[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33176-33179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14094]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0478; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-138-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-103, B4-203, and
B4-2C Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
One operator reported a failure of the MLG [main landing gear]
retraction actuator sliding rod. This incident occurred at a number
of operating flight cycles lower than the limit value imposed by the
MLG manufacturer.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, results in
undampened extension of the MLG, leading to higher than usual loads
on the MLG attachment. Higher loads
[[Page 33177]]
affect the structural integrity of the MLG and could lead to MLG
failure.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For Airbus service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Airbus SAS-EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax
+33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail [email protected]; Internet
http://www.airbus.com. For Messier-Dowty service information identified
in this proposed AD, contact Messier-Dowty: Messier Services Americas,
Customer Support Center, 45360 Severn Way, Sterling, Virginia 20166-
8910; telephone 703-450-8233; fax 703-404-1621; Internet https://techpubs.services/messier-dowty.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0478;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-138-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On November 29, 2007, we issued AD 2007-25-15, Amendment 39-15297
(72 FR 69601, December 10, 2007). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes
and all Airbus Model A300-600 series airplanes.
Since we issued AD 2007-25-15, the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2010-0102,
dated June 8, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
One operator reported a failure of the MLG [main landing gear]
retraction actuator sliding rod. This incident occurred at a number
of operating flight cycles lower than the limit value imposed by the
MLG manufacturer.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, results in
undampened extension of the MLG, leading to higher than usual loads
on the MLG attachment. Higher loads affect the structural integrity
of the MLG and could lead to MLG failure.
To address and correct this unsafe condition, EASA issued AD
2006-0075 (now at Revision 2) [which corresponds to FAA AD 2007-25-
15] to require repetitive inspections of the retraction actuator
sliding rod as installed on A300, A300-600 and A300-600ST aeroplanes
and, depending on findings, repair or replacement of the affected
parts.
Since this event, studies have been performed by Airbus, the
consequences of which are that for A300 aeroplanes, a new inspection
program (new threshold and interval) has been established.
For the reason described above, this new [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of AD 2006-0075R2, which is superseded and requires the
accomplishment of the repetitive inspections and associated
corrective actions at the new intervals. In addition, the Airbus
A300 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) Chapter 12-22-32 (associated
to Maintenance Planning Document (MPD) task 321112-0505-1) has been
revised to introduce a greasing action at the level of the pick-up
jack fitting. Consequently, this AD also requires the repetitive
lubrication task.
For A300-600 and A300-600ST aeroplanes, the analyses have shown
that, due to design differences, the loads induced on the MLG
attachments are within acceptable margins. For that reason, this AD
does not apply to those aeroplanes which were previously included in
the applicability of EASA AD 2006-0075R2.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-32-0450,
including Appendix 1, Revision 02, dated July 28, 2009; and Task
321112-0505-1 of the A300 Maintenance Planning Document, Revision 30,
dated April 1, 2010. Messier-Dowty has issued Special Inspection
Service Bulletin 470-32-806, dated October 27, 2005. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
[[Page 33178]]
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 3 products of U.S. registry.
We estimate that it would take about 6 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $1,530, or $510 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 6 work-hours and require parts costing $0, for a cost of
$510 per product. We have no way of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15297 (72 FR
69601, December 10, 2007) and adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2011-0478; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-
138-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by July 25, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2007-25-15, Amendment 39-15297.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model A300 B4-103, B4-203, and
B4-2C airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with MLG
retraction actuator having part number (P/N) C23129 fitted with
sliding rod P/N C69029-2 or C69029-3.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
One operator reported a failure of the MLG [main landing gear]
retraction actuator sliding rod. This incident occurred at a number
of operating flight cycles lower than the limit value imposed by the
MLG manufacturer.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, results in
undampened extension of the MLG, leading to higher than usual loads
on the MLG attachment. Higher loads affect the structural integrity
of the MLG and could lead to MLG failure.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Revised Compliance Times for Inspection of MLG Retraction Actuator and
Corrective Actions
(g) At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD: Remove the MLG retraction actuator
having P/N C23129 and do a detailed and high frequency eddy current
inspection for defects that exceed the criteria defined in Messier-
Dowty Special Inspection Service Bulletin 470-32-806, dated October
27, 2005, of the retraction actuator sliding rods having P/N C69029-
2 or C69029-3, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-32-0450, Revision 02, dated
July 28, 2009.
(1) For airplanes on which the retraction actuator sliding rod
has accumulated 12,000 or fewer total flight cycles as of the
effective date of this AD: Inspect at the later of the times
specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 12,000 total flight cycles on the
retraction actuator sliding rod.
(ii) Within 2,000 flight cycles or 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(2) For airplanes on which the retraction actuator sliding rod
has accumulated more than 12,000 total flight cycles, and 22,000 or
fewer total flight cycles, as of the effective date of this AD:
Inspect at the earliest of the times specified in paragraphs
(g)(2)(i), (g)(2)(ii), and (g)(2)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 23,000 total flight cycles on the
retraction actuator sliding rod.
(ii) Within 2,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD.
(iii) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD.
(3) For airplanes on which the retraction actuator sliding rod
has accumulated more than 22,000 total flight cycles as of the
effective date of this AD: Inspect within 1,000 flight cycles or 12
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(h) Thereafter, repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g)
of this AD at intervals not to exceed 12,000 flight cycles.
(i) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g) or (h)
of this AD, any defect is detected that exceeds the criteria defined
in Messier-Dowty Special Inspection Service Bulletin 470-32-806,
dated October 27, 2005, before further flight, replace the affected
sliding rod with a serviceable unit in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-32-0450, Revision 02, dated July 28, 2009.
(j) Before the accumulation of 32,000 flight cycles on any
retraction actuator sliding rod, it must be replaced with a
serviceable unit
[[Page 33179]]
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-32-0450, Revision 02, dated July 28,
2009. Parts removed from an airplane as required by this paragraph
must be returned to Messier-Dowty within 30 days after removing the
part from the airplane.
(k) As of the effective date of this AD, any MLG retraction
actuator sliding rod having P/N C69029-2 or C69029-3 that has
accumulated less than 32,000 total flight cycles, may be installed
on any airplane, provided that the inspections required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD are accomplished at the compliance
times specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD and all
applicable replacements required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this
AD are done.
Lubrication of the MLG Assembly
(l) Within 1,500 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD: Clean and lubricate the MLG assembly, in accordance with Task
321112-0505-1 of the Airbus A300 Maintenance Planning Document,
Revision 30, dated April 1, 2010. Repeat the cleaning and
lubrication thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,500 flight
hours.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(m) Inspections accomplished before the effective date of this
AD, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-32-0450, dated
December 1, 2005; or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-32-0450,
Revision 01, dated May 10, 2006; are acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding requirements of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1 : This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(n) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be e-mailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD. AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2007-25-15,
amendment 39-15297, are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(o) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2010-0102, dated June 8, 2010; Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300-32-0450, Revision 02, dated July 28, 2009; Messier-
Dowty Special Inspection Service Bulletin 470-32-806, dated October
27, 2005; and Task 321112-0505-1 of the Airbus A300 Maintenance
Planning Document, Revision 30, dated April 1, 2010; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 27, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-14094 Filed 6-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P