[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 91 (Thursday, May 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27448-27449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11292]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Amended Notice of Intent To Revise the Scope of an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Recapitalization of Infrastructure Supporting
Naval Spent Nuclear Fuel at the Idaho National Laboratory
AGENCY: Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended Notice of Intent to Revise the Scope of an
Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of NEPA (40 CFR part 1500-1508), and the Department of
Energy (DOE) implementing procedures (10 CFR part 1021), the DOE Naval
Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP) announces its intent to revise the
scope to the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the
Recapitalization of Naval Spent Nuclear Fuel Handling and Examination
Facilities at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The NNPP issued its
Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare the EIS for the Recapitalization of
Naval Spent Nuclear Fuel Handling and Examination on July 20, 2010 (75
FR 42082).
DATES: The NNPP invites interested parties to comment on the revised
scope of the EIS. NNPP will consider all comments received by June 11,
2012, and to the extent practical comments received after that date, in
the preparation of the EIS.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the revised scope of the EIS may be
submitted by mailing to: Ms. Samantha O'Hara (08U-Naval Reactors),
Naval Sea Systems Command, 1240 Isaac Hull Avenue SE., Stop 8036,
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376-8036.
Comments provided by email should be submitted to
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about this
project, contact Ms. Samantha O'Hara, as described above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NNPP is responsible for all aspects of
U.S. Navy nuclear power and propulsion. These responsibilities include
design, maintenance, and safe operation of nuclear propulsion systems
throughout their operational life cycles. A crucial component of this
mission, naval spent nuclear fuel handling, occurs at the end of a
nuclear propulsion system's useful life. Once a naval nuclear core is
depleted, the NNPP is responsible for removal of the spent nuclear fuel
through a defueling or refueling operation. Both operations remove the
spent nuclear fuel from a reactor core, but a refueling operation also
involves installing new fuel into the reactor core, allowing the
nuclear-powered ship to be redeployed into the U.S. Navy fleet. After
the naval spent nuclear fuel has been removed from an aircraft carrier
or submarine, NNPP spent fuel handling includes the subsequent
transfer, preparation, and packaging required for dry storage pending
transportation of the fuel to a national geologic repository or interim
storage site.
The NNPP ensures that naval spent nuclear fuel handling is
performed in a safe and environmentally responsible manner in
accordance with 50 U.S.C. 2406, 2511 (codifying Executive Order 12344).
Nuclear fuel handling is an intricate and intensive process requiring a
complex infrastructure. Naval spent nuclear fuel handling includes the
transfer of spent nuclear fuel removed from a reactor to the Expended
Core Facility (ECF) at the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF) at the INL,
where it is received, unloaded, prepared, and packaged for disposal.
The NNPP is proposing to recapitalize the existing ECF
infrastructure at the INL. The purpose of the proposed action is to
ensure the continued availability of the infrastructure needed to
support the transfer, handling, examination, and packaging of naval
spent nuclear fuel removed from nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and
submarines, as well as from land-based prototype reactors for at least
the next 40 years. This action is needed because, although the ECF at
the NRF, where this work is currently supported, continues to be
maintained and operated in a safe and environmentally responsible
manner, a significant portion of the ECF infrastructure has been in
service for over 50 years. Deterioration of the ECF infrastructure
could immediately and profoundly impact the NNPP mission, including the
NNPP's ability to support refueling and defueling of nuclear powered
submarines and aircraft carriers. The ECF capabilities to transfer,
prepare, examine, and package naval spent nuclear fuel, and other
irradiated materials are vital to the NNPP's mission of maintaining the
reliable operation of the naval nuclear-powered fleet and developing
militarily effective nuclear propulsion plants.
Consistent with the Record of Decision for the April 1995 DOE
Programmatic EIS for Spent Nuclear Fuel Management (DOE/EIS-0203-F),
naval spent nuclear fuel is shipped by rail from shipyards and
prototype facilities to NRF for examination and processing. After
processing, naval spent nuclear fuel is transferred into dry storage
containers and placed into temporary storage at NRF, prior to off-site
transfer consistent with the Record of Decision for the November 1996
Navy EIS for a Container System for Management of Naval Spent Nuclear
Fuel (DOE/EIS-0251). Ongoing efforts to sustain the infrastructure
needed to transfer, prepare, examine, and package naval spent nuclear
fuel will preserve these essential capabilities and ensure that the
NNPP high standards for protecting the public and the environment
continue to be met. Facility age, however, is expected to cause a
growing maintenance burden and increase the likelihood of
[[Page 27449]]
unacceptable workflow interruptions that could adversely impact the
fleet.
The NNPP proposes to recapitalize the infrastructure for
transferring, preparing, examining, and packaging naval spent nuclear
fuel and other irradiated materials, to ensure these capabilities are
maintained for the vital NNPP mission of supporting the naval nuclear-
powered fleet. The recapitalization will be carried out as two
projects. The first project will be the Spent Fuel Handling
Recapitalization Project; the second project will be the Examination
Recapitalization Project. The NNPP was initially pursuing two
recapitalization projects in the same time frame; however, since the
initiation of the NEPA process, the project schedules have changed such
that the Spent Fuel Handling Recapitalization Project has progressed
further than the Examination Recapitalization Project. Preparing one
EIS that includes both projects would require decisions about the
Examination Recapitalization Project too early in the design process
prior to having sufficient information to fully analyze the
environmental impacts of the project. Additionally, funding
uncertainties have made the timing of the Examination Recapitalization
Project speculative in nature. To ensure an EIS is completed in support
of the Navy's need for the Spent Fuel Handling Recapitalization
Project, it is necessary to reduce the scope of the EIS to cover only
the Spent Fuel Handling Recapitalization Project. The proposed
Examination Recapitalization Project will be considered in the
cumulative impacts section of the EIS along with other reasonably
foreseeable projects on the INL. A separate document will be prepared
in accordance with NEPA for the Examination Recapitalization Project
once this project has been more clearly defined.
The EIS will consider the environmental effects related to the
Spent Fuel Handling Recapitalization Project. The alternatives being
evaluated have been revised to remove aspects related to an Examination
Recapitalization Project and to address public comments received during
initial EIS scoping. The NNPP will evaluate building a new facility at
two potential sites on the NRF, an ECF Overhaul Alternative, and a No
Action Alternative:
Alternative 1--Construct and operate a new facility for
spent fuel handling capabilities at one of two potential locations at
the NRF on the INL.
Alternative 2--Overhaul the spent fuel handling
capabilities of the ECF at NRF by implementing major infrastructure and
water pool refurbishment projects while performing corrective
maintenance and repair actions as necessary.
Alternative 3 (No Action)--Maintain the spent fuel
handling capabilities of the ECF by continuing to use the current ECF
infrastructure while performing corrective maintenance and repairs
necessary to keep the infrastructure in good working order (i.e.,
actions sufficient to sustain the proper functioning of structures,
systems, and components).
The NNPP proposes to address the issues listed below when
considering the potential impacts of the proposed alternatives in the
EIS. This list is presented to facilitate public comment during the
scoping period and is not intended to be comprehensive, or to imply any
predetermination of impacts. Issues include:
Potential impacts of emissions on air and water quality.
Potential impacts on plants, animals, and their habitats,
including species that are listed by either State or Federal government
as threatened, endangered, or of special concern.
Potential impacts from postulated accidents, as well as
potential impacts from acts of terrorism or sabotage.
Potential effects on the public health from exposure to
hazardous materials or radiological releases under routine operations.
Potential safety and health impacts to workers.
Impacts on cultural resources, such as historic,
archeological, and Native American culturally important sites.
Socioeconomic impacts to the potentially affected
communities.
Compliance with applicable Federal and state regulations.
Potential disproportionately high and adverse effects on
low-income and minority populations (environmental justice).
Cumulative impacts.
NEPA implementing regulations require an early and open process for
determining the scope of an EIS and for identifying the significant
issues related to the proposed action. Accordingly, NNPP invites
Federal agencies; Tribal, State, and local governments; and the general
public to comment on the revised scope of the EIS including
identification of reasonable alternatives and specific issues that
should be addressed. All public comments received as described above
will be considered during the development of the EIS.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 4, 2012.
John M. McKenzie,
Director, Regulatory Affairs, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.
[FR Doc. 2012-11292 Filed 5-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P