[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37956-37957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15395]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0075; Notice 1]
BMW of North America, LLC, a Subsidiary of BMW AG; Receipt of
Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of Petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC,\1\ a subsidiary of BMW AG,\2\ has
determined that certain model year 2012 BMW X6M SAV multipurpose
passenger vehicles (MPV) manufactured between April 1, 2011 and March
23, 2012, do not fully comply with paragraph S4.3(b) of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire selection and rims and
motor home/recreation vehicle trailer load carrying capacity
information for motor vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000
pounds) or less. BMW has filed an appropriate report dated April 4,
2012, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ BMW of North America, LLC, is a U.S. company that
manufacturers and imports motor vehicles.
\2\ BMW AG, is a German company that manufactures motor
vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see implementing rule
at 49 CFR part 556), BMW submitted a petition for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
This notice of receipt of BMW's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
Vehicles involved: Affected are approximately 364 model year 2012
BMW X6M SAV MPVs manufactured between April 1, 2011 and March 23, 2012.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, these provisions
only apply to the subject 364 \3\ vehicles that BMW no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ BMW's petition, which was filed under 49 CFR part 556,
requests an agency decision to exempt BMW as a vehicle manufacturer
from the notification and recall responsibilities of 49 CFR part 573
for the 364 affected vehicles. However, a decision on this petition
will not relieve vehicle distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, introduction or delivery
for introduction into interstate commerce of the noncompliant
vehicles under their control after BMW notified them that the
subject noncompliance existed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noncompliance: BMW explains that the noncompliance is that the tire
[[Page 37957]]
placard on the affected vehicles incorrectly identifies the rear
designated seating capacity as ``2'' when in fact it should be ``3,''
and the total designated seating capacity as ``4'' when in fact it
should be ``5.''
Rule text: Paragraph S4.3(b) of FMVSS No. 110 requires in pertinent
part:
S4.3(b) Placard. Each vehicle, except for a trailer or
incomplete vehicle, shall show the information specified in S4.3(a)
through (g), and may show, at the manufacturer's option, the
information specified in S4.3(h) and (i), on a placard permanently
affixed to the driver's side B-pillar. * * *
(b) Designated seated capacity (expressed in terms of total
number of occupants and number of occupants for each front and rear
seat location); * * *
Summary of BMW's Analysis and Arguments
BMW states that while the tire placard incorrectly identifies the
vehicle seating capacity, this noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following reasons:
1. It would become clear to a vehicle owner that the rear seat of
the affected vehicles contains three sets of seat belts, and provides
adequate space for three people to occupy the rear seat and that the
vehicle in fact does accommodate five passengers not four as labeled.
2. The tire pressure value on the tire placard is correct. In fact,
the recommended tire inflation pressure for both the five passenger and
the four passenger vehicles is the same. Therefore, there is no risk of
under-inflation.
3. The vehicle capacity weight listed on the tire placard is
correct, and is the same for X6M model vehicles built for four or five
occupants. Therefore, there is no risk of overloading.
4. The vehicle's Monroney label contains a listing of all options
that have been equipped on the affected vehicles. The option regarding
the rear seat for three occupants is noted on the Monroney label;
therefore, an owner would have been notified at time of purchase of the
vehicle that the rear seat is equipped to accommodate three occupants.
5. The vehicle Owner's Manual contains information pertaining to
the vehicle's tires, tire pressure, and the vehicle capacity weight.
Therefore, if owners check the Owner's Manual, correct information is
available for their use.
6. BMW also offers Roadside Assistance\TM\ and BMW Assist\TM\ which
are available 24 hours/day with representatives that are available to
provide drivers with all of the available tires sizes and
specifications for the affected vehicles.
7. BMW has received no customer complaints and are unaware of any
accidents or injuries regarding this noncompliance of the affected
vehicles.
BMW has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected future
production and that all other required markings are present and
correct.
BMW also expressed its belief that NHTSA has previously granted
similar petitions.
In summation, BMW believes that the described noncompliance of its
tire placards regarding seating capacity is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition, to exempt from providing recall
notification of noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and
remedying the recall noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120
should be granted.
Comments: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be
submitted by any of the following methods:
a. By mail addressed to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
b. By hand delivery to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on
weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
c. Electronically: By logging onto the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Web site at http://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the
online instructions for submitting comments. Comments may also be faxed
to 1-202-493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
DATES: Comment Closing Date: July 25, 2012.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at
CFR 1.50 and 501.8)
Issued on: June 18, 2012.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2012-15395 Filed 6-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P