[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70799-70805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28642]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-5660-N-01]
Notice of Neighborhood Stabilization Program; Closeout
Requirements and Recapture
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice describes closeout requirements that apply to and
additional regulations waived for grantees receiving grants under the
three rounds of funding under the Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
DATES: Effective Date: November 27, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Gimont, Director, Office of
Block Grant Assistance, Office of Community Planning and Development,
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW.,
Room 7286, Washington, DC 20410, telephone number 202-708-3587 (this is
not a toll-free number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at 800-
877-8339. FAX inquiries may be sent to Mr. Gimont at 202-401-2044.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Program Background and Purpose
The Neighborhood Stabilization Program (or NSP) was established by
the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) (Pub. L. 110-289,
approved July 30, 2008), specifically Division B, Title III of HERA,
for the purpose of stabilizing communities that have suffered from
foreclosures and abandonment. As established by HERA, NSP provided
grants to all states and selected local governments on a formula basis.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act)
(Pub. L. 111-5, approved February 17, 2009) authorized additional NSP
grants to be awarded to states, local governments, nonprofits and a
consortium of nonprofit entities, but on a competitive basis. The
Recovery Act also authorized funding for national and local technical
assistance providers to support NSP grantees.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Dodd-Frank Act) (Pub. L. 111-203, approved July 21, 2010) authorized a
third round of Neighborhood Stabilization grants to all states and
select governments on a formula basis.
The purpose of the funds awarded under the three rounds of NSP is
to target the stabilization of neighborhoods negatively affected by
properties that have been foreclosed upon and abandoned. The notice,
Notice of Formula Allocations and Program Requirements for Neighborhood
Stabilization Program Formula Grants, published October 19, 2010 (75 FR
64322) (``Unified NSP Notice'') provides further background for these
programs, the program principles, and the objectives and outcomes of
the NSP program. In addition, the Notice of Fund Availability (NOFA)
for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 under the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 2009, 74 FR 21377 (May 7, 2009), as
amended by subsequent notices (``NSP2 NOFA''), includes requirements
specific to the competitive round of funding under the Recovery Act.
The primary purpose of this notice is to revise requirements set
forth in the Unified NSP Notice to provide the grant closeout framework
for all three rounds of NSP by minimally adjusting the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) closeout requirements (24 CFR 570.509).
Following publication of this notice, HUD will update issued CDBG
closeout guidance (CPD Notice 12-0004) to incorporate specific
operating instructions for closeout of NSP grants. These instructions
will create an NSP closeout process that is nearly identical to the
CDBG closeout process and place both sets of instructions in a single
document. This approach takes advantage of NSP grantee (and HUD field
staff) familiarity with the CDBG closeout procedures because, by the
time of grant closeout, almost every NSP grantee will have completed
closeout of a CDBG Recovery Act grant.
Since this notice applies to grantees receiving grants under the
three rounds of funding under the Neighborhood Stabilization Program,
the terms NSP1, NSP2 or NSP3 are used to describe each of the three
funding rounds. When referring to the grants, grantees, assisted
activities, and implementation rules under HERA, this notice will use
the term ``NSP1.'' When referring to the
[[Page 70800]]
grants, grantees, assisted activities, and implementation rules under
the Recovery Act, this notice will use the term ``NSP2.'' When
referring to the grants, grantees, assisted activities, and
implementation rules under the Dodd-Frank Act, this notice will use the
term ``NSP3.'' Collectively, the grants, grantees, assisted activities,
and implementation rules under these three rounds of funding are
referred to as NSP.
NSP is a component of the CDBG program, authorized under Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974 (HCD Act) (42 U.S.C. 5301 et
seq.).
Authority To Provide Alternative Requirements and Grant Regulatory
Waivers
HERA appropriated $3.92 billion for emergency assistance for
redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes and residential
properties, and provides under a rule of construction that, unless HERA
states otherwise, the grants are to be CDBG funds. HERA, the Recovery
Act, and the Frank-Dodd Act authorize the Secretary of HUD to specify
alternative requirements to any provision under Title I of the HCD Act
except for requirements related to fair housing, nondiscrimination,
labor standards, and the environment (including lead-based paint). The
alternative requirements must be in accordance with the terms of
section 2301 of HERA and for the sole purpose of expediting for NSP1,
or facilitating for NSP2 and NSP3, the use of grant funds. The CDBG
requirements will apply to NSP except where this or other published
notices supersede or amend such requirements.
This Notice specifies a new alternative requirement to a statutory
requirement by extending the requirement that NSP program income be
used for NSP purposes not only under the grant agreement, but after
grant closeout. Except as described in this notice and previous notices
governing NSP, statutory and regulatory provisions governing the CDBG
program, including those at 24 CFR part 570 subpart I for states or,
for CDBG entitlement communities, including those at 24 CFR part 570
subparts A, C, D, J, K, and O, as appropriate, apply to the use of
these funds. The State of Hawaii was allocated funds and will be
subject to part 570, subpart I, as modified by this notice.
I. Alternative Requirements and Regulatory Waivers
A. Closeout Requirements
1. General Grant Closeout Requirements
Background
This part of the Notice provides instructions on the closeout of
all NSP grants. The procedures describe the grantee's continuing
obligations with respect to program income, long-term affordability,
and land-banked properties. This Notice provides an alternative
requirement for section 104(j) of the HCD Act of 1974 and a waiver of
24 CFR 570.509 to the extent necessary to allow an NSP grantee to
continue to use NSP program income on hand at the time of grant
closeout with HUD in accordance with NSP program requirements,
including this notice, instead of for community development activities
in accordance with CDBG regulations. All NSP program income on hand at
the time of closeout must meet program requirements as specified,
including meeting a national objective.
Requirement
A new Section Y is added to the Unified NSP Notice that reads:
Y. NSP Grant Closeout Procedures
An alternative requirement is provided for section 104(j) of
Title I of the HCD Act and provisions of 24 CFR 570.509 are waived
to provide that the CDBG closeout requirements apply as modified for
NSP1, NSP2, and NSP3 grants as described below (The modifications
adjust for the use of DRGR and the difference in the program
names.):
(a) Criteria for closeout. An NSP grant will be closed out when
HUD determines, in consultation with the grantee, that the following
criteria have been met:
(1) All costs to be paid with NSP funds have been incurred, with
the exception of closeout costs (e.g., audit costs) and costs
resulting from contingent liabilities described in the closeout
agreement pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section. Contingent
liabilities include, but are not limited to, third-party claims
against the grantee, as well as related administrative costs.
(2) With respect to activities (such as rehabilitation of
privately owned properties) which are financed by means of escrow
accounts, loan guarantees, or similar mechanisms, the work to be
assisted with NSP funds (but excluding program income) has actually
been completed.
(3) That not less than 25 percent of the grantee's NSP grant
(initial allocation plus any program income) was expended to house
individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of
area median income.
(4) Other responsibilities of the grantee under the grant
agreement and applicable laws and regulations appear to have been
carried out satisfactorily or there is no further Federal interest
in keeping the grant agreement open for the purpose of securing
performance.
(b) Closeout actions. (1) Within 90 calendar days of the date it
is determined that the criteria for closeout have been met, the
grantee shall submit to HUD the final quarterly report in the
Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system. If an acceptable
report is not submitted in a timely manner, an audit of the
grantee's grant activities may be conducted by HUD.
(2) Based on the information provided in the final performance
report and other relevant information, HUD, in consultation with the
grantee, will prepare a closeout agreement in accordance with
paragraph (c) of this section.
(3) HUD will cancel any unused portion of the awarded grant, as
shown in DRGR and the signed grant closeout agreement. Any unused
grant funds disbursed from the U.S. Treasury which are in the
possession of the grantee shall be refunded to HUD.
(4) Any costs paid with NSP funds which were not audited
previously shall be subject to coverage in the grantee's next single
audit performed in accordance with the regulations in 24 CFR part 84
or 85. The grantee may be required to repay HUD any disallowed costs
based on the results of the audit, or on additional HUD reviews
provided for in the closeout agreement.
(c) Closeout agreement. Any obligations remaining as of the date
of the closeout shall be covered by the terms of a closeout
agreement. The agreement shall be prepared by the HUD field office
in consultation with the grantee. The agreement shall identify the
grant being closed out, and include provisions with respect to the
following:
(1) Identification of any closeout costs or contingent
liabilities subject to payment with NSP funds (excluding program
income) after the closeout agreement is signed;
(2) Identification of any unused grant funds to be canceled by
HUD;
(3) Identification of the amount of program assets, including:
(i) Any program income on deposit in financial institutions at
the time the closeout agreement is signed and of any program income
currently held by subrecipients or consortium members;
(ii) A list of real property subject to NSP continuing
affordability requirements;
(iii) A list of real property held in an NSP-assisted land bank;
(iv) If the grantee has assisted a land-bank, a plan detailing
how the land bank will meet the 10-year maximum land holding
requirement of Section II.E.2.d of the Unified NSP Notice and
Appendix I, Section E.2.d of the NSP2 NOFA; and
(v) A management plan on the attached template describing how
the grantee will enforce the NSP continuing affordability
requirements, including the responsible organization for this
function.
(4) Description of the grantee's responsibility after closeout
for:
(i) Compliance with all NSP program requirements, certifications
and assurances in using program income on deposit at the time the
closeout agreement is signed and in using any other remaining NSP
funds available for closeout costs and contingent liabilities;
[[Page 70801]]
(ii) Use of real property assisted with NSP funds in accordance
with the principles described in 24 CFR 570.505 and, for properties
held in land banks, the requirement to obligate or otherwise commit
a property for a specific eligible use in accordance with CDBG
requirements;
(iii) Compliance with requirements governing NSP program income
received subsequent to grant closeout, as described in 24 CFR
570.504(b)(4)-(5) and this Notice, and
(iv) Ensuring that flood insurance coverage for affected
property owners is maintained for the mandatory period;
(5) Other provisions appropriate to any special circumstances of
the grant closeout, in modification of or in addition to the
obligations in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section. The
agreement shall authorize monitoring by HUD, and shall provide that
findings of noncompliance may be taken into account by HUD, as
unsatisfactory performance of the grantee, in the consideration of
any future grant award under the NSP, CDBG, or HOME Investment
Partnerships (HOME) programs.
2. Additional Grant Closeout Requirements
Background
HERA does not address grant closeout. HERA directs through a rule
of construction that unless HERA sets forth a different requirement,
NSP funds shall be treated as CDBG funds. Therefore, the CDBG
requirements apply to grant closeout. CDBG requirements address program
income earned after grant closeout by a grantee with a continuing CDBG
grant. NSP grants are generating program income and are likely to do so
for several more years. In accordance with paragraph II.N of the
Unified NSP Notice and Appendix I, paragraph N of the NSP2 NOFA,
grantees must use program income for NSP eligible activities. After
closeout, the HCD Act, at section 104(j), provides:
``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any unit of
general local government may retain any program income that is
realized from any grant made by the Secretary, or any amount
distributed by a State, under section 106 if (1) such income was
realized after the initial disbursement of the funds received by
such unit of general local government under such section; and (2)
such unit of general local government has agreed that it will
utilize the program income for eligible community development
activities in accordance with the provisions of this title; except
that the Secretary may, by regulation, exclude from consideration as
program income any amounts determined to be so small that compliance
with this subsection creates an unreasonable administrative burden
on the unit of general local government.''
Given that demonstrated need for neighborhood stabilization exceeds
available NSP funding, HUD has concluded that grantees should continue
neighborhood stabilization activities with NSP program income after
closeout to the extent sufficient program income is received annually
to support viable projects. This notice therefore provides a continuing
alternative requirement for section 104(j) that, after grant closeout,
a CDBG grantee must use NSP program income in accordance with all NSP
requirements with some exceptions. (1) In instances in which the annual
NSP program income does not exceed $25,000, the funds shall be used for
general administrative costs related to ensuring continued
affordability of NSP units or added to the grantee's CDBG program
income receipts and the CDBG requirements at 570.500(a)(4) shall apply,
which may exclude such amounts from the definition of program income if
combined earnings (NSP plus CDBG) are less than $25,000; and (2) in
instances in which a grantee's annual NSP program income exceeds
$25,000 and does not exceed $250,000, the requirement of paragraph
II.E.2.e of the Unified NSP Notice, and Appendix I, paragraph E.2.e of
the NSP2 NOFA, shall not apply.
Paragraph II.E.2.e and paragraph E.2.e restate the NSP statutory
requirement that ``not less than 25 percent of the funds appropriated
or otherwise made available * * * shall be used to house individuals or
families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of area median
income.'' HUD believes that in applying this requirement to program
income received after closeout, grantees need to receive sufficient
annual program income to be able to comply. Using NSP1 grantee data,
HUD analyzed the average cost to produce one unit of affordable housing
assisted with NSP funds. The cost analysis considered costs associated
with NSP eligible activities such as rehabilitation and new
construction. HUD reasoned that Congress chose the percentage to be set
aside in consideration of the large amount of funds that grantees
received under their original grant. In other words, Congress did not
intend to require NSP grantees to spend all of their NSP funds to house
individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of area
median income. With regard to program income, HUD notes that there are
a number of grantees that are projected to generate only small amounts
of program income after grant closeout. Thus, to maintain consistency
with the manner in which Congress intended for the 25 percent set aside
to be applied, HUD has determined that a minimum of $250,000 in annual
program income may be necessary to comply with the requirement to spend
25 percent of any program income generated after grant closeout to
house for individuals or families at or below 50 percent of area medium
income and to produce at least one unit of affordable housing without
significant burden.
The NSP continuation provisions apply to program income generated
from the use of NSP funds by a CDBG entitlement or State grantee for
the duration of the grantee's participation in the CDBG program in any
year in which NSP funds exceed the thresholds above. Minimum annual
reporting requirements will continue, initially in DRGR and later
joined to the grantee's CDBG reporting in the Integrated Disbursement
and Information System (IDIS).
After closeout, if a former NSP grantee wishes to use funds for
acquisition of property into a land bank, HUD will hold that property
subject to the same deadline as all other land-banked properties: the
property will have ten years from the date the NSP grant closeout
agreement is fully executed to meet an eligible redevelopment of that
property in accordance with NSP requirements.
For NSP2, State and entitlement grantees that are consortium lead
entities or a consortium member administering NSP2 funds subject to a
consortium funding agreement, must comply with program income and land
bank rules as described above. A local government that was not an
entitlement grantee would be subject to the same requirements as 24 CFR
570.489(e)(3)(ii)(B). Non-profit grantees or members of consortia are
not subject to ongoing NSP or CDBG program requirements with the
exception of requirements imposed by HUD concerning the reporting of
activities using miscellaneous revenue from the NSP program for 5 years
and that any land bank properties be disposed of for a specific use
supporting neighborhood stabilization within 10 years after grant
closeout.
Revised Requirements
A new Section Z. is added to the Unified NSP Notice that reads:
Z. Closeout Procedures for Program Income, Land Banks, and Long-Term
Affordability
Background
Program Income. NSP program income on hand at the time of
closeout or received after closeout shall, subject to the de minimis
exception provided for in Section Y, continue to be used in
accordance with NSP requirements. The additional flexibility created
by the legislation for the creation of financing mechanisms,
development of new
[[Page 70802]]
housing, operation of land banks, and service of families up to 120
percent of Area Median Income (AMI), will remain in place.
However, HUD notes that continued acquisition of new land bank
property after closeout with NSP program income could undermine the
urgency of finding uses for the properties already acquired.
Grantees will be required to allocate 25 percent of program income
to housing for families with less than 50 percent of Area Median
Income when the amount of annual program income received by a
grantee is sufficient to make application of this requirement
reasonable. After grant closeout, former NSP grantees that are CDBG
entitlements or State governments will report at least annually as
provided for by HUD, initially in DRGR and later in an enhanced
IDIS, on the receipt and use of program income, and the disposition
of land banked properties. These grantees must also include NSP
program income in the CDBG Action Plan or substantial amendment in
accordance with CDBG requirements. All former NSP grantees,
including nonprofits and non-entitlement units of general local
government receiving funds directly from HUD, must report at least
annually in a form acceptable to the Secretary regarding enforcement
of any NSP continuing affordability restrictions. Reporting will
continue over the course of the minimum period of affordability set
forth in HOME program standards at 24 CFR 92.252 (e) and
92.254(a)(4).
Finally, most program income will be received by entitlement
cities and counties, and by states, which have systems and
procedures to manage NSP revenues, which are treated in most
respects like CDBG revenues. However, non-profit consortium members
in NSP2 grant consortia that receive revenues generated by NSP
projects will not have access to the state and municipal CDBG
tracking systems. Further, the CDBG regulation and Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) circular implemented at 24 CFR 84.24(e)
do not require that non-profit grantees continue to treat revenues
generated from use of NSP funds and received after grant closeout as
federal funds unless HUD regulations or the terms and conditions of
the award provide otherwise. Thus, for grantees that are not direct
formula CDBG grantees (non-profits and non-entitlement local
governments, including those that are part of a consortium), HUD is
requiring that revenues generated by projects funded before closeout
but received within 5 years after grant closeout must be used for
NSP eligible activities and meet NSP benefit requirements, but no
other federal requirements would apply. With the exception of income
earned from the sale of NSP-assisted real property or loans, any
income earned by such post-closeout use of funds would not be
governed by any NSP requirements and would be miscellaneous
revenues, although HUD encourages such grantees to apply NSP
principles to subsequent uses of the funds.
Disposition of Land Bank Property. The HERA created a use of
funds which did not exist in the Community Development Block Grant
program: land banks. HUD implemented this use in association with
two CDBG eligible activities: acquisition of real property and
disposition of real property. This tool has been used by a number of
grantees, in all parts of the country but primarily in the upper
Midwest, to hold property acquired with NSP funds that has no
immediate demand in the housing market. Given the non-recurring
nature on NSP funds, HUD set a limit of ten years for n NSP-acquired
property to remain in a land bank without ``obligating the property
for a specific, eligible redevelopment of that property in
accordance with NSP requirements.''
In this Notice, HUD is adjusting the land bank disposition
requirement in two ways. First, HUD is setting the start date of the
10-year period before which land held in a land bank must be
obligated or committed for a specific use as the date of the
closeout agreement. Second, HUD is re-stating the existing
requirement for NSP-assisted properties held in a land bank to:
``obligat[e]or otherwise commit[] the property for a specific use
supporting neighborhood stabilization.''
Long Term Affordability of Housing. The NSP authorization law,
HERA, at section 2301(f)(3)(B), directs:
The Secretary shall, by rule or order, ensure, to the maximum
extent practicable and for the longest feasible term, that the sale,
rental, and redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed upon homes
under this section remain affordable to individuals and families * *
*.
NSP implements this direction by requiring each grantee to
address in its submission how it will ensure continued
affordability, and define affordable rents, standards, and
enforcement mechanisms. Long-term affordability enforcement for
homeownership activities, owing to the mostly automatic operation of
the resale/recapture mechanisms, will ensure grantees are notified
when a property is disposed of within the term of affordability.
Grantees and HUD will require policies and procedures for tracking
the re-use of funds recovered through these mechanisms.
Despite the difficulties of implementation, NSP rules do require
grantees to have a system for securing the long-term affordability
of NSP-assisted units. In many cases, this is implemented in
developer or subrecipient agreements or in recorded property
restrictions. Grantees must meet the requirement and HUD will
monitor to verify compliance. To ensure some accountability for
long-term affordability, this Notice requires that each NSP grantee
regularly update a HUD-provided online registry of covered NSP
properties throughout the affordability period for each property.
HUD will also cover grantee review and tracking of the NSP property
inventory in the standard CDBG risk analysis and monitoring
protocols. At minimum, grantees must use the HOME program
affordability periods as defined in 24 CFR 92.252 and 92.254. HUD
expects former NSP grantees to continue to enforce affordability
restrictions after grant closeout.
Requirements
1. Program Income. Gross revenues received by NSP grantees after
closeout will be governed by the following requirements:
a. In general, annual funds received in excess of $25,000 shall
be used in accordance with all NSP requirements for eligible NSP
properties, uses and activities, including new construction,
financing mechanisms, and management and disposition of land bank
property.
b. If annual NSP program income does not exceed $25,000, the
funds shall be used for general administrative costs related to
ensuring continued affordability of NSP units or added to the
grantee's CDBG program income receipts and the CDBG requirements at
24 CFR 570.500(a)(4) shall apply, which may exclude such amounts
from the definition of program income.
c. Program income may provide benefit to individuals and
families with incomes up to 120 percent of AMI as permitted in NSP
under Section II.E;
d. If a grantee's annual NSP program income exceeds $250,000, 25
percent of the program income shall be used to house individuals or
families below 50 percent of AMI; in instances in which a grantee's
annual NSP program income does not exceed $250,000, the requirements
of paragraph II.E.2.e does not apply.
e. NSP2 grantees that are not CDBG entitlement communities or
States must use post-closeout revenues generated from NSP-assisted
activities funded before closeout for NSP purposes. If the grantee
does not have another ongoing grant received directly from HUD at
the time of closeout, then in accordance with 24 CFR 570.504(b)(5),
income received after closeout from the disposition of real property
or from loans outstanding at the time of closeout shall not be
governed by NSP or CDBG rules, except that such income shall be used
for activities that meet one of the national objectives in 24 CFR
570.208 and the eligibility requirements described in section 105 of
the HCD Act. The provisions of 24 CFR 570.504(b)(5) are waived to
limit its application to income received within 5 years of grant
closeout. Any income received 5 years after grant closeout, as well
as program income from funds outlaid after the date of the closeout
agreement may be used without restriction. Such grantees are
encouraged to use such funds in accordance with the principles
above.
f. States may continue to act directly to implement NSP
activities post-closeout.
g. HUD will provide direction to grantees by the date of
closeout on procedures for reporting and tracking NSP program income
revenues. Tracking will continue in DRGR until IDIS enhancements to
allow NSP property registry and program income tracking are
developed and released.
2. Disposition of Landbank Properties
a. Grantees must not hold NSP-assisted properties in land banks for
more than ten years. HUD will calculate this period beginning with the
date of execution of the grant closeout agreement. HUD will provide
direction to grantees by the date of closeout on procedures for
reporting and tracking property held in land banks.
[[Page 70803]]
b. After grant closeout, landbank properties must be obligated or
otherwise committed for a specific use that supports neighborhood
stabilization. Properties in a landbank, or otherwise held by the
grantee, will be considered obligated for redevelopment if the property
is:
(1) Owned by a local government or non-profit entity and identified
under a Consolidated Plan approved by HUD for use as a CDBG-eligible
public improvement such as parks, open space, or flood control;
(2) Owned by a community land trust to create affordable housing;
(3) Transferred to and committed for any other use in the grantee's
CDBG program, included in an annual Action Plan, subject to all CDBG
regulations and no longer part of the NSP program;
(4) Designated for affordable housing in accordance with HERA and
under development by an eligible development entity which has control
of the site and has expended predevelopment costs; or
(5) Included in a redevelopment plan that has been approved by the
local governing body.
c. Any NSP assisted properties remaining in the land bank ten years
after the date of grant closeout shall revert entirely to the CDBG
program and must be immediately used to meet a national objective or
disposed of in accordance with CDBG use of real property requirements
at 24 CFR 570.505.
3. Long-Term Affordability
a. Grantees must ensure that, when a house is sold, the
affordability requirements are met as provided in their NSP action plan
substantial amendment or NSP2 NOFA application. Generally this will be
through following the Resale or Recapture provisions of the HOME
regulations at 24 CFR 92.254(a)(5). Property that serves owner-
occupants may assure compliance with the continued affordability period
by recording with the sale documents in the form of a lien on the
mortgage loan and/or a covenant on the deed.
b. At a minimum, each property that serves rental household will
meet the requirements of the HOME program, at 24 CFR 92.252(a), (c),
(e), and (f). This will require active oversight by the grantee to
monitor the project for compliance. It is permissible to use program
income to pay for such costs. If there is no program income, grantees
may charge the project a small fee as part of their agreements with
property owners based on documented costs to accomplish this
monitoring, but only if the development has sufficient income after
paying operating expenses.
c. HUD will establish reporting capability to maintain a property
registry including information on all NSP properties still subject to
continued affordability requirements at the time of grant closeout.
Grantees must report as provided in the closeout agreement so long as
program requirements apply to the unit or it fulfills the affordability
requirement.
4. Non-Compliance
In the closeout agreement, HUD will include a provision allowing
the Department access to records and the ability to apply the
corrective and remedial actions in 24 CFR 570.910 for grantees that do
not fully satisfy this requirement.
B. Recapture Provisions
Background
Section 2301(c)(1) of HERA required NSP1 grantees to use their
funds within 18 months of receipt. In the Unified NSP Notice, 75 FR.
64326, HUD defined the term ``use'' to mean ``obligate.'' The Unified
NSP Notice also provided, at 75 Fed. Reg. 64323, that NSP1 grantees
that failed to obligate their NSP1 funds within 18 months would be
subject to corrective action or recapture of grant funds. States with
unused funds would be subject to recapture of unobligated amounts up to
$19.6 million because states were statutorily required to receive this
amount regardless of their relative needs for funds. States received
the $19.6 million base plus any need-based formula increment.
NSP1 grantees are required by the formula allocation notice and the
terms of their grant agreements to expend 100 percent of their grant
funds within 48 months of award. NSP2 and NSP3 grantees are statutorily
required to expend an amount of NSP funds equal to 50 percent of their
grant (grant plus program income) within 24 months and an amount equal
to 100 percent of their grant within 36 months from the date HUD signed
their grant agreement. One of the sanctions for failure to expend NSP
grant funds by the relevant deadline is recapture.
HUD is providing that any NSP1 or NSP3 recaptured funds may be used
in accordance with the provisions of section 106(c)(4) of the HCD Act
(42 U.S.C. 5306(c)(4)) for the purpose of providing disaster relief.
Although HUD had originally proposed to reallocate NSP1 funds for this
purpose, in the subsequent Notice of Neighborhood Stabilization Program
Reallocation Process Changes, dated August 23, 2010, HUD recognized
that NSP1 recaptured funds are not required to be reallocated under the
disaster relief provisions and could instead be reallocated by formula.
Upon further reflection and based on the limited funds to be
recaptured, HUD has determined that recaptured funds should be used for
disaster relief and is amending the Unified Notice to clarify
reallocation options.
Revised Requirement
Section I.B.2.g. of the Unified NSP Notice at page 64324 is amended
to read as follows:
HUD may reallocate recaptured funds by formula or under the
provisions of 42 U.S.C. 5306(c)(4).
Section I.B.3 of the Unified NSP Notice at page 64324 is amended to
read as follows:
NSP3 grantees must expend 50 percent of their grants within 2
years and 100 percent of their grants within 3 years. HUD will
recapture and reallocate the amount of funds not expended by those
deadlines or provide for other corrective action(s) or sanction. HUD
may reallocate recaptured funds by formula or under the provisions
of 42 U.S.C. 5306(c)(4).
II. Other Technical Corrections
A. Demolition Eligible Activities and Jobs National Objective
Background
The Unified NSP Notice sets forth a table of eligible activities
that are correlated with the statutory eligible uses of NSP. The table
provides that ``24 CFR 570.201(d) Clearance for blighted structures
only'' is a correlated activity for the demolition of blighted
structures. HUD has recognized since publishing the last NSP Notice
that acquisition and disposition are also eligible activities that are
regularly correlated with using NSP funds for demolition. 24 CFR
570.201(a), (b).
The June 19, 2009 Notice of Allocations, Application Procedures,
Regulatory Waivers Granted to and Alternative Requirements for
Emergency Assistance for Redevelopment of Abandoned and Foreclosed
Homes Grantees Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, 2008;
Revisions to Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) and Technical
Corrections at 74 FR 29223 (``Bridge Notice'') clarified that job
creation or retention was not an activity that could meet the HERA low-
and moderate-income national objective. In this notice, HUD is revising
its position to reflect market change and better support mixed use
development to allow for NSP activities that create or maintain jobs
for persons whose household
[[Page 70804]]
incomes are at or below 120 percent of median income (LMMJ).
Revised Requirement
On page 64330 of the Unified Notice, and Appendix 1, section H.3.a
of the NSP2 NOFA, modify the second full paragraph of the middle column
to read:
Other than the change in the applicable low- and moderate-income
qualification level from 80 percent to 120 percent and this notice's
change to the calculation at 570.483(b)(3), the area benefit,
housing, jobs, and limited clientele benefit requirements at 24 CFR
570.208(a) and 570.483(b) remain unchanged, as does the required
documentation.
On page 64333 of the Unified Notice, and Appendix 1, section H.3.a
of the NSP2 NOFA, revise the table of NSP eligible uses and activities
to read:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Correlated eligible activities from
NSP-eligible uses the CDBG entitlement regulations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Establish financing mechanisms As part of an activity
for purchase and redevelopment of delivery cost for an eligible
foreclosed upon homes and activity as defined in 24 CFR
residential properties, including 570.206.
such mechanisms as soft-seconds, Also, the eligible
loan loss reserves, and shared- activities listed below to the
equity loans for low- and extent financing mechanisms are
moderate-income homebuyers. used to carry them out.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Purchase and rehabilitate 24 CFR 570.201(a)
homes and residential properties Acquisition
that have been abandoned or (b) Disposition,
foreclosed upon, in order to (i) Relocation, and
sell, rent, or redevelop such (n) Direct homeownership assistance
homes and properties. (as modified below);
24 CFR 570.202 eligible
rehabilitation and preservation
activities for homes and other
residential properties.
HUD notes that any of the
activities listed above may include
required homebuyer counseling as an
activity delivery cost.
24 CFR 570.203 Special
economic development activities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C) Establish and operate land 24 CFR 570.201(a)
banks for homes and residential Acquisition and (b) Disposition.
properties that have been HUD notes that any of the
foreclosed upon. activities listed above may include
required homebuyer counseling as an
activity delivery cost.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D) Demolish blighted structures.. 24 CFR 570.201(a)
Acquisition, (b) Disposition, and
(d) Clearance for blighted
structures only.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(E) Redevelop demolished or vacant 24 CFR 570.201(a)
properties as housing*. Acquisition,
(b) Disposition,
(c) Public facilities and
improvements,
(e) Public services for housing
counseling, but only to the extent
that counseling beneficiaries are
limited to prospective purchasers
or tenants of the redeveloped
properties,
(i) Relocation, and
(n) Direct homeownership assistance
(as modified below).
24 CFR 570.202 Eligible
rehabilitation and preservation
activities for demolished or vacant
properties.
24 CFR 570.204 Community
based development organizations.
HUD notes that any of the
activities listed above may include
required homebuyer counseling as an
activity delivery cost.
NSP1 Only: 24 CFR 570.203
Special economic development
activities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* NSP1 funds used under eligible use (E) may be used for nonresidential
purposes, while NSP2 and NSP3 funds must be used for housing.
B. Low-Income Set-Aside for NSP2
Background
This notice is revising the NSP2 NOFA to explicitly require NSP2
grantees to use an amount equal to 25 percent of program income before
grant close-out for the purchase and redevelopment of abandoned or
foreclosed homes or residential properties that will be used to house
individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of area
median income. Although this requirement was stated in Unified NSP
Notice, there was some confusion among NSP2 grantees whether the
requirement applied to their program income. The law requires that 25%
of the original grant amount plus program income be used for families
at 50% of AMI and below, so this language is intended to eliminate any
confusion.
Revised Requirement
Appendix I, Section E.2.e of the NSP2 NOFA Is Revised to Read:
Not less than 25 percent of any NSP grant (initial allocation
plus any program income) shall be used to house individuals or
families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of area median
income. Each NSP2 grantee must spend an amount equal to 25 percent
of any NSP program income in accordance with this requirement.
Duration of Funding
The appropriation accounting provisions in 31 U.S.C. 1551-1557,
added by section 1405 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1991 (Pub. L. 101-510), limit the availability of certain
appropriations for expenditure. Such a limitation may not be waived.
The appropriations acts for NSP1 and NSP3 grants direct that these
funds be available until expended. However, HUD is imposing a shorter
deadline on the expenditure of NSP funds in this notice.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers for grants made
under NSP1 are as follows: 14.218; 14.225; and 14.228.
Paperwork Reduction Act
HUD has approval from OMB for information collection requirements
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). OMB approval is under OMB control number 2506-0165. In
[[Page 70805]]
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information, unless the collection displays a valid control number.
Finding of No Significant Impact
A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment
has been made in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 50,
which implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(C)(2)). The Finding of No Significant
Impact is available for public inspection between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.
weekdays in the Office of the Rules Docket Clerk, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500.
Dated: November 16, 2012.
Mark Johnston,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development.
[FR Doc. 2012-28642 Filed 11-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P