[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 84 (Thursday, May 26, 2016)]
[House]
[Pages H3288-H3290]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 6, 2015, the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Russell) is
recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the majority leader.
Mr. RUSSELL. Madam Speaker, since December 15, 1791, nearly 225
years, our Congress has operated under the constitutional requirement
to do the following. Amendment 1 of the Bill of Rights to the
Constitution of the United States of America:
``Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble,
and to petition the government for a regress of grievances.''
I am saddened, Madam Speaker, that, in our current day, the greatest
assault on the free exercise of religion is being perpetuated,
seemingly, by those most responsible to protect it: those who are sworn
to uphold the law.
Worse still, we see our Armed Forces, whose singular purpose is to
support and defend the Constitution, now perpetually being used as the
vehicle to subvert the very document that they risked their lives to
defend.
In a recent example, we have seen executive guidance with regard to
religious corporations, religious associations, religious educational
institutions, and religious societies placed in jeopardy.
More than 2,000 Federal Government contracts a year are awarded to
religious organizations and contractors that provide essential services
in many vital programs. Now many of these services are being impacted
due to conflicting, ambiguous executive guidance.
Here are some examples:
Chaplain services. Multiple organizations provide chaplains and
related services to the military and other government agencies.
{time} 1200
Chaplains have faced significant religious liberty challenges in
pursuing contracts with religious education directories, youth
ministers, musicians, and other religious service providers who adhere
to the teachings of their particular faith. Without protecting free
exercise of religion, chaplains have been forced to hire people that
work directly against their teachings, tenets, and faith. This is a
clear violation of the First Amendment.
Here is another example: refugee service providers. The vast majority
of refugee and suffering vulnerable population relief is done by
religious service organizations. I have worked with many on
battlefields in my time as a career soldier.
Because of bad agency guidance, now these organizations are facing
mounting liability related to their performance under grants,
contracts, and cooperative agreements. Sadly, when these organizations
cannot partner with the government, the relief of human suffering just
goes away, seldom being replaced.
The groups under assault are often the best--if not the only--
organizations able to offer the assistance they perform, doing
invaluable work to relieve the suffering, aid the returning combat
warrior, assist in the rehabilitation of substance abuse for those not
adjusting well, and many other such services that have been going on
for many decades.
To curtail the blatant discrimination against these groups, I offered
a simple amendment to protect them under existing law which passed in
the National Defense Authorization, and that existing law upheld is the
1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.
You would have thought I had killed someone's mother. Instead of
upholding the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, we have now
seen this body continue its assault on faith in America. It is not
enough to level accusations of injustice by some. They will not be
satisfied until their assaults of intolerance on people of faith in
this country has produced an elimination of God in public life in
America.
We are accused of hatred, called out as shameful on this floor, and
enjoined to use the whole Constitution to support an opposing view that
embodies behavior, mores, and outcomes that not only violate our
conscience, but have been prohibited under the laws of nature and
nature's God.
In the last 50 years, we have seen the Constitution used by these
ideologues to kill American children in the womb, eliminate family
structure, elevate behavior over belief, redefine marriage, and assault
into silence and inaction any who may oppose them. Not satisfied, we
see them without rest on their quest to eliminate free exercise of
faith in the United States.
Do we really want a Nation without God?
They would call it progress, yet our conscience knows differently.
The Apostle Paul explains why when he said this:
For the wrath of God is revealed from Heaven against all
ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth
in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is
manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the
creation of the world, His invisible attributes are clearly
seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His
eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,
because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as
God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts,
and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be
wise, they became fools.
Therefore, God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the
lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among
themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and
worshiped and served the creature, rather than the Creator.
The Creator, our Nation has always been anchored in the Creator, from
its inception throughout our history. God has been the foundation of
our Republic as seen in the sweeping lines of the Declaration of
Independence, when it drove our Founders to proclaim ``the separate and
equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and Nature's God entitle
them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they
should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.
``We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
Happiness.''
That life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness could not be realized
without God in our Republic. George Washington spoke for all Americans
in his first inaugural address, that ``No people can be bound to
acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of
men more than . . . the United States.''
Our Nation's survival and prosperity in the future were understood to
be dependent upon faith. When Washington left office in the most
remarkable, peaceful transfer of power the world had seen, he warned of
a future that somehow supposed that we could have order and prosperity
without faith. In his last address to the Nation, he declared:
Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to the
political prosperity, religion and
[[Page H3289]]
morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that men
claim the tribute of patriotism, who would subvert the great
pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties
of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the
pious man, ought to respect and cherish them. And let us with
caution indulge in the supposition that morality can be
maintained without religion.
None of the Founders of this country believed that a governmental
connection to religion was an evil in itself. They opposed the
establishment of a national religion because it could prohibit the free
exercise of faith but that faith would and should be freely exercised.
This same foundational belief extended to a prohibition of a national
press so that it could express freely, so people could speak and
assemble freely, and that their grievance would not only become known,
but redressed. This was embodied in the First Amendment of the Bill of
Rights.
The Framers of our Constitution understood that restriction on
religious conduct should not be from application of general laws but,
rather, should be applied to those laws that target religion. Laws that
``substantially burden'' religion, even if they are generally
applicable, must be justified as the ``least restrictive means'' of
achieving a ``compelling interest.''
The same day the Bill of Rights was introduced, July 13, 1787, this
Congress also introduced the Northwest Ordinance that laid guidelines
and instruction on new territory acquired for a future United States.
Article 3 of that Ordinance stated: ``Religion, and morality, and
knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of
mankind, schools and the means of education shall be forever
encouraged.''
``Forever be encouraged.'' Some in this body today, Madam Speaker,
would believe forever stops in 2016 and should have stopped much
sooner. They claim that Congress grants these unalienable rights and
uses the powers of the government, without the consent of the governed,
to regulate and diminish faith and eliminate it from public life.
In 1798, in response to the claim that Congress could regulate First
Amendment freedoms without abridging them, James Madison condemned it
saying: the liberty of conscience and the freedom the press were
completely exempted from all congressional authority whatever.
Every constitution of our Thirteen Original States, and all
thereafter following their example, understood this and embodied such
language in their State constitutions, which survive today.
New York, article I, section 3: ``The free exercise and enjoyment of
religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference,
shall forever be allowed in this State to all humankind.''
New Hampshire, article 5: ``Every individual has a natural and
unalienable right to worship God according to the dictates of his own
conscience, and reason; and no subject shall be hurt, molested, or
restrained, in his person, liberty, or estate, for worshipping God in
the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of his own
conscience; or for his religious profession, sentiments, or
persuasion.''
Vermont, article 3: ``That all persons have a natural and unalienable
right, to worship Almighty God, according to the dictates of their own
consciences and understandings, as in their opinion shall be regulated
by the word of God; and that no person ought to, or of right can be
compelled to attend any religious worship, or erect or support any
place of worship, or maintain any minister, contrary to the dictates of
conscience, nor can any person be justly deprived or abridged of any
civil right as a citizen, on account of religious sentiments, or
peculiar mode of religious worship; and that no authority can, or ought
to be vested in, or assumed by, any power whatever, that shall in any
case interfere with, or in any manner control the rights of conscience,
in the free exercise of religious worship.''
Massachusetts, part 1, articles II and III: ``It is the right as well
as the duty of all men in society, publicly, and at stated seasons to
worship the Supreme Being, the great Creator and Preserver of the
universe. And no subject shall be hurt, molested, or restrained, in his
person, liberty, or estate, for worshipping God in the manner and
season most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience; or for his
religious profession or sentiments . . . As the happiness of a people,
and the good order and preservation of civil government, essentially
depend upon piety, religion and morality; and as these cannot be
generally diffused through a community, but by the institution of the
public worship of God, and of public instructions in piety, religion
and morality.''
Connecticut, article I, section 3: ``The exercise and enjoyment of
religious profession and worship, without discrimination, shall be free
to all persons in the state.''
Rhode Island, article I, section 3: ``Whereas Almighty God hath
created the mind free; and all attempts to influence it by temporal
punishments or burdens, or by civil incapacitations, tend to beget
habits of hypocrisy and meanness; and whereas a principal object to our
venerable ancestors, in their migration to this country and their
settlement of this state, was, as they expressed it, to hold forth a
lively experiment that a flourishing civil state may stand and be
maintained with full liberty and religious concernments; we, therefore,
declare that no person shall be compelled to frequent or to support any
religious worship, place, or ministry whatever, except in fulfillment
of such person's voluntary contract; nor enforced, restrained,
molested, or burdened in any body or goods; nor disqualified from
holding office; nor otherwise suffer on account of such person's
religious belief; and that every person shall be free to worship God
according to the dictates of such person's conscience, and to profess
and by argument to maintain such person's opinion in matters of
religion; and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or
affect the civil capacity of any person.''
Pennsylvania, article 1, sections 3 and 4:
``All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty
God according to the dictates of their own consciences; no man can of
right be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship or
to maintain any ministry against his consent; no human authority can,
in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of
conscience, and no preference shall ever be given by any law to any
religious establishments or modes of worship . . . No person who
acknowledges the being of a God and a future state of rewards and
punishments shall, on account of his religious sentiments, be
disqualified to hold any office or place of trust or profit under this
Commonwealth.''
{time} 1215
New Jersey: Article 1, sections 3-5: ``No person shall be deprived of
the inestimable privilege of worshipping Almighty God in a manner
agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience; nor under any pretense
whatever be compelled to attend any place of worship contrary to his
faith and judgement; nor shall any person be obliged to pay tithes,
taxes, or other rates for building or repairing any church or churches,
place or places of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or
ministry, contrary to what he believes to be right or has deliberately
and voluntarily engaged to perform.
``There shall be no establishment of one religious sect in preference
to another; no religious or racial test shall be required as a
qualification for any office or public trust.
``No person shall be denied the enjoyment of any civil or military
right, nor be discriminated against in the exercise of any civil or
military right, nor be segregated in the militia or in the public
schools, because of religious principles . . .''
North Carolina: Article 1, section 13: ``All persons have a natural
and inalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates
of their own consciences, and no human authority shall, in any case
whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience.''
Maryland: Article 36: ``That as it is the duty of every man to
worship God in such manner as he thinks most acceptable to Him, all
persons are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty;
wherefore, no person ought by any law to be molested in his person or
estate, on account of his religious persuasion, or profession, or for
[[Page H3290]]
his religious practice . . . nor shall any person, otherwise competent,
be deemed incompetent as a witness, or juror, on account of his
religious belief; provided, he believes in the existence of God, and
that under His dispensation such person will be held morally
accountable for his acts, and be rewarded or punished therefor either
in this world or in the world to come.''
Virginia: Article 1, sections 11 and 16: ``That religion or the duty
which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be
directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and,
therefore, all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of
religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the
mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity
towards each other . . . all men shall be free to profess and by
argument to maintain their opinions in matters of religion, and the
same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil
capacities . . . it shall be left free to every person to select his
religious instructor, and to make his support such private contract as
he shall please.''
South Carolina: Article 1, section 2: ``The general assembly shall
make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof . . . ''
Last among them, the State of Georgia: Article 1, section 1,
paragraph 4: ``No inhabitant of this state shall be molested in person
or property or be prohibited from holding any public office or trust on
account of religious opinions.''
These constitutions are still in effect in each of these States
today. All speak of the exceptions on maintaining the peace and safety
of each State.
Forever--forever--be encouraged. That is the way it was phrased. Is
that where we stand today? Shall religious freedom, the hallmark of
Columbia's shores, continue to be forever encouraged or do we who are
so humbly honored to serve in these Chambers now just step aside and
see the indispensable supports of religion and morality knocked from
under our foundation?
Madam Speaker, I cannot be silent. Since I was 18 years of age, I
have pledged to support and defend the Constitution of this great
Republic. I have been moved by conscience and dictates to speak out
against the coercion of people of faith who are being discriminated
against because they merely hold to the laws of nature and nature's
God.
Our institutions, once based on the Creator of life, have now
appointed themselves to usurp the authority of God, who is the author
of life, marriage, and family. The most elemental sovereign unit, our
families, has been destroyed by our foolish decisions.
We are told instead by those of us sworn to uphold the law that
murder is not murder, marriage is not marriage, and family is not
family. We have allowed constitutional constructs to kill a child and
call it a choice.
We have seen discreet behaviors and private sexual preferences
promoted to public display while what is constitutionally guaranteed to
be able to express--religion--is now being publicly prohibited. This
Nation, at its highest level, has taken a position against God.
Is it possible, if that be the case, that we can form a more perfect
union? Can we establish justice absent the giver of law? Can domestic
tranquility be ensured that when we abandon His precepts? Can we
provide for a common defense absent a mighty fortress and an unfailing
bulwark?
How do we promote the general welfare when every American is
unanchored, adrift to do what seems right in his own eyes? Do we
suppose that we can secure the blessings of liberty without Him? Can
those of our posterity expect to obtain His blessing without
acknowledging His existence?
So, Madam Speaker, like our forebears, I cannot be silent. My faith
directs that I act with love and civility in a gentlemanly manner. As a
warrior on battlefields, I have seen the worst that human beings have
to offer.
But my optimism is secured by eternal hope and everlasting truth. My
conscience speaks to God's eternal Being. So I am without excuse. His
love and mercy cannot be separated from those that answer His call.
I take solace in the words of Christ when He encourages: ``Blessed
are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil
against you falsely for My sake. Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for
great is your reward in Heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who
were before you.''
Like the Founders of our Nation and Framers of our great
Constitution, I speak with many as a Representative in this august body
``with a firm reliance on the protections of Divine Providence, we
mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred
Honor.''
So, Madam Speaker, I will stand with Joshua when he said: ``And if it
seems evil to you to serve the Lord, choose for yourselves this day
whom you will serve . . . But as for me and my house, we will serve the
Lord.''
I stand with the Apostle Paul when he said: ``Putting away falsehood,
let each one of you speak truth with his neighbor, for we are members
of one another. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but
against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the
darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the
heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may
be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.''
So I ask America: Who will stand with me?
Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
____________________