[Federal Register Volume 68, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2003)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6653-6655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 03-3181]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 360
[Docket No. 02-067-1]
Noxious Weeds; Cultivars of Kikuyu Grass
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
[[Page 6654]]
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are considering whether we should remove Whittet and AZ-1,
two cultivars of kikuyu grass, from the list of noxious weeds. In order
to make a scientifically sound decision, we are soliciting data
regarding research or studies on cultivars of kikuyu grass. We are
especially interested in data concerning potential invasiveness in the
United States of cultivars of kikuyu grass.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before April
11, 2003.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by postal mail/commercial delivery
or electronically. If you use postal mail/commercial delivery, please
send four copies of your comment (an original and three copies) to:
Docket No. 02-067-1, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS,
Station 3C71, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238.
Please state that your comment refers to Docket No. 02-067-1. If you
wish to submit electronic comments, please visit the Internet Web site
http://comments.aphis.usda.gov and follow the instructions there.
You may read any comments that we receive on this docket in our
reading room, or online at http://comments.aphis.usda.gov. Electronic
comments will be posted to this website immediately after receipt, and
postal mail/commercial delivery comments will be scanned and posted to
the website within a few days after receipt. The reading room is
located in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure
someone is there to help you, please call (202) 690-2817 before coming.
APHIS documents published in the Federal Register, and related
information, including the names of organizations and individuals who
have commented on APHIS dockets, are available on the Internet at
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppd/rad/webrepor.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael A. Lidsky, Esq., Assistant
Director, Regulatory Coordination, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit
141, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-5762.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The noxious weed regulations were promulgated under the authority
of the Federal Noxious Weed Act (FNWA) of 1974, as amended (7 U.S.C.
2801 et seq.), and are set out in 7 CFR part 360 (referred to below as
the regulations). The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) is authorized under the Plant Protection Act (the Act) to
regulate the movement of noxious weeds into or through the United
States or interstate in order to prevent the artificial spread of
noxious weeds into noninfested areas of the United States (7 U.S.C.
7712). Under Executive Order 13112, Invasive Species (February 2,
1999), we are required, among other things, ``to prevent the
introduction of invasive species * * * and to minimize the economic,
ecological, and human health impacts. * * *'' The Executive Order
defines ``invasive species'' as ``an alien species whose introduction
does or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to
human health.''
We list noxious weeds in Sec. 360.200 of the regulations. In this
section, weeds are divided into three categories: Aquatic weeds,
parasitic weeds, and terrestrial weeds. In order for a weed to be
listed, it must meet the definition contained in the Plant Protection
Act for ``noxious weed.'' The Plant Protection Act defines a ``noxious
weed'' as
``* * * any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly
injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant
products), livestock, poultry or other interests of agriculture,
irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the
public health, or the environment.''
Kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) has been listed as a noxious
weed since 1983. As stated in our regulations at 7 CFR 360.200,
footnote 1, each scientific name in our lists of noxious weeds is
intended to include all plants within the genus or species represented
by the scientific name. In other words, if the scientific name of a
species is listed as a noxious weed, all cultivars are included in the
listing. Under our regulations, kikuyu grass, like any other listed
noxious weed, is subject to certain restrictions in order to prevent
its artificial spread into noninfested areas of the United States.
Listed noxious weeds are eligible to be moved into and through the
United States, or interstate, only under a permit granted by APHIS.
Persons who move noxious weeds under permit must follow all conditions
contained in the permit with regard to storage, shipment, cultivation,
and propagation. Kikuyu grass is not permitted to be moved interstate
other than to Arizona, California, and Hawaii. Those States have agreed
to accept shipments of kikuyu grass. California has listed kikuyu grass
(Pennisetum clandestinum) as a noxious weed; Arizona and Hawaii have
not.
We have received a recent request to remove two cultivars of kikuyu
grass--Whittet and AZ-1--from the list of Federal noxious weeds. Based
on all information available to us, we believe Whittet and AZ-1 are the
only existing cultivars of kikuyu grass that are being moved interstate
to Arizona, California, and Hawaii. As explained above, all cultivars
of kikuyu grass are included in the list of Federal noxious weeds under
the listing for Pennisetum clandestinum (kikuyu grass). The requesting
individual is not requesting that we remove wild kikuyu grass from the
list of Federal noxious weeds, only that we remove the kikuyu grass
cultivars Whittet and AZ-1. The requesting individual maintains that
our assessment of these cultivars is erroneous and that Whittet and AZ-
1 do not qualify for inclusion on the noxious weed list.
Within the past several years, two scientific panels have reviewed
pertinent scientific information regarding the invasiveness of Whittet.
One independent panel of scientists representing the disciplines of
genetics, ecology, weed science, ecosystems management, and cultivar
development and evaluation considered all information published on
Whittet as of the end of 1998. The panel documented one source
published in early 1999. The other review was conducted by the
Agricultural Research Service of the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA). The USDA panel considered all available information
regarding Whittet, including the independent panel's report and
information presented personally by the individual who is now
requesting that we delist kikuyu grass cultivars Whittet and AZ-1. Both
panels concluded that there is not enough scientific evidence to
support removing Whittet from the list of noxious weeds.
Based on the findings of these panels, we continue to include all
varieties and cultivars of kikuyu grass on the list of Federal noxious
weeds. Both panels' reports and a list of other sources of information
regarding kikuyu grass are available for review on the Internet at
http://comments.aphis.usda.gov.
If we remove Whittet and AZ-1 from the list of noxious weeds, that
would potentially remove all noxious weed-related interstate and import
restrictions that now apply to these cultivars of
[[Page 6655]]
kikuyu grass. Any change to the noxious weed status of Whittet and AZ-1
would not, however, affect the possible regulation of Whittet and AZ-1
under other applicable regulations contained in 7 CFR, chapter III.
We are soliciting comments on the request we have received to
remove Whittet and AZ-1, cultivars of kikuyu grass, from the list of
noxious weeds in Sec. 360.200. We welcome any comments regarding this
request, including those documenting personal experiences with Whittet
and AZ-1. However, we need research data in order to make a
scientifically-sound decision regarding delisting Whittet and AZ-1 as
noxious weeds. We believe we are aware of all research on kikuyu grass
cultivars published prior to and during 1998; therefore, unpublished
research conducted prior to or during 1998 and published or unpublished
research conducted after that year would be especially helpful. In
particular, we are soliciting information on the following issues:
1. At this time, we are aware of the existence of kikuyu grass
cultivars Whittet and AZ-1. Are there any other cultivars of kikuyu
grass that we need to consider for delisting? If so, please identify
these cultivars.
2. What is the invasive potential in the United States of Whittet
and AZ-1? What is the invasive potential in the United States of other
cultivars of kikuyu grass that should be considered for delisting?
Would Whittet and AZ-1, and other cultivars of kikuyu grass, be
considered ``invasive species'' within the meaning of Executive Order
13112? Please explain and provide specific data supporting your
conclusions.
3. Were any unpublished research or studies conducted on Whittet or
AZ-1 during or prior to 1998? Has any research on Whittet or AZ-1 been
conducted, published or unpublished, since 1998? If so, please identify
the research or studies and provide results, especially data concerning
invasiveness and potential noxious weediness.
4. If Whittet and AZ-1 have invasive potential in the United
States, can they be controlled? If so, specify the conditions and
control techniques and to which cultivar they should be applied.
Include detailed supporting data.
5. Are there natural mechanisms that would tend to render control
procedures ineffectual for Whittet and AZ-1 and that might contribute
to the spread of these cultivars outside of agricultural settings?
We urge all commenters to include all relevant data supporting
their positions.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7711-7714, 7718, 7731, 7751, and 7754; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of February 2003.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 03-3181 Filed 2-7-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P