[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27994-27998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11871]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-918]
First Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers From
the People's Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 9, 2010, the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') published in the Federal Register the preliminary
results of the first administrative review of the antidumping duty
order on steel wire garment hangers from the People's Republic of China
(``PRC'').\1\ We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on
the Preliminary Results. Based upon our analysis of the comments and
information received, we made changes to the margin calculations for
the final results. We continue to find that certain exporters have sold
subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of
review (``POR''), March 25, 2008, through November 30, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of
the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 68758
(November 9, 2010) (``Preliminary Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: May 13, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik or Josh Startup, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6905 or (202) 482-5260, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 9, 2010, the Department published in the Federal
Register the Preliminary Results of this administrative review. On
December 9, 2010, both M&B Metal Products Co., Inc. (``Petitioner'')
and Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd., (``Dingli'') filed a
request for a public hearing. On December 22, 2010, Petitioner
submitted additional surrogate value (``SV'') information. On January
3, 2011, Dingli filed comments rebutting Petitioner's December 22,
2010, SV information. On January 7, 2011, the Department extended in
the Federal Register the deadline for the final results by 60 days.
[[Page 27995]]
See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 1134 (January 7, 2011).
On March 17, 2011, we reset the schedule for interested parties to
submit case briefs and rebuttal briefs to March 24, 2011, and March 29,
2011, respectively. On March 17, 2011, the Department placed certain
entry data, obtained from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') with respect to Dingli, on the record and solicited comments
from interested parties. Both Petitioner and Dingli filed comments
regarding this data on March 21, 2011. Dingli filed rebuttal comments
on March 23, 2011. On March 23, 2011, Shanghai Wells Hanger Co.,
Ltd.\2\ (``Wells'') filed its case brief. On March 24, 2011,
Petitioner, Dingli, Fabricare (U.S. importer), and one of the separate
rate respondents filed case briefs.\3\ On April 1, 2011, Petitioner,
Dingli, and the Shaoxing Metal Companies filed rebuttal briefs. The
Department did not hold a public hearing pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(d),
as all hearing requests made by interested parties were withdrawn.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that
Wells, Hong Kong Wells Limited (``HK Wells''), and Hong Kong Wells
Limited (USA) (``Wells USA'') are affiliated, pursuant to sections
771(33)(A), (E), and (F) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(``the Act''). We also preliminarily found that Wells and HK Wells
should be treated as a single entity for the purposes of this
administrative review. See Preliminary Results 76 FR at 68759. For
the final results, we continue to find that Wells, HK Wells, and
Wells USA are affiliated pursuant to sections 771(33)(A), (E), and
(F) of the Act and that Wells and HK Wells comprise a single entity,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1) and (2). See id.
\3\ See the ``Background'' section of the ``Steel Wire Garment
Hangers from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the First Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,'' (``Decision Memo''), dated concurrently
with this notice, for a discussion of the post-case brief letters
submitted by Petitioner and Dingli regarding arguments of untimely
filed factual information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.307(b)(iv), we conducted a verification of
Dingli's questionnaire responses.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ From February 22 to February 25, 2011, we verified Dingli's
constructed export price (``CEP'') sales responses in the United
States. See ``Memorandum to the File through Catherine Bertrand,
Program Manager, Office 9, from Irene Gorelik, Senior Case Analyst,
Office 9, and Joshua Startup, Analyst, Office 9, re: Verification of
the Sales Response of Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd.,
in the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment
Hangers from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''),'' dated March
16, 2011 (``CEP Report''). Then, from March 7 to March 11, 2011, we
verified Dingli's export price (``EP'') sales and factors of
production (``FOP'') responses. See ``Memorandum to the File through
Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager, Office 9 from Irene Gorelik,
Senior Case Analyst, Office 9, and Joshua Startup, Analyst, Office
9, re: Verification of the Sales and Factors Response of Shaoxing
Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC''),'' dated March 17, 2011 (``EP
Report'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this review are addressed in the Decision Memo, which is dated
concurrently with this notice. A list of the issues which parties
raised and to which we respond in the Decision Memo is attached to this
notice as an Appendix. The Decision Memo is a public document and is on
file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), Main Commerce Building,
Room 7046, and is accessible on the Department's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and electronic version of the
memorandum are identical in content.
Final Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department preliminarily
rescinded the review, in part, with respect to five companies that
stated that they made no shipments of subject merchandise during the
POR. These companies are: Viet Anh Import-Export Joint Stock Company;
Dong Nam A Co., Ltd.; Vietnam Hangers Joint Stock Company; Royal McGoun
Chemicals Inc.; and NV Hanger Co., Ltd. See Preliminary Results at
68759. Because the Department did not receive any information to the
contrary, we continue to find that these companies did not make any
shipments during the POR. Thus, for these final results, we are
rescinding this review, in part, with respect to the five above-named
companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record, the verifications, and comments
received from parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we have made
changes to the surrogate financial ratio calculation and to the dumping
margin calculations for Wells and Dingli in the final results. See
Decision Memo at Comment 2. We have also corrected errors from the
Preliminary Results alleged by Wells and Dingli. See Decision Memo at
Comments 5 and 7. Lastly, we have made certain changes to a portion of
Dingli's submitted sales data as a result of the verification findings
and minor corrections presented at verification. For all detailed
changes made to Dingli's reported sales and factor data, see Decision
Memo at Comments 4B and 4F; see also ``Memorandum to the File from Josh
Startup, Case Analyst: Program Analysis for the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers
from the People's Republic of China: Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse
Co., Ltd.,'' (``Dingli Final Analysis Memo''), dated concurrently with
this notice.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise that is subject to the order is steel wire garment
hangers, fabricated from carbon steel wire, whether or not galvanized
or painted, whether or not coated with latex or epoxy or similar
gripping materials, and/or whether or not fashioned with paper covers
or capes (with or without printing) and/or nonslip features such as
saddles or tubes. These products may also be referred to by a
commercial designation, such as shirt, suit, strut, caped, or latex
(industrial) hangers. Specifically excluded from the scope of the order
are wooden, plastic, and other garment hangers that are not made of
steel wire. Also excluded from the scope of the order are chrome-plated
steel wire garment hangers with a diameter of 3.4 mm or greater. The
products subject to the order are currently classified under U.S.
Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(``HTSUS'') subheadings 7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and
7323.99.9080.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
Separate Rates
In proceedings involving NME countries, it is the Department's
practice to begin with a rebuttable presumption that all companies
within the country are subject to government control and thus should be
assessed a single antidumping duty rate. See Policy Bulletin 5.1 \5\;
see also Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, and Affirmative Critical Circumstances, In Part: Certain Lined
Paper Products From the People's Republic of China, 71 FR 53079, 53080
(September 8, 2006); and Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Final Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China, 71 FR 29303, 29307 (May 22, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Separate Rates and Combination Rates in Antidumping
Investigations involving Non-Market Economy Countries, 70 FR 17233
(April 5, 2005), also available at: http://ia.ita.doc.gov/policy/index.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In our Preliminary Results, we determined that the following
[[Page 27996]]
companies met the criteria for separate rate status: (1) Shaoxing
Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.; Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal
Manufactured Co. Ltd.; and Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co.,
Ltd.\6\; (2) Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd.; (3) Yiwu Ao-
Si Metal Products Co., Ltd.; (4) Shangyu Baoxiang Metal Manufactured
Co., Ltd.; (5) Jiaxing Boyi Medical Device Co., Ltd.; (6) Pu Jiang
County Command Metal Products Co., Ltd.; (7) Shaoxing Meideli Metal
Hanger Co., Ltd.; (8) Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd.;
(9) Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger Co., Ltd.; (10) Ningbo Dasheng Hanger
Ind. Co., Ltd.; (11) Shaoxing Guochao Metallic Products Co., Ltd.; (12)
Shanghai Jianhai International Trade Co., Ltd.; and (13) Shaoxing
Liangbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In the Preliminary Results, we stated that these three
companies all reported in their individual separate rate
certifications that their affiliations with one another, legal
structure, and ownership structure have not changed since the
underlying investigation. For the final results, we continue to find
that Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd., Shaoxing
Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd., and Shaoxing Andrew Metal
Manufactured Co., Ltd. comprise a single entity, as determined in
the underlying investigation, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1) and
(2). See Preliminary Results at 68766; see also Steel Wire Garment
Hangers from the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 47587, 47589 (August 14, 2008)
(``Hangers LTFV'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, in the Preliminary Results, we noted that the
Department received completed responses to the Section A portion of the
NME questionnaire from the individually reviewed respondents (Dingli
and Wells), which contained information pertaining to the companies'
eligibility for a separate rate. With respect to Wells, we
preliminarily determined that there is no PRC ownership, and because
the Department has no evidence indicating that Wells is under the
control of the PRC, a separate rates analysis was not necessary to
determine whether it is independent from government control. With
respect to Dingli, we preliminarily granted separate rate status to it
based on its submitted information. See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at
68760-62.
We did not receive any information since the issuance of the
Preliminary Results that provides a basis for the reconsideration of
these preliminary separate rate determinations. Therefore, the
Department continues to find that Wells, Dingli, and the 13 above-
named, non-individually examined companies meet the criteria for a
separate rate.
Separate Rate Calculation
The separate rate is determined based on the estimated weighted-
average antidumping margins established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding zero and de minimis margins or
margins based entirely on AFA.\7\ In this administrative review, one
mandatory respondent, Dingli, has an estimated weighted-average
antidumping margin which is above de minimis and which is not based
entirely on AFA. Therefore, because there is only one weighted-average
antidumping margin calculated for these final results that is neither
zero, de minimis, nor based entirely on AFA, we have assigned Dingli's
margin to the companies not selected for individual examination.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Decision Memo at Comment 3.
\8\ See, e.g., Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 76 FR 16379, 16381-16382 (March 23, 2011); Certain Frozen
Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper
Reviews, 74 FR 11349, 11350 (March 17, 2009) (where the Department
stated ``For the exporters subject to review that are determined to
be eligible for separate-rate status, but were not selected as
mandatory respondents, the Department normally establishes a
weighted-average margin based on an average of the rates it
calculated for the mandatory respondents, excluding any rates that
are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. In this
proceeding, there is only one such mandatory respondent, QVD.
Accordingly, the rate calculated for QVD is applied as the rate for
Agifish and Anvifish.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facts Available
Section 776(a) of the Act provides that if necessary information is
not available on the record, or an interested party: (A) Withholds
information that has been requested by the Department; (B) fails to
provide such information in a timely manner or in the form or manner
requested, subject to sections 782(c)(1) and (e) of the Act; (C)
significantly impedes a proceeding under the antidumping statute; or
(D) provides such information but the information cannot be verified;
the Department shall, subject to subsection 782(d) of the Act, use
facts otherwise available in reaching the applicable determination.
Section 782(c)(1) of the Act provides that if an interested party
``promptly after receiving a request from (the Department) for
information, notifies (the Department) that such party is unable to
submit the information requested in the requested form and manner,
together with a full explanation and suggested alternative form in
which such party is able to submit the information,'' the Department
may modify its requirements to avoid imposing an unreasonable burden on
that party.
Section 782(d) of the Act provides that, if the Department
determines that a response to a request for information does not comply
with its request, the Department will inform the person submitting the
response of the nature of the deficiency and shall, to the extent
practicable, provide that person the opportunity to remedy or explain
the deficiency. If that person submits further information that
continues to be unsatisfactory, or this information is not submitted
within the applicable time limits, the Department may, subject to
section 782(e), disregard all or part of the original and subsequent
responses.
Section 782(e) of the Act states that the Department shall not
decline to consider information deemed ``deficient'' under section
782(d) if: (1) The information is submitted by the established
deadline; (2) the information can be verified; (3) the information is
not so incomplete that it cannot serve as a reliable basis for reaching
the applicable determination; (4) the interested party has demonstrated
that it acted to the best of its ability; and (5) the information can
be used without undue difficulties.
Furthermore, section 776(b) of the Act states that if the
Department ``finds that an interested party has failed to cooperate by
not acting to the best of its ability to comply with a request for
information from the administering authority * * *, the administering
authority * * *, in reaching the applicable determination under this
title, may use an inference that is adverse to the interests of that
party in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.'' The
Department's determination is in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A),
(B), and 776(b) of the Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See, e.g., Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 71 FR 69546 (December 1, 2006) and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. See also
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Preliminary Results of the First Administrative Review and
New Shipper Review, 72 FR 10689, 10692 (March 9, 2007) (decision to
apply total AFA to the NME-wide entity) unchanged in Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final
Results of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
First New Shipper Review, 72 FR 52052 (September 12, 2007)
(``Vietnam Shrimp AR1'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the final results, in accordance with sections 776(a)(2)(A) and
(B) of the Act, we have determined that the use of facts available
(``FA'') is appropriate to account for Dingli's consumption of its
hydrochloric acid (``HCL'') input in the production of subject
merchandise. See
[[Page 27997]]
Decision Memo at Comment 4C. During the on-site verification of
Dingli's sales and factors of production, we found that Dingli failed
to report information requested by the Department; specifically, one
month of HCL consumption, which is a direct material used to produce
subject merchandise. Additionally, for the final results, in accordance
with section 776(b) of the Act, we find that Dingli failed to cooperate
by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with our request for
information and, as a result, have determined that the application of
an adverse inference is warranted for Dingli's unreported consumption
of HCL. See id.; see also ``EP Report'' at 2 and 17. As an adverse
inference, we are using the highest reported monthly consumption
quantity of HCL during the POR as a proxy for the unreported month in
the normal value calculation. See ``Dingli Final Analysis Memo'' for
further details.
Final Results of Review
The final weighted-average dumping margins for the POR are as
follows:
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average
Exporter margin (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. and/or Hong Kong 0.15
Wells Limited \10\.................................
Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd......... 1.71
Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd \11\... 1.71
Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd......... 1.71
Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd........ 1.71
Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co. Ltd.......... 1.71
Yiwu Ao-Si Metal Products Co., Ltd.................. 1.71
Shangyu Baoxiang Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd........ 1.71
Jiaxing Boyi Medical Device Co., Ltd................ 1.71
Pu Jiang County Command Metal Products Co. Ltd...... 1.71
Shaoxing Meideli Metal Hanger Co., Ltd.............. 1.71
Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd....... 1.71
Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger Co., Ltd................ 1.71
Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Ind. Co., Ltd................. 1.71
Shaoxing Guochao Metallic Products Co. Ltd.......... 1.71
Shanghai Jianhai International Trade Co., Ltd....... 1.71
Shaoxing Liangbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd....... 1.71
PRC-Wide Entity \12\................................ 187.25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For the final results, we continue to find that Wells and HK Wells
comprise a single entity, as determined in the Preliminary Results,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1) and (2). See Preliminary Results, 75
FR at 68759.
\11\ For the final results, we continue to find that Shaoxing Gangyuan
Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd., Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co.
Ltd., and Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd. comprise a
single entity, as determined in the underlying investigation, pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1) and (2). See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at
68766; see also Hangers LTFV, 73 FR at 47589.
\12\ The PRC-Wide entity continues to include the 94 companies listed in
footnote 17 of the Preliminary Results. See Preliminary Results, 75 FR
at 68762.
Assessment
Upon issuance of these final results, the Department will
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by these reviews. The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of
the final results of this review excluding any reported sales that
entered during the gap period. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
we calculated exporter/importer (or customer)-specific assessment rates
for the merchandise subject to this review. Where the respondent has
reported reliable entered values, we calculated importer (or customer)-
specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated
for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this
amount by the total entered value of the sales to each importer (or
customer). See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer (or customer)-
specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, we will apply the
assessment rate to the entered value of the importers'/customers'
entries during the POR. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales, we
calculated a per-unit assessment rate by aggregating the antidumping
duties due for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and
dividing this amount by the total quantity sold to that importer (or
customer). See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). To determine whether the duty
assessment rates are de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set
forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer (or customer)-
specific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated entered value. Where
an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties. See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For the
companies receiving a separate rate that were not selected for
individual review, we will calculate an assessment rate based on the
simple average of the cash deposit rates calculated for the companies
selected for individual review pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the
Act.
With respect to the companies upon which we have rescinded this
review, we intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of this notice. The Department will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash-deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be established in the final
results of this review (except, if the rate
[[Page 27998]]
is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than 0.5 percent, no cash deposit
will be required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific
rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of
187.25 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporters that supplied
that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: May 9, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I--Decision Memorandum
General Issues
Comment 1: Treatment of Sales with Negative Margins
Comment 2: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Comment 3: Calculation of the Separate Rate Margin
Company-Specific Issues
Dingli
Comment 4: Whether to Assign Adverse Facts Available (``AFA'') to
Dingli
A. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') Data on the Record
B. Hanger Quantity Conversions
C. Hydrochloric Acid (``HCL'') Consumption
D. Weight of Packing Cartons
E. Sale of Machinery
F. Changes to Margin Calculation Per Verification Findings
Comment 5: Calculation of Domestic Movement Expenses
Comment 6: Byproduct Offset for Scrap Iron Buckets
Wells
Comment 7: Calculation of Domestic Movement Expenses
[FR Doc. 2011-11871 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P