[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9029-9031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02750]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests; ID; Clear Creek Integrated 
Restoration Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a corrected notice. This notice updates information 
about proposed actions in the Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The DEIS will include two site-
specific, nonsignificant amendments of the Nez Perce Forest Plan 
(1987). The proposed amendments would clarify the Forest's 
interpretation of old growth standards found in the Nez Perce Forest 
Plan, and would adopt the Regional soils standard for the Clear Creek 
Integrated Restoration project area. The original notice was published 
in the Federal Register on January 6, 2012, pages 775 and 776. The 
Forest Service gives notice of its intent to prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement for the Clear Creek Integrated Restoration Project. 
The Proposed action would use a combination of timber harvest, pre-
commercial thinning, prescribed fire and reforestation to achieve the 
desired range of age classes, size classes, vegetative species 
distributions, habitat complexity (diversity) and landscape patterns 
across the forested portions of the project area. Road decommissioning, 
culvert replacements and road improvements are also proposed to improve 
watershed health. The EIS will analyze the effects of the proposed 
action and alternatives. The Nez Perce-Clearwater Forest invites 
comments and suggestions on the issues to be addressed. The agency 
gives notice of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis 
and decision making process on the proposal so interested and affected 
members of the public may participate and contribute to the final 
decision.

DATES: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is expected in March 
2013, and will be followed by a 45-day public comment period. The Final 
Environmental Impact Statement is expected in November 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send written or electronic comments to Lois Hill, 
Interdisciplinary Team Leader; Kamiah Ranger Station; 903 3rd Street; 
Kamiah, ID 83536; FAX 208-935-4257; Email [email protected]. Include your name, address, organization 
represented (if any), and the name of the project for which you are 
submitting comments. Electronic comments will be accepted in MS Word, 
Word Perfect, or Rich Text formats. Comments received in response to 
this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, 
will be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments 
submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, 
anonymous comments will not provide the Agency with the ability to 
provide the respondent with subsequent environmental documents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois Hill, Interdisciplinary Team 
Leader, (208) 935-4258.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The objective of the Clear Creek Integrated 
Restoration Project is to manage forest vegetation to restore natural 
disturbance patterns; improve long term resistance and resilience at 
the landscape level; reduce fuels; improve watershed conditions; 
improve elk habitat effectiveness; improve habitat for early seral 
species; and maintain habitat structure, function, and diversity. 
Timber outputs from the proposed action would be used to offset 
treatment costs and support the economic structure of local communities 
and provide for regional and national needs.

Purpose and Need for the Proposal

Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat Improvement

    Purpose: Trend vegetation species composition, structure, and 
distributions toward desired conditions described in the Forest Plan.
    Need: There is a need to change tree species composition by 
retaining and planting early seral species, such as ponderosa pine, 
western larch and western white pine. The project area has a high 
proportion of grand fir/Douglas fir habitat. These habitats tend to be 
more susceptible to insects and diseases. Grand fir is unlikely to 
survive a wildfire. There is a need to trend the area toward a more 
diverse and resilient forest structure by creating a range of age 
classes, size classes, habitat complexity (diversity) and disturbance 
patterns that more closely emulate natural mixed severity disturbance.

[[Page 9030]]

Increasing early seral species in managed areas would help trend the 
area toward, or maintain, desired habitat conditions and would make 
these habitats more resistant and resilient to change agents such as 
insects, diseases, and fire.
    There is a need to increase diversity within previously harvested 
areas to begin restoring long-term habitat quality for sensitive and 
old growth associated species. Historic logging practices and fire 
suppression have created a landscape that is more highly fragmented 
than would be expected to result from natural disturbances. Ladder 
fuels have increased and there has been a shift to shade tolerant 
species. Habitat structure and patch sizes of young forests are 
simplified and smaller than would be expected to result from natural 
disturbances. Edges of patches are straight and even.
    There is a need to increase young forest habitats on this 
landscape. Age classes are dominated by middle-aged and mature forest 
habitats. Forest management would increase high quality early seral 
wildlife habitats by retaining large trees and promoting establishment 
of tall shrubs and hardwood tree species by using variable retention 
regeneration harvest. In the short term, this would benefit wildlife 
species that use early seral habitats, such as neotropical migratory 
birds, resident birds, small mammals, and big game species. In the long 
term, large tree retention would help maintain habitat structure and 
complexity needed by old growth associated species.

Goods and Services

    Purpose: To utilize timber outputs produced through restoration 
activities to support the economic structure of local communities and 
provide for regional and national needs (Forest Plan page II-1).
    Need: There is a need to provide a sustained yield of resource 
outputs, as directed by the Forest Plan. Much of the area consists of 
grand fir dominated stands that have insect and disease infestations 
that are contributing to increased tree mortality, or are at risk from 
stand replacing events. Stands proposed for treatment are currently 
losing volume and value due to insects and diseases. Harvest of the 
timber would provide materials to local industries.

Fire Regime/Natural Disturbance Restoration and Fuel Reduction

    Purpose: Reduce ladder fuels created by shade-tolerant species and 
create more natural patch sizes by emulating mixed severity fire 
(Forest Plan page II-2).
    Need: There is a need to increase patch sizes to shift age and size 
class distributions to increase high quality early seral wildlife 
habitats. Effective fire suppression in this area began in the 1930's. 
As a result, there has been a vegetative shift to less fire resistant 
species, and an increase in ladder fuels that can contribute to the 
risk of high intensity and potentially resource damaging wildfire. Some 
portions of the project area have been identified as being up to five 
times outside of their normal fire return intervals. Past harvest 
patterns do not emulate natural disturbance patterns nor do they 
emulate natural habitat structure. Landscape burning and timber harvest 
that mimics natural fire would help increase forest resilience, help 
reduce risk of wildfires, and help create high quality habitats that 
would benefit neotropical migratory birds, resident birds, small 
mammals, and big game species. Fire dependent wildlife species would 
benefit from landscape burning.

Watershed Improvement

    Purpose: Reduce potential sediment inputs into the aquatic 
ecosystem from roads.
    Need: There is a need to drain roadside ditchline water away from 
streams by installing cross drain pipes near live stream crossings. The 
cross drain pipes collect ditchline water and direct it onto the forest 
floor. There is also a need to replace existing undersized, damaged, or 
rusting culverts on streams to minimize failure potential.
    There are 283 miles of road within the project area, 200 of which 
are needed for current and future management. The remaining 83 miles of 
road have been cleared for decommissioning under the South Fork-West 
Fork Clear Creek Road Decommissioning Environmental Assessment (2011). 
The roads needed for management can contribute sediment to streams 
through road surface erosion and potential culvert failures. Surface 
erosion occurs during spring snowmelt and rain events. Dirt coming off 
roads is diverted into ditchlines which are often directed into 
streams. Preliminary surveys show most roads in the area are drained by 
ditches. Culvert failures can result from undersized, damaged or 
rusting culverts which can plug with debris and then fail as water 
saturates the surrounding fill. Failures can contribute large pulses of 
sediment into streams. Surveys indicate at least 60 miles of road with 
culverts that are in need of replacement or cleaning. There is a 
minimum of 40 high or moderate priority culverts in need of 
replacement, and 12 in need of cleaning. There are an additional 40 low 
priority culverts in need of replacement and 15 in need of cleaning. 
The surveyed roads pose the highest risk to streams in the project 
area.
    The desired condition for roads is to have ditchlines that drain 
road surface water away from streams and onto forest the forest floor. 
All culverts at stream crossings are appropriately sized to allow for 
the passage of material within minimal risk of plugging.
    The Proposed Action would:

Improve Forest Health, Provide Goods and Services, Reduce Fuels and 
Improve Wildlife Habitat

     Conduct ``variable retention'' regeneration harvest and 
post harvest burning activities on up to 2,500 acres to create early 
sucessional plant communities and improve wildlife habitat while re-
establishing long-lived early seral tree species. Variable retention 
harvest would include areas of full retention (clumps), irregular 
edges, and retention of snags and legacy trees to provide structure and 
a future source of woody debris. Openings will likely exceed 40 acres.
     Commercially thin approximately 7,810 acres to reduce 
stand densities improve forest health and reduce the chance of crown 
fire.
     Apply improvement harvest to approximately 311 acres (thin 
from below) to remove encroachment and ladder fuels from ponderosa pine 
dominated stands.
     Construct a minimum temporary road system to carry out the 
proposed action. Roads would be decommissioned after use.
     Pre-commercially thin approximately 1,865 acres to reduce 
stand densities improve forest health and reduce fuels.
     Restore approximately 42 acres of bunchgrass communities 
through prescribed burning and revegetation with native grasses to 
improve wildlife winter range through reestablishment of native grasses 
and forbs.
     Apply approximately 1,400 acres of low and mixed severity 
prescribed fire within the Clear Creek Roadless area to restore natural 
fire regimes, reduce fuels, improve wildlife habitat and create mosaic 
forest conditions. Proposed activities are consistent with Idaho 
Roadless Rule. There is no timber cutting planned within the Clear 
Creek Roadless area.
     Site-specifically amend the Nez Perce Forest Plan (1987) 
to clarify the Forest's interpretation of old growth features described 
in the Forest Plan.

[[Page 9031]]

The amendment would replace the definitions for old growth found in 
Appendix N of the Forest Plan with the definitions found in ``Old 
Growth Forest Types of the Northern Region'' (Green, et al., 1992, 
errata corrected 02/05, 12/07, 10/08, 12/11).

Reduce Sediment Production and Address Transportation Needs

     Conduct maintenance on or improve 100-130 miles of system 
roads including culvert installation or replacement, ditch cleaning, 
and riprap placement for drainage improvement. It may also include 
gravel placement, road grading and dust abatement.
     Additional site specific maintenance or improvements would 
occur to improve watershed conditions on up to 20 miles of roads 
outside of proposed treatment areas.
     Decommission 2-5 miles of system roads no longer 
considered necessary for transportation needs.
     Site-specifically amend the Nez Perce Forest Plan (1987) 
to adopt the Region 1 soil standard of 15% for detrimentally compacted, 
displaced, or puddled soils for the Clear Creek Integrated Restoration 
project area.
    Possible Alternatives the Forest Service will consider include a 
no-action alternative, which will serve as a baseline for comparison of 
alternatives. The proposed action will be considered along with 
additional alternatives that will be developed to meet the purpose and 
need for action, and to address significant issues identified during 
scoping.
    The Responsible Official is Rick Brazell, Nez Perce-Clearwater 
Forest Supervisor, Clearwater National Forest Supervisor's Office, 
12730 Highway 12, Orofino, ID 83544.
    The Decision To Be Made is whether to adopt the proposed action, in 
whole or inpart, or another alternative; and what mitigation measures 
and management requirements will be implemented.
    The Scoping Process for the EIS was initiated with the original 
notice published on January 6, 2012. The scoping process identifies 
issues to be analyzed in detail and leads to the development of 
alternatives to the proposal. The Forest Service is seeking information 
and comments from other Federal, State, and local agencies; Tribal 
Governments; and organizations and individuals who may be interested in 
or affected by the proposed action. Comments received in response to 
this notice, including the names and addresses of those who comment, 
will be a part of the project record and available for public review.
    Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent 
Environmental Review: A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) 
will be prepared for comment. The next major opportunity for public 
input will be when the DEIS is published. The comment period for the 
DEIS will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency 
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Draft 
EIS is anticipated to be available for public review in March 2013.

    Dated: January 28, 2013.
Joyce E. Thompson,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2013-02750 Filed 2-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P