[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35652-35656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14566]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0323; FRL-9686-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and
Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Tennessee:
Bristol; Determination of Attainment for the 2008 Lead Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On April 4, 2012, the State of Tennessee, through the
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), submitted
a request to EPA to make a determination that the Bristol nonattainment
area for the 2008 lead national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or
standard) has attained the 2008 lead NAAQS. In this action, EPA is
proposing to determine that the Bristol nonattainment area (hereafter
also referred to as the ``Bristol Area'' or ``Area'') has attained the
2008 lead NAAQS. This proposed determination of attainment is based
upon complete, quality-assured and certified ambient air monitoring
data for the 2009--2011 period showing that the Area has monitored
attainment of the 2008 lead NAAQS. EPA is further proposing that, if
EPA finalizes this proposed determination of attainment, the
requirements for the Area to submit an attainment demonstration,
together with reasonably available control measures (RACM), a
reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, and contingency measures for
failure to meet RFP and attainment deadlines shall be suspended for so
long as the Area continues to attain the 2008 lead NAAQS.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 16, 2012.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2012-0323, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: [email protected].
3. Fax: (404) 562-9040.
4. Mail: EPA-R04-OAR-2012-023, Regulatory Development Section, Air
Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2012-0323. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or
email, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Scofield or Richard Wong,
Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
[[Page 35653]]
Mr. Scofield may be reached by phone at (404) 562-9034 or via
electronic mail at [email protected]. Mr. Wong may be reached by
phone at (404) 562-8726 or via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What actions is EPA taking?
II. What is the background for these actions?
III. Application of EPA's Clean Data Policy to the 2008 Lead NAAQS
IV. Does the Bristol area meet the 2008 lead NAAQS?
A. Criteria
B. Bristol Area Air Quality
V. What is the effect of these actions?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What actions is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to determine that the Bristol Area (comprising the
portion of Sullivan County bounded by a 1.25 kilometer radius
surrounding the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates 4042923
meters E, 386267 meters N, Zone 17, which surrounds the Exide
Technologies Facility) has attained the 2008 lead NAAQS. This proposal
is based upon complete, quality-assured and certified ambient air
monitoring data for the 2009-2011 monitoring period that show that the
Area has monitored attainment of the 2008 lead NAAQS.
Further, EPA is proposing that, if this proposed determination of
attainment is made final, the requirements for the Bristol Area to
submit an attainment demonstration together with RACM, a RFP plan, and
contingency measures for failure to meet RFP and attainment deadlines
would be suspended for so long as the Area continues to attain the 2008
lead NAAQS. As discussed below, EPA's proposal is consistent with EPA's
regulations and with its longstanding interpretation of subpart 1 of
part D of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
If this proposed rulemaking is finalized and EPA subsequently
determines, after notice-and-comment rulemaking in the Federal
Register, that the Area has violated the 2008 lead NAAQS, the basis for
the suspension of these attainment planning requirements would no
longer exist for the Bristol Area, and the Area would thereafter have
to address such requirements.
II. What is the background for these actions?
On November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964), EPA established a 2008 primary
and secondary lead NAAQS at 0.15 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/
m\3\) based on a maximum arithmetic 3-month mean concentration for a 3-
year period. See 40 CFR 50.16. On November 22, 2010 (75 FR 71033), EPA
published its initial air quality designations and classifications for
the 2008 lead NAAQS based upon air quality monitoring data from those
monitors for calendar years 2007-2009. These designations became
effective on December 31, 2010.\1\ The Bristol Area was designated
nonattainment for the 2008 lead NAAQS. See 40 CFR 81.343.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA completed a second and final round of designations for
the 2008 Lead NAAQS on November 22, 2011. See 76 FR 72097. No
additional areas in Sullivan County, Tennessee were designated as
nonattainment for the 2008 Lead NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 4, 2012, the State of Tennessee, through TDEC, submitted a
request to EPA to make a determination that the Bristol Area for the
2008 lead NAAQS has attained that standard based on complete, quality-
assured, quality-controlled monitoring data from 2009 through 2011.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This Area has ambient air monitoring data for forty-seven
(47) months for the period of February 2008 through December 31,
2011, which show attainment of the 2008 lead NAAQS. Preliminary 2012
data indicates that this Area is continuing to attain the 2008 lead
NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Application of EPA's Clean Data Policy to the 2008 Lead NAAQS
Following enactment of the CAA Amendments of 1990, EPA promulgated
its interpretation of the requirements for implementing the NAAQS in
the general preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the CAA
Amendments of 1990 (General Preamble) 57 FR 13498, 13564 (April 16,
1992). In 1995, based on the interpretation of CAA sections 171 and
172, and section 182 in the General Preamble, EPA set forth what has
become known as its ``Clean Data Policy'' for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
See Memorandum from John S. Seitz, Director, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, ``RFP, Attainment Demonstration, and Related
Requirements for Ozone Nonattainment Areas Meeting the Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard'' (May 10, 1995). In 2004, EPA indicated
its intention to extend the Clean Data Policy to the PM2.5
NAAQS. See Memorandum from Steve Page, Director, EPA Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, ``Clean Data Policy for the Fine
Particle National Ambient Air Quality Standards'' (December 14, 2004).
Since 1995, EPA has applied its interpretation under the Clean Data
Policy in many rulemakings, suspending certain attainment-related
planning requirements for individual areas, based on a determination of
attainment. See 60 FR 36723 (July 18, 1995) (Salt Lake and Davis
Counties, Utah, 1-hour ozone); 61 FR 20458 (May 7, 1996) (Cleveland
Akron-Lorain, Ohio, 1-hour ozone); 61 FR 31832 (June 21, 1996) (Grand
Rapids, Michigan, 1-hour ozone); 65 FR 37879 (June 19, 2000)
(Cincinnati-Hamilton, Ohio-Kentucky, 1-hour ozone); 66 FR 53094
(October 19, 2001) (Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, Pennsylvania, 1-hour
ozone); 68 FR 25418 (May 12, 2003) (St Louis, Missouri, 1-hour ozone);
69 FR 21717 (April 22, 2004) (San Francisco Bay Area, 1-hour ozone), 75
FR 6570 (February 10, 2010) (Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1-hour ozone), 75
FR 27944 (May 19, 2010) (Coso Junction, California, PM10).
EPA also incorporated its interpretation under the Clean Data
Policy in implementation rules. See Clean Air Fine Particle
Implementation Rule, 72 FR 20586 (April 25, 2007); Final Rule To
Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard--Phase
2, 70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005). The Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) upheld EPA's rule embodying
the Clean Data Policy for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. NRDC v. EPA,
571 F.3d 1245 (D.C. Cir. 2009). Other courts have reviewed and
considered rulemakings applying EPA's Clean Data Policy, and have
consistently upheld them. Sierra Club v. EPA, 99 F. 3d 1551 (10th Cir.
1996); Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F. 3d 537 (7th Cir. 2004); Our
Children's Earth Foundation v. EPA, No. 04-73032 (9th Cir. June 28,
2005 (Memorandum Opinion)), Latino Issues Forum v. EPA, Nos. 06-75831
and 08-71238 (9th Cir. March 2, 2009 (Memorandum Opinion)). EPA sets
forth below a brief explanation of the Clean Data Policy. EPA also
incorporates the discussions of its interpretation set forth in prior
rulemakings, including the PM2.5 implementation rulemaking.
See also 75 FR 31288 (June 3, 2010) (Rhode Island, 1997 8-hour ozone),
75 FR 62470 (October 12, 2010) (Knoxville, Tennessee, 1997 8-hour
ozone), 75 FR 53219 (August 31, 2010) (Greater Connecticut Area, 1997
8-hour ozone), 75 FR 54778 (September 9, 2010) (Baton Rouge, Louisiana,
1997 8-hour ozone), 75 FR 64949 (October 21, 2010) (Providence, Rhode
Island, 1997 8-hour ozone), 76 FR 11080 (March 1, 2011) (Milwaukee-
Racine and Sheboygan Areas, 1997 8-hour ozone), 76 FR 31273 (May 31,
2011) (Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, 1997 8-hour ozone), 76 FR 33647 (June
9, 2011) (St. Louis, Missouri-Illinois, 1997 8-hour ozone), 76 FR 7145
(November 15, 2011) (Charlotte, North Carolina-South Carolina, 1997 8-
hour ozone), 77 FR 31496 (May 29, 2012)
[[Page 35654]]
(Boston-Lawrence-Worchester, Massachusetts, 1997 8-hour ozone). See
also, 75 FR 56 (January 4, 2010) (Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point,
1997 PM2.5), 75 FR 230 (January 5, 2010) (Hickory-Morganton,
Lenoir, 1997 PM2.5), 75 FR 57186 (September 20, 2010)
(Birmingham, Alabama, 2006 PM2.5) 76 FR 12860 (March 9,
2011) (Louisville, Kentucky-Indiana, 1997 PM2.5), 76 FR 1850
(April 5, 2011) (Rome, Georgia, 1997 PM2.5), 76 FR 31239
(May 31, 2011) (Chattanooga, Tennessee-Georgia-Alabama, 1997
PM2.5), 76 FR 31858 (June 2, 2011) (Macon, Georgia, 1997
PM2.5), 76 FR 36873 (June 23, 2011) (Atlanta, Georgia 1997
PM2.5), 76 FR 38023 (June 29, 2011) (Birmingham, Alabama
1997 PM2.5), 76 FR 5542 (September 7, 2011) (Huntington-
Ashland, West Virginia-Kentucky-Ohio, 1997 PM2.5), 76 FR
60373 (September 29, 2011) (Cincinnati, Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana, 1997
PM2.5), (November 18, 2011) (Charleston, West Virginia, 2006
PM2.5), 77 FR 18922 (March 29, 2012) (Harrisburg-Lebonon-
Carlisle-York Allentown, Johnstown and Lancaster, 1997
PM2.5)
The Clean Data Policy represents EPA's interpretation that certain
requirements of subpart 1 of part D of the Act are by their terms not
applicable to areas that are attaining the NAAQS.\3\ As explained
below, the specific requirements that are inapplicable to an area
attaining the standard are the requirements to submit a SIP that
provides for: Attainment of the NAAQS; implementation of all reasonably
available control measures; reasonable further progress; and
implementation of contingency measures for failure to meet deadlines
for RFP and attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This discussion refers to subpart 1 because subparts 1 and 5
contain the requirements relating to attainment of the lead NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAA section 172(c)(1), the requirement for an attainment
demonstration, provides in relevant part that SIPs ``shall provide for
attainment of the [NAAQS].'' EPA has interpreted this requirement as
not applying to areas that have attained the standard. If an area has
attained the standard, there is no need to submit a plan demonstrating
how the area will reach attainment. In the General Preamble (57 FR
13564), EPA stated that no other measures to provide for attainment
would be needed by areas seeking redesignation to attainment since
``attainment will have been reached.'' See also Memorandum from John
Calcagni, ``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,'' (September 4, 1992), at page 6.
A component of the attainment plan specified under section
172(c)(1) is the requirement to provide for ``the implementation of all
reasonably available control measures as expeditiously as practicable''
(RACM). Since RACM is an element of the attainment demonstration, see
General Preamble (57 FR 13560), for the same reason the attainment
demonstration no longer applies by its own terms, RACM also no longer
applies. Furthermore, EPA has consistently interpreted this provision
to require only implementation of potential RACM measures that could
advance attainment.\4\ Thus, where an area is already attaining the
standard, no additional RACM measures are required. EPA' s
interpretation that the statute requires only implementation of RACM
measures that would advance attainment was upheld by the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Sierra Club v. EPA, 314 F. 3d
735, 743-745, 5th Cir. 2002) and by the United States Court of Appeals
for the D.C. Circuit (Sierra Club v. EPA, 294 F. 3d 155, 162-163, D.C.
Cir. 2002). See also the final rulemakings for Pittsburgh-Beaver
Valley, Pennsylvania, 66 FR 53096 (October 19, 2001) and St. Louis, 68
FR 25418 (May 12, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ This interpretation was adopted in the General Preamble, see
57 FR 13498, and has been upheld as applied to the Clean Data
Policy, as well as to nonattainment SIP submissions. See NRDC v.
EPA, 571 F.3d 1245 (D.C. Cir. 2009); Sierra Club v. EPA, 294 F.3d
155 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAA section 172(c)(2) provides that state implementation plan (SIP)
provisions in nonattainment areas must require ``reasonable further
progress.'' The term ``reasonable further progress'' is defined in
section 171(1) as ``such annual incremental reductions in emissions of
the relevant air pollutant as are required by this part or may
reasonably be required by the Administrator for the purpose of ensuring
attainment of the applicable NAAQS by the applicable date.'' Thus, by
definition, the ``reasonable further progress'' provision requires only
such reductions in emissions as are necessary to attain the NAAQS. If
an area has attained the NAAQS, the purpose of the RFP requirement has
been fulfilled, and since the area has already attained, showing that
the State will make RFP towards attainment ``[has] no meaning at that
point.'' General Preamble, 57 FR 13498, 13564 (April 16, 1992).
CAA section 172(c)(9) provides that SIPs in nonattainment areas
``shall provide for the implementation of specific measures to be
undertaken if the area fails to make reasonable further progress, or to
attain the [NAAQS] by the attainment date applicable under this part.
Such measures shall be included in the plan revision as contingency
measures to take effect in any such case without further action by the
State or [EPA].'' This contingency measure requirement is inextricably
tied to the reasonable further progress and attainment demonstration
requirements. Contingency measures are implemented if reasonable
further progress targets are not achieved, or if attainment is not
realized by the attainment date. Where an area has already achieved
attainment by the attainment date, it has no need to rely on
contingency measures to come into attainment or to make further
progress to attainment. As EPA stated in the General Preamble: ``The
section 172(c)(9) requirements for contingency measures are directed at
ensuring RFP and attainment by the applicable date.'' See 57 FR 13564.
Thus these requirements no longer apply when an area has attained the
standard.
It is important to note that should an area attain the lead
standards based on 3 years of data, its obligation to submit an
attainment demonstration and related planning submissions is suspended
only for so long as the area continues to attain the standard. If EPA
subsequently determines, after notice-and-comment rulemaking, that the
Area has violated the 2008 lead NAAQS, the requirements for the State
to submit a SIP to meet the previously suspended requirements would be
reinstated. It is likewise important to note that the area remains
designated nonattainment pending a further redesignation action.
IV. Does the Bristol area meet the 2008 lead NAAQS?
A. Criteria
Today's proposed rulemaking assesses whether Bristol Area has
attained the 2008 Lead NAAQS, based on the most recent 3 years of
quality-assured data. The Bristol Area comprises the portion of
Sullivan County bounded by a 1.25 kilometer radius surrounding the UTM
coordinates 4042923 meters E, 386267 meters N, Zone 17, which surrounds
the Exide Technologies Facility.
Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR 50.16, the 2008 primary and
secondary lead standards are met when the maximum arithmetic 3-month
mean concentration for a 3-year period, as determined in accordance
with 40 CFR part 50, Appendix R, is less than or equal to 0.15
[micro]g/m\3\ at all relevant monitoring sites in the subject area.
B. Bristol Area Air Quality
EPA has reviewed the ambient air monitoring data for the Bristol
Area in
[[Page 35655]]
accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR part 50, Appendix R. All data
considered are complete, quality-assured, certified, and recorded in
EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database. This review addresses air
quality data collected in 3-year period of 2009-2011 which are the most
recent quality-assured data available.
40 CFR part 58, Appendix D, Section 4.5, states that ``At a
minimum, there must be one source-oriented State and Local Air
Monitoring Station site located to measure the maximum Pb [lead]
concentration in ambient air resulting from each non-airport Pb source
which emits 0.50 or more tons per year * * *.'' The Exide Technologies
facility in Bristol is responsible for operating the monitors that meet
this requirement. EPA's review shows that Exide has been exceeding the
minimum monitoring requirement of one monitor, and is currently
operating three Federal reference method (FRM) source-oriented monitors
at the facility, which meet the quality assurance requirements of 40
CFR part 58, Appendix A. In addition, the State of Tennessee is also
operating one additional source-oriented FRM monitor (AQS ID 47-163-
3004, identified in Table 1) at the Exide facility. The State's monitor
originally operated from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (AQS
ID 47-163-4002). Beginning January 1, 2010, Tennessee's monitor was
relocated 0.3 miles to its current location, approximately 10 feet from
Exide's design value monitor (47-163-3001), which is an area of
expected maximum concentration at the site.
Table 1 shows the 2009-2011 design values at the Bristol Area
monitors (the metrics calculated in accordance with 40 CFR part 50,
Appendix R, for determining compliance with the NAAQS) for the 2008
lead NAAQS. It also shows the maximum 3-month rolling average for each
individual year.
Table 1--Design Value for Monitors in the Bristol Nonattainment Area for the 2008 Lead NAAQS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009 Max 3-month 2010 Max 3-month 2011 Max 3-month 2009-2011 design
Location AQS site ID rolling avg rolling avg rolling avg value ([micro]g/
([micro]g/m\3\) ([micro]g/m\3\) ([micro]g/m\3\) m\3\)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
364 Exide Drive............................................... \5\ 47-163-3001 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.09
47-163-3002 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.06
47-163-3003 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.06
47-163-3004 ................ 0.05 0.08 ................
47-163-4002 0.04 ................ ................ ................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA's review of these data indicates that the Bristol Area has
attained and continues to attain the 2008 Lead NAAQS, with a design
value of 0.09 [micro]g/m\3\ for the period of 2009-2011. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered before taking final action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ According to 40 CFR 58.12(b) ``For Pb manual methods, at
least one 24-hour sample must be collected every 6 days except
during periods or seasons exempted by the Regional Administrator.''
All three Exide monitors met and exceeded this requirement, and
collected a sample every three days. EPA also publishes an annual
recommended national sampling calendar, which contains suggested
days of the week for sampling. While this schedule is recommended,
it is not a CFR requirement. From March 30, 2011-November 23, 2011,
the Exide facility's monitors inadvertently operated on a schedule
that deviated from the recommended national schedule by one day of
the week. However, since the monitors still collected a sample every
six days, the data collection requirements were met by all three
Exide monitors for the Area. EPA has thus counted the samples
collected using the alternate sampling schedule as creditable
samples and calculated valid design values supporting a clean data
determination for the Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. What is the effect of these actions?
EPA is proposing to determine that the Bristol Area has attained
the 2008 lead NAAQS, based on complete, quality-assured and certified
data for 2009-2011. Preliminary data available for 2012 indicates that
the area continues to be in attainment. EPA further proposes that, if
its proposed determination of attainment is made final, the
requirements for the Bristol Area to submit an attainment demonstration
and associated RACM, a RFP plan, contingency measures, and any other
planning SIPs related to attainment of the 2008 lead NAAQS would be
suspended for so long as the Area continues to attain the 2008 lead
NAAQS. EPA's proposal is consistent and in keeping with its long-held
interpretation of CAA requirements, as well as with EPA's regulations
for similar determinations for ozone (see 40 CFR 51.918) and fine
particulate matter (see 40 CFR 51.1004(c)). As described below, any
such determination would not be equivalent to the redesignation of the
Area to attainment for the 2008 Lead NAAQS.
Finalizing this proposed action would not constitute a
redesignation of the Area to attainment of the 2008 Lead NAAQS under
section 107(d)(3) of the CAA. Further, finalizing this proposed action
does not involve approving a maintenance plan for the Area as required
under section 175A of the CAA, nor would it find that the Area has met
all other requirements for redesignation. Even if EPA finalizes the
proposed action, the Bristol Area would remain designated nonattainment
for the 2008 Lead NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that the Area
meets the CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment and takes
action to redesignate the Area.
If the Bristol Area continues to monitor attainment of the 2008
lead NAAQS, EPA proposes that the requirements for the Bristol Area to
submit an attainment demonstration and associated RACM, a RFP plan,
contingency measures, and any other planning SIPs related to attainment
of the annual PM2.5 NAAQS will remain suspended. If this
proposed rulemaking is finalized and EPA subsequently determines, after
notice-and-comment rulemaking in the Federal Register, that the Area
has violated the 2008 Lead NAAQS, the basis for the suspension of these
attainment planning requirements would no longer exist for the Bristol
Area, and the Area would thereafter have to address such requirements.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This
action proposes to make a determination based on air quality data and
to suspend certain Federal requirements. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic
[[Page 35656]]
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.). Because this rule proposes to
make a determination based on air quality data and to suspend certain
Federal requirements, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This proposed
rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This proposed action also does not have
Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct
effects on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
only proposes to make a determination based on air quality data and
suspend certain Federal requirements, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established in the CAA. This proposed rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because
it proposes to determine that air quality in the affected area is
meeting Federal standards. The requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) do not apply because it would be inconsistent with applicable law
for EPA, when determining the attainment status of an area, to use
voluntary consensus standards in place of promulgated air quality
standards and monitoring procedures that otherwise satisfy the
provisions of the CAA. This proposed rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). Under Executive Order
12898, EPA finds that this rule involves a proposed determination of
attainment based on air quality data and will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on any communities in the area, including minority and low-
income.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Lead, Reporting
and Recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 5, 2012.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2012-14566 Filed 6-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P