[Congressional Record Volume 169, Number 83 (Wednesday, May 17, 2023)] [House] [Page H2383] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Auchincloss) for 5 minutes. Mr. AUCHINCLOSS. Mr. Speaker, recently the United States has considered issuing a central bank digital currency. CBDCs are digital liabilities issued by a central bank and made available to the public. The implications for the United States dollar as the world's reserve currency, and for domestic fiscal and monetary policy, of a US CBDC are hotly debated by experts. What should not be controversial, however, is that the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and all other executive agencies cannot issue a CBDC without explicit authorization from Congress. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants that power ``to coin money'' and ``regulate the value thereof'' exclusively to Congress. Under section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act, the Fed can issue ``Federal Reserve notes,'' but CBDCs are not Federal Reserve notes. The law restricts Federal Reserve notes to paper notes printed on ``plates and dies'' engraved by the Treasury Department according to a detailed process that clearly does not apply to digital money. The Federal Reserve has consistently recognized that it lacks authority to issue a CBDC without congressional authorization. The Fed published a report on CBDCs in January of 2022 and said that it would not issue a CBDC without ``clear support'' from Congress ``in the form of a specific authorizing law.'' Fed Chair Jerome Powell has personally affirmed that view on multiple occasions since that report was published. For example, last September, he said during a panel discussion on digital finance that the Fed ``will need approval from both the executive branch and Congress to move ahead with a central bank digital currency.'' Although the Fed understands that it cannot issue a CBDC without authorization from Congress, some commentators continue to suggest that legislation may not be necessary. They are wrong. The Framers of the Constitution understood the importance of a strong and stable national currency, which is why they granted Congress the exclusive power to coin money and regulate its value. Congress must not forfeit this power, which is why I am introducing the Power to Mint Act. This bill clearly prohibits the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department from issuing a CBDC without authorization from Congress. Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend, Representative French Hill, who is the chairman of the Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion on the Financial Services Committee for his work with me on this bill. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Hill). Mr. HILL. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, also I congratulate the gentleman from Massachusetts for having the third child join his family in this past week. We congratulate the Auchinclosses on that. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of the gentleman from Massachusetts' bill, the Power of the Mint Act. I thank him for our partnership in introducing the first bipartisan bill in this House to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency, or a CBDC. We believe together that under the Constitution, that authority rests solely with Congress and the American people, not unelected bureaucrats. That is a nonpartisan view. Something that sets Americans apart from others is that we are rebelliously independent and skeptical of Government overreach. It is a cultural tradition in this country that has been passed down from our Founders. I compliment the gentleman for having a portrait of Alexander Hamilton in his office indicating his strong support of the Constitution's views on money. Recently, the only time my constituents from central Arkansas call me about digital assets is when they are worried that Uncle Sam is going to use a central bank digital currency to surveil where they are spending money and how much and ultimately block them from using the banking and payments system. Instead, we are working collaboratively on a bicameral, bipartisan basis to believe that innovation belongs in the private sector. That is why we had this coalition working in both the House Agriculture Committee and the House Financial Services Committee to craft a regulatory framework that preserves Americans' privacy, preserves American competitiveness, and puts America in the right form for a digital future in money. Americans have that right to financial privacy, and that is why I am proud to support the gentleman from Massachusetts' bill. Mr. AUCHINCLOSS. Mr. Speaker, I thank Representative Hill for his partnership and leadership on this subject. The benefits that the United States enjoys due to the dollar's global reserve status have been called an exorbitant privilege, but that privilege rests in part upon scrupulous observance of the rule of law and how we regulate our currency. The Power to Mint Act reinforces the rule of law by emphasizing Congress' authority to control the future of the dollar. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to cosponsor my bill and keep the power to authorize new currency with Congress. ____________________