[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15602-15604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6382]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2011-1120]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Spa Creek and
Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing special local regulations
during the swim segment of the ``TriRock Triathlon Series'', a marine
event to be held on the waters of Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor on May
12, 2012. These special local regulations are necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is
intended to temporarily restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the Spa
Creek and Annapolis Harbor during the event.
DATES: This rule is effective and will be enforced from 6 a.m. to 9:45
a.m. on May 12, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2011-1120 and are available online by going to
http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1120 in the ``Search''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, MD; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected].
If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager,
[[Page 15603]]
Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On January 18, 2012, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Spa
Creek and Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD'' in the Federal Register (77
FR 11). We received no comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
On Saturday, May 12, 2012, Competitor Group Inc. of San Diego,
California, will sponsor the ``TriRock Triathlon Series'' in Annapolis,
Maryland. The swim segment of the event will occur from 6:30 a.m. to
9:15 a.m. and will be located in Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor. Up to
300 swimmers will operate on a 500-meter course located between the
Annapolis City Dock and the confluence of the Spa Creek with the Severn
River. The swimmers will be supported by sponsor-provided watercraft.
The start and finish will be located at the Annapolis City Dock. A
portion of the swim course will impede the federal navigation channel.
Due to the need for vessel control during the event, the Coast Guard
will temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the event area to provide
for the safety of participants, spectators and other transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none was held.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. We expect the economic
impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation
under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation will prevent traffic from transiting a portion
of Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor during the event, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant due to the limited duration that the
regulated area will be in effect and the extensive advance
notifications that will be made to the maritime community via the Local
Notice to Mariners and marine information broadcasts, so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule would affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in the effected portions of Spa Creek and
Annapolis Harbor during the event.
Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a portion
of the Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor during the event, this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons: Though the regulated area extends
across the entire width of the waterway, this rule would be in effect
for only a limited period; and before the enforcement period, we will
issue maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly. All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this regulated area can
be contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on marine band radio
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of
[[Page 15604]]
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is
not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule involves implementation of
regulations within 33 CFR Part 100 applicable to organized marine
events on the navigable waters of the United States that could
negatively impact the safety of waterway users and shore side
activities in the event area. The category of water activities includes
but is not limited to sail boat regattas, boat parades, power boat
racing, swimming events, crew racing, canoe and sail board racing. An
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. Add a temporary section, Sec. 100.35T05-1120 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35T05-1120 Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Spa
Creek and Annapolis Harbor, Annapolis, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area: All
waters of the Spa Creek and Annapolis Harbor, within lines connecting
the following positions: from position latitude 38[deg]58'34'' N,
longitude 076[deg]29'05'' W, thence to position latitude 38[deg]58'27''
N, longitude 076[deg]28'55'' W, and from position latitude
38[deg]58'40'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'49'' W to position latitude
38[deg]58'32'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'45'' W. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations. (1) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander
may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol vessel, a
vessel or person in the regulated area shall immediately comply with
the directions given. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
(2) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this regulated area can be
contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on marine band radio VHF-
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio announcing specific event date
and times.
(d) Enforcement period: This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
to 9:45 a.m. on May 12, 2012.
Dated: February 23, 2012.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2012-6382 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P