretty cool. [The statement of Nina Fascione follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.145 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.146 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.147 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.148 Mr. Simpson. They are weird looking. Ms. Fascione. They are weird looking, some of them. Some of them are quite cute and they are very important. Mr. Simpson. How do you fight that? Ms. Fascione. Again, as anybody who has had athlete's foot knows, it is actually very hard to fight a fungus, particularly bats are colonial. You know, they live in these huge populations in caves. It is going to be very hard to treat this. You cannot treat with a fungicide or you risk killing other cave biota. So far, agencies and private landowners have been doing decontamination protocols, keeping people out of caves when necessary or when people need to go in caves, doing a full decontamination protocol. The disease is spread bat to bat. So it is going to be a tough task to stop this. You cannot obviously vaccinate bats, and that is what we need to find out. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. Thank you. Ms. Fascione. Thank you, sir. Doug Headrick, General Manager of the Santa Ana Sucker Task Force, as Mr. Lewis said that this is a subject he has brought up many times with the individuals testifying, so welcome. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. WILDLIFE AND WILDERNESS WITNESS DOUG HEADRICK, GENERAL MANAGER, SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT/SANTA ANA SUCKER TASK FORCE Mr. Headrick. Thank you very much, Chairman Simpson. As Congressman Lewis mentioned, I am here today representing the 12 inland California agencies that have banded together in the face of what we believe is regulatory overreach by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Unfortunately, our region has the distinction of having the highest unemployment rate in the entire United States, but in the midst of this economic turmoil, the service under some heavy political and legal pressure by the Center for Biological Diversity threw out their carefully determined Critical Habitat designation from five years ago and greatly expanded that territory late last year. The Santa Ana sucker is a small fish, maybe about six inches long. It was listed as threatened in 2001, and since that time, members of our task force have worked cooperatively with the service and others to conduct studies, monitor the species and also identify restoration projects, and so far we spent well over $1 million to do that. However, after all this cooperative work was in place, in December 2009 the service announced that they were planning to overturn their previous rule based on a closed-door settlement agreement that was signed between the service and the Center for Biological Diversity. Those of us that were going to be most impacted by this decision were not involved in that. So back in 2005, after a lengthy public comment and review process, the service established the critical habitat for this fish. At that time the service intentionally excluded areas of the river that are dry for obvious reasons, finding that these areas were not essential to the conservation of the species, which is the finding required, and that the enormous cost to our economy far outweighed any possible benefits to the fish. But we believe the new designation, the new expanded designation, disregards the scientific and economic realities which should have been central to their decision. In short, the service did not follow its own rules or federal law. Let me underscore if I could that none of the newly designated areas currently nor in the past ever supported a sustainable population of this fish, mainly because they are dry nine to 11 months a year. Even before water diversion started over 100 years ago, based on the climate, these reaches of the river would go dry during dry times. Amazingly, the service included these ephemeral streams in the new critical habitat for the fish. The new untested claim is that the gravel that is on the bed of these dry streams, it might be needed in the future for the fish that live downstream. As you know, water supply reliability in California is a big issue, especially when it is tied to the Sacramento Delta, as we are through the state water project. The new designation critical habitat, directly opposes our efforts to reduce our reliance on that water source. We have been working to undertake stormwater capture programs to expand our water supplies without impacting species. These are projects that capture water that would have flowed to the Pacific Ocean during flood events, not helping humans or fish. This new designation puts these projects in jeopardy and makes us look back to the delta for our water needs. For example, several years ago Congress authorized funding for the Seven Oaks Dam. It is mainly a flood control project. However, Congress also authorized spending to alter the dam's design to allow us to capture more water. After that, the California State Water Resource Control Board spent several years evaluating the project, the water capture project behind Seven Oaks Dam, to try to determine the impacts it might have on the species and determined that with mitigation that we have implemented, the water diversion would not harm the fish. Should this habitat expansion be allowed, our access to this valuable water supply could be nullified, violating Congress's clear intention. How much water is at risk? This is essentially the amount of water that would serve about a million Californians every year. To replace this water with the value of water in California today would cost over $2 billion over the next 25 years. That is assuming we could actually find it. Our region, with its 13 percent unemployment rate, can really ill afford the uncertainty caused by this ruling. When combined with the Delta smelt, which we are all familiar with, this recent ruling essentially could stop all economic growth in our region. Despite this chilling result and the fact that the issue was repeatedly raised with the Fish and Wildlife Service, they chose not to even evaluate the economic issue. Earlier this week, the task force that I represent took the first step to try to reverse this decision by the service. We formally filed what is called a 60-day notice outlining all the deficiencies of the ruling. Now we hope that the service will take the 60 days provided by law to reverse their decision and reestablish the critical habitat to what it was originally determined to be. I ask that the committee please undertake an active role in oversight of the service and its use of the Endangered Species Act as a regulatory tool. Thank you. [The statement of Doug Headrick follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.149 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.150 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.151 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.152 Mr. Simpson. Thank you, and thank you for your testimony. I feel fairly certain that there are a couple members on this committee that will keep us well informed of what is going on, Mr. Lewis and Mr. Calvert. So thanks for your testimony and thanks for being here today. Mr. Headrick. Thank you very much. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Andy Oliver, Coordinator of the Multinational Species Coalition. Ms. Oliver. I am batting cleanup here. Hopefully I will hit a home run. Mr. Simpson. There you go. ---------- Friday, April 15, 2011. WILDLIFE AND WILDERNESS WITNESS ANDY OLIVER, COORDINATION, MULTINATIONAL SPECIES COALITION Ms. Oliver. Mr. Simpson, Chairman Simpson, thank you so much for the opportunity to testify today on behalf of the Multinational Species Coalition on the Multinational Species Conservation Fund of the Fish and Wildlife Service, and I just wanted to thank you and your staff for all of the hard work that has gone into providing this opportunity to testify for all of us. The work that has gone into this as a new participant really, you know, made it very easy and feasible and seamless for all of us so that you could hear the many voices that you have heard over the last four days. My name is Andy Oliver and I serve as the brand-new Coordinator of the Multinational Species Coalition, a broad- based coalition comprised of 32 organizations representing sportsmen, conservationists, zoos, circuses, veterinarians, animal welfare groups and their more than 15 million members, which is a huge number. I was shocked when I heard that. I want to thank you for your past and consistent support for these small but vital programs, and in fiscal year 2012 we respectfully request your support for funding the Multinational Species Conservation Fund at $12.5 million and the Wildlife Without Borders program at $7.4 million. Wildlife conservation programs are a modest but essential piece of the United States engagement with the developing world. Through the Multinational Species Conservation Fund, the United States supplements the efforts of developing countries that are struggling to balance needs of their human populations and wildlife. The Multinational Species Conservation Fund helps to sustain wildlife populations, address threats by controlling poaching, reducing human-wildlife conflict, and protecting essential habitat. By working with local communities, they also improve people's livelihoods, contribute to local and regional stability, and support U.S. security interests in impoverished regions. Over the past two decades, these popular and highly effective programs have provided seed money for public-private partnerships that conserve wild tigers, elephants, rhinos, great apes and marine turtles in their native habitat. The Multinational Species Conservation Fund and the Wildlife Without Borders programs have long enjoyed broad bipartisan support and we urge you to continue that support going forward. Multinational Species Conservation Fund serves the dual purpose of protecting wildlife populations and essential habitat for local communities. They are an excellent investment for the Federal Government, consistently leveraging three or four times as much in matching funds from corporations, conservation groups and national governments. Recognizing our challenging budget situation, the Multinational Species Coalition hopes you will consider including funding for the five funds that make up this small but vital program at $2 million each for the African elephant, Asian elephant and marine turtle funds, $2.5 million for great apes, and $4 million for the combined rhino-tiger fund. These funding levels are consistent with fiscal year 2010 appropriations for all of the funds except rhino-tiger, for which we request a $1 million increase to bring it in line with the African and Asian elephant and marine turtle fund, so $2 million for rhinos, $2 million for tigers, and capitalize on the global awareness and commitments made at last year's International Tiger Summit that Mr. Calvelli mentioned earlier. The need for your support of these funds has never been greater. My written testimony includes many examples of many of the success stories made possible by the Multinational Species Conservation Fund. I think that you heard from Mr. Calvelli about the situation with tigers and so I will not elaborate on that further, but that is just one example of the great work that is done through these funds for all of these wildlife species. Just a few words about the Wildlife Without Borders program. The Wildlife Without program addresses some of the world's most pressing challenges to wildlife. Faced with emerging disease threats that pass between animals and people-- you heard about the bats--extracted industry practices and pressures from local communities for nature to provide for their livelihoods, this program allows for greater investment in addressing cross-cutting threats to ecosystems and wildlife. The program is making a lasting impact through capacity- building and technical support and training and local community education. It is just doing terrific work, and the small investment really makes it worth it. We hope you will consider the proven success and very positive impacts of these programs in relation to their modest cost and the broad-based and enthusiastic support of constituents. We urge the committee to fund the programs at the levels outlined earlier. Thank you again for the opportunity. We really appreciate it. We look forward to working with you, and I am happy to answer any questions that after four days of this you may have. [The statement of Andy Oliver follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.153 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.154 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.155 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982A.156 Mr. Simpson. Thank you for being here today and for your testimony, and we appreciate it very much. Most of you here may wonder when you leave if what you say to us makes any difference in what we do. I suspect most people who testify before Congress wonder if that is the case. But it does make a difference in what happens because we do take your testimony into consideration and the concerns when we are trying to put together a budget, whether it is in times when we increased funding or flat funding or with decrease in funding. So it is important that we have the views of your organizations and people in the country of what their priorities are and what we need to be doing. So I do appreciate all of you being here today and for your testimony and we look forward to working with all the different organizations that have an interest in various parts of this Interior and Environment budget. So thank you all. Tuesday, May 3, 2011. TESTIMONY OF INTERESTED INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS PUBLIC WITNESSES--NATIVE AMERICANS Mr. Cole. We are going to go ahead and start. We will have members coming in and out through the morning, but we certainly want to try and stay as much on time as we can. I am presiding. Chairman Simpson will be here at some points and some points he will not, but if we could have our first panel come forward, please. If we could have Mr. Tortalita. Mr. Tortalita. Good morning. Mr. Cole. Thank you. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. PUEBLO OF ACOMA WITNESS LLOYD TORTALITA Mr. Tortalita. Good morning. My name is Lloyd Tortalita, and I am from Pueblo of Acoma in New Mexico. Not Mexico, but New Mexico. A lot of people do not know that New Mexico does exist, and I am from Pueblo of Acoma. I am a Vietnam veteran. I am also a uranium worker, 20 years of working in the uranium mines. Also the best title I have right now is being grandpa. And as a tribal elder, the young people that I am speaking for, I am from Pueblo of Acoma. It is my concern my young people are growing up because of the type of world that we live in and what is happening in the world. So mostly my testimony is geared towards those individuals that are being affected by things like uranium mining, industry ruin, and I suffer, and you know, a lot of things that we are doing now, the national budget, is requiring a lot of money. As a Vietnam veteran I did not know that I was going to get diabetes from Agent Orange, did not know that I was going to be suffering what I am suffering now. I look good and healthy but inside I am not anymore. Same way with uranium. You know the recall compensation that has been going through, reauthorization back in 2000, when I was governor of Pueblo of Acoma, I testified before Congress in trying to pass that, got it passed, and now we have a lot of individuals that are suffering from that or families are suffering because we did not know when we went to work for them. The United States said, we need your help; we need you to go to Vietnam, and I got drafted, got sent to Vietnam, and now we are paying for it. My skin is not what it used to be. I did not know I was getting diabetes, did not know some of my friends were burying an individual, one of our veterans from the American Legion Post 116. I am also a chaplain at that. We are burying one of our individuals because of colon cancer, and he got it from being in Vietnam from Agent Orange and everything else. They are burying him right now. I should be out there as a tribal elder, and you know, we are losing a lot of our elders. Now these baby boomers who were the ones that were in Vietnam are the ones that are suffering, are the ones that are supposed to be the grandpas and grandmas teaching our young people our tradition and culture of Acoma and throughout our country. And, you know, we come here, I come here sometimes, this year, again, I am privileged to come back because I am the former governor, and I have testified a couple of times before Congressman Yates, Congressman Dicks, and now in front of Congressman Cole. And but it is an honor to be here, and again, some of the things that I will be talking about I am not going to see it probably within 10 years. You know, I came here asking for money to build a community center for my people. It took 10 years to get it built. It is built now, and it is done, and we are addressing diabetes and everything else, and some of the things that are happening to our young people. Education is another one. We are still fighting for education, Native American education, education for our young people, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Bureau of Indian Education. It is not happening, and a lot of things are not happening as we all know. You hear a lot of people come before you, and one of the biggest subjects is Johnson-O'Malley. I know you are very aware of it. I know because I have talked to you before. Johnson- O'Malley is a program that is there for our young people, our young Native students that most are, as you know, were in rural settings, way out there in the middle of nowhere, where there is really no transportation, no roads. In my testimony you will probably read later on, talking about roads. Our roads are falling apart, and our hospitals are, this and that. And so we are in a bad situation with bridges and roads, hospitals, I mean, Indian Health Service, VA hospitals, those, same way with the Johnson-O'Malley. You know, we are fighting for $24 million, get it back to what it was, and I have pictures that you can look at in the back of my testimony here that shows that my program is successful, that we are doing what we need to do and also at one time or another we also had an office within the central office here in Washington of JOM, but Save America's Treasures was another one. Acoma dating back to 1,200. And then like I said, budget. I mean, we are down. IHS hospitals, Acoma-Canoncito, 50 percent or 50 positions are open. How are we going to provide medical services? VA hospitals, takes all day for individuals to get there, but we are suffering from all that stuff. So we are just here to ask for help, and it is all written out. It is all there, so please read what I am telling you, but, you know, we have all this, and water is another example, coming off of Mount Taylor, you do not have any good water coming off of there. All of it, right now they are saying they are putting chemicals into the ground which directly affects our irrigation. Irrigation system is another one that we worry about. So please if you could, pay attention to some of this. Johnson- O'Malley is the biggest thing. I mean, it is all there, 24 million, a position in Washington, student, and freeze it and educate our young people like they need to be educated. And I know I am running out of time, but the red light is on, but, you know, thank you very much for listening to me, and it is all written out, and I just urge and ask Congress to read and help us. Thank you very much. [The statement of Lloyd Tortalita follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.001 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.002 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.003 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.004 Mr. Cole. Well, first of all, thank you for your service and not only to our country but to your tribe as well and the many things you have done. Your testimony will be entered. This committee has a really strong bipartisan tradition of trying to work on these things, and in a tough budget time it actually has. We actually exceeded the President's request for 2011. We have met it in previous years, and again, that has been bipartisan. We recognize the problems you are talking about are very real, and certainly Chairman Simpson has made a real effort in a period of budget cuts to make sure that on Native American programs we have been able to avoid those and actually add a little bit to what was done in 2010. So I cannot predict what is going to happen going forward. We live in an era of trillion and a half dollar deficits, and that is not sustainable, but I can assure you this committee is going to do everything it can on a bipartisan basis to protect and build on these really critical programs. So, again, thank you for being here. Mr. Tortalita. Thank you very much, and you can see pictures of my state cross country champions. Mr. Cole. I was going to say I am pretty impressed with the state champs. Mr. Tortalita. The after-school van. If they did not have the transportation service to the schools, we would have never gotten the state championship. It is really a good program that, again, this is the Johnson-O'Malley Program. Mr. Cole. It is awfully impressive. Mr. Tortalita. Thank you very much. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Thank you for your testimony. And if we could, we will move on to Mr. Dasheno. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. SANTA CLARA PUEBLO WITNESS WALTER DASHENO Mr. Dasheno. Chairman Simpson, Ranking Member Moran, and Congressman Cole, and members of the subcommittee, my name is Walter Dasheno. I am the governor of the Pueblo Santa Clara, and thank you for this opportunity to present to you on the fiscal year 2012 budget. Santa Clara Pueblo is a federally recognized Indian tribe located 25 miles north of Santa Fe, New Mexico. We are only one of two tribes in New Mexico that have ventured into self- governance compacts with the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Santa Clara Pueblo's experience as a self-governance tribe mirrors that of many other self-governance tribes. Overall, the program has been a great success. Self- governance works because it promotes self-sufficiency and accountability, strengthens tribal planning and management capacities, invests in our local resources to strengthen reservation economies, allows for flexibility and a firm sovereignty. Santa Clara is happy to see that the President's budget proposes continued investment in the self-governance program with a modest increase in the IHS budget of 263,000 for administrative costs and a larger increase in the self- governance line in the BIA budget of 7.32 million for a total of 155.84 million from the fiscal year 2010-2011 continuing resolution level. And this is an increase of approximately 5 percent. Overall, the Federal Government obligates over 425 million to some 225 federally-recognized tribes through the self- governance compacts. Notwithstanding this increases in the self-governance program, in reality overall funding for self- governance tribes does not keep pace with non-self-governance tribes. It has been the experience of self-governance tribes that when others have received funded increases, self- governance tribes do not or did not receive their relatively fair share. I would urge this committee to examine closely this issue. Santa Clara budget matters illustrate some of the national concerns that we have. Santa Clara publicly submitted grant applications to various feasibility studies for a range of energy projects. Both the Department of Energy, Office of Tribal Affairs, and the BIA Office of Indian Energy and Economic Development have been very helpful, and their programs should receive more funding. Santa Clara desperately needs a new and expanded health clinic. Santa Clara does not believe that the in-house service has the funding to pay the cost for constructing a new facility, and so it plans to finance its own facility if necessary. Still, Congress should support funding for more hospital construction and also continue to support and provide favorable grants and loans and loan guarantees for tribes that seek to construct their own facilities. Invested in irrigation infrastructure, Rio Grande Pueblos Irrigation Infrastructure Improvement Act funding. This act authorizes the funding of projects to correct deficiencies identified by a Secretarial study. The implementation of this act will favorably affect public traditional lifestyle and culture which for hundreds of years has been based on the culture, agriculture, and irrigated lands. So far almost no money has been spent implementing this act. In late 2009, Santa Clara Pueblo completed construction of a 10,800 square foot regional adult daycare center that will be able to serve a growing population of tribal seniors. Although the center has been completed, the adult daycare program has not yet been implemented due to severe funding restraints. Congress needs to expand funding for programs that serve Indian elders. The Santa Clara Pueblo wastewater systems are also in an advanced state of decay and threaten community health and the water quality of the Rio Grande. The system was largely constructed in the 1960s and '70s and has out-served its actual use life. The need to upgrade wastewater and water facilities is common throughout Indian Country. Santa Clara urges funding through the Army Corps of Engineers from the Espanola Valley Watershed Study to address ecosystem restoration and critical health and human safety concerns, specifically flooding along the Espanola River Valley. Finally, Santa Clara urges increased funding for the BIA Real Estate Services, which support cadastral surveys, lease compliances, and energy and mineral development issues. Current funding only meets about one-quarter of the need, holding up critical tribal projects. I must add, by the way, that the Southwest Region is blessed with the outstanding BIA Real Estate officer in Johnna Black. Finally, although not immediately affected, Santa Clara does support passage of the statuary fix which the subcommittee worked so hard on last year. In conclusion, as you work on the budget, please feel free to reach out to our DC Council, Greg Smith, who is well versed in all of these matters. Thank you for this opportunity to present the budget perspective of Santa Clara Pueblo. And I am on time. [The statement of Walter Dasheno follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.005 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.006 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.007 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.008 Mr. Cole. It was like to the second. Did you practice? Mr. Dasheno. No, I did not, but certainly, Mr. Chairman, and Mr. Cole, I support what Governor, former Governor Tortalita has said. We need to put our hand out to the veterans. That is an organization that is widely needed and also to the elderly. We met with some people yesterday, but there is very little involvement of support from the national programs that support Indian issues for the Native elderly, and we have some recommendations that we will come back with. So with that, congratulations. Thank you very much, and the United States has to be something to be proud of in the passing of what has happened over the weekend. So thank you. Mr. Cole. I think all of us, regardless of our points of view, take a great deal of pride in what our military did, and again, thank you for your service. Thank you for mentioning veterans. I see Mr. Calvert is here. I do not know if you have any questions of either of our guests. Mr. Calvert. Mr. Chairman, I apologize for being a little late but---- Mr. Cole. I am just happy to have the company. Mr. Calvert. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. If we could, we will move onto Faye BlueEyes. Welcome. Ms. BlueEyes. Thank you. Mr. Cole. We will go ahead and hear your testimony and then have questions. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. DZILTH-NA-O-DITH-HLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL WITNESS FAYE BLUEEYES Ms. BlueEyes. Mr. Chairman, members of the subcommittee, my name is Faye BlueEyes, and I am the program director for Dzilth-Na-O-Dith-Hle School, which is a school on the Navajo Reservation in Bloomfield, New Mexico. Our school has been in continuous service since 1968, and operates a K-8 educational program and a dorm program for students 1 through 12. Two hundred students are enrolled in our school, and 51 students are in the dorm. Our mission is to make a difference in the educational progress of our students, and we believe that all of our students are capable of achieving academic success. But we struggle with chronic under-funding of virtually each and every one of our educational and related programs. Though we operate with authorization from the Navajo Nation, we are a separate tribal organization, carrying out the federal trust responsibilities to educate Native American children under the Indian Self-Determination Act. Our buildings are more than 40 years old with serious deficiencies in our aging electrical, heating, and plumbing systems. We have to continually cope with major problems such as leaking sewer lines and in November, '09, we discovered a major leak in an underground gas line which threatened to cause an explosion at our school. Recently, the electrical panel in our gym caught fire and had to be disconnected. The gym does not have a sprinkler system, so we were fortunate to catch the fire early and avoid serious injury to our students. The Bureau has a process for evaluation school construction projects and placing them on a priority list for funding, but no new projects have been added to the list since 2004. Our school and many of the Native American schools are in dire need of school replacement, so we urge Congress to direct the Bureau to reopen the process by which schools can submit applications for replacement school construction projects and to restore 61 million to the school construction account. The deferred maintenance backlog for school buildings is well over 250 million, yet the Bureau requested only 50.7 million in the fiscal year 2012 budget, a mere fraction of what is required to make a significant dent in the maintenance backlog. Funding of 76 million for facilities' maintenance and 110 million in facilities' operation funding is but a modest first step in addressing these long-neglected needs. The very real health and safety risks that can be reduced by adequate O&M funding seems short sided. Funding for tribal grand support costs of 72 million in contrast to the 46 million in the fiscal year 2012 budget request, this is the amount calculated by NCAI as needed to fully fund the indirect cost requirements of current tribally- controlled schools and provide 2 million in start-up funds for newly-converting schools. Tribal grant support costs are funds provided to tribally-operated schools to cover the administrative costs associated with the operation of a school. One-hundred twenty-four of the 183 Bureau-funded schools are operated by tribal school boards. In fiscal year 2010, the funding met only 61 percent of the need, the lowest rate to date. The Bureau estimates the 3 million increase requested for fiscal year 2012 will fund 65 percent of need, but we believe the 65 percent projection is highly optimistic. The consequence of insufficient funding means that we absorb more administrative expenses and scale back on prudent management activities. It is hard to comprehend that non-school BIA and IHS contractors have received huge increases in the FY '10, budget when tribally-controlled schools have received no increase in funding since 2004. Then the fiscal year 2012 budget requests an increase of 25.5 million for BIA non-school contractors and 50 million increase for IHS contractors while the increase requested for schools is only 3 million. This disparity in the funding is unexplained. Good education costs money, and it is our hope and expectation the Congress will recognize the tremendous needs that exist in our Bureau-funded schools and the potentially- disastrous impact of budget reductions. Please join us in supporting a quality educational program for all Native students. We are grateful for any assistance you can provide. Thank you. [The statement of Faye BlueEyes follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.009 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.010 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.011 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.012 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much for your testimony. Just a quick question or two. In addition to the federal funds you receive, do you have any other sources of funding? Ms. BlueEyes. We are totally dependent on federal funds. Mr. Cole. Has there been any effort to look for other funding? Ms. BlueEyes. Well---- Mr. Cole. And I do not want to suggest that is my preferred solution. I understand the challenges you are dealing with. Ms. BlueEyes. Well, we are going to have to start trying to find some funding elsewhere, but we are not one of the rich casino tribes, so we have nowhere to turn but the Federal Government. Mr. Cole. And just for the record, would you give the committee an idea of what the per capita income in your area is? Ms. BlueEyes. It is like $14,750. Mr. Cole. So quite challenging to raise much local revenue. Ms. BlueEyes. Yes, and no tax base either. Mr. Cole. Absolutely. Well, thank you very much for your comments. Do not leave. There may be other people with questions. Ms. BlueEyes. Okay. Mr. Cole. We will certainly begin with Mr. Moran, my good friend who has a passionate interest in this and who has done a lot of great work in these areas for Native Americans. Mr. Moran. Thank you, Chairman Cole. I will not ask any further questions. I think that is the issue, your dependency upon the Federal Government and our ability to come through with your most basic necessities. Ms. BlueEyes. Yes. Mr. Moran. I do thank you for traveling so far as have all the other witnesses and just speaking for myself, I certainly intend to work with Mr. Cole and his leadership, Mr. Calvert and Chairman Simpson in trying to do as much as we can for the American Indian tribes, particularly those that do not have the kinds of resources that other tribes may have. Ms. BlueEyes. Thank you. Mr. Moran. So thank you. Ms. BlueEyes. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Mr. Calvert. Mr. Calvert. No further questions other than to thank the gentlelady for coming today, and certainly we will work with Chairman Cole and Mr. Moran and others to help out Indian Country. Ms. BlueEyes. Thank you very much. Mr. Cole. Thank you very much for your testimony. If we could next, President Shelly, Navajo Nation. Mr. President, how are you? Mr. Shelly. I am okay. Fine. Thank you. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NAVAJO NATION WITNESS BEN SHELLY Mr. Shelly. I would like to say first off that, you know, this is a wonderful country, the United States of America, and we have a policy which is the constitution, United States Constitution. Within that constitution we have under a commercial clause the treaty clause and also property clause, and I believe that with the constitution is our founding father made policies, and I think we need to obey that. Mr. Chairman, members of the subcommittee, good morning. I am Ben Shelly, President of Navajo Nation. To fight for overall prosperity of our community we ask your committee to work with us and support the following priorities in your Interior budget; infrastructure development, energy, health, public safety, and education. The Navajo Nation. At the Navajo Nation we have a unique relationship with the Federal Government. We hope to further our relationship as recognized by the Navajo Treaty of 1868. Your committee can help fulfill that treaty obligation and other promise made over our history. Navajo support job creation, infrastructure energy development. Infrastructure development is a key to job creation. For this reason the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project, NIIP, needs full funding. NIIP stimulates the economy and the regions. In the proposed 2012 federal budget NIIP funding was reduced to $4 million. That is embarrassing. Without consulting with the Navajo Nation, Congress had passed a law and promised to fund NIIP in its entirety, which is estimated at a cost of $500 million to complete. Congress should restore the funding to the NIIP to $26 million per year for the next 10 years. The Navajo Nation supports other infrastructure projects, the Navajo-Gallup water pipeline. This is an infrastructure project that will supply water to residents in the region and stimulate farming and agriculture. Additionally, the Nation is working to develop a vast energy resource for job creation. Support hospital facility construction priority. Health facility construction funding is critical in our remote but populated area. The Nation had five projects on the existing IHS health construction priority listing whose costs estimated in a total of $1 billion. Funding shortfall would delay the building of these necessary projects. We support funding this line item in 2010 level. Public safety and justice service. Two hundred-ninety Navajo Nation law enforcement officers patrol over a vast reservation that is equal to the size of West Virginia. There is one police officer for every 1,000 residents, and each patrolling the region of 5,000 square miles. Public safety requires full funding at approximately $55 million. Further, the proposed 2012 federal budget includes costs to facility construction, which funds jail replacement and employee's housing. These cuts will impact the safety of our community. We support funding at 2010 level. Education. Facility and school construction programs were eliminated in the proposed 2012 federal budget. The Nation has many substandard school facilities that need replacement to provide a safe learning environment. School construction dollars need to be restored to 2010 funding level. Annually the Navajo Nation receives about 13,000 applicants and only half are awarded funding to assist with the higher education costs. We request an additional $25 million for these education costs. Full restoration of the Pell Grant, and Carl Perkins Fund and others ensure the Navajo student contributes to the American workforce. Conclusion, the annual federal budget provides essential needs to Indian Country, however, since drastic cuts are made to the proposed 2012 federal funding, we insist that this subcommittee and other members of Congress hold the Navajo Nation and other nations harmless from additional cuts for the 2012 budget. We request that this subcommittee honor your treaty obligation and support our budget recommendation for fiscal year 2012. Thank you very much. I still have time. [The statement of Ben Shelly follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.013 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.014 Mr. Cole. I am fairly impressed. Mr. Chairman, I will tell you. Mr. Shelly. I am a BIA-educated person. How far I went. Could you imagine these college kids nowadays? Mr. Cole. Rather than use my time as the acting chairman, I want to immediately defer to the real chairman of this committee, Mr. Simpson, by whose courtesy I sit in this chair today, so I recognize that and appreciate that. Mr. Chairman, do you have any opening questions? Mr. Simpson. No. I really do not, but I want to thank you for being here and your testimony, and I apologize for our earlier schedule of having the Indian tribes come and testify a couple of weeks ago, I guess it was, or three weeks ago when we were scheduled, but we were in the middle of a little bit of a debate about the budget, and we were not sure we were going to be open the next week, and all that kind of stuff, and so we decided it was best to cancel them rather than have everybody here and then us be closed. So we know that is an imposition to all of you that came to testify, and thank you for coming back as we rescheduled this. Mr. Shelly. Yes. Can I say something on that? We were ready for the shutdown, but when we done that, we would also look at our finance we depend on mostly, we found out three-fourths, well, let's say about 80 percent of our budget is dependent on Federal Government, and we are going to turn that around. We are going to try to change it to where it is about equal. We are trying to work with energy policies and others to make that happen. All it is this Code of Federal Regulations prevent us to do things. We need to change, be more flexible with that and working with the Interior and Congress that maybe energy policies so that we can use our natural resources to create jobs, economics, and so on. So we are working on that so we realize that depending on the Federal Government should not go on forever. We need to stop that somewhere. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Mr. Shelly. Thank you. All right. Mr. Cole. No, no. We are not done yet. Mr. Shelly. We are not done? Oh, I am sorry. Mr. Cole. I am sure there will be other questions. I want to call on Mr. Moran for any questions. Mr. Moran. That is fine, Mr. Cole. Thanks. Mr. Cole. Mr. Calvert, do you have any? Mr. Calvert. No questions at this time. Thank you. Mr. Cole. I have one question actually. What would have been the consequences for you and for the Navajo Nation had there been a Federal Government shutdown? Mr. Shelly. Probably what we would have done is that the one that our probably police, fire department, some direct services are going to keep running. The one that is under 638, some of those would probably keep running, and I would say shutting it down we probably would be in operation to keep the Nation running about 30 percent. Everybody else would be off. Mr. Cole. From an already pretty low level. Mr. Shelly. Yeah. Very low. So we had some general fund that picks up that 30 percent, too, so we do not have much, but we could have used that to run it. Mr. Moran. Will you yield, Mr. Cole? Mr. Cole. Certainly will. Mr. Moran. So two-thirds of the activities on the reservation would be unfunded, would have shut down? Mr. Shelly. Well, most of them will be. It depends on what kind of grant it is, what kind of funding it is to base on that. Mr. Moran. I wanted to make sure I understood that. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Yes. It is very uneven across Indian Country. It is obvious tribes that have other sources of incomes can continue to operate, but the more dependent you are to the Federal Government, the more challenging these kind of shutdowns are. Mr. Shelly. It is. It is. We realized that, and we are working on it heavily, and we want to turn that around somehow and creating jobs is very important to us and revenue. We have so much to offer with our natural resources. We have the sun, the wind, and just let us go. Take care of some of that Code of Federal Regulations that keeps us down, lift that for us, we can run with it. Mr. Cole. If I can ask you one more question, maybe one or two more actually, Mr. President. You mentioned in your testimony and just alluded to the fact you have some energy projects that you think are important and would help you increase your self-sufficiency. Can you quickly tell us what those are and what the obstacles are for developing those kind of resources? Mr. Shelly. Let me put it this way. I did it in my testimony with Subcommittee on Energy with Indian Affairs. These are bipartisan groups that when we went before I mentioned something like Indian tribes are so heavily over- regulated. We are not playing the same level game as any other energy company. Like state, if we want to drill oil, it takes forever to get a permit because of the federal regulations. Yet a private business driller that is going to drill oil it does not take them long to get the permits, but there is a lot of difference. Mr. Cole. Well, we would certainly like to work with you and see what we can do to streamline that process so you have more control over the resources in your own Nation and are able to use them as you see fit as opposed to how others may see fit. Mr. Shelly. It has to happen. You know, education, we have been, you know, taking our kids, give them an education, what we can muster in money to get them through. They are back. I have got one here. He is my energy policy advisor. Sam Wood. Look how young he is. Sam, get up. He is my energy policy. He is going to be doing all the policy for us. He has been working with Young, Chairman Young on the Subcommittee on Energy. He will be working with them, so he provides some draft from us. They wanted to do it. I told him, I said, himself, I said, do not do it yourself. Let me get involved and let the Nation get involved because we know what we want done. So we are working with them. Maybe we can put it together and make it happen. Mr. Cole. I would very much like to see any recommendations or proposals that you have that would assist you. Mr. Shelly. We want to work with you. I will make sure that Sam works with you on that to give you something we are working on at energy. We will do that. And, again, I would like to say really recognize Native America. We offer so much. We fulfill our agenda with the United States Government. We have always done that. What is I hear this past Sunday, Geronimo E-KIA? There was youth and---- Mr. Cole. Geronimo is actually buried in my district, and I will tell you the Fort Sill Apaches were not happy at the use of that particular nickname. Mr. Shelly. I know. I got a lot of emails and Facebook that says they are questioning that, and the code talker. We have one left out of 29 code talkers, and a lot of us like to, I will tell you right now to tell you the truth, a lot of us if the language, the Navajo language was never used, a lot of us will not be here. Mr. Cole. Again, as one of my Fort Sill Apaches pointed out, they would have never gotten Geronimo. He came in voluntarily. Thank you very much, Mr. President. Appreciate it. I am sorry. I did not see you come in Mr. Flake. I apologize. Questions or comments? Mr. Flake. No. Mr. Shelly. See, he is part of the subcommittee. Mr. Cole. Well, it is good to have him on your side of the table. He may be in a much higher body not too long from now. Mr. Shelly. He is a good man. Mr. Cole. Mr. President, thank you very much for your testimony. We appreciate it very much. And if we could, we will move onto Ms. Garcia. Oh. I am sorry. We just have you in a different panel, but that is fine. We would be more than happy to take your testimony right now. Thank you very much. I am sorry. Mr. Maxx. I have to sit here with my president. Mr. Cole. Well, it is good to do what they tell you to do. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NAVAJO HOPI LAND COMMISSION OFFICE OF THE NAVAJO NATION WITNESS RAYMOND MAXX Mr. Maxx. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity. My name is Raymond Maxx. I am an executive director of Navajo Hopi Land Commission Office. It is an entity of the Navajo Nation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide testimony on what is one of the most vexing matters in modern federal Indian policy and a true tragedy for the Navajo Nation. When I was very young, my family lived in District 6, an area that was declared exclusively Hopi. Although we had lived there for generations, we were forced to leave. At the time the Federal Government provided no benefits for moving. We just had to move. We relocated to the Big Mound Area in what was known as a joint use area, owned together by Navajo and Hopi according to court decree. In the late 1970s when we had just about reestablished ourselves and our livelihood after land a federal mediator divided the joint use area, and we found ourselves again on Hopi land. We moved to the nearest portion of the Navajo Reservation, the Bennett Freeze area. I do not think my parents fully understood at the time as a matter of federal law you would almost never get permission to fix your home in the Bennett Freeze, that you would not make additions, that no federal travel or state programs would assist your community through building of infrastructure essential to the health and well-being of any community. As a result, the Bennett Freeze area was locked into the poverty of 1966, when the freeze was imposed. The final agreement to resolve the travel land dispute and end the freeze provided that most of the disputed area belonged to the Navajo Nation. For the thousands of Navajo families who lived there this means that the freeze served no real purpose other than to bring them misery and hardship. In his proposed fiscal year 2012 budget President Obama has set aside 1.2 million to begin redeveloping the former Bennett Freeze area. In the budget justification the Administration notes that more than 12,000 Navajo people lived in an area where subject to the 41-year freeze on development. During the freeze era the Navajo people were prohibited from building new homes, schools, health facilities, constructing electricity, water, roads, et cetera, and community economic development projects. While the President's budget request is welcomed, it is intended to be spent largely on land use and agricultural purposes. While these purposes are important, the number one need in this area based on extensive independent study completed last year is improving housing. I would propose that an additional 5 million in BIA funds be set aside for immediate critical housing repairs and construction and that this committee direct the BIA and HUD to come by with a larger housing construction plan for this area. This committee should establish a trust fund for reconstruction of the former Bennett Freeze area with an initial investment of 10 million. For the former Bennett Freeze area to recover, there must be a sustained reconstruction program implemented over a decade or more. Congress should authorize the Office of Navajo Hopi Relocation near to oversee their reconstruction activities with the Navajo Nation having the option of assuming control of these activities that affect Navajo people and lands as well as the option of assuming control of the trust fund proposed above. Office of Navajo Indian Relocation, we would ask that the budget, which in recent years has ranged from 8 to 9 million, be increased to 50 percent, increased by 50 percent to accelerate the provision of benefits for those many families who relocated but have not received their benefits. And in conclusion, although the Navajo Hopi land dispute and the Bennett Freeze are painful issues, I thank the committee for this opportunity to provide testimony on the path forward to assure that the many Navajo families who have suffered under these federal actions can have hope for a better life. Thank you, and if you have questions, I am ready to respond. [The statement of Raymond Maxx follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.015 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.016 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.017 Mr. Cole. Mr. Maxx, thank you very much for your testimony. I think we have heard about this issue before. It has been a matter of considerable concern. I just have one question before I defer to my colleagues. You mentioned the Administration's proposed $1.2 million to begin to address the problem. Have there in previous years been much in the way of funding to help deal with this freeze issue? Mr. Maxx. There has been no federal funding until now with this Administration. They are creating a line item to address the Bennett Freeze issues, and the Bennett Freeze is like third world within the Navajo Nation. We are like 30, 40 years behind the mainstream Navajo, and you know, we need help to get back on our feet with, you know, support and funding to rehabilitate homes and infrastructure. Mr. Cole. I just wanted to get into the record that to the Administration's credit they have actually proposed doing something, and nothing else had been done up to this point, but obviously, we have a terrific problem then. Mr. Maxx. Uh-huh. Mr. Cole. If I could, I will go to Mr. Moran for any comments or questions he might have. Mr. Moran. On the face of it, it seems probably unjust to the Navajo who were displaced. I do not know enough about it to offer thoughtful comments, let alone questions. I do intend to discuss this with you, though, Mr. Cole, if you do not mind, get your perspective but I remember we did do something last year, and I do think it is the kind of thing we need to focus on and see if we cannot rectify. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Absolutely. Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. I would just say that I am in the same boat that Mr. Moran is. I have tried to understand this and what the heck the policies were that created this situation and how we get out of it and how we remedy it. It is a subject that, I do not know, I need a book or something, a little history book, that will give me the basis of how the genesis of all this and from that I would then be able to hopefully have a better opinion about what is going on, and now we might be able to help you solve the problem. So if you guys have any information, I read all night long, so I would love to sit down and educate myself a little bit more about the policies that created this situation. Mr. Moran. Well, if Mike is going to read all night long, I will just wait until he reads it up, save myself some time. Mr. Cole. Mr. Maxx, would you care to comment on either of these two remarks just in terms of helping educate the committee a little bit? Mr. Maxx. The freeze was implemented in 1966, and---- Mr. Simpson. But why? Mr. Cole. There was a dispute between the Hopi and the Navajo Nation. Mr. Maxx. The land dispute between the Navajo and the Hopis. Mr. Cole. And it took 41 years to make a decision. Mr. Maxx. And through court actions and back and forth the two tribes sat down, and, you know, settled the dispute, and that was in 2006. Since then, you know, we have been, you know, reaching out, you know, for development funds, and you know, the people in the area, they have been, you know, in probably worse state than depression for 40 years and---- Mr. Simpson. Because your economic development was frozen? Mr. Maxx. Yes. Everything was frozen. Mr. Simpson. Until a decision was made? Mr. Maxx. Yeah. Mr. Calvert. Would the gentleman yield on that for a second? When you say frozen, does it mean that the funding levels were frozen at a certain amount for a period of time and the amounts for your neighbor, the Navajo, the rest of the Navajo Nation, had gone up? So, basically you were held at a lower amount for a longer period of time and that put you in that dire financial situation you were talking about? Mr. Maxx. It is not the funding that was frozen. It was the---- Mr. Cole. They were not allowed to construct homes and such. Mr. Maxx [continuing]. Development. Mr. Calvert. It was development? Mr. Maxx. Yeah. Even if we were to receive funding, you know, we could not develop anything because we had to get permission from the Hopi Tribe and federal agencies. Mr. Calvert. Thank you. Mr. Maxx. Yeah, and I have this information maybe I can forward. Mr. Calvert. Please do. Mr. Maxx. And, you know, distribute it among the committee. That would be more information. We also have a bill that we would like to get introduced and then some pictures and more information that would, you know, address all the phases of the land dispute. There is a District 6 and the relocation and then the Bennett Freeze, and you know, this bill would, you know, encompass the whole, you know, the phases of the land dispute. And this land dispute has been going on for over 100 years. Mr. Simpson. Is the land dispute resolved now since 2006, or whatever it was? Mr. Maxx. The Bennett Freeze is resolved, and there is still some litigation outstanding in the relocation era, so it is almost resolved. Hopefully we can get past that and start rebuilding. Mr. Cole. Right. Mr. Maxx. With the support of the leadership here, you know, we can do that. Mr. Cole. Mr. Calvert, do you have any additional questions? Mr. Calvert. No additional questions. Mr. Cole. Mr. Flake. Mr. Flake. No. Mr. Cole. Thank you very much for your testimony, and thank you particularly for the submission of the additional information. Very helpful. Mr. Maxx. Thank you very much. Mr. Cole. Thank you. If we could, we are going to bring our next two witnesses up together. Martha Garcia and Nancy Martine-Alonzo. Thank you. It is good to have you here. I will be happy to let you choose who should speak first. Ms. Garcia. Okay. I will go first. Mr. Cole. Please identify yourself for the record, please. Ms. Garcia. Okay. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. RAMAH BAND OF NAVAJO/RAMAH NAVAJO CHAPTER WITNESS MARTHA GARCIA Ms. Garcia. My name is Martha Garcia. I am the Ramah Navajo Chapter Development Officer. Our President, Rodger Martinez, is not able to be here with us today because he has a conflicting schedule with the reschedule hearing date, but thank you for the opportunity. Mr. Chair, Mr. Simpson, and members of this committee, I am just really happy for me to come before almost a full committee. Over the years I have been coming here and presenting testimony, and this is the first time that I am really honored to be presenting before five members of this committee. Today I am focusing on the need for additional fundings to address the unmet needs of our Ramah Navajo community, and our needs as we have presented earlier $2,670,610 is our need, but then between the rescheduled dates, the Bureau of Indian Affairs came in and started working with us, so that has come down to $2,400,000 plus, so it pays to make that extra effort to come before the committee and work with you. So I just have to request the first one is the Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Justice Service funding for the operations and maintenance of the detention facilities. Ramah Navajo Chapter has been submitting proposals over the years requesting for construction funds to build a detention facility. Our law enforcement detention center has been about the size of this room for many years since the '70s, and finally when the ARRA Fund came through we were very much surprised and very happy to have received an award of $3.8 million to construct a detention facility. And it will be completed in the year 2012, which is only a year away. But in the meantime now we need to staff the new detention facilities, and that is our request. It is a startup cost to pay for the equipment, furniture, and whatever that is needed to put the detention facilities up to standard and also to staff that. We would need to staff that, so there is a one-time funding request and then a recurring fund, and I know that within the budget request there is an increase being proposed of $10.4 million to address the need to staff many detention facilities across the Indian Country. And we would like to ensure that our request, and we support that effort to have this done so that we can be part of that, and our request is at $1.8 million, and in regard to that part of it, we hope that it would become a recurring fund so we would continue to maintain and operate the detention facilities. Our second request that we have been coming here for and slowly we are making progress is to fund the Natural Resources Training Facilities in the amount of $600,000. It was more in the previous year. We were very fortunate that we were able to get $150,000 from the State of New Mexico over a year ago. This past year we were not very fortunate because they also had budget problems. But with that we are able to at least construct the framework of the training facilities, and we just need to have it completed, and then we are also asking, again, for increase in the staff for the operation, which is a trust responsibility of the Federal Government, and we have been working very closely with our local BIA agency to implement the program as it is needed. And the last request that I was going to make, that has been fulfilled and it is in process, and that is also to put in a building, replace the building that real estate and natural resources have been using for over 30 years, and it previously was used by the Bureau of Indian Affairs when they were running the programs. But now we are having a building being brought in and be set up, and we will have that implemented and run a full service as we would like to see it done. We have had some issues and problems because of the current building. It cannot accommodate wireless services and all that, but now we are able to do that and be able to put in the service so that we can have closer ties with the central and our title plant in Albuquerque. So that has worked out, and I would like to thank Congress for helping us over the years. There has been many positive exchange that has happened, and starting back in the '70s, and I remember coming before the committee at the time and been doing that for a number of years, and I have seen many positive results that has truly benefited our people out there. So with that I thank you. [The statement of Martha Garcia follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.018 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.019 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.020 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.021 Mr. Cole. Thank you for your testimony. Ms. Martine-Alonzo. I love those squash blossoms. They are gorgeous. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD WITNESS NANCY MARTINE-ALONZO Ms. Martine-Alonzo. Thank you very much. Mr. Chair, Mr. Simpson, and members of the subcommittee, my name is Nancy Martine-Alonzo. I am President of the Ramah Navajo School Board, and we have been in operation for 41 years, and we started out almost with direct Congressional funding, so I thank you on behalf of our community for all the years that we have been able to benefit from that. We have graduated over 800 students, and many of our students have gone on to become very successful doctors, lawyers, CPAs, and all walks of life, and it is truly a blessing to see that. We are here to speak on several priorities that we have, but the number one need that we have is our ARRA Funding was appropriated to repair and maintain one of the elementary buildings, and in the process of that project we uncovered structural damage from water, damage from black mold, and also termites in the building. And so the building needs to be replaced now. However, you have heard other testimonies that talked about the lack of construction dollars, and so we are here to request that you consider approving and putting construction dollars back in the funding, and we need about $5.6 million for that elementary school. Right now our children are displaced. They are using some of the middle school and high school for classroom spaces, and so we are in very tight quarters, and we operated that way for a year, and we really would like to be able to put our children back in appropriate classroom settings. The second funding need that we have is for water and sewer. Our facilities are over 35 years old and over the years we have expanded our facilities, and so there is more consumers on the water and the sewer system and just due to the aging material, you know, we need to replace and update all of the infrastructure that is there, and so our request is for $2.5 million to take care of that. And then in addition to that we also are requesting $3.5 million for our elderly community center. We know that we have a large population of elderly who need more care now in their later years, and many of them do not wish to be sent to nursing homes outside the communities. And so one of the solutions is to have a community center where we can provide more or less part-time daycare for some of our elders where they can receive kind of a one-stop service for their health and for other needs. And so that is something that is a priority as well. In addition to that, we are just asking for continued support and funding for the ISEP dollars, the money that is dedicated for the core education programs and the 638 contract schools, and we also are in need of the indirect costs because we do need funds to be able to operate our schools and operate our clinics and all of the 638 projects that we have we have not received, you know, the full 100 percent funding for that. We have received about 50 or 60 percent every year, and we would like to see that move up to a higher number. Of course, eventually 100 percent because that was the law, but we have not realized that for a long, long time. We are also asking for funding for the tribal schools. We have a lot of young people that do not belong to colleges, but they do go to our tribal colleges for vocational or for two- year programs, and that is a real critical need. So any funding that you can provide in the area to continue the support of our young people so that they can, in turn, become productive citizens of our tribal reservations as well as the global society, we would really appreciate that. And so we thank you for all of these, and we provided written testimony. We have also provided additional documents explaining all of the areas in detail. So thank you very much. [The statement of Nancy Martine-Alonzo follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.022 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.023 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.024 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.025 Mr. Cole. Thank you for your testimony. I actually have no questions. Mr. Moran. Mr. Moran. No. I am fine. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Just out of curiosity, the committee appropriates money in general categories for, say, school construction. Any idea where the elementary school you are talking about that you need $5.4 million I think you said for, where that would fall? I assume the BIA has a priority list for school construction. Ms. Martine-Alonzo. Yes. Mr. Simpson. Any idea where that falls within that priority list and what it would take to get to that level? Ms. Martine-Alonzo. Our elementary school is pretty high on the repair and maintenance. That is why we were able to get the ARRA dollars, but at the time it was not determined for a replacement. And so it was not on the list anywhere up at least the top, and you have been funding, I think you have ten more that you have slated to fund, and that is still in progress. I think four of them are still in the pipeline. But you had committee work that has been going on now for about maybe 18 months where there is a committee that is working on criteria for reassessing the schools and putting them in another priority listing, and more than likely our school would not rise to that because we probably do not fit in any of that category because these conditions were discovered through the error, through the repair and maintenance process. And so it is not anywhere neatly on a list anywhere. So the only way that it could get done is if you were able to ask the BIA and asking them to focus on that school, what the status is, and what did they need, because when we talked to BIA on it, we have been working with them because that is what ARRA funds require us to do is to work closely with them. We have a year's time to finish all the projects. We are slated to finish by May 31, and we are pretty much on schedule to do that. And so in doing that the BIA has said we do not have any new construction dollars immediately in this budget or in the next budget, and we do not have any other ARRA funds that are coming back as surplus anywhere. So we just really do not have any answers for you, and the jury is still out on whether or not we will get our building repaired right away, I mean, replaced right away. And that is why our only option is to come to this committee to see if you could help us with that. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate that. It is true not only with school construction but with detention facilities and other justice facilities that we put things in a category when we appropriate money, and sometimes there are needs out there that if you are not on that priority list or in a certain place, even if we increased money for that fund, it might not get down to you. Ms. Martine-Alonzo. Yes. Mr. Simpson. So I appreciate your testimony. Thank you. Ms. Martine-Alonzo. Thank you. Mr. Cole. There must be other cases like this where ARRA funding---- Mr. Simpson. I suspect they are all over. Mr. Cole [continuing]. Found places that we thought we could repair and then learned later that we could not. That would be something worth checking into from an administration standpoint, if they are running into this problem elsewhere because I would suspect your situation is not totally unique. Ms. Martine-Alonzo. I am sure. Mr. Simpson. Well, and the other thing we found, Mr. Chairman, is that as you well know, some of the ARRA funding did construction for some things, it does not do any good to do construction if you do not have the resources to actually put the personnel in the justice center or in the health clinic or whatever you have built out there, and that is some of the challenges we are facing. Mr. Calvert. Just one comment, Mr. Chairman. Excuse me. Go ahead, Mr. Moran. Mr. Cole. Well, Mr. Moran has already had his time, but Ms. McCollum just arrived and has not had an opportunity, so I wanted to go to her next. Ms. McCollum. Well, thank you, and I just got back from the State Department where we were talking about maternal child health internationally and I said there are some things we can do for women right here in this country, and I fully engaged members of the panel to talk about what we can do for maternal child health. But you are here on school construction right now, and I do have a question. I know that there has been a survey that has taken place on some of the Navajo reservation land with the uranium dust, and is the school in that belt or that zone where there has been some observation and reexamination of radiation contaminant from the mining? Ms. Martine-Alonzo. The Ramah Navajo reservation land is 60 miles from grants from the area where the uranium mining has taken place. Ms. McCollum. Okay. So Mr. Chair, I was just wondering if that was also on impact, that this school was looking at. I was being creative in other ways that we might approach other people for help. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Mr. Calvert. Mr. Calvert. Just a comment. You know, property manager, sometimes when you do not spend the money on repair and maintenance over the years and you build up this maintenance criteria to the point where you cannot fix it anymore, I suspect that this is going on throughout the BIA management community. Ms. Martine-Alonzo. In many cases, yes. Uh-huh. Mr. Calvert. And there are probably a lot of facilities could have been enjoyed for a further period of time if, in fact, they had gone ahead and upheld their obligation to do the repairs and the maintenance in a timely fashion. So we end up spending a lot more money because we do not do the maintenance and the operations in the first place. And since the gentlelady brought up uranium, I was just curious, do the Navajo Nation enjoy a particular royalty from that mining? Are there any benefits from that at all that you get? Is that on Navajo property? Ms. Martine-Alonzo. I would defer that question to President Shelly if he is still in the house. Ms. McCollum. Mr. Chair, for the most part I would say a big no. They have had water pollution, they have had housing issues with dust moving forward, and might be something that the Chairman and Mr. Cole, at some point we can get an update. We worked with the Bush Administration in government reform to get everybody in the room talking to each other, because everybody was pointing the agency finger about who was responsible for the cleanup, and that is why I was wondering if the school was impacted, but I would say for the most part it is a big not positive for the Navajo reservation, but they should speak for themselves. Mr. Calvert. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Cole. Mr. Flake. Mr. Flake. No questions. Mr. Cole. Thank you, ladies, for your testimony. Appreciate it very much. Ms. Martine-Alonzo. Thank you very much. Mr. Cole. Mr. Honyaoma, Todd, Vice President of the Native American Grant School Association. Good to see you. Mr. Honyaoma. How are you? Mr. Cole. Very good. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NATIVE AMERICAN GRANT SCHOOL ASSOCIATION WITNESS TODD HONYAOMA Mr. Honyaoma. Good morning, Honorable Chairman Simpson and Chairman Cole, and honorable members of the committee. My name is Todd Honyaoma. I am a Hopi Tribal member, member of the Spider Clan as you can see. I am President of Hotevilla- Bacavi Community School located on the Hopi Indian Reservation east of Flagstaff, and I am the former Vice Chairman of the Hopi Tribe also. And I have here with me my big man, my body guard, Jeff Mike from Navajo Nation, Pinon Community School. I serve as the Executive Board of Vice President for Native American Grant School Association. We consist of 17 school members throughout the southwest, including Navajo Nation in Arizona, New Mexico, Hopi Nation, White Mountain Apache, and also the Gila River Pima tribes would consist of those schools, grant schools. I am here today to present NAGSA's statement to draw Congressional attention to the impacts of declining under- funding of BIA-funded schools, especially our grossly-under- funded travel grant support costs. In the fiscal year 2012 proposed budget on travel-operated schools the United States Government has a binding treaty, trust responsibility, and a legal obligation to educate all Native American children forever. The right to attend good schools should be the birthright of every child in America. The government recognizes that it would provide the highest quality education and basic necessities to Indian tribes forever. We are expressing our concern about the current budgeting crisis affecting all federal agencies and particularly to address the impact of potential budgeting shortfalls on BIA- funded schools such as our member schools. Travel grant support costs. We were promised 100 percent funding, formerly known as the Administrative Cost Grant, to cover the operation or indirect costs for the operation of our schools. This funding is applied to the cost of schools for administrators, business management, human resources department, payroll, accounting, insurance, background checks, other legal reporting, recordkeeping requirements, including annual audits. We receive only 61 percent of our administrative costs. Some other tribal contractors such as Indian Health Service, IHS, receive a higher percentage. Now, why are we different? We want full funding. If you were to fund us tomorrow, we would ask for 72 million. Transportation, dirt roads, as you may know, Hopi, Navajo, we operate our busses on nothing but dirt roads. The majority of our roads are dirt roads, and when it gets muddy, it gets muddy, a foot deep. We bus our students long distances, 20, 30 miles on dirt roads. Let us set up after-school activity bus runs, and with high fuel costs today in Hopi we have our average $4.15 a gallon at this point. Diesel is a whole lot different story for buses. If we were to be funded tomorrow, we would ask for 61 million in that area. New school replacements. Our school is over 60 plus years old. When you sit in there, there is cracks in the walls. You can sit in there, and you can see right outside the wall on the other side. I usually jokingly say if there is a social dance, you can kick back in the school and watch them dance on the other side. That is how big the cracks are. Asbestos is another issue. We had a lot of patchwork done to our school. We could go down the hallway, there is asbestos in there, but sheetrock is covering it right at this point, and that is very dangerous for our students. New school construction was zeroed out. We would like this to be restored. NCAI, National Congress of American Indians, in its budget fiscal year 2012 budget request estimated that it would take 2.4 million just to keep pace with the growing need for facility construction and repairs, but we are only asking that you restore 61 million at this time. In closing, you promised us that you would be solely responsible for funding Native American schools at their highest quality. You are not coming close to keeping that promise. This promise has been broken. We are not asking for Welfare entitlement or any such thing. We are asking the Federal Government to honor their past due, and this is past due treaties, agreement, declarations, Presidential declarations that we have done. And with that I want to bless you all. May the Creator bless everybody, all of us here today. [The statement of Todd Honyaoma follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.026 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.027 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.028 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.029 Mr. Honyaoma. I am going to put the floor over, give him the floor. Do you have anything to say? Mr. Mike. Well, I just wanted to say good morning to Chairman Cole, Chairman Simpson, and the members of the subcommittee here, and I just wanted to go ahead and follow up on Mr. Honyaoma here based on his testimony here that we do rely on the Federal Government quite a bit for our educational needs, but that is only because it states that in the NCLB, No Child Left Behind. And it also is a trust responsibility that the Federal Government has up this point, and we are trying to have the Federal Government live up to their responsibility of educating our young ones, our Native American children so that we may be able to have the same quality education as everybody else in the United States of America. So I just wanted to follow with Mr. Honyaoma that way. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Well, thank you both for your testimony. I do have a question. It just might be helpful for the committee. I would be very interested on what your funding per student is versus the average in Arizona. What would be the differential for a child going to a BIE school and one that you operated versus, you know---- Mr. Honyaoma. Currently right now we are sort of like fluctuating back and forth because of the rolling average. Mr. Cole. Uh-huh. Mr. Honyaoma. They are considering per capita versus ADM, average daily membership count that we used to have. BIA is still trying to figure out what they want to do, and they are the one that does the figures to the tribes. And we are doing ours, but we still think that BIA should be the one to come up with a policy of some sort. Okay. This is what we are going to go under, but they are throwing things at us, and we are saying that, no, it is no use. It is good that we have the opportunity, but when it comes to the Bureau, I do not know where it goes. I am pretty sure it never gets here, which I hate to say. But I sat on a transportation committee for the Hopi Tribe, and we understand some green book does all the evaluations and all the reports. That never makes it to Congress. So my thoughts are after seeing that everything that we do on tribal nations through the Bureau never gets to the highest. Maybe that is the reason why we are getting real low funding. Mr. Cole. Again, if you can help us on this with the staff, I would love just to see the difference on a roughly per-pupil basis what the funding that the children that are going to the schools you are talking about are getting and what, you know, in the broader community a statewide average would be. Just make it very striking what the difference is. Mr. Honyaoma. And we submitted a package. It should be in there. If not, we will follow right back up as soon as possible with those figures for your information. Mr. Cole. Yes. Please do. Mr. Honyaoma. Yes. With the other states comparison. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Ms. McCollum. Ms. McCollum. That is a great question. It really is, and different states have different pockets of money the way that they calculate it. I know in Minnesota we took transportation out of the per-pupil unit to account for it differently, and as states have cut their budgets, they have often cut their transportation budgets, but you cannot cut your transportation budget. Mr. Honyaoma. No, we cannot. Ms. McCollum. You cannot start telling kids even though roads are dangerous to walk because it is too far. Could you maybe comment for a second on Head Start and your interactions with Head Start Programs, which is funded in a different pot of money than this committee has but maybe the impact of Head Start, lack of Head Start, waiting list to Head Start to give the children that you serve a boost when they start in the traditional grade schools? Mr. Honyaoma. Well, in the past I will put myself back in my former vice chairman role in the Hopi Tribe. Ms. McCollum. That is why I figured I could ask you. Mr. Honyaoma. But what we did was Head Start is completely different from first grade on up to eighth grade. So they had their own pot of funding, and the director of the Head Start monitored all of those programs, but what money that we had available from the Hopi Tribe as a whole and that was not used for other things, like for example, transportation, teacher, we are very bad with buildings. Our Hopi Reservation consists of nothing but trailers for Head Start, and that was very back. They were falling apart. So we ended up having to foot their bills, and we tried asking the Bureau to supplement or replenish us back what we have tried to put out, but so far until the day I got out of office we have never got anything back. And that hurts me because that is our roots. Head Start is our roots of the foundation of our lives. They are the ones that are going to lead us into the future, and I think we need to focus a lot of our attention on that and our veterans. We had talked about that today, because if it was not for them, we would not be here in this free country. Ms. McCollum. Thank you. Mr. Honyaoma. But there is a lot to do with that. Ms. McCollum. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I bring this up because I and I am sure you have had some of the same conversations, monies that the tribes might have put into schools where we were short, where the Federal Government was short on the funding, they struggled between do we put it into Head Start, or do we put it into traditional K-12, and when you know how important Head Start is, early childhood with all the information coming out, it is starting to become even a deeper, deeper struggle for many of the Native American communities. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Honyaoma. And it is affecting all the tribes. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. No. Mr. Cole. Mr. Calvert. Mr. Calvert. Not at this time, but thank you. Mr. Cole. Mr. Flake. Mr. Flake. Yes, sir. With regard to limited funding again, in Arizona there is a mix of funding that goes to a lot of these schools you are referring to. Is there any state funding that is pulled down? Mr. Honyaoma. No. As far as I am concerned there is no state funding. It is nothing but Bureau operated, but I can tell you this. Back when I was in office we had a situation with our state. They were accusing us of double-dipping because states had competitive funding, grant funding, and we applied for that as schools. We got the money, and the state legislature started saying, well, you are double-dipping, Indian tribes, because you get money from the Federal Government, plus you are asking for money from the state. But to me they funnel through the same process. Just like Federal Highways Administration. Well, it is the state and the Bureau, and that is all we were trying to do is take advantage of the opportunity for grants to further enhance our education, our students, but that was when we were criticized. So, no, we do not get anything from the state. Mr. Flake. I recall that. That is why I brought it up. So you did receive funding for a time under that or not? Mr. Honyaoma. Just a short time. Mr. Flake. Okay. Mr. Honyaoma. And that was it, and after that everything closed up. Mr. Flake. Okay. Thank you. Mr. Cole. There are real problems here just in the sense that tribal governments do not have the power to tax. Obviously we have very low per capital income anyway, so, I would love to see statistics on, the amount of dollars per kid on a reservation and the amount of dollars per kid immediately off the reservation, because there is a federal trust responsibility. I do not know how you could argue we would be spending less money on the kids that we are responsible for than the state surrounding is putting for its children. And yet I am sure you would find out again and again that this is not just a minor differential. It would be a factor of two or three times in many cases, and there is just no way, schools can operate at that kind of disadvantage and be able to provide those children with the education that they deserve. Mr. Mike. And just to add to what you are saying as far as the disparity between the funding, you would have to understand the impact of environment that our schools are located and our homes are located. Just for our school, Pinon Community School, is only a kindergarten school, but we have a residential as well, but the kindergarten, we go door to door to their homes and bring them in and take them back every day. Then on top of that it gets really hard during winter season, during seasons where some of these roads become impassible. That is where this transportation costs come in, and a lot of times it is not enough to cover all of that as far as some of our buses, even the four-wheel drive, they are stuck halfway in mud ruts, and so we have children on there and kind of safety issues, things like that. Mr. Cole. I know Chairman Simpson has plans for August and later to actually make some trips into Indian Country so the committee has a better opportunity to see these things firsthand. So hopefully we will have an opportunity sometime in the not too distant future to do that, and I know in several areas we will. Mr. Mike. Well, I welcome you to come over to our area. Mr. Cole. I would very much like it. I have had the privilege of certainly going through Navajo Country but not in official capacity. Just enjoying the beauty of the land but honestly seeing the challenges you face geographically, too. They are enormous. Mr. Mike. Yeah. Mr. Honyaoma. And I just wanted to leave you with this, that our school, Hotevilla-Bacavi, has been meeting adequate yearly progress since its inception in 2000. We just made AYP again last year, so with that I would like to invite all of you to come out and look at our school and look at our reservation, how they look, so you have a better idea. But, again, we take this opportunity to thank you for that, and we look forward to working with you, and we will get you that information as soon as possible. Mr. Cole. Thank you very much, and I appreciate your testimony. Thank you. Mr. Honyaoma. Thank you. Mr. Cole. I am going to take chairman's prerogative or temporary chairman's prerogative and invite the three Oklahomans up here that we have altogether. So Harold Dusty Bull and Joy Culbreath and Melanie Knight, if all three of you could come. If I may, Mr. Chairman, these are three people I know quite well because they have certainly been in my office, and they represent tribes in my state, and they have been here before, before this committee, so I want to thank all three of you for being here. I do not know any three people who work harder in Indian Country not only for their respective tribes but to defend the interests of all tribes and advance them here, and they have different things to talk about, so Madame Secretary, perhaps we just start with you and work across the line, and if you would, just for the benefit of the committee, introduce yourself and certainly let them know what your title is with the Cherokee Nation and what you do. Ms. Knight. Certainly. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. CHEROKEE NATION WITNESS MELANIE KNIGHT Ms. Knight. Thank you, Chairman Cole, Chairman Simpson, members of the committee. I am Melanie Knight. I am Secretary of State with the Cherokee Nation, and I am here to present on behalf of Cherokee Nation today. Cherokee Nation just for benefit of those of you that do not know us well, we were one of the first tribes to enter a treaty with the United States in 1785. Two hundred years later we entered into agreements under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, which was for us a new era of partnership with the United States. No single enactment had a more progressive affect on tribes and specifically the Cherokee Nation than the Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act. In three decades we have assumed control of many door-opening affairs in Indian health service programs, including healthcare, education, law enforcement, land and natural resource management, and protection. It serves a mechanism to shift back control to the Nation in the sovereign light of ours to control and administer these essential services, manage our own natural resources, control our economic future, and increase self-sufficiency and economy as a Nation. Presently the Cherokee Nation is thriving in our 14-county jurisdiction in Northeast Oklahoma. We have approximately 305,000 citizens worldwide, and we are the largest employer now in Northeast Oklahoma, and we employ 8,500 people there. About 5,000 of those employees are employed in our various businesses, and those businesses range from hospitality, information technology, environmental services, and the aerospace sector. So we have grown quite a bit since the advent of self-determination. Strong, cohesive Cherokee communities are also existing and help us preserve, adapt, and prosper in today's economic climate and help preserve our culture and language in those communities. So funding for both the Indian Health Service and Bureau of Indian Affairs is important to our progress and important to help maintain that progress as we move forward. So I will discuss just a few of those things today. Under our self-governance compact with the United States we construct and maintain water lines. We also operate a sophisticated network of eight outpatient clinics and also WW Hastings Hospital in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. We provide primary medical care, dental, optometry, radiology, mammography, behavioral health, and health promotion and disease prevention services. Hastings Hospital in Tahlequah is a 60-bed inpatient facility. We have 300,000 outpatient visits in that facility each year. We fill over 335,000 prescriptions in that facility annually, so it is quite a large workload for one facility. The IHS Joint Venture Program has become a very important program for us. It demonstrates a shared commitment between the Indian Health Service and tribes to help expand facilities in Indian Country where otherwise we may not be able to, and it has become especially effective in the Oklahoma area. The Cherokee Nation and other tribes in Oklahoma have joined together to support that this be funded on an annual basis more consistently, that we provide adequate funding for the Indian Health Service side, which is the program side of the house, the tribes commit to build the facility, and that we fully fund the contract support costs that go along with that program. It helps advance facility building out in Indian Country. In addition to the well-documented disparate funding between the IHS and other federally-funded health systems, funds among the IHS areas are funded equivocally as well. The Indian Healthcare Improvement Fund assists us in achieving parity among the Indian Health Service areas for funding. We join other tribes in recommending that the Indian Healthcare Improvement Fund be addressed, be addressed on a time-limited basis so that we can raise parity for the Oklahoma area and others like it that are among the lowest funded in the Nation. Given the deficit in funding for Indian health in general we recommend, of course, that all funds appropriated to Indian Health Service be specifically exempted from the rescissions that may come about during the appropriations process. In regard to Bureau of Indian Affairs Services, the Nation, of course, operates a full range of those services now from Sequoia Schools, child wellness programs, child abuse services, adult and higher education, housing, law enforcement, and so forth, and these programs since the advent of self- determination have become important building blocks in us achieving self-sufficiency and being able to develop the economy of our jurisdiction. So they are important to continue to fund those programs. One of the most important budgetary issues that is facing Indian Country is a severe under-funding of contract support costs in both the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service. It negatively affects almost every tribe in the United States. Nearly every tribe has some form of a contract that is negatively affected. The issue is specifically significant because each dollar that we do not recover in contract support costs which is a legally-required and a cost to be covered affects direct programs one for one. So if the Nation sustains a shortfall, presently our shortfall is about $4.2 million a year, that results in $4.2 million in direct healthcare that must be diverted to cover these costs, because of course, they are fixed costs, must be paid. The Nation has no option but to pay them, and so direct care is affected by that. The IHS projects a total shortfall of 153 million. So when you look across the country, $153 million in direct care is affected by the failure to fund contract support costs. In addition, the BIA is under-funded by another $62 million, so that means funds going to law enforcement, courts, and other programs are affected as well. Now, I would like to give you just short example of how it affects us. Mr. Cole. We are running out of time. Ms. Knight. Okay. In 2010, we made a little bit of progress. We were able to recover an additional $8 million based on the increase in contract support cost that was approved. With that $8 million it meant 124 jobs, health jobs that we were able to hire for our health system, pharmacists, healthcare providers, dental staff, and so forth, and that generated another $8 million in third-party revenue for our health system. So you can see how this has a direct relationship on patient care. So with that I will wrap up my comments, but thank you for your time, and I would be happy to answer any questions you have for me today. [The statement of Melanie Knight follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.030 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.031 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.032 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.033 Mr. Cole. Thank you, Madam Secretary. Ms. Culbreath, good to see you again. I will tell you early just to warn you I will be talking with Chief Pyle later today about water issues in Oklahoma, and I am going to tell him how you do. Ms. Culbreath. Tell him I hacked it up. Mr. Cole. He will not be surprised. Ms. Culbreath. He would appreciate that. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA WITNESS JOY CULBREATH Ms. Culbreath. Thank you so much that I could be here today. On behalf of Chief Gregory Pyle of the Great Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma I bring greetings to the distinguished members of this committee. I am Joy Culbreath. I am the Executive Director of Education for the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, and I appreciate this opportunity to appear before this committee. There are two priorities today. One of them is health. Mickey Peercy is our Executive Director of Health. He could not be here today, and so I hope you will read the testimony that is here for him. Contract health services and contract support costs are priorities for the Choctaw Nation, and we have the written testimony. The support for Jones Academy is what I would like to visit with you about today and keep that afresh and on your minds. I am here to express our appreciation to you as the committee and the members past and present who supported our efforts to reestablish the federal trust relationship for Jones Academy education through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, BIE, and, BIA. We worked together on this correction for decades. This happened back in the 1950s. Since the Federal Government unilaterally closed the academic programs at Jones Academy and Wheelock, both of those were in the Choctaw Nation, we really do not know why, created the Jones Academy Boarding Facility which required students to go to the local public school. The statutory language to rectify this wrong is included in the President's fiscal year 2012 budget request. It was also in the fiscal year 2011, House committee-passed Interior appropriations bill written by this subcommittee. If enacted, it finally brings Jones Academy into compliance with the self- determination policy of the last 30 years. Strongly supported by this subcommittee. Most importantly of all it enhances future educational opportunities for our students. There are so many people here to thank. The list would be endless. Mr. Simpson, Mr. Moran, and of course, our own Representative, Tom Cole from Okalahoma. I also would like to mention Representative Dan Boren, who has, no, not a member of this committee, but he has provided extensive guidance and support, and then, of course, representatives of the Administration, particularly Assistant Secretary Indian Affairs Larry EchoHawk. He considered our situation with an open mind and an open heart, and he looked at the results of the subcommittee-directed report on the history of Jones Academy and recommended the budget neutral language under consideration in this bill. This is a prime example of the ancient Choctaw philosophy that issues should be resolved openly and fairly by people of goodwill working together. With a new Jones Academy we built a brand new facility and opened it just a few years ago totally with tribal funds and the dedication of our Choctaw staff. We will work tirelessly to affirm your faith in us and especially in our students. With your support we look forward to continuing the unprecedented achievement record of our extraordinary students at Jones Academy. We were found to be two years in a row academically the top four elementary schools in the State of Oklahoma at Jones Academy. So on behalf of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and our chief we are honored to provide our tribe's views on these priorities and respectfully urge your consideration and support of these program funding requests in the 2012 budgets for the BIA and the IHS. [The statement of Joy Culbreath follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.034 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.035 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.036 Mr. Cole. Thank you for your testimony. Ms. Culbreath. Yes. Mr. Cole. Harold. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NATIONAL JOHNSON-O'MALLEY ASSOCIATION WITNESS HAROLD DUSTY BULL Mr. Dusty Bull. Chairman Simpson, Ranking Member Moran, Congressman Cole, Congressman Calvert, I am the Director of the Blackfeet Johnson-O'Malley Program in Browning, Montana on the Blackfeet Indian Reservation. I am here representing the National Johnson-O'Malley Association, which is based out of Oklahoma. I am the Vice President, and I also have with me the President, Virginia Thomas, who is sitting back here. We educators in Indian Country are always happy to be in your company. If it were not for Congress supporting the Johnson-O'Malley Program and the appropriation process, we would not be here today. I want to acknowledge Congressman Cole from the State of Oklahoma for the many, many years he has supported this program. Congressman Cole knows the purpose and scope of JOM and how vital and how great the need is in the country and throughout this Nation. I am here to tell you a little bit about the JOM Program and give you an update on our 2012 request and recommendations. It has been a very interesting year for JOM at the current funding year program. Like many who testified and will be testifying before you, it is very hard to plan for the future when you do not know what you currently have. Johnson-O'Malley was enacted in 1934, to allow the Department of Interior to provide assistance to Indians in the areas of education and other needs but including relief and distress and transition from Indian settings to the general population. Seventy-six years later this program is still providing this vital, critical service to Indian children who most of them live in impoverished communities where their unemployment rate runs as high as 70 percent, especially during the school year when children need the assistance the most. JOM grads provide Indian tribes, school districts, tribal organizations, parent committees with supplemental funds to provide special educational needs for their children who attend public schools, non-sectarian schools from ages three years to grade 12. Without JOM dollars Indian children of all academic standings would not be able to afford such things as college counseling, athletic equipment, after-school tutoring, transition programs, musical instruments, scholastic testing fees, school supplies, and other basic needs such as cap and gowns for graduation. Other federal programs such as the Department of Education, I want to reiterate this, other federal programs such as the Department of Education does not allow for these types of activities within their funding. Our program on the Blackfeet Reservation funds the basic needs to keep our children in school and to keep our parents involved in the education of their children. If you go back in history, you will understand that the education of our children was taken away from our parents. Kids were housed in boarding schools and so forth and so on. And so that responsibility was taken away. So we are still reintroducing that responsibility to our parents. Seven percent of the Indian children go to boarding schools. Ninety-three percent go to public schools, so it is a big job. Nationally we are requesting a new student count and to lift the freeze on the student count that was enacted in 1995. Along with our partners, the National Indian Education Association, we are requesting the JOM Program be restored to 24 million, the amount that was appropriated when the BIA and the BIE froze the account in 1995. They froze the account in 1995, but they did not freeze the money. I wish they would have froze the money and not the account. We would be in better shape today. But last but not least, we want the JOM position to be restored here in Washington, DC, so that Indian tribes and Congress will have a process to provide the proper information we both need to move this program forward and to continue the success this program has had for 76 years. I am very grateful to be here to testify before you. We have submitted written testimony. We are asking for your help in regard to our requests and recommendations, and if you have any questions, I will be more than happy to answer them at this time. [The statement of Harold Dusty Bull follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.037 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.038 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much for your testimony. I want to make a couple of comments, and then we will move because we are running behind schedule, and that is more my fault than anybody else's, I can assure you. Madam Secretary, I just want to thank you for bringing up the concept of joint ventures. Again, Mr. Simpson is going to be visiting Oklahoma I think some time later this year and a number of other members, and that is one of the things we are going to make sure he has an opportunity to see. As you know Choctaws have a joint venture hospital as well. All our tribes have really done a good job when they have got money to match, and you will be impressed, Mr. Chairman, when you see how far they can stretch the healthcare dollars and bring additional things in here. So I think this is a real way forward to break some of these deadlocks, and honestly, potentially a godsend for the tribes that are not fortunate enough and have to rely more heavily on Indian healthcare funding. It is very impressive what some of these tribes are doing. Certainly what the Cherokees are doing is very impressive. Ms. Culbreath, I am glad you made the point which I always like to make, the Jones Academy deal did not cost the Federal Government a dime. This was simply a matter of going back and Congressman Boren worked very hard on this, going back and recognizing the relationship as it should have been and should have never been changed, and it was correcting a historical wrong at no expense to the Federal Government. And the Choctaws are really to be commended for that. And finally, I want to just agree from the chair with what you had to say, Harold, about the need to get a new student count. The idea that we stopped having students in 1995 and the number never changed is a rather convenient budget fiction out here, and I also particularly appreciate you making the point of how many Native children are not in BIE schools. The reality is the vast majority, nine out of ten, are in the public school system, and Johnson-O'Malley is one of the few programs that actually gives you some flexibility to help those kids where they are going to school as opposed to simply BIE schools who would certainly have their own needs and need additional funding as well. But this is one of those programs that is absolutely invaluable, and you get a lot of bang for the buck because you are building on top of a state appropriation, local appropriations that are already there. So I appreciate your advocacy and everything you and Virginia have done in this regard. It is has just been exceptional. Ms. Culbreath. And most of those programs, there is not enough money for JOM. I know with the Choctaws with Johnson- O'Malley that the Nation is putting in like 50 percent of what goes to the Johnson-O'Malley students, because we had to either cut the program out or cut it in half, and so we use our federal funds, and then the Choctaw Nation puts in the other half. Just like you were talking about our early childhood programs, we are second to none. Matter of fact, we have the best programs in the State of Oklahoma. We just received the award that we met 100 percent of all of the mandates of the Federal Government in our Head Start Programs which are 1,700. Well, that cannot be met with federal funds. That is totally impossible. The tribe puts more money in Head Start than the Federal Government does in the Choctaw Nation. So those are things that need to be mentioned. I asked the lady that came and did our report this past year, audited us, do not compare us with other tribes. That is unfair because the tribes that cannot put the money into their programs should not be compared to a tribe that can have more money from their tribe than they do from the Federal Government. We met those 1,700 requirements 100 percent. Only two tribes in the United States. The other tribe had 20-something students. We have 310. So that is why I am telling you that the tribes that can, we are stepping up to the plate. We are not asking the feds for everything, but we are also having to do that, to meet the mandates of the Federal Government, which is totally unfair to the other tribes. Mr. Cole. Now, this goes to a point that Mr. Shelly, President Shelly of the Navajo Nation made earlier, how important it is for tribes to have sources of revenue beyond the Federal Government, and that is hard to do, you know. That is very hard to do, but when tribes are able to do that, they always take the money and reinvest it back in their people. So the things this committee can do beyond just money are to try and assist them to be entrepreneurial because I can tell you they make money like a private business, and they invest it like a government right back in their people. So I am sorry, Ms. McCollum, I was kind of on my high horse there and so I can turn it over to you for your questions. Ms. McCollum. I just echo what you said and the comments that you made about reinvesting in people and not comparing tribes to tribes, and I know that two leadership tribes in Minnesota are successful in gaming but they are also diversifying, the Mille Lacs Band and the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux not only help their own people but they help, as they say, their brothers and sisters and cousins in surrounding areas, and I know especially in the Dakotas and throughout Minnesota, so the reach-out is great. I would just like to ask a question about Impact Aid. The other appropriations subcommittee I serve on is veterans and military construction, which deals with some of the Impact Aid. Questions about that also go to the heart of Johnson-O'Malley. Would you, for this committee, because I am trying to cobble some information together as you can tell through Head Start and that, that impact as well, for this committee? Mr. Dusty Bull. Well, the Impact Aid Committee was actually designed for the military bases at one time because there were large military bases, and they were educating students on the military bases, and they had no tax base. So that is how that came about. Then all of a sudden they realized Indian tribes fell under the same category because they had no tax base. They had no way to generate revenue to educate the Indian children. Okay, and that is how Impact Aid came about, so it is not just for Indians on Indian reservations. It is for anybody in trust, where the government has land and trust and people live there, and they have children to educate. So that is how Impact Aid came about. The Johnson-O'Malley Program is a simple mental education program that is designed to meet the specialized and unique educational needs of Indian children, and these funds go directly to Indian tribes, and it is kind of a way of us practicing our sovereignty in a way, of promoting the education of our children, where Impact Aid funds go directly to the school districts and to the state process. Ms. McCollum. Thank you, and Impact Aid both for our military families and for Native American children has not kept up with inflation, so that is a cost factor to school districts that sometimes have extra transportation costs, and at times if Head Start has not been provided, intervention costs. Thank you. Mr. Dusty Bull. I just wanted to make one more point. Impact Aid is in lieu of taxes for those areas. Ms. McCollum. Yes. Mr. Cole. Absolutely true. Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Thank you for your testimony. I look forward to seeing you in August. We questioned whether August was the right time to go to Oklahoma. Nevertheless, we will be there in August, so I look forward to that. Harold, let me ask you a question. I do not mean to throw a bomb out to you or anything like that, but I have wondered this and some people have asked me this. Should the BIE be under the Department of Education instead of the Department of the Interior? Mr. Dusty Bull. Well, because of the trust responsibility and the treaties that we have with the United States Government, in my opinion I think it should stay where it is. Mr. Simpson. Where it is? Mr. Dusty Bull. Uh-huh. Mr. Simpson. Because those trust responsibilities would not diminish. It is how we deliver it. Some people have asked me, you know, why is the Department of the Interior trying to run Indian schools instead of the Department of Education, which is supposed to be the education experts. I do not know. I do not have an answer for them, do not know how it originated this way or what, and I am not suggesting that that ought to happen. I just would like to answer the questions sometimes. Mr. Cole. Mr. Chairman, if I may, just a point of reference, part of the problem, I do not know if it is a problem or not, but just there was no Department of Education when Indian schools were set up. Mr. Simpson. That is true. Mr. Cole. So they were located where Indian affairs were administered. Ms. Culbreath. If you ask three people, you will get four different answers. Mr. Simpson. And they do not even have to be attorneys, do they? Ms. Culbreath. No. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Ms. McCollum. Mr. Chair, to that point the Department of Education does not build and maintain facilities, so that would be a whole new addition onto them. I think what we need are better operation and memorandums of understanding that are clear as to who has responsibility for what so that people cannot walk away from their responsibilities. Mr. Cole. Well, the one advantage you would have is to move towards some sort of formula funding. I mean, I think the big problem always is the disparity between reservation schools and the surrounding schools. I have never seen a situation where a reservation school was remotely funded as well, and again, that is a federal responsibility. So I think there ought to be some sort of linkage that requires the Federal Government to match in the area what states and localities. Then you actually would be providing on a dollar-for-dollar basis the kind of education in a given state that the average kid is getting, and honestly, the kid on the reservation school or BIA school quite often is not getting, through no fault of their own. Mr. Simpson. You are right, and if the argument is we want to do it under the Department of the Interior because they get better service, that has not proven to be the case if you are looking at it in terms of the quality of schools and stuff. Ms. Culbreath. We wrote a letter to Congress. I serve on the No Child Left Behind. We wrote a letter to Congress saying that you need a better working between BIE and BIA. You might want to look at that. We found that one of our biggest problems was they did not know whose job it was to do certain things. Mr. Simpson. Well, we are never going to help Indian tribes across this country address the unemployment, poverty, the things that they uniquely face on the reservations if we do not do something about the quality of education that they have. Mr. Cole. Madam Secretary. Ms. Knight. I just wanted to mention that in the reauthorization of the education bill, there has been some discussion of considering tribal education agencies on the same basis as local education agencies for the purposes of formula funding from the Department of Education, and I think that would be a very positive step, to consider tribes that operate education programs in very much the same way as other local agencies. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Mr. Calvert. Mr. Calvert. We should just match the District of Columbia. I thank the gentlelady. You mentioned the large boarding school. I have one of them in my congressional district; the Sherman Indian Institute has been there for well over 100 years now. I guess it is only one of, what, four or five left in the country of significant size. I want to get your feeling about--I, you know, as Mr. Simpson, I do not want to throw a bomb but they have changed somewhat over the years, and it has certainly been an integral part of our community. One of the frustrations for me has been that they do not allow flexibility in funding. I have talked to Chairman Cole about that where we could bring in outside possibilities of income to help offset their operation, maintenance accounts, and it seems that they are not falling down like a lot of the problems within Indian education throughout the country. But what is your philosophy about these institutes or these boarding schools? Mr. Dusty Bull. Well, first of all, boarding schools are still necessary across Indian Country because of the ruralness and the remoteness of Indian tribes, and you have heard, no roads and no access to the educational facilities, so they are still necessary, and that is probably why only 7 percent attend. Okay? But yet those 7 percent are probably most likely students that perhaps would have a hard time getting to a regular public school if they were not in place. But another thing, too, is that a lot of times we have a lot of children who do not have a family base, you know, to support them through education. This is why this program is important. The only problem I have with this program is that it needs to go further than just education. It also needs to meet the social situations that these children face when they get to that school and to keep them there and complete the process of their education. That is what I would like to see them do. But as far as saying they are totally not needed no more, that would not be the case, not at this time and probably not in the near future. They are still necessary. Mr. Calvert. And that is what I wanted to hear, Mr. Chairman, because it seems that the difficulties of these young men and women that are going through these large boarding schools are still necessary, the few that we have left, and I wish we did a better job of operating them, and I think that the flexibility that we talked about before we ought to look into. With that, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Appreciate it. Mr. Cole. Thank you very much for your testimony. Mr. Coochise, I believe you are next up. It is good to see you again. Mr. Coochise. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Welcome back. Mr. Coochise. Good to see you again. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. INDEPENDENT REVIEW TEAM ON TRIBAL COURTS WITNESS ELBRIDGE COOCHISE Mr. Coochise. With me is one of my team members, Mr. Ralph Gonzales, of the Independent Court Review Team. We have eight members of retired judges, attorneys, and court reporters and administrators who are in this project to do assessments of tribal court. First of all, I want to thank you. My name is Elbridge Coochise but easier to say Coochise. Mr. Cole. I apologize. Mr. Coochise. No, but one thing I do want to say, thank you very much to the committee for FY '10, increase of $10 million added to the courts in Indian Country. Just as a kind of summary, there are 300 courts in Indian Country right now; 184 are funded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs under Interior and BIA. The funding up to now with that last increase is 24.7 million. Prior to that it was only about 11.4 and then the committee added 2.4 in '08, and 2.4 in '09, then '10, and fiscal year 2010. So but in our five years we have been on the road assessing courts that only still means 26 percent federal dollars to tribal courts through the system, where we found as low as 10,800 in one court and then as high as 2.3 million who was successful gaming in funding their court system. The other issue now is the new law that Congress passed in '10 the Tribal Law and Order Act, and that did two things. It requires for enhancements in the judges, the prosecutors, and attorneys have to, public defenders have to be attorneys who are also barred, and most tribes cannot afford that with the funding that they get. And it also increased the maximum penalties from one year and $5,000 to three years and a little higher on the money. So we are here to request an additional 10 million be added to the fiscal year 2010 base that you had appropriated for, you know, $10 million which was a real welcome sight. We were in Nevada last week, and we still have courts that do not have recording systems that cannot afford judges but maybe every three months or a prosecutor who is an attorney or public defenders, and so the cost is still there and the other was our request for tribal code development in fiscal policy manuals. Those are the two areas that we found in the five years that we are having to go back and assist, put together court procedures manuals to comply with their codes and fiscal policy manuals. Those are the two top items that we have had to go in and help them draft up in written form. So our request is still, again, a second 58.4 million that Congress passed in December of 1993. It has never been funded, and the only funds is the piece meals that has happened, and like I said, now we are 184, and we have another year on the contract to assess the 184. The assessments are only those courts that get money from BIA through the Department of the Interior. Then there are other issues that OMB added in there. That is the speedy trial issue, and we are finding that that is not really a problem because most of them are complying with that. And for the tribal courts to maintain their staff they need to get increases in salary. So that is our request here. We do not work for any particular tribe or court. We are just here to help the tribal courts in trying to get resources to operate their institutions on the reservations. [The statement of Elbridge Coochise follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.039 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.040 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.041 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.042 Mr. Coochise. Mr. Gonzales is here with me as a team member, but he also was a former bureaucrat and did a couple of surveys while he was in the BIA to try to get resources to tribal courts. Ralph, do you want---- Mr. Gonzales. As Judge Coochise points out, there is a major shortage of funding on Indian reservations, and it is three-tiered. One is 26 percent of the total funding needed comes from the Federal Government. The other 74 percent comes from tribal governments. But that is not the total need that tribal courts have. That is not 100 percent. They still need more in order to operate, so whatever you are giving is very helpful, but it falls short of what is totally necessary. Mr. Cole. Judge, if I could, I just have one question before I defer to my colleague. I agree with you. The need for funding is very great here. Now that we have had a little bit of operation of the Tribal Law and Order Bill and starting to see it, do you have any suggestions? None of these things are ever perfect. They are also part of a compromise. Are there things legislatively in addition to extra funding that we ought to be looking at in the tribal law and order area from your standpoint? Mr. Coochise. Well, I think other than money any act that is passed, how to implement it, and that it be done with assistance of tribes. The Law and Order Act put some new requirements that realistically today cannot be done. There is only 70 jails in Indian Country with 300 court systems, so even if they wanted to enhance sentencing, you just heard about the attention and other issues that there are, I think, four new detentions out there that are built, but there is no staffing, and they say they do not have the funds to operate those. And so it is more or less following up on what has already been done and then getting the money to the tribal governments to run their justice systems. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Ms. McCollum. Ms. McCollum. Thank you. We had a discussion about a month ago about mutual aid between law enforcement and that can really affect a chain of evidence and all the other information that come in front of the court. To Mr. Cole's question, is this something that we should be looking at to help create more opportunities, more trusts, more work in the mutual aid between law enforcement agencies, both tribal and non-tribal? Mr. Coochise. Yeah, I think especially in fiscal year 2010 when there was appropriation, the new money, the $10 million which was really welcome. There was an additional 50 million went to law enforcement. They are constantly going--there is a disparity. If you increase law enforcement and do not increase court, you have a bottleneck situation. So that is what is happening with Indian Country. And the other issue with Department of Justice funding, they are giving grants for cops program and for drug courts. And I believe it was GAO just did a report which we looked at and said those federal agencies need to talk because we found in South Dakota when we did an assessment, one tribe received three grants from DoJ, and none of them knew that they had the other. You know, each department did not know they gave money. So there is no coordination, and that needs to happen between the BIA and DoJ so that those funds, whatever they are, can work better to the benefit of the tribal justice system. Ms. McCollum. Do you have a record of your backlog? I actually have my Blackberry out to make a note to get a copy of the CRS report if there is one. I haven't read it yet. And any GAO reports, and you alluded to one. Mr. Coochise. Yeah, the GAO, I submitted it. Ms. McCollum. Is that---- Mr. Coochise. I do not know if you got it. Our last year's report and the two places I will have you check is page 2, page 5 and 21. Two is the 18 courts we reviewed, the assessment and their scores, how they are doing. Page 5 is the corrective action where we go back in. Those that scored below a certain level and help them, and it is on the right-hand column. It tells what we have done for them. And then the last two pages, 21 to 22, is a list of the 79 courts that we have done thus far, and we have done 10 of the 18 that we contracted for this year already. And so that is what the team has done to date is not on the back. And I submitted a copy to Grace so all of you guys could get it. Here is just on the last two pages, it looks like this. Ms. McCollum. Yeah, I am looking at them. So these are only the courts that you have had an opportunity to survey? Mr. Coochise. Yes, to do assessments. Ms. McCollum. This probably is not fair because everybody is in a different spot where they are with the tribal courts and the tribal justice and the cooperation between state and federal, everyone is different. But would you say on average, for percentage of population, that there is a 15 percent backlog, 25 percent backlog? Mr. Coochise. I think the larger courts have a backlog problem of around 20 percent. The smaller ones, even though they can only hold court like--last week in Nevada, they only hold court like maybe every second or third month because they do not have the funds to pay a judge to come in. Then they have to do all of it in one day, and they have a higher backlog, and then there are others who do not have because they just put it through and whoever the prosecutor or public defender seems to work it out so that not as many cases get hung up on it. Ms. McCollum. Okay. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Thank you very much for your testimony. Mr. Coochise. Well, thank you again. Again, to Mr. Simpson, we really thank you for the additional $10 million you appropriated last year to tribal courts. It is helpful and we know that our court systems out there need the financial assistance. Thank you very much. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Next I am going to call on Representative Berg, if I can. I understand you are going to introduce the next panel for us, so please, all of you from the Dakotas that are testifying, come on up, and Rick is kind of the Master of Ceremonies here I guess. Welcome, and if I can, I am going to recognize you, Rick, first so you can make the appropriate introductions. Mr. Berg. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Really, it is a great honor here today to introduce some fellow North Dakotans, and I would like to start with Dr. David Gipp. Since 1977, he served as the President of the United Tribes Technical College, and he has really become a leader. Maybe everyone does not want to hear me. He has become a leader really in North Dakota in the Native American community. One message that he has gotten to people in North Dakota that I want to share, and these are his quotes, ``We must do for ourselves what no one else can do and take control of our own destinies by making our own decisions and taking action to improve our lives.'' So Dr. Gipp, I admire your passion and all your efforts for building up what you have done with UTTC in North Dakota. Dr. Gipp is a former student, so I will introduce Russ and then also I want to recognize Dave Archambault from Standing Rock. Also thanks. You are admitted by many, and I appreciate your being out here, so thank you. Chairman Yelbert, I guess we have not had a chance to get to know each other in South Dakota, but there is a bond between North Dakota and South Dakota. So I will give Kristy Nome a hard time for not being here to introduce you guys. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Cole. Rick, thank you, and I just want to tell all of you here, thank you for the great member you sent us from North Dakota. He is very knowledgeable on Indian Country and Indian affairs. That is not always the case with new members. He has been a terrific help and a great ally on a lot of these issues. So just again, thank you for sending us a member of such great quality and honestly, great interest in these issues. I suppose the easiest thing is to start at one end and work through on the testimony. So Chief, if we could begin with you and if you would pull the microphone down there toward you so we can all hear your testimony, we will go through and then we will open it up for questions. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. INTER-TRIBAL BISON COOPERATIVE WITNESS ERVIN CARLSON Mr. Carlson. Good morning, Mr. Chairman, and members of the Committee. Thank you for this opportunity you have given me to provide testimony today on behalf of the Inter Tribal Buffalo Council. I have also submitted the written testimony. My name is Ervin Carlson. I am a member of the Blackfeet Tribe in Montana. I am the President of the Inter Tribal Buffalo Council. Just a little history on ITBC, ITBC consists of 57 tribes across 19 states, and recently we reorganized as a federally charted Indian organization under Section 17 of the Indian Reorganization Act. In 1991, ITBC was established by seven tribes with less than 1,600 animals, collectively, for the purpose of restoring buffalo to the Indian lands. With federal assistance, tribes now have grown to 52 herds with over 17,000 buffalo on our lands. As you know, buffalo historically sustained Indians on this continent, and ITBC believed that reestablishing this cultural and spiritual connection would benefit both buffalo and Indian tribes. I am here today to request $3 million to allow ITBC to continue with buffalo restoration and herd maintenance, pursue economic development through marketing initiatives and implement health initiatives that will restore buffalo to the diets of Indian people. ITBC is one of the few federally funded programs that actually passes the money directly out to tribes. Our unmet needs are $10 million-plus, and these needs that we have is for our infrastructure, fencing, water development, staff for our tribes. Presently ITBC is in the 2012 budget for $1.4 million. A $3 million increase will restore ITBC back to the 2006 levels that we were once at, and that was not where we need to be but it sure helped the tribes a lot more at that level, and we have recently gone down. Restoration and herd maintenance, today ITBC members have 52 herds that are of various sizes and various stages of sustainability. Federal funding is very critical to continue buffalo restoration to Indian lands and to successfully maintain herds. Indian lands are native to buffalo and tribes, and tribes have been successful at restoration. However, ITBC provides critically needed technical assistance such as range management, management plans, buffalo health assessments and as I mentioned before, all the infrastructure needs. Buffalo have developed a new Indian Country industry. ITBC grants to tribes for buffalo management, creates jobs on reservations with extreme unemployment. Additionally, tribes are utilizing buffalo for economic opportunities. With additional funding ITBC could assist tribes in establishing markets, develop marketing techniques and strategies. ITBC had to end its previous efforts through health initiatives due to funding cuts. Additional funding will allow ITBC to undertake efforts to restore buffalo into the diets of the Indian populations. ITBC would provide education to reservation populations on the health benefits of buffalo and also promote local slaughter and processing opportunities. Presently, few opportunities for local slaughter exist in Indian Country. With funding ITBC hopes it might obtain a mobile slaughter facility to allow field slaughter and the use of buffalo products by local communities. The buffalo were real important I guess to our diet. We were doing a health initiative with the additional funding that we had I guess in 2006 and reeducating our people back to the health benefits of eating buffalo. At one time, that is all we had for our diets, and we were free from diabetes. As you know, diabetes is rampant in Indian Country nowadays, heart disease, and we have gone away from eating those healthy foods. We were I guess brought away from that, and now we are teaching our people to come back to that, along with the restoration of buffalo to the Indian Country. Economic opportunities, you know, buffalo is becoming very, very popular nowadays. So there are some economic opportunities also for tribes. And I will say that, you know, our tribes are at different stages right now. Some are looking toward the herds big enough for economic development, some are just sustaining with the land base they have. But they can help our Indian people in a whole new way as they did in the past. In the past, they were everything for Indian people. They were our clothing, our lodging, our tools, and today they help us in a different way. So ITBC is here to help tribes in whatever way they can prosper from the buffalo herds that are within the Indian nations. So with that, I thank you for your careful and diligent consideration of, you know, additional funding for ITBC and restore back to where we were once before, and it would be I guess a kind of waste for the prior funding if we couldn't continue and enhance the programs that we have built with the tribes, you know, until now. [The statement of Ervin Carlson follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.043 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.044 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.045 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.046 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.047 Mr. Cole. Thank you, Mr. President. I am sorry about the misidentification a moment ago. If you guys can, there is a clock there to sort of keep an eye on. It is tough when you are as far away as you are. So we will try and make that a little bit more visible for everybody. Mr. Carlson. Well, we just kind of operate on Indian time anyway. Mr. Cole. You were pretty close on. You were not very far off. Mr. Carlson. Last time I was here testifying I walked up and I put my hat over the---- Mr. Cole. Simpson usually makes cracks about Indian time, and I do not allow any of those when I am in the chair. Mr. Carlson. Well, I noticed anyway because we were way behind. It is kind of back to this time where it should have been when we were first going to have the hearing, so now they said 10:30 so I guess we are all---- Mr. Cole. We are going to blame it on Representative Berg. He was late showing up. Mr. Carlson. So if you have any questions, you know, I am happy to answer those. Mr. Cole. We will. We are going to go through the testimony first so we make sure everybody has an opportunity to say what they want to, and then we will go to questions, okay? ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE WITNESS JOHN YELLOW BIRD STEELE Mr. Steele. My name is John Yellow Bird Steele. I am the President of the Oglala Sioux Tribe in South Dakota. I came, Congressman, to tell you a little bit about the relationship between the United States Government and our Indian nations. I know, Mr. Cole, you are a member of the Chickasaw Nation. Ms. McCollum, you are very well-versed on our Indian issues. Mr. Simpson, I know you are pretty close to us there, but I would like to address some of the stuff that I heard a little before. The veterans. I was in Vietnam for 2 years, Vietnam veteran. And we do have a veteran clinic on Pine Ridge and a veteran homeless shelter that is full. We need more veteran homeless shelter space. But I would say that the veterans coming from Iraq and Afghanistan are quite similar to the Vietnam veterans. The drugs that are there, not knowing who the enemy is, situations happen there. And it is very heavy on the mental part of it and coping afterwards. So those Iraqi and Afghanistan veterans are really going to need some help. I am here today to let you know that the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, we are quite unique. We are rural. IHS says they are the last resort, but they are our only resort. Very difficult. We have, through the past decades, been the poorest per capita income, the second poorest. In 2010, we made it up to the third poorest per capita income. And I look at our treaties with the United States Government, this unique relationship, this political relationship, not a special interest, not a minority like Mr. Stossel says that we are freeloaders, no way. I know that you people sitting here know the difference. But I really am disturbed at being responsible for a people who just cannot make it to the healthcare facilities, and once they get there, it is very poor healthcare. And these were promised in our treaties, especially the 1868 treaty. It made all the promises, 1868 treaty that said until the grass stops growing and the river stops flowing that the Black Hills, which are sacred to us, would be ours, and then the United States Government took them. In 1980, the United States Supreme Court says the most-- case in the history of the United States is the illegal taking of the Black Hills. And I have seen where trillions of dollars worth of uranium, gold and timber have been taken out of those stolen lands. I would like to debate up to today what has happened with the Black Hills. I would like some sort of equity there. The people I represent have problems putting food on the table and doing business on reservation which is quite rural. The roads, the responsibilities the Federal Government have in education, in healthcare, in economic development, all of these are in our treaty which comes from the Constitution of the United States. They were put into law by the ratification of the Senate, two-thirds ratification. And I do not think that the United States has to date been honoring their word to those treaties because of the conditions that people in these United States have to live under. You should see my daughter's living conditions. They are deplorable. One little room that they have made to live in in a 2-inch wall trailer house have to hold water in to cook and drink, use an outhouse, raise four kids that way. The United States, I say, I termed a phrase, inherent federal neglect. When they built up the infrastructure across the United States, they forgot about this large land base called Pine Ridge. They said that was Indian Health Service and BIA responsibility. I do not have the infrastructure there for any development to happen. It is very, very difficult. Our IRA government has been trying to work on this infrastructure for the past several, several, several decades. I am optimistic that we are going to try to catch up a little bit with the rest of America when we get this infrastructure in place, and I am optimistic that our children will have a better life than we have because we are working on all of the basics that the United States Government forgot to do or did not want to do, I do not know which. But we do need some help. And I just wanted to come say, and I know I do not have to say it to yourselves, that we have this unique relationship through the treaty that word must be honored. We go do our duty for the United States, for our country. We fight for freedom. But when we look at our people, we say the United States Government says it is deplorable how the Indians were treated in the past. They say it is not the past, it is today that they are being treated that way. Why? Thank you for holding this hearing. I would like to have one more point is that National Congress of American Indians, National Indian Health Board, who you call to represent us and speak for us, do not know our issues back home with the large land base, with the larger populations, with the isolation, with all of our circumstances. They do not know our issues to speak to them. So we would like a place at the table, one of us from North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, to speak to our issues. They do not have treaties, they do not have our issues knowledgeable to speak to them. We did form an organization called COLT. It is very, very new. It is the Coalition of Large Tribes we call ourselves. We did not say land-based, but we are going to try to get similar tribes together that have the same issues to address here to let yourselves know what they are. [The statement of John Yellow Bird Steele follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.048 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.049 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.050 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.051 Mr. Cole. Thank you for your testimony. I am sure we will be back to visit. Mr. Steele. Thank you for your time. Mr. Cole. Thank you. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE WITNESS DAVE ARCHAMBAULT II Mr. Archambault. Thank you, President Steele. I just want to thank the Committee for giving me the opportunity to testify in this federal process. It is needed, and I hope that this continues so that you can hear the words such as President Steele's. What I see today is kind of a movement in Indian Country towards this decolonization, but the only way that we can achieve this is if we can continue to get the adequate funding. Currently we are inadequately funded in several areas. I will just start by introducing myself. I kind of got ahead of myself. My names is Dave Archambault. I am a member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, and I am honored to provide testimony for the Standing Rock people. Our tribe is approximately 2.3 million acres. That is about the size of Connecticut. We straddle both North and South Dakota, one of the unique tribes that has two states that we deal with. Our lands are along the Missouri River, and some of our best lands were taken from us in the past, just recently, in the 1944 Flood Control Act, relocated us from our precious, our best grounds along the river to hilltops. And it is hard to describe the impact that it had on us. There is a lot of social issues as a result. There is high unemployment rates, there is high poverty, just several problems relating to this man-made event. There is a lot of benefits from this though also, and the people who benefit from this are the U.S. citizens in the area, how they benefited from it, from the low cost power supply that they get from Western Area Power Association. But you have to remember, in order to gain that benefit, there was a cost paid, a sacrifice made, and it is still paid today. We do have a lot of representation in our military throughout the country. There is a high population in there, so I just want to remind you of these occurrences. We are a treaty tribe. We do have treaties, and we did uphold our end of the treaties for almost 200 years now since we entered into these contracts. Our end has been upheld with great sacrifices, and the reason why I am here is to ask that you take that into consideration and remember that as you go through this 2012 budgeting process. I just want to say that we at Standing Rock support the education needs that need to be met, public safety needs. And you have been hearing testimony about that, throughout Indian Country, the healthcare needs and the infrastructure needs that are there. And if you can provide the adequate funding that is needed, then you will see this development that is desired throughout Indian Country. And it is a movement toward the decolonization that we have been experiencing for a time now. We support the United Tribes Technical College. It is an exceptional institution that provides education for our young adults once they finish high school. We support Johnson- O'Malley. We have public funded schools, and we have tribal grant schools. We have both within our boundaries, and we need that continued funding for those students who attend the public schools through Johnson-O'Malley. For public safety and law enforcement, we have experienced an increase with the help--of police officers, but we are feared that we do not want to take resources from other tribes. And we are feared that we are going to lose that public safety, the police officers, with budget cuts. There is a need throughout Indian Country of 1,800 police officers, and we need to assure that that is attained. We support everything for IHS, our healthcare services. Throughout Indian Country we experience high diabetes, heart disease, as the gentleman has said earlier. But it is very personal for each and every one of us. It is in our households, our relatives, our families all see it. And we do provide healthcare, but at Standing Rock we only provide the minimal services, and we depend a lot on contract services. So I ask that you make sure that the contract dollars and the request that the Administration made of $408 million be preserved. Infrastructure, roads, we do not have the infrastructure in order for the economies to flourish. So we ask that you keep the infrastructure in place. And I just want to thank you for your time in allowing me to testify. [The statement of Dave Archambault II follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.052 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.053 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.054 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.055 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. UNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE WITNESSES DAVID M. GIPP RUSSELL M. SWAGGER Mr. Gipp. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the Subcommittee. We appreciate the opportunity to be here. My name is Dave Gipp, President at the United Tribes Technical College in Bismarck, North Dakota, as Congressman Berg pointed out. I have been coming here for a number of years, and we appreciate the past and hopefully the continued support of the Subcommittee, the Committee and the Congress. I am a Hunkpapha Lakota from the area where my colleague and councilman from Standing Rock just presented. I am also President of United Tribes, and with me is Dr. Russell Swagger who is a graduate from United Tribes, went on and got his not only 2-year there but a 4-year master's and has completed his doctorate degree last year, and he is the Vice-President of our Institution for Campus and Student Services where we serve about 1,000 students and about 400 to 500 children on our campus as well, which I will get into later on. I would like him to perhaps also add about a minute within my time just to give you an idea of some of those things that we do. I would just point out that many of the things that Councilman Archambault pointed out, the pillars of a good, sound community, that of education and training, economy, business, public safety, health and infrastructure needs are all the kinds of things that we are trying to do at United Tribes and have been trying to do and have been contributing back to Indian Country for the past 42 years. We occupy an old military fort, at one time Fort Abraham Lincoln. And so we took that over. It is close to over 110 years old. And it is always very historic, of course, and we since, of course, have added other facilities to it. But we serve the American Indian family, children and adults there, about 1,000 adults, and we have three early childhood centers and we have a K-8 elementary school that we do within our whole effort. Our effort then is to provide training and education to the whole family as well as the individual Indian adult who comes there, and we serve up to 87 different tribes from across the Nation. Those are the kinds of things that we do. We just completed 10 years of accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission, and we just had a very successful visit with them, informally, I cannot announce it publically as they say, but we look forward to some of the very sound recommendations that they are going to give us for the next 10 years. We anticipate that we will move also and keep the existing 25 or so 2-year and 1-year certificate and degree programs but also will add several 4-year programs. And I mention things like sound economy. Business administration is one of those degrees we are doing right now. The severe need for teachers in our communities throughout Indian Country. Elementary education is one of those 4-year degrees. We already do a 2-year early childhood degree program, and we are in the area of public safety, criminal justice. Our request then speaks to three different things, about $6.4 million for United Tribes and Navajo Technical College which is located on the Navajo Nation. Those two schools share and appropriation that comes through the Department of Interior. Second, one-time forward funding for those two institutions, which would be about $5 million if we were able to do that to get us in a more advantageous position of being able to have continuity in our operations. Third, I mentioned the issue of public safety, and that is an issue that we have garnered from our various tribes, the 16 tribes in a three or actually a four- or five-state area supporting us for doing an American Indian Northern Plains academy in the area of law enforcement because of the severe shortages that Councilman Archambault pointed out, nearly 1,800 slots that are unfilled in law enforcement throughout the Bureau of Indian Affairs and throughout Indian Country. We think we can provide more training and education that is so crucial for good, sound public safety in our tribal communities. You cannot have a good, sound community unless you have good assurances of that safety in community. You are not going to attract good business if you do not have public safety. The same with education and on down the line. Those are the three fundamental things that I would speak to, Mr. Chairman. We have a very important role in our community, and we work very closely with our tribes. Our board is comprised of tribal chairs and others who sit on our board and directly control and direct what we do as far as our curriculum goes. I am going to ask Dr. Swagger to at least summarize some of the things that I think are so crucial to what we do. [The statement of David Gipp follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.056 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.057 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.058 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.059 Mr. Swagger. Thank you. Mr. Chairman, I think just briefly, if it were not for a place called United Tribes, I would not be in the situation that I am in right now. And I can speak for many students who come to United Tribes, too. These tribal leaders have sacrificed a lot over the years to make sure that students like myself had a place, and we continue to offer that same quality service to students. These students come from conditions where there are many hardships, and they do not even think about college as an opportunity for their future, and a place like United Tribes offers that opportunity to them. So thank you. Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. Mr. Gipp, I just have a quick question for you, and I am sure others will have many questions. But out of curiosity, your students, as they graduate, how many remain working in Indian Country, how many go do other things? Nothing inappropriate about going someplace else, but I am just curious. We have such a challenge in terms of human capital all across Indian Country, so how many folks actually are able to stay and sort of bring their skills back? Mr. Gipp. I would say about 70 percent have a desire to go back, and a good number of them do go back into their tribal communities. Our placement rate is about 87 to 90 percent placement, by the way. One of the realities, though, is that they need a place to go back to where there are jobs and where there is going to be a place where they can, you know, support themselves and their families. And that is why it is so important I think with some of the earlier remarks by our previous testifiers. Mr. Cole. You sort of anticipated my follow-up which is in addition to those who go back, how many would like to but run into exactly the problem you just laid out? There just simply are not sufficient opportunities for them to return to? Mr. Gipp. I think tribal government needs better support just in the arena of things like economic and business development, and our role is to provide those kinds of people with the training in business or small business management which we do on our campus. Sitting Bull College where Mr. Archambault is from is doing much of that kind of thing. Entrepreneurship and playing up those kinds of things are so crucial if we are going to have successful kinds of developing economies. I look at our tribes in many respects, domestic Third World countries that need a lot of foreign aid, if you want to call it that. Mr. Cole. I do not think it is foreign aid. Ms. McCollum. Ms. McCollum. Thank you, and thank you all, gentlemen, for sincere, heartfelt testimony which really speaks to the responsibility that we have to work together on to make sure that all of our peoples live up to their commitments and more so on the Federal Government's side. Your commitment is, I have to say, never give up, and so I really appreciate that. I wanted to just make one observation and then ask a question. I have been to Rosebud but I have not been to Pine Ridge. I have been looking to revisit. It has been a while, so you have kind of given me a loop around to leave the Twin Cities and visit many of the places where my mother was from in both the Dakotas. I will be visiting. But I do not know if I will get all the way over to Montana, so I have got a question for you. Although I have been to Glendive, Sidney and Fairview a lot and a lot of fishing in Fort Peck. But a couple of questions, so I understand better what you are working on with the Bison Cooperative. I grew up in a meat packing town, okay, so people used to bring cattle into South St. Paul to slaughter. And I am going to do a lot of questions together. So you have mobile facilities. Has there been any discussion within the cooperative to transport? Maybe you do not have access to rail. Bison are a lot bigger than cattle. I would not want to be trying to get too many of them on a truck. So maybe that is why it is a mobile facility, and I just want to understand that better. And then tying in what they do at the Technical College, I know there are issues in the deer and the moose population in Wisconsin and Minnesota, and I do not know if it is spread over where you are, maybe it is an issue having chronic wasting disease and the moose are dying from some brain infection. We have no idea. So it leads me to the question of veterinary science, veterinary technicians, training for them, job opportunities. Then the last thing I will toss at you as with these mobile slaughter vehicles, what is your relationship with FDA inspectors and all that? And so I will be seeing you gentlemen later at the schools and at your tribal areas, and I will come visit the veterans. Mr. Carlson. Yeah, one of the things as you know as you say was real hard to, you know, bring the animals to a slaughter facility, so we do not have presently a mobile slaughter facility. In the past there was one, it could not pass the federal requirements. So we had to make it stationary. So it is a lot easier if we can get a mobile facility that will go out to every tribe and have them do their field kills. I guess one of the other areas and I would refer to--to help me answer some questions on, we have had problems with the USDA inspection fee. I guess that is one of the issues that we are continuing--you know, tribes are you know, strapped for dollars anyway, and the inspection fee is one of the areas that we kind of have a problem with. We are trying to not only have the mobile slaughter facility but a regional permanent facility is kind of one of our long-term goals as to all of our tribes. And I have Majel Russell with me who is our legal person and helps in every aspect of ITBC, and I would like to have her talk to you about the inspection. Ms. Russell. Just real quickly---- Mr. Cole. And your name also for the record. Ms. McCollum. And can you tie in how you use the funding to accomplish some of these challenges that you are describing right now? Ms. Russell. I am Majel Russell, and I am legal counsel for the Inter-Tribal Buffalo Council. The reason the mobile slaughter facility is important is that it will allow tribes to do field kills of the animals and maintain the cultural significance of killing the animals out in the field. And we are hoping that if we can get a mobile slaughter facility that USDA will approve, then it will allow us to harvest animals in the field in the cultural manner that the tribes desire and yet still have the meat approved so that we can provide it to schools and provide it to other facilities with the USDA approval. Presently we have to transport animals to USDA facilities, and generally they want to finish those animals in the feed lot. When you finish a buffalo in a feed lot, then that is the kind of buffalo you are going to eat downtown at one of these restaurants where it is all fatted up. And you have basically diminished the health benefit of the buffalo because it has been grain fed, corn fed, and it no longer maintains the value of a healthy food. So a mobile slaughter facility is very important to maintain the integrity of the animal that we are providing, which is a healthy grass-fed animal and also maintains the cultural slaughter for the tribes. Let's see, you had a question about---- Ms. McCollum. That vet training because that will also tie in. Ms. Russell. Yes. Ms. McCollum. So how would having the funding help with these issues? Ms. Russell. Having the funding would critically help us grow the buffalo industry for Indian Country. I mean, right now we are very limited, and it seems like we cannot get over a threshold where we can create more jobs. We have some jobs. We actually have been as successful with U.S. Department of Labor to have a new position of a buffalo manager. So we now have created that position. We actually have created an official position, but we need to work with the tribal colleges on training. We just have so limited funding that we provide only about $70,000 to tribes that are part of our program just for herd development, infrastructure, water, so forth. We cannot get over that threshold. So we think with additional funding we can strategize and meet with tribal colleges to try to promote jobs and training programs and basically grow the industry. Mr. Steele. We wanted to get buffalo from Yellowstone Park who wants to get rid of them. They are not a brucellosis-free herd. And so they have to be quarantined for 30 days. And we are brucellosis free so that is an expense that it is very difficult for us to access those. Mr. Cole. Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. Just a couple things. President Steele, thank you for your testimony. Very important that we hear that. And Councilman, you mentioned the issues that you face on the reservation, transportation being one of them. Just out of curiosity, do you share in the state gasoline tax for transportation needs on your reservation? And the reason I ask that, when I was in the state legislature, I was always trying to get the Department of Transportation to share those gasoline tax revenue with the tribes and let them do in terms of employment and stuff the maintenance on the roads and so forth. Mr. Archambault. Yes, we do, but it is still inadequate. We do have a compact with the state so that we can share in those, but rather than having a compact, we would like to learn how and that is why we depend a lot on our educational institutions. But we would like to learn how to take the taxing duties of the state and do it ourselves so that we do not have to share and we do not have to have a compact and there would be more realization of benefits to the tribes rather than having a compact. Or if that cannot be achieved, then we would like to not have a tax on a fuel within our boundaries, but that is difficult to do also. So there are a lot of things that are brewing that we would like to pursue to probably help us with a lot of these transportation requirements and needs, maintenance of roads. We struggle all the time, and we have to depend on the Bureau through formula funding, and as a large land-based tribe, it is just not enough. And the revenue generated from the sharing of taxes by the state is not enough, and we have a shortfall every year. When a tribe does have to somehow come up with money to subsidize the maintenance of our roads, that is not always--we have to sacrifice other areas in order to just open up roads. And we live in North Dakota where we just had a snowstorm Saturday. Mr. Simpson. We had one in Idaho Friday. Fortunately it was gone in about two days. You get it just after we do. Were you going to say something? Mr. Steele. Yeah, we went to court with the State of South Dakota. We collect all the--tax on Pine Ridge, but it needs to go into people's driveways they call them. They can be anywhere from 100 feet to 3 miles. They have never seen a blade on them themselves. An Indian car is minus a muffler because the road has never had a blade on it. They knock out transmissions. It is very difficult. So that all goes in to trying to do these driveways to people's homes. Mr. Simpson. Well, thank you all. We plan on getting out to North and South Dakota for a visit later this year. Mr. Steele. I do not like when Congress paints the whole United States with this Indian brush. We are unique in different ways. In South Dakota, we went through the state courts up to the State Supreme Court. The State Police cannot come onto the reservations in South Dakota, contrary to Hicks v. Nevada out of the Supreme Court. They tried to bring it to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court did not hear it, would not take it, and so in South Dakota, the state law enforcement tells us before they come onto our territories, and if they do not and they come try to do business, we will arrest them. That is illegal for them to do that. But it is difficult having the full responsibility for all law enforcement, all courts, all prosecutions within our area and then not have the funding to do it. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Mr. Gipp. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and we certainly would appreciate any of you coming to visit us out there. Mr. Cole. Actually, we look very much forward to doing that. I want to thank again and I want to associate myself very much with Chairman Simpson's remarks. I appreciate some of the pointed comments. They need to be made and they need to be heard, and they are certainly very, very appropriate. So thank you. My dad was a pretty old tough master sergeant. He used to have a wonderful saying that your friends are the people that tell you what you need to know, not what you want to hear. So you all said some things that needed to be said and certainly the Congress needs to hear, and we appreciate that very much. We reconvene at 1:00, and I am going to actually try to move it along on time, but we will see. Thank you. [Recess.] Mr. Cole. In the interest of time so we can get back on schedule, and we apologize, the votes came very inopportunely. We are going to call folks up kind of at a panel at a time. So if we could have McCoy Oatman, Chairman of Nez Perce, Tracy ``Ching'' King, the President of Fort Belknap Indian Community and Roxann Smith, the Vice Chair of the---- Mr. Oatman. Mr. Chairman. Mr. Cole. How are you? Mr. Oatman. Good to see you. Mr. Cole. Good to see you. If we can, we will just move from our left to the right, so if you would identify yourself and then go ahead and we will take all the testimony, and then we will open it up for questions. Mr. Oatman. Is the microphone on? Mr. Cole. If you will press the button down there. If it has got that red light, it is on. Mr. Oatman. Okay. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NEZ PERCE TRIBAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WITNESS McCOY OATMAN Mr. Oatman. Good afternoon. My name is McCoy Oatman. I am the Chairman of the Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee. I would like to first off start by thanking the Committee for hearing our testimony here today. Today on behalf of the Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee, I am here to address the Committee as it evaluates and prioritizes the spending needs of the United States regarding IHS, BIA, EPA, the Forest Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and I know Mike Simpson is not here but I would like to give a special thanks to him. He is from our State of Idaho for holding these important hearings. Simpson has seen in person the variety and the quality of work that the tribe does. Mr. Moran. We will pass that on to Mike. Mr. Cole. We will indeed. Mr. Oatman. I appreciate it. So you guys have our written testimony from the tribe, and so due to time I will summarize some of the major points that we have and issues that we have. First off, the tribe recommends increased funding for Indian Health Service including monies for contract health services and contract support costs. The tribe supports the request for at least 4.6 billion which would be an increase of 14 percent over the fiscal year 2010 funding for IHS and contract health services, and contract support costs should be funded at $615 million. The tribe's shortfall last year for the contract support costs was 152,546, and the shortfall for all Idaho tribes is $1.27 million. At this time, our tribal clinic is facing a potential $1 million to $1.5 million shortfall for this year's budget. That is with the 5 percent budget cut that the tribe has done itself on its facility. The clinic has been in priority one status for the last three months which, as you know, means life and limb are the only claims approved for treatment. With the low level of current funding provided by IHS, the tribe would have to double the amount normally received to its third-party billing to fill that gap, and only 35 percent of the 4,500 patients that we service have insurance. One thing that I would like to share, too, is that I spoke with our executive director for our clinics, and one of the statements that she made to me is that our people are chronically ill. So that is something that I would like to pass along to you guys. The tribe also requests approval for 650,000 in funding requested in fiscal year 2011 budget, BIA budget for survey work that was supposed to be done under the Snake River Basin Adjudication which the tribe, as you know, settled. This money would go to the BIA and BLM to do the survey work which is part of the agreement under the transfer of land from the Bureau of Land Management. The tribe also recommends funding contract support costs for BIA at $228 million for programs that the tribe administers such as law enforcement, to supplement its law enforcement program by 600,000 for the last fiscal years to compensate for the budget shortfall from BIA. The tribe recommends proper funding for BIA Endangered Species Fund, Rights Protection Fund and Tribal Management and Development Program Fund. Particularly, the Rights Protection Fund is very critical for the tribe because it helps our harvest management and also funds our conservation enforcement. It also helps the tribe work on protection--resources for on and off reservation hunting and fishing and fish production. The tribe is a natural resource tribe and has made a commitment to work to preserve, enhance those resources where funding is needed. We also support the funding for the BIA, wildlife parks, travel priority allocations which will be covered later on in more detail by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission which the tribe is part of. We would also like to emphasize the tremendous amount of positive work that is done through that program. Also we request support for the Fish and Wildlife Service, travel wildlife grants which has been proposed to be eliminated under some funding scenarios. The grants are the only source of funding for many tribal wildlife programs and is only one of funding sources for the research that the tribe does on the big horn sheep. We also request support for the work of the Forest Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Parks Service on the buffalo hunt and the Gallatin National Forest near Yellowstone National Park. Finally, we request continued support and funding for work with the tribe with EPA through its Federal Air Rules for Reservations, more commonly known as FARR. As you may, I am not sure if you are aware, but the tribe has received a couple of awards for this program. It has been a model program through EPA, through the partnership. And the tribe continues to work on its efforts to improve water quality on the reservation, and so we would like continued funding for that through the state and travel partnership. Lastly, as you know, the NCAI has produced a comprehensive budget request outline for Indian Country which my tribe supports, and with that I would like to thank the Committee for hearing my testimony today, and I look forward to continue the good working relationship that we have. Thank you. [The statement of McCoy Oatman follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.060 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.061 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.062 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.063 Mr. Cole. Before we move on, just so you know, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Oatman said wonderful things about you before you arrived, but Mr. Moran and I moved that that be stricken from the record. But he did stick up for you. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I appreciate that. Good seeing you again. Mr. Cole. If we could go on, Ms. Smith. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK RESERVATION WITNESS ROXANN SMITH Ms. Smith. Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman. Good afternoon. My name is Roxann Smith, and I am the Vice Chairman of Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation in Montana. Our reservation is located in the northeastern part of the State, and we have had so much snow this winter, you would not believe. We had over 80 inches of snow in my little area, and we have gone through so much money in the area of snow removal. And so it has tapped into our reserves at the tribe. So everybody is telling me, if you can put a plug in there for any emergency funding for snow removal, please do so. With that being said, our reservation is approximately 43 percent of our people live at below poverty which is not unusual for Indian reservations. And with that comes some of our requests. We are asking that Congress would increase appropriations for the IHS for healthcare for Native Americans, especially in the area of mental health funding, hospitals and clinics funding and contract healthcare. During the 2009-2010 school year, five of our school children committed suicide, and that is a plague that we have had at Fort Peck. I was out here earlier this year with Senator Dorgan, and he had a summit on suicide. And I myself have lost a son to suicide, and so I know the trauma and the devastating effects it has on families. And so with that, I implore you that, you know, if you could continue to put funding behind IHS because that will in turn help in the area of mental health. Another scourge that plagues our community is diabetes, and in the previous funding request, Fort Peck had asked for an appropriations in the area of dialysis, and that got scratched. It was I think considered an earmark, and we would like to see if Congress would please help us to build upon the existing dialysis unit that we have. Currently we are at capacity with the idea we are guessing that we have an additional 73 to 100 pre-renal diabetics that are going to be needing dialysis. And we not only serve our native population but we serve all of northeastern Montana. So it serves everybody, and it is not just a Native American service. I am trying to rush through this, too. Health status of the community is directly related to the quality of water which is why Fort Peck tribes took the lead in building the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System where we are--I just had a tour of it recently with Mr. Echo Hawk came out to visit our tribe, and we took him out on a tour and things are going along very well. However, one of the areas that we are wishing to ask for assistance on is the O&M charges for bringing the water to Poplar. One of the wells actually was contaminated now with the brine water, and we have shut down those wells, and we are actually piping in water from some external wells. So we are really in dire need there for funding that water will bring--we are concentrating on Poplar initially and then eventually it is going to reach all of the northeastern part of the state. We are needing about an additional $800,000 to operate the project. Another critical area is the public safety on our reservations. I want to support the $11.4 million request to fund operations of the newly constructed detention facilities. The Fort Peck tribes received $1 million from the Department of Justice to rebuild our detention facilities, and this is critical in our ability to operate this facility. We actually broke ground last fall, and they are in the process of working on that, all of the construction, now. Finally I would like to end by talking about economic development and the need to improve and streamline oil and gas development on the reservations. Specifically I urge the Committee to find efforts to plug abandoned wells on trust lands. Currently there are five wells on the Fort Peck Reservation that need to be plugged at an average of $80,000 a well. The BIA failed to fulfill its trust responsibility to ensure that the operators plugged these wells. Now we are left with this environmental threat. Finally, I urge the Subcommittee to support efforts to streamline oil and gas development efforts on the federal trust land. Due to the ridiculous bureaucratic maze that oil development companies face, they elect to avoid important oil development opportunities on reservations for less certain opportunities off reservations. And with that, that concludes my report. [The statement of Roxann Smith follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.064 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.065 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.066 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.067 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. Mr. King. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY WITNESS TRACY ``CHING'' KING Mr. King. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, members of the Committee. My name is Tracy ``Ching'' King. I serve as the President of the Assiniboine and Gros Ventre in Northcentral Montana where, like Vice President Smith said, we had a hard winter. I think the past 3 years we started the end of October, first part of November and upwards of 50 to 60 below zero with wind chill factor of 66 to 70 below. And so our resources have been drained that helps our people keep warm, like the low energy assistance. And our tribes have thrown in helping people to heat their homes, and it is very important to keep their homes. Many of them are veterans of the war, like myself. I come from a war veterans--tribal leaders, and I had a daughter that was capturing insurgents back in 2004, and a nephew who was wounded over in Iraq in '03, and then my daughter was--I did not know if she was dead or alive when Mosul was hit back before Christmas. So my family proudly served this country and my brother was left for dead in Vietnam and an uncle killed in World War II. So there is a lot of history of veterans that probably served our country. And so we still have a code talker from the Assiniboine Tribe that is still alive today and many prisoners of the wars. And so we are very proud that their people have served, and it is a big honor for me to be part of that. With that, we have many issues like the Vice President said, you know, suicide is rampant, and it has to do with a lot of the historical trauma and with the--many of us know what the--are being sued, and so my brother is part of that suit, you know. It is not fun to be part of that because he has to expose what his suicidal thoughts were. He now is an alcohol counselor for our CDC program and helps people go through that. But education is very important to us as well, but in the State of Montana, through the impact aid, in my lifetime I will say I have never seen a child fail. But it is us who fail children, and so we really need to look at overhauling the educational system that impacts Indian Country. And I had some of those who had failed and worked on a program with some young ladies and young men that were ready to be locked up. And we had this program through the Department of Justice that was alternatives to incarceration. And the success of that is they went off to war, to Iraq and Afghanistan and became war veterans. And so there are proven ways to work with many of our youth to become successful in any job opportunities out there. So I am hoping that we could have some mental health like Lusamsa and others that would help us to get our youth and their families help. Many of our veterans suffer from post- traumatic stress, and so we really need to look at beefing up that more to look at ways to have them have a better life, you know, because many of them are veterans that have been in the field of World War II, Korea, and just about every conflict that there is, we have veterans there. We also are looking at gas and oil development that we need to create jobs and look at our natural resources and ways to make some dollars through that. Our budgets through the 638 program through BIA, it appears that once the 638 contract, that the money kind of goes away or it stalemates, and we never get the increase. The distance factor, the weather factor are not really factored into the budget formulation process, as well as the cost of living and inflation are not, either. So we are actually always behind with the budgets we receive. We also are looking at a water compact settlement just like the Black Feet and the Crow Nations have settled with the Congress, we have been working on ours for a number of years and are looking at introduction of a bill. And some of those lands that were taken away from us back in 1896 were, according to the documents of the Cornell Agreement, that a lot of our people had a choice to starve or cede the land back to the government. As a result, a lot of people became rich off of that, and now there is pollution that comes on our reservation. State-of-the- art water treatment plants on the waters that go through the towns off the reservation, but there is no water system in place on Fort Belknap. So our waters are being polluted, there is a high rate of cancer and other diseases that are impacting the people of Fort Belknap. So that is a huge concern with us. Like I said, we have our testimony here, but I want to thank the Committee for allowing us to be here and to listen to us. Thank you. [The statement of Tracy ``Ching'' King follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.068 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.069 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.070 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.071 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.072 Mr. Cole. Thank you. I have got two sets of quick questions if I may, one relates to the oil and gas that both of you mentioned, and two questions under that category I have that I would like you to address. Number one, we hear this quite often that it is much more difficult to develop oil and gas reserves or energy reserves of any kind of tribal lands than it is either even other kinds of federal lands but certainly privately held lands in the vicinity. What are the specific things that make it more difficult bureaucratically, number one, so we could sort of begin to get at that so you could use your resources in the way you choose to. And number two, you mentioned five or six wells that had not been appropriately capped by the people that were operating them. Are those companies that are still in existence that we could go back on? Honestly, they have a responsibility once they are finished with the production to do that themselves, and certainly that is something the BIA or somebody ought to be able to force them to do. Ms. Smith. As far as the capped wells, the Bureau takes a bond, you know, the part of the--are given to the Bureau, and then after so much time has elapsed, then you give it back. And what happened, there was not anybody monitoring those wells on the BIA side, so they just gave the money back to the company. So now there are these abandoned wells hanging out up in Fort Peck. And then the first question that you had regarding the streamlining is what I am asking for is that we have EPA regulations. There is like the BLM, MMS, they all require a certain permit process, and what we are asking for is if they can somehow streamline it like they did in North Dakota. They had a one-stop-shop, and we are hoping that, you know, they can do the same sort of thing at Fort Peck because they are knocking on our doors. I mean, if you look at our map of the oil companies, they are all around the reservation. All they have to pay is $25 to go on a non-Indian piece of land, and they have to pay $7,500 to go onto tribal lands. Mr. Cole. That is certainly something we ought to look at. It is not appropriate. The other question I have, do you all have a school on your reservation, your BIE school? Okay. I'm just curious. So it is an impact aid issue with you strictly. Okay. Thank you very much. Mr. Moran. Mr. Moran. It is interesting, but I think you covered. I am fine. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. No, I am fine. Thanks for being here, Chairman. I appreciate it. Sorry I missed the first of your testimony, but we get a chance to talk frequently. Mr. Cole. Ms. McCollum. Ms. McCollum. Thank you. Could you just elaborate a little more on the need for dialysis? I also have something for Mille Lacs Band for dialysis, especially in a rural area, and how you serve. Do you serve all the way down into Sidney, Fairview? Ms. Smith. We have some people that come from Circle, that area. Ms. McCollum. Oh, my gosh. Ms. Smith. And they drive up--need to drive up every week, you know, for their dialysis. They come up--to poplar. Ms. McCollum. Is the North Dakota Department of Health, are they--I mean, some of this is it is tribal but it is also a public health issue. Is the State of North Dakota trying to do anything to---- Ms. Smith. Dialysis unit in Williston, and it is a 70-mile drive for our people to Williston to have their dialysis. Ms. McCollum. That is where my grandmother went was Williston. And then when the weather is bad on top of it. And how often do some of the elders have to go in for dialysis, twice a week? And they are there for four to six hours? Ms. Smith. And then what we are looking at if we continue to see an influx of people, we are going to have to open up for a second shift of dialysis because, you know, we will have to hire more people. Ms. McCollum. And was part of the dialysis center--I know the nations have been talking together about how to address this epidemic. Was part of what the dialysis center was going to be part about was prevention, monitoring and doing other things besides just the dialysis? It was going to have a, holistic is the wrong word, but a very broad approach to it? Ms. Smith. Well, just feel we need to expand our dialysis as far as I know--expand the---- Ms. McCollum. Okay. And then one other question, Mr. Chair. Some dialysis places now have almost two shifts, but the machines have to be maintained, there is cleaning in between, things like that. Is it more than one shift at your dialysis unit? Ms. Smith. She goes Monday through Saturday and the holiday. I think she opens at 6:00 in the morning until 6:00 at night, all day long. Ms. McCollum. So she is at capacity. Thank you. Mr. King. Mr. Chairman, as far as Fort Belknap, our enrolled members have anywhere from 150-mile to 500-mile round trip, and my nephew gets up about 3:00 in the morning and probably gets done about 6:00 in the evening, and that is one of the things we were looking at is the change of diets as well as using buffalo meat to feed our people. But unfortunately, we have to pay a $40-per-hour USDA fee, and that kind of holds us back a lot. Mr. Cole. Well, thank you very much for your testimony, and I appreciate that. It is very helpful. If we can, we are going to move by just calling groups of people up. If we could have Mr. Whitebird, Mr. Zorn, President Maulson, Chief Rodgers and Chairman Billie. Okay, welcome. If we can we will start at the far end and again, if you could identify yourself before you deliver your testimony, that will make it a lot easier on the clerk. Yeah, if the red light is on, it is on. Mr. Whitebird. Can you hear me? Mr. Cole. Yeah, keep it close, though. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE WITNESS EUGENE ``RIBS'' WHITEBIRD Mr. Whitebird. Thank you Chairman Simpson, Ranking Member Moran, representative McCollum and Congressman Cole for allowing me to testify today. My name is Ribs Whitebird. I am a member of the tribal council of Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe. Our reservation is located in northern Minnesota. My reservation has numerous needs, but today I will focus solely on the band's need to replace its high school facility at the Bug-O-Nay-Ge- Shig School. The School is administered and funded by the BIA. We estimate that the cost to replace our high school is about $25 million. We do not understand why the U.S. can spend billions and billions of dollars on wars and foreign aid like Pakistan and Iraq but cannot build a school for Indian kids. Under our treaty of 1855, the Leech Lake Reservation was established. The band gave up millions of acres of land. In return, the U.S. is supposed to provide for band welfare which includes providing our kids with decent and safe schools. Further, the U.S. Congress passed the Nelson Act of 1889, the Dawes Act for Minnesota, and other federal laws specific to Minnesota to take more of our land. Logging companies wanted our--and homesteaders wanted our land for farming. In return, proceeds from land and timber share were supposed to be used for our schools. The U.S. has never met these obligations. The school serves nearly 300 Indian children in grades K- 12. The students commute to the school from working communities within a 70-mile radius. The school had won many awards for its academic achievement which is native language programs. I have also provided you with pictures of students at the school. The elementary and middle-school facilities are in satisfactory condition, but the high school needs to be replaced. The current facility is a metal-clad pole barn. One- third of the facility was destroyed in a gas explosion in 1992. The facility has serious structural and mechanical deficiencies and lacks proper insulation. This facility does not meet safety, fire and security standards. Also, the facility has electrical problems and lacks alarm systems. Further, the building lacks a communication intercom system, telecom technologies and safe zones which puts everyone at the greatest risk during emergencies. Also, the facility jeopardizes the health of the students--indoor air quality from mold, fungus and faulty HVAC system. The facility suffers from rodents in it. Roof leaks, sagging--uneven floor, poor lighting, sewer problem, lack of handicap access and lack of classroom and other space--facility's numerous deficiencies. Due to unsafe and undesirable condition of the high school, many students leave after middle school to attend other schools. Students are embarrassed about the condition of the high school resulting in a negative image of the school in the community and the lower enrollment rate. The high school is on the BIA list of schools in need of replacement. The BIA has acknowledged that the school has exceeded its life expectancy by decades. By BIA categories, the high school facility has been in poor condition. The high school is among more than 70 schools funded by the BIE that are in poor condition. BIE construction backlog is at least $1.3 billion. There needs to be sustained funding to adjust the backlog. We appreciate that times are tough financially. We know that $1.3 billion is a lot of money, but our kids should not be the ones forced to shoulder the burden. $1.3 billion is a drop in the bucket compared to what the U.S. spends every day overseas. The Administration's fiscal year 2012 budget request does not even come close to making a dent in the backlog. The administration proposes only $52.1 million toward BIE school construction which is a cut of $61 million from last year's enacted level. You cannot build much with that. These funding levels are unacceptable. In fiscal year 2005, funding of BIE school construction is $263 million. We urge the BIA to increase funding for BIE school construction, not decrease it. The lives of our children are at stake. In conclusion, we pledge and urge the committee to help us replace our high school. The fact is simple, that the high school is not safe and should not be a place where kids go to school. With all due respect, I doubt that anyone sitting at this table will allow their children in school in this type of--facilities that our children go to school in. Chairman Simpson, if it is okay with you, I would like to provide you with a booklet of information about the school. Thank you. [The statement of Eugene ``Ribs'' Whitebird follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.073 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.074 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.075 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.076 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. LAC DU FLAMBEAU BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA WITNESSES TOM MAULSON LARRY WAWRONOWICZ Mr. Maulson. I said I was Lac Du Flambeau, Wisconsin, northern part of the State where things are cold, just as cold as Minnesota. Mr. Chairman, madam, gentlemen, I come here as a treaty tribe, and I come here to identify that as really important that it is your obligation to me and my people back home and all the other tribal leaders that are sitting here in this here room that there is something far greater than just appropriate and making sure that our dollars are going to be affordable to us. I come here looking like we were begging you people for those particular dollars that is owed to us as Indian people. I brought with me my Natural Resource Director, Larry Wawronowicz, in reference to some of the things that he has done on our reservation in the last 25 years. You have heard the horror stories of Indian Country--and education. There is not enough dollars out there to continue that type of movement to bring our children to the forefront, to make them just as qualified or better than some people are there. We have the Bureau of Indian Affair dollars that are needed. We got conservation programs. We have programs in our housing where we have got people standing in line almost 100 waiting for homes on our reservation. We have these same major problems in reference to making sure that our people back home in the wintertime have ample heat. We have many shortfalls. We have come to Congress many times, spent hundreds of thousands of dollars as we come in the past years to come and sit at these here tables and come to visit you all in your offices and identify our needs back home. So I definitely as a tribal chairman of my people, I ask you to support these here endeavors that a lot of these leaders are requesting of this organization, this Congress, to make sure that, you know, that things are in place for us as Indian people out there, your fiduciary responsibility, you know, according to treaty rights. [The statement of Tom Maulson follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.077 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.078 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.079 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.080 Mr. Maulson. I want to give my time to my Executive Director of our Natural Resources so he can identify some of the needs back home. We need jobs. We are putting people to work under these type of programs. Larry. Mr. Wawronowicz. I am Larry Wawronowicz, Natural Resource Director for the Lac du Flambeau Band. One of the things that the tribes in the Midwest area are blessed with very good natural resources. We have a lot of water, and we have a lot of land. And we have both on- and off-reservation treaty rights which we need to protect. Jim Zorn is here with the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission and will talk a little bit more about the off-reservation stuff. But on-reservation management is very, very important. A lot of the Midwest tribes require to have clean air, water and land to be able to support their hunting, fishing and gathering rights. It is absolutely imperative that we do have clean air, water and land in order for us to be able to exercise treaty rights, culture, our way of life, the way we view things as native peoples. It is just so important. Our testimony gets in specifics. Indian education is very, very important, but conservation, law enforcement funding as well as funding for EPA programs seems to be--I mean, it gives us the opportunity to have environmental presence on the reservation. In order for us to be able to develop economically, we are going to have clean air, water and land. So it is very, very important that we tie the natural resources and the ability to have clean air, water and land for us as a nation, a tribal nation, as well as a federal Nation to be able to provide economic opportunities for our citizens. I mean, it is imperative, absolutely imperative that we have those three resources, clean air, water and land. So with that, I hope that, you know, you take the time to read our testimony. We have some specific needs and specific requests. But the bottom line is this. If we do not have clean air, water and land, we are nothing as a nation. Thank you very much for your time. Mr. Cole. Thank you for your testimony. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA WITNESS COLLEY BILLIE Mr. Billie. I am Chairman Colley Billie from the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida. Chairman Simpson, Ranking Member Moran, and Subcommittee members, on behalf of the Miccosukee tribe of Indians of Florida, thank you for the opportunity to appear before this Subcommittee. I also wish to thank Congressman Cole and the other Members of Congress with whom I have met recently for their efforts to enact a legislative fix to address the harmful effects of the Supreme Court's decision in Carcieri v. Salazar. I strongly urge the Congress to take immediate action to enact a clean remedy. The longer the delay, the more Indian Country will suffer. I have two general matters to briefly discuss this afternoon that are included in my prepared remarks, dispelling the myth that federal tribal assistance programs are no longer needed because of gaming and raise awareness about an environmental catastrophe in the making in our home, the Florida Everglades. There is a misperception that federal tribal programs are welfare. This is not the case. Rather, they are designed to enable the Federal Government to honor its trust responsibilities arising from numerous treaties, laws, policies, agreements and practices. Without the special relationship, it would be difficult, and in the case of some types, impossible to provide assistance for the young, elder and infirmed as well as manage tribal judicial systems. Some tribes, like the Miccosukees, have gaming. Through these businesses, many tribes have been able to defeat the vicious cycle of poverty that plagues Indian Country. They help achieve significant improvements in the area of health, housing and education. Yet, even those tribes that have successful gaming businesses have been severely impacted by the global economic crisis. I urge you to take a close look at these Federal Government commitments and make sure that they are not defunded or underfunded. If you are looking to save federal tax dollars, the Miccosukee people have the ideal project for you, a very expensive and scientifically unsound bridging project that will cause great harm to the Everglades and the Miccosukee. We must honor the Earth from where we are made is a central tenant of the Miccosukee people. Our efforts to protect the Everglades are well-documented, and our future commitment unwavering. When it comes to Everglades restoration, however, our tribe has struggled for decades to have an equal place at the table. In 2008, the Interior Department and Army Corps of Engineers decided to build a one-mile bridge alongside U.S. highway 41. The initial price tag was $233 million, and more bridges are supposedly planned for the Tamiami Trail. We immediately realized that this project was fiscally and scientifically unsound. Because of the lack of fulsome consultation, we were forced to go to federal court. The Judge called it, and I quote, ``an environmental bridge to nowhere'' and issued a temporary injunction to stop construction until all federal laws were complied with. Our victory, however, was short-lived. Unfortunately, Congress was misinformed about this decision and was mistakenly led to believe and to intervene the following year by inserting language in the 2009 Omnibus Appropriation Act that said, ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law'' the one-mile bridge was to be built. This section of the law violates several statutes and our Constitutional rights. We were not consulted on this matter back then, but you can do something about it today. Do not approve additional bridges. You should also order a halt to any further work on the Tamiami Trail one-mile bridge until all the federally required studies are completed and our concerns afforded meaningful consideration. By stopping construction of these Department of Interior and Army Corps skyway bridges, you would be saving the taxpayers approximately $400 million. There is a less expensive, safer and scientifically viable alternative supported by the tribe and experts such as the Formal Regional Commandant of the Army Corps of Engineers. This approach focuses on clearing existing culverts located underneath the road to increase water flow. Clearing the culvert is simple, cost-effective and should be tried before costly bridges damage the Everglades we are trying to restore, as well as destroy Miccosukee ancestral and sacred lands. This method is consistent with the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration plan. Finally, the Miccosukee Tribe thanks for allowing me this opportunity to share our thoughts with you. We look forward to working with this Congress--in my language, that means thank you. [The statement of Colley Billie follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.081 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.082 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.083 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.084 Mr. Cole. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chief Rodgers. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. CATAWBA INDIAN NATION WITNESS DONALD RODGERS Mr. Rodgers. Good afternoon. I am Chief Rodgers of the Catawba Indian Nation in South Carolina, so I thank you all for allowing me to be here. I first want to begin my testimony by expressing my appreciation for the support that this Subcommittee itself has provided the Catawba Tribe on budget and audit issues that I had to address almost 3\1/2\ years ago when I took my tenure as Chief. With the support of Chairman Simpson, Ranking Member Moran, and Congressman Cole and the Subcommittee as a whole, the Bureau of Indian Affairs took action that allowed the Catawba to receive several millions of dollars of funds that had been allocated to the tribe we could not access, and only a month ago we were notified that a debt to the BIA that we simply could not repay was forgiven, and I want to thank you personally for that. Thank you so much. We now have clean audits, and we are free from crippling financial liabilities. Your support then and now means a great deal to the Catawba people as a whole, and on their behalf I would like to say a heartfelt thank you for all that. I also want to thank this Subcommittee for last year's support in seeking passage of the Carcieri fix. Early on there were suggestions that the Catawba was one of the tribes that would no longer be able to take land in the trust because of the Supreme Court's bizarre decision in Carcieri v. Salazar. However, Interior has recently made clear in writing that it believes the Supreme Court's decision does not directly affect the Catawba. Nonetheless, the Court decision is unfair, is already generating a growing mountain of litigation and will create jurisdictional uncertainties throughout Indian Country, and I applaud the Subcommittee's action last year to move the Carcieri fix legislation and ask that you continue to strongly advocate for this and seek for its final putting to rest this year. As we had discussed before, the Catawba Nation is one of a handful of federally recognized tribes that do not enjoy the range of sovereign powers possessed by most federally recognized Indian nations. Under the terms of our Settlement Act, we possess what I would term second-class tribal sovereignty. For example, in the area of gaming, we are not authorized to establish gaming operations pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Instead, we are limited to two bingo halls which only enjoy a modest advantage over bingo halls already established in the State. For this reason I am here today to urge the Subcommittee to invest federal dollars in programs that support economic development for smaller tribes that have limited resources but like the Catawba are committed to becoming economically and self-sufficient to help us move forward in the future. In the 2000 census the Catawba Indian Nation had a per capita income of just a little over $11,000. The estimated current unemployment rate among the Catawba is more than double that of the State of South Carolina which itself is very high unemployment. The tribe currently has no operating economic development ventures. I have highlighted in my written testimony four projects we are working to begin the process for developing a tribal economy. The first one is the Catawba market, a gas station that will create jobs and improve services on the reservation to provide much-needed assets and necessity for tribal members there located. A major road extension to provide decent and safe access to our reservation so we can open up other economic development opportunities. We had a young child go blue on our reservation about six months ago. It took an ambulance 45 minutes to get to our reservation. It is horrible thing, so this road extension is much needed. A ride-share program to get members of our nation to jobs located throughout the surrounding area to help and assist to do that. And a summer youth program to engage in education and prevention activities for our young. I want to also give a plug for Indian Health Service. Much- needed services are needed there, contract support and these issues. But I want to take this opportunity to thank you for allowing me to talk on behalf of Catawba Indian Nation and your support for our people and indeed for all native people is greatly appreciated and truly in the best traditions of the government relationship. And again, I say--thank you very much. [The statement of Donald Rodgers follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.085 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.086 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.087 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.088 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much, Chief. Mr. Zorn. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. GREAT LAKES INDIAN FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION WITNESS JAMES ZORN Mr. Zorn. My name is James Zorn. I am the Executive Administrator of the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, and on behalf of our 11 tribal nations located in Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan, including Mille Lacs and Fon du Lac in Minnesota and Chairman Maulson, Lac du Flambeau, we extend our appreciation for being here. And on behalf of their 38,000 tribal members who continue to enjoy the rights to hunt, fish and gather on lands that the courts have ruled were sold to the United States in various treaties but on which the tribes might continue their life ways to meet their subsistence, their economic, their cultural, their spiritual and medicinal needs, that is the nature of the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission program that this body has funded for over 25 years with the support of all administrations, all Congresses of the Rights Protection Implementation program. So we are here to talk about that as well as the EPA Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. The Commission is grateful for the fiscal year 2011 appropriations for these types of programs. They were held pretty harmless from some drastic potential cuts and the contract support increases. We greatly appreciate that, and we will do what we can to help you in fiscal year 2012 to try to achieve the same result. And so we are here today to help remind the Committee as to why these programs are important to the tribal communities, the real-world benefits they achieve and why these are really good examples of good government programs that get the money into the hands of the tribes, where that money should go, that produce not only healthier people because they are eating traditional foods, they are engaging in traditional exercises; we are trying to get the kids off their butts and out into the woods and on the lakes to do some real activities; reviving language; support tribal economic enterprise, not only of commercial fishermen but of folks who sell wild rice, maple syrup and so on. The cost of food is high now. These foods are very expensive, and so to be able to fish, hunt and gather is very important. And the relationship to diabetes as we heard a former chair talk about for example and other diseases in tribal communities, getting back to the natives' food is very important. So we strongly support the $30.5 million for the Rights Protection Implementation program. I know you will hear from the Columbia River folks and Billy Frank tomorrow. They will say the same. Do not let Billy steal too much, please. GLIFWC gets about $5.6 million of that, and you know, that is really important money because it provides the base on which we can leverage other money, including the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. You know, that $5.6 million grows into $8 million for us. We supply about 70 full-time jobs, about 140 seasonal jobs in areas that are chronically under- or unemployed. This is really important for our member tribes. We operate a comprehensive natural resource management program of biologists, of conservation officers, that provide benefits not just to the tribal communities but to the surrounding communities. For example, and we are grateful to the Administration for highlighting this in their department highlights, I think on page 64, where two of our conservation officers stumbled upon during their routine patrol duties, 150 pot plants in a state forest in northern Wisconsin. Well, you call up the local drug task force, and their line was, wait a minute. You guys know the woods. You go back out there and sit on that until the people come. Okay. So we have fully trained certified officers. We are the ones who busted the guy that came back to harvest the pot. And so just the notion that these tribal programs benefit only Indians is fallacious. It benefits the surrounding communities. Our officers are there for everybody. They respond to auto accidents, medical emergencies. Our biologists provide fish for everybody, protect habitat for everybody. So that is the nature of our Rights Protection Implementation program. In terms of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, the $300 to $350 million is fantastic. Thank you. We would like to push for some money there for tribes, perhaps $25 million that is funneled through the Indian Self- Determination Act. That got to the ground quicker before the field season before any other money got out from any other agency. Let's see if we can beat that up and do better. The youth, final sum-up. Our tribes are very committed to trying to figure out how to get Indian kids into careers, natural resource management conservation officers just out there to reconnect with their grandma and grandpa doing the things that Indian families should do. We have initiated a conservation internship program this year. We are trying to get kids out to camps early on in their lives so that they appreciate the outdoors again. We are trying to get kids back in the language programs. So any help that you can provide in this type of area, you know, there are all sorts of initiatives we are being asked to get involved in. But the capacity for tribes to do so is greatly stretched. We have a hard enough time doing our basic job, let alone dealing with a whole bunch of new initiatives. Thank you very much. We really appreciate the opportunity to be here. [The statement of James Zorn follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.089 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.090 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.091 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.092 Mr. Cole. I thank all of you for your testimony. Let me make a couple of points, and then we will get into questions. Number one, a number of you mentioned the Carcieri issue and I could not agree more. But I would be remiss not to point out that we would not have gotten it through the House last year if it had not been for then-Chairman Moran and now Chairman Simpson who worked together for us to do something on this Committee. That is very unusual. That stretches our rules. I am sure we never would have violated them by legislating on an appropriations bill. But that was a very bi-partisan issue here. It was a 14 to 0 vote. I know everybody on this Committee is still committed to doing that. Mr. Kildee has a bill out there, I have got a bill that is out there, I think Mr. Young is here later today and I suspect the subject will come up, and I think he is committed. Our biggest problem quite honestly tends to be in the United States Senate on this as opposed to the House because it did get through the House, and the Administration has been very good on this. They very much want to deal with this as well. So hopefully we can have a real bipartisan effort and get that done. I also want to point out a number of you mentioned that you had been shielded a little bit from the 2011 budget cuts. The gentleman to my right is solely responsible for that and has scars to show it. And again, Chairman Simpson and this Committee's commitment in this area on the bi-partisan basis is genuine. A number of you made really compelling cases about the education of Indian children. I do want to ask one question on that, and I could not agree more. That is a federal responsibility and it is a trust responsibility. There is no way that we have come anywhere close to fulfilling our obligations in those areas, and I do not know if you would have these figures, but I am increasingly interested any time I can to find out if you can tell us what is the expenditure per child roughly or per student in the schools that you represent. They are usually BIE schools but whatever your local school is, and then I would love to see the contrast of that with schools in the States because if there is a federal responsibility, I would think we ought to be roughly doing for the children in Indian Country what the surrounding states are doing for their children. Otherwise, I do not see how the educational opportunity can be remotely comparable. So if you have that data, I would be very interested in you sharing it with the Committee. Mr. Whitebird. I do not know exactly what it is, but we are going to find out what it is and stuff like that because it is different from state to state and children. I think a lot of it has to do with enrollment and stuff like that in areas that we are in. Mr. Cole. Yeah, I think it will and I think Ms. McCollum made the point earlier, taking out the transportation component, or separating it, because a lot of what you encounter on some of our reservations, obviously, the transportation expenses are enormous, and they really should not be counted directly toward the educational cost. But I am going to ask the staff on this Committee to do what they can to help us get that information because I think it is going to be quite striking when we see again how far behind the Federal Government is in its responsibilities to Indian children versus the state and local governments in the neighboring areas. Thanks for bringing that up. Ms. McCollum. Ms. McCollum. Thank you, Mr. Chair. First of all, Chairman Billie, it is interesting that you spoke about a bridge. I have a mayor from Minnesota, and we are going to be talking about a bridge and some legislation to override some of the federal protections for the St. Croix River. So thank you for your comments, and local government officials from the areas that are impacted should be consulted, and it is a shame that you were not listened to. Mr. Billie. Yes, that is all we have been asking for, to give us an opportunity to be heard and to be given serious consideration to some of our concerns. Ms. McCollum. I have one question for council member Whitebird. Ribs, when you were talking about people not wanting to attend school there and the importance of a school reflecting how we value our youth, I have had an opportunity to be at the school. Can you elaborate a little more as a council member what you hear from parents, what you hear from students and how that affects your enrollment because then when you go to count the number of students, you do not have as many students as normally would be attending a school that was in good repair. Mr. Whitebird. I go to both schools. I go to Catholic, be in a public school and talk a lot and then I go to the Bug School to associate with the students out there, like those graduations coming up now. You are hearing students talk about ashamed of the high school that is out there, you know, due to--like I said in here, we get academic awards and stuff, you know, and then they are scared to go on to any other schools, like any other kid would. You know, I would want a top-notch school instead of a pole barn building. You know, that is terrible out there. And then I share it out into my local Indian council meetings, and I got the District II rep who is here today that he can tell them the same thing, you know, we definitely need a new high school. When other people come in there and play sports--and they got to go to that school? You know, our kids get talked about, I mean, run down at other schools. And it gets back into the community, and when it gets back into the community, it gets back to me, and how do you think I feel? There is something that has got to be done, and that is why you know, I am here testimony on hopefully that we can get something done, a new school in the near future. And you know, we have been working on this now for about 2 years, and you know, it seems like--I want to make one point in here that I did make. You know, I think it is very important for the Appropriation Committee to look at and that is, you know, we spend billions and billions of dollars on war. If you take a good look at it, you know, I hear other Indian leaders around Indian Country say this, if we had $1 billion of this, you know, that would help solve a lot of the Indian program, not every program, but across Indian Country. You know, I think it is very important for the Appropriations Committee to look at, and that is, you know, we spend billions and billions of dollars on war. You know, if you take a good look at it, you know, other Indian leaders around Indian culture say this. If we had $1 billion of this, you know, that would help us all, a lot of the Indian program, not every program but across Indian Country. Take a good look at how much goes to the war, people we are helping out in tsunami, Japan, whatever, you know, but we are left out. You know, we are definitely put on the back burner when we were the first ones here and I do believe, you know, that we should be treated like first-class citizens like we are supposed to be. Our treaties are broken, you know, I hear this all the time at the big meetings, NCAI and NIGA, you know, it is just a tough battle. We are one battle after another, all the Indian leaders across the Indian nation; we are all together on one. You know, we want to be back up here where we belong. Thanks for listening. Thanks for your comments, Congressman Cole, Congressman McCollum, and Simpson. You know, I heard a lot of good things here today and I hope you help us all. Mr. Cole. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. Just a couple quick things. One, Ribs, how do you pronounce the name of that school? Mr. Whitebird. Bug-O-Nay-Ge-Shig. Mr. Simpson. And what does it mean? Mr. Whitebird. All in a day. Mr. Simpson. Okay. Ms. McCollum. Which is named after--I will tell you later more about the school. Mr. Simpson. Okay. Mr. Whitebird. All in a day. Mr. Simpson. I am trying to figure it out. Mr. Zorn. Betty could tell you. Mr. Simpson. Jim, you mentioned the Great Lakes Restoration Project, the geographical program. Mr. Zorn. Right. Mr. Simpson. We have got several of those: Puget Sound, Chesapeake Bay, Great Lakes, San Francisco Bay now. Do you get money from that program for projects for the tribes to do on the reservations and other types of things? Mr. Zorn. Yes, reservation and treaty-seated territory. Mr. Simpson. One of the complaints--I do not know if this is true--actually from people around the region up there, around the Great Lakes--is that there is--what was the appropriation for that last year? Do you remember, Darren? Darren Benjamin. Four hundred seventy-five, was it not? Mr. Simpson. Four hundred seventy-five was the year before. $350 million this year under the last year. Darren Benjamin. Three hundred eleven, was it not? I think it was $311 million. Mr. Simpson. Okay. Darren Benjamin. Yeah. Yeah. Mr. Simpson. All of the geographic programs took somewhat of a hit. Darren Benjamin. Right. Exactly. Mr. Simpson. Which means we did not have to go after BIA or any health services or some of those other ones. Some of those other programs took a hit. But some of the complaints I hear-- and I do not know if they are necessarily complaints or some of the concerns, I guess, is a better word--is that this $311 million or whatever it is goes out to all these little things and there is not an overall big plan about how we are going to clean up the Great Lakes and that they need a plan and to be able to do this on a grander scale than what they are currently doing. Do you find that true or---- Mr. Zorn. Well, the balance there is if you over- regionalize the Great Lakes, you tend to miss certain things. Like Lake Superior tends to be the cleanest of the lakes, and if you focus on restorations, say, like down in Lake Eerie, what do you have to do to Lake Superior before you are eligible for dollars? And so there is this effort to find a way to quarterback it through, say, Camp Davis or someone else in the administration while also having the diversity of each of the Great Lakes and some of these successful existing structures. So I do not find that necessarily to be true because I think if you over-centralize it, you are going to create this hourglass; you are going to lose your chance to accomplish good things and preserve things that need to be preserved. I do agree that there has been probably too much talking and not a lot of action and I think people are trying to correct that. And I think the whole issue of trying to get that initial 475 out into the field, how long it took---- Mr. Simpson. Um-hum. Mr. Zorn [continuing]. Compared to what it took to get the tribal dollars out through the Indian Self-Determination Act. That is something we would like to have looked at because we think we can get the dollars out there quicker to do more on- the-ground good. That is the continuing concern. I think we have to be concerned about over-governance, though, because then it is all talk, all around the table instead of going out and doing things. Mr. Simpson. Well, the other side of the argument, and it is probably just as valid is that pollution does not come out of one great big pipe. Mr. Zorn. Exactly. Mr. Simpson. It comes in small things, and you clean it up in those areas that happen to cause the problems. I do not think anybody on the committee is opposed to these geographical programs and what we are doing because we all want to maintain the greatest body of fresh water---- Mr. Zorn. Right. Mr. Simpson [continuing]. In North America and these other, Puget Sound and Chesapeake Bay. We want to do whatever is necessary to clean those up. We just want to make sure that the dollars that we are spending are actually achieving a goal. Mr. Zorn. And we are on board with you. Please keep looking over our shoulder because the accountability is important. If we cannot show results, this is not going to keep coming. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. What were you going to say? Mr. Wawronowicz [continuing]. Management plan that is basically council-driven, people-driven where the research---- Mr. Simpson. Turn on your mike. Mr. Wawronowicz [continuing]. What are the resources of values to the tribal members and the non-Indian community that is living within the boundaries of a reservation. And we utilize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative this year for fiscal year 2011 we are going to have $300,000 that is going to be working within the Basin in order to provide, like I indicated in testimony earlier, clean air, water, and land. Lake Sturgeon Restoration is one project, Wetland Enhancement projects that we have going on the res, Wild Rice Enhancement, a lot of those ecosystem approaches that if you, you know, take care of your ecosystem at home, you know, that will, you know, just regionally be a benefit to the Great Lakes region. Mr. Simpson. Let me just ask you, on your reservation, do you have your own clean air standards, clean water standards, or do you have---- Mr. Wawronowicz. We have federally-approved clean water standards. Mr. Simpson. These are your standards---- Mr. Wawronowicz. Our standards, yes. Mr. Simpson [continuing]. That have been federally approved? Mr. Wawronowicz. Correct. Mr. Simpson. And do you enforce those or does the EPA enforce those? Mr. Wawronowicz. EPA will enforce those. Mr. Simpson. Okay. Mr. Wawronowicz. We have federally-approved water quality standards. We are working on air standards as we speak. The other thing that we are also utilizing is Department of Energy money to come up with an energy plan in order for the reservation to reduce its use of fossil fuels by 25 percent by the year 2025. So, you know, that is all with an integrated resource management plan that we have that is council-driven, that gives us the opportunity to go after federal dollars, you know, tribal dollars in order to maintain that clean air, water, and land. You know, and to be quite honest with you, like I indicated I mean without that, economic development will not be possible with an Indian Country or within the United States of America because that is the basic supply follow it. I mean, we just cannot cut corners in that area as a Nation. We just cannot. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Ms. McCollum. Mr. Chair, on this point I am glad you mentioned, you know, is it pollution that we are measuring? Is it invasive species that we are measuring? Is it restoration of wetlands so that a Great Lake does not become further polluted? So it is a lot of things and so a regional board needs to oversee that we are reaching our goal, but the objectives need to be embraced for each one of the lakes, and in Lake Superior, with such a large shoreline, even within that. But the question I wanted to ask, because you mentioned the Circle of Flight---- Mr. Wawronowicz. Um-hum. Ms. McCollum [continuing]. And I know that that is something that I have heard from our tribes back home, which also not only affects--you talk about the greater good--it is not only for tribal areas but it also supports conservation. I mean, Ducks Unlimited supports, and you have wide, wide support on that. Could you talk a little bit about your interaction with Fish and Wildlife and how cuts to those dollars, how it impacts you? Mr. Wawronowicz. Well, Circle of Flight, you know, it is an initiative that has been in Indian Country for a long time and the Great Lakes region, was 20 years or so now. And we are able to utilize those dollars for leverage. In other words, the money that, you know, that Congress appropriates, you know, the President puts in his budget, Congress appropriates it, we are able to use that money to, you know, to work with Ducks Unlimited. For our example, on our reservation we have the Pall Marsh in which we were able to provide monies to the State of Wisconsin in order to do some work on their side of the marsh in order to enhance waterfall production, be able to, you know, move some water around to where it is not having a negative impact on another ecosystem. So, you know, there is that cooperation there with those dollars that are, you know, benefitting the non-Indian community on and off the reservation. We are a checkerboard reservation, which means that we have fee land, allotted land, and tribal land that, you know, helps protect those resources for both the tribal and non-tribal in utilizing those resources. And that is just important. Just to mention, the Circle of Flight program did receive an award from the Department of the Interior. I always cannot remember the--it is the Conservation---- Mr. Simpson. Partners in Conservation Award. Yeah. Mr. Wawronowicz. So in order to do that, you know, I mean we have done some good things in Indian Country over the years both in Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan. So it is a good program and we definitely appreciate continued support from this committee, as well as, you know, the administration that puts it in there, so thank you very much. Mr. Cole. Before we let you all go, I would be remiss not to recognize Chairman Billie because I want to tell you, he is the only person that has ever appeared before this committee that said do not build a road and take the money back. I think that alone means we ought to really look at this very carefully. He made a very good point and a very good case. And if we could, we will let you all go and we will bring our next panel up. Ms. Jackie--Ms. Johnson I guess I should say formally, Mr. Barnett, Mr. Secatero, Dr. Neary, Dr. Deters, and Mr. Miller. It is fine and just what we will do is just start at the far end if you would introduce yourself and we will work through, give everybody an opportunity to make their testimony and then we will open it up for questions and response from the committee. So whenever you would like. Please. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION WITNESS MATT NEARY Mr. Neary. Begin my testimony? Mr. Cole. Yes. Mr. Neary. Chairman Simpson, Committee Member Cole, I am Matt Neary, Chairman of the Council on Government Affairs of the American Dental Association and a practicing dentist in New York City. The ADA thanks the committee for its support for the Indian Health Service Dental Program. Your support has expanded the dental division's recruitment efforts, maintained an adequate level of dentists with advanced training, and initiated an electronic dental records system. The level of early childhood caries, tooth decay, among the American Indian and Alaska Native children has reached epidemic proportions. Tooth decay is 400 percent higher in this population than for all U.S. races. The disease is so extensive that between 25 and 50 percent of preschool children require full mouth restoration under general anesthesia. Aside from the medical risk to the child, this is the most expensive way to treat dental disease. It costs thousands of dollars to treat a child in a hospital, primarily due to anesthesia-related tests and recovery management compared to a couple of hundred dollars if the tooth decay is caught at an early stage or a few cents per day to prevent it. We are very pleased that the IHS is pursuing its Early Childhood Caries Initiative as a cost-effective way of addressing and preventing tooth decay. The American Dental Association shares IHS's concerns about the tooth decay epidemic and supports research that will afford us a better understanding of the disease. Last year, we hosted our second symposium on the subject. Participants included caries researchers, tribal health officials, pediatric dentists, and dental public health staff. During the past year, the American Dental Association and four state dental associations established a Native American Oral Healthcare project to address the imbalance and access to quality healthcare among Native Americans. We have held numerous visits with tribal leaders to discuss collaborative ways of improving oral healthcare in Indian Country and anticipate the development of long-term partnerships to achieve those goals. For several years, the ADA has come before the committee and shared our concerns regarding the number of dental vacancies in the IHS. Three years ago, there were over 140 dental positions open. Today, there are 45. Several factors have contributed to reducing this number, including the IHS Summer Student Extern program. The IHS has been able to place nearly 500 dental students during the past two summers. These students become IHS ambassadors when they return to school and contribute to more dentists applying for IHS residencies upon graduation. This has proven to be a highly effective program, which we look forward to continuing into the future. Two other areas of high priority are reinstating the funding to replace modular dental units at $1 million per year and continuing to install the electronic dental health records system for $12 million. As a periodontist, I can tell you that untreated adult oral disease significantly complicates the management and inflates the treatment cost associated with diabetes and heart disease, two conditions with extremely high incidence among tribal peoples. The eight dental support centers funded by the IHS focus on preventing and treating oral disease for all age groups. We have learned from tribal leaders that these centers are highly valued and we recommend funding the increase by $2 million so that they can service each geographic area. Oral disease among Native Americans can be significantly reduced with a strong prevention program and a sufficient workforce. We cannot drill and fill our way out of this dental disease epidemic. That approach will not result in any disease reduction or cost savings. But by focusing on prevention and timely treatment for all ages, we can accomplish our goals. I want to thank you for allowing ADA to testify. We are committed to working with you, the IHS, and the tribes to aggressively reduce the disparity in oral disease and care that currently exists in Indian Country. Thank you. [The statement of Matt Neary follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.093 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.094 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.095 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.096 Mr. Simpson. Okay. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD WITNESS LESTER SECATERO Mr. Secatero. Mr. Chairman, members of the subcommittee, my name is Lester Secatero. I serve as the Albuquerque area representative to the National Indian Health Board and the chairman of the Albuquerque Area Indian Health Board. Thank you for inviting me and the NIHB here today to provide testimony regarding the fiscal year 2012 budget for the Indian Health Service. The NIHB was pleased to learn that for the fiscal year 2012 HIS budget, the administration recommends a $571 million increase over the fiscal year 2010 enacted IHS appropriations. We acknowledge that this 14.1 percent increase is quite significant in this budget climate, yet this increase is needed to address the critical health needs of our tribal communities. This increase also represents a continued commitment to honor the Federal Government's legal obligation and sacred responsibility to provide healthcare to American Indians and Alaska Natives. The trust obligation to provide healthcare is paramount, and it is upon this foundation that the IHS National Tribal Budget Formulation Workgroup built its recommendation for the fiscal year 2012 IHS budget. This Workgroup recommends preserving basic healthcare programs currently being funded. Current services increases are the lowest budget increments needed to enable the Indian Health System to continue operating at its current level of service. This category contains such items as pay cost increases, inflation, contract support costs, funding for the population growth, and facilities construction and staffing. Without these increases to base funding, the Indian health system would experience a decrease in its ability to care for the current service population. Second, significant program increases are required to address the overwhelming health needs in Indian Country. The recommended increases are made in key IHS budget accounts to enable programs to improve and expand the services they provide to Indian patients. As you know, the IHS has been plagued by woefully inadequate funding, which has made it impossible to supply Indian people with the level of care they need and deserve and to which they are entitled by treaty obligation. In addition to the Workgroup recommendation, I would like to provide additional recommendations regarding the IHS budget. First, the President's proposed budget for IHS includes proposed cuts of the small grant programs, but the impact of eliminating these programs in Indian Country is enormous. All of these small grants serve and target very vulnerable native populations such as children, elders, and women, and their purpose is to strengthen and build capacity for the long-term health of the tribes in such areas as public health, wellness, fighting childhood obesity, and working to end domestic violence against native women. In addition, the proposal also includes cutting the small grant to the tribes' primary healthcare resource for information and coordination of the national tribal voice, the National Indian Health Board. We ask that you do not implement any cuts to this organization, which is vital to improving the health status of all tribal people. Second, as a discretionary budget line, the IHS budget falls target to across-the-board cuts to discretionary funding. Such across-the-board cuts are detrimental not only to a federal agency's budget but to the lives and well-being of Indian people. Today, the IHS budget is funded approximately at half the level of need. Any budget cuts in any form will have harmful effects on healthcare delivery to Alaska Natives and American Indians. The NIHB asks the committee to exempt the Indian Health Service from any cuts, freezes, or rescissions. Lastly, we ask that a plan be put into place to fully fund IHS. Developing and implementing a plan to achieve funding parity is critical to the future of Indian health and to fulfilling the United States' trust responsibility to AI and AN people. The funding disparities between the IHS and other federal healthcare expenditure programs still exist in 2010. IHS spending for medical care was $2,741 per user in comparison to the average of federal healthcare expenditures of $6,909 per person. On behalf of all the tribes, please move forward towards full funding of the IHS budget. On behalf of the National Indian Health Board, thank you for the opportunity to address this subcommittee on these important matters. [The statement of Lester Secatero follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.097 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.098 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.099 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.100 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS WITNESS JACQUELINE JOHNSON PATA Ms. Johnson Pata. Good afternoon. My name is Jacqueline Pata. I am the executive director of the National Congress of American Indians. I am also a councilmember for the Tlingit- Haida Tribes of Alaska. My testimony today is on behalf of the National Congress of American Indians. And first I would like to thank you, Chairman Simpson, for holding it and the staff for holding this hearing. It is such an honor to be able to come and sit with the witnesses back here and listen to tribal leader after tribal leader have this one-on-one dialogue with Members of Congress, and I appreciate the history of allowing this to continue. I also want to thank you and the members of this committee for the extraordinary work that you did at this budget debate cycle and for the respect of being able to protect the treaties and other legal instruments that are really our relationship with the Federal Government and honoring that. We know, as this Nation deals with very difficult issues around the deficit and tightening the belt and being able to address the ongoing challenges of the budget deficit, that the dialogue will continue to be difficult and we want to let you know that we stand with you to be able to help shore you up in any of those areas. We also recognize that there will be many proposals to deal with those budget reductions and certainly to make the government work more efficiently and effectively and we stand with you for looking for those ways as tribal leaders and tribal communities to also deal with what we can do to contribute, but want to recognize and remember that we should not balance those budget deficits on the backs and the expense of the treaty and trust obligations and those solemn agreements. I want to also say that we are very appreciative as we go forward in looking into the next budget cycles of, obviously, the ``Carcieri'' fix, the language that has been included, and certainly was included from the present fiscal year 2012 budget. We believe and we hope that this is the year that we will get it through. But in addition to that, I want to just bring your attention to the overall BIA budget and certainly, you know, even with the protected funding for fiscal year 2011, there has been an effort to address the prior 2012 is we are concerned about the ongoing trend of appropriation levels to the Department of the Interior and the various agencies. Even in the last nine fiscal years, the budgets for Fish and Wildlife Service have grown by 30 percent, the National Park Service by 28 percent, and the U.S. Geological Survey by 19 percent. Meanwhile, BIA has only seen a increase of 8 percent, which barely covers any cost-of-living or inflation factors. And we have seen this historical trend. So even though we feel like we are raising the bar and protecting tribes, in relationship to the other departments within the Department of the Interior, we are sorely lagging behind. And so we ask you to take a look at that and to be able to help us address this disproportionate funding trend that seems to be arising throughout Indian Country. Another area that, of course, we have strong united support from tribes across the country is funding for the contract support costs. I looked at some of my other panel members here; I am sure they will speak to it. But with IHS and BIA and tribally-operated schools, which are funded by tribal grant support costs, we recommend that the contract support costs be increased to $615 million and the BIA contract support to $228 million, the tribal grant support to $70.3 million. And this really would provide full funding. Now, full funding means 100 percent funding, which means that the government would actually pay the contracts as they pay any other contract that they engage in across the Nation with other contractors at 100 percent. As far as natural resources programs such as Rights Protection Implementation, fish hatcheries, forestry, water services, the last panel spoke to a lot of those issues. They have been identified as critical to Indian tribes in the budget and we have offered specific recommendations that you will see in our written testimony. But natural resources, of course, are an important part to our tribal economies, as well as our cultural values. And talking about tribal economies, the last thing I want to touch on in my brief moment here is that the Tribal Guarantee Loan Guarantee Programs of 5.1 million, these guarantees may have been unused but it was not the fault of the tribal leaders that it went unused. It was the fault of the Agency for not getting them out. This does not mean that we do not need them. And this leveraged dollars 10 to 1 means important financing to tribes and actually will help spur our future economic opportunities. So we hope that you restore those loan guarantee funds and look at helping to provide that oversight to the federal agencies to ensure that they are being properly used. So once again, I thank you for the ability to be able to testify here today and provide our brief opinions. Thank you. [The statement of Jacqueline Johnson Pata follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.101 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.102 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.103 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.104 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. You notice how I just moved right down---- ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. FRIENDS OF INDIAN HEALTH WITNESS PAMELA DETERS Ms. Deters. Good afternoon, Chairman Simpson and other committee members. I am Dr. Pam Deters. I am an American Indian of Cherokee and Choctaw heritage. I am a clinical psychologist practicing in Louisiana and Mississippi. I am also currently the president of the Society of Indian Psychologists whose mission is to advocate for the mental well being of Native American people. And I am a proud member of the American Psychological Association. My expertise is in trauma among Native American children, families, and communities with an emphasis on cultural revitalization and resilience. My people have experienced an extensive history of intergenerational trauma and oppression, including numerous atrocities such as forced assimilation, genocide, compulsory enrollment in boarding schools, involuntary relocations of entire tribal populations, and the resulting loss of culture and traditional practices. As a professor at the University of Alaska, my research entailed visiting remote Alaska Native villages and witnessing the devastation of families and communities due to youth suicide, alcohol and substance abuse, poverty, and the loss of traditional ways and culture. But I have also witnessed the emergence of wellness programs where communities work to restore and revitalize native culture, language, dance, and traditional healing practices. I have served as a statewide director of Alaska Natives into Psychology, which is a training program supporting American Indian and Alaska Native students pursuing careers in psychology. I am committed to and I am passionate about the importance of training native students to return to their own reservations and their villages to heal the physical and mental ills of our people. Today, I am representing the Friends of Indian Health, which is a coalition of health organizations dedicated to improving the health of American Indians and Alaska Natives. The Friends thanks the committee for the additional funding in the 2010 bill and for maintaining these levels in the continuing resolutions. The increased support will help provide care without interruptions or reductions. The Friends supports the administration's proposed 2012 funding level for the Indian Health Service of over $4 billion. This level recognizes the need to close the health disparity gaps experienced by native people. However, there are priority areas that, if not addressed, will continue to overwhelm IHS. The most urgent of these is contract health services. In 2010, over 168,000 contract health services were denied. The root cause of this issue lies in the IHS and Tribal delivery system. The IHS and Tribes operate at over 600 locations, the majority of which provide primary medical care but depend on the private sector for secondary and tertiary care. This situation is not going to change. Therefore, the request for contract health services funds needs to be realistic. The administration's request for over $948 million is significant but a more realistic amount would be over $1 billion. The Friends strongly supports prevention and early treatment programs to reduce the need for contract health services, but that depends on a sufficient workforce. Filling vacancies through loan repayment has proven to be the best recruiting and retention tool for IHS. The average retention period for IHS loan repayment recipients is over seven years. Therefore, the Friends have concerns about the administration's loan repayment request, which is $178,000 less than current funding and will result in 33 fewer contracts. Before loan repayment can be offered, dedicated and qualified healthcare professionals have to be recruited. A year ago, the IHS director commissioned a report on recruitment and retention. The Friends strongly believe that if the recruitment process were improved, it would have a positive effect on filling vacancies. We urge the committee to encourage the service to put into action recommendations from the director's report. IHS also needs a strong network of both clinical and support staff. These positions are usually filled by tribal members providing a very important cultural link to patients. However, the salaries for some of these needed positions are so low that facilities cannot attract sufficient staff. The Friends urges the committee to seek a report on the effect of the outdated 600 series pay scale on employee recruitment and retention and what actions need to be taken to finalize a new pay scale. The Friends are encouraged by the administration's request because it will help eliminate health disparities faced by Native Americans, but we also encourage the committee to go beyond the administration's proposal to ensure that IHS is fully staffed so that it can raise the physical, mental, social, and spiritual health of American Indians and Alaska Natives to the highest levels possible. The Friends thanks the committee for the opportunity to testify today and we look forward to working with you on these issues. Thank you again. [The statement of Pamela Deters follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.105 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.106 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.107 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.108 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Go ahead. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NATIONAL TRIBAL CONTRACT SUPPORT COST COALITION WITNESS LLOYD B. MILLER Mr. Miller. My name is Lloyd Miller. I am with the Sonosky, Chambers Law Firm, but I am here today as counsel to the National Tribal Contract Support Cost Coalition. You have heard a lot of testimony today about contract support costs. That issue is relevant because over one-half of the Indian Health Service and over one-half of the Bureau of Indian Affairs has been turned over to tribal operation under Indian Self- Determination Act contracts. Now, I have been practicing law for 33 years. I have been practicing government contract law for over 30 years. I can tell you without fear of contradiction that there is no other area in government contract law where the government can underpay a fully-performed contract. It does not exist. But somehow, when it comes to Indian affairs, a contract with an Indian tribe is underpaid regularly by the Indian Health Service or by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and there is no recourse. This was not supposed to be the way the act would be implemented. In 1988, there had been hearings in Congress about how the act was being run and these contracts were, at that time, being viewed as grants, which would fairly describe the situation I just described. And Congress was frustrated with the process and amended the act to require that these instruments would thereafter be contracts, that they would be binding under the Contract Disputes Act. Over 400 times in this statute the word ``contract'' was used. They were made enforceable. The secretaries were told they have to add the full amount of the contract support cost to the contract. And in 2006, the Supreme Court and the Cherokee Nation and Shoshone-Paiute Tribes case ruled in favor of the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes, and the Cherokee Nation held the Indian Health Service liable for underpaying the contracts saying no other government contractor would be treated this way, neither should the tribes. Now, there are two reasons why we are here. One is that there is a line-item cap in the Appropriations Act which you never see anywhere else when it comes to government contracts. You do not see a line-item cap capping the amount of a contract to supply food to our troops in Afghanistan to the ABC Corporation that is providing food on a particular base. You do not see that. But when it comes to Indian tribes, there is a cap in the Appropriations Act. And in fact the first solution would be to remove that line item. Secondly, of course, as Jackie alluded to and testified in support of the amount has to be budgeted correctly. And the full amount that the Indian Health Service tells us is required is $615 million. What is really quite shocking in the Indian Health Service budget justification is the statement that at the funding level requested, there will be $153 million shortfall in paying the contracts. This, too, is unheard of. You will not find any place in the government contracting regime, which is largely Defense Department oriented, where an agency comes to the appropriators and says, by the way, we are asking you for a dollar amount that will lead to $100 million less than what we owe Boeing or General Electric. It is just the opposite. They budget fully and if they end up short, they ask for a supplemental appropriation. Never in the history of the Indian Self-Determination Act has the BIA or the IHS ever come to Congress and asked for a supplemental appropriation. The Indian Self-Determination Act has had the most profound effect on the growth of tribal governments, improvement in Indian healthcare, improvement in local employment, providing a base for future economic development, and it is true all over the country, whether where I hail from now in Alaska or where I came from this week and on the Chickasaw Reservation, all across Indian Country. The single greatest impediment to the success of that act has been the failure to pay contract support costs. That is actually a quotation from Senator Inouye in 1987 and it is still a true statement today. The National Contract Support Cost Coalition respectfully urges that the committee finally end this abuse of contract rights by fully funding these contracts. If that is done, I can tell you three things that will happen. First of all, the programs that are transferred to hospitals and the clinics that are transferred to tribal operation will not be cut on account of a contract being awarded to a tribe. Remember, if you have a million-dollar clinic being run by the Indian Health Service and a million-dollar clinic run by the tribe next door, the tribe has $800,000 to run the clinic. The Indian Health Service has $1 million. That is not right. And the only reason that is so is because the contract support costs are not being paid in full, and therefore, the tribe has to take it out of their programs. These costs are fixed costs. Removal of the line-item limitation and full budgeting at $615 million are the solutions to the contract support cost dilemma for the Indian Health Service. As for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Mr. Chairman, you are a hero. What you were able to do in the fiscal year 2011 process is remarkable and it may be that contract support costs over there are $220 million from BIA contracts ends up being short, but if it is, it will be short by $8 or $10 million. We have never been that close to full funding since the act was passed in 1975, so thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. [The statement of Lloyd B. Miller follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.109 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.110 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.111 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.112 Tuesday, May 3, 2011. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH WITNESS D'SHANE BARNETT Mr. Barnett. Good afternoon. My name is D'Shane Barnett. I am a member of the Sapushgo Hutay Clan of the Mandan Tribe of the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation of Fort Berthold, North Dakota and I am currently serving as the executive director of the National Council of Urban Indian Health, also known as NCUIH. On behalf of NCUIH's 36-member organizations and the 150,000 urban Indians that our programs serve each year, I would like to thank the committee for this opportunity to provide testimony addressing the urban Indian priorities for the fiscal year 2012 budget. This year, NCUIH has five budget recommendations. First, NCUIH supports the National Indian Health Board's budget recommendation that the Indian Health Services funding be increased by $735 million. We are encouraged by President Obama's proposed increase of $571 million. However, if the Native American health delivery system is to truly fulfill the Federal Government's trust responsibility to native people, the Indian Health Service must be fully funded. Second, NCUIH strongly advocates for a $9 million increase to the Urban Indian Health program line item to address several years of near-flat funding due to the previous administration's attempts to zero out the program. In order to meet rising need, cost inflation, and to remain competitive in leveraging federal dollars with other private grants and funding opportunities, Urban Indian Health programs must receive an increase to our base funds. Third, NCUIH opposes the proposed elimination of the IHS Small Grants programs. These competitively awarded grants provide our communities with essential health services that cannot be duplicated through other means. I will discuss the significance of these grants in just a moment. Fourth, NCUIH opposes recent attempts to cut funding for community health centers. Community health centers provide comprehensive, culturally competent, quality primary healthcare services to medically underserved communities and vulnerable populations. Many of our member programs receive a significant portion of their funding through these 330 grants. Recent moves to slash funding for community health centers by nearly 60 percent would have a devastating impact on the most vulnerable members of our American Indian communities in urban communities at a time when they can least afford it. Already woefully underfunded, further cuts to our health centers would leave countless individuals with no other health options. Finally, NCUIH opposes the recent moves to eliminate funding for the National Indian Health Board's cooperative agreement. NIHB is a vital partner in providing healthcare guidance and education to American Indian and Alaska Native people. Regarding the Small Grants programs that I mentioned, the Indian Health Services fiscal year 2012 budget justification calls for the elimination of nine Small Grant programs. These programs provide our communities with preventative health services which reduce the cost of healthcare in the long run by addressing threats to health before they result in the need for more expensive acute care. The elimination of these competitive grants has been justified on the basis of unsatisfactory results, but the evaluation report provided by IHS indicates that many of these programs have been successful and can serve as national models for future recipients of these grants. Furthermore, many of the urban Indian grant recipients will have their funding eliminated halfway through the grant period, long before any evaluation of their effectiveness has actually been conducted. The elimination of these grants amounts to a $1 million decrease in funding for Urban Indian Health programs, completely eliminating the President's net proposed increase in funding for Urban Indian Health programs over the fiscal year 2011 proposed levels. These cuts undermine our ability to promote health and wellness, to prevent disease, sexual assault, and domestic violence, and to care for the elderly, women, and children in our community. With Urban Indian Health programs unable to provide these critical services, the burden will fall on the medical system where the costs to treat are far more expensive than for providing education and information. We need to maintain these grants so that we can help provide services to the most vulnerable members of the American Indian and Alaska Native population. Regarding NIHB's cooperative agreement, the National Indian Health Board advocates on behalf of all tribal governments and American Indians and Alaska Natives in their efforts to provide quality healthcare. The IHS budget justification proposes eliminating the NIHB cooperative agreement, which would result in marginal savings while making it even more difficult to achieve IHS's stated goal of eliminating health disparities. In order to share resources and reduce costs, NCUIH and NIHB have concluded a memorandum of understanding which provides for the sharing of time and resources between the two organizations. Eliminating support for NIHB will therefore have negative consequences for NCUIH, hindering our efforts to work with a crucial partner in providing guidance and education regarding the provision of healthcare to American Indians. In conclusion, I would like to thank all of the committee members for this opportunity to testify on the budget priorities for urban Indians. Congress has long supported the Urban Indian Health program since its inception in 1976 with the original Indian Healthcare Improvement Act. While we are encouraged by the bipartisan support we have received during the past appropriations cycles, ongoing economic hardship, as well as demographic factors have placed an increased demand on our health programs. It is the position of NCUIH that the Urban Indian health line item should receive an increase, the competitive small grants should continue to be made available, that funding to HRSA should be protected and maintained, and that our partner, NIHB, should continue to receive the critical funding provided by their cooperative agreement. The time has come to seriously invest in the health of all Native Americans. And we thank you for this opportunity. [The statement of D'Shane Barnett follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.113 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.114 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.115 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Lloyd, you mentioned in your testimony eliminating the line item of contracts for--would you eliminate the line item entirely or you would eliminate the cap on the line item? Mr. Miller. Eliminate the cap on the line item. By taking out the capping language, then the contracts would be paid out of the lump sum appropriation like all other government contracts are paid. In fact, all of the Indian Health Service's other contracts because they have many other contracts are paid out of their lump sum appropriation. And that is the situation that prevailed until about the year 2000, 1999 when the cap started coming into play. So they came into play because courts had held the Indian Health Service liable for failing to pay the contracts. Mr. Simpson. Are they--the contract support, is it not met because of duration of payment or amount of payment? Do you understand what I am getting at? Mr. Miller. I am not sure. It is not met because of the amount of payment. The contract support costs themselves are actually set by the government. It is set by a different agency; usually the National Business Center sets the indirect cost rates. Then, the tribes have to incur at that rate. If they do not, they owe the money back to the government. And these are fixed costs. These are property insurance, liability insurance, audit costs, and so forth. So they have to be incurred. They are fixed costs. The sum does not change from year to year. They are fixed. Pretty much 25 percent of the program amount is the amount owed in contract support costs. Mr. Simpson. There is a saying that, I think I read an article by Tom Coburn that said if you are going to get sick in Indian Country, get sick before June---- Mr. Miller. Yeah. Mr. Simpson [continuing]. Something like that? Interesting. I am glad we were able to do something about that this year and we will continue to work on it because it is very important. We do have obligations that I think we have to meet. Jacqueline, you mentioned the overall appropriation for Interior---- Ms. Johnson Pata. Um-hum. Mr. Simpson [continuing]. And you are right. I agree with you fully. I think the allocation for the Interior Department has been insufficient over a number of years, and then when you look within the different bureaus within the Department of Interior, that is an amazing little graph where Fish and Wildlife Service has gone up 30 percent in the last eight years, the National Park Service, 28 percent or so, and BIA is down there at 8 percent. In the last couple of years, we have done a pretty good job of trying to catch up, but that means it must have been really ugly prior to that. Ms. Johnson Pata. We do have some other graphs that we would be glad to share with you where we have charted out like just cost-of-living increases and what it has looked like for, you know, the last decade or so for BIA and Indian funding I think would be very helpful for you to see. Mr. Simpson. Good. Well, I appreciate it. Dr. Neary, now, something I know something about having been a dentist in the real world. Four hundred percent higher decay rate in Native American tribes than in the general population? Mr. Neary. Yes, that is correct. Mr. Simpson. What does the research show on that? Why is that? I mean the molecular makeup of the enamel has got to be fairly similar, is it not? Mr. Neary. It is not. Mr. Simpson. Really? Mr. Neary. The early childhood caries studies--there were two symposia because the first one was so confusing that everybody had to take a hard look at it. But there is a congenital defect in the enamel of many Native American children. It is probably acquired in the third trimester of pregnancy or immediately after birth. So they have increased enamel hypoplasia. Mr. Simpson. Really? Mr. Neary. It is a common occurrence in malnourished populations, fetal trauma, maybe even birth trauma, so it affects the development of incisors and first molars typically, you know, which primary teeth would be developing at that time. You take those predisposing factors, the hypoplastic enamel becomes a culture medium for strep mutans, so they start growing increased numbers of known cariogenic pathogens. Once the established colonies are formed, they start to dominate, so you get a much higher incidence of strep mutans in these children who are affected than you do in the general population. What you superimpose on that, then, is dietary factors and things. Mr. Simpson. Right. Mr. Neary. Aside from native populations, the military is finding that non-Indian caries-resistant U.S. troops who go to the desert in Iraq consuming a great deal of Dr. Pepper and Mountain Dew in particular, so they are 20-year-olds who were caries-resistant for their whole lives and one-year deployment in Iraq they start getting tooth decay. Mr. Simpson. Really? Mr. Neary. So you have the dietary thing, increased consumption of sugar beverages because you are in desert environment superimposed on this high susceptibility which is perinatally acquired--probably--susceptibility. So there is more to it than just negligence or, you know, careless maintenance. Mr. Simpson. That may be more than any of you want to know about dental care, but I find it kind of interesting because I happen to know a little bit about it. But thank you for the work that the ADA does in trying to make sure that Indians have access to dentists. And that is, as we have talked about in the past, a problem on many reservations and particularly in Alaska, as Don and I have talked about, trying to get dentists out to some of these tribes that are in very, very, very remote places is sometimes very difficult. And I know the ADA has worked hard to make sure that we have qualified and quality dentists out in those areas, and we will continue to work with the ADA. But I appreciate the work that the Association has done in trying to address that problem. Mr. Neary. Thank you very much. Mr. Simpson. Thank you all for your testimony. I appreciate it very much. Now, we have the Honorable Don Young here and Jerry Isaac, Ted Mala, and Andy Teuber. Is it like tuber? Mr. Teuber. Yes. Mr. Simpson. Well, that is like an Idaho spud. We call them tubers. This is what we will call the Alaska panel. Mr. Young. Mr. Chairman, thank you. And it is my honor to introduce the three witnesses who will be here today. First, we have Jerry Isaac, President of the Tanana Chiefs. The Tanana Chiefs Conference is a traditional tribal consortium of 42 villages. President Isaac has been active in the Tanana's tribal and community affairs, served as the president Tanana Tribal Council from 1980 until he was elected as TCC president in 2006. Jerry Isaac was born and raised traditionally by a family teaching him essentials in culture and language in Tanacross, Alaska, which also produced some of the finest- looking ladies in the country, too. Dr. Ted Mala, Director of Tribal Relations, Traditional Healing Clinic, Southcentral Alaska; Southcentral Foundation. Southcentral is an Alaska Native Health Consortium that serves the Anchorage area as well as 55 villages. Dr. Mala received his Doctor of Medicine and Surgery (MD) from the Autonomous University of Guadalajara in 1976, has a Master's Degree in Public Health from Harvard University in 1980. He actively pursued his career in public health and health administration both in Alaska, as well as internationally in the circumpolar countries. Dr. Mala is an Alaska Native Inupiat Eskimo enrolled in the Village of Buckland, as well as the Northwest Arctic Native Association. We now have Andy Teuber, Chairman and President of Alaska Native Tribal Consortium. The consortium serves 138,000 Alaska Natives and American Indians residing in Alaska through the partnership in Alaska Native Medical Center, Alaska's Level II Trauma Center. The Consortium employs nearly 2,000 people and operates over $400 million in annual resources to deliver care as well are rural infrastructure development and engineering. And he serves as the president and CEO of Kodiak Area Native Association. Mr. Chairman, may I say this is one of the finer groups of people representing health in Alaska. We have made great progress. We have a lot further to go. And Mr. Chairman, may I say, thank you, too, for your work on the 2011 budget and our work for American Indians and Alaska Natives I think is crucially important. You have a great challenge ahead of you but I will back you up anywhere you can when it comes to trying to make sure health is provided to the American Indian and the Alaska Native because I think it is crucial. They do a good job. We can do a little better job with a little more understanding of what their intent is. So Mr. Chairman, with that, you have the panel. Mr. Simpson. Well, thank you, Don. There is no more serious of an advocate for Native Americans, Indians, both in the lower 48 and Alaska than Don Young. And it has been my pleasure to work with you over the years to try to address some of those issues, and he is the one that keeps telling me we have responsibilities. We have treaty responsibilities and everything else. And a great Nation does not ignore those, so that is why I think we have done some of the things that we have been able to do in this last health bill. So thank you, Don. I appreciate it. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE WITNESS JERRY ISAAC Mr. Isaac. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee. Thank you for the honor of presenting testimony today. I also would like to thank Congressman Young for the introduction. I appreciate that. As Congressman Young has introduced me, my name is Jerry Isaac and I am the president of the Tanana Chiefs Conference. The Tanana Chiefs Conference in an intertribal consortium of 42 Alaska Native Tribes located in the interior of Alaska. Our tribes occupy a largely road-less area of 235,000 square miles stretching from Fairbanks clear up to the Brooks Range and over the Canadian border. Our area is almost the size of Texas. Our tribes have authorized TCC to contract with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and with the Indian Health Services to operate their large number of federal programs and services for our tribal members. TCC does this under the authority of the Indian Self-Determination Act, contracting to operate federal programs which IHS and the BIA would otherwise operate for our tribes. We honor our bargain with the government by operating these federal programs and facilities year in and year out, but the government does not keep its bargain. Specifically, the Indian Health Services does not honor its duty under our contracts to reimburse the fixed contract support costs that we incur in carrying out these contracts for the government. We work for so many tribes in such a high-cost environment, but every year the government shorts us by several million dollars in fully audited fixed costs. The result is that we must cut into our programs to make up for the IHS's contract support costs shortfalls. In fact, even after our shortfall was reduced in fiscal year 2010 thanks to the President's and the committee's commitment to addressing this problem, IHS still left TCC short by $3.2 million. That is $3.2 million that we had to take out of the federal healthcare programs that we operated. That is $3.2 million worth of desperately needed and already underfunded healthcare services that our tribal members had to go without. That is $3.2 million that came out of our programs but not out of the IHS's bureaucracy or agency-operated programs, and this year, IHS will fail to pay us another $3.2 million. For us, $3.2 million could translate into 70 positions because we strive to leverage each dollar with another dollar from Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance. This is an enormous amount of healthcare employment and services that we must cut from our IHS contract just to make up for the IHS's failure to pay us what it owes us. IHS should not be able to short a contract that it has awarded and that we have performed. And the Agency should not be able to hide behind appropriations-backed language as an excuse for not honoring its contracts. It pays other contracts. It should pay our contracts, too. TCC asks that the committee finally complete the work it began in fiscal year 2010 and clear the way toward full payment of contracts we operate for IHS. The limitations in the appropriations acts should be removed and $615 million should be budgeted for this activity. In this way, these IHS contracts will at long last be paid in full, just as the committee's work this year will permit the BIA in 2011 to pay its contracts in full for the first time in 15 years. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for the opportunity to present testimony today on the contract support cost crisis facing tribes and tribal organizations that contract to operate federal facilities and programs for the IHS and the BIA. [The statement of Jerry Isaac follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.116 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.117 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.118 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Go ahead. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION WITNESS TED MALA Dr. Mala. Hello. My name is Ted Mala. Thank you. I am an Alaska Native and citizen, past president of the Association of American Indian Physicians, and served as commissioner of health for Governor Hickel on his cabinet. Today, I come before you as director of tribal relations for Southcentral Foundation, as well as director of the Traditional Healing Clinic. And I want to thank you both for your service. You guys are just legends and we really appreciate you. Southcentral Foundation is the lead tribal organization in southcentral Alaska. We provide a full range of medical, dental, optometric, behavioral health and substance abuse to 45,000 people, both Alaska Native and American Indians living in Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, and a number of villages nearby. We also serve 13,000 Alaska Native people in 55 villages, and it is all over an area of 100,000 square miles. So I know you are looking at the map so you can relate. We employ 1,400 people to do this. The core of our service delivery system is our self-governance contract with Indian Health Service. In fact, we are one of the largest tribal health contractors in the country, along with Oklahoma and Navajo. We are here today because the government has repeatedly broken its contract to Southcentral. It has failed to pay us the contract support costs, which our contract and the law dictates are supposed to be paid in full. You know this very well. We just add our voice to the others saying that we have the same problem. We discussed this issue with Congress and were told the problem was the administration. We go to the administration and they tell us Congress did not appropriate enough. And when you go to the Agency, they say that yes, it is very important but they have other competing needs. So I am sure it sounds familiar. So at Southcentral, we do not understand a lot of the finger-pointing because to us a contract is a contract and a contract is not a matter of balancing priorities but doing what the contract says to do. Besides the competing priorities as a false issue, when IHS underpays our IHS contract, we are forced to cut programs and the administration wants to protect them. We have to cut mental health and substance abuse, as well as dental, optometry. It is a zero-sum game. The fact is that the budget is balanced by cutting only funds that go to tribally-administered parts of the IHS system. When that happens, Congress and the administration discriminate against and punish the very part of the system that has proven most effective in delivering healthcare. So at SCF we do not ask to be treated any differently or any better than part of IHS, but we do not want to be treated worse either. So for the first time in many years, we are hopeful. It is clear that Congress and the administration now understand that an underpaid dollar in contract support costs means a $1 reduction in tribal healthcare. Congress and the administration understand that these are contracts that really have to be paid. Congress especially seems to appreciate that 100 percent of every contract support cost dollar goes right into tribal health and not one penny of it goes into the federal bureaucracy. We are hopeful today for the first time in over a decade. Last year's SCF's shortfall was substantially reduced. As a result, SCF opened 97 new positions to fill multiple healthcare provider teams and support staff. These positions provide covered services. We are billing anywhere we can, Medicaid, Medicare, private insurers, and we hope that our revenues will allow us to bring on 100 more additional positions. In short, we are proving every day that reducing contract support cost shortfall--that contract health is a sound investment, both in tribal employment and tribal health services. Finally, in Congress in 2012, once the government's contract support costs, if Congress funds and closes that, we will be able to fill at least 100 positions. I am sure it is true across America. So as Congress was able to eliminate the stark BIA shortfalls as part of 2011 budget compromise, we ask today that Congress in fiscal year 2012 finally end all of the IHS support cost shortfalls that have plagued us for over 15 years. Thank you for the privilege of testifying on behalf of Southcentral Foundation and the 58,000 Native Americans we serve. Mr. Chairman and Congressman Young, you are legends. Thank you. [The statement of Ted Mala follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.119 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.120 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.121 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.122 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Andy. ---------- Tuesday, May 3, 2011. ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM WITNESS ANDY TEUBER Mr. Teuber. Thank you. Good afternoon, Chairman Simpson. My name is Andy Teuber. Thank you, Congressman Young, for the very flattering introduction. I am the president and chairman of the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, which serves 138,000 Alaska Natives and American Indians across the great State of Alaska, a state which comprises 650,000 square miles and has a population of only 700,000 people, 20 percent of which are the Alaska Natives and American Indians that we serve in the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium. I also have the distinct pleasure to serve as the president and CEO of the Kodiak Area Native Association, which delivers primary and social services to the population of Kodiak Island in the Gulf of Alaska. And in that capacity I deliver services to seven of the communities around Kodiak. If you look at the State of Alaska, you can see, it kind of looks like this here. Kodiak is going to be right down here in the Gulf. It is nice to have a Congressman to serve as your assistant. Yes, thank you, Congressman. It is, in fact, the largest island in the United States by coastline and second to the large island of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, for distance or area. What I was going to talk about today, and I do not want to articulate anything that has already been said better than I can say it in what Mr. Lloyd Miller has said for contract support costs and what Dr. Matt Neary has said on behalf of the ADA, but I did want to talk about a couple of issues that have not been addressed yet. And the first one is IHS Village Built Lease program. It is the first issue that I want to bring to the chairman's attention today. And the foundation of the Alaska Native Tribal Health system is kind of built on the VBC program or the Village Built Clinic Lease program. The VBC program provides funding for rent, utilities, insurance, janitorial, maintenance costs, healthcare facilities throughout rural Alaska. Despite an increase in the number and size of clinics throughout Alaska and the rapidly increasing costs of operating these clinics, the funding for the VBC lease program has barely increased since 1996. Current funding for leases covers less than 60 percent of the costs of operating these clinics. Without additional funding, the VBC lease program, Alaska villages will be forced to further reduce clinic operations for primary, tertiary care for dental services and behavior health services in and around all of our rural communities. And they will be forced to defer long-term maintenance and improvement projects. This situation not only reduces healthcare availability in villages. It also threatens nearly $200 million worth of rural infrastructure in the state that the Federal Government has already funded. So the solutions that I propose today are, number one, to have the VBC lease program listed as a separate line item in the IHS budget. And number two, provide an increase of $7 million in funding for the VBC lease program to be added in the current program base for the 2012 budget. This funding is needed to sustain the VBC lease program and cover the expected operating cost in fiscal year 2012 and to establish funding for the long-term maintenance and improvement, and without this funding, many Alaska villages will not be able to continue supporting local clinics, which will lead to serious negative consequences for the health and safety of Alaska Native people. As I stated earlier, Mr. Miller's testimony was informative for me. I am certain that it was for the committee as well. And the information that Dr. Neary had provided on the dental health for American Indian and Alaska Native people, I did want to touch on the oral health as it relates to the Dental Health Aid Therapy program in Alaska. And with just a minute, Indian Country--in Alaska in particular--faces considerable oral health disparities, and American Indians and Alaska Natives, especially children, continue to be plagued by oral health disparities. Alaska Native children suffer a dental caries rate two-and-a-half times the national average and for American Indian and Alaska Native children ages two to four, the rate of tooth decay is five times higher than the U.S. average. An astonishing 79 percent of Alaska Native and American Indian children ages two to five have tooth decay, 60 percent of which are severe cavities. With that, on behalf of the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium and the Kodiak Area Native Association, I want to thank the chairman for the time and the opportunity to testify here today. Thanks to Congressman Young, and I will look forward to providing any additional information requested by the committee. [The statement of Andy Teuber follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.123 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.124 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.125 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982B.126 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I appreciate all of your testimony. Alaska is a big country, is it not? Mr. Teuber. It is. Mr. Simpson. That is one of the places I have never been and always wanted to go, and Don said I cannot go until he says it is okay. So he has invited me up there a few times and we were talking earlier with my staff and some other people about, you know, you have got some beautiful national parks, you have got some issues with Alaska Natives and healthcare and other things, and we need to get up there and see some of that. Mr. Young. And Mr. Chairman, you are definitely invited and we could work on that with you and really see the area without working too hard but see the people in Alaska. I can say only one other thing as a guideline. You brought up the point about the level of funding under the Department of Interior, and if you want to spend money on people, take it out of the parks and spend it on the people. And I am dead serious. Do you see the staffing and you see the--and the Forest Service, I do not know if you handle the Forest Service or not---- Mr. Simpson. We do. Mr. Young [continuing]. Well, they have got the same thing. I was in Ketchikan the other day. There are 27 brand new trucks sitting there. There are three boats with six motors sitting there. There are 28 kayaks and we are not cutting any trees in southeast Alaska. And the agencies that are being funded are not for people. And I am not saying the agencies are not people themselves---- Mr. Simpson. Yeah. Mr. Young [continuing]. But the money should be spent, especially in healthcare, for what I think is a commitment. This was done many years ago under treaty and I do think they own it and they deserve it, and this contracting concept that Mr. Miller and other people have talked about is, to me, a disgrace. It is a contract with the government, and if there is a shortage of money, I know where we can find it. We will not take the parks away, but we do not need Taj Mahals. We do not need boats on the river that they have. We do not need all of the fancy quarters that they live in. We need to take care of the people. That is what I am asking. Mr. Simpson. There is one area you can take it away. Mr. Young. And Mr. Chairman, I am dead serious about it and I hope you will listen to me very carefully and read the documents---- Mr. Simpson. I am listening to you. Mr. Young. All right. I appreciate it. Mr. Simpson. I appreciate it. I was surprised, actually, when we learned that half of the tribes in America are located in Alaska, I was kind of shocked when I heard that, 260 some odd or something? Mr. Young. Two hundred twenty-nine. Mr. Simpson. Two hundred twenty-nine out of the 500 or so that we have. So it is stunning. But I do need to get up there and see it. And you have unique problems because of the size of Alaska and the remoteness of it. And it is issues, as I said earlier, that we have tried to work out with the ADA and others to try to make sure that you have access to dentists and those types of things. And it is an issue that I know that the ADA takes very seriously in trying to make sure that, you know, it is remote. So anyway, I look forward to coming up there and seeing what you do and as we have heard today in this testimony that, you know, Don has told me for the 12 years I have been here that we have responsibilities, tribal responsibilities, and you are right, we need to maintain those things. And that is why in the CR we cut some areas that were pretty tough to cut but we went in and did it so that we did not have to cut Indian Health Services or some of the other things. And if you talk to Dr. Rubidoux at Indian Health Services, she was showing me the difference in what we spend per person in Indian Country for healthcare versus what the average American gets and it is substantially different. If you want to see poverty in this country, go out to an Indian reservation or go to some of the villages up in Alaska. We have got to address that, and I will tell you this committee is committed to addressing it. So I appreciate you all being here today and thank you for your testimony and coming down to beautiful Washington, D.C., from that ugly Alaska up there. Thank you. Wednesday, May 4, 2011. TESTIMONY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND OTHER INTERESTED INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS PUBLIC WITNESSES--NATIVE AMERICANS Mr. Cole. Okay. We will go ahead and open proceedings, and we will invite our witnesses up in a group of panels, so if we could have Chairman Bear, Chairman Melendez, Chairman Small, Chairman Joseph, and then Representative Richardson will be joining us when she arrives at the table, as she has got things to tell us as well. Probably the easiest thing once you get settled is, we will just start here and work our way across. Each person has got of course about 5 minutes and then we will have time after that to ask questions or comments from the members. If you would, as you begin your testimony, if you would just simply introduce yourself so that we have got that clearly for the record. That would be extremely helpful. And we can begin whenever you want to start to testify. Press the button. If it is red, it is on. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. SHOSHONE-PAIUTE TRIBES OF THE DUCK VALLEY INDIAN RESERVATION WITNESS ROBERT BEAR, CHAIRMAN Mr. Bear. Thank you for that. Good morning, Mr. Chairman and everyone here today. I just want to thank you for giving me this opportunity. First of all, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, my name is Robert Bear. I am the Chairman of the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Indian Reservation. I asked to testify today so that I could talk about the crisis in unfunded contract payments that the Indian Health Service and the Bureau of Indian Affairs owe my tribe under our self-governance contracts. From the very beginning, these agencies have broken their contract obligations to my tribe. Let me just talk about IHS. In 1995, my tribe negotiated a contract with IHS to operate the government's hospital in Owyhee. The contract required IHS to pay us $1.7 each year in fixed contract support costs. These were our fixed costs that we had to incur by law to run this federal contract. Think of the costs as mandates to do things like carry insurance, complete federally required audits, to do our daily accounting and similar fixed costs. We did not set those costs. Some were set by IHS and the rest were set by the Interior Department, all based on our annual audit report, but IHS never paid us a dime, not in 1996 and not in 1997. What happened? Since those costs that IHS failed to pay were our fixed costs, we had no choice but to reduce hospital operations and hospital employment in order to pay those costs and make up for the shortfall. The next thing we knew, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospital Organizations came in and told us that it was considering revoking our certification to operate. Why? Because we had so many vacancies in critical positions. So eventually we went to court, and 10 years later in 2005, we were vindicated by a Supreme Court decision in the case known as Cherokee Nation and the Shoshone- Paiute Tribes v. Leavitt. The court said it was illegal for IHS to underpay us and the court awarded my tribe damages against IHS. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, this should have never happened. These are government contracts and the government should have kept its word. In fact, the very reason why we won the Supreme Court case is because the court ruled unanimously that the government has no more right to break a contract with an Indian tribe than it has to break a contract with anyone else. Yet here we are years later and IHS is again failing to pay us our contract amounts. I do not understand how this is possible. Every other federal contractor gets paid in full yet we do not. Is it because we are an Indian tribe? The Supreme Court already said that shocking excuse was no excuse at all. Is it because our appropriation act now limits how much the agency will pay tribal contractors? There never used to be a limit and contract payments just came out of the agency's general appropriation. If there is such a limit, why not eliminate it? Why not go back to the system where the agency pays us out of its general appropriations just like all other government contractors. The line item for contract support costs was never put into law to protect the tribes and our contracts. It was put into law to protect the agency. I say take it out. Why? Because after losing in the Supreme Court, IHS still comes here and asks for protection to underpay its federal contracts with Indian tribes, next year by about $153 million including protection to underpay my tribe about $615,000. That is just not right. The law should not protect an agency when it underpays a fully performed contract. We are doing our part by providing health care in the government's Owyhee hospital. Now the government must do its part to pay us in full for the work that we are doing. The government should not come her and ask permission to force us to reduce these contracted health programs and contracted positions so that the government can get away with not paying us. As for the BIA, I cannot offer enough thanks to this committee and to you, Mr. Chairman, for last month's action in raising the BIA level of contract payments. At long last, the BIA will now be able to fully pay its contract obligations to my tribe, to the other tribes in Idaho and to the other tribes across the country. This funding level must not roll back in 2012. But when it comes to IHS, much more needs to be done. I do applaud the President for recommending a very significant increase in the IHS contract support cost line, but until these IHS contracts are fully paid just like all other government contracts, justice will not have been done. Thank you for the opportunity for me to testify today. [The statement of Robert Bear follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.001 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.002 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.003 Mr. Cole. Thank you for your testimony. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. FORT HALL BUSINESS COUNCIL, SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES WITNESS NATHAN SMALL, CHAIRMAN Mr. Small. Good morning, Chairman Simpson and Congressman Cole. I would like to thank you for the opportunity to testify this morning. My name is Nathan Small. I serve as Chairman of the Fort Hall Business Council, the governing body of the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes in southeastern Idaho. Our community faces tremendous needs in a variety of areas but I am here to speak on behalf of the children of Fort Hall Reservation. Native American youth are among the most vulnerable groups in America. They suffer the highest dropout rates in the Nation, and tragically, also suffer the highest rates of suicide. There are two reasons for the suffering: one, a broken juvenile justice system, and two, an underfunded Indian education system. Juvenile justice in Indian Country like the broader tribal justice system has been crippled by federal laws and court decisions handed by Washington, D.C., for more than a century. Our tribe endures many of the same public concerns that plague other tribes. However, we face the added pressure of dealing with Public Law 280. In 1963, the State of Idaho without the consent of the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes assumed jurisdiction over juvenile crimes on the Fort Hall Reservation, and for almost 50 years, the state has ignored its responsibility under Public Law 280 and our youth in our community have suffered as a result. With no help at the state level and little help at the federal level, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes took matters into its own hands. Last year, we completed construction of a new criminal justice center which houses our police department, courts and an adult-juvenile corrections center. Basically this is what it looks like right now, and if you would like, we can get a copy of this for you to look at later on. We built that juvenile center with a vision of having it serve as a regional juvenile center. Detention is often the final opportunity at turning around the life of a young person. As a result, they deserve our best efforts. This means providing strong education, mental health and substance treatment and services to our youth in custody. However, the BIA budget proposes elimination of the juvenile educational funding and the BIA has refused our request to use correction program funding to provide these services to our juveniles. To address these critical needs, I am making two requests. Neither request will cost the taxpayer additional money but will permit commonsense use of existing funds and allow tribes to stretch existing dollars where they are needed. First, I ask you to direct the Administration to designate our juvenile center as a region correction center, and second, I ask that you direct the BIA to authorize the use of correction program funding for education and mental health services to tribal youth in custody. As I just noted, in spite of the shortfalls in the education of Indian juveniles, the President's budget would eliminate the educational services to Indian youth in custody. I urge you to reject the President's proposed elimination of this program and instead increase funding for juvenile education. I have one final request in the area of tribal justice, and that is to urge you to work with Chairman Frank Wolf's Commerce, Justice and Science subcommittee to fully fund programs reauthorized in the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010 at the requested levels in the fiscal year 2012 Interior and Justice Department budgets. I will now briefly discuss some concerns about educating our young people. The United States in hundreds of treaties including the Four Bridges Treaty of 1868 promised to provide for the education of Indian youth as well as other services and in return taking hundreds of millions of acres of our tribal homeland. Sadly, these promises have not been kept and again our children in our community suffer as a result. Unhappy with the level of education provided in the United States, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes contracted to operate the Shoshone- Bannock Junior and Senior High School locally. However, in order to make this effort work, we rely on tribal grant support costs. These programs provide administrative costs that would be incurred by the BIA and the Federal Government continue to provide direct education services. The fiscal year 2012 budget requests flat funding for school support costs, which would meet less than two-thirds of the tribal needs. I ask that the tribal support costs be funded at $72.3 million to meet 100 percent of the need. Also, with regard to Indian education this school year, we added a 6th-grade program to our tribal school. This 6th-grade program fills a gap in educational services on the reservation and will provide students with a consistent learning environment. Despite this need, the BIA has refused our request to use school support cost funding for our new 6th grade. To overcome this bureaucratic barrier, I would ask you to include report language to direct the BIA to permit tribal grant support cost funding to be used for our expansion to the 6th grade and include 6th-grade students in our annual funding formula. Finally, my written testimony provides additional details for a request to provide funding for a dormitory to provide our homeless children stable housing, meals on campus and an opportunity to learn and a chance at a brighter future. Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for your recognition of the Federal Government's treaty obligations to the Indian tribes and your efforts to hold tribal programs harmless as Congress works to bring the federal deficit under control. As you know, the need to meet these solemn obligations is especially critical for our Native youth, and again, thank you for this opportunity to testify. [The statement of Nathan Small follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.004 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.005 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.006 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.007 Mr. Cole. Thank you. I see we have been joined by Representative Richardson. Would you like to join us at the table? And I do not know what your schedule is--just grab that chair right there, that would be great--and you may need to testify, you may have a committee meeting or something, and so we would be happy to take your testimony whenever you would like to deliver it. We are moving in order, but again, I recognize you may have a committee to get to, so we are delighted to have you here. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. NATIVE AMERICAN ISSUES WITNESS HON. LAURA RICHARDSON, A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ms. Richardson. First of all, good morning. Good morning to all of you. Thank you for having me, allowing me to be here to share my priorities and thoughts within the Native Americans and Alaska Natives in this country. I am a member of the Native American Caucus and I represent the 37th Congressional district in California. California is home to over 100 federally recognized tribes, so being a member of this community and providing the support is something we all believe in, but in California in particular, that is my commitment. Particularly, I want to cover four areas: health, education, transportation and economic development. In the 111th Congress, we permanently reauthorized the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, and while this was a step in the right direction, we still have a responsibility to ensure that there is adequate funding for the Indian Health Service's section. I want to highlight a few statistics that stick out in my mind. American Indians, Alaska Natives have the lowest life expectancy across all races in the United States. Diabetes in particular has a high rate for Native Americans and Alaska Natives, 177 percent higher than the general U.S. population. Now, you on these committees know these statistics far better than I do, and I respect that, but I think you need to know that I lend my full support as you approach these issues and need members to step up to add to that voice. Years of underfunding of Indian health care have led to overcrowded facilities, outdated facilities and equipment and delayed maintenance of facilities that are on average over 30 years. The Indian Health Service reports that many Indian health facilities use equipment that is over twice its useful lifespan. So when we consider this, I support President Obama's fiscal year 2012 budget request which increases funding for the Indian Health Service by 14.1 percent. Education--education in our Native American communities is another crucial area that needs a substantial investment. There was a report done in February 2010, a study by the Civil Rights Project of the UCLA Graduate School of Education and Informal Studies. Now, I am a graduate of both UCLA and USC so I watch these studies carefully. And in that study, they found that less than 50 percent of American Indian and Alaska Native students graduated from high school. That is lagging from our national average of 69 percent. So when we consider this, the Indian school equalization formula is the primary source of funding that we have for the elementary and secondary schools, and I urge when we look at how it is being very severely underfunded in fiscal year 2009 and 2010, it is something that warrants our attention. I also support the Johnson-O'Malley Act, the act that was implemented in 1934 to provide the supplemental funding. Transportation--I serve on the Transportation Committee and the Homeland Security Committee, and when you look at the Bureau of Indian schools, they often incur significant costs in transporting students. Many have to travel from reservations. Buses travel very long routes on unpaved roads, and it is critical that there is adequate funding. So therefore with the increasing fuel costs, the President's fiscal year 2012 budget slightly reduces funding for this program over the 2010 levels, and I think certainly that should be preserved or increased. And then finally, my last section, which is economic development and job training. In California, although we have had very successful gaming places in my area surrounding and it has served as an excellent opportunity for many people to work, not just working in the general casino area but working as accountants, working in many aspects of the business, but unfortunately, not all areas have the ability to have those types of businesses or have not grown to that point as of yet. So it is important that we invest and we assist in making sure that there is adequate job training available for everyone. So when we look at the division of capital investment within the Office of Indian Energy and Economic Development that overseas the Indian loan guarantee program, this program enables eligible borrowers for Indian businesses to be able to get money that they otherwise would not receive. Unfortunately, the President's fiscal year 2012 budget cuts this program by $5.1 million, and I would not be supportive of that. As I close, there is a national ironworkers training program. I have a very strong relationship with the ironworkers in my district. This is a program that has not been funded for 2011 or 2012. It was only seeking $750,000. This program was actually an 11-week program where after that program the candidates would be able to participate in the apprenticeship program and go on and have a very decent job, so I would urge you to consider that. And lastly, when you look at the Carcier---- Mr. Cole. Carcieri. Ms. Richardson. Thank you. Versus Salazar---- Mr. Cole. We are looking at it. Ms. Richardson. I am sure you are. Mr. Cole. We are very familiar here. Ms. Richardson. Well, I look forward to standing with you and helping in that area as well. So thank you for the opportunity to speak. Thank you for sitting here with my brothers and I am sure sisters as well in the audience and just look forward to counting on my help. Even though I have not had an opportunity to serve on your committee, count me as a full committed one to help on your issues. [The statement of Laura Richardson follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.008 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.009 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.010 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.011 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. Thank you for your testimony. You are free to go, or you are free to stay. We will have questions. We have two more sets of testimony, so it is up to you. Again, your schedule is---- Ms. Richardson. Unfortunately, I have two committees at the exact same time. Mr. Cole. I assumed that was going to be the case, but thank you very much for coming. I appreciate it. Ms. Richardson. Thank you, sir, and thank you, gentlemen. Mr. Cole. Again, thanks for your indulgence for allowing the Congresswoman to make her points, so if we can, we will just resume regular order. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY TRIBAL COUNCIL WITNESS ARLAN MELENDEZ, CHAIRMAN Mr. Melendez. Good morning, Mr. Chairman and committee members. My name is Arlan Melendez. I am Tribal Chairman of the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony, Washoe, Paiute and Shoshone people, located in Reno, Nevada. I am also the Vice President of both the Indian Health Board in Nevada and also the Intertribal Council in Nevada, which are the 27 tribes in the State of Nevada. First, I want to thank Chairman Simpson and Mr. Cole for listening to us this morning, and I am very appreciative of Mr. Simpson's comments that were circulated a few months ago indicating the importance of protecting the funding for the programs from the budget cuts. Today I wish to address--first of all, I also want to introduce our consultant here in D.C., Mr. George Waters, who is in the audience, and George also said not to mention the Nevada-Boise State game. Mr. Simpson. Yeah, there might be some funding problems there. Mr. Cole. You are clearly very well represented. Mr. Simpson. Yes, I was going to say, he is from Oklahoma, you know, and we did have a problem with Oklahoma. Mr. Cole. You know, there is an old saying in Oklahoma: it is hard to be humble when you are a Sooner. Unfortunately, not when I talk to my chairman, who delivers regular doses of humility on what is now, I must say, a five-year-old game. Mr. Melendez. Well, today, I wish to address three main topics here. First of all, Contract Health Service and also an increasing problem with pain management, and I will talk about that, and also, the third topic is the need for detention facilities in the State of Nevada. Because my tribe consists of approximately 1,100 tribal members and we are one of the few urban reservations in the country, we not only provide health care to our tribal members but we have to comply with the Indian Health Service open-door policy requiring us to provide service to any federally recognized Indian person. The urban Indian population in proximity to our health center is approximately 8,000 and growing. Four years ago, my tribe constructed a new health center at our own expense due to the fact that we could not wait any longer for the Indian Health Service to replace our old, dilapidated facility. Since then, our caseload has really grown. There are 27 tribes and bands, 16 federally recognized tribes in the State of Nevada, and we are part of the Phoenix area. The other area tribes are from Arizona and Utah. There are also two main service units in the State of Nevada, the western Nevada service unit and the eastern Nevada, and there is also field station in southern Nevada. We are part of the Schurz service unit along with six other tribes. Schurz, Nevada, is approximately 90 miles southeast of Reno, Nevada, and it is where our old Indian hospital was located until the Indian Health Service closed its doors in 1986. Since that time, the tribes who use that hospital have greatly seen more dependence on Contract Health Service, and there is a correlation between not having an Indian Health Service hospital and the need for Contract Health Service. Without a hospital, Nevada tribes are totally CHS dependent. The Contract Health Service formula needs to be changed to give more weight to tribes that do not have access to Indian hospitals. Due to the lack of CHS funding, Indian Health Service is only allowing priority level one life-or-limb referrals, and so far only 30 percent of the referrals for patients to use CHS have been approved. Basically, our patients are being denied health care. Furthermore, the Indian Health Service is not paying patients' Contract Health Service medical bills in a timely manner. Thus, patients are receiving letters from collection agencies and they are not paying also the providers, the outside providers who provide those services. Therefore, the relationship is not good and some providers are denying to work with the Indian Health Service. Any budget savings due to the adherence to priority level one, which has happened with the new Indian Health Service director, has resulted in some savings. That savings should go back into opening up priority level two and not be disbursed elsewhere within the Indian Health Service. One recommendation would be to create centers of excellence like our brand-new facility that we built ourselves. A center of excellence would provide services that they do not have right now, X-rays, and therefore that would help not sending people out for X-rays, and there is a lot of specialty service that we could have within our health facility. Rather than building a new hospital, maybe we could create centers of excellence that would offset sending people out, which decreases the use of Contract Health Service. I would like to briefly talk about the increasing concern having to do with pain management or the lack of, which has resulted in patients being addicted to certain medications, painkillers. This issue is also a CHS issue whereby referring a patient outside our health clinic to a pain specialist is also not in the approved category of priority one, so referrals for this are also being denied. We believe IHS should address this ever-growing problem. This situation has resulted in security guards being placed at our health centers due to the irrational outbursts by patients who demand medication. A demonstration project would be something that would help. And finally, our detention facility need in Nevada is really something that is critical there. Right now, we are desperately in need of regional detention facilities to hold those Indian people who have broken the law. You may be surprised to hear that there is not a single detention facility anywhere within the jurisdiction of Bureau of Indian Affairs western Nevada agency. This lack of detention facilities for adults and juveniles along with great distances that need to be traveled to access detention facilities that we contract for has been identified as the single most significant issue that our tribal justice systems face. Tribes in our region are presently contracting with five different counties. For longer- term sentences, prisoners are being sent out to facilities in Colorado and Wyoming. We are working jointly---- Mr. Cole. We are going to need to wind up pretty quickly. Mr. Melendez. Okay. We would ask this committee to work with the BIA and perhaps with the Commerce, Justice and Science Subcommittee to ensure that there is a coordinated approach and that staffing and overall operation and maintenance for a western Nevada tribal detention center is funded. So I want to thank you very much for listening to me. [The statement of Arlan Melendez follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.012 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.013 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.014 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.015 Mr. Cole. Thank you. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. NORTHWEST PORTLAND AREA INDIAN HEALTH BOARD WITNESS ANDREW JOSEPH, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Mr. Joseph. Good morning, Chairman Simpson, Ranking Member Moran and Honorable Mr. Cole. My name is Badger. I am Andy Joseph, Jr. I chair the Health and Human Services Committee for the Confederated Tribes of Colville and also the chair for the Portland Area Indian Health Board, 43 tribes of Washington, Idaho and Oregon, and as an executive member of the National Indian Health Board. I have submitted my testimony for the record and will summarize our recommendations. Let me begin by underscoring the federal trust responsibility to provide health care to Indians and the significant health disparities that affect our people. There is no question that Indian people suffer the highest rates of disease for most health indicators. My written testimony documents these glaring health disparities. This fact along with the trust responsibility makes it a requirement that Congress provide an adequate level of funding for IHS budget. In fiscal year 2011, we estimate that it would take at least $400 million to maintain current services. I hope the subcommittee recognizes that the $25 million increase was less than adequate funding in fiscal year 2011. We urge the subcommittee to support the level of funding requested in the President's fiscal year 2012 budget request. The President's 2012 request will help to preserve services by restoring lost funding to inflation, population growth, pay costs, contract support costs that were not funded in the fiscal year 2011 budget. We recognize that this might seem like a sizable increase given the current fiscal estimate. However, I hope you will balance the request with the principles of the federal trust relationship and the fact that Indian people have the highest health disparities of any group in the United States. Our specific budget recommendations include, one, we recommend the subcommittee restore funding eliminated in the President's request for tribal pay costs. We estimate this funding to be at least $13.4 million based on fiscal year 2011 IHS Congressional justification. These costs were eliminated in the President's fiscal year 2012 request due to the administrative policy to freeze federal pay increases. If the tribal health system does not maintain pay cost requirements, it will be difficult to remain competitive, to recruit and retain health care professionals. Two, we recommend an additional $50 million be provided for the contract services program. The contract health program comprises 34 percent of Idaho, Oregon and Washington tribes' budget. Since we do not have hospitals, we must rely on CHS programs for all specific inpatient care. Three, we do not support the $6 million increase for business operation support. If the IHS cannot effectively utilize the resources it has now, then provide it with the additional funding to address material weaknesses in processing the billing CHS claims dealing with business office practices and address weaknesses in the united financial management system will only result in the same dysfunction. Tribes have effectively managed these same growth challenges as IHS. If it is truly to address CHS needs, then the $6 million should be reprogrammed to the CHS budget line item. Four, we further recommend the subcommittee provide an additional $53 million to fund past years contract support cost shortfalls that are owed to tribes under Public Law 93638. The achievements of Indian self-determination have consistently improved services delivery, increased services levels and strengthened tribal government services for Indian people. Every Administration since 1975 has embraced the policy and Congress has repeatedly affirmed it through extensive amendments to strengthen the Self-Determination Act. Five, we urge the subcommittee to include bill report language that directs the IHS Director to fund innovative approaches for facilities construction in Indian Country. Over 15 years, the Portland area developed---- Mr. Cole. I do not mean to interrupt, but we are going to need to wrap up the statement pretty quickly, please. Mr. Joseph. The small ambulatory construction program--this program has been very beneficial for addressing facilities construction needs throughout Indian Country. Once again, the Portland area tribes have developed a new regional referral specialty care center concept that holds great promise to innovative approach to addressing health facility needs. Our proposal has been shared with the IHS Director, who equally believes it holds great promise. We appreciate this opportunity to meet with the committee staff to understand our proposal and how we might be able to move this concept. Thank you, and I am happy to take any questions. One of the things I would like to say is, today one of my comrades is being buried, and his service is in White Swan. His family is related to me from the Yakima Nation, and he was a young soldier that gave his life, and he swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and I expect the Congress here to remember that oath and to remember our soldiers that swore to protect that for us as I did myself. Thank you. [The statement of Andrew Joseph follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.016 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.017 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.018 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.019 Mr. Cole. Thank you, and thank you for your service. I note with a great deal of satisfaction the emblem you have for the United States Army, so we very much appreciate your service as well. I am going to go directly to you, Chairman, particularly since we have somebody from your home state, and I will ask my questions after Mr. Moran asks his. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Let me first ask, Robert, you and the Cherokee Nation sued the Federal Government over contract support, right? Mr. Bear. Yes, we did. Mr. Simpson. And the Supreme Court said essentially that the government was in default by not paying the contracts, that we have to pay the contracts, right? Mr. Bear. That is correct, Chairman. Mr. Simpson. And then we started paying but not the full cost of the contract support. Has a lawsuit followed up anywhere that I am not aware of that is suing the government over not paying the full cost of the contract support? Mr. Bear. Not that I am aware of currently, but that is our situation with IHS right now. We do have a self-governance compact but there is still a shortfall, though. Mr. Simpson. Well, as you know, that is one of the things that we focused on during this last budget was trying to get the funding up for contract support because last year during the testimony from tribes, what we heard from almost everybody that testified was the issue of contract support and not covering those costs, and so we made a substantial effort to address that last year when we wrote the C.R., and I will tell you, since Mr. Moran is here, he was a great chairman when he was in charge in terms of Indian Country and making sure that we put the resources in there to do what is necessary to meet our obligations. The same was true with Mr. Dicks when he was chairman of it, so I think the committee has shown some bipartisan support in trying to make sure that we meet these obligations that we have. It is going to be more difficult under reduced budgets that we had in our Continuing Resolution and in next year's budget but we will do everything we can to make sure that we need those contract support obligations that we have, not just because it is right thing to do; we have an obligation to do it. So I appreciate that. Nathan, welcome and thanks for being here today. Where are we with the regional detention facility? Because we had put language in directing the department to look at that possibility, and if you look at the number of tribes across the country, 560 something or whatever it is, you are not going to be able to build a detention facility like Fort Hall built in every one of these locations, and it makes sense to start looking at some regional sorts of facilities, and have we come anywhere with that? Mr. Small. Last word I got was I think there was tribes in Wyoming and in Nevada and possibly Utah that are looking at possibly using our place as a regional jail, but there has not been a lot of talk and there has not been a lot of anything to really get that nailed down, and we feel that there is even other places that could utilize our area as a regional jail, especially in northern Nevada and the eastern part of Nevada. Mr. Simpson. Has the department done anything to look across Indian Country and say, you know, where could regional detention facilities be built that make sense, that would be usable and accessible? You mentioned western Nevada. You know, we do not want to transport people all across the country, but to do it within a region where they would have access to their families, their families would have access to them and those types of things makes some sense. Mr. Small. Yes. I think they were--last I heard, they were looking at anywhere from a five- to an eight-hour drive from the regional facility to the outlying areas, and that is just what I have been hearing. However, I am not absolutely sure on a lot of that stuff. Mr. Simpson. Well, your tribe did a great job, and you went out and built this with your own funds, and the only thing you are asking of the BIA is to help the operational costs of it, and we have done the same thing. I know Tom has mentioned in Oklahoma where tribes have used their own funds to build a hospital, and you mentioned the same thing too, that tribes are stepping up to the plate and building these facilities that are necessary. The BIA needs to step in and make sure that they have the people to operate these facilities that the tribes are putting their resources into, so we look forward to seeing you in August, and we will be out there, and Tom, you will get a firsthand view of this. Mr. Cole. I am looking forward to it, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Small. Okay. Great. I welcome you guys there. Mr. Simpson. I do not know if you know this yet. We are trying to put together a plan. We want to visit several areas across the country on probably two or three different trips. Mr. Cole. The chairman said he could probably get me there in time to watch Boise's August training. Mr. Simpson. And I want to say, it was a great football game with Boise State and Nevada, and I love good football games regardless of who wins. Mr. Cole. Do not believe that. He cares very much about who wins. Mr. Moran. Mr. Moran. Thanks, Mr. Chairman. These issues are a classic case in point where I think the tribes' best interests are served if I follow the leadership and judgment of you and Chairman Simpson, and so at this point I am just going to listen and learn and, as I say, follow your lead. But thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Cole. Well, thank you very much, and again, I am going to make the point, I have made it before, it needs to be made frequently, we made a lot of progress in the last few years, and Chairman Simpson and Chairman Moran are two of the big reasons for that. This is actually one of the committees that really does work exceptionally well on a bipartisan basis and takes these responsibilities seriously, and quite honestly, the Administration has done a good job here in the last couple years stepping up in a lot of different ways as well, and so we appreciate that. I have one comment I wanted to make and then I have a couple quick questions. A comment, I am interested for any of you that are involved in gaming. This really was sparked by something Representative Richardson said. It made me begin to think. I know that she mentioned gaming and how important that was, and just for the record, the difference in taxation rates between gaming facilities is dramatic, and some states look on tribes as an asset and keep that relatively low. They make money. Oklahoma, I think our compacts are around 6 percent, but we try to keep the tax rate roughly where it is for industry. Other states, it is higher, it is way higher than any other industry would pay. It might be 25 percent of the gross in some places like that. That is something maybe sometime we ought to take a look at, because when they do that, what they are effectively doing is taking money out of a tribe's hand that would otherwise be spending it on, guess what, health care, education, services and that sort of thing. There ought to be some sort of federal limitation that you cannot take more from a tribe than you would from a business in your own state. I do not know if we have that ability or that power because compacting is pretty much a negotiation, but there is a big difference in some states where the state has really a hammer over the head of the tribes and uses it as a cash cow. I am particularly interested, a couple of you made the remarks about education, so I think you mentioned that, Mr. Small, and I think you did as well, Mr. Bear, although most of yours was on health care. Do you actually have a BIE school? Mr. Small. Yes, we have a school that was built here probably about 10, 15 years ago after about 30 years of lobbying for it and we finally got the school built for us and it houses our junior and senior high schools. One of the reasons why we have that is because the surrounding school district that has been educating our youth has somewhat been a failure to a lot of our people. There are a few success stories out there but the majority of them were not getting the educational thing, so the tribes felt at that time it would need to be building our own school and let us capture those people before it is too late. Well, I also mentioned that we added a 6th grade. Well, a lot of our students that are at our junior and senior high school right now, they come from the outside districts where they are a failure so they come to the tribal school to try and catch up, and it takes a lot of effort on our schoolteachers and staff to bring them back up to speed and sometimes it just does not quite get there, so we thought we would go a little lower and capture the 6th grade and see if we can follow up with the 6th grade all the way to the time that they graduate, they would have a better educational opportunity to have that happen. Mr. Cole. On the funding, is the funding that the Federal Government provides for the school comparable on a per-pupil basis with what is provided in the surrounding school districts? Mr. Small. I believe right now they are only funding at about $3,000 per student. Mr. Cole. So quite a bit less, I would think. Mr. Small. It is a lot less. It is almost half of what is on---- Mr. Cole. I am going to keep making this point, but I think, again, as a committee, we ought to begin to look at that. We have a federal trust responsibility. I do not see how in the world you fulfill it if we are not funding students at the same level that they are being funded in the state around it. There does not have to be the same level nationally but we ought to be providing kids comparable economic support with what they are getting locally. Mr. Small. Yes. Mr. Cole. One other quick question, if I can direct it at you, Mr. Melendez. I was very interested in what you had to say about the challenges you have with an urban reservation and health care, and we see a lot of this in Oklahoma as well. Do you get any particular extra money because you are taking care of a much larger population than your tribal population? Mr. Melendez. Not really. It is pretty much the same budget that we have every year. It increases slightly because of the overall--you know, I think the President increased Indian Health Service across the board but it was not really---- Mr. Cole. But there is no special provision for--I know in Oklahoma we have urban Indian health care facilities that again deal with large populations. Oklahoma City is not even in Indian Country. Most of the state is. And so we have one there. It is a special one to take care of the Native population. In Tulsa, we have overlapping jurisdiction. There is tribal jurisdiction but there is also a separate Indian health care facility that is really non-tribal affiliated to help with exactly this sort of thing so that the tribes are not picking up beyond, really their own membership. But is there no BIA program? I mean, you are clearly in a very special situation. We are mandating you take care of a very large population and we do not provide you any extra resources to do that? Mr. Melendez. Not really. Right now, of every four people that comes to the door of our health center located in an urban setting, only one is a tribal member, so it is a four-to-one ratio, and the urban population, because the State of Nevada is also a Contract Health Service delivery area, the whole state, that does not really help the situation because more people are gravitating to the city for jobs and so we get that increased number of people that we cannot turn away, because the crossover. Other tribes 30 miles away come to our brand-new facility. We cannot turn them away either so they think we have better services, they come to our facility, saving their own money and basically using our doctors, and we can only see so many at one time. So it is a problem for urban tribes. Mr. Cole. That is something we really need to look at figuring out what we can do. That is a very unfair burden on your tribe. Ms. McCollum. Ms. McCollum. Representative Cole, you have me thinking of doing more research on how school-aid formulas are put together, and I am looking in Minnesota in particular. But sir, do you know if it is just a state match or if there is property taxes that are levied that are part of the blend for the per-pupil dollars that go towards children in public school? Mr. Small. The state does not provide anything to our tribal school. Ms. McCollum. To your tribal school, but to the public school district? Because Representative Cole has been making, I think, an interesting and a very valid point that at least children in the same state should have an expectation of a level playing field. For example, in Minnesota, it is in the constitution so the state has the responsibility, be there additional property taxes that can be levied so there are disparities even within the state as to how much children are receiving, and I think you are looking to go towards an aggregate. But I am wondering if you know in your state besides what the state puts in towards the state public school, do communities levy property taxes and levy money for bonding? You might not know living where you do, so I do not mean to put you on the spot. Mr. Small. Well, no, they do have local levies that they have for specific, many for construction, but as far as putting extra money into the actual curriculums and those kinds of things, I do not think that is occurring there as far as extra taxes and those kinds of things that go on on the outside. And Public Law 874 I think provides some of that funding to the outside school district for the students that do attend there. Ms. McCollum. Thank you. Mr. Cole. Well, thank you very much, gentlemen, for your testimony. Once again, we are running behind. It is always my fault. But thank you very much for what you had to say. I appreciate it. If we could, we will call our next panel, and I hope I do not mispronounce anybody's name: Mr. Suppah, Ms. Pigsley, Ms. Brigham, Mr. Blythe. Do we have two Ms. Brighams? No, you are just down twice. I guess you get extra time. And Chairwoman Kennedy. Okay. If we could, we will proceed as we did with the last panel. We will just start on our left, your right, and if you would identify yourself and then you have got five minutes, and obviously we try to be generous. I think there is somebody here who is representing two constituents so we will give you a little bit of extra time if you need it. If we can, we will go ahead and get started. ---------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON WITNESS RON SUPPAH, VICE-CHAIRMAN Mr. Suppah. Good morning, Mr. Chairman. I am Ron Suppah, Vice-Chairman for the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon. I thank you for this chance to testify today. We did submit our written testimony, and I will just summarize briefly what the testimony states. I also want to express the Warm Springs Tribes' appreciation for your efforts to maintain the BIA and IHS budgets serving the Indian people. In these times, we thank you for your courage and your dedication. We wish the economic picture could be brighter, Mr. Chairman, because there are still many areas in the BIA and IHS budgets that need attention. Below, I want to set out the Warm Springs tribes' priorities for fiscal year 2012 increases. First, Warm Springs is a timber tribe with approximately 250,000 commercial forest acres, and we ask that the BIA's forestry and forestry project budgets be increased substantially. Since fiscal year 2004, the forestry budget has fallen behind inflation by more than 40 percent. This loss of forest management capacity could be testing the bureau's ability to fulfill its trust responsibilities. Regarding the forest projects budget, we ask that it receive a $5 million increase for reducing the backlog of commercial forest acres in need of forest development treatment throughout Indian forests across the country. The Warm Springs Reservation also must manage for northern spotted owl, spring Chinook salmon and steelhead, all ESA listed species, with inadequate resources. For the owl, we receive less than half of what we received more than 12 years ago. To help the BIA endangered species budget meet its mandates, Warm Springs requests that it be funded at $5 million with $2.3 million of that dedicated to northern spotted owl and marbled murrelet. Warm Springs supports the increases provided for law enforcement in recent years. That has put more law enforcement personnel in tribal communities but they remain unfortunately low paid and personnel turnover is a big problem. Therefore, we are encouraged that portions of the fiscal year 2012 investigations and police services increase and a portion of the detention and corrections fiscal year 2012 request are to help boost tribal base budgets which can help address this low- pay problem. We also support the conservation law enforcement officer initiative. Such personnel are needed on our reservation where they are patrolling our forests and waterways and protecting our natural resources and allow our Warm Springs police to focus on community safety. In education, for fiscal year 2012, we urge that you double Johnson-O'Malley funding to $27 million. Johnson-O'Malley is the only elementary and secondary education support provided by the BIE for the more than 85 percent of Indian children who are in public schools. Its funding has declined to just $13.4 million for fiscal year 2012 and it really should be at least doubled to preserve a semblance of BIE commitment to those Indian public school students. In the Indian Health Service, Warm Springs requests you round up the $89.6 million increase for Contract Health Services to a full $100 million to simply underscore your commitment to addressing the $1 million backlog in deferred services. In the Northwest, where there is no IHS hospital, Contract Health Service remains a critical issue. Also in IHS, we request that $50 million be added to contract support costs, specifically for new contracts, and that those funds be used for that purpose. Today, IHS directs all contract support funds to existing contracts, basically shutting out any new contracts. Simply equity demands that we change. Finally, we ask that the subcommittee check to make sure the IHS northwest regional office's distribution of discretionary funds fairly and fully includes the direct service tribes. It seems altogether too often that those funds go to self-governance tribes, and direct service tribes just want to make sure we are treated fairly. That concludes my testimony, and I would like to thank the subcommittee for its time and attention. [The statement of Ron Suppah follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.020 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.021 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.022 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.023 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. If we could, we will move along. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION WITNESS N. KATHRYN BRIGHAM, SECRETARY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES Ms. Brigham. Good morning. My name is Kathryn Brigham. I go by Kat Brigham. I am a member of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. I am also the elected official for the tribe and serve as the board of trustees' secretary, and I am here today on behalf of the tribe supporting the Indian Health Service to approve the administrative IHS budget in the amount of $4.6 billion, which includes much-needed increases in the Contract Health Service of $89.6 million, catastrophic health emergency funds, $10 million, and contract support of $63.3 million. The other thing we support is the BIA public safety adding $30 million to the tribal courts for public defenders and related extension costs and BIA rights protection, restoring the 2,101,000 elimination of litigation support attorney fees. We appreciate you guys stepping up for the fiscal year 2011 and 2012 and we are hoping, we know this is tough times and we are hoping that in these tough times you are able to step up again to help us in this funding crisis. I was really pleased to hear, you know, you have accepted the trust responsibility to the tribes and the obligations that you have. We signed treaties. The Federal Government has a trust responsibility to the tribes and we are continuing to ask that the Federal Government live up to that trust responsibility in seeking the funding that we have been asking for for some time. I think we have made substantial improvements through the gaming but we also need assistance as well. Our Contract Health Service is establishing priorities and saying yes or no, you can have contract health, and this is early in the year, I mean, so this is something that we all have to face. And I just also want to add, you know, you brought up education. Our tribe has a charter school that was developed. This is our seventh year. That charter school has been supported by the Pendleton School District, and with that charter school, we are able to--we have increased our graduation rates. It used to be down to 40 percent. Now we are up to almost 97 percent. Mr. Cole. Wow. Ms. Brigham. So it is a substantial increase, and while these students are not only learning, they are learning their grades, keeping their grades up, but they are also learning their language, culture and history, so we are really pleased with our charter school but we want to increase that as well. We are looking for a building too because right now it is in one of our old buildings that, you know, we vacated and so they are in there. I think also we have real concerns with the enforcement. We are really glad with the law enforcement act that was passed but we also need to have the trained judges and the training that is needed to implement the law enforcement act. I guess, again, you know, I thank you for this opportunity and I support everything that was basically said this morning. I think it is something that is needed. Do you want me to go on to CRITFC? [The statement of N. Kathryn Brigham follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.024 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.025 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.026 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.027 Mr. Cole. Sure. ---------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. COLUMBIA RIVER INTER-TRIBAL FISH COMMISSION WITNESS N. KATHRYN BRIGHAM, SECRETARY Ms. Brigham. Again, this time I am the Secretary of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, a commission that has been formed since 1977, and this is an organization to provide technical assistance to the four member tribes: the Yakima Nation of Washington, Warm Springs and Umatilla of Oregon and Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho, and so we coordinate our actions through this body in providing technical assistance to the four tribes, and we are known as CRITFC. You know, our base budget is through the BIA rights protection implementation account. Our programs are carried out pursuant to the Indian Self-Determination and Assistance Act. We conduct comprehensive treaty rights implementation programs and attempt to remain compliant with court orders such as U.S. v. Oregon, regional intergovernmental agreements such as the accord that was signed with the federal agencies, and the Pacific salmon treaty, an international treaty. Together, the tribes' managers and co-managers, we are about the size of Georgia in the area in which they cover. We also have taken a lead in ecosystem management. We are looking at watershed to watershed. We are looking at water quality, and we are also working with five states plus the federal agencies and some private individuals in trying to develop a coordinated, collaborative approach in addressing the salmon restoration. Our principals in the region are first to halt the decline of the salmon, and I wanted to show you this graph, and this graph is important to us simply because it shows this is what has been happening under the federal and state leadership. When the tribes start taking leadership, we started seeing a trend of increases. We went down here and went back up here. Twenty ten is up here, 2011 is even going to be higher for our fall Chinook, and this also shows the trends that we have done with natural stocks, with ESA stocks, and so we are working on those and we have also been working--and I want to give this to you and I also want to let you know that, you know, I know Congressman Norm Dicks and I have got into it over tribal science, but I wanted to assure him---- Mr. Dicks. We will always work together. Ms. Brigham. Yes, we will. I wanted to assure you, and I am sorry Mr. Simpson is gone but we have been working with the University of Idaho in trying to develop a really rigorous science approach on how to address genetics and rebuilding of our naturally spawning fish so we are working hard, and I think we have a good approach because one of our goals is to protect our first foods, which is in the Pacific Northwest, and each of us have our first foods. I think with tribal leadership it shows that we are making positive steps to rebuilding stocks, and I can remember when we did not have any salmon to harvest and now our fishermen are glad that they are fishing. Specifically, at a minimum, I would like to recommend that we restore the entire rights protection implementation account to its 2010 level of $30,471,000. This is to meet our current needs, and we also request $7,712,000 for the Columbia River Fisheries Management, $3 million over the President's budget request. We also request a restored level of $4,800,000 to the U.S. Pacific salmon treaty, which is $694,000 above the President's request, and this is to implement the U.S.-Canada treaty that we have signed. We have what we call a triple crown in the Pacific Northwest, which is the U.S.-Canada treaty, which is a 10-year agreement that we signed in 2008. We have the accords that three of the CRITFC tribes have signed which is a 10-year agreement that was signed in 2008, and then we also have the U.S. v. Oregon management plan, which is a court- ordered plan that is a 10-year agreement that we also signed in 2008, and we will be celebrating the accords on May 26th, I think it is, so this month, and looking at the progress that we have made in signing the accords to help us, you know, rebuild some of the natural stocks because one of the things that we have seen is that, you know, ESA is out there but at the same time, there are other stocks out there as well, and for this reason, I would also--and I know, again, Congressman Norm and I do not necessarily agree but I think the mass marking issue needs to be revisited because those stocks that are on the chart that show higher, some of those stocks, and I can give examples where the Imnaha tributary, we are killing 600 stock fish that are coming back to the tributary, and the only way they can tell them apart is because they are mass marked. So we think we should be looking at that to determine, you know, how we can help rebuild our naturally spawning fish. That is all. Thank you. [The statement of N. Kathryn Brigham follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.028 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.029 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.030 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.031 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. Larry, we will go to you next. ---------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. INTERTRIBAL TIMBER COUNCIL WITNESS C. LARRY BLYTHE, BOARD MEMBER Mr. Blythe. Good morning, Mr. Chairman, members of the committee. I am Larry Blythe. I am the Vice Chief for the Eastern Band of Cherokees in North Carolina. I am here today as a board member for the Intertribal Timber Council, or ITC, to testify on its behalf. Intertribal Timber Council is a consortium of about 70 timber-owning tribes across America, and we of course advocate for forest management practices. We advocate for funding for tribes wherever they are located. We control about 10 million acres of property. Mr. Chairman, the ITC wants to thank you for protecting Indian programs. These are difficult times including for those of us in the forestry business, and your support is really appreciated. As timber tribes, keeping our forest healthy and productive is essential. We rely on our forests for physical and spiritual sustenance and for governmental revenues and community jobs. To help sustain our forests and our local economies, the ITC is developing a concept we call anchor forests. An anchor forest is a large tract of forestland that is dedicated to being maintained as healthy and productive. This must include related infrastructure such as sawmills, and the community and its workforce, which provide the capacity and resources necessary to actively manage and preserve the forest. As sawmills go away, the forest markets and communities wither, and the forest itself can subside into a poorly managed or unmanaged state vulnerable to fire and infestation and disease. As timber tribes wedding to our forest homelands, we cannot allow this to occur. Our reservation forest operations and communities should be viewed as anchor forests. They need to be sustained. To that end, we ask the subcommittee to direct the BIA and Forest Service to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of anchor forests in Indian Country, to examine their role, what is needed to preserve tribal forests and their related economies and how those needs might be addressed. We would also ask that agencies be directed to work with the Intertribal Timber Council and timber tribes on such an evaluation. Mr. Chairman, in conjunction with a study of anchor forests, the Intertribal Timber Council urges the subcommittee to consider a range of forestry-related program increases. We recognize this is a difficult environment but Indian forestry has historically been underfunded. Much of what we request is simply urging the tribal forestry-related programs be funded at something close to or at least closer to similar budgets in other federal agencies. For the BIA forestry program, we support the $1 million increase for tribal priority allocation and urge that the increase be a total of $5 million. For years, independent reports have documented Indian per-acre forestry funding at about half of that for the Forest Service, and more recently, BIA TPA forestry funding has lagged further and further behind other federal forest management agencies. It is even worse for BIA forestry projects, which has been an outright decline for seven years. To correct this disparity, the ITC requests an increase of $8 million, $5 million of which is to reduce the 800,000-acre backlog in commercial forests in need of replanting and thinning. For BIA endangered species, ITC requests a total of $5 million based on the same per-acre funding as the Bureau of Land Management. The same goes for cooperative landscape management where BIA's total funding for 52 million acres of Indian trust land is a mere $200,000. To be treated as an equal among the Interior Department's other agencies, the BIA should receive at least $17.5 million. Mr. Chairman, we support BIA's new and needed conservation law enforcement officer program. It will help protect tribal trust natural resources and ease the burden on regular tribal law enforcement personnel. Finally, for the Department of Interior wild land fire management, the ITC asks that Interior and Forest Service wild land fire funding and accounting be standardized. We also ask that $44.6 million be restored to Interior hazards fuel reduction. Limiting fuels funding to the wild land-urban interface endangers the lives of our people who live all throughout the lands and abandons the trust responsibility to protect our forest assets. Lastly, we ask that $6.8 million be restored to Interior burned area rehabilitation. Again, the United States must abide by its fiduciary obligation to care for our forest resources including stabilizing and restoring burned-over acres. Mr. Chairman, that concludes my remarks. Thank you. [The statement of C. Larry Blythe follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.032 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.033 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.034 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.035 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. SILETZ TRIBE WITNESS DELORES PIGSLEY, CHAIRMAN, TRIBAL COUNCIL Ms. Pigsley. Good morning. My name is Delores Pigsley, and I welcome the opportunity to be here today and to provide testimony. I am the Chairman of the Confederated Tribes, the Siletz Indians, and I have served over 32 years on the tribal council and 26 of those years as the tribal chairman. We are a small tribe on the Oregon coast. I have testified previously before this committee and many committees in the past and know that you listen and act accordingly. The tribe understands the whole Nation is going through a tough economic time, and so are we. However, even in good times, we are sorely underfunded in critical areas. We are a self-governance tribe and have the ability to move funds around when it is necessary to cover priority services. We use grants from government, tribal resources and private organizations to help us cover necessary programs. It is the only way we can maintain our services. The Bureau of Indian Affairs has never been adequately funded to cover the costs of programs nor allow enough money under contract support costs. For tribal court, our tribal court budget is $235,000. Of this amount, only $21,000 comes from BIA funds. Other funds must be used to fully fund the court including Department of Interior, Department of Justice and tribal resources. The fiscal year 2012 request is for a $1.2 million reduction from the $24.7 million that was appropriated last year. Education is a very high priority. Every year we see large growth in the number of students applying for funds for adult education, adult vocational training and higher education. We recognize the problem is a good one for us. We have more students in college and adult programs than ever before in our history. However, our funding for higher education is at the same level it was at in 1995. For the years 2004 to 2010, that six years, the tribe received $665,000 for AVT, and the actual cost was $1.1 million. That is a $454,000 shortfall. And for higher education for the same period, the tribe received BIA funds of $827,000. Our actual cost was $5.1 million, and that is a shortfall of $4.3 million. Education is our highest priority. For 2012, the BIA is requesting $32 million, a $1.8 million reduction, and this is unacceptable to us and it is insulting to see such a reduction where within this area we have the greatest need. Charter schools were mentioned. We have a charter school in Siletz, and it was necessary because the state was closing the school. We had a 75 percent dropout rate, and it was necessary for the tribe to get involved and keep the school in Siletz, and today we fund that school along with state funds. Our commitment is about a quarter of a million dollars a year. Funding for boarding schools such as Chimowa Indian School is totally inadequate. Boarding schools are criticized for the level of education that students receive, and if additional funds were provided for these students, they could reach the same potential that we recognize in our students who attend public and private schools, and I urge that someone take the time to review this situation, perhaps visit Chimowa Indian boarding school in Salem, Oregon. Contract support costs have been mentioned many times. Without adequate contract support fund costs, the promise of the 1975 Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to allow tribes to contract and compact to administer programs formerly administered by federal agencies such as Bureau of Indian Affairs goes unfulfilled. Tribes have increased the quality and level of service to our tribal members under self- governance yet tribes are left to fill the shortfall by having to reduce services. A good example is our Indian child welfare program where positions cannot be filled because of inadequate funds. Workers currently carry workloads two and three times higher than that in state programs. Failure to adequately fund contract support costs defeats the program's very purpose to improve services and the lives of our members. Tribes go to extraordinary lengths to pool together resources to meet priority needs for our members, often at the expense of foregoing or reducing other services. I hope that you are convinced by our written testimony that increases to these and other programs are essential for tribes to create safe, healthy and functioning communities, and I thank you for allowing me to share these recommendations. [The statement of Delores Pigsley follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.036 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.037 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.038 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.039 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much for your testimony. Chairwoman Kennedy. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF GRAND RONDE WITNESS CHERYLE A. KENNEDY, CHAIRWOMAN Ms. Kennedy. Good morning to you, Chairman Simpson, Congressman Cole, Congressman Moran, Congresswoman McCollum and Congressman Dicks. My name is Cheryle Kennedy. I am the Chairwoman of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde in Oregon. Mr. Simpson, it has been a pleasure to have worked with a number of your tribes from the great State of Idaho. I served as executive director of the Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board, representing 43 tribes in Oregon, Washington and Idaho. I am also honored to serve on the Secretary Sebelius's Secretary Tribal Advisory Committee, called the STAC. This is the first tribal advisory committee established to advise the Secretary in the history of the Department of the Health and Human Services. I want to thank the subcommittee for meeting with Native American tribes who have the unique relationship with the United States. I want to thank you for your leadership that you have taken in addressing concerns and problems of Native Americans across the United States. My testimony is also shaped as far as the 30-year health career that I had as a health administrator for a number of tribes. I also come from a tribe that was terminated for nearly 30 years, seeing those effects and suffering those injustices. Many of them still remain today and we lag far behind other tribes of the United States. I want to specifically talk about some of the things that have already been addressed so I will take a departure from the written comments, but those things are on Contract Health Service. As you have heard many tribes mention here today, being in an area where we have no hospitals, it is a great extra burden on us. We are dependent Contract Health Service dollars for all of our hospital care that we receive. The Indian Health Service does have a formula whereby CHS funds are distributed. We believe it is an unfair formula. There is not enough weight given to the areas that do not have hospitals and we would like to see that there be another look in another committee that is formed to address these important issues. Contract support costs are also very important for tribes. They are what supports strong governments, and if you do not have dollars to support your strong governments, you have one of two decisions that you make. One is that you take those funds to support your government out of the program costs, so when we talk about Indian Health Service and Bureau of Indian Affairs, which are so greatly underfunded anyhow for programs, our choice and the only choice we have is to take from those costs and to support the governmental needs that we do have, not a very good choice at all but a choice that is forced upon us because of the insufficient funds that are there. I want to also mention that Dr. Roubideaux, who is the Indian Health Service Director, conducted listening sessions with tribes and she talked about many of the disparities that are existing in health care. One of the programs that she set up was the Contract Health Service's formula, and we discussed last year in this listening session the problems that are associated, particularly for dependent area tribes, and we want to come straightforward with some recommendations that were developed under that work group. One is that the alternate resources, Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance and changes under health reform when making CHS distribution. Two is for the contract support services dependency. Three, the use of actual medical inflation when allocating CHS funds. Four is the unique circumstances of CHS dependent areas that must be addressed by IHS and Congress. Otherwise these systems will continue to be plagued with chronic underfunding and may not be able to capitalize on health care coverage expansions that will come with health reform. And five, to address the lack of access to the Catastrophic Health Emergency Fund, or CHEF. Congress should consider establishing an intermediate risk pool for CHS dependent areas. In sum, the work group formula does not meet the test of fairness in the way it was developed or the results it produced. Grand Ronde along with the Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board is ready to work on developing this new area. In addition, again, to the CHS formulas, I strongly support the IHS budget formulation work group request for a $118 million increase to be provided for Contract Health Services. Considering the estimated CHS program needs exceed $1 billion---- Mr. Cole. If we could, we are about out of time, so if we could---- Ms. Kennedy. I will. Thank you so much. The other thing, I will move on to a couple of other areas. I want to especially say that there is great underfunding in the infrastructure for all tribes, that we want the Congress to work with us so that funds are directly distributed to tribes rather than going through the middleman, which is the states, often that is a very cumbersome policy, and that public safety services need to be provided to a much greater degree for tribes. Again, thank you for this time to present this testimony and for your willingness to listen. [The statement of Cheryle A. Kennedy follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.040 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.041 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.042 Mr. Cole. Thank you very much. I am going to forego my time. With Mr. Simpson's and Mr. Moran's permission, Mr. Dicks obviously is our former chairman and the ranking member of the entire committee, I know his time is always limited so it is great to have you here, Mr. Chairman, and I wanted to recognize you first. Mr. Dicks. Well, I just wanted to respond to the questions about the Columbia River and why we have moved towards mass marking in selective fisheries, and that is because we want to protect wild salmon, and one of the things I want to compliment the tribes on is their supplementation programs where you take wild fish and use them as brood stock so that the hatchery fish are as close to wild as possible. In California, they did not mark their fish and now they do not have a fishery because they are shut down under the Endangered Species Act. I just completely disagree with your conclusion that somehow not marking these fish is a better way to go. It simply is not, and the scientists say all of the habitat work that we do is enhanced if you lower the stray rates and you have to be able to identify the hatchery fish and the wild fish in order to do that. So I hope you can get some science. When you do, please bring it to my office and we will talk about it. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Ms. Brigham. Can I respond? Mr. Cole. Absolutely. Ms. Brigham. You know, Congressman Norm Dicks and I have disagreed on this for quite some time. We have partnered up with the University of Idaho and we are looking at the genetics of how we can identify, you know, natural stocks, and we are really glad, you know, because this is another graph that shows some of the work that the tribes have done since we started getting into re building naturally spawning fish, and our numbers have gone up, but also, you know, if---- Mr. Dicks. How do you know? Ms. Brigham. Look at the graph. I mean, our graph shows we have got positive numbers. Mr. Dicks. If the fish were marked, then you would definitely know they were wild fish. You cannot tell unless you do extensive DNA analysis whether they are wild or hatchery fish. Ms. Brigham. I have asked scientists, a number of them, can you tell me if it is a hatchery fish or a natural fish if it was not mass marked, and the answer is no. I mean, they cannot tell the difference. Mr. Dicks. They can with DNA analysis. They can tell that. Ms. Brigham. With DNA, you can tell that those supplement fish are coming back. Mr. Dicks. But we do not ask you to mark the supplemented fish because we want you to encourage supplementation of wild stocks. Ms. Brigham. We are just asking that this be reviewed, I mean, simply because we are taking--I mean, one of the Imnaha, we had 1,000 fish coming back to Imnaha. We had to take 600 of those fish out and destroy them, and they came from the supplementation that you are telling us was a success, and we had to destroy them because they were mass marked. Mr. Dicks. That is not true. The Nisqually Indians got 11,000 fish back to the hatchery. They gave them to the local food banks for hungry people and hungry tribal members. You do not have to do away with the fish. The fish are perfectly good. You can use them for a socially important purpose, and I will be glad to help you on that if you need help. Ms. Brigham. Okay. I used the wrong word. By destroying, I mean you are not putting it back into the system, and that is exactly what happened is, they got put into different areas, you know, so people could use them, so they were not buried or anything like that, but they were put to human consumption use but they could have been put back into the tributaries to help rebuild those naturally spawning fish. Mr. Dicks. Well, if you have a hatchery, you take a certain amount of the fish that you have caught and you take the eggs and the sperm and put it in the hatchery and then you use that for the next year's run of fish. I mean, this is not rocket science. Ms. Brigham. We are having a future salmon conference on June 1st and 2nd in Portland. We would like to invite all of you to come or send some staff people to come to this meeting in Portland, Oregon, and we are going to talk about some of these things that Congressman Dicks and I are talking about. Mr. Cole. I would just say, speaking as a member of a Plains tribe, you might want to think about buffalo. It is a lot easier to keep track of them. With that, let me move to Mr. Simpson. Mr. Simpson. The only problem with buffalo is, you do not know if they were raised in a pasture that is fenced or in the wild. Mr. Dicks. That is right. Mr. Cole. It does not take long to figure out which they are. Mr. Simpson. Well, you know, I always love these discussions. If I have a look at the DNA of a fish to know whether it is something, I question what the difference is, to some degree, but we do mark hatchery fish. Mr. Dicks. We do, and it is the right thing to do. Mr. Simpson. Yeah, they got blunt noses from hitting up against the cement. Mr. Dicks. Mr. Chairman, it is the right thing to do. Mr. Simpson. Never mind. Since I was not here for the testimony, I do not really have any questions except to say that obviously your testimony is important about what we are going to do as we put together the 2012 appropriations bill, and we look forward to working with you as we do that, and since the subject came up earlier, and it has absolutely nothing to do with this, but since the subject came up in an earlier panel, I just wanted to bring this down for Mr. Cole. Mr. Cole. I will put this--just so you know, Mr. Simpson in the spirit of being such a good sport, as you know, we lost to them five years ago. He once brought me a pen with the school colors, and I thought that was very nice. He said just press it, and I did, and it immediately played the last 90 seconds of the game so I would not forget it ever. So this will be right with my pen, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Dicks. Has he shown you his Statue of Liberty play? Mr. Cole. I believe I have seen enough Statues of Liberty out of Boise State. Mr. Moran, I am sorry I have lost control of this meeting but you are next. Mr. Moran. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman. I was just thinking, you know, I live in an urban metropolitan area right here in Washington, DC. Boise State-Nevada, we know those are two darn good teams so we watch them for our entertainment. We do not care that much who wins as long as it is well-fought, but they have established themselves, particularly Boise State, over the years, and so we turn on, we put our attention to things when we know what they stand for. They stand for good football, sportsmanship, whatever. And likewise, we have no salmon in northern Virginia but we eat a whole lot of it. We consume an enormous amount of salmon because it is frankly the healthiest fish there is. But we buy from people and restaurants where we know what they stand for, and my concern is that if salmon are adulterated, if we cannot trust whether they are farm-raised or wild salmon--and obviously there is a premium. If you go into any one of these stores, Whole Foods, you know, Trader Joe's, wherever you go, you will find a discriminating buyer looking for the wild salmon because they know there is more protein there, it is healthier, et cetera, et cetera, and they pay an enormous premium. It is like two, three times what they paid for the farm raised. And my concern is if it is adulterated--if we cannot really tell the difference between one or the other then certainly the value of the wild goes down and there are bound to be articles questioning whether they are really wild salmon. You can be sure that the paper is going to jump all over it if we cannot prove it. And in fact the attraction of buying salmon generally goes down. That has an adverse affect on everyone. So I have been thinking about this. I--at first when Mr. Dicks--we are going to tag, mark all the salmon. You are going to what? That is the most bizarre thing. But actually the more I look into it, it does not strike me as very bizarre because you have got to maintain the integrity of wild salmon because it has an enormous value. And it needs to be what you say it is. And so just a random comment from somebody and I may be the only one who does not have any salmon in my district, but you are not going to be raising as many salmon and you are certainly not going to be getting the revenue unless my constituents continue consuming it and being willing to pay very high prices for the best wild salmon. So with that, that is all I have to say, Mr. Chairman. Thanks for having the hearing. Ms. Brigham. Can I share? Mr. Moran. Certainly. Ms. Brigham. We have this exact--exact what you're talking about exactly happened to the Umatilla Tribe. In the Umatilla River, we lost our salmon for 75 years. In the Walla Walla Basin we lost our salmon for 100 years. This is a graph of the work that we have done and we are actually co-managing with the State of Washington or Oregon on how to rebuild naturally spawning fish in the Umatilla River. And we have been successful. We are actually retaining annually over 3,000 fish into the Umatilla River that we are harvesting at a 50/50 allocation. Last year was the first time in 100 years that the Umatilla Tribe opened the season in the Walla Walla Basin and we are hoping, I mean, we are hoping this year numbers are going to show up so that we can have another season. And if we are taking the same approach we are taking we are seeing hatcheries or nurseries and helping us rebuild our naturally spawning fish so that they can be spawning naturally into the system and rebuild and continue to come back. Mr. Moran. That is all good. Ms. Brigham. Yes. Mr. Moran. That is all well and good, but when you showed us the last chart and it was wonderful that it was going up in a very positive incline, but it does not distinguish between farm raised and hatchery raised or wild salmon. Ms. Richardson. Okay. Mr. Moran. And thus distinguish between the value of each, nor did the first chart. I mean, the--even though it is a smaller share, I suspect that the wild salmon bring in almost as much revenue as the much greater share of farm raised. But for example, this is a small--the natural versus farm. The natural is as pretty much at a plateau, but farm I understand is going way up. But these natural salmon may be brining in almost as much revenue as the farm. It is another supply and demand. Now, I do not want to get into an argumentative situation. I am just giving you the perspective somebody that you know provides the revenue for a lot of this, but you know has a very different perspective than those of you who have salmon in your wonderful river systems. So I will not be argumentative as they say and I have said it again I--you know these things I am just learning and a lot of you, you all know much more than I. I just thought I would share that perspective that is all. Ms. Brigham. Okay. Just for clarification on the Columbia River we do not have farm fish. It is hatchery fish. There is a real difference. There is. Mr. Cole. I think I know why they call you Cat. This is kind of a cat fight here. Anyway, Ms. McCollum. Ms. McCollum. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank St. Catherine's football team. My college alumni is undefeated. That is because we do not have one. So I will put my team up against--you know. The issues of economic livelihood--we heard about and I would like to kind of shift this just a little bit. We heard from some tribes in the Dakotas about buffalo and slaughter and access and small business support and doing things with the buffalo with the way that they are slaughtered and a way that speaks to tribal customs, usage, the spirituality, the connection of giving thanks for the buffalo. In Minnesota we have buffalo, we have wild rice, we have the issue between paddy rice and wild rice which is not even designated. I mean, we do not even have in the agriculture area our tribes' wild rice--anything can be called wild rice. So it is protecting the tribe making economic recovery and jobs off of that and then we have walleye. We have the issue of walleye and tribal rights protecting stock for that to come back in force. So if you could talk about that for just a few minutes the importance of schools, vocational training, and then having the ladder up with working with the business, the economic growth in your tribes. Ms. Pigsley. Our tribe is a timber tribe and as we know in the Northwest, timber tribes are suffering greatly. If it--to be honest with you if it were not for us having a tribal casino and using those revenues, we would be in serious trouble with all of our programs, our education program and everything that we have. We cut 2.5 million board feet of timber a year and that does supply the tribe with some income, but it is not anywhere near what the revenue we get back from our casino operation. And that is how we fund--that is what we use to supplement the education program. And I mentioned in our testimony it is a good problem to have knowing that in 1995 I think we had 35 or 40 students in college and today we have 195 students in college. But we are paying the price for that by as a self-governance tribe we can move funds around, but there is not--we do not even--what we paid just in higher education from our own resources is more than the money that we get from the Bureau of Indian Affairs for all the programs. And so because education and because we were a determinate tribe and education is such a high priority we--I mentioned we began a charter school. It was a great school and it was because the school district was closing the school and they were going to bus kids from Siletz to you know 10 miles away. And when they did that with our high school students we saw a 75 percent dropout rate. When they got to high school they just did not go to school because of the bussing and because you could not play in sports and you could not do all the other extra-curricular activities. And so we decided we were going to keep the school in Siletz and fund it and we funded it out of timber--or out of gaming revenues to keep those kids in Siletz. And we have seen an extra-ordinary good result in students achieving, graduating, and in meeting the state requirements for whatever level of education and attend--school attendance. So termination was devastating for the tribe. Restoration was extremely--an extremely happy time for the tribe, but we have never been able--and I think Cheryle mentioned it. We have never been able to catch up with those needs that we see. Mr. Blythe. Mr. Chairman, just back to some of my testimony. When we talk about gaming tribes and some of us are very fortunate with locations that we are in and metropolitan areas, major corridors, some tribes are not. And so we have to look at the resource that they have to be able to work with. And we have to keep Congress and those people that provide funding and the managers that do the work are cognizant that this is truly a trust responsibility. And whether you have a casino on your property or not, that is what makes you the unique people you are, that land base and protecting that land base, enhancing that land base. And at any opportunity for employment I am sure that we can all say that you know if we can put a mill back in business with good sustainable forestry practices then if it is 50 jobs that is real, that is real to a lot of communities and economies. So you know our--the testimony from the Inter-Tribal Timber Council is please look at what we need in those areas whether it is Navaho or Warm Springs or Yakama, or Menominee to enhance and to grow those businesses that are going to enhance and grow the spin off. That is when you know a lot of people at home we have a great casino. A lot of our people at home do not like that type of work. They want to be outdoors doing with their hands as they have always done and getting that sense of satisfaction. So you know if we put people in the woods thinning and planting and growing the future then they have a legacy, their children have a legacy and it builds on and continues to build. So you know now it is a lot of philosophy I guess, but it is real. It is real to our people that live and work and maintain our lives every day. And you know whether it is fire suppression dollars or whether it is forest development dollars or whether it is mil enhancement dollars that is what we need. The casinos hopefully will be here forever. We do supplement a lot of our programs as some of the committee here is aware, but we still have those folks and we still have that need. We are a high tourist destination with needs of insect disease control, fire suppression as many of the other tribes across America are. So---- Ms. Kennedy. I would like to provide a comment also. With the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Tour stating we were terminating it, everything was taken away from us. We had no land base. Everything that we got we have to buy back. And so we do have some timber--not very much, but we do depend upon that. We have a casino that has been, you know I say it is divine justice, but it too had its great downturn during this economic time and we had to cut our budgets by over $2 million for our government services. We provide all of our health care, education as many of the tribes of the northwest have, but we did hire an economic developer. We are probably one of the biggest employers. We employ about 1,500 people for our casino and our motto was to keep them at all costs, not to lay off and we did not lay off any during this economic down times. We-- with our economic development we are looking at all kinds of businesses, but we do have some real estate property that provides some jobs. Also an economic boost we have looked at the medical industry to start working in that area. The Siletz Tribe and us have a partnership for developing a property there in Salem by the Chemawa School so we are looking at any kind of stimulus that can be added to us. We are good partners as well as very wise and astute in building businesses. So we see that the future is bright and we certainly look forward to any help that we can get along the way and education is of course as you hear from all tribes. You know I get amazed sometimes we want to build institutions to incarcerate our youth and I--and I, too shake my head at that thinking that these are children, they need to be taught. They need education. There are some that need perhaps that stronger hand, but I really--I am a believer in education. Mr. Cole. I want to bring us to close because we are running way behind schedule and I am going to turn the meeting back over to my chairman. I have a meeting upstairs, but I want to note I am leaving with my Boise State helmet, my tail between my legs and--but I will be planning a rematch for the national title game this year because we are going to be very, very good, Mr. Chairman. But anyway. Mr. Simpson. Thank you very much. Mr. Cole. Thank you. Turn it over and call the next panel. Mr. Simpson [presiding]. Thanks, Tom. The next panel, Joseph Pavel, Lawrence LaPointe, Billy Frank, Jr., and Ray Peters. Jim, thanks for having such an interest in wild salmon versus hatchery salmon. Mr. Moran. I try to learn. Mr. Dicks. You know, no I--well it is interesting that what you saw here was a little bit about the debate that has been going on for about 40 years that things would go on top of that. I mean, it is not to say how much of it is land use, water usury, storm water, having all of the--and then you add all of the--yeah and all for your hands--in blocking the--at Manchester, Washington we took the last of the sock-eye salmon from Red Fish Lake in Idaho and did a captive breeding program and restored that run and it is amazing. You know things--the farm fish are in pens and they feed them just---- Mr. Simpson. It is like the difference between the free range chicken and---- Mr. Moran. There is a difference between wild fish and hatchery fish. But you can keep them very close if you take the wild fish and use them as brood stock in the hatcheries. So the farm fish---- Mr. Simpson. Is that right, Billy? Mr. Frank. That is right. Thank you. We got them coming back 22,000. That is right and 11,000. Mr. Simpson. Who is first? Who wants to go first? Mr. Frank. I will. Mr. Simpson. Go ahead. ---------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. SKOKOMISH TRIBAL NATION WITNESS JOSEPH PAVEL, VICE CHAIRMAN Mr. Pavel. All right, thank you, Mr. Chairman, Representatives of the committee. It is my pleasure to be here. I am Joseph Pavel, Vice Chairman of the Skokomish Tribe in the Pacific Northwest. I was here last year and appreciate all the support and funding we got. I would just like to make one note to the written testimony you received. On the second page it says we received a 40,000 increase in our law enforcement base funding. I would just like to remind the committee that we never had any law enforcement funding in our base. This was law enforcement funding put into our base. As a 638 Tribe, the Skokomish Tribe never did have an enforcement program well as a PL874, that is seated our jurisdiction to the State so as through self-governance we have been able to out of that base direct money toward law enforcement. So we have built up program on Cauble together over the years so this 40,000 increase to our funding for law enforcement is a first and really appreciate that entirely--a lot. I am sorry. I would just like to emphasize that and we also got a onetime funding for a probation officer and that was a great boon to our program. Our court system, we utilize an Inter-Tribal, a traveling court system: Northwest Indian Court system that provides our court and prosecutorial services. And as such without a probation officer or somebody to do administrative work within our local area every time an offender or violator--they had to go to the bench and so we had a huge backlog there. So with this probation officer we are able to clear that off. We developed a--was able to implement a community service program. We have always had community service as part of the penalty, but nobody to operate it. So that has been a great resource. I know that I also function as a Natural Resources Director for the Skokomish Tribe. We have been able to use some of those folks. I think it looks good for the community to see these people out there doing things. That helps the operations that we have this available resourcing to be able to put these guys to work and I think it makes them feel a lot better to be able to do that. So we also have used some of that funding to get a youth specialty in our substance abuse treatment programs. That was one of the lacks or gaps that we identified last year is that we need to target youth, of course. I think you will see and hear that unfortunately law enforcement remains our number one priority. Certainly respect and support the Administration's attention and the increases that he has offered up for law enforcement. It is a resource that we need not only just to enforce, you know against violations and criminals and so forth, but in the interest of public safety we have endeavored and strived to work with our law enforcement, our public safety department to think of them--this has got to be a community service. This is another community service. We are a service organization. These are our clients, our members, and so not--we are trying to emphasize that point so that it is important to have these people, these resources, these men, these bodies on the ground to have some continuity so they get to know their community. That is just one of the problems we have had is being able to maintain some continuity of staff, some longevity within staff. We need the resources to keep these people interest and keep them on payroll. Unfortunately I mentioned the probation officer. Hired a great guy, but he is gone. He moved on. I think our neighbors--I think Chehalis Tribe hired him away. And this has been the tribe--as a small tribe I am struggling and certainly not having the great amount of resources to put in our program. We hire people. We train them. They move on. And so it is a constant struggle to maintain some longevity and I think that is a component that we need to emphasize so that we can have some community relationship between our staff, our public safety enforcement staff and the community. That being said I think you will note that we do not say much about education and social service programs in here, but not that it is not a priority, but those are areas that we are able to coddle together other resources. There are funding opportunities out there and we have been very aggressive and worked very hard to get that and meet those particular needs. You have heard from some of the other tribes here with BIA Schools and so forth. We do not have a BIA School on our reservation. We do have a state--a school district with a school right in the middle, in the heart of our reservation on tribal lands. And 35 percent of the students to that are tribal members, so our emphasis is to try to work with those people as efficiently as possible and try to develop that relationship. It has not been good in the past, but that is the goal of the tribal council is to develop that relationship and work with those folks. Our social services programs as I mentioned we have identified the gap with the youth, and the environmental natural resource programs we have heard a lot about that here. I certainly would anticipate that I could support whatever the Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission is going to say there. I would just like to remind you that we are on Hood Canal which is the Jewel of Puget Sound. [The statement of Joseph Pavel follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.043 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.044 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.045 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.046 Mr. Dicks. And it is certainly not a canal. It is a fjord. Right in front of the Olympic Mountains, salt water. Mr. Simpson. Fjord, well that is a foreign word to me. Thank you. Frank, you want to go next, Billy? Mr. Dicks. I will call it that. Mr. Simpson. Well, do not worry. I watched a program last night where Mount Rainier theoretically blows up and when it does, Seattle and the whole region--that would be bad. Mr. Frank. Mr. Chairman. ---------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. NORTHWESTERN INDIAN FISHERIES COMMISSION WITNESSES BILLY FRANK, JR., CHAIRMAN MIKE GRAYEM ED JOHNSTONE Mr. Frank. Mr. Chairman, thank you and honorable members of the subcommittee. I am Billy Frank, Chairman Northwest Indian Fish Commission. It is indeed a pleasure to be here. Northwest Indian Fish Commission is one of our natural resource managers for the tribes, the twenty tribes that we represent and we come back here with one voice. You see all of our tribes in here today. And we try to talk with one voice to the United States Congress. And we have been doing that for the last--now I just had an eightieth birthday, so I have been here for a long time and so with me today I have my executive director Mike Grayem and my treasurer down here Ed Johnstone from Quinault. And so I would like Mike to go through this part of the---- Mr. Grayem. Thank you one and all. I am--Billy has asked me to give you a quick thumbnail sketch of the requests that we are making. Our biggest interest in the Bureau of Indian Affairs Budget is the rights protection implementation account. These are the monies that the government provides the tribes to manage and protect and restore the resources that are vital to the rights that they reserved under treaty with the United States. So our biggest first priority is we want this account to be maintained at at least the fiscal year 2010 enacted levels. In particular the western Washington Fisheries Management Account which is the dollars that come to the tribes in the Northwest that are members of our commission. We have been asking for a number of years for an increase there of 12 million. In fiscal year 2010, you heard that plea and increased the Rights Protection Account as a whole by 12 million of which 3.386 was allocated by the Bureau to Western Washington. Those dollars are greatly appreciated. They have allowed us to maintain some very important programs, but our needs continue to be greater. And so we are asking for an increase of 8.643 which would get that total up to the 12 million that we have been asking for in total to meet the natural resource management needs of our member tribes. This is particularly important right now because the State of Washington's budget is being slashed particularly in the realm of natural resource management. We just met with the governor's staff on Friday and learned in particular where those cuts are coming from and in order for the tribes to protect these resources that are the basis of their treaty right, they are going to have to do more because the State simply cannot do what they have been doing. So that is our first request. We also request that the Washington State Timber Fish and Wildlife line in this Rights Protection Account be maintained at the fiscal year 2010 enacted levels. We are also asking for an increase in the salmon marking line. I do not want to reenergize the debate that occurred here a few moments ago with--but we, the Northwest Tribes have a--well the whole Northwest Fish Hatcher system is the largest in the world between state, tribal, and federal. And under the congressional mandate to mark hatchery production that is funded by federal dollars we are doing that but we--marking is only part of what is required. We have got two problems. We are not--we do not have the resources to continue marking the increased production that is occurring and we need additional money to address the issues that result from marking the fish. And so we are marking the fish for a purpose. One of those purposes is to be able to identify hatchery and wild fish and so you can deal with them separately. Another purpose they are being put to is marked selected fisheries and those require additional funds to do the analysis, do the monitoring, to basically utilize those mass marks. And so that is where our request of additional 1.4 million comes in. And then the last issue under Rights Protection is the U.S. Canada Pacific Salmon Treaty. We support the request that is being made by the Pacific, the United States section of the Pacific Salmon Commission for an increase of 694,000 to this account which supports the Northwest Columbia River and Matlakatla Tribe and Alaska's participation in that treaty and the responsibilities. The last issue on the BIA is the Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Account and particularly the fish hatchery maintenance. We were very pleased with the Administration's increase to this account and we fully support what the Administration has put into the budget. This is a really important account to the tribes to maintain their aging hatchery facilities and will be put to great use. And then lastly EPA--we are generally pleased with what we saw in the budget by the Administration. We want to mention our support for the Tribal General Assistance Program (GAP). That money is used by all the tribes nationwide to support capacity building and partnership with EPA. In addition to that, the President's budget has a new initiative called a Multimedia Tribal Implementation Grant Program. We are very excited about this. It is in the budget for 20 million and we fully support that. We have been working with EPA to try to identify how we move beyond the capacity building and actually implementing this environmental program partnership of EPA and we see this as the funding avenue to allow us to do that. And then lastly but not least is restoring the geographic program and clean of Puget Sound to the 50 million level that was enacted in 2010. This is an extremely important program to everybody in the Northwest to restore Puget Sound, recover salmon, and I do not think I need to say more because Congressman Dicks---- Mr. Dicks. Well, the Chairman has been very helpful on this, too. We are doing our best. It is very difficult. Mr. Johnstone. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I come here as a piece of this delegation. One, as a treasurer of the Northwest Indian Fish Commission and two, as an actual Fisheries Manager for the Quinault Indian Nation of which I am a member. And I just wanted to stress the importance of the Western Washington Bold Account and those funds are really the core of the base funding for all of our Fisheries Programs. It is a very important funding source and it is actually tied to the U.S. v. Washington Case. The judge wrote certain requirements in the decision and to comply with those decisions the Western Washington Account was created by Congress to fulfill those court orders. So as other decisions have come down since then like the Rafeedie Decision, those decisions did not include the funding to execute the rights that were affirmed in those court cases. So our duties and responsibilities went up tremendously and our funding level stayed at 1970's levels. And so this request that you see here is an attempt at us to reflect those duties and responsibilities in the current inflationary costs and so forth that would get us to the basis for being able to just carry on the requirements under those court decisions. Mr. Frank. Mr. Chairman, I just want to thank you for coming and letting us speak today. And we know that it is a difficult time for all of you to be looking at this budget. You know our--we are the Treaty Tribes throughout the Northwest and throughout all of our country, you know and we fought determination as you heard here a little while ago and we finally got everybody back on line. And you know we are just support each other. Thank you. [The statement of Billy Frank, Jr. follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.047 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.048 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.049 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.050 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Next. ---------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. PUYALLUP TRIBE WITNESS LAWRENCE W. LAPOINTE, VICE CHAIRMAN Mr. LaPointe. I am next. Mr. Chairman, thank you for allowing me to speak on behalf of the Tribe of Puyallup. My name is Lawrence LaPoint, Vice Chairman. Puyallup Tribe, we do have an education facility. We represent 4,260 Puyallup Tribal members plus about 25,000 relocated members of other tribes-- 355, almost half of the tribes of the United States. The President's budget increase of 2.4 billion for Indian Programs, operations of Indian Programs is 23.7 million above 2010 levels. Same with 4.6 billion for IHS which is rated 571.4 billion--million and the Puyallup Tribe would like to see that increase looked at as a base funding and start next year. And then if that is possible, I do not know. I mean, there are a lot of things to be looking at. We are one of 20 tribes that received arrow funding to create a correctional facility on our reservation but that is like enabled unfunded mandate as far as we are concerned because we can build a building but where are the funds to operate it? So we are asking Congress to support our request for annual budget of 1.3 million to operate the facility. The natural resources--I do not think I have to reiterate what Billy and the rest of them said from Northwest Indian Fish Commission. It needs to be maintained. Our education--the budget request for 795 million for education is a decrease of 3.8 million from current levels and we have a population 910 students in our school system. And it is slowly growing. You can say location, location, location as far as the casino. We are successful, but I think we are one of the few casinos in the country because we did not take an economic hit like Wolf's--did. And we are able to supplement a lot of programs. But I do not believe there is any tribe in this country that is self-sufficient to the point where we can assume whatever we receive from the federal government to provide services to our membership plus the other natives that are within our service area. So and then we have a school that was--is not complete yet. The Bureau did not provide funding to complete the auditorium which probably now--it was 800,000 at the time and I believe it is about 1.4 million now. And we, you know there was a mention of education for secondary students and we have put approximately 250 tribal members through college and they are working throughout the country. Transportation--we are recommending that the transportation not be changed from the current formula because as Congressman Dicks knows we are a very urban tribe. We do have access to natural resource areas and we need to be able to maintain those access roads with cooperation with the county as well as I think Hancock knows where the fish ladder is. Mr. Dicks. Ron Puyallup. Mr. LaPointe. Ron Puyallup, yeah. I read about boarding. So we are recommending that. And the same with contracts for it. We would like to see that covered 100 percent so that when we get new grants and contracts that we are able to handle them. And then last but not least I guess non-BIA Internal Revenue Service. And we are getting attacked in all different ways from IRS and in regards to--even native made materials that we have to send 1099's to our tribal members and most native created like hand carvings is not taxable. I do not know. Mr. Simpson. That is different. We will look into that. Mr. LaPointe. Thank you. [The statement of Lawrence W. LaPointe follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.051 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.052 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.053 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.054 Mr. Simpson. Our agency. Thank you. ---------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE WITNESS RAY PETERS, INTER-GOVERNMENTAL LIAISON TO THE TRIBAL COUNCIL Mr. Peters. On behalf of the Squaxin Island Tribe leadership and the citizens of the tribe, I am honored to be here to submit our budget request for 2012. Much of the written testimony that I am submitting here is detailed, but really want to talk about a tribal specific program that the Squaxin Island Tribe runs. We are in the lower Puget Sound. We are next to our brothers and sisters of the Skokomish Tribe, but we are on the Sound, not the--what is that word you used? The refora-- -- Mr. Simpson. Fjord. Mr. Peters. Refera. Yes. The Squaxin Island Tribe is the largest employer in Mason County Sixth Congressional District and we run the Northwest Indian Treatment Center that is a regional facility that is very effective and efficiently run. And that base budget was established in a Congressional set aside in 1993, and we are at a point where we in the past have been able to piece together that budget by using State funds, county funds. We are state accredited. We are nationally accredited through CARF, but with the climate in the States some of those funds are going away and our base budget has not been increased since that initial set aside. We are requesting an increase in our base budget of $1 million. It is a program that the tribe has put many resources in as well we have been very effective in our capabilities of third party billing, going after grants, and other outside funding to be able to piece together that budget. But we are in a critical need here to be able to continue the services that we provide and the efficiency is outstanding. Not only do we service the Oregon, Idaho, Washington, but we have tribes seeking out and sending tribal members to us across the nation as far away as Florida. And so that is an area that is at the utmost importance. We have been able to increase the treatment in regards to behavioral health and also psychiatric services as well. Without that increase in funding we will need to start to cut back our services and that would be a shame. That would be an impact on all the tribes of the Northwest, but also as well to the State as well. As I said, all the specifics that the other tribes have talked about that are very important, the budget detail is in the written testimony so I will not take up your time in regards to reviewing most of those things that have already been discussed today. I will say that we fully support affiliated tribes in Northwest Indian's recommendations, Northwest Indian Fish Commission recommendations as well as the National Congress of American Indians, Northwest Indian Health Board, and as well the National Indian Health Board. Thank you for your time and I just want to close by saying Norm, we do take all of our fish as well as Squaxin Island Tribe. It is very important. Our fisheries department and the habitat issues are very important to us as well. Thank you. [The statement of Ray Peters follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.055 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.056 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.057 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.058 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I will turn it over to Norm since this is kind of a Washington delegation. And let me say for all of you that you know that the reason that the budget for BIA and Indian Health Services and the Education Department at the BIA was the increases that have occurred over the last several years have been primarily due to Norm. When he was chairman of this committee he did a fantastic job. While I had differences with my Democratic colleagues on some things, it is one of the areas where I really appreciated the work that he did in working with him and we fortunately have been able to continue that under both Mr. Moran and under myself to--it is very important to all of us, but it started with Norm. Mr. Dicks. Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman for that very kind remark and Tom Cole, who was chairing here, has been a tremendous supporter. And we are faced with some very difficult times coming ahead here in terms of having to make some cuts in the budget. And you know we tried to minimize the damage this year on 2011, but 2012 you know initially is going to be very difficult. Hopefully at the end of the process we can work out compromises and protect some of these most sensitive programs. Who do you apply to? Do you go to the Indian Health Service or the Portland Office for this million? Because you know we cannot do earmarks now. So you know I do not know if I did this earmark. Was it my earmark or was it Senator Murry's or---- Mr. Peters. Set aside, yes. Mr. Dicks. Yeah, so see you are going to have to find a program in the department where you can go and apply for funding and we will try to help you. So that is really going to be the one or if there is an account that we can plus up without specificity because they have to make the decisions then those are the ways we could help you. Mr. Peters. Yeah, and we are hoping--our hope is that the increase that the IHS budget is hopefully going to see that some of those dollars can be directed to the treatment center. And again, we appreciate your help and the influence that you have made---- Mr. Dicks. You are applying though? Mr. Peters. Yes. Mr. Dicks. Do you know when they have their application time frame and all that? Mr. Peters. We are meeting with the director. In fact we had a conflict. The director is actually at Self-Governance Conference right now. And so some of our leadership is there as well. Mr. Dicks. Well, Pete Modaff can help you on this and again we are going to try to do the best we can. I mean, Billy, this is as tough a year as I have seen. Mr. Frank. Oh yeah. Mr. Simpson. So we will just try to work with the Chairman and do the best we can and at the end of the day it I--it will not be as quite as bad. The House is going to make some very serious cuts and we--and but there will be a process. The Senate will go in and then we have conferences and you know we will do our best to protect these sensitive programs. Mr. Frank. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. Appreciate it. Thank you all for being here today. Mr. Frank. Thank you. Mr. Simpson. You bet. Sheri Lee Williams, Fawn Sharp, Brian Patterson, and Ryland Bowechop, and T.J. Greene. Ready? Who wants to start? Would you like to start? Go ahead. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. QUINAULT INDIAN NATION WITNESS FAWN SHARP, PRESIDENT Ms. Sharp. Sure. I will start. Good morning. Chairman, members of the committee. On behalf of the Quinault Indian Nation, my name is Fawn Sharp. I am honored and pleased to be here today. I would like to begin my remarks by lending our support in our written testimony. Many of the issues that have been raised already today by other tribes we would like to draw your attention to both the IHS and BIA are recommendations that we do support before I get into the tribal specific requests. Our first tribal specific request relates to the Blueback Restoration Project. This is a project that the Quinault Nation undertook a number of years ago in terms of planning the Upper Quinault Watershed that had been destroyed at the turn of the century and we have undertaken an effort to start phase one to restore the ecosystem and this is a project that we are extremely proud to take the lead in. We have been working with the residence of the Upper Quinault, State agencies, the counties, and federal agencies, so this is truly an example of governmental entities coming together with nonprofits and private citizenry to restore habitat that will most certainly provide an opportunity for us to bring back the Blueback Sockeye Salmon. It is a prized run that is unique to the Quinault Watershed. So we are very happy to continue with that effort. We are moving into phase II of that project and we are seeking seven million that we will apply toward phase II. And we are pursuing a number of funding sources to reach that goal. But we have invested roughly $150,000 at this point into the basic planning for that project and we will pursue private funding as well as state and federal funding. So we wanted to report our success there and I urge this committee to support our continued efforts as we get into phase II of that project. The second issue that I would like to draw your attention to is the Quinault Nation's Comprehensive Strategic Drug Strategy. I have been here the last three years talking about our drug strategy at the Quinault Nation. This year we have added a unique component to that strategy that relates to national security and this is an issue that I really want to stress to the committee. Over the course of the last year the Tribal Council task me with putting together a comprehensive approach to address an operating budget and strategy to step up enforcement. As I began to work into this issue I realized that the level of need is much greater than I ever imagined. I had reports that a tribal elder was driving from Akai home to Taholah through one of the logging roads and noticed a low flying helicopter out in the middle of a logging road after midnight with--surrounded by cars. And a big spotlight and we know they were not having a picnic out in the middle of the woods on an abandoned logging road. I also receive reports from our crabbing fleet that they notice while crabbing this last year what appeared to be a mother vessel and a small high speed vessel traveling four or five trips at 45 knots an hour. I am not a nautical person, but I am told that 45 knots an hour is quite fast. About two weeks ago our general manager of Quinault Land and Timber Enterprise who has been working in the woods for 30 years was in the northern part of our reservation near lands held by a non-Indian logging company Anderson and Middleton. They own about 11,000 acres to the northern part of our reservation. They noticed a newer model Mercedes Benz, black Mercedes again out in the middle of a logging road where they have no business conducting any activity. And at my last tribal council meeting, I stayed after hours and I was there until about three o'clock in the morning burning the midnight oil and returning from Taholah to Lake Quinault which requires me to travel up to the Moclips Highway, and I noticed a two trailer semi going into the interior part of our reservation off the Moclips Highway at 3:30 in the morning. So again, this is an issue that is absolutely critical to the Nation. The law enforcement that needs and Border Patrol protection needs that we see to effectively combat this problem clearly transcend BIA funding. And we are working with the Director of National Intelligence, Homeland Security, and the military to see what we might be able to do to step up that effort at the Quinault Nation. So with my last 20 seconds, we do have an emergency preparedness request that we have set forth in detail as well as funding related to our forest management plan. But the most critical need that we have realized this last year does relate to drug and security protection issues. We have 27 miles of international border that is not being patrolled today by the Border Patrol Agency. So thank you. [The statement of Fawn Sharp follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.059 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.060 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.061 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.062 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Sheri. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. LUMMI INDIAN BUSINESS COUNCIL WITNESS SHERI LEE WILLIAMS, COUNCILWOMAN Ms. Williams. Yes, good afternoon and I am very honored to be here today. I am a Lummi Nation Tribal Councilwoman. Also, I am the treasurer of the Lummi Commercial Company, and I also attend the Department of Interior Tribal Budgeting on a quarterly basis, and I am with the Department Area Indian Health Board. And so Mr. chairman, I am really honored to be here and present to the distinguished group of committee members today the appropriation priorities for the Lummi Nation for the upcoming 2012 budgets for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Indian Health Services. And bullet points, our specific request of the Bureau of Indian Affairs are--we are requesting for $2 million for Phase I. This is a new water supply system for our fish hatcheries, construction operation, and maintenance. Funding will be directed to increase the hatchery production, and make up for the shortfall we are experiencing in our wild salmon there in the Pacific Northwest. I would like to direct the BIA to work with the Lummi Nation and we can work together and increase our hatchery construction operations and maintenance funding, and direct the Department of Interior to fully fund the Indian Energy and Economic Development Workforce Development Division to continue its job training, development, work that has resulted in jobs. Turning to the Indian Health Service we are requesting funds for a community based aids and HIV rapid testing system. And additionally, I know this is a large amount, but we are getting desperate because we are looking--we think it will take $4 million and that is what we are requesting to combat the drug epidemic not only in the Lummi community but those communities around us. Regional requests, the Lummi Nation is requesting that this committee support the affiliated tribes of the Northwest, Department Area Indian Health Board, the National Indian Health Board and the Northwest Indian Fish Commission. Nationally in the budgeting area the TPA--we are requesting an $82.9 million increase, a general increase. And this is just 10 percent over the 2010 funding level. I would like to reiterate what those before me that sat at this table have said about the contract support costs. We would like to have provided an additional $50 million increase to BIA and $112 million to the Indian Health Service to fully fund the contract support costs including the direct contract support costs and provide $5 million for the Indian Self-Determination Fund. Law enforcement, tribal courts, tribal detention facilities provide $30 million over the 2010 levels that were funded. And education provides $24.3 million to fully restore the Johnson O'Malley Fund. And increase the funding for the Office of Self-Governance to fully fund the staff and support the requests of NTAI and the National Indian Health Board. You know our Lummi Nation is located in the Northwest with 5,200 tribal employees and we have drawn our physical and spiritual sustenance from the marine tidelands. And our fisheries are trying to survive. Because the salmon are gone our fishers are trying to survive on shellfish and that is not good because in 1999 we had 700 licenses fishers who supported nearly 3,000 tribal members and to date we have about 523. So that means that we have lost over 200 small businesses, more families because it takes more than one person to fish on a boat. We have really lost a significant amount of revenue which caused a lot of depression in our community. And so specific requests to the Bureau again I reiterate the $2 million. This is for the water supply system and that is for our hatcheries. $300,000 for the Natural Resources law enforcement, and we have 1,846 square miles of marine area that our enforcement officers have to serve and 9,100 square miles of seeded lands that they serve. And that goes all the way from the U.S. Canadian border all the way to Mount St. Helens and throughout that whole area. We have to protect everything. That is our national resources and there again, I think I have kind of summarized it all, and so thank you very much. [The statement of Sheri Lee Williams follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.063 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.064 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.065 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.066 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Ryland. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. MAKAH TRIBAL COUNCIL WITNESS RYLAND BOWECHOP Mr. Bowechop. First of all, Mr. Chairman, we would like to associate and support the comments submitted by the Portland Area Indian Heath Board Inter-Tribal Timber Council, Northwest Fish Commission, and we would like to touch on three points. The first need for assistance for improvements of our jail. Mr. Modaff has been there. He knows that it is in pretty rough shape. Mr. Dicks. To visit. Mr. Bowechop. I am going to let that one float. Desire to deepen the harbor at Neah Bay for economic development, also to utilize that harbor for oil spill prevention on the coast. Any assistance from the federal government for helping us close the warm-house dump. It is an open landfill that we have been working to close for a number of years now and we are going to do it with your assistance. As I stated, the jail is in pretty bad shape. We understand the moratorium that is in place on earmarks and we are working closely with staff to start filling out grant applications to justice departments, coordinated tribal assistance. And that is going fairly well. We always appreciate the letters of support. We are committed to improving the harbor in Neah Bay to help our economic development efforts. We are interested for example in shipping aggregate materials from our sand and gravel pit for use in regional construction projects. We were unsuccessful in our effort to secure Tiger Grants for waterfront planning and for replacing our dock, but we will continue to press our efforts. We were disturbed to learn that the Administration has proposed to cut in half harbor maintenance in low use harbors as part of its 2012 budget request. In our case we want to deepen our harbor to greatly increase use of our harbor for the good of our community and the economy of our region. The shallow draft in Neah Bay harbor also poses a threat to marine safety. We have rescue tugs stationed in our harbor and other response vessels also called there. When the tide is low these vessels often are difficult in entering and exiting the marina. Makah Tribe has taken aggressive steps to address the serious environmental and health risks posed by the warm-house beach dump, a decades old landfill located on the reservation that was used by the U.S. Department of Defense and other federal agencies to dispose of hazardous waste. The dump is leeching harmful chemicals into a nearby stream which flows into the pristine waters of the Straits of Juan de Fuca, a traditional shell fishing location for the Makah people. Frequent fires at the dump contribute to air pollution in the town of Neah Bay and the reservation community. Closing the dump is the Makah Council's top environmental priority. If any of those chemicals get into the ocean it will not matter if the fish are clipped, unclipped, tagged, or untagged. They will be in bad shape. The tribe has documented that the Air Force which supported radar operations at Behokah's Peak from World War II through 1988 disposed of many hazardous substances at the dump since its opening in the 1970s including asbestos, batteries, pesticides, paints, and waste oil. Other federal agencies also disposed of their waste at the dump. As a result of this legacy of waste disposal on tribal land, the federal government bears substantial responsibility for cleaning up the dump and preventing further exposure of the reservation community to the environment. Makah tribe has taken action to secure federal assistance for closing the dump through negotiations with Defense Department or possibly through the Federal Superfund Program. We have waited many years and tried many avenues to close this dump. We believe that our latest actions are a necessary last resort to protect the health of our citizens. We would appreciate this subcommittee's support of our efforts. My written testimony also discusses other issues including the need to provide adequate contract support costs and the importance of tribal consultation regarding expansion of the Olympic National Park. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee. [The statement of Ryland Bowechop follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.067 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.068 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.069 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.070 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. Brian. ---------- -- -------- Wednesday, May 4, 2011. UNITED SOUTH AND EASTERN TRIBES, INC. WITNESS BRIAN PATTERSON, PRESIDENT Mr. Patterson. I say those words more for my benefit as I sit here with you. It is a greeting for peace, power, and righteousness of a good heart and a good mind as we greet the day. And so I say it for my benefit because we have been here before. I just came from a meeting where I first attended in 1994 and the issues have not changed and the approach has not changed and it is more of the same from Indian Country. At that 1994 meeting Chairman from the Northwest Ron Alan, who I called the Tireless Warrior, was giving a presentation and he was begging and pleading to not cut my TPA monies and it is the same issue today. And so I think it requires a fresh approach from Indian Country to establish our agenda and begin to have those critical conversations to identify the need to advance those leadership to those critical issues. Certainly every issue I have heard in the past today--and I thought Indian folks were tough because we could sit in our council meetings all day and we could sit in ceremonies all day, but you guys I think might have us beat. I think you guys are tough. And so it is---- Mr. Dicks. You should look at H.R. 1. Mr. Patterson. I will tell you. I will tell you. And but it is good to be in front of you. My English name is Brian Patterson. I have served my people for 20 years, Bear Clan Representative Oneidas Nation in New York. Congressman Dicks, I am in your territory now living in the State of Washington, the Northwest. It kind of feels like home, you know, to see this home away from home. We are longhouse people there--longhouse people. So I represent my people as Bear Clan Representative on council for 20 years. I am also President of the United South and Eastern Tribes, 26 federally recognized tribes, Texas to Florida, up to Maine. Certainly we have our issues. Chairman Simpson, I would like to recognize your leadership, the veteran leadership of this committee. Where would Indian Country be if we did not have that leadership in place? But my concern and my thought is Indian Country really needs to demonstrate our capabilities to manage these issues and move them forward. I think as every issue I have heard today is paramount and the key to our survival. Education, health care, natural resource stewardship, the care take and culture heritage, our sovereignty, are our fundamental foundations that Indian Country has identified and advanced the need for countless generations. So they are all priority issues. There is no one greater than the other. For United South and Eastern Tribes our top priority remains a clean legislative of--and I wish to recognize the work you did and the leadership this committee brought forward to push in last year a bipartisan approach to that as well as Congressman Cole's continued push and introduction this year. So we give our--express gratitude to the work the committee is doing to bring a clean resolve to-- that is our top priority. As well as joining the rest of Indian Country in myriad of issues that are priority issues for us. I would like to just take a moment. Last time I sat with you guys--let me wrap on-- has led to historical effort in my opinion--in the work that you did with the rest of Indian Country has put together a letter and I am going to have this resent to your staff so you can take a look at it. Really a historical letter where we have 25 Inter-Tribal organizations putting their signature on this to say this is a priority issue. In my life I have not seen an example of that. But I think so I want to resend that to you and I kind of lost my place. I would much rather have my time in conversation with Indian Country and advancing our priorities, but I would make this point to you is that when we look at issues such as emergency response, those type of issues in my comment to the committee the last time I sat before you was that Indian Country needs to stand for Indian Country. We will find ways to assist and advance Indian Country priorities from within and we have begun that process. As an example, ATNI, Affiliated Tribes Northwest Indians, and USET signed a covenant. In part of that covenant is to address the common areas of priorities. A week and a half ago we had a historic tax summit hosted by the Miccosuki Band. National tribal leader meeting ATNI joined us. We invited them to join us and so we are taking charge of our agenda, becoming proactive. I think we owe it to the Joe Dellacrus, Divine Delorious, the Wendell Chinos, the Billy Franks who said--Billy Frank has a great quote where he says do not get tired. There is too much work to be done. We can sleep when we leave this earth. Too much work to be done. So I have been to every State in the Union. I am now living in Washington State for two years. I followed my wife out in--we live in Spokane and I must say that it is the most beautiful State. And if Mount Rainier is a little too much for you, go to Yellowstone. But it is the most beautiful State. Quinault, Averred, Nisqually, Makah, it is just very awesome territory. And Congressman Dicks, there is a great book out by a Pulitzer prize winner that talked about your first governor and the atrocities and his approach in New York--in Washington State. Bittercreek it is called--an interesting read. Mr. Dicks. I will get it. Mr. Patterson. Yeah, it is an interesting read. But thank you. I think Indian country needs to be proactive in our own agenda rather than reactive from a D.C. landscape. And USET is leading that charge within Indian Country. Thank you for your time. Thank you for your veteran leadership. [The statement of Brian Patterson follows:] [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.071 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.072 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.073 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.074 Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I am shocked to hear that you have been to every State in the Union. You got that close to Idaho and chose Spokane. I mean, that--you know you could have been like 20 miles over and you could have been in God's country. Mr. Patterson. Idaho is right out my picture window. Mr. Simpson. I spent last week in Coeur d'Alene, in Spokane and did some things in Spokane. Mr. Dicks. You can see it where you walk. Mr. Patterson. And that is all I want. Mr. Dicks. From your front window. From your front door. Mr. Patterson. That is all I want. Mr. Dicks. No, I did a trail with Speaker Foley that goes from Spokane right to the border. So maybe you can just keep it going, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Simpson. Well, that is what needs to happen. I said I spent last week in Spokane and Coeur d'Alene and a little bit in Seattle, but beautiful country. Mr. Patterson. Beautiful country. Mr. Simpson. It really is. Mr. Dicks. We did the world's fair in 1974 ``Man living and playing in his environment.'' Mr. Simpson. I went to it. Mr. Dicks. I did the staff work for Senator Magnusson on that and the railroads gave us some great land. And Spokane has got one of the great features is a water fall right in the city. Where do you get that? I mean that is pretty neat. Mr. Simpson. Do you have questions? Mr. Dicks. I just wanted to say this is going to be a very difficult year. As you heard what I said before the budget resolution calls for more cuts in discretionary spending and we are discretionary spending. I am hoping that we can come to some agreement before we get to this debt ceiling vote where we can lay out a program that includes all aspects of the budget. But the other thing I got to tell you is we cannot do earmarks. So a lot of these things that we used to be able to do at least for the time being we are not able to do. So you are going to have to get the Obama Administration to put the critical things in they have to be in the President's budget. And that does not mean it is going to be enacted, but at least you have a fighting chance if it is in the President's budget. And so I just give you that advice. You know I have been here a long time and I have been on this subcommittee a long time and these are important programs. And the Indian Health Service, the BIA, law enforcement, education, higher education, you know these things are very, very important and the programs for your natural resources also are important. You know we will do our best, but you know I think we have got to pick ourselves up and go find ways to do these things. And there are a lot of programs. I mean there is a lot of money still there that you can apply for. It is going to take people you know instead of just coming to Congress for earmarks. You are going to have to go to these agencies and work hard to try to get your projects funded that way. That is my advice. Mr. Simpson. Well, and I will just echo what Norm said. It is going to be a tough year and one of the things we find out through all these hearings while there are--you know it is kind of like the States. We always say no two States are the same. No two tribes really are the same. It is interesting to hear from the testimony that there are general issues that affect all the tribes, whether it is contract support and fully funding that or whether it is some of the other issues, but each tribe has unique issues to their tribe and that is what is kind of interesting to me. And as we have tried to address them in the past as Norm said through some of the earmarking process, we do not have that availability. Norm and I have been on the other side of that issue and unfortunately we have lost so far. But we are coming back. But we are more than willing to help you as we can when you have requests from the agencies if there are things we can do to help you out be sure and let us know because some of those unique issues on--that different tribes have are very important obviously. Mr. Dicks. I just want to say one thing. The last time the Republican Party won the election back in '94, they did away with this hearing. I want to complement the Chairman, now that they are in the Majority, for having this hearing so that we, the members have a chance, and the tribes have a chance to come in and really tell us what the situation is. And I complement you for doing that. Mr. Simpson. Thanks. Mr. Dicks. It takes time, but I think it is time well spent. Mr. Simpson. Thank you. I appreciate that. And it is--as I said at the end of last week or whenever it was when we had the public witness testimony, other individuals that came in and testified on other things within the Interior budget, sometimes I suspect people come in and they wonder if this really makes a difference. You spend a few minutes talking to us about--and I mean it is hard to wrap up everything in five minutes. It does make a difference because when we start to write a budget what you have said influences what we are able to do or what we know the need is. So while you may sometimes wonder how important this is, it really is important to us. So we do appreciate you taking the time to come in and talk to us and we will be doing this again next year and talking about hopefully not the same issues, but we will have addressed some of them. Mr. Patterson. Did I mention--costs nothing. Mr. Simpson. Yeah, it is and I appreciate you bringing that up. Mr. Cole was obviously very interested in resolving that as are many of us. We had it in the bill last year that just did not survive at the end. The CR at the end and---- Mr. Dicks. Yeah, this has to be fixed. Mr. Simpson [continuing]. It has got to be fixed and we are going to be working on it, so---- Mr. Patterson. Indian Country may need an area of additional support from you to us. We are looking--we have a long term priority to reexamine the trust relationship, the trust platform from an Indian country point of view which in my hope will lead to Indian Country defining self-determination from our expectation and our vantage--our value. And so one step in that direction would be to develop an orientation for all new members coming in to sit down. You said as interested in pursuing this. We have a number of resources at Harvard through their executive program. I am an alumni. My nation representative is an alumni. We have other chiefs, so we have resources. My nation sponsored a $3 million chair for the Harvard Indian Law Program. So we have resources and relationships there. We would like to work to develop that. And why I say that is because this Country should be outraged by the usage of the word Geronimo with Bin Laden. You know they could have called it anything else, but they equate it to one our national heroes and there is tolerance for that. Mayor Bloomberg in New York City, get your cowboy hat. He told the New York State Governor, get your cowboy hat, get your cowboy boots, and get your shotgun, and get on through and get those tags from those Indians. The President golfed with him two weeks later. Not a word was said. If it was any other ethnic group, special interest, minority, there would be an outrage. But Indian country in our trust relationship we need to develop that relationship where we can have advocates who are outraged by this. My Seminole Tribe was equated to Al Qaeda tactics. It was silent. There was no response. Mr. Dicks. I know. I am very glad you brought that up. I am on the Defense Subcommittee---- Mr. Patterson. Thank you, sir. Mr. Dicks [continuing]. And I will raise this with the appropriate officials in the department. Mr. Patterson. We would welcome that critical dialogue. Mr. Simpson. Thank you all for being here today and thanks for attending the hearings. [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.075 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.076 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.077 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.078 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.079 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.080 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.081 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.082 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.083 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.084 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.085 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.086 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.087 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.088 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.089 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.090 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.091 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.092 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.093 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.094 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.095 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.096 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.097 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.098 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.099 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.100 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.101 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.102 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.103 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.104 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.105 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.106 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.107 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.108 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.109 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.110 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.111 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.112 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.113 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.114 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.115 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.116 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.117 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.118 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.119 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.120 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.121 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.122 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.123 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.124 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.125 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.126 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.127 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.128 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.129 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.130 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.131 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.132 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.133 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.134 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.135 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.136 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.137 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.138 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.139 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.140 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.141 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.142 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.143 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.144 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.145 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.146 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.147 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.148 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.149 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.150 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.151 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.152 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.153 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.154 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.155 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.156 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.157 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.158 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.159 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.160 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.161 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.162 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.163 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.164 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.165 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.166 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.167 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.168 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.169 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.170 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.171 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.172 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.173 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.174 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.175 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.176 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.177 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.178 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.179 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.180 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.181 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.182 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.183 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.184 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.185 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.186 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.187 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.188 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.189 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.190 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.191 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.192 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.193 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.194 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.195 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.196 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.197 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.198 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.199 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.200 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.201 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.202 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.203 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.204 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.205 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.206 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.207 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.208 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.209 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.210 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.211 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.212 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.213 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.214 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.215 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.216 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.217 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.218 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.219 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.220 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.221 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.222 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.223 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.224 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.225 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.226 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.227 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.228 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.229 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.230 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.231 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.232 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.233 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.234 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.235 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.236 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.237 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.238 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.239 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.240 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.241 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.242 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.243 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.244 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.245 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.246 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.247 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.248 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.249 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.250 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.251 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.252 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.253 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.254 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.255 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.256 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.257 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.258 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.259 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.260 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.261 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.262 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.263 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.264 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.265 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.266 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.267 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.268 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.269 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.270 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.271 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.272 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.273 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.274 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.275 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.276 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.277 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.278 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.279 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.280 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.281 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.282 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.283 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.284 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.285 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.286 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.287 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.288 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.289 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.290 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.291 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.292 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.293 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.294 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.295 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.296 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.297 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.298 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.299 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.300 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.301 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.302 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.303 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.304 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.305 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.306 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.307 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.308 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.309 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.310 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.311 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.312 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.313 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.314 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.315 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.316 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.317 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.318 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.319 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.320 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.321 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.322 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.323 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.324 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.325 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.326 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.327 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.328 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.329 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.330 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.331 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.332 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.333 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.334 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.335 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.336 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.337 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.338 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.339 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.340 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.341 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.342 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.343 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.344 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.345 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.346 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.347 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.348 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.349 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.350 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.351 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.352 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.353 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.354 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.355 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.356 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.357 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.358 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.359 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.360 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.361 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.362 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.363 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.364 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.365 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.366 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.367 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.368 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.369 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.370 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.371 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.372 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.373 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.374 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.375 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.376 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.377 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.378 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.379 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.380 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.381 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.382 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.383 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.384 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.385 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.386 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.387 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.388 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.389 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.390 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.391 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.392 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.393 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.394 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.395 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.396 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.397 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.398 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.399 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.400 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.401 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.402 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.403 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.404 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.405 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.406 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.407 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.408 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.409 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.410 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.411 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.412 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.413 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.414 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.415 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.416 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.417 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.418 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.419 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.420 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.421 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.422 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.423 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.424 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.425 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.426 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.427 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.428 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.429 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.430 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.431 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.432 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.433 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.434 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.435 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.436 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.437 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.438 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.439 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.440 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.441 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.442 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.443 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.444 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.445 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.446 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.447 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.448 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.449 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.450 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.451 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.452 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.453 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.454 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.455 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.456 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.457 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.458 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.459 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.460 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.461 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.462 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.463 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.464 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.465 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.466 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.467 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.468 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.469 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.470 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.471 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.472 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.473 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.474 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.475 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.476 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.477 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.478 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.479 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.480 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.481 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.482 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.483 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.484 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.485 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.486 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.487 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.488 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.489 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.490 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.491 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.492 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.493 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.494 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.495 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.496 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.497 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.498 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.499 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.500 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.501 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.502 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.503 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.504 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.505 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.506 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.507 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.508 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.509 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.510 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.511 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.512 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.513 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.514 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.515 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.516 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.517 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.518 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.519 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.520 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.521 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.522 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.523 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.524 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.525 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.526 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.527 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.528 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.529 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.530 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.531 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.532 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.533 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.534 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.535 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.536 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.537 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.538 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.539 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.540 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.541 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.542 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.543 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.544 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.545 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.546 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.547 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.548 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.549 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.550 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.551 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.552 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.553 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.554 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.555 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.556 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.557 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.558 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.559 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.560 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.561 [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] T6982C.562 I N D E X ---------- Public Witnesses Day One--April 14, 2011 INDEX--ORGANIZATIONS Page Civil War Trust.................................................. 34 Federal Forest Resource Coalition................................ 15 Federation of State Humanities Councils.......................... 52 Idaho Shakespeare Festival....................................... 86 Interstate Mining Compact Commission............................. 8 Marine Conservation Biology Institute............................ 106 National Association of Forest Service Retirees (NAFSR).......... 28 National Association of State Foresters.......................... 22 National Humanities Alliance..................................... 59 Outdoor Alliance................................................. 99 Partners in Preservation......................................... 45 Public Lands Foundation.......................................... 93 Saving America's Mustangs........................................ 117 Seminole Nation, Oklahoma........................................ 125 INDEX--MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Burton, Representative Dan....................................... 125 Thompson, Representative Glenn................................... 2 INDEX--WITNESSES Adkins, Trace.................................................... 39 Ayers, Ed........................................................ 74 Brintall, Dr. Michael............................................ 59 Burns, Ken....................................................... 66 Chandler, Bill................................................... 106 Clark, Trent..................................................... 52 Conrad, Gregory.................................................. 8 Daly, Elena...................................................... 93 Graves, Margaret................................................. 45 Hofflund, Mark................................................... 86 Jackson, Travis.................................................. 123 Kashdan, Hank.................................................... 28 King, Barbara.................................................... 113 Lighthizer, Jim.................................................. 34 Looking Horse, Chief Avrol....................................... 125 Nafisi, Azar..................................................... 79 Pickens, Madeleine............................................... 117 Robinson, Brady.................................................. 99 Shannon, John.................................................... 22 Troxel, Tom...................................................... 15 __________ Public Witnesses Day Two--April 15, 2011 INDEX--ORGANIZATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers.............................. 166 American Thoracic Society........................................ 136 Bat Conservation International................................... 252 Defenders of Wildlife............................................ 246 Environmental Council of the States/MT Dept. of Environmental Quality........................................................ 153 Geological Society of America (GSA).............................. 159 Idaho Rural Water Association.................................... 131 LWCF Coalition................................................... 173 Multinational Species Coalition.................................. 265 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation............................ 212 National Parks Conservation Association.......................... 193 National Utility Contractors Association (NUCA).................. 143 National Wildlife Refuge Association............................. 231 Partnership for the National Trails System....................... 217 San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District/Santa Ana Sucker Task Force..................................................... 258 The Conservation Fund, FWS....................................... 206 The Nature Conservancy........................................... 200 The Wilderness Society........................................... 186 ................................................................. The Wildlife Society............................................. 239 Wilderness Land Trust............................................ 180 Wildlife Conservation Society.................................... 224 INDEX--WITNESSES Anker, Conrad.................................................... 173 Beetham, Mary Beth............................................... 246 Bies, Laura...................................................... 239 Blomquist, Jim................................................... 180 Calvelli, John................................................... 224 Cassidy, Tom..................................................... 200 Fascione, Nina................................................... 252 Headrick, Doug................................................... 258 Kiernan, Tom..................................................... 193 Natale, Patrick.................................................. 166 Oliver, Andy..................................................... 265 Opper, Richard................................................... 153 Roberts, Shelley................................................. 131 Rowsome, Alan.................................................... 186 Schiffries, Dr. Craig............................................ 159 Schmitt, Ryan.................................................... 143 Sorenson-Groves, Desiree......................................... 231 Szema, Dr. Anthony............................................... 136 Trandahl, Jeff................................................... 212 Turner, John..................................................... 206 Werner, Gary..................................................... 217 __________ Public Witnesses--Tribes and American Indian Advocacy Groups Day One--May 3, 2011 INDEX--ORGANIZATIONS Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC)................... 497 American Dental Association...................................... 446 Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Reservation........ 396 Catawba Indian Nation............................................ 429 Cherokee Nation.................................................. 330 Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma....................................... 337 Dzilth-Na-O-Dith-Hle Community School............................ 287 Fort Belknap Indian Community.................................... 402 Friends of Indian Health......................................... 465 Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission.................. 435 Independent Review Team on Tribal Courts......................... 350 Inter-Tribal Bison Cooperative................................... 358 Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa................... 417 Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe........................................ 411 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida........................... 422 National Congress of American Indians............................ 459 National Council of Urban Indian Health.......................... 477 National Indian Health Board (NIHB).............................. 453 National Johnson-O'Malley Association............................ 342 National Tribal Contract Support Cost Coalition.................. 471 Native American Grant School Association (NAGSA)................. 321 Navajo Hopi Land Commission Office of the Navajo Nation.......... 300 Navajo Nation.................................................... 293 Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee............................. 389 Oglala Sioux Tribe............................................... 366 Pueblo of Acoma.................................................. 273 Ramah Band of Navajo/Ramah Navajo Chapter........................ 307 Ramah Navajo School Board........................................ 313 Santa Clara Pueblo............................................... 280 Southcentral Foundation.......................................... 491 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe........................................ 373 Tanana Chiefs Conference......................................... 486 United Tribes Technical College.................................. 379 INDEX--MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Berg, Representative Rick........................................ 358 Young, Representative Don........................................ 485 INDEX--WITNESSES Archambault II, Dave............................................. 373 Barnett, D'Shane................................................. 477 Billie, Colley................................................... 422 BlueEyes, Faye................................................... 287 Carlson, Ervin................................................... 358 Coochise, Elbridge............................................... 350 Culbreath, Joy................................................... 337 Dasheno, Walter.................................................. 280 Deters, Dr. Pamela............................................... 465 Dusty Bull, Harold............................................... 342 Garcia, Martha................................................... 307 Gipp, Dr. David M................................................ 379 Honyaoma, Todd................................................... 321 Isaac, Jerry..................................................... 486 Johnson Pata, Jacqueline......................................... 459 King, Tracy ``Ching''............................................ 402 Knight, Melanie.................................................. 330 Mala, Ted........................................................ 491 Martine-Alonzo, Nancy............................................ 313 Maulson, Tom..................................................... 417 Maxx, Raymond.................................................... 300 Mike, Jeff....................................................... 321 Miller, Lloyd.................................................... 471 Neary, Dr. Matt.................................................. 446 Oatman, McCoy.................................................... 389 Rodgers, Donald.................................................. 429 Russell, Majel................................................... 358 Secatero, Lester................................................. 453 Shelly, Ben...................................................... 293 Smith, Roxann.................................................... 396 Steele, John Yellow Bird......................................... 366 Swagger, Dr. Russell M........................................... 379 Teuber, Andy..................................................... 497 Tortalita, Lloyd................................................. 273 Wawronowicz, Larry............................................... 417 Whitebird, Eugene ``Ribs''....................................... 411 Zorn, Jim........................................................ 435 __________ Public Witnesses--Tribes and American Indian Advocacy Groups Day Two--May 4, 2011 INDEX--ORGANIZATIONS Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission...................... 554 Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde............................... 572 Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation........... 548 Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon.... 541 Ft. Hall Business Council, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes............... 511 Intertribal Timber Council....................................... 560 Lummi Indian Business Council.................................... 616 Makah Tribal Council............................................. 622 Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission............................ 590 Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board...................... 531 Puyallup Tribe................................................... 597 Quinault Indian Nation........................................... 610 Reno-Sparks Indian Colony Tribal Council......................... 524 Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Indian Reservation..... 505 Siletz Tribe..................................................... 566 Skokomish Tribal Nation.......................................... 583 Squaxin Island Tribe............................................. 603 United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc............................. 628 INDEX--MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Richardson, Representative Laura................................. 517 INDEX--WITNESSES Bear, Robert..................................................... 505 Blythe, C. Larry................................................. 560 Bowechop, Ryland................................................. 622 Brigham, N. Kathryn.............................................. 548 Frank, Jr., Billy................................................ 590 Grayem, Mike..................................................... 590 Johnstone, Ed.................................................... 590 Joseph, Andrew................................................... 531 Kennedy, Cheryle A............................................... 572 Melendez, Arlan.................................................. 524 Patterson, Brian................................................. 628 Pavel, Joseph.................................................... 583 Peters, Ray...................................................... 603 Pigsley, Delores................................................. 566 Sharp, Fawn...................................................... 610 Small, Nathan.................................................... 511 Suppah, Ron...................................................... 541 LaPointe, Lawrence W............................................. 597 Williams, Sheri Lee.............................................. 616 __________ Written Testimony from Members of Congress INDEX Representative David Price, U.S. Congress, NC-04................. 638 Representative Pedro Pierluisi, Resident Commissioner, Puerto Rico........................................................... 641 __________ Written Testimony from Individuals and Organizations INDEX 11 organizations in the fields of conservation, forestry, and horticulture................................................... 644 1854 Treaty Authority............................................ 647 Alaska Federation of Natives..................................... 649 Alliance to Save Energy.......................................... 652 American Association of Petroleum Geologists..................... 654 American Bird Conservancy........................................ 657 American Forest & Paper Association.............................. 661 American Forest Foundation....................................... 665 American Forests................................................. 668 American Foundation for Suicide Prevention....................... 672 American Geological Institute.................................... 674 American Geophysical Union....................................... 678 American Herds................................................... 682 American Indian Higher Education Consortium (AIHEC).............. 686 American Institute of Biological Sciences........................ 690 American Lung Association........................................ 694 American Public Power Association................................ 697 American Society for Microbiology................................ 699 American Society of Agronomy..................................... 703 Animal Welfare Institute......................................... 706 Appalachian Trail Conservancy.................................... 710 APS Four Corners Power Plant..................................... 714 Arctic Slope Native Association.................................. 716 Association of American Universities............................. 718 Association of Community Tribal Schools Inc...................... 722 Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies........................ 727 Association of Public and Land-grant Universities................ 728 Association of State Drinking Water Administrators............... 732 Aurora Water..................................................... 736 BHP Navajo Coal Company.......................................... 737 Bird Conservation Funding Coalition.............................. 739 Center for Plant Conservation.................................... 742 Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska. 746 Central Utah Water Conservancy District.......................... 750 Cherokee Nation.................................................. 752 Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Council.............................. 753 Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Association............... 757 Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority............................... 761 Chugach Regional Resources Commission............................ 767 Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum...................... 770 Colorado River District.......................................... 774 Colorado Water Congress.......................................... 776 Columbus Metro Park.............................................. 778 Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes.......................... 779 Cook Inlet Tribal Council........................................ 783 Cooperative Alliance for Refuge Enhancement...................... 787 Copper River Native Association.................................. 790 Council of Western State Foresters............................... 793 D.J. Schubert, Wildlife Biologist, Private Citizen............... 795 Denver Water..................................................... 799 Ding Darling Wildlife Society--Friends of the Refuge, Sanibel.... 801 Dolores Water Conservancy District............................... 803 Ducks Unlimited, Inc............................................. 805 Emission Control Technology Association.......................... 809 Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa....................... 813 Forest County Potawatomi Community............................... 817 Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges...................... 821 Friends of Back Bay.............................................. 822 Friends of Balcones Canyonlands National Wildlife Refuge......... 825 Friends of Camas National Wildlife Refuge........................ 828 Friends of Cape May National Wildlife Refuge..................... 829 Friends of Laguna Atascosa NWR................................... 832 Friends of Rachel Carson NWR..................................... 833 Friends of the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge........ 835 Friends of the Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Inc............................................................ 838 Friends of the Desert Mountains.................................. 841 Friends of the Desert National Wildlife Refuge Complex........... 844 Friends of the Potomac River Refuges............................. 845 Friends of the Red River National Wildlife Refuge, Inc........... 848 Friends of the Savannah Coastal Wildlife Refuges, Inc............ 852 Friends of the Tampa Bay National Wildlife Refuges, Inc.......... 854 Friends of Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge..................... 857 Friends of Virgin Islands National Park.......................... 859 Friends of Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuges.............. 862 Gathering Waters Conservancy..................................... 865 Governor of Wyoming.............................................. 868 Grand Valley Water Users' Association............................ 870 Green Mountain Club.............................................. 871 Green Ravens of Rio Grande High School........................... 875 Humane Society Legislative Fund & Doris Day Animal League........ 877 Industrial Minerals Association.................................. 881 Interstate Council on Water Policy............................... 883 Izaak Walton League of America................................... 886 Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe........................................ 890 Jicarilla Apache Nation.......................................... 894 Keep Valley Forge Safe........................................... 896 Kevin Vertesch, Private Citizen, Sanibel, FL..................... 898 League of American Orchestras.................................... 900 Little River Band of Ottawa Indians.............................. 904 Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust............................... 907 Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara Nation................................. 911 Mike Dobesh, Private Citizen..................................... 914 Montana Wildlife Federation...................................... 918 National Assembly of State Arts Agencies......................... 921 National Association of Abandoned Mine Land Programs (NAAMLP).... 925 National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA)............... 929 National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO)........... 933 National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers...... 935 National Cooperators' Coalition.................................. 939 National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) Local 1957....... 941 National Ground Water Association................................ 945 National Indian Education Association............................ 948 National Institutes of Water Resources........................... 952 National Mining Association...................................... 956 National Recreation and Park Association......................... 958 National Tribal Environmental Council............................ 962 National WH&B Advocate Team...................................... 966 National Wild Horse and Burro Political Action Committee......... 970 National Wildlife Federation..................................... 972 Naturalstep Horse Training....................................... 976 New Hampshire Fish and Game Department........................... 980 New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission.......................... 984 Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District..................... 987 Northern Forest Center........................................... 989 Northern Sierra Partnership...................................... 992 Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority........................ 995 Orchard Mesa Irrigation District................................. 996 Oregon Water Resources Congress.................................. 998 Oregon Water Resources Congress 2 of 2........................... 1000 Pacific Salmon Commission........................................ 1004 Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission.............................. 1008 Performing Arts Alliance......................................... 1009 Peter Maier, PhD, PE............................................. 1013 PNC, Inc......................................................... 1016 PNM Resources.................................................... 1020 Preservation Action.............................................. 1022 Pueblo of Zuni................................................... 1026 Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians................................ 1030 Riverside-San Bernardino County Indian Health, Inc............... 1034 Sac and Fox Nation of Oklahoma................................... 1036 San Juan Water Commission........................................ 1040 Sawtooth Society................................................. 1042 SouthEast Alaska Regional Health Consortium...................... 1045 Southern Appalachian Highlands Conservancy....................... 1047 Southern Ute Indian Tribe........................................ 1049 Southwestern Water Conservation District......................... 1051 St. Marks Refuge Association..................................... 1053 State and Tribal Wildlife Grants program......................... 1055 Steer Clear of Wildlife.......................................... 1058 Supporters of St. Vincent NWR.................................... 1059 Sustainable Urban Forests Coalition.............................. 1062 Taos County Board of Commissioners............................... 1064 The Glacier National Park Fund................................... 1067 The National Association of Abandoned Mine Land Programs......... 1070 The Trust for Public Land........................................ 1074 Theatre Communications Group..................................... 1078 Three Rivers Park District....................................... 1081 Timucuan Trail Parks Foundation.................................. 1082 Town of Ophir.................................................... 1086 Tri-County Water Conservancy District............................ 1089 United Sioux Tribes of South Dakota Development Corporation...... 1091 University Consortium for Geographic Information Science......... 1095 University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)........... 1097 Upper Colorado River Commissioner for New Mexico................. 1099 Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District.................. 1101 Upper Peninsula Public Access Coalition.......................... 1103 USGS Coalition................................................... 1106 Utah Water Users Association..................................... 1110 Washington Wildlife Recreation Coalition......................... 1112 Wilderness Society and the National Association of State Foresters...................................................... 1115 Wyoming Water Association........................................ 1118 Yakama Nation.................................................... 1120 Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation............................... 1123