[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 5, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61597-61599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25416]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Parts 18 and 19
RIN 2105-AD60
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments:
DOT Amendments on Regulations on Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements With Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations
AGENCY: Department of Transportation (DOT), Office of the Secretary
(OST).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation (DOT) is adopting a public
proposal on Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local
Governments; Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations. The rule
amends Department of Transportation regulations on uniform
administrative requirements for grants and agreements with Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals and other Non-profit Organizations.
Specifically, the DOT is making requirements for these grants and
agreements consistent with the uniform administrative requirements for
grants and cooperative agreements to State and Local governments. In
addition, this rule updates references to applicable cost principles
for grants and cooperative agreements with State and Local Governments
that appear in current Department of Transportation regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective November 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Shields, Office of the Senior
Procurement Executive, Office of Administration (M-61), (202) 366-
4268, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office
hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Background
Regulations governing two types of U.S. Department of
Transportation grant and cooperative agreements recipients are found in
Parts 18 and 19 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations:
1. 49 CFR part 18: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.
2. 49 CFR part 19: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and
Other Non-Profit Organizations.
Both of these parts contain a provision that governs allowable
costs. However, 49 CFR 18.22 imposes specific limitations on the use of
grant funds while 49 CFR 19.27 merely lists cost principles applicable
to each kind of grant and agreement recipient. Specifically, under 49
CFR 18.22(a), grant funds may only be used for:
(1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-type
contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments to
fixed-price contractors; and
(2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not any
fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the grantee
or subgrantee.
Public comments on this matter were solicited in a Federal Register
notice dated May 2, 2008. Only one comment was received, from Robert
Taylor, regarding the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) cost
principle circulars as well as revisions prohibiting the payment of
profit or fee to grantees and subgrantee covered by 49 CFR part 19.
This comment did not pertain to the content of the proposed rule.
Therefore, we are adopting the proposed rule without change.
This rule imposes the same limitation on the use of funds used for
Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals,
and Other Non-Profit Organizations as there are on the use of funds
used for Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements to State and Local Governments.
In addition, this rule updates references to applicable cost
principles for grants and cooperative agreements with State and Local
Governments that appear in 49 CFR 18.22(b) and include comparable
updates references in 49 CFR 19.27(b). These updated references are
necessary in light of the establishment of title 2 of the Code of
Federal Regulations in 2004. Subtitle A of title 2 of the Code of
Federal Regulations consists of government-wide guidance from the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to Federal agencies for grants
and other financial assistance and nonprocurement agreements that
previously had been contained in seven separate OMB circulars and other
OMB policy documents. Currently, 49 CFR 18.22(b) references three
specific OMB circulars that are now codified in several Parts in
chapter II, subtitle A of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
This rule amends 49 CFR 18.22(b) by replacing the citations to these
former OMB circulars with the appropriate references in title 2 of the
Code of Federal Regulations and would reflect these same changes in 49
CFR 19.27(b).
The rule also makes minor referencing revisions to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) cost principle circulars and, consistent
with OMB materials, revises prohibitions on payment of profit or fee to
grantees and subgrantees covered by 49 CFR part 19. The revised
referencing is needed as the OMB cost circulars have been published in
Title II of the Code of Federal Regulations since August 2005. However,
these OMB circulars are only published as guidance (see 2 CFR
1.105(a)). Also, the OMB circular number has been retained in the title
of each circular, for example, 2 CFR part 225, Cost Principles for
State and Local Governments (OMB Circular A-87).
The title for the CFR part 19, which includes the OMB Circular
number in the title, is included in the reference for all three cost
principles. In addition, this makes the formatting of all titles in 49
CFR sections 18.22 and 18.27 consistent.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The DOT has determined that this document does not constitute a
significant rule within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 or within
the meaning of Department of Transportation regulatory policies and
procedures. DOT anticipates that the
[[Page 61598]]
economic impact of this rule will be minimal because the effect of the
rule is simply to make similar provisions consistent with each other.
These changes do not adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of
the economy. In addition, the change does not interfere with any action
taken or planned by another agency and does not materially alter the
budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354,
5 U.S.C. 60l-612) the Department has evaluated the effects of this
proposed action on small entities. This ruledoes not have any economic
effects, let alone significant effects, on anyone. This rulemaking
establishes the same limitation on the use of funds for both Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Non-Profit Organizations and Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. The
amendment does not change or limit the potential eligibility of any
small entity. For these reasons, the DOT certifies that this action
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, March 22, 1995,
109 Stat. 48). Indeed, it does not impose any mandates. This rule will
not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in
any one year (2 U.S.C. 1532).
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
This rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, and the DOT has determined
that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism assessment. The DOT has also
determined that this rule does not preempt any State law or State
regulation or affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State
governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number [Insert
number], [Insert Program Name]. The regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal
programs and activities [apply/do not apply] to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they
conduct, sponsor, or require through regulations. The DOT has
determined that this rule does not contain collection of information
requirements for the purposes of the PRA.
National Environmental Policy Act
The agency has analyzed this rule for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321) and has determined
that this rule does not have any effect on the quality of the
environment.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Parts 18 and 29
Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs, Allowable
costs, Cooperative agreements.
Issued this 21st day of September 2011, at Washington, DC.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary of Transportation.
In consideration of the foregoing, the DOT amends, title 49, Code
of Federal Regulations, Parts 18 and 19, as set forth below:
PART 18--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
0
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR part 18 continues to read as
follows.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a).
0
2. In Sec. 18.22, revise the table in paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 18.22 Allowable costs.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the costs of a Use the principles in--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, local or federal-recognized 2 CFR part 225.
Indian tribal government.
Private nonprofit organization other 2 CFR part 230.
than an (1) Institution of higher
education, (2) hospital, or (3)
organization named in 2 CFR part 230,
Appendix C, as not subject to that
part.
Institutions of Higher Education....... 2 CFR part 220.
For-profit organizations other than a 48 CFR part 31. Contract Cost
hospital, commercial organization or a Principles and Procedures, or
non-profit organization listed in 2 uniform cost accounting
CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not standards that comply with
subject to that part. cost principles acceptable to
the Federal agency.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 19--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND
AGREEMENTS WITH INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION, HOSPITALS, AND
OTHER NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
0
3. The authority citation for 49 CFR part 19 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a).
0
4. Revise Sec. 19.27 to read as follows:
Sec. 19.27 Allowable Costs.
(a) Limitation on use of funds. Grant funds may be used only for:
(1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-type
contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments to
fixed-price contractors; and
(2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not any
fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the grantee
or subgrantee.
(b) Applicable cost principles. For each kind of recipient, there
is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs.
Allowability of costs shall be determined according to the cost
principles applicable to the entity organization incurring the costs.
The following chart lists the kinds of organization and the applicable
cost principles:
[[Page 61599]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the costs of a Use the principles in--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, local or federal-recognized 2 CFR part 225.
Indian tribal government.
Private nonprofit organization other 2 CFR part 230.
than an (1) Institution of higher
education, (2) hospital, or (3)
organization named in 2 CFR part 230,
Appendix C, as not subject to that
circular.
Institutions of Higher Education....... 2 CFR part 220.
Hospitals.............................. 45 CFR part 74, Appendix E,
``Principles for Determining
Costs Applicable to Research
and Development under Grants
and Contracts with
Hospitals.''
For-profit organizations other than a 48 CFR part 31. Contract Cost
hospital, commercial organization or a Principles and Procedures, or
non-profit organization listed in 2 uniform cost accounting
CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not standards that comply with
subject to that part. cost principles acceptable to
the Federal agency.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2011-25416 Filed 10-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P