[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56661-56678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23249]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 56661]]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 429 and 430
[Docket No. EERE-2011-BT-TP-0012]
RIN 1904-AC45
Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedures for General Service
Fluorescent Lamps, General Service Incandescent Lamps, and Incandescent
Reflector Lamps
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and announcement of public
meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to revise its
test procedures for general service fluorescent lamps (GSFLs) and
general service incandescent lamps (GSILs) established under the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). DOE is not proposing changes to the
existing test procedure for incandescent reflector lamps (IRLs)
established under EPCA. For GSFLs and GSILs, DOE is proposing to update
several citations and references to the industry standards currently
referenced in DOE's test procedures. DOE is also proposing to establish
a lamp lifetime test procedure for GSILs. Additionally, in this NOPR,
DOE is requesting comments on all aspects of the GSFL, GSIL, and IRL
test procedures and whether any further amendments are necessary. DOE's
review of the GSFL, GSIL, and IRL test procedures fulfills the EPCA
requirement that DOE review test procedures for all covered products at
least once every seven years. Finally, DOE is proposing to extend the
compliance certification date for GSILs so as to be consistent with the
compliance date of the amended test procedure. DOE is also announcing a
public meeting to discuss and receive comments on the issues presented
in this rulemaking.
DATES: Meeting: DOE will hold a public meeting on October 4, 2011, from
9 a.m. to 5 p.m., in Washington, DC, for both this rulemaking on test
procedures for GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs, as well as the rulemaking on
GSFL and IRL energy conservation standards. The meeting will also be
broadcast as a Webinar. See section V, ``Public Participation,'' for
Webinar registration information, participant instructions, and
information about the capabilities available to Webinar participants.
Comments: DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding
this notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) before and after the public
meeting, but no later than November 28, 2011. See section V, ``Public
Participation,'' for details.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of
Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 1E-245, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. To attend, please notify Ms. Brenda Edwards at
(202) 586-2945. Please note that foreign nationals visiting DOE
Headquarters are subject to advance security screening procedures. Any
foreign national wishing to participate in the meeting should advise
DOE as soon as possible by contacting Ms. Brenda Edwards at the phone
number above to initiate the necessary procedures.
Any comments submitted must identify the NOPR for Test Procedures
for General Service Fluorescent Lamps, General Service Incandescent
Lamps, and Incandescent Reflector Lamps and provide docket number EERE-
2011-BT-TP-0012 and/or regulatory information number (RIN) 1904-AC45.
Comments may be submitted using any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
2. E-mail: [email protected]. Include the docket number
and/or RIN 1904-AC45 in the subject line of the message.
3. Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. If possible, please submit all
items on a compact disc (CD), in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite
600, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD, in which case it is not necessary to
include printed copies.
No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see section V of this document (Public
Participation).
Docket: The docket is available for review at http://www.regulations.gov, including Federal Register notices, public meeting
attendee lists and transcripts, comments, and other supporting
documents/materials. All documents in the docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. However, not all documents listed in
the index may be publicly available, such as information that is exempt
from public disclosure.
A link to the docket Web page on the regulations.gov site can be
found at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/incandescent_lamps.html. The http://www.regulations.gov
Web page contains simple instructions on how to access all documents,
including public comments, in the docket. See section V, ``Public
Participation,'' for information on how to submit comments through
http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on how to submit a comment, review other
public comments and the docket, or participate in the public meeting,
please contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202) 586-2945 or e-mail:
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Tina Kaarsberg, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, EE-2J,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 287-1393. E-mail: [email protected].
Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 586-9507. E-mail: [email protected].
For information on how to submit or review public comments, contact
Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, EE-2J,
1000
[[Page 56662]]
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202)
586-2945. E-mail: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Summary of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
III. Discussion
A. Seven-Year Test Procedure Review
B. Updates to Industry Standards Incorporated by Reference
1. ANSI C78.81-2010 for General Service Fluorescent Lamps
2. IES LM-9-2009 for General Service Fluorescent Lamps
3. IES LM-45-2009 for General Service Incandescent Lamps
C. Test Procedures for Incandescent Reflector Lamps
D. General Service Incandescent Lamp Lifetime Testing
1. Selection of Industry Standard
2. Summary of IESNA LM-49-2001
3. Accelerated Lifetime Testing
4. Sample Size
5. ``Rated Lifetime'' Definition
6. Certification Requirements and Laboratory Accreditation
7. Effective Date and Compliance Date for the Amended Test
Procedures and Compliance Date for Submitting GSIL Certification
Reports
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration
Act of 1974
V. Public Participation
A. Attendance at the Public Meeting
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests To Speak and Prepared
General Statements for Distribution
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
D. Submission of Comments
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Title III, Part B \1\ of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975 (EPCA or the Act), Public Law 94-163 (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309, as
codified) sets forth a variety of provisions designed to improve energy
efficiency and established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles, a program covering most major
household appliances. These include general service fluorescent lamps
(GSFLs), general service incandescent lamps (GSILs), and incandescent
reflector lamps (IRLs), the subject of today's notice (referred to
below as one of the ``covered products'').\2\ (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(14)
and 6295(i))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated Part A.
\2\ All references to EPCA in this rulemaking refer to the
statute as amended through the Energy Independence and Security Act
of 2007, Public Law 110-140.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the Act, this program generally consists of four parts: (1)
Testing; (2) labeling; and (3) establishing Federal energy conservation
standards and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. The testing
requirements consist of test procedures that manufacturers of covered
products must use: (1) As the basis for certifying to DOE that their
products comply with the applicable energy conservation standards
adopted pursuant to EPCA, and (2) for making representations about the
efficiency of those products. (42 U.S.C. 6293(c); 42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
Similarly, DOE must use these test requirements in determining whether
covered products comply with any relevant energy conservation standards
promulgated under EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth the criteria and procedures
that DOE must follow when prescribing or amending test procedures for
covered products. EPCA provides in relevant part that any test
procedures prescribed or amended under this section must be reasonably
designed to produce test results which measure energy efficiency,
energy use, or estimated annual operating cost of a covered product
during a representative average use cycle or period of use and not be
unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
In addition, if DOE determines that a test procedure amendment is
warranted, it must publish proposed test procedures and offer the
public an opportunity to present oral and written comments on them. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)) Finally, in any rulemaking to amend a test
procedure, DOE must determine the extent to which the proposed test
procedure would alter the measured energy efficiency. (42 U.S.C.
6293(e)(1)) If DOE determines that the amended test procedure would
alter significantly the measured efficiency of a covered product, DOE
must amend the applicable energy conservation standard accordingly. (42
U.S.C. 6293(e)(2))
Relevant to this rulemaking, EPCA, as codified, directs DOE to
prescribe test procedures for GSFLs and IRLs to which energy
conservation standards are applicable, taking into consideration the
applicable standards of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North
America \3\ (IESNA) or the American National Standards Institute \4\
(ANSI). (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(6))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA)
standards can be purchased on the IESNA Web site at: http://www.ies.org/store/.
\4\ American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards can
be purchased on the ANSI Web site at: http://www.webstore.ansi.org/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, on December 19, 2007, the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), Public Law 110-140, was enacted.
Section 321 of EISA 2007 amended EPCA, in relevant part, to prescribe
energy conservation standards for GSILs that included maximum rated
wattage and minimum rated lifetime requirements for several different
lumen ranges; these standards will be phased in between 2012 and 2014.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(i)) Section 302 of EISA 2007 also amended EPCA to
require DOE to review test procedures for all covered products at least
once every seven years. DOE must either amend the test procedures or
publish notice in the Federal Register of any determination not to
amend a test procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A))
Accordingly, to fulfill these statutory requirements for periodic
review, in this NOPR, DOE invites comment on all aspects of the
existing test procedures for GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs that appear at
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): 10 CFR 429.27
(``General service fluorescent lamps, general service incandescent
lamps, and incandescent reflector lamps''), 10 CFR 430.2
(``Definitions''), 10 CFR 430.3 (``Materials incorporated by
reference''), 10 CFR 430.23 (``Test procedures for the measurement of
energy and water consumption''), 10 CFR 430.25 (``Laboratory
Accreditation Program''), and 10 CFR part 430 subpart B, Appendix R
(``Uniform Test Method for Measuring Average Lamp Efficacy (LE), Color
Rendering Index (CRI), and Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) of
Electric Lamps'').
To address prior EPCA requirements for GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs, DOE
has undertaken a number of rulemaking actions pertaining to the test
procedures for these products. On September 28, 1994, DOE published in
the Federal Register an Interim Final Rule on Test Procedures for
Fluorescent and Incandescent Lamps that established
[[Page 56663]]
test procedures for GSFLs, medium-base compact fluorescent lamps
(CFLs), IRLs, and GSILs. 59 FR 49468 (establishing 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, Appendix R). On May 29, 1997, DOE published a final rule in
the Federal Register on Test Procedures for Fluorescent and
Incandescent Lamps that revised some definitions and calculation
methods and updated several references to industry standards adopted in
the September 1994 Interim Final Rule. 62 FR 29222.
Subsequently, DOE amended its GSFL, GSIL, and IRL test procedures
in a final rule published in the Federal Register on July 6, 2009
(hereinafter referred to as the 2009 Lamps Test Procedure). 74 FR
31829. This final rule made the following technical modifications to
the test procedures: (1) Required testing of GSFLs to be based on low-
frequency reference ballasts, except for those lamps that can only be
tested on high-frequency ballasts; (2) required lamp efficacy for GSFLs
to be rounded to the nearest tenth of a lumen per watt, rather than the
nearest whole number; (3) adopted a test method for measuring and
calculating correlated color temperature (CCT) for fluorescent lamps
and incandescent lamps; and (4) updated citations and references to
industry standards referenced in DOE's test procedures. Additionally,
because EISA 2007 promulgated energy conservation standards for certain
GSILs, DOE also amended its test procedures for GSILs by: (1)
Specifying the units to be tested; (2) defining the ``basic model'' for
GSILs; and (3) providing a method for calculating annual energy
consumption and efficacy of GSILs.
In a separate rulemaking that amended GSFL and IRL energy
conservation standards, DOE adopted standards for additional general
service fluorescent lamp types and also established test procedures for
those lamps. These test procedure amendments included specific
reference ballast settings for testing those additional GSFLs. 74 FR
34080, 34095-96 (July 14, 2009).
The current test procedures for GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs are
specified in various sections of the CFR and are based on the 1997 and
2009 final rules addressing test procedures for fluorescent and
incandescent lamps. 62 FR 29222 (May 29, 1997); 74 FR 31829 (July 6,
2009); 74 FR 34080 (July 14, 2009). Calculations for lamp efficacy of
GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs and for color rendering index of GSFLs are
discussed in 10 CFR 430.23, which references 10 CFR part 430, subpart
B, Appendix R. Appendix R also specifies several IESNA and ANSI
standards to use for test conditions and procedures. For GSFLs, it
references measurement procedures set forth in IESNA LM-9-1999.\5\
Additionally, GSFL are to be operated according to general procedures
for taking electrical measurements described in ANSI C78.375-1997,\6\
and at the voltage and current conditions described in ANSI C78.81-2005
(double-based lamps) \7\ or ANSI C78.901-2005 (single-based lamps),\8\
and using the reference ballast at input voltage specified by the
reference circuit in ANSI C82.3-2002.\9\ Appendix R also notes that the
measurement procedures for GSILs and IRLs are set forth in IESNA LM-45-
2000 \10\ and IESNA LM-20-1994,\11\ respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ``IESNA Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric
Measurements of Fluorescent Lamps'' (approved Dec. 4, 1999).
\6\ ``American National Standard for electric lamps: Fluorescent
Lamps-Guide for Electrical Measurements'' (approved Sept. 25, 1997).
\7\ ``American National Standard for Electric Lamps Double-
Capped Fluorescent Lamps--Dimensional and Electrical
Characteristics'' (approved August 11, 2005).
\8\ ``American National Standard for Electric Lamps Double-
Capped Fluorescent Lamps--Dimensional and Electrical
Characteristics'' (approved March 23, 2005).
\9\ ``American National Standard For Lamp Ballasts-Reference
Ballasts for Fluorescent Lamps'' (approved Sept. 4, 2002).
\10\ ``IESNA Approved Method for Electrical and Photometric
Measurements of General Service Incandescent Filament Lamps''
(approved May 8, 2000).
\11\ ``IESNA Approved Method for Photometric Testing Of
Reflector-Type Lamps'' (approved Dec. 3, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In overview, in addition to requesting comment on all aspects of
the current GSFL, GSIL, and IRL test procedures, this NOPR proposes to
amend DOE's current test procedures for GSFLs and GSILs based on DOE's
review of the existing test procedures. These amendments would achieve
two objectives: (1) To update test procedures by incorporating certain
lighting industry standards by reference in order to adopt current best
practices and technological developments and (2) to adopt a new test
procedure for determining GSIL rated lifetime. If the revisions and
additions proposed by this test procedure NOPR were adopted, their use
would be required for standards compliance purposes upon the effective
date of the test procedure final rule (i.e., 30 days after its
publication).
Regarding the first objective (i.e., updating references in DOE's
existing test procedures to incorporate current best practices and
technological developments), today's notice proposes updating
references for the industry standards incorporated by reference to the
latest versions of those documents. For GSFLs, DOE is proposing to
update references ANSI C78.81-2005 to ANSI C78.81-2010 \12\ and from
IESNA LM-9-1999 to IES LM-9-2009 \13\ for measuring the electrical and
photometric attributes. For GSILs, DOE proposes updating references
from IESNA LM-45-2000 to IES LM-45-2009 \14\ for measuring their
electrical and photometric attributes. This NOPR is not proposing
changes to the current IRL test procedures, because no updated version
of the relevant industry standard, IESNA LM-20-1994, has been
published, nor do current best practices and technological developments
appear to warrant such an update.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ ``American National Standard for Electric Lamps-Double-
Capped Fluorescent Lamps-Dimensional and Electrical
Characteristics'' (approved Jan. 14, 2010).
\13\ ``IES Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric
Measurement of Fluorescent Lamps'' (approved Jan. 31, 2009).
\14\ ``IES Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric
Measurement of General Service Incandescent Filament Lamps''
(approved Dec. 14, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE has identified and outlined in section III.B the modifications
and clarifications found in the most recent versions of the industry
standards for GSFLs and GSILs, as compared to the versions of those
same standards currently incorporated by reference in DOE's test
procedures. These changes will not, in DOE's view, significantly alter
reported lamp efficacy values.
Regarding the second objective (i.e., adoption of a GSIL rated
lifetime test procedure), today's notice proposes incorporating by
reference industry standard, IESNA LM-49-2001.\15\ As noted above, EISA
2007 amended EPCA, in part, by establishing energy conservation
standards for GSILs which include for the first time minimum rated
lifetime requirements that are to be phased in between January 2012 and
January 2014. DOE must now address GSIL lifetimes in an amended test
procedure for GSILs. EPCA's definition of lamp ``life'' and
``lifetime'' requires that DOE make this amendment in accordance with
test procedures described in the IES Lighting Handbook--Reference
Volume. (42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(P))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ ``IESNA Approved Method for Life Testing of Incandescent
Filament Lamps'' (approved Dec. 1, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To initiate the development of a test procedure for determining
GSIL rated lifetime, DOE conducted literature research and interviews
with several GSIL lifetime testing facilities and
[[Page 56664]]
determined that IESNA LM-49-2001 aligns with guidance in the IESNA
Lighting Handbook, and is also the industry standard for GSIL lifetime
testing. Additionally, DOE has tentatively concluded this industry
standard adequately covers the test setup, conditions, and procedures
for GSIL lifetime testing. Therefore, in order to meet the EISA 2007
requirements for GSIL lifetimes that will begin going into effect in
January 2012, this notice proposes to incorporate by reference IESNA
LM-49-2001 to establish the test procedure for determining rated
lifetime of GSILs.
The following sections detail changes associated with the revised
versions of the applicable industry standards incorporated by reference
(IES LM-9-2009 and IES LM-45-2009) and summarize DOE's proposed test
procedure for the GSIL rated lifetime.
Lastly, DOE discusses the compliance date for use of the amended
test procedure and certifying compliance with DOE's energy conservation
standards.
III. Discussion
A. Seven-Year Test Procedure Review
In undertaking this rulemaking, DOE is fulfilling its statutory
obligation under section 302 of EISA 2007 to review its test procedures
for all covered products, including GSFL, GSIL, and IRL, at least once
every seven years. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A)) DOE must either: (1) Amend
the test procedure to improve its measurement representativeness or
accuracy or reduce its burden, or (2) determine that such amendments
are unnecessary. Id. Although DOE is proposing revisions to only
certain parts of the existing test procedures (see sections III.A.1,
III.A.2, and III.A.3), DOE invites comments on all aspects of DOE's
test procedures for GSFL, GSIL, and IRL, including those provisions
appearing at 10 CFR 429.27, 10 CFR 430.2, 10 CFR 430.23, 10 CFR 430.25,
and 10 CFR 430, subpart B, Appendix R. (See Issue 1 in section V.E), as
well as comments on current best practices and technological
developments that may warrant amendments.
B. Updates to Industry Standards Incorporated by Reference
Because the current GSFL, GSIL, and IRL test procedures are based
mainly on references to industry standards, this review, in part,
consists of determining whether or not to adopt the updated version of
these standards. Industry periodically updates its test procedure
standards to account for changes in product lines and/or developments
in test methodology and equipment. In its review of these industry
standards, DOE compared updated and current versions to determine, as
directed by EPCA, whether adopting the latest industry standards would
alter measured energy efficiency. (42 U.S.C. 6293(e)(1)) In addition,
in considering whether to adopt an updated standard, DOE must ensure
that a revision to DOE's regulations would not result in a test
procedure that is unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
After reviewing the industry standards incorporated by reference
for the existing GSFL, GSIL, and IRL test procedures as well as current
best practices and technological developments, DOE tentatively
identified appropriate updates for the GSFL and GSIL test procedures,
but no updates for the IRL test procedure. For GSFLs, DOE is proposing
to update references to the 1999 version of IES LM-9 to the 2009
version and references to the 2005 version of ANSI C78.81 to the 2010
version. For GSILs, DOE proposes to update references to the 2000
version of IES LM-45 to the 2009 version. DOE is proposing to adopt the
latest versions of IES LM-9 and IES LM-45, as they include requirements
that will increase the precision of measurements and clarifications of
existing test setup and methodology. The updated version of ANSI C78.81
provides lamp specifications for additional lamp types that may become
useful in the future. Adoption of these latest versions will also
better align DOE test procedures with industry practice, thereby
potentially reducing testing burden.
Generally, DOE has determined that the changes associated with
adoption of the updated versions of industry standards referenced in
the existing test procedures for the products that are the subject of
this NOPR would not be unduly burdensome for manufacturers, nor would
they result in a change in measured lamp efficacy values, as they are
not making substantive changes to test setup and methodology. In its
review of the updated versions of industry standards, DOE identified
some provisions in the revised industry test procedures that could
potentially result in small changes in lamp efficacy values (e.g.,
modifications to impedance thresholds, voltage and current
regulations). However, DOE tentatively determined that these potential
changes in lamp efficacy values from the modified provisions would not
be significant.\16\ Nevertheless, DOE requests comments on its
assessment (see Issues 2 and 3 in section V.E). The following sections
discuss in more detail each of the updated industry standards and their
provisions that could potentially result in small changes in lamp
efficacy values.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ In this document, changes in efficacy that are described as
``not significant'' are considered to be within measurement error or
variation. DOE tentatively concludes that these amendments do not
affect reported efficacy values to the extent that would warrant
modifications to energy conservation standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. ANSI C78.81-2010 for General Service Fluorescent Lamps
The existing GSFL test procedure at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
Appendix R incorporates by reference ANSI C78.81-2005, addressing
dimensional and electrical characteristics for double-capped
fluorescent lamps. This 2005 standard, a revision to ANSI C78.81-2003,
is also referenced in DOE's definitions of ``cold-temperature
fluorescent lamp'' and ``rated wattage.'' (See 10 CFR 430.2) In
addition, ANSI C78.81-2003 is currently referenced in parts of DOE's
test procedure for fluorescent lamp ballasts. (See 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, Appendix Q) In this NOPR, DOE proposes to update all
reference to ANSI C78.81 (both 2003 and 2005) to now reference ANSI
C78.81-2010 in DOE's test procedures and definitions relating to GSFLs
and fluorescent lamp ballasts. The 2010 version adds high-frequency and
low-frequency lamp specifications for reduced-wattage 4-foot T8 medium
bipin lamps. While DOE's current test procedures do not require the use
of these specifications, they may become relevant in DOE's ongoing
assessment of whether industry has provided high-frequency lamps
specifications for all GSFL covered by standards and subsequently, if
DOE should consider requiring GSFLs be tested using high-frequency
ballasts. Furthermore, if upcoming GSFL energy conservation standards
rulemakings adopt additional lamp types, incorporating the latest
version of ANSI C78.81 may necessitate little or no changes to DOE test
procedures in terms of specifications for the new lamp types.
Section 1 (``Definitions'') of Appendix Q (``Uniform Test Method
for Measuring Energy Consumption of Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts'') to the
DOE test procedure refers to specific datasheets in ANSI C78.81-2003 to
identify dimensional and electrical characteristics for the following
lamps: F40T12, F96T12, F96T12HO, F34T12, F96T12ES, F96T12HO/ES. DOE has
[[Page 56665]]
determined that 2003 datasheets referenced in Appendix Q are identical
to the corresponding datasheets in the 2010 version of ANSI C78.81. As
updating references to ANSI C78.81-2003 to ANSI C78.81-2010 in Appendix
Q does not constitute a substantive change to the fluorescent lamp
ballast test procedure, DOE concludes that such amendments would not
result in any changes in testing burden or a change in measured energy
consumption as compared to the current DOE test procedure.
In comparing ANSI C78.81-2010 to the 2005 version of the standard,
DOE notes that the only change is to include high-frequency and low-
frequency lamp specifications for 25W, 28W, and 30W, reduced-wattage 4-
foot T8 medium bipin lamps. These lamps, commonly used as replacements
for a 32W 4-foot T8 medium lamp, are newer products and only recently
have been added to the ANSI standard. The low-frequency reference
ballast specifications in ANSI C78.81-2010 for these lamps are
identical to the specifications DOE currently directs manufacturers to
use for those fluorescent lamps in section 4.1.2.1 of Appendix R.\17\
Therefore, neither measured efficacy nor testing burden would be
affected by updating the current references in the DOE test procedure
to ANSI C78.81-2010. Thus, DOE proposes to update all references to
ANSI C78.81 (both the 2003 and 2005 version) in 10 CFR part 430 to the
2010 version of the standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ DOE's current test procedure for 4-foot medium bipin lamps
specifies that testing be done using low-frequency reference ballast
specifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. IES LM-9-2009 for General Service Fluorescent Lamps
IESNA LM-9-1999 specifies procedures for measuring the efficacy of
GSFLs. As discussed above, this industry standard has been updated with
a 2009 edition. DOE is proposing to update references to IESNA LM-9-
1999 to the more recent 2009 version of the standard.\18\ A review
indicates that incorporating the 2009 edition of IES LM-9 could provide
further clarification of the test procedure and improve the test
methodology and test instrumentation setup and specifications. DOE has
identified the following four key updates in the 2009 edition of IES
LM-9 and discusses them in greater detail below. Specifically, IES LM-
9-2009:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The 2009 version of the standard is labeled as IES instead
of IESNA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adds information on conducting tests under high-frequency
conditions;
Modifies the lamp stabilization method;
Specifies temperature and orientation for stabilization of
T5 lamps; and
Specifies impedance \19\ thresholds for the multipurpose
volt, amperes, and watts (VAW) meter and power source, where previously
only general guidance was provided.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ A measure of the total opposition to current flow in an
alternating current (AC) circuit made up of resistance and
reactance, ``reactance'' is the opposition of a circuit element to a
change of electric current or voltage, due to the element's
capacitance or inductance. For a direct current (DC) circuit, the
impedance is just the resistance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the key updates in IES LM-9-2009 is the addition of guidance
on taking measurements under high-frequency conditions when using high-
frequency ballasts. Because high-frequency test specifications are not
available for all lamp types and in order to maintain consistency and
comparability across testing, DOE required testing of GSFLs using low-
frequency ballasts where possible in the 2009 Lamps Test Procedure
final rule.\20\ 74 FR 31829, 31835 (July 6, 2009). This NOPR does not
propose to change this requirement. Because 8-foot T8 recessed double-
contact high-output and 4-foot T5 miniature bipin standard and high-
output lamps only have high-frequency reference ballasts specifications
available, the DOE test procedure directs manufacturers to use high-
frequency test conditions for these lamps.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ One exception to this rule would be 8-foot T8 recessed
double-contact high-output and 4-foot T5 miniature bipin standard
and high-output lamps, which only have high-frequency reference
ballasts specifications listed in ANSI C78.81-2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IES LM-9-2009 now provides some guidance for testing in high-
frequency situations, specifically regarding instrument thresholds and
circuit setup. As noted above, DOE requires GSFLs testing using low-
frequency ballasts where possible. However, the high-frequency guidance
in IES LM-9-2009 would be applicable for lamps that only have high-
frequency ballast specifications available and, therefore, cannot be
tested using low-frequency ballasts. IES LM-9-2009 specifies for high-
frequency measurements that root mean square (RMS) voltage applied to
the test lamp be regulated to within 1.0 percent of the
reference ballast voltage setting and that instruments have a frequency
response \21\ of at least 100 kilohertz (kHz). For measurements under
high-frequency operation, the industry standard specifies that lamps be
operated in series with a non-inductive reference resistor ballast,\22\
as specified in ANSI C78.81-2010. IES LM-9-2009 also states that when
the impedance is not specified in a standard, the value is to be set to
one half of the lamp impedance under high-frequency conditions. High-
frequency-specific impedance, along with current and input voltage for
reference ballasts, are necessary parameters for testing under high-
frequency conditions. The industry standard also clarifies that for
high-frequency circuits, cathode heating should not be used when the
lamp is in operation. DOE has tentatively concluded that for lamps that
can only be tested at high frequency, the impact of the new guidance
provided in IES LM-9-2009 regarding high-frequency testing would be
useful, and it would not significantly impact lamp efficacy
measurements (which would likely be within the margin of measurement
error). Furthermore, DOE's analyses indicate that most modern equipment
would accommodate the thresholds specified in IES LM-9-2009 for high-
frequency testing, and, thus, they would not impose an additional
testing burden on manufacturers since new testing instruments would not
be required to run the test. DOE requests comment on whether the
clarification on high-frequency testing provided would affect lamp
efficacy values and/or significantly increase the testing burden (see
Issue 2 in section V.E).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ ``Frequency response'' is the measure of a system's output
frequency spectrum in response to an input signal.
\22\ A high-frequency reference ballast has only resistive
elements, while a low-frequency reference ballast includes
inductors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, IES LM-9-2009 includes modifications to the lamp
stabilization methodology. IES LM-9-2009 now prescribes six (instead of
four) measurements at one-minute intervals for a total of five (instead
of three) minutes. It also removes the requirement that the stability
percentage be two percent for lamps with cold spots/chambers, leaving
only the general one-percent stability threshold. Additionally, IES LM-
9-2009 requires that stabilization measurements continue until six
consecutive measurements meet the stabilization criteria. These
modifications to the lamp stabilization method allow for more accurate
and consistent measurements of lamp efficacy. After review, DOE has
tentatively concluded that the 2009 version provides a stricter
stabilization method, but one that is consistent with industry
standards. DOE requests comments on the impact of these proposed
changes in stabilization methodology on lamp efficacy values (see Issue
2 in section V.E).
[[Page 56666]]
IES LM-9-2009 also prescribes lamp stabilization characteristics
unique to T5 linear fluorescent lamps. To obtain stable photometric
results in 25 [deg]C (77 [deg]F) air, it recommends keeping the mercury
dose in the test lamp close to the equilibrium temperature and vapor
pressure. IES LM-9-2009 also specifies that T5 lamps are to be seasoned
\23\ in the vertical orientation, even though they are measured
horizontally. Stable light output is reached when all the liquid
mercury is in the cold spot, which by industry convention is at the
monogrammed end of the lamp. Therefore, T5 lamps are operated in a
vertical position to keep the mercury dose at one end of the lamp. IES
LM-9-2009 references IESNA LM-54-1999 \24\ for further guidance on this
procedure. Upon review, DOE has tentatively concluded that the addition
of the T5 lamp stabilization method, as proposed, would address
stability characteristics specific to these lamp types, but it would
not be expected to alter measured lamp efficacy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ ``Seasoned'' or ``seasoning'' refers to the initial burning
or operation of a lamp with the goal of minimizing time-related
changes in lamp operating characteristics.
\24\ ``IESNA Guide to Lamp Seasoning'' (approved May 10, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IES LM-9-2009 also specifies impedance thresholds for the
multipurpose volt, amperes, and watts (VAW) meter and power source. The
VAW meter voltage input must have input impedance greater than one
megaohm; and the electrical current input impedances may not exceed 10
milliohms.\25\ IES LM-9-2009 also prohibits power source impedance
greater than two percent of the ballast impedance. For high-frequency
power supplies, the 2009 version adds the note that it is impossible to
meet this power source impedance limit internally, so external control
circuits are used to keep the output voltage at the desired level. This
modification addresses the need for low impedance in order to ensure
accurate measurements, but DOE does not expect that it would
significantly affect lamp efficacy measurements. DOE has tentatively
concluded that because the updates to impedance limitations mainly
affect error correction and ensure accurate measurements, these changes
would not be expected to affect lamp efficacy values. In addition,
DOE's research indicates that manufacturers' existing instrument setups
should meet the impedance thresholds prescribed and, therefore, would
not pose an additional testing burden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ The 2009 version also removes Annex A, Corrections to
Compensate for Presence of Test Instruments in the Lamp Circuit.
This annex addresses how to account for the change in the circuit
caused by the test instruments. IES LM-9-2009 notes, however, that
the error introduced to the circuit is negligible when using high-
input-impedance (one megaohm or greater) instruments. Because IES
LM-9-2009 has been modified to require that voltage input of a
multifunction meter have input impedance greater than one megaohm,
this annex is no longer relevant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the above mentioned updates, IES LM-9-2009 provides
recommendations and further guidance that remove a number of
ambiguities in the previous version (e.g., updates to sources of
measurement errors, definitions, and references). Because these
proposed updates do not involve substantive changes to the test setup
and methodology, but rather just clarification, DOE has tentatively
concluded they would not affect lamp efficacy measurements or pose an
additional testing burden.
For the reasons discussed above, DOE has tentatively concluded that
substituting the 2009 version of IES LM-9 for the version (1999)
currently incorporated in the DOE test procedure for GSFLs would
generally result in more precise measurements and provide further
clarification to the DOE test procedures. It would also align DOE's
requirements with current industry standards, thereby potentially
reducing testing burden. The proposed amendments would not be expected
to significantly affect measured lamp efficacy. DOE requests comments
on its proposed incorporation of IES LM-9-2009 and its tentative
conclusion that the update would have an insignificant impact on lamp
efficacy values (see Issue 2 in section V.E).
3. IES LM-45-2009 for General Service Incandescent Lamps
The existing GSIL test procedure at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
Appendix R incorporates by reference IESNA LM-45-2000 and specifies its
use for measuring efficacy of GSILs. As discussed above, this industry
standard has been updated with a 2009 edition which is labeled as IES
instead of IESNA. DOE is considering updating references from IESNA LM-
45-2000 to the 2009 version of the standard. A review indicates that
incorporating the 2009 edition of IES LM-45 could provide further
clarification of the test procedure and improvements in test
methodology. DOE has identified the following five key updates in the
2009 edition of LM-45 and discusses them in greater detail below:
Modifies the lamp stabilization method;
Modifies voltage and current regulation tolerances of the
alternating current (AC) power source;
Modifies instrument tolerance for AC voltage, current, and
wattage;
Specifies impedance tolerances for instruments;
Specifies the tolerance of the spectral response of the
photo detector;
The first key update in IES LM-45-2009 is clarification of the lamp
stabilization methodology. IES LM-45-2009 specifies that the stability
percentage should be calculated by dividing the difference between the
maximum and minimum of the five consecutive measurements by the average
value of the measurements. IES LM-45-2009 also states that measurements
must continue at 15-second intervals until five consecutive
measurements meet the stability criteria. These additional
specifications in IES LM-45-2009 provide a more precise definition of
stabilization, which may improve consistency of test results.
IES LM-45-2009 also contains modified requirements for voltage and
current regulation of the AC power source. It specifies that RMS
voltage or current is to be regulated to within 0.1
percent instead of 0.02 percent. The revised standard also
changed the instrument tolerances for voltage, current, and wattage
measurements for AC, specifying 0.5 percent or less for
voltage and current and 0.75 percent or less for wattage
as allowable accuracies. IES LM-45-2000 had stated that uncertainty of
voltage and current shall not exceed 0.05 for both DC and
AC circuits. All else held equal, uncertainty for AC measurements tends
to be higher than DC measurements, due to the time-varying properties
of AC signals.
While the above mentioned changes in power source regulation and in
instrument tolerances could introduce slightly more variation in lamp
efficacy measurements, DOE does not expect that these proposed changes
would have a significant impact on reported lamp efficacy values, which
are based on testing of 21 samples. Additionally, the revised
tolerances are closer to those achievable by today's commercially-
available equipment being used industry-wide, and, therefore, they
would not pose an additional testing burden.
IES LM-45-2009 also adds upper and lower input impedance thresholds
for the voltage and the current inputs of the multimeter used for
measurements. Under the revised version of the industry standard, the
input impedance for the voltage input to the multifunction meter must
exceed one megaohm, and the input impedance for the current inputs must
be less than 10 milliohms. DOE has tentatively
[[Page 56667]]
concluded that these changes would have an insignificant impact on lamp
efficacy values. The updates to impedance thresholds mainly affect
error correction and ensure accurate measurements. In addition, this
change would not pose an additional testing burden, as DOE's research
indicates that manufacturers' existing instrument setups should meet
the impedance thresholds prescribed.
Both versions of IES LM-45 include a requirement that the photo-
detector have a relative spectral responsivity which approximates
V([lambda]), the photopic luminous efficiency function.\26\ The
V([lambda]) function represents the response curve of a standard
observer, which quantifies the visual sensitivity of the human eye to
light at different wavelengths. IES LM-45-2009 adds the specification
that the V([lambda]) parameter, f1', be less than five percent. The
parameter f1' describes the degree of spectral match of the photo-
detector measurements to the V([lambda]) function. DOE's research
indicates that industry commonly considers a value for f1' of less than
five percent good commercial quality and a value of less than three
percent good laboratory/research quality. DOE has tentatively concluded
that the additional specification of the spectral response tolerance of
the photo-detector would not affect lamp efficacy measurements. In
addition, DOE research shows that manufacturers already employ at least
commercial-grade instruments, and, therefore, this specification would
not pose an additional test burden. However, it is useful to explicitly
specify the allowable error in spectral response to ensure a certain
accuracy of photometric measurements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ The Commission International de l'Eclairage (CIE)
established the photopic luminous efficiency function as the
response curve of a standard observer. IESNA Lighting Handbook,
Ninth Edition (2000) p. 1-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons discussed above, DOE has tentatively concluded that
substituting the 2009 version of IES LM-45 for the 2000 version
currently incorporated in the DOE test procedure for GSILs would result
in more precise measurements and provide further clarification to the
DOE test procedures. Updating to the latest version would also better
align DOE's requirements with current industry standards and best
practices. The proposed amendments would not be expected to
significantly affect measured lamp efficacy. DOE requests comments on
its proposed incorporation of LM-45-2009 and its tentative conclusion
that the update would have an insignificant impact on lamp efficacy
values and testing burden (see Issue 3 in section V.E).
C. Test Procedures for Incandescent Reflector Lamps
The existing IRL test procedure at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
Appendix R incorporates by reference IESNA LM-20-1994 \27\ for
measuring efficacy of IRLs. At the time of publication of this NOPR, a
revised edition of this standard had not been published. Upon review
DOE has determined that existing test procedures for IRLs are
appropriate for measuring efficacy and continue to not impose an undue
testing burden. Further, DOE is not aware of any current best practice
or technical development that necessitates modifications to the
existing test procedure. Therefore, no amendments to IRL test
procedures are proposed. DOE requests comment on its assessment that no
updates to the IRL test procedure are needed and welcomes any
suggestions for amendments (see Issue 4 in section V.E).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ ``IESNA Approved Method for Photometric Testing of
Reflector-Type Lamp,'' (approved Dec. 3, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. General Service Incandescent Lamp Lifetime Testing
Section 321 of EISA 2007 amended EPCA by prescribing for the first
time for GSILs, minimum rated lifetime \28\ requirements to be phased
in between January 2012 and January 2014 (codified at 42 U.S.C.
6295(i)(1)). EPCA defines ``life'' and ``lifetime'' as the length of
operating time of a statistically large group of lamps between first
use and failure of 50 percent of the group, in accordance with test
procedures described in the IESNA Lighting Handbook Reference Volume.
(42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(P))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ DOE is proposing to use the term ``rated lifetime'' rather
than ``rate lifetime,'' which is the term used in the statutory
standards for GSILs prescribed by EISA 2007. (42 U.S.C. 6295(i)) DOE
believes ``rated'' is more commonly used in industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rated lifetime of a general service incandescent lamp depends
mainly on the rate of vaporization of the surface of the tungsten
filament due to the high filament temperatures required during lamp
operation. The tungsten filament generates the light in incandescent
lamps when a current is passed through it, which heats the filament by
electrical resistance. As the filament evaporates and shrinks, its
resistance increases, thereby reducing current, power, and light in
multiple circuits.\29\ Light output is also reduced by the deposit of
light-absorbing tungsten particles on the bulb surface. When the
filament breaks, it interrupts the electrical circuit, thereby
resulting in an inoperable lamp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition (2000) p. 6-13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Selection of Industry Standard
As stated above, EPCA defines the term ``lifetime'' in part by
referencing test procedures in the IESNA Lighting Handbook.\30\ The
IESNA Lighting Handbook provides guidance on two methods of testing
GSIL lifetime: (1) At rated voltage; and (2) at overvoltage (also known
as accelerated lifetime testing). DOE notes that the rated voltage
testing guidance in the IESNA Lighting Handbook generally coincides
with IESNA LM-49-2001. (See discussion in section III.D.3 below for
further details on accelerated lifetime testing.) In light of its
common usage in the industry and its similarity to the test procedure
in the IESNA Lighting Handbook, DOE is proposing to incorporate by
reference IESNA LM-49-2001, ``IESNA Approved Method for Life Testing of
Incandescent Filament Lamps'' (approved Dec. 1, 2001), into the DOE
test procedure for measuring GSIL lifetime, in order for there to be an
appropriate test method in place by the compliance date for the GSIL
minimum lifetime standard levels established by EISA 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition (2000) p. 2-24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE notes, however, that the IESNA Lighting Handbook test
procedures depart from those described in IESNA LM-49-2001 in one way:
the IESNA Lighting Handbook requires test voltage or current be held
within 0.25 percent of rated voltage/current, whereas
IESNA LM-49-2001 requires test voltage or current be held within 0.5 percent of rated RMS values. As IESNA LM-49-2001 is the more
commonly used reference for GSIL lifetime testing, DOE is proposing to
stay with the voltage/current regulation prescribed in IESNA LM-49-
2001. DOE also has tentatively concluded that this difference in
voltage regulation specification would have an insignificant impact on
lifetime testing and would reduce testing burden by providing a
somewhat wider tolerance.
DOE also considered IEC 60064-2005 \31\ which contains similar test
conditions and procedures as IESNA LM-49-2001. After speaking to
representatives from major lighting testing facilities, however, DOE
found that IESNA LM-49-2001 is the more common reference for GSIL
lifetime testing, which suggests it is the more workable approach.
Further evidence of the IESNA standard's usage is the
[[Page 56668]]
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reference to IESNA LM-49 in its
regulations for product labeling of GSILs. 16 CFR 305.5(b). By adopting
the same industry standard for purposes of compliance with energy
conservation standards and FTC labeling, DOE would minimize the need
for additional testing. IESNA LM-49-2001 adequately covers ambient
conditions, test setup (lamp orientation, power supply specifications,
instrumentation), and operating cycle methodology, thereby providing a
comprehensive test procedure for testing GSIL lifetime. DOE requests
comments on its proposal to adopt IESNA LM-49-2001 as the standard for
GSIL lifetime testing (see Issue 5 in section V.E). The following
section describes the test procedures laid out in IESNA LM-49-2001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ ``International Standard: Tungsten filament lamps for
domestic and similar general lighting purposes--Performance
requirements'' (approved 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Summary of IESNA LM-49-2001
Similar to EPCA, section 1.2 of IESNA LM-49-2001 defines ``rated
lifetime'' as the statistically-determined estimate of median
operational lifetime, where median is the total operating time under
which, at normal operating conditions, 50 percent of a large group of
initially installed lamps is expected to be still operating. IESNA LM-
49-2001 prescribes testing lifetime of an incandescent lamp at its
rated voltage, and it requires the lamp to be checked for failure at
certain intervals and to be cooled on a daily basis.
Section 3.2 of IESNA LM-49-2001 provides instrument specifications
that require lamps to be operated at their rated voltage for voltage-
rated lamps or at their rated current for current-rated lamps, and at
60 Hertz (Hz). When using an AC power supply, the voltage wave shape is
to be such that total harmonic distortion does not exceed three percent
of the fundamental. As mentioned previously, the referenced industry
standard also specifies that regardless of whether AC or DC power
supply is used, voltage or current must be regulated to within 0.5 percent of its rated RMS value for the duration of the
lifetime test as a design consideration for the lifetime test system.
IESNA LM-49-2001 specifies test conditions for vibration, temperature,
and airflow. It addresses orientation, spacing, handling, and marking
of the lamps, as well as specifications for the lamp holders.
The method for lamp lifetime testing detailed in IESNA LM-49-2001
allows for an elapsed time meter to monitor operating time. The
referenced industry standard further states that it is permissible to
use video monitoring, current monitoring, or other means that are
designed to provide sufficient temporal accuracy. The procedure
specifies that lamp failure is determined by either visual observation
or automatic monitoring at intervals of no more than 0.5 percent of the
rated lifetime. It requires that for normal lifetime testing, lamps be
cooled to ambient temperature once per day and specifies cooling time
as usually 15 to 30 minutes per day.
3. Accelerated Lifetime Testing
IESNA LM-49-2001 permits accelerated lifetime testing for non-
halogen GSILs. In principle, an accelerated lifetime test measures a
shortened lamp lifetime and scales it to determine the full lifetime of
the lamp, thereby reducing total testing time required and overall test
burden. DOE has tentatively determined, however, that industry lacks a
consistent methodology for developing GSIL scaling factors for halogen
lamps (which are expected to comprise the vast majority of compliant
GSILs). Thus, as detailed in the next section, DOE has tentatively
decided not to allow the use of accelerated lifetime testing for GSILs
as part of this test procedure.
Accelerated lifetime testing involves operating lamps at higher
than rated voltage, thereby forcing the lamp to fail faster. A scaling
factor is used to correlate the measured accelerated lifetime to the
lifetime at the rated voltage. The appropriate scaling factor, critical
in obtaining accurate accelerated lifetime results, is determined by
conducting a certain number of comparison parallel lifetime tests at
rated voltage and overvoltage. The IESNA Lighting Handbook notes that
scaling factors are empirical and that their determination requires
many comparison tests at rated voltages.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition (2000) pp. 2-24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, IESNA LM-49-2001 limits accelerated lifetime testing
methodology to non-halogen lamps. Accurate accelerated lifetime testing
can be difficult to conduct for halogen lamps due to the tungsten-
halogen regenerative cycle. This cycle, intended to increase lamp
lifetime by redepositing evaporated tungsten back onto the filament, is
designed around certain operating temperatures; deviations from the
rated voltage would change the operating temperature and potentially
alter or introduce new modes of lamp failure. Even if accurate scaling
factors (to relate overvoltage lifetime testing to rated voltage
lifetime testing) could be empirically derived for halogen lamps,
unique scaling factors would likely need to be developed for each lamp
design. Alterations in filament or halogen capsule designs could affect
the tungsten-halogen regenerative cycle and, therefore, the scaling
factor. Due to the extensive testing necessary to develop these scaling
factors for each basic model, DOE tentatively concludes that
accelerated lifetime testing for halogen lamps would not significantly
reduce testing burden.
Since few non-halogen GSILs will meet the 2012 energy conservation
standards, and given the minimal impact on testing burden and potential
inaccuracies introduced, DOE has tentatively decided to disallow the
use of accelerated lifetime testing for GSILs as part of this test
procedure. DOE requests comments on its assessment that accelerated
lifetime test should not be incorporated as part of the DOE test
procedure (see Issue 6 in section V.E).
4. Sample Size
For GSIL lifetime measurements, DOE is proposing a minimum sampling
size of 20 lamps: a minimum of two lamps per month for seven months of
production out of a 12-month period. If lamp production occurs in fewer
than seven months out of the year, two or more lamps will be selected
for each month that production exists as evenly as possible to meet the
minimum 20 sample requirement. These seven months do not need to be
consecutive and can be any combination of seven months out of the
twelve available. DOE has tentatively concluded that 20 samples is
consistent with the statutory definition of ``lifetime,'' that requires
that such sample be based on ``statistically large group of lamps.''
This selection of 20 lamps as the sample size is also consistent with
DOE's regulations for measuring lamp efficacy, which currently specify
a sampling size of a minimum of three lamps for each month of
production for a minimum of seven months (not necessarily consecutive)
out of the 12-month period, totaling a minimum of 21 lamps. 10 CFR
429.27 This 21-lamp sample size was selected to promote statistically
valid results without imposing an undue testing burden on
manufacturers. 62 FR 29222, 29229 (May 29, 1997) DOE has chosen 20
samples (an even number) instead of 21 samples in order to facilitate
the calculation of the 50 percent failure rate. This sample size also
allows manufacturers the opportunity to test the same sample set for
measurements of lumen output, wattage, and lifetime, thereby
potentially reducing testing burden. DOE requests comments on this
assessment and whether alternative
[[Page 56669]]
sample sizes should be used instead (see Issue 7 in section V.E).
5. ``Rated Lifetime'' Definition
In addition to incorporating by reference IESNA LM-49-2001 as the
test procedure for GSIL lifetime testing, DOE is also proposing to
define ``rated lifetime'' as the parameter that should be used to
determine whether the lamp meets minimum rated lifetime standards. The
rated lifetime for general service incandescent lamps will be defined
as the length of operating time between first use and failure of 50
percent of the sample size in accordance with test procedures described
in IESNA LM-49-2001. This proposed definition of ``rated lifetime'' is
consistent with the existing statutory definition of ``life'' or
``lifetime,'' which describes this parameter as the length of operating
time of a statistically large group of lamps between first use and
failure of 50 percent of the group in accordance with test procedures
described in the IES Lighting Handbook. (42 U.S.C. 6291(30)(P)) Since
DOE is proposing to adopt IESNA LM-49-2001 as the standard industry
reference for GSIL lifetime testing, the GSIL ``rated lifetime''
definition will reference IESNA LM-49-2001 rather than the IES Lighting
Handbook.
6. Certification Requirements and Laboratory Accreditation
10 CFR 429.12(e) specifies that for most covered products,
including GSILs, certification reports of new models must be submitted
before products are distributed into commerce. However, for GSFLs and
IRLs, because reported values are based on testing of samples over a
12-month period of production, DOE requires manufacturers to submit an
initial certification report prior to or concurrent with distribution
of the new model. This initial certification report filing, describing
how the manufacturer has determined that the new model meets or exceeds
energy conservation standards, allows manufacturers to distribute new
models while completing the 12-month sampling requirement for
certification of GSFLs and IRLs. This initial report is then followed
by a final certification report, based on the full sampling provisions,
to be submitted a year after the first date of manufacture of the new
model.
Since DOE also requires a 12-month sampling period for
certification of GSILs, today's notice is proposing to implement new
model filing requirements, similar to those for GSFLs and IRLs, for
GSILs. Just as with GSFLs and IRLs, DOE is proposing to require that
the final certification report be submitted one year following the
start of manufacturing of the new model. DOE proposes this time period
for final certification for GSIL testing to account for the time it
takes to measure lamp lifetime as part of GSIL testing. Lifetime
testing of a 1000-hour rated lamp (the minimum rated lifetime standard)
would require lamp operation for a minimum of 42 days. Since the sample
is taken over a 12-month span and only requires sampling from 7 months
of the year, DOE believes that several months after the last month of
the sampling period are necessary to complete testing, given that some
GSILs have rated lifetimes longer than 1000 hours. Consequently, DOE is
proposing a total of 12 months after the date of manufacture of the new
model, allowing manufacturers sufficient time to conduct lifetime
testing for all GSILs manufactured in a 12-month production period. DOE
requests comment on its proposal regarding GSIL certification filing
requirements. (See Issue 8 in section V.E).
Additionally, when conducting compliance testing for GSIL lifetime,
DOE proposes to require that such testing be conducted by a facility
accredited by the National Volunteer Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NVLAP) \33\ or by an organization recognized by NVLAP. NVLAP
accreditation is a finding of laboratory competence, certifying that a
laboratory operates in accordance with NVLAP management and technical
requirements. The NVLAP program is described in 15 CFR part 285, and it
encompasses the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025.\34\ DOE has determined
that NVLAP imposes fees of $9,000 and $8,000 on years one and two of
accreditation. For the years following, the fees alternate between
$5,000 and $8,000, with the $8,000 fee corresponding to the on-site
evaluation required every other year. Fees for other accreditation
organizations are expected to be similar. DOE does not expect this
requirement for GSIL lifetime testing to impose a significant burden
for most manufacturers, because efficacy testing of GSILs is already
required to take place at a laboratory that is accredited by either
NVLAP or an NVLAP-recognized organization. Accordingly, manufacturers
should be able to meet this requirement with minimal change or
incremental burden.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ NVLAP is a program administered by the National Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST).
\34\ International Organization for Standardization/
International Electrotechnical Commission, General requirements for
the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC
17025 (available at:-- http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39883).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Effective Date and Compliance Date for the Amended Test Procedures
and Compliance Date for Submitting GSIL Certification Reports
The effective date for these test procedure amendments would be 30
days after publication of the test procedure final rule in the Federal
Register. At that time, manufacturers and importers of covered GSFLs,
IRLs, and GSILs may use the amended test procedure for making
representations of the energy efficiency of each basic model.
Additionally for GSFLs and IRLs, manufacturers may use the amended test
procedure or the existing test procedures to certify compliance with
DOE's test procedure. Should manufacturers or importers elect to use
the new test procedure and applicable sampling plans prior to the
compliance date of the amended test procedure, this would need to be
noted on the certification report.
The compliance date for certifying compliance with the Department's
regulations and for making any representations of the energy efficiency
derived from the revised version of the test procedure for GSFLs, IRLs,
and GSILs is 180 days from the date of publication of the test
procedure final rule in the Federal Register. On or after that date,
any such representations, including those made on marketing materials
and product labels, must be based upon results generated under these
amended test procedures and the applicable sampling plans. At that
time, manufacturers and importers of covered GSFLs, IRLs, and GSILs
must use the amended test procedures when certifying compliance to the
Department. For example, for GSFLs and IRLs after the compliance date,
if the test procedure amendments in conjunction with the applicable
sampling plans proposed today alter the energy use in a manner which
results in the basic model being less efficient, then the manufacturer
or importer would be required to revise the existing certification.
Otherwise, any changes to the certified ratings for GSFLs and IRLs may
be submitted in the next annual certification filing due on the 1st of
March.
To reduce confusion, DOE is proposing to amend the initial
compliance date for submitting GSIL certification reports for those
products subject to standards on January 1, 2012, by approximately 5
months so as to be concurrent with the compliance date of
[[Page 56670]]
the amended test procedure. Thus, under this proposal, for GSILs that
have energy conservation standards effective January 1, 2012,
certification would not be required until 180 days after publication of
the test procedure final rule in the Federal Register. At that time,
these test procedure amendments and sampling plans, including the new
lifetime requirements, would need to be used to develop the certified
ratings in order to certify compliance 180 days after publication of
the test procedure final rule in the Federal Register.
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that test
procedure rulemakings do not constitute ``significant regulatory
actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory
Planning and Review.'' 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
regulatory action was not subject to review under the Executive Order
by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IFRA) for
any rule that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the
agency certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
As required by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small
Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE
published procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that
the potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the DOE rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made
its procedures and policies available on the Office of the General
Counsel's Web site: http://www.gc.doe.gov.
Today's proposed rule would adopt test procedure provisions for
GSFLs and GSILs, primarily through updates to current active industry
testing standards, as well as specification of a procedure for testing
GSIL lifetime. In referencing the updated versions of the industry test
method, DOE anticipates that there would be no incremental increase in
testing cost or burden for covered products, because the updated
versions are not making substantial changes to test setup or
methodology. In this NOPR, DOE is also proposing to establish a test
procedure for GSIL lifetime testing and recommending the incorporation
by reference of IESNA LM-49-2001 as the basis for this test procedure.
The proposed GSIL lifetime test procedure will provide an appropriate
test method for the purposes of compliance with the GSIL minimum
lifetime standard levels established by EISA 2007. DOE has tentatively
determined that the proposed GSIL lifetime test procedure would not
pose undue testing costs or burdens on manufacturers of covered
products. DOE has reviewed the proposed rule under the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the policies and procedures
published on February 19, 2003. For the reasons explained below, DOE
concludes and certifies that this test procedure rulemaking would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has set a size threshold
for manufacturers of GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs that defines those entities
classified as ``small businesses'' for the purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis. DOE used the SBA's small business size standards
to determine whether any small manufacturers of GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs
would be subject to the requirements of the rule. 65 FR 30836, 30849
(May 15, 2000), as amended at 65 FR 53533, 53545 (Sept. 5, 2000) and
codified at 13 CFR part 121. The size standards are listed by North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and industry
description and are available at http://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf. GSFL, GSIL, and IRL manufacturing is
classified under NAICS 335110, ``Electric Lamp Bulb and Part
Manufacturing.'' The SBA sets a threshold of 1,000 employees or less
for an entity to be considered as a small business for this category.
In the 2009 rulemaking that set standards for GSFLs and IRLs, DOE
identified 12 companies as potential small business manufacturers of
GSFLs and IRLs covered by standards. After further research including
interviews with companies, DOE identified only one company as a small
business manufacturer of covered GSFLs and no company as a small
business manufacturer of covered IRLs. 74 FR 34080, 34174 (July 14,
2009) Through an analysis conducted in this rulemaking, DOE identified
six small business manufacturers of covered GSILs (see below for
further details). Since DOE does not anticipate the proposed
incorporation of updated versions of the industry test methods for
GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs would result in significant changes in test
setup and methodology, DOE does not expect a significant economic
impact on small business manufacturers of GSFLs, GSILs and IRLs.
DOE conducted further analysis to determine that the proposed new
test procedure provisions for testing GSIL lifetime would not have a
significant impact on small business manufacturers of GSILs. DOE
compiled a preliminary list of potential small business manufacturers
of GSILs by searching Hoover's and the SBA databases and referencing a
list of small business manufacturers for GSILs identified in the 2009
rulemaking for GSFLs and IRLs.\35\ DOE then determined if the companies
actually manufactured GSILs by reviewing the company Web site and/or
calling the company. Through this process, DOE was able to identify six
small business U.S. manufacturers of GSILs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ The list had been compiled in the advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANOPR) stage of the rulemaking for GSFLs and
IRLs, at which point proposing standards for GSILs was within the
scope of the rulemaking. (See Chapter 3 of the ANOPR TSD; available
at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/pdfs/lamps_anopr_tsd/lamps_tsd_chap3.pdf.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE then estimated the cost of testing GSIL lifetime for a certain
number of lamps. The initial setup for lamp lifetime testing can take
from one day (if using sockets attached to an Edison plug and power
strips) to two weeks (for a custom-built rack). The cost for a custom-
built rack that can accommodate up to 100 lamps could be about $3,000.
DOE understands that manufacturers of GSILs would already have the
other necessary testing instrumentation, because this same equipment is
used for determination of GSIL efficacy.
In addition to materials, labor also contributes to the overall
testing burden of GSIL lifetime testing. The GSIL lifetime test
procedure requires accurate monitoring of operating time and checking
for lamp failure at intervals of 0.5 percent of the rated lifetime
(e.g., five-hour intervals for a lamp with a rated lifetime of 1000
hours). Rather than have a technician inspect the lamp at the end of
each interval, a still camera with a programmable snapshot system to
record lamp operation can reduce the labor cost. Alternatively, a test
lab could monitor operating time using a baffled photodiode pointing at
each lamp location with a software program reading photodiode signals
at regular intervals. This method would increase initial costs by
requiring equipment costing about $18,000 to $20,000 per
[[Page 56671]]
100 lamps and a one-time setup that could take at least a month with
three full-time staff, but which would reduce overall labor costs.
DOE based its estimates of labor costs on the still camera method,
as it expects more laboratories to have this capability. About three
hours per week would be required to review images of 100 lamps, and
assuming the typical average rated lifetime of 1,000 hours, it would
require six weeks to conduct a lifetime test of a lamp. Therefore, a
total of 18 hours would be required to conduct lifetime testing for 100
lamps. DOE used the labor rate of $100 per hour and a sampling size of
20 lamps (see section III.D). DOE surveyed small manufacturers of GSILs
to determine a number of models produced per year by a typical small
business. Based on the six responses received, DOE determined that
small manufacturers are producing anywhere from four to 50 models of
GSILs, with an average of 30 models.\36\ Based on these parameters, the
labor costs of GSIL lifetime testing for one reporting period is
estimated to be $1,800 for four models, $10,800 for 30 models, and
$18,000 for 50 models. In addition, if manufacturers need to build 100-
lamp custom test racks, the initial cost setup is estimated to be
$3,000 for four models (one test rack), $18,000 for 30 models (six test
racks), and $30,000 for 50 models (10 test racks). However, DOE
believes that most GSIL manufacturers would already have sufficient
testing racks for their own internal uses and for FTC labeling
requirement testing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ As noted, these findings were based on a survey of six
small manufacturers of GSIL. Only a few manufacturers had models
that would meet these standards at this time. However, the survey
accounted for all covered GSIL models regardless of whether or not
they would meet the EISA 2007 standards for GSIL, under the
assumption that manufacturers will eventually be producing a
comparable number of compliant models.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the maximum number of 50 models, assuming testing apparatus is
already available, the labor costs to carry out testing to demonstrate
all products comply with standards would be approximately $18,000. In
subsequent years, testing costs would be much smaller, likely less than
10 percent of the initial cost, because only new products or redesigned
products would need to be tested. Assuming a conservative estimate of
$1 million in revenue for a small business, initial testing costs would
represent about two percent of revenue, but when amortized over
subsequent years with little or no testing, testing costs would
represent less than one percent of revenue. In addition, some
businesses may already have lifetime data that could be used for
compliance purposes from previously completed FTC labeling testing.
Based upon its comparison of estimated revenue to estimated testing
costs, DOE has tentatively concluded that labor costs would not be
significant enough to pose a substantial burden on small manufacturers.
DOE requests comments on its analysis of initial setup and labor costs
for conducting lifetime testing of GSILs (see Issue 9 in section V.E).
In this NOPR, DOE is also proposing to require test facilities
conducting GSIL lifetime and efficacy compliance testing to be NVLAP
accredited or accredited by an organization recognized by NVLAP. If
accreditation were sought for the first time, DOE has determined that
NVLAP imposes fees of $9,000 and $8,000 on years one and two of
accreditation. For the years following, the fees alternate between
$5,000 and $8,000, with the $8,000 fee corresponding to the on-site
evaluation required every other year. However, DOE does not expect this
requirement to impose a significant burden for most manufacturers,
because efficacy testing of GSILs is already required to take place at
a laboratory accredited either by NVLAP or a NVLAP-recognized
organization (see section III.D.6).
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis
for this rulemaking. DOE's certification and supporting statement of
factual basis will be provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
SBA for review under 5 U.S.C. 605(b). DOE certifies that this rule
would have no significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. DOE seeks comment regarding whether the proposed amendments
in today's rule would have a significant economic impact on any small
entities (see Issue 9 in section V.E).
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs must certify to DOE that
their products comply with any applicable energy conservation standard.
In certifying compliance, manufacturers must test their products
according to the DOE test procedure for GSFLs, GSILs, or IRLs,
including any amendments adopted for that test procedure. DOE has
established regulations for the certification and recordkeeping
requirements for all covered consumer products and commercial
equipment, including GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs. 76 FR 12422 (March 7,
2011). The collection-of-information requirement for the certification
and recordkeeping is subject to review and approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been approved by
OMB. Public reporting burden for the certification is estimated to
average 20 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this proposed rule, DOE proposes test procedure amendments that
it expects would be used to develop and implement future energy
conservation standards for GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs. DOE has determined
that this rule falls into a class of actions that are categorically
excluded from review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, codified at 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and DOE's
implementing regulations at 10 CFR part 1021. Specifically, this
proposed rule would amend the existing test procedures without
affecting the amount, quality, or distribution of energy usage, and,
therefore, would not result in any environmental impacts. Thus, this
rulemaking is covered by Categorical Exclusion A5 under 10 CFR part
1021, subpart D, Appendix A, which applies to any rulemaking that
interprets or amends an existing rule without changing the
environmental effect of that rule. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 10,
1999), imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have Federalism implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any
action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States and
to carefully assess the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order
also requires agencies to have an accountable process to ensure
meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have Federalism implications.
On March 14, 2000, DOE published a
[[Page 56672]]
statement of policy describing the intergovernmental consultation
process it will follow in the development of such regulations. 65 FR
13735. DOE has examined this proposed rule and has determined that it
would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. EPCA governs and prescribes Federal preemption of State
regulations as to energy conservation for the products that are the
subject of today's proposed rule. States can petition DOE for exemption
from such preemption to the extent, and based on criteria, set forth in
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d)) No further action is required by Executive
Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing regulations and the promulgation
of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996), imposes on Federal
agencies the general duty to adhere to the following requirements: (1)
Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write regulations to
minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988
specifically requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable
effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing
Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden reduction;
(4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines
key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires Executive
agencies to review regulations in light of applicable standards in
sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law,
this rule meets the relevant standards of Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub.
L. 104-4, codified at 2 U.S.C. 1501, et seq.) requires each Federal
agency to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the private sector. For a proposed
regulatory action likely to result in a rule that may cause the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a
Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy.
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) Section 204 of UMRA also requires a Federal
agency to develop an effective process to permit timely input by
elected officers of State, local, and Tribal governments on a proposed
``significant intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an agency plan
for giving notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially
affected small governments before establishing any requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE
published a statement of policy on its process for intergovernmental
consultation under UMRA. 62 FR 12820; also available at http://www.gc.doe.gov. DOE examined today's proposed rule according to UMRA
and its statement of policy and determined that the rule contains
neither an intergovernmental mandate, nor a mandate that may result in
the expenditure of $100 million or more in any year. Accordingly, no
further assessment or analysis is required under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This proposed rule to amend DOE test procedures would not have any
impact on the autonomy or integrity of the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a
Family Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined under Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights'' 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988), that this proposed regulation
would not result in any takings that might require compensation under
the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (Pub. L. 106-554, codified at 44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides
for agencies to review most disseminations of information to the public
under guidelines established by each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452
(Feb. 22, 2002), and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446
(Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed today's proposed rule under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded that it is consistent with
applicable policies in those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB
a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use.
Today's regulatory action to amend the test procedure for measuring
the energy efficiency of GSFLs, GSILs, and IRLs is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 or any successor order.
Moreover, it would not have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy, nor has it been designated as a
significant energy action by the Administrator of OIRA. Therefore, DOE
has tentatively determined that this rule is not a significant energy
action, and, accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy
Effects.
[[Page 56673]]
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
Under section 301 of the Department of Energy Organization Act
(Pub. L. 95-91; 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), DOE must comply with all laws
applicable to the former Federal Energy Administration, including
section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, as amended
by the Federal Energy Administration Authorization Act of 1977. (15
U.S.C. 788; FEAA) Section 32 essentially provides in relevant part
that, where a proposed rule authorizes or requires use of commercial
standards, the notice of proposed rulemaking must inform the public of
the use and background of such standards. In addition, section 32(c)
requires DOE to consult with the Attorney General and the Chairman of
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) concerning the impact of the
commercial or industry standards on competition.
The proposed rule would incorporate testing methods contained in
the following commercial standards: IES LM-9-2009, ``IES Approved
Method for Electrical and Photometric Measurements of Fluorescent
Lamps;'' IES LM-45-2009, ``IES Approved Method for Electrical and
Photometric Measurement of General Service Incandescent Filament
Lamps;'' IESNA LM-49-2001, ``IESNA Approved Method for Life Testing of
Incandescent Filament Lamps;'' and ANSI C78.81-2010, ``American
National Standard for Electric Lamps--Double-Capped Fluorescent Lamps--
Dimensional and Electrical Characteristics.'' The Department has
evaluated these standards and is unable to conclude whether they fully
comply with the requirements of section 32(b) of the FEAA, (i.e., that
they were developed in a manner that fully provides for public
participation, comment, and review). DOE will consult with the Attorney
General and the Chairman of the FTC concerning the impact of these test
procedures on competition, prior to prescribing a final rule.
V. Public Participation
A. Attendance at the Public Meeting
The time, date, and location of the public meeting are listed in
the DATES and ADDRESSES sections at the beginning of this document. If
you plan to attend the public meeting, please notify Ms. Brenda Edwards
at (202) 586-2945 or [email protected]. Please also note that
those wishing to bring laptops into the Forrestal Building will be
required to obtain a property pass. Visitors should avoid bringing
laptops, or allow an extra 45 minutes. As explained in the ADDRESSES
section, foreign nationals visiting DOE Headquarters are subject to
advance security screening procedures.
In addition, you can attend the public meeting via webinar. Webinar
registration information, participant instructions, and information
about the capabilities available to webinar participants will be
published on DOE's Web site at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/incandescent_lamps.html. Participants
are responsible for ensuring their systems are compatible with the
webinar software.
B. Procedure for Submitting Requests To Speak and Prepared General
Statements for Distribution
Any person who has an interest in the topics addressed in this
notice, or who is a representative of a group or class of persons that
has an interest in these issues, may request an opportunity to make an
oral presentation at the public meeting. Such persons may hand-deliver
requests to speak to the address shown in the ADDRESSES section at the
beginning of this notice between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. Requests may also be sent by mail or
email to Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121, or [email protected]. Persons who
wish to speak should include with their request a computer diskette or
CD-ROM in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or text (ASCII) file format
that briefly describes the nature of their interest in this rulemaking
and the topics they wish to discuss. Such persons should also provide a
daytime telephone number where they can be reached.
DOE requests persons selected to make an oral presentation to
submit an advance copy of their statements at least one week before the
public meeting. DOE may permit persons who cannot supply an advance
copy of their statement to participate, if those persons have made
advance alternative arrangements with the Building Technologies
Program. As necessary, requests to give an oral presentation should ask
for such alternative arrangements.
Any person who has plans to present a prepared general statement
may request that copies of his or her statement be made available at
the public meeting. Such persons may submit requests, along with an
advance electronic copy of their statement in PDF (preferred),
Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format, to
the appropriate address shown in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning
of this notice. The request and advance copy of statements must be
received at least one week before the public meeting and may be
emailed, hand-delivered, or sent by mail. DOE prefers to receive
requests and advance copies via email. Please include a telephone
number to enable DOE staff to make a follow-up contact, if needed.
C. Conduct of Public Meeting
DOE will designate a DOE official to preside at the public meeting
and may also use a professional facilitator to aid discussion. The
meeting will not be a judicial or evidentiary-type public hearing, but
DOE will conduct it in accordance with section 336 of EPCA (42 U.S.C.
6306). A court reporter will be present to record the proceedings and
prepare a transcript. DOE reserves the right to schedule the order of
presentations and to establish the procedures governing the conduct of
the public meeting. There shall not be discussion of proprietary
information, costs or prices, market share, or other commercial matters
regulated by U.S. anti-trust laws. After the public meeting, interested
parties may submit further comments on the proceedings as well as on
any aspect of the rulemaking until the end of the comment period.
The public meeting will be conducted in an informal, conference
style. DOE will present summaries of comments received before the
public meeting, allow time for prepared general statements by
participants, and encourage all interested parties to share their views
on issues affecting this rulemaking. Each participant will be allowed
to make a general statement (within time limits determined by DOE),
before the discussion of specific topics. DOE will permit, as time
permits, other participants to comment briefly on any general
statements.
At the end of all prepared statements on a topic, DOE will permit
participants to clarify their statements briefly and comment on
statements made by others. Participants should be prepared to answer
questions by DOE and by other participants concerning these issues. DOE
representatives may also ask questions of participants concerning other
matters relevant to this rulemaking. The official conducting the public
meeting will accept additional comments or questions from those
attending, as time permits. The presiding official will announce any
further procedural rules or modification
[[Page 56674]]
of the above procedures that may be needed for the proper conduct of
the public meeting.
A transcript of the public meeting will be posted on the DOE Web
site and will be included in the docket, which can be viewed as
described in the Docket section at the beginning of this notice. In
addition, any person may buy a copy of the transcript from the
transcribing reporter.
D. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
proposed rule before or after the public meeting, but no later than the
date provided in the DATES section at the beginning of this proposed
rule. Interested parties may submit comments using any of the methods
described in the ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this notice.
Submitting comments via http://www.regulations.gov. The http://www.regulations.gov Web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. Persons viewing comments will see only first and last names,
organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any
documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to http://www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (CBI)). Comments submitted through
http://www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received
through the Web site will waive any CBI claims for the information
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential
Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through http://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that http://www.regulations.gov provides after you have successfully uploaded your
comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand delivery, or mail. Comments and
documents submitted via email, hand delivery, or mail also will be
posted to http://www.regulations.gov. If you do not want your personal
contact information to be publicly viewable, do not include it in your
comment or any accompanying documents. Instead, provide your contact
information on a cover letter. Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. Email submissions are
preferred. If you submit via mail or hand delivery, please provide all
items on a compact disc (CD), if feasible, in which case it is not
necessary to submit printed copies. No telefacsimiles (faxes) will be
accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English, and are free of any defects or
viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email, postal mail, or hand delivery two well-marked copies: one copy
of the document marked confidential including all the information
believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document marked non-
confidential with the information believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email or on a CD, if feasible. DOE will make
its own determination about the confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat
submitted information as confidential include: (1) A description of the
items; (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as
confidential within the industry; (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from other sources; (4) whether the
information has previously been made available to others without
obligation concerning its confidentiality; (5) an explanation of the
competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from
public disclosure; (6) when such information might lose its
confidential character due to the passage of time; and (7) why
disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
Although DOE welcomes comments on any aspect of this proposal, DOE
is particularly interested in receiving comments and views of
interested parties concerning the following issues:
1. DOE requests comments on all aspects of DOE's test procedures
for GSFL, GSIL, and IRL See section III.A for further detail.
2. For GSFL test procedures, DOE requests comments on its proposed
incorporation of IES LM-9-2009, and its tentative conclusion that the
update would neither significantly affect measured lamp efficacy nor
increase testing burden. In particular, DOE requests comments on the
impact on lamp efficacy of high-frequency testing amendments and
modifications to the lamp stabilization procedure in LM-9-2009. See
section III.B.2 for further detail.
3. For GSIL test procedures, DOE requests comments on its proposed
incorporation of IES LM-45-2009, and its tentative conclusion that the
update would neither significantly affect lamp efficacy values nor
impose undue testing burden. See section III.B.3 for further detail.
4. DOE requests comment on whether any amendments to the IRL test
[[Page 56675]]
procedure are necessary. See section III.C for further detail.
5. For GSIL lifetime test procedures, DOE requests comments on its
proposal to incorporate by reference IESNA LM-49-2001 as the basis for
GSIL lifetime testing. See section III.D.1 for further detail.
6. For GSIL lifetime test procedures, DOE requests comments on its
proposal to disallow accelerated lifetime testing as part of the GSIL
test procedure. See section III.D.2 for further detail.
7. DOE requests comments on its proposal to require a minimum
sample size of 20 lamps for GSIL lifetime measurements. See section
III.D.4 for further detail.
8. For GSIL lifetime test procedures, DOE requests comment on its
proposal regarding GSIL certification filing requirements. See section
III.D.6 for further detail.
9. DOE seeks comment regarding whether the proposed amendments in
today's rule would have a significant economic impact on any small
entities. In particular, DOE requests comments on its preliminary
analysis of initial setup and labor costs for conducting lifetime
testing of GSILs. See section IV.B for further detail.
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this notice of
proposed rulemaking.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 429
Administrative practice and procedure, Buildings and facilities,
Business and industry, Energy conservation, Grants programs--energy,
Housing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Technical
assistance.
10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Issued in Washington, DC, September 6, 2011.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Office of Technology
Development, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DOE is proposing to amend
parts 429 and 430 of Chapter II of Title 10, Subchapter D of the Code
of Federal Regulations to read as set forth below:
PART 429--CERTIFICATION, COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT
1. The authority citation for part 429 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317.
2. Section 429.12 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (e)(2); and
b. Adding new paragraph (i)(7).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 429.12 General requirements applicable to certification reports.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) For general service fluorescent lamps, incandescent reflector
lamps, or general service incandescent lamps: Prior to or concurrent
with the distribution of a new basic model, each manufacturer shall
submit an initial certification report listing the basic model number,
lamp wattage, and date of first manufacture (i.e., production date) for
that basic model. The certification report must also state how the
manufacturer determined that the lamp meets or exceeds the energy
conservation standards, including a description of any testing or
analysis the manufacturer performed. Manufacturers of general service
fluorescent lamps, incandescent reflector lamps, and general service
incandescent lamps must submit the certification report required by
paragraph (b) of this section within one year after the first date of
new model manufacture.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(7) General service incandescent lamps, [date to be inserted 180
days from publication of test procedure final rule].
3. Section 429.27 is amended by
a. Removing in paragraph (a)(2)(i), first sentence, ``, general
service incandescent lamp,'';
b. Adding in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) ``and general service
incandescent lamp'' after ``general service fluorescent lamp''; and
removing the words, ``paragraph (a)(2)(i)'' and adding in their place,
the words, ``paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(iii)'';
c. Adding new paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) and (a)(2)(iv); and
d. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(iii).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 429.27 General service fluorescent lamps, general service
incandescent lamps, and incandescent reflector lamps.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) For each basic model of general service incandescent lamp,
for measurements of rated wattage and rated lumen output, samples of
production lamps shall be obtained from a 12-month period, tested, and
the results averaged. A minimum sample of 21 lamps shall be tested. The
manufacturer shall randomly select a minimum of three lamps from each
month of production for a minimum of 7 out of the 12-month period. In
the instance where production occurs during fewer than 7 of such 12
months, the manufacturer shall randomly select 3 or more lamps from
each month of production, where the number of lamps selected for each
month shall be distributed as evenly as practicable among the months of
production to attain a minimum sample of 21 lamps. Any represented
value of rated wattage of a basic model shall be based on the sample
and shall be greater than or equal to the higher of:
(A) The mean of the sample, where:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN14SE11.000
and, x is the sample mean; n is the number of samples; and
xi is the ith sample; Or,
(B) The upper 95 percent confidence limit (UCL) of the true mean
divided by 1.03, where:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN14SE11.001
and
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN14SE11.002
is the sample mean; s is the sample standard deviation; n is the number
of samples; and t0.95 is the t statistic for a 95% two-
tailed confidence interval with n-1 degrees of freedom (from Appendix A
to this subpart).
(iv) For each basic model of general service incandescent lamp, for
measurements of rated lifetime, a minimum sample of 20 lamps shall be
tested. The manufacturer shall randomly select a minimum of two lamps
from each month of production for a minimum of 7 out of the 12-month
period. In the instance where production occurs during fewer than 7 of
such 12 months, the manufacturer shall randomly select two or more
lamps from each month of production, where the number of lamps selected
for each month shall be distributed as evenly as practicable among the
months of production to attain a minimum sample of 20 lamps. The
lifetime shall be represented as the length of operating
[[Page 56676]]
time between first use and failure of 50 percent of the sample size, in
accordance with test procedures described in section 4.2 of Appendix R
to subpart B of part 430 of this chapter.
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) General service incandescent lamps: The testing laboratory's
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)
identification number or other NVLAP-approved accreditation
identification, production dates of the units tested, the rated wattage
in watts (W), the rated lifetime (hours), and the Color Rendering Index
(CRI).
* * * * *
PART 430--ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS
4. The authority citation for part 430 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
5. Section 430.2 is amended by:
a. Removing in paragraph (2) of the definition of ``colored
fluorescent lamp'' the words ``IESNA LM-9'' and adding in their place
``IES LM-9''; and
b. Adding in alphabetical order the definition of ``Rated lifetime
for general service incandescent lamps''.
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 430.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Rated lifetime for general service incandescent lamps means the
length of operating time of a sample of lamps (as defined in Sec.
429.27(a)(2)(iv) of this chapter) between first use and failure of 50
percent of the sample size in accordance with test procedures described
in IESNA LM-49, (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3), as
determined in section 4.2 of Appendix R to subpart B of this part.
* * * * *
6. Section 430.3 is amended by:
a. Removing paragraph (c)(5) and redesignating paragraphs (c)(6)
through (c)(17) as paragraphs (c)(5) through (c)(16);
b. Revising the newly redesignated paragraph (c)(5);
c. Revising paragraphs (k)(2) and (k)(5); and
d. Redesignating paragraph (k)(6) as paragraph (k)(7) and adding
new paragraph (k)(6).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 430.3 Materials incorporated by reference.
* * * * *
(c) ANSI. * * *
(5) ANSI--ANSLG C78.81-2010, Revision of ANSI--IEC C78.81-2005
(``ANSI C78.81''), American National Standard for Electric Lamps--
Double-Capped Fluorescent Lamps-- Dimensional and Electrical
Characteristics, approved January 14, 2010, IBR approved for Sec.
430.2, Sec. 430.32, Appendix Q, Appendix Q1, and Appendix R to Subpart
B.
* * * * *
(k) IESNA. * * *
(2) IES LM-9-09, Revision of IESNA LM-9-99 (``LM-9''), IES Approved
Method for the Electrical and Photometric Measurement of Fluorescent
Lamps, approved January 31, 2009; IBR approved for Sec. 430.2 and
Appendix R to Subpart B.
* * * * *
(5) IES LM-45-09, Revision of IESNA LM-45-00 (``LM-45''), IES
Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric Measurement of
General Service Incandescent Filament Lamps, approved December 14,
2009; IBR approved for Appendix R to Subpart B.
(6) IESNA LM-49-01 (``LM-49''), IESNA Approved Method for Life
Testing of Incandescent Filament Lamps, approved December 1, 2001, IBR
approved for Appendix R to Subpart B.
* * * * *
7. Section 430.23 is amended by adding paragraph (r)(6) to read as
follows:
Sec. 430.23 Test procedures for the measurement of energy and water
consumption.
* * * * *
(r) * * *
(6) The rated lifetime for general service incandescent lamps shall
be equal to the length of operating time of a sample of lamps (as
defined in Sec. 429.27(a)(2)(iv) of this chapter) between first use
and failure of 50 percent of the sample size in accordance with test
procedures described in section 4.2 of Appendix R of this subpart.
* * * * *
8. Section 430.25 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 430.25 Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Testing for fluorescent lamp ballasts performed in accordance with
appendix Q1 to this subpart shall comply with this Sec. 430.25. The
testing for general service fluorescent lamps, general service
incandescent lamps, and incandescent reflector lamps shall be performed
in accordance with Appendix R to this subpart. The testing for medium
base compact fluorescent lamps shall be performed in accordance with
Appendix W of this subpart. This testing shall be conducted by test
laboratories accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NVLAP) or by an accrediting organization
recognized by NVLAP. NVLAP is a program of the National Institute of
Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce. NVLAP standards
for accreditation of laboratories that test for compliance with
standards for fluorescent lamp ballast luminous efficiency (BLE), lamp
efficacy, lamp lifetime, and fluorescent lamp CRI are set forth in 15
CFR part 285. A manufacturer's or importer's own laboratory, if
accredited, may conduct the applicable testing. Testing for BLE may
also be conducted by laboratories accredited by Underwriters
Laboratories or Council of Canada. Testing for fluorescent lamp
ballasts performed in accordance with Appendix Q to this subpart is not
required to be conducted by test laboratories accredited by NVLAP or an
accrediting organization recognized by NVLAP.
9. Appendix Q to subpart B of part 430 is amended by revising
sections 1.5 through 1.10 and 2.1 to read as follows:
Appendix Q to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
1. Definitions
* * * * *
1.5 F40T12 lamp means a nominal 40 watt tubular fluorescent lamp
which is 48 inches in length and one and a half inches in diameter,
and conforms to ANSI C78.81 (Data Sheet 7881-ANSI-1010-1)
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3).
1.6 F96T12 lamp means a nominal 75 watt tubular fluorescent lamp
which is 96 inches in length and one and one-half inches in
diameter, and conforms to ANSI C78.81 (Data Sheet 7881-ANSI-3007-1)
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3).
1.7 F96T12HO lamp means a nominal 110 watt tubular fluorescent
lamp that is 96 inches in length and 1\1/2\ inches in diameter, and
conforms to ANSI C78.81 (Data Sheet 7881-ANSI-1019-1) (incorporated
by reference; see Sec. 430.3).
1.8 F34T12 lamp (also known as a ``F40T12/ES lamp'') means a
nominal 34 watt tubular fluorescent lamp that is 48 inches in length
and 1\1/2\ inches in diameter, and conforms to ANSI C78.81 (Data
Sheet 7881-ANSI-1006-1) (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3).
1.9 F96T12/ES lamp means a nominal 60 watt tubular fluorescent
lamp that is 96 inches in length and 1\1/2\ inches in diameter, and
conforms to ANSI C78.81 (Data Sheet 7881-ANSI-3006-1) (incorporated
by reference; see Sec. 430.3).
1.10 F96T12HO/ES lamp means a nominal 95 watt tubular
fluorescent lamp that is 96 inches in length and 1\1/2\ inches in
diameter, and conforms to ANSI C78.81 (Data
[[Page 56677]]
Sheet 7881-ANSI-1017-1) (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3).
* * * * *
2. Test Conditions
2.1 Measurement of Active Mode Energy Consumption, BEF. The test
conditions for testing fluorescent lamp ballasts shall be done in
accordance with ANSI C82.2 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3). Any subsequent amendment to this standard by the standard
setting organization will not affect the DOE test procedures unless
and until amended by DOE. The test conditions for measuring active
mode energy consumption are described in sections 4, 5, and 6 of
ANSI C82.2. The test conditions described in this section (2.1) are
applicable to section 3.1 of section 3, Test Method and
Measurements. For section 2.1 and 3, ANSI C78.81 (incorporated by
reference; see Sec. 430.3), ANSI C82.1 (incorporated by reference;
see Sec. 430.3), ANSI C82.11 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3), and ANSI C82.13 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3)
shall be used when applying ANSI C82.2 instead of the versions
listed as normative references in ANSI C82.2.
* * * * *
10. Appendix Q1 to subpart B of part 430 is amended by revising
sections 2.1, 2.3.1, and 2.4.1 to read as follows:
Appendix Q1 to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
* * * * *
2. Active Mode Procedure
2.1 Where ANSI C82.2 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3) references ANSI C82.1-1997, the operator shall use ANSI C82.1
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3) for testing low-
frequency ballasts and shall use ANSI C82.11 (incorporated by
reference; see Sec. 430.3) for testing high-frequency ballasts. In
addition, ANSI C78.81 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3),
ANSI C82.1 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3), ANSI C82.11
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3), and ANSI C82.13
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3) shall be used when
applying ANSI C82.2 instead of the versions listed as normative
references in ANSI C82.2.
* * * * *
2.3 Test Setup
2.3.1 The ballast shall be connected to a main power source and
to the fluorescent lamp load according to the manufacturer's wiring
instructions and ANSI C82.1 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3) and ANSI C78.81 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3).
* * * * *
2.4 Test Conditions
2.4.1 The test conditions for testing fluorescent lamp ballasts
shall be done in accordance with ANSI C82.2 (incorporated by
reference; see Sec. 430.3). DOE further specifies that the
following revisions of the normative references indicated in ANSI
C82.2) should be used in place of the references directly specified
in ANSI C82.2: ANSI C78.81 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3), ANSI C82.1 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3),
ANSI C82.3 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3), ANSI C82.11
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3), and ANSI C82.13
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3). All other normative
references shall be as specified in ANSI C82.2.
* * * * *
11. Appendix R to subpart B of part 430 is amended by:
a. Revising the appendix heading;
b. Revising sections 2.1, 2.9, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 4.2.2, and,
4.4.1;
c. Adding new section 4.2.3 and 4.2.3.1; and
d. Removing section 4.5.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix R to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
Average Lamp Efficacy (LE), Color Rendering Index (CRI), Correlated
Color Temperature (CCT), and Lamp Lifetime of Electric Lamps
* * * * *
2. Definitions
2.1 To the extent that definitions in the referenced IESNA and
CIE standards do not conflict with the DOE definitions, the
definitions specified in section 3.0 of IES LM-9 (incorporated by
reference; see Sec. 430.3), section 3.0 of IESNA LM-20
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3), section 3.0 and the
Glossary of IES LM-45 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3),
section 2 of IESNA LM-58 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3), and Appendix 1 of CIE 13.3 (incorporated by reference; see
Sec. 430.3) shall be included.
* * * * *
2.9 Reference condition means the test condition specified in
IES LM-9 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3) for general
service fluorescent lamps, in IESNA LM-20 (incorporated by
reference; see Sec. 430.3) for incandescent reflector lamps, and in
IES LM-45 for general service incandescent lamps (incorporated by
reference; see Sec. 430.3).
3. Test Conditions
3.1 General Service Fluorescent Lamps: For general service
fluorescent lamps, the ambient conditions of the test and the
electrical circuits, reference ballasts, stabilization requirements,
instruments, detectors, and photometric test procedure and test
report shall be as described in the relevant sections of IES LM-9
(incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3).
3.2 General Service Incandescent Lamps: For general service
incandescent lamps, the selection and seasoning (initial burn-in) of
the test lamps, the equipment and instrumentation, and the test
conditions shall be as described in IES LM-45 (incorporated by
reference; see Sec. 430.3).
* * * * *
4. Test Methods and Measurements * * *
4.1.1 The measurement procedure shall be as described in IES LM-
9 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3), except that lamps
shall be operated at the appropriate voltage and current conditions
as described in ANSI C78.375 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3) and in ANSI C78.81 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3) or ANSI C78.901 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3),
and lamps shall be operated using the appropriate reference ballast
at input voltage specified by the reference circuit as described in
ANSI C82.3 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3). If, for a
lamp, both low-frequency and high-frequency reference ballast
settings are included in ANSI C78.81 or ANSI C78.901, the lamp shall
be operated using the low-frequency reference ballast.
* * * * *
4.2 General Service Incandescent Lamps
4.2.1 The measurement procedure shall be as described in IES LM-
45 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3). Lamps shall be
operated at the rated voltage as defined in Sec. 430.2.
4.2.2 The test procedure shall conform to sections 6 and 7 of
IES LM-45 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3), and the
lumen output of the lamp shall be determined in accordance with
section 7 of IES LM-45. Lamp electrical power input in watts shall
be measured and recorded. Lamp efficacy shall be determined by
computing the ratio of the measured lamp lumen output and lamp
electrical power input at equilibrium for the reference condition.
The test report shall conform to section 8 of IES LM-45.
4.2.3 The measurement procedure for testing the lifetime of
general service incandescent lamps shall be as described in IESNA
LM-49 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3). The lifetime
measurement shall be taken by measuring the operating time of a lamp
until failure, expressed in hours, not including any off time. The
measured operating time shall be used to determine the rated
lifetime, which is equal to the length of operating time between
first use and failure of 50 percent of the sample size specified in
Sec. 429.27 of this chapter. The rated lifetime shall be used to
determine whether the lamp meets minimum rated lifetime standards
(see Sec. 430.32(x)(1)(i)(A) and (B)).
4.2.3.1 Accelerated lifetime testing is not allowed. The second
paragraph of section 6.1 of IESNA LM-49 (incorporated by reference;
see Sec. 430.3) is to be disregarded.
* * * * *
4.4 Determination of Color Rendering Index and Correlated Color
Temperature
4.4.1 The CRI shall be determined in accordance with the method
specified in CIE 13.3 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3)
for general service fluorescent lamps. The CCT shall be determined
in accordance with the method specified in IES LM-9 (incorporated by
reference; see Sec. 430.3) and rounded to the nearest 10 kelvin for
general service fluorescent lamps. The CCT shall be determined in
accordance with the CIE 15 (incorporated by reference; see Sec.
430.3) for incandescent lamps. The required spectroradiometric
measurement and characterization shall be conducted in accordance
with the methods set forth in
[[Page 56678]]
IESNA LM-58 (incorporated by reference; see Sec. 430.3)
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-23249 Filed 9-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P