[Congressional Record Volume 157, Number 22 (Friday, February 11, 2011)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E214-E215]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ANDEAN TRADE PREFERENCE ACT
_____
HON. DONALD M. PAYNE
of new jersey
in the house of representatives
Friday, February 11, 2011
Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Speaker, while it is my hope that the Andean Trade
Preference Act has promoted trade between the Andean countries and the
United States and in so doing it has acted to limit drug production, I
and many of my colleagues remain deeply concerned over certain recent
conduct by the Peruvian government with reference to its treatment of
U.S. investment in Peru. I would ask that a letter my colleagues and I
recently sent in regard to this matter be made a part of the record.
And I would hope our Government would work diligently to protect the
interests of our U.S. citizens in this regard. I would
[[Page E215]]
hope before Congress is asked to extend this Act again, the Peruvian
government will have addressed this concern so that it will not be an
issue when a further extension is requested.
February 8, 2011.
Hon. Hillary Clinton,
Secretary, Department of State,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Timothy F. Geithner,
Secretary, Department of Treasury,
Washington, DC.
Dear Madam Secretary and Mr. Secretary: We are writing you
to raise a serious concern relating to the treatment of a
U.S.-based company by the Government of Peru. We understand
that this company has received disparate treatment by that
Government and is apparently the subject of a possible
expropriation. We understand that the Department of State is
aware of this situation and that it has already expressed its
concern to the Government of Peru.
As we understand it, Doe Run Peru (``DRP''), owned by the
Renco Group, a U.S.-based holding company, owns a smelter in
Peru that has been in operation for almost 100 years, though
DRP has only operated the smelter since 1997. At the time
that DRP acquired the smelter from the Government of Peru,
DRP agreed to assume certain environmental upgrade costs
associated with the smelter, and the Government of Peru
assumed soil remediation costs for cleaning up the
surrounding community. We understand that by 2009 DRP had
invested $315 million in meeting the terms of the agreement,
and, during this same period of time, and up until this date,
the Government of Peru has spent nothing to fulfill its
obligations.
While DRP has proposed good faith negotiations, to date the
Government of Peru has refused to enter such discussions.
Though DRP has completed eight and a half of the nine
environmental commitments contained in the 1997 agreement,
DRP has indicated its willingness to take further and
additional steps, but for whatever reason the Government of
Peru refuses to enter such negotiations.
We urge the Treasury Department and the State Department to
work together on this matter as it raises very serious
issues, particularly since the U.S. provides major funding to
the Inter-American Development Bank that in turn is quite
active in Peru. A de facto expropriation would raise
questions about the appropriateness of further IDB investment
in Peru. We would hope that your two Departments would
communicate on this matter with the IDB and express the
concerns of this Government and the consequences that might
flow from an expropriation by the Government of Peru.
Sincerely,
Donald M. Payne,
Member of Congress.
____________________