[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61463-61466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25519]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-65439; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2011-68]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12 To Revise
the Current Methodology for Determining When To Halt Trading in All
Stocks Due to Extraordinary Market Volatility
September 28, 2011
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on September 27, 2011, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12 to
revise the current methodology for determining when to halt trading in
all stocks due to extraordinary market volatility. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the Commission's
Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12 to
revise the current methodology for determining when to halt trading in
all stocks due to extraordinary market volatility. The Exchange is
proposing this rule change in consultation with other equity, options,
and futures markets, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA''), and staffs of the Commission and the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission.
Since May 6, 2010, when the markets experienced excessive
volatility in an abbreviated time period, i.e., the ``flash crash,''
the exchanges and FINRA have implemented market-wide measures designed
to restore investor confidence by reducing the potential for excessive
market volatility. Among the measures adopted include pilot plans for
stock-by-stock trading pauses \4\ and related changes to the clearly
erroneous
[[Page 61464]]
execution rules \5\ and more stringent market maker quoting
requirements.\6\ In addition, on April 5, 2011, the equities exchanges
and FINRA filed a plan pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS to
address extraordinary market volatility (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down
Plan'').\7\ As proposed, the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan is designed to
prevent trades in individual NMS stocks from occurring outside
specified price bands.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11.
\5\ NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.10.
\6\ NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.23(a)(1).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64547 (May 25,
2011), 76 FR 31647 (June 1, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Joint CFTC-SEC Advisory Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues
(``Committee'') has recommended that, in addition to the initiatives
already adopted or proposed, the markets should consider reforming the
existing market-wide circuit breakers. Among other things, the
Committee noted that the interrelatedness of today's highly electronic
markets warrants the need to review the present operation of the
system-wide circuit breakers now in place. Specifically, the Committee
recommended that the markets consider replacing the Dow Jones
Industrial Average (``DJIA'') with the S&P 500[reg] Index (``S&P
500''), revising the 10%, 20%, and 30% decline percentages, reducing
the length of trading halts, and allowing halts to be triggered up to
3:30 p.m.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Summary Report of the Committee, ``Recommendations
Regarding Regulatory Responses to the Market Events of May 6, 2010''
(Feb, 18, 2011). The Exchange notes that NYSE Euronext submitted a
comment letter to the Committee that recommended, among other
things, reform of the market-wide circuit breaker rules. See Letter
to Elizabeth Murphy, Secretary, Commission, from Janet M. Kissane,
SVP and Corporate Secretary, NYSE Euronext (July 19, 2010). The
proposed reforms set forth in this rule proposal differ slightly
from the changes recommended in that comment letter, and represent
consensus among the markets of how to address reform of the market-
wide circuit breakers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The exchanges and FINRA have taken into consideration the
Committee's recommendations, and with some modifications, have proposed
changes to market-wide circuit breakers that the Exchange believes will
provide for a more meaningful measure in today's faster, more
electronic markets, of when to halt stocks on a market-wide basis as a
result of rapid market declines.
Background
In October 1988 as part of an effort by the securities and futures
markets to implement a coordinated means to address potentially
destabilizing market volatility, the New York Stock Exchange, LLC
(``NYSE'') and other markets adopted rules governing Trading Halts Due
to Extraordinary Market Volatility (i.e., NYSE Rule 80B).\9\ NYSE Rule
80B provides for market-wide halts in trading at specified levels in
order to promote stability and investor confidence during a period of
significant stress. As the Commission noted in its approval order, NYSE
Rule 80B was intended to enable market participants to establish an
equilibrium between buying and selling interest and to ensure that
market participants have an opportunity to become aware of and respond
to significant price movements. Importantly, the market-wide circuit
breakers were not intended to prevent markets from adjusting to new
price levels; rather, they provide for a speed bump for extremely rapid
market declines.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 26198 (Oct. 19,
1988) (SR-CBOE-88-14, SR-NASD-88-46, SR-NYSE-88-22, SR-NYSE-88-23,
SR-NYSE-88-24, and SR-Amex-88-24). NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12 was
adopted in 2001 when the Pacific Exchange, Inc. filed a rule
proposal to create an electronic trading facility called the
Archipelago Exchange (``ArcaEx''). See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 44983 (Oct. 25, 2001), 66 FR 55225 (Nov. 1, 2001) (SR-
PCX-00-25). The Pacific Exchange, Inc. is now known as NYSE Arca,
and ArcaEx is now known as NYSE Arca Equities.
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its current form,\11\ NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12 provides for
Level 1, 2, and 3 declines and specified trading halts following such
declines. The values of Levels 1, 2 and 3 are calculated at the
beginning of each calendar quarter, using 10%, 20% and 30%,
respectively, of the average closing value of the DJIA for the month
prior to the beginning of the quarter. Each percentage calculation is
rounded to the nearest fifty points to create the Levels' trigger
points. The NYSE disseminates the new trigger levels quarterly to the
media and via an Information Memo and is available on the NYSE's Web
site.\12\ The values then remain in effect until the next quarterly
calculation, notwithstanding whether the DJIA has moved and a Level 1,
2, or 3 decline is no longer equal to an actual 10%, 20%, or 30%
decline in the most recent closing value of the DJIA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The rule was last amended in 1998, when declines based on
specified point drops in the DJIA were replaced with the current
methodology of using a percentage decline that is recalculated
quarterly. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39846 (April 9,
1998), 63 FR 18477 (April 15, 1998) (SR-NYSE-98-06, SR-Amex-98-09,
SR-BSE-98-06, SR-CHX-98-08, SR-NASD-98-27, and SR-Phlx-98-15).
\12\ See e.g., NYSE Regulation Information Memos 11-19 (June 30,
2011) and 11-10 (March 31, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once a Rule 7.12 circuit breaker is in effect, trading in all
stocks halt for the time periods specified below:
Level 1 Halt
Anytime before 2 p.m.--one hour; at or after 2 p.m. but before 2:30
p.m.--30 minutes; at or after 2:30 p.m.--trading shall continue, unless
there is a Level 2 Halt.
Level 2 Halt
Anytime before 1 p.m.--two hours; at or after 1 p.m. but before 2
p.m.--one hour; at or after 2 p.m.--trading shall halt and not resume
for the rest of the day.
Level 3 Halt
At any time--trading shall halt and not resume for the rest of the
day.
Proposed Amendments
As noted above, the Exchange, other equities, options, and futures
markets, and FINRA propose to amend the market-wide circuit breakers to
take into consideration the recommendations of the Committee, and to
provide for more meaningful measures in today's markets of when to halt
trading in all stocks. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 7.12 as follows: (i) Replace the DJIA with the S&P
500; (ii) replace the quarterly calendar recalculation of Rule 7.12
triggers with daily recalculations; (iii) replace the 10%, 20%, and 30%
market decline percentages with 7%, 13%, and 20% market decline
percentages; (iv) modify the length of the trading halts associated
with each market decline level; and (v) modify the times when a trading
halt may be triggered. The Exchange believes that these proposed
amendments update the rule to reflect today's high-speed, highly
electronic trading market while still meeting the original purpose of
Rule 7.12: To ensure that market participants have an opportunity to
become aware of and respond to significant price movements.
First, the Exchange proposes to replace the DJIA with the S&P 500.
The Exchange believes that because the S&P 500 is based on the trading
prices of 500 stocks, as compared to the 30 stocks that comprise the
DJIA, the S&P 500 represents a broader base of securities against which
to measure whether extraordinary market-wide volatility is occurring.
In addition, as noted by the Committee, using an index that correlates
closely with derivative products, such as the E-Mini and SPY, will
allow for a better cross-market measure of market volatility.
Second, the Exchange proposes to change the recalculation of the
trigger values from once every calendar quarter to daily. The Exchange
believes that updating the trigger values daily will better reflect
current market conditions.
[[Page 61465]]
In particular, a daily recalculation will ensure that the percentage
drop triggers relate to current market conditions, and are not compared
to what may be stale market conditions. As noted in the proposed rule,
the daily calculations of the trigger values will be published before
the trading day begins.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Exchange and other markets will advise via Trader
Update the specific methodology for publishing the daily
calculations, as well as the manner by which the markets will halt
trading in all stocks should a Rule 7.12 trading halt be triggered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, the Exchange proposes to decrease the current Level 1, 2,
and 3 declines of 10%, 20%, and 30% to a Level 1 Market Decline of 7%,
a Level 2 Market Decline of 13%, and Level 3 Market Decline of 20%. In
particular, as demonstrated by the May 6, 2010 flash crash, the current
Level 1 10% decline may be too high a threshold before determining
whether to halt trading across all securities. In fact, since adoption,
the markets have halted only once, on October 27, 1997.\14\
Accordingly, to reflect the potential that a lower, yet still
significant decline may warrant a market-wide trading halt, the
Exchange proposes to lower the market decline percentage thresholds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ At that time, the triggers were based on absolute declines
in the DJIA (350 point decrease for a Level 1 halt and 550 point
decrease for a Level 2 halt).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As further proposed, the Exchange would halt trading based on a
Level 1 or Level 2 Market Decline only once per day. For example, if a
Level 1 Market Decline were to occur and trading were halted, following
the reopening of trading, the Exchange would not halt the market again
unless a Level 2 Market Decline were to occur. Likewise, following the
reopening of trading after a Level 2 Market Decline, the Exchange would
not halt trading again unless a Level 3 Market Decline were to occur,
at which point, trading in all stocks would be halted until the primary
market reopens the next trading day.
Fourth, to correspond with the lower percentages associated with
triggering a trading halt, the Exchange also proposes to shorten the
length of the market-wide trading halts associated with each Level. As
proposed, a Level 1 or 2 Market Decline occurring after 9:30 a.m.
Eastern and up to and including 3:25 p.m. Eastern, or in the case of an
early scheduled close, 12:25 p.m. Eastern, would result in a trading
halt in all stocks for 15 minutes.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Consistent with the current Rule 7.12 and NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 1.1(j), the proposed Rule 7.12 uses Pacific Time
instead of Eastern Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that by reducing the percentage threshold,
coupled with the reduced length of a trading halt, the proposed rule
would allow for trading halts for serious market declines, while at the
same time, would minimize disruption to the market by allowing for
trading to continue after the proposed more-abbreviated trading halt.
The Exchange believes that in today's markets, where trading
information travels in micro-second speed, a 15-minute trading halt
strikes the appropriate balance between the need to halt trading for
market participants to assess the market, while at the same time
reducing the time that the market is halted.
Finally, because the proposed Level 1 and Level 2 trading halts
will now be 15 minutes, the Exchange proposes amending the rule to
allow for a Level 1 or 2 Market Decline to trigger a trading halt up to
3:25 p.m. Eastern. Under the current rule, a trading halt cannot be
triggered after 2:30 p.m., and this time corresponds to the need for
the markets both to reopen following a 30-minute halt and to engage in
a fair and orderly closing process. However, as the markets experienced
on May 6, 2010, even if the Level 1 decline had occurred that day,
because the market decline occurred after 2:30 p.m., it would not have
triggered a halt under the current rule. The Committee recommended that
trading halts be triggered up to 3:30 p.m. The Exchange agrees that the
proposed amendments must strike the appropriate balance between
permitting trading halts as late in the day as feasible without
interrupting the closing process.
Accordingly, to accommodate existing NYSE rules concerning closing
procedures, including the publication of imbalance information
beginning at 3:45 p.m. Eastern and the restrictions on entry and
cancellation of market on close (``MOC'') and limit on close (``LOC'')
orders after 3:45 p.m.,\16\ the Exchange proposes that the last Level 1
or Level 2 Market Decline trading halt should be 3:25 p.m. The Exchange
proposes 3:25 p.m. as the cut-off time so that there is time following
the 15-minute trading halt for the markets to reopen before the 3:45
cut-off for entry and cancellation of MOC and LOC orders under Exchange
rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See NYSE Rule 123C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As with current Level 3 declines, under the proposed rule, a Level
3 Market Decline would halt trading for the remainder of the trading
day, including any trading that may take place after 4:00 p.m.,
Eastern, and would not resume until the next trading day.
In addition to these proposed changes, the Exchange proposes to add
to Rule 7.12 how the markets will reopen following a 15-minute trading
halt. In particular, similar to the reopening procedures set forth in
Rule 7.12, the Exchange proposes that if the primary market halts
trading in all stocks, all markets will halt trading in those stocks
until the primary market has resumed trading or notice has been
provided by the primary market that trading may resume. As further
proposed, if the primary market does not re-open a security within 15
minutes following the end of the trading halt, other markets may resume
trading in that security.
The Exchange proposes to implement the changes to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 7.12 at the same time that the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan,
if approved, is implemented.
2. Statutory Basis
The basis under the Act for these proposed rule changes are [sic]
the requirement under Section 6(b)(5)\17\ that an Exchange have rules
that are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. Specifically, this rule proposal
supports the objectives of perfecting the mechanism of a free and open
market and the national market system because it promotes uniformity
across markets concerning when and how to halt trading in all stocks as
a result of extraordinary market volatility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and
[[Page 61466]]
publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-
regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed
changes to the market-wide circuit breaker regime are consistent with
the Act. The Commission specifically requests comment on the following:
As discussed above, the proposed rule change would narrow
the percentage market declines that would trigger a market-wide halt in
trading. How would the proposed changes interact with the existing
single-stock circuit breaker pilot program \18\ or, if approved, the
proposed NMS Plan to establish a limit-up/limit-down mechanism for
individual securities? \19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64735 (June 23,
2011), 76 FR 38243 (June 29, 2011) (SR-BATS-2011-016; SR-BYX-2011-
011; SR-BX-2011-025; SR-CBOE-2011-049; SR-CHX-2011-09; SR-EDGA-2011-
15; SR-EDGX-2011-14; SR-FINRA-2011-023; SR-ISE-2011-028; SR-NASDAQ-
2011-067; SR-NYSE-2011-21; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-32; SR-NYSEArca-2011-26;
SR-NSX-2011-06; SR-Phlx-2011-64) (approving the ``Phase III Pilot
Program''). The Phase III Pilot Program has been extended through
January 2012. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release 65094
(August 10, 2011), 76 FR 50779 (August 16, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-
011).
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64547 (May 25,
2011), 76 FR 31647 (June 1,
2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To what extent could the concurrent triggering of single
stock circuit breakers in many S&P 500 Index stocks lead to
difficulties in calculating the index? Would the triggering of many
single stock circuit breakers in a general market downturn cause the
index calculation to become stale and thereby delay the triggering of
the market-wide circuit breaker?
Should the market-wide circuit breaker be triggered if a
sufficient number of single-stock circuit breakers or price limits are
triggered, and materially affect calculations of the S&P 500 Index?
Should market centers implement rules that mandate
cancellation of pending orders in the event a market-wide circuit
breaker is triggered? If so, should such a rule require cancellation of
all orders or only certain order types (e.g., limit orders)? Should all
trading halts trigger such cancellation policies or should the
cancellation policies apply only to a Level 3 Market Decline?
Should some provision be made to end the regular trading
session if a market decline suddenly occurs after 3:25 p.m. but does
not reach the 20% level?
In the event of a Level 3 Market Decline, should some
provision be made for the markets to hold a closing auction?
Should the primary market have a longer period (e.g., 30
minutes) to reopen trading following a Level 2 Market Decline before
trading resumes in other venues?
In the event of a Level 3 Market Decline, should the
markets wait for the primary market to reopen trading in a particular
security on the next trading day before trading in that security
resumes?
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-68 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca- 2011-68. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of NYSE
Arca. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEArca-2011-68 and should be submitted on or before October 25, 2011.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-25519 Filed 10-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P