[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 249 (Friday, December 28, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76415-76417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31064]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0174; FRL-9764-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Redesignation of the West Virginia Portion of the
Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter
Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Approval of the Associated
Maintenance Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a redesignation request and State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of West
Virginia. The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection
(WVDEP) requested that the West Virginia portion of the Huntington-
Ashland, WV-KY-OH fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (``Huntington-Ashland Area'' or ``Area'') be
redesignated as attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5
national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). In this rulemaking
action, EPA is approving the 1997 annual PM2.5 redesignation
request for the West Virginia portion of the Area. EPA is also
approving the maintenance plan SIP revision that the State submitted in
conjunction with its redesignation request. The maintenance plan
provides for continued attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS for 10 years after redesignation of the West Virginia portion of
the Area. The maintenance plan includes an insignificance determination
for the onroad motor vehicle contribution of PM2.5, nitrogen
oxides (NOX), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) for the
West Virginia portion of the Area for purposes of transportation
conformity. EPA is approving West Virginia's insignificance
determination for transportation conformity. EPA is also finding that
the Area continues to attain the standard. This rulemaking action
approving the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS redesignation request,
maintenance plan, and insignificance determination for transportation
conformity for the West Virginia portion of the Area is based on EPA's
determination that the Area has met the criteria for redesignation to
attainment specified in the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on December 28, 2012.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2012-0174. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street SE.,
Charleston, West Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Huntington-Ashland Area is composed of Cabell and Wayne
Counties and the Graham Tax District in Mason County in West Virginia
(West Virginia portion of the Area); Boyd County and a portion of
Lawrence County in Kentucky; and Lawrence and Scioto Counties and
portions of Adams and Gallia Counties in Ohio. On November 15, 2012 (77
FR 68076), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the
State of West Virginia. Pursuant to sections 107(d)(3) and 175A of the
CAA, the NPR proposed approval of West Virginia's redesignation
request, a SIP revision that establishes a maintenance plan for the
West Virginia portion of the Area that provides for continued
attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for at least 10
years after redesignation, and the insignificance determination for
transportation conformity for the West Virginia portion of the Area.
The formal SIP revision was submitted by WVDEP on June 30, 2011. In a
separate action, EPA approved the base year emissions inventory on
December 11, 2012 (77 FR 73544) meeting the requirements of section
172(c)(3) of the CAA. Other specific details of West Virginia's
redesignation request, the associated maintenance plan SIP revision and
insignificance determination, and the rationales for EPA's proposed
actions are explained in the NPR and will not be restated here. No
public comments were received on the NPR.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the redesignation request, maintenance plan, and
insignificance determination for transportation conformity for the West
Virginia portion of the Area that was submitted by WVDEP on June 30,
2011 because the requirements for approval have been satisfied. EPA has
evaluated West Virginia's redesignation request, and determined that it
meets the redesignation criteria set forth in section 107(d)(3)(E) of
the CAA. Approval of this redesignation request will change the legal
designation of the West Virginia portion of the Area from nonattainment
to attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is
approving the associated maintenance plan for the West Virginia portion
of the Area, submitted on June 30, 2011, as a revision to the West
Virginia SIP because it meets the requirements of section 175A of the
CAA. EPA is also approving the transportation conformity insignificance
determination submitted by West Virginia for this Area in conjunction
with its redesignation request.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds there is good cause
for this action to become effective immediately upon publication. A
delayed effective date is unnecessary due to the nature of a
redesignation to attainment, which eliminates CAA obligations that
would otherwise apply. The immediate effective date for this action is
authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that
rulemaking actions may become effective less than 30 days after
publication if the rule ``grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves
a restriction,'' and section 553(d)(3), which allows an effective date
less than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise provided by the
agency for good cause found and published with the rule.'' The purpose
of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in section 553(d) is to give
affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare
before the final rule takes effect. Today's rule, however, does not
create any new regulatory requirements such that
[[Page 76416]]
affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. Rather, today's rule relieves West Virginia of the obligation
to comply with nonattainment-related planning requirements for this
PM2.5 Area pursuant to Part D of the CAA. For these reasons,
EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for this action to become
effective on the date of publication of this notice.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 26, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action approving the redesignation request, maintenance
plan, and transportation conformity insignificance determination for
the West Virginia portion of the Area may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 18, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart XX--West Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2520, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for the 1997 annual PM2.5 Maintenance Plan, West
Virginia portion of the Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH Area at the end of
the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable submittal EPA approval date Additional explanation
revision geographic area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
1997 annual PM2.5 Maintenance Cabell and Wayne 6/30/11 12/28/12 [Insert
Plan for Huntington-Ashland WV- Counties, and the page number where
KY-OH Area. Graham Tax the document
District in Mason begins].
County.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 76417]]
PART 81--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 81.349 is amended by revising the PM2.5 (Annual
NAAQS) table entry for the Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH Area to read as
follows:
Sec. 81.349 West Virginia
* * * * *
West Virginia--PM2.5 (Annual NAAQS)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation \a\
Designated area ----------------------------------------
Date \1\ Type
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH
Cabell County.................. 12/28/12 Attainment.
Mason County (part)............ 12/28/12 Attainment.
Graham Tax District........
Wayne County................... 12/28/12 Attainment.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes Indian County located in each county or area, except
otherwise specified.
\1\ This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-31064 Filed 12-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P