[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15590-15591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6176]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DoD-2012-OS-0035]
32 CFR Part 319
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, DoD.
ACTION: Direct final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) is proposing to update the
DIA Privacy Act Program by adding an exemption to accurately describe
the basis for exempting the records in the system of records notice
LDIA 0660, Security and Counterintelligence Records. This direct final
rule makes nonsubstantive changes to the Defense Intelligence Agency
(DIA) Privacy Program rules. These changes will allow the Department to
add an exemption rule to the DIA Privacy Program rules that will exempt
applicable Department records and/or material from certain portions of
the Privacy Act. This will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of
DoD's program by preserving the exempt status of the applicable records
and/or material when the purposes underlying the exemption(s) are valid
and necessary. This rule is being published as a direct final rule as
the Department of Defense does not expect to receive any adverse
comments, and so a proposed rule is unnecessary.
DATES: The rule is effective on May 25, 2012 unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments will
be accepted on or before May 15, 2012. If DoD receives a significant
adverse comment, the Department will publish a withdrawal of this
direct final rule in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark
Center Drive, 2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Theresa Lowery at (202) 231-1193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Direct Final Rule and Significant Adverse Comments
DoD has determined this rulemaking meets the criteria for a direct
final rule because it involves nonsubstantive changes dealing with
DoD's management of its Privacy Progams. DoD expects no opposition to
the changes and no significant adverse comments. However, if DoD
receives a significant adverse comment, the Department will publish a
withdrawal of this direct final rule in the Federal Register. A
significant adverse comment is one that explains: (1) Why the direct
final rule is inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's
underlying premise or approach; or (2) why the direct final rule will
be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. In determining whether
a comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, DoD will
consider whether it warrants a substantive response in a notice and
comment process.
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in these Executive orders.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that this Privacy Act rule for the
Department of Defense does not have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it is concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
Public Law 95-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no additional information collection requirements on the
public under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that this Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the
Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rule
does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 319
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 319 is amended as follows:
PART 319--DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR Part 319.13 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
[[Page 15591]]
0
2. Section 319.13 is amended by revising paragraph (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 319.13 Specific exemptions.
* * * * *
(e) System identifier and name: LDIA 0660, Security and
Counterintelligence Files.
(1) Exemption: Any portion of this record system which falls within
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), (k)(5) and (k)(6) may be exempt
from the following subsections of 5 U.S.C. 552a: (c)(3), (d), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I).
(2) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), (k)(5) and (k)(6).
(3) Reasons: The reasons for asserting these exemptions are to
ensure the integrity of the adjudication process used by the Agency to
determine the suitability, eligibility or qualification for Federal
service with the Agency and to make determinations concerning the
questions of access to classified materials and activities. The proper
execution of this function requires that the Agency have the ability to
obtain candid and necessary information in order to fully develop or
resolve pertinent information developed in the process. Potential
sources, out of fear or retaliation, exposure or other action, may be
unwilling to provide needed information or may not be sufficiently
frank to be a value in personnel screening, thereby seriously
interfering with the proper conduct and adjudication of such matters;
and protects information used for medical, psychological evaluations,
security questionnaires and polygraph testing.
* * * * *
Dated: February 28, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-6176 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P