[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14509-14510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5877]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. EESEP0216]
State Energy Program and Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block
Grant (EECBG) Program; Request for Information
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Office of
the General Counsel, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI); request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) is
interested in continuing to promote the use of financing mechanisms by
grantees of the State Energy Program (SEP) and Energy Efficiency and
Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) program, in support of energy
efficiency and renewable energy activities. To facilitate this process
and to allow interested parties to provide suggestions, comments, and
information, DOE is publishing this request for information. This
request identifies several areas on which DOE is particularly
interested in receiving information; however, any input and suggestions
considered relevant to the topic are welcome.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested by April 11,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively,
interested persons may submit comments, identified by docket number
EESEP0216, by any of the following methods:
Email: to christine.platt@ee.doe.gov. Include EESEP0216 in
the subject line of the message.
Mail: Christine Platt Patrick, U.S. Department of Energy,
Mailstop EE-2K, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121, Phone: (202) 287-1546. Please submit one signed paper original.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Christine Platt Patrick, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121, Phone: (202) 287-1546. Please submit one signed paper
original.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this request.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents, or
comments received, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Platt Patrick, Policy
Advisor, U.S Department of Energy, Weatherization and Intergovernmental
Program, Mailstop EE-2K, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121, Telephone: (202) 287-1546, Email:
christine.platt@ee.doe.gov. For legal issues contact Chris Calamita,
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, Forrestal
Building, Mailstop GC-71, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC
20585, Telephone: (202) 586-1777, Email:
christopher.calamita@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority and Background
The Office of Weatherization and Intergovernmental Programs (OWIP)
is seeking to promote the use of ``evergreen funds'' among its
grantees. ``Evergreen funds'' describes generally a use of funds that
would allow a grantee to rely on an initial amount of funding to
periodically provide support to eligible projects in an on-going basis,
for example through a revolving loan fund (RLF) program or a loan loss
reserve (LLR) program.
SEP is authorized under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 6321 et seq.) Evergreen funds such as RLFs and LLRs
are eligible uses of funds under SEP to the extent that the activities
supported by the loans are eligible activities under the program. The
implementing regulations for SEP expressly identify RLFs as an eligible
use of SEP funds (10 CFR 420.18(d)).
Title V, Subtitle E of the Energy Independence and Security Act, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 17151-17158) authorizes the Department to administer
the EECBG program. Evergreen funds such as revolving loan funds (RLF)
and loan loss reserves (LLR) are eligible uses of funds under the EECBG
Program to the extent that the activities supported by the loans are
eligible activities under the program. EECBG grantees must comply with
statutory law regarding RLFs. 42 U.S.C. 17155(b)(3)(B) mandates a
limitation on the use of funds for the establishment (i.e., the
capitalization) of RLFs by formula-eligible units of local governments
and formula-eligible tribes equal to the greater of 20 percent of the
grantee's allocation or $250,000. Funds used for administrative costs
to set up a RLF are not subject to this restriction, but are subject to
the general limitations established by statute on administrative costs.
For both SEP and the EECBG Program, grantee arrangements for
leveraging additional public and private sector funds, including
rebates, grants, and other incentives, must be arranged to ensure that
Federal funds go to support eligible activities listed in 42 U.S.C.
6322(d)(5)(A) for SEP and 42 U.S.C. 17154(3)-(13) for EECBG. The
leveraging of funds may be accomplished through mechanisms such as
partnerships with third party lenders, co-lending, third party
administration of loans, and loan loss reserves.
The Department would like to continue to promote the use of
evergreen funds by grantees of the SEP and EECBG programs. The
Department is issuing this initial request for information to allow
interested parties an opportunity to provide information that will
assist DOE in continuing to promote these mechanisms.
Public Participation
A. Submission of Information
DOE will accept comments in response to this RFI under the timeline
provided in the DATES section above. Comments submitted to the
Department through the eRulemaking Portal or by email should be
provided in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or text file format.
Those responding should avoid the use of special characters or any form
of encryption, and wherever possible, comments should include the
electronic signature of the author. Comments submitted to the
Department by mail or hand delivery/courier should include one signed
original paper copy. No telefacsimiles will be accepted.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will become a matter
of public record and will be made publicly available.
The Department encourages interested parties to contact DOE if they
would like to meet in person to discuss their comments. The
Department's policy
[[Page 14510]]
governing ex parte communications is posted on the Office of the
General Counsel's Web site at: http://www.gc.energy.gov/1309.htm.
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Information
For this RFI, DOE requests comments, information, and
recommendations on the following concepts for the purpose of the
continued use of evergreen funds by SEP and EECBG grantees. As set
forth below, we seek comment on DOE's requirements for (1) Types of
Evergreen Funds; (2) Ending an Evergreen Fund After The End of the
Grant Period; (3) Monitoring; and (4) Reporting. The sequence of these
questions does not reflect any specific DOE preference.
(1) Types of Evergreen Funds
a. Under existing Department rules, evergreen funds such as RLFs
and LLRs are eligible uses of funds under the SEP and EECBG Programs to
the extent that the activities supported by the loans are eligible
activities under the program. DOE would like to continue to promote the
use of these types of evergreen funds. Which types of evergreen funds
are being used by grantees and subgrantees in both programs? What are
the costs and benefits of using these types of evergreen funds?
b. Currently, the SEP and EECBG regulations allow a grantee to
elect to use a third party to administer evergreen funds. What recourse
should be available for a grantee if a third party fails to follow
through on properly administering the financing mechanism? Should that
recourse be available if the third party fails just once to properly
administer a financing mechanism? Should DOE disallow a third party
with a history of poor performance from acting as a third party
representative?
(2) Ending an Evergreen Fund After the End of the Grant Period
Currently, the SEP and EECBG programs allow grantees to end or
reduce funding for a RLF program, LLR, or other eligible financing
program at any time as long as any remaining funds are used by the
grantee for an eligible purpose after submitting and finalizing an
amendment through the DOE Project Officer. Alternatively, the funds may
be returned to DOE.
(3) Periodic Reporting
a. DOE is considering periodic reporting by grantees that operate
evergreen funds that continue beyond the grant period specified in the
Recovery Act grant awards. This reporting would be separate from
reporting requirements for annual appropriated funds in both programs.
DOE seeks comment on whether DOE periodic reporting according to
specified conditions and criteria.
b. With regard to such periodic reporting, the Department seeks
comment on the following conditions and criteria:
Information Flow
(i) Should reporting occur more frequently than on an annual basis?
(ii) DOE requests comment on the types of information that grantees
can provide on evergreen funds, for example how many loans were issued
in the period, what types of loans, the dollar amount of loans, what
projects were completed, what loans were paid back.
(iii) DOE requests comment on when information on a loan that is
defaulted upon can be provided to DOE and what other information
grantees can provide in this situation.
Cost
(i) DOE requests comments regarding the cost burden placed on
grantees for the above described reporting. Please provide a detailed
description of the anticipated costs and supporting information.
(4) Monitoring
a. DOE is considering periodic monitoring that would be applicable
to all evergreen funds that continue beyond the grant period specified
in the Recovery Act grant awards. This requirement would be separate
from monitoring requirements for annual appropriated funds in both
programs. DOE seeks comment on whether grantees should conduct periodic
monitoring according to specified conditions and criteria.
b. With regard to such periodic monitoring, the Department seeks
comment on the following conditions and criteria:
Information Flow
(i) Should monitoring occur on more than an annual basis?
(ii) DOE requests comment on the types of information that grantees
can provide on evergreen funds, for example how many loans were issued
in the period, what types of loans, the dollar amount of loans, what
projects were completed, what loans were paid back.
(iii) DOE requests comment on when information on a loan that is
defaulted upon can be provided to DOE and what other information
grantees can provide in this situation.
(iv) Should monitoring be performed by an independent third party,
in addition to DOE monitoring?
Cost
(i) DOE requests comments regarding the anticipated cost burden
placed on grantees for the above described monitoring. Please provide a
detailed description of the costs and supporting information.
Docket: For direct access to the docket to read background
documents, or comments received, visit the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at http://www.regulations.gov.
Procedural Requirements: Today's regulatory action has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under section
3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'',
58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993).
Statutory Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6321 et seq. and 42 U.S.C.
17154(14).
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 6, 2012.
AnnaMaria Garcia,
Acting Program Manager, Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2012-5877 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P