[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 28, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70964-70967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28790]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0938]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers; Washington, DC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action is a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
(SNPRM) to the Coast Guard's October 24, 2012, notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) that proposed to establish a security zone during
activities associated with the Presidential Inauguration in Washington,
DC from January 15, 2013 through January 24, 2013 (77 FR 64943). This
supplemental proposal extends the southern boundary of the proposed
security zone. This rule prohibits vessels and people from entering the
security zone and requires vessels and persons in the security zone to
depart the security zone, unless specifically exempt under the
provisions in this rule or granted specific permission from the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. This action is intended to
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in portions of the Potomac and
Anacostia Rivers during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before December 28, 2012.
[[Page 70965]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Sector Baltimore, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (410) 576-2674, email
[email protected]. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0938), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when
you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by the
Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2012-0938] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0938) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On October 24, 2012, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers;
Washington, DC'' in the Federal Register (77 FR 64943). The NPRM stated
that from January 15, 2013 through January 24, 2013, activities
associated with the Presidential Inauguration will occur in Washington,
DC. Activities associated with the Presidential Inauguration include
several Inaugural ceremonies, balls, parades and receptions. During
these activities, a gathering of high-ranking United States officials
and the public-at-large is expected to take place. Due to the need for
vessel control during the event, the Coast Guard will temporarily
restrict vessel traffic in portions of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers
to safeguard life and property on the navigable waters before, during,
and after activities associated with the Presidential Inauguration.
After the NPRM was published in the Federal Register, however, the
Coast Guard determined that the boundary of the proposed security zone
on the south between the Virginia shoreline and the District of
Columbia shoreline along latitude 38[deg]51'00'' N needed to be
relocated farther downstream to and along latitude 38[deg]50'00'' N.
The additional area is necessary to prevent vessels or persons from
bypassing the security measures established on shore for the events and
engaging in waterborne terrorist actions during the highly-publicized
events.
C. Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary security zone.
The proposed zone will be in effect from January 15, 2013 through
January 24, 2013. The proposed zone will cover (1) all waters of the
Potomac River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on the north by the
Francis Scott Key (U.S. Route 29) Bridge at mile 113.0, downstream to
and bounded on the south between the Virginia shoreline and the
District of Columbia shoreline along latitude 38[deg]50'00'' N,
including the waters of the Georgetown Channel Tidal Basin; and (2) all
waters of the Anacostia River, from shoreline to shoreline, bounded on
the north by the 11th Street (I-295) Bridge at mile 2.1, downstream to
and bounded on the south by its confluence with the Potomac River.
This rule requires that entry into or remaining in this security
zone is
[[Page 70966]]
prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port
Baltimore. Vessels already at berth, mooring, or anchor in the security
zone at the time the security zone is implemented do not have to depart
the zone. All vessels underway within this security zone at the time it
is implemented are to depart the zone. To seek permission to transit
the area of the security zone, the Captain of the Port Baltimore can be
contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF-
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Coast Guard vessels enforcing the security
zone can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). Federal, state, and local agencies may assist the Coast Guard in
the enforcement of the security zone. The Coast Guard will issue
notices to the maritime community to further publicize the security
zone and notify the public of changes in the status of the zone. Such
notices will continue until the event is complete.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. There is no vessel
traffic associated with recreational boating and commercial fishing
expected during the effective period, and vessels may seek permission
from the Captain of the Port Baltimore to enter and transit the zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate or transit through or within the security
zone during the enforcement period. Although the security zone will
apply to the entire width of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, traffic
may be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of the
Captain of the Port Baltimore. Before the effective period, maritime
advisories will be widely available to the maritime community.
Additionally, given the time of year this event is scheduled, the
vessel traffic is expected to be minimal.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did
[[Page 70967]]
not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves establishing a temporary security zone. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0938 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.0938 Security Zone, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers;
Washington, DC.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone:
(1) All waters of the Potomac River, from shoreline to shoreline,
bounded on the north by the Francis Scott Key (U.S. Route 29) Bridge at
mile 113.0, downstream to and bounded on the south between the Virginia
shoreline and the District of Columbia shoreline along latitude
38[deg]50'00'' N, including the waters of the Georgetown Channel Tidal
Basin; and
(2) All waters of the Anacostia River, from shoreline to shoreline,
bounded on the north by the 11th Street (I-295) Bridge at mile 2.1,
downstream to and bounded on the south by its confluence with the
Potomac River. All coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983.
(b) Regulations. The general security zone regulations found in 33
CFR 165.33 apply to the security zone created by this temporary
section, Sec. 165.T05.0938.
(1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations
governing security zones found in 33 CFR 165.33.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. Vessels
already at berth, mooring, or anchor at the time the security zone is
implemented do not have to depart the security zone. All vessels
underway within this security zone at the time it is implemented are to
depart the zone.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone must
first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or
his designated representative. Permission may be requested prior to
activation of the zone. To seek permission to transit the area, the
Captain of the Port Baltimore and his designated representatives can be
contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF-
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other Federal,
State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing light, or
other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed. If
permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his designated
representative and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section:
Captain of the Port Baltimore means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Baltimore to assist in enforcing the security zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(d) Effective period. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m. on
January 15, 2013 through 10 p.m. on January 24, 2013.
Dated: November 15, 2012.
Brian W. Roche,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2012-28790 Filed 11-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P