[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23226-23237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11542]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

[Docket No. OST-2009-0115]


Interim Notice of Funding Availability for Supplemental 
Discretionary Grants for Capital Investments in Surface Transportation 
Infrastructure Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and 
Request for Comments on Grant Criteria

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation (``OST''), DOT.

ACTION: Interim Notice of Funding Availability, Request for Comments on 
Grant Criteria.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 17, 2009, the President of the United States 
signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the 
``Recovery Act'') to, among other purposes, (1) preserve and create 
jobs and promote economic recovery, (2) invest in transportation 
infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits, and (3) 
assist those most affected by the current economic downturn. The 
Recovery Act appropriated $1.5 billion of discretionary grant funds to 
be awarded by the Department of Transportation (the ``Department'') for 
capital investments in surface transportation infrastructure. The 
Department is referring to these grants as ``Grants for Transportation 
Investment Generating Economic Recovery'' or ``TIGER

[[Page 23227]]

Discretionary Grants.'' This notice requests that applications for 
TIGER Discretionary Grants be submitted by September 15, 2009, from 
State and local governments, including U.S. territories, tribal 
governments, transit agencies, port authorities, other political 
subdivisions of State or local governments, and multi-State or multi-
jurisdictional applicants (``Eligible Applicants''). The funds provided 
by TIGER Discretionary Grants (``Grant Funds'') will be awarded on a 
competitive basis to projects that have a significant impact on the 
Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region.
    The Recovery Act allows for up to $200 million of the $1.5 billion 
to be used to pay the subsidy and administrative costs of the 
Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 1998 
(``TIFIA'') program, a Federal credit assistance program, if it would 
further the purposes of the TIGER Discretionary Grants program. The 
Department is referring to these payments as ``TIGER TIFIA Payments.'' 
The Department estimates that $200 million of TIGER TIFIA Payments 
could support approximately $2 billion in TIFIA credit assistance. 
Applicants for TIGER TIFIA Payments will be required to submit an 
application pursuant to this notice and a separate TIFIA loan 
application. Additional details are included below in Section VI (TIGER 
TIFIA Payments). Unless otherwise noted, or the context requires 
otherwise, references in this notice to TIGER Discretionary Grants 
include TIGER TIFIA Payments.
    This notice announces the availability of funding for TIGER 
Discretionary Grants, project selection criteria, application 
requirements and the deadline for submitting applications. However, 
because this is a new program, this notice also requests comments on 
the proposed selection criteria and guidance for awarding TIGER 
Discretionary Grants. The Department will take all comments into 
consideration and may publish a supplemental notice revising some 
elements of this notice. If the Department determines that no 
substantive changes need to be made in this notice, the Department will 
respond to all comments when it publishes a Federal Register notice 
announcing the successful applications. If substantive changes are 
necessary, the Department will publish a supplemental Federal Register 
notice and request for applications by June 17, 2009. Depending on the 
nature of the comments and the number of initial applications received, 
the Department may award funds based on the initial applications 
without publishing a supplemental notice. In addition, in the event 
that this solicitation does not result in the award and obligation of 
all available funds, the Department may decide to publish an additional 
solicitation.

DATES: Comments must be received by June 1, 2009. Late-filed comments 
will be considered to the extent practicable. Complete applications for 
TIGER Discretionary Grants must be submitted by September 15, 2009 (the 
``Application Deadline''). Due to the need to expedite the grant award 
process to meet the requirements and purposes of the Recovery Act, the 
Department will evaluate all applications and announce the projects 
that have been selected to receive Grant Funds as soon as possible 
after the Application Deadline, but no later than February 17, 2010. In 
addition, in the event that this solicitation does not result in the 
award and obligation of all available funds, the Department may decide 
to publish an additional solicitation.

ADDRESSES: For Comments: You must include the agency name (Office of 
the Secretary of Transportation) and the docket number [OST-2009-0115] 
with your comments. To ensure your comments are not entered into the 
docket more than once, please submit comments, identified by the docket 
number [OST-2009-0115], by only one of the following methods:
    Web site: The U.S. Government electronic docket site is 
www.regulations.gov. Go to this Web site and follow the instructions 
for submitting comments into docket number [OST-2009-0115];
    Fax: Telefax comments to [OST-2009-0115];
    Mail: Mail your comments to U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Docket Operations, M-30, Room W12-140, 
Washington, DC 20590; or
    Hand Delivery: Bring your comments to the U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Docket Operations, M-30, 
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, between 
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Instructions for submitting comments: You must include the agency 
name (Office of the Secretary of Transportation) and Docket number 
[OST-2009-0115] for this notice at the beginning of your comments. You 
should submit two copies of your comments if you submit them by mail or 
courier. For confirmation that the Office of the Secretary of 
Transportation, has received your comments, you must include a self-
addressed stamped postcard. Note that all comments received will be 
posted without change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal 
information provided, and will be available to Internet users. You may 
review the Department's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal 
Register published April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477), or you may visit 
www.regulations.gov.
    For Applications: Applications must be submitted to the TIGER 
Discretionary Grants program manager electronically via e-mail at 
TIGERGrants@dot.gov. Applicants should receive a confirmation e-mail, 
but are advised to request a return receipt to confirm transmission. 
Only applications received via e-mail as provided above shall be deemed 
properly filed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning 
this notice please contact the TIGER Discretionary Grants program 
manager via e-mail at TIGERGrants@dot.gov. A TDD is available at 202-
366-7687.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition to announcing funding 
availability, project selection criteria, application requirements and 
the deadline for submitting applications, this notice also requests 
comments on the proposed selection criteria and guidance for awarding 
TIGER Discretionary Grants. The Department will take all comments into 
consideration and may publish a supplemental notice revising some 
elements of this notice. If the Department determines that no 
substantive changes need to be made in this notice, the Department will 
respond to all comments when it publishes a Federal Register notice 
announcing the successful applications. If substantive changes are 
necessary, the Department will publish a supplemental Federal Register 
notice and request for applications by June 17, 2009. Depending on the 
nature of the comments and the number of initial applications received, 
the Department may award funds based on the initial applications 
without publishing a supplemental notice. In addition, in the event 
that this solicitation does not result in the award and obligation of 
all available funds, the Department may decide to publish an additional 
solicitation.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Selection Criteria and Guidance on Application of Selection 
Criteria

[[Page 23228]]

III. Evaluation and Selection Process
IV. Grant Administration
V. Waiver of Minimum Grant Size Requirement
VI. TIGER TIFIA Payments
VII. Contents of Application
VIII. Project Benefits
IX. Reporting Requirements
X. Certification Requirements
XI. Questions and Clarifications

I. Background

    On February 17, 2009, the President of the United States signed the 
Recovery Act in order to, among other purposes, (1) preserve and create 
jobs and promote economic recovery, (2) invest in transportation and 
other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits, and 
(3) assist those most affected by the current economic downturn.
    The Recovery Act appropriated $1.5 billion of supplemental 
discretionary grant funding for TIGER Discretionary Grants. These funds 
are available for obligation to Eligible Applicants until September 30, 
2011. Pursuant to the Recovery Act, TIGER Discretionary Grants are to 
be awarded on a competitive basis to projects that have a significant 
impact on the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region.
    Projects that are eligible for TIGER Discretionary Grants under the 
Recovery Act (``Eligible Projects'') include, but are not limited to: 
(1) Highway or bridge projects eligible under title 23, United States 
Code, including interstate rehabilitation, improvements to the rural 
collector road system, the reconstruction of overpasses and 
interchanges, bridge replacements, seismic retrofit projects for 
bridges, and road realignments; (2) public transportation projects 
eligible under chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, including 
investments in projects participating in the New Starts or Small Starts 
programs that will expedite the completion of those projects and their 
entry into revenue service; (3) passenger and freight rail 
transportation projects; and (4) port infrastructure investments, 
including projects that connect ports to other modes of transportation 
and improve the efficiency of freight movement. Federal wage rate 
requirements included in subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, 
United States Code, apply to all projects receiving funds.
    The Recovery Act specifies that grants funded under the program may 
be no less than $20 million and no greater than $300 million. However, 
the Recovery Act gives the Department discretion to waive the $20 
million minimum grant size for the purpose of funding significant 
projects in smaller cities, regions, or States (``Smaller Projects''). 
The term ``grant'' in this provision of the Recovery Act does not 
include TIGER TIFIA Payments.
    Pursuant to the Recovery Act, no more than 20 percent of the funds 
made available under this program may be awarded to projects in a 
single State. The Department must take measures to ensure an equitable 
geographic distribution of funds and an appropriate balance in 
addressing the needs of urban and rural communities. TIGER 
Discretionary Grants may be used for up to 100 percent of project 
costs, but priority must be given to projects for which Federal funding 
is required to complete an overall financing package that includes non-
Federal sources of funds. Priority must also be given to projects that 
can be completed by February 17, 2012.
    The Recovery Act permits up to $200 million of the $1.5 billion 
appropriated to be used for TIGER TIFIA Payments at the Department's 
discretion if it would further the purposes of the TIGER Discretionary 
Grants program. TIFIA is a Federal credit assistance program that 
provides secured loans, loan guarantees and lines of credit to 
borrowers for up to 33 percent of the costs of major surface 
transportation projects.
    On March 20, 2009, the President of the United States signed a 
memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies on 
ensuring responsible spending of Recovery Act funds. The memorandum 
directs the Department to develop transparent, merit-based selection 
criteria to guide the commitment, obligation and expenditure of TIGER 
Discretionary Grant funds.
    The memorandum directs departments and agencies to award TIGER 
Discretionary Grants to projects with a demonstrated or potential 
ability to: ``(i) Deliver programmatic results; (ii) achieve economic 
stimulus by optimizing economic activity and the number of jobs created 
or saved in relation to the Federal dollars obligated; (iii) achieve 
long-term public benefits by, for example, investing in technological 
advances in science and health to increase economic efficiency and 
improve quality of life; investing in transportation, environmental 
protection, and other infrastructure that will provide long-term 
economic benefits; fostering energy independence; or improving 
educational quality; and (iv) satisfy the Recovery Act's transparency 
and accountability objectives.''
    The purpose of this notice is to solicit applications from Eligible 
Applicants interested in receiving funds under this program and to 
request comments on the selection criteria and guidance outlined in 
this notice.

II. Selection Criteria and Guidance on Application of Selection 
Criteria

    This section specifies the criteria that the Department will use to 
evaluate applications. The criteria incorporate the limited statutory 
eligibility requirements for this program, which are specified in this 
notice as relevant. This section is split into three parts. Section A 
(Selection Criteria) specifies the criteria that the Department will 
use to rate projects. Additional guidance about how the Department will 
apply these criteria, including illustrative metrics and examples, is 
provided in Section B (Additional Guidance on Selection Criteria). 
Section C (Program-Specific Criteria) explains how the Department is 
going to use certain program-specific criteria to help differentiate 
between similar projects (for example, multiple bridge replacement 
projects, or multiple New Starts projects). The program-specific 
criteria will not be rated as the selection criteria are rated, but 
rather will be used to assign priority among similar projects during 
the evaluation and selection process. As stated below in Section VII(F) 
(Contents of Application, Selection Criteria), applicants should 
address both the selection criteria and the program-specific criteria 
in their applications.

A. Selection Criteria

    TIGER Discretionary Grants will be awarded based on the selection 
criteria as outlined below. There are two categories of selection 
criteria, ``Primary Selection Criteria'' and ``Secondary Selection 
Criteria.''
    The Primary Selection Criteria include (1) Long-Term Outcomes and 
(2) Jobs Creation & Economic Stimulus. The Secondary Selection Criteria 
include (1) Innovation and (2) Partnership. The Primary Selection 
Criteria are intended to capture the primary objectives of the TIGER 
Discretionary Grants provision of the Recovery Act, which include near-
term economic recovery and job creation, maximization of long-term 
economic benefits and impacts on the Nation, a region, or a 
metropolitan area, and assistance for those most affected by the 
current economic downturn. The Secondary Selection Criteria are 
intended to capture the benefits of new and/or innovative approaches to 
achieving programmatic objectives.

[[Page 23229]]

1. Primary Selection Criteria
(a) Long-Term Outcomes
    The Department will give priority to projects that have a 
significant impact on desirable long-term outcomes for the Nation, a 
metropolitan area, or a region. Applications that do not demonstrate a 
likelihood of significant long-term benefits in this criterion will not 
proceed in the evaluation process. The following types of long-term 
outcomes will be given priority:
    (i) State of Good Repair: Improving the condition of existing 
transportation facilities and systems, with particular emphasis on 
projects that minimize life-cycle costs.
    (ii) Economic Competitiveness: Contributing to the economic 
competitiveness of the United States over the medium- to long-term.
    (iii) Livability: Improving the quality of living and working 
environments and the experience for people in communities across the 
United States.
    (iv) Sustainability: Improving energy efficiency, reducing 
dependence on oil, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and benefitting 
the environment.
    (v) Safety: Improving the safety of U.S. transportation facilities 
and systems.
(b) Job Creation & Economic Stimulus
    Consistent with the purposes of the Recovery Act, the Department 
will give priority to projects that are expected to quickly create and 
preserve jobs and stimulate rapid increases in economic activity, 
particularly jobs and activity that benefit economically distressed 
areas as defined by section 301 of the Public Works and Economic 
Development Act of 1965, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3161) (``Economically 
Distressed Areas'').
2. Secondary Selection Criteria
(a) Innovation
    The Department will give priority to projects that use innovative 
strategies to pursue the long-term outcomes outlined above.
(b) Partnership
    The Department will give priority to projects that demonstrate 
strong collaboration among a broad range of participants and/or 
integration of transportation with other public service efforts.

B. Additional Guidance on Selection Criteria

    The following additional guidance explains how the Department will 
evaluate each of the selection criteria identified above in Section 
II(A) (Selection Criteria). Applicants are encouraged to demonstrate 
the responsiveness of a project to any and all of the selection 
criteria with the most relevant information that applicants can 
provide, regardless of whether such information has been specifically 
requested, or identified, in this notice. Any such information shall be 
considered part of the application, not supplemental, for purposes of 
the application size limits specified below in Section VII(A) (Length 
of Application).
1. Primary Selection Criteria
(a) Long-Term Outcomes
    In order to measure a project's alignment with this criterion, the 
Department will assess the public benefits generated by the project, as 
measured by the extent to which a project produces one or more of the 
following outcomes.
    (i) State of Good Repair: In order to determine whether the project 
will improve the condition of existing transportation facilities or 
systems, including whether life-cycle costs will be minimized, the 
Department will assess (i) whether the project is part of, or 
consistent with, relevant state, local or regional efforts to maintain 
transportation facilities or systems in a state of good repair, (ii) 
whether an important aim of the project is to rehabilitate, reconstruct 
or upgrade surface transportation projects that threaten future 
economic growth and stability due to their poor condition, (iii) 
whether the project is appropriately capitalized up front and uses 
asset management approaches that optimize its long-term cost structure, 
and (iv) the extent to which a sustainable source of revenue is 
available for long-term operations and maintenance of the project. The 
application should include any quantifiable metrics of the facility or 
system's current condition and performance and, to the extent possible, 
projected condition and performance, with an explanation of how the 
project will improve the facility or system's condition, performance 
and/or long-term cost structure.
    (ii) Economic Competitiveness: In order to determine whether a 
project promotes the economic competitiveness of the United States, the 
Department will assess whether the project will measurably contribute 
over the long-term to growth in employment, production or other high 
value economic activity. For purposes of aligning a project with this 
outcome, applicants should provide evidence of the long-term economic 
benefits that are provided by the completed project, not the near-term 
economic benefits of construction that are captured in the Jobs 
Creation & Economic Stimulus criterion. In weighing long-term 
employment benefits, the quality of jobs supported will be considered 
as well as number of jobs and whether these jobs are expected to 
provide employment in Economically Distressed Areas. Priority 
consideration will be given to projects that: (i) Improve long term 
efficiency, reliability or cost-competitiveness in the movement of 
workers or goods, or (ii) make improvements that allow for expansion, 
hiring, or other growth of private sector production at specific 
locations, particularly Economically Distressed Areas. Applicants may 
propose other methods of demonstrating a project's contribution to the 
economic competitiveness of the country and such methods will be 
reviewed on a case by case basis.
    Economic competitiveness may be demonstrated by the project's 
ability to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the 
transportation system through integration or better use of all existing 
transportation infrastructure (which may be evidenced by the project's 
involvement with or benefits to more than one mode and/or its 
compatibility with and preferably augmentation of the capacities of 
connecting modes and facilities), but only to the extent that these 
enhancements lead to the economic benefits that are identified in the 
preceding paragraph.
    (iii) Livability: Livability investments are projects that not only 
deliver transportation benefits, but are also designed and planned in 
such a way that they have a positive impact on qualitative measures of 
community life. This element of long-term outcomes delivers benefits 
that are inherently difficult to measure. However, it is implicit to 
livability that its benefits are shared and therefore magnified by the 
number of potential users in the affected community. Therefore, 
descriptions of how projects enhance livability should include a 
description of the affected community and the scale of the project's 
impact. In order to determine whether a project improves the quality of 
the living and working environment of a community, the Department will 
qualitatively assess whether the project:
    (1) Will significantly enhance user mobility through the creation 
of more convenient transportation options for travelers;
    (2) Will improve existing transportation choices by enhancing 
points of modal connectivity or by reducing congestion on existing 
modal assets;

[[Page 23230]]

    (3) Will improve accessibility and transport services for 
economically disadvantaged populations, non-drivers, senior citizens, 
and persons with disabilities, or to make goods, commodities, and 
services more readily available to these groups; and/or
    (4) Is the result of a planning process which coordinated 
transportation and land-use planning decisions and encouraged community 
participation in the process.
    Livability improvements may include projects for new or improved 
biking and walking infrastructure. Particular attention will be paid to 
the degree to which such projects contribute significantly to broader 
traveler mobility through intermodal connections, or improved 
connections between residential and commercial areas.
    (iv) Sustainability: In order to determine whether a project 
promotes a more environmentally sustainable transportation system, the 
Department will assess its ability to:
    (1) improve energy efficiency, reduce dependence on oil and/or 
reduce greenhouse gas emissions; applicants are encouraged to provide 
quantitative information regarding expected reductions in emissions of 
CO2 or fuel consumption as a result of the project, or 
expected use of clean or alternative sources of energy; projects that 
demonstrate a projected decrease in the movement of people or goods by 
less energy-efficient vehicles or systems will be given priority under 
this factor; and
    (2) maintain, protect or enhance the environment, as evidenced by 
its avoidance of adverse environmental impacts (for example, adverse 
impacts related to air quality, wetlands, and endangered species) and/
or by its environmental benefits (for example, improved air quality, 
wetlands creation or improved habitat connectivity).
    Applicants are encouraged to provide quantitative information that 
validates the existence of substantial transportation-related costs 
related to energy consumption and adverse environmental effects and 
evidence of the extent to which the project will reduce or mitigate 
those costs.
    (v) Safety: In order to determine whether the project improves 
safety, the Department will assess the project's ability to reduce the 
number, rate and consequences of surface transportation-related 
crashes, and injuries and fatalities among drivers and/or non-drivers 
in the United States or in the affected metropolitan area or region, 
and/or its contribution to the elimination of highway/rail grade 
crossings, the protection of pipelines, or the prevention of unintended 
release of hazardous materials.
    Evaluation of Expected Project Costs and Benefits: The Department 
believes that benefit cost analysis (``BCA''), including the 
monetization and discounting of costs and benefits to a common unit of 
measurement in present day dollars, is an important discipline. For BCA 
to yield useful results, the Department believes that full 
consideration of cost and benefits is necessary. These range from 
factors traditionally considered, including fuel savings and travel 
time benefits, to some that have not traditionally been considered, 
such as greenhouse gas emissions, water quality impacts, public health 
effects, and others. In addition, to be fully useful, BCA should 
attempt to capture the dynamic effects that transportation investments 
can have on land use and household budgets. The systematic process of 
comparing expected benefits and costs helps decision-makers organize 
information about, and determine trade-offs between, alternative 
transportation investments. The Department has responsibility under 
Executive Order 12893, Principles for Federal Infrastructure 
Investments, 59 FR 4233, to base infrastructure investments on 
systematic analysis of expected benefits and costs, including both 
quantitative and qualitative measures.
    Therefore, applicants for TIGER Discretionary Grants are generally 
required to identify, quantify, and compare expected benefits and 
costs, subject to the following qualifications:
    This requirement will be waived for applicants seeking waivers of 
the $20 million minimum grant size requirement for Smaller Projects.
    Any applicant seeking a TIGER Discretionary Grant of more than $20 
million but less than $100 million must include in its application 
estimates of the project's expected benefits in the five long-term 
outcomes identified in this Section II(A)(1)(a). The lack of a useful 
analysis of expected project benefits may be ground for denying award 
of a TIGER Discretionary Grant to any such applicant.
    Any applicant seeking a TIGER Discretionary Grant in excess of $100 
million must provide a well-developed analysis of expected benefits and 
costs, including a description of input and output requirements and 
other methodological standards used for the analysis. The analysis 
should indicate the value that was assigned for qualitative measures, 
in addition to quantitative measures. Where information on costs and 
benefits, including consideration of externalities, is of sufficient 
quality and completeness to allow for a robust assessment of a 
project's benefit cost ratio, this analysis should be presented. In 
doing so, applicants should discuss the effects that better or more 
complete information would be likely to have on the benefit cost ratio 
presented and the reasons such information was not available for 
analysis. Where quality or completeness of data is not sufficient to 
allow a meaningful assessment of whether a project's benefit cost ratio 
is positive or negative, applicants should discuss the data limitations 
that lead to this conclusion and present a qualitative comparison of 
costs and benefits. The lack of a useful analysis comparing expected 
benefits and costs for any such project may be ground for denying award 
of a TIGER Discretionary Grant to such an applicant.
    The Department is still considering how best to implement this 
requirement for applicants seeking TIGER Discretionary Grants in excess 
of $100 million. The Department therefore requests comments on 
appropriate input and output requirements, methodological standards, 
and other characteristics of this analysis. Comments are also requested 
on how this approach might best be applied to criteria that do not 
readily lend themselves to monetization. As soon as possible after the 
comment period, DOT will publish more detailed guidance on the analysis 
required for applicants seeking TIGER Discretionary Grants in excess of 
$100 million.
    In all cases, if it is clear to the Department that the total 
benefits of a project are not reasonably likely to outweigh the 
project's costs, the Department will not award a TIGER Discretionary 
Grant to the project. Consistent with the broader goals of the Recovery 
Act and the specific appropriation for the TIGER Discretionary Grants 
program, the Department can consider some factors that do not readily 
lend themselves to monetization, including equity, and distributional, 
geographic and other considerations.
    Evaluation of Project Performance: The Department also encourages 
applicants with the requisite wherewithal to provide a plan for 
evaluating the success of the project (or a program of projects) and 
measuring short- and long-term performance, specifically with respect 
to the economic recovery measures and long-term outcomes specified in 
this notice.
(b) Job Creation & Economic Stimulus
    In order to measure a project's alignment with this criterion, the

[[Page 23231]]

Department will assess whether the project promotes the short- or long-
term creation or preservation of jobs and whether the project rapidly 
promotes new or expanded business opportunities during construction of 
the project or thereafter. Demonstration of a project's rapid economic 
impact is critical to a project's alignment with this criterion. 
Applicants are encouraged to provide information to assist the 
Department in making these assessments, including the total amount of 
funds that will be expended on construction and construction-related 
activities by all of the entities participating in the project and, to 
the extent measurable, the number and type of jobs to be created and/or 
preserved by the project during construction and thereafter. Applicants 
should also identify any business enterprises to be created or 
benefited by the project during its construction and once it becomes 
operational.
    Consistent with the Recovery Act, the Updated Implementing Guidance 
for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 issued by the 
Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') on April 3, 2009 (the ``OMB 
Guidance''), and federal laws guaranteeing equal opportunity, 
applicants are encouraged to provide information to assist the 
Department in assessing (1) whether the project will promote the 
creation of job opportunities for low-income workers through the use of 
best practice hiring programs and utilization of apprenticeship 
(including pre-apprenticeship) programs; (2) whether the project will 
provide maximum practicable opportunities for small businesses and 
disadvantaged business enterprises, including veteran-owned small 
businesses and service disabled veteran-owned small businesses; (3) 
whether the project will make effective use of community-based 
organizations in connecting disadvantaged workers with economic 
opportunities; (4) whether the project will support entities that have 
a sound track record on labor practices and compliance with federal 
laws ensuring that American workers are safe and treated fairly; and 
(5) whether the project implements best practices, consistent with our 
nation's civil rights and equal opportunity laws, for ensuring that all 
individuals--regardless of race, gender, age, disability, and national 
origin--benefit from the Recovery Act.
    To the extent possible, applicants should indicate whether the 
populations most likely to benefit from the creation or preservation of 
jobs or new or expanded business opportunities are from Economically 
Distressed Areas. In addition, to the extent possible, applicants 
should indicate whether the project's procurement plan is likely to 
create follow-on jobs and economic stimulus for manufacturers and 
suppliers that support the construction industry. A key consideration 
in assessing projects under this criterion will be how quickly jobs are 
created.
    Consistent with Section 1602 of the Recovery Act (Preference for 
Quick-Start Activities), the Department will assess whether a project 
is ready to proceed rapidly upon receipt of a TIGER Discretionary 
Grant, as evidenced by:
    (i) Project Schedule: A feasible and sufficiently detailed project 
schedule demonstrating that the project can begin construction quickly 
upon receipt of a TIGER Discretionary Grant and that the Grant Funds 
will be spent steadily and expeditiously once construction starts; the 
schedule should show how many direct, on-project jobs are expected to 
be created or sustained during each calendar quarter after the project 
is underway;
    (ii) Environmental Approvals: Receipt (or reasonably anticipated 
receipt) of all environmental approvals necessary for the project to 
proceed to construction on the timeline specified in the project 
schedule, including satisfaction of all Federal, State and local 
requirements and completion of the National Environmental Policy Act 
process;
    (iii) Legislative Approvals: Receipt of all necessary legislative 
approvals (for example, legislative authority to charge user fees or 
set toll rates), and evidence of support from State and local 
officials, including relevant governor(s) and/or mayors. Evidence of 
support from all relevant State and local officials is not required, 
however, the evidence should demonstrate that the project is broadly 
supported;
    (iv) State and Local Planning: The inclusion of the project in the 
relevant State, metropolitan, and local planning documents, or a 
certification from the appropriate agency that the project will be 
included in the relevant planning document prior to award of a TIGER 
Discretionary Grant;
    (v) Technical Feasibility: The technical feasibility of the 
project, including completion of substantial preliminary engineering 
work; and
    (vi) Financial Feasibility: The viability and completeness of the 
project's financing package (assuming the availability of the requested 
TIGER Discretionary Grant funds), including evidence of stable and 
reliable financial commitments and contingency reserves, as 
appropriate, and evidence of the grant recipient's ability to manage 
grants.
    The Department reserves the right to revoke any award of TIGER 
Discretionary Grant funds and to award such funds to another project to 
the extent that such funds are not timely expended and/or construction 
does not begin in accordance with the project schedule. Because 
projects have different schedules the Department will consider on a 
case-by-case basis how much time after award of a TIGER Discretionary 
Grant each project has before funds must be expended and construction 
started. This deadline will be specified for each TIGER Discretionary 
Grant in the project-specific grant agreements signed by the grant 
recipients and will be based on critical path items identified by 
applicants in response to items (i) through (vi) above. For example, if 
an applicant reasonably anticipates that National Environmental Policy 
Act requirements will be completed and final documentation received 
within 30 to 60 days of award of a TIGER Discretionary Grant, this 
timeframe will be taken into account in evaluating the application, but 
also in establishing a deadline for expenditure of funds and 
commencement of construction. The Department's ability to obligate 
funds for TIGER Discretionary Grants expires on September 30, 2011.
    In compliance with the Recovery Act, the Department will give 
priority to projects that are expected to be completed on or before 
February 17, 2012. For purposes of this solicitation, ``completed'' 
means that all of the TIGER Discretionary Grant funds awarded to the 
project have been obligated and expended and construction of the 
project is substantially complete.
    The ability of the grant recipient to complete the project by this 
date must be clearly demonstrated in the project schedule. The 
Department will give priority to projects that utilize innovative 
contracting approaches that encourage accelerated project delivery. The 
Department will consider projects that are not expected to be completed 
by February 17, 2012, but these projects will not be rated as highly 
under this criterion.
2. Secondary Selection Criteria
(a) Innovation
    In order to measure a project's alignment with this criterion, the 
Department will assess the extent to which the project uses innovative 
technology (including, for example, intelligent transportation systems, 
dynamic pricing, rail wayside or on-board energy recovery, smart cards, 
real-

[[Page 23232]]

time dispatching, active traffic management, radio frequency 
identification (RFID), or others) to pursue one or more of the long-
term outcomes outlined above and/or to significantly enhance the 
operational performance of the transportation system. The Department 
will also assess the extent to which the project incorporates 
innovations that demonstrate the value of new approaches to, among 
other things, transportation funding and finance, contracting, project 
delivery, congestion management, safety management, asset management, 
or long-term operations and maintenance. The applicant should clearly 
demonstrate that the innovation is designed to pursue one or more of 
the long-term outcomes outlined above and/or significantly enhance the 
transportation system.
(b) Partnership
    (i) Jurisdictional & Stakeholder Collaboration: In order to measure 
a project's alignment with this criterion, the Department will assess 
the project's involvement of non-Federal entities and the use of non-
Federal funds, including the scope of involvement and share of total 
funding. The Department will give priority to projects that receive 
financial commitments from, or otherwise involve, State and local 
governments, other public entities, or private or nonprofit entities, 
including projects that engage parties that are not traditionally 
involved in transportation projects, such as nonprofit community 
groups. Pursuant to the OMB Guidance, the Department will give priority 
to projects that make effective use of community-based organizations in 
connecting disadvantaged people with economic opportunities.
    In compliance with the Recovery Act, the Department will give 
priority to projects for which a TIGER Discretionary Grant will help to 
complete an overall financing package. An applicant should clearly 
demonstrate the extent to which the project cannot be readily and 
efficiently completed without Federal assistance, and the extent to 
which other sources of Federal assistance are or are not readily 
available for the project, including other funds made available 
pursuant to the Recovery Act. The Department will assess the amount of 
private debt and equity to be invested in the project or the amount of 
co-investment from State, local or other non-profit sources.
    The Department will also assess the extent to which the project 
demonstrates collaboration among neighboring or regional jurisdictions 
to achieve National, regional or metropolitan benefits. Multiple States 
or jurisdictions may submit a joint application and should identify a 
lead State or jurisdiction as the primary point of contact. Where 
multiple States are submitting a joint application, the application 
should demonstrate how the project costs are apportioned between the 
States to assist the Department in making the distributional 
determinations described below in Section III(C) (Distribution of 
Funds).
    (ii) Disciplinary Integration: In order to demonstrate the value of 
partnerships across government agencies that serve the various public 
service missions forwarded by the Recovery Act and to promote 
collaboration on the objectives outlined in this notice, the Department 
will give priority to projects that are supported, financially or 
otherwise, by non-transportation public agencies that are pursuing 
similar objectives. For example, the Department will give priority to 
transportation projects that create more livable communities and are 
supported by relevant public housing agencies, or transportation 
projects that encourage energy efficiency or improve the environment 
and are supported by relevant public agencies with energy or 
environmental missions.

C. Program-Specific Criteria

    The Department will use certain program-specific criteria in the 
evaluation and selection process to help differentiate between similar 
projects. Similar projects are those that have similar characteristics 
and satisfy the eligibility requirements of existing programmatic 
structures (for example, two urban light rail projects eligible to 
participate in the New Starts program). To the extent two or more 
similar projects have similar ratings based on the selection criteria 
outlined in Section II(A) (Selection Criteria), the program-specific 
criteria will be used to assign priority among these projects.
    Projects will not be given specific ratings of ``highly 
recommended,'' ``recommended'' or ``not recommended'' for applicable 
program-specific criteria; rather, the Department will use the program-
specific criteria to rank similar projects. To the extent otherwise 
similar projects can be differentiated based on the selection criteria, 
program-specific criteria will not be given any weight.
    The program-specific criteria are not intended to limit the number 
of similar projects that can receive TIGER Discretionary Grants.
    Program-specific criteria will only be applied to the types of 
projects identified below. Any other type of project will be 
differentiated from other similar projects solely based on the 
selection criteria outlined in Section II(A) (Selection Criteria). The 
Department will use the following program-specific criteria, where 
applicable, to assign priority among similar projects:
    1. For bridge replacement projects, program-specific criteria are 
the following criteria found in 23 CFR 707: Total daily truck and non-
truck traffic, bridge sufficiency ratings, and bridges with load or 
geometric restrictions.
    2. For transit projects, program-specific criteria are as follows: 
Bus and rail fleet purchases that are within established FTA spare 
ratio policies, rehabilitation and replacement of assets that have 
exceeded the useful life span as identified in FTA policy, and/or the 
proposed project's rating under the New Starts and Small Starts program 
criteria, as applicable (a copy of the criteria used for this program 
is available at http://www.fta.dot.gov/planning/newstarts/planning_environment_5615.html).
    3. For projects involving port infrastructure investments, program-
specific criteria are, for both current state and post-project 
completion, the port or system's:
    (a) Passenger and/or freight throughput, storage or processing 
capacity, including but not limited to, capacity movement (in tonnage, 
TEU (twenty-foot equivalent unit), barrels, etc.) across the dock, 
storage capacity on the terminal, and gate throughput;
    (b) Demand for services or demand for capacity (in the case of 
post-project completion, projections or estimates);
    (c) Efficiency (e.g. time savings, including vessel turnaround, 
gate and dwell times, and/or cost savings);
    (d) Reliability and/or resiliency, including but not limited to, 
ability of the facility or system to recover from natural or man-made 
disasters and provide necessary services;
    (e) National security or National interest aspects of items (a) 
through (d) above including but not limited to movement of Department 
of Defense assets and strategic location; and
    (f) External factors that may influence or limit items (a) through 
(e) above (channel or berth maintenance or deepening and other 
navigation issues, road, rail or waterway factors that could represent 
bottlenecks and backups, etc.).
    4. For TIGER TIFIA Payments, program-specific criteria are the 
eight statutory selection criteria used by the Department's TIFIA Joint 
Program Office to evaluate and select projects (these criteria have 
been assigned weights through regulation, as indicated below):
    (a) The extent to which the project is nationally or regionally 
significant, in

[[Page 23233]]

terms of generating economic benefits, supporting international 
commerce, or otherwise enhancing the national transportation system (20 
percent);
    (b) The extent to which the project helps maintain or protect the 
environment (20 percent);
    (c) The extent to which TIFIA assistance would foster innovative 
public-private partnerships and attract private debt or equity 
investment (20 percent);
    (d) The creditworthiness of the project, including a determination 
by the Secretary that any financing for the project has appropriate 
security features, such as a rate covenant, to ensure repayment (12.5 
percent);
    (e) The likelihood that TIFIA assistance would enable the project 
to proceed at an earlier date than the project would otherwise be able 
to proceed (12.5 percent);
    (f) The extent to which the project uses new technologies, 
including Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), that enhance the 
efficiency of the project (5 percent);
    (g) The amount of budget authority required to fund the Federal 
credit instrument made available (5 percent); and
    (h) The extent to which TIFIA assistance would reduce the 
contribution of Federal grant assistance to the project (5 percent).
    In addition, approval for TIFIA credit assistance requires the 
receipt of a preliminary rating opinion letter indicating that the 
project's senior debt obligations have the potential to attain an 
investment-grade rating. Complete details regarding the TIFIA selection 
process can be found in the program guide, which can be downloaded from 
http://tifia.fhwa.dot.gov/.

III. Evaluation and Selection Process

A. Ensuring Responsible Spending of Recovery Act Funds

    On March 20, 2009, the President of the United States signed a 
memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies on 
ensuring responsible spending of Recovery Act funds. The memorandum 
directs the Department to develop transparent, merit-based selection 
criteria to guide the commitment, obligation and expenditure of TIGER 
Discretionary Grant funds.
    In accordance with the memorandum, the criteria specified in this 
notice help ensure that TIGER Discretionary Grants will be awarded to 
projects with a demonstrated or potential ability to: ``(i) Deliver 
programmatic results; (ii) achieve economic stimulus by optimizing 
economic activity and the number of jobs created or saved in relation 
to the Federal dollars obligated; (iii) achieve long-term public 
benefits by, for example, investing in technological advances in 
science and health to increase economic efficiency and improve quality 
of life; investing in transportation, environmental protection, and 
other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits; 
fostering energy independence; or improving educational quality; and 
(iv) satisfy the Recovery Act's transparency and accountability 
objectives.''
    In accordance with the memorandum, the Department will not award 
TIGER Discretionary Grants to any project that is imprudent or does not 
further the job creation, economic recovery and other purposes of the 
Recovery Act.

B. Evaluation Process

    The Department will establish an evaluation team to review each 
application that is received by the Department prior to the Application 
Deadline. The evaluation team will be organized and led by the Office 
of the Secretary and will include members from each of the Cognizant 
Modal Administrations (as defined below). These representatives will 
include technical and professional staff with relevant experience and/
or expertise. The evaluation team will be responsible for evaluating 
and rating all of the projects and making funding recommendations to 
the Secretary. The evaluation process will require team members to 
evaluate and rate applications individually before convening with other 
members to discuss ratings. The composition of the evaluation team will 
be finalized after the Application Deadline, based on the number and 
nature of applications received.
    The Department will not assign specific numerical scores to 
projects based on the selection criteria outlined above in Section 
II(A) (Selection Criteria). Rather, ratings of ``highly recommended,'' 
``recommended,'' or ``not recommended'' will be assigned to projects 
for each of the selection criteria. The Department will award TIGER 
Discretionary Grants to projects that are ``highly recommended'' in one 
or more of the selection criteria, with projects that are ``highly 
recommended'' in multiple selection criteria being more likely to 
receive TIGER Discretionary Grants. To the extent the initial 
evaluation process does not sufficiently differentiate among highly 
rated projects, the Department will use a similar three-tiered rating 
process to re-assess the projects that were highly rated and identify 
those that should be most highly rated.
    The Department will give more weight to the two Primary Selection 
Criteria (Long-Term Outcomes and Jobs Creation & Economic Stimulus) 
than to the two Secondary Selection Criteria (Innovation and 
Partnership). Projects that are unable to demonstrate a likelihood of 
significant long-term benefits in any of the five long-term outcomes 
identified in Section II(A)(1)(a) (Long-Term Outcomes) will not proceed 
in the evaluation process. A project need not be well aligned with each 
of the long-term outcomes in order to be successful in the long-term 
outcomes criterion overall. However, to be successful in the long-term 
outcomes criterion a project must be ``highly recommended'' for at 
least one of the long-term outcomes or ``recommended'' for multiple 
long-term outcomes. Projects that are strongly aligned with multiple 
long-term outcomes will be the most successful in this criterion.
    For the Jobs Creation & Economic Stimulus criterion, projects need 
not receive a rating of ``highly recommended'' in order to be 
recommended for funding, although a project that is not ready to 
proceed quickly, as evidenced by the items requested in Section 
II(B)(1)(b)(i)-(vi) (Project Schedule, Environmental Approvals, 
Legislative Approvals, State and Local Planning, Technical Feasibility, 
and Financial Feasibility), is less likely to be successful in this 
criterion.
    The Department will give less weight to the two Secondary Selection 
Criteria (Innovation and Partnership) than to the two Primary Selection 
Criteria (Long-Term Outcomes and Jobs Creation & Economic Stimulus). 
The two Secondary Selection Criteria will be rated equally.
    As noted above in Section II(C) (Program-Specific Criteria), the 
Program-Specific Criteria will not be given ratings and will only be 
used to the extent the Department needs to differentiate and assign 
priority among similar projects that have similar ratings based on the 
selection criteria outlined above in Section II(A) (Selection 
Criteria).
    The following table summarizes the weighting of the selection 
criteria, as described in the preceding paragraphs:

[[Page 23234]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-Term Outcomes...........  The Department will give more weight to
                                this criterion than to either of the
                                Secondary Selection Criteria. In
                                addition, this criterion has a minimum
                                threshold requirement. Projects that are
                                unable to demonstrate a likelihood of
                                significant long-term benefits in any of
                                the five long-term outcomes identified
                                in this criterion will not proceed in
                                the evaluation process.
Jobs Creation & Economic       The Department will give more weight to
 Stimulus.                      this criterion than to either of the
                                Secondary Selection Criteria. This
                                criterion will be considered after it is
                                determined that a project demonstrates a
                                likelihood of significant long-term
                                benefits in at least one of the five
                                long-term outcomes identified in the
                                long-term outcomes criterion.
Innovation & Partnership.....  The Department will give less weight to
                                these criteria than to the Primary
                                Selection Criteria.
Project-Specific Criteria....  The Department will only give weight to
                                these criteria to the extent the
                                Department needs to differentiate
                                multiple similar projects that are rated
                                similarly based on the Primary and
                                Secondary Selection Criteria.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To be selected for a TIGER Discretionary Grant, a project must be 
an Eligible Project and the applicant must be an Eligible Applicant. 
The Department may consider one or more components of a large project 
to be an Eligible Project, but only to the extent that the components 
themselves, not the project of which they are a part, are Eligible 
Projects and satisfy the selection criteria specified in this notice. 
For these projects, the benefits described in an application must be 
related to the components of the project for which funding is 
requested, not the full project of which they are a part.

C. Distribution of Funds

    As noted above in Section I (Background), the Recovery Act 
prohibits the award of more than 20 percent of the funds made available 
under this program to projects in any one State. The Recovery Act also 
requires that the Department take measures to ensure an equitable 
geographic distribution of funds and an appropriate balance in 
addressing the needs of urban and rural communities. The Department 
will apply an initial unconstrained competitive rating process based on 
the selection criteria and program-specific criteria identified above 
in Section II(A) (Selection Criteria) and Section II(C) (Program-
Specific Criteria) to determine a preliminary list of projects 
recommended for TIGER Discretionary Grants. The Department will then 
analyze the preliminary list and determine whether the purely 
competitive ratings are consistent with distributional requirements of 
the Recovery Act. If necessary, the Department will adjust the list of 
recommended projects to satisfy the statutory distributional 
requirements while remaining as consistent as possible with the 
competitive ratings.
    As noted above in Section II(B)(2)(b)(i) (Jurisdictional & 
Stakeholder Collaboration), applications submitted jointly by multiple 
States should include an allocation of project costs to assist the 
Department in making these determinations. In addition, the Department 
will use the subsidy and administrative cost estimate, not the 
principal amount of credit assistance, to determine any TIGER TIFIA 
Payment's effect on these distributional requirements.

D. Transparency of Process

    In the interest of transparency, the Department will disclose as 
much of the information related to its evaluation process as is 
practical. The Department expects that the TIGER Discretionary Grants 
program may be reviewed and/or audited by Congress, the U.S. Government 
Accountability Office, the Department's Inspector General, or others, 
and has and will continue to take steps to document its decision making 
process.

IV. Grant Administration

    The Department expects that each TIGER Discretionary Grant will be 
administered by the modal administration in the Department with the 
most experience and/or expertise in the relevant project area (the 
``Cognizant Modal Administration''), pursuant to a grant agreement 
between the TIGER Discretionary Grant recipient and the Cognizant Modal 
Administration. In accordance with the Recovery Act, the Secretary has 
the discretion to delegate such responsibilities.
    Applicable Federal laws, rules and regulations will apply to 
projects that receive TIGER Discretionary Grants, including all of the 
requirements included in the Recovery Act.
    As noted above in Section II(B)(1)(b) (Jobs Creation & Economic 
Stimulus), how soon after award a project is expected to expend Grant 
Funds and start construction will be considered on a case-by-case basis 
and will be specified in the project-specific grant agreements. The 
Department reserves the right to revoke any award of TIGER 
Discretionary Grant funds and to award such funds to another project to 
the extent that such funds are not timely expended and/or construction 
does not begin in accordance with the project schedule. The 
Department's ability to obligate funds for TIGER Discretionary Grants 
expires on September 30, 2011.

V. Waiver of Minimum Grant Size Requirement

    The Department has discretion under the Recovery Act to waive the 
$20 million minimum grant size requirement for Smaller Projects. 
Applicants for TIGER Discretionary Grants of less than $20 million for 
Smaller Projects are encouraged to apply and should address the same 
criteria as applicants for TIGER Discretionary Grants in excess of $20 
million. The term ``grant'' in this provision of the Recovery Act does 
not include TIGER TIFIA Payments.

VI. TIGER TIFIA Payments

    Up to $200 million of the $1.5 billion available for TIGER 
Discretionary Grants may be used for TIGER TIFIA Payments. Given the 
average subsidy cost of the existing TIFIA portfolio, $200 million in 
TIGER TIFIA Payments could support approximately $2 billion in Federal 
credit assistance. Applicants seeking TIGER TIFIA Payments should apply 
in accordance with all of the criteria and guidance specified in this 
notice for TIGER Discretionary Grant applicants and will be evaluated 
concurrently with all other applications. Any applicant seeking a TIGER 
TIFIA Payment is required to comply with all of the TIFIA program's 
standard application and approval requirements, including submission of 
a Letter of Interest prior to submission of a TIFIA application (the 
TIFIA program guide can be downloaded from http://tifia.fhwa.dot.gov/). 
The Letter of Interest must be submitted at least six weeks prior to 
the Application Deadline.
    The Department does not expect applicants for TIGER TIFIA Payments 
to have received an instrument from TIFIA obligating Federal credit 
assistance for the project before the application is submitted; 
however, applicants should demonstrate that they are ready to proceed 
rapidly upon receipt of a TIGER

[[Page 23235]]

TIFIA Payment in accordance with the guidance specified above in 
Section II(B)(1)(b) (Job Creation & Economic Stimulus). The 
Department's TIFIA Joint Program Office will assist the Department in 
determining a project's readiness to proceed rapidly upon receipt of a 
TIGER TIFIA Payment.
    Applicants seeking TIGER TIFIA Payments may also apply for a TIGER 
Discretionary Grant for the same project and must indicate the type(s) 
of funding for which they are applying clearly on the face of their 
applications. An applicant for a TIGER TIFIA Payment must submit an 
application pursuant to this notice for a TIGER TIFIA Payment even if 
it does not wish to apply for a TIGER Discretionary Grant.
    Unless otherwise expressly noted herein, any and all requirements 
that apply to TIGER Discretionary Grants pursuant to the Recovery Act, 
this notice, or otherwise, including all reporting and Recovery Act 
related requirements, apply to TIGER TIFIA Payments. TIFIA applicants 
that do not receive TIGER TIFIA Payments will not be required to comply 
with any of these requirements.

VII. Contents of Application

    An applicant for a TIGER Discretionary Grant should include all of 
the information requested below in its application. The Department 
reserves the right to ask any applicant to supplement the data in its 
application, but expects applications to be complete upon submission. 
To the extent practical, the Department encourages applicants to 
provide data and evidence of project merits in a form that is publicly 
available or verifiable. For TIGER TIFIA Payments, these requirements 
apply only to the applications required under this notice; the standard 
TIFIA loan application requirements, including the standard $30,000.00 
application fee, are separately described in the Program Guide and 
Application Form found at http://tifia.fhwa.dot.gov/.

A. Length of Applications

    The narrative portion of an application should not exceed 25 pages 
in length. Documentation supporting the assertions made in the 
narrative portion may also be provided, but should be limited to 
relevant information. If possible, Web site links to supporting 
documentation should be provided rather than copies of these materials. 
At the applicant's discretion, relevant materials provided previously 
to a Cognizant Modal Administration (as defined below) in support of a 
different DOT discretionary program (for example, New Starts or TIFIA) 
may be referenced and described as unchanged. To the extent referenced, 
this information need not be resubmitted for the TIGER Discretionary 
Grant application.

B. Contact Information

    An application should include the name, phone number, e-mail 
address and organization address of the primary point of contact for 
the applicant. The Department will use this information to inform 
parties of the Department's decision regarding selection of projects, 
as well as to contact parties in the event that the Department needs 
additional information about an application.

C. Project Description

    An application should include a detailed description of the 
proposed project and geospatial data for the project, including a map 
of the project's location and its connections to existing 
transportation infrastructure. An application should also include a 
description of how the project addresses the needs of an urban and/or 
rural area. An application should clearly describe the transportation 
challenges that the project aims to address, and how the project will 
address these challenges. This description should include relevant data 
such as, for example, passenger or freight volumes, congestion levels, 
infrastructure condition, or safety experience.

D. Project Parties

    An application should include information about the grant recipient 
and other project parties.

E. Grant Funds and Sources and Uses of Project Funds

    An application should include information about the amount of grant 
funding requested, sources and uses of all project funds, total project 
costs, percentage of project costs that would be paid for with TIGER 
Discretionary Grant funds, and the identity and percentage shares of 
all parties providing funds for the project (including Federal funds 
provided under other programs).

F. Selection Criteria

    An application must include information required for the Department 
to assess each of the criteria specified in Section II(A) (Selection 
Criteria), as such criteria are explained in Section II(B) (Additional 
Guidance on Selection Criteria), and each of the relevant criteria 
specified in Section II(C) (Program-Specific Criteria). Applicants are 
encouraged to demonstrate the responsiveness of a project to any and 
all of the selection criteria with the most relevant information that 
applicants can provide, regardless of whether such information has been 
specifically requested, or identified, in this notice. Any such 
information shall be considered part of the application, not 
supplemental, for purposes of the application size limits identified 
above in item A (Length of Applications). If an applicant is unsure 
whether any of the program-specific criteria apply to its project and 
should be addressed in its application the applicant should contact the 
Department pursuant to the procedures specified below in Section X 
(Questions and Clarifications). Information provided pursuant to this 
paragraph must be quantified, to the extent possible, to describe the 
project's impacts on the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region. 
Information provided pursuant to this paragraph should include 
projections for both the build and no-build scenarios for the project 
for a point in time at least 20 years beyond the project's completion 
date or the lifespan of the project, whichever is closest to the 
present.

G. Federal Wage Rate Requirement

    An application must include a certification, signed by the 
applicant, stating that it will comply with the requirements of 
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (Federal 
wage rate requirements), as required by the Recovery Act.

H. National Environmental Policy Act Requirement

    An application must detail whether the project will significantly 
impact the natural, social and/or economic environment. If the NEPA 
process is completed, an applicant must indicate the date of, and 
provide a Web site link or other reference to, the final Categorical 
Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact or Record of Decision. If 
the NEPA process is underway but not complete, the application must 
detail where the project is in the process, indicate the anticipated 
date of completion and provide a Web site link or other reference to 
copies of any NEPA documents prepared.

I. Environmentally Related Federal, State and Local Actions

    An application must indicate whether the proposed project is likely 
to require actions by other agencies (e.g., permits), indicate the 
status of such actions and provide a Web site link or other reference 
to materials submitted to the other agencies, and/or demonstrate

[[Page 23236]]

compliance with other Federal, State and local regulations as 
applicable, including, but not limited to, Section 4(f) Parklands, 
Recreation Areas, Refuges, & Historic Properties; Section 106 Historic 
and Culturally Significant Properties; Clean Water Act Wetlands and 
Water; Executive Orders Wetlands, Floodplains, Environmental Justice; 
Clean Air Act Air Quality (specifically note if the project is located 
in a nonattainment area); Endangered Species Act Threatened and 
Endangered Biological Resources; Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat; The Bald and Golden Eagle 
Protection Act; and/or any State and local requirements.

J. Protection of Confidential Business Information

    All information submitted as part of or in support of an 
application shall use publicly available data or data that can be made 
public and methodologies that are accepted by industry practice and 
standards, to the extent possible. If the application includes 
information that the applicant considers to be a trade secret or 
confidential commercial or financial information, the applicant should 
do the following: (1) Note on the front cover that the submission 
``Contains Confidential Business Information (CBI);'' (2) mark each 
affected page ``CBI;'' and (3) highlight or otherwise denote the CBI 
portions. The Department protects such information from disclosure to 
the extent allowed under applicable law. In the event the Department 
receives a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the 
information, the Department will follow the procedures described in its 
FOIA regulations at 49 CFR Sec.  7.17. Only information that is 
ultimately determined to be confidential under that procedure will be 
exempt from disclosure under FOIA.

VIII. Project Benefits

    The Department expects to identify and report on the benefits of 
the projects that it funds with TIGER Discretionary Grants. To this 
end, the Department may request that recipients of TIGER Discretionary 
Grants cooperate in Departmental efforts to collect and report on 
information related to the benefits produced by the projects that 
receive TIGER Discretionary Grants.
    In addition to the creation and preservation of jobs and other 
benefits that the Department is required to track and report pursuant 
to the Recovery Act, the benefits that the Department reports on may 
include the following: (1) Improved condition of existing 
transportation facilities and systems; (2) long-term growth in 
employment, production or other high-value economic activity; (3) 
improved livability of communities across the United States; (4) 
improved energy efficiency, reduced dependence on oil and reduced 
greenhouse gas emissions; (5) reduced adverse impacts of transportation 
on the natural environment; (6) reduced number, rate and consequences 
of surface transportation-related crashes, injuries and fatalities; (7) 
greater use of innovative technology and innovative approaches to 
transportation funding and project delivery; (8) greater collaboration 
with state and local governments, other public entities, private 
entities, nonprofit entities, or other non-traditional partners; or (9) 
greater integration of transportation decisionmaking with 
decisionmaking by other public agencies with similar public service 
objectives.
    Because of the limited nature of this program, these benefits are 
likely to be reported on a project-by-project basis and trends across 
projects that were selected for TIGER Discretionary Grants may not be 
readily available. In addition, because many of these benefits are 
long-term outcomes, it may be years before the value of the investments 
can be quantified and fully reported. The Department is considering the 
most appropriate way to collect and report information about these 
potential project benefits.

IX. Reporting Requirements

A. Section 1201(c): Maintenance of Effort: Reporting Requirements

    Pursuant to the Recovery Act, entities receiving TIGER 
Discretionary Grants will be required to report on grant activities on 
a routine basis. Section 1201(c) of the Recovery Act (Maintenance of 
Effort: Reporting Requirements), under General Provision--Department of 
Transportation--imposes an obligation on entities receiving TIGER 
Discretionary Grants, along with other Department grantees receiving 
funds from the Department's Covered Programs, to submit periodic 
reports to the agency from which funds were received. Section 
1201(c)(2) requires that such reports include, for each Covered Program 
(which includes the TIGER Discretionary Grant program) the following 
information: the amount of Grant Funds appropriated, allocated, 
obligated, and outlayed under the appropriation; the number of projects 
put out to bid under the appropriation and the amount of Grant Funds 
associated with these contracts; the number of projects for which 
contracts have been awarded under the appropriation and the amount of 
Grant Funds associated with these contracts; the number of projects for 
which work has begun under these contracts and the associated amount of 
Grant Funds; the number of projects for which work has been completed 
and the associated amount of Grant Funds; the number of direct, on-
project jobs created or sustained by the Grant Funds for projects under 
the appropriation and, to the extent possible, the estimated indirect 
jobs created or sustained in associated supplying industries, including 
the number of job-years created and total increase in employment since 
February 17, 2009; and the actual aggregate expenditures by each 
recipient from State sources for projects eligible for funding under 
the program between February 17, 2009, and September 30, 2010, compared 
to the level of such expenditures planned to occur during this period 
as of February 17, 2009.
    According to the statute, grant recipients must submit the first of 
these reports not later than 90 days from February 17, 2009, and must 
submit updated reports not later than 180 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 
years after that date. Due to the unique timeframe for TIGER 
Discretionary Grant awards, TIGER Discretionary Grant recipients should 
submit the first of such reports on the first due date following the 
award of Grant Funds and on each subsequent due date thereafter.

B. Section 1512: Reports on Use of Funds

    Section 1512 of the Recovery Act (Reports on Use of Funds) requires 
any entity that received TIGER Discretionary Grants to submit a report 
not later than 10 days after the end of each calendar quarter as a 
condition of receiving funding under the Recovery Act. Pursuant to the 
OMB Guidance (which is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_fy2009/m09-15.pdf), recipients must report to OMB 
beginning 10 days after the end of the first calendar quarter after 
funds are awarded. Recipients should refer to the OMB Guidance for more 
detailed instructions on such reports. OMB is currently developing a 
government-wide central reporting system. Detailed instructions for 
centrally reporting the required information will be made available at 
www.FederalReporting.gov.

[[Page 23237]]

C. Section 1609: Environmental Reporting

    Section 1609(c) of the Recovery Act requires that Federal agencies 
report via the President (specifically, to the White House Council on 
Environmental Quality) every 90 days following enactment of the 
Recovery Act on the status of projects funded under the Recovery Act 
with respect to compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
    To satisfy the purposes of the Recovery Act, grant recipients may 
be required to provide additional information in response to requests 
from OMB, the Congressional Budget Office, the Government 
Accountability Office, or the Department's Inspector General. The 
Department will inform grant recipients if and when such additional 
reports are required.
    Further information about how grant recipients will be expected to 
comply with the reporting requirements of the Recovery Act will be 
provided in the individual grant agreements signed by recipients of 
TIGER Discretionary Grants.

X. Certification Requirements

    As a condition of award, to the extent applicable, grantees must 
comply with the Certification requirements of the Recovery Act. These 
include Section 1201 (Maintenance of Effort); Section 1511 
(Transparency and Oversight); and Section 1607 (Additional Funding 
Distribution and Assurance of Appropriate Use of Funds). On February 
27, 2009, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood sent a letter to the 
Governors of each State providing guidance and a template for the 
Certifications required by the Recovery Act, a copy of which is 
available on the Department's Recovery Act Web site, at http://www.dot.gov/recovery/. All applicable Certifications must be submitted 
to the Department at TigerTeam.Leads@dot.gov. Certifications may be 
submitted via e-mail as electronic, scanned copies, with original 
signed versions to follow via U.S. mail.

A. Section 1201(a): Maintenance of Effort

    By March 19, 2009, State Governors were required to certify to the 
Secretary of Transportation that the State would maintain its effort 
with regard to State funding for the types of projects funded by the 
appropriation, for each amount distributed to a State or a State agency 
under this program. As part of this Certification, the Governor was 
required to submit to the Secretary a statement identifying the amount 
of funds the State planned to expend from State sources as of February 
17, 2009, during the period between February 17, 2009 and September 30, 
2010, for the types of projects funded by the appropriation. The 
maintenance of effort requirement in section 1201(a) applies to any 
TIGER Discretionary Grant recipient that is a State government (or 
agency thereof) that planned, as of February 17, 2009, to expend State 
funds on the project receiving a TIGER Discretionary Grant during the 
period between February 17, 2009, and September 30, 2010.

B. Section 1511: Transparency and Oversight

    For Grant Funds made available to State or local governments for 
infrastructure investments, the Governor, mayor, or other chief 
executive, as appropriate, must certify that the infrastructure 
investment (1) received the full review and vetting required by law; 
and (2) that the chief executive accepts responsibility that it is an 
appropriate use of taxpayer dollars. This Certification must be 
executed and posted on a Web site and linked to Recovery.gov prior to 
the recipient of a TIGER Discretionary Grant receiving Grant Funds. If 
the potential project is a highway or transit project and it is 
included in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 
with the specific information required by Section 1511 (a description 
of the investment, the estimated total cost, and the amount of ARRA 
funds to be used), it may be included in the Governor's Section 1511 
Certification covering highway and transit projects in a State. One way 
for the Governor's Certification to satisfy the Section 1511 
requirement is for the Certification to state that the project is 
included in the STIP and therefore has completed the TIP/STIP planning 
process. In this case, the Governor's Certification must also provide a 
link to the public web posting of the STIP that includes (or will 
include) any highway and transit project designated to receive Recovery 
Act funding. If the project is not included in the STIP, a separate 
Certification for the potential TIGER Discretionary Grant project must 
be executed, attaching the relevant information or linking to a public 
Web site where the information may be obtained. This Certification must 
include a description of the investment, the estimated total cost, and 
the amount of covered funds to be used, and must be posted online and 
linked to the Web site Recovery.gov. The Certification must also state 
that the projects have been properly reviewed and vetted and are an 
appropriate use of taxpayer dollars.

C. Section 1607: Additional Funding Distribution and Assurance of 
Appropriate Use of Funds

    Section 1607 required that Governors of States receiving funding 
under the Recovery Act certify by April 3, 2009, that, for Grant Funds 
provided to any State or State agency, the State would request and use 
the funds provided in the Recovery Act and that such funds would be 
used to create jobs and promote economic growth. Alternatively, the 
State legislature could have acted to accept such funds by the adoption 
of a concurrent resolution. States or State agencies ultimately 
receiving TIGER Discretionary Grant funds must ensure that this 
Certification has been completed.

D. Submission of Certifications Under Sections 1201, 1511, and 1607

    All Certifications, once executed, shall be submitted to the 
Secretary of Transportation, c/o Joel Szabat, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Transportation Policy, at TigerTeam.Leads@dot.gov. 
Certifications may be submitted via e-mail as electronic, scanned 
copies, with original signed versions to follow via U.S. mail. As 
required by the Recovery Act, Certifications under Section 1511 shall 
be immediately posted on a Web site and linked to the Web site 
Recovery.gov.

XI. Questions and Clarifications

    Questions about this notice should be submitted to the TIGER 
Discretionary Grants program manager via e-mail at TIGERGrants@dot.gov. 
The Department will regularly post answers to these questions and other 
important clarifications on the Department's Web site at http://www.dot.gov/recovery/ost/.

    Issued on: May 12, 2009.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11542 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P