[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31719-31720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13065]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2012 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 31719]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 58
[AMS-DA-10-0055]
Grading and Inspection, General Specifications for Approved
Plants and Standards for Grades of Dairy Products; General
Specifications for Dairy Plants Approved for USDA Inspection and
Grading Service
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the General Specifications for Dairy
Plants Approved for United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Inspection and Grading Service (General Specifications) by raising the
maximum allowable somatic cell count in producer herd goat milk from
1,000,000 cells per milliliter to 1,500,000 cells per milliliter. This
will ensure that goat milk can continue to be shipped and recognizes
that goats have a need for different regulatory limits for somatic
cells than cows. In addition this document eliminates mandatory
sediment testing on producer milk except for milk in cans. The
requirement for sediment testing has become outdated and is no longer
needed.
DATES: Effective: June 29, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Sausville, Chief,
Standardization Branch, Dairy Programs, AMS, USDA, telephone (202) 720-
9382 or email Susan.Sausville@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Executive Order 12866
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and therefore has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The final rule has been reviewed in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on small entities. It is determined
that its provisions will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
AMS provides, under the authority of the Agricultural Marketing Act
of 1946, voluntary, user-fee funded inspection and grading services to
approximately 400 dairy manufacturing plants. All of the dairy
manufacturing plants utilizing the program would be considered small
businesses under the criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201).
These amendments will not have a significant economic impact since
participation in the USDA-approved plant program is voluntary and the
cost to those utilizing the program will not increase.
C. Civil Justice Reform
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive
effect. There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements that appear in Part 58 of
the regulations have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB
Control Number 0581-0110 under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). This action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on large or small dairy processors.
Background and Changes
The change for goat milk raises the maximum allowable somatic cell
count from 1,000,000 to 1,500,000 cells per milliliter. Due to inherent
differences between cows and goats, goat milk with a somatic cell count
of 1,500,000 cells per milliliter can be produced from a healthy, non-
mastitic udder and therefore is quality milk. The change for goat milk
will ensure its continued shipment and recognizes that goats have a
need for different regulatory limits for somatic cells than cows. The
need for a separate standard for goat milk was recognized by the
National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments (NCIMS), and a
proposal to raise the somatic cell count in goat milk was approved at
the 2009 NCIMS Conference. This change will align the General
Specifications for Dairy Plants Approved for USDA Inspection and
Grading with the Grade A requirements for goat milk.
The change on sediment testing eliminates the provisions imposing
mandatory sediment testing on producer milk except for milk in cans.
The requirement for sediment testing has become outdated and is no
longer needed. The regulations governing sediment testing were
promulgated in 1975 before dairy operations started using contained
milking, storage, and transportation facilities for commercial milk
production. The change in sediment testing is based on the fact that
the majority of milk sold in the United States is produced using
automated milking equipment and systems that provide no opportunity for
sediment contamination. Because milk production predominantly occurs in
clean, modern facilities, using sealed lines, storage tanks and
sanitary pumps with no ``manual handling'' sediment testing is no
longer needed except for those producers using cans for milk collection
where there is a risk of sediment contamination.
Public Comments
On December 23, 2012, the Department published a proposed rule (76
FR 80280) to amend the General Specifications for Dairy Plants Approved
for USDA Inspection and Grading Service. The public comment period
closed February 23, 2012. One comment was received from the Chairperson
of the Other Species Committee of the National Conference on Interstate
Milk Shipments (NCIMS) in support of the proposed amendments.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 58
Dairy products, Food grades and standards, Food labeling, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 58, Subpart
B, is amended as follows:
[[Page 31720]]
PART 58--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 58 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
0
2. Amend Sec. 58.133 by revising paragraphs (b)(5) introductory text,
(b)(5)(ii), and (b)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 58.133 Methods for quality and wholesomeness determination.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) Whenever the official test indicates the presence of more than
750,000 somatic cells per ml. (1,500,000 per ml. for goat milk), the
following procedures shall be applied:
* * * * *
(ii) Whenever two out of the last four consecutive somatic cell
counts exceed 750,000 per ml. (1,500,000 per ml. for goat milk), the
appropriate State regulatory authority shall be notified and a written
notice given to the producer. This notice shall be in effect as long as
two of the last four consecutive samples exceed 750,000 per ml.
(1,500,000 per ml. for goat milk).
(6) An additional sample shall be taken after a lapse of 3 days but
within 21 days of the notice required in paragraph (b)(5)(ii) of this
section. If this sample also exceeds 750,000 per ml. (1,500,000 per ml.
for goat milk), subsequent milkings shall not be accepted for market
until satisfactory compliance is obtained. Shipment may be resumed and
a temporary status assigned to the producer by the appropriate State
regulatory agency when an additional sample of herd milk is tested and
found satisfactory. The producer may be assigned a full reinstatement
status when three out of four consecutive somatic cell count tests do
not exceed 750,000 per ml. (1,500,000 per ml. for goat milk). The
samples shall be taken at a rate of not more than two per week on
separate days within a 3-week period.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 58.134 by revising the section heading and paragraphs
(b), (c) introductory text, (d), and (e) and removing paragraphs (c)(1)
and (2).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 58.134 Sediment content for milk in cans.
(b) Sediment content classification. Milk in cans shall be
classified for sediment content, regardless of the results of the
appearance and odor examination required in Sec. 58.133(a), as
follows:
USDA SEDIMENT STANDARD
No. 1 (acceptable)--not to exceed 0.50 mg. or equivalent.
No. 2 (acceptable)--not to exceed 1.50 mg. or equivalent.
No. 3 (probational, not over 10 days)--not to exceed 2.50 mg. or
equivalent.
No. 4 (reject)--over 2.50 mg. or equivalent.
(c) Frequency of tests. At least once each month, at irregular
intervals, one or more cans of milk selected at random from each
producer shall be tested.
(d) Acceptance or rejection of milk. If the sediment disc is
classified as No. 1, No. 2, or No. 3, the producer's milk may be
accepted. If the sediment disc is classified No. 4 the milk shall be
rejected: Provided that, If the shipment of milk is commingled with
other milk in a transport tank the next shipment shall not be accepted
until its quality has been determined before being picked up; however,
if the person making the test is unable to get to the farm before the
next shipment it may be accepted but no further shipments shall be
accepted unless the milk meets the requirements of No. 3 or better. In
the case of milk classified as No. 3 or No. 4, all cans shall be
tested. Producers of No. 3 or No. 4 milk shall be notified immediately
and shall be furnished applicable sediment discs and the next shipment
shall be tested.
(e) Retests. On test of the next shipment all cans shall be tested.
Milk classified as No. 1, No. 2, or No. 3 may be accepted, but No. 4
milk shall be rejected. The producers of No. 3 or No. 4 milk shall be
notified immediately, furnished applicable sediment discs and the next
shipment tested. This procedure of retesting successive shipments and
accepting probational (No. 3) milk and rejecting No. 4 milk may be
continued for not more than 10 calendar days. If at the end of this
time all of the producer's milk does not meet the acceptable sediment
content classification (No. 1 or No. 2), it shall be rejected.
* * * * *
Dated: May 22, 2012.
David R. Shipman,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-13065 Filed 5-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P