[Congressional Record Volume 168, Number 157 (Wednesday, September 28, 2022)] [House] [Pages H8157-H8158] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] CREDIT UNION BOARD MODERNIZATION ACT Ms. WATERS. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6889) to mend the Federal Credit Union Act to modify the frequency of board of directors meetings, and for other purposes, as amended. The Clerk read the title of the bill. The text of the bill is as follows: H.R. 6889 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Credit Union Board Modernization Act''. SEC. 2. FREQUENCY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS. Section 113 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1761b) is amended-- (1) by striking ``monthly'' each place such term appears; (2) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``The board of directors'' and inserting the following: ``(a) In General.--The board of directors''; (3) in subsection (a) (as so designated), by striking ``shall meet at least once a month and''; and (4) by adding at the end the following: ``(b) Meetings.--The board of directors of a Federal credit union shall meet as follows: ``(1) With respect to a de novo Federal credit union, not less frequently than monthly during each of the first five years of the existence of such Federal credit union. ``(2) Not less than six times annually, with at least one meeting held during each fiscal quarter, with respect to a Federal credit union-- ``(A) with composite rating of either 1 or 2 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable rating system); and ``(B) with a capability of management rating under such composite rating of either 1 or 2. ``(3) Not less frequently than once a month, with respect to a Federal credit union-- ``(A) with composite rating of either 3, 4, or 5 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (or an equivalent rating under a comparable rating system); or ``(B) with a capability of management rating under such composite rating of either 3, 4, or 5.''. SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in [[Page H8158]] the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters) and the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Steil) each will control 20 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from California. General Leave Ms. WATERS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and insert extraneous material thereon. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentlewoman from California? There was no objection. Ms. WATERS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. First, I thank the gentleman from California (Mr. Vargas) for offering H.R. 6889, the Credit Union Board Modernization Act. This bipartisan bill would revise Federal credit union board meeting requirements to bring highly rated Federal credit unions in line with State credit union charter requirements in 17 States, including my home State of California. Under this bill, Federal credit unions that are highly rated by their regulator, including a highly rated management team, would be required to meet at least six times annually, with at least one meeting held during each fiscal quarter. This would be a reduction from the current requirement to meet monthly. To ensure stability and mitigate the risk of institutional failure, there are important safeguards included in the bill. For example, de novo or new Federal credit union boards would still be required to meet at least monthly during the first 5 years of receiving a charter, as well as Federal credit unions that have received low exam ratings. Additionally, if emergencies or issues arise requiring a board meeting, nothing in the bill prevents Federal credit unions from meeting more frequently. Credit unions and consumer groups support H.R. 6889, including the California and Nevada Credit Union Leagues, Americans for Financial Reform, and Center for Responsible Lending. Mr. Speaker, I urge Members to support this bill as well, and I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. STEIL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I rise in support of H.R. 6889, the Credit Union Board Modernization Act. I thank the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters), the chairwoman of the Financial Services Committee, as well as the gentleman from California (Mr. Vargas) for introducing this legislation, and the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Gonzalez) for cosponsoring. The commonsense bill will modernize credit union practices while ensuring the safety and soundness of Federal credit unions. H.R. 6889 would amend the Federal Credit Union Act to revise the frequency of meetings that a Federal credit union's board of directors is required to hold. Specifically, the bill requires monthly meetings for de novo Federal credit unions during the first 5 years of existence. Highly rated credit unions, 1 or 2 CAMELS rating, with high management ratings, must hold at least six meetings annually, with at least one meeting held during each fiscal quarter. Lower rated credit unions, 3, 4 or 5 CAMELS, must continue meeting once a month. This is a change from current law, which requires all Federal credit union boards to meet at least once a month. This meeting requirement can be burdensome for credit union staff and their volunteer board members. This is especially true for smaller credit unions and for those with few employees or those located in rural areas. The resources needed to run monthly board meetings shift valuable employee and board member time and focus away from services that credit unions provide to their consumers. Commonsense, regulatory right-sizing bills like this one help American families by reducing costs and the challenges associated with accessing financial services. H.R. 6889 is a strong, bipartisan bill that protects the safety and soundness of credit unions. It also illustrates how Members can come together to create nonpartisan legislation, modernizing outdated practices and policies. I look forward to working with my colleagues across the aisle to meaningfully support our community financial institutions. Mr. Speaker, I reiterate to my colleagues that H.R. 6889 is commonsense legislation that will modernize credit unions. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support the bill, and I yield back the balance of my time. Ms. WATERS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time to close. H.R. 6889 will incentivize Federal credit union boards to ensure their institutions are highly rated and well run in order to reduce the number of board meetings they need to hold. I therefore urge Members to support H.R. 6889, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters) that the House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 6889, as amended. The question was taken. The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being in the affirmative, the ayes have it. Mr. FULCHER. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on this motion will be postponed. ____________________