[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6842-6845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02073]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68735; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2012-119]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Establish a New Optional Wireless
Connectivity for Colocated Clients
January 25, 2013.
On October 10, 2012, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'' or
``NASDAQ'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to establish a new optional wireless connectivity
for colocated clients. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on October 29, 2012.\3\ The Commission
received one comment on the proposal and a response from NASDAQ.\4\ On
December 12, 2012, the Commission extended the time period in which to
either approve NASDAQ's proposal, disapprove NASDAQ's proposal, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove
NASDAQ's proposal, to January 25, 2013.\5\ This order approves the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68085 (October 23,
2012), 77 FR 65596 (``Notice'').
\4\ See comment from Anthony C.J. Nuland, Attorney at Law,
representing Quincy Data LLC, dated January 17, 2013 (``Quincy Data
Letter''); see also letter from Jeff Davis, Vice President and
Deputy General Counsel, NASDAQ, to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Commission, dated January 24, 2013 (``NASDAQ Letter'').
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68416 (December 12,
2012), 77 FR 75229 (December 19, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
Under the proposal, NASDAQ would establish fees for new optional
means for clients to receive third party market data and NASDAQ
TotalView ITCH market data. NASDAQ would offer wireless connectivity
for colocated clients in NASDAQ's Carteret data center to receive
Direct Edge, BATS, NYSE, and NYSE ARCA multi-cast market data feeds. It
also would offer remote multi-cast ITCH Wave Ports for clients
colocated at other third party data centers, through which NASDAQ
TotalView ITCH market data will be distributed after delivery to those
data centers via wireless network. As noted by the Exchange, wireless
connectivity involves the beaming of signals through the air between
towers that are within sight of one another. Over the last year,
wireless technology has been introduced in the financial services
industry, according to the Exchange.
Additionally, the proposed rule change would amend NASDAQ Rule 7034
to establish fees for the delivery of third party market data to market
center clients via a wireless network using millimeter wave or
microwave technology. It also would amend NASDAQ Rule 7015 to establish
fees for remote multi-cast ITCH Wave Ports for clients colocated at
other third-party data centers, through which NASDAQ TotalView ITCH
market data will be distributed after delivery to those data centers
via wireless network.
Wireless Connectivity in Carteret
Under the proposed rule change, NASDAQ would utilize a network
vendor to supply wireless connectivity from its Carteret data center to
the Secaucus Equinix data center (NY4) used by Direct Edge and other
exchanges; the Newark data center used by NYSE as a SFTI Network Point
of Presence; and the Weehawken Savvis data center (NJ2) used by BATS.
The vendor would install, test and maintain the necessary communication
equipment for this wireless network between the data centers.
Clients who choose this optional service would have their NASDAQ
cross connect handoffs (1G, 10G, or 40G) enabled to receive the chosen
raw, multicast market data for Direct Edge, BATS, and/or NYSE. NASDAQ
OMX would continue to act as re-distributor of these third party market
data feeds, capturing the data at the originating data centers and
transporting the data to the Carteret data center. In the Notice, the
Exchange represented that it is offering these particular equity feeds
because they are the feeds requested by clients. There is limited
bandwidth available on the wireless connection, and the Exchange has
opted to offer those that are in most demand to start. Additional feeds
may be added based on overall client demand and bandwidth availability.
The wireless connectivity would be an optional offering, an
alternative to fiber optic network connectivity, and according to the
Exchange, would provide lower latency. It would not provide a new
market data product, but merely an alternative means of connectivity.
The Exchange has represented that NASDAQ's wireless connectivity
offering, in conjunction with NASDAQ's equidistant cross connect
handoffs (1G, 10G, or 40G), would ensure that all clients colocated
within Carteret and electing to use this wireless connectivity offering
would receive the chosen market data at the same low latency,
equalizing any variances that might otherwise result from differences
in the location of client cabinets within the facility.
To obtain wireless connectivity, clients would be charged a $2,500
installation fee (a non-recurring charge) and a monthly recurring
charge (MRC) that will vary depending upon the feed. The MRC for the
NYSE multi-cast equities data feed, which includes NYSE ArcaBook
Highspeed and NYSE OpenBook (Aggregated or Ultra), will be $10,000; the
MRC for BATS Multicast PITCH, which includes BZX and BYX, will be
$7,500; and the MRC for Direct Edge Depth of Book multi-cast feed,
which includes EDGA and EDGX, will be $7,500. According to the
Exchange, the rates are higher for the NYSE feeds because the two feeds
are larger and take up more bandwidth than the BATS and Direct Edge
feeds.
Clients would place orders for the wireless connectivity via the
CoLo Console \6\ and would be subject to a one-year minimum lock-in
period. In the Notice, the Exchange represented that
[[Page 6843]]
the lock-in feature, which is common practice for colocation offerings,
would ensure that the Exchange can recoup the substantial investment
required to establish the wireless system. As an incentive to clients,
NASDAQ would waive the first month's MRC. Clients would continue to be
charged by NYSE, BATS and Direct Edge for the market data received, and
NASDAQ would continue to be charged the redistribution fees by the
other exchanges, as occurs today. No changes in these charges would
occur as a result of this proposed offering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The ``CoLo Console'' is a web-based ordering tool NASDAQ
offers to enable members to place colocation orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Notice, the Exchange represented that NASDAQ OMX would
perform substantial network testing prior to offering the service for a
fee to members. After this ``beta'' testing period, upon initial roll-
out of the service, clients would be offered the service for a fee, and
on a rolling basis, the Exchange would enable new clients to receive
the feed(s) for a minimum of 30 days before incurring any monthly
recurring fees. The wireless network would continue to be closely
monitored and the client informed of any issues. Similar to receiving
market data over fiber optic networks, the wireless network can
encounter delays or outages due to equipment issues, as noted by the
Exchange in the Notice. As wireless networks may be affected by severe
weather events, clients would be expected to have redundant methods to
receive this market data and would be asked by the Exchange to attest
to having alternate methods or establishing an alternate method in the
near future when they order this service from the Exchange.
This new data feed delivery option would be available to all
clients of the data center, and is in response to industry demand, as
well as to changes in the technology for distributing market data.
Clients opting not to pay for the wireless connectivity would still be
able to receive market data via fiber optics and standard
telecommunications connections, as they do currently, and under the
same fees. According to the Exchange, receipt of trade data via
wireless technology is completely optional. In addition, clients can
choose to receive market data via other third-party vendors (Extranets
or Telecommunication vendors) via fiber optic networks or wireless
networks. They can receive the wireless service, according to the
Exchange, by contracting with a wireless service provider to install
the required dishes on towers near the data centers and paying the
service provider to maintain the service.
Remote Multi-Cast ITCH (MITCH) Wave Ports
Pursuant to the proposed rule change, NASDAQ also would offer
remote multi-cast ITCH Wave Ports for clients colocated at other third-
party data centers. NASDAQ TotalView ITCH market data would be
delivered to NASDAQ-owned cabinets at those data centers via a wireless
network. Clients would have the option of cross-connecting to the MITCH
Wave Ports in those data centers to receive the raw NASDAQ multi-cast
data feed, TotalView ITCH. An installation charge for the remote port
would be, at each of the locations, $2,500 for installation, and $7,500
as a monthly recurring fee. According to the Exchange, this offering,
which is entirely optional, would enable delivery of NASDAQ TotalView
ITCH to the third-party data centers at the same low latency.\7\
Clients opting to pay for the remote MITCH Wave Ports would continue to
be fee liable for the applicable market data fees as described in
NASDAQ Rule 7026, NASDAQ Rule 7019 and NASDAQ Rule 7023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In the Notice, NASDAQ noted that it cannot preclude minor
latency variances in delivery of NASDAQ TotalView in the third-party
data centers to individual clients because it does not control the
cross-connects in those centers; however, the microwave connectivity
would provide the same latency to all MITCH Wave Ports clients and
according to the Exchange, offers an improvement in latency over
fiber optic network connectivity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Notice, the Exchange represented that the proposed fees are
based on the cost to NASDAQ of installing and maintaining the wireless
connectivity and on the value provided to the customer, which receives
low latency delivery of data feeds. According to the Exchange, the
costs associated with the wireless connectivity system are
incrementally higher than fiber optics-based solutions due to the
expense of the wireless equipment, cost of installation, and testing.
Furthermore, the Exchange represented that the fees allow NASDAQ to
make a profit, and reflect the premium received by the clients in terms
of lower latency over the fiber optics option. In the Notice, the
Exchange also stated that the fees for colocation services generally,
including those proposed for wireless connectivity, are constrained by
the robust competition for order flow among exchanges and non-exchange
markets, and colocation exists to advance that competition.
III. Discussion and Commission's Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act \8\
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange. Additionally, in approving this proposed rule
change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation, as discussed in more
detail below.\9\ The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4),\10\ which provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members,
and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ which requires, among other things,
that the Exchange's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. In addition, the
Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\12\ which requires that the rules of the
exchange not impose any burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\9\ See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that the Exchange's proposal to provide
this additional connectivity option is consistent with the requirement
of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. The Commission believes that the
proposal is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers because the Exchange makes
wireless connectivity available to clients of the data center on an
equal basis. The Exchange represented that it will perform substantial
network testing prior to offering the service for a fee to members and
that after the testing period the network will be closely monitored and
maintained by the vendor and clients will be informed of any issues. As
wireless networks may be affected by severe weather events, the
Exchange notes that clients will be expected to
[[Page 6844]]
have redundant methods to receive this market data and will be asked to
attest to having alternate methods or establishing an alternate method
in the near future when they order this service from the Exchange.
The Commission also finds that consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act the proposed rule change does not impose a burden on
competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes
of the Act. The Quincy Data Letter argues that NASDAQ's proposal is
``an anti-competitive arrangement'' because ``Nasdaq would be the only
wireless provider permitted to install microwave dishes on the
rooftop'' of its data center.\13\ The Quincy Data Letter states that
this rooftop access is a ``critical ingredient'' for an alternative
wireless network to be competitive.\14\ Ultimately, argues the Quincy
Data Letter, by preventing other wireless networks from accessing the
roof of the data center, NASDAQ reduces competition with its own
wireless network and is able to charge fees for its service that ``are
not grounded in competition.'' \15\ This arrangement would result in
``vertical tying,'' according to the Quincy Data Letter, as customers
desiring the lowest latency for data would have to obtain the service
from NASDAQ.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Quincy Data Letter, supra note 4, at 2. The Quincy Data
Letter also made certain comments outside of the scope of the
proposed rule change. Quincy argues that NASDAQ can ``control, delay
or limit'' the vendors that can distribute NASDAQ data through (1)
the market data license application process; (2) the co-location
application and approval process; (3) the authorized telecom
provider and application and approval process; and (4) by
controlling the initial dissemination and re-dissemination of NASDAQ
data from the trading engine and distribution of other market data
within the NASDAQ data center. Id., at 3. The Commission notes, as
recognized in the NASDAQ Letter, that these comments are not germane
to the proposed rule change, which deals solely with NASDAQ's
creation of an alternative means of data transmission. Additionally,
the processes the Quincy Data Letter notes here are subject to the
relevant standards of the Act.
\14\ See Id., at 2.
\15\ See Id., at 3.
\16\ See Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NASDAQ makes a variety of representations in the Notice and in the
NASDAQ Letter that respond to the concerns raised by the Quincy Data
Letter. The NASDAQ Letter responds by noting that its proposed rule
change ``does not unduly constrain competition, nor impede a free and
open market and national market system.'' \17\ First, NASDAQ notes that
it does not have exclusive control of the roof rights at its data
center. Verizon, the lessor of the facility, retains rights to the roof
that would permit it to approve other vendors to place equipment on the
roof of the facility for the provision of wireless network services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See NASDAQ Letter, supra note 4, at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, in the Notice, NASDAQ states that it has chosen not to sell
roof rights to individual clients as it ``would quickly result in a
lack of physical space on the data center roof to accommodate all
clients fairly and equally.'' \18\ The NASDAQ Letter states further
that ``practical issues--space constraints and interference between
dishes that are placed too closely together--impose limits to the
number of networks that can occupy the Carteret rooftop'' and that it
is ``technologically impossible for the rooftop to support equipment
from every provider that NASDAQ anticipates would seek rooftop
access.'' \19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 65597.
\19\ See Id., at 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, even if NASDAQ were to operate the only wireless network on
the data center roof, the Exchange notes that its wiraeless network
service would still be subject to competition from (1) other wireless
network providers and (2) fiber optic networks. NASDAQ responds that
roof access is not a prerequisite for creating a competitive network,
noting that a variety of factors are at play in determining the speed
of a wireless network. Ultimately, NASDAQ avers that competitive
wireless networks can be established on buildings across the street
from the data center providing ``the same or similar data, at the same
or similar speed, at the same or similar cost.'' \20\ The NASDAQ Letter
also notes that fiber optic networks are also ``effective competitors
for wireless data,'' highlighting that (1) 17 market data vendors
currently offer connectivity to NASDAQ, and (2) fiber optic networks
may be more attractive to some clients as they are ``more resilient
than wireless networks, which can be more susceptible to weather
affects.'' \21\ For these reasons, the Commission does not believe that
the proposed rule change imposes a burden on competition not necessary
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Id., at 2.
\21\ See Id., at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also believes that the proposed fees for wireless
connectivity to NASDAQ are consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.
The Commission believes that the proposed fees are reasonable and
equitably allocated. All Exchange members that voluntarily select this
service option will be charged the same amount for the same services.
The Exchange noted that they are based on the Exchange's costs to cover
hardware, installation, testing and connection, as well expenses
involved in maintaining and managing the enhanced connection.\22\ The
Commission notes that, according to the Exchange, the proposed fees
would allow the Exchange to recoup these costs and make a profit, while
providing customers with additional data connectivity options for
receiving data from certain third parties and NASDAQ. With respect to
the fee differentials for receiving NYSE data feeds versus BATS and
Direct Edge data feeds, the Exchange noted that the fees are higher for
the NYSE feeds because the two feeds are larger and take up more
bandwidth than the BATS and Direct Edge feeds.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 65599.
\23\ See Id., at 65597.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Quincy Data Letter argues that NASDAQ is able to charge fees
for the wireless distribution of market data that are ``not grounded in
competition,'' suggesting that these fees may not be consistent with
the Exchange Act.\24\ As described above, NASDAQ has provided a variety
of examples of how it believes its wireless network service could be
subject to competition. The Exchange also stated that the fees for
colocation services generally, including those proposed for wireless
connectivity, are constrained by the robust competition for order flow
among exchanges and non-exchange markets, and colocation exists to
advance that competition.\25\ For these reasons, the Commission
believes that the proposed fees for wireless connectivity are
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Quincy Data Letter, supra note 4, at 3.
\25\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 65599.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also believes that the proposed wireless
connectivity fees are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. All
market participants that voluntarily select this service option will be
charged the same amount for the same services. Under the proposal, all
colocated clients would have the option to select wireless
connectivity, and there would be no differentiation among customers
with regard to the fees charged for the service.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\26\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2012-119) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
[[Page 6845]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-02073 Filed 1-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P