[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 1994)] [Unknown Section] [Page 0] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-5456] [[Page Unknown]] [Federal Register: March 10, 1994] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION [GSA Bulletin FTR 11] Federal Travel Regulation; Subsistence Expense Payment Options for Attendance at a Conference AGENCY: Federal Supply Service, GSA. ACTION: Notice of bulletin. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The attached bulletin clarifies subsistence expense payment options available under the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) (41 CFR chapters 301-304) to agencies planning, or authorizing attendance at, a conference. This information will assist agencies in minimizing overall conference costs in the prevailing seasonal per diem rate environment. EFFECTIVE DATE: This bulletin is effective January 1, 1994. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry A. Tucker, General Services Administration, Transportation Management Division (FBX), Washington, DC 20406, telephone 703-305-5745. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Areas with seasonal variations in lodging rates may offer cost effective choices for conferences, especially during the off-season. Avoiding them because of their resort connotations without consideration of overall conference costs is not prudent policy. Moreover, contracts negotiated by Federal agencies before implementation of new off-season per diem rates on January 1, 1994 (FTR Amendment 34 (58 FR 67950, Dec. 22, 1993)), should not automatically be terminated. If the total conference cost still is less than the alternatives, payment of actual subsistence expenses at a rate up to 150 percent of the applicable maximum per diem rate for the area may be authorized for attendees. The attached GSA Bulletin FTR 11 clarifies fiscally responsible methods of planning conferences and handling subsistence expense payments. Dated: March 3, 1994. Allan W. Beres, Assistant Commissioner, Transportation and Property Management. Attachment ATTACHMENT [GSA Bulletin FTR 11] March 3, 1994 To: Heads of Federal agencies Subject: Subsistence expense payment options for attendance at a conference. 1. Purpose. This bulletin informs agencies of subsistence expense payment options available under the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) (41 CFR chapters 301-304) to agencies planning, or authorizing attendance at, a conference. This information will assist agencies in minimizing overall conference costs in the prevailing seasonal per diem rate environment. 2. Background. The General Services Administration (GSA) recognizes that resort areas may offer attractive options for conference business when overall conference costs are considered, especially during the off-season. The FTR in Amendment 32 (58 FR 58234, Oct. 29, 1993) instructs agencies in Sec. 301-16.4(a) to avail themselves of such cost savings opportunities. GSA issued FTR Amendment 32 to implement that portion of President Clinton's February 10, 1993, memorandum requiring Heads of agencies to exercise strict fiscal responsibility when selecting a conference site. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) amplified the President's direction in OMB Bulletin No. 93-11, issued April 19, 1993, requiring agencies to select conference sites that minimize conference costs. Additionally, GSA issued FTR Amendment 34 (58 FR 67950, Dec. 22, 1993) implementing seasonal locality per diem rates effective January 1, 1994. Agencies are responsible for diligently planning and managing conferences to effectively control associated subsistence costs. 3. Reimbursement of subsistence expenses for conference attendance. a. GSA's implementation of seasonal locality per diem rates in FTR Amendment 34 may have significantly affected conference commitments agencies entered into prior to the January 1, 1994, effective date of the new amendment. For conferences scheduled in an area where the per diem rate was lowered, it appears some agencies assume their only recourse is to cancel their plans and move the conference to a new site. While in some cases this may be the prudent choice, the same careful analysis of overall conference costs required by the FTR in the initial planning phase should be undertaken before any final decision is made about changing the conference site. b. If a formal contract has been signed, its terms should dictate what happens in the event of a per diem rate change. In those cases where a fixed rate has been established, the costs of termination (if any) and the overall cost of shifting the conference to a new site should be considered before any final decision is made. c. It may be that payment of an employee's actual subsistence expenses for conference attendance in a particular locality, in an amount up to 150 percent of the appropriate maximum per diem rate for the area, would result in lower overall costs to the Government than payment of per diem expenses for the employee to attend a conference scheduled in a locality with a higher per diem rate. If no other practical alternative is available, it would be prudent management for the agency to negotiate the best possible deal and, where appropriate, to authorize or approve payment of actual subsistence expenses in accordance with FTR Secs. 301-8.3 and 301-16.4. 4. Expiration date. This bulletin expires on March 3, 1995. 5. For further information contact. Larry A. Tucker, General Services Administration, Transportation Management Division (FBX), Washington, DC 20406, telephone 703-305-5745. By delegation of the Commissioner, Federal Supply Service. Allan W. Beres, Assistant Commissioner, Transportation and Property Management. [FR Doc. 94-5456 Filed 3-9-94; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820-24F