[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-3927] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: February 22, 1994] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [CGD07-93-110] Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, FL AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change regulations governing the operation of the State Road 402, Max Brewer bridge, at mile 878.9, at Titusville, Florida, by permitting the draw to remain closed during different periods. This proposal is being made to synchronize the existing closed periods with the periods of peak vehicular traffic. This action should accommodate the needs of vehicular traffic, while still providing for the reasonable needs of navigation. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 25, 1994. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Commander (oan), Seventh Coast Guard District, 909 SE 1st Avenue, Miami, Florida 33131-3050, or may be delivered to room 406 at the above address between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays. The telephone number is (305) 536-4103. The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District maintains the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or copying at the above address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Paskowsky, Project Manager, Bridge Section at (305) 536-4103. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Request for Comments The Coast Guard encourages interested persons to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written data, views, or arguments. Persons submitting comments should include their names and addresses, identify this rulemaking [CGD07-93-110] and the specific section of this proposal to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. The Coast Guard requests that all comments and attachments be submitted in an unbound format suitable for copying. If not practical, a second copy of any bound material is requested. Persons wanting acknowledgment of receipt of comments should enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. The Coast Guard will consider all comments received during the comment period. It may change this proposal in view of the comments. The Coast Guard plans no public hearing. Persons may request a public hearing by writing to Mr. Walt Paskowsky at the address under ADDRESSES. The request should include reasons why a hearing would be beneficial. If it determines that the opportunity for oral presentations will aid this rulemaking, the Coast Guard will hold a public hearing at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register. Drafting Information The principal persons involved in drafting this document are Walter Paskowsky, Project Manager, and LT J.M. Losego, Project Counsel. Background and Purpose This bridge presently opens on signal except that from 6:15 a.m. to 7:15 a.m. and 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays, the draw need not open. NASA, whose employees commute to and from the John F. Kennedy Space Center across the bridge, requested a 30 minute increase in the morning closed period extending from 6 a.m. to 7:30 a.m. This change was requested to ensure continuous uninterrupted flow of highway traffic during the heaviest daily commuter traffic periods. The bridgeowner, Brevard County, concurred with this proposal. Discussion of Proposed Amendment A Coast Guard analysis of highway traffic showed the bridge is used almost exclusively by commuter traffic (90% flow in one direction) for about an hour each morning and afternoon. The drawbridge is opened frequently due to its substandard clearance (9 feet closed), especially during the fall and spring vessel migration periods. Holding conditions for vessels near the bridge are considered adequate to allow vessels to safely wait for a bridge opening during the commuter closed periods. A review of the traffic data indicates there has been a change in the timing and density of commuter traffic which requires an earlier morning closure period. In addition, the data shows there has been a reduction in the volume of afternoon commuter traffic which would allow a change in the closure periods without requiring an increase in the length of time vessels are required to wait for an opening. Regulatory Evaluation This proposal is not considered a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not significant under the Department of Transportation Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this proposal to be so minimal that a Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. We conclude this because the proposed rule exempts tugs with tows. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Coast Guard must consider whether this proposal, if adopted, will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small entities'' include independently owned and operated small businesses that are not dominant in their field and that otherwise qualify as ``small business concerns'' under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). Since the proposed rule exempts tugs with tows, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposal, if adopted, will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Collection of Information This proposal contains no collection of information requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Federalism The Coast Guard has analyzed this proposal under the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12612, and has determined that this proposal does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Environment The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this proposal and concluded that, under section 2.B.2.g.(5) of Commandant Instruction M16475.1B, promulgation of operating requirements or procedures for drawbridges is categorically excluded from further environmental documentation. A Categorical Exclusion Determination is available in the docket. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges. For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for Part 117 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g). 2. Section 117.261 is amended by revising paragraph (k) to read as follows: Sec. 117.261 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marys River to Key Largo. * * * * * (k) State Road 402, Max Brewer bridge, mile 878.9, at Titusville. The draw shall open on signal; except that, from 6 a.m. to 7:15 a.m. and 3:15 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, except federal holidays, the draw need not open. * * * * * Dated: January 26, 1994. William P. Leahy, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 94-3927 Filed 2-18-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-14-M