Federal Register, Volume 77 Issue 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55737-55755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22258]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 11, 2012 /
Proposed Rules

[[Page 55737]]

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 121

RIN 3245-AG45

Small Business Size Standards: Finance and Insurance and
Management of Companies and Enterprises

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) proposes to
increase small business size standards for 37 industries in North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Sector 52, Finance and
Insurance, and for two industries in NAICS Sector 55, Management of
Companies and Enterprises. In addition, SBA proposes to change the
measure of size from average assets to average receipts for NAICS
522293, International Trade Financing. As part of its ongoing
comprehensive size standards review, SBA evaluated all receipts based
and assets based size standards in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55 to determine
whether they should be retained or revised. This proposed rule is one
of a series of proposed rules that will review size standards of
industries grouped by NAICS Sector. SBA issued a White Paper entitled
``Size Standards Methodology'' and published a notice in the October
21, 2009 issue of the Federal Register to advise the public that the
document is available on its Web site at www.sba.gov/size for public
review and comments. The ``Size Standards Methodology'' White Paper
explains how SBA establishes, reviews, and modifies its receipts based
and employee based small business size standards. In this proposed
rule, SBA has applied its methodology that pertains to establishing,
reviewing, and modifying a receipts based size standard.

DATES: SBA must receive comments to this proposed rule on or before
November 13, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Identify your comments by RIN 3245-AG45 and submit them by
one of the following methods: (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov, following the instructions for submitting
comments; or (2) Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Khem R. Sharma, Ph.D.,
Chief, Size Standards Division, 409 Third Street SW., Mail Code 6530,
Washington, DC 20416. SBA will not accept comments to this proposed
rule submitted by email.
SBA will post all comments to this proposed rule on
www.regulations.gov.. If you wish to submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User Notice at www.regulations.gov,
you must submit such information to U.S. Small Business Administration,
Khem R. Sharma, Ph.D., Chief, Size Standards Division, 409 Third Street
SW., Mail Code 6530, Washington, DC 20416, or send an email to
sizestandards@sba.gov. Highlight the information that you consider to
be CBI and explain why you believe SBA should hold this information as
confidential. SBA will review your information and determine whether it
will make the information public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Khem R. Sharma, Ph.D., Chief, Size
Standards Division, (202) 205-6618 or sizestandards@sba.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To determine eligibility for Federal small
business assistance, SBA establishes small business size definitions
(referred to as size standards) for private sector industries in the
United States. SBA uses two primary measures of business size--average
annual receipts and average number of employees. SBA uses financial
assets, electric output, and refining capacity to measure the size of a
few specialized industries. For example, currently six size standards
in NAICS Sector 52 are based on total assets. In addition, SBA's Small
Business Investment Company (SBIC), Certified Development Company
(504), and 7(a) Loan Programs use either the industry based size
standards or net worth and net income based alternative size standards
to determine eligibility for those programs. At the beginning of the
current comprehensive size standards review, there were 41 different
size standards covering 1,141 NAICS industries and 18 sub-industry
activities (``exceptions'' in SBA's table of size standards). Thirty-
one of these size levels were based on average annual receipts, seven
were based on average number of employees, and three were based on
other measures.
Over the years, SBA has received comments that its size standards
have not kept up with changes in the economy, in particular the changes
in the Federal contracting marketplace and industry structure. The last
time SBA conducted a comprehensive review of all size standards was
during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Since then, most reviews of size
standards were limited to a few specific industries in response to
requests from the public and Federal agencies. SBA also adjusts its
monetary based size standards for inflation at least once every five
years. SBA's latest inflation adjustment to size standards was
published in the Federal Register on July 18, 2008 (73 FR 41237).
Because of changes in the Federal marketplace and industry
structure since the last comprehensive size standards review, SBA
recognizes that current data may no longer support some of its existing
size standards. Accordingly, in 2007, SBA began a comprehensive review
of all size standards to determine if they are consistent with current
data, and to adjust them when necessary. In addition, on September 27,
2010, the President of the United States signed the Small Business Jobs
Act of 2010 (Jobs Act). The Jobs Act directs SBA to conduct a detailed
review of all size standards and to make appropriate adjustments to
reflect market conditions. Specifically, the Jobs Act requires SBA to
conduct a detailed review of at least one-third of all size standards
during every 18-month period from the date of its enactment. In
addition, the Jobs Act requires that SBA conduct a review of all size
standards at least once every five years thereafter. Reviewing existing
small business size standards and making appropriate adjustments based
on current data are also consistent with Executive Order 13563 on
improving regulation and regulatory review.
Rather than review all size standards at one time, SBA is reviewing
size standards on a Sector by Sector basis. A NAICS Sector generally
includes 25 to 75 industries, except for NAICS Sector

[[Page 55738]]

31-33, Manufacturing, which has considerably more industries. Once SBA
completes its review of size standards for industries in a given NAICS
Sector, it issues a proposed rule to revise size standards for those
industries for which it believes currently available data and other
relevant factors support doing so.
Below is a discussion of SBA's size standards methodology for
establishing receipts based size standards that SBA applied to this
proposed rule, including analyses of industry structure, Federal
procurement trends and other relevant factors for industries reviewed
in this proposed rule, the impact of the proposed revisions to size
standards on Federal small business assistance, and the evaluation of
whether a revised size standard would exclude dominant firms from being
considered small.

Size Standards Methodology

SBA has recently developed a ``Size Standards Methodology'' for
developing, reviewing, and modifying size standards when necessary. SBA
published the document on its Web site at www.sba.gov/size for public
review and comments, and has included it as a supporting document in
the electronic docket of this proposed rule at www.regulations.gov, SBA
does not apply all features of its ``Size Standards Methodology'' to
all industries because not all features are appropriate for every
industry. For example, since 36 of the 42 industries in NAICS Sectors
52 and 55 reviewed in this rule have receipts based size standards, the
methodology described in this proposed rule applies only to
establishing receipts based size standards. For those interested in
SBA's overall approach to establishing, evaluating, and modifying small
business size standards, the methodology is available on SBA's Web site
at www.sba.gov/size. SBA always explains its analysis in individual
proposed and final rules relating to size standards for specific
industries.
SBA welcomes comments from the public on a number of issues
concerning its ``Size Standards Methodology,'' such as whether there
are other approaches to establishing and modifying size standards;
whether there are alternative or additional factors that SBA should
consider; whether SBA's approach to small business size standards makes
sense in the current economic environment; whether SBA's use of anchor
size standards is appropriate; whether there are gaps in SBA's
methodology because the data it uses are not current or sufficiently
comprehensive; and whether there are other data, facts, and/or issues
that SBA should consider. Comments on SBA's size standards methodology
should be submitted via (1) the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov, following the instructions for submitting
comments; the docket number is SBA-2009-0008, or (2) Mail/Hand
Delivery/Courier: Khem R. Sharma, Ph.D., Chief, Size Standards
Division, 409 Third Street SW., Mail Code 6530, Washington, DC 20416.
As it will do with comments to this and other proposed rules, SBA will
post all comments on its methodology on www.regulations.gov. As of May
31, 2012, SBA has received 14 comments to its ``Size Standards
Methodology.'' The comments are available to the public at
www.regulations.gov. SBA continues to welcome comments on its
methodology from interested parties. SBA will not accept comments to
its ``Size Standards Methodology'' submitted by email.
Congress granted SBA's Administrator discretion to establish
detailed small business size standards. 15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2).
Specifically, Section 3(a)(3) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C.
632(a)(3)) requires that ``* * * the [SBA] Administrator shall ensure
that the size standard varies from industry to industry to the extent
necessary to reflect the differing characteristics of the various
industries and consider other factors deemed to be relevant by the
Administrator.'' Accordingly, the economic structure of an industry is
the basis for developing and modifying small business size standards.
SBA identifies the small business segment of an industry by examining
data on the economic characteristics defining the industry structure
(as described below). In addition, SBA considers current economic
conditions, its mission and program objectives, the Administration's
current policies, suggestions from industry groups and Federal
agencies, and public comments on the proposed rule. SBA also examines
whether a size standard based on industry and other relevant data
successfully excludes businesses that are dominant in the industry.
This proposed rule includes information regarding the factors SBA
evaluated and the criteria it used to propose adjustments to size
standards in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55. This proposed rule affords the
public an opportunity to review and to comment on SBA's proposals to
revise size standards in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55, as well as on the
data and methodology it used to evaluate and revise the size standards.

Industry Analysis

For the current comprehensive size standards review, SBA has
established three ``base'' or ``anchor'' size standards--$7.0 million
in average annual receipts for industries that have receipts based size
standards, 500 employees for manufacturing and other industries that
have employee based size standards (except for Wholesale Trade), and
100 employees for industries in the Wholesale Trade Sector. SBA
established 500 employees as the anchor size standard for manufacturing
industries at its inception in 1953. Shortly thereafter, SBA
established $1 million in average annual receipts as the anchor size
standard for nonmanufacturing industries. SBA has periodically
increased the receipts based anchor size standard for inflation, and
today it is $7 million. Since 1986, the size standard for all
industries in the Wholesale Trade Sector for SBA financial assistance
and for most Federal programs has been 100 employees. However, NAICS
codes for the Wholesale Trade Sector and their 100 employee size
standards do not apply to Federal procurement programs. Rather, for
Federal procurement the size standard for all industries in Wholesale
Trade (NAICS Sector 42) and for all industries in Retail Trade (NAICS
Sector 44-45), is 500 employees under SBA's nonmanufacturer rule (13
CFR 121.406(b)).
These long-standing anchor size standards have stood the test of
time and gained legitimacy through practice and general public
acceptance. An anchor is neither a minimum nor a maximum size standard.
It is a common size standard for a large number of industries that have
similar economic characteristics and serves as a reference point in
evaluating size standards for individual industries. SBA uses the
anchor in lieu of trying to establish precise small business size
standards for each industry. Otherwise, theoretically, the number of
size standards might be as high as the number of industries for which
SBA establishes size standards (1,141). Furthermore, the data SBA
analyzes are static, while the U.S. economy is not. Hence, absolute
precision is impossible. SBA presumes an anchor size standard is
appropriate for a particular industry unless that industry displays
economic characteristics that are considerably different from other
industries with the same anchor size standard.
When evaluating a size standard, SBA compares the economic
characteristics of the industry under review to the average
characteristics of industries with one of the three anchor size
standards (referred to as the ``anchor comparison group''). This allows
SBA to assess the industry structure and to

[[Page 55739]]

determine whether the industry is appreciably different from the other
industries in the anchor comparison group. If the characteristics of a
specific industry under review are similar to the average
characteristics of the anchor comparison group, the anchor size
standard is generally appropriate for that industry. SBA may consider
adopting a size standard below the anchor when (1) all or most of the
industry characteristics are significantly smaller than the average
characteristics of the anchor comparison group, or (2) other industry
considerations strongly suggest that the anchor size standard would be
an unreasonably high size standard for the industry.
If the specific industry's characteristics are significantly higher
than those of the anchor comparison group, then a size standard higher
than the anchor size standard may be appropriate. The larger the
differences are between the characteristics of the industry under
review and those in the anchor comparison group, the larger will be the
difference between the appropriate industry size standard and the
anchor size standard. To determine a size standard above the anchor
size standard, SBA analyzes the characteristics of a second comparison
group. For industries with receipts based size standards, including
those in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55, SBA has developed a second comparison
group consisting of industries that have the highest of receipts based
size standards. To determine a size standard above the anchor size
standard, SBA analyzes the characteristics of this second comparison
group. The size standards for this group of industries range from $23
million to $35.5 million in average annual receipts; the weighted
average size standard for the group is $29 million. SBA refers to this
comparison group as the ``higher level receipts based size standard
group.''
The primary factors that SBA evaluates to examine industry
structure include average firm size, startup costs and entry barriers,
industry competition, and distribution of firms by size. SBA evaluates,
as an additional primary factor, the impact that revised size standards
might have on Federal contracting assistance to small businesses. These
are, generally, the five most important factors SBA examines when
establishing or revising a size standard for an industry. However, SBA
will also consider and evaluate other information that it believes is
relevant to a particular industry (such as technological changes,
growth trends, SBA financial assistance, other program factors, etc.).
SBA also considers possible impacts of size standard revisions on
eligibility for Federal small business assistance, current economic
conditions, the Administration's policies, and suggestions from
industry groups and Federal agencies. Public comments on a proposed
rule also provide important additional information. SBA thoroughly
reviews all public comments before making a final decision on its
proposed size standards. Below are brief descriptions of each of the
five primary factors that SBA has evaluated for each industry in NAICS
Sectors 52 and 55 that has a receipts based size standard. A more
detailed description of this analysis is provided in SBA's ``Size
Standards Methodology,'' available at http://www.sba.gov/size.
1. Average firm size. SBA computes two measures of average firm
size: Simple average and weighted average. For industries with receipts
based size standards, the Simple average is the total receipts of the
industry divided by the total number of firms in the industry. The
weighted average firm size is the sum of weighted simple averages in
different receipts based size classes, where weights are the shares of
total industry receipts for respective size classes. The simple average
weighs all firms within an industry equally regardless of their size.
The weighted average overcomes that limitation by giving more weight to
larger firms.
If the average firm size of an industry is significantly higher
than the average firm size of industries in the anchor comparison
industry group, this will generally support a size standard higher than
the anchor size standard. Conversely, if the industry's average firm
size is similar to or significantly lower than that of the anchor
comparison industry group, it will be a basis to adopt the anchor size
standard, or, in rare cases, a standard lower than the anchor.
2. Startup costs and entry barriers. Startup costs reflect a firm's
initial size in an industry. New entrants to an industry must have
sufficient capital and other assets to start and maintain a viable
business. If new firms entering a particular industry have greater
capital requirements than firms in industries in the anchor comparison
group, this can be a basis for establishing a size standard higher than
the anchor size standard. In lieu of actual startup cost data, SBA uses
average assets as a proxy to measure the capital requirements for new
entrants to an industry.
To calculate average assets, SBA begins with the sales to total
assets ratio for an industry from the Risk Management Association's
Annual Statement Studies. SBA then applies these ratios to the average
receipts of firms in that industry. An industry with average assets
that are significantly higher than those of the anchor comparison group
is likely to have higher startup costs; this in turn will support a
size standard higher than the anchor. Conversely, an industry with
average assets that are similar to or lower than those of the anchor
comparison group is likely to have lower startup costs; this will
support the anchor standard or one lower than the anchor.
3. Industry competition. Industry competition is generally measured
by the share of total industry receipts generated by the largest firms
in an industry. SBA generally evaluates the share of industry receipts
generated by the four largest firms in each industry. This is referred
to as the ``four-firm concentration ratio,'' a commonly used economic
measure of market competition. SBA compares the four-firm concentration
ratio for an industry to the average four-firm concentration ratio for
industries in the anchor comparison group. If a significant share of
economic activity within the industry is concentrated among a few
relatively large companies, all else being equal, SBA will establish a
size standard higher than the anchor size standard. SBA does not
consider the four-firm concentration ratio as an important factor in
assessing a size standard if its share of economic activity within the
industry is less than 40 percent. For an industry with a four-firm
concentration ratio of 40 percent or more, SBA examines the average
size of the four largest firms to determine a size standard.
4. Distribution of firms by size. SBA examines the shares of
industry total receipts accounted for by firms of different receipts
and employment size classes in an industry. This is an additional
factor in assessing industry competition. If most of an industry's
economic activity is attributable to smaller firms, this generally
indicates that small businesses are competitive in that industry. This
can support adopting the anchor size standard. If most of an industry's
economic activity is attributable to larger firms, this indicates that
small businesses are not competitive in that industry. This can support
adopting a size standard above the anchor.
Concentration is a measure of inequality of distribution. To
determine the degree of inequality of distribution in an industry, SBA
computes the Gini coefficient, using the Lorenz curve. The Lorenz curve
presents the cumulative

[[Page 55740]]

percentages of units (firms) along the horizontal axis and the
cumulative percentages of receipts (or other measures of size) along
the vertical axis. (For further detail, please refer to SBA's ``Size
Standards Methodology'' on its Web site at www.sba.gov/size.) Gini
coefficient values vary from zero to one. If receipts are distributed
equally among all the firms in an industry, the value of the Gini
coefficient will equal zero. If an industry's total receipts are
attributed to a single firm, the Gini coefficient will equal one.
SBA compares the Gini coefficient value for an industry with that
for industries in the anchor comparison group. If the Gini coefficient
value for an industry is higher than it is for industries in the anchor
comparison industry group this may, all else being equal, warrant a
size standard higher than the anchor. Conversely, if an industry's Gini
coefficient is similar to or lower than that for the anchor group, the
anchor standard, or in some cases a standard lower than the anchor, may
be adopted.
5. Impact on Federal contracting and SBA loan programs. SBA
examines the possible impact a size standard change may have on Federal
small business assistance. This most often focuses on the share of
Federal contracting dollars awarded to small businesses in the industry
in question. In general, if the small business share of Federal
contracting in an industry with significant Federal contracting is
appreciably less than the small business share of the industry's total
receipts, this could justify considering a size standard higher than
the existing size standard. The disparity between the small business
Federal market share and industry-wide small business share may be due
to various factors, such as extensive administrative and compliance
requirements associated with Federal contracts, the different skill set
required for Federal contracts as compared to typical commercial
contracting work, and the size of Federal contracts. These, as well as
other factors, are likely to influence the type of firms within an
industry that compete for Federal contracts. By comparing the small
business Federal contracting share with the industry-wide small
business share, SBA includes in its size standards analysis the latest
Federal contracting trends. This analysis may support a size standard
larger than the current size standard.
SBA considers Federal contracting trends in the size standards
analysis only if (1) the small business share of Federal contracting
dollars is at least 10 percent lower than the small business share of
total industry receipts, and (2) the amount of total Federal
contracting averages $100 million or more during the latest three
fiscal years. These thresholds reflect significant levels of
contracting where a revision to a size standard may have an impact on
contracting opportunities to small businesses.
Besides the impact on small business Federal contracting, SBA also
evaluates the impact of a proposed size standard revision on SBA's loan
programs. For this, SBA examines the data on volume and number of its
guaranteed loans within an industry and the size of firms obtaining
those loans. This allows SBA to assess whether the existing or the
proposed size standard for a particular industry may restrict the level
of financial assistance to small firms. If current size standards have
impeded financial assistance to small businesses, higher size standards
may be supportable. However, if small businesses under current size
standards have been receiving significant amounts of financial
assistance through SBA's loan programs, or if the financial assistance
has been provided mainly to businesses that are much smaller than the
existing size standards, SBA does not consider this factor when
determining the size standard.

Sources of Industry and Program Data

The primary source of industry data that SBA used in evaluating
industries in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55 that have receipts based size
standards is a special tabulation of the 2007 Economic Census (see
www.census.gov/econ/census07/) prepared by the U.S. Bureau of the
Census (Census Bureau) for SBA. The 2007 Economic Census data are the
latest available. The special tabulation provides SBA with data on the
number of firms, number of establishments, number of employees, annual
payroll, and annual receipts of companies by Industry (6-digit level),
Industry Group (4-digit level), Subsector (3-digit level), and Sector
(2-digit level). These data are arrayed by various classes of firms'
size based on the overall number of employees and receipts of the
entire enterprise (all establishments and affiliated firms) from all
industries. The special tabulation enables SBA to evaluate average firm
size, four-firm concentration ratio, and distribution of firms by
various receipts and employment size classes.
In some cases, where data were not available due to disclosure
prohibitions in the Census Bureau's tabulation, SBA either estimated
missing values using available relevant data or examined data at a
higher level of industry aggregation, such as at the NAICS 2-digit
(Sector), 3-digit (Subsector), or 4-digit (Industry Group) level. In
some instances, SBA's analysis was based only on those factors for
which data were available or estimates of missing values were possible.
Five of the seven industries within NAICS Subsector 525 (Funds,
Trusts and Other Financial Vehicles) are not covered by the 2007
Economic Census. All industries in that Subsector currently have a
common size standard. To maintain the common size standard, in this
proposed rule, SBA applies the results for the two industries (NAICS
525910, Open End Investment Funds, and NAICS 525990, Other Financial
Vehicles) for which the Economic Census data are available to those
five industries.
To evaluate industries in NAICS Sector 52 that have assets based
size standards, as discussed below, SBA obtained the data from the
Statistics on Depository institutions (SDI) database of the Federal
Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) between 1984 and 2011 (http://www2.fdic.gov/sdi/main.asp). SDI does not include a field to classify
the institutions by the NAICS definition. However, it has a field that
identifies an institution's primary specialization in terms of asset
concentration and another field that identifies each institution as a
bank or thrift. Since the SDI database does not identify minority owned
financial institutions from others, SBA identified them using data on
financial institutions that participate in the Department of the
Treasury's Minority Bank Deposit Program, compiled by the Federal
Reserve Board (FRB) (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/mob/). To
examine characteristics of minority owned financial institutions, SBA
merged the FRB data with SDI database using the common identification
number for each institution.
The SDI database does not include Credit Unions, NAICS 522130,
while the FRB data is limited to minority-owned credit unions only. The
data to evaluate the Credit Unions industry were based on call reports
for the fourth quarters of 1994 and 2011 from the National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA) Web site (http://www.ncua.gov/DataApps/QCallRptData/Pages/CallRptData.aspx). The earliest year for which these
data were available on the NCUA Web site is 1994.
To calculate average assets, SBA used sales to total assets ratios
from the Risk Management Association's Annual Statement Studies, 2008-
2010.

[[Page 55741]]

To evaluate Federal contracting trends, SBA examined data on
Federal contract awards for fiscal years 2008-2010. The data are
available from the U.S. General Service Administration's Federal
Procurement Data System--Next Generation (FPDS-NG).
To assess the impact on financial assistance to small businesses,
SBA examined data on its own guaranteed loan programs for fiscal years
2008-2010.
Data sources and estimation procedures SBA uses in its size
standards analysis are documented in detail in SBA's ``Size Standards
Methodology'' White Paper, which is available at www.sba.gov/size.

Dominance in Field of Operation

Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) defines a
small business concern as one that is (1) independently owned and
operated, (2) not dominant in its field of operation, and (3) within a
specific small business definition or size standard established by SBA
Administrator. SBA considers as part of its evaluation whether a
business concern at a proposed size standard would be dominant in its
field of operation. For this, SBA generally examines the industry's
market share of firms at the proposed standard. Market share and other
factors may indicate whether a firm can exercise a major controlling
influence on a national basis in an industry where a significant number
of business concerns are engaged. If a contemplated size standard
includes a dominant firm, SBA will consider a lower size standard to
exclude the dominant firm from being defined as small.

Selection of Size Standards

To simplify receipts based size standards, SBA has proposed to
select size standards from a limited number of levels. For many years,
SBA has been concerned about the complexity of determining small
business status caused by a large number of varying receipts based size
standards (see 69 FR 13130 (March 4, 2004) and 57 FR 62515 (December
31, 1992)). At the beginning of the current comprehensive size
standards review, there were 31 different levels of receipts based size
standards. They ranged from $0.75 million to $35.5 million, and many
applied to one or only a few industries. SBA believes that such a large
number of different small business size standards are unnecessary and
difficult to justify analytically. To simplify managing and using size
standards, SBA proposes that there be fewer size standard levels. This
will produce more common size standards for businesses operating in
related industries. This will also result in greater consistency among
the size standards for industries that have similar economic
characteristics.
The SBA proposes, therefore, to apply one of eight receipts based
size standards to each industry in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55 that has a
receipts based standard. The eight ``fixed'' receipts based size
standard levels are $5 million, $7 million, $10 million, $14 million,
$19 million, $25.5 million, $30 million, and $35.5 million. SBA
established these eight receipts based size standard based on the
current minimum, the current maximum, and the most commonly used
current receipts based size standards. At the start of the current
comprehensive review, the most commonly used receipts based size
standards clustered around the following--$2.5 million to $4.5 million,
$7 million, $9 million to $10 million, $12.5 million to $14.0 million,
$25 million to $25.5 million, and $33.5 million to $35.5 million. SBA
selected $7 million as one of eight fixed levels of receipts based size
standards because it is an anchor standard. The lowest or minimum
receipts based size level will be $5 million. Other than the size
standards for agriculture that are statutorily set at $0.75 million and
those based on commissions (such as real estate brokers and travel
agents), $5 million includes those industries with the lowest receipts
based standards, which ranged from $2 million to $4.5 million. Among
the higher level size clusters, SBA has set four fixed levels: $10
million, $14 million, $25.5 million, and $35.5 million. Because of the
large intervals between some of the fixed levels, SBA established two
intermediate levels, namely $19 million between $14 million and $25.5
million, and $30 million between $25.5 million and $35.5 million. These
two intermediate levels reflect roughly the same proportional
differences as between the other two successive levels.
To simplify size standards further, SBA may propose a common size
standard for closely related industries. Although the size standard
analysis may support a separate size standard for each industry, SBA
believes that establishing different size standards for closely related
industries may not always be appropriate. For example, in cases where
many of the same businesses operate in the same multiple industries, a
common size standard for those industries might better reflect the
Federal marketplace. This might also make size standards among related
industries more consistent than separate size standards for each of
those industries. This led SBA to establish a common size standard for
the information technology (IT) services (NAICS 541511, NAICS 541112,
NAICS 541513, NAICS 541519, and NAICS 811212), even though the industry
data might support a distinct size standard for each industry (57 FR
27906 (June 23, 1992)). More recently SBA adopted common size standards
for some of the industries in NAICS Sector 44-45, Retail Trade (75 FR
61597 (October 6, 2010)), NAICS Sector 54, Professional, Scientific and
Technical Services (77 FR 7490 (February 10, 2012)), and NAICS Sector
48-49, Transportation and Warehousing (77 FR 10943 (February 24,
2012)).
In NAICS Sector 52, currently all industries in NAICS Industry
Group 5221 and NAICS Industries 522210 and 522293 have a common size
standard of $175 million in total assets. Similarly, all other
industries in NAICS Sector 52, with an exception of NAICS Industry
524126 which has a size standard of 1,500 employees, have a common size
standard of $7 million in average annual receipts. Based on the
characteristics of those industries, SBA proposes to retain common size
standards for all industries within NAICS Industry Group 5222 (with the
exception of NAICS 522210, Credit Card Issuing). NAICS 522210 currently
has an assets based size standard and based on the evaluation of
business operations and characteristics of firms in this industry SBA
proposes to maintain the assets based size standard for this industry.
NAICS 522293, International Trade Financing, also has an assets based
size standard currently, but based on the evaluation of business
operations and characteristics of firms involved in this industry, SBA
proposes to replace the assets based size standard with a receipts
based size standard for this industry. In addition, SBA proposes to
apply the same common receipts based size standard for NAICS 522293 as
that for NAICS Industry Group 5222 (except for NAICS 522210). SBA also
proposes common size standards for industries within NAICS Subsector
523, NAICS Industry Group 5241 (with exception of NAICS 524126), and
NAICS Subsector 525. Whenever SBA proposes a common size standard for
closely related industries it will provide its justification.

Evaluation of Industry Structure

SBA evaluated 29 industries in NAICS Sector 52, Finance and
Insurance, and two industries in NAICS Sector 55, Management of
Companies and Enterprises (for which industry data were available from
the 2007 Economic Census), to assess the appropriateness of

[[Page 55742]]

the current receipts based size standards. For this, as described
above, SBA compared data on the economic characteristics of each of
those industries to the average characteristics of industries in two
comparison groups. The first comparison group consists of all
industries with $7 million size standards and is referred to as the
``receipts based anchor comparison group.'' Because the goal of SBA's
review is to assess whether a specific industry's size standard should
be the same as or different from the anchor size standard, this is the
most logical group of industries to analyze. In addition, this group
includes a sufficient number of firms to provide a meaningful
assessment and comparison of industry characteristics.
If the characteristics of an industry are similar to the average
characteristics of industries in the anchor comparison group, the
anchor size standard is generally appropriate for that industry. If an
industry's structure is significantly different from industries in the
anchor group, a size standard lower or higher than the anchor size
standard might be appropriate. The proposed new size standard is based
on the difference between the characteristics of the anchor comparison
group and a second industry comparison group. As described above, the
second comparison group for receipts based standards consists of
industries with the highest receipts based size standards, ranging from
$23 million to $35.5 million. The average size standard for this group
is $29 million. SBA refers to this group of industries as the ``higher
level receipts based size standard comparison group.'' SBA determines
differences in industry structure between an industry under review and
the industries in the two comparison groups by comparing data on each
of the industry factors, including average firm size, average assets
size, the four-firm concentration ratio, and the Gini coefficient of
distribution of firms by size. Table 1, Average Characteristics of
Receipts Based Comparison Groups, shows the average firm size (both
simple and weighted), average assets size, four-firm concentration
ratio, average receipts of the four largest firms, and the Gini
coefficient for both anchor level and higher level comparison groups
for receipts based size standards.

Table 1--Average Characteristics of Receipts Based Comparison Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average firm size ($ million) Average
-------------------------------- Average Four-firm receipts of
Receipts based comparison group assets size concentration four largest Gini
Simple Weighted ($ million) ratio (%) firms ($ coefficient
average average million) *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchor Level............................................ 1.32 19.63 0.84 16.6 196.4 0.693
Higher Level............................................ 5.07 116.84 3.20 32.1 1,376.0 0.830
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* To be used for industries with a four-firm concentration ratio of 40% or greater.

Derivation of Size Standards Based on Industry Factors

For each industry factor in Table 1, SBA derives a separate size
standard based on the differences between the values for an industry
under review and the values for the two comparison groups. If the
industry value for a particular factor is near the corresponding factor
for the anchor comparison group, the $7 million anchor size standard is
appropriate for that factor.
An industry factor significantly above or below the anchor
comparison group will generally imply a size standard for that industry
above or below the $7 million anchor. The new size standard in these
cases is based on the proportional difference between the industry
value and the values for the two comparison groups.
For example, if an industry's simple average receipts are $3.3
million, that can support a $19 million size standard. The $3.3 million
level is 52.8 percent between $1.32 million for the anchor comparison
group and $5.07 million for the higher level comparison group (($3.30
million-$1.32 million) / ($5.07 million - $1.32 million) = 0.528 or
52.8%). This proportional difference is applied to the difference
between the $7 million anchor size standard and average size standard
of $29 million for the higher level size standard group and then added
to $7.0 million to estimate a size standard of $18.61 million ([{$29.0
million - $7.0 million{time} * 0.528] + $7.0 million = $18.61
million). The final step is to round the estimated $18.61 million size
standard to the nearest fixed size standard, which in this example is
$19 million.
SBA applies the above calculation to derive a size standard for
each industry factor. Detailed formulas involved in these calculations
are presented in SBA's ``Size Standards Methodology'' which is
available on its Web site at www.sba.gov/size. (However, it should be
noted that figures in the ``Size Standards Methodology'' White Paper
are based on 2002 Economic Census data and are different from those
presented in this proposed rule. That is because when SBA prepared its
``Size Standards Methodology,'' the 2007 Economic Census data were not
yet available). Table 2, Values of Industry Factors and Supported Size
Standards, (below) shows ranges of values for each industry factor and
the levels of size standards supported by those values.

Table 2--Values of Industry Factors and Supported Size Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Or if avg.
Or if weighted Or if avg. receipts of Then implied
If simple avg. receipts avg. receipts assets size ($ largest four Or if Gini size standard
size ($ million) size ($ million) firms ($ coefficient is ($
million) million) million)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<1.15....................... <15.22......... <0.73.......... <142.8......... <0.686......... 5.0
1.15 to 1.57................ 15.22 to 26.26. 0.73 to 1.00... 142.8 to 276.9. 0.686 to 0.702. 7.0
1.58 to 2.17................ 26.27 to 41.73. 1.01 to 1.37... 277.0 to 464.5. 0.703 to 0.724. 10.0
2.18 to 2.94................ 41.74 to 61.61. 1.38 to 1.86... 464.6 to 705.8. 0.725 to 0.752. 14.0
2.95 to 3.92................ 61.62 to 87.02. 1.87 to 2.48... 705.9 to 0.753 to 0.788. 19.0
1,014.1.
3.93 to 4.86................ 87.03 to 111.32 2.49 to 3.07... 1,014.2 to 0.789 to 0.822. 25.5
1,309.0.

[[Page 55743]]

4.87 to 5.71................ 111.33 to 3.08 to 3.61... 1,309.1 to 0.823 to 0.853. 30.0
133.41. 1,577.1.
>5.71....................... >133.41........ >3.61.......... >1,577.1....... >0.853......... 35.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Derivation of Size Standard Based on Federal Contracting Factor

Besides industry structure, SBA also evaluates Federal contracting
data to assess the success of small businesses in getting Federal
contracts under the existing size standards. For industries where the
small business share of total Federal contracting dollars is 10 to 30
percent lower than the small business share of total industry receipts,
SBA has designated a size standard one level higher than their current
size standard. For industries where the small business share of total
Federal contracting dollars is more than 30 percent lower than the
small business share of total industry receipts, SBA has designated a
size standard two levels higher than the current size standard.
Because of the complex relationships among several variables
affecting small business participation in the Federal marketplace, SBA
has chosen not to designate a size standard for the Federal contracting
factor alone that is more than two levels above the current size
standard. SBA believes that a larger adjustment to size standards based
on Federal contracting activity should be based on a more detailed
analysis of the impact of any subsequent revision to the current size
standard. In limited situations, however, SBA may conduct a more
extensive examination of Federal contracting experience. This may
support a different size standard than indicated by this general rule
and take into consideration significant and unique aspects of small
business competitiveness in the Federal contract market. SBA welcomes
comments on its methodology for incorporating the Federal contracting
factor in its size standard analysis and suggestions for alternative
methods and other relevant information on small business experience in
the Federal contract market that SBA should consider.
Eight of the 29 industries in NAICS Sector 52 that have receipts
based size standards averaged $100 million or more annually in Federal
contracting during fiscal years 2008-2010. The Federal contracting
factor was significant (i.e., the difference between the small business
share of total industry receipts and small business share of Federal
contracting dollars was 10 percentage points or more) in three of those
eight industries and a separate size standard was derived for that
factor for each of them. Federal contracting averaged less than $100
million annually for both industries in NAICS Sector 55 and was not
included in the calculations of new size standards for them.

New Size Standards Based on Industry and Federal Contracting Factors

Table 3, Size Standards Supported by Each Factor for Each Industry
(millions of dollars), shows the results of analyses of industry and
Federal contracting factors for each industry covered by this proposed
rule. Many NAICS industries in columns 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 show two
numbers. The upper number is the value for the industry or federal
contracting factor shown on the top of the column and the lower number
is the size standard supported by that factor. For the four-firm
concentration ratio, SBA estimates a size standard only if its value is
40 percent or more. If the four-firm concentration ratio is 40 percent
or more, SBA indicates in column 6 the average size of the industry's
four largest firms together with a size standard based on that average.
Column 9 shows a calculated new size standard for each industry. This
is the average of the size standards supported by each factor, rounded
to the nearest fixed size level. Analytical details involved in the
averaging procedure are described in SBA's ``Size Standard
Methodology.'' For comparison with the new standards, the current size
standards are in column 10 of Table 3.

Table 3--Size Standards Supported by Each Factor for Each Industry
[Millions of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal
Simple Weighted Average Four-firm Four-firm Gini contract New size Current
NAICS code/title average average assets ratio (%) average coefficient factor standard size
firm size firm size size size (%) standard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
522220............................................. $48.8 $434.1 $162.7 42.1 $13,199.9 0.880 ......... ......... .........
Sales Financing.................................... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... 35.5 $35.5 ......... 35.5 $7.0
522291............................................. 11.8 364.4 35.4 61.2 6,874.4 0.940 ......... ......... .........
Consumer Lending................................... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... 35.5 $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
522292............................................. 11.5 279.0 31.4 38.5 9,127.3 0.930 ......... ......... .........
Real Estate Credit................................. 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
522294............................................. 796.6 6,175.9 2,987.1 97.9 25,931.0 0.871 ......... ......... .........
Secondary Market Financing......................... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... 35.5 $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
522298............................................. 16.6 750.8 62.4 ......... ......... 0.959 ......... ......... .........
All Other Nondepository Credit Intermediation...... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
522310............................................. 0.6 6.2 1.2 5.2 186.3 0.583 ......... 7.0 .........
Mortgage and Nonmortgage Loan Brokers.............. 5.0 5.0 10.0 ......... ......... $5.0 ......... ......... 7.0
522320............................................. 18.9 387.6 12.9 33.1 3,624.7 0.934 1.9 ......... .........
Financial Transactions, Reserve, and Clearinghouse 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
Activities........................................
522390............................................. 1.9 47.2 1.9 19.6 602.8 0.834 -17.0 ......... .........
Other Activities Related to Credit Intermediation.. 10.0 14.0 19.0 ......... ......... $30.0 10.0 19.0 7.0
523110............................................. 74.9 1,453.1 86.4 51.7 26,248.4 0.941 -1.1 ......... .........
Investment Banking and Securities Dealing.......... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... 35.5 $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
523120............................................. 17.4 581.4 9.7 36.9 14,369.4 0.952 ......... ......... .........
Securities Brokerage............................... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0

[[Page 55744]]

523130............................................. 8.4 118.6 13.3 43.4 756.7 0.903 ......... ......... .........
Commodity Contracts Dealing........................ 35.5 30.0 35.5 ......... 19.0 $35.5 ......... 30.0 7.0
523140............................................. 4.5 120.3 1.0 46.9 654.9 0.886 ......... ......... .........
Commodity Contracts Brokerage...................... 25.5 30.0 7.0 ......... 14.0 $35.5 ......... 19.0 7.0
523210............................................. 467.4 852.8 ......... ......... ......... 0.454 ......... ......... .........
Securities and Commodity Exchanges................. 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... ......... $5.0 ......... 19.0 7.0
523910............................................. 2.0 16.6 6.1 15.0 636.0 0.797 -27.7 ......... .........
Miscellaneous Intermediation....................... 10.0 7.0 35.5 ......... ......... $25.5 10.0 19.0 7.0
523920............................................. 10.2 212.6 6.5 12.0 5,350.2 0.914 ......... ......... .........
Portfolio Management............................... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
523930............................................. 1.5 40.3 0.6 26.7 1,531.6 0.815 ......... ......... .........
Investment Advice.................................. 7.0 10.0 5.0 ......... ......... $25.5 ......... 14.0 7.0
523991............................................. 5.3 64.8 8.9 35.2 887.0 0.876 ......... ......... .........
Trust, Fiduciary and Custody Activities............ 30.0 19.0 35.5 ......... ......... $35.5 ......... 30.0 7.0
523999............................................. 6.7 124.9 28.8 ......... ......... 0.909 7.0 ......... .........
Miscellaneous Financial Investment Activities...... 35.5 30.0 35.5 ......... ......... $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
524113............................................. 635.4 2,977.0 1,003.3 26.8 35,953.1 0.787 ......... ......... .........
Direct Life Insurance Carriers..................... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... $19.0 ......... 30.0 7.0
524114............................................. 554.7 1,746.5 256.0 36.9 45,842.3 0.684 -0.1 ......... .........
Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers....... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... $5.0 ......... 25.5 7.0
524127............................................. 8.9 493.1 4.1 84.3 3,628.8 0.954 ......... ......... .........
Direct Title Insurance Carriers.................... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... 35.5 $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
524128............................................. 13.7 152.5 19.6 50.9 755.9 0.890 ......... 30.0 7.0
Other Direct Insurance (except Life, Health and 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... 19.0 $35.5 ......... 30.0 7.0
Medical) Carriers.................................
524130............................................. 214.5 771.1 ......... 50.9 5,405.7 0.724 ......... ......... .........
Reinsurance Carriers............................... 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... 35.5 $14.0 ......... 30.0 7.0
524210............................................. 0.8 26.0 0.5 10.3 2,729.8 0.667 ......... 5.0 .........
Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.................. 5.0 7.0 5.0 ......... ......... $5.0 ......... ......... 7.0
524291............................................. 2.0 73.7 ......... 46.7 841.7 0.840 ......... ......... .........
Claims Adjusting................................... 10.0 19.0 ......... ......... 19.0 $30.0 ......... 19.0 7.0
524292............................................. 8.7 76.2 4.1 21.7 1,622.9 0.847 -4.0 ......... .........
Third Party Administration of Insurance and Pension 35.5 19.0 35.5 ......... ......... $30.0 ......... 30.0 7.0
Funds.............................................
524298............................................. 1.9 25.5 0.8 30.6 278.7 0.817 -24.4 ......... .........
All Other Insurance Related Activities............. 10.0 7.0 7.0 ......... ......... $25.5 $10.0 14.0 7.0
525910............................................. 10.0 90.3 ......... ......... ......... 0.865 ......... ......... .........
Open-End Investment Funds.......................... 35.5 25.5 ......... ......... ......... $35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
525990............................................. 2.1 21.4 ......... ......... ......... 0.811 ......... ......... .........
Other Financial Vehicles........................... 10.0 7.0 ......... ......... ......... $25.5 ......... 19.0 7.0
551111............................................. 9.6 30.1 32.2 ......... ......... 0.644 ......... ......... .........
Offices of Bank Holding Companies.................. 35.5 10.0 35.5 ......... ......... $5.0 ......... 19.0 7.0
551112............................................. 9.4 27.1 35.4 ......... ......... 0.668 ......... ......... .........
Offices of Other Holding Companies................. 35.5 10.0 35.5 ......... ......... $5.0 ......... 19.0 7.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Common Size Standards

When many of the same businesses operate in several closely related
industries, SBA believes that a common size standard can be more
appropriate for these industries even if the industry and relevant
program data might suggest different size standards. For instance, in
past rules, SBA established a common size standard for Computer Systems
Design and Related Services (NAICS 541511, NAICS 541112, NAICS 541513,
NAICS 541519 (excluding the ``exception'' for Information Technology
Value Added Resellers), and NAICS 811212). Another example is the
common size standard for certain Architectural, Engineering and Related
Services. These include NAICS 541310, NAICS 541330 (excluding the
``exceptions''), Map Drafting (an ``exception'' under NAICS 541340),
NAICS 541360, and NAICS 541370 (64 FR 28275 (May 25, 1999)). As stated
previously, more recently SBA adopted common size standards for the
industries in NAICS Sector 44-45, Retail Trade (75 FR 61597 (October 6,
2010)), NAICS Sector 54, Professional, Scientific and Technical
Services (77 FR 7490 (February 10, 2012)), and NAICS Sector 48-49,
Transportation and Warehousing (77 FR 10943 (February 24, 2012)).
Similarly, SBA proposed common size standards for several other
industries in NAICS Sector 56, Administrative and Support, Waste
Management and Remediation Services (76 FR 63510 (October 12, 2011)),
NAICS Sector 53, Real Estate and Rental and Leasing (76 FR 70680
(November 15, 2011)), and NAICS Sector 62, Health Care and Social
Assistance (77 FR 11001 (February 24, 2012)).
For NAICS Sector 52, SBA proposes, as an alternative to a separate
size standard for each industry, common size standards for industries
in two NAICS Subsectors and two NAICS Industry Groups, as shown in
Table 4, NAICS Subsectors and Industry Groups for Common Size
Standards. SBA evaluated industry and Federal contracting factors and
derived a common size standard for each NAICS Subsector and Industry
Group using the same method as described above. The results are in
Table 5, Size Standards Supported by Each Factor for Subsectors and
Industry Groups, which immediately follows Table 4, below.

[[Page 55745]]

Table 4--NAICS Subsectors and Industry Groups for Common Size Standards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsectors/industry groups: Subsector/industry Industries: 6-digit
NAICS codes group title NAICS codes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5222 \a\ (except NAICS Nondepository Credit 522220, 522291,
522210). Intermediation. 522292, 522293,
522294, 522298.
523......................... Securities, 523110, 523120,
Commodity 523130, 523140,
Contracts, and 523210, 523910,
Other Financial 523920, 523930,
Investments and 523991, 523999.
Related Activities.
5241 \b\ (except NAICS Insurance Carriers.. 524113, 524114,
524126). 524127, 524128,
524130.
525 \c\..................... Funds, Trusts, and 525110, 525120,
Other Financial 525190, 525910,
Vehicles. 525920, 525930,
525990.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ NAICS 522210 is excluded from this Industry Group as that industry
currently has an asset based size standard. NAICS 522293 also has an
assets based size standard currently, but SBA proposes to replace it
with the same common size standard that SBA is proposing for NAICS
Industry Group 5222 (except NAICS 522210).
\b\ NAICS 524126 is excluded from this Industry Group as that industry
currently has an employee based size standard. This will be reviewed
at a later date along with other employee based size standards.
\c\ The 2007 Economic Census special tabulation includes data only for
two NAICS codes within NAICS Subsector 525, namely 525910 (Open-End
Investment Funds) and 525990 (Other Financial Vehicles). Consequently,
SBA proposes to apply the results from NAICS 525910 and 525990 to all
remaining industries within this Subsector because they all share the
same size standard currently.

Table 5--Size Standards Supported by Each Factor for Subsectors and Industry Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simple Weighted Calculated
average average Average Four-firm Federal size Current
NAICS code/Subsector or Industry Group title firm size firm size assets Four-firm average Gini contract standard size
($ ($ size ($ ratio (%) size ($ coefficient factor ($ standard
million) million) million) million) (%) million) ($million)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5222 (except NAICS 522210)....................... $23.0 $550.3 $75.8 ......... ......... 0.944 ......... .......... ..........
Nondepository Credit Intermediation.............. 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... 35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
523.............................................. 10.6 319.1 7.7 24.6 37,547.5 0. 938 4.5 .......... ..........
Securities, Commodity Contracts, and Other 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... 35.5 ......... 35.5 7.0
Financial Investments and Related Activities....
5241 (except NAICS 524126)....................... 256.0 1,907.7 185.6 ......... ......... 0.866 -0.2 .......... ..........
Insurance Carriers............................... 35.5 35.5 35.5 ......... ......... 35. 5 ......... 35.5 7.0
525.............................................. 3.6 43.8 14.7 ......... ......... 0. 860 ......... .......... ..........
Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles...... 19.0 14.0 35.5 ......... ......... 35.5 ......... 30.0 7.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Evaluation of the Assets Based Size Standard

In 1984, SBA published a notice of policy allowing financial
services that prime contractors procure from small minority owned and
controlled financial institutions to qualify as subcontracts for
purposes of meeting subcontracting goals and credits (see 49 FR 13091-
01 (April 2, 1984)). Concurrently, SBA also published a proposed rule
that a financial institution with total assets of not more than $100
million would be considered small (see 49 FR 13052-01 (April 2, 1984)).
SBA adopted the $100 million in total assets as the size standard for
financial institutions (see 49 FR 49398-01 (October 16, 1984)). Over
time, the definition of small depository institution was extended to
other financial institutions, such as Credit Cards Issuing and
International Trade Financing. Since then, along with other monetary
based size standards, SBA has periodically adjusted the assets based
size standard for inflation, with the latest adjustment increasing it
to $175 million (see 73 FR 41237 (July 18, 2008)).
Currently, the $175 million assets based size standard applies to
four industries within NAICS Industry Group 5221, Depository Credit
Intermediation, and two industries within NAICS Industry Group 5222,
Non-depository Credit Intermediation. These are NAICS 522110
(Commercial Banking), NAICS 522120 (Savings Institutions), NAICS 522130
(Credit Unions), NAICS 522190 (Other Depository Credit Intermediation),
NAICS 522210 (Credit Card Issuing), and NAICS 522293 (International
Trade Financing).
Because only a small number of industries have assets based size
standards, no comparison groups could be developed to assess differing
characteristics of individual industries based on total assets. Thus,
most of the SBA's size standards methodology is not applicable to
analyzing the assets based size standards for financial institutions.
Consequently, in this proposed rule, SBA has examined trends on
financial industry factors since 1984 to assess whether the current
$175 million assets based size standard should be modified to reflect
today's financial industry structure. Specifically, SBA evaluated
changes in average firm size, industry concentration, and distribution
of firms by size (i.e., Gini coefficient) for financial institutions.
Similarly in the 1984 proposed and final rules, SBA both evaluated
depository institutions as a whole and the minority owned and
controlled depository institutions separately.
SBA evaluated all depository institutions (except for Credit
Unions, NAICS 522130 which were evaluated using the NCUA data) using
SDI data. SDI does not provide the NAICS definition for every firm
included in the database. However, it has a field called Asset
Concentration Hierarchy, which can be used to identify each
institution's primary specialization in terms of asset concentration,
such as credit card services. Another field, Bank Charter Class,
identifies the institutions as banks or thrifts. Because the data are
not separated by NAICS code, and also the differences among services
offered by different financial instructions (such as commercial banks,
saving institutions, and credit card issuing companies) have greatly
diminished over the recent decades, SBA has analyzed these financial
institutions as one industry group.
Since the SDI database does not distinguish minority owned
financial institutions from others, SBA identified them using the data
on financial institutions that participate in the

[[Page 55746]]

Department of the Treasury's Minority Bank Deposit Program, compiled by
the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/mob/) for the 3rd quarter of 2011, and examined their
characteristics using the assets data from the SDI database. The
earliest period the FRB data are available is the 2nd quarter of 2003.
Thus, to fully capture the changes in industry structure of minority
owned financial institutions since 1984, SBA has compared the results
based on the FRB and SDI data with those based on the data for minority
owned banks from the 1984 proposed and final rules.
SBA evaluated the changes in the industry structure of Credit
Unions (NAICS 522130) between 1994 and 2011, using the data from the
5300 Call Reports available on the NCUA Web site (http://www.ncua.gov/DataApps/QCallRptData/Pages/default.aspx).
The number of all depository institutions (excluding Credit
Unions), total assets and calculated industry factors for 1984 and 2011
are shown in Table 6, Industry Factors for All Depository Institutions
(excluding Credit Unions). Similar calculations for the minority owned
depository institutions (excluding Credit Unions) are shown in Table 7,
Industry Factors for Minority Owned Depository Institutions (excluding
Credit Unions). The number of Credit Unions, total assets and
calculated industry factors for 1995 and 2011 are shown in Table 8,
Industry Factors for Credit Unions. For comparability, all monetary
values are expressed in 2011 dollars.

Table 6--Industry Factors for All Depository Institutions (Excluding Credit Unions)
[All monetary values are in millions of 2011 dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simple Weighted
Year Number of Total assets average firm average firm Four-firm Four-firm Gini
institutions size size ratio (%) average size coefficient
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1984*................................... 17,901 $6,702,968 $374 $12,319 10.1 $168,843 0.798
2011.................................... 7,445 13,843,140 1,859 81,690 41.4 1,433,933 0.907
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: SDI/FDIC (http://www2.fdic.gov/sdi/main.asp).
\*\ 1984 dataset is not available online, but is available from FDIC on request.

Table 7--Industry Factors for Minority Owned Depository Institutions (excluding Credit Unions).
[All monetary values are in millions of 2011 dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simple Weighted
Year Number of Total assets average firm average firm Four-firm Four-firm Gini
institutions size size ratio (%) average size coefficient
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1984 \a\................................ 96 $7,556 $79 $274 N/A N/A 0.491
2011 \b\................................ 108 39,138 362 1,662 40.0 $3,917 0.626
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: a. 1984 proposed (49 FR 13052-01 (April 2, 1984)) and final (49 FR 49398-01 (October 16, 1984)) rules.
b. FRB (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/mob/) and FDIC.

Table 8--Industry Factors for Credit Unions
[All monetary values are in millions of 2011 dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simple Weighted
Year Number of Total assets average firm average firm Four-firm Four-firm Gini
institutions size size ratio (%) average size coefficient
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994.................................... 12,201 $420,606 $34 $733 5.5 $5,742 0.793
2011.................................... 7,240 974,187 135 3,543 9.8 3,907 0.829
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: NCUA, http://www.ncua.gov/DataApps/QCallRptData/Pages/CallRptData.aspx.

During the 1984 to 2011 span, as shown in Table 6, Industry Factors
for All Depository Institutions (excluding Credit Unions), above, the
financial industry saw a large drop in the total number of financial
institutions, but at the same time it saw a significant increase in
asset concentration among fewer of them. The total number of all
financial institutions decreased more than half from 17,901 in 1984 to
7,445 in 2011, while their total assets (measured in 2011 dollars) more
than doubled during the same period. The average firm size (measured in
total assets) also showed significant increase from 1984 to 2011, with
their simple average firm size increasing by a factor of 5 and the
weighted average firm size increasing by a factor of nearly 7. The four
largest institutions' share of total assets (also referred to as four-
firm concentration ratio) more than quadrupled (from 10.1% to 41.4%)
and their average size increased more than 8 times. The Gini
coefficient value also increased from 0.798 in 1984 to 0.907 in 2011,
thereby further confirming the trend of increased concentration in the
financial industry. The average firm size and Gini coefficient value
for the minority owned banks in Table 7, Industry Factors for Minority
Owned Depository Institutions (excluding Credit Unions), also strongly
confirmed the trend of increased concentration in the financial
industry. As shown in Table 8, Industry Factors for Credit Unions,
above, the number of Credit Unions decreased by 40 percent and their
total assets more than doubled between 1995 and 2011. The average firm
size, four-firm statistics, and Gini coefficient for Credit Unions also
indicated increased concentration.
For all the six industries in NAICS Subsector 522 that have the
$175 million assets based size standard, Federal contracting dollars
averaged only about $22 million per year during fiscal years 2008-2010.
Thus, under SBA's methodology, Federal contracting was not a
significant factor for

[[Page 55747]]

establishing a size standard for these industries.
Besides the industry structure, SBA also reviewed the relevant
literature and information to determine if total assets are a suitable
measure of bank size given the current structure of the banking
industry. SBA has found that total assets are still the commonly
accepted measure of bank size. For example, the Federal Reserve Board,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and U.S. Treasury Department all
use total assets to measure bank size for their regulatory and program
purposes. Accordingly, SBA proposes to retain total assets to measure
the size of financial institutions.
The current structure of the financial industry relative to that
for the 1980s and 1990s, as discussed above, strongly supports
increasing the current $175 million assets based size standard. The
changes in industry factors for all financial institutions in Table 6
as well as the results for the minority owned institutions in Table 7
and Credit Unions in Table 8 support a size standard in the range of
$500 million to $1 billion in total assets. SBA is proposing $500
million as it would include about 82 percent of the financial
institutions and 7 percent of total assets of all financial
institutions as compared to 54 percent of institutions and only about 3
percent of total assets under the current $175 million. It would
include about 82 percent of institutions and one-third of the total
assets of all minority owned institutions, as compared to 58 percent of
institutions and 14 percent of total assets under the current $175
million. Similarly, the $500 million size standard would include nearly
95 percent of all Credit Unions and 36 percent of their total assets,
compared to 87 percent of all Credit Unions and 19 percent of their
total assets under the current $175 million size standard. SBA
considered proposing $1 billion in total assets, but that would include
all but the five largest minority owned banks, some of which may not be
in need of Federal assistance.
The proposed $500 million assets based size standard would apply to
the following five industries within NAICS Subsector 522, Credit
Intermediation and Related Activities: NAICS 522110 (Commercial
Banking), NAICS 522120 (Savings Institutions), NAICS 522130 (Credit
Unions), NAICS 522190 (Other depository Credit Intermediation), and
NAICS 522210 (Credit Card Issuing).

Special Considerations

NAICS 522293, International Trade Financing

NAICS 522293, International Trade Financing, currently has the $175
million assets based size standard. However, there are no assets data
available to evaluate this industry. Furthermore, most of the receipts
and employment data for this industry are suppressed in the 2007
Economic Census special tabulation due to the disclosure limitation. In
terms of average size and distribution of firms by receipts and
employment size based on SBA's estimated values for missing data, firms
primarily engaged in NAICS 522293 are much more similar to those
primarily engaged in other industries within NAICS Industry Group 5222
(except for NAICS 522210) that have receipts based size standards than
firms primarily engaged in industries in NAICS Industry Group 5221 and
NAICS 522210 that have assets based sized standards. Accordingly, for
NAICS 522293 SBA is proposing the same $35.5 million receipts based
size standard that it has proposed for all industries in NAICS Industry
Group 5222 (except for NAICS 522210). SBA welcomes feedback on this
proposal.

NAICS Subsector 525, Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles

As noted earlier, the 2007 Economic Census special tabulation
includes data only for two NAICS codes within NAICS Subsector 525: (1)
NAICS 525910, Open-End Investment Funds: and (2) NAICS 525990, Other
Financial Vehicles. Because all industries in that Subsector currently
share the same $7 million receipts based size standard, SBA applies the
results based on data for NAICS 525910 and 525990 to all remaining
industries within this Subsector and proposes the same common size
standard of $30 million in average annual receipts for all industries
in the Subsector. SBA seeks comments on this proposal as well as
suggestions on alternative data sources, if any, to evaluate those
industries.

NAICS 524126, Direct Property and Causality Insurance Carriers

The current size standard for NAICS 524126, Direct Property and
Causality Insurance, is 1,500 employees, which SBA has not reviewed in
this proposed rule. SBA will review this size standard together with
other employee based size standards at a later date. Until then, SBA
proposes to retain the current 1,500-employee size standard for NAICS
524126.

Evaluation of SBA Loan Data

Before deciding on an industry's size standard, SBA also considers
the impact of new or revised size standards on SBA's loan programs.
Accordingly, SBA examined its 7(a) and 504 Loan Program data for fiscal
years 2008-2010 to assess whether the proposed size standards need
further adjustments to ensure credit opportunities for small businesses
through those programs. For the industries reviewed in this rule, the
data show that it is mostly businesses much smaller than the current
size standards that use SBA's 7(a) and 504 loans.
Furthermore, the Jobs Act established an alternative size standard
for SBA's 7(a) and 504 Loan Programs. Specifically, an applicant
exceeding an NAICS industry size standard may still be eligible if its
maximum tangible net worth does not exceed $15 million and its average
net income after Federal income taxes (excluding any carry-over losses)
for the 2 full fiscal years before the date of the application is not
more than $5 million.
Therefore, no size standard in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55 needs an
adjustment based on this factor.

Proposed Changes to Size Standards

Table 9, Summary of Size Standards Analysis, below, summarizes the
results of SBA's analyses of industry specific size standards from
Table 3, the results of common size standards analysis from Table 5,
and the results of the analysis of the assets based size standard. With
the proposed change of an assets based size standard to a receipts
based size standard for NAICS 522293, International Trade Financing,
the results show increases in size standards for 37 industries, a
decrease for one, and no change for one industry in NAICS Sector 52.
The results also show increases in size standards for both industries
in NAICS Sector 55.

[[Page 55748]]

Table 9--Summary of Size Standards Analysis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Calculated
industry-
NAICS code NAICS title Current size standard ($ million) specific size Calculated common size standard ($
standard ($ million)
million)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
522110....................... Commercial Banking...... 175 million in assets.................. .............. $500 million in assets.
522120....................... Savings Institutions.... 175 million in assets.................. .............. 500 million in assets.
522130....................... Credit Unions........... 175 million in assets.................. .............. 500 million in assets.
522190....................... Other Depository Credit 175 million in assets.................. .............. 500 million in assets.
intermediation.
522210....................... Credit Card Issuing..... 175 million in assets.................. .............. 500 million in assets.
522220....................... Sales Financing......... 7.0.................................... $35.5 35.5.
522291....................... Consumer Lending........ 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
522292....................... Real Estate Credit...... 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
522293....................... International Trade 175 million in assets.................. .............. 35.5.
Financing.
522294....................... Secondary Market 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
Financing.
522298....................... All Other Nondepository 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
Credit Intermediation.
522310....................... Mortgage and Nonmortgage 7.0.................................... 7.0 ......................................
Loan Brokers.
522320....................... Financial Transactions, 7.0.................................... 35.5 ......................................
Reserve, and
Clearinghouse
Activities.
522390....................... Other Activities Related 7.0.................................... 19.0 ......................................
to Credit
Intermediation.
523110....................... Investment Banking and 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
Securities Dealing.
523120....................... Securities Brokerage.... 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
523130....................... Commodity Contracts 7.0.................................... 30.0 35.5.
Dealing.
523140....................... Commodity Contracts 7.0.................................... 19.0 35.5.
Brokerage.
523210....................... Securities and Commodity 7.0.................................... 19.0 35.5.
Exchanges.
523910....................... Miscellaneous 7.0.................................... 19.0 35.5.
Intermediation.
523920....................... Portfolio Management.... 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
523930....................... Investment Advice....... 7.0.................................... 14.0 35.5.
523991....................... Trust, Fiduciary and 7.0.................................... 30.0 35.5.
Custody Activities.
523999....................... Miscellaneous Financial 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
Investment Activities.
524113....................... Direct Life Insurance 7.0.................................... 30.0 35.5.
Carriers.
524114....................... Direct Health and 7.0.................................... 25.5 35.5.
Medical Insurance
Carriers.
524127....................... Direct Title Insurance 7.0.................................... 35.5 35.5.
Carriers.
524128....................... Other Direct Insurance 7.0.................................... 30.0 35.5.
(except Life, Health
and Medical) Carriers.
524130....................... Reinsurance Carriers.... 7.0.................................... 30.0 35.5.
524210....................... Insurance Agencies and 7.0.................................... 5.0 ......................................
Brokerages.
524291....................... Claims Adjusting........ 7.0.................................... 19.0 ......................................
524292....................... Third Party 7.0.................................... 30.0 ......................................
Administration of
Insurance and Pension
Funds.
524298....................... All Other Insurance 7.0.................................... 14.0 ......................................
Related Activities.
525110....................... Pension Funds........... 7.0.................................... .............. 30.0.
525120....................... Health and Welfare Funds 7.0.................................... .............. 30.0.
525190....................... Other insurance Funds... 7.0.................................... .............. 30.0.
525910....................... Open[dash]End Investment 7.0.................................... 35.5 30.0.
Funds.
525920....................... Trusts, Estates and 7.0.................................... .............. 30.0.
Agency Accounts.
525930....................... Real Estate Investment 7.0.................................... .............. 30.0.
Trusts.
525990....................... Other Financial Vehicles 7.0.................................... 19.0 30.0.
551111....................... Offices of Bank Holding 7.0.................................... 19.0 ......................................
Companies.
551112....................... Offices of Other Holding 7.0.................................... 19.0 ......................................
Companies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Although the results in Table 9, Summary of Size Standards
Analysis, seem to support lowering the size industry for one industry
(NAICS 524210, Insurance Agencies and Brokerages), SBA believes that
lowering small business size standards is not in the best interest of
small businesses in the current economic environment. The U.S. economy
was in recession from December 2007 to June 2009, the longest and
deepest of any recessions since World War II. The economy lost more
than eight million non-farm jobs during 2008-2009. In response,
Congress passed and the President signed into law the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) to promote economic
recovery and to preserve and create jobs. Although the recession
officially ended in June 2009, the unemployment rate is still high at
8.2 percent in June 2012 and is forecast to remain around this level at
least through the end of 2012. Recently, Congress passed and the
President signed the Jobs Act to promote small business job creation.
The Jobs Act puts more capital into the hands of entrepreneurs and
small business owners; strengthens small businesses' ability to compete
for contracts; includes recommendations from the President's Task Force
on Federal Contracting Opportunities for Small Business; creates a
better playing field for small businesses; promotes small business
exporting, building on the President's National Export Initiative;
expands training and counseling; and provides $12 billion in tax relief
to help small businesses invest in their firms and create jobs. A
proposal to reduce size standards will have an immediate impact on
jobs, and it would be contrary to the expressed will of the President
and the Congress.
Lowering size standards would decrease the number of firms that
participate in Federal financial and procurement assistance programs
for small businesses. It would also affect small businesses that are
now exempt from or receive some form of relief from myriad other
Federal regulations that use SBA's size standards. That impact could
take the form of increased fees,

[[Page 55749]]

paperwork, or other compliance requirements for small businesses.
Furthermore, size standards based solely on analytical results without
any other considerations can cut off currently eligible small firms
from those programs and benefits. That would run counter to what SBA
and the Federal government are doing to help small businesses. Reducing
size eligibility for Federal procurement opportunities, especially
under current economic conditions, would not preserve or create more
jobs; rather, it would have the opposite effect. Therefore, in this
proposed rule, SBA does not intend to reduce size standards for any
industries. For one industry where analysis might seem to support
lowering the size standard, SBA proposes to retain the current size
standard.
Furthermore, as stated previously, the Small Business Act requires
the Administrator to ``* * * consider other factors deemed to be
relevant * * *'' to establishing small business size standards. The
current economic conditions and the impact on job creation are quite
relevant factors when establishing small business size standards. SBA
nevertheless invites comments and suggestions on whether it should
lower the size standard for NAICS 524210, Insurance Agencies and
Brokerages, to $5 million, or retain the current $7 million, which is
the anchor standard for receipts based standards.
Comparing industry specific size standards and common size
standards within each Industry Group or Subsector, SBA finds that for
several industries, as shown in Tables 4 and 5 above, common size
standards are more appropriate for several reasons. First, analyzing
industries at the more aggregated Industry Group or Subsector levels
simplifies size standards analysis, and the results will be more
consistent among related industries. Second, in NAICS Sector 52 most
industries within each Industry Group or Subsector currently have the
same size standards and SBA believes it is better to keep the revised
size standards also same unless industries are significantly different.
Third, within each Industry Group or Subsector many of the same
businesses tend to operate in the same multiple industries. Thus, SBA
believes that common size standards would reflect the Federal
marketplace in those industries better than different size standards
for each industry.
For industries where both industry specific size standards and
common size standards have been calculated, for the above reasons, SBA
proposes to apply common size standards. For industries for which SBA
has not estimated common size standards it proposes to apply industry
specific size standards. As discussed above, lowering small business
size standards is inconsistent with what the Federal government is
doing to stimulate the economy and would discourage job growth for
which Congress established the Recovery Act and Jobs Act. In addition,
it would be inconsistent with the Small Business Act requiring the
Administrator to establish size standards based on industry analysis
and other relevant factors such as current economic conditions.
In addition, retaining current standards when the analytical
results can suggest lowering them is consistent with SBA's prior
actions for NAICS Sector 44-45 (Retail Trade), NAICS Sector 72
(Accommodation and Food Services), and NAICS Sector 81 (Other Services)
that the Agency proposed (74 FR 53924, 74 FR 53913, and 74 FR 53941,
October 21, 2009) and adopted in its final rules (75 FR 61597, 75 FR
61604, and 75 FR 61591, October 6, 2010). It is also consistent with
the Agency's proposed rule (76 FR 14323 (March 16, 2011)) and final
rule (77 FR 7490 (February 10, 2012)) for NAICS Sector 54,
Professional, Technical, and Scientific Services, the proposed rule (76
FR 27935 (May 13, 2011)) and final rule ((77 FR 10943 (February 24,
2012)) for NAICS Sector 48-49, Transportation and Warehousing, and
proposed rules for NAICS Sector 51, Information (76 FR 63216 (October
12, 2011)), NAICS Sector 56, Administrative and Support, Waste
Management and Remediation Services (76 FR 63510 (October 12, 2011)),
NAICS Sector 61, Educational Services (76 FR 70667 (November 15,
2011)), NAICS Sector 53, Real Estate and Rental and Leasing (76 FR
70680 (November 15, 2011)), NAICS Sector 62, Health Care and Social
Assistance (forthcoming), NAICS Sector 71, Arts, Entertainment and
Recreation (forthcoming), and NAICS Sector 23, Construction
(forthcoming). In each of those final and proposed rules, SBA opted not
to reduce small business size standards, for the same reasons it has
provided above in this proposed rule.
Thus, SBA proposes to increase size standards for 37 industries,
and retain the current size standards for two industries in NAICS
Sector 52. In addition, SBA proposes to change the measure of size for
NAICS 522293, International Trade Financing, from total assets to
annual receipts. SBA also proposes to increase size standards for two
industries in NAICS Sector 55. The SBA's proposed changes are
summarized in Table 10, Summary of Proposed Size Standards Revisions,
below.

Table 10--Summary of Proposed Size Standards Revisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current size standard ($ Proposed size standard ($
NAICS code NAICS title million) million)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
522110................. Commercial Banking 175 million in assets............ 500 million in assets.
522120................. Savings 175 million in assets............ 500 million in assets.
Institutions.
522130................. Credit Unions..... 175 million in assets............ 500 million in assets.
522190................. Other Depository 175 million in assets............ 500 million in assets.
Credit
intermediation.
522210................. Credit Card 175 million in assets............ 500 million in assets.
Issuing.
522220................. Sales Financing... 7.0.............................. 35.5.
522291................. Consumer Lending.. 7.0.............................. 35.5.
522292................. Real Estate Credit 7.0.............................. 35.5.
522293................. International 175 million in assets............ 35.5.
Trade Financing.
522294................. Secondary Market 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Financing.
522298................. All Other 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Nondepository
Credit
Intermediation.
522320................. Financial 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Transactions,
Reserve, and
Clearinghouse
Activities.
522390................. Other Activities 7.0.............................. 19.0.
Related to Credit
Intermediation.
523110................. Investment Banking 7.0.............................. 35.5.
and Securities
Dealing.
523120................. Securities 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Brokerage.
523130................. Commodity 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Contracts Dealing.
523140................. Commodity 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Contracts
Brokerage.
523210................. Securities and 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Commodity
Exchanges.

[[Page 55750]]

523910................. Miscellaneous 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Intermediation.
523920................. Portfolio 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Management.
523930................. Investment Advice. 7.0.............................. 35.5.
523991................. Trust, Fiduciary 7.0.............................. 35.5.
and Custody
Activities.
523999................. Miscellaneous 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Financial
Investment
Activities.
524113................. Direct Life 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Insurance
Carriers.
524114................. Direct Health and 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Medical Insurance
Carriers.
524127................. Direct Title 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Insurance
Carriers.
524128................. Other Direct 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Insurance (except
Life, Health and
Medical) Carriers.
524130................. Reinsurance 7.0.............................. 35.5.
Carriers.
524291................. Claims Adjusting.. 7.0.............................. 19.0.
524292................. Third Party 7.0.............................. 30.0.
Administration of
Insurance and
Pension Funds.
524298................. All Other 7.0.............................. 14.0.
Insurance Related
Activities.
525110................. Pension Funds..... 7.0.............................. 30.0.
525120................. Health and Welfare 7.0.............................. 30.0.
Funds.
525190................. Other Insurance 7.0.............................. 30.0.
Funds.
525910................. Open-End 7.0.............................. 30.0.
Investment Funds.
525920................. Trusts, Estates, 7.0.............................. 30.0.
and Agency Funds.
525930................. Real Estate 7.0.............................. 30.0.
Investments Funds.
525990................. Other Financial 7.0.............................. 30.0.
Vehicles.
551111................. Offices of Bank 7.0.............................. 19.0.
Holding Companies.
551112................. Offices of Other 7.0.............................. 19.0.
Holding Companies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Evaluation of Dominance in Field of Operation

SBA has determined that for the industries in NAICS Sectors 52 and
55 for which it has proposed to increase size standards, no individual
firm at or below the proposed size standard will be large enough to
dominate its field of operation. At the proposed size standards for
individual industries, if adopted, the small business share of total
industry receipts among those industries with receipts based size
standards is, in average, 0.3 percent, varying from .01 percent to 1.3
percent and the small business share among the industries with assets
based size standards is .004 percent. These levels of market shares
effectively preclude a firm at or below the proposed size standards
from exerting control on any of the industries.

Request for Comments

SBA invites public comments on this proposed rule, especially on
the following issues:
1. Whether SBA's proposal to simplify size standards by using eight
fixed levels for receipts based size standards--$5 million, $7 million,
$10 million, $14 million, $19 million, $25.5 million, $30 million, and
$35.5 million--is necessary and whether the proposed fixed size levels
are appropriate. SBA welcomes suggestions on alternative approaches to
simplifying small business size standards.
2. Whether SBA's proposal to increase 32 receipts based and five
assets based size standards and to retain two receipts based size
standards in NAICS Sector 52, is appropriate given the economic
characteristics of each industry.
3. Whether SBA's proposal to increase the two size standards in
NAICS Sector 55 is appropriate given the economic characteristics of
each industry.
4. Whether SBA should change the measure of size for NAICS 522293,
International Trade Financing, from total assets to annual receipts.
5. SBA also seeks feedback and suggestions on alternative size
standards, if they would be more appropriate, including whether the
number of employees is a more suitable measure of size for certain
industries and what that employee level should be.
6. SBA proposes common receipts based size standards for industries
within NAICS Subsectors 523 and 525 as well as NAICS Industry Groups
5222 (except for NAICS 522210) and 5241 (except for NAICS 524126).
Similarly, SBA proposes a common assets based size standard for three
industries within NAICS Industry Group 5221 (except for NAICS 522130)
and for NAICS 522210. SBA invites comments or suggestions along with
supporting information with respect to the following:
a. Whether SBA should adopt common size standards for those
industries or establish a separate size standard for each industry, and
b. Whether the proposed common size standards for those industries
are at the correct levels or what would be more appropriate if what SBA
has proposed are not appropriate.
7. For several industries in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55, based on
industry and program data, SBA proposes large increases, while for
others the proposed increases are modest. The SBA seeks feedback on
whether, as a policy, it should limit the increase to a size standard
or establish minimum or maximum values for its size standards. The SBA
seeks suggestions on appropriate levels of changes to size standards
and on their minimum or maximum levels.
8. SBA's proposed size standards are based on five primary
factors--average firm size, average assets size (as a proxy of startup
costs and entry barriers), four-firm concentration ratio, distribution
of firms by size and, the total share and small business share of
Federal contracting dollars of the evaluated industries. SBA welcomes
comments on these factors and/or suggestions of other factors that it
should consider when evaluating or revising size standards. SBA also
seeks information on relevant data sources, other than what it uses, if
available.
9. SBA gives equal weight to each of the five primary factors in
all industries. SBA seeks feedback on whether it should continue giving
equal weight to each factor or whether it should give more weight to
one or more factors for certain industries. Recommendations to weigh
some factors more than others should include suggested weights for each
factor along with supporting information.
10. For analytical simplicity and efficiency, in this proposed
rule, SBA has refined its size standard methodology to obtain a single
value as a proposed size standard instead of a

[[Page 55751]]

range of values, as in its past size regulations. SBA welcomes any
comments on this procedure and suggestions on alternative methods.
Public comments on the above issues are very valuable to SBA for
validating its size standard methodology and its proposed size
standards revisions in this proposed rule. This will help SBA to move
forward with its review of size standards for other NAICS Sectors.
Commenters addressing size standards for a specific industry or a group
of industries should include relevant data and/or other information
supporting their comments. If comments relate to using size standards
for Federal procurement programs, SBA suggests that commenters provide
information on the size of contracts in their industries, the size of
businesses that can undertake the contracts, start-up costs, equipment
and other asset requirements, the amount of subcontracting, other
direct and indirect costs associated with the contracts, the use of
mandatory sources of supply for products and services, and the degree
to which contractors can mark up those costs.

Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 12988 and 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35) and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)

Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' for purposes
of Executive Order 12866. In order to help explain the need of this
rule and the rule's potential benefits and costs, SBA is providing a
Cost Benefit Analysis in this section of the rule. This is also not a
``major rule'' under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 800.

Cost Benefit Analysis

1. Is there a need for the regulatory action?
SBA believes that proposed size standards revisions in NAICS Sector
52, Finance and Insurance, and NAICS Sector 55, Management of Companies
and Enterprises, will better reflect the economic characteristics of
small businesses in this Sector and the Federal government marketplace.
SBA's mission is to aid and assist small businesses through a variety
of financial, procurement, business development, and advocacy programs.
To determine the intended beneficiaries of these programs, SBA
establishes distinct definitions of which businesses are deemed small
businesses. The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) delegates to
SBA's Administrator the responsibility for establishing small business
definitions. The Act also requires that small business definitions vary
to reflect industry differences. The recently enacted Jobs Act also
requires SBA to review all size standards and make necessary
adjustments to reflect market conditions. The supplementary information
section of this proposed rule explains SBA's methodology for analyzing
a size standard for a particular industry.
2. What are the potential benefits and costs of this regulatory action?
The most significant benefit to businesses obtaining small business
status because of this rule is gaining eligibility for Federal small
business assistance programs. These include SBA's financial assistance
programs, economic injury disaster loans, and Federal procurement
programs intended for small businesses. Federal procurement programs
provide targeted opportunities for small businesses under SBA's
business development programs, such as 8(a), Small Disadvantaged
Businesses (SDB), small businesses located in Historically
Underutilized Business Zones (HUBZone), women-owned small businesses
(WOSB), and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSB).
Federal agencies may also use SBA's size standards for a variety of
other regulatory and program purposes. These programs help small
businesses become more knowledgeable, stable, and competitive. SBA
estimates that in the 34 industries for which it proposes to increase
receipts based size standards in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55, more than
5,400 firms, not small under the existing size standards, will become
small under the proposed size standards and therefore eligible for
these programs. That is about 2.2 percent of all firms classified as
small under the current receipts based size standards in NAICS Sector
52 and 55. If adopted as proposed, this will increase the small
business share of total receipts of all industries with receipts based
size standards within NAICS Sectors 52 and 55 from 5.1 percent to 7.5
percent. Additionally, due to the proposed increase to the assets based
size standard from $175 million to $500 million for four industries in
NAICS Sector 52 (i.e., NAICS 522110, 522120, 522190 and 522210),
approximately 2,000 additional depository institutions, including about
25 minority owned financial institutions, will qualify as small. This
will increase the small business share of total assets in those
industries from 2.5 percent under the current assets based size
standard to 7 percent for all financial institutions and from 14.4
percent to 33 percent for minority owned institutions. This would also
include about 550 additional Credit Unions, but they would not qualify
as small business concerns for Federal programs intended for small
businesses because they are not-for profit entities. However, they may
qualify as small entities for other Federal programs and regulatory
purposes.
The following groups will benefit from the proposed size standards
revisions in this rule, if adopted as proposed: (1) Some businesses
that are above the current size standards may gain small business
status under the higher size standards, thereby enabling them to
participate in Federal small business assistance programs; (2) growing
small businesses that are close to exceeding the current size standards
will be able to retain their small business status under the higher
size standards, thereby enabling them to continue their participation
in the programs; (3) Federal agencies will have a larger pool of small
businesses from which to draw for their small business procurement
programs; (4) prime contractors that could benefit from agreements with
the minority owned depository institutions in meeting their
subcontracting goals and credits; and (5) potentially small business
communities could benefit from increased banking activities in the
area.
SBA estimates that firms gaining small business status under the
proposed receipts based size standards could receive Federal contracts
totaling $8 million to $10 million annually under SBA's small business,
8(a), SDB, HUBZone, WOSB, and SDVOSB Programs, and other unrestricted
procurements. The added competition for many of these procurements can
also result in lower prices to the Government for procurements reserved
for small businesses, but SBA cannot quantify this benefit.
Under SBA's 7(a) and 504 Loan Programs, based on the fiscal years
2008-2010 data, SBA estimates up to 30 additional loans totaling about
$4 million to $5 million in Federal loan guarantees could be made to
these newly defined small businesses under the proposed size standards.
Increasing the size standards will likely result in more small business
guaranteed loans to businesses in these industries, but it is be
impractical to try to estimate exactly the number and total amount of
loans. There are two reasons for this: (1) Under the Jobs Act, SBA can
now guarantee substantially larger loans than in the

[[Page 55752]]

past; and, (2) as described above, the Jobs Act established an
alternative size standard ($15 million in tangible net worth and $5
million in net income after income taxes) for business concerns that do
not meet the size standards for their industry. Therefore, SBA finds it
difficult to quantify the actual impact of these proposed size
standards on its 7(a) and 504 Loan Programs.
Newly defined small businesses will also benefit from SBA's
Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) Program. Since this program is
contingent on the occurrence and severity of a disaster, SBA cannot
make a meaningful estimate of this impact.
To the extent that those 7,400 newly defined firms (including 5,400
firms under the receipts based size standards in 34 industries and
2,000 firms under the assets based size standards in four industries)
could become active in Federal procurement programs, the proposed
changes, if adopted, may entail some additional administrative costs to
the government associated with there being more bidders on small
business procurement opportunities. In addition, there will be more
firms seeking SBA's guaranteed loans, more firms eligible for
enrollment in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR)'s Dynamic Small
Business Search database, and more firms seeking certification as 8(a)
or HUBZone firms or qualifying for small business, WOSB, SDVOSB, and
SDB status. Among those newly defined small businesses seeking SBA
assistance, there could be some additional costs associated with
compliance and verification of small business status and protests of
small business status. SBA believes that these added administrative
costs will be minimal because mechanisms are already in place to handle
these requirements.
Additionally, Federal government contracts may have higher costs.
With a greater number of businesses defined as small, Federal agencies
may choose to set aside more contracts for competition among small
businesses rather than using full and open competition. The movement
from unrestricted to small business set-aside contracting might result
in competition among fewer total bidders, although there will be more
small businesses eligible to submit offers. However, the additional
costs associated with fewer bidders are expected to be minor since, by
law, procurements may be set aside for small businesses or reserved for
the 8(a), HUBZone, WOSB, or SDVOSB Programs only if awards are expected
to be made at fair and reasonable prices. In addition, there may be
higher costs when more full and open contracts are awarded to HUBZone
businesses that receive price evaluation preferences.
The proposed size standards revisions, if adopted, may have some
distributional effects among large and small businesses. Although SBA
cannot estimate with certainty the actual outcome of the gains and
losses among small and large businesses, it can identify several
probable impacts. There may be a transfer of some Federal contracts to
small businesses from large businesses. Large businesses may have fewer
Federal contract opportunities as Federal agencies decide to set aside
more Federal contracts for small businesses. In addition, some Federal
contracts may be awarded to HUBZone concerns instead of large
businesses since these firms may be eligible for a price evaluation
preference for contracts when they compete on a full and open basis.
Similarly, currently defined small businesses may obtain fewer
Federal contracts due to the increased competition from more businesses
defined as small. This transfer may be offset by a greater number of
Federal procurements set aside for all small businesses. The number of
newly defined and expanding small businesses that are willing and able
to sell to the Federal Government will limit the potential transfer of
contracts from large and currently defined small businesses. SBA cannot
estimate the potential distributional impacts of these transfers with
any degree of precision. The proposed revisions to the existing size
standards in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55 are consistent with SBA's
statutory mandate to assist small business. This regulatory action
promotes the Administration's objectives. One of SBA's goals in support
of the Administration's objectives is to help individual small
businesses succeed through fair and equitable access to capital and
credit, Government contracts, and management and technical assistance.
Reviewing and modifying size standards, when appropriate, ensures that
intended beneficiaries have access to small business programs designed
to assist them.

Executive Order 13563

A description of the need for this regulatory action and benefits
and costs associated with this action including possible distributional
impacts that relate to Executive Order 13563 is included above in the
Cost Benefit Analysis under Executive Order 12866.
In an effort to engage interested parties in this action, SBA has
presented its size standards methodology (discussed above under
Supplementary Information) to various industry associations and trade
groups. SBA also met with a number of industry groups to get their
feedback on its methodology and other size standards issues. In
addition, SBA presented its size standards methodology to businesses in
13 cities in the U.S. and sought their input as part of Jobs Act tours.
The presentation also included information on the latest status of the
comprehensive size standards review and on how interested parties can
provide SBA with input and feedback on size standards review.
Additionally, SBA sent letters to the Directors of the Offices of
Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) at several Federal
agencies with considerable procurement responsibilities requesting
their feedback on how the agencies use SBA's size standards and whether
current size standards meet their programmatic needs (both procurement
and non-procurement). SBA gave appropriate consideration to all input,
suggestions, recommendations, and relevant information obtained from
industry groups, individual businesses, and Federal agencies in
preparing this proposed rule.
The review of size standards in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55 is
consistent with EO 13563, Section 6, calling for retrospective analyses
of existing rules. The last comprehensive review of size standards
occurred during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Since then, except for
periodic adjustments for monetary based size standards, most reviews of
size standards were limited to a few specific industries in response to
requests from the public and Federal agencies. SBA recognizes that
changes in industry structure and the Federal marketplace over time
have rendered existing size standards for some industries no longer
supportable by current data. Accordingly, in 2007, SBA began a
comprehensive review of its size standards to ensure that existing size
standards have supportable bases and to revise them when necessary. In
addition, the Jobs Act requires SBA to conduct a detailed review of all
size standards and to make appropriate adjustments to reflect market
conditions. Specifically, the Jobs Act requires SBA to conduct a
detailed review of at least one-third of all size standards during
every18-month period from the date of its enactment and do a complete
review of all size standards

[[Page 55753]]

not less frequently than once every 5 years thereafter.

Executive Order 12988

This action meets applicable standards set forth in Sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action does not
have retroactive or preemptive effect.

Executive Order 13132

For purposes of Executive Order 13132, SBA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have substantial, direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, SBA has determined that this proposed
rule has no federalism implications warranting preparation of a
federalism assessment.

Paperwork Reduction Act

For the purpose of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35,
SBA has determined that this proposed rule will not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), this proposed rule, if
adopted, may have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
businesses in NAICS Sector 52, Finance and Insurance, and NAICS Sector
55, Management of Companies and Enterprises. As described above, this
rule may affect small businesses seeking Federal contracts, loans under
SBA's 7(a), 504 and Economic Injury Disaster Loan Programs, and
assistance under other Federal small business programs, as well as
subcontracting programs.
Immediately below, SBA sets forth an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) of this proposed rule addressing the following
questions: (1) What are the need for and objective of the rule? (2)
What are SBA's description and estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule will apply? (3) What are the projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the
rule? (4) What are the relevant Federal rules that may duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the rule? and (5) What alternatives will
allow the Agency to accomplish its regulatory objectives while
minimizing the impact on small businesses?
1. What are the need for and objective of the rule?
Changes in industry structure, technological changes, productivity
growth, mergers and acquisitions, and updated industry definitions have
changed the structure of many industries in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55.
Such changes can be sufficient to support revisions to current size
standards for some industries. Based on the analysis of the latest data
available, SBA believes that the revised standards in this proposed
rule more appropriately reflect the size of businesses that need
Federal assistance. The recently enacted Jobs Act also requires SBA to
review all size standards and make necessary adjustments to reflect
market conditions.
2. What are SBA's description and estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule will apply?
If the proposed rule is adopted in its present form, SBA estimates
that more than 5,400 additional firms will become small because of
proposed increases to receipts based size standards for 36 industries
in NAICS Sectors 52 and 55. That represents 2.2 percent of total firms
that are small under current receipts based size standards in all
industries within these Sectors. This will result in an increase in the
small business share of total receipts in those industries from 5.1
percent under the current size standards to 7.5 percent under the
proposed size standards. Additionally, due to the proposed increase in
the asset-based size standard for four industries within NAICS Sector
52 about 2,000 additional financial institutions will qualify as small,
including about 25 minority owned financial institutions that could be
eligible to participate in agreements with prime contractors for
subcontracting goals and credits. In addition, about 550 additional
Credit Unions would qualify as small under the higher assets based size
standard, but they would not qualify for Federal programs intended for
small businesses because they are not-for profit entities. However,
they may qualify as small entities for other Federal programs and
regulatory purposes. The proposed size standards, if adopted, will
enable more small businesses to retain their small business status for
a longer period. Many firms may have lost their eligibility and find it
difficult to compete at current size standards with companies that are
significantly larger than they are. SBA believes the competitive impact
will be positive for existing small businesses and for those that
exceed the size standards but are on the very low end of those that are
not small. They might otherwise be called or referred to as mid-sized
businesses, although SBA only defines what is small; other entities are
other than small.
3. What are the projected reporting, record keeping and other
compliance requirements of the rule?
The proposed size standard changes impose no additional reporting
or record keeping requirements on small businesses. However, qualifying
for Federal procurement and a number of other programs requires that
businesses register in the CCR database and certify in the Online
Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) that they are
small at least once annually. Therefore, businesses opting to
participate in those programs must comply with CCR and ORCA
requirements. There are no costs associated with either CCR
registration or ORCA certification. Changing size standards alters the
access to SBA's programs that assist small businesses, but does not
impose a regulatory burden because they neither regulate nor control
business behavior.
4. What are the relevant Federal rules, which may duplicate, overlap or
conflict with the rule?
Under Sec. 3(a)(2)(C) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
632(a)(2)(c), Federal agencies must use SBA's size standards to define
a small business, unless specifically authorized by statute to do
otherwise. In 1995, SBA published in the Federal Register a list of
statutory and regulatory size standards that identified the application
of SBA's size standards as well as other size standards used by Federal
agencies (60 FR 57988 (November 24, 1995)). SBA is not aware of any
Federal rule that would duplicate or conflict with establishing size
standards.
However, the Small Business Act and SBA's regulations allow Federal
agencies to develop different size standards if they believe that SBA's
size standards are not appropriate for their programs, with the
approval of SBA's Administrator (13 CFR 121.903). The Regulatory
Flexibility Act authorizes an Agency to establish an alternative small
business definition, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of
the U.S. Small Business Administration (5 U.S.C. 601(3)).

[[Page 55754]]

5. What alternatives will allow the agency to accomplish its regulatory
objectives while minimizing the impact on small entities?
By law, SBA is required to develop numerical size standards for
establishing eligibility for Federal small business assistance
programs. Other than varying size standards by industry and changing
the size measures, no practical alternative exists to the systems of
numerical size standards.

List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 121

Administrative practice and procedure, Government procurement,
Government property, Grant programs--business, Individuals with
disabilities, Loan programs--business, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses.

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, SBA proposes to amend
part 13 CFR Part 121 as follows:

PART 121--SMALL BUSINESS SIZE REGULATIONS

1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as
follows:

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 662, and 694a(9).

2. In Sec. 121.201, amend the table ``Small Business Size
Standards by NAICS Industry'' as follows:
a. In Sec. 121.201, in the table, revise the entries for
``522110'', ``522120'', ``522130'', ``522190'', ``522210'', ``522220'',
``522291'', ``522292'', ``522293'', ``522294'', ``522298'', ``522320'',
``522390'', ``523110'', ``523120'', ``523130'', ``523140'', ``523210'',
``523910'', ``523920'', ``523930'', ``523991'', ``523999'', ``524113'',
``524114'', ``524127'', ``524128'', ``524130'', ``524291'', ``524292'',
``524298'', ``525110'', ``525120'', ``525190'', ``525910'', ``525920'',
``525930'', ``525990'', ``551111'', and ``551112''
b. Revise footnote 8 as shown below after the table.
The revisions read as follows:

Sec. 121.201 What size standards has SBA identified by North American
Industry Classification System codes?

* * * * *

Small Business Size Standards by NAICS Industry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAICS U.S. Size standards in millions of Size standards in number of
NAICS codes industry title dollars employees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
522110................ Commercial 500 million in assets \8\......... .................................
Banking \ 8\.
522120................ Savings 500 million in assets \8\......... .................................
Institutions \
8\.
522130................ Credit Unions.... 500 million in assets \8\......... .................................
522190................ Other Depository 500 million in assets \8\......... .................................
Credit
Intermediation \
8\.
522210................ Credit Card 500 million in assets \8\......... .................................
Issuing \ 8\.
522220................ Sales Financing.. 35.5.............................. .................................
522291................ Consumer Lending. 35.5.............................. .................................
522292................ Real Estate 35.5.............................. .................................
Credit.
522293................ International 35.5.............................. .................................
Trade Financing.
522294................ Secondary Market 35.5.............................. .................................
Financing.
522298................ All Other 35.5.............................. .................................
Nondepository
Credit
Intermediation.

* * * * * * *
522320................ Financial 35.5.............................. .................................
Transactions,
Reserve, and
Clearing House
Activities.
522390................ Other Activities 19.0.............................. .................................
Related to
Credit
Intermediation.

* * * * * * *
523110................ Investment 35.5.............................. .................................
Banking and
Securities
Dealing.
523120................ Securities 35.5.............................. .................................
Brokerage.
523130................ Commodity 35.5.............................. .................................
Contracts
Dealing.
523140................ Commodity 35.5.............................. .................................
Contracts
Brokerage.
523210................ Securities and 35.5.............................. .................................
Commodity
Exchanges.
523910................ Miscellaneous 35.5.............................. .................................
Intermediation.
523920................ Portfolio 35.5.............................. .................................
Management.
523930................ Investment Advice 35.5.............................. .................................
523991................ Trust, Fiduciary 35.5.............................. .................................
and Custody
Activities.
523999................ Miscellaneous 35.5.............................. .................................
Financial
Investment
Activities.

* * * * * * *
524113................ Direct Life 35.5.............................. .................................
Insurance
Carriers.
524114................ Direct Health and 35.5.............................. .................................
Medical
Insurance
Carriers.

* * * * * * *
524127................ Direct Title 35.5.............................. .................................
Insurance
Carriers.
524128................ Other Direct 35.5.............................. .................................
Insurance
(except Life,
Health and
Medical)
Carriers.
524130................ Reinsurance 35.5.............................. .................................
Carriers.

* * * * * * *
524291................ Claims Adjusting. 19.0.............................. .................................
524292................ Third Party 30.0.............................. .................................
Administration
of Insurance and
Pension Funds.
524298................ All Other 14.0.............................. .................................
Insurance
Related
Activities.

* * * * * * *
525110................ Pension Funds.... 30.0.............................. .................................
525120................ Health and 30.0.............................. .................................
Welfare Funds.
525190................ Other Insurance 30.0.............................. .................................
Funds.
525910................ Open[dash]End 30.0.............................. .................................
Investment Funds.
525920................ Trusts, Estates, 30.0.............................. .................................
and Agency Funds.
525930................ Real Estate 30.0.............................. .................................
Investments
Trusts.

[[Page 55755]]

525990................ Other Financial 30.0.............................. .................................
Vehicles.

* * * * * * *
551111................ Offices of Bank 19.0.............................. .................................
Holding
Companies.
551112................ Offices of Other 19.0.............................. .................................
Holding
Companies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Footnotes
\8.\ NAICS Codes 522110, 522120, 522130, 522190, and 522210--A financial Institution's assets are determined by
averaging the assets reported on its four quarterly financial statements for the preceding year. ``Assets''
for the purposes of this size standard means the assets defined according to the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council 041 call report form for NAICS codes 522110, 522120, 522190, and 522210 and
the National Credit Union Administration 5300 call report form for NAICS code 522130.
* * * * * * *

Dated, June 22, 2012.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-22258 Filed 9-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P