[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33063-33075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13358]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2012 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 33063]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary
7 CFR Part 7
RIN 0560-AG90
Selection and Functions of Farm Service Agency State and County
Committees
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the regulations governing the selection and
functions of Farm Service Agency (FSA) State and county committees. The
amendments are needed to make the regulations consistent with the Farm
Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (the 2002 Farm Bill) and the
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (the 2008 Farm Bill). The
intent of the amendments is to ensure that socially disadvantaged
farmers and ranchers are appropriately represented on county
committees, to make the county committee election process more open and
accountable, and to clarify requirements for committee membership in
the situation where existing county committees are consolidated or
combined. All of these amendments have already been implemented by FSA,
except for the new provisions specifying that the Secretary may appoint
a voting member to the county committee when required to ensure fair
representation of socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers. There
will be no change in State and County Committee functions and election
procedures as a result of this rule, except for limited appointments of
socially disadvantaged voting members. This rule is needed to make the
regulations consistent with current FSA practice.
DATES: Effective Date: September 4, 2012.
Comment Date: We will consider comments that we receive by August
6, 2012.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit comments on this interim rule. In
your comment, include the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) and the
volume, date, and page number of this issue of the Federal Register.
You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Barbara Boyd, Field Operations Program Manager, FSA,
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Mail Stop 0542, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-0542.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver comments to the above
address.
All written comments will be available for inspection online at
www.regulations.gov and at the mail address above during business hours
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. A copy
of this interim rule is available through the FSA home page at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Boyd; telephone: (202) 720-
7890. Persons with disabilities or who require alternative means for
communications should contact the USDA Target Center at (202) 720-2600
(voice and TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 10708 of the 2002 Farm Bill (Pub. L. 107-171) mandates
several changes in the election process for FSA county committees and
in the functions of both State and County committees in conducting
county committee elections. Section 1615 of the 2008 Farm Bill (Pub. L.
110-246) makes minor additional changes. This interim rule implements
those changes in the regulations, and also makes additional clarifying
changes in response to comments on a previous proposed rule for the
2002 Farm Bill changes. This rule includes provisions for the
appointment of a voting member to a county committee, which is
authorized by the 2002 Farm Bill, but has not been implemented.
Consistent with the 2002 Farm Bill, the purpose of the amendments
is to increase the transparency and accountability of county elections
and to provide opportunities for the nondiscriminatory participation of
socially disadvantaged (SDA) farmers and ranchers in county committees
and in the programs of USDA. The 2002 Farm Bill requires several
actions by FSA to achieve those goals. These regulations are one of
those actions; the other actions include collecting and reporting
extensive data on the results of county committee elections and
establishing Uniform Guidelines for conducting those elections. The
2008 Farm Bill requires additional changes to increase the maximum
number of county committee members in the situation where counties are
combined or consolidated into a single multi-county office, and to
clarify that a farmer or rancher may serve only on the county committee
for the county office where their farm records are administered.
This interim rule follows a proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on November 28, 2006 (71 FR 68755-68762). The 60-day comment
period for the proposed rule closed on January 29, 2007; 13 comments
were submitted. The issues raised in the comments and the resulting
changes to the rule in response to those comments are discussed later
in this document. The changes between the proposed and interim rule in
response to comments are minor because most of the issues raised by the
commenters have already been addressed or can be addressed with minor
clarifying changes.
The ``Uniform Guidelines for Conducting Farm Service Agency County
Committee Elections'' (the Uniform Guidelines) were published in the
Federal Register on January 18, 2005 (70 FR 2837-2842). These
regulations are consistent with the Uniform Guidelines. The Uniform
Guidelines are available on the FSA Web site at www.usda.fsa.gov/elections.
This rule uses the phrase ``county committee'' in both the preamble
and in the regulations. A county committee may have jurisdiction over a
geographical area that is different from an actual county, such as more
than one county, or a county and a Tribal area. The proposed rule and
the current regulations refer to ``area committees'' for county
committees that have jurisdiction over more than one county,
[[Page 33064]]
which some commenters found confusing, so this interim rule does not
use that phrase.
This document first provides background information on county
committees, then discusses the changes to county committee procedures
specified in this rule. Most of the changes have already been
implemented. Comments on the previous proposed rule, and our responses
to those comments, are at the end of the preamble, followed by the
amended regulations.
Background on County Committees
County committees were originally authorized by Congress in the
1930s to allow for grassroots input and local administration of
Agricultural Adjustment Administration programs. At that time, local
farmers elected delegates to a county convention, which selected the
members of the county committee. Direct election of county committee
members has been FSA practice since FSA itself was authorized by the
Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture
Reauthorization Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-334).
County committees provide local input on the administration of FSA
programs, including commodity price support loans and payments,
conservation programs, disaster payments, and emergency programs.
Committee members are a critical component of the day-to-day operations
of FSA. They help deliver and provide outreach for FSA Farm Programs at
the local level. Farmers who serve on committees help decide the kind
of programs their counties will offer. They provide input on how to
improve program delivery. They work to make FSA agricultural programs
serve the needs of local farmers and ranchers, and help local farmers
and ranchers know what programs are available. The duties of county
committees currently include:
Informing farmers of the purpose and provisions of FSA
programs;
Keeping the State FSA Committee informed of local
administrative area (LAA) conditions;
Monitoring changes in farm programs;
Participating in monthly county meetings;
Directing outreach activities;
Making recommendations to the State committee on existing
programs;
Conducting hearings and reviews as requested by the State
committee; and
Ensuring socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers are
fairly represented.
County committee decisions are made by consensus. Committee members
vote to come to consensus on various items, for example, yield
determination for the county, the county executive director (CED)
ratings, and approving producer applications when required for various
Farm Programs.
County committees do not oversee the administration of FSA direct
or guaranteed farm operating loans or ownership loans. Those are
administered by FSA federal employees.
There are currently more than 7,700 committee members serving on
more than 2,200 committees nationwide. More than 235,000 ballots were
cast in the 2010 county elections. Elected committee members serve for
a 3-year term, and roughly one-third of seats are up for election each
year. There are term limits, which enables beginning farmers and those
who have not participated in the past have an opportunity to serve.
This rule adds provisions specifying that the Secretary may appoint an
SDA voting member when there is no elected SDA member and one is needed
to ensure fair representation. In the context of this rule, SDA groups
are women, African Americans, American Indians, Alaska Natives,
Hispanics, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Appointed members
serve a 1-year term and also have term limits. The determination of the
need for an appointed member will be performed after each annual
election.
Nomination forms for county elections are distributed to all
eligible voters by June 15th of each year; the forms are also available
online and at all county offices. Anyone who is an eligible voter can
nominate themself or another person to be on the slate of candidates.
An organization, such as a local nonprofit, Tribal government, or local
Tribal organizations representing SDA farmers, can also nominate a
candidate. Nominations are due in August, and elections take place in
December. Anyone of legal voting age who lives in the county, or whose
FSA farm records are administered in the county, and participates in a
USDA program or has provided the county office with information about
their farming operation, can vote in the election. Minors can vote if
they are in charge of the operations on an entire farm. The person
receiving the most votes in the election serves on the county
committee, and the first and second runners up may serve as alternates,
if they meet the eligibility requirements and agree to serve.
County committees may also have appointed non-voting SDA advisors.
The appointment of those advisors is one of the efforts USDA has made
to address the concerns in the 2002 Farm Bill about fair representation
of SDA farmers and ranchers on county committees. Non-voting SDA
advisors are recommended by the local county committee, in consultation
with local groups and local Tribal organizations, representing SDA
farmers and ranchers, and appointed by the State committee. Advisors
attend county committee meetings and ensure that SDA issues and
viewpoints are understood and considered in FSA actions. Non-voting
advisors do not have the authority to sign documents or vote on county
committee actions.
The county committee is the official employer of CED, and in the
case of a vacancy, will be responsible for selecting the new CED.
As discussed in the next section, this rule updates the regulations
to make them consistent with current practice, but does not change the
role of county committees or county committee voting members from
current practice, with the exception of the new appointment authority.
Amendments to the Regulation That Are Consistent With Current FSA
Practice
This interim rule amends 7 CFR part 7 ``Selection and Functions of
Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation State, County, and
Community Committees.'' Those regulations were most recently updated in
1994, and are no longer consistent with current FSA practice. This rule
makes substantive changes to the regulations that are needed to add
requirements from the 2002 and 2008 Farm Bills. This section of the
document discusses the amendments to the regulations that have already
been implemented administratively. The next section discusses the new
provisions to appoint SDA members that have not yet been implemented.
In addition to the changes required by the two Farm Bills, this
rule also removes obsolete terms. This rule removes text that does not
relate to public compliance and is therefore appropriately addressed in
FSA handbooks and directives. It changes the name of the part to
``Selection and Functions of Farm Service Agency State and County
Committees.''
This rule includes definitions for ``participate'' and
``cooperate.'' These terms, which are specified in the 2002 Farm Bill,
are used to clarify who is eligible to vote in county elections and be
nominated to serve on county committees. Farmers and ranchers who
``participate,'' meaning they receive
[[Page 33065]]
assistance, benefits, or services from USDA or indirectly through
another federal government agency, may vote in county elections and be
nominated as county committee members. Farmers and ranchers who provide
information to the FSA county office about their farming operation,
thus meeting the definition of ``cooperate'' in Sec. 7.3 of this rule,
may also be eligible voters and nominees even if they do not directly
receive benefits or services from USDA. For example, farmers who grow
specialty crops that do not qualify for FSA programs and beginning
farmers may qualify to vote by providing information about their
farming operation to the county office. Those who do not both own and
operate their farm, such as landowners, tenants, and sharecroppers, may
qualify to vote by providing such information. USDA uses this
information to better understand the agricultural communities that our
programs serve, or might serve in the future. We also wish to ensure
that persons who have an interest in farming that may not qualify for
our programs at this time have an opportunity to be represented on the
county committee.
The additional requirements for eligibility for county committee
members in this rule, including term limits for elected members, are
largely unchanged from the current regulations. The requirement that a
voter who operates a farm or ranch in more than one local
administrative area (LAA) in a county can only vote in any election in
any one LAA is unchanged. (An LAA is similar to a precinct or voting
district in function.) Similarly, the requirements for spouse
eligibility and entity eligibility are unchanged. This rule specifies
that the county office will maintain the list of eligible voters in the
county and must disclose that list to the public, which is also not a
new requirement.
The regulations for the establishment of LAAs are revised to be
consistent with current practice and with the two Farm Bills. The
current regulations specify exactly three LAAs per county, with some
exceptions that include fewer than three LAAs per county. The revised
regulations specify at least 3 LAAs per county, with up to 11 LAAs for
county committees that have jurisdiction over multiple counties. The
purpose of having more LAAs is, in part, to ensure that SDA
representation is not reduced when county offices are combined. In some
circumstances, such as a very large county or one with many farms, a
single county committee can have up to five LAAs. The LAA boundaries
will be determined by the State committee, after considering
recommendations from the county committee in which an LAA is located.
The county committee must give public notice of LAA designations before
the election and nomination processes. FSA has already implemented
these provisions through handbooks and the Uniform Guidelines.
This rule revises the nomination process regulations to be
consistent with current FSA practice. The revisions make the nomination
process and deadlines provisions more clear and specific than the
current regulations. Nominations for county committee are due not less
than 90 days before the election date. The nomination form is
distributed to eligible voters and is also available at county offices
and on the internet at http://www.sc.egov.usda.gov. Nominees must meet
eligibility requirements, which include residing in the LAA for which
the election is being held and being willing to serve if elected. The
eligibility requirements for nominees, county committee members, and
other personnel are largely unchanged from the current regulations. As
specified in the 2008 Farm Bill, a farmer or rancher with farming
interests in multiple LAAs or counties can only serve on the county
committee in the jurisdiction where their FSA records are administered.
This rule has revised provisions, consistent with the Uniform
Guidelines, on how the slate of candidates for the election will be
determined. The slate of candidates for a county committee election
will typically consist of the farmers and ranchers nominated through
the public solicitation of nominees. If at least one nomination is
filed, the county committee will not take any action to add more
nominees to the slate, although write-in candidates are always allowed.
If no nominations are received, which is not common, the existing
county committee will develop a slate of candidates following the
procedures in the Uniform Guidelines. As specified in the Uniform
Guidelines, if there are no nominations, the Secretary and the State
committee may nominate up to two individuals to the slate. If they
choose not to do so, the county committee must ensure that the slate is
filled by selecting two nominees. Slates developed by the county
committee must include at least one individual representing the
interests of SDA farmers and ranchers.
The current regulation provides that election dates will be held
sometime after July 1st each year, on a date or within a time period
specified by the Deputy Administrator. This rule includes more specific
requirements to give the public advance notice at least 30 days before
the election on how, where, and when eligible voters may vote. FSA has
already implemented this. FSA holds all the county elections at the
same time every year, with ballots available in November and counted in
December. The elections are widely publicized at the county, State,
Tribal, and national levels. As specified in this rule, the public may
observe the opening and counting of the ballots, and the county
committee must provide at least 10 days advance notice of the date,
time, and place at which the ballots will be opened and counted.
Occasionally, there is a vacancy on the county committee that
occurs outside of the normal election cycle, such as when a member
resigns or moves away. This rule specifies that in the case of a
vacancy, there can be a special election to fill the vacancy, or the
State committee may designate an alternate to serve out the remaining
term. While the option to have the State committee designate an
alternate is specified in the regulation so that FSA can exercise that
option if needed, special elections are normally held to fill
vacancies. The obsolete provisions on vacancies in the current
regulations that specify the procedures for the county conventions and
community committees to fill the vacancies are removed, but those
provisions have not been used in many years because those entities have
not been authorized since 1994.
The challenges and appeals requirements regarding the voter
eligibility or results of a county committee election follow the
Uniform Guidelines and current practice and are largely unchanged from
the current regulations. Obsolete references to challenging the results
of county conventions have been removed. This rule includes specific
requirements to allow nominees to challenge the results of elections
within required times and to allow a special election if the election
is nullified.
The 2002 Farm Bill requires FSA to collect and report detailed
information on county election results. Therefore, the regulations
include new requirements for FSA county committees to collect this
information and provide it to the FSA national office. This information
is already being collected and reported. FSA publishes this information
annually, and it is available on our Web site at www.fsa.usda.gov/elections. Election results for 2002 through 2010 are currently posted.
The political activity restrictions and personnel actions
procedures were modified in the regulation to be
[[Page 33066]]
consistent with the specific procedures in FSA handbooks and directives
that are already in use. Since the details are in the handbooks and
directives, the provisions now reference the appropriate handbooks and
directives. Obsolete appeals provisions were removed.
New Provisions To Appoint SDA Members to County Committees
The 2002 Farm Bill grants the Secretary the authority to appoint a
committee member to a committee to achieve the goal of fair
representation in a county committee jurisdiction. The 2008 Farm Bill
requires the Secretary to develop procedures to maintain SDA
representation on county committees.
Since the 2002 Farm Bill, USDA has increased outreach to SDA
communities to encourage participation in COC elections. SDA non-voting
advisors have been appointed by State committees to many county
committees. However, voter turnout has remained low among all groups,
and particularly among SDA farmers and ranchers, whose voter
participation rate is about 7 percent. That is about half the voter
participation rate for all eligible voters. USDA has also collected and
analyzed extensive data on county committee election results, and found
that a few counties (about 5 percent) still do not have fair
representation of SDA farmers and ranchers. Given the continued low SDA
voter turnout, despite sustained and extensive outreach over the past
decade, it is unlikely that the regular election process alone will
result in fair SDA representation on all county committees. An
additional effort is needed to achieve fair representation on county
committees in a few cases. USDA has therefore decided to utilize the
appointment authority provided in the 2002 Farm Bill.
In the preamble to the 2006 proposed rule, USDA stated that ``in
the event the Secretary does decide to utilize the appointment
authority, the Secretary will only do so after providing an opportunity
for the public to comment on the proposed provisions under which such
appointments will be made.'' This interim rule provides that
opportunity for public comment. This rule specifies in 7 CFR 7.17 that
the Secretary will use the discretionary authority to make appointments
when such appointments are necessary to maintain fair representation.
USDA will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the Uniform
Guidelines and these regulations to ensure that they are sufficient to
ensure fair representation of SDA farmers and ranchers on county
committees. If needed to ensure fair representation, the Secretary will
use the authority to appoint committee members when the statistical
evidence, measured at the county-level, demonstrates a lack of
diversity and underrepresentation on selected county committees over a
period of at least 4 years. The appointed committee member will be in
addition to the elected voting members. The appointed member does not
replace any of the elected members.
This rule does not specify what specific procedures the Secretary
will use to determine that an appointment is necessary. The method USDA
currently plans to use to identify counties where an appointment is
appropriate is as follows: USDA will first determine a baseline number
of eligible voters in a county, using operator data in the Census of
Agriculture and eligible-voter data in FSA records. The baseline
eligible voter pool for each county committee will be measured annually
against the demographics of the current committee to ensure fair
representation each year on the committees and to identify where there
is a need for increased SDA representation. The method used to
determine if an appointment should be made will be a benchmark level of
expected representation, which will be the number of SDA
representatives expected in the county to ensure fair representation.
The benchmark is a threshold percentage that is calculated as follows:
1 / 1 plus the current number of elected COC members
For example, if there are 3 elected county committee members, the
threshold will be 1 divided by 4, or 25 percent. If more than 25
percent of the eligible voters in the county are SDA, but there is no
SDA voting member on the COC, that county will be considered for an SDA
appointment. Where the county already has an SDA advisor, the Secretary
plans to appoint that advisor as the SDA voting member.
Our current analysis of 2010 election results shows that of the
2,244 county committees, about 13 percent met the threshold where SDA
representation would be expected based on the demographics of the
eligible COC voters in the county. (In the example above, if 10 percent
of the eligible voters in the county are SDA farmers and ranchers, but
there is no SDA member on the existing 3-member COC, that county does
not meet the threshold where an SDA voting member would be expected.)
FSA analysis shows that 153 counties met the threshold where SDA
representation would be expected based on race or ethnicity of eligible
voters, and 160 counties met the threshold where SDA representation
would be expected based on gender of eligible voters (28 counties were
in both groups). Of these counties where SDA representation would be
expected, over half already had an SDA voting member. Almost all of the
counties where SDA representation would be expected already had a non-
voting SDA advisor. Only 17 counties that met the benchmark for
expected SDA representation had neither an SDA voting member nor an SDA
advisor.
FSA analysis also considered observed historical voting patterns.
FSA has collected detailed election data for the past decade of county
committee elections, as required by the 2002 Farm Bill. Voting patterns
are relevant because individual voting members may resign or reach term
limits, resulting in a temporary lack of SDA representation. Only
counties that have an observed pattern of non-representation for at
least the past four election cycles will be considered for SDA
appointments. Analysis of 2007 through 2010 election data found that
about 5 percent of counties would be in this group. Counties that meet
the benchmark for lacking SDA representation and do not currently have
an SDA voting member, but have had one in at least one of the last four
election cycles, will not be considered for appointments. Where
counties do not currently have an SDA voting member, meet the benchmark
for lacking SDA representation for at least four election cycles, and
have an advisor, the Secretary plans to select the existing advisor as
the appointed SDA voting member. The vast majority of the appointments
(roughly 80 percent) are expected to be elevation to voting status of
persons who are already serving on their local county office committee
as a non-voting SDA advisor. In the few counties with no SDA advisor,
the selection of an appointed member will follow the same procedure
used to identify an SDA advisor, including, among other things,
outreach to community based organizations.
FSA will continue outreach efforts to increase SDA voter
participation and SDA representation on county committees through the
regular election process. We will also continue to update the
statistical analysis with current year election data. Going forward,
the appointment process will be used where and when it is needed to
ensure fair representation of SDA farmers and ranchers. If in any year
the statistical analysis finds that SDA farmers and ranchers are fairly
represented on all county committees, then USDA will not
[[Page 33067]]
need to make any SDA appointments that year.
Removal of Obsolete Provisions and Other Technical Changes
This rule removes the current section of the regulations specifying
procedures for county conventions. All county committee elections are
conducted by direct election by eligible voters. County conventions
have not been used to select county committee members in many years,
because they were removed from the authority with the reorganization of
USDA required by the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of
Agriculture Reauthorization Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-334).
This rule removes all references to community committees. Community
committees were also removed from the underlying authority in 1994 as
part of the USDA reorganization. Community areas are no longer used to
establish the boundaries of LAAs, and have not been for many years.
This rule removes the reference to consideration of at large and
cumulative voting that were in Sec. 7.17 in the proposed rule because
USDA assessed the at large and cumulative alternatives and found them
not viable.
As noted earlier, obsolete appeals and hearings provisions for
appealing a suspension, disqualification, or removal from office are
removed. Updated procedures are now in the employee handbooks and
Uniform Guidelines.
Non-substantive editorial changes were made throughout to improve
clarity by providing plain language explanation of election procedures
and by grouping related provisions in the same section. Plain language
changes, such as replacing ``shall'' with ``will'' or ``must,'' have
been made.
Discussion of Comments on Proposed Rule
FSA received 13 comments on the proposed rule. The comments were
received from agricultural associations and representative groups,
Indian tribes and communities, FSA employee associations, an FSA county
committee, USDA's Office of Inspector General, and individuals. The
commenters generally supported the 2002 Farm Bill goals of making
election processes more transparent and ensuring fair SDA
representation, but requested clarification and objected to specific
proposed regulatory provisions to implement those goals. Some issues
raised by commenters were subsequently addressed in the 2008 Farm Bill.
Most of the issues raised by commenters have already been addressed in
current FSA practice.
Comment: Provide addition clarification or further definition of
the terms ``assistance,'' ``services,'' ``benefits,'' ``enroll,'' and
``indirect service'' because these terms are used to establish
eligibility.
Response: FSA procedural handbooks will include the definitions of
these terms. This rule specifically defines ``cooperate'' and
``participate'' as they relate to voter eligibility. The other terms
listed are not specific to the county election process and FSA does not
use them in a different way from their dictionary meaning to establish
voter eligibility, so therefore they are not defined in this rule.
Comment: Please define and clarify the term ``fairly
representative.'' A common dictionary meaning would mean that the
committee's make-up is proportional to the make-up of the farming or
ranching population of the administrative area in terms of race,
ethnicity, and gender.
Response: The 2002 Farm Bill and the Uniform Guidelines specify the
information that we must collect to measure SDA farmer participation
and representation. This information, including the total ballots cast
by race, gender, and ethnicity, the total eligible voters in each
category, and the total nominees in each category, is currently
collected and reported on the FSA Web site. This information is
collected and reported at the LAA, county, State, Tribal, and national
levels. Detailed county election results are available on our Web site
for the 2002 through 2010 elections. As required by Congress, these
detailed statistics on participation rates at the LAA, county, State,
Tribal, and national levels are how FSA measures SDA representation on
our county committees and participation in the elections.
The benchmark for what will be considered ``fairly representative''
for the purpose of appointments is a percentage that is calculated as
follows:
1 / 1 plus the current number of COC members
For example, if there are 3 county committee members, the benchmark for
fair representation will be 1 divided by 4, or 25 percent. If 25
percent of the eligible voters in the county are SDA, and there is at
least one SDA member on the COC, that county will be considered to have
fair representation of SDA voters. If not, it will be considered for a
Secretarial appointment of one SDA member. The 2002 Farm Bill does not
provide authorization to appoint more than one member, nor does it
specify strictly proportional representation as a goal.
Comment: Provide clarification on whether both participants and
cooperators would have voting rights and eligibility for county
committees if they are reporting on the same tract of land. As written,
both the landowner and the farm operator would have voting rights if
they either participated or cooperated. We are particularly concerned
that SDA farmers who are tenants, operators, or sharecroppers are
eligible to vote.
Response: Both a landowner and an operator may be eligible to vote
based on reporting on the same tract of land. An owner and an operator
are not an entity; they are both individuals both eligible to vote.
Only one vote is allowed for an entity such as a cooperative or trust,
but tenants and sharecroppers are unlikely to be entities.
Comment: The time requirements that farmers and ranchers must have
participated or cooperated within the past year to vote or be nominated
appear to be in direct conflict with the goal of increasing SDA
participation. The time frame should be increased.
Response: Anyone who lives in the county can be eligible to vote or
be nominated if they ``cooperate'' by providing information about their
farming operation and their current name and address to the county
office no later than the final date to return ballots (to be eligible
to vote) or the final date for nomination forms (to run for county
committee). So, if someone has not received farm benefits recently but
wishes to vote in county elections, they should be able to easily meet
the ``cooperate'' eligibility criteria by updating their records at the
county office at any time up to the day ballots are due. Farmers and
ranchers can be eligible voters under the cooperation requirement even
if they have not participated in programs (received benefits or
services) within the past year. They can provide their information the
day they vote or pick up their ballot. Therefore, this requirement
should not discourage SDA participation. It is unclear how a longer
time frame would increase participation by SDA farmers or by any other
group. The intent of the ``within the past year'' provision, as
discussed in the preamble to the proposed rule, was in part to ensure
that county committee members are elected by those who are directly
affected by committee actions, including those who have participated in
USDA programs in the past year.
Comment: The regulations may exclude certain landowners that have
been eligible voters.
[[Page 33068]]
Response: The voter eligibility requirements are specified in the
rule to ensure that farmers and ranchers, including landowners, are
fully informed of the voter eligibility requirements. Please note that
landowners who provide information to the FSA county office about their
farming operation, thus meeting the definition of ``cooperate'' in 7
CFR 7.3, may be eligible voters even if they do not directly receive
benefits or services from USDA or from other federal agencies. To
``cooperate,'' a landowner must provide their current name and address
information to the county office.
Comment: Some Tribal members may no longer be considered eligible
voters under the proposed rules. Section 7.5 of the proposed rule says
that they must be producers, and 7 CFR part 718 defines producers as a
person who shares in the risk of producing a crop. Tribal members as
owners of Tribal agricultural land may not meet the requirements for
voter eligibility because most of the parcels are operated under a
lease or permit. We recommend changing the definition of ``producer''
to include owners of crop producing lands.
Response: As specified in this rule, a farmer or rancher is
eligible to vote if they participated or cooperated in USDA programs,
as participated and cooperated are defined in this rule. Specifically,
a Tribal member of a tribe with Tribally owned agricultural land who
provides their name and current address to the county office will meet
the requirement of ``cooperate'' and be eligible to vote. In response
to this comment, Sec. 7.5 has been modified to refer to ``farmers and
ranchers,'' the term used for voters in the relevant sections of the
2002 and 2008 Farm Bills.
Comment: The rule isn't clear how the voter or FSA determines which
LAA is the correct area for a voter with an interest in more than one
LAA in the county.
Response: A voter with an interest in more than one LAA in the
county will vote based on the location of their home. As specified in
Sec. 7.18, the LAA where the voter resides, or in cases where the LAA
boundary or other jurisdictional boundary runs through a farm, the
county office and LAA where the farm's FSA records are kept is the LAA
for the voter.
Comment: The proposed rule doesn't have language on how a producer
can seek relief if they have been deemed ineligible to vote. That
appeals provision is in the Uniform Guidelines but it should also be in
the rule in Sec. 7.5, with the 15 day response period, like in the
Uniform Guidelines.
Response: This rule specifies in Sec. 7.15 that challenges and
appeals on voter eligibility will be handled in accordance with the
Uniform Guidelines. In response to this comment, an appeals provision
specifically for voter eligibility has also been added to Sec. 7.5.
This is not a change from current practice, or from the current
regulations.
Comment: Disciplinary action and political activity guidance should
not be removed from the rule.
Response: They are not entirely removed from the rule. The
requirements are updated to be consistent with current legal
requirements, and some details have been moved to FSA procedural
handbooks and directives, which are the appropriate location for
detailed disciplinary action and political activity guidance.
Comment: The authority granted to the Secretary in the 2002 Farm
Bill to appoint a voting member should not be included in the rule.
Neither the Secretary of Agriculture nor anyone else should appoint
members.
Response: The Secretary was provided the authority in the 2002 Farm
Bill to appoint a member to represent socially disadvantaged farmers
and ranchers after a thorough analysis of the representation of
socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers in a particular county
committee jurisdiction. The 2002 Farm Bill also required USDA to
collect detailed election data, which we have done. USDA now has
multiple years of data available to identify which counties do not
currently have appropriate SDA representation, and have not had
appropriate SDA representation in the recent past. The procedures for
appointing SDA members are included in the regulations so that members
of the public are fully informed of what actions USDA may take in the
future to achieve appropriate SDA representation on a county committee.
Comment: If the Secretary uses the authority to appoint SDA
committee members, the regulations should require the Secretary to
solicit and accept nominations from community-based organizations that
represent SDA farmers and ranchers in the area.
Response: When the authority is used, it will be in consultation
with local organizations and Tribal organizations that represent SDA
producers in the area, as was discussed in the notice published in the
Federal Register in which the Uniform Guidelines were published. Where
an SDA non-voting COC member exists, the Secretary will typically
appoint that member as the SDA voting member, if such an appointment is
made.
Comment: Releasing the names and addresses of eligible voters to
candidates for county committees may violate the Privacy Act.
Response: The release of names and addresses is handled in
accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974. The
Privacy Act requires that agencies publish a System of Records notice
in the Federal Register with a period for public comment before
personal information is collected, to inform the public on how
collected information will be used. Personally identifiable information
may be released for certain routine uses, which must be specified in
the System of Records notice. The release of names and addresses of
eligible voters to candidates for county committees was specifically
listed as a ``routine use'' of that information in the System of
Records notice that covers the collection of that information. Only
names and addresses are provided to candidates; other information such
as financial information about farming operations, geospatial
information about farm tracts, etc., is not released to candidates.
Comment: Restrict the use of the names and addresses to the county
committee elections--prohibit anyone who received the list of names
from selling it or using it for any political or profitable use. The
list of voters must not be used for any other purpose than to inform or
educate the voters in the capacity as county committee candidate.
Response: We do not have the authority to restrict the use of this
public information, however a disclaimer will be provided with the list
of voters indicating that the information is for use in running as a
COC candidate and should not be used for any other purpose.
Comment: Maintain local control of FSA county committees' ability
to supervise FSA county office employees. Provide further clarification
on the proposed change to remove references to county office employee
personnel actions from the regulations. Does this apply only to FSA
county committee elections?
Response: County committees retain the authority to employ a county
executive director and are considered the supervisor(s) of record of
the county executive director. Personnel actions will be conducted
under official FSA handbook procedure with input from the county
committee. The scope of the county committee authority regarding
personnel actions is not limited to committee elections, and has not
changed with this rule.
[[Page 33069]]
Comment: On the LAA issue, the rule changed the intent of LAA
delineation, which was meant for commodity similarities rather than for
fair representation of producers.
Response: The purpose of establishing LAAs has been and remains
fair representation of farmers and ranchers in the county or larger
area under the jurisdiction of a county committee. Commodities grown in
an area are only one of many criteria used for LAA delineation. That
has not changed with this rule.
Comment: Increase the number of LAAs from 3 to 7.
Response: This rule specifies up to 11 LAAs per county. The 2002
Farm Bill allows 3 to 5 county committee members for a single county
jurisdiction and the 2008 Farm Bill allows up to 11 members in a
combined or consolidated county. That is reflected in this interim
rule, and in current practice. The number of LAAs will correspond to
the number of members on the county committee, which could be as many
as 11 for a combined or consolidated committee.
Comment: The Uniform Guidelines should be included in the
regulation.
Response: As noted above, the Uniform Guidelines were issued
previously in the Federal Register. They are too extensive to include
in the regulations, and include provisions that do not apply to members
of the public. As revised by this rule, the regulations are consistent
with the Uniform Guidelines. If the Uniform Guidelines are updated in
the future, they will be published in the Federal Register. They are
available on FSA's Web site at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/elections.
Comment: A disinterested party should maintain the ballots and the
ballots should not be handled by employees of the county committees.
Response: While it is not appropriate for candidates to handle the
ballots, FSA county employees may not run for election and are
therefore disinterested parties. As specified in the Uniform
Guidelines, any candidate may request that ballots be sent to the State
FSA Office until the official counting, and the county committee must
do so if requested.
When the Uniform Guidelines were originally developed in 2004, FSA
considered requiring that ballots be sent to the State FSA Office in
all cases, and tested that approach in a pilot program. After a review
of the pilot program, it was determined to be impractical to require
this approach for all county committees, so it was decided to keep
State office collection of ballots as an option, but not a requirement,
unless a candidate requests it. That provision is in the final Uniform
Guidelines and in this rule.
Comment: The community committees should not be removed from the
regulation. Community committees are a valuable resource.
Response: The community committees are removed from the regulation
because they have not been used since 1995. The authorization for
community committees was removed from the relevant United States Code
in 1994 as part of the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of
Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994.
Comment: The Guidelines specify that only mail or hand-delivered
ballots are allowed, but the rule in Sec. 7.11 provides for meeting or
polling place method. The guidelines and the rule should be consistent.
Response: The Guidelines will be updated to properly reflect the
options for meeting or polling place method.
Comment: The rule usually refers to county committees, but there
are a few references to area committees that are potentially confusing.
Response: Those references have been removed from the interim rule
to address this comment. Area committees is a commonly used term for
county committees that have jurisdiction over multiple counties.
Comment: FSA should include a provision setting forth an
appropriate retention period for county committees to maintain books,
records, and documents in Sec. 7.30, which only specifies the
retention period for ballots.
Response: The proper retention period for the various program and
administrative records are documented in applicable agency handbooks
and are not needed in this rule. Retention periods vary depending on
program or administrative function.
Comment: When Tribal lands cross state boundaries, Tribal farmers
and ranchers also be able to have the ability for unified decision-
making and implementation by county committees.
Response: When Tribal lands cross state boundaries, members of the
Tribe may choose to all participate at a single county office, and
therefore vote in a single LAA to have unified decision making and
implementation for their land.
Comment: The final rule should reflect that the political activity
of county office employees must comply with the Hatch Act.
Response: That is an appropriate topic for handbooks and
directives, and has therefore been addressed there, rather than in the
rule.
Other Comments
Some of the comments received expressed general support or
opposition for the rule or the 2002 Farm Bill provisions, without
offering specific suggestions for changes. FSA also received comments
that are outside the scope of this rule but have been addressed
elsewhere. The topics of the out of scope comments included financial
support for outreach and updates to employee handbooks.
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,''
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasized the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as
not significant under Executive Order 12866 and therefore, OMB has not
reviewed this interim rule.
Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563,
requires each agency to write all rules in plain language. In addition
to your substantive comments on this rule, we invite your comments on
how to make it easier to understand. For example:
Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated? Are the
scope and intent of the rule clear?
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is
not clear?
Is the material logically organized?
Would changing the grouping or order of sections or adding
headings make the rule easier to understand?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or
diagrams?
Would more, but shorter, sections be better? Are there
specific sections that are too long or confusing?
What else could we do to make the rule easier to
understand?
Regulatory Flexibility
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA), generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any
[[Page 33070]]
rule subject to the notice and comment rulemaking requirements under
the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) or any other statute,
unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. FSA has
determined that this rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons explained below.
Therefore, FSA has not prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis.
The costs to comply with this rule are primarily borne by FSA, not
the public. The costs of compliance with this rule for the public are
expected to be minimal. No comments were received on the proposed rule
regarding disparate economic impact on small entities. Therefore, FSA
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Environmental Review
The environmental impacts of this rule have been considered in a
manner consistent with the provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, the regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and the FSA
regulations for compliance with NEPA (7 CFR part 799). The following
interim rule was determined to be Categorically Excluded. Therefore, no
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement will be
completed for this final rule.
Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs,'' requires consultation with State, and local officials. The
objectives of the Executive Order are to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened Federalism, by relying on State, and
local processes for State, and local government coordination and review
of proposed Federal Financial assistance and direct Federal
development. For reasons set forth in the Notice to 7 CFR part 3015,
subpart V (48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983), the programs and activities
within this rule are excluded from the scope of Executive Order 12372.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12988, ``Civil Justice Reform.'' This interim rule is not retroactive
and it does not preempt State, or local laws, regulations, or policies
unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. Before
any judicial action may be brought regarding the provisions of this
rule the administrative appeal provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and 780
must be exhausted.
Executive Order 13132
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13132,
``Federalism.'' The policies contained in this rule do not have any
substantial direct effect on States, the relationship between the
Federal government and the States, or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Nor does this
interim rule impose substantial direct compliance costs on State, and
local governments. Therefore, consultation with the States is not
required.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed for compliance with Executive Order
13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.'' Executive Order 13175 imposes requirements on the
development of regulatory policies that have Tribal implications or
preempt Tribal laws. The policies contained in this rule do not preempt
Tribal law.
FSA has been working closely with the USDA Office of Tribal
Relations to ensure that the rule meets the concerns of Tribal leaders
and to develop a plan to improve the rule implementation with FSA
staff. USDA will also respond in a timely and meaningful manner to all
Tribal government requests for consultation concerning this rule and
will provide additional venues, such as webinars and teleconferences,
to periodically host collaborative conversations with Tribal leaders
and their representatives concerning ways to improve this rule in
Indian country.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L.
104-4) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on State, local, or Tribal governments or the
private sector. Agencies generally must prepare a written statement,
including a cost benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with
Federal mandates that may result in expenditures of $100 million or
more in any 1 year for State, local, or Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. UMRA generally requires agencies
to consider alternatives and adopt the more cost effective or least
burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. This
interim rule contains no Federal mandates under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) for State, local, or Tribal governments, or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202
and 205 of UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Currently approved information collection activities are covered
under OMB control number 0560-0229. This rule involves no change to the
currently approved collection of information.
E-Government Act Compliance
FSA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects for 7 CFR Part 7
Agriculture.
For the reasons discussed above, 7 CFR part 7 is revised to read as
follows:
PART 7--SELECTION AND FUNCTIONS OF FARM SERVICE AGENCY STATE AND
COUNTY COMMITTEES
Sec.
7.1 Administration.
7.2 General.
7.3 Definitions.
7.4 Selection of committee members.
7.5 Eligible voters.
7.6 Establishment of local administrative areas.
7.7 Calling of elections.
7.8 Nominations for county committee.
7.9 Slate of candidates.
7.10 Conduct of county committee elections.
7.11 Election of county committee members.
7.12 Composition of a county committee.
7.13 Tie votes.
7.14 Vacancies.
7.15 Challenges and appeals.
7.16 Report of election.
7.17 Remedial measures.
7.18 Eligibility requirements of county committee members.
7.19 Eligibility requirements of all other personnel.
7.20 Prohibition on dual office.
7.21 Terms of office of county committee members.
7.22 State committee duties.
7.23 County committee duties.
7.24 Chairperson of the county committee duties.
7.25 County executive director duties.
7.26 Private business activity and conflicts of interest.
7.27 Political activity.
7.28 Removal from office or employment for cause.
7.29 Delegation of authority to Deputy Administrator.
[[Page 33071]]
7.30 Custody and use of books, records, and documents.
7.31 Administrative operations.
7.34 Retention of authority.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2279-1, 16 U.S.C. 590d and 590h.
Sec. 7.1 Administration.
(a) The regulations in this part apply to the election and
functions of the Farm Service Agency (FSA) county committees and the
functions of FSA State committees (``county committees'' and ``State
committees,'' respectively). State and county committees will be under
the general supervision of the FSA Administrator.
(b) State and county committees, and representatives and employees
of those committees, do not have authority to modify or waive any of
the provisions of this part.
(c) State committees will take any actions required by these
regulations that have not been taken by a county committee. State
committees will also:
(1) Correct, or require a county committee to correct, any action
taken by such county committee that is not in accordance with this
part, or
(2) Require a county committee to withhold taking any action that
is not in accordance with this part.
(d) No provision or delegation to a State or county committee will
preclude the FSA Administrator, or designee, from determining any
question arising under this part, or from reversing or modifying any
determination made by a State or county committee.
(e) These regulations will be administered in accordance with the
Uniform Guidelines for Conducting FSA County Committee Elections.
(f) Unless specifically provided in this part, the Deputy
Administrator, Field Operations, FSA (Deputy Administrator), is
authorized to issue the official instructions and procedures referred
to in this part to implement the provisions of this part.
(g) This part applies to the United States, its territories, and
Puerto Rico.
Sec. 7.2 General.
State and county committees will, as directed by the Secretary, or
a designee of the Secretary, carry out the programs and functions of
the Secretary.
Sec. 7.3 Definitions.
The following definitions apply to this part. The definitions in
Sec. 718.2 of this title also apply to this part, except where they
conflict with the definitions in this section.
Cooperate means to enroll a farming operation or agricultural
property with a county office.
Deputy Administrator means Deputy Administrator for Field
Operations, Farm Service Agency, U.S. Department of Agriculture or the
designee.
Local administrative area means an elective area for FSA committees
in a single county or multi-county jurisdiction.
Participate means to receive assistance, services, or benefits
directly from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), or
from USDA indirectly through another governmental agency.
Socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher is an individual or entity
who is a member of a group whose members have been subject to racial,
ethnic, or gender prejudice because of their identity as members of a
group without regard to their individual qualities. These groups
consist of: American Indians or Alaskan Natives, Asians, Blacks or
African Americans, Native Hawaiians or other Pacific Islanders,
Hispanics, and women.
State committee means the FSA State committee.
Uniform Guidelines means the Uniform Guidelines for Conducting Farm
Service Agency County Committee Elections, which are available in FSA
Handbook 15-AO.
Sec. 7.4 Selection of committee members.
(a) State committee members will be selected by the Secretary and
will serve at the pleasure of the Secretary.
(b) County committee members will be elected as specified in Sec.
7.11 of this part or appointed as specified in Sec. 7.17 of this part.
Sec. 7.5 Eligible voters.
(a) Persons must meet the requirements of paragraphs (b) or (c) of
this section to be eligible to vote in direct elections of county
committee members.
(b) Farmers and ranchers who are of legal voting age in the State
in which their farms or ranches are located, regardless of race, color,
national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, and marital or family status, and any farmers or
ranchers not of legal voting age who are in charge of the supervision
and conduct of the farming operations on an entire farm, are eligible
to vote for direct election of county committee members, if they:
(1) Participated in a program administered within a county, or area
under the jurisdiction of the county committee, within 1 year of the
date of the election; or
(2) Not later than the final date to return ballots, cooperate as
evidenced in county office records.
(c) In any State having a community property law, the spouse of a
person who is eligible to vote in accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section is also eligible to vote.
(d) If an eligible voter is a legal entity, the eligible voter's
vote may be cast by a duly authorized representative of such entity, as
determined by the Deputy Administrator, Field Operations, FSA.
(e) Each county office will maintain a list of eligible voters for
each local administrative area within the county. A county office must
disclose a list containing the names of eligible voters to the public.
A county office must disclose a list containing the names and addresses
of eligible voters to a candidate for a county committee position at
the request of the candidate.
(f) Farmers and ranchers who are not on the list of eligible voters
who believe that they meet eligibility requirements may file a written
challenge with the county committee and may appeal county committee
voting ineligibility determinations to the State committee.
(g) Each eligible voter will be entitled to only one ballot in any
election held in any one local administrative area. If the eligible
voter has an interest in land located in more than one local
administrative area in a single county, such voter will not be entitled
to vote in more than one local administrative area in that county.
There will be no voting by proxy.
Sec. 7.6 Establishment of local administrative areas.
(a) The Secretary, or the Secretary's designee, may designate local
administrative areas within a county or a larger area under the
jurisdiction of a county committee.
(1) There will be a minimum of three local administrative areas in
each county. In counties that have been combined or consolidated into a
multiple county office, there will be 3 to 11 local administrative
areas. In single-county offices, there will be three to five local
administrative areas. With respect to Alaska and Puerto Rico, the
county will be the area so designated by the State committees. In
Louisiana, the term ``county'' applies to parishes.
(2) Each local administrative area will have not more than one
elected county committee member.
(3) The boundaries of the local administrative areas will be
determined by the State committee after considering recommendations by
the county committee in which the local administrative areas are
located.
(4) The county committee must give public notice of the local
administrative
[[Page 33072]]
area boundaries in advance of the election and nomination processes.
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. 7.7 Calling of elections.
(a) The Secretary will establish a county committee in each county
or area under the jurisdiction of a multiple county office.
(b) Each election of county committee members must be held on a
date, or within a specified period of time, determined by the Deputy
Administrator. Each such election must be held in accordance with
instructions issued by the Deputy Administrator, and the instructions
must be available for public examination in each county office.
(c) If the number of eligible voters voting in any election of
county committee members is so small that the State committee
determines that the result of that election does not represent the
views of a substantial number of eligible voters, the State committee
may declare the election void and call a new election. If it is
determined by the State committee that the election for any position on
a county committee has not been held substantially in accordance with
official instructions, the State committee will declare such election
void and call a new election.
Sec. 7.8 Nominations for county committee.
(a) Nominations to the county committee will be publicly solicited
with a closing date for nominations not less than 90 days prior to the
election date.
(b) Each solicitation for nomination will include the
nondiscrimination statement used by the Secretary.
(c) To be eligible for nomination for election in a single county
jurisdiction in the local administrative area conducting the election,
a person must be a farmer or rancher residing within that local
administrative area under the jurisdiction of the county committee. In
a multiple county jurisdiction, or in the case where an local
administrative area or county boundary runs through a farm, a person
will only be eligible for nomination in the jurisdiction and local
administrative area in which the person's records are administered.
(d) To be eligible, nominees must be farmers or ranchers who:
(1) Participated in a program administered within an area under the
jurisdiction of the county committee; or
(2) At the time of the deadline to submit nominations, cooperate as
evidenced in county office records.
(e) Nominations of eligible farmers and ranchers will be solicited
and accepted from organizations representing the interests of socially
disadvantaged farmers and ranchers.
(f) Eligible farmers and ranchers may nominate themselves or other
farmers and ranchers who meet the nomination criteria in paragraph (d)
of this section, and who certify their willingness to serve on the
county committee.
(g) If elected, nominees must meet all the eligibility requirements
in Sec. 7.18 to serve as county committee members.
Sec. 7.9 Slate of candidates.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a slate of
candidates will consist of one or more eligible farmers and ranchers
nominated through public solicitation of nominees as specified in Sec.
7.8.
(b) If no nominations are received by the closing date for
nominations, the county committee must develop a slate of candidates in
accordance with the Uniform Guidelines.
(c) A slate developed by the county committee must include at least
one individual representing the interests of socially disadvantaged
farmers and ranchers.
(d) Candidates must certify their willingness to serve on the
county committee if elected as a member or alternate.
(e) The county committee must accept write-in candidates on
ballots.
(f) Write-in candidates, if elected as a member or an alternate,
must meet the eligibility requirements of Sec. 7.18 and must certify
their willingness to serve on the county committee before they will be
certified as a member or alternate.
Sec. 7.10 Conduct of county committee elections.
(a) The county committee serving at the time of the election will
be responsible for the conduct of the county committee election in
accordance with the Uniform Guidelines and with any instructions issued
by the Deputy Administrator.
(b) County committee elections must not be associated with, or held
in conjunction with, any other election or referendum conducted for any
other purpose.
(c) The county committee must give advance public notice at least
30 calendar days prior to the election date of how, when, and where
eligible voters may vote.
(d) The county committee must provide at least 10 calendar days of
public notice of the date, time, and place at which election ballots
will be opened and counted.
(e) The county committee must provide at least 10 calendar days of
public notice that any person may observe the opening and counting of
the election ballots.
(f) The county executive director must notify all nominees of the
outcome of the election within 5 calendar days of the election date.
The notification must be in writing.
Sec. 7.11 Election of county committee members.
(a) Where there are three local administrative areas as specified
in Sec. 7.6, there will be an election of a county committee member
and, if available, any alternates, for a term of not more than 3 years,
or until such person's successor is elected and qualified, in only one
of the local administrative areas so that the term of office of one
county committee member and any alternates within one of the local
administrative areas will expire each year.
(b) Where there are more than three local administrative areas as
specified in Sec. 7.6, there will be an election in at least one of
the local administrative areas each year, such that the term of office
of the county committee member(s) and any alternates within at least
one-third of the local administrative areas will expire each year.
(c) Every 3 years, the eligible voters in a local administrative
area will elect a county committee member and may elect first and
second alternates, as available, to serve. The alternates will serve,
in the order of the number of votes received, as acting members of the
county committee, in case of the temporary absence of a member, or to
become a member of the county committee in that same order elected in
case of the resignation, disqualification, removal, or death of a
member. In other words, the candidate receiving the most votes will be
elected as the committee member, and the candidates receiving the
second and third most votes, if there are multiple candidates, will be
elected as first and second alternates, respectively.
(d) An alternate serving as an acting member of the county
committee will have the same duties, responsibilities, and authority as
a regular member of such committee. In the event an alternate fills a
permanent vacancy on the county committee, such person will assume the
remainder of the unexpired term of the county committee member who was
replaced.
(e) The election must be conducted in all counties by mail or other
distribution of ballots in accordance with the Uniform Guidelines,
except that the Deputy Administrator may authorize use of the meeting
or polling place
[[Page 33073]]
method in any county where such exception is deemed justified.
(f) Elections will be by secret ballot with each eligible voter
allowed to cast one vote and having the option of writing in the name
of a candidate.
(g) Failure to elect alternates at the regular election will not
invalidate such election or require a special election to elect
alternates.
Sec. 7.12 Composition of a county committee.
(a) A committee established under this part will consist of not
fewer than 3 nor more than 11 elected members.
(b) Committee members must be fairly representative of the farmers
and ranchers within their respective LAA from which they are elected.
(c) The county committee must select a secretary who must be the
county executive director or other employee of the county committee.
The secretary cannot be a county committee member.
(d) The county committee must select a chairperson and vice-
chairperson.
Sec. 7.13 Tie votes.
Tie votes in county committee elections will be settled by lot in a
manner that is open to the public.
Sec. 7.14 Vacancies.
(a) In case of a vacancy in the office of chairperson of a county
committee, the respective vice chairperson will become chairperson. In
case of a vacancy in the office of vice chairperson of a three member
committee, the respective third member will become vice chairperson. In
case of a vacancy in the office of a member, a respective first
alternate, if available, will become a member. In case of a vacancy in
the office of vice chairperson of a four to five member county
committee, the first alternate, if available, for the LAA of the vice
chairperson will become a member and the county committee will conduct
an organizational meeting to select a vice chairperson; and in case of
a vacancy in the office of the first alternate, a respective second
alternate, if available, will become the first alternate. When
unanimously recommended by the members of the county committee, as
constituted under this paragraph, and approved by the State committee,
the offices of chairperson and vice chairperson of the county committee
may be filled by any county committee member without regard to the
order of succession specified in this paragraph.
(b) In the event that a vacancy, other than one caused by temporary
absence, occurs in the membership of the county committee and no
alternate is available to fill the vacancy, a special election may be
held to fill such vacancies as exist in the membership.
(c) In the event that a vacancy, other than one caused by temporary
absence, occurs in the membership of the county committee and no
alternate is available to fill the vacancy, the State committee may
designate a person to serve out the balance of the term of the vacant
position on the county committee.
Sec. 7.15 Challenges and appeals.
(a) Challenges and appeals by nominees regarding voter eligibility
or the results of a county committee election must be handled in
accordance with the Uniform Guidelines.
(b) Any nominee has the right to challenge an election in writing,
in person, or both within 15 calendar days after the results of the
election are posted.
(c) Challenges to the election must be made to the county
committee, which will provide a decision on the challenge to the
appellant within 7 calendar days of the receipt of the challenge.
(d) The county committee's decision may be appealed to the State
Committee within 15 calendar days of receipt of the notice of the
decision if the appellant desires.
(e) In the event that an election is nullified as a result of a
challenge or appeal, or an error in the election process, a special
election must be conducted by the county office and closely monitored
by the FSA State office.
Sec. 7.16 Report of election.
(a) The county committee must file an election report with the
Secretary through the Deputy Administrator's office not later than 20
days after the date an election is held.
(b) The election report must include:
(1) The number of eligible voters in the local administrative area;
(2) The number of ballots cast in the election by eligible voters;
(3) The percentage of eligible voters that cast ballots;
(4) The number of ballots disqualified in the election;
(5) The percentage of ballots disqualified;
(6) The number of nominees for each seat up for election;
(7) The race, ethnicity, and gender of each nominee, as provided by
the voluntary self identification of each nominee; and
(8) The final election results, including the number of ballots
received by each nominee.
Sec. 7.17 Remedial measures.
(a) FSA will consider additional efforts to achieve the objective
that county committees are fairly representative of farmers and
ranchers within areas covered by the committees. Such efforts may
include, but are not limited to, compliance reviews of selected
counties, further centralization of the election process, and the
appointment of socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers to
particular committees in accordance with a notice published in the
Federal Register issued by the Secretary authorizing such appointments.
(b) The Secretary may ensure inclusion of socially disadvantaged
farmers and ranchers by appointment of 1 additional voting member to a
county committee when a significant population of socially
disadvantaged farmers and ranchers exist in the committee jurisdiction
and no member is elected from that socially disadvantaged population.
The appointment of the socially disadvantaged voting member will be in
accordance with standards and qualifications furnished by the State
committee.
Sec. 7.18 Eligibility requirements of county committee members.
(a) To be eligible to hold office as a county committee member or
an alternate to any county office, a person must meet the conditions
specified in this section.
(b) Such person must:
(1) Meet the eligibility for nomination criteria specified in Sec.
7.8;
(2) Reside in the local administrative area in which the election
is held, in cases where a State line, a county line, or a local
administrative area boundary runs through a farm, eligible farmers and
ranchers residing on such farm may hold office in the county and local
administrative area in which the farm has been determined to be located
for program participation purposes;
(3) Not be ineligible based on prohibited political activities, as
specified in the Uniform Guidelines;
(4) Not have been dishonorably discharged from any branch of the
armed services; removed for cause from any public office; convicted of
any fraud, larceny, embezzlement, or felony, unless any such
disqualification is waived by the State committee or the Deputy
Administrator;
(5) Not have been removed as a county committee member, alternate
to any county office, or as an employee for: Failure to perform the
duties of the office; committing, attempting, or conspiring to commit
fraud; incompetence; impeding the effectiveness of any program
administered in the county; refusal to
[[Page 33074]]
carry out or failure to comply with the Department's policy relating to
equal opportunity and civil rights, including the equal employment
policy, or interfering with others in carrying out such policy; or for
violation of official instructions, unless any such disqualification is
waived by the State committee or the Deputy Administrator;
(6) Not have been disqualified for future service because of a
determination by a State committee that during previous service as a
county committee member, alternate to any county office, or as an
employee of the county committee, the person has: Failed to perform the
duties of such office or employment; committed, attempted, or conspired
to commit fraud; impeded the effectiveness of any program administered
in the county; in the course of their official duties, refused to carry
out or failed to comply with the Department's policy relating to equal
opportunity and civil rights, including the equal employment policy, or
interfered with others in carrying out such policy; or violated
official instructions, unless any such disqualification is waived by
the State committee or the Deputy Administrator;
(7) Not be an employee of the U.S. Department of Agriculture during
the term of office;
(8) Not be a sales agent or employee of the Risk Management Agency
or their affiliates during the term of office;
(9) Not be already serving as a county committee member with 1 or
more years remaining in their current term of office; and
(10) Not have served more than 9 consecutive years (three
consecutive terms as an elected member) as an elected or appointed
county committee member just prior to the current election in which
elected office is sought. After a break in service of at least 1 year,
a member who has previously served 9 consecutive years may run for re-
election or be re-appointed.
Sec. 7.19 Eligibility requirements of all other personnel.
(a) The county executive director and other employees of the county
committee must not have been: Dishonorably discharged from any branch
of the armed services; removed for cause from any public office; or
convicted of any fraud, larceny, embezzlement, or any other felony,
unless any such disqualification is waived by the State committee or
the Deputy Administrator.
(b) The county executive director or any other employee of the
county committee must not have been removed as a county committee
member, alternate to any county office, county executive director, or
other employee of the county committee for: Failure to perform the
duties of the office; committing, attempting, or conspiring to commit
fraud; incompetence; impeding the effectiveness of any program
administered in the county; refusal to carry out or failure to comply
with the Department's policy relating to equal opportunity and civil
rights, including equal employment policy, or interfering with others
in carrying out such policy; or for violation of official instructions,
unless such disqualification is waived by the State committee or the
Deputy Administrator.
(c) The county executive director or any other employee of the
county committee must not have been disqualified for future employment
because of a determination by a State committee that during previous
service as a county committee member, alternate to any county office,
or as an employee of the county committee, the person has: Failed to
perform the duties of such office or employment; committed, attempted,
or conspired to commit fraud; impeded the effectiveness of any program
administered in the county; refused to carry out or failed to comply
with the Department's policy relating to equal opportunity and civil
rights, including the equal employment policy, or interfered with
others in carrying out such policy; or violated official instructions,
unless such disqualification is waived by the State committee or the
Deputy Administrator.
Sec. 7.20 Prohibition on dual office.
(a) A member of the county committee cannot, during the time they
are a committee member, also serve as:
(1) The secretary to the county committee;
(2) A member of the State committee; or
(3) A county executive director or any other county office
employee.
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. 7.21 Terms of office of county committee members.
(a) The term of office of county committee members and alternates
to such office will begin on a date fixed by the Deputy Administrator,
which will be after their election or appointment.
(b) Before any county committee member or alternate to the county
committee may take office as a county committee member, such person
must sign an oath of office to pledge that they will faithfully,
fairly, and honestly perform to the best of their ability all of the
duties devolving on them as committee members.
(c) A term of office will continue until a successor is elected and
qualified as specified in Sec. Sec. 7.8 and 7.9 or appointed as
specified in Sec. 7.17.
Sec. 7.22 State committee duties.
The State committee, subject to the general direction and
supervision of the Deputy Administrator, will be generally responsible
for carrying out all Farm Programs in the State or any other functions
assigned by the Secretary or a designee of the Secretary.
Sec. 7.23 County committee duties.
(a) The county committee, subject to the general direction and
supervision of the State committee, will be generally responsible for
carrying out in the county Farm Programs and any other program or
function assigned by the Secretary or a designee of the Secretary.
(b) The county committee will:
(1) Employ the county executive director, subject to standards and
qualifications furnished by the State committee, except that incumbent
directors must not be removed except as specified in Sec. 7.28. There
must be no employment discrimination due to race, color, national
origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual
orientation, or marital or family status. The county executive director
may not be removed for advocating or carrying out the Department's
policy on equal opportunity and civil rights, including the equal
employment policy. In the event it is claimed that dismissal is for
such reasons, the dismissal will not become effective until the State
committee and the Deputy Administrator have determined that dismissal
was not because of such reasons;
(2) Direct outreach activities to reach and inform socially
disadvantaged farmers and ranchers of all programs and county committee
election processes;
(3) Follow official instructions to review, approve, and certify
forms, reports, and documents requiring such action;
(4) Recommend to the State committee needed changes in boundaries
of local administrative areas;
(5) Make available to farmers, ranchers, and the public information
concerning the objectives and operations of the programs administered
through the county committee;
(6) Make available to agencies of the Federal Government and others
information with respect to the county committee activities in
accordance with official instructions issued;
[[Page 33075]]
(7) Give public notice of the designation and boundaries of each
local administrative area within the county prior to the election of
county committee members;
(8) Direct the giving of notices in accordance with applicable
regulations and official instructions;
(9) Recommend to the State committee desirable changes in or
additions to existing programs;
(10) Conduct such hearings and investigations as the State
committee may request; and
(11) Perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the State
committee.
Sec. 7.24 Chairperson of the county committee duties.
The chairperson of the county committee or the person acting as the
chairperson will preside at meetings of the county committee, certify
such documents as may require the chairperson's certification, and
perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the State committee.
Sec. 7.25 County executive director duties.
(a) The county executive director will execute the policies
established by the county committee and be responsible for the day-to-
day operations of the county office.
(b) The county executive director will:
(1) In accordance with standards and qualifications furnished by
the State committee, employ the personnel of the county office. There
must be no employment discrimination due to race, color, national
origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual
orientation, and marital or family status. An employee may not be
removed under this paragraph for advocating or carrying out the
Department's policy on equal opportunity and civil rights, including
the equal employment policy. In the event it is claimed that the
dismissal is for such reason, the dismissal will not become effective
until the State committee and the Deputy Administrator have determined
that dismissal was not because of such reason;
(2) Receive, dispose of, and account for all funds, negotiable
instruments, or property coming into the custody of the county
committee.
Sec. 7.26 Private business activity and conflicts of interest.
(a) No county committee member, alternate to any such office, or
county office employee, may at any time use such office or employment
to promote any private business interest.
(b) County committee members, alternates, and any person employed
in the county office will be subject to the official instructions
issued with respect to conflicts of interest and proper conduct.
Sec. 7.27 Political activity.
Permitted and prohibited political activities, with respect to any
State committee member, county committee member, county executive
director, or any other county employee, will be determined in
accordance with applicable policies specified in FSA handbooks and
directives.
Sec. 7.28 Removal from office or employment for cause.
(a) Adverse personnel actions involving any county committee member
or alternate member, county executive director, or other county office
employee will be taken for failing to perform the duties of their
office, impeding the effectiveness of any program administered in the
county, violating official instructions, or for misconduct.
(b) Any person whom FSA proposes to suspend or remove from office
or employment must be given advance written notice of the reason for
such action and must be advised of the right to reply to such a
proposal and any right of further review and appeal if the person is
removed or suspended.
Sec. 7.29 Delegation of authority to Deputy Administrator.
(a) Notwithstanding the authority vested by this part to a State
committee, a county committee, and the county executive director, the
Deputy Administrator has the authority to take adverse personnel
actions involving any county committee member or alternate member,
county executive director, or other county office employee for failing
to perform the duties of their office or for misconduct.
(b) Any person whom FSA proposes to suspend or remove from office
or employment must be given advance written notice of the reason for
such action and must be advised of the right to reply to such a
proposal and any right of further review and appeal if the person is
removed or suspended.
Sec. 7.30 Custody and use of books, records, and documents.
(a) All books, records, and documents of or used by the county
committee in the administration of programs assigned to it, or in the
conduct of elections, will be the property of FSA or the United States
Department of Agriculture, as applicable, and must be maintained in
good order in the county office.
(b) Voted ballots must be placed into and remain in sealed
containers, such containers not being opened until the prescribed date
and time for counting. Following the counting of ballots, the ballots
must be placed in sealed containers and retained for 1 year unless
otherwise determined by the Deputy Administrator.
(c) The books, records, and documents referred to in paragraph (a)
of this section must be available for use and examination:
(1) At all times by authorized representatives of the Secretary,
the Administrator, or a designee of the Administrator.
(2) By State and county committee members, and authorized employees
of the State and county office in the performance of duties assigned to
them under this part, subject to instructions issued by the Deputy
Administrator;
(3) At any reasonable time to any program participant insofar as
such person's interests under the programs administered by the county
committee may be affected, subject to instructions issued by the Deputy
Administrator; and
(4) To any other person only in accordance with instructions issued
by the Deputy Administrator.
Sec. 7.31 Administrative operations.
The administrative operations of county committees including, but
not limited to, the following, must be conducted, except as otherwise
provided in this part, in accordance with official instructions issued:
Annual, sick, and other types of employee leave; the calling and
conduct of elections; and the maintenance of records of county
committee meetings.
Sec. 7.34 Retention of authority.
(a) Nothing in this part will preclude the Secretary, the
Administrator, or the Deputy Administrator from administering any or
all programs, or exercising other functions delegated to the county
committee, State committee, or any employee of such committees.
(b) In exercising this authority, the Secretary, the Administrator,
or the Deputy Administrator may designate for such period of time as
deemed necessary a person or persons of their choice to be in charge
with full authority to carry out the programs or other functions
without regard to the normal duties of such committees or employees.
Signed on April 25, 2012.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2012-13358 Filed 6-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P