[Senate Report 111-228]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]


                                                       Calendar No. 478
111th Congress                                                   Report
                                 SENATE
 2d Session                                                     111-228

======================================================================



 
         ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2011

                                _______
                                

                 July 22, 2010.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

           Mr. Dorgan, from the Committee on Appropriations, 
                        submitted the following

                                 REPORT

                         [To accompany S. 3635]

    The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 3635) 
making appropriations for energy and water development and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, 
and for other purposes, favorably thereon and recommends that 
the bill do pass.



Amount in new budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2011

Total of bill as reported to the Senate................. $35,073,700,000
Amount of 2010 appropriations...........................  33,978,000,000
Amount of 2011 budget estimate..........................  35,878,274,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
    2010 appropriations.................................  +1,095,700,000
    2011 budget estimate................................    -804,574,000


                                CONTENTS

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page

Purpose..........................................................     4
Summary of Estimates and Recommendations.........................     4
Title I:
    Department of Defense--Civil: Department of the Army:
        Corps of Engineers--Civil:
            General Investigations...............................    14
            Construction, General................................    29
            Flood Control, Mississippi River, and Tributaries....    41
            Operation and Maintenance, General...................    44
            Regulatory Program...................................    66
            Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program......    66
            Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies................    67
            General Expenses.....................................    67
            Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil 
              Works).............................................    68
            General Provisions--Corps of Engineers--Civil........    68
Title II:
    Department of the Interior:
        Central Utah Project Completion Account..................    70
        Bureau of Reclamation:
            Water and Related Resources..........................    72
            Central Valley Project Restoration Fund..............    80
            California Bay-Delta Restoration.....................    80
            Policy and Administration............................    80
        General Provisions--Department of the Interior...........    80
Title III:
    Department of Energy:
        Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy...................    83
            Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability..........    90
            Nuclear Energy.......................................    91
            Fossil Energy Research and Development...............    93
            Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves...............    95
            Strategic Petroleum Reserve..........................    95
            Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve...................    96
            Energy Information Administration....................    96
        Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup........................    96
        Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning 
          Fund...................................................    97
        Science..................................................    98
        Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy................   103
        Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program.............   103
        Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program..   104
        Departmental Administration..............................   104
        Office of the Inspector General..........................   105
        Atomic Energy Defense Activities:
            National Nuclear Security Administration:
                Weapons Activities...............................   105
                Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.................   112
                Naval Reactors...................................   112
                Office of the Administrator......................   116
        Environmental and Other Defense Activities:
            Defense Environmental Cleanup........................   116
            Other Defense Activities.............................   119
            Power Marketing Administrations:
                Operation and Maintenance, Southeastern Power 
                  Administration.................................   119
                Operation and Maintenance, Southwestern Power 
                  Administration.................................   120
                Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and 
                  Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration.   120
                Falcon and Amistad Operations and Maintenance 
                  Fund...........................................   120
            Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Salaries and 
              Expenses...........................................   120
        General Provisions--Department of Energy.................   143
Title IV:
    Independent Agencies:
        Appalachian Regional Commission..........................   144
        Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board..................   144
        Delta Regional Authority.................................   145
        Denali Commission........................................   145
        Northern Border Regional Commission......................   145
        Southeast Crescent Regional Commission...................   145
        Nuclear Regulatory Commission............................   145
            Office of Inspector General..........................   146
        Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.....................   147
        Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas 
          Transportation Projects................................   147
        Tennessee Valley Authority: Office of the Inspector 
          General................................................   147
Title V: General Provisions......................................   148
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of 
  the 
  Senate.........................................................   149
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules 
  of the 
  Senate.........................................................   149
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of 
  the 
  Senate.........................................................   150
Budgetary Impact of Bill.........................................   158
Disclosure of Congressionally Directed Spending Items............   158
Comparative Statement of Budget Authority........................   212

                                PURPOSE

    The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for 
the fiscal year 2011 beginning October 1, 2010, and ending 
September 30, 2011, for energy and water development, and for 
other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources 
development programs and related activities of the Department 
of the Army, Civil Functions--U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' 
Civil Works Program in title I; for the Department of the 
Interior's Bureau of Reclamation in title II; for the 
Department of Energy's energy research activities, including 
environmental restoration and waste management, and atomic 
energy defense activities of the National Nuclear Security 
Administration in title III; and for related independent 
agencies and commissions, including the Appalachian Regional 
Commission, Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, and 
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in title IV.

                SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    The fiscal year 2011 budget estimates for the bill total 
$35,878,274,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The 
recommendation of the Committee totals $35,073,700,000. This is 
$804,574,000 below the budget estimates and $1,095,700,000 
above the enacted appropriation for the current fiscal year.

                         Subcommittee Hearings

    The Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water held 
three sessions in connection with the fiscal year 2011 
appropriation bill. Witnesses included officials and 
representatives of the Federal agencies under the 
subcommittee's jurisdiction.
    The recommendations for fiscal year 2011 therefore, have 
been developed after careful consideration of available data.

                         Votes in the Committee

    By a vote of 17 to 12 the Committee on July 22, 2010, 
recommended that the bill, as amended, be reported to the 
Senate.

                                TITLE I

                      DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL

                         DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

                       Corps of Engineers--Civil

                              INTRODUCTION

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is made up of 
approximately 35,000 civilian and 650 military members that 
perform both military and Civil Works functions. The military 
and civilian engineers, scientists and other specialists work 
hand in hand as leaders in engineering and environmental 
matters. The diverse workforce of biologists, engineers, 
geologists, hydrologists, natural resource managers, and other 
professionals meets the demands of changing times and 
requirements as a vital part of America's Army.
    The Corps' mission is to provide quality, responsive 
engineering services to the Nation including:
  --Planning, designing, building, and operating water 
        resources and other Civil Works projects. (Navigation, 
        Flood Control, Environmental Protection, Disaster 
        Response, et cetera);
  --Designing and managing the construction of military 
        facilities for the Army and Air Force. (Military 
        Construction); and
  --Providing design and construction management support for 
        other Defense and Federal agencies. (Interagency and 
        International Services).
    The Energy and Water bill only funds the Civil Works 
missions of the Corps of Engineers. Approximately 23,000 
civilians and about 290 military officers are responsible for 
this nationwide mission.
    It is important to realize that while the Corps Civil Works 
programs impact all 50 States and virtually every citizen of 
our Nation, they are a relatively minor part of the Federal 
budget. It is instructive to understand the Federal budget and 
the resources that go into the various programs in order to 
determine the proper value that perhaps should be placed on 
these programs.
    For fiscal year 2010, the overall Federal budget amounted 
to $3,540,000,000,000. Discretionary spending made up 
$1,250,000,000,000 or just over 35 percent of the overall 
budget. The remaining nearly 65 percent of the budget consists 
of mandatory spending not subject to annual appropriations.
    Of the $1,250,000,000,000 in discretionary spending, 
$530,000,000,000 is referred to as non-defense discretionary 
spending. This amounts to 15 percent of the Federal budget and 
is what the administration has proposed to freeze for 3 years 
to reduce the annual budget deficit.
    The $530,000,000,000 in non-defense discretionary spending 
in fiscal year 2010 was where 97.5 percent of the funds for the 
Corps of Engineers was appropriated. In fiscal year 2010, the 
Corps non-defense budget amounted to just more than 
$5,300,000,000. That means that the Corps' budget makes up 
about 1 percent of the non-defense discretionary spending or 
about 0.15 percent of the overall budget.
    A logical question to ask would be what does the Nation 
receive for an investment of that magnitude? Through its Civil 
Works program the Corps carries out a wide array of projects 
that provide:
  --Coastal storm damage reduction;
  --Disaster preparedness and response;
  --Environmental protection and restoration;
  --Flood damage reduction;
  --Hydropower;
  --Navigable waters;
  --Recreational opportunities;
  --Regulatory oversight; and
  --Water supply.
    In fiscal year 2010, 1,167 projects were under 
construction. These included 434 projects specifically 
authorized by Congress and 733 projects, comprising 9 
authorities, of the Continuing Authorities Program.
    Of the specifically authorized projects, 191 were flood 
risk management; 5 were for hydropower; 147 were for 
navigation; 39 were for environmental restoration; and 52 were 
for environmental infrastructure.
    Forty-one States are served by Corps of Engineers ports and 
waterways including all States east of the Mississippi River. 
The Corps operates and maintains 12,000 miles of commercial 
inland channels. Sixteen percent of U.S. domestic freight was 
carried by water in 2007 (by ton-miles, excluding air and 
pipeline). In 2007, 2,734 U.S. companies were operating on U.S. 
waterways. The Corps operates and maintains 926 harbors on the 
coasts, inland waterways, and the Great Lakes. Nearly 2.5 
billion tons of cargo were handled by U.S. ports and waterways 
in 2008 (998.7 million tons inbound from foreign sources, 522.1 
million tons outbound and 956.3 million tons shipped 
domestically. The value of the foreign commerce handled at U.S. 
ports in 2008 was $1,624,000,000,000. More than 43 percent of 
the tonnage consisted of shipments of crude oil and petroleum 
products. The Corps also operates 238 lock chambers on the 
inland waterway system. The average age of these facilities is 
58 years.
    To maintain these navigation channels, the Corps dredges 
approximately 263 million cubic yards of material at a cost of 
$1,344,000,000. More than 82 percent of this dredging is done 
by 51 private firms (33 of which are small businesses). To 
augment the private commercial dredge fleet, the Corps owns 11 
dredges--4 hopper dredges and 7 others.
    The Corps manages structures for flood risk management at 
674 sites including 563 at Corps of Engineers-owned and -
operated dam projects. The Corps also oversees a network of 
about 11,750 miles of levees either built or controlled by the 
Corps. The average annual damages prevented by these flood risk 
management projects for the 10 year period from 1999-2008 was 
$22,300,000,000.
    The Corps has 75 hydropower projects in operation with 350 
generating units. The installed generating capacity of these 
units is 21,747 megawatts. Seventy billion nine hundred million 
kilowatt-hours of electricity are generated annually providing 
$800,000,000 in revenue to the Treasury. The Corps owns and 
operates 24 percent of the U.S. hydropower capacity and 
provides 3 percent of the total U.S. electric capacity. There 
are another 90 non-Federal power plants located at Corps 
facilities providing an additional 2,300 megawatts of capacity.
    The Corps owns more than 76 million acres and manages an 
additional 4 million acres at various Corps projects. The total 
surface area, at full pool level, of all Corps lakes totals 
26,300,000 acres, or an area slightly larger than the State of 
Kentucky.
    The total capacity of Corps lakes is 329.2 million acre-
feet of storage. Of that amount, the Corps has a total of 9.76 
million acre-feet of authorized municipal and industrial water 
supply storage in 136 projects. These projects are located in 
25 States as well as Puerto Rico. Forty-eight Corps project 
also have authorized irrigation storage. The total investment 
in municipal and industrial water supply storage is 
$1,500,000,000.
    The Corps is the top provider for recreation within the 
Federal Government. Ten percent of the U.S. population visits a 
Corps project at least once a year--that is more than 370 
million visits per year. The Corps has 4,641 recreation sites 
at 422 Corps projects (mostly lakes). Seventy percent of the 
U.S. population live within 50 miles of a Corps lake. Twelve 
million acres of land and water controlled by the Corps is used 
for recreation. The Corps hosts 20 percent of the visits to 
Federal recreation areas on 2 percent of Federal lands. Corps 
projects provide 56,964 miles of shoreline (which is longer 
than the coastline of the continental United States). The Corps 
maintains 94,964 campsites, 6,487 miles of trails, and 3,522 
boat launch ramps. The Corps has one-third of all U.S. 
freshwater fishing and 20,000 fishing tournaments are held 
annually at Corps projects. Visitors spend $18,000,000,000 
annually at Corps projects. Visitation at Corps projects 
supports more than 350,000 full- or part-time jobs. There are 
more than 500 concessionaires on Corps projects with gross 
fixed assets of $1,000,000,000.
    In fiscal year 2009, the Corps acted on 71,260 permit 
requests through the Corps regulatory program. There were 4,240 
individual permits and letters of permission; 18,680 regional 
general permits; and 26,540 nationwide permits. Two hundred and 
sixty permits were denied and the applications were withdrawn 
for 9,750 requests. The Corps also made some 80,000 
jurisdictional wetland determinations in fiscal year 2009.
    The Corps continues to provide support to local, State, and 
Federal agencies before, during, and after major disasters. 
Major disasters responded to in 2009: North Dakota/Minnesota 
Floods; Continued support to Hurricane Katrina, Gustaf, and Ike 
recovery operations.
    The Corps also supports more than 70 other (non-defense) 
Government agencies. In fiscal year 2009, the expenditures for 
this effort topped $2,000,000,000 and were paid for by the 
agencies requesting the assistance. The biggest customers for 
the Corps' services are: Department of Homeland Security--
Customs and Border Protection; Department of Homeland 
Security--FEMA; Department of State; Environmental Protection 
Agency [EPA]; and U.S. Agency for International Development.

      OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET REQUEST

    The fiscal year 2011 budget request for the Corps of 
Engineers is composed of $4,939,000,000 in new budget 
authority. This is a decrease of $186,000,000 from the fiscal 
year 2010 request. The budget request is $506,000,000 less than 
the fiscal year 2010 enacted amount.
    The Committee is disappointed that the administration has 
proposed to invest less in our Nation's water infrastructure in 
fiscal year 2011 than they did in fiscal year 2010. The 
Committee is very concerned about the continued large gap 
between the administration's budget proposal and the annual 
appropriations provided by this Committee. The Committee would 
like to find a constructive way to work with the administration 
to narrow this gap.
    The Committee is concerned that the administration is not 
placing the proper economic value on the Corps' Civil Works 
program when budgetary resources are parceled out. At a time 
when this existing infrastructure, the foundation of our 
economic security and quality of life, is depreciating much 
faster than it is being recapitalized, when our increasing 
population is placing much greater stress on the Nation's vital 
water resources, when shifts in population centers mean new and 
different problems, and when a growing environmental awareness 
requires new solutions to persistent problems, this 
underfunding is unacceptable and threatens our continued well-
being. Infrastructure budgets have to be increased. If not, the 
Nation will continue to face unscheduled outages, damaged and 
incomplete infrastructure, and other emergency situations that 
must be dealt with through ever-increasing emergency 
appropriations. The situations in New Orleans and south 
Louisiana in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina should have 
been a wake-up call to the Nation as to how we should be making 
investment decisions. A few billion dollars more of investment 
in advance of Hurricane Katrina would have reduced the outlay 
of the tens of billions of dollars that the Nation has had to 
invest since the hurricane.
    The Corps Civil Works program means jobs for our citizens 
in the form of design and construction of the projects, 
materials and supplies for construction and maintenance not to 
mention the ancillary services that are provided for all 
aspects of the Civil Works programs. Just as important to the 
Nation as the jobs created and retained by these investments 
are the taxes paid to local, State, and Federal coffers as a 
result of these investments.
    Over the last decade, the infrastructure provided by the 
Civil Works program has provided more than $500,000,000,000 in 
benefits to the Nation as well as revenues to the Treasury 
through prevention of flood damages, transportation savings, 
recreation benefits, hydropower revenues, water supply 
benefits, and environmental benefits. This is a very 
conservative estimate based on readily quantifiable data. These 
benefits were achieved on an investment of less than 
$70,000,000,000 (including the funds provided in the aftermath 
of Hurricane Katrina and the American Recovery and Reinvestment 
Act). Yet this return on investment seems not to be considered 
when parceling out budgetary resources.
    The Committee urges the administration to assess the value 
of the Corps' programs to the national economy and derive a 
level of investment from that impact that is commensurate with 
the outputs of this critical infrastructure.
    Unfortunately, this budget proposal, like many previous 
budget proposals, is woefully inadequate in funding national 
infrastructure needs. It ignores studies and projects that are 
ongoing and funded in the fiscal year 2010 Energy and Water 
Appropriations Act, that was agreed to by the Congress and 
signed into law by the President, in favor of a select group of 
studies and projects that comport to budgetary criteria devised 
by the administration. While this is the prerogative of the 
administration, it should be noted that the criteria utilized 
is not based in law. It is simply the administration's choice 
and as such has changed from year to year and from 
administration to administration.
    The Committee differs with the administration concerning 
benefit-to-cost ratios being utilized to establish priority for 
funding. The Flood Control Act of 1936 established that project 
benefits should exceed projects costs. This has been the Corps' 
longstanding water resource policy and legislative attempts to 
change this requirement have been unsuccessful. However, the 
administration has arbitrarily decided that benefits simply 
exceeding the costs is not a sufficient measure of a project's 
worth. For fiscal year 2011, the administration has chosen 2.5 
to be the threshold for projects to be included in the budget. 
Yet the administration has even chosen to ignore this 
requirement.
    Of the 95 projects recommended by the administration in the 
construction account for fiscal year 2011, only 40 had a 
benefit-to-cost ratio above the arbitrary 2.5 threshold chosen 
for fiscal year 2011. An additional nine projects with benefit-
to-cost ratios of less than 2.5 were included based on 
``substantial life saving benefits''. These 49 projects account 
for only $570,000,000 or 34 percent of the requested 
$1,690,000,000 for construction. That means that the other 46 
projects funded at more than $1,100,000,000 were chosen by 
other criteria established by the administration. Some of these 
criteria, such as dam safety/seepage stability correction and 
environmental compliance are criteria where the administration 
and the Congress are in agreement. However, other criteria 
utilized by the administration are more subjective.
    The criteria for determining which studies to budget for 
appears to be even murkier than the criteria for determining 
which construction projects to fund. What is obvious is the 
result. Fewer studies are funded every year than are enacted in 
the previous appropriation act. These studies provide the 
information needed to make vital investments in our water 
resources infrastructure. However, they are de-emphasized in 
the budget request.
    The Regulatory Program is proposed at $193,000,000 for 
fiscal year 2011. This is an increase of $3,000,000 to this 
program that provides the funding for the Corps nationwide 
regulatory roles primarily under section 404 of the Clean Water 
Act and section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899.
    The Committee is disappointed that funding for the Formerly 
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program [FUSRAP] was cut by 
$4,000,000 from the fiscal year 2010 enacted amount of 
$134,000,000. This is a $10,000,000 cut to the program over the 
last 2 years. This program was transferred to the Corps from 
the Department of Energy, because the Committee was concerned 
with management and cost issues of the program within the 
Energy Department. This is a program that is being well-managed 
by the Corps and should have stable, adequate budget resources 
to continue these radiological clean-up activities.
    The Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account is 
proposed at $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2011. These funds are 
proposed for readiness and preparedness activities for the 
Corps of Engineers.
    The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil 
Works) is proposed as a separate account for $6,000,000. The 
Committee continues to believe that the Assistant Secretary's 
office should be funded in the Defense appropriations bill. 
However, until such time as that can be reintegrated into that 
bill, the Committee agrees that the office should be funded as 
a separate account. The Assistant Secretary's duties encompass 
much more than the Civil Works functions of the Corps of 
Engineers and the budget needs of the office should be 
addressed separately.
    The General Expenses [GE] account is proposed at 
$185,000,000 for fiscal year 2011. This is the same as the 
fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. With inflation, this is a cut 
to the management and oversight functions of the headquarters 
of the Corps. The Committee notes that the Corps operates one 
of the most efficient headquarters staffs in the National 
Capital region. Only about 3.5 percent of their staffing is at 
headquarters as opposed to 10 percent or more for comparable 
agencies in the National Capital region.

                            PLANNING PROGRAM

    The Committee is very concerned about the Corps planning 
program. The Committee believes that the Corps should have a 
robust planning program to not only address new water resource 
needs but also to evaluate changes throughout the project 
development process. Over the last 10 years, the Committee has 
provided more than $1,500,000,000 to the Corps for planning 
studies versus just over $1,000,000,000 as proposed by the 
administration for the same period.
    As this Committee has noted in the past, planning in the 
Corps is a specialized skill set and once that ability is lost, 
it is difficult to re-establish. Most of the criticisms of the 
Corps' project development process in recent years have 
centered on problems in the planning process. The Committee has 
attempted to maintain consistent planning funding in order to 
retain these skills. Even within the meager planning budgets 
provided by the administration, some improvements to the 
planning program such as the Planning Associates Program and 
Planning Centers of Expertise have been initiated. However, the 
Planning Centers of Expertise have not been funded to the 
extent necessary to develop them into an effective planning 
tool. The Committee has provided additional funding for these 
centers in fiscal year 2011 and strongly urges the 
administration to provide the necessary resources in future 
budget submissions.
    However, somewhere the planning process is breaking down. 
Despite relatively stable planning budgets, the number of 
reports by the Chief of Engineers has declined precipitously. 
In the run-up to the Water Resources Development Act of 2007, 
26 Chief of Engineers' reports were completed in 2005 and 2006. 
However since 2007, only six Chief of Engineers' reports have 
been completed. Complex planning studies seem to take 
unbelievable amounts of time.
    A General Reevaluation Report [GRR] of an approximately 
$1,250,000,000 flood risk management/environmental restoration 
project in the West has been ongoing since 1998 and has 
received nearly $30,000,000 in Federal funds to date. According 
to the latest schedule, a Chief of Engineers' report is not 
expected until late 2012. At the other extreme, in the Upper 
Great Plains, a roughly $1,250,000,000 flood risk management 
feasibility study was initiated in 2009 and a draft Chief's 
report is currently scheduled for December 2010 at a Federal 
cost of about $7,000,000. At this rate, the preconstruction 
engineering and design on the second study may be completed 
before the GRR on the first.
    These are just two of the extremes in the planning program 
across the Corps Civil Works program. Another problem area is 
deep draft navigation. These studies also seem to extend for 
unusually long periods of time and suffer from dramatically 
increased study costs. Two east coast DOEP draft studies have 
been underway for more than 10 years with no end in sight to 
the study process. Across the planning spectrum, studies with 
shorter schedules are far outweighed by those with unusually 
long schedules. While inconsistent funding is a reason for some 
drawn out schedules, it is not the only reason. Some planning 
efforts seem to go on forever, regardless of the amount of 
funding provided.
    The Committee understands that the planning process is the 
most difficult phase of the project development process and 
that a myriad of factors can lengthen or derail a planning 
study. However, a planning study that lasts longer than 10 
years seems excessive. One would think that studies of this 
length would be limited to the largest, most complex projects 
that the Corps expects to undertake. Proper planning is 
critical to the success of every Corps project; however, 
planning for planning's sake leads to frustration with the 
planning process.
    The Corps is directed to report to this Committee by 
September 30, 2010, on ways to improve the planning program to 
reduce these extended planning schedules. This report should 
address funding needs, process changes, management changes and 
other elements required to improve the timeliness of the 
planning process.

           THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [ARRA], 
enacted on February 17, 2009, was an attempt to combat the 
severe economic downturn by putting our citizens back to work 
rebuilding our Nation's water resource infrastructure. The 
Corps was provided $4,600,000,000 to stimulate job growth by 
addressing needed water resource infrastructure needs. The 
Corps project list was not approved by the administration until 
May 2009. However, even with this delayed start, the Corps has 
obligated more than 85 percent of the ARRA funding. More than 
44 percent of the funding has gone to small businesses. The 
Corps is on track to obligate all of this funding before it 
expires on September 30, 2010.

                         BUDGET JUSTIFICATIONS

    The Committee notes that the budget justifications arrived 
nearly concurrently with the administration's budget rollout. 
This is a considerable improvement over the past 2 years. The 
Committee appreciates the traditional layout of the 
justifications and notes that information was provided for all 
accounts.

                       INLAND WATERWAY TRUST FUND

    The Committee was first made aware of the precipitous 
decline of revenues in the Inland Waterway Trust Fund [IWTF] 
when the fiscal year 2008 budget was submitted to Congress. At 
that time, the Committee was told a legislative proposal would 
be forthcoming. It was developed as a part of the fiscal year 
2009 budget request. As such, there was no stakeholder 
involvement in the proposal. When it was finally presented to 
Congress--some 12 months later--it was universally panned by 
the navigation industry. The fiscal year 2009 budget request 
was predicated on this proposal being enacted. Congress 
demurred and indicated that a more equitable proposal was 
needed.
    The fiscal year 2011 budget repeats the proposal to phase 
out the existing fuel tax that funds the IWTF and phase in a 
lockage fee. Fortunately, the budget was not predicated on this 
proposal being enacted. The administration proposal only 
expends existing revenues available in the IWTF and deposits 
assumed revenues from the lockage fee into the IWTF to be used 
in subsequent years. This is a much more prudent way to budget 
with these limited funds.
    The Committee is aware of a Government-industry working 
group that is working to find acceptable ways to enhance 
revenues in the IWTF while providing an overhaul in the way 
that IWTF projects are prioritized and budgeted. Much of this 
group's work will require legislation to effect the changes 
needed to enhance the funding for these projects. The Committee 
looks forward to the final product from this working group and 
the appropriate authorizing committees of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate acting on this proposal.
    Until new revenues are introduced into the IWTF, the 
Committee will only provide funds for inland waterway projects 
that can be accommodated within the approximately $90,000,000 
annually that the current fuel tax generates. The Committee has 
again included legislative text to prohibit the Corps from 
entering into any new continuing contracts for any inland 
waterway project until the revenue stream for the IWTF is 
enhanced.
    It should be noted that the Committee has waited through 
four budget cycles for a viable proposal to more robustly fund 
the investments that need to be made in the inland waterway 
system. The Committee continues to support the current cost-
shared approach for these projects with half of the funds 
derived from general revenues and half from the IWTF. However, 
the Committee is only willing to wait so long for the 
appropriate committees to fulfill their responsibilities and 
provide the necessary legislation to resolve this issue. 
Ultimately, this Committee may be forced to act in order to 
address the serious needs of the inland waterway system.

                 CONTINUING CONTRACTS AND REPROGRAMMING

    The Committee expects the Chief of Engineers to execute the 
Civil Works program generally in accordance with congressional 
direction. This includes moving individual projects forward in 
accordance with the funds annually appropriated. However, the 
Committee realizes that many factors outside the Corps' control 
may dictate the progress of any given project or study.
    The Committee is retaining the reprogramming legislation 
provided in the fiscal year 2010 Energy and Water Development 
Act.

                  5-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE BUDGET PLANNING

    While the Committee appreciates the Corps' attempts to 
provide a meaningful 5-year budget plan, it recognizes the 
inherent difficulties between the legislative and executive 
branches in preparing a useful plan. The executive branch is 
unwilling to project a 5-year horizon for projects for which 
they do not budget, leaving a sizeable percentage of the Corps 
annual appropriations with a year-to-year event horizon for 
planning purposes. The fact that a sizeable portion of the 
annual appropriations are dedicated to congressional priorities 
is not a new phenomenon. Many major public works projects over 
the last two centuries have been funded on an annual basis 
without a clear budget strategy. The Committee would welcome 
the ideas and the opportunity to work with the executive branch 
to determine a mutually agreeable way to develop an integrated 
5-year comprehensive budget that displays true funding needs 
for congressional as well as administration priorities. 
Anything less will only give a partial view of the investments 
needed in water resources infrastructure.

                         DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS

    The budget for the Corps of Engineers consists of 
individual line items of projects. As presented by the 
President, the budget contains 975 specific line-item requests 
for directed spending by the administration. Additional funding 
is requested by the administration for nationwide line items. 
All of these line items were specific requests by the 
administration or the Congress to be funded in fiscal year 
2011. They did not request these funds programmatically, they 
requested them for a specific project in a specific location 
for a specific purpose.
    All of the projects funded in this report have gone through 
the same rigorous public review and approval process as those 
proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these 
projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed 
projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary 
prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to 
decide what not to fund.
    In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding 
provided in the energy and water bill, all disclosures are made 
in the report accompanying the bill.
    Two tables are provided at the back of this report for 
disclosure. The first table provides the congressionally 
directed spending items requested by Members of Congress 
requiring disclosure under the provisions of Rule 44 of the 
Standing Rules of the Senate. If the Member requested the 
budget request or if only the budget request was provided, 
Member names are not listed next to these items because under 
the provisions of Rule 44 this would not be considered 
congressionally directed spending. The second table lists the 
Presidentially directed spending items. While this table is not 
required under the disclosure provisions of Rule 44, the 
Committee believes that it is prudent to provide this 
additional disclosure information.
    The purposes for the funding provided in the various 
accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each 
account. The location of the programs, projects, or studies are 
denoted in the account tables.

                         GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $160,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     104,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     166,000,000

    This appropriation funds studies to determine the need, 
engineering feasibility, economic justification, and the 
environmental and social suitability of solutions to water and 
related land resource problems; and for preconstruction 
engineering and design work, data collection, and interagency 
coordination and research activities.
    The planning program is the entry point for Federal 
involvement in solutions to the Nation's water resource 
problems and needs. Unfortunately, the General Investigations 
[GI] account amount proposed in the budget is generally the 
same as what has been proposed in previous budgets. Nationwide 
studies and programs consume almost half of the 
administration's GI request. This budget asserts that the 
Nation should concentrate scarce resources on completing 
studies but not carrying forward ongoing studies.
    The Committee has provided for a robust and balanced 
planning program for fiscal year 2011. However, no new starts 
are included in this recommendation. To provide additional 
transparency in the budget process, the Committee is pleased 
that the administration has maintained the structure of this 
account from how it was displayed in the fiscal year 2010 
Energy and Water Act.
    The first column represents the reconnaissance phase of the 
planning process. These studies determine if there is a Federal 
interest in a water resource problem or need and if there is a 
cost sharing sponsor willing to move forward with the study. 
The next column represents the feasibility phase of the study. 
These detailed cost-shared studies determine the selected 
alternative to be recommended to the Congress for construction. 
The third column represents the preconstruction engineering and 
design phase. These detailed cost-shared designs are prepared 
while the project recommended to Congress is awaiting 
authorization for construction.
    The Committee believes that by segregating the table in 
this manner, more attention will be focused on the various 
study phases, and a more balanced planning program will be 
developed by the administration. As the last two columns are 
generally cost shared, they demonstrate the commitment by cost-
sharing sponsors to be a part of the Federal planning process. 
By the same token, it also shows the level of commitment of the 
Federal Government to these cost-sharing sponsors.
    The budget request and the recommended Committee allowance 
are shown on the following table:

                                   CORPS OF ENGINEERS--GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Budget estimate              Committee recommendation
                Project title                 ------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 RECON       FEAS       PED       RECON       FEAS        PED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    ALASKA

HOMER HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, AK.....  .........  .........  .........  .........        300   .........
MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK................  .........        100  .........  .........        100   .........
VALDEZ NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, AK...........  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        500
YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK...........................  .........        450  .........  .........        450   .........

                   ARKANSAS

LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT,   .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
 AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, & TN................
MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR...................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        250
PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, AR........................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        250
WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO.....  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR.....  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........

                  CALIFORNIA

ALISO CREEK, CA..............................  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
ARROYO SECO WATERSHED, CA....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA..  .........        900  .........  .........        900   .........
CENTRAL VALLEY INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT     .........  .........  .........  .........        500   .........
 STUDY, CA...................................
COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA..............  .........  .........        500  .........  ..........        500
COYOTE DAM, CA...............................  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA (LACDA)       .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
 WATER CONSERVATION AND SUPPLY, WHITTIER
 NARROWS DAM, CA.............................
LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA..  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND   .........  .........  .........  .........        100   .........
 VICINITY, CA................................
LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA......................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        250
MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA...................  .........        210  .........  .........        210   .........
MATILIJA DAM, CA.............................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        100
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
MIDDLE CREEK, CA.............................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        400
PAJARO RIVER, CA.............................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        300
REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA......................  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL (GRR), CA       .........  .........  .........  .........        600   .........
 (SYSTEM EVALUATION).........................
SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, DELTA ISLANDS AND       .........        468  .........  .........        750   .........
 LEVEES, CA..................................
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA (OCEANSIDE)...  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK, CA...................  .........  .........  .........  .........        300   .........
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, FRAZIER CREEK, CA...  .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN     .........  .........  .........  .........        500   .........
 RIVER, CA...................................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS       .........  .........  .........  .........        223   .........
 COUNTY, ORESTIMBA CREEK, CA.................
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WHITE RIVER AND DRY   .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
 CREEK, CA...................................
SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED, CA..............  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA...............  .........        307  .........  .........        307   .........
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA............  .........  .........  .........  .........        500   .........
ST HELENA-NAPA RIVER, CA.....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
SUN VALLEY WATERSHED, CA.....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
SUTTER COUNTY, CA............................  .........        339  .........  .........        339   .........
TIJUANA RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, CA..  .........  .........  .........         50  ..........  .........
UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA...................  .........        177  .........  .........        177   .........
WESTMINSTER, EAST GARDEN GROVE, CA...........  .........  .........  .........  .........        279   .........

                   COLORADO

CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER BASIN, GREELEY, CO.....  .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
CHATFIELD REALLOCATION STUDY, CO.............  .........  .........  .........  .........        267   .........
ADAMS AND DENVER COUNTIES, CO................  .........  .........  .........         50  ..........  .........

                 CONNECTICUT

WESTCHESTER COUNTY STREAMS, BYRAM RIVER FLOOD  .........        200  .........  .........        300   .........
 REDUCTION, CT & NY..........................
CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT,   .........  .........  .........  .........        350   .........
 MA, NH & VT.................................

                   DELAWARE

RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE  .........  .........  .........  .........        100   .........

                   FLORIDA

CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL.........................  .........  .........  .........  .........        500   .........
FLAGLER COUNTY, FL...........................  .........  .........  .........  .........        287   .........
LAKE WORTH INLET, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL......  .........        340  .........  .........        340   .........
MILE POINT, FL...............................  .........  .........  .........  .........        375         100
SARASOTA, LIDO KEY BEACH, FL.................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        250
WALTON COUNTY, FL............................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        250

                   GEORGIA

AUGUSTA, GA..................................  .........        578  .........  .........        578   .........
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA................  .........  .........        600  .........  ..........        600
TYBEE ISLAND, GA.............................  .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........

                    HAWAII

ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI......................  .........        408  .........  .........        408   .........
HILO HARBOR MODIFICATIONS, HI................  .........  .........  .........  .........        300   .........
WEST MAUI WATERSHED, MAUI, HI................  .........  .........  .........  .........        100   .........

                   ILLINOIS

DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II).............  .........        500  .........  .........        500   .........
ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL.........  .........        400  .........  .........        750   .........
INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES-MISSISSIPPI  .........        400  .........  .........        750   .........
 RIVER AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES, IL, IN, OH,
 WI..........................................
PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE AND SANITARY DISTRICT     .........  .........  .........  .........        850   .........
 AND FISH LAKE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT,
 IL..........................................
UPPER MISS RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IL, IA,    .........  .........  .........        750  ..........  .........
 MO, MN & WI.................................
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER-ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM,    .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........      4,000
 IL, IA, MN, MO & WI.........................

                   INDIANA

INDIANA HARBOR, IN...........................  .........  .........        300  .........  ..........        300

                     IOWA

CEDAR RIVER, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA................  .........  .........  .........  .........        700       3,000
HUMBOLDT, IA.................................  .........  .........  .........  .........        175   .........

                    KANSAS

BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO...................  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
MANHATTAN, KS................................  .........  .........  .........  .........        300   .........
TOPEKA, KS...................................  .........  .........        100  .........  ..........        500
UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS.......................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........         90

                  LOUISIANA

AMITE RIVER--ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA.......  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA........................  .........  .........      2,000  .........  ..........      2,000
BOSSIER PARISH, LA...........................  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
CALCASIEU LOCK, LA...........................  .........      1,000  .........  .........      1,000   .........
CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA....................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        250
CROSS LAKE, LA...............................  .........  .........  .........  .........         50   .........
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION,  .........     16,595  .........  .........     16,595   .........
 LA..........................................
PORT OF IBERIA, LA...........................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........      1,000
SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE          .........  .........  .........  .........      1,000   .........
 PROTECTION, LA..............................
ST CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA....  .........  .........  .........  .........        350   .........
WEST SHORE-LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA............  .........  .........  .........  .........        350   .........

                    MAINE

SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME.........................  .........  .........  .........  .........        300   .........

                   MARYLAND

ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD & DC       .........        183  .........  .........        183   .........
 (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN)........................
ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, PRINCE        .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
 GEORGE'S COUNTY LEVEE, MD & DC..............
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES, MD...  .........  .........  .........         50  ..........  .........
CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD & VA...  .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
CHESAPEAKE BAY MARSHLANDS, MD................  .........  .........  .........         50  ..........  .........
CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
 MANAGEMENT, PA, MD & VA.....................
EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD.  .........  .........        483  .........  ..........        169
MIDDLE POTOMAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD, VA,     .........  .........  .........  .........         68   .........
 PA, WV & DC.................................
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL          .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
 RESTORATION AND LOW FLOW MANAGEMENT, NY, PA
 & MD........................................

                MASSACHUSETTS

BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA..........  .........  .........  .........  .........      1,800   .........
PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA.......  .........        100  .........  .........        100   .........

                   MICHIGAN

CLINTON RIVER RIPARIAN CORRIDOR, MI..........  .........  .........  .........  .........        100   .........
ECORSE CREEK, MI.............................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        200
GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION SYSTEM STUDY, MI, IL,         400  .........  .........        400  ..........  .........
 IN, MN, NY, OH, PA & WI.....................
GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS & SEDIMENT   .........  .........  .........  .........        500   .........
 REMEDIATION, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, PA & WI
LANSING GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION,    .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
 MI..........................................

                  MINNESOTA

MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, MN & SD.....  .........        350  .........  .........        350   .........

                 MISSISSIPPI

PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........

                   MISSOURI

KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS........................  .........        500  .........  .........        500   .........
MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO & KS..........  .........        600  .........  .........        600   .........
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L-455 & R   .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        150
 460-471, MO & KS............................
RIVER DES PERES, MO..........................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........         45

                   MONTANA

YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT...............  .........        200  .........  .........        500   .........

                    NEVADA

TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV..........................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........      4,500

                NEW HAMPSHIRE

MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA.....  .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER         .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        150
 TURNING BASIN, NH...........................

                  NEW JERSEY

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, NJ.......  .........        290  .........  .........        290   .........
HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK             .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........
 MEADOWLANDS, NJ.............................
HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER,   .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........
 NJ..........................................
LOWER SADDLE RIVER, NJ.......................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        200
NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION, HEREFORD INLET    .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
 TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ.......................
NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM     .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
 NOURISHMENT, NJ.............................
PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ & NY.............  .........  .........  .........  .........        125   .........
PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ..................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        160
PECKMAN RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ............  .........  .........  .........  .........        620   .........
RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ.......................  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ  .........  .........  .........  .........        207   .........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ.  .........  .........  .........  .........        100   .........
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH,   .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        125
 NJ..........................................
SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ.........  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        200
STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ.......  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........

                  NEW MEXICO

ESPANOLA VALLEY, RIO GRANDE AND TRIBUTARIES,   .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
 NM..........................................
RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO AND TX (SECTION 729)  .........        500  .........  .........        500   .........

                   NEW YORK

DUTCHESS COUNTY WATERSHEDS, NY...............  .........  .........  .........  .........        100   .........
FORGE RIVER WATERSHED, NY....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        400   .........
HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ..............  .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........
JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH, NY.  .........  .........        170  .........  ..........        170
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY......................  .........        172  .........  .........        172   .........
NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, ASHAROKEN, NY....  .........  .........  .........  .........        100   .........
SOUTH SHORE OF STATEN ISLAND, NY.............  .........  .........  .........  .........        250   .........
TEN MILE RIVER, DUTCHESS COUNTY, NY AND        .........  .........  .........  .........        100   .........
 LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CT.......................

                NORTH CAROLINA

CURRITUCK SOUND, NC..........................  .........        300  .........  .........        300   .........
NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC........................  .........  .........        200  .........  ..........        200
NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL, NC....        104  .........  .........         11        393   .........
SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC........  .........        300  .........  .........        300   .........

                 NORTH DAKOTA

FARGO-MOORHEAD METRO STUDY, ND & MN (RRN       .........        150     15,000  .........        150      15,000
 BASIN AUTHORITY)............................
FARGO-MOORHEAD UPSTREAM STUDY, ND & MN (RRN    .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
 BASIN AUTHORITY)............................
JAMES RIVER, ND..............................  .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, ND, MN, SD &     .........        433  .........  .........      1,896   .........
 MANITOBA, CANADA............................
MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS & MO..  .........  .........  .........  .........      5,000   .........
SHEYENNE RIVER, ND...........................  .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........

                     OHIO

WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI........  .........  .........  .........  .........      2,000   .........

                   OKLAHOMA

ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OK..................  .........  .........  .........  .........      1,650   .........
GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, KS,  .........  .........  .........  .........        190   .........
 MO & AR.....................................
SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK..  .........  .........  .........  .........        325   .........
WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK......................  .........  .........  .........  .........        325   .........

                    OREGON

LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION,    .........        300  .........  .........        300   .........
 OR & WA.....................................
WALLA WALLA WATERSHED, OR & WA...............  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        500
WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR..  .........        220  .........  .........        220   .........
WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR..  .........  .........        153  .........  ..........        153

                 PENNSYLVANIA

BLOOMSBURG, PA...............................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        500
DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION,   .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
 PA, DE & NJ.................................
SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, WISSAHICKON            .........        214  .........  .........        214   .........
 WATERSHED, PA...............................
UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION SYSTEM STUDY, PA.......  .........        749  .........  .........      1,200   .........
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION,   .........  .........  .........          4  ..........
 PA..........................................

                SOUTH CAROLINA

EDISTO ISLAND, SC............................  .........        114  .........  .........        114   .........

                  TENNESSEE

MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN....  .........         50  .........  .........         50   .........

                    TEXAS

ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN-ELM CREEK)...  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX  .........        726  .........  .........        726   .........
DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN,    .........        700  .........  .........      2,300   .........
 TX..........................................
GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER              .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........
 REALIGNMENTS, TX............................
GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX...  .........        600  .........  .........        600   .........
LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX...............  .........        425  .........  .........        425   .........
NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX.............  .........        250  .........  .........        250   .........
SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX.............  .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX...................  .........  .........  .........  .........  ..........        400
SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX....  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........

                   VIRGINIA

CHOWAN RIVER, VA & NC........................  .........  .........  .........        124  ..........  .........
CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA...................  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
DISMAL SWAMP & DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA........  .........  .........  .........  .........         22   .........
FOUR MILE RUN, VA............................  .........  .........  .........  .........         53   .........
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA............  .........  .........  .........  .........        200   .........
JOHN H KERR DAM & RESERVOIR, VA & NC (SEC      .........        300  .........  .........        300   .........
 216)........................................
LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA....  .........  .........         50  .........  ..........         50
NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA..................  .........  .........  .........  .........        150   .........
UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER BASIN, VA...........  .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........

                  WASHINGTON

CENTRALIA, CHEHALIS RIVER, LEWIS COUNTY, WA..  .........  .........  .........  .........        500   .........
CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA.....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        500   .........
ELLIOT BAY SEAWALL, WA.......................  .........  .........  .........  .........        500   .........
MT. ST. HELENS...............................  .........        225  .........  .........        225   .........
PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT           .........        400  .........  .........        400   .........
 RESTORATION, WA.............................
PUYALLUP RIVER, WA...........................  .........  .........  .........  .........        450   .........
SKAGIT RIVER, WA.............................  .........  .........  .........  .........      1,137   .........
SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        300   .........

                WEST VIRGINIA

OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY,  .........  .........  .........  .........      3,000   .........
 OH, PA, IL, IN, VA, AL, TN, NY, MD, NC, MS &
 GA..........................................
                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATES..        504     34,323     19,556      1,489     77,840      37,762
                                              ==================================================================
              NATIONAL PROGRAMS

COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA:
    AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT TRI-  .........        350  .........  .........        350   .........
     CADD....................................
    COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION............  .........      1,400  .........  .........      3,400   .........
    ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES...............  .........         75  .........  .........         75   .........
    FLOOD DAMAGE DATA PROGRAM................  .........        220  .........  .........        220   .........
    FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES..........  .........      8,000  .........  .........     11,000   .........
        DELAWARE DAM SAFETY, DE..............  .........  .........  .........  .........       (250)  .........
        NUUANU (OAHU), HI....................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (200)  .........
        WAIOHULI GULCH (MAUI), HI............  .........  .........  .........  .........       (200)  .........
        WAIMEA (KAUAI), HI...................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (200)  .........
        ANAHOLA (KAUAI), HI..................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (200)  .........
        HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, HI.....  .........  .........  .........  .........       (300)  .........
        DES MOINES RIVER REGULATED FREQUENCY   .........  .........  .........  .........        (80)  .........
         CURVE AND SAYLORVILLE AND RED ROCK
         RESERVOIRS POOL ELEVATION FREQUENCY
         ESTIMATES, IA.......................
        IOWA LIDAR, IA.......................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (100)  .........
        URBAN LEVEE EVALUATIONS, MUSCATINE,    .........  .........  .........  .........        (60)  .........
         IA..................................
        WICHITA AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN, KS  .........  .........  .........  .........       (300)  .........
        CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LOUISIANA, LA      .........  .........  .........  .........       (400)  .........
         [GIS]...............................
        CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, LA [GIS].........  .........  .........  .........  .........       (400)  .........
        EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [GIS]....  .........  .........  .........  .........       (200)  .........
        LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [GIS]..........  .........  .........  .........  .........       (500)  .........
        AU TRAIN, MI.........................  .........  .........  .........  .........        (75)  .........
        PAPILLION CREEK WATERSHED, NE........  .........  .........  .........  .........       (430)  .........
        OTERO COUNTY, NM.....................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (100)  .........
        SOUTHEASTERN, PA.....................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (250)  .........
        ABINGDON, VA.........................  .........  .........  .........  .........        (55)  .........
    HYDROLOGIC STUDIES.......................  .........        250  .........  .........        250   .........
    INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES..............  .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........
    PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER    .........        225  .........  .........        225   .........
     SERVICE)................................
    REMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION    .........        150  .........  .........        150   .........
     SYSTEM SUPPORT..........................
    SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION       .........         50  .........  .........         50   .........
     CENTERS.................................
    STREAM GAGING (U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY)...  .........        600  .........  .........        600   .........
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM....................  .........        350  .........  .........        350   .........
COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES:
    ACCESS TO WATER DATA.....................  .........        750  .........  .........        750   .........
    COMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION         .........        100  .........  .........        100   .........
     SYSTEMS.................................
    OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS:
        CALFED...............................  .........        100  .........  .........        100   .........
        CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM...............  .........         75  .........  .........         75   .........
        COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES.....  .........        200  .........  .........        200   .........
        GULF OF MEXICO.......................  .........        100  .........  .........        100   .........
        INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT  .........        700  .........  .........        700   .........
        INTERAGENCY WATER RESOURCE             .........        955  .........  .........        955   .........
         DEVELOPMENT.........................
        INVENTORY OF DAMS....................  .........        400  .........  .........        400   .........
        LAKE TAHOE...........................  .........        100  .........  .........      1,000   .........
        NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM.............  .........         50  .........  .........         50   .........
        NORTH AMERICAN WATERFOWL MANAGEMENT..  .........         50  .........  .........         50   .........
        PACIFIC NW FOREST CASE...............  .........         50  .........  .........         50   .........
        SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS...............  .........      1,550  .........  .........      1,550   .........
    PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES............  .........      7,000  .........  .........      9,000   .........
        AUGUSTA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, AR...  .........  .........  .........  .........        (50)  .........
        DELAWARE DAM SAFETY, DE..............  .........  .........  .........  .........       (250)  .........
        SUSUPE/CHALAN KANOA DRAINAGE PLAN      .........  .........  .........  .........       (160)  .........
         (CNMI)..............................
        PALA LAGOON (AMERICAN SAMOA).........  .........  .........  .........  .........       (200)  .........
        CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY AND RISK  .........  .........  .........  .........       (250)  .........
         ASSESSMENT, HI......................
        HE'EIA WATERSHED, HI.................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (100)  .........
        PALMYRA ATOLL........................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (100)  .........
        STATE OF HAWAII GENERAL FLOOD CONTROL  .........  .........  .........  .........       (190)  .........
         PLAN UPDATE.........................
        GREENWAYS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DES      .........  .........  .........  .........       (100)  .........
         MOINES, IA..........................
        LOWER NISHNABOTNA RIVER BASIN, IA....  .........  .........  .........  .........       (100)  .........
        MIDDLE AMANA, IA.....................  .........  .........  .........  .........        (74)  .........
        SHUNGANUNGA CREEK, KS................  .........  .........  .........  .........       (100)  .........
        CHOCTAW COUNTY RESERVOIR, MS.........  .........  .........  .........  .........        (50)  .........
        JONES COUNTY RESERVOIR, MS...........  .........  .........  .........  .........       (450)  .........
        GENESEE RIVER SEDIMENT STUDY, NY.....  .........  .........  .........  .........       (250)  .........
        OKLAHOMA COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLAN, OK  .........  .........  .........  .........       (500)  .........
        DRIFT CREEK RESERVOIR PROJECT, OR....  .........  .........  .........  .........        (20)  .........
OTHER:
    FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (FEMA/MAP MOD        .........      2,000  .........  .........      2,000   .........
     COORDINATION)...........................
    INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW..................  .........        700  .........  .........        700   .........
    NATIONAL SHORELINE STUDY.................  .........        375  .........  .........        375   .........
    PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM.................  .........      2,100  .........  .........      3,000   .........
    TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM...............  .........      1,000  .........  .........      1,600   .........
    WATER RESOURCES PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES  .........        500  .........  .........        500   .........
    WATER RESOURCES PRIORITY STUDY...........  .........      2,000  .........  .........  ..........  .........
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.....................  .........  .........  .........  .........      5,000   .........
    BASIC RESEARCH...........................  .........      1,689  .........  .........      1,689   .........
    ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION.....  .........      2,597  .........  .........      2,597   .........
    FLOOD AND COASTAL SYSTEMS................  .........      2,714  .........  .........      2,714   .........
    NAVIGATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH..............  .........      3,439  .........  .........      3,439   .........
    SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION, MD & VA....  .........  .........  .........  .........      1,000   .........
    SYSTEM-WIDE WATER RESOURCES..............  .........      6,083  .........  .........      6,083   .........
    URBAN FLOOD DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, DRI,    .........  .........  .........  .........      2,000   .........
     NV......................................
    WATER RESOURCE INFRASTRUCTURE (FLD & CSTL  .........        370  .........  .........        370   .........
     SYS)....................................
                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL NATIONAL PROGRAMS.............  .........     49,617  .........  .........     65,017   .........
                                              ==================================================================
      TOTAL..................................        504     83,940     19,556      1,489    142,857      37,762
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE.........................  .........  .........  .........  .........    -16,108   .........
                                              ==================================================================
      GRAND TOTAL............................  .........    104,000  .........  .........    166,000   .........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Homer Harbor Modification, Alaska.--The Committee 
recommends $300,000 to continue feasibility studies of a new 
harbor basin. The current harbor basin at the Port and Harbor 
of Homer is utilized beyond its capacity, with boats rafting 
three and four abreast at many locations in the harbor. 
Additionally, Homer is experiencing more demand every year for 
servicing larger fishing vessels, as a delivery port for these 
vessels to sell their catch, acquire ice, effect repairs, and 
for outfitting and provisioning as well as lay up between 
seasons.
    Valdez Harbor Expansion, Alaska.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $500,000 to continue preconstruction 
engineering and design studies. Rafting during the commercial 
fishing season has been reported up to eight boats deep on a 
regular basis. The problem is highly seasonal, requiring a 
large need for transient space primarily during the summer 
months.
    May Branch, Arkansas.--Flooding causes an estimated 
$1,800,000 in average annual damages. The proposed project 
would remove 127 structures from the 100-year floodplain, 
decrease expected annual flood damage by more than 96 percent, 
reduce highway and railroad traffic interruptions, and decrease 
the threat of loss of life attendant to flash flooding in urban 
settings. The Committee recommends $250,000 is provided to 
continue preconstruction engineering and design.
    Middle Creek, California.--The Committee recommends 
$400,000 for preconstruction engineering and design studies. 
Clear Lake is the largest natural lake entirely within the 
borders of California. The project would restore the natural 
functions of the Middle Creek/Clear Lake ecosystem and 
contribute to the goals of the North American Waterfowl 
Management Plan.
    Chatfield Lake Reallocation Study, Colorado.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $267,000 to complete the feasibility 
studies on reallocation a portion of the flood control storage 
in the lake to water supply.
    Connecticut River Ecosystem Restoration, Connecticut, 
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont.--The Committee 
recommends $350,000 for feasibility studies to identify and 
evaluate measures to reduce stream bank erosion, restore 
anadramous fisheries migratory corridors and spawning habitat, 
restore degraded wetlands and riverine habitat and improve the 
overall fish and wildlife habitat of the Connecticut River. The 
study will also identify opportunities to modify the management 
of the dams and water systems to address ecological concerns 
while maintaining their intended purposes.
    Mile Point, Florida.--The Committee recommendation includes 
$475,000 to complete feasibility studies and initiate 
preconstruction engineering and design studies to determine the 
source of erosion along the Mile Point shoreline and identify 
solutions to which velocities in the area restrict deep draft 
navigation to Jacksonville Harbor.
    Walton County, Florida.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $250,000 to initiate preconstruction engineering and 
design activities. This project is a test bed for the Institute 
of Water Resources Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction model.
    Interbasin Control of Great Lakes--Mississippi River 
Aquatic Nuisance Species, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin.--
The Committee has included $750,000 for these studies. Within 
the funds provided, the Committee expects the Corps to include 
interim studies providing the costs and benefits of hydrologic 
separation of the Great Lakes watershed from the Mississippi 
River watershed. Alternatives that would provide cost-effective 
means to prohibit interbasin transfer of species should be 
investigated while allowing current projects to continue to 
provide the benefits of flood control, transportation savings, 
and recreation uses of the current system.
    Prairie Dupont Levee, Illinois.--The Committee recommends 
$190,000 for the feasibility study to assess the potential for 
reconstruction of deteriorated features such as gates and 
culverts. The recommendation also includes $660,000 for the 
deficiency correction preconstruction engineering and design 
studies to investigate solutions such as rehabilitation/
replacement of existing relief wells and the construction of 
additional relief wells.
    Upper Mississippi River--Illinois Waterway Navigation 
System, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin.--
The Committee recommendation includes $4,000,000 for 
continuation of preconstruction engineering and design studies. 
The Committee recognizes the need to modernize this more than 
60-year-old navigation system and has provided continued 
funding for both structural design and environmental 
restoration work.
    Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration, Louisiana.--
The Committee recommends $16,595,000 for these important 
studies. The Committee notes that the Science activities are 
included within the overall line item rather than being 
budgeted separately.
    Chesapeake Bay, Susquehanna Reservoir Sediment Management, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia.--It has been estimated 
that 280 million tons of sediment originating from the 
Susquehanna River watershed are trapped behind the four 
hydroelectric dams located on the Lower Susquehanna River 
between Havre de Grace, Maryland, and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. 
Three of the four dams Holtwood, Safe Harbor, and York Haven 
have reached steady state. It is estimated that the Conowingo 
Dam will cease to have trapping capacity in 15 to 20 years. 
Once this last reservoir reaches steady state, the sediment 
input to the bay may increase dramatically. The Committee 
recommendation includes $250,000 to initiate feasibility 
studies to examine the impact of the Lower Susquehanna River 
Dams on sediment transport into the Bay.
    Boston Harbor (45-foot channel), Massachusetts.--The 
Committee recommendation includes $1,800,000 to continue 
studies for this harbor deepening project. The Committee notes 
that the feasibility phase of this study was initiated in June 
2002. Study costs have increased from $3,500,000 to the current 
$6,500,000 while project construction still seems to be years 
away. This is another example of the extended planning studies 
that the Corps must resolve.
    Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans and Sediment Remediation, 
Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, 
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $500,000 for these remedial action plans to include 
studies on the Black, Cuyahoga and Maumee Rivers, Ohio.
    Peckman River and Tributaries, New Jersey.--The Committee 
recommends $620,000 to complete the feasibility studies of this 
flood risk management and environmental restoration of the 
watershed.
    Western Lake Erie Basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan.--The 
feasibility studies will provide a framework for sustainable 
development in the watershed by examining ecosystem restoration 
including habitat and wetland restoration, prevention of future 
environmental losses, elimination of bacterial loadings and 
pollutants of concern, improvements to navigation channels, and 
analysis of flood control operations to ensure that they are 
meeting evolving conditions. Within the funds recommended, work 
should continue on the Blanchard River Multipurpose Feasibility 
Study.
    Upper Ohio Navigation Study, Pennsylvania.--The Committee 
recommends $1,200,000 to continue feasibility studies to 
evaluate alternatives to maintain safe, reliable, efficient, 
and environmentally sustainable navigation on the Upper Ohio 
River.
    Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $400,000 to initiate preconstruction 
engineering and design efforts for navigation modifications up 
to the Port of Beaumont to improve the efficiency and safety of 
navigation on the waterway.
    Skagit River, Washington.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $1,137,000 to continue feasibility studies for flood 
risk management in the cities of Mount Vernon, Burlington, and 
La Conner in Skagit County, Washington.
    Coastal Field Data Collection.--The Committee has 
recommended $3,400,000 for this nationwide program. In addition 
to budgeted funds of $1,400,000, $1,000,000 has been included 
for Surge and Wave Island Modeling Studies, Hawaii and 
$1,000,000 for the Pacific Island Land Ocean Typhoon Experiment 
Program. The Wave Data Study should also be continued within 
this overall funding amount. The Committee notes that the 
Coastal Data Information Program has been moved to a new line 
item in the Operation and Maintenance account under the 
remaining items.
    Flood Plain Management Services Program.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $11,000,000. The Committee has provided 
a listing in the table of projects that should be given 
priority if cost sharing funds are available from the local 
sponsors. However, the Corps should view these amounts as 
guides and reprogram funds as appropriate to move these studies 
forward as rapidly as possible.
    Planning Assistance to States.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $9,000,000 for this nationwide cost-
shared program. The Committee recognizes that there are 
hundreds of these studies ongoing at any given time. The 
Committee has provided a listing in the table of projects that 
should be given priority if cost-sharing funds are available 
from the local sponsors. However, the Corps should view these 
amounts as guides and reprogram funds as appropriate to move 
these studies forward as rapidly as possible.
    Planning Support Program.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $900,000 over the budget request. As the Committee has 
noted in the introduction, the Corps has a number of Planning 
Centers of Expertise, however, these Centers do not have the 
resources necessary to make them truly effective. The 
additional funds provided should be utilized to ensure the 
effectiveness of these Centers and the Corps is urged to budget 
necessary resources in future budgets to ensure that these 
Centers of Expertise remain viable assets for the Corps' 
planning program.
    Tribal Partnership Program.--Within the funds provided 
studies with tribes in New Mexico and with the Lower Brule 
Sioux Tribe in South Dakota should be undertaken.
    Water Resources Priorities Study.--No funds are provided 
for this study as proposed by the administration.
    Research and Development.--The Committee has recommended 
$24,892,000 for the Corps nationwide research and development 
programs. The Committee believes that this is an important area 
of the Corps' program that should be supported and has 
recommended $5,000,000 above the budget request. The Committee 
believes that some of this additional funding should be applied 
to global climate change research initiated in fiscal year 2010 
particularly concentrating on the effects of sea level rise. 
The Committee has also recommended $1,000,000 to continue 
submerged aquatic vegetation research in the Chesapeake Bay and 
$2,000,000 to continue the Urban Flood Demonstration Program in 
cooperation with the Desert Research Institute.
    National Shoreline Study.--The Committee recommends an 
additional $375,000 for the national Planning Center of 
Expertise for Coastal Storm Damage Reduction for continuing to 
develop a process for managing shore protection projects as 
part of a systems approach to coastal protection for the 
purpose of achieving improved project performance, increased 
cost effectiveness, and enhanced benefits.

                         CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL

Appropriations, 2010....................................  $2,031,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   1,690,000,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,780,000,000

    This appropriation includes funds for construction, major 
rehabilitation and related activities for water resources 
development projects having navigation, flood and storm damage 
reduction, water supply, hydroelectric, environmental 
restoration, and other attendant benefits to the Nation. The 
construction and major rehabilitation for designated projects 
for inland and costal waterways will derive one-half of the 
funding from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund. Funds to be 
derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund will be applied 
to cover the Federal share of the Dredged Material Disposal 
Facilities Program.
    The administration request for the Construction, General 
account is $1,690,000,000, a decrease of $341,000,000 from the 
fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. By the Committee's estimate, 
less than 60 percent of the needed funding is available in this 
account. The administration request adequately funds only eight 
projects; the rest are funded at much less than optimum levels. 
Construction levels will slip due to constrained funding and 
benefits to the national economy will be deferred. The 
Committee is concerned that this lack of investment will 
inevitably lead to another Katrina-style disaster somewhere in 
the Nation, whether it is a catastrophic failure on the inland 
waterway system or overwhelmed incomplete or damaged flood 
control or shore protection infrastructure. The aftermath of 
Hurricane Katrina should have taught us, if nothing else, that 
more robust investment before the fact would have led to 
considerably smaller payouts after the disaster. Yet, based on 
the budget requests in the intervening 5 years, it is obvious 
that no lesson has been learned.
    The Committee recommendation includes $1,780,000,000 in new 
budget authority for this account. The Committee is aware that 
execution problems in the Continuing Authorities Program have 
resulted in considerable unobligated balances in this program 
that are to be carried into fiscal year 2011 and 2012. The 
Committee has utilized $120,000,000 of these unobligated 
balances from this program toward the remainder of the account 
for fiscal year 2011. Therefore the Construction, General 
program for fiscal year 2011 is based on a total available 
amount of $1,900,000,000. This is $210,000,000 above the budget 
request but is still $131,000,000 below the enacted level. The 
Committee recognizes that this is considerably less than the 
needs in the program, but is the best that can be accomplished 
in this constrained fiscal environment. The Committee will 
continue to seek additional resources as the bill progresses 
toward enactment.
    The Committee deleted the new construction starts requested 
by the administration as sufficient funding does not exist in 
the current budget nor is there reasonable assurance that 
sufficient funds will be available in the future to accommodate 
these new items as well as ongoing work.
    The appropriation provides funds for the Continuing 
Authorities Program (projects which do not require specific 
authorizing legislation), which includes projects for flood 
control (section 205), emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection (section 14), beach erosion control (section 103), 
mitigation of shore damages (section 111), navigation projects 
(section 107), snagging and clearing (section 208), aquatic 
ecosystem restoration (section 206), beneficial uses of dredged 
material (section 204), and project modifications for 
improvement of the environment (section 1135).
    The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 
shown on the following table:

                CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL
                        [In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Committee
             Project title              Budget estimate   recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                ALABAMA

TUSCALOOSA, AL........................  ...............           8,240

                ALASKA

AKUTAN HARBOR, AK.....................           7,000            7,000
ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK............  ...............           2,000
BETHEL RIVER BANK STABILIZATION, AK...  ...............           3,000
HAINES HARBOR, AK.....................  ...............             500
KENAI RIVER BLUFF EROSION, AK.........  ...............           2,500

               ARKANSAS

OZARK-JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE, AR......  ...............          12,900
RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, AR, LA, &  ...............           2,500
 TX...................................
RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION,    ...............           2,000
 AR, LA, OK, & TX.....................

              CALIFORNIA

AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON                 4,200            4,200
 FEATURES), CA........................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM            78,000           78,000
 MODIFICATIONS), CA...................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM               500              500
 RAISE & BRIDGE), CA..................
CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA....  ...............           5,000
CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA................  ...............             500
FARMINGTON RECHARGE DEMONSTRATION       ...............             500
 PROGRAM, CA..........................
GUADALUPE RIVER, CA...................  ...............             200
HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS                      20,000           11,750
 RESTORATION, CA......................
HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING        ...............           2,000
 PROJECT, LOS ANGELES, CA.............
LOS ANGELES RIVER DEMONSTRATION         ...............           1,000
 PROJECTS, CA.........................
MID-VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION,   ...............           1,500
 CA...................................
MURRIETA CREEK, CA....................  ...............           3,500
NAPA RIVER, CA........................  ...............           2,100
NAPA RIVER, SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA          12,000           12,000
OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA..           4,330            4,330
PLACER COUNTY, CA.....................  ...............           1,000
SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA.....  ...............             500
SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA.          12,500           12,500
SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION                10,000           10,000
 PROJECT, CA..........................
SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA          ...............             700
 IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA..............
SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA................  ...............           2,500
SAN RAMON VALLEY RECYCLED WATER, CA...  ...............             459
SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA..........          25,000           25,000
SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA...           4,800            4,800
SUCCESS DAM AND RESERVOIR, CA (DAM                 500            1,000
 SAFETY)..............................
TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA & NV......  ...............           4,000
UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA.............  ...............           2,500
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA...................           5,000            5,000
YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA..................  ...............           3,500

               DELAWARE

DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, BROADKILL       ...............             250
 BEACH, DE............................
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT                  350              350
 INLET TO LEWES BEACH, DE.............
DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE.........  ...............             390
DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO        ...............           4,700
 FENWICK ISLAND, BETHANY BEACH TO
 SOUTH BETHANY, DE....................
DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO        ...............             150
 FENWICK ISLAND, FENWICK ISLAND, DE...
DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO        ...............             150
 FENWICK ISLAND, REHOBOTH BEACH AND
 DEWEY BEACH, DE......................
DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL     ...............           7,000
 DEEPENING, DE, NJ & PA...............

                FLORIDA

BREVARD COUNTY, FL....................             350              350
DADE COUNTY, FL.......................          11,000           11,000
DUVAL COUNTY, FL......................           7,500            7,500
FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY              ...............           2,800
 IMPROVEMENTS, FL.....................
FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL.................             350              350
HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE               104,800          104,800
 CONTROL).............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL...............           6,000            6,000
MANATEE COUNTY, FL....................             100              100
MANATEE HARBOR, FL....................  ...............             100
MARTIN COUNTY, FL.....................           8,000            8,000
NASSAU COUNTY, FL.....................             350              350
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL (DELRAY BEACH     ...............             680
 REIMBURSEMENT).......................
PINELLAS COUNTY, FL...................  ...............           2,500
SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM             180,000          155,000
 RESTORATION, FL......................
    CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL..        (152,330)        (127,330)
    EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA                (5,170)          (5,170)
     ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL........
    KISSIMMEE RIVER PROJECT, FL.......         (22,500)         (22,500)
ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL..................             350              350
TAMPA HARBOR, FL......................           1,000            1,200

                GEORGIA

ATLANTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE,   ...............           1,000
 GA...................................
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC.           1,000            1,000
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA.........             400            1,000

                HAWAII

HAWAII WATER MANAGEMENT, HI...........  ...............           2,000
KAHUKU, HI............................  ...............           4,590

                 IDAHO

LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, ID........  ...............             150
RURAL IDAHO, ID.......................  ...............           2,000

               ILLINOIS

ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE                      150              150
 DISTRICT, IL & MO (DEF CORR).........
CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI                5,385            5,385
 RIVER, IL (DEF CORR).................
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL,                 5,200           11,100
 DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL................
DES PLAINES RIVER, IL.................           6,500           10,000
EAST ST. LOUIS, IL....................           1,000            2,000
LOCK AND DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL             350              350
 (MAJOR REHAB)........................
MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL....          40,000           40,000
NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT,    ...............             300
 IL...................................
OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL          136,000          136,000
 & KY.................................
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION,            21,150           19,000
 IL, IA, MN, MO & WI..................
WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL..................           1,098            1,098

                INDIANA

FORT WAYNE, ST. MARY'S AND MAUMEE       ...............             165
 RIVERS, IN (GREENWOOD AVENUE TOE
 DRAIN)...............................
INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL                8,000            8,000
 FACILITY, IN.........................
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN..............          10,000           10,000

                 IOWA

DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND       ...............           3,200
 GREENBELT, IA........................
MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA,             78,400           74,000
 KS, MO, MT, NE, ND & SD..............
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (UNIT L-    ...............           1,500
 385), IA, NE, KS, MO.................

                KANSAS

TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KANSAS CITY, KS &            8,000            8,000
 MO...................................

               KENTUCKY

KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE                 2,868            2,868
 RIVER, KY............................
MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY (MAJOR                5,400            5,400
 REHAB)...............................
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY            134,000          134,000
 (SEEPAGE CONTROL)....................

               LOUISIANA

ASCENSION PARISH ENVIRONMENTAL          ...............             160
 INFRASTRUCTURE, LA...................
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, DMMP, LA....  ...............           1,000
COMITE RIVER, LA......................  ...............           8,000
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ENVIRONMENTAL   ...............             500
 INFRASTRUCTURE, LA...................
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH (FC), LA......  ...............           3,000
J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA......           1,500            7,000
LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE           5,500            5,500
 PROTECTION)..........................
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM                19,000           19,000
 RESTORATION, LA......................
OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA.............  ...............           1,000
WEST BANK AND VICINITY, NEW ORLEANS,             5,000            5,000
 LA...................................

               MARYLAND

ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD.................           1,000            1,000
ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD........  ...............           3,100
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER            ...............             200
 RESOURCES, GWYNNS FALLS, MD..........
CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL            ...............           1,000
 RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, MD, VA &
 PA...................................
CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD &             5,000            5,000
 VA...................................
POPLAR ISLAND, MD.....................           1,530            1,530

             MASSACHUSETTS

MUDDY RIVER, MA.......................             500            2,500

               MICHIGAN

GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM       ...............           2,000
 RESTORATION, MI......................
HAMILTON DAM, FLINT RIVER, FLINT, MI..  ...............           1,000
OAKLAND COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL            ...............             500
 INFRASTRUCTURE, MI...................
SAULT STE MARIE (REPLACEMENT LOCK), MI  ...............           1,000
ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR      ...............             300
 MANAGEMENT PLAN, MI..................

               MINNESOTA

BRECKENRIDGE, MN......................  ...............             407
ROSEAU, MN (RED RIVER OF THE NORTH      ...............           2,500
 BASIN)...............................

              MISSISSIPPI

DESOTO COUNTY, MS.....................  ...............          12,000
MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL               ...............          18,000
 INFRASTRUCTURE, MS...................

               MISSOURI

BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO.....  ...............             550
BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO...           4,500            4,500
CHESTERFIELD, MO......................           3,439            3,939
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL).          40,000           40,000
KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS.................             700              700
MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK        ...............           2,000
 LEVEE, MO............................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND           4,345            4,345
 MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS),  MO & IL
MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS  ...............           1,200
 ENHANCEMENT, MO......................
ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO........             100              200
SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS      ...............           5,330
 CITY, MO.............................

                MONTANA

FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT........  ...............           1,000
RURAL MONTANA, MT.....................  ...............           5,000

               NEBRASKA

ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE...........  ...............             315
WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND CLEAR CREEK,   ...............           2,470
 NE...................................

                NEVADA

RURAL NEVADA, NV......................  ...............          20,000

              NEW JERSEY

BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR     ...............           7,600
 INLET, NJ............................
BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR    ...............             400
 INLET, ABSECON ISLAND, NJ............
BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR    ...............              80
 INLET, BRIGANTINE ISLAND, NJ.........
CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ..             200              200
DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DE & NJ,        ...............             250
 OAKWOOD BEACH........................
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET AND PECK BEACH,             500              500
 NJ...................................
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET TO TOWNSENDS     ...............           2,000
 INLET, NJ............................
HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ............  ...............             300
JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER          ...............           3,000
 WATERFRONT, NJ.......................
LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY                 8,920            8,920
 POINT, NJ............................
PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT,   ...............             500
 NJ...................................
RARITAN & SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT          ...............           1,500
 MONMOUTH, NJ.........................
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-            1,000            1,000
 BASIN, NJ............................
SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ......  ...............           2,000
TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ.  ...............           2,000

              NEW MEXICO

ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM........  ...............           2,770
ALAMOGORDO, NM........................  ...............           4,200
CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, NM................  ...............           1,000
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION,     ...............             500
 BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM..............
RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO              10,000            1,500
 BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM................
SOUTHWEST VALLEY, FLOOD DAMAGE          ...............           5,809
 REDUCTION, ALBUQUERQUE, NM...........

               NEW YORK

ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES    ...............             300
 INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG
 BEACH ISLAND, NY.....................
ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET              300              300
 TO NORTON POINT, NY..................
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET   ...............           1,000
 AND JAMAICA BAY, NY..................
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY           1,100            4,600
LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY.................             300              300
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY &            57,000           57,000
 NJ...................................
NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY...........  ...............           1,000
ONONDAGA LAKE, NY.....................  ...............           1,000

            NORTH CAROLINA

BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC..........  ...............             350
WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET,  ...............             722
 TOPSAIL BEACH, NC....................
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC.................           1,800            2,100
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC................  ...............             300

             NORTH DAKOTA

FARGO, ND--MOORHEAD, MN...............  ...............          20,000
GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND                11,088           11,088
 (REPLACEMENT)........................
GRAFTON, ND...........................  ...............           3,000
MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND........  ...............             500
NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL              ...............          14,300
 INFRASTRUCTURE, ND...................

                 OHIO

DOVER DAM MUSKINGUM RIVER, OH.........          36,000           36,000
HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OH......  ...............           1,000
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, OH.  ...............           2,600
    EUCLID, OH (EI)...................  ...............          (1,100)
    PORTSMOUTH CSO MITIGATION, OH.....  ...............            (500)
    TOLEDO WATERWAYS INITIATIVE PHASE   ...............          (1,000)
     2, OH............................
OHIO RIVERFRONT, CINCINNATI, OH.......  ...............           3,000

               OKLAHOMA

CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY)..........          24,334           24,334
YUKON, OK (EI)........................  ...............             500

                OREGON

COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS               500              500
 SITES, OR & WA.......................
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM                   4,700            4,700
 RESTORATION, OR & WA.................

             PENNSYLVANIA

EMSWORTH LOCKS & DAM, OHIO RIVER, PA            11,500           11,500
 (STATIC INSTABILITY CORRECTION)......
LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA........  ...............             500
LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3, AND 4 MONONGAHELA           2,000            2,000
 RIVER, PA............................
PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, PA (PERMANENT)           1,000            1,000
WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING)....  ...............           1,500

              PUERTO RICO

PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR.......          39,539           39,539
RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR..................          12,000           12,000

             SOUTH DAKOTA

BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD......  ...............           3,000
MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SD........  ...............             300

               TENNESSEE

CENTER HILL DAM, TN (SEEPAGE CONTROL).          77,800           77,800
CUMBERLAND COUNTY WATER SUPPLY, TN....  ...............             210

                 TEXAS

FORT BEND COUNTY (ARCOLA-FRESNO         ...............  ...............
 REGIONAL WASTEWATER), TX (EI)........
BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX..............           7,740            3,740
CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER         ...............           4,815
 TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX..............
DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY      ...............          20,500
 RIVER PROJECT, TX....................
JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN,     ...............             500
 ARLINGTON, TX........................
LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN (WHARTON/            10,000
 ONION), TX...........................
RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX &  ...............           2,800
 OK...................................

                 UTAH

RURAL UTAH, UT........................  ...............          25,000

                VERMONT

LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATIVE,    ...............             500
 VT...................................

               VIRGINIA

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE            1,590            1,590
 REPLACEMENT AT DEEP CREEK,
 CHESAPEAKE, VA.......................
JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA &             6,000            6,000
 NC (REPLACEMENT).....................
NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS             ...............           1,000
 (DEEPENING), VA......................
NORFOLK HARBOR, CRANEY ISLAND, VA.....           1,000            1,000
ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS            1,075            1,075
 AREA, VA.............................
SANDBRIDGE, VA........................  ...............             300
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (HURRICANE           ...............           2,000
 PROTECTION)..........................

              WASHINGTON

CHIEF JOSEPH DAM GAS ABATEMENT, WA....             200              200
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA,            137,615          116,000
 OR, & ID.............................
DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA....           5,500            5,500
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA.................             500              500
LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE              1,500            1,500
 COMPENSATION, WA, OR, & ID...........
MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.             800            1,800
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA (FISH PASSAGE)...           1,000            1,000
PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS         ...............           3,000
 RESTORATION, WA......................
SHOALWATER BAY, WA....................  ...............           3,000

             WEST VIRGINIA

BLUESTONE LAKE, WV (DAM SAFETY                  15,000           15,000
 ASSURANCE)...........................
GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV............  ...............           1,500
ISLAND CREEK, LOGAN, WV...............  ...............           5,000
LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER                  19,500           22,250
 CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA, & KY.......
LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV...........  ...............           1,500
                                       ---------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL........................       1,571,596        1,867,693

           NATIONAL PROGRAMS

AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL.................           4,000            5,000
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM:
    AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION                7,273            7,273
     (SECTION 206)....................
    BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL           2,195            2,195
     (SECTION 204, 207, 993)..........
    EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE           4,993            4,993
     PROTECTION (SECTION 14)..........
    FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION              6,635            6,635
     205).............................
    MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES                  8,300            8,300
     (SECTION 111)....................
    NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)..           1,227            1,227
    PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR                    7,046            7,046
     IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
     (SECTION 1135)...................
    SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)....           3,100            3,100
    SNAGGING AND CLEARING (SECTION                 200              200
     208).............................
DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY                49,100           49,100
 CORRECTION PROGRAM...................
EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION FUND...........          19,000           19,000
ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (Public              5,000            2,500
 Law 106-457).........................
INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (BOARD                  60               60
 EXPENSES)............................
INLAND WATERWAYS USER BOARD (COE                   275              275
 EXPENSES)............................
SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT   ...............           2,500
 AND DEMONSTRATION....................
RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINES........  ...............             500
                                       ---------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL........................         118,404          119,904
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE..................  ...............         -87,597
USE OF PRIOR-YEAR BALANCES............  ...............        -120,000
                                       ---------------------------------
      TOTAL...........................       1,690,000        1,780,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tuscaloosa, Alabama.--The Committee recommends $8,240,000 
to complete the relocation project at Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
    Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Arkansas.--This is another case where 
Administration investments in our infrastructure seem to be 
penny-wise and pound-foolish. The budget request provided no 
funds for this on-going continuing contract. Termination costs 
for this continuing contract are estimated to be $20,000,000. 
Energy losses over the past 3 fiscal years exceed $25,000,000 
due to forced outages of the hydropower units. The Committee 
has recommended $12,900,000 to complete the rehabilitation work 
on turbine unit 3. The Committee urges the administration to 
budget for this contract in future budget submissions.
    Red River Below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, 
and Texas.--The Committee recommends $2,500,000 to continue 
levee rehabilitation work in Arkansas and Louisiana to protect 
the 1.7 million-acre flood plain from crop damage; loss of 
livestock; damage to levees, railroads, highways, industries, 
and other river and urban developments.
    Red River Emergency Bank Protection, Arkansas, and 
Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for protection 
of critical infrastructure and land along the Red River below 
Index,
    Arkansas.--The project plan provides for revetment, dikes, 
or cutoffs that can be accomplished in advance of developing 
the design for the entire project.
    Hamilton Airfield Wetlands Restoration, California.--The 
Committee recommendation includes $11,750,000 for this tidal 
wetland restoration project. This reduction from the budget 
request is based on updated information from the Corps.
    Mid Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, California.--The 
Committee recommendation includes $1,500,000 to complete the 
design of areas two and four of the reconstruction of this 
flood control project. The project includes levee 
reconstruction through installing landside berms with toe 
drains, ditch relocation, embankment modification, slurry cut-
off walls, and developing land for fish and wildlife 
mitigation.
    Oakland Harbor, California.--Within the Committee's 
recommendation, $2,087,000 is recommended as a repayment to the 
Port of Oakland to settle the port's payments in excess of the 
local cost share on the 42-foot construction project DACW07-95-
003.
    Tahoe Basin Restoration, California.--The Committee 
recommends $4,000,000 for planning, design, and construction 
assistance for environmental restoration, resource protection 
and development projects in Lake Tahoe Basin. These projects 
are part of the $2,500,000,000 local, State, Federal and 
private watershed restoration effort referred to as the Lake 
Tahoe Environmental Improvement Program [EIP]. Of the funds 
provided, $2,700,000 are recommended for construction of the 
Incline and Third Creek restoration project.
    Delaware Coast, Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island, Bethany 
Beach to South Bethany Beach, Delaware.--The Committee has 
recommended $4,700,000 for the second nourishment cycle on this 
shore protection project.
    Delaware Coast Protection, Delaware.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $390,000 to reimburse the State for the 
Federal share of the annual operation and maintenance of the 
sand bypass facilities.
    Everglades and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration, 
Florida.--The Committee has chosen to display the various, 
separately authorized components of the project in the table in 
addition to a single line item as was proposed in the budget. 
The Committee believes that it is prudent to maintain 
visibility of the various project elements in the budget 
process. It is the Committee's understanding that the Corps 
cannot utilize all of the funding requested for the Site one 
project in fiscal year 2011 due to the need to complete a post 
authorization change report on the remaining features of this 
project due to cost growth. Therefore, the Committee has 
reduced The Central and Southern Florida element by $25,000,000 
to account for this change. This lowers the overall committee 
recommendation for the Everglades to $155,000,000.
    Tampa Harbor, Florida.--$200,000 is provided above the 
budget request to complete the General Reevaluation Report of 
the Federal project.
    Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Illinois.--The Committee 
recommends $11,100,000 for the aquatic nuisance species 
Barriers I and II and for interim measures for potential 
barrier bypasses.
    Olmsted Locks and Dam, Ohio River, Illinois and Kentucky.--
The Committee recommends $136,000,000 to continue construction 
of this project. None of the funds provided for the Olmsted 
Locks and Dam Project or any other construction funds are to be 
used to reimburse the Claims and Judgment Fund.
    Missouri Fish and Wildlife Recovery, Iowa, Kansas, 
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.--
The Committee recommends $74,000,000 for this project. Within 
the recommended funds, $12,000,000 is to be used for 
modifications to the Intake Dam to provide additional habitat 
for the pallid sturgeon.
    Wolf Creek Dam, Lake Cumberland, Kentucky.--The Committee 
recommends $134,000,000 for continuation of seepage control 
measures at Wolf Creek Dam. It is the Committee's understanding 
that this is the Corps' full funding capability for this 
project in fiscal year 2011.
    Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.--The Committee has 
recommended $5,500,000 to continue efforts to provide 100-year 
flood protection for this project. Surveys show the levee grade 
is deficient by 12-18 inches.
    Chesapeake Bay Environmental Program, Maryland, 
Pennsylvania, and Virginia.--The Committee has recommended 
$1,000,000 for continuation of this project that is integral to 
the clean-up of the Chesapeake Bay.
    Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, Maryland and Virginia.--The 
Committee recommends $5,000,000 to continue oyster recovery 
efforts in the Chesapeake Bay.
    Muddy River, Massachusetts.--The Committee recommends 
$2,500,000 for the Muddy River, Boston and Brookline, 
Massachusetts project, $500,000 of which is to be used along 
with fiscal year 2010 carryover funds to award a fully funded 
contract to construct the flood risk management features of 
Phase I of the project, and $2,000,000 of which is to be used 
to complete design of Phase II, including the environmental 
restoration elements of the project.
    Oakland County, Michigan.--The Committee recommends 
$500,000 for the George W. Kuhn drain project.
    Meramec River Basin, Valley City, Missouri.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $2,000,000 for additional flood risk 
management features to address problems that became apparent 
during the 2008 flood.
    Fort Peck Dam and Lake, Montana.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $1,000,000 for continuation of the 
disposition of Fort Peck cabins.
    Rural Nevada, Nevada.--The Committee recomendation includes 
$20,000,000 for this project. Within the funds provided, the 
Corps should give consideration to the Spanish Springs Valley 
Sewering Project, Phase II; the Indian Springs Wastewater 
Collection and Treatment System Project; the Moapa Valley 
Wastewater Collection System Project; Searchlight Water System 
Improvements Project; Minden Arsenic Compliance Project; 
Tonopah Water Treatment Project; River Oaks Water and 
Wastewater Collection System; Murray Creek Storm Drain; Incline 
Village Wastewater Effluent Pipeline; and also to projects at: 
Boulder City; Lyon County; Douglas County; Gerlach; Esmeralda 
County; Fallon; Goldfield; Churchill County; West Wendover; 
Yerington; Virgin Valley Water District; Lovelock; Truckee 
Meadows Water Authority; Eldorado Valley; Ely; and Carson City. 
Other communities that meet the program criteria should be 
considered as funding allows.
    Barnegat Inlet to Little Egg Harbor Inlet, New Jersey.--The 
Committee recommends $7,600,000 for construction on this shore 
protection project.
    Acequias Irrigation System, New Mexico.--The Committee 
recommends $2,770,000 to continue restoration of these historic 
irrigation distribution systems.
    Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina.--$300,000 is recommended 
above the budget request to initiate a general reevaluation 
study to investigate modification of the anchorage basin.
    North Dakota [EI], North Dakota.--The Committee has 
recommended $14,300,000 for this program. $1,600,000 is 
recommended for the Mandan Raw Water Intake; $75,000 for the 
Southeast Water Users District SEWUD; $1,700,000 for the 
Grafton Water Treatment Plant Improvements; $1,375,000 for the 
North Prairie Rural Water District; $1,575,000 for the Park 
River Water Distribution System Improvements; $900,000 for the 
Walsh Rural Water District Ground Storage Expansion; $1,500,000 
for the Grand Forks Water Treatment Plant--Pilot Testing and 
Design; $275,000 for the Fargo Water Treatment Plant Facility 
Study Plan; $1,825,000 for the McKenzie County Regional Water 
Service; $750,000 for the Williams Rural Water Phase I; 
$1,500,000 for the Greater Ramsey Water District--expansion; 
$100,000 for the Williston Waste Water Treatment System 
Improvements; $425,000 for the LaMoure Sanitary Sewer Lining 
Project; and $700,000 for the Traill Rural Water District Phase 
III project.
    Ohio [EI], Ohio.--The Committee recommendation includes 
$2,600,000. $1,100,000 is recommended for the Euclid project; 
$500,000 for the Portsmouth CSO project and $1,000,000 for the 
Toledo Waterways Initiative Phase II.
    Presque Isle, Pennsylvania.--The Committee recommends 
$1,000,000 to continue this project to mitigate flood and 
coastal storm damage.
    Red River Basin Chloride Control, Texas, Oklahoma, 
Arkansas, and Louisiana.--The Committee recommends $2,800,000 
to continue construction of the project. Within the funds 
recommended, $800,000 should be used for the Elm Fork, Area VI 
element.
    Rural Utah, [EI], Utah.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $25,000,000 to continue construction of eligible 
projects.
    Within the funds provided, the Corps should give 
consideration to Duchesne County Water Conservancy District; 
Uintah County Whiterocks Projects; Emery Town water delivery 
project; Cedarview Water Conservancy District; Bear River Water 
Conservancy District; Eureka Town water and sewer project; 
Monticello City water system project; Long Canal Project, 
Garfield County; Cottonwood Irrigation Project, Emery County; 
and Coalville Town water treatment project. Other communities 
that meet the program criteria should be considered as funding 
allows.
    Lake Champlain Watershed Initiative, Vermont.--The 
Committee recommendation includes $500,000 for continuation of 
this project.
    Columbia River Fish Mitigation, Washington, Oregon, and 
Idaho.--The Committee recommendation includes $124,385,000 for 
this project. The reduction made to this project should not be 
viewed as any diminution of support for this project, rather an 
attempt to balance out the Corps of Engineers nationwide 
program among the various missions of the Corps.
    Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland 
River, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Virginia.--The Committee 
recommends $22,250,000 for the continuation of the project. 
Within the funds recommended, the Committee includes 
$19,500,000 for the Buchanan County, Dickenson County, and 
Grundy, Virginia elements. Further, the recommendation includes 
$2,750,000 for Kermit, Lower Mingo County, McDowell County, 
Upper Mingo, and Wayne County, West Virginia.
    Aquatic Plant Control Program.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $5,000,000 for this program. Funds 
above the budget request are included for cost-shared programs: 
$150,000 for Black Rock Lake, Odensburg, New York and $500,000 
for Lake Champlain, Vermont.
    Estuary Restoration Program.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $2,500,000 for this nationwide program. Within the 
funds provided, $1,000,000 is for the Colorado Lagoon, 
California, project.
    Shore Line Erosion Control Development and Demonstration 
Program.--The Committee has recommended $2,500,000 for 
construction of a shoreline erosion abatement device at Oil 
Piers in Ventura County, California, as well as monitoring 
programs and other appropriate activities under this authority.

                     CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM

    The Committee will no longer list individual projects in 
the CAP program in the table. The priority system that has been 
established will guide the execution of the projects.
    For each Continuing Authorities Program [CAP] section, 
available funds shall be allocated utilizing this sequence of 
steps until the funds are exhausted:
  --capability-level funds for ongoing projects that have 
        executed cost-sharing agreements for the applicable 
        phase;
  --capability-level funds for projects that are ready for 
        execution of new cost-sharing agreements for the 
        applicable phase and for which Corps Headquarters 
        authorizes execution of the agreements;
  --funds, as permitted by Corps policies, for other projects 
        previously funded for the applicable phase but not 
        ready for execution of new cost-sharing agreements; and
  --funds as permitted by Corps policies, for projects not 
        previously funded for the applicable phase.
    Funds shall be allocated by headquarters to the appropriate 
Field Operating Agency [FOA] for projects requested by that 
FOA. If the FOA finds that the study/project for which funds 
were requested cannot go forward, the funds are to be returned 
to Corps headquarters to be reallocated based on the nationwide 
priority listing. In no case should the FOA retain these funds 
for use on a different project than the one for which the funds 
were requested without the explicit approval of the Corps' 
Headquarters.
    Within the step at which available funds are exhausted for 
each CAP section, funds shall be allocated to the projects in 
that section that rank high according to the following factors: 
high overall performance based on outputs; high percent 
fiscally complete; and high unobligated carry-in. Section 14 
funds shall be allocated to the projects that address the most 
significant risks and adverse consequences, irrespective of 
phase or previous funding history.
    The Corps shall continue the ongoing process for suspending 
and terminating inactive projects. Suspended projects shall not 
be reactivated or funded unless the sponsor reaffirms in 
writing its support for the project and establishes its 
willingness and capability to execute its project 
responsibilities.
    In order to provide a mix of studies, design and 
construction within each CAP section, the Corps is directed to 
divide the funding generally 80/20 between the Design and 
Implementation and the Feasibility phases within each 
authority. The Chief of Engineers shall provide a report to the 
Committees on Appropriations within 30 days of enactment of 
this Act detailing how funds will be distributed to the 
individual items in the various CAP sections for the fiscal 
year. The Chief shall also provide an annual report at the end 
of each fiscal year detailing the progress made on the backlog 
of projects. The report should include the completions and 
terminations as well as progress of ongoing work.
    The Corps may initiate new continuing authorities projects 
in all sections as funding allows. New projects may be 
initiated after an assessment is made that such projects can be 
funded over time based on historical averages of the 
appropriation for that section and after prior approval by the 
Committees on Appropriations.

 FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ARKANSAS, ILLINOIS, 
       KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, AND TENNESSEE

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $340,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     240,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     335,000,000

    This appropriation funds planning, construction, and 
operation and maintenance activities associated with water 
resource projects located in the lower Mississippi River Valley 
from Cape Girardeau, Missouri to the Gulf of Mexico.
    The budget request and the approved Committee allowance are 
shown on the following table:

                    MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
                        [In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Committee
              Project title               Budget request  recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------

             INVESTIGATIONS

SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR..................  ..............             300
DONALDSONVILLE TO THE GULF, LA..........  ..............             400
MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA................  ..............           2,600
SPRING BAYOU, LA........................  ..............              81
COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA                246             246
 LAKE, MS...............................
QUIVER RIVER, MS........................  ..............             100
MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER                      100             100
 MANAGEMENT STUDY, TN...................
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA, AR,              500           1,400
 IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN................

              CONSTRUCTION

BAYOU METO BASIN, AR....................  ..............           4,000
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS,          47,209          47,209
 MO & TN................................
GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR................  ..............          16,000
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY,             29,150          36,038
 LA, MS, MO & TN........................
ST FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO...............  ..............           4,000
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA...           2,631           2,631
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...................           6,300          15,000
ST JOHNS BAYOU & NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MO  ..............             200
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS....  ..............           2,200
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS..............  ..............              25
YAZOO BASIN, MISSISSIPPI DELTA            ..............          23,200
 HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS.................
YAZOO BASIN, REFORMULATION, MS..........  ..............           1,600
YAZOO BASIN, UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS...  ..............          13,300
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER LESS ROCKY   ..............             575
 BAYOU, MS..............................

        OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS,          66,008          66,008
 MO & TN................................
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR......             198             600
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.......             190             190
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR....             223             223
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR....             200             200
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY,              7,582          11,843
 LA, MS, MO & TN........................
ST FRANCIS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR &             6,293          10,000
 MO.....................................
TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS,             2,374           2,374
 AR & LA................................
WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR...............           1,276           1,276
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.......             100             100
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.......              20              20
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA...           1,878           1,878
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...................          12,398          12,398
BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA.....              42              42
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA......              47              47
BONNET CARRE, LA........................           2,300           3,500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.......             586             586
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA..             377             377
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION--CAERNARVON, LA             921             921
OLD RIVER, LA...........................           9,255           9,255
TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA...           3,286           3,286
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.......             185             185
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO.....................           4,966           4,966
GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS...................              18           1,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.......             109             109
VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS....................              32             750
YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS.........           5,961           7,961
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS....             184           1,684
YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS..............           5,784           7,784
YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS..............             790             790
YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS...........           6,301           8,301
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS..............           1,469           1,469
YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS............           7,113           9,113
YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS............             967           1,017
YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX                  377             400
 CHAN, MS...............................
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS...             583             733
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS.............             731             831
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.......              70              70
MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN.......           1,433           1,433

             REMAINING ITEMS

MAPPING.................................           1,237           1,237
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE....................  ..............         -11,162
                                         -------------------------------
      TOTAL.............................         240,000         335,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                         GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS

    Morganza to the Gulf, Louisiana.--The Committee has 
recommended $2,600,000 to continue development of the Post 
Authorization Change report and Revised Programmatic 
Environmental Impact Statement [RPEIS]. Fiscal year 2011 
efforts will focus on selecting a recommended plan, completing 
feasibility-level designs and costs for the recommended plan, 
and developing a RPEIS that reflects the recommended plan.
    Collection and Study of Basic Data, Arkansas, Illinois, 
Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee.--The 
Committee recommendation includes $900,000 above the budget 
request for LIDAR mapping in the Yazoo Basin, Mississippi.

                              CONSTRUCTION

    Grand Prairie, Arkansas.--The Committee has recommended 
$16,000,000 for continued construction of the project. This 
project will provide for agricultural water supply, ground 
water protection, and fish and wildlife restoration and 
enhancement.
    Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, 
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee.--Additional 
funds above the budget request could be used to continue the 
preparation of additional NEPA documentation in association 
with the MRL features of the St. Johns New Madrid, Missouri 
project; fully fund relief wells at Tunica, Mississippi, Parcel 
2; Rena Lara, Mississippi; Magna Vista-Brunswick, Mississippi, 
Item 463-L; Item 465-L; Reid Bedford-King, Item 422-R; continue 
ongoing construction contracts; Duncan Point Seepage; and 
Avondale Ramps.
    Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower Basin, Mississippi.--The 
Committee recognizes the need to control bank erosion and 
reduce sedimentation and headcutting in watersheds of the Yazoo 
Basin for purposes of improving water quality, fisheries, and 
reducing maintenance. The Committee recommends $2,200,000 for 
continued construction of the Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River 
Project. Not more than $2,200,000 should be used for the 
continued construction of these water quality and sedimentation 
reduction measures. The Committee expects the water quality 
funds to be used for the monitoring and establishment of water 
quality reference indicators and the development of total 
maximum daily loads target loads on Yazoo Basin projects.
    Yazoo Basin, Delta Headwaters Project, Mississippi.--The 
Committee has recommended $23,200,000 for continuation of a 
joint effort by the Corps of Engineers and the Natural 
Resources Conservation Service in the Yazoo Basin of 
Mississippi. Funds are provided for the Corps to undertake 
construction work in the following watersheds: Abiaca Creek, 
Batupan Bogue, Black Creek, Coldwater River, Cane-Mussacana 
Creek, Hurricane-Wolfe Creek, Hickahala-Senatobia Creek, 
Hotophia Creek, Long Creek, Pelucia Creek, Otoucalofa Creek, 
Toby-Tubby Creek, Yalobusha River, and Skuna River. The 
Committee expects the Corps to design and construct future 
work, acquire real estate, and monitor results for all 
watersheds in fiscal year 2011 and for future work as required 
for completion of the total program. The Committee expects the 
administration to request funds for this vital project.

                              MAINTENANCE

    Mississippi River Levees, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, 
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee.--Funds above 
the budget request could be used to resurface the mainline 
levee below West Memphis, Arkansas; periodic inspections at 
locations in Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, and 
Tennessee; installation of levee mile posts at various 
locations; critical slide repairs; placement of crushed stone 
surfacing on levees; mitigation; bank stabilization; levee 
surfacing material and operation and maintenance of the motor 
vessel Mississippi.
    Mississippi Lakes.--The Committee has recommended 
additional funding to address the maintenance backlog at 
Arkabutla, Sardis, Enid, and Grenada Lakes in Mississippi.

                   OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, GENERAL

Appropriations, 2010....................................  $2,400,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   2,361,000,000
Committee recommendation................................   2,495,000,000

    This appropriation funds operation, maintenance, and 
related activities at the water resources projects that the 
Corps operates and maintains. Work to be accomplished consists 
of dredging, repair, and operation of structures and other 
facilities, as authorized in the various river and harbor, 
flood control, and water resources development acts. Related 
activities include aquatic plant control, monitoring of 
completed projects where appropriate, removal of sunken 
vessels, and the collection of domestic waterborne commerce 
statistics.
    Maintenance of our aging water infrastructure inventory 
gets more expensive every year, however, it is consistently 
underfunded. If this trend continues, the Corps will not be 
able to maintain expected levels of service at all of its 
projects. The Committee has maintained its tradition of 
supporting what the budget request terms as ``low use harbors 
and waterways''. The Committee recognizes the importance of 
these facilities and will continue to provide funding for them. 
The Committee is concerned about the administration's O&M 
request. In fiscal year 2010, the administration proposed a 
budget of $2,504,000,000 for operation and maintenance. For 
fiscal year 2011, the request is $143,000,000 less. The 
Committee understands that the O&M budget fluctuates from year 
to year due to periodic maintenance dredging requirements, 
however, the general trend should be for this budget to 
increase. Nearly 75 percent of the O&M budget consists of labor 
and dredging costs in most years. Labor costs rarely decrease 
for the Corps as it takes roughly the same amount of manpower 
to operate Corps projects on a yearly basis. That means that 
when the budget request is reduced as it is for fiscal year 
2011, the only areas available to reduce are dredging and real 
maintenance items.
    This is the wrong trend for this program. The Corps is to 
be commended for managing to keep as much of their 
infrastructure operable as they have with the O&M budgets that 
have been put forward and enacted. The American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act of 2009 was a tremendous boost to clear out 
some of the worst of the backlogged maintenance items and 
dredging, however, more needs to be done. The Committee 
recommendation of $2,495,000,000, $134,000,000 above the budget 
request, is a step in the right direction. The Committee urges 
the administration to commit to a more realistic budget for O&M 
in fiscal year 2012 and beyond to avoid problems such as 
occurred on the Ohio River in fiscal year 2010.
    In late 2009 and early 2010, transportation was disrupted 
on the Ohio River twice due to unexpected lock closures. First 
a miter gate fell off its mounts and into the river at the 
Markland Lock, closing the main lock chamber for about 6 
months. Shippers' costs increased dramatically as tows had to 
be broken down to move through the much smaller auxiliary lock. 
Fortunately, there was a smaller redundant lock at the site. If 
not the river would have been closed above Markland for 6 
months. That would mean no shipping by water of any commodities 
in or out of the Ohio River Valley from Cincinnati, Ohio, to 
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
    To add insult to injury, in January 2010, the mount for the 
miter gate at the Greenup Lock failed. That lock was out of 
service for a number of weeks as well. With more than half of 
the Corps locks more than 50 years old, unscheduled lock 
closures may be the norm, if more funding is not invested in 
the infrastructure. With more than 600 million tons of cargo 
moved on the inland waterway system, these closures would have 
significant impacts on the national economy. Maintenance of 
this infrastructure is too important to our national economy to 
allow it to fail due to short term budget goals.
    The budget request and the Committee recommendation are 
shown on the following table:

              CORPS OF ENGINEERS--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
                        [In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Committee
             Project title              Budget estimate   recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                ALABAMA

ALABAMA-COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER                  253              253
 STUDY, AL............................
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL...............          15,745           18,745
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL          20,751           20,751
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL........           5,230            5,230
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORK, AL......              30               30
MOBILE HARBOR, AL.....................          23,560           23,560
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL.........             100              100
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE            1,900            2,344
 MITIGATION, AL & MS..................
TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS.          23,767           28,000
WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA           8,394            8,394

                ALASKA

ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK..................          14,013           14,013
BETHEL HARBOR, AK.....................             234            1,000
CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK.................           2,999            2,999
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK.................             955              955
DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK....................             241              241
HAINES HARBOR, AK.....................             241              241
HOMER HARBOR, AK......................             513              513
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK.....             180              180
KODIAK HARBORS, AK....................  ...............             750
NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK..................             420              420
NOME HARBOR, AK.......................             973              973
PETERSBURG HARBOR, AK.................             500            1,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK.........           1,360            1,360

                ARIZONA

ALAMO LAKE, AZ........................           3,019            3,019
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ.....              90               90
PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ..................           1,522            1,522
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ...              33               33
WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ.................             607              607

               ARKANSAS

BEAVER LAKE, AR.......................          10,570           10,570
BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR.....           8,452            9,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR................           1,612            1,612
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR..................           7,292            7,292
DARDANELLE LOCK & DAM, AR.............           7,632            7,632
DEGRAY LAKE, AR.......................           6,979            7,500
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR......................           1,467            1,467
DIERKS LAKE, AR.......................           1,570            1,570
GILLHAM LAKE, AR......................           1,340            1,340
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR.................          10,230           10,230
HELENA HARBOR, AR.....................              15              500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.....             311              311
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER                   33,553           33,553
 NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR................
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR.....................           4,802            4,802
NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR.........           4,874            5,250
NIMROD LAKE, AR.......................           1,957            1,957
NORFORK LAKE, AR......................           6,224            6,224
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR....................              15            1,000
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA....           7,505           10,505
OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK & DAM, AR......           5,485            5,485
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR.........               3                3
WHITE RIVER, AR.......................              30               30
YELLOW BEND PORT, AR..................               3              115

              CALIFORNIA

BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA..................           2,367            2,367
BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA.....           2,119            2,119
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA............           4,600            4,600
COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA.           3,652            6,190
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE &                  5,831            9,471
 CHANNEL, CA..........................
FARMINGTON DAM, CA....................             450              450
HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA..........           2,163            2,163
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA...........           5,848            5,848
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA.....           4,604            4,604
ISABELLA LAKE, CA.....................           1,956            1,956
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA..           7,035            7,035
MARINA DEL REY, CA....................           2,050            5,050
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA.............             401              401
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA..................             522              522
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA..................           1,590            1,590
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA....................           2,476            2,476
NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL,            1,929            1,929
 CA...................................
NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA................           1,280            1,280
OAKLAND HARBOR, CA....................           7,500            7,500
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA..................           1,520            1,520
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA....................           3,378            3,378
PINOLE SHOAL MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA.....  ...............           2,500
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA.........           2,132            2,132
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA...................           8,375            8,375
SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), CA           3,585            3,585
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES                 1,475            1,475
 (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA.................
SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT                     161              161
 CHANNEL, CA..........................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY, DELTA MODEL                   1,087            1,087
 STRUCTURE, CA........................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA                 3,090            3,090
 (DRIFT REMOVAL)......................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA..............           2,776            2,776
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON,             3,603            6,500
 CA...................................
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT,            2,750            2,750
 CA...................................
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA.............           4,883            4,883
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA..............           2,040            2,040
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA...           1,751            1,751
SUCCESS LAKE, CA......................           2,529            2,529
SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA................           2,980            2,980
TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA.........           2,133            2,133
VENTURA HARBOR, CA....................           2,840            2,840
YUBA RIVER, CA........................             121              121

               COLORADO

BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO...................             647              647
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO....................           1,375            1,375
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO.................           1,057            1,057
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO.....             572              572
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO.............           2,941            2,941
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO...             765              765
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO.....................           1,243            1,243

              CONNECTICUT

BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT...................             537              537
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT..............             689              689
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT................             478              478
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT....................           1,092            1,092
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT.....             292              292
LONG ISLAND SOUND, DMMP, CT...........           2,000            2,000
MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT.............             699              699
MYSTIC RIVER, CT......................             160              160
NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT..................             400              400
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT.............             559              559
NORWALK HARBOR, CT....................  ...............             582
PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT...................  ...............             918
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT.........           1,050            1,050
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT........             467              467
THOMASTON DAM, CT.....................             994              994
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT................             849              849

               DELAWARE

CEDAR CREEK, DE.......................              50               50
HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE...........  ...............             200
INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE........             100              100
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER           16,075           16,075
 TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD...........
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO             100              100
 DELAWARE BAY, DE.....................
MISPILLION RIVER, DE..................              50               50
MURDERKILL RIVER, DE..................              50               50
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE.........              40               40
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE.................           4,270            7,020

         DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC.....             100              100
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVER, DC (DRIFT             845              845
 REMOVAL).............................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC.........              30               30
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC.................              25               25

                FLORIDA

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, FL....  ...............           2,820
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL..................           4,715            4,715
CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........          19,520           19,520
ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL.......              68               68
FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL.................           1,294            1,294
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL.....             900              900
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY CALOOSAHATCHEE    ...............           2,000
 RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL...........
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO             350            4,000
 MIAMI, FL............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL...............           5,708            5,708
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE                  9,449            9,449
 SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA................
MIAMI HARBOR, FL......................  ...............             200
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL...............           2,444            2,444
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL.................           2,510            2,510
PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL................              55               55
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL..................              67               67
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL.........           1,450            1,450
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL.........           3,500            3,500
ST. LUCIE INLET, FL...................             250              250
TAMPA HARBOR, FL......................           5,200            5,200
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL.             400              400

                GEORGIA

ALLATOONA LAKE, GA....................           7,008            7,008
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT            2,603            2,603
 RIVERS, GA, AL & FL..................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA....             265            1,500
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA..................           6,719            6,719
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA.           8,840            8,840
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA..............           8,136            8,136
HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC................          11,501           11,501
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL               85               85
 PROJECTS, GA.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA.....             141              141
J. STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC.......          10,918           10,918
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA.........             122              122
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC.           9,387            9,387
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA...................          18,462           18,462
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA......             230              230
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL......           8,845            8,845

                HAWAII

BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI..............             245              330
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI.....             642              961
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI.........             604              604

                 IDAHO

ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID..................           1,521            1,521
DWORKSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID.......           2,965            2,965
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID.....             288              288
LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID...................           2,689            2,689
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID...             499              499

               ILLINOIS

CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN.....           4,238            4,238
CARLYLE LAKE, IL......................           5,643            5,643
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL....................           2,064            2,064
CHICAGO RIVER, IL.....................             510              510
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL                  7,450            7,450
 DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL................
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL.............             398              398
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVR                 32,238           32,238
 PORTION).............................
ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVS                  1,802            1,802
 PORTION).............................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL               65               65
 PROJECTS, IL.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.....           1,707            1,707
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL........           2,176            2,176
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL...........             710              710
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL..................           5,512            5,512
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI              53,692           53,692
 RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION),
 IL...................................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI              21,581           21,581
 RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION),
 IL...................................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL.........             106              106
REND LAKE, IL.........................           5,702            5,702
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                  689              689
 WATERS, IL...........................
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL...................             590              590

                INDIANA

BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN...................           1,141            1,141
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN.............             171              171
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN..................           1,030            1,030
CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN..............           1,013            1,013
INDIANA HARBOR, IN....................           5,700            5,700
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN.....             800              800
J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN..............           1,793            1,793
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN.................           1,147            1,147
MONROE LAKE, IN.......................           1,899            1,899
PATOKA LAKE, IN.......................             980              980
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN.........             185              185
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN....................           1,012            1,012
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                  125              125
 WATERS, IN...........................

                 IOWA

CORALVILLE LAKE, IA...................           4,559            5,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA.....             393              393
MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO               137              137
 SOIUX CITY, IA.......................
MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO MOUTH, IA, NE,  ...............           7,000
 KS & MO..............................
MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO THE                9,021            9,021
 MOUTH, IA, KS, MO, & NE..............
RATHBUN LAKE, IA......................           2,501            2,501
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE, RED ROCK, IA...           8,135            9,000
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA..................           5,003            5,500

                KANSAS

CLINTON LAKE, KS......................           2,080            2,080
COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS................           1,649            1,649
EL DORADO LAKE, KS....................             609              609
ELK CITY LAKE, KS.....................           1,040            1,040
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS...................           1,200            1,200
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS....................             791              791
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS.....             318              318
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS....           1,760            1,760
KANOPOLIS, KS.........................           1,561            1,561
MARION LAKE, KS.......................           1,613            1,613
MELVERN LAKE, KS......................           1,981            1,981
MILFORD LAKE, KS......................           2,391            2,391
PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS.....           1,332            1,332
PERRY LAKE, KS........................           2,254            2,254
POMONA LAKE, KS.......................           1,965            1,965
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS...             100              100
TORONTO LAKE, KS......................             652              652
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS.................           2,644            2,644
WILSON LAKE, KS.......................           1,415            1,715

               KENTUCKY

BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE, BARKLEY, KY & TN          10,025           10,025
BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY.................           3,454            3,454
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY..................           1,600            1,600
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY.....................           1,655            1,655
CARR CREEK LAKE, KY...................           1,882            1,882
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY.....................             965              965
DEWEY LAKE, KY........................           1,762            1,762
ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY......              16              780
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY.....................           1,942            1,942
GRAYSON LAKE, KY......................           1,434            1,434
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY...........           2,100            2,100
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY..................           2,242            2,242
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.....             839              839
KENTUCKY RIVER, KY....................              10               10
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY.................           1,646            1,646
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY.................           1,088            1,088
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY             113              113
NOLIN LAKE, KY........................           2,821            2,821
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN           31,433           31,433
 & OH.................................
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL,            5,682            5,682
 IN & OH..............................
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY..................           1,361            1,361
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY.........               2                2
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY..................           2,606            2,606
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY.................           1,232            1,232
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY...           8,089            8,089
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY...................           1,154            1,154

               LOUISIANA

ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE,              8,230           12,230
 BOEUF & BLACK, LA....................
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA............             135              135
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA............           1,072            1,072
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP               1,050            1,050
 WATERWAY, LA.........................
BAYOU PIERRE, LA......................              24               24
BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA...........              37               37
BAYOU TECHE & VERMILION RIVER, LA.....              11               11
BAYOU TECHE, LA.......................             150              150
CADDO LAKE, LA........................             222              222
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA..........          14,495           20,081
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA..................           1,625            1,625
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA........          19,031           19,031
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA............           2,352            4,352
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.....             758              758
J.BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA.......           7,745           12,000
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA............              17              600
MADISON PARISH PORT, LA...............               5              150
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA...................           2,008            2,008
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE,             2,215            4,215
 LA...................................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE           62,969           62,969
 GULF OF MEXICO, LA...................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA.........              60               60
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA.........           1,410            1,410
WALLACE LAKE, LA......................             241              241
WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA..               5                5
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO              30               30
 BAYOU DULAC, LA......................

                 MAINE

BASS HARBOR, TREMONT, ME..............              65               65
BEALS HARBOR, ME......................             100            1,250
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME..........           1,050            1,050
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME.....             148              148
PIG ISLAND GUT, ME....................             100              100
PORTLAND HARBOR, ME...................  ...............           8,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME.........             750              750
SACO RIVER, ME........................             140              140
SCARBOROUGH RIVER, ME.................             160              160
SOUTHERN MAINE AND NEW HAMPSHIRE OCEAN  ...............             200
 DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION,  ME & NH..
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                   20               20
 WATERS, ME...........................

               MARYLAND

BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50               17,215           17,215
 FOOT), MD............................
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL)..             375              375
CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD..................  ...............             160
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV.......             188              188
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD.....             124              124
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV.......           1,756            2,856
LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD......  ...............           1,440
NANTICOKE RIVER, MD...................             160              160
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND                  1,400            1,400
 SINEPUXENT BAY, MD...................
POCOMOKE RIVER, MD....................  ...............           1,800
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD.........             475              475
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD...              60               60
WICOMICO RIVER, MD....................           1,500            1,500

             MASSACHUSETTS

BARRE FALLS DAM, MA...................             700              700
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA....................             792              792
BOSTON HARBOR, MA.....................           2,700            2,700
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA..................             657              657
CAPE COD CANAL, MA....................          14,174           14,174
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE               329              329
 AREA, MA.............................
CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA.................             403              403
DUXBURY HARBOR, MA....................             100              100
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA...............             557              557
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA................             629              629
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA.....             349              349
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA...................             688              688
LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA..................             682              682
NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET              1,250            1,250
 HURRICANE BARRIER, MA................
NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA................  ...............           3,000
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA.........           1,200            1,200
TULLY LAKE, MA........................             726              726
WEST HILL DAM, MA.....................             842              842
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA....................             661              661

               MICHIGAN

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI.....             125              125
MICHIGAN NAVIGATION O&M, MI...........  ...............           8,000
    ALPENA HARBOR, MI.................  ...............  ...............
    ARCADIA HARBOR, MI................  ...............  ...............
    BIG BAY HARBOR, MI................  ...............  ...............
    BLACK RIVER HARBOR, GOGEBIC CO-OP,  ...............  ...............
     MI...............................
    BOLLES HARBOR, MI.................  ...............  ...............
    CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION  ...............  ...............
     STRUCTURES)......................
    CHANNELS IN LAKE ST CLAIR, MI.....           1,117            1,117
    CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI.............             208              208
    CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI..............  ...............  ...............
    CLINTON RIVER, MI.................  ...............  ...............
    DETOUR HARBOR, MI.................  ...............  ...............
    DETROIT RIVER, MI.................           5,218            5,218
    EAGLE HARBOR, MI..................  ...............  ...............
    FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI..............  ...............  ...............
    GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI............             722              722
    GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION  ...............  ...............
     STRUCTURES)......................
    GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI             ...............  ...............
     (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)..........
    HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI...........  ...............  ...............
    HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI............  ...............  ...............
    HOLLAND HARBOR, MI................             655              655
    KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI.............              12               12
    KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (NAVIGATION   ...............  ...............
     STRUCTURES)......................
    LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI...........  ...............  ...............
    LELAND HARBOR, MI.................  ...............  ...............
    LES CHENEAUX ISLANDS CHANNELS, MI.  ...............  ...............
    LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI..............  ...............  ...............
    LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI............  ...............  ...............
    LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI..............           1,419            1,419
    LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION    ...............  ...............
     STRUCTURES)......................
    MANISTEE HARBOR AND RIVER CHANNEL,             252              252
     MI...............................
    MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI..............             230              230
    MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI & WI.........  ...............  ...............
    MONROE HARBOR, MI.................           1,340            1,340
    MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI...............             872              872
    ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI..............           1,172            1,172
    PENTWATER HARBOR, MI..............  ...............  ...............
    PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI...........  ...............  ...............
    PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI             ...............  ...............
     (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)..........
    PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI...........  ...............  ...............
    ROUGE RIVER, MI...................  ...............  ...............
    SAGINAW RIVER, MI.................           3,190            3,190
    SAUGATUCK HARBOR, KALAMAZOO RIVER,  ...............  ...............
     MI...............................
    SEBEWAING RIVER, MI...............              75               75
    SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI............  ...............  ...............
    ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI...............           1,233            1,233
    ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI.............             755              755
    ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (NAVIGATION             22,074           22,074
     STRUCTURES)......................
    WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI.............  ...............  ...............
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI.........             430              430
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                2,501            2,501
 WATERS, MI...........................

               MINNESOTA

BIGSTONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN              251              251
 & SD.................................
DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI.......           7,237            7,237
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN.....             463              463
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER,              677              677
 MN...................................
MINNESOTA RIVER, MN...................             262              262
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI              48,426           48,426
 RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION),
 MN...................................
ORWELL LAKE, MN.......................             462              462
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN.........              84               84
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN................             233              233
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF                      4,381            4,381
 MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN................
ST. PAUL HARBOR DREDGING, MN..........  ...............             200
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                  446              446
 WATERS, MN...........................

              MISSISSIPPI

BILOXI HARBOR, MS.....................           1,400            1,400
CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS.............               1               74
EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS........             220              220
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS...................           3,882           10,537
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.....              34               34
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS..............              30              175
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS....................           1,655            2,505
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS.................           5,520           10,910
PEARL RIVER, MS & LA..................             145              145
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS.........              77               77
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS...................              11            1,200
YAZOO RIVER, MS.......................              26              154

               MISSOURI

CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO.............              13              900
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN               7,841            7,841
 LAKE, MO.............................
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO...................           3,021            3,021
HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO..           8,842            8,842
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.....           1,713            1,713
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO...........             741              741
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO..................             941              941
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND          28,731           28,731
 MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS),  MO & IL
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MILE 889, MO.......  ...............             420
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO.................             210              240
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO...............           2,156            2,156
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO.........               4                4
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO...             327              327
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO...................           1,160            1,160
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO...........  ...............             360
STOCKTON LAKE, MO.....................           4,153            4,153
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR..............           8,293            8,293
UNION LAKE, MO........................               5                5

                MONTANA

FT. PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT.............           5,411            5,411
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT.....             120              120
LIBBY DAM, MT.........................           1,846            1,846
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT...             270              270

               NEBRASKA

GAVINS POINT DAM, NE & SD.............           7,706            7,706
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE................           2,222            2,222
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE.....             343              343
PAPILLION CREEK, NE...................             738              738
SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE........           1,067            1,067

                NEVADA

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV.....              66               66
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA............           1,170            1,170
PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV....             557              557

             NEW HAMPSHIRE

BLACKWATER DAM, NH....................             716              716
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH.............             635              635
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH................             724              724
HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH...........           1,440            1,440
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH.....             105              105
OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH..................             730              730
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA        ...............             500
 RIVER, NH............................
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR, (SAGAMORE CREEK      ...............             150
 CHANNELS), NH........................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH.........             275              275
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH...............             746              746

              NEW JERSEY

ABSECON INLET, NJ.....................  ...............             200
BARNEGAT INLET, NJ....................             325              325
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ.................             350              350
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ..........              15               15
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE             20,020           20,020
 SEA, NJ, PA & DE.....................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ.....             145              145
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ...................  ...............             250
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ..             250              250
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC                 100              100
 RIVERS, NJ...........................
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, NJ             570              570
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ.........           1,506            1,506
RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF,              100              400
 NJ...................................
RARITAN RIVER, NJ.....................              80              225
SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARD, NJ.........             100              100
SHARK RIVER, NJ.......................             500              500
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ....              80               80
SHREWSBURY RIVER MAIN CHANNEL, NJ.....              80               80

              NEW MEXICO

ABIQUIU DAM, NM.......................           2,891            2,891
COCHITI LAKE, NM......................           3,546            3,546
CONCHAS LAKE, NM......................           2,067            2,972
GALISTEO DAM, NM......................             927              927
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM.....             740              740
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM..................           1,398            1,398
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES             2,500            2,500
 COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM [MRGESCP]..
SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM...........           1,220            1,220
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM...             532              532
TWO RIVERS DAM, NM....................             601              601
UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS                1,000            1,000
 MODEL STUDY, CO, NM, TX..............

               NEW YORK

ALMOND LAKE, NY.......................             490              490
ARKPORT DAM, NY.......................             223              223
BROWNS CREEK, NY......................             100              100
BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY................           8,600            8,600
EAST RIVER, NY........................           2,800            2,800
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY...............             200              200
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY..................             573              573
EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY.................             150              150
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY..             100            5,100
FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY............             100              100
GREAT KILLS HARBOR, STATEN ISLAND, NY.              60               60
GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY...................             100              100
HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY..............             100              100
HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT)..............           3,700            3,700
HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C)..............           1,650            1,650
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY.....             858              858
JAMAICA BAY, NY.......................             120              120
JONES INLET, NY.......................             150              150
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY...............              60               60
LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY.             100              100
MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY..................              60               60
MORICHES INLET, NY....................             100              100
MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY..................           3,661            3,661
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY..           6,150            6,150
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY...................           3,796            3,796
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT                  7,200            7,200
 REMOVAL).............................
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (PREVENTION             1,045            1,045
 OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS).............
NEW YORK GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION O&M,    ...............           1,700
 NY...................................
    BARCELONA HARBOR, NY..............  ...............  ...............
    BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA             1,552            1,552
     HARBOR, NY.......................
    BUFFALO HARBOR, NY................           1,165            1,165
    CAPE HARBOR, NY...................  ...............  ...............
    GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY........  ...............  ...............
    IRONDEQUOIT HARBOR, NY............  ...............  ...............
    LITTLE RIVER HARBOR, NY...........  ...............  ...............
    LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY.......               6                6
    MORRISTOWN HARBOR, NY.............  ...............  ...............
    OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY............  ...............  ...............
    OGDENSBURG HARBOR, NY.............  ...............  ...............
    OLCOTT HARBOR, NY.................  ...............  ...............
    OSWEGO HARBOR, NY.................              34               34
    PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, NY...........  ...............  ...............
    ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY..............              56               56
    VINCENT HARBOR, NY................  ...............  ...............
    WILSON HARBOR, NY.................  ...............  ...............
NEWTOWN CREEK, NY.....................              60               60
PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY................              60               60
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY.........           1,928            1,928
SHINNECOCK INLET, NY..................             100              100
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL                    925              925
 PROJECTS, NY.........................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                  635              635
 WATERS, NY...........................
WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY.................             100              100
WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY................             642              642

            NORTH CAROLINA

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC....           4,750            4,750
B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC....           1,918            1,918
BOGUE INLET AND CHANNEL, NC...........  ...............             500
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC..           2,243            2,243
CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC..............  ...............             500
FALLS LAKE, NC........................           2,042            2,042
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC.....             255              255
LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC.............  ...............             500
MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC...........           4,095            8,095
MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING                      50               50
 CHANNELS, NC.........................
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC..............           3,800            4,100
NEW RIVER INLET, NC...................             600              600
NEW TOPSAIL INLET AND CONNECTING        ...............             500
 CHANNELS, NC.........................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC.........             655              655
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC.................              50               50
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC................             150              150
W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC...           3,591            3,591
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC.................          12,247           12,847

             NORTH DAKOTA

BOWMAN HALEY, ND......................             246              246
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND......          12,564           12,764
HOMME LAKE, ND........................             276              276
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND.....             303              303
LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND...           1,424            1,424
MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FORT PECK DAM,   ...............             560
 MT, AND GAVIN'S POINT DAM, SD & NE
 (SEC. 33), (MANDAN DIKE RESTORATION,
 ND)..................................
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND.....................             550              550
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND...             253              253
SOURIS RIVER, ND......................             509              509
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                   35               35
 WATERS, ND...........................

                 OHIO

ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH...................           1,435            1,435
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH..................           1,995            1,995
BERLIN LAKE, OH.......................           2,347            2,347
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH.................           1,559            1,559
CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM, OH.............           1,190            1,190
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH..................          10,680           14,480
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH...................             940              940
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH...................           1,323            1,323
DELAWARE LAKE, OH.....................           1,362            1,362
DILLON LAKE, OH.......................           1,260            1,260
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH...................           1,572            1,572
HURON HARBOR, OH......................  ...............             500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH.....             624              624
LORAIN HARBOR, OH.....................             443              443
MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH              21               21
MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR,             1,403            1,403
 OH...................................
MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH.........           1,722            1,722
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH...............           1,413            1,413
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH.............           8,244            8,244
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH..             296              296
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH..................           1,297            1,297
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH.........             295              295
ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH              35               35
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH...................           1,102            1,102
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                  257              257
 WATERS, OH...........................
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH.....................           5,049            7,849
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH...................             603              603
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH......             750              750
WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH............           1,611            1,611

               OKLAHOMA

ARCADIA LAKE, OK......................             596              596
BIRCH LAKE, OK........................             646              646
BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK...................           2,458            2,458
CANTON LAKE, OK.......................           1,949            1,949
COPAN LAKE, OK........................           1,104            1,104
EUFAULA LAKE, OK......................           7,232            7,232
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK..................           6,216            6,216
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK..................           1,058            1,058
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK............             406              406
HEYBURN LAKE, OK......................             603              603
HUGO LAKE, OK.........................           1,748            1,748
HULAH LAKE, OK........................             901              901
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK.....             261              261
KAW LAKE, OK..........................           2,121            2,121
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK.....................           5,006            5,006
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER                    5,794            5,794
 NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK................
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK......................           2,089            2,089
OPTIMA LAKE, OK.......................             197              197
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE                   167              167
 CHEROKEES, OK........................
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK...................           1,032            1,032
ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND                  7,604            7,604
 RESERVOIR, OK........................
SARDIS LAKE, OK.......................           1,130            1,130
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK...             900              900
SKIATOOK LAKE, OK.....................           1,465            1,465
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK..............           4,459            4,459
WAURIKA LAKE, OK......................           2,568            2,568
WEBBERS FALLS LOCK & DAM, OK..........           5,617            5,617
WISTER LAKE, OK.......................             922              922

                OREGON

APPLEGATE LAKE, OR....................           1,298            1,298
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR...................             573              573
BONNEVILLE LOCK & DAM, OR & WA........           7,487            7,487
CHETCO RIVER, OR......................             586              586
COLUMBIA & LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW                 24,868           24,868
 VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR.......
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA..          12,850           18,350
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA &             645              645
 THE DALLES, OR.......................
COOS BAY, OR..........................           4,697            5,791
COQUILLE RIVER, OR....................             433              433
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR................           1,319            1,319
COUGAR LAKE, OR.......................           1,733            1,733
DEPOE BAY, OR.........................  ...............             166
DETROIT LAKE, OR......................           1,127            1,127
DORENA LAKE, OR.......................           1,055            1,055
ELK CREEK LAKE, OR....................              87               87
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR...................           1,149            1,149
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR...................           1,800            1,800
GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR..........           2,139            2,139
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR..................             863              863
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL               30               30
 PROJECTS, OR.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR.....             559              559
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA........           5,217            5,217
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR................           2,080            2,080
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR...................           3,897            3,897
MCNARY LOCK & DAM, OR & WA............           6,277            6,277
PORT ORFORD, OR.......................  ...............             400
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR.........             200              200
ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR.........             579              579
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR...              92               92
SIUSLAW RIVER , OR....................             708            1,083
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                4,100            4,100
 WATERS, OR...........................
TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR.............  ...............             600
UMPQUA RIVER, OR......................             800              800
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS,               92              258
 OR...................................
WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR..              85               85
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR.................             657              657
YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR............           1,786            1,986
YAQUINA RIVER (DEPOT SLOUGH), OR......  ...............              12

             PENNSYLVANIA

ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA...................           8,456            8,456
ALVIN R. RUSH DAM, PA.................             600              600
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA.............             230              230
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA...................           1,425            1,425
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA...................           2,817            2,817
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA..............           1,351            1,351
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA...................           1,772            1,772
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA................           2,039            2,039
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA.................             687              687
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO                820              820
 TRENTON, NJ..........................
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA....           1,671            1,671
ERIE HARBOR, PA.......................           1,389            1,389
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA..........             672              672
FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA.............             880              880
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND                       250              250
 RESERVOIR, PA........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA.....             744              744
JOHNSTOWN, PA.........................              36               36
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHANY RESERVOIR, PA           1,469            1,469
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA...................           1,460            1,460
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA...............           1,326            1,326
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA.................          15,861           15,861
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV          28,023           28,023
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH &             633              633
 WV...................................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA.........             170              170
PROMPTON LAKE, PA.....................             506              506
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA......................              22               22
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA.....................           3,752            3,752
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA...              46               46
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA..................             250              250
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA...............           2,496            2,496
STILLWATER LAKE, PA...................             363              363
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                  107              107
 WATERS, PA...........................
TIOGA HAMMOND LAKES, PA...............           2,384            2,384
TIONESTA LAKE, PA.....................           2,200            2,200
UNION CITY LAKE, PA...................             425              425
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA...............           1,078            1,078
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA..............             480              480
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD......           2,358            2,358

              PUERTO RICO

SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR...................           3,700            3,700

             RHODE ISLAND

BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI.....           1,250            1,250
FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER,                       500              500
 PROVIDENCE, RI.......................
GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI.....  ...............             250
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI.....              24               24
PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT    ...............           2,500
 BAY & WATCH HILL COVE, CT & RI.......
POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI.....  ...............             500
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI.........             500              500
PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI  ...............           3,800
WOONSOCKET, RI........................             300              300

            SOUTH CAROLINA

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC....             900            2,500
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC.................           9,925            9,925
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC...           6,140            6,140
GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC.................             320            1,500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC.....              64               64
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC.........             625              625
TOWN CREEK, SC........................             380              380

             SOUTH DAKOTA

BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD.........           9,768            9,768
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD...................           1,080            1,080
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD...........             285              285
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE,             8,970            8,970
 SD...................................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD.....             100              100
LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN................             656              656
OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND..........          10,477           10,477
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD...             144              144

               TENNESSEE

CENTER HILL LAKE, TN..................           5,067            5,067
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN.............           6,358            6,358
CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN.           3,500            3,500
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN....           6,429            6,429
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN..................           6,219            6,219
J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN.           4,608            4,608
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN..........           8,237            8,237
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN.........               3                3
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN...................          16,540           16,540
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN.................             180              180

                 TEXAS

AQUILLA LAKE, TX......................           1,120            1,120
ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE               1,439            1,439
 CONTROL--AREA VIII, TX...............
BARDWELL LAKE, TX.....................           1,879            1,879
BELTON LAKE, TX.......................           3,682            3,682
BENBROOK LAKE, TX.....................           2,578            2,578
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX..............           3,468            3,468
BUFFALO BAYOU & TRIBUTARIES, TX.......           3,518            3,518
CANYON LAKE, TX.......................           3,429            3,429
CEDAR BAYOU, TX.......................           1,695            1,695
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX...........             329              329
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX.......           4,608            4,608
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX & OK.....          10,057           10,057
ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL                      43               43
 PROJECT, TX..........................
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE                 3,709            3,709
 PINES, TX............................
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX...................           3,538            3,538
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX......           8,441            8,441
GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX.........           1,825            1,825
GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX..............           2,360            2,360
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX....................           3,014            3,014
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX........          27,792           27,792
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX..................           1,708            1,708
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX..............          23,817           29,040
    BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX......          (1,811)  ...............
    BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX..........          (4,028)  ...............
    GREENS BAYOU, TX..................  ...............  ...............
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX.....           1,364            1,364
JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX..................           1,939            1,939
JOE POOL LAKE, TX.....................           1,094            1,094
LAKE KEMP, TX.........................             467              467
LAVON LAKE, TX........................           3,135            3,135
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX....................           3,542            3,542
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX............           3,024            5,000
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX................           2,767            2,767
NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE                   2,536            2,536
 GEORGETOWN, TX.......................
O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX...........           1,373            1,373
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX....................             992              992
PROCTOR DAM AND LAKE, TX..............           2,336            2,336
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX.........             451              451
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX..................           1,525            1,525
SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX............          14,330           15,000
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX.....           6,396            6,396
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX...             194              194
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX...................           3,292            3,292
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX.............           2,150            2,150
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX...........           1,436            1,436
TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX.             100            1,000
TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE,             2,666            2,666
 TX...................................
WACO LAKE, TX.........................           3,131            3,131
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX..................           2,175            2,175
WHITNEY LAKE, TX......................           7,221            7,221
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX........           3,804            3,804

                 UTAH

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT.....              31               31
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT...             653              653

                VERMONT

BALL MOUNTAIN, VT.....................             896              896
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT.....              79               79
NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY....              85               85
NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT...............             719              719
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT............             838              838
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT....................             797              797
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT.................             683              683

               VIRGINIA

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC,             2,150            2,150
 VA...................................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC,               895            1,825
 NC & VA..............................
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA................             500              500
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA.....           2,268            2,268
HAMPTON ROADS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS            1,225            1,225
 HARBOR, VA (DRIFT REMOVAL)...........
HAMPTON ROADS, VA (PREVENTION OF                    50               50
 OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA.....             367              367
JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA...............           4,180            5,000
JOHN H. KERR LAKE, VA & NC............          11,423           11,423
JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR,             2,230            2,230
 VA...................................
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA...................             300              500
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA....................           9,766           11,000
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA....             668              668
PHILPOTT LAKE, VA & NC................           6,396            6,396
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA.........             870              870
RUDEE INLET, VA.......................             520              520
TANGIER CHANNEL, VA...................           1,135            1,135
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA.             104              104
WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA.             143              600

              WASHINGTON

CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA..................             772              772
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR..  ...............             800
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND      ...............             900
 SAND ISLAND, WA......................
EDIZ HOOK, WA.........................              30               30
EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA           1,006            1,006
GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA...          10,550           10,550
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA.................           3,276            3,276
ICE HARBOR LOCK & DAM, WA.............           4,147            4,147
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL               32               32
 PROJECTS, WA.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA.....             750              750
LAKE CROCKETT (Keystone Harbor), WA...             550              550
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA........           8,276           13,376
LITTLE GOOSE LOCK & DAM, WA...........           2,314            2,314
LOWER GRANITE LOCK & DAM, WA..........           5,872            5,872
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK & DAM, WA.......           4,734            4,734
MILL CREEK LAKE, WA...................           3,817            3,817
MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.             265              265
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA..................           3,441            3,441
NEAH BAY, WA..........................              50               50
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA.........             459              459
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA..             905              905
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA..................           1,590            1,590
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA...             447              447
SEATTLE HARBOR, WA....................             951              951
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA...............             265              265
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                   74               74
 WATERS, WA...........................
SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA.................              62              600
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA............             142              142
THE DALLES LOCK & DAM, WA & OR........           8,702            8,702
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA..........              30               75

             WEST VIRGINIA

BEECH FORK LAKE, WV...................           1,377            1,377
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV....................           1,700            1,700
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV...................           3,049            3,049
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV....................           2,215            2,215
ELKINS, WV............................              15               15
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV.....             279              279
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS & DAM, WV.........           9,791            9,791
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH          34,802           34,802
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY &           3,088            3,088
 OH...................................
R D BAILEY LAKE, WV...................           2,237            2,237
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV............           1,173            1,273
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV.................           2,376            2,636
SUTTON LAKE, WV.......................           3,075            3,075
TYGART LAKE, WV.......................           1,434            1,434

               WISCONSIN

EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI..............             729              729
FOX RIVER, WI.........................           2,402            2,402
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI..................           2,698            7,698
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI.....              64               64
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI...................               8                8
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI..................           1,672            1,672
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI.........             239              239
STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN               19               19
 SHIP CANAL, WI.......................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                  509              509
 WATERS, WI...........................
TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI.................  ...............           1,020

                WYOMING

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL               10               10
 PROJECTS, WY.........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY.....              37               37
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY...............           1,001            1,001
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY...             213              213
                                       ---------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL........................       2,198,519        2,381,612

            REMAINING ITEMS

AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH.....             690              690
ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND                  4,750            5,250
 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE................
BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M
 BUSINESS LINES:
    OPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR NAVIGATION.             750              750
    PERFORMANCE BASED BUDGETING                  4,000            4,000
     SUPPORT PROGRAM..................
    RECREATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT                1,650            1,650
     PROGRAM..........................
    STEWARDSHIP SUPPORT PROGRAM.......             392              392
COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM......           3,000            5,000
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM........           3,000            3,000
CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION)..           5,500            5,500
DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVE........          10,000           10,000
DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE..........          11,000           11,000
DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE               1,150            1,150
 MONITORING SYSTEM....................
DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL            7,000            7,000
 RESTORATION [DOER]...................
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT            2,000            2,000
 PROGRAM [DOTS].......................
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM..             270              270
FACILITY PROTECTION...................           6,500            6,500
FERC HYRDOPOWER COORDINATION..........           3,000            3,000
FISH & WILDLIFE OPERATING FISH                   3,800            3,800
 HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT...............
GLOBAL CHANGE SUSTAINABILITY..........          10,000           10,000
GREAT LAKES TRIBUTARY MODEL...........           1,200            1,200
INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS.....           3,800            3,800
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL            1,780            1,780
 PROJECTS.............................
INTERAGENCY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION               8,000            8,000
 TASK FORCE/HURRICANEPROTECTION
 DECISION CHRONOLOGY LESSONS LEARNED
 IMPLEMENTATION.......................
LONG-TERM OPTION ASSESSMENT FOR LOW              1,500            1,500
 USE NAVIGATION.......................
MONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION               1,800            1,800
 PROJECTS.............................
NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY......          15,000           15,000
NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM......           7,000            9,500
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM...........          17,450           17,450
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS                  6,750            6,750
 PROGRAM [NEPP].......................
NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT            4,230            4,230
 ACTIVITIES...........................
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR                  571              571
 REALLOCATION.........................
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SUPPORT              300              300
 [ABS-P2, WINABS].....................
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: HARBOR                   825              825
 MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION......
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: PROTECT,                  50               50
 CLEAR AND STRAIGHTEN CHANNELS (SEC 3)
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: REMOVAL OF               500              500
 SUNKEN VESSELS.......................
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION: WATERBORNE             4,771            4,771
 COMMERCE STATISTICS..................
RECREATION ON STOP [R1S] NATIONAL                   65               65
 RECREATION RESERVATION...............
REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT                     2,000            5,000
 DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM................
    HAWAII RSM, HI....................  ...............          (1,000)
    NORTH CAROLINA RSM, NC............  ...............            (600)
    DELAWARE ESTUARY RSM, NJ..........  ...............            (200)
    SOUTH COASTAL RHODE ISLAND RSM, RI  ...............            (750)
    CHESAPEAKE BAY, NEWPOINT COMFORT,   ...............             (59)
     MATHEWS COUNTY, VA...............
RELIABILITY MODELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR               608              608
 REHAB................................
RESPONSES TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT CORPS             5,000            5,000
 PROJECTS.............................
SHORELINE USE PERMIT STUDY............             250              250
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT                 653              653
 [WOTS]...............................
                                       ---------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL........................         162,555          170,555
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE..................  ...............         -57,167
                                       =================================
ROUNDING..............................             -74   ...............
      TOTAL...........................       2,361,000        2,495,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Alabama and Mississippi.--The 
Committee recommendation includes additional funds above the 
budget request for additional dredging, environmental 
stewardship activities and backlog maintenance.
    Bethel Harbor, Alaska.--$1,000,000 is recommended to for 
plans and specifications and dredging of this small harbor that 
serves as a regional transportation center for 50 villages.
    Arkansas Lakes, Arkansas.--The Committee recommendation 
includes funds above the budget request for each of these 
projects: DeGray Lake, Lake Greeson, and Lake Ouachita, to 
provide adequate levels of service and for backlog maintenance 
items.
    Ouachita and Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana.--The 
Committee recommends $3,000,000 for maintenance dredging of 
this inland navigation project.
    Marina Del Rey, California.--The Committee recommends an 
additional $3,000,000 for dredging this project, the largest 
man-made harbor in the United States with nearly 6,000 boat 
slips and home to a U.S. Coast Guard cutter. The harbor also 
serves as the key rescue support for the Los Angeles 
International Airport.
    San Francisco Harbor, California.--The Committee is 
concerned that significant coastal erosion is occurring in the 
vicinity of the San Francisco Main Ship Channel, jeopardizing 
municipal wastewater infrastructure. The Committee expects that 
the Corps should complete its planning studies and the 
environmental requirements for a potential project to prevent 
further deterioration in fiscal year 2011 and directs the Corps 
to take all steps necessary to proceed to construction no later 
than fiscal year 2012.
    Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut.--The Committee recommends 
$1,500,000 for the phase III maintenance dredging of the 
harbor.
    Harbor of Refuge, Lewes, Delaware.--The Committee 
recommends $200,000 to update existing preliminary design and 
condition survey.
    Wilmington Harbor, Delaware.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $7,020,000 for this project. Additional funds 
recommended above the budget request are for maintenance of 
disposal areas and additional dredging.
    Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee to Anclote, 
Florida.--The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for maintenance 
dredging.
    Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Georgia.--$1,500,000 is 
recommended for dredging critical areas of this waterway as 
well as for work related to new upland disposal sites.
    Wilson Lake, Kansas.--The Committee recommendation includes 
$300,000 above the budget request for the reallocation study.
    Indiana Harbor Confined Disposal Facility, Indiana.--Funds 
for this project have been included in the CG account.
    Calcasieu River and Pass, Louisiana.--The Committee has 
included additional funds for dredging needs on this project.
    J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Louisiana.--The Committee has 
included $4,255,000 above the budget request for backlog 
maintenance and dredging needs.
    Lower Thorofare, Maryland.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $1,440,000 for dredging needs on this channel that 
service watermen and the Maryland seafood industry.
    Michigan Great lakes Harbor Maintenance and Dredging, 
Michigan.--The Committee notes that there are some 80 federally 
maintained harbors and waterways in Michigan. However, the 
Committee also notes that fewer than 20 are budgeted. With the 
limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee has 
recommended $8,000,000 under this line item to provide for some 
of the dredging and maintenance needs of the State rather than 
trying to fund small amounts for each project. The Committee 
has listed all of the harbors and waterways in the table that 
are eligible for this funding. However, recognizing that 
conditions on these waterways is constantly changing, the 
Committee is directing the Corps to propose a maintenance 
program for fiscal year 2011 that would most effectively 
utilize both the budgeted funds along with the funds provided 
in this line item for these harbor and waterway projects.
    Mouth of the Yazoo River, Mississippi.--The Committee 
includes additional funds for the maintenance dredging of the 
entrance to the Vicksburg Harbor.
    Rosedale Harbor, Mississippi.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $1,200,000 for maintenance dredging of the harbor. The 
port serves many small communities and the farmers in the area.
    Caruthersville Harbor, Missouri.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $900,000 to dredge the harbor and 
turning basin.
    Portsmouth Harbor, New Hampshire.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $650,000 for the project. This includes 
$500,000 for dredging the Simplex Shoals and $150,000 for 
environmental documentation and plans and specifications for 
dredging Sagamore Creek and the other harbor back channels.
    Absecon Inlet, New Jersey.--The Committee recommends 
$200,000 for dredging of the inlet.
    Cape May Inlet to Lower Township, New Jersey.--The 
Committee has included funding for this project in the 
construction account.
    New York Great Lakes Harbor Maintenance and Dredging, New 
York.--The Committee notes that there are more than 20 
federally maintained harbors and waterways along the Great 
Lakes in New York. However, the Committee also notes that only 
five are budgeted. With the limited funding available to the 
Committee, the Committee has recommended $1,700,000 under this 
line item to provide for some of the dredging and maintenance 
needs of the State rather than trying to fund small amounts for 
each project. The Committee has listed all of the harbors and 
waterways in the table that are eligible for this funding. 
However, recognizing that conditions on these waterways is 
constantly changing, the Committee is directing the Corps to 
propose a maintenance program for fiscal year 2011 that would 
most effectively utilize both the budgeted funds along with the 
funds provided in this line item for these harbor and waterway 
projects.
    Coastal Inlets, North Carolina.--The Committee has included 
additional funds for the coastal inlets on the North Carolina 
coast that were not funded in the administration's budget 
request. With the limited funding available to the Committee, 
the Committee has attempted to provide for some of the dredging 
needs of the State.
    Wilmington Harbor, North Carolina.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $600,000 over the budget request for a 
sand management study for Bald Hill Island.
    Garrison Dam and Lake Sakakawea, North Dakota.--The 
Committee recommends $100,000 for mosquito control in the 
Williston area due to the shallow-water mosquito breeding areas 
created by the impoundment of Lake Sakakawea.
    Ohio Great Lakes Harbors.--The Committee has included 
additional funds for Cleveland, Huron and Toledo Harbors that 
were underfunded in the administration's budget request. With 
the limited funding available to the Committee, the Committee 
has attempted to provide for some of the dredging need of the 
State. The Committee notes that Cleveland Harbor has got to 
determine interim and long-term disposal alternatives to avoid 
closure of the harbor after 2014.
    Columbia River at the Mouth, Oregon and Washington.--The 
Committee recommends $5,500,000 above the budget request for 
South Jetty beach material placement.
    Providence Harbor, Rhode Island.--The Committee has 
recommended $3,800,000 to dredge this project.
    Houston Ship Channel, Texas.--The Committee has combined 
the line items for the Houston Ship Channel, the Bayport 
Channel, Greens Bayou and the Barbers Point Channel under this 
single line item for fiscal year 2011 to allow for more 
efficient utilization of funds on these interconnected 
navigation channels. The Corps is urged to budget these 
channels as a single line item in future budget submissions. 
However, for transparency, the justification sheet should still 
show the individual amounts for each of the channels. The 
Committee has also recommended additional funds above the 
budget request for additional maintenance dredging and other 
related activities.
    Texas Water Allocation Assessment, Texas.--$1,000,000 is 
recommended to continue these studies to determine if existing 
water can be better allocated to support more balanced water 
use in light of future needs.
    Appomattox River, Virginia.--The Committee recommends 
$500,000 to complete environmental testing and analysis and 
obtain environmental permits.
    Chinook, Head of Sand Island, and Baker Bay, Washington.--
The Committee notes the proximity of Corps navigation 
facilities on the Columbia River between Chinook and the Head 
of Sand Island, Washington, and at Baker Bay, Washington, and 
encourage the Corps of Engineers to seek ways to achieve cost 
savings and efficiency, such as by utilizing appropriate 
contracting methods while having these two projects be 
considered together when seeking bids and awarding contracts. 
$1,700,000 is recommended for dredging at these harbors.
    Lake Washington Ship Canal, Washington.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $5,100,000 over the budget request for 
additional maintenance needs at the project.
    Mud Mountain Dam, Washington.--Within the funds 
recommended, the Corps is directed to continue to satisfy 
Federal fish passage obligations for the term of the 
cooperative agreement with Puget Sound Energy.
    Green Bay Harbor, Wisconsin.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $5,000,000 above the budget request for backlog 
maintenance and dredging needs.
    Asset Management/Facilities and Equipment Maintenance.--The 
Committee recognizes the critical importance of protecting the 
large Federal investment in the Nation's aging inventory of 
water infrastructure and the key objectives of the Corps' asset 
management program in this regard. Improving system reliability 
and efficiency, extending useful life, minimizing risk, and 
identifying critical maintenance needs (on a risk basis) will 
achieve cost savings to better meet service needs across the 
Nation. The Committee has therefore provided $500,000 to 
initiate an automated risk based asset management system 
including, but not limited to, condition assessments, 
geospatial mapping, data base integration/interoperability and 
photogrammetric visualization of the inventory. The Corps shall 
also evaluate technologies for real time dam monitoring for 
emergency events and the subsurface piping and seepage problems 
associated with aging dams and levees. The Corps is urged to 
budget for this automated system in future budget submissions.
    Coastal Data Information Program.--The Committee believes 
that this is a better account for this work to be funded than 
the GI account where it has been previously funded. The 
Committee recognizes the importance of accurate directional 
wave measurements to the success of coastal Corps projects and 
notes that nationwide, coastal Corps districts have called for 
sustained and enhanced wave information as a top data priority. 
The additional funding recommended above the budget request 
along with the budget request is directed toward the 
maintenance of wave observations and the expansion of the 
national wave monitoring network. The Corps is requested to 
report back to the Committee on its plan to address critical 
data gaps in this system.
    National Coastal Mapping.--A total of $9,500,000 is 
recommended for this program. Additional funds recommended 
above the budget request are for LIDAR bathymetry for use in 
regional sediment management and for Coastal Zone Mapping and 
Imaging LIDAR/LASER to be conducted with the University of 
Southern Mississippi.
    Regional Sediment Management Demonstration Program.--The 
Committee has recommended $5,000,000 for this program, 
$3,000,000 above the budget request. Within the funds 
recommended, the Corps is directed to undertake studies for the 
State of Hawaii; the State of North Carolina; South Coastal 
Rhode Island; Delaware Estuary, New Jersey; and for Chesapeake 
Bay, New Point Comfort, Mathews County, Virginia.

                           REGULATORY PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $190,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     193,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     193,000,000

    An appropriation of $193,000,000 is recommended for the 
regulatory program of the Corps of Engineers.
    This appropriation provides for salaries and costs incurred 
administering regulation of activities affecting U.S. waters, 
including wetlands, in accordance with the Rivers and Harbors 
Act of 1899 33 U.S.C. section 401, the Clean Water Act of 1977 
Public Law 95-217, and the Marine Protection, Research and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 Public Law 92-532.
    The appropriation helps maintain program performance, 
protects important aquatic resources, and supports partnerships 
with States and local communities through watershed planning 
efforts.

            FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $134,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     130,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     130,000,000

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $130,000,000 
to continue activities related to the FUSRAP in fiscal year 
2005.
    The responsibility for the cleanup of contaminated sites 
under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program was 
transferred to the Army Corps of Engineers in the fiscal year 
1998 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public 
Law 105-62.
    FUSRAP is not specifically defined by statute. The program 
was established in 1974 under the broad authority of the Atomic 
Energy Act and, until fiscal year 1998, funds for the cleanup 
of contaminated defense sites had been appropriated to the 
Department of Energy through existing appropriation accounts. 
In appropriating FUSRAP funds to the Corps of Engineers, the 
Committee intended to transfer only the responsibility for 
administration and execution of cleanup activities at eligible 
sites where remediation had not been completed. It did not 
intend to transfer ownership of and accountability for real 
property interests that remain with the Department of Energy.
    The Corps of Engineers has extensive experience in the 
cleanup of hazardous, toxic, and radioactive wastes through its 
work for the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies. 
The Committee always intended for the Corps' expertise be used 
in the same manner for the cleanup of contaminated sites under 
FUSRAP. The Committee expects the Corps to continue programming 
and budgeting for FUSRAP as part of the Corps of Engineers--
Civil program. The Committee directs the Corps to prioritize 
sites that are nearing completion during fiscal year 2008.
    The Corps is directed to prioritize sites that are nearing 
completion. The Committee directs the Corps of Engineers during 
fiscal year 2011 to complete the Remedial Investigation/
Feasibility Study of the former Sylvania nuclear fuel site at 
Hicksville, New York and to proceed expeditiously to a Record 
of Decision and, if appropriate, initiate any necessary 
remediation in accordance with CERCLA. The Secretary of the 
Army shall submit a report to the Committees on Appropriations 
of the House of Representatives and the Senate detailing the 
progress not later than 120 days after enactment of this act.

                 FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES

Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     $30,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      30,000,000

    The Committee has recommended $30,000,000 for the Flood 
Control and Coastal Emergencies account. This account provides 
funds for preparedness activities for natural and other 
disasters, response, and emergency flood fighting and rescue 
operations, hurricane response, and emergency shore protection 
work. It also provides for emergency supplies of clean water 
where the source has been contaminated or where adequate 
supplies of water are needed for consumption.

                            GENERAL EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $185,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     185,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     185,000,000

    This appropriation finances the expenses of the Office, 
Chief of Engineers, the Division Offices, and certain research 
and statistical functions of the Corps of Engineers. The 
Committee recommendation is $185,000,000.
    Executive Direction and Management.--The Office of the 
Chief of Engineers and 8 division offices supervise work in 38 
district offices.
    Humphreys Engineer Center Support Activity.--This support 
center provides administrative services (such as personnel, 
logistics, information management, and finance and accounting) 
for the Office of the Chief of Engineers and other separate 
field operating activities.
    Institute for Water Resources.--This institute performs 
studies and analyses, and develops planning techniques for the 
management and development of the Nation's water resources.
    United States Army Corps of Engineers Finance Center.--This 
center provides centralized support for all Corps finance and 
accounting.
    Office of Congressional Affairs.--The Committee believes 
that an Office of Congressional Affairs for the Civil Works 
Program would hamper the efficient and effective coordination 
of issues with the Committee staff and Members of Congress. The 
Committee believes that the technical knowledge and managerial 
expertise needed for the Corps headquarters to effectively 
address Civil Works authorization, appropriation, and 
headquarters policy matters resides in the Civil Works 
organization. Therefore, the Committee strongly recommends that 
the Office of Congressional Affairs not be a part of the 
process by which information on Civil Works projects, programs, 
and activities is provided to Congress.
     The Corps is reminded that General Expense funds are 
appropriated solely for the executive management and oversight 
of the Civil Works Program under the direction of the Director 
of Civil Works.

      OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS)

Appropriations, 2010....................................      $5,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................       6,000,000
Committee recommendation................................       6,000,000

    The Committee has recommended $6,000,000 for the Office of 
the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) [OASA(CW)]. 
As has been previously stated, the Committee believes that this 
office should be funded through the Defense appropriations bill 
and directs the administration to budget for this office under 
the Department of Defense, Operation and Maintenance--Army 
account in future budget submissions. It is the Committee's 
opinion that the traditional role of the ASA(CW) is to provide 
the Chief of Engineers advice about policy matters and 
generally be the political spokesperson for the 
administration's policies; however, the Chief of Engineers is 
responsible for carrying out the program. This is underscored 
by the administration's budget documents that state that the 
OASA(CW) provides policy direction and oversight for the civil 
works program and the Headquarters of the Corps provides 
executive direction and management of the civil works program.
    The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works advises 
the Secretary of the Army on a variety of matters, including 
the Civil Works program of the Corps of Engineers. The 
Assistant Secretary is a member of the Army Secretariat with 
responsibilities, such as participating in continuity of 
Government exercises that extend well beyond Civil Works. The 
Assistant Secretary also oversees the administration, operation 
and maintenance, and capital development of Arlington National 
Cemetery and the Soldiers' and Airmen's Home National Cemetery. 
Congressional oversight of the Army Cemetery program lies not 
with the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, but 
rather with the Appropriations Subcommittee on Military 
Construction and Veterans Affairs and with the Committee on 
Veterans Affairs.
    The Army's accounting system does not track OMA funding of 
overhead or Army-wide support offices on the basis of which 
office receives support, nor would it be efficient or effective 
to do so for a 20-person office. Instead, expenses such as 
legal support, personnel services, finance and accounting 
services, the executive motor pool, travel on military 
aircraft, and other support services are centrally funded and 
managed on a department-wide basis. Transferring the funding 
for the expenses of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Works to 
a separate account has greatly complicated the Army's 
accounting for such indirect and overhead expenses with no 
commensurate benefit to justify the change. The Committee does 
not agree that these costs should be funded in this bill and 
therefore has only provided funding for salaries and expenses 
as in previous years.

             GENERAL PROVISIONS--CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL

    Section 101. The bill includes language concerning 
reprogramming guidelines.
    Section 102. The bill includes language prohibiting 
implementation of competitive sourcing or HPO.
    Section 103. The bill includes language concerning 
continuing contracts and the Inland Waterway Trust Fund.
    Section 104. The bill includes language concerning report 
notifications.
    Section 105. The bill includes a provision providing the 
Corps of Engineers authorization for emergency measures to 
exclude Asian carp from the Great Lakes. It should be noted 
that when considering this language for inclusion in this bill 
that the Committee did not consider hydrologic separation of 
the Great Lakes Basin from the Mississippi River Basin to be an 
emergency measure. The Committee believes that the issue of 
hydrologic separation should be fully studied by the Corps of 
Engineers and vetted by the appropriate congressional 
authorizing committees and specifically enacted into law rather 
than have implementation be attempted through this limited 
provision.
    Section 106. The bill includes language deauthorizing a 
portion of a project.
    Section 107. The bill includes language modifying the scope 
of a project.
    Section 108. The bill includes language concerning a 
project cost limit change.
    Section 109. The bill includes language concerning the 
utilization of the Revolving Fund for the acquisition of a 
building.
    Section 110. The bill includes language concerning the 
utilization of the Revolving Fund for the construction of three 
buildings.
    Section 111. The bill includes language concerning a 
project cost limit change.
    Section 112. The bill includes language modifying the 
boundaries of a project.
    Section 113. The bill includes language deauthorizing a 
portion of a project.
    Section 114. The bill includes language concerning 
operation and maintenance of a project.
    Section 115. The bill includes language concerning leasing 
of property.
    Section 116. The bill includes language concerning 
acquisition of property.
    Section 117. The bill includes language modifying the cost 
sharing for certain projects.
    Section 118. The bill includes language concerning a 
property transfer.

                                TITLE II

                       DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

                Central Utah Project Completion Account

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $42,004,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      43,004,000
Committee recommendation................................      43,004,000

    The Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2011 to carry 
out the provisions of the Central Utah Project Completion Act 
totals $43,004,000. An appropriation of $38,810,000 has been 
provided for Central Utah project construction; $2,500,000 for 
fish, wildlife, and recreation, mitigation and conservation. 
The Committee recommendation provides $1,694,000 for program 
administration and oversight.
    Legislative language is included which allows up to 
$1,500,000 of the funds provided to be used for administrative 
costs.
    The Central Utah Project Completion Act (titles II-VI of 
Public Law 102-575) provides for the completion of the central 
Utah project by the Central Utah Water Conservancy District. 
The Act also authorizes the appropriation of funds for fish, 
wildlife, recreation, mitigation, and conservation; establishes 
an account in the Treasury for the deposit of these funds and 
of other contributions for mitigation and conservation 
activities; and establishes a Utah Reclamation Mitigation and 
Conservation Commission to administer funds in that account. 
The act further assigns responsibilities for carrying out the 
act to the Secretary of the Interior and prohibits delegation 
of those responsibilities to the Bureau of Reclamation.

                 AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [ARRA] 
enacted on February 17, 2009, was an attempt to combat the 
severe economic downturn by putting our citizens back to work 
rebuilding our Nation's water resource infrastructure. Through 
the Bureau of Reclamation's Water and Related Resources 
Account, $50,000,000 was provided to stimulate job growth by 
addressing water resource infrastructure needs in the Central 
Utah Project area. All of this ARRA funding has been obligated.

                         Bureau of Reclamation


                              INTRODUCTION

    The Bureau of Reclamation was established in 1902 with the 
primary mission of harnessing the western rivers that led to 
homesteading and the economic development in the west. Today, 
Reclamation has evolved into a contemporary water management 
agency. In addition to the traditional missions of bringing 
water and power to the west, Reclamation has developed and 
continues to develop, programs, initiatives, and activities 
that will help the Western States, Native American tribes, and 
others meet new water needs and balance the multitude of 
competing uses of water in the West.
    While Reclamation only has projects in the 17 Western 
States, their programs impact the entire Nation. Reclamation is 
the largest wholesaler of water in the country operating 348 
reservoirs with a total storage capacity of 245 million acre-
feet. Reclamation projects deliver 10 trillion gallons of water 
to more than 31 million people each year, and provide 1 out of 
5 Western farmers (140,000) with irrigation water for 10 
million acres of farmland that produce 60 percent of the 
Nation's vegetables and 25 percent of its fruits and nuts. 
Reclamation manages, with partners, 289 recreation sites that 
have 90 million visits annually.
    Reclamation is also the second largest producer of 
hydroelectric power in the Western United States. Fifty-eight 
powerplants annually provide more than 41 billion kilowatt 
hours generating nearly $1,000,000,000 in power revenues and 
produce enough electricity to serve 3.5 million homes. 
Reclamation's power revenues to the Treasury alone justify the 
investments proposed in the budget request. When water supply, 
recreation, environmental, and other ancillary benefits are 
considered, the return on this investment is greatly increased.
    As with the Corps of Engineers budget, the Committee does 
not believe that the administration properly values the 
economic input of the Bureau of Reclamation's programs to the 
national economy. Reclamation's budget amounted to a meager 
0.21 percent of the $530,000,000,000 in nondefense 
discretionary spending in fiscal year 2010. Or more broadly, 
Reclamation's budget amounted to 0.03 percent of the entire 
$3,540,000,000,000 fiscal year 2010 Federal budget.
    The Committee urges the administration to assess the value 
of Reclamation's programs to the national economy and derive a 
level of investment from that impact that is commensurate with 
the outputs of this critical infrastructure.

      OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET REQUEST

    The fiscal year 2011 budget request for the Bureau of 
Reclamation is composed of $1,064,697,000 in new budget 
authority. The budget request is $23,019,000 less than the 
fiscal year 2010 enacted amount but is an increase of 
$44,014,000 from the fiscal year 2010 request.
    The Committee is pleased that the administration has chosen 
to invest marginally more in Western water infrastructure in 
fiscal year 2011, but the needs far outweigh the amount 
proposed. Many Reclamation projects are 100 years old. A 
majority are more than 50 years old. This aging infrastructure 
desperately needs to be recapitalized if the Nation intends to 
continue to reap the benefits that this infrastructure 
provides. Besides the jobs created by the construction and 
maintenance of the existing infrastructure, this infrastructure 
has greatly contributed to the population boom in the Western 
States over the last 50 years. This population boom and the 
jobs and taxes to Federal, State, and local coffers that 
accompanied it would not have been possible without the 
infrastructure provided by the Bureau of Reclamation.
    Unfortunately this budget proposal is woefully inadequate 
in funding the infrastructure needs. The Committee is 
particularly disappointed to see that rural water projects are 
greatly underfunded in this budget. In many cases the budget 
proposals for these projects are less than the inflation rate 
for the project. In other words, at this level of investment, 
these projects will never be completed because project costs 
are increasing faster than the amount recommended by the 
administration.
    The largest account in Reclamation's budget is the Water 
and Related Resources account. The administration budget 
proposal includes $913,582,000 for this account. This is a 
decrease of $37, 576,000 from the fiscal year 2010 enacted 
amount, but it is an increase of $20,457,000 more than the 
administration's fiscal year 2010 budget request.
    The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund is proposed at 
$49,915,000 for fiscal year 2011. This is an increase of 
$14,557,000 over the fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. This 
account is primarily funded from revenues collected from water 
and power customers. Levels of funding in this account are 
based on a 3-year rolling average of revenues collected.
    The California Bay-Delta Restoration account is proposed at 
$40,000,000 for fiscal year 2011. This is the same as the 
fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. The Committee notes that this 
is a $9,000,000 increase over the administration's fiscal year 
2010 budget request.
    The Policy and Administration account is requested at 
$61,200,000, the same as the fiscal year 2010 enacted amount. 
This is also the same as the fiscal year 2010 budget request.

                 AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT

    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [ARRA] 
enacted on February 17, 2009, was an attempt to combat the 
severe economic downturn by putting our citizens back to work 
rebuilding our Nation's water resource infrastructure. The 
Bureau of Reclamation was provided $950,000,000 to stimulate 
job growth by addressing water resource infrastructure needs. 
Reclamation has obligated more than 85 percent of their ARRA 
funding. Reclamation is on track to obligate all of this 
funding before it expires on September 30, 2010.

                      WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $951,158,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     913,582,000
Committee recommendation................................     938,600,000

    An appropriation of $938,600,000 is recommended by the 
Committee for general investigations of the Bureau of 
Reclamation. The water and related resources account supports 
the development, management, and restoration of water and 
related natural resources in the 17 Western States. The account 
includes funds for operating and maintaining existing 
facilities to obtain the greatest overall level of benefits, to 
protect public safety, and to conduct studies on ways to 
improve the use of water and related natural resources. Work 
will be done in partnership and cooperation with non-Federal 
entities and other Federal agencies.
    The Committee has divided underfinancing between the 
Resources Management subaccount and the Facilities Operation 
and Maintenance subaccount. The Committee directs that the 
underfinancing amount in each subaccount initially be applied 
uniformly across all projects within the subaccounts. Upon 
applying the underfinanced amounts, normal reprogramming 
procedures should be undertaken to account for schedule 
slippages, accelerations, or other unforeseen conditions.

                         DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS

    The budget for the Bureau of Reclamation consists of 
individual line items of projects. As presented by the 
President, the budget contains 211 specific line-item requests 
for directed spending by the administration. An additional 43 
line-item requests for funding by the administration is for 
nationwide line items. All of these line items were specific 
requests by the administration of the Congress to be funded in 
fiscal year 2011. They did not request these funds 
programmatically, they requested them for a specific project in 
a specific location for a specific purpose.
    All of the projects funded in this report have gone through 
the same rigorous public review and approval process as those 
proposed for funding by the President. The difference in these 
projects, of course, is that the congressionally directed 
projects are not subject to the artificial budgetary 
prioritization criteria that the administration utilizes to 
decide what not to fund.
    In the interest of providing full disclosure of funding 
provided in the energy and water bill, all disclosures are made 
in the report accompanying the bill.
    Two tables are provided at the back of this report for 
disclosure. The first table provides the congressionally 
directed spending items requested by Members of Congress 
requiring disclosure under the provisions of Rule 44 of the 
Standing Rules of the Senate. If the Member requested the 
budget request or if only the budget request was provided, 
Member names are not listed next to these items because under 
the provisions of Rule 44 this would not be considered 
congressionally directed spending. The second table lists the 
Presidentially directed spending items. While this table is not 
required under the disclosure provisions of Rule 44, the 
Committee believes that it is prudent to provide this 
additional disclosure information.
    The purposes for the funding provided in the various 
accounts is described in the paragraphs associated with each 
account. The location of the programs, projects, or studies are 
denoted in the account tables

                               BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Budget estimate     Committee recommendation
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
                         Project title                           Resources  Facilities   Resources    Facilities
                                                                management     OM&R      management      OM&R
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            ARIZONA

Ak Chin Indian Water Rights Settlement Act Project............  ..........      10,960  ...........      10,960
Colorado River Basin Project--Central Arizona Project.........       9,055         361       9,055          361
Colorado River Front Work and Levee System....................       2,255  ..........       2,255   ...........
Northern Arizona Investigations Program.......................         182  ..........         182   ...........
Phoenix Metropolitan Water Reclamation and Reuse Project......         200  ..........         200   ...........
Salt River Project............................................         581         219         581          219
San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Settlement Act Project..........         325  ..........         325   ...........
South/Central Arizona Investigations Program..................         608  ..........         608   ...........
Yuma Area Projects............................................       1,362      20,058       1,362       20,058

                          CALIFORNIA

All American Canal-Imperial Dam Electrification rehabilitation  ..........  ..........       1,000   ...........
Cachuma Project...............................................         787         614         787          614
California Investigations Program.............................         233  ..........         233   ...........
Calleguas Municipal Water District Recycling Project..........       1,400  ..........       1,400   ...........
Central Valley Projects:
    American River Division, Folsom Dam Unit/Mormon Island....       1,631       7,833       2,551        7,833
    Auburn-Folsom South Unit..................................       1,400  ..........       1,400   ...........
    Delta Division............................................      14,004       6,004      14,004        6,004
    East Side Division........................................       1,458       2,943       1,458        2,943
    Friant Division...........................................       1,733       3,342       9,733        3,342
    Miscellaneous Project Programs............................      10,949         910      12,949          910
    Replacements, Additions, and Extraordinary Maintenance      ..........      21,656  ...........      21,656
     Program..................................................
    Sacramento River Division.................................      41,642       1,722      41,642        1,722
    San Felipe Division.......................................       1,173           6       1,173            6
    San Joaquin Division......................................         400  ..........         400   ...........
    Shasta Division...........................................         925       9,566         925        9,566
    Trinity River Division....................................      12,331       4,330      12,331        4,330
    Water and Power Operations................................       1,483       8,408       1,483        8,408
    West San Joaquin Division, San Luis Unit..................       8,367       7,033       8,367        7,033
    Yield Feasibility Investigation...........................         448  ..........         448   ...........
Lake Tahoe Regional Wetlands..................................          94  ..........          94   ...........
Long Beach Area Water Reclamation Project.....................       1,000  ..........       1,000   ...........
Long Beach Desalination Project...............................       1,000  ..........       1,000   ...........
Mokelumne River Regional Water Storage & Conjunctive..........  ..........  ..........         500   ...........
Orland Project................................................  ..........         767  ...........         767
Rancho California Water District..............................  ..........  ..........         250   ...........
Salton Sea Research Project...................................         400  ..........         400   ...........
San Diego Area Water Reclamation Program......................       4,969  ..........       4,969   ...........
San Diego Four Reservoir Intertie.............................  ..........  ..........         500   ...........
San Jose Area Water Reclamation and Reuse Program.............         242  ..........         242   ...........
Soboba........................................................       4,000  ..........       4,000   ...........
Solano Project................................................       1,498       2,337       1,498        2,337
Southern California Investigations Program....................         262  ..........         762   ...........
Ventura River Project.........................................         203           9         203            9

                           COLORADO

Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado River Storage Participating       12,134         328      12,134          328
 Project......................................................
Collbran Project..............................................         249       2,265         249        2,265
Colorado-Big Thompson Project.................................         221      12,557         221       12,557
Colorado Investigations Program...............................         183  ..........         183   ...........
Fruitgrowers Dam Project......................................         154         165         154          165
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project....................................         103       8,721         103        8,721
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project--Arkansas Valley Conduit...........       3,000  ..........       3,000   ...........
Grand Valley Unit, CRBSCP, Title II...........................         195       1,345         195        1,345
Leadville/Arkansas River Recovery Project.....................  ..........       6,659  ...........       6,659
Mancos Project................................................         113         163       1,500          163
Paradox Valley Unit, CRBSCP, Title II.........................          93       2,850          93        2,850
Pine River Project............................................         326         237         326          237
San Luis Valley Project.......................................         319       4,743         319        4,743
Uncompahgre Project...........................................         252         145         252          145

                            HAWAII

Hawaii Water Resources Study..................................  ..........  ..........         300   ...........

                             IDAHO

Boise Area Projects...........................................       3,031       2,515       3,031        2,515
Columbia and Snake River Salmon Recovery Project..............      18,000  ..........      18,000   ...........
Idaho Investigations Program..................................         390  ..........         390   ...........
Lewiston Orchards Project.....................................         721         105         721          105
Minidoka Area Projects........................................       2,901       2,310       2,901        2,310

                            KANSAS

Kansas Investigations Program.................................           5  ..........           5   ...........
Wichita Project...............................................          10         404          10          404
Wichita Project (Equus Beds Division).........................          50  ..........          50   ...........

                            MONTANA

Fort Peck Reservation/Dry Prairie Rural Water System..........       2,000  ..........       6,000   ...........
Hungry Horse Project..........................................  ..........         702  ...........         702
Huntley Project...............................................          31          84          31           84
Lower Yellowstone Project.....................................          34          15          34           15
Milk River Project............................................         327       2,456       1,327        2,456
Montana Investigations Program................................          20  ..........          20   ...........
Rocky Boys/North Central MT Rural Water System................       1,000  ..........       5,000   ...........
Sun River Project.............................................          52         272          52          272

                           NEBRASKA

Mirage Flats Project..........................................          13         131          13          131

                            NEVADA

Halfway Wash Project/Study....................................          75  ..........          75   ...........
Lahontan Basin Project (Humbolt, Newlands, and Washoe                4,056       2,667       4,056        2,667
 Projects)....................................................
Lake Mead/Las Vegas Wash Program..............................         700  ..........       1,850   ...........
North Las Vegas Water Reuse...................................  ..........  ..........       3,000   ...........

                          NEW MEXICO

Albuquerque Metro Area Reuse..................................  ..........  ..........         500   ...........
Carlsbad Project..............................................       3,032       1,748       3,032        1,748
Eastern New Mexico Investigations Program.....................          23  ..........          23   ...........
Eastern New Mexico Water Supply--Ute Reservoir................  ..........  ..........       2,000   ...........
Jicarilla Apache Rural Water System...........................         500  ..........         500   ...........
Middle Rio Grande Project.....................................      14,772      10,323      15,422       10,323
Navajo Gallup Water Supply....................................      10,000  ..........      10,000   ...........
Navajo Nation Investigations Program..........................         114  ..........         114   ...........
Pecos River Basin Water Salvage Project.......................  ..........         485  ...........         485
Rio Grande Project............................................       1,141       5,222       2,141        5,222
San Juan River Basin Investigations Program...................          91  ..........          91   ...........
Southern New Mexico/West Texas Investigations Program.........          91  ..........          91   ...........
Tucumcari Project.............................................          25          16          25           16
Upper Rio Grande Basin Investigations Program.................          35  ..........          35   ...........

                         NORTH DAKOTA

P-SMBP--Garrison Diversion Unit...............................      30,672       5,879      44,121        5,879

                           OKLAHOMA

Arbuckle Project..............................................          48         182          48          182
McGee Creek Project...........................................          20         660          20          660
Mountain Park Project.........................................           7         472           7          472
Norman Feasibility Study......................................  ..........  ..........         755   ...........
Norman Project................................................           9         467           9          467
Oklahoma Investigations Program...............................          47  ..........          47   ...........
Washita Basin Project.........................................           7       1,425           7        1,425
W.C. Austin Project...........................................          18         481          18          481

                            OREGON

Crooked River Project.........................................         458         486         458          486
Deschutes Ecosystem Restoration Project.......................  ..........  ..........         500   ...........
Deschutes Project.............................................         434         392         934          392
Eastern Oregon Projects.......................................         555         297         555          297
Klamath Dam Removal Study.....................................       5,000  ..........       5,000   ...........
Klamath Project...............................................      18,813       3,687      18,813        3,687
Oregon Investigations Program.................................         157  ..........         457   ...........
Rogue River Basin Project, Talent Division....................       1,222         354       1,222          354
Tualatin Project..............................................         315         238         315          238
Umatilla Project..............................................       1,370       2,767       1,370        2,767
Wallowa Lake Dam Rehabilitation and Water Management..........  ..........  ..........       1,000   ...........
Water for Irrigation Streams and Economy Feasibility Study      ..........  ..........         400   ...........
 [WISE].......................................................

                         SOUTH DAKOTA

Lewis and Clark Rural Water System............................       2,000  ..........      10,000   ...........
Mid-Dakota Rural Water Project................................  ..........          15  ...........          15
Mni Wiconi Project............................................      17,280      10,200      20,280       10,200
Perkins County Rural Water District...........................       1,000  ..........       1,000   ...........
Rapid Valley Project..........................................  ..........          84  ...........          84

                             TEXAS

Balmorhea Project.............................................          41          10          41           10
Canadian River Project........................................          54         111          54          111
Lower Rio Grande Water Conservation Project...................          50  ..........          50   ...........
Nueces River Project..........................................          20         543          20          543
Round Rock Reclaimed Water Project, TX........................  ..........  ..........       2,000   ...........
San Angelo Project............................................          35         383          35          383
Texas Investigations Program..................................          47  ..........          47   ...........

                             UTAH

Hyrum Project.................................................         167         157         167          157
Moon Lake Project.............................................          13          38          13           38
Newton Project................................................          69          26          69           26
Northern Utah Investigations Program..........................         102  ..........         602   ...........
Ogden River Project...........................................         280         166         280          166
Provo River Project...........................................       1,076         520       1,076          520
Scofield Project..............................................         346          77         346           77
Southern Nevada/Utah Investigations Program...................          26  ..........          26   ...........
Southern Utah Investigations Program..........................         128  ..........         128   ...........
Strawberry Valley Project.....................................         289          22         289           22
Summit County Water Supply (Weber Basin)......................  ..........  ..........         500   ...........
Weber Basin Project...........................................         914         756         914          756
Weber River Project...........................................          71         134          71          134

                          WASHINGTON

Columbia Basin Project........................................       4,575       6,500       5,575        6,500
Odessa Subarea Special Study..................................  ..........  ..........       1,250   ...........
Washington Area Projects......................................         407          52         407           52
Washington Investigations Program.............................          75  ..........          75   ...........
Yakima Project................................................       1,493       6,992       1,493        6,992
Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project..................      12,395  ..........      16,395   ...........

                            WYOMING

Kendrick Project..............................................         119       4,191         119        4,191
North Platte Project..........................................         266       1,569         266        1,569
Shoshone Project..............................................          76       1,122          76        1,122
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal................................................     311,885     230,166     381,696      230,166

                            VARIOUS

Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title I........  ..........      10,536  ...........      11,536
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title II.......       7,000  ..........       7,000   ...........
Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), Section 5..............       3,955       4,947       3,955        4,947
Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), Section 8..............       3,752  ..........       3,752   ...........
Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program..............         635  ..........         635   ...........
Dam Safety Program:
    Department of the Interior Dam Safety Program.............  ..........       1,900  ...........       1,900
    Initiate Safety of Dams Corrective Action.................  ..........      74,274  ...........      74,274
    Safety Evaluation of Existing Dams........................  ..........      19,000  ...........      19,000
Drought Emergency Assistance Program..........................         380  ..........         380   ...........
Emergency Planning and Disaster Response Program..............  ..........       1,157  ...........       1,157
Endangered Species Recovery Implementation Program............      23,721  ..........      23,721   ...........
Environmental and Interagency Coordination Activities.........       1,883  ..........       1,883   ...........
Environmental Program Administration..........................       1,140  ..........       1,140   ...........
Examination of Existing Structures............................  ..........       9,037  ...........       9,037
Federal Building Seismic Safety Program.......................  ..........       1,140  ...........       1,140
General Planning Activities...................................       2,347  ..........       2,347   ...........
Land Resources Management Program.............................      10,665  ..........      10,665   ...........
Lower Colorado River Investigations Program...................         137  ..........         137   ...........
Lower Colorado River Operations Program.......................      25,300  ..........      25,300   ...........
Miscellaneous Flood Control Operations........................  ..........         803  ...........         803
Native American Affairs Program...............................       7,465  ..........       7,465   ...........
Negotiation and Administration of Water Marketing.............       1,924  ..........       1,924   ...........
Operation and Program Management..............................         936       1,044         936        1,044
Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (other Pick Sloan)..........       3,018      37,339       3,018       37,339
Power Program Services........................................       1,269         307       1,269          307
Public Access and Safety Program..............................         616         155         616          155
Reclamation Law Administration................................       2,265  ..........       2,265   ...........
Recreation and Fish and Wildlife Program Administration.......       2,137  ..........       2,137   ...........
Research and Development:
    Desalination and Water Purification Program...............       2,066       1,600       2,066        1,600
    Science and Technology Program............................      11,488  ..........      12,488   ...........
Rural Water Program, Title I..................................       2,677  ..........       2,677   ...........
Site Security Activities......................................  ..........      30,268  ...........      30,268
United States/Mexico Border Issues--Technical Support.........          90  ..........          90   ...........
Upper Colorado River Operations Program.......................         252  ..........         252   ...........
Water Conservation Field Services Program.....................       7,854  ..........       7,854   ...........
WaterSMART Program:
    WaterSMART Grants (Challenge Grant in 2010)...............      27,000  ..........      20,000   ...........
    Title XVI Water Reclamation/Reuse Projects................      20,189  ..........       7,689   ...........
    Basin Studies.............................................       6,000  ..........       4,000   ...........
                                                               -------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal................................................     178,024     193,507     157,524      194,507
Underfinancing................................................  ..........  ..........     (16,800)      (8,493)
                                                               =================================================
      TOTAL...................................................     489,909     423,673     522,420      416,180
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All American Canal, California.--The Committee has 
recommended $1,000,000 to initiate the Imperial Dam 
Electrification Rehabilitation project. The Committee 
understands that a repayment contract will have to be 
negotiated with the Imperial Irrigation District under the 
provisions of Public Law 111-11, Title IX, Subtitle G--Aging 
Infrastructure before any funding can be provided for the 
project.
    Central Valley Project--American River Division.--$920,000 
has been recommended above the budget request for the El Dorado 
Irrigation District Temperature Control Device.
    Central Valley Project--Miscellaneous Project Programs.--
The Committee recommendation includes $2,000,000 for anadramous 
fish screens.
    Central Valley Project--Friant Division.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $8,000,000 for the San Joaquin River 
Restoration. These funds should be utilized in conjunction with 
and in advance of those funds available from the San Joaquin 
River Restoration Fund. The Committee encourages the timely 
completion of all environmental review, feasibility, and design 
documents to allow for construction to begin in fiscal year 
2011 on the Friant-Kern and Madera Canals Capacity Correction 
projects, and further encourages the expeditious completion of 
studies to inform the hatchery and genetics management plan and 
other actions necessary for reintroduction of salmon in 2012.
    Hawaii Water Resources Study, Hawaii.--The Committee 
recommends $300,000 to update the Hawaii Water Resources Study. 
This study is especially critical in view of the significant 
changes to plantation agriculture and the related water systems 
that have prevailed for more than 100 years in the State of 
Hawaii.
    Milk River Project.--$1,000,000 has been recommended for 
the St. Mary Diversion Rehabilitation Project. These funds 
should be utilized using applicable Reclamation Law and as 
directed in this act.
    Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin, Garrison Diversion Unit, North 
Dakota.--Within the Committee recommendation, $32,000,000 is 
recommended for rural water projects. Of this amount, 
$16,000,000 shall be expended for the following projects: 
$2,000,000 for the Northwest Area Water Supply; $7,000,000 for 
the South Central Regional Water District; and $7,000,000 for 
the Southwest Pipeline. Additionally the Committee recommends 
$3,120,000 for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Irrigation 
Project.
    Oregon Investigations Program, Oregon.--$300,000 above the 
budget request is recommended for developing appraisal-level 
designs and cost estimates for Umatilla on-reservation 
distribution systems.
    Water for Irrigation Streams and Economy Feasibility 
Study.--The Committee recommendation includes $400,000 for the 
Water for Irrigation Streams and Economy Feasibility study.
    Tualatin Valley Water Supply Feasibility Study, Oregon.--
The Committee understands that Reclamation has sufficient funds 
available for the feasibility study and recognizes that the 
completion of the Bureau of Reclamation's Scoggins Dam 
Corrective Action Alternative Study is integral to determining 
how the State, local and Federal partners will proceed to 
address dam safety and long-term water needs of the region. 
Therefore, the Committee urges Reclamation to maintain its 
schedule for completion of the Scoggins Dam CAAS in Federal 
fiscal year 2011 in order to address these needs in a timely 
and efficient manner.
    Northern Utah Investigations Program, Utah.--The Committee 
has recommended an additional $500,000 for the Rural Water 
Technology Alliance.
    Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Washington.--
The Committee recommends an additional $4,000,000 above the 
budget request for the Diversion Reduction Agreement with the 
Sunnyside Irrigation District to address water shortages in the 
basin.
    Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title I.--
The Committee recommends $1,000,000 above the budget request 
for plant replacements that would contribute to the successful 
pilot run of the Yuma Desalting Plant.
    Drought Emergency Assistance.--The Committee has provided 
the budget request for this program. Within the funds provided, 
the Committee urges the Bureau of Reclamation to recognize the 
unique conditions in Hawaii and provide full and fair 
consideration of the request for drought assistance from the 
State of Hawaii and fund if meritorious.
    Research and Development, Science and Technology Program.--
The Committee recommends $1,000,000 above the budget request 
for Quagga and Zebra Mussel research activities. The Committee 
is concerned about the impacts to western waters of these two 
invasive species. Reclamation efforts to date have necessarily 
focused on addressing the problems caused by the mussels at 
Reclamation facilities. The Committee believes that Reclamation 
should establish a research program geared toward eradicating 
or controlling these invasive species.
    Water Conservation Field Services Program.--Within the 
amounts provided, Reclamation is urged to continue urban water 
conservation projects identified through the Metropolitan Water 
District of Southern California Innovative Conservation 
Program; industrial water efficiency surveys to assess 
opportunities to conserve water in industrial water use; and 
for weather based irrigation controller activities to pilot 
ways to speed distribution and acceptance of these landscape 
water efficiency devices.
    WaterSMART Program.--Within the amounts provided for the 
challenge grants, funds are included for the Desert Research 
Institute to create a systems framework to identify solutions 
for addressing water supply, flood control, natural resources 
and climate change challenges. The Committee also recommends 
that the Education Center at the Conservation Garden Park, Utah 
and the Gravel Pit Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project, Utah 
should be considered for challenge grants. Within the amounts 
provided for title XVI, Water Reclamation, and Reuse under this 
item, the Committee has recommended $2,500,000 for the 
WateReuse Foundation. These funds are available to support the 
Foundation's research priorities.

                CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $35,358,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      49,915,000
Committee recommendation................................      49,915,000

    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $49,915,000 
for the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.
    The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund was authorized 
in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of 
Public Law 102-575. This fund was established to provide 
funding from project beneficiaries for habitat restoration, 
improvement and acquisition, and other fish and wildlife 
restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of 
California. Revenues are derived from payments by project 
beneficiaries and from donations. Payments from project 
beneficiaries include several required by the act (Friant 
Division surcharges, higher charges on water transferred to 
non-CVP users, and tiered water prices) and, to the extent 
required in appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation 
and restoration payments.

                    CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION

                     (INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $40,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      40,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      40,000,000

    The Committee recommendation includes an appropriation of 
$40,000,000 for the CALFED Bay-Delta Program.
    This account funds activities that are consistent with the 
CALFED Bay-Delta Program, a collaborative effort involving 18 
State and Federal agencies and representatives of California's 
urban, agricultural, and environmental communities. The goals 
of the program are to improve fish and wildlife habitat, water 
supply reliability, and water quality in the San Francisco Bay-
San Joaquin River Delta, the principle hub of California's 
water distribution system.

                       POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $61,200,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      61,200,000
Committee recommendation................................      61,200,000

    The Committee recommendation for general administrative 
expenses is $61,200,000.
    The policy and administrative expenses program provides for 
the executive direction and management of all reclamation 
activities, as performed by the Commissioner's offices in 
Washington, DC, Denver, Colorado, and five regional offices. 
The Denver office and regional offices charge individual 
projects or activities for direct beneficial services and 
related administrative and technical costs. These charges are 
covered under other appropriations.

             General Provisions--Department of the Interior

    Section 201. The bill includes language regarding Bureau of 
Reclamation Reprogramming.
    Section 202. The bill includes language regarding the San 
Luis Unit and the Kesterson Reservoir in California.
    Section 203. The bill includes language that states 
requirements for purchase or lease of water from the Middle Rio 
Grande or Carlsbad Projects in New Mexico.
    Section 204. The bill includes language regarding Drought 
Emergency Assistance.
    Section 205. The bill includes language concerning a 
project cost ceiling increase.
    Section 206. The bill includes language regarding the 
Desert Terminal Lakes Program.
    Section 207. The bill includes language extending a water 
service contract.
    Section 208. The bill includes language concerning certain 
recreational use permits.

                               TITLE III

                          DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

                              Transparency

    The Committee recognizes the Department's efforts to 
achieve greater transparency in financial and programmatic 
performance. This has particularly been demonstrated in the 
execution of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. In 
other more focused efforts, the Committee has seen that greater 
transparency has exposed significant financial risks and 
liabilities facing the Department, such as those liabilities 
arising from contractor managed defined benefit pension 
liabilities and other contractor benefits. The Committee 
expects the Department to apply the same degree of transparency 
to its base programs and mission support activities by the end 
of fiscal year 2011.

                             Cyber Security

    Pervasive and sustained cyber attacks against the United 
States are on the rise and continue to pose a threat to Federal 
operations. DOE is particularly vulnerable because web-based 
systems and data support critical mission activities related to 
energy security, nuclear security, scientific discovery and 
innovation, and environmental programs. The Committee supports 
DOE's efforts to implement cyber security measures to protect 
classified systems and networks. Moreover, the Committee is 
encouraged that a November 2009 Office of Independent Oversight 
report found that DOE's classified systems are adequately 
protected against cyber security threats, including the threat 
of compromise from external sources and the threat from 
malicious insiders. However, the Office also found remaining 
weaknesses that, if addressed, could further strengthen DOE's 
cyber security. The major weaknesses include (1) a lack of 
clear policies and guidance to ensure the appropriate level of 
protection for information that is shared between networks that 
operate at different classification categories, (2) operational 
and system-specific risks are not being fully evaluated and 
documented, and (3) site-specific cyber security plans are not 
sufficiently detailed to address the full range of threats. The 
Committee directs DOE to submit a report by April 1, 2011, on 
how the Department resolved the program weaknesses identified 
in the November 2009 Office of Independent Oversight report.

                        Reprogramming Guidelines

    The Department of Energy is directed to operate in a manner 
fully consistent with the following reprogramming guidelines. A 
reprogramming request must be submitted to the Committees on 
Appropriations for consideration before any implementation of a 
reorganization proposal which includes moving previous 
appropriations between appropriation accounts. The Department 
is directed to inform the Committees promptly and fully when a 
change in program execution and funding is required during the 
fiscal year. To assist the Department in this effort, the 
following guidance is provided for programs and activities 
funded in the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act. The Department is directed to follow this 
guidance for all programs and activities unless specific 
reprogramming guidance is provided for a program or activity.
    Definition.--A reprogramming includes the reallocation of 
funds from one activity to another within an appropriation, or 
any significant departure from a program, project, activity, or 
organization described in the agency's budget justification as 
presented to and approved by Congress. For construction 
projects, a reprogramming constitutes the reallocation of funds 
from one construction project identified in the justifications 
to another project or a significant change in the scope of an 
approved project.
    Any reallocation of new or prior year budget authority or 
prior year deobligations must be submitted to the Committees in 
writing and may not be implemented prior to approval by the 
Committees on Appropriations.

                            Energy Programs

                 ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

Appropriations, 2010....................................  $2,242,500,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   2,355,473,000
Committee recommendation................................   2,287,800,000

    The Committee recommendation is $2,287,800,000 for Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
    Hydrogen Technology.--The Committee recommends $174,000,000 
for hydrogen technology. Within the available funds, 
$20,000,000 is for Technology Validation, at least half of 
which is focused on vehicle and hydrogen infrastructure 
applications; $47,000,000 is for hydrogen fuels R&D, with a 
particular focus on the synergies between hydrogen and 
renewable energy and deriving hydrogen from renewable 
resources; $20,000,000 is for Market Transformation in early 
markets, particularly for stationary sources (not safety codes 
and standards); and $1,000,000 is for education.
    Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D.--The Committee 
recommends $220,000,000 for biomass and biorefinery systems 
R&D. Within the available funds a total of $30,000,000 is for 
algae biofuels. The Committee recognizes that improvements and 
innovations to feedstock production will contribute to meeting 
overall cost goals. Significant potential exists for 
discoveries in this area, particularly with algae strains that 
possess unique metabolic and enzymatic adaptations to tolerate 
high salinity. The Committee directs the Department to make 
$5,000,000 available for research and development activities 
for halophilic algae applications in partnership with a 
university-led consortia having expertise in this area and 
ready access to a wide variety of high-salinity algae strains.
    Also within available funds, $15,000,000 is for the 
cellulosic reverse auction. The Committee is aware the 
Department is considering a reverse auction in fiscal year 2010 
using $4,500,000 made available in fiscal year 2008. The 
Committee urges the Department to consider delaying such action 
and combining the 2008 funding with fiscal year 2011 funds to 
make the reverse auction more compelling. Further, within 
available funds, $4,000,000 is provided for coordination with 
the Fuels Technology subprogram under Vehicles Technologies to 
continue testing the effects of intermediate fuel blends (15-20 
percent ethanol mixed with 80-85 percent gasoline) on Tier 1 
vehicles and small engines. The testing will provide data on 
how these blends may affect materials, durability, performance 
and emissions of legacy engines. Work should be done in 
coordination with the Vehicles Technology Program.
    The Committee continues to be concerned about the Nation's 
capability to meet the 2022 requirement of 21 billion gallons 
of advanced biofuels required under the Renewable Fuel Standard 
[RFS]. The Committee is not aware of a coordinated strategy 
among Federal agencies to achieve this requirement. The lack of 
a Federal strategy creates opportunities for duplication of 
efforts and the waste of taxpayer dollars. To address this, the 
Committee directs the Department to coordinate with the 
appropriate Federal agencies, with input from industry 
partners, to develop a strategy to meet the advanced biofuel 
requirements of the RFS. The strategy should seek to avoid 
duplication among the Federal agencies while drawing on their 
research strengths and capabilities. The Committee directs the 
Department to complete this strategy by September 30, 2011. The 
Committee recommends $5,000,000 for a demonstration of a 
catalytic process to convert liquid ethanol into gaseous 
ethylene. The Committee notes that thermochemical conversion of 
biomass to fuels involves the production of synthetic natural 
gas [SNG], a valuable and important energy feedstock in its own 
right. The Committee encourages the Department to study the 
economic and ecological sustainability of integrating SNG 
production with existing forest, crop or other biomass source 
operations. The Department should place particular emphasis on 
instances where production of SNG can result in near-term job 
creation and prevention of job loss. The Department shall 
report back to the Committee no later than 8 months from 
enactment.
    Solar Energy.--The Committee recommends $272,000,000 for 
solar energy. From within the available funds, the Committee 
directs the Department to provide $50,000,000 for concentrating 
solar power demonstration projects as proposed in the budget 
request. The Committee is aware of recent developments in the 
field of concentrated photovoltaics where ultra-high-efficiency 
concentrator solar cells are being designed at less than the 
cost of current technology now used in concentrating 
photovoltaic applications. This technology has the advantages 
of lower land use and increased power. The Committee encourages 
DOE to continue its efforts to invest in promising high 
efficiency, low cost concentrated photovoltaic solar technology 
that will accelerate the achievement of grid parity. The 
Committee also encourages the Department of Energy to designate 
and fund, in fiscal year 2011, a center for solar energy 
innovation to be located in close proximity to high-quality 
solar resources and the site chosen by the Department of Energy 
for its Solar Demonstration Zone Project. The center should 
support the research, development, and deployment of the 
essential components of the solar energy supply chain to 
promote the integration of solar technologies and products into 
utility, building and commercial systems, and to improve their 
reliability, affordability and rapid deployment across the 
Southwest region and the United States.
    Wind Energy.--The recommendation is $123,000,000 for wind 
energy. The Department is encouraged to undertake at least two 
offshore wind demonstration projects off the Atlantic Coast, 
with at least one project in transitional depths and one in 
deepwater. To the greatest extent possible, the Department 
shall coordinate with the Department of Interior (Bureau of 
Offshore Energy, Management, Regulation, and Enforcement) and 
the Atlantic Offshore Wind Energy Consortium in order to select 
projects that are likely to foster the deployment of commercial 
offshore wind generation in the short term.
    Geothermal Technology.--The recommendation for geothermal 
technology is $55,000,000, the same as the administration's 
request. The Committee directs the Department to make not less 
than $5,000,000 available to continue development and 
deployment of low-temperature geothermal systems.
    Together, the funding provided through the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Act [ARRA] and the fiscal year 2010 
and fiscal year 2011 appropriations bills reflect the 
Committee's intent to fund the full range of activities 
authorized by Congress in 2007 in subtitle B of Public Law 110-
140. The Committee expects that in future years the Department 
will request funding for a broad based program, and not just 
Enhanced Geothermal System activities. The Committee also 
requests that the Department provide the Committee with a copy 
of its report required by section 621 of Public Law 110-140 
evaluating the Department's progress implementing the 
geothermal provisions of Public Law 110-140 and evaluating 
additional advanced concepts and technologies to maximize the 
geothermal resource potential of the United States.
    Water Power Energy R&D.--The Committee recommends 
$60,000,000 for water power. Of the funds made available, 
$15,000,000 is directed for conventional hydropower activities 
and $45,000,000 is for marine and hydrokinetic activities. 
Within available funds, the Committee directs the Department to 
provide not less than $6,000,000 for the construction of 
necessary testing infrastructure for marine and hydrokinetic 
systems. Further, the Committee includes $1,000,000 for 
research and development activities of tidal barrage 
technology.
    Vehicle Technologies.--The Committee recommends 
$325,000,000 for vehicle technologies. The Committee recognizes 
the Department's efforts to increase the number of hybrids and 
plug-in electric vehicles in its fleet and is also cognizant 
that significant research, development, and deployment [RD&D] 
challenges exist to the adoption of this technology on a large 
scale. To address these challenges, the Department should 
investigate technologies that will advance electrification of 
all classes of passenger vehicles. The Committee also directs 
the Department to make $3,000,000 available to continue efforts 
on both stationary and in-motion inductive power transfer 
technology to a national laboratory-university consortia. The 
Committee includes $5,000,000 for natural gas vehicle research 
and development.
    The Committee recognizes that batteries that reach the end 
of their useful lives in electric vehicles will have remaining 
capacity for other uses and directs the program to use 
$2,000,000 in conjunction with the Office of Electricity to 
commence work on the secondary use program authorized in 
section 915 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
    The Committee further directs $5,000,000 for the Department 
to establish a program to collect and synthesize data on the 
use of plug-in electric drive vehicles and provide technical 
assistance to communities that want to prepare for plug-in 
electric drive vehicle deployment.
    Building Technologies.--The Committee recommends 
$222,000,000 for building technologies. The Committee includes 
$5,000,000 for the solar decathlon, which the Department had 
proposed to fund under the RE-ENERGYSE program. The Committee 
includes $1,500,000 for research and development activities for 
advanced sensing and control technologies for task-intuitive 
lighting systems, and directs the Department to identify a 
university-led partnership with experience in this field. The 
Committee includes $16,000,000 for the Energy Efficient 
Building Systems Design Hub.
    The Committee is concerned about the memorandum of 
understanding [MOU] the Department signed with the 
Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] in September 2009 that 
reassigns new duties and responsibilities for implementing the 
ENERGY STAR program within the two agencies. The Committee does 
not understand why the Department used its limited resources to 
pursue this MOU without congressional input, particularly when 
an energy bill with significant statutory changes to the ENERGY 
STAR program has been favorably reported from the authorizing 
committee and was pending before the Senate. The Committee 
encourages the Department to consult with Congress in the 
future before it attempts to implement such sweeping changes to 
its programs.
    The Committee is also concerned about deficiencies in the 
ENERGY STAR program as noted in the October 2009 Audit Report 
from the Department's Office of Inspector General, and the 
March 5, 2010 GAO report. The Committee also questions the 
Department's claim that Americans saved $17,000,000,000 last 
year using these products, since that data was reported by the 
same entities who had abused the program in the past. The 
Committee recognizes that the Department and EPA have issued 
new guidelines to address these deficiencies, but that 
insufficient time has passed to determine their effectiveness. 
The Committee believes the Department should require 
independent verification from accredited or third party 
laboratories for all products. The Committee directs the 
Government Accountability Office [GAO] to assess (1) whether 
the Department has taken sufficient steps to implement the 
recommendations of the Office of Inspector General, and (2) 
whether the new guidelines and other changes to the program 
adequately address the issues raised both by the Office of 
Inspector General and GAO.
    The Committee notes that the Energy Policy Conservation Act 
of 1975 authorized the Department to issue efficiency standards 
for a list of products, and to date televisions are the only 
item for which DOE has failed to issue a standard. The 
Committee encourages the Secretary to complete a rulemaking 
process to establish effective efficiency standards for 
televisions, as expeditiously as possible.
    Industrial Technologies.--The Committee recommends 
$100,000,000 for industrial technologies. Within available 
funds, the Committee recommends $14,000,000 for the Industries 
of the Future (Specific), and $1,500,000 for the Department to 
contract with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct an 
analysis of cooperative mechanisms, beyond research and 
development support, to advance the development of a robust, 
domestic clean energy technology sector. Such mechanisms may 
include, but are not limited to, grants, loan guarantees, 
demonstration projects, tax incentives, procurement, and other 
forms of public-private partnerships.
    Federal Energy Management Program.--The Committee 
recommends $42,000,000 for the Federal Energy Management 
Program [FEMP]. Of the funds made available, the Committee 
recommends that Federal Fleets receive $5,000,000 to conduct an 
assessment of the most appropriate places to deploy electric 
vehicles in the Federal fleet and to begin a pilot program to 
deploy electric vehicles based on the assessment.
    The FEMP is intended to assist Federal agencies--which 
together spend roughly $10,000,000,000 annually on energy 
procurements--in achieving energy savings. The Committee is 
troubled with recent findings of the DOE Inspector General 
[OIG] in its audit report on the FEMP. The OIG found that FEMP 
``had not always maintained up-to-date energy efficiency 
specifications; could not demonstrate that it had adequately 
pursued the development of new energy efficiency 
specifications; and had not effectively managed relevant 
contractor efforts essential to the program.'' The Committee 
directs the Department to deliver by March 15, 2011 an action 
plan to address the problems identified by the OIG.
    RE-ENERGYSE.--The Committee recommends no funds for RE-
ENERGYSE.
    Facilities and Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends 
$57,500,000 for facilities and infrastructure consistent with 
the budget request.
    Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $170,000,000 
for program direction.
    Program Support.--The Committee recommends $59,700,000 for 
program support. Within the international subprogram, 
$2,000,000 is to continue the United States-Israel energy 
cooperative agreement.
    Weatherization Assistance Program.--The Committee provides 
$200,000,000. Of that amount, $7,500,000 is for training and 
technical assistance and $30,000,000 is for innovations in 
weatherization as requested in the budget. The Committee notes 
that this program received $5,000,000,000 in the Recovery Act 
in addition to current year appropriations, and that prior 
appropriated balances are more than sufficient to carry the 
existing program into fiscal year 2012 without further 
appropriation.
    Intergovernmental Activities.--The Committee provides 
$50,000,000 for State Energy Programs and $10,000,000 for 
Tribal Energy Activities.
    Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee 
includes $147,600,000 for the following list of projects that 
provide for research, development, and demonstration of energy 
efficiency or renewable energy technologies or programs. The 
Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing 
requirements may apply to these projects.

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project title              Amount             Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
21st Century Renewable Fuels,       $400,000  Senators Levin, Stabenow
 Energy, and Materials
 Initiative.
Adams State College Solar           $400,000  Senator Mark Udall
 Project.
Advanced Closed-Cycle Turbine     $1,000,000  Senator Murray
 Generator.
Advanced Energy Studies........   $2,750,000  Senator Dorgan
Advanced Solid State Lithium        $300,000  Senators Levin, Stabenow
 Ion Battery Domestic
 Manufacturing Initiative.
Algae Biofuels Research........   $2,000,000  Senators Murray, Cantwell
Alternative and Unconventional   $10,000,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
 Energy Research and
 Development.
Alternative Energy Medical          $500,000  Senator Reid
 Complex.
Bio-Energy Research Center.....     $800,000  Senator Tester
Biofuel from Nevada's Municipal     $500,000  Senator Reid
 Wastes.
Biofuels, Biopower, and           $1,250,000  Senators Chambliss,
 Biomaterials Initiative.                      Isakson
Biomass Boiler and Steam            $650,000  Senator Johnson
 Absorption Chiller Plant.
Biomass Boiler at Ferrum            $300,000  Senators Webb, Warner
 College.
Bucknell University Marcellus       $200,000  Senators Specter, Casey
 Shale Research Initiative.
Center for Biomass Utilization.   $1,500,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Center for Ocean Renewable          $500,000  Senator Shaheen
 Energy.
Center for Ozark Community        $1,500,000  Senator Bond
 Biomass Energy Development.
Chittenden County Natural Gas     $1,000,000  Senator Leahy
 Refueling Project.
CHRISTUS Center for Healthy         $300,000  Senators Landrieu, Vitter
 Living and Energy Efficient
 LEED Technology.
City of Grand Rapids City           $400,000  Senators Levin, Stabenow
 Building Solar and Wind
 Renewable Energy Demonstration
 Project.
City of Lansing Bioengergy          $400,000  Senators Levin, Stabenow
 Generation Demonstration
 Project.
City of San Jose Smart LEED         $600,000  Senator Feinstein
 Streetlights, CA.
City of Yreka Biomass Facility,     $500,000  Senator Feinstein
 CA.
Clean Energy Infrastructure         $200,000  Senator Sherrod Brown
 Educational Initiative.
Co-Gen Electrostatic                $700,000  Senator Gillibrand
 Precipitator.
Collaboration on Renewable          $300,000  Senator Reid
 Energy Job Creation Strategies.
Delaware Energy Efficiency.....      $55,000  Senators Carper, Kaufman
Development of High Yield         $6,000,000  Senators Inouye, Akaka
 Tropical Feedstocks and
 Biomass Conversion Technology
 for Renewable Energy
 Production.
Energy Conservation, Solar          $300,000  Senator Landrieu
 Energy Education and Research.
Energy Recovery at the Water        $750,000  Senators Tester, Baucus
 Reclamation Facility.
Ethanol From Agriculture for      $1,000,000  Senators Pryor, Lincoln
 Arkansas and America.
Farm Solar Share...............     $645,000  Senators Carper, Kaufman
Farm-Based Renewable Energy....     $400,000  Senator Murray
Fuel Cell Durability Research..     $400,000  Senator Dodd
Genetic Improvement of              $500,000  Senators Reed, Whitehouse
 Switchgrass for Biofuels.
Geothermal Conversion Project..   $1,000,000  Senator Lugar
Great Basin College--Direct Use   $1,000,000  Senator Reid
 Geothermal Demonstration
 Project.
Green Building.................     $250,000  Senators Schumer,
                                               Gillibrand
Green Energy Sustainable Loan       $700,000  Senator Gillibrand
 Program.
Hawaii Energy Sustainability      $6,000,000  Senators Inouye, Akaka
 Program.
Hawaii Renewable Energy           $6,000,000  Senator Inouye
 Development Venture.
High Performance Computing          $700,000  Senator Hagan
 Infrastructure for Modeling
 Solar Energy.
High Speed Wind Turbine Noise     $1,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
 Model with Suppression.
Home Energy Efficiency Research     $500,000  Senator Specter, Casey
 and Development Initiative.
Hoonah IPEC Hydroelectric         $1,500,000  Senator Murkowski
 Project.
Industrial Technologies Program   $1,000,000  Senator Reid
 Language.
Institute for Environmental         $450,000  Senator Rockefeller
 Studies.
Iowa Central Community College      $500,000  Senators Harkin, Grassley
 Renewable Fuels Laboratory.
Kaukauna Utilities                $1,000,000  Senator Kohl
 Hydroelectric Generator
 Replacement.
Large-Scale Wind Training......     $400,000  Senators Schumer,
                                               Gillibrand
Las Vegas Residential Energy        $500,000  Senator Reid
 Efficiency Program.
Livingston Campus Geothermal        $750,000  Senators Lautenberg,
 Energy System.                                Menendez
Long Island Sustainable Schools     $450,000  Senator Schumer
 Network.
Maine Tidal Power Initiative...   $1,000,000  Senators Collins, Snowe
Martin County Microfiber Fuel       $500,000  Senators Burr, Hagan
 Cell Technology Development.
Mega-Turbine Research for           $750,000  Senator Ben Nelson
 Enhanced Wind Power.
Mendocino County for the            $450,000  Senators Feinstein, Boxer
 Strategic Woody-Biomass
 Initiative.
MidSouth/Southeast BioEnergy      $1,000,000  Senators Pryor, Lincoln
 Consortium.
Montana Algal BioDiesel             $750,000  Senators Tester, Baucus
 Initiative.
Nanostructured Materials for      $1,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
 Improved Photovoltaics.
National Center for Deepwater    $10,000,000  Senators Collins, Snowe
 Offshore Wind.
National Open-Ocean Energy        $1,200,000  Senator Bill Nelson
 Laboratory.
National Wind Energy Center,      $3,000,000  Senator Hutchison
 University of Houston,
 Houston, TX.
National Wind Resource Center     $1,000,000  Senator Cornyn
 at Pantex.
Natural Resource Research           $750,000  Senators Pryor, Lincoln
 Center (NRCC).
Nevada Inter-Tribal Energy          $150,000  Senator Reid
 Consortium.
Nevada Renewable Energy           $3,000,000  Senator Reid
 Consortium.
Nevada Renewable Energy           $3,000,000  Senator Reid
 Innovation and Deployment
 Cluster--Technology
 Commercialization and Site
 Development.
North Country Community Wood        $200,000  Senator Shaheen
 Energy Systems.
Nushagak Area Hydropower            $500,000  Senator Murkowski
 Project.
Ocean-Based Energy Generation..     $600,000  Senator Murray
Ohio Advanced Energy                $500,000  Senator Sherrod Brown
 Manufacturing Center (OAEMC).
Ohio Low Cost Carbon Fiber        $1,500,000  Senators Voinovich,
 Initiative.                                   Sherrod Brown
OIT Geothermal Power Generation     $400,000  Senators Wyden, Merkley
 Plant.
Old Dominion University,            $750,000  Senators Webb, Warner
 Construction and Operation of
 a Demonstration Scale Algal
 Research Center.
Optimized Concentrated Solar        $750,000  Senator Specter
 Power Trough Development
 Project.
Photovoltaic System at Closed,      $650,000  Senator Schumer
 Capped Landfill.
Producing Renewable, Value-       $1,000,000  Senator Landrieu
 Added Products from Waste
 Feedstocks.
Rapid Battery Charging Device       $500,000  Senator Reid
 for Electric Vehicles.
Red Wing Regional Biosolids         $700,000  Senator Klobuchar
 Processing Facility.
Reedsport Wave Power Project        $400,000  Senators Wyden, Merkley
 (Phase I).
Renerwable Energy Technical         $500,000  Senator Schumer
 Training Center.
Renewable Energy Demonstration.     $750,000  Senator Durbin
Renewable Energy Demonstration      $300,000  Senator Mark Udall
 Projects at Old FLC.
Renewable Energy Feasibility        $500,000  Senator Reid
 Study and Resources Assessment
 for Lincoln County, NV.
Renewable Energy Initiative....     $500,000  Senator Durbin
Renewable Energy Solar Farm....     $650,000  Senators Lautenberg,
                                               Menendez
Reno Hydrogen Fuel.............   $1,000,000  Senator Reid
Research and Develop Geothermal     $700,000  Senator Begich
 Energy.
Research, Development and         $1,000,000  Senator Kohl
 Demonstration of Plug-In
 Hybrid Electric Drive  Kits.
Rowan University Algae-Based        $750,000  Senators Lautenberg,
 Renewable Fuel Initiative.                    Menendez
Salem City Solar Energy Project     $300,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
San Francisco Bay Area              $500,000  Senator Feinstein
 Biosolids to Energy Project,
 CA.
San Francisco Electric Vehicle      $300,000  Senator Boxer
 Initiative.
Shenandoah Valley as a National     $350,000  Senator Warner
 Demonstration Project
 Achieving 25 Percent Renewable
 Energy by the Year 2025.
Sitka Blue Lake Hydroelectric     $1,000,000  Senators Murkowski, Begich
 Expansion Project.
Solar Cell Connectivity           $1,000,000  Senators Reed, Whitehouse
 Research and Development.
Solar Electric System..........     $200,000  Senator Gillibrand
Solar Energy Infrastructure         $500,000  Senator Reid
 Enhancement.
Solar Energy Research and           $500,000  Senator Lugar
 Laboratory.
Solar Power Module Development.     $500,000  Senator Leahy
Solar Testing and Training.....     $400,000  Senators Dodd, Lieberman
South Jordan NGV Fleet              $300,000  Senator Bennett
 Implementation Program.
South Utah Electric District      $1,000,000  Senator Bennett
 Crab Creek Small Hydropower
 Facility.
Southern Regional Center for      $3,500,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
 Lightweight Innovative Designs.
Southwest Washington Tidal        $1,000,000  Senators Murray, Cantwell
 Energy Project.
Springfield Fast-Fill CNG           $500,000  Senator Bond
 Facility.
Strategic Biomass Initiative...     $500,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Sun Grant Initiative, South       $2,000,000  Senators Johnson, Thune
 Dakota State University
 Regional Biomass Feedstock
 Research and Development.
Sustainable Biofuel Production--    $400,000  Senator Kerry
 Consolidated Bioprocessing
 Strategy for Biomass
 Conversion.
Sustainable Campus Initiative       $400,000  Senator Reid
 of Sierra Nevada College at
 Lake Tahoe.
Sustainable Energy Homeowner        $200,000  Senator Sanders
 Outreach Program.
Sustainable Energy in Schools..     $500,000  Senator Sanders
Sustainable Energy Institute...     $500,000  Senators Harkin, Grassley
Sustainable Energy Research       $9,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
 Center.
Tri-County Biomass Energy Pilot     $800,000  Senators Tester, Baucus
 Project.
Truckee Meadows Water             $1,000,000  Senator Reid
 Reclamation Facility
 Environmental and Energy
 Enhancement.
Uintah Natural Gas Fueling          $300,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
 Station.
University of Louisville          $2,000,000  Senator McConnell
 Research and Energy
 Independence Program.
UNLV--Intermountain West            $500,000  Senator Reid
 Sustainable Development
 Project.
UNR--Great Basin Center for         $250,000  Senator Reid
 Geothermal Energy.
University of Rhode Island--        $750,000  Senators Reed, Whitehouse
 Offshore Wind Energy Research
 Initiative.
Utah Center for Energy            $3,400,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
 Innovation and
 Commercialization.
Vermont Biofuels and Carbon         $750,000  Senator Leahy
 Harvest Initiative.
Vermont Biomass Energy Resource   $1,000,000  Senator Leahy
 Center.
Vernonia Sustainable Schools...     $300,000  Senators Wyden, Merkley
White Earth Tribal BioMass Bio      $700,000  Senators Klobuchar,
 Fuel Project.                                 Franken
Wind Energy Infrastructure.....     $550,000  Senator Dorgan
Wind Energy Materials             $1,500,000  Senator Dorgan
 Development.
Wind Energy Technology Training     $500,000  Senator Murray
 Program.
Wind Energy Training and            $750,000  Senator Dorgan
 Infrastructure.
Wind Power Exploration.........     $100,000  Senators Tester, Baucus
Wind Resource Monitoring and      $1,000,000  Senator Reid
 Training Program.
Wireless Turbine Blade Sensor       $750,000  Senator Schumer
 System Research.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

              Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $171,982,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     185,930,000
Committee recommendation................................     190,180,000

    The Committee provides $190,180,000 for Electricity 
Delivery and Energy Reliability. The Committee recommends 
continued development and use of the Electricity Infrastructure 
Operations Centers for researching, developing and deploying 
technologies to better manage and control the electrical grid.
    Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee 
includes $4,250,000 for the following list of projects that 
provide for research, development, and demonstration of 
electricity delivery and energy reliability technologies or 
programs. The Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost-
sharing requirements may apply to these projects.

  CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY
                                PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project title              Amount             Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dubuque Smarter Energy Project.     $500,000  Senator Harkin
Energy Development and              $300,000  Senator Dorgan
 Reliability.
Navajo Nation Electrification       $900,000  Senators Bingaman, Tom
 Program.                                      Udall
Smart Grid Simulation               $800,000  Senator Dorgan
 Technology.
Technology Development.........     $750,000  Senator Dorgan
UNR--Energy Storage for           $1,000,000  Senator Reid
 Intermittent Renewable Energy
 Sources.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                             Nuclear Energy

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $786,637,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     824,052,000
Committee recommendation................................     783,170,000

                        RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

    The Committee recommendation for nuclear energy research, 
development, and facilities totals $783,170,000.
    Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies.--The Committee 
recommends $62,000,000 for Nuclear Energy Enabling 
Technologies. The Committee recommends no funding for the new 
Transformative Nuclear Concepts R&D program for which the 
Committee finds no compelling argument. This line appears to be 
redundant to work scope already undertaken in Advanced Reactor 
Concepts and potentially in the Small Modular Reactors and 
Modified Open Cycle lines. Further, the Committee recommends 
$16,000,000 for the Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling & 
Simulation.
    Integrated University Program.--The Committee provides 
$5,000,000 to restore funding to current year levels and 
sustain the ongoing collaboration between the Office of Nuclear 
Energy, NNSA's Office of Nuclear Nonproliferation, and the 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission to support the training of 
engineers and scientists in nuclear engineering, as well as 
nonproliferation, nuclear forensics, and nuclear safeguards 
missions. This funding is to be used consistent with the 
authorization provided in section 313 of Public Law 111-8. This 
funding is not intended to supplant university research funding 
provided within the nuclear energy research and development 
activities. Studies by the American Physical Society, American 
Association for the Advancement of Science and the American 
Nuclear Society recommended Federal investment in university 
research and training in nuclear engineering and forensics.
    RE-ENERGYSE.--The Committee recommends no funding for this 
line. Alternately, the Committee continues to support the on-
going Integrated University Program.
    Reactor Concepts R&D.--The Committee recommends 
$188,500,000 for Reactor Concepts Research and Development.
    The Committee recommends $85,000,000 for the Next 
Generation Nuclear Plant program. This program has already 
spent over $500,000,000 with none of the funds requiring a 
match by industry. Furthermore, of the two entities selected by 
the Department to proceed with conceptual design, one has 
failed to reach agreement with the Department on the issue of 
cost-sharing and the other is proceeding with minimal cost-
share. The issue of cost-sharing is plaguing this program and 
will do so into the future without a realistic approach by 
industry. Additionally, the one conceptual design team 
progressing today is not expected to finish its design until 
late this year or early the following year. The design will 
then be reviewed by advisory entities and the Department and is 
subject to a formal determination by the Secretary as to 
whether to proceed further. Hence, any funding provided in 
fiscal year 2011 may be for a program that is no longer 
supported by a demonstration element.
    The Committee fully supports the other budget request lines 
under Reactors Concepts R&D and provides $50,000,000 for the 
small modular reactor [SMR] program. The Committee understands 
the arguments that SMRs, if successful, may have unique 
attributes in meeting base-load power supply needs of the 
future. However, the Committee notes that light-water SMRs are 
unlikely to lessen the nuclear waste issues facing the country. 
Regarding the Light Water Reactor Sustainability program, the 
Committee expects a high cost share from industry.
    Fuel Cycle Research and Development.--The Committee 
recommends $191,000,000 for Fuel Cycle Research and 
Development. The Committee recommends $40,000,000 for the 
Advanced Fuels program, including $7,000,000 for the Department 
to issue a competitive solicitation requesting industry teams 
(fuel suppliers, utilities and advanced ceramic developers) for 
cost shared proposals to develop and test advanced LWR fuel 
with ceramic cladding, with the capability of very high burn up 
and with the objective of achieving readiness for Lead Test Rod 
operation in commercial reactors within 5 years. This should be 
awarded on a 50-50 cost-share basis. The Committee recommends 
$30,000,000 for the Modified Open Cycle program. The Committee 
notes the Department's request is putting significant funding 
into three different approaches to the fuel cycle--once 
through, closed, and modified open. It is not clear to the 
Committee how long the Department envisions exploring these 
three pathways and this raises questions about out-year costs. 
Significant waste reductions in a closed fuel cycle will be 
costly. It is less clear what potential exists with a modified 
open cycle. The Committee urges the Department to develop 
research plans that include decision dates in order to avoid 
costly and long-term research and development in these areas.
    International Nuclear Energy Cooperation.--The Committee 
recommends the budget request level of $3,000,000 for 
International Nuclear Energy Cooperation.

                   RADIOLOGICAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

    Space and Defense Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends 
$57,000,000 for Space and Defense Infrastructure. Of the funds 
provided, $15,160,000 is for Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The 
Committee urges the Department to request sufficient funds for 
nuclear infrastructure in future budgets in order that nuclear 
materials and engineering facilities are maintained compliant 
with DOE orders and directives.
    Research Reactor Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends 
the budget request for this activity at $4,818,000.
    Pu-238 Production Restart Project.--The Committee provides 
no funding for Pu-238 production capabilities. The Committee 
understands that the United States no longer has the capability 
to produce plutonium-238, which is a critical source of power 
for NASA space missions, and that a shortage of this 
radioisotope may affect future NASA missions. However, Pu-238 
is not needed for any DOE or NNSA missions, including national 
security applications. As NASA will be the only user of Pu-238, 
the Committee believes NASA should pay for the entire service 
through a similar work for others arrangement that DOE has with 
the Department of Homeland Security and other government 
agencies.

                      IDAHO FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

    The Committee recommends $173,000,000 for Idaho Facilities 
Management.

                           PROGRAM DIRECTION

    The Committee recommends $91,452,000 for Program Direction, 
consistent with the budget request.
    Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee 
includes $7,400,000 for the following list of projects. The 
Committee reminds recipients that statutory cost sharing 
requirements may apply to these projects.

            CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED NUCLEAR ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project title              Amount             Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Engineering Research        $500,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
 Center.
Nuclear Fabrication Consortium.   $2,000,000  Senator Voinovich, Sherrod
                                               Brown
Nuclear Power Operator              $400,000  Senator Kerry
 Simulator.
Ohio State Nuclear Reactor        $2,000,000  Senator Voinovich
 Laboratory Facility Research
 and Education Expansion.
Oversight of Yucca Mountain       $2,500,000  Senator Reid
 Shut Down and Reclamation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Fossil Energy Research and Development

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $672,383,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     586,583,000
Committee recommendation................................     725,950,000

    The Committee recommendation for Fossil Energy Research and 
Development is $725,950,000. The Committee urges the Department 
to develop a plan and request funding in the next budget 
request for a Clean Coal Power Initiative Round IV to build on 
previous efforts. The Committee also supports the Department's 
efforts to develop a new budget structure that reflects the 
future direction of the coal research programs in Advanced 
Power Systems, Carbon Capture, Geologic Storage, and Cross-
Cutting Research.
    Fuels and Power Systems.--The Committee recommends 
$452,000,000 for fuels and power systems which is $48,150,000 
above the request. From within existing funds, the Committee 
recommends $10,000,000, in addition to sums allocated for 
university research, to initiate the NETL-Regional University 
Alliance for Energy Innovation and encourages the Department's 
future support for this initiative. The recommendation includes 
$68,000,000 for innovations for existing plants. Within 
available funds, the Committee also supports $5,000,000 to 
continue the mercury research program. The Committee recommends 
$64,000,000 for the Advanced Integrated Gasification Combined 
Cycle activities and $32,000,000 for the Advanced Turbines 
program. The Committee recommends $170,000,000 for Carbon 
Sequestration activities, including support for integrated 
emission reduction initiatives. Of these funds, $20,000,000 is 
provided for the creation of a center focused on innovative 
concepts for the beneficial use of carbon dioxide for non-
geologic activities. The Committee has also provided an 
additional $4,000,000 for the Focus Area for Carbon 
Sequestration Science. The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for 
Fuels, including for coal/biomass activities. The Committee 
supports additional research and development projects that 
would produce substantially higher quality fuels which would 
include greater carbon lifecycle requirements than conventional 
fuels and technologies. Such fuels would be derived from coal/
biomass feed stocks and seek to meet fuel specifications for 
military and civilian use without additional petroleum 
components. The Committee recommends $50,000,000 for Fuel Cell 
research. The Committee recommends $48,000,000 for Advanced 
Research, including $20,000,000 for computational energy 
sciences and system dynamics.
    Natural Gas Technologies.--The Committee recommendation 
includes $22,000,000. Of this amount, $15,000,000 is provided 
for methane hydrates activities. The Committee has restored the 
hydrates technology program to this account and does not 
support funding a gas hydrates research program within the 
Office of Science. The Committee recommends $3,000,000 to 
continue research being conducted that targets small, 
independent producers in the areas of exploration production, 
and safety, including completion and well control technology, 
and to continue to develop solutions to minimize the 
environmental impacts of natural gas development, including 
advancement of water resources treatment technologies. The 
Committee further recommends support for one or more 
demonstration-scale projects to treat water resources 
associated with domestic natural gas development. The Committee 
understands that, with the projected increases in demand for 
natural gas, the amount of produced water affected will pose an 
even greater challenge unless cost-effective methods are 
developed to treat the water, including treatment for 
beneficial reuse. The Committee encourages the Office of Fossil 
Energy to consult with other offices, including the Office of 
Environmental Management, and conduct the project, or projects, 
jointly with industry to integrate existing, validated, low-
cost technology. The Committee recommends continued support for 
unconventional natural gas production from basins that contain 
tight gas sands, shale gas, and coal bed methane resources.
    Unconventional Fossil Energy Technologies.--The Committee 
recommends $26,000,000 to continue the implementation of the 
comprehensive research, development, and demonstration [RD&D] 
strategy the Committee directed the Department to develop in 
Public Law 111-85. The Committee recommends that the Department 
concentrate its RD&D activities on developing the significant 
unconventional energy resource within the United States, 
including the Western Energy Corridor. The Department should 
look to demonstrate technology applications for these resources 
on state and Federal lands, as appropriate, including oil shale 
and tar sands. The Committee urges the Department to partner 
with research universities, national laboratories, and 
industry. Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$1,200,000 to continue the Risk Based Data Management System. 
Within available funds, the Committee also recommends 
continuation of the stripper well program and ongoing research 
being conducted that targets small, independent producers in 
the areas of enhanced oil recovery, exploration and production, 
safety, and environmental solutions.
    Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $170,300,000 
for Program Direction, of which $138,700,000 is for the 
National Energy Technology Laboratory.
    Other Programs.--The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for 
Plant and Capital Equipment. The Committee recommends 
$10,000,000 for Fossil Energy Environmental Restoration. The 
Committee recommends $700,000 for the special recruitment 
programs. The Committee recommends $5,000,000 to restore 
funding for Cooperative research and development. The Committee 
urges the Department to continue NETL's efforts within the 
Project Management Center [PMC]. The Committee continues to 
encourage the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
to carry on this collaboration and funding of the PMC with the 
NETL.
    Congressionally Directed Projects.--The Committee 
recommends $19,950,000 for the following congressionally 
directed projects.

             CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED FOSSIL ENERGY PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project title              Amount             Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clean Energy Technology........   $2,000,000  Senator Dorgan
CO2 Sequestration Projects.....     $700,000  Senators Mark Udall,
                                               Bennet
Fossil Fuel Research and          $3,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
 Development.
Gulf of Mexico Hydrates           $1,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
 Research Consortium.
Hydrogen Fuel Dispensing            $750,000  Senator Rockefeller
 Station.
Long Term Environmental and         $750,000  Senator Rockefeller
 Economic Impacts of the
 Development of a Coal
 Liquefaction Sector in China.
National Center for Hydrogen      $3,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
 Technology.
Sunbury Generation/Calera           $750,000  Senator Specter
 Carbon Capture Project.
University of Kentucky Coal-      $1,000,000  Senator McConnell
 Derived Low Energy Materials
 for Sustainable Construction
 Project.
Utah Center for Ultra-Clean       $7,000,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
 Coal Utilization and Heavy Oil
 Research.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $23,627,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      23,614,000
Committee recommendation................................      23,614,000

    The Committee recommends $23,614,000 for fiscal year 2011, 
the same as the budget request for the operation of the naval 
petroleum and oil shale reserves.

                      Strategic Petroleum Reserve

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $243,823,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     138,861,000
Committee recommendation................................     209,861,000

    The Committee recommends $209,861,000 for the Strategic 
Petroleum Reserve. The Committee does not support the budget 
proposal to cancel $71,000,000 of prior appropriated funds for 
the proposed expansion site in Richton, Mississippi. The 
Committee notes that although the Department was directed by 
statute in Public Law 111-8 to submit a report to Congress 
regarding the effects of expanding the Reserve on the domestic 
petroleum market within 45 days of enactment of the conference 
report, the Department has failed to submit this report. The 
Committee included these reporting requirements to inform 
decision making for both the Department and Congress, and is 
troubled that the Department has chosen to ignore this 
requirement for more than a year. The Committee expects the 
Department to be more responsive to congressional direction in 
future budget requests.

                   Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $11,300,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      11,300,000
Committee recommendation................................      11,300,000

    The Committee recommends $11,300,000, the same as the 
budget request.

                   Energy Information Administration

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $110,595,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     128,833,000
Committee recommendation................................     119,000,000

    The Committee recommends $119,000,000 for the Energy 
Information Administration. The Committee strongly encourages 
the Energy Information Administration to continue its work on 
the Energy and Financial Markets Initiative.

                   Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $244,673,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     225,163,000
Committee recommendation................................     244,163,000

    The Committee's recommendation for Non-Defense 
Environmental Cleanup is $244,163,000.
    Reprogramming Control Levels.--In fiscal year 2011, the 
Environmental Management program may transfer funding between 
operating expense funded projects within the controls listed 
below using guidance contained in the Department's budget 
execution manual (DOE M 135.1-1A, chapter IV). All capital 
construction line item projects remain separate controls from 
the operating projects. The Committees on Appropriations in the 
House and Senate must be formally notified in advance of all 
reprogrammings, except internal reprogrammings, and the 
Department is to take no financial action in anticipation of 
congressional response. The Committee recommends the following 
reprogramming control points for fiscal year 2011:
  --Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and 
        Decommissioning;
  --Gaseous Diffusion Plants;
  --Small Sites; and
  --West Valley Demonstration Project.
    Internal Reprogramming Authority.--Headquarters 
Environmental Management may transfer up to $2,000,000, one 
time, between accounts listed above to reduce health and safety 
risks, gain cost savings, or complete projects, as long as a 
program or project is not increased or decreased by more than 
$2,000,000 in total during the fiscal year.
    The reprogramming authority--either formal or internal--may 
not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding 
levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased 
by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on 
Appropriations in the House and Senate must be notified within 
30 days after the use of the internal reprogramming authority.
    Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility Decontamination and 
Decommissioning.--The Committee recommends $3,659,000, the same 
as the request.
    Gaseous Diffusion Plants.--The Committee recommends 
$99,464,000, the same as the request.
    Small Sites.--The Committee recommends $82,966,000. A total 
of $50,000,000 is provided to Moab.
    West Valley Demonstration Project.--The Committee 
recommends $58,074,000.

      Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $573,850,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     530,498,000
Committee recommendation................................     550,000,000

    The Committee's recommendation is $550,000,000 to sustain 
clean-up activities at uranium enrichment facilities. Of the 
funds provided, $85,000,000 is recommended for the Paducah 
Gaseous Diffusion Plant, $200,000,000 is recommended for the 
East Tennessee Technology Park, and $265,000,000 is recommended 
for the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant. With these funds 
and any additional funds generated though the barter of uranium 
in the Department's inventory, the Department is encouraged to 
maintain its current accelerated cleanup schedule at the 
Portsmouth site. Accelerated cleanup of the site is consistent 
with the Department's mission for responsible resolution to the 
environmental legacy of nuclear weapons production, and is 
anticipated to reduce life cycle costs and more quickly resolve 
associated risks. The funding for Portsmouth is substantially 
less than the budget request due to the administration's 
reliance on a legislative proposal to reinstate a $200,000,000 
fee on uranium fuel to pay for the Portsmouth increase. This is 
the second year the Committee has rejected this proposal. The 
Committee is aware of the fact that more than $5,000,000,000 in 
available funding remains in the UED&D fund. The administration 
is urged to propose real increased budget authority for these 
activities rather than legislative proposals that have not been 
proposed to the authorizing committees of jurisdiction.

                                SCIENCE

Appropriations, 2010....................................  $4,903,710,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   5,121,437,000
Committee recommendation................................   5,012,000,000

    The Committee recommends $5,012,000,000 for the Office of 
Science. The Committee understands that changing the Nation's 
decades-long dependence on imported oil and unfettered emission 
of carbon dioxide requires fundamental changes in the ways we 
produce, store, and use energy. To meet these strategic 
challenges, the United States will have to develop new 
technologies that require scientific breakthroughs that come 
only with fundamental understanding of new materials and 
chemical processes. The Committee believes the funding increase 
in fiscal year 2011 will support initiatives to advance 
scientific understanding for new energy technologies.

                          HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS

    The Committee recommends $820,085,000 for High Energy 
Physics. The Committee is encouraged that the Large Hadron 
Collider [LHC] started operations again in March 2010 and it 
reached energy levels of 3.5 trillion electron volts, which is 
three times higher than any other machine in the world has been 
able to achieve. However, the Committee is concerned about the 
LHC's planned shutdown at the end of 2011 to address design 
problems and the impact the shutdown may have on the U.S. High 
Energy Physics Program. For example, a decision to operate the 
Tevatron at the Fermi National Accelerator beyond fiscal year 
2011 might reduce funding available for other high-priority 
projects. The Committee urges the Office of Science to keep the 
Committee informed about the status of operations at LHC and 
how the planned shutdown will impact the U.S. program. The 
Committee also recognizes the recommendation made in the 2008 
report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel to 
develop a world-leading program of neutrino science to 
understand the role neutrinos play in the evolution of the 
universe. The United States has unique capabilities and 
infrastructure at Fermilab to advance this area of science. The 
Committee supports design work for two new potential 
construction projects--the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment 
and the Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment. However, the 
Committee directs the Office of Science to submit a report not 
later than 180 days after enactment of this act that lays out 
(1) the expected benefits of intensity frontier science, (2) a 
strategy for maintaining the U.S. lead, and (3) the funding 
needs over the next 10 years, including construction 
activities, of implementing the proposed strategy. The 
Committee also is concerned about the status of the Deep 
Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory [DUSEL] funded 
by the National Science Foundation [NSF]. The neutrino program 
relies on the construction of DUSEL and any delays in the DUSEL 
program would impact advances in this area of science. The 
Committee urges the Office of Science to coordinate its 
neutrino program research efforts with NSF to avoid unnecessary 
delays. The Committee is very encouraged by DOE and NASA's 
collaborative effort and success on the Joint Dark Energy 
Mission Interim Science Working Group and expects the 
Department to continue to fully support this process and to 
work closely with NASA in the planning and execution of this 
mission.

                            NUCLEAR PHYSICS

    The Committee recommends $554,000,000 for Nuclear Physics. 
A recent National Academy of Sciences report, Advancing Nuclear 
Medicine through Innovation, recommended increasing the Federal 
commitment to nuclear medicine research. Nuclear medicine could 
substantially accelerate, simplify, and reduce the cost of 
delivering and improving healthcare. However, the Committee is 
concerned that the Department is not using funds to directly 
support nuclear medicine research with human application. To 
this end, within the funds provided, $15,400,000 is for nuclear 
medicine research with human application. All of the added 
funds must be awarded competitively in one or more 
solicitations that include all sources--universities, the 
private sector, and Government laboratories--on an equal basis. 
Funding for nuclear medicine application research was 
previously within the Biological and Environmental Research 
program.

                 BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

    The Committee recommends $614,500,000 for Biological and 
Environmental Research. Of these funds, $11,000,000 is provided 
for artificial retina research. An artificial retina has the 
potential to restore vision to millions of people suffering 
from eye diseases. In November 2009, the Lawrence Livermore 
National Laboratory team developing artificial retinas received 
a Research and Development 100 Award, known as the ``Oscars of 
Invention.'' The Committee encourages the Department to 
continue this research and meet its goal of producing a 
prosthesis with more than 1,000 electrodes, which would allow 
facial recognition, as quickly as possible. The funding request 
of $15,400,000 for nuclear medicine research efforts has been 
moved to Nuclear Physics to better address mission 
requirements.

                         BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES

    The Committee recommends $1,739,115,000 for Basic Energy 
Sciences. Of these funds, $151,600,000 is provided for 
construction activities as requested in the budget. The 
remaining $1,587,515,000 is for research. Within available 
funds, up to $100,000,000 shall be used to support the 46 
Energy Frontier Research Centers. The Committee does not 
support the creation of new Energy Frontier Research Centers at 
this time. The Department must first demonstrate the benefits 
and results of this new research and development approach 
designed to address fundamental scientific energy challenges 
before the program is expanded further. A significant increase 
in funding for the core research program in materials and 
chemical sciences should be sufficient to advance scientific 
and engineering knowledge in areas of study where the 
Department feels there are gaps in addressing energy 
challenges.
    Within the research funds provided, $16,000,000 shall be 
available for the Fuels from Sunlight energy innovation hub and 
$22,000,000 for a new Batteries and Energy Storage energy 
innovation hub.
    The Committee recommends no funding for a research program 
in gas hydrates. A gas hydrates research program should 
continue in the Office of Fossil Energy, not the Office of 
Science. A recently issued, congressionally mandated report by 
the National Research Council [NRC] concluded that the Office 
of Fossil Energy's methane hydrate program had been 
``consistent and effective'' in leading a broad-based science 
and technology development program to investigate naturally 
occurring gas hydrates. In addition, the NRC found the methane 
hydrate program had made advances in identification, drilling, 
and production of methane from hydrate for use as a possible 
energy source. The Office of Science is not the appropriate 
office to continue this work. The Committee also provides no 
funding for modeling of engine design at this time. Within the 
research funds provided, $35,000,000 is for the Experimental 
Program to Stimulate Competitive Research [EPSCoR]. The EPSCoR 
program is currently funding energy research that will help 
reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

                 ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH

    The Committee recommends $418,000,000 for Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research.

                         FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES

    The Committee recommends $384,000,000 for Fusion Energy 
Sciences. The Committee is concerned by cost increases and 
schedule delays related to the ITER project. In the last year, 
the projected start date for ITER has slipped another 10 months 
to November 2019, or 3 years later than first projected. These 
schedule changes put U.S. cost estimates at risk as costs 
escalate for the total project. The Committee encourages the 
Office of Science to keep the Committee informed about 
significant decisions and developments related to the ITER 
project.
    The Committee is encouraged that the Office of Science 
tasked the National Academy of Sciences with reviewing options 
to advance inertial fusion energy. The Committee understands 
that an independent National Academy of Sciences committee will 
(1) assess the prospects of generating power using inertial 
confinement fusion, (2) identify scientific and engineering 
challenges, the costs for manufacturing targets, and research 
and development objectives to develop an inertial fusion energy 
demonstration plant, and (3) advise DOE on a roadmap for 
developing a demonstration plant.
    The Committee believes that this is a practical way of 
identifying the steps that are needed to develop an inertial 
fusion energy program and plans to work with DOE to assess the 
budget needs for this alternative approach to fusion energy. 
Within available funds, the Committee provides $4,000,000 to 
advance inertial fusion energy, which may include experiments 
using solid state or krypton fluoride lasers, ion beams, or 
pulsed power, and to help laboratories and universities 
participate in the National Academy of Sciences review.
    The Committee is encouraged by DOE's progress in advancing 
fusion energy sciences. However, the Committee is concerned by 
the Fusion Advisory Committee finding that the United States 
risks losing leadership and competitiveness in material 
science. To successfully harness fusion energy, scientists and 
engineers must design and build reactor components that can 
withstand extreme radiation environments and temperature. Since 
these extreme environments and material needs are common to 
both magnetic and inertial fusion energy, the Committee 
encourages DOE to reassess its materials science program and 
establish a program that would explore science, engineering, 
and materials issues for both magnetic and inertial fusion 
energy and build U.S. expertise.

                  SCIENCE LABORATORIES INFRASTRUCTURE

    The Committee recommends $126,000,000 to support 
infrastructure activities.

                        SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY

    The Committee recommends $86,500,000 for Safeguards and 
Security activities.

                       SCIENCE PROGRAM DIRECTION

    The Committee recommends $208,000,000 for the Office of 
Science Program Direction. Of these funds, $8,963,000 shall be 
used for the Office of Scientific and Technical Information. No 
funds shall be used to hire new site office personnel, except 
for field staff at the Integrated Support Centers in Chicago 
and Oak Ridge.

                     SCIENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

    The Committee recommends $21,000,000 for Workforce 
Development for Teachers and Scientists program. Of these 
funds, up to $5,000,000 shall be available for the graduate 
fellowship program. The Committee encourages the Office of 
Science to monitor the impact of this program and demonstrate 
whether students continue to pursue careers in scientific and 
technical fields. The Committee also provides $5,800,000 for 
educator programs that provides professional development for 
middle school, high school, community college, and 
undergraduate educators. Furthermore, $2,500,000 shall be 
available for program administration and evaluation to ensure 
the efficiency and effectiveness of science workforce 
development activities.
    Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee 
includes $40,800,000 for the following list of projects that 
provide for research, development, and demonstration of science 
technologies or programs. The Committee reminds recipients that 
statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these 
projects.

                CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SCIENCE PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project title              Amount             Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advanced Computer Simulation      $1,000,000  Senator Reid
 Initiative.
Alaska Climate Center..........     $500,000  Senators Murkowski, Begich
Antibodies Research............   $4,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Center for Diagnostic             $2,000,000  Senator Rockefeller
 Nanosystems.
Center for Nanoscale Energy....   $7,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Characteristics and Cleanup of    $3,500,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
 the U.S. Nuclear Legacy.
Climate Model Evaluation          $2,000,000  Senators Shelby, Sessions
 Program.
Computing Capability...........   $2,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Development of Nontechnology-       $500,000  Senator Reid
 enhanced Solar Cells with Low
 Cost and High Conversion
 Efficiency.
Energy Research................     $250,000  Senator Cochran
Environmental Radioactivity         $750,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
 Monitoring Laboratory:
 Monitoring/Assessment of the
 Radioactive Pollutants in the
 South-West Mississippi.
Functional Nanoparticles for      $1,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
 Improved Ultra Capacitor
 Devices.
Idaho National Laboratory         $1,000,000  Senators Crapo, Risch
 Center for Advanced Energy
 Studies.
KU Cancer Research Equipment...   $4,000,000  Senators Brownback,
                                               Roberts
Lincoln Memorial University/      $2,000,000  Senator Alexander
 ORNL Partnership on Geothermal
 Energy.
Material Science Smart Coatings     $500,000  Senator Ben Nelson
Metal-enhanced Fluorescence         $750,000  Senators Mikulski, Cardin
 Research and Development.
Missouri University Research      $1,000,000  Senator Bond
 Reactor Reflector Shield.
Nanotechnology Initiative......     $600,000  Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Nevada Water Resources Data,        $750,000  Senator Reid
 Modeling, and Vizualization
 (DMV) Center.
Oregon Sustainability Center...     $300,000  Senators Wyden, Merkley
RNAi Research..................     $300,000  Senator Kerry
Solid State Preparation and         $500,000  Senator Reid
 Characterization Lab.
Southern Illinois University        $750,000  Senator Durbin
 Research.
Technology Transfer &               $500,000  Senators Bingaman, Tom
 Commercialization of                          Udall
 Technologies at DOE.
TU Algae to Green Fuels Energy      $750,000  Senator Inhofe
 Project.
University of California, San     $1,500,000  Senator Feinstein
 Diego Seismic Research.
University of South Dakota          $350,000  Senator Johnson
 Project on Renewable Energy
 and the Economy.
URI Regional Earth System           $750,000  Senators Reed, Whitehouse
 Center.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

           ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY--ENERGY [ARPA-E]

Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011...................................    $299,966,000
Committee recommendation................................     200,000,000

    The Committee recommends $200,000,000 for the Advanced 
Research Projects Agency--Energy [ARPA-E]. ARPA-E is 
responsible for funding high-risk research and development 
projects to meet long-term energy challenges. The primary goal 
is to invest in energy projects that can overcome technological 
barriers and eventually reduce energy imports, improve energy 
efficiency, and reduce energy-related emissions, including 
greenhouse gases. ARPA-E will also help the United States 
maintain a technological lead in developing and deploying 
advanced energy technologies. The Committee supports ARPA-E's 
efforts to fund creative ``out-of-the-box'' transformational 
energy research that industry by itself cannot or will not 
support due to its high risk, but where success would provide 
significant benefits for the United States. The Committee 
encourages ARPA-E to work closely with the Office of Science, 
including scientists and engineers working at Energy Frontier 
Research Centers and Hubs, to identify promising projects that 
are potential game changers for energy systems.

              Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program


                    (INCLUDING RESCISSION OF FUNDS)

                        ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

                          GROSS APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $43,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     558,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     438,000,000

                          OFFSETTING RECEIPTS

Appropriations, 2010....................................    -$43,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     -58,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     -58,000,000

                           NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011...................................    $500,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     380,000,000

    The Committee recommends new loan authority of 
$10,000,000,000 for nuclear power facilities, and 
$7,000,000,000 for coal and petroleum coke-based power 
generation and industrial gasification projects that 
incorporate carbon capture and sequestration [CCS], pipelines 
and transportation of CO2. Eligible CCS projects may 
include stand-alone pipeline projects that transport carbon 
dioxide to storage sites for the purpose of storage and any 
such project shall be considered by the Secretary to have 
satisfied the requirements of section 1703(a) of Public Law 
109-58. The Secretary may also direct a portion of such 
authority for projects focused on the beneficial use of carbon 
dioxide.
    The Committee also recommends $380,000,000 for subsidy 
costs of renewable energy projects. The Committee derives 
$140,000,000 of this amount from the rescission of 
$14,000,000,000 in unsubsidized loan authority for renewable 
projects provided in fiscal year 2009. This leaves over 
$3,800,000,000 in renewable unsubsidized loan authority 
remaining. The Committee notes that since fiscal year 2008, 
when renewable unsubsidized loan authority was first granted, 
only two conditional commitments collectively valued at 
$317,000,000 have been made. There are only two additional 
projects in the near term pipeline valued collectively at 
$300,000,000. Hence, in over 2 years the program is prepared to 
use only $617,000,000 of the $18,500,000,000 in renewable 
unsubsidized loan authority. Nearly all original applicants for 
the 1703 unsubsidized renewable program have moved their 
applications to the subsidized 1705 program appropriated 
through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. 
These factors demonstrate that renewable projects will advance 
much more quickly through a 1703 credit subsidy program than 
through an unsubsidized program. The failure to convert the 
majority of the $18,500,000,000 in renewable loan authority to 
credit subsidy will result in that authority being untapped for 
over a decade.
    The Committee remains concerned with the Department's 
implementation of the Loan Guarantee Program. While some 
program improvements have been made in the last year, DOE's 
program implementation has been ad hoc. A recent Government 
Accountability Office [GAO] review of the Loan Guarantee 
Program found that the Department treats applicants 
inconsistently, and lacks mechanisms to identify and address 
applicants' concerns. The program lacks transparency and has 
been slow to come to closure on applications. Since the 
program's inception, only one loan guarantee has been closed, 
along with conditional commitments for just eight projects. 
With more than $80,000,000,000 in available loan guarantee 
authority, less than $14,000,000,000 has been committed. The 
Committee expects the Department to address the problems raised 
by GAO expeditiously, and report within 90 days of its 
progress.
    The Committee is also concerned that the Loan Guarantee 
Program does not support a diverse set of clean fuel technology 
and more importantly, the Committee is concerned about the 
impact that operation is having on the commercialization of 
those technologies. The Department of Energy is directed to 
encourage the production of advanced biofuels by comparing the 
risk profiles against similar risk profiles.
    The Committee is concerned that the Loan Guarantee Program, 
expanded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to help 
finance renewable energy projects that commence construction by 
September 30, 2011, will be unable to finance certain solar 
projects on private land due to environmental permitting 
timelines established by the Department. While the Committee is 
aware that the Department of the Interior has ``fast tracked'' 
the permitting of a subset of proposed solar energy projects on 
Federal land, the Committee is concerned that DOE has not 
established goals to complete environmental impact statements 
for projects on private land seeking loan guarantees by the 
September 2011 deadline. The Department has advised solar 
developers that if NEPA requires an EIS on a solar development 
proposal, DOE will likely not complete the EIS by the September 
2011 deadline. The Committee instructs the Department to 
identify a set of proposed solar development projects on 
private lands with the goal of completing all necessary 
environmental reviews by September 2011. The Committee also 
strongly recommends that the Department initiate the 
environmental review process earlier in the loan guarantee 
selection process, in order to assure that environmental 
impacts of renewable energy projects are considered during loan 
guarantee selection.

        ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $20,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................       9,998,000
Committee recommendation................................       9,998,000

    The Committee recommends the $9,998,000 as requested.

                      Departmental Administration


                                (GROSS)

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $288,684,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     288,872,000
Committee recommendation................................     288,872,000

                        (MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES)

Appropriations, 2010....................................   -$119,740,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................    -119,740,000
Committee recommendation................................    -119,740,000

                           NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $168,944,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     169,132,000
Committee recommendation................................     169,132,000

    The Committee recommends $288,872,000 for Departmental 
Administration, which provides a net appropriation of 
$169,132,000 in fiscal year 2011.

                    Office of the Inspector General

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $51,927,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      42,850,000
Committee recommendation................................      42,850,000

    The Committee recommends $42,850,000, the same as the 
request. In fiscal year 2011, the budget request moves funding 
for financial statement audits from the Office of the Inspector 
General to the Working Capital Fund. This accounts for the 
reduction in the Office of Inspector General funding from 
fiscal year 2010 to fiscal year 2011.

                    ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES


                National Nuclear Security Administration


                           WEAPONS ACTIVITIES

Appropriations, 2010....................................  $6,384,431,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   7,008,835,000
Committee recommendation................................   7,018,835,000

    The Committee recommends $7,018,835,000 for National 
Nuclear Security Administration [NNSA] Weapons Activities, an 
increase of $10,000,000 above the budget request. This level of 
funding will allow NNSA to modernize aging infrastructure and 
maintain the scientific, technological, and engineering 
capabilities needed to assess the safety, security, and 
reliability of nuclear weapons.

                        DIRECTED STOCKPILE WORK

    The Committee recommends $1,874,279,000 for directed 
stockpile work, a decrease of $24,100,000 below the request. 
Within these funds, at least $197,700,000 shall be for directed 
stockpile work activities at Pantex. This increase in funding 
will help restore activities at Pantex related to weapons 
dismantlement and disposition and stockpile services support 
for scheduled weapons assembly, disassembly, and dismantlement.
    Life Extension Program.--The Committee recommends 
$249,463,000 for the Life Extension Program, the same as the 
budget request.
    Stockpile Systems.--The Committee recommends $649,366,000, 
the same as the request. Of these funds, at least $165,000,000 
shall be used for surveillance activities. Over the last 
several years, the laboratory directors of Los Alamos, Lawrence 
Livermore, and Sandia National Laboratories, who are 
responsible for assessing the safety, security, and reliability 
of the nuclear weapons stockpile every year, have expressed 
concern that funding shortfalls in the surveillance program may 
begin to jeopardize the annual assessment process. Furthermore, 
in September 2009, the JASON study group found NNSA's 
surveillance program was becoming inadequate and the continued 
success of stockpile stewardship required a revised 
surveillance program. A robust surveillance program is required 
to maintain confidence in the performance of nuclear weapons in 
the absence of underground nuclear testing. Thus, the Committee 
is encouraged by NNSA's decision to increase funding for 
surveillance activities and make changes to the surveillance 
program to better address aging issues. When NNSA completes its 
Phase 6.2/6.2A study for the B61 life extension program, the 
Committee directs NNSA to submit to the Committee both a 
classified and unclassified report 90 days after the completion 
of the study with (1) a description of the safety and security 
features NNSA would add to a refurbished B61 and (2) a cost and 
benefit analysis of installing the proposed features in the 
warhead. The cost and benefit analysis should include (1) the 
costs of science, technology, and engineering to install new 
safety and security features, (2) the costs of assessing the 
impact the new features may have on the performance of the 
nuclear explosive package at the national laboratories, (3) the 
extent to which the proposed safety and security features 
address specific safety and security concerns, and (4) why 
current safety and security features would not be sufficient.
    When NNSA completes its Phase 6.2/6.2A study, the Committee 
also directs NNSA to submit to the Committee a revised B61 LEP 
Alternative Analysis study on whether the benefits of a 
combined nuclear and nonnuclear refurbishment option for the 
B61 outweighs the costs or whether it would be more cost 
effective to delay the nuclear scope. The Committee understands 
that the preliminary analysis shows that NNSA would save 
approximately $2,000,000,000 by combining the nuclear and 
nonnuclear scope. A combined nuclear and nonnuclear scope would 
also reduce NNSA and Air Force security risks and costs by a 
factor of 2 because they would not have to handle the weapon 
and transport it overseas twice. In addition, a combined 
nuclear and nonnuclear scope would allow NNSA to consolidate 
the different variants of the B61 bomb into one variant that 
has the least special nuclear material, add modern safety 
features, and extend the life of the weapon for both strategic 
and tactical missions for 30 years. However, the costs 
portrayed in this study are a rough order of magnitude and 
detailed program costs will not be available until NNSA 
completes the B61 study. The Committee will need the most 
accurate information possible on these cost savings before it 
can make an informed decision about moving forward with the 
life extension program.
    Weapons Dismantlement.--The Committee recommends 
$64,425,000, an increase of $6,400,000 above the budget 
request. Within these funds, $27,500,000 shall be used to help 
restore activities at Pantex for weapons dismantlement 
activities. The Committee encourages NNSA to keep the Committee 
informed about changes to dismantlement rates as a result of 
the new START treaty.
    Stockpile Services.--The Committee recommends $911,025,000, 
a decrease of $30,500,000 below the budget request. Within 
these funds, at least $74,000,000 shall be used to support 
surveillance activities. Also, within these funds, no more than 
$160,000,000 shall be used for plutonium sustainment. The 
Committee understands that NNSA will complete building W88 war 
reserve pits in fiscal year 2011 and continue to exercise its 
pit manufacturing capability. Furthermore, within these funds, 
$84,100,000 shall be used for scheduled weapons assembly, 
disassembly, and dismantlement work at Pantex.

                               CAMPAIGNS

    The campaigns support scientific research, experimental 
activities and advanced computation, which make up the core of 
the science-based stockpile stewardship program. This program 
has enabled the U.S. Government to ensure the safety, 
reliability, and security of our nuclear weapons stockpile 
without underground nuclear testing for the past 16 years. The 
Committee recommends $1,693,630,000 for NNSA Campaigns, which 
is $22,900,000 below the request.
    Science Campaign.--The Committee recommends $354,300,000, a 
decrease of $10,924,000 below the budget request. Within these 
funds, $56,050,000 shall be used for advanced certification to 
advance scientific understanding of safety and security systems 
for nuclear weapons and to improve the annual weapons 
certification process. The Committee continues to strongly 
support the weapons physics activities at Sandia's Z facility 
that are critical to sustaining a safe, secure, and effective 
nuclear stockpile. The Committee provides $53,296,000 to 
Sandia's Z facility. An additional $10,000,000 in funding will 
help the Z facility conduct plutonium experiments in 
environments of extreme conditions found in nuclear weapons 
explosions.
    Engineering Campaign.--The Committee recommends 
$149,900,000, an increase of $7,980,000 above the budget 
request. Within these funds, the Committee provides $21,510,000 
for weapons systems engineering assessment technology 
activities. Nuclear weapons may have to operate in a nuclear 
environment and electronic and other nonnuclear weapons 
components, which are critical to the proper functioning of a 
nuclear weapon, must survive thermal, blast and shock effects 
as well as exposure to neutron and gamma radiation. The 
Committee is providing funding to support testing and 
experimental capabilities that create or simulate radiation 
environments similar to those found in a nuclear explosion. The 
funding will also maintain the highly technical set of 
specialized skills needed to develop the tests and simulations, 
interpret the results, and design radiation hardened components 
for life extension programs, such as the upcoming W78.
    Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High-yield 
Campaign.--The Committee recommends $481,548,000 as requested. 
Within these funds, at least $62,477,000 and $48,000,000 shall 
be used for inertial confinement fusion activities at the 
University of Rochester's Omega facility and Sandia National 
Laboratory's Z facility, respectively.
    The Committee is concerned that NNSA has been slow to 
solicit help and ideas from outside experts with knowledge in 
inertial confinement fusion to make the first ignition 
experiments a success. The Committee questions Lawrence 
Livermore National Laboratory's decision, as the laboratory 
with lead responsibility for managing ignition experiments, to 
wait 4 years--and only months before the first ignition 
experiment is expected to take place--to implement the JASON 
study group's 2005 recommendation to form a standing external 
review committee of experts that could provide expert advice on 
the scientific and technical challenges. Even with the creation 
of this external review committee, a Government Accountability 
Office [GAO] study found that the committee currently in place 
falls short of meeting the intent of the JASON study group 
recommendation. For example, GAO found that the committee may 
not be able to give fully objective, candid advice because the 
committee will take direction from, and report to, Livermore's 
Director, rather than to NNSA. The Committee strongly supports 
the creation of an independent advisory board that can evaluate 
experiments planned at the National Ignition Facility, identify 
potential weaknesses with the experimental plan, and recommend, 
if necessary, alternative approaches to address scientific and 
technical challenges. The Committee also strongly supports the 
advisory committee's role in setting a strategic direction for 
inertial confinement fusion and high-energy density physics 
research and determining how best to use current facilities to 
advance this scientific field.
    Advanced Simulation and Computing.--The Committee 
recommends $615,748,000 for the Advanced Simulation and 
Computing [ASC] Campaign as requested. The Committee supports 
NNSA's efforts to establish a dual validation approach in the 
annual assessment process. Independent peer review by Los 
Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, with 
assistance from Sandia National Laboratory, will increase 
confidence in the annual assessment of the current stockpile 
and weapons that are refurbished under life extension programs.
    Readiness Campaign.--The Committee recommends $92,134,000 
for the Readiness Campaign, $19,958,000 less than the budget 
request. Within these funds, no more than $30,199,000 shall be 
used for tritium production efforts. The Committee is concerned 
about the technical challenges NNSA is facing with tritium 
production at the Watts Bar reactor and the slow progress in 
increasing production capacity.

               READINESS IN TECHNICAL BASE AND FACILITIES

    The Committee recommends $1,919,970,000, an increase of 
$71,000,000 above the request. While the committee supports the 
increase in funding for science, technology, and engineering to 
better assess the safety, security, and reliability of the 
nation's nuclear stockpile, the committee is concerned that the 
budget request does not contain sufficient funds for two major 
production plants--Y-12 in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Pantex in 
Amarillo, Texas. These production plants are responsible for, 
among other things, dismantlement of retired nuclear weapons, 
surveillance to detect aging issues, and disassembly and 
assembly of life-extended W76 warheads. The increase in funding 
will fill significant gaps at these facilities that would avoid 
layoffs and disruption to dismantlement and life extension 
schedules.
    The Committee has also restored funding for the Los Alamos 
Neutron Science Center [LANSCE] Refurbishment project. This 
facility is the cornerstone of scientific research at Los 
Alamos serving between 500-600 users per year. LANSCE is 
currently being used to support stockpile stewardship 
experiments, produce medical isotopes to treat cancer and 
calibrate medical imaging equipment, and conduct Office of 
Science research to study matter and materials that may be used 
in new energy technologies. Specifically, NNSA's stockpile 
stewardship plans through 2020 show LANSCE being used by the 
three nuclear weapons laboratories to address issues of 
immediate concern to the stockpile and only LANSCE will be able 
to provide needed data in a timely and cost-effective manner. 
Congressional funding over the last 2 years has helped Los 
Alamos purchase spare parts for a critical component that is 
reaching the end of its life and will allow LANSCE to return to 
full operation. Fiscal year 2011 funds will allow Los Alamos to 
purchase parts for one of its main power sources that are 
expected to fail within the next 3 years and develop and 
purchase new computers, instruments, controls, and diagnostics 
systems that have components that are no longer commercially 
available because they were manufactured in the 1960s.
    The Committee is concerned about NNSA's use of funds for 
the Kansas City Responsive Infrastructure Manufacturing and 
Sourcing [KCRIMS] project. The purpose of the project is to 
build a new, smaller, and more modern facility at the Kansas 
City Plant to manufacture nonnuclear components for nuclear 
warheads and bombs. The costs of this project range from 
$500,000,000 to $673,000,000 with an estimated life-cycle cost 
of $4,700,000,000. Rather than financing this construction 
project using a budget line item in the President's annual 
request for appropriations, NNSA has decided to acquire the 
facility using the General Services Administration [GSA] 
leasing authority, which allows GSA to lease space from a 
private developer on behalf of NNSA. NNSA chose the GSA leasing 
option as the best financing approach because it would lead to 
the lowest overall total cost over a 20-year period, eliminate 
the need for large up-front capital outlays, and it would meet 
NNSA's commitment to Congress to operate the facility by 2012. 
However, ground breaking for the new building has been delayed 
until at least August 2011 and the Committee is concerned that 
some level of funding may be being used to supplement 
construction costs. The Committee directs NNSA to identify 
funds for the KCRIMS project as a separate line item under the 
Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities [RTBF] account with 
an explanation of how the funds will be used to support the 
project.
    The Committee recommends $1,479,954,000, an increase of 
$30,000,000 above the request, for the RTBF Operations and 
Maintenance account. This funding supports the operations and 
maintenance of the NNSA laboratories and production facilities, 
equipment purchases, and personnel. Of these funds:
    Operations of Facilities.--The Committee recommends 
$1,277,991,000, an increase of $20,000,000 above the budget 
request. Within these funds, at least $230,927,000 and 
$131,254,000 shall be used for operations of facilities support 
for Y-12 and Pantex, respectively. This funding increase will 
help Y-12 and Pantex sustain facilities and other critical 
infrastructure needed for life extension programs, 
dismantlement work, and other national security needs.
    Program Readiness.--The Committee recommends the requested 
amount of $69,309,000.
    Material Recycle and Recovery.--The Committee recommends 
$80,429,000, an increase of $10,000,000. Within these funds, 
$50,905,000 shall be for material recycle and recovery 
activities at Y-12. This increase in funding will help restore 
activities at Y-12 related to the recovery and reuse of 
enriched uranium and lithium from dismantled nuclear weapons 
for stockpile stewardship, naval reactors, and nuclear 
nonproliferation missions.
    Containers.--The Committee recommends the requested amount 
of $27,992,000.
    Storage.--The Committee recommends the requested amount of 
$24,233,000.
    Construction.--The Committee recommends $440,016,000.
    Project 11-D-801, TA-55 Reinvestment Project, Los Alamos, 
New Mexico.--The Committee provides $20,000,000 as requested to 
begin the second phase of this effort to mitigate safety risks 
to workers identified by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board.
    Project 09-D-007, LANSCE Refurbishment Project, Los Alamos, 
New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $30,000,000 to refurbish 
the LANSCE facility. These funds shall be made available for 
capital equipment acquisition, installation, and associated 
design funds.
    Project 09-D-404, Test Capabilities Revitalization Phase 
II, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.--The 
committee recommends $11,000,000 to build mechanical shock 
facilities and rocket sled tracks that will be needed for the 
B61 life extension program.
    Project 08-D-802, High Explosive Pressing Facility, Pantex 
Plant, Amarillo, Texas.--The Committee recommends $30,000,000 
as requested.
    Project 07-D-140, Project Engineering and Design [PED], 
Various Locations.--The Committee recommends $5,000,000 as 
requested to continue design work on the Transuranic Waste 
Facility Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
    Project 06-D-140, PED, Various Locations.--The Committee 
recommends $4,000,000 as requested. The project account 
supports ongoing design efforts for the Radioactive Liquid 
Waste Treatment Facility.
    Project 06-D-141, PED, Uranium Processing Facility, Y-12, 
Oak Ridge, Tennessee.--The Committee recommends $115,016,000, 
as requested.
    Project 04-D-125 Chemistry and Metallurgy Facility 
Replacement Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los 
Alamos, New Mexico.--The Committee recommends $225,000,000 as 
requested.

                      SECURE TRANSPORTATION ASSET

    The Committee recommendation for the Secure Transportation 
Asset program is $248,045,000, the same as the budget request.

               NUCLEAR COUNTERTERRORISM INCIDENT RESPONSE

    The Committee recommends full funding of the nuclear 
counterterrorism incident response program. The Committee 
provides $233,134,000 as requested. The Committee supports 
NNSA's efforts in developing equipment, procedures, and human 
expertise to identify and render safe improvised nuclear 
devices.

             FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE RECAPITALIZATION

    The Committee provides $94,000,000 for Facilities and 
Infrastructure Recapitalization activities, consistent with the 
budget request. This program was developed to reduce the 
backlog in deferred maintenance of aging infrastructure 
facilities throughout the complex.

                            SITE STEWARDSHIP

    The Committee recommends $100,478,000, a decrease of 
$5,000,000 below the budget request. The Committee supports 
NNSA's efforts to consolidate and dispose of NNSA special 
nuclear material that is no longer required for the nuclear 
weapons mission. Within available funds, up to $4,000,000 may 
be used for energy-saving projects. The Committee directs NNSA 
to submit with the fiscal year 2012 budget request the list of 
projects under the energy modernization and investment program. 
The list of projects should include the total cost of each 
project, the expected cost savings and other benefits of each 
project and when those cost savings will be realized, and the 
extent to which they contribute to NNSA's energy conservation 
goals.
    Operations and Maintenance.--The Committee recommends 
$85,478,000.
    Construction.--The Committee recommends the requested level 
of $15,000,000.
    Project 11-D-601 Sanitary Effluent Reclamation Facility, 
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The 
Committee recommends full funding of $15,000,000 for this 
project.

                        SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY

    The Committee recommendation for the Safeguards and 
Security Program is $835,299,000.
    Defense Nuclear Security Operations and Maintenance.--The 
Committee recommends the requested level of $667,954,000. The 
Committee support NNSA's efforts to reduce costs related to 
securing national laboratories and production sites while still 
maintaining effective physical security measures at each site. 
The Committee encourages NNSA to continue eliminating 
unnecessary costs while still protecting facilities' assets and 
resources against theft, sabotage, and other criminal acts.
    Construction.--The Committee recommends $43,000,000, a 
decrease of $9,000,000.
    Project 08-D-701 Nuclear Materials Safeguards and Security 
Upgrades Project Phase II, Los Alamos, New Mexico.--The 
Committee recommends $43,000,000 for this project, a decrease 
of $9,000,000 from the budget request. NNSA will not be able to 
complete design activities and begin construction work until 
design plans for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research 
Replacement--Nuclear Facility [CMR-NF] project is more 
developed. The size of CMR-NF will determine the amount of 
security fencing needed.
    Cybersecurity.--The Committee recommends the full request 
of $124,345,000.

            SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND ENGINEERING CAPABILITY

    The Committee recommends $20,000,000 as requested for 
Science, Technology, and Engineering Capability activities. The 
Committee supports NNSA's efforts to leverage its science, 
engineering, and technological expertise to work with the 
Defense Threat Reduction Agency to improve the nation's 
counterterrorism capabilities. The Committee encourages NNSA to 
continue working with DTRA to improve nuclear forensics 
capabilities and develop the tools needed to probe materials 
and objects and identify hidden or concealed nuclear threats.

                    Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation

Appropriations, 2010....................................  $2,136,709,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   2,687,167,000
Committee recommendation................................   2,612,167,000

    The Committee recommends $2,612,167,000 for Defense Nuclear 
Nonproliferation. The Committee supports NNSA's goal of 
securing all vulnerable nuclear material within 4 years. 
Securing nuclear materials at the sites and facilities where 
they are located is the best defense against nuclear terrorism. 
Since April 2009, when President Obama announced the 4-year 
goal, NNSA, with the assistance of other Government agencies, 
has made significant progress. For example, in the last year, 
four countries have eliminated all weapons-usable nuclear 
material on their soil--bringing the total to 17 countries in 
the last 10 years. Despite this progress, NNSA lacks a clear 
set of metrics to assess and report on the progress of the 4-
year nuclear security effort. The Committee directs NNSA to 
provide a report to the Committee by April 1, 2011, with (1) 
the measures and indicators it will use to assess the progress 
in meeting the 4-year goal, (2) the progress it has made toward 
meeting the goals 2 years into the effort, and (3) additional 
measures it must take and funding requirements for the last 2 
years. Such measures should include the fraction of the total 
number of sites in the world with nuclear weapons or weapons-
usable materials where all of those stocks have been eliminated 
and the fraction that have demonstrated that their security 
systems are performing effectively and could protect against a 
broad range of outsider and insider threats.

       NONPROLIFERATION AND VERIFICATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

    The Committee recommends $362,068,000, an increase of 
$10,500,000 above the budget request, to support expanded 
investment in developing advanced nuclear detection 
technologies. Within the available funds, the Committee 
provides $10,000,000 for NNSA laboratories to use their 
expertise and advanced computational, modeling, and simulation 
capabilities to meet the United States' space situational 
awareness requirements. The Committee expects NNSA to include 
this initiative in the regular budget request. Also, within 
available funds, at least $500,000 should be used for the 
Global Seismographic Network [GSN] Equipment Renewal project. 
The GSN, among other things, has 46 sites--the single largest 
contribution--that monitor compliance with the Comprehensive 
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and could detect foreign nuclear tests. 
However, GSN equipment, such as sensors, is more than 15 years 
old, obsolete, and increasingly difficult to effectively 
maintain.

              NONPROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

    The Committee recommends $155,930,000 as requested.

       INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND COOPERATION

    The Committee recommends $590,118,000 as requested. The 
Committee is encouraged by NNSA's efforts in completing 
security upgrades at 210 out of 229 buildings that store 
weapons usable nuclear material and warheads in Russia. NNSA is 
also on track to complete security upgrades at the remaining 19 
buildings by the end of fiscal year 2012. In addition to 
completing security upgrades, NNSA is working on gradually 
decreasing U.S. funding and relying more heavily on Russian 
resources for upgrades and maintenance. The August 2009 Joint 
Transition Plan between the United States and Russia laid out 
the necessary steps at each site to maintain robust material, 
protection, control, and accounting [MPC&A] systems in place. 
However, the Committee remains concerned about sustaining 
security upgrades after the program expires at the end of 
fiscal year 2012. The Committee wants assurances that the U.S. 
investment of $2,700,000,000 since fiscal year 1996 will not be 
squandered. The Committee directs NNSA to submit a report to 
the Committee not later than 90 days of enactment on (1) 
whether Russia has taken steps to implement the Joint 
Transition Plan, (2) the remaining challenges in sustaining 
security upgrades and how NNSA plans to address those 
challenges, and (3) U.S. resources, whether direct or indirect, 
needed after fiscal year 2012 to support U.S.-funded MPC&A 
activities.

                     FISSILE MATERIALS DISPOSITION

    The Committee recommends $935,213,000, a reduction of 
$95,500,000, to support the plutonium disposition program and 
construction projects.
    U.S. Surplus Fissile Materials Disposition.--The Committee 
provides for the full request of $304,925,000, including 
$278,940,000 as requested for the U.S. plutonium disposition 
and $25,985,000 as requested for the U.S. uranium disposition 
program.
    Construction.--The Committee recommends $582,788,000 to 
support construction, a reduction of $30,000,000. The Committee 
supports construction of three critical facilities at Savannah 
River in South Carolina--the MOX Fuel Fabrication 
Facility [MFFF], the Waste Solidification Building, and the Pit 
Disassembly and Conversion Facility [PDCF]--that will dispose 
of at least 34 metric tons of plutonium by fabricating it into 
mixed oxide fuel for domestic nuclear reactors. However, a 
March 2010 GAO report found that NNSA (1) may not be able to 
supply MFFF with sufficient quantities of plutonium oxide 
feedstock to meet its planned production schedule of 
MOX fuel and (2) there may not be demand from 
domestic utilities that own nuclear reactors to buy 
MOX fuel. NNSA plans to complete construction of 
MFFF at least 6 years before PDCF is completed even though PDCF 
will provide the majority of the plutonium feedstock to MFFF. 
In addition, NNSA only has a limited quantity of feedstock on 
hand to supply the MFFF prior to the start of pit disassembly 
operations at PDCF. However, NNSA has not established a clear 
strategy on how it will supply feedstock to MFFF to meet its 
goals. Furthermore, while NNSA has one potential customer for 
most of its MOX fuel, it has not done sufficient 
outreach to find MOX fuel customers. Without this 
outreach, NNSA will not be able to sell MOX fuel and 
return more than $1,000,000,000 to the U.S. Treasury. The 
Committee directs the NNSA to submit a plan not later than 90 
days of enactment to mitigate the likely shortfall in plutonium 
oxide feedstock for the MFFF prior to the start of pit 
disassembly operations. This plan should include, at a minimum, 
the following five items: (1) the actions needed to ensure that 
the Advanced Recovery and Integrated Extraction System project 
at Los Alamos will meet its existing production goals, and the 
cost and schedule associated with any needed expansion of the 
project; (2) an assessment of how much additional plutonium 
material, including fuel-grade plutonium, is available within 
the DOE complex for use as feedstock for the MFFF; (3) an 
assessment of the effect on the design and safety of the MFFF 
from the use of fuel-grade plutonium as feedstock; (4) an 
assessment of potential changes to the MOX fuel 
production schedule and the effect of these changes on the cost 
and schedule for operating the MFFF; and (5) an assessment of 
the cost and schedule associated with obtaining a limited but 
sufficient pit disassembly process to produce feedstock for the 
MFFF. The Committee also directs NNSA to submit a report not 
later than 90 days after enactment of this act on what actions 
it has taken to inform utilities about the MOX fuel 
program and related incentives and how it plans to increase the 
number of customers for MOX fuel.
    Project 99-D-143, Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility, 
Savannah River, South Carolina.--The Committee recommends 
$475,788,000 as requested.
    Project 99-D-141-02, Waste Solidification Building, 
Savannah River, South Carolina.--The Committee recommends full 
funding of $57,000,000 for this project.
    Project 99-D-141-01, Pit Disassembly and Conversion 
Facility, Savannah River, South Carolina.--The Committee 
recommends $50,000,000, a reduction of $30,000,000, for 
construction of this facility. The Committee supports NNSA's 
efforts to design and develop gloveboxes and other critical 
equipment and technologies to handle plutonium and establish a 
pit disassembly and conversion capability. However, no funding 
should be used for construction activities until (1) NNSA 
completes its assessment of the impact on cost and schedule of 
combining NNSA's Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility 
project with the Office of Environmental Management's Plutonium 
Preparation Project at Savannah River, (2) determines whether 
the projects should be combined and the pit disassembly and 
conversion capability will be located at the K-area Facility 
rather than a new, stand-alone facility, and (3) completes its 
conceptual design report with a new cost and schedule range 
consistent with DOE guidance.
    Russian Surplus Materials Disposition.--The Committee 
recommends $47,500,000, a reduction of $65,500,000. No funding 
shall be used to support research and development of the Gas 
Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor in Russia. The Committee 
understands that on April 13, 2010, the United States and 
Russia signed the Plutonium Management and Disposition 
Agreement. The agreement represents an important step in 
advancing nuclear disarmament. Under the agreement, the United 
States and Russia will each dispose of 34 metric tons of 
weapon-grade plutonium--enough material for approximately 
17,000 nuclear weapons--by using it as fuel in civil power 
reactors to produce electricity. The Committee also understands 
that the United States committed $400,000,000, subject to 
future appropriations, to help Russia dispose of the excess 
plutonium and that NNSA requested the first $100,000,000 in the 
fiscal year 2011 budget. The Committee cannot provide the full 
$100,000,000 requested because of tight budget constraints, 
spending on other nonproliferation priorities, and the fact 
that NNSA does not plan to spend any of the $100,000,000 
requested in fiscal year 2011. According to NNSA planning 
documents, NNSA will spend the $100,000,000 over 3 years 
beginning in fiscal year 2012. In addition, NNSA has 
$17,000,000 in uncosted funds appropriated in fiscal year 2010 
at its disposal to implement the agreement in fiscal year 2011. 
However, as a confidence-building measure and in support of the 
agreement, the Committee will provide $47,500,000.
    The Committee directs NNSA to submit to the Committee a 
report on how the United States will spend the $400,000,000 and 
the milestones that Russia must meet before the United States 
releases any of these funds.

                   GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE

    The Committee recommends $568,838,000, an increase of 
$10,000,000. The Global Threat Reduction Initiative's Domestic 
Material Protection program works to install security upgrades 
at buildings containing high-priority nuclear and radiological 
materials located at civilian sites in the United States. The 
Committee is concerned by the decrease in funding and level of 
effort for these activities. As a result, of the total funds 
requested for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, at least 
$35,147,000 should be used for the Domestic Material Protection 
program to secure vulnerable nuclear materials in the United 
States. If by the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 
NNSA has not entered into an agreement with South Africa to 
remove South African highly enriched uranium, the Committee 
directs NNSA to use $27,000,000 of the $108,000,000 
appropriated for gap nuclear material remove activities for 
domestic material protection activities.

                             Naval Reactors

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $945,133,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   1,070,486,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,040,486,000

    The Committee provides $1,040,486,000 for Naval Reactors. 
In fiscal year 2010, NNSA began work on three significant 
projects: design of a reactor plant for new Ohio-class 
ballistic missile submarines, refueling of a land-based reactor 
prototype, and construction of a new spent fuel facility. Based 
on current projections, funding for these three projects will 
grow from $200,000,000 in fiscal year 2011 to more than 
$600,000,000 in fiscal year 2015. The Committee is concerned 
that the cost for these projects and management requirements 
will peak at the same time. The Committee urges the program to 
keep Congress informed on the progress of each project.

                      Office of the Administrator

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $420,754,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     448,267,000
Committee recommendation................................     438,267,000

    The Committee recommends $438,267,000 for the Office of the 
Administrator, a decrease of $10,000,000 below the budget 
request.

               ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES


                     Defense Environmental Cleanup

Appropriations, 2010....................................  $5,642,331,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   5,588,039,000
Committee recommendation................................   5,262,838,000

    The Committee recommendation for Defense Environmental 
Cleanup is $5,262,838,000. Within the total provided, the 
Department is directed to fund the Hazardous Waste Worker 
Training Program at $10,000,000. The Committee is supportive of 
the Office of Environmental Management's efforts to improve the 
management of its portfolio of projects by creating operational 
activities and capital cleanup projects funded under the 
existing PBS structure. The capital cleanup projects are aimed 
at environmental remediation efforts like soil and groundwater 
cleanup, including monitoring well installation and 
construction of treatment systems, as well as decontamination 
and decommissioning of excess facilities. The Environmental 
Management program plans to apply the rigor of the Department's 
Project Management Order, DOE 413.3A, to these relatively small 
cleanup projects. The Committee directs Environmental 
Management to include a summary of these capital cleanup 
projects, including scope, cost and schedule, as supplementary 
information to accompany the submission of the fiscal year 2012 
request. Environmental Management should budget for these 
capital cleanup projects as operating expense funded projects 
within the PBSs, apply the principles of DOE 413 for all these 
projects, and apply all pertinent, generally accepted 
government accounting principles and DOE Orders for 
capitalization of these projects upon completion.
    Reprogramming Control Levels.--In fiscal year 2011, the 
Environmental Management program may transfer funding between 
operating expense funded projects within the controls listed 
below using guidance contained in the Department's budget 
execution manual (DOE M 135.1-1A, chapter IV). All capital 
construction line item projects remain separate controls from 
the operating projects. The Committees on Appropriations in the 
House and Senate must be formally notified in advance of all 
reprogrammings, except internal reprogrammings, and the 
Department is to take no financial action in anticipation of 
Congressional response. The Committee recommends the following 
reprogramming control points for fiscal year 2011:
  --Closure sites;
  --Hanford Site;
  --Idaho National Laboratory;
  --NNSA Sites;
  --Oak Ridge Reservation;
  --Office of River Protection;
  --Savannah River Site;
  --Waste Isolation Pilot Plant;
  --Program Direction;
  --Program Support;
  --Technology Development and Deployment;
  --Safeguards and Security;
  --All Capital Construction Line Items, regardless of site.
    Internal Reprogramming Authority.--The new reprogramming 
control points above obviates, in most cases, the need for 
internal reprogramming authority. However, at the few sites to 
which the internal reprogramming statute still applies, 
Environmental Management site managers may transfer up to 
$5,000,000, one time, between accounts listed above to reduce 
health and safety risks, gain cost savings, or complete 
projects, as long as a program or project is not increased or 
decreased by more than $5,000,000 in total during the fiscal 
year.
    The reprogramming authority--either formal or internal--may 
not be used to initiate new programs or to change funding 
levels for programs specifically denied, limited, or increased 
by Congress in the act or report. The Committee on 
Appropriations in the House and Senate must be notified within 
30 days after the use of the internal reprogramming authority.
    Closure Sites.--The Committee recommends $6,375,000, the 
same as the request, for closure sites.
    Hanford Site.--The Committee recommends $1,018,929,000 for 
Richland Operations. The Department is directed to carry out 
maintenance and public safety efforts at the B Reactor. Funding 
for the Hazardous Materials Management and Emergency Response 
[HAMMER] facilities are provided for within available funds.
    Idaho National Laboratory.--The Committee recommends 
$407,100,000 for Idaho National Laboratory.
    NNSA Sites.--The Committee recommends $279,373,000 for NNSA 
sites.
    Oak Ridge Reservation.--The Committee recommends 
$232,700,000 for Oak Ridge Reservation, including $152,278,000 
for ORNL and Y12 D&D activities under the Integrated Facilities 
Disposition Program. The amount provided for cleanup activities 
at ORNL shall include the 2000 Area slabs and soils remediation 
and the Isotope Area decommissioning and demolition.
    Office of River Protection.--The Committee recommends 
$1,158,178,000 for the Office of River Protection.
    Savannah River Site.--The Committee recommends 
$1,217,799,000 for the Savannah River site. The Committee 
provides $910,533,000 for Radioactive Liquid Tank Waste at the 
Savannah River Site, an increase of $104,300,000 over the 
request, funded by offsets from Nuclear Materials and Spent 
Nuclear Fuel Activities at Savannah River. These funds should 
be combined with other fiscal year 2010 and 2011 savings to 
accelerate tank retrievals at the site through the deployment 
of innovative technologies, such as small column ion exchange, 
advanced solvent extractants and steam reforming. Successful 
demonstration of these technologies has the potential to save 
tens of millions of dollars in life cycle costs at Savannah 
River and will expand the range of treatment options for 
similar wastes at other sites.
    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.--The Committee recommends 
$230,245,000 for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
    Program Direction.--The Committee recommends $355,000,000 
for program direction. The Committee notes that in fiscal year 
2010 the administration requested $355,000,000 for program 
direction and then oddly reduced the fiscal year 2011 request 
to $323,825,000. The Environmental Management program has 
suffered due to management issues with construction projects 
and completing projects on time and within budget. While not 
the only answer to this problem, sufficient workforce is 
certainly required to address management issues. The Committee 
was pleased with the fiscal year 2010 request level even if it 
could not match it. The dramatic reduction of the fiscal year 
2011 request is disconcerting and inexplicable. The Committee 
recognizes the need to improve project management in the 
Environmental Management organization, and supports efforts to 
make such improvements. The Committee supports the efforts of 
the Assistant Secretary to create a more effective 
Environmental Management project management team with the 
assistance of the Army Corps of Engineers.
    Program Support.--The Committee recommends $34,000,000 for 
program support.
    Safeguards and Security.--The Committee recommends 
$249,754,000 for safeguards and security.
    Technology Development and Deployment.--The Committee 
recommends $39,685,000 for technology development and 
deployment. Additional funds above the budget request are 
provided to continue successful efforts with industry to 
transfer and demonstrate international technologies and 
approaches to the cleanup program. The Committee also 
encourages the Department to work with industry on initiatives 
which better support the transition of ideas and technology 
into practice.
    Federal Contribution to Uranium Enrichment Decontamination 
and Decommissioning Fund.--The Committee recommends 
$33,700,000, the remaining balance for the Federal contribution 
for the UED&D Fund.

                        Other Defense Activities

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $847,468,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     878,209,000
Committee recommendation................................     866,317,000

    The Committee recommendation is $866,317,000, a decrease of 
$11,892,000 below the budget request. The Committee does not 
provide the funding requested under the general provisions to 
increase the Department's acquisition workforce capacity and 
capabilities.
    Health, Safety and Security.--The Committee recommends 
$462,211,000.
    Office of Legacy Management.--The Committee recommends 
$188,626,000.
    Nuclear Energy.--The Committee recommends $88,200,000 for 
Idaho infrastructure for sitewide safeguards and security.
    Defense-related Administrative Support.--The Committee 
provides $118,836,000.
    Office of Hearings and Appeals.--The Committee provides 
$6,444,000.
    Congressionally Directed Spending Items.--The Committee 
includes $2,000,000 for the following list of projects of Other 
Defense Activities. The Committee reminds recipients that 
statutory cost-sharing requirements may apply to these 
projects.

       CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES PROJECTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project title              Amount             Requestor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burlington Atomic Energy          $1,000,000  Senators Harkin, Grassley
 Commission Plant and Ames
 Laboratory Former Workers
 Medical Surveillance Programs.
Medical Monitoring at Paducah,    $1,000,000  Senator McConnell
 KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak
 Ridge, TN.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Power Marketing Administrations


                    BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION

    The Bonneville Power Administration is the Department of 
Energy's marketing agency for electric power in the Pacific 
Northwest. Bonneville provides electricity to a 300,000 square 
mile service area in the Columbia River drainage basin. 
Bonneville markets the power from Federal hydropower projects 
in the Northwest, as well as power from non-Federal generating 
facilities in the region. Bonneville also exchanges and markets 
surplus power with Canada and California. The Committee 
recommends no new borrowing authority for BPA during fiscal 
year 2011.

      OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................      $7,638,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................

    For the Southeastern Power Administration, the Committee 
recommends no funding, the same as the budget request.

      OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $44,944,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      12,699,000
Committee recommendation................................      12,699,000

    For the Southwestern Power Administration, the Committee 
recommends $12,699,000, the same as the budget request.

 CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, WESTERN AREA 
                          POWER ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $256,711,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     105,558,000
Committee recommendation................................     105,558,000

    For the Western Area Power Administration, the Committee 
recommends $105,558,000, the same as the budget request.

           FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND

Appropriations, 2010....................................      $2,568,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................         220,000
Committee recommendation................................         220,000

    For the Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund, 
the Committee recommends $220,000 the same as the request.

                  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $298,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     315,600,000
Committee recommendation................................     315,600,000

                            REVENUES APPLIED

Appropriations, 2010....................................   -$298,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................    -315,600,000
Committee recommendation................................    -315,600,000


                                                                  DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
                                                                [In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Committee recommendation
                                                                                                          Committee               compared to--
                                                                         Enacted      Budget estimate   recommendation ---------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Enacted      Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

               ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D:
    Hydrogen Technology............................................         174,000   ...............         174,000   ...............        +174,000
    Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies............................  ...............         137,000   ...............  ...............        -137,000
    Biomass and Biorefinery Systems R&D............................         220,000          220,000          220,000   ...............  ...............
    Solar energy...................................................         225,000          302,398          272,000          +47,000          -30,398
    Wind energy....................................................          80,000          122,500          123,000          +43,000             +500
    Geothermal technology..........................................          44,000           55,000           55,000          +11,000   ...............
    Water Power....................................................          50,000           40,488           60,000          +10,000          +19,512
    Vehicle technologies...........................................         311,365          325,302          325,000          +13,635             -302
    Building technologies..........................................         200,000          230,698          222,000          +22,000           -8,698
    Industrial technologies........................................          96,000          100,000          100,000           +4,000   ...............
    Federal energy management program..............................          32,000           42,272           42,000          +10,000             -272
    RE-ENERGYSE (Regaining our energy science and engineering edge)  ...............          50,000   ...............  ...............         -50,000

    Facilities and infrastructure:
        National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL]................          19,000           18,000           18,000           -1,000   ...............

        Construction:
            10-EE-01 South table mountain ingress/egress and                 44,000   ...............  ...............         -44,000   ...............
             traffic capacity upgrades, National Renewable Energy
             Laboratory, Golden, CO................................
            08-EE-01 Energy systems integration facility, National   ...............          39,500           39,500          +39,500   ...............
             Renewal Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction...............................          44,000           39,500           39,500           -4,500   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Facilities and infrastructure..............          63,000           57,500           57,500           -5,500   ...............

    Program direction..............................................         140,000          200,008          170,000          +30,000          -30,008
    Program support................................................          45,000           87,307           59,700          +14,700          -27,607
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy RDD&D.......       1,680,365        1,970,473        1,880,200         +199,835          -90,273

Weatherization and intragovernmental:
    Weatherization:
        Weatherization assistance..................................         210,000          262,500          162,500          -47,500         -100,000
        Training and technical assistance..........................  ...............           7,500            7,500           +7,500   ...............
        Innovations in weatherization..............................  ...............          30,000           30,000          +30,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Weatherization.................................         210,000          300,000          200,000          -10,000         -100,000

    Other:
        State energy program grants................................          50,000           75,000           50,000   ...............         -25,000
        Tribal energy activities...................................          10,000           10,000           10,000   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Other..........................................          60,000           85,000           60,000   ...............         -25,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Weatherization and intragovernmental...........         270,000          385,000          260,000          -10,000         -125,000

Congressionally directed projects..................................         292,135   ...............         147,600         -144,535         +147,600
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY.................       2,242,500        2,355,473        2,287,800          +45,300          -67,673

            ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY

Research and development:
    Clean energy transmission and reliability......................          38,450           35,000           35,000           -3,450   ...............
    Smart grid research and development............................          32,450           39,293           39,293           +6,843   ...............
    Energy storage.................................................          14,000           40,000           40,000          +26,000   ...............
    Cyber security for energy delivery systems.....................          40,000           30,000           30,000          -10,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Research and development...........................         124,900          144,293          144,293          +19,393   ...............

Permitting, siting, and analysis...................................           6,400            6,400            6,400   ...............  ...............
Infrastructure security and energy restoration.....................           6,187            6,188            6,188               +1   ...............
Program direction..................................................          21,420           29,049           29,049           +7,629   ...............
Congressionally directed projects..................................          13,075   ...............           4,250           -8,825           +4,250
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY...........         171,982          185,930          190,180          +18,198           +4,250

                           NUCLEAR ENERGY

Research and development:
    Nuclear energy enabling technologies...........................  ...............          99,300           62,000          +62,000          -37,300
    Integrated university program..................................           5,000   ...............           5,000   ...............          +5,000
    RE-ENERGYSE....................................................  ...............           5,000   ...............  ...............          -5,000
    Reactor concepts RD&D..........................................  ...............         195,000          188,500         +188,500           -6,500
    Generation IV nuclear energy systems...........................         220,137   ...............  ...............        -220,137   ...............
    Nuclear power 2010.............................................         105,000   ...............  ...............        -105,000   ...............
    Fuel cycle research and development............................         136,000          201,000          191,000          +55,000          -10,000
    International nuclear energy cooperation.......................  ...............           3,000            3,000           +3,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Research and development...........................         466,137          503,300          449,500          -16,637          -53,800

Infrastructure:
    Radiological facilities management:
        Space and defense infrastructure...........................          42,000           47,000           57,000          +15,000          +10,000
        Research reactor infrastructure............................          10,000            4,818            4,818           -5,182   ...............
        Oak Ridge nuclear infrastructure...........................          10,000   ...............  ...............         -10,000   ...............
        Los Alamos nuclear infrastructure..........................          10,000   ...............  ...............         -10,000   ...............
        PU-238 production restart project..........................  ...............          15,000   ...............  ...............         -15,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Radiological facilities management.............          72,000           66,818           61,818          -10,182           -5,000

    INL facilities management:
        INL Operations and infrastructure..........................         173,000          162,482          173,000   ...............         +10,518

Program direction..................................................          73,000           91,452           91,452          +18,452   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Nuclear Energy.....................................         784,137          824,052          775,770           -8,367          -48,282
                                                                    ====================================================================================
Congressionally directed projects..................................           2,500   ...............           7,400           +4,900           +7,400
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY........................................         786,637          824,052          783,170           -3,467          -40,882
                                                                    ====================================================================================

               FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Fuels and Power Systems:
    Innovations for existing plants................................          52,000           65,000           68,000          +16,000           +3,000
    Advanced integrated gasification combined cycle................          63,000           55,000           64,000           +1,000           +9,000
    Advanced turbines..............................................          32,000           31,000           32,000   ...............          +1,000
    Carbon sequestration...........................................         154,000          143,000          170,000          +16,000          +27,000
    Fuels..........................................................          25,000           12,000           20,000           -5,000           +8,000
    Fuel cells.....................................................          50,000           50,000           50,000   ...............  ...............
    Advanced research..............................................          28,000           47,850           48,000          +20,000             +150
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Fuels and power systems............................         404,000          403,850          452,000          +48,000          +48,150

Natural Gas Technologies...........................................          17,833   ...............          22,000           +4,167          +22,000
Unconventional fossil energy technologies from Petroleum--Oil                20,000   ...............          26,000           +6,000          +26,000
 Technologies......................................................
Program direction..................................................         158,000          152,033          170,300          +12,300          +18,267
Plant and Capital Equipment........................................          20,000           20,000           20,000   ...............  ...............
Fossil energy environmental restoration............................          10,000           10,000           10,000   ...............  ...............
Special recruitment programs.......................................             700              700              700   ...............  ...............
Cooperative research and development...............................           5,000   ...............           5,000   ...............          +5,000
Congressionally directed projects..................................          36,850   ...............          19,950          -16,900          +19,950
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................         672,383          586,583          725,950          +53,567         +139,367

NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES.............................          23,627           23,614           23,614              -13   ...............

                    STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVES
Storage facilities development.....................................         224,732          188,906          188,906          -35,826   ...............
Management for SPR operations......................................          19,091           20,955           20,955           +1,864   ...............
Use of prior-year balances.........................................  ...............         -71,000   ...............  ...............         +71,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVES..........................         243,823          138,861          209,861          -33,962          +71,000

NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE.................................          11,300           11,300           11,300   ...............  ...............

ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION..................................         110,595          128,833          119,000           +8,405           -9,833

                 NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA)...............................           7,652            3,659            3,659           -3,993   ...............
Gaseous Diffusion Plants...........................................         100,885           99,464           99,464           -1,421   ...............

Small Sites:
    Brookhaven National Lab........................................          15,000           13,861           13,861           -1,139   ...............
    SNF stabilization and disposition--2012 Idaho National Lab.....           5,000            4,900            4,900             -100   ...............

    Consolidated Business Center:
        California Site support....................................             262   ...............  ...............            -262   ...............
        Soil and water remediation:
            Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.....................           4,600            3,526            3,526           -1,074   ...............
        Nuclear facility D&D:
            Energy Technology Engineering Center...................          13,000           10,679           10,679           -2,321   ...............
        Soil and water remediation--Moab...........................          39,000           31,000           50,000          +11,000          +19,000
        Completed sites administration and support.................           1,200   ...............  ...............          -1,200   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Consolidated Business Center...................          58,062           45,205           64,205           +6,143          +19,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Small Sites....................................          78,062           63,966           82,966           +4,904          +19,000

West Valley Demonstration Project..................................          58,074           58,074           58,074   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.....................         244,673          225,163          244,163             -510          +19,000

    URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND

Decontamination and decommissioning................................         573,850          730,498          550,000          -23,850         -180,498
Offsetting collections.............................................  ...............        -200,000   ...............  ...............        +200,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING         573,850          530,498          550,000          -23,850          +19,502
       FUND/URANIUM INVENTORY CLEANUP..............................
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                              SCIENCE

Advanced scientific computing research.............................         394,000          426,000          418,000          +24,000           -8,000
Basic energy sciences:
    Research.......................................................       1,482,260        1,683,400        1,587,515         +105,255          -95,885

    Construction:
        07-SC-06 Project Engineering and Design [PED] National              139,000          151,600          151,600          +12,600   ...............
         Synchrotron Light Source II [NSLS-II].....................
        05-R-320 LINAC Coherent Light Source [LCLS]................          15,240   ...............  ...............         -15,240   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction...................................         154,240          151,600          151,600           -2,640   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Basic energy sciences.............................       1,636,500        1,835,000        1,739,115         +102,615          -95,885

Biological and environmental research:
    Biological systems science.....................................         318,476          321,947          317,547             -929           -4,400
    Climate and environmental sciences.............................         285,706          304,953          296,953          +11,247           -8,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Biological and environmental research.................         604,182          626,900          614,500          +10,318          -12,400

Fusion energy sciences program.....................................         426,000          380,000          384,000          -42,000           +4,000
High-energy physics:
    Proton accelerator-based physics...............................         434,471          439,262   ...............        -434,471         -439,262
    Electron accelerator-based physics.............................          26,420           24,707   ...............         -26,420          -24,707
    Non-accelerator physics........................................          99,321           88,539   ...............         -99,321          -88,539
    Theoretical physics............................................          67,240           69,524   ...............         -67,240          -69,524
    Advanced technology R&D........................................         183,031          189,968   ...............        -183,031         -189,968
    Research.......................................................  ...............  ...............         803,085         +803,085         +803,085

    Construction:
        11-SC-40 Project Engineering and Design [PED] long baseline  ...............          12,000           12,000          +12,000   ...............
         neutrino experiment, FNAL.................................
        11-SC-41 Project Engineering and Design [PED] muon to        ...............           5,000            5,000           +5,000   ...............
         electron conversion experiment, FNAL......................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction...................................  ...............          17,000           17,000          +17,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, High-energy physics...............................         810,483          829,000          820,085           +9,602           -8,915

    Operations and maintenance.....................................         515,000          526,000          518,000           +3,000           -8,000
    Construction:
        06-SC-01 Project Engineering and Design [PED] 12 GeV                 20,000           36,000           36,000          +16,000   ...............
         continuous electron beam accelerator facility upgrade,
         Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator facility (was
         project 07-SC-001), Newport News, VA......................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Total, Nuclear physics.................................         535,000          562,000          554,000          +19,000           -8,000

Workforce development for teachers and scientists..................          20,678           35,600           21,000             +322          -14,600

Science laboratories infrastructure:
    Laboratories facilities support:
        Infrastructure support:
            Payment in lieu of taxes...............................           1,385            1,385            1,385   ...............  ...............
            Oak Ridge landlord.....................................           5,214            5,260            5,260              +46   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Infrastructure support.....................           6,599            6,645            6,645              +46   ...............

        Construction:
            11-SC-70 Utilities upgrade, FNAL.......................  ...............           7,524            7,524           +7,524   ...............
            11-SC-71 Utility infrastructure modernization at TJNAF.  ...............           7,828            7,828           +7,828   ...............
            10-SC-70 Research support building and infrastructure             6,900           33,100           33,100          +26,200   ...............
             modernization, SLAC...................................
            10-SC-71 Energy sciences building, ANL.................           8,000           15,000           15,000           +7,000   ...............
            10-SC-72 Renovate science laboratory, Phase II, BNL....           5,000           15,000           15,000          +10,000   ...............
            09-SC-72 Seismic life-safety, modernization and                  34,027           20,103           20,103          -13,924   ...............
             replacement of general purpose buildings Phase 2, PED/
             Construction, LBNL....................................
            09-SC-73, Interdisciplinary science building Phase 1,            39,387   ...............  ...............         -39,387   ...............
             PED, BNL..............................................
            09-SC-74, Technology and engineering development                 27,687           20,800           20,800           -6,887   ...............
             facilities PED, TJNAF.................................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction...............................         121,001          119,355          119,355           -1,646   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, Science laboratories infrastructure...........         127,600          126,000          126,000           -1,600   ...............

Safeguards and security............................................          83,000           86,500           86,500           +3,500   ...............

Science program direction:
    Headquarters...................................................          75,261           87,236           85,000           +9,739           -2,236
    Office of Science and Technical Information....................           8,916            8,963            8,963              +47   ...............
    Field offices..................................................         105,200          118,238          114,037           +8,837           -4,201
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Science program direction.............................         189,377          214,437          208,000          +18,623           -6,437

Congressionally directed projects..................................          76,890   ...............          40,800          -36,090          +40,800
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, SCIENCE...............................................       4,903,710        5,121,437        5,012,000         +108,290         -109,437

                       NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL

Repository program.................................................          28,400   ...............  ...............         -28,400   ...............
Program direction..................................................          70,000   ...............  ...............         -70,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL................................          98,400   ...............  ...............         -98,400   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
             ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY--ENERGY

Advanced research projects agency--Energy ARPA-E projects..........  ...............         273,400          173,434         +173,434          -99,966
Program direction..................................................  ...............          26,566           26,566          +26,566   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, ENERGY TRANSFORMATION ACCELERATION FUND...............  ...............         299,966          200,000         +200,000          -99,966
                                                                    ====================================================================================
         TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM

Administrative operations..........................................          43,000           58,000           58,000          +15,000   ...............
Offsetting collection..............................................         -43,000          -58,000          -58,000          -15,000   ...............
Cost of loan guarantees............................................  ...............         500,000          380,000         +380,000         -120,000
Additional loan volume.............................................  ...............         360,000          170,000         +170,000         -190,000
Additional subsidy cost............................................  ...............         300,000   ...............  ...............        -300,000
Loan volume (rescission)...........................................  ...............  ...............        -140,000         -140,000         -140,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY GUARANTEE PROGRAM.....  ...............       1,160,000          410,000         +410,000         -750,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM

Administrative expenses............................................          20,000            9,998            9,998          -10,002   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                    DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

Administrative operations:
    Salaries and expenses:
        Office of the Secretary:
            Program direction......................................           5,864            5,864            5,864   ...............  ...............
            Management reform......................................  ...............           2,000   ...............  ...............          -2,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, Office of the Secretary.......................           5,864            7,864            5,864   ...............          -2,000

        Chief Financial Officer....................................          62,981           62,731           62,731             -250   ...............
        Management.................................................          78,456           74,783           74,783           -3,673   ...............
        Human capital management...................................          29,537           27,560           27,560           -1,977   ...............
        Chief Information Officer..................................          38,146           36,238           36,238           -1,908   ...............
        Congressional and intergovernmental affairs:
            Program direction......................................           4,826            4,826            4,826   ...............  ...............
            Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs............  ...............           1,500            5,500           +5,500           +4,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, Congressional and intergovernmental affairs...           4,826            6,326           10,326           +5,500           +4,000

        Economic impact and diversity..............................           3,896            4,033            4,033             +137   ...............
        General Counsel............................................          32,478           36,654           34,654           +2,176           -2,000
        Policy and international affairs...........................          19,296           19,296           19,296   ...............  ...............
        Public affairs.............................................           4,500            4,500            4,500   ...............  ...............
        Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs................           5,500   ...............  ...............          -5,500   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Salaries and expenses..........................         285,480          279,985          279,985           -5,495   ...............

    Program support:
        Minority economic impact...................................           2,775            2,304            2,304             -471   ...............
        Policy analysis and system studies.........................           1,159            1,159            1,159   ...............  ...............
        Environmental policy studies...............................             528              528              528   ...............  ...............
        Climate change technology program (program support)........           9,270            9,270            9,270   ...............  ...............
        Cybersecurity and secure communications....................          33,365           35,872           35,872           +2,507   ...............
        Corporate management information program...................           9,403            8,933            8,933             -470   ...............
        Energy information technology services.....................          22,149           21,120           21,120           -1,029   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Program support................................          78,649           79,186           79,186             +537   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Administrative operations.........................         364,129          359,171          359,171           -4,958   ...............

    Cost of work for others........................................          47,537           48,537           48,537           +1,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION........................         411,666          407,708          407,708           -3,958   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Funding from other defense activities..............................        -122,982         -118,836         -118,836           +4,146   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Departmental administration (gross)...................         288,684          288,872          288,872             +188   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
Miscellaneous revenues.............................................        -119,740         -119,740         -119,740   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (net).....................         168,944          169,132          169,132             +188   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL........................................          51,927           42,850           42,850           -9,077   ...............

                  ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

              NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

WEAPONS ACTIVITIES:
    Directed stockpile work:
        Life extension program:
            W76 Life extension program.............................         223,196          249,463          249,463          +26,267   ...............

        Stockpile systems:
            B61 Stockpile systems..................................          91,956          317,136          317,136         +225,180   ...............
            W76 Stockpile systems..................................          65,497           64,521           64,521             -976   ...............
            W78 Stockpile systems..................................          50,741           85,898           85,898          +35,157   ...............
            W80 Stockpile systems..................................          19,064           34,193           34,193          +15,129   ...............
            B83 Stockpile systems..................................          35,682           39,349           39,349           +3,667   ...............
            W87 Stockpile systems..................................          51,817           62,603           62,603          +10,786   ...............
            W88 Stockpile systems..................................          43,043           45,666           45,666           +2,623   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, Stockpile systems.............................         357,800          649,366          649,366         +291,566   ...............

    Weapons dismantlement and disposition:
        Operations and maintenance.................................          96,100           58,025           64,425          -31,675           +6,400

    Stockpile services:
        Production support.........................................         301,484          309,761          309,761           +8,277   ...............
        Research and development support...........................          37,071           38,582           38,582           +1,511   ...............
        Research and development certification and safety..........         165,076          209,053          209,053          +43,977   ...............
        Management, technology, and production.....................         183,223          193,811          193,811          +10,588   ...............
        Plutonium sustainment......................................         141,909          190,318          159,818          +17,909          -30,500
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Stockpile services.............................         828,763          941,525          911,025          +82,262          -30,500
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Directed stockpile work...........................       1,505,859        1,898,379        1,874,279         +368,420          -24,100

    Campaigns:
        Science campaign:
            Advanced certification.................................          19,400           76,972           56,050          +36,650          -20,922
            Primary assessment technologies........................          83,181           85,723           85,723           +2,542   ...............
            Dynamic materials properties...........................          86,617           96,984          106,984          +20,367          +10,000
            Advanced radiography...................................          28,535           23,594           23,594           -4,941   ...............
            Secondary assessment technologies......................          77,913           81,949           81,949           +4,036   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Science campaign...........................         295,646          365,222          354,300          +58,654          -10,922

        Engineering campaign:
            Enhanced surety........................................          42,000           42,429           42,429             +429   ...............
            Weapons system engineering assessment technology.......          18,000           13,530           21,510           +3,510           +7,980
            Nuclear survivability..................................          21,000           19,786           19,786           -1,214   ...............
            Enhanced surveillance..................................          69,000           66,175           66,175           -2,825   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Engineering campaign.......................         150,000          141,920          149,900             -100           +7,980

        Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high-yield
         campaign:
            Ignition...............................................         106,734          109,506          109,506           +2,772   ...............
            NIF diagnostics, cryogenics, and experimental support..          72,252          102,649          102,649          +30,397   ...............
            Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion...............           5,000            5,000            5,000   ...............  ...............
            Joint program in high-energy density laboratory plasmas           4,000            4,000            4,000   ...............  ...............
            Facility operations and target production..............         269,929          260,393          260,393           -9,536   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Inertial confinement fusion................         457,915          481,548          481,548          +23,633   ...............

        Advanced simulation and computing..........................         567,625          615,748          615,748          +48,123   ...............

        Readiness campaign:
            Stockpile readiness....................................           5,746           18,941           18,941          +13,195   ...............
            High-explosives and weapon operations..................           4,608            3,000            3,000           -1,608   ...............
            Nonnuclear readiness...................................          12,701           21,864           21,864           +9,163   ...............
            Tritium readiness......................................          68,246           50,187           30,229          -38,017          -19,958
            Advanced design and production technologies............           8,699           18,100           18,100           +9,401   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Readiness campaign.........................         100,000          112,092           92,134           -7,866          -19,958
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, Campaigns.....................................       1,571,186        1,716,530        1,693,630         +122,444          -22,900

    Readiness in technical base and facilities [RTBF]:
        Operations of facilities:
            Operations of facilities...............................  ...............       1,257,991   ...............  ...............      -1,257,991
            Kansas City Plant......................................         156,056   ...............         186,102          +30,046         +186,102
            Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.................          86,670   ...............          80,106           -6,564          +80,106
            Los Alamos National Laboratory.........................         311,776   ...............         318,464           +6,688         +318,464
            Nevada Test Site.......................................          79,583   ...............          80,077             +494          +80,077
            Pantex.................................................         131,602   ...............         131,254             -348         +131,254
            Sandia National Laboratory.............................         104,133   ...............         117,369          +13,236         +117,369
            Savannah River Site....................................         128,580   ...............          92,722          -35,858          +92,722
            Y-12 Productions Plant.................................         229,774   ...............         230,927           +1,153         +230,927
            Institutional Site Support.............................         120,129   ...............          40,970          -79,159          +40,970
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Operations of facilities...................       1,348,303        1,257,991        1,277,991          -70,312          +20,000

        Program readiness..........................................          73,021           69,309           69,309           -3,712   ...............
        Material recycle and recovery..............................          69,542           70,429           80,429          +10,887          +10,000
        Containers.................................................          23,392           27,992           27,992           +4,600   ...............
        Storage....................................................          24,708           24,233           24,233             -475   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, RTBF...........................................       1,538,966        1,449,954        1,479,954          -59,012          +30,000

        Construction:
            11-D-801 TA-55 Reinvestment project, LANL..............  ...............          20,000           20,000          +20,000   ...............
            10-D-501 Nuclear facilities risk reduction Y-12                  12,500   ...............  ...............         -12,500   ...............
             National security complex, Oakridge, TN...............
            09-D-007, LANSCE Reinvestment Los Alamos National Lab,           20,000   ...............          30,000          +10,000          +30,000
             Los Alamos, NM........................................
            09-D-404, Test capabilities revitalization II, Sandia             3,200   ...............          11,000           +7,800          +11,000
             National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM................
            08-D-801 High-pressure fire loop [HPFL] Pantex Plant,            31,910   ...............  ...............         -31,910   ...............
             Amarillo, TX..........................................
            08-D-802 High-explosive pressing facility Pantex Plant,  ...............          30,000           30,000          +30,000   ...............
             Amarillo, TX..........................................
            07-D-140 Project Engineering and Design [PED], various   ...............           5,000            5,000           +5,000   ...............
             locations.............................................
            06-D-140 Project Engineering and Design [PED], various           12,000            4,000            4,000           -8,000   ...............
             locations.............................................
            06-D-141 Project Engineering and Design [PED], Y-12              94,000          115,016          115,016          +21,016   ...............
             National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN..............
            06-D-402 NTS replace fire stations 1 & 2 Nevada Test              1,473   ...............  ...............          -1,473   ...............
             Site, NV..............................................
            04-D-125 Chemistry and metallurgy facility replacement           97,000          225,000          225,000         +128,000   ...............
             project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
             NM....................................................
            04-D-128 TA-18 mission relocation project, Los Alamos             1,500   ...............  ...............          -1,500   ...............
             Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM............................
            99-D-141 Pit disassembly and conversion facility, SRS..          30,321   ...............  ...............         -30,321   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction...............................         303,904          399,016          440,016         +136,112          +41,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, RTBF..........................................       1,842,870        1,848,970        1,919,970          +77,100          +71,000

        Secure transportation asset:
            Operations and equipment...............................         138,772          149,018          149,018          +10,246   ...............
            Program direction......................................          96,143           99,027           99,027           +2,884   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Secure transportation asset................         234,915          248,045          248,045          +13,130   ...............

    Nuclear counterterrorism incident response.....................         221,936          233,134          233,134          +11,198   ...............

    Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program.........          83,959           94,000           94,000          +10,041   ...............
        Construction:
            07-D-253 TA 1 Heating Systems Modernization [HSM]                 9,963   ...............  ...............          -9,963   ...............
             Sandia National Laboratory............................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction...............................           9,963   ...............  ...............          -9,963   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization          93,922           94,000           94,000              +78   ...............
               program.............................................

    Site stewardship:
        Site stewardship...........................................          61,288           90,478           85,478          +24,190           -5,000
        Construction:
            11-D-601 Sanitary effluent reclamation facility LANL...  ...............          15,000           15,000          +15,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, Site stewardship..............................          61,288          105,478          100,478          +39,190           -5,000

    Safeguards and security:
        Defense nuclear security...................................         720,044          667,954          667,954          -52,090   ...............

            Construction:
                10-D-701 Security improvements project Y-12 Plant,           49,000   ...............  ...............         -49,000   ...............
                 Oak Ridge, TN.....................................
                08-D-701 Nuclear materials S&S upgrade project Los   ...............          52,000           43,000          +43,000           -9,000
                 Alamos National Laboratory........................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Construction...........................          49,000           52,000           43,000           -6,000           -9,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Subtotal, Defense nuclear security...............         769,044          719,954          710,954          -58,090           -9,000

        Cybersecurity..............................................         122,511          124,345          124,345           +1,834   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Safeguards and security...........................         891,555          844,299          835,299          -56,256           -9,000

    Science, technology, and engineering capability................  ...............          20,000           20,000          +20,000   ...............

    Congressionally directed projects..............................           3,000   ...............  ...............          -3,000   ...............
    Use of prior-year balances.....................................         -42,100   ...............  ...............         +42,100   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES....................................       6,384,431        7,008,835        7,018,835         +634,404          +10,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================

                  DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION

Nonproliferation and verification, R&D.............................         317,300          351,568          362,068          +44,768          +10,500
Nonproliferation and international security........................         187,202          155,930          155,930          -31,272   ...............
International nuclear materials protection and cooperation.........         572,050          590,118          590,118          +18,068   ...............
Elimination of weapons-grade plutonium production program..........          24,507   ...............  ...............         -24,507   ...............

Fissile materials disposition:
    U.S. plutonium disposition.....................................          90,896          278,940          278,940         +188,044   ...............
    U.S. uranium disposition.......................................          34,691           25,985           25,985           -8,706   ...............
    Supporting activities..........................................           1,075   ...............  ...............          -1,075   ...............

    Construction:
        MOX fuel fabrication facilities:
            99-D-143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility,                 504,238          475,788          475,788          -28,450   ...............
             Savannah River, SC....................................
            99-D-141-01 Pit disassembly and conversion facility,     ...............          80,000           50,000          +50,000          -30,000
             Savannah River, SC....................................
            99-D-141-02 Waste solidification building, Savannah              70,000           57,000           57,000          -13,000   ...............
             River, SC.............................................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Construction...............................         574,238          612,788          582,788           +8,550          -30,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposal....         700,900          917,713          887,713         +186,813          -30,000

        Russian surplus materials disposition......................           1,000          113,000           47,500          +46,500          -65,500
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Fissile materials disposition.....................         701,900        1,030,713          935,213         +233,313          -95,500

Global threat reduction initiative.................................         333,500          558,838          568,838         +235,338          +10,000
Congressionally directed projects..................................             250   ...............  ...............            -250   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION......................       2,136,709        2,687,167        2,612,167         +475,458          -75,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================

                           NAVAL REACTORS

Naval reactors development.........................................         877,533          997,886          967,886          +90,353          -30,000

Construction:
    10-D-093, Security upgrades, KAPL..............................           1,500              400              400           -1,100   ...............
    10-D-904, NRF infrastructure upgrades, Idaho...................             700              500              500             -200   ...............
    09-D-190, PED, Infrastructure upgrades, KAPL...................           1,000   ...............  ...............          -1,000   ...............
    09-D-902, NRF Office Building #2, ECC upgrade, Idaho...........           6,400            4,000            4,000           -2,400   ...............
    08-D-190 Project engineering and design, Expended Core Facility           9,500           25,000           25,000          +15,500   ...............
     M-290 recovering discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID
    07-D-190 Materials research technology complex [MRTC]..........          11,700            2,700            2,700           -9,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Construction.......................................          30,800           32,600           32,600           +1,800   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Naval reactors development............................         908,333        1,030,486        1,000,486          +92,153          -30,000

Program direction..................................................          36,800           40,000           40,000           +3,200   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS........................................         945,133        1,070,486        1,040,486          +95,353          -30,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================

                    OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

Office of the Administrator........................................         418,074          448,267          438,267          +20,193          -10,000
Congressionally directed projects..................................          13,000   ...............  ...............         -13,000   ...............
Use of prior-year balances.........................................         -10,320   ...............  ...............         +10,320   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR...........................         420,754          448,267          438,267          +17,513          -10,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION..............       9,887,027       11,214,755       11,109,755       +1,222,728         -105,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                   DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

Closure Sites:
    Closure sites administration...................................           8,225            6,375            6,375           -1,850   ...............
    Miamisburg.....................................................          33,243   ...............  ...............         -33,243   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Closure sites.........................................          41,468            6,375            6,375          -35,093   ...............

Hanford Site:
    Nuclear facility D&D, river corridor closure project...........         327,955   ...............  ...............        -327,955   ...............
    Nuclear material stabilization & disposition PFP...............         118,087   ...............  ...............        -118,087   ...............
    SNF stabilization and disposition..............................          95,325   ...............  ...............         -95,325   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions.......................         541,367   ...............  ...............        -541,367   ...............

    Nuclear facility D&D--remainder of Hanford.....................          70,250   ...............  ...............         -70,250   ...............
    Richland community and regulatory support......................          21,940   ...............  ...............         -21,940   ...............
    Soil & water remediation--groundwater/vadose zone..............         223,766   ...............  ...............        -223,766   ...............
    Solid waste stabilization & disposition--200 area..............         132,757   ...............  ...............        -132,757   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions.......................         448,713   ...............  ...............        -448,713   ...............

    Central plateau remediation:
        Nuclear material stabilization and disposition PFP.........  ...............          64,969           79,969          +79,969          +15,000
        SNF stabilization and disposition..........................  ...............          94,016   ...............  ...............         -94,016
        Solid waste stabilization and disposition 2035.............  ...............         135,026          135,026         +135,026   ...............
        Soil and water remediation--groundwater vadose zone 2035...  ...............         129,629          204,629         +204,629          +75,000
        Nuclear Facility, D&D--remainder of Hanford 2035...........  ...............  ...............          99,641          +99,641          +99,641
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Central plateau remediation....................  ...............         423,640          519,265         +519,265          +95,625

        River corridor and other clean-up operations:
            Nuclear facility D&D--remainder of Hanford 2035........  ...............         139,641   ...............  ...............        -139,641
            Nuclear facility D&D river corridor closure project....  ...............         386,028          380,228         +380,228           -5,800
            Richland community and regulatory support..............  ...............          19,620           25,420          +25,420           +5,800
            SNF Stabilization and disposition......................  ...............  ...............          94,016          +94,016          +94,016
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, River corridor and other clean-up            ...............         545,289          499,664         +499,664          -45,625
               operations..........................................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Total, Hanford Site..................................         990,080          968,929        1,018,929          +28,849          +50,000

Idaho National Laboratory:
    SNF stabilization and disposition--2012........................          34,268           43,337           23,337          -10,931          -20,000
    Solid waste stabilization and disposition......................         143,500          172,631          165,631          +22,131           -7,000
    Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition....          91,850          111,773           97,773           +5,923          -14,000
    06-D-401, Sodium bearing waste treatment project, ID...........          93,700            6,500           12,500          -81,200           +6,000
    11-D-402, PE&D Calcine Disposition Project, Idaho..............  ...............  ...............          15,000          +15,000          +15,000
    Soil and water remediation--2012...............................          91,500           68,959           88,959           -2,541          +20,000
    Nuclear facility D&D...........................................           5,450   ...............  ...............          -5,450   ...............
    Idaho community and regulatory support.........................           3,900            3,900            3,900   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Idaho National Laboratory.............................         464,168          407,100          407,100          -57,068   ...............

NNSA:
    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.........................             910              635              635             -275   ...............
    NNSA Service Center/SPRU.......................................          17,938           15,547           15,547           -2,391   ...............
    Nevada.........................................................          65,674           66,000           66,000             +326   ...............
    California site support........................................             238              238              238   ...............  ...............
    Sandia National Laboratories...................................           2,864   ...............  ...............          -2,864   ...............
    Los Alamos National Laboratory.................................         196,500          196,953          196,953             +453   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites.......................         284,124          279,373          279,373           -4,751   ...............

Oak Ridge Reservation:
    Building 3019..................................................          38,900           50,001           50,001          +11,101   ...............
    Nuclear facility D&D ORNL......................................          44,400           58,101           88,503          +44,103          +30,402
    Nuclear facility D&D Y-12......................................          53,500           63,775           63,775          +10,275   ...............
    Nuclear facility D&D, E. Tenn. Technology Park.................             100               87               87              -13   ...............
    OR reservation community & regulatory support..................           6,253            6,409            6,409             +156   ...............
    Solid waste stabilization and disposition--2012................          35,615           23,925           23,925          -11,690   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Oak Ridge Reservation.................................         178,768          202,298          232,700          +53,932          +30,402

Office of River Protection:
    Waste treatment and immobilization plant:
        01-D-16 A-D................................................         365,000          370,178          370,178           +5,178   ...............
        01-D-16E Pretreatment facility.............................         325,000          370,000          370,000          +45,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Waste treatment and immobilization plant.......         690,000          740,178          740,178          +50,178   ...............

    Tank Farm activities:
        Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition........         408,000          418,000          418,000          +10,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Tank Farm activities...........................         408,000          418,000          418,000          +10,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Office of River Protection........................       1,098,000        1,158,178        1,158,178          +60,178   ...............

Savannah River site:
    Nuclear material stabilization and disposition:
        Nuclear material stabilization and disposition.............         385,310   ...............  ...............        -385,310   ...............
        Construction:
            08-D-414 Project engineering and design plutonium                 6,315   ...............  ...............          -6,315   ...............
             preparation facility, VL..............................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, 2012 accelerated completions...............         391,625   ...............  ...............        -391,625   ...............

    SR community and regulatory support............................          18,300   ...............  ...............         -18,300   ...............
    Spent nuclear fuel stabilization and disposition...............          38,768   ...............  ...............         -38,768   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, 2035 accelerated completions.......................          57,068   ...............  ...............         -57,068   ...............

    Clean-up and waste disposition:
        Savannah River community and regulatory support............  ...............          18,330           18,330          +18,330   ...............

    Site risk management operations:
        NM stabilization and disposition...........................  ...............         370,042          275,542         +275,542          -94,500
        SNF stabilization and disposition..........................  ...............          23,194           13,394          +13,394           -9,800

        Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization:
            Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and          ...............         549,282          653,582         +653,582         +104,300
             disposition...........................................
            Construction:
                05-D-405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah    ...............         256,951          256,951         +256,951   ...............
                 River.............................................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste.............  ...............         806,233          910,533         +910,533         +104,300
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Total, Site risk management operations...........  ...............       1,199,469        1,199,469       +1,199,469   ...............

    Tank Farm activities:
        Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition........         527,138   ...............  ...............        -527,138   ...............
        05-D-405, Salt waste processing facility...................         234,118   ...............  ...............        -234,118   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Tank farm activities...........................         761,256   ...............  ...............        -761,256   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Savannah River site...............................       1,209,949        1,217,799        1,217,799           +7,850   ...............

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant:
    Operate WIPP...................................................         154,902          134,999          134,999          -19,903   ...............
    Central Characterization Project...............................          13,730           25,797           30,797          +17,067           +5,000
    Transportation.................................................          33,851           30,678           35,678           +1,827           +5,000
    Community and regulatory support...............................          27,854           28,771           28,771             +917   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant...........................         230,337          220,245          230,245              -92          +10,000

Program direction..................................................         345,000          323,825          355,000          +10,000          +31,175
Program support....................................................          34,000           25,143           34,000   ...............          +8,857

Safeguards and Security:
    Oak Ridge Reservation..........................................          32,400           17,300           17,300          -15,100   ...............
    Paducah........................................................           8,190            8,496            8,496             +306   ...............
    Portsmouth.....................................................          17,509           15,979           15,979           -1,530   ...............
    Richland/Hanford Site..........................................          82,771           69,234           69,234          -13,537   ...............
    Savannah River Site............................................         132,064          132,064          132,064   ...............  ...............
    Waste Isolation Pilot Project..................................           4,644            4,755            4,755             +111   ...............
    West Valley....................................................           1,859            1,926            1,926              +67   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Safeguards and Security...............................         279,437          249,754          249,754          -29,683   ...............

Technology development.............................................          20,000           32,320           39,685          +19,685           +7,365
Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution...........................         463,000          496,700           33,700         -429,300         -463,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP......................       5,638,331        5,588,039        5,262,838         -375,493         -325,201
                                                                    ====================================================================================
Congressionally directed projects..................................           4,000   ...............  ...............          -4,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.........................       5,642,331        5,588,039        5,262,838         -379,493         -325,201
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                      OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

Health, safety, and security:
    Health, safety and security....................................         337,757          356,471          354,471          +16,714           -2,000
    Program direction..............................................         104,125          107,740          107,740           +3,615   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Health, safety and security...........................         441,882          464,211          462,211          +20,329           -2,000

Office of Legacy Management:
    Legacy management..............................................         177,618          176,122          176,122           -1,496   ...............
    Program direction..............................................          12,184           12,504           12,504             +320   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Office of Legacy Management...........................         189,802          188,626          188,626           -1,176   ...............

Defense-related activities:
    Infrastructure:
        Idaho sitewide safeguards and security.....................          83,358           88,200           88,200           +4,842   ...............

Defense-related administrative support.............................         122,982          118,836          118,836           -4,146   ...............
Office of hearings and appeals.....................................           6,444            6,444            6,444   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Other Defense Activities...........................         844,468          866,317          864,317          +19,849           -2,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================
Acquisitions workforce improvement.................................  ...............          11,892   ...............  ...............         -11,892
Congressionally directed projects..................................           3,000   ...............           2,000           -1,000           +2,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES..............................         847,468          878,209          866,317          +18,849          -11,892
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL.....................................          98,400   ...............  ...............         -98,400   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES......................      16,475,226       17,681,003       17,238,910         +763,684         -442,093
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                  POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS

SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION:
    Operation and maintenance:
        Purchase power and wheeling................................          85,228           88,615           88,615           +3,387   ...............
        Program direction..........................................           7,638            8,034            8,034             +396   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Operation and maintenance......................          92,866           96,649           96,649           +3,783   ...............

    Less alternative financing [PPW]...............................         -14,422          -14,458          -14,458              -36   ...............
    Offsetting collections.........................................         -78,444          -82,191          -82,191           -3,747   ...............
    Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts..............           7,638   ...............  ...............          -7,638   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION.....................           7,638   ...............  ...............          -7,638   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION:
    Operation and maintenance:
        Operating expenses.........................................          13,775           13,676           13,676              -99   ...............
        Purchase power and wheeling................................          48,000           49,000           49,000           +1,000   ...............
        Program direction..........................................          27,153           28,381           28,381           +1,228   ...............
        Construction...............................................           6,016            8,073            8,073           +2,057   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Operation and maintenance......................          94,944           99,130           99,130           +4,186   ...............

    Less alternative financing.....................................         -12,000          -13,818          -13,818           -1,818   ...............
    Offsetting collections.........................................         -69,868          -72,613          -72,613           -2,745   ...............
    Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts..............          31,868   ...............  ...............         -31,868   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION.....................          44,944           12,699           12,699          -32,245   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION:
    Operation and maintenance:
        Construction and rehabilitation............................         104,971          109,887          109,887           +4,916   ...............
        Operation and maintenance..................................          57,159           57,793           57,793             +634   ...............
        Purchase power and wheeling................................         548,847          543,622          543,622           -5,225   ...............
        Program direction..........................................         180,756          193,961          193,961          +13,205   ...............
        Utah mitigation and conservation...........................           7,584            7,627            7,627              +43   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Operation and maintenance......................         899,317          912,890          912,890          +13,573   ...............

    Less alternative financing.....................................        -288,920         -271,895         -271,895          +17,025   ...............
    Offsetting collections (Public Law 108-477, Public Law 109-103)        -349,807         -350,919         -350,919           -1,112   ...............
    Offsetting collections (Public Law 98-381).....................          -3,879           -4,212           -4,212             -333   ...............
    Offsetting collections (for program direction).................        -110,492         -149,036         -149,036          -38,544   ...............
    Offsetting collections (for O&M)...............................         -37,038          -31,270          -31,270           +5,768   ...............
    Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts..............         147,530   ...............  ...............        -147,530   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION.....................         256,711          105,558          105,558         -151,153   ...............

FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND:
    Operation and maintenance......................................           2,568            3,715            3,715           +1,147   ...............
    Offsetting collections.........................................          -2,348           -3,495           -3,495           -1,147   ...............
    Cost of implementing reclassification of receipts..............           2,348   ...............  ...............          -2,348   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND.....           2,568              220              220           -2,348   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS.......................         311,861          118,477          118,477         -193,384   ...............

                FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission...........................         298,000          315,600          315,600          +17,600   ...............
    FERC revenues..................................................        -298,000         -315,600         -315,600          -17,600   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      GRAND TOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY............................      27,111,438       29,613,170       28,346,405       +1,234,967       -1,266,765
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

    The following list of general provisions is recommended by 
the Committee. The recommendation includes several provisions 
which have been included in previous Energy and Water 
Appropriations Acts and new provisions as follows:
    Section 301. Language is included on reprogramming 
authority.
    Section 302. Language is included that prohibits the use of 
funds in this act to initiate a request for proposal or 
expression of interest or other similar arrangements for new 
programs which have not yet been presented to Congress in the 
annual budget submission and which have not yet been approved 
and funded by Congress.
    Section 303. Language is included to address issues under 
section 3161 of Public Law 102-484.
    Section 304. Language is included which permits the 
transfer and merger of unexpended balances of prior 
appropriations with appropriation accounts established in this 
bill.
    Section 305. Language is included specifically authorizing 
intelligence activities pending enactment of the fiscal year 
2011 Intelligence Authorization Act.
    Section 306. The Committee has included a provision related 
to pensions.
    Section 307. Language is included related to the minor 
construction threshold.
    Section 308. The Committee has included a provision related 
to notification of funding awards.
    Section 309. Language is included related to the barter of 
uranium.
    Section 310. Language is included related to notification 
of loan guarantee awards.

                                TITLE IV

                          INDEPENDENT AGENCIES

                    Appalachian Regional Commission

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $76,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      76,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      76,000,000

    Established in 1965, the Appalachian Regional Commission is 
an economic development agency composed of 13 Appalachian 
States and a Federal co-chair appointed by the President. For 
fiscal year 2011, the Committee recommends $76,000,000 for the 
ARC.
    The Committee recognizes the Commission's efforts to 
cooperate with appropriate Federal, regional, State, and local 
entities to help diversify and strengthen the Appalachian 
regional economy. The Committee encourages the Commission to 
explore environmental remediation projects related to 
brownfield sites and abandoned mine lands. The Committee 
encourages the Commission to examine the Appalachian Regional 
Reforestation Initiative, and other initiatives that will 
foster economic development related to forest products, 
ecosystem services, and tourism, by restoring healthy forests 
on a landscape scale. The Committee encourages the Commission 
to coordinate with the Appalachian Coal Country Watershed Team 
within the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and 
Enforcement, Department of the Interior, and the State and 
Private Forestry programs of the U.S. Forest Service.
    The Committee recognizes the importance of trade and 
investment opportunities to the Appalachian Region and is 
encouraged by the findings in a report that Appalachian firms 
could find significant trade and investment opportunities, 
particularly in the energy, high technology, and transportation 
sectors in the Republic of Turkey and the surrounding region. 
In this regard, the Committee supports the Appalachian-Turkish 
Trade Project [ATTP], a project to promote opportunities to 
expand trade, encourage business interests, stimulate foreign 
studies, and to build a lasting and mutually meaningful 
relationship between Appalachian States and the Republic of 
Turkey, as well as the neighboring regions, such as Greece. The 
Committee commends the ARC for its leadership role in helping 
to implement the mission of the ATTP. The Committee expects the 
ARC to continue to be a prominent ATTP sponsor.

                Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board


                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $26,086,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      28,640,000
Committee recommendation................................      26,086,000

    For fiscal year 2011, the Committee recommends $26,086,000, 
for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

                        Delta Regional Authority

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $13,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      13,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      13,000,000

    For the Delta Regional Authority, the Committee recommends 
$13,000,000. The Delta Regional Authority was established to 
assist the eight State Mississippi Delta Region in obtaining 
basic infrastructure, transportation, skills training, and 
opportunities for economic development.

                           Denali Commission

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $11,965,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      11,965,000
Committee recommendation................................      11,965,000

    The Denali Commission is a Federal-State partnership 
responsible for promoting infrastructure development, job 
training, and other economic development services in rural 
areas throughout Alaska. For fiscal year 2011, the Committee 
recommends $11,965,000.

                  Northern Border Regional Commission

Appropriations, 2010....................................      $1,500,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................       1,500,000
Committee recommendation................................................

    The Committee recommends no funding for the Northern Border 
Regional Commission.

                 Southeast Crescent Regional Commission

Appropriations, 2010....................................        $250,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................         250,000
Committee recommendation................................................

    The Committee recommends no funding for the Southeast 
Crescent Regional Commission.

                     Nuclear Regulatory Commission


                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2010....................................  $1,056,000,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................   1,043,483,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,053,483,000

                                REVENUES

Appropriations, 2010....................................   -$902,402,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................    -906,220,000
Committee recommendation................................    -915,220,000

                           NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................    $153,598,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................     137,263,000
Committee recommendation................................     138,263,000

    The Committee recommendation for the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission for fiscal year 2011 is $1,053,483,000, an increase 
of $10,000,000 above the budget request. This amount is offset 
by estimated revenues of $915,220,000 resulting in a net 
appropriation of $138,263,000. The additional $10,000,000 of 
funding supplements the $5,000,000 included in the budget 
request for Nuclear Regulatory Commission participation in an 
Integrated University Program as directed by section 313 of 
Public Law 111-8. The total of $15,000,000 for this program is 
subject to fee recovery consistent with that authorized by the 
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended. The 
Committee recommends $10,000,000 of this amount to be used to 
support university education programs relevant to the NRC 
mission. In addition, not less than $5,000,000 of this amount 
will be used for grants to support research projects that do 
not align with programmatic missions but are critical to 
maintaining the discipline of nuclear science and engineering.
    Fee Recovery.--The Committee recommendation assumes that 
the NRC will recover 90 percent of its budget authority from 
user fees and annual charges, as authorized in the Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended, less the 
appropriation derived from the Nuclear Waste Fund, the amount 
necessary to implement section 3116 of the Ronald W. Reagan 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public 
Law 108-375), and the amount necessary for generic homeland 
security activities of the Commission. Of the $1,053,483,000 
gross appropriation for fiscal year 2012, $10,000,000 is drawn 
from the Nuclear Waste Fund, $524,000 is drawn from the General 
Fund of the Treasury to execute NRC's responsibilities to 
provide oversight of certain Department of Energy activities 
under section 3116 of Ronald W. Reagan National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375), 
and $26,048,000 is drawn from the General Fund of the Treasury 
to execute NRC's homeland security responsibilities. Ninety 
percent of the balance of $1,016,911,000 (i.e., $915,220,000) 
is funded by fees collected from NRC licensees, and the 
remaining 10 percent (i.e., $101,691,000) is funded from the 
General Fund of the Treasury.

                      OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

                          GROSS APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................     $10,860,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................      10,102,000
Committee recommendation................................      10,860,000

                                REVENUES

Appropriations, 2010....................................      $9,774,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................       9,092,000
Committee recommendation................................       9,774,000

                           NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................      $1,086,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................       1,010,000
Committee recommendation................................       1,086,000

    The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $1,086,000, 
an increase of $76,000 over the budget request. The Committee 
directs that the current no year funding authority of the 
Office of Inspector General be retained.

                  Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board

Appropriations, 2010....................................      $3,891,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................       2,490,000
Committee recommendation................................       3,891,000

    The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board was established to 
evaluate the scientific and technical validity of the 
Department of Energy's nuclear waste disposal program. The 
Board reports its findings no fewer than two times a year to 
Congress and to the Secretary of Energy. For fiscal year 2011, 
the Committee recommends $3,891,000.

Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation 
                                Projects

Appropriation, 2009.....................................      $4,466,000
Budget estimate, 2011...................................       4,285,000
Committee recommendation................................       4,285,000

    The Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural 
Gas Transportation Projects was established as an independent 
agency in the executive branch on December 13, 2006, pursuant 
to the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Act of 2004. The Committee 
recommends $4,285,000, the same as the budget request.

                       Tennessee Valley Authority


                      OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

                          GROSS APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................

              OFFSET FROM TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY FUND

Appropriations, 2010....................................................
Budget estimate, 2011...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................


                                TITLE V

                           GENERAL PROVISIONS

    The following list of general provisions are recommended by 
the Committee.
    Section 501. The provision prohibits the use of any funds 
provided in this bill from being used to influence 
congressional action.
    Section 502. The provision addresses transfer authority 
under this act.

  COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on 
general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment 
to the House bill ``which proposes an item of appropriation 
which is not made to carry out the provisions of an existing 
law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution previously 
passed by the Senate during that session.''
    The Committee recommends funding for the following programs 
or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal 
year 2011:
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: General Investigations; 
Construction, General; Mississippi River and Tributaries; 
Operations and Maintenance; Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial 
Action Program;
    Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation;
    Water and Related Resources;
    Department of Energy: Energy Conservation and Supply 
Activities:
    Office of Fossil Energy: Fossil Energy R&D, Clean Coal, 
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Research;
    Health, Safety and Security;
    Non-Defense Environmental Management;
    Office of Science;
    Department of Administration;
    National Nuclear Security Administration: Weapons 
Activities; Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation; Naval Reactors; 
Office of the Administrator;
    Defense Environmental Management, Defense Site Acceleration 
Completion;
    Other Defense Activities;
    Defense Nuclear Waste Fund;
    Office of Security and Performance Assurance;
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
    Power Marketing Administrations: Southeastern, 
Southwestern, Western Area; and
    Energy Information Administration.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 22, 2010, 
theCommittee ordered reported en bloc an original bill (S. 
3636) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and 
Justice, and Science, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2011, and for other purposes; an original 
bill (S. 3635) making appropriations for energy and water 
development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2011, and for other purposes; and an original 
bill making appropriations for the Departments of 
Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and related 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, and for 
other purposes; with each subject to amendment and subject to 
the Committee spending guidance, and authorized the chairman of 
the committee or the chairman of the subcommittee to offer the 
text of the Senate-reported bill as a committee amendment in 
the nature of a substitute to the House companion measure, by a 
recorded vote of 17-12, a quorum being present. The vote was as 
follows:
        Yeas                          Nays
Chairman Inouye                     Mr. Cochran
Mr. Leahy                           Mr. Bond
Mr. Harkin                          Mr. McConnell
Ms. Mikulski                        Mr. Shelby
Mr. Kohl                            Mr. Gregg
Mrs. Murray                         Mr. Bennett
Mr. Dorgan                          Mrs. Hutchison
Mrs. Feinstein                      Mr. Brownback
Mr. Durbin                          Mr. Alexander
Mr. Johnson                         Ms. Collins
Ms. Landrieu                        Mr. Voinovich
Mr. Reed                            Ms. Murkowski
Mr. Lautenberg
Mr. Nelson
Mr. Pryor
Mr. Tester
Mr. Specter

 COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports 
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute 
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or 
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a 
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution 
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof 
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and 
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical 
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the 
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by 
the Committee.''
    In compliance with this rule, changes in existing law 
proposed to be made by the bill are shown as follows: existing 
law to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets; new matter is 
printed in italic; and existing law in which no change is 
proposed is shown in roman.

       WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1996, PUBLIC LAW 104-303


                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 333. PASSAIC RIVER, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 1148 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(100 Stat. 4254) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1148. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN.

    ``(a) Acquisition of Lands.--The Secretary may acquire from 
willing sellers lands on which residential structures are 
located and that are subject to frequent and recurring flood 
damage, as identified in the supplemental floodway report of 
the Corps of Engineers, Passaic River Buyout Study, September 
1995, at an estimated total cost of $194,000,000.
    ``[(b) Retention of Lands for Flood Protection.--Lands 
acquired by the Secretary under this section shall be retained 
by the Secretary for future use in conjunction with flood 
protection and flood management in the Passaic River Basin.]
    (b) Lands individually acquired by the Secretary under this 
section for flood protection and flood management in the 
Passaic River Basin are to held by the Secretary and the non-
Federal sponsor as tenants in common with, thereafter, any 
interest held by the Secretary in such lands to be transferred 
by Quitclaim Deed to the Non-Federal sponsor for consideration 
as is necessary to render the project cost sharing percentages 
to be in compliance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) and such other law as 
may be applicable.
    ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
carrying out this section shall be 25 percent plus any amount 
that might result from application of subsection (d).
    ``(d) Applicability of Benefit-Cost Ratio Waiver 
Authority.--In evaluating and implementing the project under 
this section, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal 
interest to participate in the financing of the project in 
accordance with section 903(c), to the extent that the 
Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.''.
    (e) Funds for Land Acquisition.--Funds for acquiring such 
lands as are necessary in carrying out the requirements of this 
section and requirements as further recommended by the 
Secretary shall include funds as provided in subsection (c) and 
(d) of this section herein and also funds as previously 
appropriated with any and all such funds to be held by the 
Secretary for use in acquiring the requisite lands in 
proportion to the project cost sharing percentages.
                                ------                                


       WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT, 2000, PUBLIC LAW 106-541


                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 529. LAS VEGAS, NEVADA.

    (a) Definitions.-- * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

    (b) Participation in Project.-- * * *
            (1) In general.-- * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated [$20,000,000] $30,000,00 
        to carry out this section.
                                ------                                


 ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004, PUBLIC LAW 108-
                                  137


                                TITLE I


                      DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL


                         DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY


                       Corps of Engineers--Civil


                           GENERAL PROVISIONS

                       CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL

    Sec. 117. Section 595 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat. 142) is amended--
            (1) by striking the section heading and inserting 
        the following:

``SEC. 595. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, AND RURAL 
                    UTAH.'';

            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 
                (3) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), 
                respectively;
                    (B) by striking (a) and all that follows 
                through ``means--'' and inserting the 
                following:
    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Rural nevada.--The term `rural Nevada' 
        means''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Rural utah.--The term `rural Utah' means--
                    ``(A) the counties of Box Elder, Cache, 
                Rich, Tooele, Morgan, Summit, Dagett, Wasatch, 
                Duchesne, Uintah, Juab, Sanpete, Carbon, 
                Millard, Sevier, Emery, Grand, Beaver, Piute, 
                Wayne, Iron, Garfield, San Juan, and Kane, 
                Utah[; and];
                    ``(B) the portions of Washington County, 
                Utah, that are located outside the city of St. 
                George, Utah[.]; and'';
                    (C) the portions of Utah County and Weber 
                Counties that are located outside of a 
                political subdivision, the population of which 
                is greater than 10,000 residents.
                                ------                                


      WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007, PUBLIC LAW 110-114


                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 3001. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

    Section 111 of title I of division C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (118 Stat. 2944) is amended to read as 
follows:

``SEC. 111. BLACK WARRIOR-TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALABAMA.

    ``(a) * * *
            ``(1) * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

            (3) may grant to the City of Tuscaloosa a long term 
        lease or license agreement for any portion of the 
        Parcel not required for construction of the new 
        administrative facility under subsection (a) 
        (2)(c)until such time as the City of Tuscaloosa is 
        prepared to take fee simple title per the provisions of 
        subsection(b)(2).
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $32,000,000.''.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *


SEC. 3113. WESTERN SARPY AND CLEAR CREEK, NEBRASKA.

    The project for ecosystem restoration and flood damage 
reduction, Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, Nebraska, authorized 
by section 101(b)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2000 (114 Stat. 2578), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
to construct the project at a total cost of [$21,664,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $14,082,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $7,582,000.] $38,800,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $25,220,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $13,580,000.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                                    SEC. 3182. LAND CONVEYANCES.
    (a)* * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

    (j) Denison, Texas.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        offer to convey at fair market value to the city of 
        Denison, Texas, all right, title, and interest of the 
        United States in and to the approximately 900 acres of 
        land located in Grayson County, Texas, which is 
        currently subject to an application for lease for 
        public park and recreational purposes made by the city 
        of Denison, dated August 17, 2005.
            (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact 
        acreage and description of the real property referred 
        to in paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey 
        paid for by the city of Denison, Texas, that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (3) Conveyance.--Not later than 90 days after the 
        date of acceptance by the city of Denison, Texas, of an 
        offer under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall convey 
        the land surveyed under paragraph (2) by quitclaim deed 
        to the city of Denison, Texas.
    (k) St. Charles County, Missouri.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
        definitions apply:
                    (A) Federal land.--The term `Federal land' 
                means the 1 parcel of Corps of Engineers land 
                totaling approximately 84 acres, located U.S. 
                Survey No. 1838, Township 48 North, Range 6 
                East.
                    (B) Non-federal land.--The term `non-
                Federal land' means the approximately 70 acres 
                of land, subject to any existing easements 
                situated in Jersey County, Illinois, adjacent 
                to existing Corps fee title land.
            (2) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraph (3), on 
        conveyance by Ameren U.E. to the United States of all 
        right, title, and interest in and to the non-Federal 
        land, the Secretary shall convey to Ameren U.E., all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and 
        to the Federal land.
            (3) Conditions.--
                    (A) Deeds.--
                            (i) Non-federal land.--The 
                        conveyance of the non-Federal land to 
                        the Secretary shall be by a warranty 
                        deed acceptable to the Secretary.
                            (ii) Federal land.--The conveyance 
                        of the Federal land to Ameren U.E., 
                        shall be--
                                    (I) by quitclaim deed; and
                                    (II) subject to any 
                                reservations, terms, and 
                                conditions that the Secretary 
                                determines to be necessary to 
                                allow the United States to 
                                operate and maintain the 
                                Mississippi River 9-Foot 
                                Navigation Project.
                            (iii) Legal descriptions.--The 
                        Secretary shall provide a legal 
                        description of the Federal land, and 
                        Ameren U.E., shall provide a legal 
                        description of the non-Federal land, 
                        for inclusion in the deeds referred to 
                        in clauses (i) and (ii).
                    (B) Removal of improvements.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary may 
                        require the removal of, or Ameren U.E., 
                        may voluntarily remove, any 
                        improvements to the non-Federal land 
                        before the completion of the exchange 
                        or as a condition of the exchange.
                            ``(ii) No liability.--If Ameren 
                        U.E., removes any improvements to the 
                        non-Federal land under clause (i)--
                                    (I) Ameren U.E., shall have 
                                no claim against the United 
                                States relating to the removal; 
                                and
                                    (II) the United States 
                                shall not incur or be liable 
                                for any cost associated with 
                                the removal or relocation of 
                                the improvements.
                    (C) Administrative costs.--The Secretary 
                shall require Ameren U.E. to pay reasonable 
                administrative costs associated with the 
                exchange.
                    (D) Cash equalization payment.--If the 
                appraised fair market value, as determined by 
                the Secretary, of the Federal land exceeds the 
                appraised fair market value, as determined by 
                the Secretary, of the non-Federal land, Ameren 
                U.E. shall make a cash equalization payment to 
                the United States.
                    (E) Deadline.--The land exchange under 
                subparagraph (B) shall be completed not later 
                than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
                this Act.
    [(k)] (l) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact 
        acreage and the legal description of any real property 
        to be conveyed under this section shall be determined 
        by a survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (2) Applicability of property screening 
        provisions.--Section 2696 of title 10, United States 
        Code, shall not apply to any conveyance under this 
        section.
            (3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary 
        may require that any conveyance under this section be 
        subject to such additional terms and conditions as the 
        Secretary considers appropriate and necessary to 
        protect the interests of the United States.
            (4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a 
        conveyance is made under this section shall be 
        responsible for all reasonable and necessary costs, 
        including real estate transaction and environmental 
        documentation costs, associated with the conveyance.
            (5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is 
        made under this section shall hold the United States 
        harmless from any liability with respect to activities 
        carried out, on or after the date of the conveyance, on 
        the real property conveyed. The United States shall 
        remain responsible for any liability with respect to 
        activities carried out, before such date, on the real 
        property conveyed.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *


                         TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS

SEC. 5067. IDAHO, MONTANA, RURAL NEVADA, NEW MEXICO, RURAL UTAH, AND 
                    WYOMING.

    (a) * * *

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

    ``(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2001 [$150,000,000 for rural Nevada] 
$200,000,000 for rural Nevada, $75,000,000 for Montana, 
$25,000,000 for New Mexico, $55,000,000 for Idaho, $100,000,000 
for rural Utah, and $30,000,000 for Wyoming. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.''.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                                ------                                


       CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2008, PUBLIC LAW 110-161


                                TITLE II


                       DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


             General Provisions, Department of the Interior

    Sec. 208. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
of amounts made available under section 2507 of the Farm 
Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (43 U.S.C. 2211 note; 
Public Law 107-171), the Secretary of the Interior--
            (1) acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation, 
        shall use--
                    (A) subject to subsection (b), $3,000,000 
                for activities necessary to convey to the State 
                of Nevada the land known as the ``Carson Lake 
                and Pasture'', as authorized by section 206(e) 
                of the Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Water Rights 
                Settlement Act (Public Law 101-618: 104 Stat. 
                3311);

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                    (C) in consultation with the Corps of 
                Engineers, as applicable, $5,000,000 to study 
                and prepare plans for the development and 
                construction of a pipeline to convey water from 
                Dixie Valley to Churchill County, Nevada; and
                    [(D) $10,000,000 for--
                            [(i) design and construction of the 
                        Derby Dam fish screen to allow passage 
                        of fish, including the cui-ui and 
                        Lahontan cutthroat trout; and
                            [(ii) any improvements to Derby Dam 
                        necessary to make the fish screen 
                        operable;
                    [(E) $6,000,000 for the acquisition of not 
                more than 4 small hydroelectric power plants 
                from the Sierra Pacific Power Company to 
                improve water allocation and fish passage in 
                the Truckee River; and]
                    [(F)] (D) $6,000,000 for Lower Truckee 
                River restoration projects identified by the 
                cities of Reno and Sparks, Nevada, and Washoe 
                County, Nevada;

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

            (3) shall allocate $1,000,000 to the Summit Lake 
        Paiute Tribe to plan and complete [restoration efforts 
        at the Summit Lake in Northern Washoe County] 
        restoration and environmental protection efforts at the 
        Summit Lake in Humboldt County, Nevada, for the benefit 
        of the Tribe because of their status as Indians;
                                ------                                


ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS, 2010, 
                           PUBLIC LAW 111-85


                                TITLE II


                       DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


             General Provisions--Department of the Interior

    Sec. 208. (a) Of the amounts made available under section 
2507 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (43 
U.S.C. 2211 note; Public Law 107-171), the Secretary of the 
Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation, 
shall--
            (1) provide, subject to subsection (b), 
        [$66,200,000] $81,200,000 to establish the Walker Basin 
        Restoration Program for the primary purpose of 
        restoring and maintaining Walker Lake, a natural desert 
        terminal lake in the State of Nevada, consistent with 
        protection of the ecological health of the Walker River 
        and the riparian and watershed resources of the West, 
        East, and Main Walker Rivers, and including associated 
        activities that enhance recovery of the federally 
        threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout; and

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

    (b)(1) The amount made available under subsection (a)(1) 
shall be--
            (A) * * *
            (B) * * *
                    (i) * * *
                            (I) to administer and manage a 3-
                        year or longer water leasing 
                        demonstration program in the Walker 
                        Lake inflows; and

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                    (vi) $200,000 to support alternative crops 
                and alternative agricultural cooperatives 
                programs in Lyon and Mineral Counties, Nevada, 
                that promote water conservation in the Walker 
                River Basin.
                    (vii) $15,000,000 to be used as described 
                in subparagraph (A), as determined by the 
                National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.

                        BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL


  PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
                                                     AMENDED
                                            [In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Budget authority               Outlays
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                                              Committee    Amount  of    Committee    Amount  of
                                                             guidance\1\      bill      guidance\1\      bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee spending
 guidance to its subcommittees for 2011: Subcommittee on
 Energy and Water Development:
    Mandatory.............................................  ............  ...........  ............  ...........
    Discretionary.........................................        34,968       34,968            NA    \2\45,782
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
    2011..................................................  ............  ...........  ............    \3\20,301
    2012..................................................  ............  ...........  ............        9,675
    2013..................................................  ............  ...........  ............        3,238
    2014..................................................  ............  ...........  ............          630
    2015 and future years.................................  ............  ...........  ............          874
Financial assistance to State and local governments for               NA           93            NA           19
 2011.....................................................

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There is no section 302(a) allocation to the Committee on Appropriations for fiscal year 2011.
\2\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\3\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

         DISCLOSURE OF CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS

    The Constitution vests in the Congress the power of the 
purse. The Committee believes strongly that Congress should 
make the decisions on how to allocate the people's money.
    As defined in Rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the 
Senate, the term ``congressional directed spending item'' means 
a provision or report language included primarily at the 
request of a Senator, providing, authorizing, or recommending a 
specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit 
authority, or other spending authority for a contract, loan, 
loan guarantee, grant, loan authority, or other expenditure 
with or to an entity, or targeted to a specific State, locality 
or congressional district, other than through a statutory or 
administrative, formula-driven, or competitive award process.
    For each item, a Member is required to provide a 
certification that neither the Member nor the Senator's 
immediate family has a pecuniary interest in such 
congressionally directed spending item. Such certifications are 
available to the public on the Web site of the Senate Committee 
on Appropriations (www.appropriations.senate.gov/senators.cfm).
    Following is a list of congressionally directed spending 
items included in the Senate recommendation discussed in this 
report, along with the name of each Senator who submitted a 
request to the Committee of jurisdiction for each item so 
identified. Neither the Committee recommendation nor this 
report contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff 
benefits as defined in rule XLIV.

                                                                             CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Agency                              Account                                              Project title                                 Funding                  Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ABILENE, TX (BRAZOS RIVER BASIN--ELM CREEK).........................        $200,000  Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ALISO CREEK, CA.....................................................        $250,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  AMITE RIVER--ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA..............................        $250,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY LEVEE, MD &         $250,000  Mikulski, Cardin
                                                                           DC.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OK.........................................      $1,650,000  Inhofe
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ARROYO SECO WATERSHED, CA...........................................        $150,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES, MD..........................         $50,000  Cardin
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  BLOOMSBURG, PA......................................................        $500,000  Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  BOSSIER PARISH, LA..................................................        $250,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL), MA.................................      $1,800,000  Kerry
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  BRUSH CREEK BASIN, KS & MO..........................................        $200,000  Bond, Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER BASIN, GREELEY, CO............................        $150,000  M. Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CALCASIEU RIVER BASIN, LA...........................................        $250,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL................................................        $500,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CEDAR RIVER, CEDAR RAPIDS, IA.......................................      $3,000,000  Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CENTRAL VALLEY INTEGRATED FLOOD MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA................        $500,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CENTRALIA, CHEHALIS RIVER, LEWIS COUNTY, WA.........................        $500,000  Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CHATFIELD REALLOCATION STUDY, CO....................................        $267,000  Bennet, M. Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN, WA............................................        $500,000  Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CHESAPEAKE BAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD & VA..........................        $150,000  Mikulski
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CHESAPEAKE BAY MARSHLANDS, MD.......................................         $50,000  Cardin
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CHESAPEAKE BAY SUSQUEHANNA RESERVOIR SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT, PA, MD, &         $250,000  Mikulski, Cardin
                                                                           VA.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CHOWAN RIVER, VA & NC...............................................        $124,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CLINCH RIVER WATERSHED, VA..........................................        $200,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CLINTON RIVER RIPARIAN CORRIDOR, MI.................................        $100,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CT, MA, NH, & VT...........        $350,000  Leahy, Dodd, Lieberman, Kerry
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  COYOTE DAM, CA......................................................        $250,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  CROSS LAKE, LA......................................................         $50,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  DALLAS FLOODWAY, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX......................      $1,600,000  Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  DELAWARE RIVER DREDGED MATERIAL UTILIZATION, PA, DE & NJ............        $200,000  Kaufman, Specter
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  DISMAL SWAMP & DISMAL SWAMP CANAL, VA...............................         $22,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  DUTCHESS COUNTY WATERSHEDS, NY......................................        $100,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ECORSE CREEK, MI....................................................        $200,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ELLIOT BAY SEAWALL, WA..............................................        $500,000  Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ESPANOLA VALLEY, RIO GRANDE AND TRIBUTARIES, NM.....................        $250,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  FARGO-MOORHEAD UPSTREAM STUDY, ND & MN (RRN BASIN AUTHORITY)........        $200,000  Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  FLAGLER COUNTY, FL..................................................        $287,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  FORGE RIVER WATERSHED, NY...........................................        $400,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  FOUR MILE RUN, VA...................................................         $53,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA...................................        $200,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  GRAND (NEOSHO) RIVER BASIN WATERSHED, OK, KS, MO & AR...............        $190,000  Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS & SEDIMENT REMEDIATION, MI, IL,           $500,000  Voinovich, Levin, Stabenow,
                                                                           IN, MN, NY, OH, PA, & WI.                                                             Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  HILO HARBOR MODIFICATIONS, HI.......................................        $300,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  HOMER HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, AK............................        $300,000  Murkowski
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  HUMBOLDT, IA........................................................        $175,000  Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION, IL................................        $350,000  Durbin, Burris
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES--MISSISSIPPI RIVER AQUATIC                $350,000  Voinovich, Durbin, Levin,
                                                                           NUISANCE SPECIES, IL, IN, OH, WI.                                                     Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  JAMES RIVER, ND.....................................................        $150,000  Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  LANSING GRAND RIVER WATERFRONT RESTORATION, MI......................        $150,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA [LACDA] WATER CONSERVATION AND             $200,000  Feinstein
                                                                           SUPPLY, WHITTIER NARROWS DAM, CA.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA.........................        $200,000  Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY, WOODLAND AND VICINITY, CA...........        $100,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA.............................................        $250,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO,        $150,000  Pryor, Lincoln, Wicker
                                                                           & TN.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  LOWER SADDLE RIVER, NJ..............................................        $200,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MANHATTAN, KS.......................................................        $300,000  Brownback, Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MATILIJA DAM, CA....................................................        $100,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MAY BRANCH, FORT SMITH, AR..........................................        $250,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA...........................................        $250,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MIDDLE CREEK, CA....................................................        $400,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MIDDLE POTOMAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MD, VA, PA, WV, & DC.............         $68,000  Cardin
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MILE POINT, FL......................................................        $475,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, UNITS L-455 & R-460-471, MO & KS.......        $150,000  Bond, Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  MISSOURI RIVER, ND, MT, SD, NE, IA, KS, & MO........................      $5,000,000  Dorgan, Harkin, Conrad
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  NEW JERSEY SHORE PROTECTION, HEREFORD INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ...        $250,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  NEW JERSEY SHORELINE ALTERNATIVE LONG-TERM NOURISHMENT, NJ..........        $200,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  NEW RIVER, CLAYTOR LAKE, VA.........................................        $150,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  NORTH CAROLINA INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL, NC...........................        $300,000  Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND, ASHAROKEN, NY...........................        $100,000  Schumer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  OHIO RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE STUDY, WV, KY, OH, PA, IL, IN, VA,         $3,000,000  Voinovich, Bunning, Rockefeller
                                                                           AL, TN, NY, MD, NC, MS, & GA.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PAJARO RIVER, CA....................................................        $300,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PASSAIC RIVER MAIN STEM, NJ & NY....................................        $125,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PASSAIC RIVER, HARRISON, NJ.........................................        $160,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PEARL RIVER WATERSHED, MS...........................................        $200,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PECKMAN RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, NJ...................................        $620,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PINE MOUNTAIN DAM, AR...............................................        $250,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PORT OF IBERIA, LA..................................................      $1,000,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER TURNING BASIN, NH............        $150,000  Shaheen
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PRAIRIE DUPONT LEVEE AND SANITARY DISTRICT AND FISH LAKE DRAINAGE           $850,000  Durbin, Burris
                                                                           AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  PUYALLUP RIVER, WA..................................................        $450,000  Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  RAHWAY RIVER BASIN, NJ..............................................        $250,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, HIGHLANDS, NJ.......................        $207,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, LEONARDO, NJ........................        $100,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, UNION BEACH, NJ.....................        $125,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  RED CLAY CREEK, CHRISTINA RIVER WATERSHED, DE.......................        $100,000  Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN, ND, MN, SD & MANITOBA, CANADA.........      $1,463,000  Dorgan, Klobuchar, Conrad
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA.............................................        $200,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  RIVER DES PERES, MO.................................................         $45,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX..........................................        $400,000  Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOOD CONTROL [GRR], CA (SYSTEM EVALUATION)........        $600,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SAC-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, DELTA ISLANDS AND LEVEES, CA.................        $282,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHORELINE, CA (OCEANSIDE)..........................        $200,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SAN FRANCISQUITO CREEK, CA..........................................        $300,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, FRAZIER CREEK, CA..........................        $150,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA................        $500,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WEST STANISLAUS COUNTY, ORESTIMBA CREEK,           $223,000  Feinstein
                                                                           CA.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, WHITE RIVER AND DRY CREEK, CA..............        $150,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED, CA.....................................        $250,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SARASOTA, LIDO KEY BEACH, FL........................................        $250,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME................................................        $300,000  Collins
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SHEYENNE RIVER, ND..................................................        $150,000  Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SKAGIT RIVER, WA....................................................      $1,137,000  Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SKOKOMISH RIVER BASIN, WA...........................................        $300,000  Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SOUTH RIVER, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NJ................................        $200,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE, CA...................................        $500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SOUTH SHORE OF STATEN ISLAND, NY....................................        $250,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SOUTHEAST OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCE STUDY, OK.........................        $325,000  Inhofe
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA................      $1,000,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA, EL PASO COUNTY, TX...........................        $200,000  Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ST. CHARLES PARISH URBAN FLOOD CONTROL, LA..........................        $350,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  ST. HELENA--NAPA RIVER, CA..........................................        $150,000  Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  STONY BROOK, MILLSTONE RIVER BASIN, NJ..............................        $250,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SUN VALLEY WATERSHED, CA............................................        $200,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND LOW FLOW              $250,000  Mikulski
                                                                           MANAGEMENT, NY, PA, & MD.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  TEN MILE RIVER, DUTCHESS COUNTY, NY AND LITCHFIELD COUNTY, CT.......        $100,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  TIJUANA RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, CA.........................         $50,000  Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  TOPEKA, KS..........................................................        $400,000  Brownback, Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV.................................................      $4,500,000  Reid, Ensign
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  UPPER MISS RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IL, IA, MO, MN, & WI............        $750,000  Harkin, Durbin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER--ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO, & WI...      $4,000,000  Durbin, Harkin, Burris, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION SYSTEM STUDY, PA..............................        $451,000  Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  UPPER TURKEY CREEK, KS..............................................         $90,000  Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  VALDEZ NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, AK..................................        $500,000  Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WALLA WALLA WATERSHED, OR & WA......................................        $500,000  Murray, Wyden, Merkley, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WALTON COUNTY, FL...................................................        $250,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WASHITA RIVER BASIN, OK.............................................        $325,000  Inhofe
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WEST MAUI WATERSHED, MAUI, HI.......................................        $100,000  Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WEST SHORE--LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA..................................        $350,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WESTCHESTER COUNTY STREAMS, BYRAM RIVER FLOOD REDUCTION, CT &  NY...        $100,000  Dodd, Lieberman, Schumer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OH, IN, & MI...............................      $2,000,000  Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, PA.....................          $4,000  Casey
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WESTMINSTER, EAST GARDEN GROVE, CA..................................        $279,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WHITE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, AR & MO............................        $250,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR............................        $200,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR, MT......................................        $300,000  Tester, Baucus
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  General Investigation Items not listed under states.................  ..............  ................................
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION:
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................      PACIFIC ISLANDS LAND OCEAN TYPHOON EXPERIMENT...................      $1,000,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................      SURGE AND WAVE ISLAND MOORING STUDIES...........................      $1,000,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................      FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES:
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          DELAWARE DAM SAFETY, DE.....................................        $250,000  Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          NUUANU (OAHU), HI...........................................        $200,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................           WAIOHULI GULCH (MAUI), HI..................................        $200,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          WAIMEA (KAUAI), HI..........................................        $200,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          ANAHOLA (KAUAI), HI.........................................        $200,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          HURRICANE EVACUATION STUDIES, HI............................        $300,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................       DES MOINES RIVER REGULATED FREQUENCY CURVE AND SAYLORVILLE AND          $80,000  Grassley
                                                                                RED ROCK RESERVOIRS POOL ELEVATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES, IA.
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          IOWA LIDAR, IA..............................................        $100,000  Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          URBAN LEVEE EVALUATIONS, MUSCATINE, IA......................         $60,000  Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          WICHITA AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN, KS.......................        $300,000  Brownback, Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LOUISIANA, LA [GIS].....................        $400,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, LA [GIS]................................        $400,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, LA [GIS]...........................        $200,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          LIVINGSTON PARISH, LA [GIS].................................        $500,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          AU TRAIN, MI................................................         $75,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          PAPILLION CREEK WATERSHED, NE...............................        $430,000  Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          OTERO COUNTY, NM............................................        $100,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          SOUTHEASTERN, PA............................................        $250,000  Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          ABINGDON, VA................................................         $55,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES:
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................      OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS:
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          LAKE TAHOE..................................................        $900,000  Reid, Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................      PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES:
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          AUGUSTA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, AR..........................         $50,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          DELAWARE DAM SAFETY, DE.....................................        $250,000  Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          SUSUPE/CHALAN KANOA DRAINAGE PLAN [CNMI]....................        $160,000  Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          PALA LAGOON (AMERICAN SAMOA)................................        $200,000  Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT, HI........        $250,000  Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          HE'EIA WATERSHED, HI........................................        $100,000  Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          PALMYRA ATOLL...............................................        $100,000  Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          STATE OF HAWAII GENERAL FLOOD CONTROL PLAN UPDATE...........        $190,000  Inouye, Akaka
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          GREENWAYS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, DES MOINES, IA................        $100,000  Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          LOWER NISHNABOTNA RIVER BASIN, IA...........................        $100,000  Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          MIDDLE AMANA, IA............................................         $74,000  Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          SHUNGANUNGA CREEK, KS.......................................        $100,000  Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          CHOCTAW COUNTY RESERVOIR, MS................................         $50,000  Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          GENESEE RIVER SEDIMENT STUDY, NY............................        $250,000  Schumer
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          OKLAHOMA COMPREHENSIVE WATER PLAN, OK.......................        $500,000  Inhofe
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................          DRIFT CREEK RESERVOIR PROJECT, OR...........................         $20,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM..........................................      $1,600,000  Johnson, Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT............................................      $5,000,000  Cochran
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................      SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION, MD & VA...........................      $1,000,000  Cardin
Corps of Engineers.............  General Investigations.................      URBAN FLOOD DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, DRI, NV......................      $2,000,000  Reid
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM......................................      $2,770,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ALAMOGORDO, NM......................................................      $4,200,000  Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ALASKA COASTAL EROSION, AK..........................................      $2,000,000  Murkowski
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ANTELOPE CREEK, LINCOLN, NE.........................................        $315,000  Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ASCENSION PARISH ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, LA...................        $160,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ATLANTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, GA............................      $1,000,000  Chambliss, Isakson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET,          $300,000  Schumer
                                                                           LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY.
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND, MD......................................      $3,100,000  Mikulski, Cardin
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN WATER RESOURCES, GWYNNS FALLS, MD............        $200,000  Cardin
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BARNEGAT INLET TO LITTLE EGG HARBOR INLET, NJ.......................      $7,600,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BETHEL RIVER BANK STABILIZATION, AK.................................      $3,000,000  Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BIG SIOUX RIVER, SIOUX FALLS, SD....................................      $3,000,000  Johnson, Thune
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO...................................        $550,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BRECKENRIDGE, MN....................................................        $407,000  Klobuchar
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, ABSECON ISLAND, NJ......        $400,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET, BRIGANTINE ISLAND, NJ...         $80,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, NC........................................        $350,000  Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, DMMP, LA..................................      $1,000,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CALFED LEVEE STABILITY PROGRAM, CA..................................      $5,000,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CENTRAL CITY, FORT WORTH, UPPER TRINITY RIVER BASIN, TX.............      $4,815,000  Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CENTRAL NEW MEXICO, NM..............................................      $1,000,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION, MD, VA, &        $1,000,000  Mikulski, Cardin, Webb, Warner
                                                                           PA.
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CHESTERFIELD, MO....................................................        $500,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL..............      $5,900,000  Voinovich, Durbin, Levin,
                                                                                                                                                                 Stabenow, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  COMITE RIVER, LA....................................................      $8,000,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA..............................................        $500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  CUMBERLAND COUNTY WATER SUPPLY, TN..................................        $210,000  Alexander
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX................     $20,500,000  Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, BROADKILL BEACH, DE.........................        $250,000  Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, DE & NJ, OAKWOOD BEACH......................        $250,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE.......................................        $390,000  Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, BETHANY BEACH TO         $4,700,000  Carper, Kaufman
                                                                           SOUTH BETHANY, DE.
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, FENWICK ISLAND,  DE        $150,000  Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, REHOBOTH BEACH AND         $150,000  Carper, Kaufman
                                                                           DEWEY BEACH, DE.
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL DEEPENING, DE, NJ, & PA.........      $7,000,000  Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA.....................      $3,200,000  Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DES PLAINES RIVER, IL...............................................      $3,500,000  Durbin
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  DESOTO COUNTY, MS...................................................     $12,000,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH [FC], LA....................................      $3,000,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, LA............        $500,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, NY...........      $1,000,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  EAST ST. LOUIS, IL..................................................      $1,000,000  Durbin
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  FARGO, ND--MOORHEAD, MN.............................................     $20,000,000  Dorgan
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  FARMINGTON RECHARGE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM, CA.......................        $500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY..............................      $3,500,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS, FL.........................      $2,800,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  FORT PECK CABIN CONVEYANCE, MT......................................      $1,000,000  Tester, Baucus
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  FORT WAYNE, ST. MARY'S, AND MAUMEE RIVERS, IN (GREENWOOD AVENUE TOE         $165,000  Lugar
                                                                           DRAIN).
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  GRAFTON, ND.........................................................      $3,000,000  Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET TO TOWNSENDS INLET, NJ.......................      $2,000,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, MI...................      $2,000,000  Voinovich, Levin, Stabenow,
                                                                                                                                                                 Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WV..........................................      $1,500,000  Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  GUADALUPE RIVER, CA.................................................        $200,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ..........................................        $300,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  HAINES HARBOR, AK...................................................        $500,000  Murkowski
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  HAMILTON DAM, FLINT RIVER, FLINT, MI................................      $1,000,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  HARBOR/SOUTH BAY WATER RECYCLING PROJECT, LOS ANGELES, CA...........      $2,000,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  HAWAII WATER MANAGEMENT, HI.........................................      $2,000,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  HOLES CREEK, WEST CARROLLTON, OH....................................      $1,000,000  Voinovich
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ISLAND CREEK, LOGAN, WV.............................................      $5,000,000  Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA....................................      $5,500,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  JOHNSON CREEK, UPPER TRINITY BASIN, ARLINGTON, TX...................        $500,000  Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER WATERFRONT, NJ.......................      $3,000,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  KAHUKU, HI..........................................................      $4,590,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  KENAI RIVER BLUFF EROSION, AK.......................................      $2,500,000  Murkowski
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA......................................        $500,000  Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  LAKE CHAMPLAIN WATERSHED INITIATIVE, VT.............................        $500,000  Leahy, Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA, & KY.......      $2,750,000  Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, ID......................................        $150,000  Crapo, Risch
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  LOS ANGELES RIVER DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS, CA........................      $1,000,000  Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WV.........................................      $1,500,000  Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MANATEE HARBOR, FL..................................................        $100,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK LEVEE, MO..........................      $2,000,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM.........        $500,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MID-VALLEY AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA............................      $1,500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MISSISSIPPI ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MS........................     $18,000,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT, MO..............      $1,200,000  Harkin
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (UNIT L-385), IA, NE, KS, MO............      $1,500,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, ND......................................        $500,000  Conrad
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION, SD......................................        $300,000  Johnson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.................................      $1,000,000  Murray
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MUDDY RIVER, MA.....................................................      $2,000,000  Kerry
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  MURRIETA CREEK, CA..................................................      $3,500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  NAPA RIVER, CA......................................................      $2,100,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY.........................................      $1,000,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA.........................      $1,000,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  NORTH DAKOTA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, ND.......................     $14,300,000  Dorgan
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL.............................        $300,000  Durbin
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  OAKLAND COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, MI.....................        $500,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, OH:
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................      EUCLID, OH......................................................      $1,100,000  Voinovich
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................      PORTSMOUTH CSO MITIGATION, OH...................................        $500,000  Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................      TOLEDO WATERWAYS INITIATIVE PHASE 2, OH.........................      $1,000,000  Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  OHIO RIVERFRONT, CINCINNATI, OH.....................................      $3,000,000  Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ONONDAGA LAKE, NY...................................................      $1,000,000  Schumer
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA...........................................      $1,000,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  OZARK-JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE, AR....................................     $12,900,000  Pryor
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL (DELRAY BEACH REIMBURSEMENT)..................        $680,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NJ............................        $500,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  PINELLAS COUNTY, FL.................................................      $2,500,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  PLACER COUNTY, CA...................................................      $1,000,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WA.....................      $3,000,000  Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RARITAN & SANDY HOOK BAY, PORT MONMOUTH, NJ.........................      $1,500,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK...........................      $2,800,000  Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, AR, LA, & TX...........................      $2,500,000  Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION, AR, LA, OK, & TX...............      $2,000,000  Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ROSEAU, MN (RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN)...........................      $2,500,000  Klobuchar, Franken
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RURAL IDAHO, ID.....................................................      $2,000,000  Crapo, Risch
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RURAL MONTANA, MT...................................................      $5,000,000  Tester, Baucus
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RURAL NEVADA, NV....................................................     $20,000,000  Reid, Ensign
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RURAL UTAH, UT......................................................     $25,000,000  Bennett
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CA..............        $700,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA...................................        $500,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA..............................................      $2,500,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SAN RAMON VALLEY RECYCLED WATER, CA.................................        $459,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SANDBRIDGE, VA......................................................        $300,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ....................................      $2,000,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SAULT STE. MARIE (REPLACEMENT LOCK), MI.............................      $1,000,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA.......................................        $600,000  Chambliss, Isakson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SHOALWATER BAY, WA..................................................      $3,000,000  Murray
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SOUTHWEST VALLEY, FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION, ALBUQUERQUE, NM...........      $5,809,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR MANAGEMENT PLAN, MI..............        $300,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO......................................        $100,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SUCCESS DAM AND RESERVOIR, CA (DAM SAFETY)..........................        $500,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SWOPE PARK INDUSTRIAL AREA, KANSAS CITY, MO.........................      $5,330,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  TAHOE BASIN RESTORATION, CA & NV....................................      $4,000,000  Reid, Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  TAMPA HARBOR, FL....................................................        $200,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ...............................      $2,000,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  TUSCALOOSA, AL......................................................      $8,240,000  Shelby
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CA...........................................      $2,500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (HURRICANE PROTECTION)...........................      $2,000,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET, TOPSAIL BEACH, NC............        $722,000  Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  WESTERN SARPY COUNTY AND CLEAR CREEK, NE............................      $2,470,000  Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...............................................        $300,000  Burr
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC..............................................        $300,000  Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING)..................................      $1,500,000  Specter, Casey
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA................................................      $3,500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  YUKON, OK [EI]......................................................        $500,000  Inhofe
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  Construction, General Items not listed under states.................  ..............  ................................
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL:
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................      BLACK LAKE, OGDENSBURG, NY......................................        $150,000  Schumer
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................      LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT..............................................        $500,000  Leahy
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAM (PUBLIC LAW 106-457):
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................      COLORADO LAGOON, CA.............................................      $1,000,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION:
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................      OIL PIERS.......................................................      $2,500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Construction, General..................  RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINES......................................        $500,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--GI...............................  COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, & TN....        $900,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--GI...............................  DONALDSONVILLE TO THE GULF, LA......................................        $400,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--GI...............................  MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA............................................      $2,600,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--GI...............................  QUIVER RIVER, MS....................................................        $100,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--GI...............................  SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS, AR..............................................        $300,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--GI...............................  SPRING BAYOU, LA....................................................         $81,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...............................................      $8,700,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  BAYOU METO BASIN, AR................................................      $4,000,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR............................................     $16,000,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, & TN..............      $6,888,000  Cochran, Landrieu, Bond, Pryor,
                                                                                                                                                                 Lincoln, Vitter, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO..........................................      $4,000,000  Bond, Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  ST. JOHNS BAYOU & NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MO...........................        $200,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS................................      $2,200,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS..........................................         $25,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  YAZOO BASIN, MISSISSIPPI DELTA HEADWATERS PROJECT, MS...............     $23,200,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  YAZOO BASIN, REFORMULATION, MS......................................      $1,600,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  YAZOO BASIN, UPPER YAZOO PROJECTS, MS...............................     $13,300,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--CG...............................  YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER LESS ROCKY BAYOU, MS...................        $575,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  BONNET CARRE, LA....................................................      $1,200,000  Landrieu
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS...............................................        $982,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR..................................        $402,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO, & TN..............      $4,261,000  Cochran, Landrieu, Pryor,
                                                                                                                                                                 Lincoln, Vitter, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR & MO..........................      $3,707,000  Bond, Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS................................................        $718,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS.....................................      $2,000,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS................................      $1,500,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS..........................................      $2,000,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS.......................................      $2,000,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS........................................      $2,000,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS........................................         $50,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, WILL M. WHITTINGTON AUX CHAN, MS.......................         $23,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS...............................        $150,000  Cochran
Corps of Engineers.............  MR&T--O&M..............................  YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS.........................................        $100,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ABSECON INLET, NJ...................................................        $200,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL.............................................      $3,000,000  Sessions
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF & BLACK, LA...............      $4,000,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, NC & VA........................        $930,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, FL..................................      $2,820,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA..................................      $1,235,000  Chambliss, Isakson
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC..................................      $1,600,000  Graham
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI............................................         $85,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  BEALS HARBOR, ME....................................................      $1,150,000  Collins
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  BETHEL HARBOR, AK...................................................        $766,000  Murkowski
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR...................................        $548,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  BOGUE INLET AND CHANNEL, NC.........................................        $500,000  Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA........................................      $5,586,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  CAROLINA BEACH INLET, NC............................................        $500,000  Burr
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO...........................................        $887,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD................................................        $160,000  Mikulski
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS...........................................         $73,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH................................................      $3,800,000  Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR................................        $800,000  Murray
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA................................      $5,500,000  Murray, Crapo, Risch, Wyden,
                                                                                                                                                                 Merkley, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND SAND ISLAND, WA..................        $900,000  Murray
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  CONCHAS LAKE, NM....................................................        $905,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  COOS BAY, OR........................................................      $1,094,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  CORALVILLE LAKE, IA.................................................        $441,000  Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA...............................      $2,538,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  DEGRAY LAKE, AR.....................................................        $521,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  DEPOE BAY, OR.......................................................        $166,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE & CHANNEL, CA.........................      $3,640,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY....................................        $764,000  Bunning
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY................................      $5,000,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND....................................        $200,000  Dorgan
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC...............................................      $1,180,000  Graham
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI...................................        $250,000  Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI................................................      $5,000,000  Kohl
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  GULFPORT HARBOR, MS.................................................      $6,655,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  HARBOR OF REFUGE, LEWES, DE.........................................        $200,000  Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  HELENA HARBOR, AR...................................................        $485,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA..........................................      $2,000,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX............................................      $5,223,000  Hutchison, Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX....................................  ..............  ................................
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX........................................  ..............  ................................
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      GREENS BAYOU....................................................  ..............  ................................
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  HURON HARBOR, OH....................................................        $500,000  Voinovich
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI...................................        $319,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL.....      $2,000,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL....................      $3,650,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA....................................      $4,255,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA.............................................        $820,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV.....................................      $1,100,000  Mikulski, Cardin, Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  KODIAK HARBORS, AK..................................................        $750,000  Begich
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA..........................................        $583,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA......................................      $5,100,000  Murray
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC...........................................        $500,000  Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD....................................      $1,440,000  Mikulski
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA.................................................        $200,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MADISON PARISH PORT, LA.............................................        $145,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ.................................................        $250,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC.........................................      $4,000,000  Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MARINA DEL REY, CA..................................................      $3,000,000  Feinstein
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX..........................................      $1,976,000  Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MIAMI HARBOR, FL....................................................        $200,000  Bill Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MICHIGAN NAVIGATION O&M, MI.........................................      $8,000,000  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      ALPENA HARBOR, MI...............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      ARCADIA HARBOR, MI..............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      BIG BAY HARBOR, MI..............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      BLACK RIVER HARBOR, GOGEBIC CO-UP, MI...........................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      BOLLES HARBOR, MI...............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)..................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI..................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI...........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      CLINTON RIVER, MI...............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      DETOUR HARBOR, MI...............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      DETROIT RIVER, MI...............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      EAGLE HARBOR, MI................................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI..........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)..................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES).................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI.........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI..........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      HOLLAND HARBOR, MI..............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI...........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)...................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI.........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LELAND HARBOR, MI...............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LES CHENEAUX ISLANDS CHANNELS, MI...............................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI..........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES)....................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      MANISTEE HARBOR AND RIVER CHANNEL, MI...........................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      MENOMINEE HARBOR, MI & WI.......................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      MONROE HARBOR, MI...............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI.............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      PENTWATER HARBOR, MI............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI.........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES).................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI.........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      ROUGE RIVER, MI.................................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      SAGINAW RIVER, MI...............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      SAUGATUCK HARBOR, KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI...........................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      SEBEWAING RIVER, MI.............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI..........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI.............................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI...........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES).....................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI...........................................  ..............  Levin, Stabenow
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA.............................      $2,000,000  Landrieu, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MISSOURI RIVER--RULO TO MOUTH, IA, NE, KS, & MO.....................      $7,000,000  Harkin, Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FORT PECK DAM, MT, AND GAVIN'S POINT DAM, SD         $560,000  Dorgan
                                                                           & NE (SEC. 33), (MANDAN DIKE RESTORATION, ND).
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC............................................        $300,000  Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS............................................        $145,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR.......................................        $376,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NEW MADRID HARBOR, MILE 889, MO.....................................        $420,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO...............................................         $30,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NEW TOPSAIL INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, NC.......................        $500,000  Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NEW YORK GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION O&M, NY.............................      $1,700,000  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      BARCELONA HARBOR, NY............................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY.....................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      BUFFALO HARBOR, NY..............................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      CAPE HARBOR, NY.................................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY......................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      IRONDEQUOIT HARBOR, NY..........................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LITTLE RIVER HARBOR, NY.........................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY.....................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      MORRISTOWN HARBOR, NY...........................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY..........................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      OGDENSBURG HARBOR, NY...........................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      OLCOTT HARBOR, NY...............................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      OSWEGO HARBOR, NY...............................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, NY.........................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY............................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      VINCENT HARBOR, NY..............................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      WILSON HARBOR, NY...............................................  ..............  Schumer, Gillibrand
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA..............................................      $3,000,000  Kerry
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NORFOLK HARBOR, VA..................................................      $1,234,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NORWALK HARBOR, CT..................................................        $582,000  Dodd, Lieberman
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS..................................................        $850,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR..................................................        $985,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA..................................      $3,000,000  Landrieu, Pryor, Lincoln, Vitter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS...............................................      $5,390,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT.................................................        $918,000  Lieberman
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY & WATCH HILL COVE, CT &  RI      $2,500,000  Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PETERSBURG HARBOR, AK...............................................        $500,000  Murkowski, Begich
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PINOLE SHOAL MANAGEMENT STUDY, CA...................................      $2,500,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  POCOMOKE RIVER, MD..................................................      $1,800,000  Mikulski
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  POINT JUDITH HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI...................................        $500,000  Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PORT ORFORD, OR.....................................................        $400,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PORTLAND HARBOR, ME.................................................      $8,000,000  Collins
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, NH..........................        $500,000  Gregg, Shaheen
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PORTSMOUTH HARBOR, (SAGAMORE CREEK CHANNELS), NH....................        $150,000  Shaheen
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  PROVIDENCE HARBOR SHIPPING CHANNEL, RI..............................      $3,800,000  Reed, Whitehouse
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, NJ............................        $300,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  RARITAN RIVER, NJ...................................................        $145,000  Lautenberg, Menendez
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE, RED ROCK, IA.................................        $865,000  Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS.................................................      $1,189,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX..........................................        $670,000  Hutchison
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA.............................      $2,897,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA................................................        $497,000  Harkin, Grassley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  SIUSLAW RIVER, OR...................................................        $375,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO.........................................        $360,000  Bond
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  SOUTHERN MAINE AND NEW HAMPSHIRE OCEAN DISPOSAL SITE DESIGNATION, ME        $200,000  Collins
                                                                           & NH.
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  ST. PAUL HARBOR DREDGING, MN........................................        $200,000  Franken
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV..........................................        $100,000  Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV...............................................        $260,000  Rockefeller
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA...............................................        $538,000  Murray, Cantwell
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL & MS...........        $444,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS...............................      $4,233,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX...............................        $900,000  Cornyn
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR...........................................        $600,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  TOLEDO HARBOR, OH...................................................      $2,800,000  Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI...............................................      $1,020,000  Kohl
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA...............................        $457,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR............................        $166,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA........................................         $45,000  Murray
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE...............................................      $2,750,000  Carper, Kaufman
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...............................................        $600,000  Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  WILSON LAKE, KS.....................................................        $300,000  Roberts
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR..........................................        $200,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  YAQUINA RIVER (DEPOT SLOUGH), OR....................................         $12,000  Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  YAZOO RIVER, MS.....................................................        $128,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  YELLOW BEND PORT, AR................................................        $112,000  Pryor, Lincoln
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  Operation and Maintenance items not listed under states.............             ---  ................................
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  COASTAL DATA INFORMATION PROGRAM....................................      $2,000,000  Shaheen, Hagan, Wyden, Merkley
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM:
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      COASTAL ZONE MAPPING AND IMAGING LIDAR, MS......................      $2,500,000  Cochran, Wicker
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............  REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM:
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      HAWAII RSM, HI..................................................      $1,000,000  Inouye
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      NORTH CAROLINA RSM, NC..........................................        $600,000  Burr, Hagan
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      DELAWARE ESTUARY RSM, NJ........................................        $200,000  Kaufman, Lautenberg, Menendez,
                                                                                                                                                                 Specter
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      SOUTH COASTAL RHODE ISLAND RSM, RI..............................        $750,000  Reed
Corps of Engineers.............  Operation and Maintenance..............      CHESAPEAKE BAY, NEWPOINT COMFORT, MATHEWS COUNTY, VA............         $59,000  Webb, Warner
Corps of Engineers.............  General Provision......................      Section 108.....................................................  ..............  Reid
Corps of Engineers.............  General Provision......................      Section 109.....................................................  ..............  Cochran, Shaheen
Corps of Engineers.............  General Provision......................      Section 110.....................................................  ..............  Cochran
Corps of Engineers.............  General Provision......................      Section 111.....................................................  ..............  Ben Nelson
Corps of Engineers.............  General Provision......................      Section 114.....................................................  ..............  Dorgan, Conrad
Corps of Engineers.............  General Provision......................      Section 115.....................................................  ..............  Shelby
Corps of Engineers.............  General Provision......................      Section 116.....................................................  ..............  Lautenberg
Corps of Engineers.............  General Provision......................      Section 117.....................................................  ..............  Lautenberg
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Albuquerque Metro Area Reuse........................................        $500,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  All American Canal-Imperial Dam Electrification rehabilitation......      $1,000,000  Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Central Valley Projects:
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      American River Division, Folsom Dam Unit/Mormon Island..........        $920,000  Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      Miscellaneous Project Programs..................................      $2,000,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      Friant Division.................................................      $8,000,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Columbia Basin Project..............................................      $1,000,000  Murray, Cantwell
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Deschutes Ecosystem Restoration Project.............................        $500,000  Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Deschutes Project...................................................        $500,000  Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Eastern New Mexico Water Supply--Ute Reservoir......................      $2,000,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Fort Peck Reservation/Dry Prairie Rural Water System................      $4,000,000  Tester, Baucus
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Hawaii Water Resources Study, HI....................................        $300,000  Inouye
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Lake Mead/Las Vegas Wash Program....................................      $1,150,000  Reid, Ensign
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Lewis and Clark Rural Water System..................................      $8,000,000  Johnson, Harkin, Grassley,
                                                                                                                                                                 Klobuchar, Franken, Thune
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Mancos Project......................................................      $1,387,000  Bennet, M. Udall
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Middle Rio Grande Project...........................................        $650,000  Bingaman
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Milk River Project..................................................      $1,000,000  Tester, Baucus
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Mni Wiconi Project..................................................      $3,000,000  Johnson, Thune
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Mokelumne River Regional Water Storage & Conjunctive................        $500,000  Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Norman Feasibility Study............................................        $755,000  Inhofe
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  North Las Vegas Water Reuse.........................................      $3,000,000  Reid
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Northern Utah Investigations Program................................        $500,000  Bennett
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Odessa Subarea Special Study........................................      $1,250,000  Murray, Cantwell
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Oregon Investigations Program.......................................        $300,000  Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  P-SMBP--Garrison Diversion Unit.....................................     $13,449,000  Dorgan, Conrad
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Rancho California Water District....................................        $250,000  Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Rio Grande Project..................................................      $1,000,000  Bingaman, Tom Udall
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Rocky Boys/North Central MT Rural Water System......................      $4,000,000  Tester, Baucus
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Round Rock Reclaimed Water Project, TX..............................      $2,000,000  Cornyn
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  San Diego Four Reservoir Intertie...................................        $500,000  Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Southern California Investigations Program..........................        $500,000  Feinstein, Boxer
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Summit County Water Supply, UT (Weber Basin)........................        $500,000  Bennett, Hatch
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Wallowa Lake Dam Rehab, OR..........................................      $1,000,000  Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Water for Irrigation Streams and Economy Feasibility Study (WISE)...        $400,000  Wyden, Merkley
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project........................      $4,000,000  Murray
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Items not listed under states.......................................  ..............  ................................
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title I..............      $1,000,000  Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............  Research and Development:
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      Science and Technology Program..................................      $1,000,000  Feinstein
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      WaterSMART Program..............................................  ..............  ................................
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      Title XVI Water Reclamation/Reuse Projects......................      $2,500,000  Reid
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      Section 205.....................................................  ..............  Reid
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      Section 206.....................................................  ..............  Reid
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      Section 207.....................................................  ..............  Tester
Bureau of Reclamation..........  Water and Related Resources............      Section 208.....................................................  ..............  Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  21st Century Renewable Fuels, Energy, and Materials Initiative......        $400,000  Senators Levin, Stabenow
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Adams State College Solar Project...................................        $400,000  Senator Mark Udall
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Advanced Closed-Cycle Turbine Generator.............................      $1,000,000  Senator Murray
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Advanced Energy Studies.............................................      $2,750,000  Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Advanced Solid State Lithium Ion Battery Domestic Manufacturing             $300,000  Senators Levin, Stabenow
                                                                           Initiative.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Algae Biofuels Research.............................................      $2,000,000  Senators Murray, Cantwell
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Alternative and Unconventional Energy Research and Development......     $10,000,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Alternative Energy Medical Complex..................................        $500,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Bio-Energy Research Center..........................................        $800,000  Senator Tester
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Biofuel from Nevada's Municipal Wastes..............................        $500,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Biofuels, Biopower, and Biomaterials Initiative.....................      $1,250,000  Senators Chambliss, Isakson
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Biomass Boiler and Steam Absorption Chiller Plant...................        $650,000  Senator Johnson
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Biomass Boiler at Ferrum College....................................        $300,000  Senators Webb, Warner
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Bucknell University Marcellus Shale Research Initiative.............        $200,000  Senators Specter, Casey
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Center for Biomass Utilization......................................      $1,500,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Center for Ocean Renewable Energy...................................        $500,000  Senator Shaheen
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Center for Ozark Community Biomass Energy Development...............      $1,500,000  Senator Bond
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Chittenden County Natural Gas Refueling Project.....................      $1,000,000  Senator Leahy
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  CHRISTUS Center for Healthy Living and Energy Efficient LEED                $300,000  Senators Landrieu, Vitter
                                                                           Technology.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  City of Grand Rapids City Building Solar and Wind Renewable Energy          $400,000  Senators Levin, Stabenow
                                                                           Demonstration Project.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  City of Lansing Bioenergy Generation Demonstration Project..........        $400,000  Senators Levin, Stabenow
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  City of San Jose Smart LEED Streetlights, CA........................        $600,000  Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  City of Yreka Biomass Facility, CA..................................        $500,000  Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Clean Energy Infrastructure Educational Initiative..................        $200,000  Senator Sherrod Brown
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Co-Gen Electrostatic Precipitator...................................        $700,000  Senator Gillibrand
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Collaboration on Renewable Energy Job Creation Strategies...........        $300,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Delaware Energy Efficiency..........................................         $55,000  Senators Carper, Kaufman
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Development of High Yield Tropical Feedstocks and Biomass Conversion      $6,000,000  Senators Inouye, Akaka
                                                                           Technology for Renewable Energy Production.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Energy Conservation, Solar Energy Education and Research............        $300,000  Senator Landrieu
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Energy Recovery at the Water Reclamation Facility...................        $750,000  Senators Tester, Baucus
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Ethanol From Agriculture for Arkansas and America...................      $1,000,000  Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Farm Solar Share....................................................        $645,000  Senators Carper, Kaufman
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Farm-Based Renewable Energy.........................................        $400,000  Senator Murray
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Fuel Cell Durability Research.......................................        $400,000  Senator Dodd
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Genetic Improvement of Switchgrass for Biofuels.....................        $500,000  Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Geothermal Conversion Project.......................................      $1,000,000  Senator Lugar
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Great Basin College--Direct Use Geothermal Demonstration Project....      $1,000,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Green Building, NY..................................................        $250,000  Senators Schumer, Gillibrand
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Green Energy Sustainable Loan Program...............................        $700,000  Senator Gillibrand
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Hawaii Energy Sustainability Program................................      $6,000,000  Senators Inouye, Akaka
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Hawaii Renewable Energy Development Venture.........................      $6,000,000  Senator Inouye
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  High Performance Computing Infrastructure for Modeling Solar Energy.        $700,000  Senator Hagan
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  High Speed Wind Turbine Noise Model with Suppression................      $1,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Home Energy Efficiency Research and Development Initiative..........        $500,000  Senators Specter, Casey
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Hoonah IPEC Hydroelectric Project...................................      $1,500,000  Senator Murkowski
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Industrial Technologies Program Language............................      $1,000,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Institute for Environmental Studies.................................        $450,000  Senator Rockefeller
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Iowa Central Community College Renewable Fuels Laboratory...........        $500,000  Senators Harkin, Grassley
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Kaukauna Utilities Hydroelectric Generator Replacement..............      $1,000,000  Senator Kohl
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Large-Scale Wind Training...........................................        $400,000  Senators Schumer, Gillibrand
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Las Vegas Residential Energy Efficiency Program.....................        $500,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Livingston Campus Geothermal Energy System..........................        $750,000  Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Long Island Sustainable Schools Network.............................        $450,000  Senator Schumer
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Maine Tidal Power Initiative........................................      $1,000,000  Senators Collins, Snowe
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Martin County Microfiber Fuel Cell Technology Development...........        $500,000  Senators Burr, Hagan
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Mega-Turbine Research for Enhanced Wind Power.......................        $750,000  Senator Ben Nelson
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Mendocino County for the Strategic Woody-Biomass Initiative.........        $450,000  Senators Feinstein, Boxer
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  MidSouth/Southeast BioEnergy Consortium.............................      $1,000,000  Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Montana Algal BioDiesel Initiative..................................        $750,000  Senators Tester, Baucus
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Nanostructured Materials for Improved Photovoltaics.................      $1,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  National Center for Deepwater Offshore Wind.........................     $10,000,000  Senators Collins, Snowe
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  National Open-Ocean Energy Laboratory...............................      $1,200,000  Senator Bill Nelson
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  National Wind Energy Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX.....      $3,000,000  Senator Hutchison
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  National Wind Resource Center at Pantex.............................      $1,000,000  Senator Cornyn
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Natural Resource Research Center [NRCC].............................        $750,000  Senators Pryor, Lincoln
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Nevada Inter-Tribal Energy Consortium...............................        $150,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Nevada Renewable Energy Consortium..................................      $3,000,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Nevada Renewable Energy Innovation and Deployment Cluster--               $3,000,000  Senator Reid
                                                                           Technology Commercialization and Site Development.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  North Country Community Wood Energy Systems.........................        $200,000  Senator Shaheen
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Nushagak Area Hydropower Project....................................        $500,000  Senator Murkowski
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Ocean-Based Energy Generation.......................................        $600,000  Senator Murray
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Ohio Advanced Energy Manufacturing Center [OAEMC]...................        $500,000  Senator Sherrod Brown
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Ohio Low Cost Carbon Fiber Initiative...............................      $1,500,000  Senators Voinovich, Sherrod
                                                                                                                                                                 Brown
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  OIT Geothermal Power Generation Plant...............................        $400,000  Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Old Dominion University, Construction and Operation of a                    $750,000  Senators Webb, Warner
                                                                           Demonstration Scale Algal Research Center.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Optimized Concentrated Solar Power Trough Development Project.......        $750,000  Senator Specter
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Photovoltaic System at Closed, Capped Landfill......................        $650,000  Senator Schumer
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Producing Renewable, Value-Added Products from Waste Feedstocks.....      $1,000,000  Senator Landrieu
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Rapid Battery Charging Device for Electric Vehicles.................        $500,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Red Wing Regional Biosolids Processing Facility.....................        $700,000  Senator Klobuchar
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Reedsport Wave Power Project (Phase I)..............................        $400,000  Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Renewable Energy Technical Training Center..........................        $500,000  Senator Schumer
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Renewable Energy Demonstration......................................        $750,000  Senator Durbin
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Renewable Energy Demonstration Projects at Old FLC..................        $300,000  Senator Mark Udall
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Renewable Energy Feasibility Study and Resources Assessment for             $500,000  Senator Reid
                                                                           Lincoln County, NV.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Renewable Energy Initiative.........................................        $500,000  Senator Durbin
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Renewable Energy Solar Farm.........................................        $650,000  Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Reno Hydrogen Fuel..................................................      $1,000,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Research and Develop Geothermal Energy..............................        $700,000  Senator Begich
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Research, Development and Demonstration of Plug-In Hybrid Electric        $1,000,000  Senator Kohl
                                                                           Drive  Kits.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Rowan University Algae-Based Renewable Fuel Initiative..............        $750,000  Senators Lautenberg, Menendez
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Salem City Solar Energy Project.....................................        $300,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  San Francisco Bay Area Biosolids to Energy Project, CA..............        $500,000  Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  San Francisco Electric Vehicle Initiative...........................        $300,000  Senator Boxer
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Shenandoah Valley as a National Demonstration Project Achieving 25          $350,000  Senator Warner
                                                                           Percent Renewable Energy by the Year 2025.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Sitka Blue Lake Hydroelectric Expansion Project.....................      $1,000,000  Senators Murkowski, Begich
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Solar Cell Connectivity Research and Development....................      $1,000,000  Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Solar Electric System...............................................        $200,000  Senator Gillibrand
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Solar Energy Infrastructure Enhancement.............................        $500,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Solar Energy Research and Laboratory................................        $500,000  Senator Lugar
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Solar Power Module Development......................................        $500,000  Senator Leahy
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Solar Testing and Training..........................................        $400,000  Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  South Jordan NGV Fleet Implementation Program.......................        $300,000  Senator Bennett
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  South Utah Electric District Crab Creek Small Hydropower Facility...      $1,000,000  Senator Bennett
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Southern Regional Center for Lightweight Innovative Designs.........      $3,500,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Southwest Washington Tidal Energy Project...........................      $1,000,000  Senators Murray, Cantwell
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Springfield Fast-Fill CNG Facility..................................        $500,000  Senator Bond
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Strategic Biomass Initiative........................................        $500,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Sun Grant Initiative, South Dakota State University Regional Biomass      $2,000,000  Senators Johnson, Thune
                                                                           Feedstock Research and Development.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Sustainable Biofuel Production--Consolidated Bioprocessing Strategy         $400,000  Senator Kerry
                                                                           for Biomass Conversion.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Sustainable Campus Initiative of Sierra Nevada College at Lake Tahoe        $400,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Sustainable Energy Homeowner Outreach Program.......................        $200,000  Senator Sanders
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Sustainable Energy in Schools.......................................        $500,000  Senator Sanders
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Sustainable Energy Institute........................................        $500,000  Senators Harkin, Grassley
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Sustainable Energy Research Center..................................      $9,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Tri-County Biomass Energy Pilot Project.............................        $800,000  Senators Tester, Baucus
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility Environmental and Energy       $1,000,000  Senator Reid
                                                                           Enhancement.
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Uintah Natural Gas Fueling Station..................................        $300,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  University of Louisville Research and Energy Independence Program...      $2,000,000  Senator McConnell
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  UNLV--Intermountain West Sustainable Development Project............        $500,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  UNR--Great Basin Center for Geothermal Energy.......................        $250,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  University of Rhode Island-Offshore Wind Energy Research Initiative.        $750,000  Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Utah Center for Energy Innovation and Commercialization.............      $3,400,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Vermont Biofuels and Carbon Harvest Initiative......................        $750,000  Senator Leahy
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Vermont Biomass Energy Resource Center..............................      $1,000,000  Senator Leahy
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Vernonia Sustainable Schools........................................        $300,000  Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  White Earth Tribal BioMass Bio Fuel Project.........................        $700,000  Senators Klobuchar, Franken
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Wind Energy Infrastructure..........................................        $550,000  Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Wind Energy Materials Development...................................      $1,500,000  Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Wind Energy Technology Training Program.............................        $500,000  Senator Murray
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Wind Energy Training and Infrastructure.............................        $750,000  Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Wind Power Exploration..............................................        $100,000  Senators Tester, Baucus
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Wind Resource Monitoring and Training Program.......................      $1,000,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  Wireless Turbine Blade Sensor System Research.......................        $750,000  Senator Schumer
Department of Energy...........  Elecricity Deliverability and Energy     Dubuque Smarter Energy Project......................................        $500,000  Senator Harkin
                                  Reliability.
Department of Energy...........  Elecricity Deliverability and Energy     Energy Development and Reliability..................................        $300,000  Senator Dorgan
                                  Reliability.
Department of Energy...........  Elecricity Deliverability and Energy     Navajo Nation Electrification Program...............................        $900,000  Senators Bingaman, Tom Udall
                                  Reliability.
Department of Energy...........  Elecricity Deliverability and Energy     Smart Grid Simulation Technology....................................        $800,000  Senator Dorgan
                                  Reliability.
Department of Energy...........  Elecricity Deliverability and Energy     Technology Development..............................................        $750,000  Senator Dorgan
                                  Reliability.
Department of Energy...........  Elecricity Deliverability and Energy     UNR--Energy Storage for Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources.......      $1,000,000  Senator Reid
                                  Reliability.
Department of Energy...........  Nuclear Energy.........................  Nuclear Engineering Research Center.................................        $500,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy...........  Nuclear Energy.........................  Nuclear Fabrication Consortium......................................      $2,000,000  Senator Voinovich, Sherrod Brown
Department of Energy...........  Nuclear Energy.........................  Nuclear Power Operator Simulator....................................        $400,000  Senator Kerry
Department of Energy...........  Nuclear Energy.........................  Ohio State Nuclear Reactor Laboratory Facility Research and               $2,000,000  Senator Voinovich
                                                                           Education Expansion.
Department of Energy...........  Nuclear Energy.........................  Oversight of Yucca Mountain Shut Down and Reclamation...............      $2,500,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  Clean Energy Technology.............................................      $2,000,000  Senator Dorgan
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  CO2 Sequestration Projects..........................................        $700,000  Senators Mark Udall, Bennet
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  Fossil Fuel Research and Development................................      $3,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  Gulf of Mexico Hydrates Research Consortium.........................      $1,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  Hydrogen Fuel Dispensing Station....................................        $750,000  Senator Rockefeller
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  Long Term Environmental and Economic Impacts of the Development of a        $750,000  Senator Rockefeller
                                                                           Coal Liquefaction Sector in China.
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  National Center for Hydrogen Technology.............................      $3,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  Sunbury Generation/Calera Carbon Capture Project....................        $750,000  Senator Specter
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  University of Kentucky Coal-Derived Low Energy Materials for              $1,000,000  Senator McConnell
                                                                           Sustainable Construction Project.
Department of Energy...........  Fossil Energy..........................  Utah Center for Ultra-Clean Coal Utilization and Heavy Oil Research.      $7,000,000  Senators Bennett, Hatch
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Advanced Computer Simulation Initiative.............................      $1,000,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Alaska Climate Center...............................................        $500,000  Senators Murkowski, Begich
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Antibodies Research.................................................      $4,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems...................................      $2,000,000  Senator Rockefeller
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Center for Nanoscale Energy.........................................      $7,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Characteristics and Cleanup of the U.S. Nuclear Legacy..............      $3,500,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Climate Model Evaluation Program....................................      $2,000,000  Senators Shelby, Sessions
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Computing Capability................................................      $2,000,000  Senators Dorgan, Conrad
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Development of Nontechnology-enhanced Solar Cells with Low Cost and         $500,000  Senator Reid
                                                                           High Conversion Efficiency.
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Energy Research.....................................................        $250,000  Senator Cochran
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring Laboratory: Monitoring/              $750,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
                                                                           Assessment of the Radioactive Pollutants in the South-West
                                                                           Mississippi.
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Functional Nanoparticles for Improved Ultra Capacitor Devices.......      $1,000,000  Senators Cochran, Wicker
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Idaho National Laboratory Center for Advanced Energy Studies........      $1,000,000  Senators Crapo, Risch
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  KU Cancer Research Equipment........................................      $4,000,000  Senators Brownback, Roberts
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Lincoln Memorial University/ORNL Partnership on Geothermal Energy...      $2,000,000  Senator Alexander
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Material Science Smart Coatings.....................................        $500,000  Senator Ben Nelson
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Metal-enhanced Fluorescence Research and Development................        $750,000  Senators Mikulski, Cardin
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Missouri University Research Reactor Reflector Shield...............      $1,000,000  Senator Bond
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Nanotechnology Initiative...........................................        $600,000  Senators Dodd, Lieberman
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Nevada Water Resources Data, Modeling, and Visualization [DMV]              $750,000  Senator Reid
                                                                           Center.
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Oregon Sustainability Center........................................        $300,000  Senators Wyden, Merkley
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  RNAi Research.......................................................        $300,000  Senator Kerry
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Solid State Preparation and Characterization Lab....................        $500,000  Senator Reid
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Southern Illinois University Research...............................        $750,000  Senator Durbin
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  Technology Transfer & Commercialization of Technologies at DOE......        $500,000  Senators Bingaman, Tom Udall
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  TU Algae to Green Fuels Energy Project..............................        $750,000  Senator Inhofe
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  University of California, San Diego Seismic Research................      $1,500,000  Senator Feinstein
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  University of South Dakota Project on Renewable Energy and the              $350,000  Senator Johnson
                                                                           Economy.
Department of Energy...........  Office of Science......................  URI Regional Earth System Center....................................        $750,000  Senators Reed, Whitehouse
Department of Energy...........  Other Defense Activities...............  Burlington Atomic Energy Commission Plant and Ames Laboratory Former      $1,000,000  Senators Harkin, Grassley
                                                                           Workers Medical Surveillance Programs.
Department of Energy...........  Other Defense Activities...............  Medical Monitoring at Paducah, KY, Portsmouth, OH, and Oak Ridge, TN      $1,000,000  Senator McConnell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             PRESIDENTIALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Agency                             Account                                                 Project title                                       Funding              Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  ALA WAI CANAL, OAHU, HI.........................................................        $408,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD & DC (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN)...................        $183,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  AUGUSTA, GA.....................................................................        $578,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  BAYOU SORREL LOCK, LA...........................................................      $2,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, BROWNSVILLE CHANNEL, TX...................................        $726,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  CALCASIEU LOCK, LA..............................................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN, CA.....................................        $900,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS, CA.................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  CURRITUCK SOUND, NC.............................................................        $300,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE, NJ..........................................        $290,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (PHASE II)................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  EASTERN SHORE, MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND, MD....................................        $169,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  EDISTO ISLAND, SC...............................................................        $114,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  FARGO-MOORHEAD METRO STUDY, ND & MN (RRN BASIN AUTHORITY).......................     $15,150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  GIWW, HIGH ISLAND TO BRAZOS RIVER REALIGNMENTS, TX..............................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  GREAT LAKES NAVIGATION SYSTEM STUDY, MI, IL, IN, MN, NY, OH, PA & WI............        $400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  GUADALUPE AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS, TX......................................        $600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ..............................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, LOWER PASSAIC RIVER, NJ.................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  HUDSON-RARITAN ESTUARY, NY & NJ.................................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  INDIANA HARBOR, IN..............................................................        $300,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  JAMAICA BAY, MARINE PARK AND PLUMB BEACH, NY....................................        $170,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  JOHN H. KERR DAM & RESERVOIR, VA & NC (SEC 216).................................        $300,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS...........................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY.........................................................        $172,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  LAKE WORTH INLET, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL.........................................        $340,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA................................     $16,595,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN, TX..................................................        $425,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, OR & WA.............................        $300,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA.......................................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  MALIBU CREEK WATERSHED, CA......................................................        $210,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  MATANUSKA RIVER WATERSHED, AK...................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  MERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, NH & MA........................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  MILL CREEK WATERSHED, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN.......................................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED STUDY, MN & SD........................................        $350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  MISSOURI RIVER DEGRADATION, MO & KS.............................................        $600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  MT ST HELENS....................................................................        $225,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  NEUSE RIVER BASIN, NC...........................................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  NUECES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX................................................        $250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  OCMULGEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, GA...................................        $600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  PILGRIM LAKE, TRURO & PROVINCETOWN, MA..........................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, WA............................        $400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM, CO AND TX (SECTION 729)...................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  SABINE PASS TO GALVESTON BAY, TX................................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  SCHUYLKILL RIVER BASIN, WISSAHICKON WATERSHED, PA...............................        $214,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  SOLANA-ENCINITAS SHORELINE, CA..................................................        $307,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  SURF CITY AND NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, NC...........................................        $300,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  SUTTER COUNTY, CA...............................................................        $339,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  TYBEE ISLAND, GA................................................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  UPPER PENITENCIA CREEK, CA......................................................        $177,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  UPPER RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER BASIN, VA..............................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR.....................................        $220,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  WILLAMETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION, OR.....................................        $153,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  General Investigations............  YAKUTAT HARBOR, AK..............................................................        $450,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  AKUTAN HARBOR, AK...............................................................      $7,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICT, IL & MO (DEF CORR)......................        $150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON FEATURES), CA..................................      $4,200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS), CA.........................     $78,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM RAISE & BRIDGE), CA........................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD...........................................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  ATLANTIC COAST OF NYC, ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT, NY.......................        $300,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AT DEEP CREEK, CHESAPEAKE, VA.      $1,590,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO.............................................      $4,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  BLUESTONE LAKE, WV (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE).......................................     $15,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  BRAYS BAYOU, HOUSTON, TX........................................................      $3,740,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  BREVARD COUNTY, FL..............................................................        $350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CANTON LAKE, OK (DAM SAFETY)....................................................     $24,334,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ............................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CENTER HILL DAM, TN (SEEPAGE CONTROL)...........................................     $77,800,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL (DEF CORR)..........................      $5,385,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD & VA.........................................      $5,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CHESTERFIELD, MO................................................................      $3,939,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL, DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL..........................     $11,100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CHIEF JOSEPH DAM GAS ABATEMENT, WA..............................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  CLEARWATER LAKE, MO (SEEPAGE CONTROL)...........................................     $40,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR & ID.....................................    $116,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA.............................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  DADE COUNTY, FL.................................................................     $11,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  DELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, ROOSEVELT INLET TO LEWES BEACH, DE......................        $350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  DES PLAINES RIVER, IL...........................................................     $10,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  DOVER DAM MUSKINGUM RIVER, OH...................................................     $36,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  DUVAL COUNTY, FL................................................................      $7,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  DUWAMISH AND GREEN RIVER BASIN, WA..............................................      $5,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  EAST ST. LOUIS, IL..............................................................      $2,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  EMSWORTH LOCKS & DAM, OHIO RIVER, PA (STATIC INSTABILITY CORRECTION)............     $11,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY..........................................      $4,600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL...........................................................        $350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  GARRISON DAM AND POWER PLANT, ND (REPLACEMENT)..................................     $11,088,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET AND PECK BEACH, NJ.......................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS RESTORATION, CA......................................     $11,750,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE CONTROL).......................................    $104,800,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA...........................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  INDIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY, IN..................................      $8,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA................................................      $7,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL.........................................................      $6,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA & NC (REPLACEMENT)...........................      $6,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  KANSAS CITYS, MO & KS...........................................................        $700,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  KENTUCKY LOCK AND DAM, TENNESSEE RIVER, KY......................................      $2,868,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION)..............................      $5,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LEVISA AND TUG FORKS AND UPPER CUMBERLAND RIVER, WV, VA & KY....................     $22,250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN........................................................     $10,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LOCK AND DAM 27, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, IL (MAJOR REHAB)............................        $350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3 AND 4 MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA.................................      $2,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY...........................................................        $300,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA................................     $19,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NJ......................................      $8,920,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, OR & WA.............................      $4,700,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION, WA, OR & ID...................      $1,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MANATEE COUNTY, FL..............................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MARKLAND LOCKS AND DAM, KY (MAJOR REHAB)........................................      $5,400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MARTIN COUNTY, FL...............................................................      $8,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL..............................................     $40,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL.....      $4,345,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MISSOURI RIVER FISH MITIGATION, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE, ND & SD.....................     $74,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.............................................      $1,800,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA (FISH PASSAGE).............................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  MUDDY RIVER, MA.................................................................      $2,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  NAPA RIVER, SALT MARSH RESTORATION, CA..........................................     $12,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  NASSAU COUNTY, FL...............................................................        $350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ.........................................     $57,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  NORFOLK HARBOR, CRANEY ISLAND, VA...............................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA............................................      $4,330,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL & KY......................................    $136,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  POPLAR ISLAND, MD...............................................................      $1,530,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR.................................................     $39,539,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, PA (PERMANENT)..........................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ..................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  RICHARD B. RUSSEL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC...........................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE, NM........................      $1,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR............................................................     $12,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, HEADWATERS AREA, VA..................................      $1,075,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  SACRAMENTO DEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA...........................................     $12,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT, CA....................................     $10,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA....................................................     $25,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA...................................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  SOUTH FLORIDA EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL..............................    $155,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS, CA.............................................      $4,800,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL............................................................        $350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  ST. LOUIS FLOOD PROTECTION, MO..................................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  SUCCESS DAM AND RESERVOIR, CA (DAM SAFETY)......................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  TAMPA HARBOR, FL................................................................      $1,200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  TURKEY CREEK BASIN, KANSAS CITY, KS & MO........................................      $8,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI........................     $19,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  WEST BANK AND VICINITY, NEW ORLEANS, LA.........................................      $5,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  WEST SACRAMENTO, CA.............................................................      $5,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...........................................................      $2,100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY (SEEPAGE CONTROL)...........................    $134,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Construction, General.............  WOOD RIVER LEVEE, IL............................................................      $1,098,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-GI...........................  COLDWATER RIVER BASIN BELOW ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS..................................        $246,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-GI...........................  COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN.................      $1,400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-GI...........................  MEMPHIS METRO AREA, STORM WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY, TN............................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-CG...........................  ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA...........................................      $2,631,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-CG...........................  ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...........................................................     $15,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-CG...........................  CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN................................     $47,209,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-CG...........................  MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN...........................     $36,038,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA...........................................      $1,878,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...........................................................     $12,398,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA.............................................         $42,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA..............................................         $47,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN................................     $66,008,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR...............................................        $190,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL...............................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY...............................................         $20,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA...............................................        $586,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO...............................................        $185,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS...............................................        $109,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN...............................................         $70,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR............................................        $223,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR............................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA..........................................        $377,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN...............................................      $1,433,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION--CAERNARVON, LA........................................        $921,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  OLD RIVER, LA...................................................................      $9,255,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR & LA..................................      $2,374,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA...........................................      $3,286,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO.............................................................      $4,966,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR.......................................................      $1,276,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS......................................................        $790,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  MR&T-O&M..........................  YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS......................................................      $1,469,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ABIQUIU DAM, NM.................................................................      $2,891,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALABAMA--COOSA COMPREHENSIVE WATER STUDY, AL....................................        $253,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL.........................................................     $18,745,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALAMO LAKE, AZ..................................................................      $3,019,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID............................................................      $1,521,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALLATOONA LAKE, GA..............................................................      $7,008,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.............................................................      $8,456,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALMOND LAKE, NY.................................................................        $490,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH.............................................................      $1,435,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ALVIN R. RUSH DAM, PA...........................................................        $600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK............................................................     $14,013,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, GA, AL & FL.......................      $2,603,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  APPLEGATE LAKE, OR..............................................................      $1,298,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  AQUILLA LAKE, TX................................................................      $1,120,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ARCADIA LAKE, OK................................................................        $596,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ARKANSAS--RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL--AREA VIII, TX......................      $1,439,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ARKPORT DAM, NY.................................................................        $223,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH............................................................      $1,995,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF & BLACK, LA...........................     $12,230,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, VA.........................................      $2,150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, NC & VA....................................      $1,825,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA..............................................      $1,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC..............................................      $4,750,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC..............................................      $2,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA.......................................................        $230,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC..............................................      $1,918,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BALL MOUNTAIN, VT...............................................................        $896,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50 FOOT), MD.....................................     $17,215,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL)............................................        $375,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA......................................................        $135,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI........................................................        $330,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BARDWELL LAKE, TX...............................................................      $1,879,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE, BARKLEY, KY & TN..........................................     $10,025,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BARNEGAT INLET, NJ..............................................................        $325,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BARRE FALLS DAM, MA.............................................................        $700,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY...........................................................      $3,454,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BASS HARBOR, TREMONT, ME........................................................         $65,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA......................................................      $1,072,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE-JUMP WATERWAY, LA.................................      $1,050,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BAYOU PIERRE, LA................................................................         $24,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA.....................................................         $37,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BAYOU TECHE & VERMILION RIVER, LA...............................................         $11,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BAYOU TECHE, LA.................................................................        $150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BEALS HARBOR, ME................................................................      $1,250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO.............................................................        $647,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BEAVER LAKE, AR.................................................................     $10,570,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BEECH FORK LAKE, WV.............................................................      $1,377,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BELTON LAKE, TX.................................................................      $3,682,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA.............................................................      $1,425,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BENBROOK LAKE, TX...............................................................      $2,578,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BERLIN LAKE, OH.................................................................      $2,347,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BETHEL HARBOR, AK...............................................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD...................................................      $9,768,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY............................................................      $1,600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BIGSTONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & SD......................................        $251,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BILOXI HARBOR, MS...............................................................      $1,400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BIRCH HILL DAM, MA..............................................................        $792,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BIRCH LAKE, OK..................................................................        $646,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA............................................................      $2,367,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY.....................................      $1,552,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT.............................................................        $537,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL..........................................     $20,751,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLACKWATER DAM, NH..............................................................        $716,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR...............................................      $9,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI...............................................      $1,250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA.............................................................      $2,817,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR..........................................................      $1,612,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR.............................................................        $573,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BLUESTONE LAKE, WV..............................................................      $1,700,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BONNEVILLE LOCK & DAM, OR & WA..................................................      $7,487,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BOSTON HARBOR, MA...............................................................      $2,700,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BOWMAN HALEY, ND................................................................        $246,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX........................................................      $3,468,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK.............................................................      $2,458,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN.............................................................      $1,141,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BROWNS CREEK, NY................................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA............................................................      $6,719,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA...............................................      $2,119,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BUCKHORN LAKE, KY...............................................................      $1,655,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BUFFALO BAYOU & TRIBUTARIES, TX.................................................      $3,518,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BUFFALO HARBOR, NY..............................................................      $1,165,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA............................................................        $657,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA...........................................      $8,840,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR............................................................      $7,292,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN.......................................................        $171,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV.............................................................      $3,049,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY..........................................................      $8,600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CADDO LAKE, LA..................................................................        $222,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH...........................................................      $1,559,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN............................................................      $1,030,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA....................................................     $20,081,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN...............................................      $4,238,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL............................................................      $4,715,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CANTON LAKE, OK.................................................................      $1,949,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CANYON LAKE, TX.................................................................      $3,429,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CAPE COD CANAL, MA..............................................................     $14,174,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC............................................      $2,243,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CARLYLE LAKE, IL................................................................      $5,643,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CARR CREEK LAKE, KY.............................................................      $1,882,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA........................................................      $8,136,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO.......................................................        $900,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CAVE RUN LAKE, KY...............................................................        $965,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN........................................................      $1,013,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CEDAR BAYOU, TX.................................................................      $1,695,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CEDAR CREEK, DE.................................................................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CENTER HILL LAKE, TN............................................................      $5,067,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL..................................................     $19,520,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA......................................................      $4,600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX.....................................................        $329,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI..................................................      $1,117,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREA, MA...................................        $329,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC...........................................................      $9,925,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI...........................................................        $208,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHATFIELD LAKE, CO..............................................................      $1,375,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN.......................................................      $6,358,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK...........................................................      $2,999,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO...........................................................      $1,057,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHETCO RIVER, OR................................................................        $586,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHICAGO HARBOR, IL..............................................................      $2,064,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHICAGO RIVER, IL...............................................................        $510,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL...........................      $7,450,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN...........................................      $3,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA............................................................        $772,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA..........................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS.......................................................         $74,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE, MO.....................................      $7,841,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH........................................................      $1,190,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CLEARWATER LAKE, MO.............................................................      $3,021,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH............................................................     $14,480,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CLINTON LAKE, KS................................................................      $2,080,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COCHITI LAKE, NM................................................................      $3,546,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COLD BROOK LAKE, SD.............................................................      $1,080,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COLD SPRING INLET, NJ...........................................................        $350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT........................................................        $689,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COLUMBIA & LWR WILLAMETTE R BLW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR..................     $24,868,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA............................................     $18,350,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA & THE DALLES, OR...........................        $645,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA...........................................................        $403,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CONCHAS LAKE, NM................................................................      $2,972,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA........................................................      $1,351,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH.............................................................        $940,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC.............................................      $6,140,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COOS BAY, OR....................................................................      $5,791,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COPAN LAKE, OK..................................................................      $1,104,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COQUILLE RIVER, OR..............................................................        $433,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CORALVILLE LAKE, IA.............................................................      $5,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN..............................................      $6,429,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX.................................................      $4,608,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR..........................................................      $1,319,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD.....................................................        $285,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COUGAR LAKE, OR.................................................................      $1,733,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS..........................................................      $1,649,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COWANESQUE LAKE, PA.............................................................      $1,772,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA...........................................      $6,190,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA..........................................................      $2,039,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV.................................................        $188,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA...........................................................        $687,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN............................................................      $6,219,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DARDANELLE LOCK & DAM, AR.......................................................      $7,632,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DEER CREEK LAKE, OH.............................................................      $1,323,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DEGRAY LAKE, AR.................................................................      $7,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DELAWARE LAKE, OH...............................................................      $1,362,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ....................................................         $15,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA, NJ, PA & DE............................     $20,020,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO TRENTON, NJ.................................        $820,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX & OK...............................................     $10,057,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DEQUEEN LAKE, AR................................................................      $1,467,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DETROIT LAKE, OR................................................................      $1,127,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DETROIT RIVER, MI...............................................................      $5,218,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DEWEY LAKE, KY..................................................................      $1,762,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DIERKS LAKE, AR.................................................................      $1,570,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK...........................................................        $955,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DILLON LAKE, OH.................................................................      $1,260,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME....................................................      $1,050,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DORENA LAKE, OR.................................................................      $1,055,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK..............................................................        $241,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE & CHANNEL, CA.....................................      $9,471,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI.................................................      $7,237,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DUXBURY HARBOR, MA..............................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  DWORKSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID.................................................      $2,965,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA..............................................      $1,671,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA.........................................................        $557,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS..................................................        $220,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EAST LYNN LAKE, WV..............................................................      $2,215,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EAST RIVER, NY..................................................................      $2,800,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY.........................................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY............................................................        $573,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY...........................................................        $150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI........................................................        $729,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EDIZ HOOK, WA...................................................................         $30,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH.......................................................        $635,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EL DORADO LAKE, KS..............................................................        $609,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ELK CITY LAKE, KS...............................................................      $1,040,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ELK CREEK LAKE, OR..............................................................         $87,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ELKINS, WV......................................................................         $15,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY................................................        $780,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ERIE HARBOR, PA.................................................................      $1,389,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL.................................................         $68,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT, TX......................................         $43,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EUFAULA LAKE, OK................................................................      $7,232,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA..........................................      $1,006,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH.............................................................      $1,572,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FALL CREEK LAKE, OR.............................................................      $1,149,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FALL RIVER LAKE, KS.............................................................      $1,200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FALLS LAKE, NC..................................................................      $2,042,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL.......................................................        $398,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FARMINGTON DAM, CA..............................................................        $450,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR.............................................................      $1,800,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL...........................................................      $1,294,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE PINES, TX......................................      $3,709,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY............................................      $5,100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FISHTRAP LAKE, KY...............................................................      $1,942,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY......................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK............................................................      $6,216,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD.........................................      $8,970,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK............................................................      $1,058,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA....................................................        $672,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, PROVIDENCE, RI.....................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FOX RIVER, WI...................................................................      $2,402,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA........................................................        $880,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH..........................................................        $724,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FREEPORT HARBOR, TX.............................................................      $3,538,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA............................................................      $1,625,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  FT. PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT.......................................................      $5,411,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GALISTEO DAM, NM................................................................        $927,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX................................................      $8,441,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND................................................     $12,764,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA...............................................      $2,268,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GAVINS POINT DAM, NE & SD.......................................................      $7,706,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA......................................        $250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC...........................................................      $1,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GILLHAM LAKE, AR................................................................      $1,340,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX...................................................      $1,825,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI..........................................................        $722,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX........................................................      $2,360,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX..............................................................      $3,014,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA.............................................     $10,550,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GRAYSON LAKE, KY................................................................      $1,434,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GREAT KILLS HARBOR, STATEN ISLAND, NY...........................................         $60,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK......................................................        $406,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY.............................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY.....................................................      $2,100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI............................................................      $7,698,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GREEN PETER--FOSTER LAKES, OR...................................................      $2,139,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY............................................................      $2,242,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR...........................................................     $10,230,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL..................................................      $5,230,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA..................................................     $19,031,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX..................................................     $27,792,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  GULFPORT HARBOR, MS.............................................................     $10,537,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HAINES HARBOR, AK...............................................................        $241,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HAMPTON ROADS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS HARBOR, VA (DRIFT REMOVAL)................      $1,225,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HAMPTON ROADS, VA (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)..........................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT..........................................................        $478,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE..........................................................      $2,222,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO...........................................      $8,842,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC..........................................................     $11,501,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HELENA HARBOR, AR...............................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HEYBURN LAKE, OK................................................................        $603,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA....................................................      $2,163,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR............................................................        $863,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HILLSDALE LAKE, KS..............................................................        $791,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA..........................................................        $629,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HOLLAND HARBOR, MI..............................................................        $655,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HOMER HARBOR, AK................................................................        $513,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HOMME LAKE, ND..................................................................        $276,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HOP BROOK LAKE, CT..............................................................      $1,092,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH.....................................................      $1,440,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX............................................................      $1,708,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA......................................................      $4,352,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX........................................................     $23,817,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........      BARBOUR TERMINAL CHANNEL, TX................................................     -$1,811,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........      BAYPORT SHIP CHANNEL, TX....................................................     -$4,028,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA...........................................................      $3,276,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY........................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT)........................................................      $3,700,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C)........................................................      $1,650,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HUGO LAKE, OK...................................................................      $1,748,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HULAH LAKE, OK..................................................................        $901,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA.....................................................      $5,848,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ICE HARBOR LOCK & DAM, WA.......................................................      $4,147,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVR PORTION)........................................     $32,238,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL & IN (MVS PORTION)........................................      $1,802,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE..................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INDIANA HARBOR, IN..............................................................      $5,700,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, GA..............................         $85,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, IL..............................         $65,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, OR..............................         $30,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, WA..............................         $32,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS, WY..............................         $10,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORK, AL................................................         $30,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK...............................................        $180,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR...............................................        $311,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ...............................................         $90,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA...............................................      $4,604,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO...............................................        $572,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT...............................................        $292,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC...............................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL...............................................        $900,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA...............................................        $141,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI...............................................        $961,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA...............................................        $393,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID...............................................        $288,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL...............................................      $1,707,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN...............................................        $800,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS...............................................        $318,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY...............................................        $839,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA...............................................        $758,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA...............................................        $349,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD...............................................        $124,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME...............................................        $148,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI...............................................        $125,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN...............................................        $463,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO...............................................      $1,713,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS...............................................         $34,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT...............................................        $120,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC...............................................        $255,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND...............................................        $303,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE...............................................        $343,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH...............................................        $105,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ...............................................        $145,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM...............................................        $740,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV...............................................         $66,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY...............................................        $858,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH...............................................        $624,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK...............................................        $261,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR...............................................        $559,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA...............................................        $744,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI...............................................         $24,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC...............................................         $64,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD...............................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX...............................................      $1,364,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT...............................................         $31,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA...............................................        $367,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT...............................................         $79,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA...............................................        $750,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI...............................................         $64,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV...............................................        $279,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY...............................................         $37,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD................     $16,075,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL................................      $4,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE.........................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ISABELLA LAKE, CA...............................................................      $1,956,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  J. BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA................................................     $12,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN........................................................      $1,793,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN...........................................      $4,608,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  J. STORM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC.................................................     $10,918,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY.........................................................      $1,001,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL.........................................................      $5,708,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JAMAICA BAY, NY.................................................................        $120,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA.........................................................      $5,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM............................................................      $1,398,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV.................................................      $2,856,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX............................................................      $1,939,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA...........................      $9,449,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JOE POOL LAKE, TX...............................................................      $1,094,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA..................................................      $5,217,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JOHN H. KERR LAKE, VA & NC......................................................     $11,423,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO.......................................................      $2,941,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS..............................................      $1,760,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA.........................................      $2,230,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JOHNSTOWN, PA...................................................................         $36,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  JONES INLET, NY.................................................................        $150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS & DAM, WV...................................................      $9,791,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KANOPOLIS, KS...................................................................      $1,561,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL..................................................      $2,176,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KAW LAKE, OK....................................................................      $2,121,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KENTUCKY RIVER, KY..............................................................         $10,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI.............................................................          $8,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI...........................................................         $12,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KEYSTONE LAKE, OK...............................................................      $5,006,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHANY RESERVOIR, PA..........................................      $1,469,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA.............................................................        $688,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN........................................        $677,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND.............................................      $1,424,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE CROCKETT (Keystone Harbor), WA.............................................        $550,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE KEMP, TX...................................................................        $467,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL.....................................................        $710,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY.........................................................         $60,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA......................................................        $600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL............................................................      $5,512,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN..........................................................        $656,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA..................................................     $13,376,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY...........................................................      $1,646,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LAVON LAKE, TX..................................................................      $3,135,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LEWISVILLE DAM, TX..............................................................      $3,542,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LIBBY DAM, MT...................................................................      $1,846,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO.....................................................        $741,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LITTLE GOOSE LOCK & DAM, WA.....................................................      $2,314,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY.....................................................          $6,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA............................................................        $682,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO............................................................        $941,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY...........................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LONG ISLAND SOUND, DMMP, CT.....................................................      $2,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR..........................................................      $2,080,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LORAIN HARBOR, OH...............................................................        $443,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA............................................      $7,035,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LOST CREEK LAKE, OR.............................................................      $3,897,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LOWER GRANITE LOCK & DAM, WA....................................................      $5,872,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK & DAM, WA.................................................      $4,734,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA.............................................................      $1,460,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID.............................................................      $2,689,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI............................................................      $1,419,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA.............................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MADISON PARISH PORT, LA.........................................................        $150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA.........................................................      $1,326,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MANISTEE HARBOR AND RIVER CHANNEL, MI...........................................        $252,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT.......................................................        $699,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC.....................................................      $8,095,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MARINA DEL REY, CA..............................................................      $5,050,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MARION LAKE, KS.................................................................      $1,613,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI............................................................        $230,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY...........................................................      $1,088,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA......................................................      $1,170,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, NC.....................................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH..........................................         $21,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX......................................................      $5,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY............................................................         $60,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR.............................     $33,553,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK.............................      $5,794,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MCNARY LOCK & DAM, OR & WA......................................................      $6,277,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MELVERN LAKE, KS................................................................      $1,981,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA.......................................................        $401,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MERMENTAU RIVER, LA.............................................................      $2,008,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH..........................................      $1,403,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM (MRGESCP)........      $2,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY..........................................        $113,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MILFORD LAKE, KS................................................................      $2,391,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MILL CREEK LAKE, WA.............................................................      $3,817,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MILLWOOD LAKE, AR...............................................................      $4,802,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI............................................................      $1,672,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MINNESOTA RIVER, MN.............................................................        $262,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISPILLION RIVER, DE............................................................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN...........................................................      $1,147,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH...................................................      $1,722,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION), MN......     $48,426,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION), IL......     $53,692,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION), IL......     $21,581,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL.....     $28,731,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA.........................................      $4,215,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LA........................     $62,969,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SOIUX CITY, IA.............................        $137,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO THE MOUTH, IA, KS, MO, & NE.......................      $9,021,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MOBILE HARBOR, AL...............................................................     $23,560,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA............................................................        $522,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA...........................................................     $15,861,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MONROE HARBOR, MI...............................................................      $1,340,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MONROE LAKE, IN.................................................................      $1,899,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC........................................................      $4,100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MORICHES INLET, NY..............................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA............................................................      $1,590,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH.........................................................      $1,413,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY............................................................      $3,661,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS........................................................        $175,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.............................................        $265,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA............................................................      $3,441,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MURDERKILL RIVER, DE............................................................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI.............................................................        $872,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH.......................................................      $8,244,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  MYSTIC RIVER, CT................................................................        $160,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NANTICOKE RIVER, MD.............................................................        $160,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR...................................................      $5,250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY..............................................         $85,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX..........................................................      $2,767,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEAH BAY, WA....................................................................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET HURRICANE BARRIER, MA.......................      $1,250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT............................................................        $400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA..............................................................      $2,476,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ............................................        $250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO...........................................................        $420,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, CA........................................      $1,929,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW RIVER INLET, NC.............................................................        $600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY............................................      $6,150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW YORK HARBOR, NY.............................................................      $3,796,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT REMOVAL)........................................      $7,200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)...................      $1,045,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ...................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA..........................................................      $1,280,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NEWTOWN CREEK, NY...............................................................         $60,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NIMROD LAKE, AR.................................................................      $1,957,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK............................................................        $420,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NOLIN LAKE, KY..................................................................      $2,821,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NOME HARBOR, AK.................................................................        $973,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NORFOLK HARBOR, VA..............................................................     $11,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NORFORK LAKE, AR................................................................      $6,224,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH............................................        $296,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA..............................................        $668,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT.........................................................        $719,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE GEORGETOWN, TX...................................      $2,536,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT......................................................        $838,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT.......................................................        $559,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX....................................................      $1,373,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND....................................................     $10,477,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OAKLAND HARBOR, CA..............................................................      $7,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD..............................      $1,400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA............................................................      $1,520,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN & OH......................................     $31,433,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV..........................................     $28,023,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH..........................................     $34,802,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, IN & OH...................................      $5,682,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & WV.......................................        $633,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & OH.......................................      $3,088,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS..............................................................      $2,505,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL.........................................................      $2,444,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN....................................................      $8,237,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI............................................................      $1,172,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OOLOGAH LAKE, OK................................................................      $2,089,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OPTIMA LAKE, OK.................................................................        $197,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ORWELL LAKE, MN.................................................................        $462,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR..............................................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OSWEGO HARBOR, NY...............................................................         $34,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH............................................................        $730,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA..............................................     $10,505,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK & DAM, AR................................................      $5,485,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH............................................................      $1,297,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ............................................................      $1,522,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY............................................................      $1,361,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL...........................................................      $2,510,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL..........................................................         $55,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PAPILLION CREEK, NE.............................................................        $738,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS...........................................................     $10,910,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM, NJ..........................................        $570,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX..............................................................        $992,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PATOKA LAKE, IN.................................................................        $980,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PEARL RIVER, MS & LA............................................................        $145,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS...............................................      $1,332,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL............................................................         $67,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE CHEROKEES, OK..................................        $167,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PERRY LAKE, KS..................................................................      $2,254,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PETERSBURG HARBOR, AK...........................................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PHILPOTT LAKE, VA & NC..........................................................      $6,396,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PIG ISLAND GUT, ME..............................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV..............................................        $557,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PINE CREEK LAKE, OK.............................................................      $1,032,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PINE FLAT LAKE, CA..............................................................      $3,378,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PIPESTEM LAKE, ND...............................................................        $550,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO.........................................................      $2,156,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  POMONA LAKE, KS.................................................................      $1,965,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY..........................................................         $60,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVER, DC (DRIFT REMOVAL).................................        $845,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROCTOR DAM AND LAKE, TX........................................................      $2,336,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK...................................................      $1,360,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL...................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR...................................................          $3,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA...................................................      $2,132,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT...................................................      $1,050,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC...................................................         $30,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE...................................................         $40,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL...................................................      $1,450,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA...................................................        $122,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI...................................................        $604,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL...................................................        $106,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN...................................................        $185,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY...................................................          $2,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA...................................................         $60,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA...................................................      $1,200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD...................................................        $475,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME...................................................        $750,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI...................................................        $430,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN...................................................         $84,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO...................................................          $4,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS...................................................         $77,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC...................................................        $655,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH...................................................        $275,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ...................................................      $1,506,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY...................................................      $1,928,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH...................................................        $295,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR...................................................        $200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA...................................................        $170,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI...................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC...................................................        $625,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN...................................................          $3,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX...................................................        $451,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA...................................................        $870,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA...................................................        $459,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI...................................................        $239,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PROMPTON LAKE, PA...............................................................        $506,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA............................................        $905,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA................................................................         $22,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA............................................................      $1,590,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV...........................................................      $2,237,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, NJ........................................        $400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RARITAN RIVER, NJ...............................................................        $225,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RATHBUN LAKE, IA................................................................      $2,501,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX............................................................      $1,525,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA...............................................................      $3,752,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN..........................................................        $233,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE, RED ROCK, IA.............................................      $9,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL...................................................      $3,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA...................................................      $1,410,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  REND LAKE, IL...................................................................      $5,702,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN...............................      $4,381,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RICHARD B. RUSSEL DAM & LAKE, GA & SC...........................................      $9,387,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RICHMOND HARBOR, CA.............................................................      $8,375,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK...................................      $7,604,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY............................................................         $56,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR...................................................        $579,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC...........................................................         $50,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS.............................................................      $1,200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH..........................................         $35,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY............................................................      $2,606,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  RUDEE INLET, VA.................................................................        $520,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX......................................................     $15,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SACO RIVER, ME..................................................................        $140,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), CA..........................................      $3,585,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA...........................      $1,475,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL, CA......................................        $161,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAGINAW RIVER, MI...............................................................      $3,190,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SALAMONIE LAKE, IN..............................................................      $1,012,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE..................................................      $1,067,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX...............................................      $6,396,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAN FRANCISCO BAY, DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA....................................      $1,087,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA (DRIFT REMOVAL)................................      $3,090,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA........................................................      $2,776,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA.........................................      $6,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR.............................................................      $3,700,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA........................................      $2,750,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH.............................................................      $1,102,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARD, NJ...................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA.......................................................      $4,883,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA........................................................      $2,040,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM.....................................................      $1,220,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SARDIS LAKE, OK.................................................................      $1,130,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA.............................................................     $18,462,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA................................................        $230,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA............................................................      $5,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCARBOROUGH RIVER, ME...........................................................        $160,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ.............................................         $33,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA.............................................      $1,751,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO.............................................        $765,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID.............................................        $499,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS.............................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD.............................................         $60,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO.............................................        $327,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT.............................................        $270,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND.............................................        $253,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM.............................................        $532,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK.............................................        $900,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR.............................................         $92,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA.............................................         $46,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD.............................................        $144,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX.............................................        $194,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT.............................................        $653,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA.............................................        $447,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY.............................................        $213,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA............................................................        $250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SEATTLE HARBOR, WA..............................................................        $951,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SEBEWAING RIVER, MI.............................................................         $75,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SHARK RIVER, NJ.................................................................        $500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA.........................................................      $2,496,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SHINNECOCK INLET, NY............................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ..............................................         $80,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SHREWSBURY RIVER MAIN CHANNEL, NJ...............................................         $80,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC..........................................................        $150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SIUSLAW RIVER, OR...............................................................      $1,083,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SKIATOOK LAKE, OK...............................................................      $1,465,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO.............................................................      $1,160,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX.............................................................      $3,292,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SOURIS RIVER, ND................................................................        $509,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY....................................        $925,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI.............................................................      $1,233,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI...........................................................        $755,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ST. LUCIE INLET, FL.............................................................        $250,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (NAVIGATION STRUCTURES).....................................     $22,074,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT..................................................        $467,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA.........................................................        $265,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX.......................................................      $2,150,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  STILLWATER LAKE, PA.............................................................        $363,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  STOCKTON LAKE, MO...............................................................      $4,153,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV......................................................      $1,273,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI............................         $19,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SUCCESS LAKE, CA................................................................      $2,529,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA..........................................................      $2,980,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV...........................................................      $2,636,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH.........................................................        $746,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IL....................................        $689,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IN....................................        $125,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ME....................................         $20,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MI....................................      $2,501,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MN....................................        $446,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ND....................................         $35,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, NY....................................        $635,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OH....................................        $257,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OR....................................      $4,100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, PA....................................        $107,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA....................................         $74,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WI....................................        $509,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SUTTON LAKE, WV.................................................................      $3,075,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA...........................................................        $600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR........................................................      $8,293,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA......................................................        $142,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TAMPA HARBOR, FL................................................................      $5,200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TANGIER CHANNEL, VA.............................................................      $1,135,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY...........................................................      $1,232,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK........................................................      $4,459,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TENNESSEE RIVER, TN.............................................................     $16,540,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL & MS.......................      $2,344,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS...........................................     $28,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA...................................................      $2,133,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX.....................................................      $1,436,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION ASSESSMENT, TX...........................................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  THE DALLES LOCK & DAM, WA & OR..................................................      $8,702,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  THOMASTON DAM, CT...............................................................        $994,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TIOGA HAMMOND LAKES, PA.........................................................      $2,384,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TIONESTA LAKE, PA...............................................................      $2,200,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TOLEDO HARBOR, OH...............................................................      $7,849,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TOM JENKINS DAM, OH.............................................................        $603,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TORONTO LAKE, KS................................................................        $652,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TOWN BLUFF DAM, B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX.......................................      $2,666,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TOWN CREEK, SC..................................................................        $380,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT..............................................................        $797,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TRINIDAD LAKE, CO...............................................................      $1,243,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TULLY LAKE, MA..................................................................        $726,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS...........................................................      $2,644,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TWO RIVERS DAM, NM..............................................................        $601,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  TYGART LAKE, WV.................................................................      $1,434,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  UMPQUA RIVER, OR................................................................        $800,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  UNION CITY LAKE, PA.............................................................        $425,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  UNION LAKE, MO..................................................................          $5,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT...........................................................        $683,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS MODEL STUDY, CO, NM, TX.......................      $1,000,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  VENTURA HARBOR, CA..............................................................      $2,840,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC.............................................      $3,591,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WACO LAKE, TX...................................................................      $3,131,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WALLACE LAKE, LA................................................................        $241,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX............................................................      $2,175,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA..........................................      $8,394,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC...........................................................         $25,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL...........................................        $400,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, VA...........................................        $104,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA............................................          $5,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA..........................         $30,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA, VA...........................................        $600,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL.............................................................        $590,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WAURIKA LAKE, OK................................................................      $2,568,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WEBBERS FALLS LOCK & DAM, OK....................................................      $5,617,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH................................................        $750,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WEST HILL DAM, MA...............................................................        $842,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL................................................      $8,845,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT..........................................................        $849,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY...........................................................        $100,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WESTVILLE LAKE, MA..............................................................        $661,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WHITE RIVER, AR.................................................................         $30,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ...........................................................        $607,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WHITNEY LAKE, TX................................................................      $7,221,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY..........................................................        $642,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WICOMICO RIVER, MD..............................................................      $1,500,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR........................................        $258,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR............................................         $85,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA....................................................         $75,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH......................................................      $1,611,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR...........................................................        $657,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE...........................................................      $7,020,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...........................................................     $12,846,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WILSON LAKE, KS.................................................................      $1,715,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WISTER LAKE, OK.................................................................        $922,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY.............................................      $8,089,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN...........................................................        $180,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA.........................................................      $1,078,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WOONSOCKET, RI..................................................................        $300,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX..................................................      $3,804,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR......................................................      $1,986,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  YATESVILLE LAKE, KY.............................................................      $1,154,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  YAZOO RIVER, MS.................................................................        $154,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  YELLOW BEND PORT, AR............................................................        $115,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA........................................................        $480,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD................................................      $2,358,000  The President
Corps of Engineers..............  Operation and Maintenance.........  YUBA RIVER, CA..................................................................        $121,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Ak Chin Indian Water Rights Settlement Act Project, AZ..........................     $10,960,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado River Storage Participating Project, CO.......     $12,462,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Arbuckle Project, OK............................................................        $230,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Balmorhea Project, TX...........................................................         $51,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Boise Area Projects, ID.........................................................      $5,546,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Cachuma Project, CA.............................................................      $1,401,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  California Investigations Program, CA...........................................        $233,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Calleguas Municipal Water District Recycling Project, CA........................      $1,400,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Canadian River Project, TX......................................................        $165,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Carlsbad Project, NM............................................................      $4,780,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Central Valley Projects, CA:
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      American River Division, Folsom Dam Unit/Mormon Island, CA..................     $10,384,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Auburn-Folsom South Unit, CA................................................      $1,400,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Delta Division, CA..........................................................     $20,008,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      East Side Division, CA......................................................      $4,401,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Friant Division, CA.........................................................     $13,075,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Miscellaneous Project Programs, CA..........................................     $13,859,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Replacements, Additions, and Extraordinary Maint. Program, CA...............     $21,656,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Sacramento River Division, CA...............................................     $43,364,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      San Felipe Division, CA.....................................................      $1,179,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      San Joaquin Division, CA....................................................        $400,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Shasta Division, CA.........................................................     $10,491,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Trinity River Division, CA..................................................     $16,661,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Water and Power Operations, CA..............................................      $9,891,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      West San Joaquin Division, San Luis Unit, CA................................     $15,400,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Yield Feasibility Investigation, CA.........................................        $448,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Collbran Project, CO............................................................      $2,514,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado Investigations Program, CO.............................................        $183,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado River Basin Project--Central Arizona Project, AZ.......................      $9,416,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado River Front Work and Levee System, AZ..................................      $2,255,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado-Big Thompson Project, CO...............................................     $12,778,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Columbia and Snake River Salmon Recovery Project, ID............................     $18,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Columbia Basin Project, WA......................................................     $12,075,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Crooked River Project, OR.......................................................        $944,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Deschutes Project, OR...........................................................      $1,326,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Eastern New Mexico Investigations Program, NM...................................         $23,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Eastern Oregon Projects, OR.....................................................        $852,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Fort Peck Reservation/Dry Prairie Rural Water System, MT........................      $6,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Fruitgrowers Dam Project, CO....................................................        $319,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Fryingpan-Arkansas Project--Arkansas Valley Conduit, CO.........................      $3,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, CO..................................................      $8,824,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Grand Valley Unit, CRBSCP, Title II, CO.........................................      $1,540,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Halfway Wash Project/Study, NV..................................................         $75,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Hungry Horse Project, MT........................................................        $702,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Huntley Project, MT.............................................................        $115,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Hyrum Project, UT...............................................................        $324,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Idaho Investigations Program, ID................................................        $390,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Jicarilla Apache Rural Water System, NM.........................................        $500,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Kansas Investigations Program, KS...............................................          $5,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Kendrick Project, WY............................................................      $4,310,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Klamath Dam Removal Study, OR...................................................      $5,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Klamath Project, OR.............................................................     $22,500,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lahontan Basin Project, NV......................................................      $6,723,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lake Mead/Las Vegas Wash Program, NV............................................      $1,850,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lake Tahoe Regional Wetlands, CA................................................         $94,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Leadville/Arkansas River Recovery Project, CO...................................      $6,659,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lewis and Clark Rural Water System, SD, IA, MN..................................     $10,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lewiston Orchards Project, ID...................................................        $826,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Long Beach Area Water Reclamation Project, CA...................................      $1,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Long Beach Desalination Project, CA.............................................      $1,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lower Colorado River Investigations Program, CO.................................        $137,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lower Rio Grande Water Conservation Project, TX.................................         $50,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lower Yellowstone Project, MT...................................................         $49,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Mancos Project, CO..............................................................      $1,663,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  McGee Creek Project, OK.........................................................        $680,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Mid-Dakota Rural Water Project, SD..............................................         $15,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Middle Rio Grande Project, NM...................................................     $25,745,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Milk River Project, MT..........................................................      $3,783,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Minidoka Area Projects, ID......................................................      $5,211,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Mirage Flats Project, NE........................................................        $144,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Mni Wiconi Project, SD..........................................................     $30,480,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Montana Investigations Program, MT..............................................         $20,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Moon Lake Project, UT...........................................................         $51,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Mountain Park Project, OK.......................................................        $479,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Navajo Gallup Water Supply, NM..................................................     $10,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Navajo Nation Investigations Program, NM........................................        $114,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Newton Project, UT..............................................................         $95,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Norman Project, OK..............................................................        $476,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  North Platte Project, WY........................................................      $1,835,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Northern Arizona Investigations Program, AZ.....................................        $182,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Northern Utah Investigations Program, UT........................................        $602,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Nueces River Project, TX........................................................        $563,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Ogden River Project, UT.........................................................        $446,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Oklahoma Investigations Program, OK.............................................         $47,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Oregon Investigations Program,OR................................................        $457,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Orland Project, CA..............................................................        $767,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Paradox Valley Unit, CRBSCP, Title II, CO.......................................      $2,943,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Pecos River Basin Water Salvage Project, NM.....................................        $485,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Perkins County Rural Water District, SD.........................................      $1,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Phoenix Metropolitan Water Reclamation and Reuse Project, AZ....................        $200,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Pine River Project, CO..........................................................        $563,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Provo River Project, UT.........................................................      $1,596,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  P-SMBP--Garrison Diversion Unit, ND.............................................     $50,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Rapid Valley Project, SD........................................................         $84,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Rio Grande Project, NM..........................................................      $7,363,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Rocky Boys/North Central MT Rural Water System, MT..............................      $5,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Rogue River Basin Project, Talent Division, OR..................................      $1,576,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Salt River Project, AZ..........................................................        $800,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Salton Sea Research Project, CA.................................................        $400,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  San Angelo Project, TX..........................................................        $418,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Settlement Act Project, AZ........................        $325,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  San Diego Area Water Reclamation Program, CA....................................      $4,969,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  San Jose Area Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, CA...........................        $242,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  San Juan River Basin Investigations Program, NM.................................         $91,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  San Luis Valley Project, CO.....................................................      $5,062,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Scofield Project, UT............................................................        $423,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Shoshone Project, WY............................................................      $1,198,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Soboba, CA......................................................................      $4,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Solano Project, CA..............................................................      $3,835,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  South/Central Arizona Investigations Program, AZ................................        $608,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Southern California Investigations Program, CA..................................        $762,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Southern Nevada/Utah Investigations Program, UT.................................         $26,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Southern New Mexico/West Texas Investigations Program, NM, TX...................         $91,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Southern Utah Investigations Program, UT........................................        $128,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Strawberry Valley Project, UT...................................................        $311,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Sun River Project, MT...........................................................        $324,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Texas Investigations Program, TX................................................         $47,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Tualatin Project, OR............................................................        $553,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Tucumcari Project, NM...........................................................         $41,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Umatilla Project, OR............................................................      $4,137,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Uncompahgre Project, CO.........................................................        $397,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Upper Rio Grande Basin Investigations Program, NM...............................         $35,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Ventura River Project, CA.......................................................        $212,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  W.C. Austin Project, OK.........................................................        $499,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Washington Area Projects, WA....................................................        $459,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Washington Investigations Program, WA...........................................         $75,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Washita Basin Project, OK.......................................................      $1,432,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Weber Basin Project, UT.........................................................      $1,670,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Weber River Project, UT.........................................................        $205,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Wichita Project (Equus Beds Division), KS.......................................         $50,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Wichita Project, KS.............................................................        $414,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Yakima Project, WA..............................................................      $8,485,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, WA................................     $16,395,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Yuma Area Projects, AZ..........................................................     $21,420,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Items not listed under states...................................................  ..............  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title I..........................     $11,536,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project--Title II.........................      $7,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), Section 5................................      $8,902,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), Section 8................................      $3,752,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program................................        $635,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Dam Safety Program:
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Department of the Interior Dam Safety Program...............................      $1,900,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Initiate Safety of Dams Corrective Action...................................     $74,274,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Safety Evaluation of Existing Dams..........................................     $19,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Drought Emergency Assistance Program............................................        $380,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Emergency Planning and Disaster Response Program................................      $1,157,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Endangered Species Recovery Implementation Program..............................     $23,721,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Environmental and Interagency Coordination Activities...........................      $1,883,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Environmental Program Administration............................................      $1,140,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Examination of Existing Structures..............................................      $9,037,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Federal Building Seismic Safety Program.........................................      $1,140,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  General Planning Activities.....................................................      $2,347,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Land Resources Management Program...............................................     $10,665,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Lower Colorado River Operations Program.........................................     $25,300,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Miscellaneous Flood Control Operations..........................................        $803,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Native American Affairs Program.................................................      $7,465,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Negotiation and Administration of Water Marketing...............................      $1,924,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Operation and Program Management................................................      $1,980,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (other Pick Sloan)............................     $40,357,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Power Program Services..........................................................      $1,576,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Public Access and Safety Program................................................        $771,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Reclamation Law Administration..................................................      $2,265,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Recreation and Fish and Wildlife Program Administration.........................      $2,137,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Research and Development:
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Desalination and Water Purification Program.................................      $3,666,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Science and Technology Program..............................................     $12,488,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Rural Water Program, Title I....................................................      $2,677,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Site Security Activities........................................................     $30,268,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  United States/Mexico Border Issues--Technical Support...........................         $90,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Upper Colorado River Operations Program.........................................        $252,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  Water Conservation Field Services Program.......................................      $7,854,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......  WaterSMART Program:
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      WaterSMART Grants (Challenge Grant in 2010).................................     $20,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Title XVI Water Reclamation/Reuse Projects..................................      $7,689,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  Water and Related Resources.......      Basin Studies...............................................................      $4,000,000  The President
Bureau of Reclamation...........  CALFED............................  California Bay-Delta Restoration................................................     $40,000,000  The President
Department of the Interior......  CUPCA.............................  Central Utah Project Completion Act.............................................     $43,004,000  The President
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
                                                                        YEAR 2011
                                                                [In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                         Senate Committee recommendation
                                                                                                                             compared with (+ or -)
                                Item                                       2010       Budget estimate     Committee    ---------------------------------
                                                                      appropriation                     recommendation        2010
                                                                                                                         appropriation   Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

               TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL

                       DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

                     Corps of Engineers--Civil

Investigations.....................................................         160,000          104,000          166,000           +6,000          +62,000
Construction.......................................................       2,031,000        1,690,000        1,780,000         -251,000          +90,000
Mississippi River and tributaries..................................         340,000          240,000          335,000           -5,000          +95,000
    Recission......................................................  ...............         -23,000   ...............  ...............         +23,000
    Recission of emergency funding.................................  ...............         -35,000   ...............  ...............         +35,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Mississippi River and tributaries..................         340,000          182,000          335,000           -5,000         +153,000

Operations and maintenance.........................................       2,400,000        2,361,000        2,495,000          +95,000         +134,000
Regulatory program.................................................         190,000          193,000          193,000           +3,000   ...............
FUSRAP.............................................................         134,000          130,000          130,000           -4,000   ...............
Flood control and coastal emergencies..............................  ...............          30,000           30,000          +30,000   ...............
Expenses...........................................................         185,000          185,000          185,000   ...............  ...............
Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)............           5,000            6,000            6,000           +1,000   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, title I, Department of Defense--Civil.................       5,445,000        4,881,000        5,320,000         -125,000         +439,000
          Appropriations...........................................      (5,445,000)      (4,939,000)      (5,320,000)       (-125,000)       (+381,000)
          Rescissions..............................................  ...............        (-23,000)  ...............  ...............        (+23,000)
          Recission of emergency funding...........................  ...............        (-35,000)  ...............  ...............        (+35,000)

                TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

              Central Utah Project Completion Account

Central Utah project construction..................................          38,800           38,810           38,810              +10   ...............
Fish, wildlife, and recreation mitigation and conservation.........           1,500            2,500            2,500           +1,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................          40,300           41,310           41,310           +1,010   ...............

Program oversight and administration...............................           1,704            1,694            1,694              -10   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Central Utah project completion account...............          42,004           43,004           43,004           +1,000   ...............

                       Bureau of Reclamation

Water and related resources........................................         951,158          913,582          938,600          -12,558          +25,018
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Subtotal, Water and related resources......................         951,158          913,582          938,600          -12,558          +25,018

Central Valley project restoration fund............................          35,358           49,915           49,915          +14,557   ...............
California Bay-Delta restoration...................................          40,000           40,000           40,000   ...............  ...............
Policy and administration..........................................          61,200           61,200           61,200   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Bureau of Reclamation.................................       1,087,716        1,064,697        1,089,715           +1,999          +25,018
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, title II, Department of the Interior..................       1,129,720        1,107,701        1,132,719           +2,999          +25,018

                  TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

                          Energy Programs

Energy efficiency and renewable energy.............................       2,242,500        2,355,473        2,287,800          +45,300          -67,673
Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................         171,982          185,930          190,180          +18,198           +4,250
Nuclear energy.....................................................         786,637          824,052          783,170           -3,467          -40,882
Fossil energy research and development.............................         672,383          586,583          725,950          +53,567         +139,367
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves.............................          23,627           23,614           23,614              -13   ...............
Strategic petroleum reserve........................................         243,823          138,861          209,861          -33,962          +71,000
Northeast home heating oil reserve.................................          11,300           11,300           11,300   ...............  ...............
Energy Information Administration..................................         110,595          128,833          119,000           +8,405           -9,833
Non-defense environmental clean up.................................         244,673          225,163          244,163             -510          +19,000
Uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning fund........         573,850          730,498          550,000          -23,850         -180,498
    Offsetting collections.........................................  ...............        -200,000   ...............  ...............        +200,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, UEDDF..............................................         573,850          530,498          550,000          -23,850          +19,502

Science............................................................       4,903,710        5,121,437        5,012,000         +108,290         -109,437
Nuclear Waste Disposal.............................................          98,400   ...............  ...............         -98,400   ...............
Advanced research projects agency--Energy ARPA-E...................  ...............         299,966          200,000         +200,000          -99,966

Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program.......................          43,000           58,000           58,000          +15,000   ...............
    Offsetting collection..........................................         -43,000          -58,000          -58,000          -15,000   ...............
    Proposed change in subsidy cost................................  ...............         500,000          380,000         +380,000         -120,000
    Additional loan volume.........................................  ...............         360,000          170,000         +170,000         -190,000
    Additional subsidy cost........................................  ...............         300,000   ...............  ...............        -300,000
    Loan volume (rescission).......................................  ...............  ...............        -140,000         -140,000         -140,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Innovative Technology Guarantee Pgm................  ...............       1,160,000          410,000         +410,000         -750,000

Advanced technology vehicles manufacturing loans program...........          20,000            9,998            9,998          -10,002   ...............

Departmental administration........................................         288,684          288,872          288,872             +188   ...............
    Miscellaneous revenues.........................................        -119,740         -119,740         -119,740   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Net appropriation............................................         168,944          169,132          169,132             +188   ...............

Office of the Inspector General....................................          51,927           42,850           42,850           -9,077   ...............

                  Atomic Energy Defense Activities

National Nuclear Security Administration:
    Weapons activities.............................................       6,384,431        7,008,835        7,018,835         +634,404          +10,000
    Defense nuclear nonproliferation...............................       2,136,709        2,687,167        2,612,167         +475,458          -75,000
    Naval reactors.................................................         945,133        1,070,486        1,040,486          +95,353          -30,000
    Office of the Administrator....................................         420,754          448,267          438,267          +17,513          -10,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration...........       9,887,027       11,214,755       11,109,755       +1,222,728         -105,000

Defense environmental cleanup......................................       5,642,331        5,588,039        5,262,838         -379,493         -325,201
Other defense activities...........................................         847,468          866,317          866,317          +18,849   ...............
    Acquisition workforce capacity and capabilities................  ...............          11,892   ...............  ...............         -11,892
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Other defense activities...........................         847,468          878,209          866,317          +18,849          -11,892

Defense nuclear waste disposal.....................................          98,400   ...............  ...............         -98,400   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities......................      16,475,226       17,681,003       17,238,910         +763,684         -442,093

                  Power Marketing Administrations

Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration.......          78,444            8,034            8,034          -70,410   ...............
    Offsetting collection..........................................         -70,806           -8,034           -8,034          +62,772   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, O&M, Southeastern Power Administration.............           7,638   ...............  ...............          -7,638   ...............

Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration.......          82,944           46,312           46,312          -36,632   ...............
    Offsetting collection..........................................         -38,000          -33,613          -33,613           +4,387   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, O&M, Southwestern Power Administration.............          44,944           12,699           12,699          -32,245   ...............

Construction, rehabilitation, operation and maintenance, Western            610,397          285,864          285,864         -324,533   ...............
 Area Power Administration.........................................
    Offsetting collection..........................................        -349,807         -180,306         -180,306         +169,501   ...............
    Offsetting collection Colorado River Dam Fund..................          -3,879   ...............  ...............          +3,879   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, O&M, Western Area Power Administration.............         256,711          105,558          105,558         -151,153   ...............

Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund..................           2,568            3,715            3,715           +1,147   ...............
    Offsetting collections.........................................  ...............          -3,495           -3,495           -3,495   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Falcon and Amistad O&M fund........................           2,568              220              220           -2,348   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Power Marketing Administrations.......................         311,861          118,477          118,477         -193,384   ...............

                Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Salaries and expenses..............................................         298,000          315,600          315,600          +17,600   ...............
Revenues applied...................................................        -298,000         -315,600         -315,600          -17,600   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, title III, Department of Energy.......................      27,111,438       29,613,170       28,346,405       +1,234,967       -1,266,765

                   TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES

Appalachian Regional Commission....................................          76,000           76,000           76,000   ...............  ...............
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board............................          26,086           28,640           26,086   ...............          -2,554
Delta Regional Authority...........................................          13,000           13,000           13,000   ...............  ...............
Denali Commission..................................................          11,965           11,965           11,965   ...............  ...............
Northern Border Regional Commission................................           1,500            1,500   ...............          -1,500           -1,500
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission.............................             250              250   ...............            -250             -250

Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
    Salaries and expenses..........................................       1,056,000        1,043,483        1,053,483           -2,517          +10,000
    Revenues.......................................................        -902,402         -906,220         -915,220          -12,818           -9,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................         153,598          137,263          138,263          -15,335           +1,000

    Office of Inspector General....................................          10,860           10,102           10,860   ...............            +758
    Revenues.......................................................          -9,774           -9,092           -9,774   ...............            -682
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................           1,086            1,010            1,086   ...............             +76
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Nuclear Regulatory Commission.........................         154,684          138,273          139,349          -15,335           +1,076

Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board...............................           3,891            2,490            3,891   ...............          +1,401

Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas                      4,466            4,285            4,285             -181   ...............
 Transportation Projects...........................................
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, title IV, Independent agencies........................         291,842          276,403          274,576          -17,266           -1,827
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Grand total..................................................      33,978,000       35,878,274       35,073,700       +1,095,700         -804,574
          Appropriations...........................................     (33,978,000)     (35,936,274)     (35,213,700)     (+1,235,700)       (-722,574)
          Rescissions..............................................  ...............        (-23,000)       (-140,000)       (-140,000)       (-117,000)
          Rescission of emergency funding..........................  ...............        (-35,000)  ...............  ...............        (+35,000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------