[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 145 (Thursday, July 28, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45199-45200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18992]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0571; FRL-9444-7]
Interim Final Determination To Defer Sanctions, San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, CA
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is making an interim final determination to defer
imposition of sanctions based on a proposed determination, published
elsewhere in this Federal Register, that the State of California has
submitted a rule that satisfies the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA)
Section 185 fee program.
DATES: This interim final determination is effective on July 28, 2011.
However, comments will be accepted until August 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2011-0571, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: [email protected].
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4114, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
I. Background
On January 13, 2010 (75 FR 1716), EPA published a final limited
approval and limited disapproval of revisions to the San Joaquin Valley
Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA's final action
concerned SJVUAPCD Rule 3170, ``Federally Mandated Ozone Nonattainment
Fee,'' a fee rule which applied to major sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emissions.
SJVUAPCD submitted Rule 3170 pursuant to section 185 of the CAA. EPA
determined that while Rule 3170 strengthened the SIP, it did not fully
meet the requirements of section 185 of the CAA. EPA's final action
started a sanctions clock for imposition of offset sanctions 18 months
after February 12, 2010 and highway sanctions 6 months after offset
sanctions, pursuant to section 179 of the CAA and our regulations at 40
CFR 52.31.
On May 19, 2011, SJVUAPCD amended Rule 3170 and on June 14, 2011,
the California Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted amended Rule 3170.
In the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, we have
proposed approval of this submittal. Based on today's proposed
approval, we are taking this final rulemaking action, effective on
publication, to defer imposition of sanctions that were triggered by
our January 13, 2010 limited approval and limited disapproval of Rule
3170, based on a finding that it is more likely than not that the
SJVUAPCD has submitted a rule that meets the requirements of sections
172(e) and 185 of the CAA.
EPA is providing the public with an opportunity to comment on this
deferral of sanctions. If comments are submitted that change our
assessment described in this final determination and the proposed
approval of Rule 3170, we would take final action proposing to
partially or fully disapprove Rule 3170 and lifting this deferral of
the sanctions. If no comments are submitted that change our assessment,
then with regard to the failure to meet the requirements of section 185
of the CAA, any imposed sanctions would no longer apply and any
sanction clocks would be permanently terminated on the effective date
of a final approval of Rule 3170.
II. EPA Action
We are making an interim final determination to defer CAA section
179 sanctions associated with SJVUAPCD's 1-hour Ozone CAA section 185
obligation based on our concurrent proposal to fully approve Rule 3170
as meeting sections 172(e) and 185 of the CAA.
Because EPA has preliminarily determined that Rule 3170 meets the
requirements of sections 172(e) and 185 of the CAA and is fully
approvable, relief from sanctions should be provided as quickly as
possible. Therefore, EPA is invoking the good cause exception under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in not providing an opportunity for
comment before this action takes effect (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)). However,
by this action EPA is providing the public with a chance to comment on
EPA's determination after the effective date, and EPA will consider any
comments received in determining whether to reverse such action.
EPA believes that notice-and-comment rulemaking before the
effective date of this action is impracticable and contrary to the
public interest. EPA has reviewed the State's submittal and, through
its proposed action, is indicating that it is more likely than not that
the State has submitted a revision to the SIP that meets sections
172(e) and 185 of the CAA that was the basis for the action that
started the sanctions clocks. Therefore, it is not in the public
interest to impose sanctions. EPA believes that it is necessary to use
the interim final rulemaking process to defer sanctions while EPA
completes its rulemaking process on the approvability of the State's
submittal. Moreover, with
[[Page 45200]]
respect to the effective date of this action, EPA is invoking the good
cause exception to the 30-day notice requirement of the APA because the
purpose of this notice is to relieve a restriction (5 U.S.C. Sec.
553(d)(1)).
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action defers Federal sanctions and imposes no additional
requirements.
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a
significant regulatory action.
The administrator certifies that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This rule does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
This rule does not have tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
The requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply to
this rule because it imposes no standards.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to Congress and the Comptroller
General. However, section 808 provides that any rule for which the
issuing agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure
thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, shall take effect at such time as the agency promulgating the
rule determines. 5 U.S.C. 808(2). EPA has made such a good cause
finding, including the reasons therefore, and established an effective
date of July 28, 2011. EPA will submit a report containing this rule
and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 26, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purpose of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental regulations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 19, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2011-18992 Filed 7-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P