[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1463-1464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-248]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-892]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People's Republic of China:
Final Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 6, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary intent to rescind the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet
pigment 23 (CVP-23) from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ This
administrative review covers Toyo Ink Mfg. America, LLC and Toyo Ink
Mfg. Co., Ltd. (collectively, Toyo) for the December 1, 2009, through
November 30, 2010, period of review (POR). Toyo provided a
certification of no sales. As the Department's review of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) import data confirmed that there
[[Page 1464]]
were no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise during the POR,
we preliminarily determined that Toyo did not have reviewable entries
during the POR. Therefore, because there were no entries on which to
assess duties, the Department preliminarily determined to rescind this
review and gave interested parties an opportunity to comment. We did
not receive comments on the Preliminary Results. We are therefore
rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
CVP-23 from the PRC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Intent To Rescind Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 76 FR 55003 (September 6, 2011) (Preliminary
Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6312 or (202) 482-0469, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As noted above, on September 6, 2011, the Department published in
the Federal Register the Preliminary Results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on CVP-23 from the PRC. The
Department did not receive comments from interested parties on our
Preliminary Results.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is carbazole violet pigment
23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-
30-1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3',2'-m]
triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, 15-diethy-5,15-dihydro-, and
molecular formula of C 34 H 22 C l2 N 4 O 2.\2\ The subject merchandise
includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder, paste, wet
cake) and finished pigment in the form of presscake and dry color.
Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., pigments dispersed in
oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included within the
scope of this order. The merchandise subject to this order is
classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description
of the scope of the order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The brackets do not indicate ``business proprietary
information'' but rather are part of the chemical formula.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of the Review
Based on its analysis of the record information, the Department
preliminarily determined that the merchandise in the CBP data and the
entry documentation on the record was not subject to the scope of the
antidumping duty order on CVP-23 from the PRC. Accordingly, in the
Preliminary Results, the Department indicated that it intended to
rescind this administrative review because there was no information on
the record which indicated that Toyo made sales, shipments, or entries
to the United States of subject merchandise during the POR. We did not
receive comments concerning the Preliminary Results. Therefore, the
Department continues to find that the merchandise reflected in the CBP
data and entry documentation on the record is not subject to the scope
of the antidumping duty order on CVP-23 from the PRC. Furthermore,
because Toyo is the only company subject to this administrative review,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our
practice,\3\ we are rescinding this review of the antidumping duty
order on CVP-23 from the PRC for the December 1, 2009, through November
30, 2010 POR. The Department intends to instruct CBP fifteen days after
the publication of this notice to liquidate such entries with respect
to the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China:
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 53408
(August 26, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended and
19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: January 3, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-248 Filed 1-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P