[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]
DEPARTUM OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF RESOURCES MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF FORESTRY LITTLE TINICUM ISLAND STATE FOREST NATUR AREA (PROPOSED) Jl- VALLEY FORGE STATE FOREST QH 76.5 .P4 L5 1985 b NOW, 08 UNOWU WOO OH= 4t hudga Moslo" :Rw' st can as"cls amptsom &T, at Can$& ts" smapow Zone k.ITTLE@'- TINICUM. 1SLAN Proposed State ForLsat HatN/al Area-'.-' all- Project coordinati6n--.,'pr1ovid.,bd-, by the Pennsylvania Department dif Eniltonment4l-. Resourqes,. Office of-Resou'rces.nanagementp BurLau of Forestry COASTAL ZONE INFORMATION CENTER Funding for this study is provided by-'the'" -Viedshral. Governmipnt through the Office of Coasta-1 Zone Management, @Nati,ona,17069anim C o'h"Under S and Atmospheric Administrati ection 305 --the oa.0 a. Zone Management Act of 1972 (P.I... @-9k;-5'83) acting Pennsylvania Department of Env.1iroig"Wffiental Resio_urcei.'@, @@Otki` Resources Management. property of cSC Library TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Little Tinicum Island Management Plan ...................... 1 Location and'Administratioii ............................ 1 Management Designatio' n........ ....................... State Forest Natural Areas ....... ................... 0.......0 1 Definition ................... ........ o...... ....... I Administrative Guidelines .............................. 2. Operating Guidelines .................................. 2 Little Tinicum Island Natural Area Guidelinesi.v ............ Inter-Agency Cooperation ..... ....................... 4. Public Participation .................................. . 5 Project Considerations .......................................... 5 Project Review .................................... , ......... 8 Appendix A: Little Tinicum Island: An Environmental Analysis and Evaluation of Alternative Utilization Plans. Tredinnick/Waetzman Associates, November 1985. Appendix B: Little Tinicum Island Maps. Tredinnick/Waetzman Associates, November 1985. Scale 1" = 2001 Map 1: Physical Features, Map 2: Recreation@ Development Proposals Map 3: Vegetation LITTLE TINICUM ISLAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Location and Administration Little Tinicum Island in the.Delaware River estuary, Delaware County, Pennsylvania, represents a unique ecosystem in the Commonwealth. It is administered by the Department of Environmental Resources, Office of Resources Management, Bureau of Forestry, Valley Forge State Forest. It is located in a heavily industrialized section of the state south of Philadelphia. The long axis of the Island runs east to west. it is about two miles long and varies from 200 to 900 feet widLe. it is bounded on the north by a shallow channel, or back channel., that accesses a number of small marinas in Essington and Darby Creek and the south by a dredged forty-foot deep channel that accommodates international freighters and tankers. Philadelphia International Airport is immediately no rtheast of theIsland. The western section of the Island is directly beneath the glide path for landings. Management Desianation An estuary is a body-of water where fresh river waters meet and mix with saline seawaters'. This results in diluted seawater or brackish water. Because of the unique nature of this area, compared to other State Forest lands;, the Bureau will recommend to the Environmental Quality Board in 1986 that. it be designated as a Natural Area. Management will- be predicated on protection of this ecosystem and its unique animal and plant inhabitants and. will follow the standard administrative and operating guide:lines for Natural. Areas. STATE FOREST NATURAL AREAS Definition Recognizing that there is abasic need for th.e preservation of certain areas of forest land with either limited or no human disturbance, the following definition has been adopted for Natural Areas that are or will be, established on. State Forest. land: A Natural Area is an area af unique scenic, historic', geologic or ecological value, which will be maintained in, a natural condition by allowing physical arid' biologic'al. processes to operate, usual.1y'without direct human intervention. These areas are set aside to provide locations for scientific observation of natural systems, to protect examples of typical and unique plant and animal communities, and to protect outstanding examples of natural interest and beauty. Administrative Guidelines The guidelines governing the administration of Natural Areas are as follows: 1. No human habitation is permitted, except that primitive type backpack camping may be permitted in designated areas only. 2. Access for all but essential administrative activities is restrictd to foot travel and non-motorized watercraft, except in designated areas. 3. Buildings and other improvements are restricted to the minimum required for public health, safety and interpretive aids. 4. Timber harvesting is not permitted except as may be required for maintenance of the public safety. 5. Leases and mineral development are prohibited; however, subsurface oil and gas rights may be leased where no surface use or distrubance of any kind will take place on the Natural Area. New rights-of-way are prohibited except for designated utility corridors in the Bucktail Natural Area. Operating Guidelines The following operating guidelines have been developed to further refine the administrative guidelines: Natural Area Location Factors Any unique or unusual biologic, geologic or historic areas can be considered for designation as Natural Areas. The size of these areas will generally be small but may be as large as several thousand acres. They should be created whenever other resource development would have an adverse effect on their future utility and value. Areas recommended for Natural Area designation should be submitted to the State Forester by the District Forester along with a map and a complete documentation describing the character of the area. Final approval and official designation as a Natural Area will be by action of the Environmental Quality Board under authority granted in Section 1920-A of the -2- Administrative Code of 1929 as Amended by Act 275, December 3, 1970. Natural Area Management Natural Areas will be left undisturbed with natural succession allowed to occur" Intervention will permitted when man-caused activities or events threaten its natural value. A 660 foot wide uneven-age management buffer will be maintained around Natural Areas except when a road, pipeline or powerline serves as a boundary in which case a 330 foot wide buffer will apply. Existing right-of-way expansion will be considered on an individual case basis. Expansion approval will be considered when the project will not harm the feature for which the area was designated and, is justified as the alternative that will result in the least overall ecological damage to State Forest lands. Proposed right-of-way expansion will undergo a Project Review as detailed in the Report Section of the Forest Resource Plan. Aerial spraying of herbicides to maintain rights-of-way within and bordering Natural Areas will be prohibited. Vegetation on these rights-of way may be cut and controlled by direct spray application to cut stems. Insect and disease control will be considered on an individual case basis. Control measures will be considered if the feature for which the area was designated is in jeopardy. All proposed insect and disease control activities will undergo a Project Review as detailed in Report Section of the Forest Resource Plan. Fire control is permitted as per normal operating procedures of the Bureau of Forestry.* Horse-back riding and handicapped apparatus equipped with electric motors may be permitted on designated, maintained trails. No artificial regeneration will be permitted in Natural Areas. Hunting and fishing will be permitted in Natural Areas unless otherwise posted. Any management or requested activity on Natural Areas that will result in some form of disturbance must be approved by the State Forester. Signs will be erected at access points and where needed along roads bordering Natural Areas. Signs will indicate the name of the Natural Area, why the area was set aside and any special restrictions which might apply. Certain Natural Areas have been designated by the Bureau and the Pennsylvania Fish Commission as protection areas for reptiles and amphibians. Signs will be maintained stating that the taking, catching, killing or possession of any reptile or amphibian within the area is prohibited. Little Tinicum Island Natural Area Guidelines Because of the diversity of the nature, type, and size of Natural Areas, specific guidelines are needed to fit each area. The following guidelines for Little Tinicum Island clarify the State Forest Natural Areas administrative and operating guidelines. 1. Primitive type backpack camping is permitted. 2. Access to the Island by motorized watercraft is permitted. No motorized vehicles are permitted on the Island. 3. Trails or other physical improvements will not be made on the Island. 4. On official designation of Little Tinicus Island as a Natural Area by the Environmental Quality Board, the Bureau and the Pennsylvania Fish Commission will designate it as a Reptile and Amphibian Protection Area. Inter-Agency Cooperation The Bureau of Forestry is committed to sound multiple resource management. The management of many of the fauna resources on State Forest lands is under the jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Game and Fish Commissions (PGC-mammals and birds: PFC-fish, reptiles, amphibians and aquatic invertebrates). The Bureau has management responsibility for the habitat on which these animals depend. It is therefore desirable for all parties to cooperate in their resources management endeavors to attain the goals and objectives of the respective agencies. To promote cooperation in resource management endeavors, separate cooperative agreements have been developed with the Pennsylvania Game Commission and the Pennsylvania Fish Commission. This cooperation will encompass the Little Tinicum Island. In addition, cooperation has been solicited and received for some time with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Bureau will pursue formalizing this cooperation. -4- Public Participation In February, 1986, the Bureau of Forestry held two public meetings to receive public comments on the management of the Valley Forge State Forest. Little Tinicum Island is part of that administrative unit and was a subject open for public input. Written public comments were also solicited with a March 31, 1986, deadline. No comments were received at the meetings or in written form. For additional information on the character and use of the Island and Delaware River and natural resource inventories of the Island, see Appendix A, Little Tinicum Island: An Environmental Analysis and Evaluation of Alternative Utilization Plans, Tredinnick/Waetzman Associates, November 1985. PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS On initiation of any project on State Forest lands that may or will disrupt, alter, or otherwise change the environment, review the following items to ensure that each concern has been adequately considered and addressed. Detailed information about each concern can be obtained from the sources in parentheses. 1. Erosion and Sedimentation: Soil losses and resultant water degradation can be greatly reduced or prevented for most activities (operating/Management Manuals or County Conservation District). 2. Water Quality: Potential sedimentary, thermal, and chemical pollution can be avoided for most activities. Existing pollution can be reduced or eliminated by certain practices or procedures (Operating/Management Manuals or the Bureau of Water Quality Management or Pennsylvania Fish Commission). 3. Air Quality: Potential dust, smoke, chemical, and other particulate pollution can be avoided for most activities. Certain practices, such as timing of the activity, can alleviate potential problems when the pollutant cannot be reduced or prevented (Bureau of Air Quality Control). 4. Water Quantity: Certain practices in or adjacent to wetlands can affect the water level. Streams and bodies of water are also subject to manipulation of water levels. Practices should have an overall beneficial effect and not adversely affect the water level (Bureau of Water Resources Management or Pennsylvania Fish Commission). 5. Groundwater: Potential pollution of groundwater can be avoided for most activities (Operating/Management Manuals or the Bureau of Water Quality Management). 6. Soils: Potential problems, i.e., erosion, stability, overcompaction, saturation, etc., should be anticipated and avoided (SCS County Soil Survey, County Conservation District, or Bureau of Soil and Water Conservation). 7. Unlque'/Unusual Geologic Features: Potential damage to uc ion of t'fi4se features should be anticipated or -dWi3ti- and''Av'ebde@d" (Forei.A;' Re@source Plan and Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Ini'@e*iitoiiy for details of locations. Minerals Section,..Division of State Forest Management or the'Bureau of T60bgrap4ic and Geologic Survey for details of possible*project effect on feature and preventive measures).. 8. Aesthetic (Visual) Values: Often projects can be blended into their surroundings, or the adverse impact of their appearance lessened, by certain practices or procedures (Operating/Management Manuals). 9. Noise Levels: Potential problems for the public, contractors, and employees should be anticipated and avoided. Certain practices or procedures, i.e., timing of the activity, use of buffer zones, etc., can. alleviate potential problems. 10. Archeological Sites/Historic Sites: Potential damage to or destruction of ti@ese features should be anticipated and avoided. Discovery of new sites should be reported to the Division of Forest Advisory Services (Forest Resource Plan and Division of Forest Advisory Services for details of locations. FAS will refer Projects to the Historical and Museum Commission for details of possible project effect on feature and preventive measures). 1I.-.- Recreation Sites/Opportunities: Potential damage to or degradation of existing or potential sites should be anticipated and avoided. Certain practices, i.e., timing of the activity, use of buffer zones, etc., can alleviate potential problems (Division of State Forest Management). 12. Public Health and,Safetjr: Project design and administration must ensure that the public is protected at the project site from all potential hazards that could be associated with the project activities or result-irom',th I4_domoleted'project (Division of State For 6 13. Transportation: Project design must ensure adequate ingress to and egress from the site and minimize disruption of public rights--of-way (Division of State Forest Management). 14. Energy Needs/Use: Energy resources fill domestic and commercial needs. Projects should ensure their conservation. Projects should also be designed to use energy wisely (Division of State Forest Management). 15. Existing/Potential Land Use: Project.design should,,be,., compatible with current zoning for the site.'a ,pd,plaio"@n''ed- f uture uses if any (District Forest Rb96ur'c-e' paps@_and, !mLh the Division of State Forest Ma' @nagq 16. Protected Animals/Plants: Certain' animal and 01aht species have been listed and,givein Protected status by. the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Pennsylvania Game and Fish Commissions and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources. Projects that will have a potential adverse effect on any of these species, or habitats critical to their survival, should be avoided. (For a listing of these species and guidelines for their protection, refer to the Forest Resource Plan, Fauna and Flora Operating Manuals, Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory, Pennsylvania Game Commission, or Pennsylvania Fish Commission). 17. Habitat Diversity and Interspersion: Habitats are classified as either terrestrial, wetland, aquatic or riparian. Management strategies ', in most cases, should strive to maximize diversity- within and between these habitats primarily by promoting v arious habitat components. When protecting-, creating or developing habitat components, consideration should be given to the arrangement or interspersion of these components within an area. (For definitions of diversity an.d interspersion and guidelines,.to promote them, refer to the Fauna Operating Plan and the Forest Resource Plan, Fauna and Flora Management Section). 18. Biological Productivity: 'While'it is the goal of the Bureau to provide for and maintain a diversity of species, we are also striving to promote conditions favorable for the highest possible.numbers of certain species while still maintaining diversity. Management_ for productivity may be aimed at a particular species or group of species while not jeopardizing the area,'G... overall species diversity (Fauna and Flora Operating,,.,. Manuals). 19. Other: Consider other unique features *hI'dh'm'-ay_be-' affected by the proposed project, i.e., scenic.-rivers,_- National Natural Landmarks, etc. '7 20. Permits: Projects affecting or encroaching on wetlands require encroachment permits. New entrances to public roads, other than State Forest roads, require occupancy permits. Certain other activities must be permitted (Division of State Forest Management). PROJECT REVIEW On initiation of any project in the following categories, a Project Review must be completed by the District Forester and approved by the State Forester: 1. Wetlands encroachment. 2. Insect and disease control activities in a Natural Area. 3. Right-of-way expansion in a Natural Area or Wild Area. 4. Surface mining. .5. Addition of Class 1 or 2 roads to the State Forest road system. "6. Other projects as determined by the State Forester. The Project Review will include a description of the project, justification for the project's need, a description of the project site, and a narrative consideration of each of the 20 Project Considerations items. The narrative must include an assessment of the project's probable impact on each factor and whether it is a beneficial or adverse impact. For factors where an adverse impact is predicted, explain the corrective measures to be taken or justification why *nonew are planned. The District Forester will submit the original copy of each Project Review to the State Forester and a copy to each Division within the Bureau for review and comment. Final project approval will be made by the State Forester. The Project Review will be made a permanent part of the project file. 8 LITTLE TINICUM ISLAND Nt An Environmental ........... Analysis and Evaluation of Alternative Utilization Plans fiA TREDINNICK/WAETZMAN ASSOCIATES AN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVE UTILIZATION PLANS FOR LITTLE TINICUM ISLANDJ L DELAWARE. COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA i 7 NOVEMBER, 1985 THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE DIVISION OF FOREST ADVISORY SERVICESj BUREAU OF FORESTRY., PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, FUNDING WAS PROVI.DED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMi. DIVISION OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENTJ*' BUREAU OF WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENTj PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES. 77 Tredinnick/ Waetzman Associates Pos.t. Office 'Box 1161 Havertown, Pa. 19083 215/ 642..- 5200 Principal. Staff: Larry S. Waet2,.man,- AICP Cathy A. Leonard TABLE OF CONTENTS Location of Little Tinicum Island 1 The History of Little Tinicum Island and Vicinity 5 Physical Characteristics of the Island 8 Tides and Navigation near the Island 9 The Quality of Delaware River Water near the Island 12 The Vegetation of Little Tinicum Island 16 Reptiles and Amphibians on the Island 25 Fish of the Delaware River near Little Tinicum Island. 31 Birds of Little Tinicum Island 33 Mammals on Little Tinicum Island 40 Recreational Use of the island and the Delaware River 41 Considerations for Activities and Facilities on the island 54 Four Plans for Little Tinicum Island 62 Endnotes 67 Bibliography 69 Contributors 70 Appendix One - Preliminary Survey of Contaminants in Fish 71 Appendix Two - National Wetlands Inventory Map of Island 84 I LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The Delaware Estuary 2 Figure 2 Regional Map 3 Figure 3 NOAA Chart of Little Tinicum Island 4 Figure 4 Physical Feature of the island 7 Figure 5 Mud Flats around the island 10 Figure 6 Water Quality Data, Paulsboro, New Jersey 13 Figure 7 Water Quality and Waste Dischargers 14 Figure 8 Vegetation Map Back Cover Insert Map Figure 9 Vegetation List 19 Figure 10 The Food Value of Aquatic Plants 24 Figure 11 Possible Amphibians and Reptiles on the Island 29 Figure 12 Amphibian & Reptile Habitats on the Island 30 Figure 13 Recreational Survey Questionaire 42 Figure 14 Number of Visitors Throughout the year 43 Figure 15 Favorite Visiting Spots 47 Figure 16 Recreational and Cultural Sites 49 Figure 17 Commercial, Private & Public Boating Facilities 51 Figure 18 Trail, Campfire and Campsite Areas 59 Figure 19 Facilities Construction Costs 61 Figure 20 National Wetlands Inventory Map 84 II Location of Little Tinicum Island Little Tinicum Island is an island in the Delaware River estuary. An estuary is a body of water in which the fresh waters of a river mix with the saline waters of the sea to create a brackish water or diluted seawater. The tidal section of the river extends north of Philadelphia. The area of brackish water moves with the seasons, but usually occurs south of Little Tinicum Island during most of the year. The Delaware River Estuary contains few islands: Pea Patch and Reedy Islands, which are south of Wilmington Delaware, Chester Island, little Tinicum Island, and Petty Island, see Figure One 1. Little Tinicum Island is located in a heavily industrialized section of the Delaware River Estuary, see Figure Two 2. An oil refinery is located on the New Jersey shore opposite the eastern end of the island. The landing glide path of large commercial jets destined for the Philadelphia International Airport crosses the western end of the island. The altitude of jets crossing the Island is a few hundred feet. The landing runway is less than one half a mile from the eastern tip of the island. Little Tinicum Island is about twelve miles downstream of Philadelphia. It is bounded on its north by a shallow channel that permits entrance to numerous small marinas in Essington and Darby Creek, see Figure Three 3. A dredged forty foot deep shipping channel which accomodates large international tankers and freighters headed for Philadelphia and Camden lies five to eight hundred (500 - 800) feet south of the Island. V C@ :3 Dora F I GURE. 1 632D #Swr 4a rftft n "-,AaW, 7, il@ Artm Ul. M 11ADEL1 JAU C 1 7 WV$j Ypare 76 EN moo shm hate PIP" C_* n ftsdowy:,\@- 7 Ram 3S2 .,V@ Lore C., ton-F HE IRY 15 Hts. Medil W.! -7- Swart re ubon '0: 13 ou gaip add L=@d Aft-.. Os t 2.H Marlton 2 Nat Hq. . C, nneft d. Op Lake-- too Ale quare TER -rg '-oale 1 7- Hook Pauls _Lzkc@ IDEI- C",itte \ r -4 'Gibbstown @z Yor lyn Taile 1. 21 LITTLE TINICULI ISLANTD p Z 2 3ymonr armp- Berlin _-I"ah Ems eor.,I, C-C All-cmieforl W- Cre-menTon' Ltr Ce e -WOM PineAmilij a rnrtur 3 ;2, 1 ren Vil 0. t W ri -D-Atc: /@Mars 11ton MINGTON 4 V- ftlinian 2 n"s Gr E 5 JUL 0 el -e@, 21 nz.@., Carneys pt, Hill D. Ora too 3 Golf v an ., "@i`., . - ! '3 Glassb a 2 4 2 N 14ewark V 40 le Will!a-,.J.-, a.13 erIllsvi !:a 114ao 4= 40 sta. tie *;@,; \ .@f C@ Velary 16ce d ycj.jt-i, - . -," IIJ@@ @ C@;l @/Ovvt 6) T bFr nkiinviloe 3 !,-*L- El`h@W2 V Kal e ai 0 4 L sel' C4Y Clai, AbtiW'y AM 0JA r Beach AldevIe St Getirm 5.: 1 3 to- &,e, 0 01.w amemi Aft@ pwam. G= -eld 3N La'! __1 ftguwr, ksl I X, If \c4hrnftl __R@ SlrW Silo". M. it N.,L S." pw 2 Buena- St. -. - , @_ .VINELAN'D orepwo 'o" 2 An 1 2 Z ei. o@ Rosent@y, % ., 00"; 301 7 49 3 Cr 9 F t 13 lidif Al 9 --eacom 5 A"'Gin PC. J, Milwe N F Mon, mex sewn S yrna Vizaboul aw, HeIrf" OV- Ing Alk filimmemItt Of. (son," 26 5W cha" rr_- 47 low ck- EAN PL 1134 'S, cover Little [email protected] am, Wyom,ng Kh" ucw@ sellc KV-Mck s C- Waa. 01 Pis PI., r J N may, St Mpmptrel MFT-%.,o We--% t i 1104. a Vil age (2). p U re, LIT d 44 e-1 w T W, jo. Gov@Pfinj \% riF lp Se pla e Ilgale Base onvev u a n d d. po@. 4. A_ -PENNS v LVAN1.4 NEW_7fi@Si@ 1?5 25 Brain e11 _pt o Lishl Crab Pt 12 Fwd Th6ftioton al ,A v - AN - 0 % % NO fit V.. A 7,@ '7 -4 v r G 01 41@,)- N/ ewARV pol Crab Fl 1,6 tall !PIAVOF-ound IV NN y L.- f 1P0 o;-00 1@0 70 w 11yu Joao Aor%@ "OvIo. v ckum L.Y-i @Iz @11 , STACK yetone 4,.,v TA K _00 RADAR 0 ........ ....... STACKiN., I fdAl /V,','I/ /U/ 15 1 9 9 13 9 1060 L.QM 10 'A ...... ........... le F u 16 .8 2 11 10 7 . ............ 7 ................ ... ...................... 5 go ....... :2.*.*.-.-.::- - , * 1.- 2 IV . - .......... E IN 0 Base 6611 ...... 3---**"'*--'*- - ... ..... . to`o It- 8 .......... 14 ... ........ 9 ............. ........ a 2 c ...... ....................... '2 2foo: .................. L 3 NOR orA _ @U Af Irl Priv MOO fj r 0 Avwf-cr7HZ,;,u TINICUM RA1VGf Ct -5-2-40--- R -3f 3T .......... ...... =2hrd 8 41 - 34 MARKE or -`2 Wi4 ........... ............ j 24 2325 13L. '29 .. j 6@ n a . *;a 20 24 28 . ..... . a ........... ................. 7 ........ 3 ............... I --- 7......... IoL ...... C, :--- ........ W. ...... . joij py 3 2 b.. ........ b*Ps .......... .......... ... . ... ... ..... Ay .......... fiLt' ...:; @ -@@ I-,' u 2(J 2 PA ooo, ............ .......... ............... .......... .. .4 2 .......... YANK r6 @2 Pit ei@b 4 3 3-. It ta 2 4 3 4 4 61 Mar sh 7 TA K town [ rjr-1 30 c3cj Marsh The History of Little Timicum Island and Vicinity The area of Essington was settled in 1640 by the New Swedith Company. The first Royal Governor, Johan Printz, arrived in 1643 and constructed the Printzhoff- his home and office. The ruins of this building are located in Govenor Printz State Park in Essington. The Swedish colony was seized by the Dutch and the British before becoming part of the United States. In 1799 a new location for the Philadelphia immigration quarantine station was sought. A new facility named the Lazaretto was built on a ten acre tract in Essington. During the yellow fever epidemic in 1870 a request to move the quarantine station to Little Tinicum Island was rejected by, the state legislature. The facility was moved to Marcus Hook. The Lazaretto has been used subsequently as a resort, yacht club, and as headquarters for the Seaplane Base and the United States Army Signal Corps. The first Swedish settlers built dikes for pastureland and cultivation. These dikes were breached in 1777 during the American revolution, but it is not clear if the British occupants or the American revolutionaries breached the dikes.4 The presently existing dikes on the island were built by the United States Army Corp of Engineers to hold sediments that were hydraulically removed from the river bottom to deepen the shipping channel. Three holding sections exist. The easternmost area was never filled and the dikes have breached creating an inlet. Mr. Robert Mills, owner of the Lazaretto found ruins of a foundations on the west end of the island. Little Tinicum Island is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the Pennsylvania Inventory of the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission. This site is not listed for future excavation for ruins or preservation. 5 A right-of-way was granted to the Southern Pipe Line Company to " lay, maintain and operate two pipe lines for the transporta- tion of oil and construct, maintain and operate telegraph-telephone lines, ... over and across Tinicum Island". The telegraph- telephone lines shall be ... of cable in the River and upon the Island". 6 The location of these rights-of-way was not given in 6 greater detail. Figure Three shows the location of a cable area and pipeline area near the eastern end of the island. These do not coincide with the existing pipeline on the extreme eastern end of the island, see Figure Four 7. An easement for a proposed two hundred foot wide channel through Little Tinicum Island is mentioned in the Title Report 8 This land may be subject to " any outstanding unrecorded agreements with the United States Army Corp of Engineers relative to deposit- ing material dredged from the Delaware River". 9 FIGURE 4 LITT*TINICUM ISLAND AND VICINITY ESSINGTON PHILADELPHIA INTERNATIONAL BACK CHANNEL' TIDAL P IKE LITTLE TINICUM ISLAND DELAWARE RIVER Erosion Are4q N 0 750' 1500, 22 Approximate 8 Physical Characteristics of the Island The recent geologic history of the Delaware River explains the formation of Little Tinicum Island. The course of the Dela- ware River allowed silt to accumulate on the river shorelines between the mouths of Darby Creek and the Schuylkill River. Little Tinicum Island may have originally been part of this deltaic marshland. A now extinct creek may have separated the island from the mainland before the Delaware River overflowed the creek. These marsh shorelines and the island north of Little Tinicum Island-Hog Island, were diked and filled to create land. Little Tinicum Island is on an inside curve of the river bend. The water flow is slower here aqnd sediments accumulate, especially in the back channel or north side of the island. 10 The shape of the island is slowly changing. The south- western end of the island and its accompanying small tida1 flats are eroding away while the extensive tidal flats and shoals offshore of the eastern end remains stable. The western end of the island previously extended beyond the mouth of Darby Creek in 1890. 11 The waves created by passing freighters erode the shorelines that are not protected by the buffering action of Three-, Square Bulrush of the tidal flats, see Figure Four. The western end has two areas that are eroding for these reasons and also because these areas lie perpendicular to the unobstructed westerly winds and subsequent building waves. These waves hit the eroding clifflike shoreline which is stabilized by strongly rooted Phragmites plants. Sandy beaches are formed in a few areas of the southern shore that are not protected by emergent vegetation. Large amounts of debris and driftwood lie at the high storm tide elevations of the island, see Figure Four. The driftwood consists mostly of large tree trunks that were uprooted upstream during large storms and floods. These trunks protect the island against erosion by waves during large storms by holding and trapping sand and silt. The soils on Little Tinicum Island are classified as Tidal Marsh- a mixture of silty clay and coarse textured sediments washed down from the coastal plain by Darby Creek. 12 Tides and Naigation near Little Tinicum Island The Delaware River has a seqmidiurnal 5.7 foot tide near Little Tinicum Island. There are two approximately equal high and low tides each day. There are no navigational aids for boaters near Little Tinicum Island marked on the chart, see Figure Three. The Pennsylvania Fish Commission does maintain their private markers near their boat basin. The western area of the back channel is designated by the United States Coast Guard as a special anchorage for pleasure craft. Navigation in the back channel is very diffi- cult at low tide, especially for sail boats and deep draft vessels. The mud flats surrounding the island extend out an average of three hundred feet. The mud flats extend for twelve hundred feet east of the island, see Figure Five 13. The entire island is in the floodplain of the river. Large storm tides cause the river to wash across low lying areas. FIGURE 5 CN NO The Mud Flats 0 C14 SOUNDINGS IN FEET' MEAN'LOW WATER +-0*7 ft. 0 10 MEAN HIGH WATER + 6,1 fte ONE INCf! 400 F=- E W, 4); 12 Island 12 The-Quality of Delaware River Estuary Waters neav Tinicum Island The water quality of the river water is improving along most of its 1 ength. The quality-of the river near Little Tinicum Island is very poor. The two recently improved sewage treatment. plants in Philadelphia are discharging'secondarily treated sewage effluent into the river. This treatment is not complete and the effluent puts a burden on the river to complete the degradation of -wastes and consequently lowers the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water.. ',Vater quality data of a section of the Delaware River near the 7sland is collected at 'Paulsboro, New Jersey. The quality of zraUer can vary greatly along short distances upstream or downstream or from shore to shore. Consequently, data collected at Paulsbcro may not accurately reflect the water quality in the back channel but probably is accurate for the south shore of the island.. Satisfactory levels are indicated for pH,. temperature, hardness., alkalinity,. chloridet phenol,-iron and lead.,1'49 15 Dissolved-oxygen is an important indicator-of water quality., ,Dissolved oxygen concentrations above 5mg/l are required for a complete life cycle of the most sensitive fish--ex. American Shad. Dissolved oxygen at two.to three milligrams per liter (2 mg/1) is recuired for a minimally diverse estuarine fishery.16 The State of zennsvivania standard states that dissolved oxygen concertralCions should be greater than 3-5 mg/1 on a single day and greater than 6.,5 mg/1 as a spring and fall seasonal average. Figure -ix 17 shows-that,oxygen levels were usually substandard. Sewer lines that combine flood waters and sewage during rain-, storms discharge raw sewage into the river during heavy stormis. The Delaware River Basin Commission estimates that thi.s is a larfre source of river pollution ('bacterial-contamination) near Little Tinicum Island'. Fecal, coliform. is a. measure of the- amount. of water contamination by-humani sewage*- Fecal coliform. levels-are indicators of the potential of human pathogenic bacteria and other organisms exist ing in the water. These bacterial, virus and protozoan pathogens cause hepatitis, salmonella, shigella, enceph- alitus and other infections. 18 The Pennsylvania standard for fecal coliform concentrations for waters used for boating and other secondary contact recreation (not swimming) is 770 counts/ml. Swimming waters should have counts less than 200 counts/ml. The Delaware River near Paulsboro never met the swimming standard during the seventeen sampling days in 1984 to the present. The boating standard was met during two sample days during this period, see Figure Six. The Pennsylvania Department of Health was contacted to determine if any instances of illness related to river contact was reported. Health Records are not kept in a format that could be readily investigated to answer this question. No outbreaks of illness due to river contact have been noted by the Chester, PA. office of the Pennsylvania Department of Health. 19 Chloride is an element found in greater concentrations in saltwater than in freshwater. It is used as an indicator of saltwater in an estuary. Freshwater has chloride concentrations of ten to twenty milligrams per liter; the saltwater front is defined at 250 mg chloride/1. Diluted saltwater enters the Essington area usually in late summer and retreats in the fall. The average location of the saltwater front during the year is Marcus Hook. 20 FIGURE SIX spring 84 summer 84 fall 84 spring 85 temperature _F 56 76 64 62 Fecal coliform 3240 2380 4000 - counts/ 100 ml Dissolved Oxygen 7.15 2.46 3.98 5.63 mg O_/1 Chloride 14.3 24.6 72 25.5 mg C1/l The water quality of the Delaware River was summarized in a map prepared by the Philadelphia City Planning Commission, see Figure Seven. 21 .x 3A, Vo 4f4'o 0 SCNUYL.O)LL ........... .. S, )ItVEN, .. SSIVAY 1@ wl XXI JKL LU CY a LU, ul CO Philadelphiatc., Flan for F-d Philadelphia City Planning LE Municipal Industrial 2 3mi.1i 3-4 4-5 wo,,TGOMI -C 0- Aa V, Co. 5-6 OL 6-7 EL OSE'4 Ot "14 93 13 ......... o, OUNL- -4 m I 16 The Vegetation and Geomorphology of Little Tinicum Island Little Tinicum Island is circled by tidal freshwater wetlands. The interior of the island consists of scrub forests and disturbed areas of fill with a variety of types of vegetation. Figure Eight is a vegetation map of the island. The vegetation types are described below. Scientific names are listed in Figure Nine. Three-square Bulrush Marsh This emergent plant grows in silty soils in the lower tidal areas and forms the outermost fringe of vegetation on most of the island. The large tidal change and waves on the south shore prevent other plants from growing in these areas habitated by the three-square bulrush. The few species that are found in this area are found more inland and are very sparse. They are pickerelweed, spatterdock, nutsedge, wild rice, cattails, great bulrush, and iris species. On the north shore the three-square bulrush fringes the Lower and Upper Tidal Marshes and mixes with these marshes. Lower Tidal Marsh This marsh is the outermost vegetation on certain more protected areas of the north shore. The soils of these areas are totally exposed at low tide and are flooded with two to three feet of water at high tide. "This marsh contain areas where a single species, such as spatterdock or pickerelweed dominates. This area also contains arrowheads, arrow arum and mud plantain. Upper Tidal Marsh This marsh is found between the lower tidal marsh and phragmites stands or scrub/forest. These mud flats are flooded shallowly during high tide. This marsh is very narrow and is a transition zone between tidal areas and uplands. It contains a mixture of numerous species, with no species predominating except for the two easternmost areas on the north shore where water smartweed is plentiful. Components of this marsh are narrow-leaved and common cattail, wild rice, nutsedge, common reed (Phragmites), spikerush, water smartweeds, speedwell, water purslane, false pimpernel, monkeyflower, waterdock and beggarticks. The Upper and Lower Marshes have been mapped together for practical 17 reasons. Common Reed Homogenous stands of the common Phragmites are spreading on the island. These reeds have replaced a narrowleaved cattail marsh near the western end of the island that was mapped in 1971. 22 These reeds are ten to fourteen feet tall and grow in thick impass- ible stands just inland of the high tide mark. Mixed Shrubs The shrubs are found above the high tide mark and as a transi- tion zone between the common reed and the scrub/forest. Areas of shrubs grow among the common reed on the western tip of the island. Staghorn sumac is the predominant shrub in these areas. Scrub/Forest Scrub/forest occupies the interior uplands. The composition varies from scrub areas with bare sands and few trees to forest areas with thirty to fifty feet tall trees. The common trees are black willow, crack willow, cottonwood, white ash, red ash and sycamore. Locally common tree species are silver maple, boxelder, red maple, wild cherry, river birch, catalpa and sweetgum. Non- native and pollution tolerant trees growing on open areas and beaches are the tree-of-heaven, princess-tree, Norway maple and white mulberry. Shrubs, tree saplings, herbs, grasses and vines comprise the understory. Purple loosestrife and Japanese knotweed are non- native 'weed' species that dominate a few small shoreline areas above the high water mark on the south shore. Thick growths of herbs and vine understory were present in richer soils in the central part of the island. The sand and gravel fill soils on the eastern and supported less of an understory. The construction of dikes and filling of these areas has altered the natural soils and hydrology of the eastern third of the island. The easternmost dike has been breached creating an inlet. The steeply sloped tidal areas of this inlet are not habitated by aquatic vegetation. Shrubs and grasses grow on the steep banks- ticklegrass, horsenettle, blackberry. 18 The grasses present in the scrub/forest are ticklegrass, switchgrass and witchgrass. The vines noted were poison ivy, virginia creeper and japanese honeysuckle. The herbs present are spotted jewelweed, morning glory, pokeweed, dodder, mints, lambsquarters, silky dogwood, staghorn sumac, buttonbush, common alder, blackberry, false indigo and hibiscus. Compositae stand The central basin has very course soils which drain quickly. This area has a history of fires. In 1971 it was noted that a fire had destroyed most of the trees leaving a thick stand of soapwort and sunflower with cottonwood and black willow sprouts. The eastern section of this central basin is now composed of a thick stand of an unidentified genus of the family Compositae. Cottonwood Grove A stand of cottonwood trees occupies the center of the central dike. This twenty to thirty-five foot stand has grown since the fire in 1971. Grasslands One small area is composed of grasses and a few shrubs that are common in the scrub/forest. Sand Beaches These clean, unvegetated sandy beaches exist on the south shore. Driftwood and Debris areas This area occurs from the high water mark and extend inland for more than a few yards. In low lying areas driftwood is found in the interior of the island. Most of the area is driftwood but some trash debris is present. Few plants grow among the driftwood. A map of the wetlands delineated by the United States Department of the Interior in the National Wetlands Inventory is Appendix Two. 19 FIGURE NINE Grasses, sedges and rushes: Three-square bulrush Scirpus americanus Great bulrush Scirpus validus Nutsedge Cyperus spp. Common reed Phragmites communis Wild rice Zizania aquatica Spikerush Eleocharis diandra Ticklegrass Agrostis hyemalis Switchgrass Panicum virgatum Witchgrass Panicum capillare Fern and Monocots: Arrow arum Peltandra virginica Arrowheads Sagittaria latifolia Common cattail Typha latifolia Narrow-leaved Cattail Typha angustifolia Sensitive fern Onoclea sensibilis Pickerelweed Pontederia cordata Mud plantain Heteranthera reniformis Marsh Herbs: Beggar-ticks Bidens spp. Water dock Rumex altissima Water hemp Acnida cannabina Annual hedge hyssop Gratiola neglecta False pimpernel Lindernia dubia Water purslane Ludwigia palustris Water smartweed Polygonum punctatum Spatterdock Nuphar advena Speedwell Veronica arvensis American germander Teucrium canadense Monkeyflower Mimulus spp. Blue Vervain Verbena hastata 20 Upland Herbs: Lambsquarters Chenopodium album Mullein Verbascum thapus Cocklebur Xanthium sp. Marsh hoarhound Lycopus europaeus Horsenettle Solanum carolinense Spotted jewelweed Impatiens capensis Milkweed Ascleppa spp. Mustard Rorippa spp. Pokeweed Phytolacca americana Sunflower Helianthus sp. Soapwort Saponaria officinalis Trees: Red Maple Acer rubrum Red Ash Fraxinus p. pennsylvanicum White Ash F. americana River birch Betula nigra Boxelder Acer negundo Catalpa Catalpa speciosa Wild cherry Prunus serotina Cottonwood Populus deltoides Norway Maple Acer platanoides Silver maple Acer saccharinum White mulberry Morus alba Osage orangge Maclura ponifera Princess Tree Paulownia tomentosa Sweetgum Licuidambar styraciflua Tree-of-heaven Ailanthus altissima Black Willow Salix nigra Crack Willow Salix fragilis Shrubs: Black alder Alnus glutinosa Common alder Alnus serrulata Blackberry Rubus spp. Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 21 Silky dogwood Cornus amomum Elderberry Sambucus canadensis False indigo Amorpha fruticosa Staghorn sumac Rhus typhina Dwarf sumac Phus copalina Shrubform Herbs: Japanese knotweed Polygonum cuspidatus Purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria Marsh mallow Hibiscus palustris Vines: Japanese honeysuckle Lonicera Japonica Poison ivy Rhus radicans Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia Dodder Cuscuta spp. Morning glory Iponoea purpurea Bittersweet nightshade solanum dulcamara 22 Plant Species of Special Concern The following species of special concern are listed in the Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. 23 Wild rice was observed during this study. A complete survey of the north shore by rowboat or canoe to areas that were inaccessible by foot or motorboat may yield reports of waterhemp ragweed and Walter's barnyard grass. Zizania aquatica (wild rice) status rare. Reported in 1983, 100-1000 plants on the mud flats of the north shore. During this study, three groups of a few plants each were observed, two groups on the mud flats of the north shore and one group at the highwater mark in driftwood on the south shore. Amaranthus cannabinus (water hemp ragweed) status rare. Reported in 1983 as 1000 - 10,000 plants growing on silt, muck and sand substrate near the upper zone of the high water mark in shallow water. Echinochloa walteri (Walter's barnyard grass) status rare. Reported in 1983 as 10,000 flowering and fruiting plants nearly all mature growing in the upper limit of high tide mark to adjacent shore on sand and gravel, and silt and muck. Hypericum gymnanthum (Clasping-leaved St. John's Wort) status rare. Reported in 1866. Scirous fluviatilis (River bulrush) status rare. Reported in 1865. Lobilia nuttallii (Nuttall's lobelia) status rare. Reported in 1864. Elatine americana (Long-stemmed water-wort) status extirpated. Reported in 1868. 23 Fires on Little Tinicum Island Fires are an annual occurence in the summer on the island. These fires occur on the east end of the island and burn a small area up to an acre. In 1985 there were two very small fires in the driftwood debris and nearby herbs and shrubs. Evidence of small fires in prvious years was noted. A few stone fire circles have been built on the southeast beach. The Food Value of Vegetation to Wildlife The value of the aquatic plants is listed in Figure Ten. 24 The many varieties of plants that grow on the island can feed a variety of reptiles, amphibians, birds and mammals. The seeds of bulrush, smartweed, waterhemp, wild rice and nutsedge are eaten by waterfowl. Common reeds are not utilized by birds for food. The spread of common reeds into valuable food habitats has a negative effect on the wildlife. Shrubs and trees provide food for wildlife. The fruit of blackberry shrubs, wild cherry, elderberry and white mulberry trees are eaten by birds and mammals. Buttonbush seeds are eaten by aquatic birds. The fruit of the dwarf sumac is eaten by wild- life. 25 a 24,' FIGURE TEN THE FOOD VALUE OF AQUAT IIC FLANTS upland muskrat g am. e water iaarsh shore song birds fowl birds birds birds Agrostis spp.. Alnus spp. X x X" Bi dens x Cyperus app. x x x Z.chi.nochloa spp. x x E., walteri x Fraxinus spp.. X x T T r@eteranthera Hibiscus pal.. .Hypericum gymn. x Iudvvigia pal. x 1'@unhar- advena x x x X, ,Peltandra virg. x x Phragmites. x Z'olygonum spp. x X, x X Pontederia cord., x x Rumex spp.; X x 2.1 x Sagittaria spp. x Salix spp. x x x x X, Scirpus- az@er. X: X, S. validus x S'.. fluviatilis- x Typha.angustifolia x. X- x x T.. lati-folia. X: x x X: Zizania aouatica x X: x x X: 25 LITTLE TINIMI ISLAND, DELAWARE RIVER.:. Herpetological Comments by John D. Groves Curator of Amphibians & Reptiles Philadelphia Zoological Garden On 31 October 1985, 1 visited Little Tinicum. Island in the Delaware River to give advice on the possible herpetological fauna that may be present.on the island. Since this visit occurred on a cool cloudy day at the end of October no amphibians or reptiles were observed. Despite the lack of direct observations and the unavailability of documented.herpetological records from the island, it is possible@ from knowledge, of the islan@d's history, habitats and food resources,, as well as a knowledge of herpetofaunal colonizations of other similar islands in other areas of the Atlantic region, to formulate a working list of probable or possible amphibians and reptiles on Little Tinicum Island. The following comments and table are intended to provide a preliminary list of this herpeto- fauna and are not to be considered a definitive account for this island. Habitat Comments Nine habitat types were noted.-on the island (Fig. l; Table 1). These varied from mud flats (extending from the shore line to deeper water of the river) to upland areas of scrub, successional woods and old fields in the interior of the island. A long, but narrow flood plain encircles most if not the entire island and a fair size (2 acre) lagoon, devoid. of' aquatic and emergent plants,. which is connected-to the.west channel are-also present on the island. A series of three dikes of sandy soil comprise three small, but distinct: habitat: types (old field,scrub and barrens) on the north side-of*the island's interior. These dikes originated as a result of the dredging of the channel in the Delaware River on the east side ofthe island which accounts for the sandy soil. Apparently a variety of environmenial factors are actively at work on the island that have created such a diversity of habitats for such a small island. Species :omments From an evaluation of the islands available habitats and the known distribution of amphibians and reptiles on both the Pennsylvania and New Jersey sides of the Delaware' River, the possible herpetofauna of Little Tinicum Island may- contain at. least three species Of amphibians:and.11 or 12-species of reptiles-. However, because of the size of the island and,its available resources it is doubtful that all of these species have resident reproducing populations on the island. It is more probable that most of these species are only present on the island as: occasional.waifs or-only to use-the resources of the island for-specific purposes.@ Table I lists, all. of the possible- amphibians 'and reptiles that may occur on the island and the habitatswhere they can,be-expected to be found. Two endangered-species of Pennsylvania and one status undetermiendspecies mav- occur on-or in the waters surrounding the island.. At least,one of the endangered species-(red-bellied turtle, Pseudemvs rubriventris) has been sited-by Pennsylvania Fish Commission biologists in the Delaware River near this island in the Federal Channel in October 1985. This site record indicates that this species may use -2- the island for feeding and nesting. The following comments are included to give justification for-the species listed on Table 1. Amphibians Three species of anurans may occur on the isalnd., These include the following: Spring Peeper (Hyla E. crucifer - This small treefrog has been reported to reproduce on the island (Cathy Leonard,. per.. comm..).. Available habitat-is found on many parts of the island for adults. The lagoon. area is probably used for breeding since the salinity levels are low or absent-in the river during their breeding season. Dean Florence (PA-Fish Commission) reports that.the salt line in the.Delaware River recedes down river between October- and December and returns in June-of, the following year. This period is adequate for both the breeding season and the tadpoles to develop to the adult stage. American Toad (Bufo a. americanus) --This toad is common throughout Delaware County with several large populations in the Essington and Tinicum areas., The adult American toad appears to withstand brackish environments and has been found on many islands along river courses in. Maryland (per. observations) and.even on Barrier islands off the Atlantic, coast (per.- observations). Fowler's Toad (Bufo woodhousei fowleri) - This toad, like the American toad, is another island colonizer'(Gibbons and Coker, 1978). Museum records from the Pennsylvania and New Jersey mainland are available@for-this species in the the-vicinity of the island... An early breeder with a short.tadpole developmental,rate makes this- species a probably resident species.. Reptiles Twelve species of reptiles are listed on Table 1 as possibly occurring on.the island. Although habitat is available for each of these species,. it is unlikely if all species have resident populations on the island. Snnping Turtle (Chelydra s. ser-Dentina) - This large aquatic, turtle is probably the most common reptile in southeastern Pennsylvania.. It occurs in,large-.numbers in.a variety-of aquatic habitats. It is known to occur in many axeas@of thenDelaware-River and most-likely occurs on and around. the-island. Musk-Turtle (Sternotherus odoratus This little turtle- is similar in habits to the.snapping turtle and.is known to,occur-in,many. areas. of the, Delaware.- River.. Eastern Mud Turtle (Kinosternon s@ subrubrum This. turtle is- endangered. in- Pennsylvania.. Only three locations are-presently known for the mud turtle alon&the,coastal plain section of the.Commonwealth. Groves (1985) reviewed its distribution and.ecological requirements. The-available habitat and food resources.on and around the island make this a possible species in the herpetoo fauna. 26' Painted Turtle (Chrysemys p. picta:) - A common turtle around the Delaware River. This species may use the'islands resources for feeding and nesting. The warm waters in the lagoon and raud flats provide adequate hibernating areas., Red-bellied Turtle (Pseudemys r. rubriventris) - This large aquatic turtle is endangered in the Commonwealth. Ernst (1985) reviewed its distribution and ecological requirements. Michael Kauffman and Chuck Emory (PA Fish Commission) sited a large adult swimming in the Delaware River near the island. Adequate feeding,- nesting and hibernation areas are available on andaround the island., Populations are probably small, however, in the,area. Box Turtle (Terrapene c. carolina) -The box turtle is frequently found. on off-shore islands. This species probably makes use of most of the terrestrial habitats on the island.. This-species is frequently kept as pets and may disappear from over-collecting if present. Water Snake (Nerodia s. sipedon common aquatic species along the Delaware River. It is considered poisonous wherever found, but is harmless to man. Many people confuse this-snake with the cottonmouth of the south. A resident population most likely exists on the island. Northern Brown Snake (Storeria d. @@ A@ai) - This small snake is one of the most common snakes on the adjacent mainlands of Pennsylvania and New Jersey. It.is highly adaptable.to urban and other disturbed areas. It- probably occurs in all terrestrial habitats thathave sufficient moisture to support slugs, worms and.pill bugs. The flood plain or the eastern shore of-the island has more than adequate habitat with an abundance of shelter (drift wood and other debris) and probably supports a large population. Eastern Garter Snake (Thamnophis s. sirtalis) - Another extremely common snake- on the mainland of Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Commonly found in association with the northern brownsnake, sometimes under the same shelter site. Habitat and food resources of the island probably supports a substantial population. Eastern Hognosed Snake (Heterodon platyrhinos) - This medium sized snake is historically known from the area, but is extremely uncommon. The sandy soil of the uplands and.the possible presence of toads on the island may -provide -adequate suitable conditions for this species. In other areas (Maryland to Florida) this species is commonly found on river and coastal islands. The size of Little Tinicum Island would, however, support only a small population. McCoy (1985) discussed this species in Pennsylvania. Black Racer (Coluber c. constrictor) - A large snake that is found in fields, and open. areas near this island. Adequate food and habitat is available on the island. Black Rat Snake (Elaphe o. obsoleta) - Historically-known from the area. May occur in the marsh and upland areas. The black racer may compete with this species keeping populations low if it indeed occurs on the island. 27 Conclusions The list and table provided here on the possible amphibians and reptiles that may occur-on Little Tinicum Island is intended to be a brief account of these animals for planning purposes only. It is not the result of extensive surveys and needs to be confirmed. I have examined. the available habitats and considered the potential food resources and potential reproductive parameters for each included species. Most likely the actual listi of species o-ccurring on the island will be reduced and not expanded upon due to human activities on the-mainland shores and possibly on the island itself.. Although three species of concern in Pennsylvania- are listed, I do not feel that special protective methods need to be formulated. for populations on the island- Current protective measures regulated by the Pennsylvania Fish Commission are adequate. Field surveys of these three species should.,. however,. be undertaken on-the island by Bureau of Forestry personnel. titerature Cited Ernst, C.H. 1985. Endangered: Red-bellied Turtle,. Pseudemys rubriventris. IN Genoways, H.H. and F.J. Brenner (Eds..) Species of Special Concern in, Pennsylvania.. Carnegie Mus.. Nat. Hist., Special Publ., No.. ll,. pp. 267-270. Gibbons,. J.W. and J.W.- Coker-. 1978., Herpetofaunal Colonization Patters on Atlantic Coast Barrier Islands. Am Midl. Nat. 99: 213-233. Groves,. J".D.. 1985-. Endangered: Eastern. Mud. Turtle, Kinosternon subrubrum. IN.Genoways, H.H. and F.J. Brenner (Eds.) Species of Special Concern.in Pennsylvania.. Carnegie Mus.- Nat... Hist,.,, Special Publ.,.,, No.. 11,. pp. 265-267'. McCoy,.C.J., 1985'. Status Undeter#ned:- Eastern Hognose Snake, Heterodon platyrhinos. IN Genoways, H.H.-and F.J. Brenner (Eds.,) 'Species of Special Concern in Pennsylvania. Carnegie Mus.. Nat. Hist.,, Special Publ., No. 11, pp., 289-291. 1.11 G U I? I--" I IPossible Amphibians and Reptiles of Littlo Tinicurn Island, Delaware River ci 0 (See Figure 12) S ecies 00. 0 C.9 Z)' b, -@, 0 p V., b@ _@,Y S111", X- 0 Aii-,phibians Spring Peeper X X X X X Is:nowri* &i.erican Toad X X X X X X X X probable ,Fowlers Toad X X X X X X X X probable Reptiles Snapping Turtle X X X, X probable Musk Turtle X X X probable I Ux L, J.. U, possible Endangered-PA Painted Turtle X X X probable* Red-bellied Turtle X X X probable*-Endangered-PA Box Turtle X X X X X X X probable 'Alatyr Snake X X X X X likely* N. brown Snake X X X X 7 probable E, Garter Snake X X X X X X X probable* [log-posed Snake X X possible Undetermined lllac7l,. Racer X X X X X X X X probable Dla@k Rat Snake 7 ? 7 unknown Observed on Little Tinicum Island by John 14iller, Pennsylvania Game Commission FIGURE 12 PUPHIBIAN AND REPTILE HABITATS ON LITTLE TINICUM ISLAND MUD FLATS 1111 DA MARSH LD-FIELDS GOON TICK D PL N SCRUB FOREST TID li-MARS B ACI 'COTTONWOODS N 0 31 The Fish of the Delawre River near Little Tinicum Island The waters surrounding the island are important spawning and nursery grounds for anadromous fish. These marine fish come into freshwater river to spawn. Few shallow protected waters and wetlands remain for these fish. The back channel of Little Tinicum Island is an important area for the following species: Bay Anchovies, Blue-back herring, American Shad and Striped Bass. Striped Bass populations have decreased along the Atlantic coast. Measures to protect the striped bass are in effect. Resident fish of the Delaware River near Little Tinicum Island are channel catfish, brown bullhead, american eel, white perch (a marine fish occassionally found in fresh water), silvery minnows, rummichogs (a brackish water fish), and banded killifish. Salt- water crabs have been present near the island during the summer and fall for the past several years. Flounder were observed near the island this year. Pennsylvania Fish Commission Area Fisheries Biologist, Mr. Mike Kaufman considers the waters near Little Tinicum Island as a remnant habitat along the tidal area of the Delaware River and very strongly feels the island should be a protected natural area. Any disruption of the shorline of channel through dredging would have a significant negative impact on these fisheries. A previous study of the island in 1971 expressed a similar appraisal of these waters-" the Back Channel is the most valuable fisheries habitat within 10 or 12 miles upstream or downstream." 27 Tiger muskelunge have been stocked in the river near the Island by the PA. Fish Commission in 1984 and 1985. Six thousand 7 - 12 inch fingerlings were stocked each year. Confirmed sitings of the 1984 fingerlings indicates that the fish have survived the first year. These fish grow to the legal size in three years. There is a possibility that some fish species may have PCBs in their flesh. This group of chemicals= polychlorinated biphenyls causes cancer in laboratory animals. They are extraordinarily resistant to degradation and their contamination is widespread. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service has sampled fish 32 and snapping turtles found in Darby Creek and ponds in the Tinicum National Environmental Center. The results indicated Levels of PCBs in fish slightly over the recommended level of the Food and Drug Administration's Action Level for human consumption. The level of PCB in snapping turtles was very high. These results may or may not apply to the fish and turtles in the Delaware River near Little Tinicum Island. The contamination of fish and turtles in the Environmental Center may be a local and restricted phenomena. The Pennsylvania Fish Commission is analyzing two fish species collected from the back channel of the island for the presence of PCBs. Results should be available from Mr. Mike Kaufman in January 1986. Appendix One is the results of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife sampling of fish and turtles for PCB contamination. 33 Birds of Little Tinicum Island This island is an extremely important bird habitat. The very large number of bird species that frequent the island represent almost all the families of birds, except tropical, open-ocean and upland bird families. The many diverse habitats supply food and shelter for a diverse bird population. The island is an important stopover area for migratory birds in the Atlantic flyway. The amount of suitable habitat is very sparse along the Delaware River and nearby counties. Mr. John Miller, Pennsylvania Game Commission, keeps a daily checklist of birds seen near Little Tinicum Island and nearby areas. He has been watching the birds and maintaining records of their occurences since the early 1950's. The following list of birds seen near or on Little Tinicum Island was prepared by Mr. Miller. The Federal status and the proposed Pennsylvania status is listed. A summary of Species of Special Concern follows: State status- none. Cattle Egret, Snowy Egret, Black-crowned Night Heron, Glossy Ibis, Hooded Merganser, Virginia Rail, Cliff Swallow. State status-undetermined. Sharp-shinned Hawk, Yellow-bellied Sapsucker, Bobolink. State status-special concern. Great Blue Heron, Cooper's Hawk, Red-shouldered Hawk, Marsh Hawk, Snowy Owl, Purple Martin, Long-billed Wren. State status- threatened. American Bittern, Black Tern. State status- endangered. Bald Eagle, Osprey, Short-eared Owl. State Status- extirpated. Peregrine Falcon, Common Tern. Federal Status- endangered. Bald Eagle, Peregrine Falcon. The following complete list includes the level of occurence of birds. It is important to note the occurence of species of special concern. Some of these are common on Little Tinicum Island. The Long-billed Marsh Wren is nesting on the island. Proposed. Federal State Occurence Status Statua Common Loon c 0.-.1. r.11 0 11 Red-throated,Loon u "I c 0 11 i _Y"'. 0 il Red-necked Grebe uncorizion Horned Grebe u n c 0 IMM 0 Pi.ed Billed Grebe U 11 C 0 Z."I 711 0 n Audobonf*s-Shearwater very ra-re Great Cormorant, rare Double breasted Cormorant c 0 r.,l 0 r_ Great Blue Heror- com=on none sp. con, Green Heron c o: i I I c. n -c c t n, Little Blue Heron COM1,10"! Cattle Egret unco*.1._1:c).n In. on e none Common '!',gret c or.11 1! 011 Snowy Egret C' 0 0 r. none none Black@crowned night Heron c 0 M ri: 0 i-4 -none none American Bittern ULICOM 0111^L none threatened Glossy Ibis undor: on- none none: @Vlute: Swan rare Whistlin&Swan COMMon Canada.Goose cor"mon. Snow Goose U n. c 0 WID, C Brant rare Mallard co=on-nesi 2.'r, Black Duck Gadwall. uncoumion PIntail com@r_'Ion' Green-winged Teal co=on Blue-winged.Teal American: Widgeon u n c orim. on Shoveler@ uncommon 'good Duck, unc:o"nmon. Redhead uncommon Ring-necked Duck u n c. orm"m o n Canvasback u n c o m = ola Greater-Scaup co=:Zon 34 Proposed Federal State Occurence Status Status Lesser Scaup common Common Goldeneye common Bufflehead common Oldsquaw uncommon White-winged Scoter rare Surf Scoter rare Ruddy Duck common Hooded Merganser uncommon none none Common Merganser common Red-breasted Merganser uncommon Turkey Vulture common Sharp-skinned Hawk common none undeter. Cooper's Hawk common none sp. Conc. Red-tailed Hawk common Red-shouldered Hawk uncommon none sp. conc. Broad-winged Hawk common Rough-legged Hawk uncommon Bald Eagle uncommon endangered endangered Marsh Hawk (Circus Cyaneus common none sp. conc. Osprey common none endangered Peregrine Falcon uncommon Sparrow Hawk common Ring-necked Pheasant common Virginia Rail unxommon nonw none Sora common Common Gallinule common American Coot uncommon Semipalmated Plover common Killdeer common-nesting Golden Plover common Black-bellied Plover common Ruddy Turnstone uncommon American Woodcock common 35 Proposed Federal State Occurence Status Status Common Snipe common Whimbrel very rare Upland Plover uncommon Spotted Sandpiper common-nesting Solitary Sandpiper common Willet very rare Greater Yellow-legs common Lesser Yellow-1egs common Pectoral Sandpiper common White-rumped Sandpiper common Least Sandpiper common Dunlin common Short-Biller Dowitcher common Long-billed Dowitcher common Stilt Sandpiper uncommon Semipalmated common Western Sandpiper common Hudsonian Godwit uncommon Sanderling uncommon Glaucous Gull uncommon Iceland Gull uncommon Great Black-backed Gull common Herring Gull common Ring-billed Gull common Laughing Gull common Bonaparte's Gull common Little Gull very rare Forster's Tern common Common Tern rare none extirpated Least Tern uncommon Caspian Tern common Black Tern common none threatened Rock Dove common Mourning Dove common-nesting Yellow-billed Cuckoo common 36 Federal State Occurence Status Status Black-billed Cuckoo common Barn Owl common none sp. comc. Snowy Owl rare Short-eared Owl common none endangered Common Nighthawk common Chimney Swift common Ruby-throated Hummingbird common Belted Kingfisher common Flicker common-nesting Yellow-bellied Sapsucker uncommon none undeter. Hairy Woodpecker uncommon Downy Woodpecker common-nesting Eastern Kingbird common-nesting Gr. Creasted Flycatcher common Eastern Phoebe common Willow Flycatcher uncommon-nesting Traill's Flycatcher uncommon Eastern Wood Pewee common Horned Lark common Tree Swallow common-nesting Bank Swallow common Rough-winged Swallow common Barn Swallow common Cliff Swallow common none none Purple Martin common none sp. conc. Blue Jay common Common Crow common-nesting Fish Crow common-nesting Black-capped Chickadee uncommon Carolina Chickadee uncommon Tufted Titmouse uncommon Red-breasted Nuthatch uncommon Brown Creeper common House Wren common-nesting Winter Wren common Carolina Wren uncommon 37 Proposed Federal State Occurence Status Status Long-billed Marsh Wren common-nesting none sp.conc. Mockingbird uncommon-nesting Catbird common-nesting Brown Thrasher uncommon-nesting Robin common-nesting Wood Thrush uncommon Hermit Thrush common Swainson's Thrush common Grey-cheeked Thrush common Veery common Blue-grey Gnatcatcher uncommon Golden-crowned Kinglet common Ruby-crowned Kinglet common Water Pipit common Cedar Waxwing uncommon Solitary Vireo uncommon Red-eyed Vireo common Black & White Warbler common Tennessee Warbler uncommon Nashville Warbler uncommon Parula Warbler common Yellow Warbler common-nesting Magnolia Warbler common Cape May Warbler common Black-throated Blue Warbler common Myrtle Warbler common Black-throated Warbler common Chestnut -sided Warbler uncommon Bay-Breasted Wabler uncommon Black-poll Warbler common Prairie Warbler uncommon Palm Warbler common Ovenbird common Northern Water Thrush common Yellow Throat common-nesting Wilson's Warbler common Proposed Federal State Occurence Status Status Canada Warbler uncommon American Redstart common House Sparrow uncommon Bobolink common none undetermin Eastern Meadowlark uncommon Red-winged Blackbird common-nesting Orchard Oriole uncommon Baltimore Oriole common Rusty Blackbird common Common Grackle common Brown-headed Cowbird common Scarlet Tanager uncommon Cardinal uncommon-nesting Rose-breasted Grosbeak common Blue Grosbeak uncommon Indigo Bunting common-nesting Purple Finch uncommon House Finch uncommon Common Redpoll common Pine Siskin common American Goldfinch common-nesting Rufous-sided Towhee uncommon Savannah Sparrow common Slate Colored Junco common Chipping Sparrow uncommon Field Sparrow uncommon White-crowned Sparrow uncommon White-throated Sparrow common Fox Sparrow common Swamp Sparrow common-nesting Song Sparrow common-nesting Lapland Longspur uncommon Snow Bunting common 39 Proposed Federal State Occurence Status Status Canada Warbler uncommon American Redstart common House Sparrow uncommon Bobolink common none undetermin Eastern Meadowlark uncommon Red-winged Blackbird common-nesting Orchard Oriole uncommon Baltimore Oriole common Rusty-Blackbird common Common Grackle common Brown-headed Cowbird common Scarlet Tanager uncommon Cardinal uncommon-nesting Rose-breasted Grosbeak common Blue Grosbeak uncommon Indigo Bunting common-nesting Purple Finch uncommon House Finch uncommon Common Redpoll common Pine Siskin common American Goldfinch conmon-nesting Rufous-sided Towhee uncommon Savannah Sparrow common Slate Colored Junco common Chipping Sparrow uncommon Field Sparrow uncommon White-crowned Sparrow uncommon White-throated Sparrow uncommon Fox Sparrow common Swamp Sparrow common-nesting Song Sparrow common-nesting Lapland Longspur uncommon Show Bunting common 39 40 Mammals on Little Tinicum Island Few mammals exist on the island. Mr. John Miller has provided a list and their level of occurence. Eastern Cottontail common Sylvilagus Floridanus Muskrat common Ondatra zibethicus Norway Rat common Rattus norvegicus Meadow Vole common Microtus pennsylvanicus House Mouse common Mus musculus Short-tailed weasel uncommon Mustela erminea Red Bat common Lasiurus borealis White-tailed deer rare Odocoileus virginianus Tracks of raccoon and opossum are visible on the mud flats. The island has many diverse habitats capable of supporting mammals. The driftwood serves as shelter and nesting sites for mammals, especially the weasel, raccoon and opossum. The availability of aquatic and terrestrial prey is beneficial to the weasil, raccoon, opossum and muskrat. Little Tinicum Island contains large stands of common reeds- which is reported to be a favorite food of muskrat. The island is excellent habitat for muskrat and also for the marsh rice rat. This species of special concern, status undetermined, occassionally nests in the walls of muskrat houses. The marsh rice rat has not been observed on the island, but the habitat is suitable for it. The Pennsylania Game Commission does not have any studies or estimates of mammal populations on Little Tinicum Island. They report the cottontail population does not contain any disease which could render the flesh inedible. 41 Recreational Use of Little Tinicum Island and the Delaware River Little Tinicum Island is accessible only by boat. The island is used by recreational boaters and hunters. A survey was distributed to boaters that were on the island or boats that were nearby. Surveys were also distributed to nearby boating ramps and clubs. The survey had a very good return rate of 35 returned from 75 distributed. Figure Thirteen is the survey questionaire (page 42) with the average (mean) response following the questions. The reverse side of the survey was a map for reference and to answer question ten. An explanation of the response follows. Question 1 and 2 Most boats traveling to the island are motorboats. Rowboats and canoes have trouble traveling upstream and downstream in the current and waves of the river. The average length of boats is 21.6 feet. These boats fall into three categories: a) canoes and rowboats 12 - 14 feet- 4 boats. b) 'run-about' motorboats 15 - 24 feet 19 boats. c) cruising motor and sail boats 25 - 36 feet, 10 boats. The draft of these boats (depth of boat below the waterline) are: a) 12 - 14 foot boats- less than 12 inches. Only 1 reply out of 4 in this category (25%) - 18". b) 15 - 24 foot boats- average draft = 28.5 inches (9 reples, 47 %) c) 25 - 36 foot boats- average draft = 4.3 inches (7 reples, 70 %) The number of respondents who did not indicate the draft of their boat (16 out of 35) may indicate that the draft of their boat, is shallow and does not pose a problem to island access. This assumption is supported by the fact that larger boats (with larger drafts) has a much higher response rate (70%) compared to smaller boats (25 % and 47 %). Access to the island is gained by wading from an anchored boat to the shore. Canoes and rowboats pull up onto the shore. The draft of most boats (excepting 25 - 36 foot) allows anchoring in water shallow enough for wading. The 5.7 foot tidal difference creates a problem for anchored boats. The tidal extremes occur six hours apart hence the tide must be considered when anchoring for more than an hour or so. Seven respondents indicated that this FIGURE 13 Dear boater Your help in completing this survey is very important. The information you provide is necessary for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources to determine the most popular use or facilities for Little Tinicum Island-in the Delaware River. A stamped envelope is enclosed for your reply. Thank you for your valuable help, 1. What type of boat do you use on the Delaware River? circle one motorboat 24 rowboat 2 canoe 1 sailboat 1 other- 0 2. Length of boat? 21.6 Draft of boat? 2.9 3. 'How many people usually occupy the-boat? 4.4 4. How many times a year do you visit or-boat near (within one mile of) Little Tinicum island? 42. 5. How many- times a year do children under twelve years old accompany you on the boat? 9.3 6. What months do. you visit Little Tinicum Island? From May to__September 7. What town or marina do you. dock your boat at? 8. If you trailer your boat, what ramp or marina do you launch it from? 9. Please indicate the number of times per year that you participate in the following activities on or near Little Tinicum Island (within about one mile of the island): fishing. 23. 3 swimming 24.4 picnicing on beach 16.0 hunting: water skiing 15.1 picnicing on boat 17. waterfowl 12.3 anchoring 31. nature observation 24.7 game 30.0 boat races 4.4 sightseeing 16. tapping - relax on beach 21.3 walking on beach 19.6 10. Cn the map of Little Tinicum Island on the reverse side -of this page mark your favorite spot 'to land or anchor by the Island.., 11, Facilities you would use if built on Little Tinicum Island: docks- 27 picnic tables 26 moorings 15 barbecue grills 25 toilets 25 trash cans 28- duck blinds- 11 nature trails 18 18 Hunters- Do you usually hunt from your boat or go ashore when you hunt, near Little Tinicum Island? 13. Do you have any suggestions that would make the Island more accessible, useful or enjoyable? 42 43. was a problem. Three of these respondents indicated. that a dock would solve this problem. Five other persons indicated they would use a. dock but did not state their purpose, except for the re- I .ply a small unloading dock.." Question 3 The Lear. number of person per boat is 4.4. Values range fro,-.-& 2. to 8 persons per boat. This is an estimated total-, of 144 people represented by this survey.. question 4 The average number of visits to or near Little Tinicum Island per year Is 42. 'The total nu-ber of visits per 'Person Der year represented by this survey is 6043.. This is an approximate and not actual- number. question 5 During twenty- one percent- of visits to the island children under twelve years old accompany adults. Question The average span of months that persons visit the-island is 6.2 months. Most respondents start boating in May and stop in September. Two respondents boat all year. Figure Fourteen is a ,graph. of the number of boats visiting the island during the year. 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 J F M A. M J J A S O N D Months FIGURE 14 44 Question 7 The marina or town the respondents boats are docked at are listed-below: Morrow's Marina, Darby Creek, Ridley Twsp., PA 9 Westville Power Boat Association,- Big Timber Creek, NJ 4 Seaplane Base, Delaware River,, Essington,. PA Fox Grove Marina, Delaware River:, Essington, PA Riverside Yacht Club, Delaware River,. Essington, PA Anchorage Marina,, Delaware River, Essington, PA. Tinicum Boat Yard,, Delaware River,, Essington,, PA Triton Marina, Chesapeake Bay, Elkton. MD Darby Creek, PA. I Essington, PA Most I -of these boats are within a mile or two of' Little Tinicum-Island. The Westville Power Boat Association is 9.5 river miles upstream.. Question 8 The ramps used by respondents with trailed boats are-:. Morrow's Marina, Darby Creek, Ridley Twsp., PA 6 Chester ramp, Delaware River, Chester,$, PA, 4- Juvesh Center, Timber Creek, NJ T Darby Creek.$ PA Fox's Marina Delaware River, Essington, PA Seaplane Base, Delaware River,. Essington.. PA The Chester Ramp is about 4 miles downstream Of Little Tinicum Island. 45 Question 9 The-average number of times per year each activity is engaged in by respondents is listed below in Column A, The number of boats with respondents who participate in activites is listed in Column. B. The total instances of participation for each activity by total persons represented by this survey per year is listed in Column.C. A B C Swimming 24.4 25 2684 Relax on beach 21.3 24 2249 Picnic on beach 16.0 28 1971 Nature observation 24.7 18 1956 Walk on beach 19.6 22 1897 Fishing 23.3 16 1640 Picnic on boat 21 17.0 1571 Waterskiing 15.1 19 1262 Sightseeing 16.4 17 1227 Anchoring 31.2 24 749 Game hunting 30.0 5 660 Waterfowl hunting 12.3 9 Boat races 4.4 7 136 Trapping 3 The number of hunters is greatly underestimated by this survey., The survey was distributed in early September. Only a few boaters indicated hunting as an activity they participated in. Interviews with Conservation Officers., Pennsylvania Fish Commission, Essington,, PA indicate that hunters use the island only during-hunting -.,and.-- are. underestimated in this survey.- The Conservation Officers report. as many as thirty persons hunt from small. boats in the" evening on weekdays., Two duck blinds exist on the north shore and. two new blinds were built this season on the south shore. Three activities in which boaters participate,, but were not questioned regarding are crabbing, overnight camping, and building fires,. It is estimated that as many as six boats with an average of four persons per boat camp overnight during summer weekends. ?-8 46, Question 10 Figure.. Fifteen shows the favorite: visiting location of, boaters. Question 11 The number of respondents that indicated they would-use the following facilities is reported below-* docks 27 picnic tables 26 moorings 15 barbecue grills 25 toilets. 25 trash cans. 28 duck blind 11 nature trails Question 12 Hunters indicate that they go ashore (6), hunt from boat and use duck blinds (1), Question 13 This question asked for suggestions to make. the island more accessible, useful or enjoyable.. The response-have been categor- ized below. Build docks 8 Do nothing-we like it the way it is 7* Clean up beach, tires, and trash 5- Depth markers along-shore I+ Clean up the Delaware '.River'- 3 Make the island a wildlife refuge 2 Keep it simple and inexpensive 2 Dredge channel a Build breakwater for large boats 1 Build state marina on. island I Picnic tables- and. grills 1 No hunting near island I No glass 1 No fee for use. Few rules.- Refreshment stand, Sandy beaches 1 Three respondents with this comment did not respond- to any other question on the survey form. lie gage #VIC Ic @ kg W- 4 V/ on E-k 4 CO Gi S rEg 0 on CO 4A, has 00 Ll 48 an Figure- Sixteen is a map from the report "Philadelphia's Plan for- River Recreation" prepared -by the City', Planning- Commission., This- figure, -Recreational and Cultural Sites shows areas of interest to boaters along 'the Delaware River.. Not all of these sites are accessible by boat. Little Tinicum: Island stands as out as one of the best recreational sites on the Delaware River.29 Figure Seventeen displays the boat. ramps, marinas- and -yacht clubs along the Delaware River. Several marinas are clustered in Essing- ton. because Little Tinicum. Island. provides a sheltered harbor. In recent years-the use of these marinas has declined because sediment 30 has accumulated in the back channel and filled in docking areas. Safety and Law-Enforcement at Little Tinicum Island The Pennsylvania Fish Commission is stationed at, Essington. These Conservation Officers- are empowered. to enforce state- laws, fine and arrest persons. A. person. violating the law may sign a field acknowledgement of guilt a:ad pay the fine immediately or within five days. Persons from other, states must pay the fine immediately. If the- fine is. not paid, a. citation is mailed. If there is no response to the citation (by- appearing in. court or paying the fine an& costs) a warrant is issued for, arrest... The Conservation Officer takes the arrested person to the District- Magistrate in Essington or Lima, PA. Little-, Tinicum Island is well patroled because the Fish. Commission docks overlook the island. Common violations$,. listed in order of frequency are: disorderly conduct,, illegally, discharging firearms, intoxication-and boating violations. It is suspected that arson may be responsible for-- some fires. The Fish Commission Officers,- have a varied and busy schedule of activities to perform including enforcement of fishing reg ulat- Ions.. endangered. species- laws: and: assisting, the Pennsylvania, Game, Commission officers. A few boating accidents occur- each year- fatalities. are rare. The Philadelp -a City- Planning- Commission's report on river recreation predicts that use of the Delaware, River will increase fourfold in the future. This optimistic estimate is based on the fact that peoples perception of water quality effects their level RECREATIONAL AND 0 ULTURAGMW SITES R.- . . . . . . . . . . . . . @16 lo i2 13 Z 14 Philadel @phia cit ...... Philadelphia a Plan f6k LEG Manayuhk Cattai tcj f wpo Mat Rock Park X! 3. Canoe Club. 4. Palmonount Park: 'A; kam Ar, Fairmount Park West House Ono Zoo Boat kou'46 Fairmount Sarframto Notion toll Fort Mit IL VFL PHIA flin 3. 19. Tinicum 0 Little T1 hicuth lAirld, J A lot Bank Battlaflold, M.Old Swedes' hn'to Landind 'IJ e JV t W, r il. p. 'WIN 20 2 ri%*U-RE 17 COMMERCIAL, PRIVATE! , AND PUBLIC BOATING FACILITIES lWoNfuumt my C, F. LAPHIA co co- .a 30 A x A,> ciftsfell 346 NEW C, <. 4 ON W2 -1phia City Plann Phildde ing Coft PhiladeAphiAts Plan fOr Riv"ok I LP-GENb 6 Commercial,: Marina, o Commercial M rinal V M Private Yacht And 8 b Public Boat Ramos' r-O I.- Nurvib&s ROO Tod tAb1#9 Lrr L P I @11 A pit. 34 31 30 M. 2 Of If @2 LO 24 6 40jj 2 1 0 53 - of use of the river.: Improvements that have recently been completed at, Philadelphia's sewage treatment were -predicted to improve. the quality of river water, although the water quality near Little Tinicum Island has not improved. The island is used mostly by local residents., There is no reason to sus- pect an-increase in river use by local boaters because local water quality has not improved. An increased use of the island by boaters of the Philadelphia, region is possible in the future, water quality has improved in other areas of the river and boating may increase on. the river- as a. whole.. Many new boating facilities are being plan-Tied. The planned boat basins in Philadelphia and Camden will hold a considerable number of boats. `The Philadelphia City Planning- commission estimates that the river can. sustain three times the present level of' recreational. use., The river area with the great- es untapped potential, is in Delaware County." 31 54 Considerations for- Activites and Facilities on Little Tinicum Island The activites that need. consideration. are swimming, hunting.- camping and building fires and duck blinds.. The water quality of the river for boating and swimming is very poor. Publ i c bath- ing- beaches are regulated by the Department of Environmental. Resources., Any area where swimming. is promoted (roped off swimming areas.. lifeguards,...) must be monitored for bacterial. concentrations-..-- Water samples must be coil ected and, analyzed weekly. If bacterial concentrations are greater- than the -State: standard swimming is not permitted until. water quality improves. Areas-that. do not. promote: but do not prohi-bit swimming are. not compelled by state law to observe these regulations. The Pennsylvania Department of Health recommends observing the. bacterial, standards- regardless if swimming is promoted or not.32 The waters surrounding-the island -mill not meet the swimming standards- in the near future., If swimming is prohibited a sign, must be posted; The owner of the property may be liable for injury, regardless. The Department of- Environmental Resources, Bureau of' Legal. Services should. be, consulted. on regulation and liability... Enforcement. of, a no swimming. regulation for, Little Tinicum Island. would limit, the accessibility of the. island for, most, boaters: .who must wade to shore., It is suggested that the Conservation Officers at Essington be contacted regarding the feasibility and desirability of enforcing a no swimming regulation. Little Tinicum Island is one of the few areas suitable for waterfowl hunting in Delaware County., The Tinicum National Environ- metal Center is a,. wildlife refuge and hunting is! not. permitted& Many species.- of special concern frequent.. the, island. A- decision must be mad& to allow- or prohibit. hunting-, If hunting is- allowed, hunters should. be. educated to recognize species: of special,. concern.. Several duck, blinds: exist on the island. ..These, blinds are. subject,. to. destruction-. during: floods but, driftwood is plentiful for thei-r reconstruction. A decision to- allow; or prohibit. the- use and/or construction of blinds must- be, made, 55 Boaters presently camp overnight on the island. At the current rate of use, camping does not present any conflicts to other-uses of the island.. Fires are built on. the island beaches, The fires in recent years have been small but the potential for a severe fire burning shrubs and trees exists.. The fire in 1971 caused a change in the vegetation of the burned areas. Fires may be safely, built on. the beach in areas where driftwood has been cleared away. This wea could also be used for camping-. This: would prevent the destruction of inland vegetation for campsites. Because overnight campers are likely to build fires in camp this would encourage campers to camp-on the beach* Figure Fifteen shows the- most popular spots to come ashore. Figure Eighteen delineates, the -suggested fire and campsite areas. Facilities, that should be considered, are docks, moorings, dredging channels$ navigational aids, duo-.-. picnic. tables, barbecue grills, trash cans, toilets and nature trails. The survey listed many facilites that could be provided. Most respondents replied that they would use these facilities. The feasiblity of. providing- these facilities must. be considered along with the. necessity of these facilities. The- conflicts that, these facilities would. create: to other uses of-the island (wildlife refuge) -must be considered. Docks were requested by 8 of the respondents in the suggestion area and checked off by 27 in question eleven. An unloading dock would help boaters- and especially small children come ashore*,,- More people picnic on the beach. than they do. on their. boa visitors carry chairs, coolers, and barbecue grills to-shore. Access to the island is difficult *hen the Delaware River-Estuary waters are cold,, especially, in the early spring when. the warm. air tempera- ture brings boaters to the river even though the river water- is- very- cold.. An estimate of the design and price of a dock was secured" from Gorman-Baldwin.Associates, RD 39 Porchtown Road, Newfield.. NJ 08344 (215-745-5549). The design and price of a small perma- nent unloading dock.were calculated. Floating docks need to be ,removed 'from the river to prevent. their destruction by ice. A single- pier, perpendicular- to the shore. sill allow boats: to pull': alongside with their bows facing New Jersey. This-docking position will. prevent. the. boats from. rolling. in the-wake of passing freighters.. A straight, eight foot. wide wooden pier fifty feet long will cost between $ 20,000. and 45,000., depending. on: the geologic composition-of the: river bottom. The 5.7 foot,. tide. difference will necessitate the 'use.. of ladders to reach- the pier level by.. persona, embarking from boats at low tide. A fifty foot Pier- will. allow- two to four boats to tie-up, depending. on. the tide and their, draft. Maintenance costs: are not included in this estimate, Moorings are- similiar to buoys and permit a. boat, to tie-up., Few respondents (15) indicated they would use-moorings. Anchoring, provides the same service, Small rowboats and canoes would probably use moorings, but these. we not essential for these. light., small. craft.- Moorings may be used by fishermen. and hunters, to-prevent drifting downstream. Moorings require a small amount of once a year maintenance.. Permit's for-_moorings must be. secured from the United, States. Coast- Guard and. the, PA DER Bureau. of Dams, & Waterways. Recreation facilities- picnic, tables,,, barbecue grills and. toilets were among the most desired, facilities. in.. t he surrey.. Because- the whole island is in the.floodplain the. permenance. of' any-unsecured structure is uncertain.. Lands above the high water, mark may be considered wetlands, depending on the soil conditions and vegetation. The placement of' fill in wetlands is regulated.by the Army Corp of Engineers, although the excavation of wetlands is not regulated. Boardwalks- and secured picnic,. tables. and grills will require permits,*,- Assistance.- for the design, and alternatives is available from the Army Corp of Engineers. The most requested-facility was trash cans. (28 out of 35). There are no, commercial. haulers--. who, offer trash, collection on the,-,-. river. An alternative would-,., be. to secure the. service&.. of- a marina In Essington.to collect the trash, and put. it in a dumpster on the mainland. Another alternative is not to put. out- trash cans. The. Adirondack Park Agency has: adopted, the. -slogan If you. pack it 57 in,. you pack.it out,ft The Adirondack-Study Commission'recommended the removal of garbage,pits.from lean-tos and campsites because they attracted. more garbage. 33 Tavigation near Little Tinicum Island is difficult in a large boat. The back channel is narrow and shoals-extend.the island on both ends., Tides make,the situation more difficult,,, but local knowledge of the waters makes navigation possible., Access to -Little Tinicum I'sland from the main channel is easier.. Dredging a channel or any area-of the river-i's regulated by the Army Corp of" Eingineers.. Sitea for the 4isposal of' dredged. spoils are scarce., The thick river sediments move and shoal continously making-any channel improvements or@dredging-only temporary, 'Permits for dredging-are reviewed by the Army Corp. Many factors are considered during permit review, including feasiblity,,. need for maintenance. need for improvement and effects-on the environ- ment., The regular maintenance- required of a. dredged channel in The Delaware River near the island would probably'make the project cost,, prohibitive.. 34 Buoys.oraids to navigation could help boaters.. A sign,@, post-tns- the times. of high- and low- tide would help boaters- judge the rivers. conditions. This ..sign would require daily adjustments.- A.system to indicate the depih of water at high and low-tides: would be valuable.. The United States Coast Guard in Gloucester,, plan the location of buoys or markers. NJ could be-consulted to An. application for-a permit to install private markers must be secured from. the Coast: Guard District- Office in. New York.. Ny. A:request could allso, be,made to the-District Office to have the Coast Guard.install and maintain Public. Markers. Nature observation was the-fourth most-.frequent activity- 'in days per- Iyear onIthe- island.. 10V@slking on the.-beach was'rated fifth. These, activ-itles. could-- be. facilitated. by' cleaning- a. path along the. south beach and'by'dr*eatingl:a trail across-the island to tha north shore., A,trail alo-ng the north shore is'nuti, feasible because of the convoluted shoreline,. wide mud:flats'and thick common reed standa. Along-the south beach-bulrush marsh mud flats force walkers. upland into piles of wood: debris. A trail could be created 58 above the. high.. water. mark, but clear of the shrubs and scrub/forest. In many areas the path. would need to be clear, ed, through driftwood Piles* Figure- eighteen- shows, a suggested trail route,. Two projects should be considered, removing the trash debris and/or removing the driftwood. One:-of the notable survey comments clean up the-beaches.- Floatable trash-has been-accumulating- on, the island for years; removing this-would increase the aesthetic beauty- of- the south shore* The driftwood should. remain on the island.. The driftwood. piles- up on the island through the natural d estructive power of storms and floods. -It. acts- to- stablilize the island and provides wildlife habitat, Removing the driftwood is-a-large under- taking which requiresa barge and crane* The-land transport and disposal site must be arranged by the landowner. Additional comments from. the survey need quick. consideration. A request, for a refreshment stand is-i6qmpractical because of the low number- of visq:qLtors1ppractical problems of construction. -and ut0qil I ties,, an4qd- flooding-* One respondent asked for a breakwater this request should be addressed to the Army Corp of,E6qngineersoi, one respond6qent.suggested the:2q14qsland support a state.mari2qna., The marinas in Essington provide adequate facilities foroater6qs,o Fuel is available for boaters up.Darby Creekqw Ferry acces6qst6qo.: the, island was suggested. 2qk 'private con0qc6qes6qs2qlonai8qm from, one of, the marinas in Essington could- 0q8-0qu6qpply this service more effe0qc2qlently and cost eff0qectq:qLvely-tha6qn cou6qldthe Bureau of Forestry. Boats could also be rented from th6qese.marinas for access to the isiand. Many respondents 0qindicat6qed-6qA0qh6qey. would. use to6qt6ql6qets'q:qLf provided oqzqL the island., It. would- be. very, difficult: t0qo@e8qmptyort0qabl' - q9qt or 0qu2qtt. toilets because island. locationq.. no in 30q1 8q40qtuatio 0qSq1, j ar. to- this islandq, the Pennsylvania Stat2qa Parke use. compost2qlng toilets- w6qhq:qL0qch.'do not require. elect6qr6q1,0qcq:qL-t4qy,,- or plumbing*, F48qac0q;qLlit2qles 8qGonstru16qctio12qn2qcosts The, cost: o56qf 'constructing! 56qfa08qc56qi60ql88qit60q1e20qs am the- island is higher. than. 56qlan56qd8q-base56qdq@q,q. pro96qj52qec56qt16qa because o56qt theq@ d60qiffic24qu.0q3q-t56qyq- of- t2qra2qr porting e56qqu0q:56qL60qj16q=e48qmt4qvq,q... -suppl6q:20qLe'16qs an& construction- 60qpersonne4q3q. to'. the- 64qis68qlandqeq, The, cost of transportingq, all. supplies- and equipment for a small recreation area is estimated at 80qS 156q258q-56qW per hour for two workers, LITTLE'TINICUM 1SLAND FIGURE]$ CAMPING and FIRE ESSINGTON PHILADELPHA INTERNATIONAL AIR 13ACK @"4NNEL PiF TIDAL P P1 LITTLE TINICUM ISLAND F 189- !%ftF-A DELAWARE RIVER N 0 7501 1500' 2250, ANN" Approximate-' 60 and a specialized boat. The minimum bid for- this job may be as. high as $1000.00 If the transportation of equipment is combined with other work (dock- construction or. facilities installation) transportation maybe lower,. once equipment and-supplies are-transported to 'the island. by a waterfront construction company, a.land-based-construction- company can. install. the facilities. The cost. of, installing the facilities. will depend. on the design and location.. The U.S. So., Army Corp of Engineers will assistin these detaila for example- -methods- to- -anchor. picnic tables in a flooplain). Figure 19- Facilities Construction costs- summarizes the cost of faciliites, the cost of installation and anchoring supplies and the cost of labor. If facilities do not need to be anchored, the cost of installation will be minimal. Trash cans may be mounted on eight foot wooden. posts to prevent animal disturbance or relocation by humans or flood.. Fire circles should be anchored to prevent relocation to fire hazard areas (scrub/forest), The costof contracted labor may range from 20,00 to $50.00 per hour per person depending-upon the ease of accessibility to the- island for the workers, Finding- a contractor, to install- the.' facilties may be. difficult because of the unique nature. of 'the- project. The minimum bid for Just the installation.. of facil I ties.- may-be approximately $ 500,00 The cost of constructing the nature trail depends on the cost of labor and the route of the trail. If the trail is routed through driftwood labor costs will be high. FIGURE 19 FACILITIES CONSTRUCT! 011 COSTS Facility Equipment Supplies- Labor Total. Dockl' $20,rO00-45*000-1 Mooring'(each) $75-002, 1.5 hrso3 $1,2o.oo 2. Vicnic-Table4 $75-80oOO $30-00 1-5 hrs-@ S155-00 Fire-ring Grill4 $500,002 @30410 1.0 hrs. rM0100 Trash Can4 .7 .' 0 0 S35.,00 1 .0 hrol $1,00000 Composting Toilet5 $4000-.00 1000 "00 $5000-00 1 Total- Cost, Gorman-Baldvin, Associat- e i eld :NJ 08344 v fi Equipment cost as per PA DE' R,..- Bureau c t atL. e Parks,, 1985, 3 Labor,Rate equals $ 30,00-- for these ca-.-Dutations., J+ ELEquipment installed and securedt tran-2--ort, to island not included.. 5' -Clivus- Multrum USA, Dept,.; 17ig 1'4A Eliot, Cambridge, MA. 62 Four Plans for Little Tinicum Island Four plans are presented for consideration. Plan A -,to. the current- use and facilites of. the island.. Plan B is designed to"maximize habitat; and wildlife protection.. Plan C Provides more for recreational use of the island., Plan D may be. utilized if large recreational demands occur- in. the future. In addition, to selecting a planV- activites and f acilites specifi to: each- plan also must be selected..- Plan: A, Doing very-little or nothing to the island was suggested by seven respondents. The current- visitors- to the are enthus- iasti and-appreciative of-the island. The current level and,are'as of use by visitors are having little impact the island....., The benefits of this: plan, is that the, freedom and. independence of* tore are preserved. The negative impact of the plan are that no restraints are imposed on the activities which couldisturb-wildlife and.destroy habitat.. Luckily,,. the current level of` use low, so that these-. impacts are minimal, The- presence of hunters- has., quest impact the bird Waterfowl are certainly discouraged'fr uslng,the island during the bunting season, Song and upla6qnd.b2qIrd6qs, may not be,disturb6qed by-hunter0qs. Only-,one trail6qec0qro sees the island north to south., It is.very difficult to cros0qethe western-two thirds of the island because of thick shrubs and reeds* Few visitors travel to the north shore; fishermen.. and hunters f0qrequent.the area 6qin boats. Most shore activity, occurs 8qin d2q12qk6qed: areas. a6qncl beache0qs-0. T6qh6qe vegetation acts. as a natural barrier to prote0qct_th0qe. wetlan2qd0qe. w6qil6qdlifel of- the north. s6qhorew The current- use of the island would. fall within the reg4qulation0qs 16q& natural- area. The only current. of the', Bureau of. Forestry as.. activity which 52q1sq; proh56qlb6qi-tedq'52q1n. natura56qL areas, 52ql20qaq., the bu52qlld52ql16qn56qg of duck. blinds& Theq, currentL act2qi28qm56qIte16qs of 16qv52q1mm0qJq'q.n52qgq' hunt56q1n60q& camping- an& 24qa24qr20qeq.q, permitted in natural, weasq'qsq, The Delaware 2qI8qt8qLv16qer-waterq- does: -not q@q,q-q.8qqeet the bacteriological 63 standards adopted to evaluate the health safety or risk of illness to swimmers and boaters. This means that persons swimming in the Delaware River risk contracting an infectious disease. It must. be decided if swimming will be prohibited ct not andif this regulations will be strictly enforced.. Natural. areas permit backpacking.,campers in designated.areas only. Itneeds to be decided if boaters,who camp are equivalent to backpacking campers. Backpackers differ-from car campers in. that they have very little equipmentq no cars or-trailerss, require no faciliti.es and.cause much.less habitat destruction.in camp.. Because boating campers must carry supplies to the shore their, supplies are limited to those roughly equivalent to backpacking supplies. Boaters,may have additional coolers and chairs but still represent the same style of camping when compared %rith other campers. Campers on-Little Tinicum Island prefer,the sparsely vegetated. beaches and cottonwood groves.. C amping in these areas destroys little vegetation. I.suggast that campers from boats.are equivalent to backpacking campers and may be permitted to camp oil the island- if it. is designated a naturall area.. It will-also be necessary to delineate.4 camping area.. The. cost of plan A.includes- a sign posting-the regulations and signs marking the camping- areas., 7lan B ""lan B offers greater-protection of habitat and.wildlife than the other-plans.. The island would be designated as a. natural area.. The permitted activities would be camping and fires only-in designated areas-and possibly swimming,, Prohibited activities would be.duck blind construction., and hunting-or limited hunting.. Facilities that might be provided would.be a. trail. on, the beach, and, possibly trash cans-... swimming activities have little impact on.habitat on the. beaches.. It must bedecfLded if swimming-will be permitted based on other factors, such as healtht safety and enforcement. It must also be decided if trash cans will.be p.7.ovided for visitors. 64 If they, are provided they would be. most useful on the 'South shore- in the two areas where most-visitors come ashore, Hunting is, permitted in. natural. areas- although. the variety of' Westing birds- on the island must be considered.. The actual benefit of a huntingban -to threatened and endangered birds on the island is hard to estimate.. The. island, would become a wildlife refuge and the Pennsylvania- Game Commission could enforce the laws. The Bureau of Forestry and the Pennsylvania Fish -Commission together- can. designate a natural. area as an amphibian and rieptile protection area., The taking, catching, killing-, or possession. of' any amphibian or reptile would. be prohibited. This designation would create a.. refuge for all -amphibians. and reptiles. Threatened and- .endangered species are currently protected by state law, The cost of Plan B includes two trash cans and labor- to clear- a short.trail. Theactual cost will depend on the source of laborers and- the amount of traill created. Plan,C This plan. provides more- recreational. facilities for boaters And hunters. The natural area designation would apply. The-.' facilities will increase the safety, convenience- and use-of the island.. The, construction. of, these- facilities on the south- shore! will, limit the destruction- of-wetlands habitat and minimize. visitor use of the wetlands. A trail crossing the island would- give. limited-access to view the north shore. I Hunting.. swimming.. camping and. fires would be permitted.. A decision regarding: the- health aspects, of swimming must. still be. considered.. Camp and fire areas: would be designated Duck blind construction would not-be permitted, Natural area improvements: are, restricted to the: mini mum necessary- for public health,,, safety- and interpretive aids.. AnY ac,tv which- msult in. some- form of disturbance- must, be approved by, the State Forester., A nature. trail. could, be- constructed through the driftwooc If the trail. was approved. A boardwalk over-the wetlands could be constructed as A safety feature possibly or as an interpretive, aid but it would require a. permit from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental and. the United States.. Army- 65 Corp of, Engineers., A cedar chip trail would destroy less vegetation and does not require a permit from the Army Corp., Facilities that would increase the safety of visitors ar e aids to navigation, docks, moorings,, toilets and trash cans. The cost of all these facilities and a nature trail would be about.$ 30,000-00 to S 53sOOO-00- Plan D If the number of visitors increases substantially the-island. may be designated-as a Special Use Area.or*a State-Park. Use regulations may be necessary-tQ limit the destruction of habitat.. Access to the island may be limited to the south shore to limit wildlife disturbance and to preserve tidal marsh plants. Boaters could visit-the area but could not land. Hunting and fires would not be permitted for safety reasons.,- Docks.$. toilets, picnic tabl.es, and trails may be necessary., Grills may have to be provided to cont-z rol wildfires. In addition to these facilities.,. a part-time enforcement officiall may be needed during-the summer weekends.. 'If the recreational demand exceeds-the capacity of'the island,:. & system to control the number of visitors- per day may be'necessary., Pass es would- be issued, by an enforcement official.. The- cost. of this plan vioul& be. an additional $ 3000.00 over, the cost of' Flaan C, The wage's of an em-p-oyee are not included as well as a boat. for emnloyee use.. T-ittle Tinicum Island is able to support a variety of"activities as long as the number of visitors reisains low. The addition-of. island based facilities is not likely to increase the numberof visitors greatly., Eastablishing navigational aids and docks may increase visitors. Because the number of,boaters on.the Dela- wara River, is predicted to increaseq. the number of visitors- to the. island should-, be. monitored periodically.. Visitors sign..- in books be placed-on the island,duringAugust and.-November,to record-the-number,and origin of visitors., If'the re-cently built Chester Ramp becomes more popular-$. the -number of visitors may- increase-in '1986. 66 Plan As, B and C were. formulated to accomodate the: current number of-visitors and a moderately increased level. of use. If recreational demand Increases, it may be necessary to restrict the number of visitors to the Island in order to achieve and maintain the goals of the elected plan. This, is. especially true for- Plan A which is based on the assumption of a. low number- of visitors. Plan B which protect wildlife and-habitat requires a-, limited number, of' visitors. If recreationaL demand increases,,,. visitor and, boat. access, will have, t be; restricted order to maintain Plan B If this. plan Is chosen, mitIng boats. to: anchoring- inesignated areas such as the camping and fire weas would. restrict the number of visitors. The maintainence of Plan C under increased recreatIonal demands will also require restricted access to the island. If'vistor cess not restricted Plan. C will fail qind Plan. D, which requires an enforcement. official. vr8qill need tobe adopted.. More elaborate plans- including permanent structures were. not considered because of' the.. signiqllcant possibl ty of flood destruct ion., Only small- anchored. structures were: considered feasble such a picnic table and gqJq1q1'0qs. None of the activities or. facilities, presented with each. of the plan is mandatory&, Pla4qnB 2qwhich,0qprotect0qs,the wildlife may involve the construct-ion of. docks,,, toilets and trash- can and not be inconsistent with-the goal of wildlife. protection if, built properly, located sensibly, and visitor access restricted.. Plan C which. provides for recreation. ma2qy not necessarily involve the constru4qct0qIo0qn o-f facilities,& No,. other catego0qr6qie6qa@ of` land used, by the-Burqlqea0qm of Forestry are: ap0qpropr2qiat6qa for Little. 6qMiqL6qt4qeuqrqt Island... The island: is- too; smaq,6q21q- 8qf16qa be 20q& Wq10q20qA A16qrea6qw It- has 16qn20qo harv16qestableq- -timer standsq- of noteworthy s:56qLzeq-qoq, qThe Bureauq.. of Forestry,", a, pol icy Isq, to maintai bm. not. developq. picnic facittqle1. New-, eas- should be, provided,. by State Park 67 ENDNOTES 1 Rand McNally Company, New Jersey Map (New York,1980) 2 United States Geological Survey, Topographic Map, Bridgeton Quadrangle., 3 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration United States Department of Commerce, Chart of Delaware River-, W mington to Philadelphia National Ocean Survey (Washington D.C. 1-983) 4 Jack McGormick and Associates, Preliminary Ecological- Evaluation and Recreational Census, Little Tinicum Island and Vicinity ( United States Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia PA, 1971) p. 6 - 9- 5 Bill Sisson, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission. Bureau of Historic Preservation Harrisburg, PA (personal communication October 1985). 6 Co=onwealth Land Title Insurance Companys Title-Report Tinicum Real Estate Holding Corporation,. Delaware County Deed, Book, 408 page 79 and 97 (A-pril 25 1977) , 7 Adapted from Pennsylvania Department-of Environnental Resources,, Divison of Coastal Zone Management, Four Environmentally Significant Areas.. Delaware Estuary Coastal-Zone Working Paper p 16 8 Commonwealth Land Title Insurance CompanY P 4 9 C, L., Orbaker and. Associates Inc. Appraisal Report Little Tinicum, Island. (April 26, 1977) P. 6. 10 McCormick 10.- 11' McCormick P. 3 - 4 12 UnitedStates Soil Conservation Service Soils Report Chester and Delaware Counties,, PA., Sheet 58. 13 United States Army Corp of Engineers, Delaware 'River Survey Eddystone to Tinicum Island, and Tinicum Island to Schuylkill. River,, 1966. 14 Delaware River Basin Commission,_Water Quality Data, Paulsboro New Jersey,, 1984 - 1985, Trenton New Jersey., 1.5 Pennsylvania Department of' Environmental. Resources, Bureau. of' Water- Quality Management, Water Quality Criteria. (1985). 16 United, States Environmental Protection. Agency Chesapeake Bay: .A. Framework- for- Action (Philadelphia. District.:. 1983) 17' Delaware River- Basin Commission.. op... cit. 18 American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the. Examination of* Water and. Wastewater (Washington,, D.C., 1985) P. 827 - 830. 68 19 Mrs"' Haffly Director of Public. Health Cheater: County, Office... Pennsylvania Department of Public, Health.. 20 Mr., Seymour ,Gross, Delaware River Basin Commission. (personal -communication, October 1985 21 Philadelphia City Planning Commissions Philadelphia's Plan for- River Recreations (Philadelphia, 1984) P. 10-11 22 McCormick p. 27 23 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Forestry Pennsylvania Natural. Diversity Inventory, (1985) 24 Norman Fassett A, Manual. of Aquatic: Plants (Madison, WI 1980) P. 343 - 351 25 Elbert Little, The Audobon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (New York, 1980). 26 John Groves-,. The Philadelphia Zoo, Report prepared for this- study. 2? McCormick P. 49. 28 Lee-Tilton Pennsylvania Fish Commission(personal communica- tion. November, 1. 1985) 29 Philadelphia City Planning Commission,, 58 59 30 !bid.., P., 40 - 41 3 1 Ibid.p. 45. 32 Mrs. Haffly. Pennsylvania Department of Health., Chester County Office (personal. communication November 1985) 33 Eleanor Brown,, The Forest Preserve (New Yorks, 198.5) 34, Dick Hassel.. United States Army Corp of Engineers Regulatory Branch,. Philadelphia PA (personal communication November 1985)- 69 BIBLIOGRAPHY American Public Health Association, Standard methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition, Washington D.C. 1985. Brown, Eleanor, The-Forest Preserve, The Adirondack Mountain Club New York, 1985, Fassett, Norman, A Manual of Aquatic -Plants, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1980. Fernald, Merritt Lyndon,, Gray's Manual of Botany American Book Company, New York,, 1950. Grimm, William Carey Recognizing Native Shrubs Stackpole Company-, Harrisburg, PA 1966. Grimm, William Carey How to Recognize Trees, Stackpole Company Harrisburg PA, 1962. Little, Elbert,- The Audobon Society Field Guide to North American Trees, Alfred A.- Knopf -yew York, 1980 McCormick Jack and Associates, Preliminary Ecological Evaluation and Recreational Census, Little Tinicum Island and Vicinty, United States Army Corp of _'Engineers, Philadelphia, PA, 1971. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Division of Coastal Zone management, Four Environmentally Significant, Areas Delaware Estuary Coastal Zone Working "Paper. Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia's Plan -for River Recreation, Philadelphia,. 1984 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay: A Framework for Action,'-United States Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1983. CONTRIBUTORS John Groves, Reptiles and.Amphibians on Littel Tinicum Isla nd, Curator of.Amphibians and Reptiles, Philadelphia Zool Garden. John Miller,,. Birds of Little- Tinicum Island,,. Deputy, Game Warden.,, Pennsylvania Game. Commission, Lee Tilton, Recreatioanl Survey of Little Tinicum Island, Conserva- tion. Officer, Pennsylvania Fish Joe Gorman, Gorman-Baldwin Associates,. Inc. RD 3 Porchtown, Road.. Newfield, New Jersey 08344 71 APPENDIXONE State College Field Office. Resource Contaminant Assessment Report No. 84-2 A Preliminary Survey of Contaminants in Fish and Wildlife at the. Tinicum National Environmental Center Philadelphia and Delaware Counties.. Pennsyl'vania Department of the Interior- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service State College, Pennsylvania. April 1985 Prepared by: Cynthia, L. Rice,,, David J. Putnam Project Leader: Charles J. Kul p. TABLE OF CONTENTS 72 Pa ge List of Figures List of' Tables it. INTRODUCTION- 1. METHODS: 31 Fish. Sampling 3 Turtl'e Sampl i ng, 4 RESULTS,. 6 Fi s h 6 Turtl es 6 Organochlorine/qPCB Analysis. 6 Metal Oil Analysis DISCUSSION AND, RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES 13 qFish Sampling, Turtle- Sampl ing- CONCLUSION . . 14- REFERENCES. 16q5 APPENDIX A . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . T li6 k CLEARVIEW LANDFIL L, (APPROX. LocAriow IL 2-. q7!V bZ6 M@' !?dew AL k V jr ow SZ J *A P. XJ .4 PH, ELPFn# % t FOLCROFr n tv r, 0: If 00 LAI 'D .-T I N U M DELWWARE: CO A01. 17'30N 75 P141L.A*CLP)VA JCjrr'MAL.4J 0 Mi. I MILE ROAD CLASSIFICATION M fIrt Heavy-duty Light-duty'_ IM Medium-duty Unimproved diet ......... FWS fish collection areas; 8/7-8/8184, 0 U. S. Route- 0 State Route, intot,tatp, Route, VE @VLVAW& LANSDOWNE,. PA. 1967 Figure 2.. Map of collection areas. 5' RESULTS 74 As- analytica1 results were.: received from the- laboratory,, copies: were- immediately forwarded to "interested parties including state and. federal agencies.. A copy of our transmittal letter.w-ith a complete- r_ontact.li:st for- the, Tinicum results is found in- Appendix A.- Fish Table. provides the data on our two. whole fish samples-,. as well as, criteria, for etch organochlorine established by the National Academy of Sciences/National Academy- of Engineering (NAS/NAE) (1972) for the protection of pisci-vorous (fish-eating) fish- and wildlife.. and the, U.S., FDA action level NOTE: While our data. can be compared directly to, the NAS/NAE criteria,. this. Is not true- for the FDA Action. Level,, as our samples represent residues:- in. whole" fish,- not, fillets as. generally., used, by FDA. Whole fish analysis includes the viscera, which, are generally high-lipid tissue& in fish. Since organochlorines. are highly lipophilic whole fish organochlorine. residues, are expected- to be somewhat. higher than fillet residues.. Both fish samples exceed- the NAS/1RAE criteria for dieldrin, cis.-chlordane trans-nonachlor and PCBs. In addition, the. brown bullhead sample: taken- near the Folcroft landfill exceeds the NAS/NAE criterion for DOT and its metabolites.. Tabl'e 1 also shows the average: and maximum concentration of these compounds detected in, whole fish collected from over 100 locations nationwide for the. 1980-1981 National Pesticide Monitoring Program. Both Darby Creek samples exceed the NPMP averages for ODE,, DDD dieldrin, trans-nonachlor and. PC.B. (1260). Al so shown in Table 1 are the: ranges of whol e fi sh tissu concentra-, tiqons: found fit this office's (State College. Field Office-SCFO) 1981-1982 survey. of over 40 areas in Pennsylvania known or suspected contaminant problems. Browr bullheas,largemouth- bass and American eels collected -in, the electrofishing- effort in Darby-Creek near the Clearview. Landfill were submitted' to- Dr.. Hans Rothenbacher, a-PSU Veterinary Pathologist, for pathological examination, Or- Rothenbacher found a condition known as "hemorrhagic erosive dermatit,is in, these fish, a. condition which could be, caused by exposure to toxic chemicals. An examination of brown bullheads, channel catfish, white suckers and white, bass from nets set in Darby Creek near the Folcroft Dump revealed fatty livers, another condition which is associated with environmental stress and. may be. caused by exposure,- to toxic. chemicals.. Turtles Organochlorine/PCB Analysis. Fi've. turtl efat and fi ve. turtl e 1eqq, meat samples. were analyzed for organochlorlne compounds., No organochlorines were. found. above detection, Timit in. the. meat. samples. The- ranges and- means of the, fi ve turtle.- fat ana1ytical results am. shown in: Table, 2 The- value of selecti n snapping, turtles- as, indicators, of organic: contamination- *as: realized and described: only recently, Stone: et al (1980) hypothesized that because snappng turtles are. Iong-l i ved, fairly. s-edentary-, omnivorous.. common- and-- widely distributed-. geographically,. they should be excelTent indict- tors of aquatic pollution. Stone- collected. turtles from various locations in! 6 75 the Hudson- River and. other waters around hew York state; the residue Tevels of" popt-ODE.,.dieldrin and- PCBS found in their-samples is-provided in Table 3, for' comparison with the Tinicum sample results'.. Table 3 also shows residue@ level's of p,p,-DDE and PCBs detected in one turtle fat sample: from each of the Upper! Hudson River near-Hudson Falls. and Irondequoit Bay in Lake Ontario by Olafsson et al. (1983);'and PC8 levels in 14 turtle fat samples from various Minnesota locatio.n. by Helwig and Hora- (1983). The latter authors concluded that the highest levels of PCBs found in their, study (up to 60S mg/kg) were from snapping turtle fat from the Mississippi River below the Twin Cities. At other- Minnesota locations, PCBs were less -.han or equal to 5 mg/kg-. im turtle fat. 7' Table I. Organochlor-iris compou #Os in whole fish samples collected from WOY Creek near Clearview and Folcmft Landfills, can red pa With Mactiop levels, NFMP average 4M maximum levels for 1980-1981, and range of levels detected by this offic "(5CF0121toovier, 40 locations in PA in 1981-198Z Results . J n Ppm (@et weiq4L NOT9: Our smples were whole fish and therefam our m- idim levels 4r-o not directly comparable to FDA action levels. NR4 SCFO P &W White Whole Fish Whole Fish FDA Bullheads Suckers CwjRund Criteria (Ppn) Action Level (ppa) &I cMft) (Clearview) Average Max. Flange ppp'-COE 0.70 0.38 OM NA-1.46 pop I-WO 0.53 0.30 0.07 3.43 N.D.-I.29 pop@-VDT N.D. N.D. O.C5 2.69 Dieldrin 0.3 0.17 0.35 0.04 0.72 N.D.-OAV "tachlor epxioq N .009 6.27 NA-0.03 0.3 D 0 QVchlordane -001 Mae singly or N.D. 0*009 N.D'.-O.03 Orda- 0*4 WWI 'Iw OA NA-1.09 1"VIV"I "Two trans-ftachlor POW wwwhiorine. 0.17 0.20 0.04 0.77 -1.55 N.D. Os-Nonachlor inw0cid-est N.D. N.D. 0.02 0.27 NA-0.09. Endrin excluding PDT N.D. N.B 0.005 0.1 N.D. Cst. Toxa0aw 0.01 Nx, 0.27 21.Q NA-0.20 Est. PR 1260 0.6 1.0 9.0 026 2.63 NA-6.36 NArOOM Otactw, WIW- )i*it Of. MPRU010 residues P M for pesticides and U PPM pp for FCO$. KO Wimotel' could be off b y- 5% up to an or* 9f *0040. 77 Tabl e 2. Range of organochlorines. in five turtle fat samPles, (ppm wet weight) from Tinicum NEC., Compound Range@. Mean p,p,-DDE* 0.49 - 3.4 1.598 p,p,,-DDD N.D. - 0.70 0.368' DDT N.D., a. Dieldrin 0.23 - 0.45 0.336. Heptachlor epoxide N. D. - 0. 11 0.046 Oxychlordane 0.26- 0.75 0.474. c,is-Chlordane 0.22. - 0.80 0.57Z trans-Nonachlor- 0'. 4Z - l..2* 0.686 cis-Nonachlor- NA' 0 - 0'.32' 0.214, Endrin N-.09 a Toxaphene.(Est.) N.D. .0 PCB (Est..) 4.7 - 23 13.24 N.D., none@ d,etected.. Lower@limit of' reportable. residues 0.1. ppm for pesticides and 0.5 ppm for PCBs-., PCB "estima-te" could be off by 50%, to an order, of magnitude. 9. red ov re orted n prew ou tuO es. Tabiq V @esidoo leve:4 qf or", mhlorims in smPping Wrtlq fat &m Poicoo NW cwP tP I el P i i ss Olafsson et al., 1980 Storke et al 1980 Helwig & @bra, 19M Qpper Uson Lake tbdson 00wr Now YOX- P"ima TwOes River QAtArio River *ters minnesou Ccmpourd n n n 4 9 14 (pp wet weigK (M wet. Wei Itt) (PPH fat -basis) (ppe-fat'basis) pop*-CO9 fOngq 0.49 14 14-999 87.598 N D. 57.50 11,50 Dieldrio Fonge 0.23 OX <02 - 26.5 N.D. 34jo 'A -;8.45 4.24 J - 23 39608.314 FCBs 4 633 1.?9@ 306- 7,990 0.36- 2,2BI < 0.2-60.5 "Bq 9*990.6 464,16 14 p swig sizo N.D. 9 Oe OD 79 We are una,ware of any st.ud:ies- that, have reported re.s.idue levels in. snWopinq tu,rtles for the other organochlorines detected in our- samp1es (heptachlor'' epoxide, oxychlordane. etc.). No organochlorines or PCBs were detected in our turtle meat samples. Thit is* consistent with the- findings of Stone et a,l.- (1980) and Helwig and Hora. (1983).- who found meat. residues to be much lower than fat residues. Helwig and Hora. (1983) concluded that "the, low lipid content of the turtle. meat. greatly reduces the potential bioaccumulation of PCBs. in the meat" (p. 189). Metal s Five, smapping turtle livers were anal'yzed for the metals lead, copper.,.zincq. vanad,ium,, cadmium, aluminum, thallium, mercury, arsenic and selenium. The, ranges and means. of our-results are-shown in Table 4. 1 Livers were selected- for the metals analysis because this organ has been shown to concentrate. metal contaminants in other organism@s (Jenkins, 1981). The specific metals were selected, by the PSU researchers. We are unaware of any previous studies- on metal levels in turtle. livers w:ith- which- to compare these data. Oil Analysis Two turtle- leg meati samples were submitted to our laboratories for- Polycyclic. aromatic, hydrocarbon. (PAH) analys.i-s. In its- analytical procedure for- testing for PAHs.,. the: laboratory also' apparently tests for aliphatic@ hydrocarbons.. The results of our, turtle samples showed no PAHs to be present,. but a wide variety* of aliphatics. includ.ing- tridecane,, tetradecane., octylcyclohexane,. pentadecane., nonylcyclohexane, hexadecane-, heptadecane, pristane-, octadecane, phytane,, nonam- decane,,. and eicosane. The levels- of these, compounds ranged from undetectable. to 0.21 ppm,., To our knowledge, no one has ever tested for a-liphatics, in turtle meat tissues., and we are therefore unable, to draw any conclusions concerning whether these results indicate petroleum contamination (and if so, whether these, levels are. life-threatening for turtles). 80 Table 4. Residues. of metals in five snapping- turtle, liver samples- from the Tinicum. NEC. Results in ppm wet, weight. Metal Range Mean Lead N.1Y. 0.19.. 0'.038, Cop.per 1.4 - 3.13 1.94 Zi nc 30.@ - X... .35, Vanadium NIODG. - 0.020 0.04- Cadmi um. N.D. Al'umi n= 9 .- 6. 51 3.88, Thal I i uw N*D. Mercury 0.- 04@ - 0@10 0.07Z Arsenic, 14-:D& - 0"08" 0. 01 S Seleniuff 0'.27- 0-078' 0.1526.1 N.D.. none detected. Lower limit of reportable- residues- 0.10 ppm- for lead, copper, zinc,.. vanadium, cadmium, and. thallium,; 1.0 ppiw for aluminum'; 0.02' ppm for mercury-i and 0.05. ppm. for arsenie and seleni=, DI.SCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES 81 Fish Sampling Residues: .in fish samples collected from Darby Creek near the Clearview and Folcroft landfills exceeded the. NAS/NAE criteria for. the protection of piscivorous fish and wildlife. for a number of organochlorines (see RESULTS section). Further studies would be needed, however,. to determine, the source of this, contamination. PCB I evels were reported by the lab as- an "estimate%. meaning that the- reported. value cou.1d b& incorrect by 50%- up to an order of magfiitude@ in either direction To get. a- more- accurate- assessment of the KB levels in these. fish,- we@ have7 resubmitted the. tissues to a second. lab for re-analysis.. Recent, work by the PaDER and the EPA have shown. high concentra,tions of heavy metals in Darby Creek water adjacent. to the. Folcroft Dump and in Darby Creek sediments near the Clearview landfill. Any future fish samples collected in this area should. inc.lude., heavy metal analyses to determine. if these@ contaminants are accumulating in fish tissues. Turtle Sampling, All of' the: turtles were, reported. to have been collected. from within the NEC's large- impoundment during the- evening of- Ju.ly 5 and the morn-ing of July 6. Because@ we- were- forced to hold. 'the turtles over a weekend to allow a. pathologist to- examine them, before--they were. killed and samples taken,. there. is- & possibility that some metabolization of contaminants may have occurred.. which could have@ affected the tissue: residues detected. In, a,ddition,- because: the. turtles were obtained from, a commercial trapper-,. the- PSU researchers were supplied w,.Jth somewhat smal'Ier turtles than- we Would like to have,collected. If Stone et al. (1980) are.- correct that Othe adipdse tissue- may accumu.late. organochlorine. toxicants throughout the life of a turtlen (p. 49),, older turtles should be. better indicators@ of the presence. of organo-, chlorine- pollutants. We made no attempt to age the turtles.. Further studies at. the NEC using- snapping turtles should- be better- controlled, with age- determinations. made.. Furthermore, fat appears to be- the best turtle. tissue, to- test for organochlorine, contaminants. Future studies should concen-, trate@ on collectiow of fat samples. In addition, every, effort should' be@ made. to- col1ect future: turtle samples from Darby Creek, as this waterway would be in the most. direct contact with any contaminants that may be emanating from the Clea.rv;iew-. and Folcroft Landfills. The-. same. reservations abou.t the. PC*B e-stim,ates described under the- a,bove discussion about our fish sampling apply to th& turtle fat samples, and. we- are, also- having- these- re-a.nalyzed- by- another- lab. We, hope, to hav& the. resu,lts of" both, fish and, turtle: PCB. samples in@ approximately three, months. 13 CONCLUSION Fi sk and w I Idli fe species- at the Tinicum. National Envfronment&l. Center are being exposed. to a variety of organic and@ inorganic contamina.nts.. Some-of these are concentrating- in biological tissues to: an extent. that exceeds established criteria for the protection of fish and wildlife health.- Additional surveys should: be conducted to, determine. the extent and source of , thit contamination. 14 83 REFERENCES Helwig, D.. D.- and M. E. Hora. 1983. Polychlorinated biphenyl,mercury, and cadmium concentrations in Minnesota snapping turtles. Bull. Environ Contam., Toxicol.- 30: 186-190. Jenkins,. 0. W. 1981. Biological monitoring of toxic trace elements (Project- Summary). U.S.. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems, Laboratory, Las Vegas, NV. EPA-600/S3-80-090. 7 pp. NatIonal Academy of Sciences/National Academy of Engineering.. Committee of Water Quality Criteria. 1972.Water. quality criteria,. - 172. Washington, D.C'. 594. pp. Ol a.f' on,, P. G..,, A. M, Bryan,, B. Bush, and W. Stone. 1983. Snapping turtTes- Hological scq;een for PCB's. Chemosphere, 12(11): 1525-1532 Stone.,. W. B., E. Kiviat, and S.. A. Butkas. 1980. Toxicants in snapping-9 turtles.. New York Fish and Game Journal. 27 (1): 39-50. Wa11ace McHarg. Roberts and Todd. Tinicum National Environmenta1 Center-- Srummary of- the- Draft, Master Plah. *p6W 16W at R R PW, q. 00 114.. Ij 1*rh westinkhok. pem u PFO) ik- I.. i Wit0 0 Pow p k Y p @EM op p t .. 'I I c W4 Al Haw IFI. RIFL t R p P551 PEMR PF01 PEMR p 1 1441 IF lot v p5m PIFL p I A Its R Fj- R F@- oil! Sy PO Aduslf to Pan RIQW -7. d#! Flat PIEW `PFQ P-%0 R20W PFOI 00 NTORY MAV OF T4ITTTjE; TIb Pow p4lusi pEMR- J?ptlustrine, Emergpnt, peap. Tida PFPI pssl- palus p:pol-.! P.4jurtriner farestpci,-Prd@ Lf, Pcd. PEM jvpI R1FL- R*verj EO- --i-p4luptrtne, Forels,@ecl/$crb,, Shrb,BLPuUPIAP PSP p -PF0 EM .3 TA @ @ 3-6668 141-0:@,,58ZB , I I I J