[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74042-74043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29960]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68378; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2012-043]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto, To Establish the Market Quality Program
December 6, 2012.
On March 23, 2012, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'' or
``NASDAQ'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule
change to establish the Market Quality Program (`MQP''). On March 29,
2012, the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1
thereto, was published for comment in the Federal Register on April 12,
2012.\3\ The Commission initially received fifteen comment letters on
the proposed rule change.\4\ On May 18, 2012, the Commission extended
the time period in which to either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change, to July 11,
2012.\5\ The Commission subsequently received three additional comment
letters on the proposed rule change and a response letter from the
Exchange.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66765 (April 6, 2012),
77 FR 22042.
\4\ See Letter from Frank Choi, dated April 13, 2012; Letter
from Christopher J. Csicsko, dated April 14, 2012; Letter from
Jeremiah O'Connor III, dated April 14, 2012; Letter from Dezso J.
Szalay, dated April 15, 2012; Letter from Kathryn Keita, dated April
18, 2012; Letter from Anonymous, dated April 18, 2012; Letter from
Mark Connell, dated April 19, 2012; Letter from Timothy Quast,
Managing Director, Modern Networks IR LLC, dated April 26, 2012;
Letter from Daniel G. Weaver, Ph.D., Professor of Finance, Rutgers
Business School, dated April 26, 2012; Letter from Amber Anand,
Associate Professor of Finance, Syracuse University, dated April 29,
2012; Letter from Albert J. Menkveld, Associate Professor of
Finance, VU University Amsterdam, dated May 2, 2012; Letter from
James J. Angel, Associate Professor of Finance, Georgetown
University, dated May 2, 2012; Letter from Ari Burstein, Senior
Counsel, Investment Company Institute, dated May 3, 2012; Letter
from Gus Sauter, Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer,
Vanguard, dated May 3, 2012; and Letter from Leonard J. Amoruso,
General Counsel, Knight Capital Group, Inc., dated May 4, 2012.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67022 (May 18,
2012), 77 FR 31050 (May 24, 2012).
\6\ See Letter from Gary L. Gastineau, Managing Member, ETF
Consultants LLC, dated June 11, 2012; Letter from Rey Ramsey,
President & CEO, TechNet, dated June 20, 2012; and Letter from
Stuart J. Kaswell, Executive Vice President & Managing Director,
General Counsel, Managed Funds Association, dated July 3, 2012. See
also Letter from Joan C. Conley, Senior Vice President & Corporate
Secretary, NASDAQ, dated July 6, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 11, 2012, the Commission instituted proceedings to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1.\7\ The Commission thereafter received six
comment letters and two response letters and one email response from
the Exchange.\8\ On October 2, 2012, the Commission issued a notice of
designation of longer period for Commission action on proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.\9\ On
November 6, 2012, the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change.\10\ On December 6, 2012, the
[[Page 74043]]
Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2 thereto (SR-NASDAQ-2012-043).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67411, 77 FR 42052
(July 17, 2012).
\8\ See Letter from Joseph Cavatoni, Managing Director, and
Joanne Medero, Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc., dated July 11,
2012; Letter from Stanislav Dolgopolov, Assistant Adjunct Professor,
UCLA School of Law, dated August 15, 2012; Letter from James E.
Ross, Global Head, SPDR Exchange Traded Funds, State Street Global
Advisors, dated August 16, 2012; Letter from Ari Burstein, Senior
Counsel, Investment Company Institute, dated August 16, 2012; Letter
from F. William McNabb, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Vanguard, dated August 16, 2012; and Letter from Andrew Stevens,
Legal Counsel, IMC Chicago, LLC d/b/a IMC Financial Markets, dated
August 16, 2012. See also Letters from Joan C. Conley, Senior Vice
President & Corporate Secretary, NASDAQ OMX LLC, dated August 30,
2012 and Jurij Trypupenko, Esq., NASDAQ, dated September 7, 2012,
and email from Ed Knight, NASDAQ, dated September 19, 2012.
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67961, 77 FR 61452
(October 9, 2012).
\10\ In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange proposed to amend its
proposed rule text to: (i) Add provisions requiring it to disclose
on its Web site: (a) The dates that MQP Securities commence
participation in and withdraw or are terminated from the MQP, (b) a
statement about the MQP that sets forth a general description of the
MQP as implemented on a pilot basis and a fair and balanced
summation of the potentially positive aspects of the MQP (e.g.,
enhancement of liquidity and market quality in MQP Securities) as
well as the potentially negative aspects and risks of the MQP (e.g.,
possible lack of liquidity and negative price impact on MQP
Securities that withdraw or are terminated from the MQP), and
indicates how interested parties can get additional information
about products in the MQP, and (c) when it receives notification
that an MQP Company or MQP Market Maker intends to withdraw from the
MQP, and the date of actual withdrawal or termination from the MQP;
(ii) add a requirement that during such time that an MQP Company
lists an MQP Security, the MQP Company must, on a product-specific
Web site for each product, indicate that the product is in the MQP
and provide the link to the Exchange's MQP Web page; (iii) add a
provision clarifying that the MQP Fee in respect of an ETF shall be
paid by the sponsor(s) of such ETF, and the MQP Fee in respect of a
TIR shall be paid by the sponsor(s) of such TIR, as applicable; (iv)
amend the termination provision to provide that the MQP will
terminate in respect of an MQP Security if such MQP Security
sustains an average daily trading volume (consolidated trades in all
U.S. markets) (``ATV'') of 1.0 million shares or more for three
consecutive months (the previously proposed termination threshold
was average daily trading volume of 2.0 million shares or more
traded on NASDAQ for three consecutive months); and (v) amend the
definition of ``MQP Company'' to clarify that such term means a fund
sponsor or issuer, as applicable, that lists an MQP Security on the
Exchange pursuant to the MQP (the previously proposed definition
defined an ``MQP Company'' as a fund sponsor or ``other entity''
that lists an MQP Security on the Exchange pursuant to the MQP).
In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange further proposed to amend the
filing to state that while the Exchange originally proposed a
termination threshold of 2.0 million shares or more ATV for three
consecutive months, it is scaling back the threshold to better
provide an opportunity to observe the impact, if any, on MQP
Securities that exceed the threshold and ``graduate'' from the MQP.
The Exchange notes that it has compiled statistics indicating that
``graduation'' from the MQP may occur more frequently at a 1.0
million ATV threshold than at a 2.0 million ATV threshold, and
includes a chart showing from years 2001 to 2012 the number of ETFs
that would have graduated from the MQP under the 2.0 million and 1.0
million ATV thresholds. Finally, in Amendment No. 2, the Exchange
proposed to amend the filing to make the following additional
representations: (i) the Exchange represents that it will post on
its Web site the monthly reports that it provides to the Commission
relating to the MQP during the pilot period; (ii) the Exchange
represents that it will endeavor to provide similar data to the
Commission about comparable products that are listed on the Exchange
that are not in the MQP and any other MQP-related data and analysis
requested by Commission staff for the purpose of evaluating the
efficacy of the MQP; and (iii) the Exchange represents that it will
issue to its members an information bulletin about the MQP prior to
operation of the MQP.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-29960 Filed 12-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P