[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33788-33790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13775]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. N2012-2; Order No. 1361]
Proposed Post Office Structure Plan
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
request for an advisory opinion regarding its Post Office Structure
Plan. This document invites public comments on the request and
addresses several related procedural steps.
DATES:
Notices of intervention are due: June 18, 2012, 4:30 p.m. Eastern
Time.
Hearing on the Postal Service's direct case: July 11, 2012, at 9:30
a.m. (Commission hearing room, 901 New York Ave. NW 20268-0001, Suite
200).
ADDRESSES: Submit notices of intervention electronically by accessing
the ``Filing Online'' link in the banner at the top of the Commission's
Web site (http://www.prc.gov) or by directly accessing the Commission's
Filing Online system at http://www.prc.gov/prc-pages/filing-online/login.aspx. Persons interested in intervening who cannot submit their
views electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section as the source for case-related
information for advice on alternatives to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
at 202-789-6820 (case-related information) or [email protected]
(electronic filing assistance).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 25, 2012, the Postal Service filed a
request with the Commission for an advisory opinion under 39 U.S.C.
3661 regarding its Post Office Structure Plan (POStPlan) under which it
intends to examine and consider changes to operating methods and
conditions, including hours of operation used to provide retail and
other services and products at approximately 17,700 of the more than
32,000 postal retail locations.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ United States Postal Service Request for an Advisory Opinion
on Changes in the Nature of Postal Services, May 25, 2012, at 1
(Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service states that under the POStPlan there is a
``possibility that the scope of the changes in service * * * could be
`substantially nationwide,' within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3661(b).''
Id. at 2. The Postal Service states that if it determines that retail
operations at facilities should be discontinued, postal patrons would
[[Page 33789]]
have to obtain services at a different postal facility or through
alternate access channels. Id.
The Postal Service has identified the POStPlan as having the
potential to change service nationwide and has asked for a Commission
advisory opinion. Under these circumstances, the Commission shall
provide an opportunity for a hearing on the record and provide a
written opinion on the POStPlan. 39 U.S.C. 3661(c).
Request. The Request is accompanied by testimony from one witness,
Jeffrey C. Day (USPS-T-1), and five library references.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing of
Initial Library References, May 25, 2012, identifying and describing
the library references filed in support of the Postal Service's
direct case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Witness Day, Manager, Retail Operations, in the Office of Delivery
and Post Office Operations at Postal Service Headquarters states that
he has primary responsibility for developing policies and procedures
relating to the day-to-day operations of post offices, opening or
closing of retail facilities, and improving the customer experience.
USPS-T-1 at i.
In his testimony, witness Day describes the current state of the
Postal Service's retail network and recent trends in customer behavior.
Id. at 2-5. He then compares the retail access and services offered by
the Postal Service with actual retail activity. Id. at 5-9. The
testimony describes the POStPlan as a Headquarters-initiated review of
all EAS Level 16 or below post offices by examining workload. Id. at
11. Witness Day explains that approximately 17,700 post offices will be
examined under the POStPlan.\3\ Id. Those post offices with an Adjusted
Earned Workload (AEWL) for FY 2011 greater than 5.74 hours will be
categorized as EAS Level 18 or above. Id. at 12. Those post offices
with an AEWL of 5.74 hours or fewer will be categorized as either
Remotely Managed Post Offices (RMPOs) or Part-Time Post Offices
(PTPOs). Id. at 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The post offices examined under the POStPlan include all
17,728 EAS Level 16 or below post offices that were operational as
of the end of FY2011. Witness Day explains that this number includes
post offices that have been suspended or become non-operational
since the close of FY2011, but that those post offices will not be
part of the POStPlan. USPS-T-1 at 1 n.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Witness Day states that RMPOs will be subject to realigned weekday
window service of 2, 4, or 6 hours per weekday, depending upon
workload. Id. at 12-13. He explains that RMPOs realigned with 6 window
service hours will be staffed by a career employee, and RMPOs realigned
with 2 or 4 window service hours will be staffed by a non-career
employee. He notes that RMPOs will report to and be managed by a
postmaster located at a designated Administrative Post Office (APO).
Id. at 13.
Witness Day states that those post offices that would otherwise
qualify as RMPOs will be classified as PTPOs if (1) the post office is
25 or more driving miles from the nearest post office, or (2) the post
office is outside a 25-mile radius of the nearest APO. He explains that
PTPOs will be staffed by a career employee for 6 hours of window
service each weekday, regardless of workload, and will report to a
district office rather than an APO. Id. at 13-14.
Witness Day also states that the Postal Service generally will not
study for discontinuance post offices that are part of the POStPlan
``unless the community has a strong preference for discontinuance * *
*.'' Id. at 15. For post offices currently being studied for
discontinuance, the Postal Service will hold the discontinuance process
in abeyance pending a determination of whether to realign retail window
hours. Id. at 18. When the community expresses a strong preference for
one of the alternative access means other than realigned window service
hours under the POStPlan, the Postal Service will proceed with a
discontinuance study utilizing the procedures set forth in ``USPS
Handbook PO-101.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id. at 22-23; see 39 CFR part 241. Witness Day notes that
the discontinuance process has been improved so that it now uses
actual employee costs based on historical data, includes detailed
financial information such as one-time costs not previously
accounted for, and captures more non-revenue transactions. USPS-T-1
at 23-24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Witness Day states that, beginning in September 2012, the Postal
Service will survey customers to solicit their preferences for
realigned window service hours or a discontinuance study. Id. at 17,
21. The Postal Service will then review the surveys and hold a
community meeting to discuss the survey results. If the Postal Service
determines to maintain the post office with realigned retail hours, it
will consider feedback from the community meeting to determine the time
of day in which retail window service will be available and the
timeline for implementation. If the post office is not continued with
realigned window service hours, the Postal Service will likely study
the facility for discontinuance. Id. at 17-18.
The Request and all supporting public materials are on file in the
Commission's docket room for inspection during regular business hours,
and are available on the Commission's Web site at http://www.prc.gov.
Timing. The Postal Service believes that its filing satisfies the
requirements of 39 CFR 3001.72, which states that a request for an
advisory opinion must be filed at least 90 days in advance of the
effective date of the proposed changes. See Request at 10. Although
witness Day indicates that the Postal Service will begin upgrading post
offices identified as APOs and those with an AEWL of greater than 5.74
hours per day to EAS Level 18 post offices in June 2012, he also states
that ``no reduction in hours or discontinuance study pursuant to
POStPlan will occur until more than 90 days after the filing of the
request for an advisory opinion with the PRC.'' USPS-T-1 at 21.
Further procedures. 39 U.S.C. 3661(c) requires that the Commission
afford an opportunity for a formal, on-the-record hearing of the Postal
Service's Request under the terms specified in sections 556 and 557 of
title 5 of the United States Code before issuing its advisory opinion.
Based on its preliminary review of the Request, the Commission finds it
appropriate to expedite the proceeding. To facilitate expeditious
review of the matter, the Commission expects parties to make judicious
use of discovery, discovery objections, and motions' practice. Every
effort should be made to confer to resolve disputes informally.
All interested persons are hereby notified that notices of
intervention in this proceeding shall be due on or before June 18,
2012. See 39 CFR 3001.20 and 3001.20a. Consistent with rule 20, each
person filing a notice of intervention shall, inter alia, specify the
nature of his/her interest and whether or not he/she requests a
hearing. See 39 CFR 3001.20. Discovery may be propounded upon filing a
notice of intervention. Responses to discovery shall be due within 7
days.
The procedural schedule shown below the signature of this order
will be followed in this proceeding assuming that no participant
desires to present rebuttal testimony. Participants who wish to present
rebuttal testimony must notify the Commission of their intent to file,
and the nature of their rebuttal, by July 11, 2012. Rebuttal testimony,
if requested, will be due July 18, 2012. The balance of the procedural
schedule will be revised accordingly.
Public Representative. Section 3661(c) of title 39 requires the
participation of an ``officer of the Commission who shall be required
to represent the interests of the general public.'' Pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 505, Emmett Rand Costich is designated to serve as the Public
Representative to represent the interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
[[Page 33790]]
Neither the Public Representative nor any additional persons assigned
to assist the Public Representative shall participate in or advise as
to any Commission decision in this proceeding, other than in their
designated capacity.
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. N2012-2 to consider the
Postal Service Request referred to in the body of this order.
2. The Commission will sit en banc in this proceeding.
3. The procedural schedule for this proceeding is set forth below
the signature of this order.
4. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Emmett Rand
Costich to represent the interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
Procedural Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 18, 2012..................................... Notices of
intervention.
June 28, 2012..................................... Close of discovery
on Postal Service
direct case.
July 2, 2012...................................... Notice of intent to
conduct oral cross-
examination.
July 11, 2012..................................... Hearing on the
Postal Service's
direct case (if
requested) (9:30
a.m. in the
Commission's
hearing room).
July 11, 2012..................................... Notice of intent to
file rebuttal
testimony.
July 18, 2012..................................... Rebuttal testimony
(if requested).
July 20, 2012..................................... Filing of briefs (if
no rebuttal
testimony).
July 27, 2012..................................... Filing of reply
briefs (if no
rebuttal
testimony).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2012-13775 Filed 6-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P