[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11916-11921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03821]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-68924; File No. SR-Phlx-2013-13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
its Customer Rebate Program and Other Technical Amendments
February 13, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on February 1, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at
Section A, entitled ``Customer Rebate Program.'' The Exchange also
proposes technical amendments to the Preface, Section I, entitled
``Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select
Symbols,'' Section II, entitled ``Multiply
[[Page 11917]]
Listed Options Fees'' \3\ and Section IV entitled ``PIXL \4\ Pricing''
of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Multiply Listed Options Fees include options overlying
equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed.
\4\ PIXL is the Exchange's price improvement mechanism known as
Price Improvement XL or (PIXL\SM\). See Rule 1080(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The
text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Customer
Rebate Program to incentivize market participants to increase the
amount of Customer order flow they transact on the Exchange. The
Exchange also proposes to amend and add certain rule text in the
Pricing Schedule to provide additional clarity to the Pricing Schedule.
Customer Rebate Program
Currently, the Exchange pays Customer Rebates by calculating an
Average Daily Volume Threshold. The Exchange calculates the Average
Daily Volume Threshold by totaling Customer volume in Multiply Listed
Options (including Select Symbols) that are electronically-delivered
and executed, except volume associated with electronic QCC Orders, as
defined in Exchange Rule 1080(o) (``Threshold Volume''). Rebates are
paid on Threshold Volume.
The Exchange is proposing to base the Customer Rebate Program on
certain ``Rebate Tiers.'' The Exchange proposes to replace the current
three tier structure, which pays rebates based on the number of
contracts transacted in a month based on four Categories (A, B, C and
D) of transactions, with a four tier structure. The four tier structure
would pay rebates based on percentage thresholds of national customer
multiply-listed options volume by month based on the same four
Categories (A, B, C and D) of transactions. Specifically, the Exchange
would base a market participant's qualification for a certain Rebate
Tier on the percentage of total national customer volume in multiply-
listed options which are transacted monthly on Phlx. The Exchange
proposes to establish a four tier Customer rebate structure with a
column entitled ``Percentage Thresholds of National Customer Volume in
Multiply-Listed Options Classes (Monthly).'' The Exchange proposes the
following Customer Rebate Tiers by percentages:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage thresholds of
national customer volume
Customer rebate tiers in multiply-listed Category A Category B Category C Category D
options classes
(monthly)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier 1............................ 0.00%-0.75%............. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Tier 2............................ Above 0.75%-1.60%....... 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.08
Tier 3............................ Above 1.60%-2.60%....... 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.08
Tier 4............................ Above 2.60%............. 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that replacing the current tiers which
require market participants to qualify for Customer Rebates based on a
certain number contracts transacted in a month with a tier structure
based on relative contracts per month as a percentage of total national
customer volume in multiply-listed options transacted on Phlx would
serve to control and account for industry-wide movements.
The Exchange is not proposing to amend the criteria to qualify for
a certain rebate Category (A, B, C or D). These will remain the same
pursuant to this proposal.\5\ In addition, the Exchange would continue
to total Customer volume in Multiply Listed Options (including Select
Symbols) that are electronically-delivered and executed, except volume
associated with electronic QCC Orders, as defined in Exchange Rule
1080(o) in the same manner.\6\ The Exchange proposes to remove
references to the Average Daily Volume Threshold and replace those
references with Customer Rebate Tier references. The Exchange also
proposes to permit members and member organizations under common
ownership to aggregate their volume for purposes of calculating the
Customer Rebate Tiers and receiving rebates. Common ownership, which
the Exchange is proposing to define in the Preface to the Pricing
Schedule as described in more detail below, shall mean 75% common
ownership or control.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Category A rebates are paid to members executing
electronically-delivered Customer Simple Orders in Penny Pilot
Options and Customer Simple Orders in Non-Penny Pilot Options in
Section II. Rebates are paid on PIXL Orders in Section II symbols
that execute against non-Initiating Order interest. Category B
rebates are paid to members executing electronically-delivered
Customer Complex Orders in Penny Pilot Options and Non-Penny Pilot
Options in Section II. Category C rebates are paid to members
executing electronically-delivered Customer Complex Orders in Select
Symbols in Section I. Category D rebates will be paid to members
executing electronically-delivered Customer Simple Orders in Select
Symbols in Section I. Rebates are paid on PIXL Orders in Section I
symbols that execute against non-Initiating Order interest.
\6\ For clarity, the Exchange will calculate volume and pay
rebates based on a member organization's Phlx house account numbers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is proposing to amend the rebates paid to market
participants with this proposal. Currently, Categories A, B, C and D
receive no rebate for volume between 0 to 99,999 contracts in a month.
The Exchange proposes to pay Categories A, B, C and D no rebate with
proposed Tier 1 which is between 0.00% to 0.75% of national customer
volume in multiply-listed options classes. Currently, the Exchange pays
the following rebates for Tier 2 volume which is between 100,000 and
349,999 contracts in a month: Category A: $0.10, Category B: $0.12,
Category C: $0.13 and Category D: $0.05. The Exchange would pay the
following rebates for new Tier 2 for a percentage of national customer
volume in multiply-listed options
[[Page 11918]]
classes above 0.75% to 1.60%: Category A: $0.11, Category B: $0.12,
Category C: $0.13 and Category D: $0.08. Currently, the Exchange pays
the following rebates for Tier 3 volume which is over 350,000 contracts
in a month: Category A: $0.15, Category B: $0.15, Category C: $0.15 and
Category D: $0.07. The Exchange would pay the following rebates for new
Tier 3 for a percentage of national customer volume in multiply-listed
options classes above 1.60% to 2.60%: Category A: $0.13, Category B:
$0.13, Category C: $0.14 and Category D: $0.08. The Exchange would pay
the following rebates for new Tier 4 for a percentage of national
customer volume in multiply-listed options classes above 2.60%:
Category A: $0.15, Category B: $0.15, Category C: $0.15 and Category D:
$0.09. By way of example, a market participant that executes 3,000,000
electronically-delivered Customer Simple Order contracts in Select
Symbols, which are Multiply Listed Options, in a given month where
150,000,000 national customer multiply-listed options contracts were
executed would receive a credit of $240,000. The market participant
would have qualified for this rebate because the number of qualifying
contracts \7\ executed on Phlx represents 2% of the total national
customer multiply-listed options volume and because the Customers
orders were Simple Orders in Select Symbols, the Category D rate in
Tier 3 of $0.08 per contract would be applied to the 3,000,000 Customer
contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Presuming the contracts are not electronic QCC Orders as
defined in Rule 1080(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, today, member organizations qualifying for either a Tier 2
or Tier 3 rebate are entitled to receive a credit of $0.04 per contract
toward the Routing Fee specified in Section V of the Pricing Schedule
if a Customer order is routed to NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX Options'')
or the NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM''). Today, a member organization
qualifying for either a Tier 2 or Tier 3 rebate is entitled to receive
a credit of $0.10 per contract toward the Routing Fee specified in
Section V of the Pricing Schedule if the Customer order is routed to an
away market other than BX Options or NOM.
The Exchange proposes to amend the qualifying tiers from Tier 2 or
3 to Tiers 2, 3 or 4 to receive credits to the various away markets.
The Exchange also proposes to amend the credit that will be paid per
contract to $0.10 per contract toward the Routing Fee specified in
Section V of the Pricing Schedule if a Customer order is routed to NOM
and $0.05 per contract credit toward the Routing Fee specified in
Section V of the Pricing Schedule if a Customer order is routed to BX
Options. A member organization qualifying for a Tier 2, 3 or 4 rebate
is entitled to a credit of $0.16 per contract toward the Routing Fee
specified in Section V of the Pricing Schedule if the Customer order is
routed to an away market other than BX Options or NOM, unless the away
market transaction fee is $0.00 or a rebate is paid by the away market,
in which case the credit would be reduced to $0.11 per contract. The
Exchange believes that offering credits toward Routing Fees will
continue to incentivize market participants to transact a greater
number of Customer orders on the Exchange.
Technical Amendments
First, the Exchange utilizes the term ``common ownership''
throughout the Pricing Schedule and defines common ownership as 75%
common ownership or control among members and member organizations.\8\
The Exchange proposes to amend the Preface of the Pricing Schedule to
define ``Common Ownership'' for purposes of pricing. The Exchange also
proposes to revise Sections II, IV and VI of the Pricing Schedule to
simply refer to the defined term ``Common Ownership'' and eliminate the
definitions throughout the rule text which reflect the same 75% common
ownership or control language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Sections II, IV and VI of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the Exchange proposes to amend Section I of the Pricing
Schedule to add the words ``Complex Order'' prior to the language
discussing the Pilot Program related to the $0.05 per contract fee
differential for Fees for Removing Liquidity for Specialists and Market
Makers that transact against a Customer order directed to them. The
Exchange received approval for a Pilot Program which commenced on
December 1, 2012.\9\ The Exchange believes the addition of the words
``Complex Order'' further clarifies the Pricing Schedule. The fee
differential for directed orders applies to Complex Orders and does not
apply to Simple Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 66884 (April 30, 2012),
77 FR 26595 (May 4, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-27and SR-Phlx-2012-54). See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68376 (December 6, 2012),
77 FR 74039 (December 12, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-139).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, the Exchange proposes to amend the Section II Monthly Market
Maker Cap rule text to specify that the Monthly Market Maker Cap
applies to electronic and floor transactions. The Exchange proposes to
remove the word ``equity'' from this paragraph as that word is not
necessary. Also, the Exchange proposes to refer to Options Transaction
Charges instead of ``fees'' in that same paragraph for consistency.
Fourth, the Exchange proposes to remove the rule text describing
the common ownership in Section IV because the Exchange has proposed
herein to permit members and member organization under common ownership
to aggregate Customer Rebate volume in Section A. The Exchange proposes
to include rule text to permit any member or member organization under
common ownership with another member or member organization that
qualifies for a Customer Rebate Tier discount in Section A to receive
the discounted PIXL Initiating Order discount as proposed herein. For
example, if Phlx member A qualifies for a Tier 5 [sic] Customer Rebate
pursuant to Section A of the Pricing Schedule, Phlx member B, an
affiliate of member A and 75% commonly owned by the same parent, would
be entitled to the discounted Initiating Order Fee of $0.05 per
contract. The Exchange would utilize the proposed defined term ``Common
Ownership'' in this section.
Fifth, the Exchange proposes to clarify in Section IV of the
Pricing Schedule that with respect to PIXL Order executions in Section
I Select Symbols,\10\ the pricing specified in Section IV is in
addition to other fees and rebates in Section I, including Payment for
Order Flow fees where appropriate. The Exchange makes a similar
statement in Section IV, Part A with respect to Section II PIXL fees
and proposes this additional language for consistency and clarity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Select Symbols are defined in Section I of the Pricing
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \11\ in general,
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \12\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Rebate Program
The Exchange's proposal to convert the qualification for the rebate
tiers from measuring a market participant's per month Average Daily
Contract Volume to relative contracts per month based on national
customer volume in multiply-listed options classes executed on Phlx
[[Page 11919]]
is reasonable because it allows the Exchange to control and account for
changes in the national industry-wide customer multiply-listed options
volume. Further, it will still allow market participants to receive
rebates on Customer volume in Multiply Listed Options (including Select
Symbols) that are electronically-delivered and executed, except volume
associated with electronic QCC Orders, as is the case today. The
Exchange believes that the amended Customer Rebate Program should
incentivize market participants to increase the amount of Customer
orders that are transacted on the Exchange to obtain a rebate. In
addition, other exchanges employ similar incentive programs.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated's
(``CBOE'') Fees Schedule. CBOE offers each Trading Permit Holder
(``TPH'') a credit for each public customer order transmitted by the
TPH which is executed electronically in all multiply-listed option
classes, excluding QCC trades and executions related to contracts
that are routed to one or more exchanges in connection with the
Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan, provided
the TPH meets certain percentage thresholds in a month as described
in the Volume Incentive Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to convert the qualification for the rebate
tiers from measuring a market participant's per month Average Daily
Contract Volume to relative contracts per month based on national
customer volume in multiply-listed options classes executed on Phlx is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will be applied to
all market participants in a uniform matter. Any market participant is
eligible to receive the rebate provided they transact a qualifying
amount of electronic Customer volume. The Exchange is merely amending
the measuring stick that it utilized to determine the amount of
qualifying volume. The Exchange would account for changes in industry-
wide volume with the amendment.
The Exchange believes that amending the rebates offered in
Categories A, B, C and D is reasonable because with respect to Tier 1,
the Exchange would continue to not offer a rebate to market
participants. The Exchange is also adding several new tiers which allow
market participants the opportunity to achieve higher rebates in
Category A and substantially the same and higher rebates in Categories
B, C and D. With respect to Tiers 2, 3, and 4, the Exchange believes
that it is providing market participants the opportunity to earn higher
rebates. Proposed Tier 2 rebates are the same or higher than the Tier 2
rebates today. Proposed Tier 3 rebates are slightly lower than the
current Tier 3 rebates. Proposed Tier 4 rebates are the same or higher
than the current Tier 3 rebates, which today are the highest rebates
that a market participant can achieve under the program. The Exchange
is unable to specify with certainty which tier would apply to
participants that are executing a certain amount of Customer volume
today. The Exchange believes that the rebates proposed herein are
reasonable because market participants may be able to obtain higher
rebates beyond Tier 1 if they are able to qualify for a higher tier as
compared to today's tiers with the proposed method of percentages of
national customer volume.
The Exchange believes that amending the rebates offered in
Categories A, B, C and D is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because the rebates will be applied to all market participants in a
uniform matter. Any market participant is eligible to receive the
rebate provided they transact a qualifying amount of electronic
Customer volume.
The Exchange believes that permitting members and member
organizations to aggregate their volume if they are under common
ownership, defined as 75% common ownership or control, is reasonable
because the Exchange desires to provide all market participants the
ability to obtain Customer Rebates. The Exchange believes that
permitting members and member organizations to aggregate their volume
if they are under common ownership is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange would permit all market
participants the ability to aggregate for purposes of receiving the
Customer Rebate even if certain members and member organizations chose
to operate under separate entities. The Exchange currently permits such
aggregation in the calculation of the Monthly Market Maker Cap and for
purposes of PIXL fees.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Section II of the Pricing Schedule. Specialists and
Market Makers are subject to a ``Monthly Market Maker Cap'' of
$550,000 for: (i) Equity option transaction fees; (ii) QCC
Transaction Fees (as defined in Exchange Rule 1080(o) and Floor QCC
Orders, as defined in 1064(e)); and (iii) fees related to an order
or quote that is contra to a PIXL Order or specifically responding
to a PIXL auction. The trading activity of separate Specialist and
Market Maker member organizations will be aggregated in calculating
the Monthly Market Maker Cap if there is at least 75% common
ownership between the member organizations. See also Section IV of
the Pricing Schedule. For purposes of the PIXL Initiating Order
members and member organizations under common ownership may
aggregate their Customer Rebate Program volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposal to further reduce Routing Fees \15\ in
Section V of the Exchange's Pricing Schedule for member organizations
that qualify for Tiers 2, 3 or 4 in the Customer Rebate Program in
Section A of the Pricing Schedule is reasonable because the Exchange
proposes to provide an additional incentive for transacting Customer
orders on the Exchange. By offering member organizations a credit
toward the cost of routing to an away market, the Exchange is seeking
to encourage market participants to transact a greater number of
Customer orders on Phlx which liquidity benefits all market
participants. In addition, the Exchange is offering the credit toward
Customer Routing Fees in addition to the Customer rebate received for
the qualifying Customer Rebate Tier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Each destination market's transaction charge varies and
there is a cost incurred by the Exchange when routing orders to away
markets. The costs to the Exchange include clearing costs,
administrative and technical costs associated with operating NOS
that are assessed on the Exchange, membership fees at away markets,
and technical costs associated with routing options. The Routing
Fees enable the Exchange to recover the costs it incurs to route
orders to away markets in addition to transaction fees assessed to
market participants for the execution of orders by the away market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that providing a credit of $0.10 per contract
toward the Customer Routing Fee specified in Section V of the Pricing
Schedule if a Customer order is routed to NOM and a $0.05 per contract
credit toward the Customer Routing Fee specified in Section V of the
Pricing Schedule if a Customer order is routed to BX Options is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because NOM does not pay a
Customer Rebate to Remove Liquidity and BX Options pays a Rebate to
Remove Liquidity.\16\ The Exchange believes that paying a $0.16 per
contract credit toward the Routing Fee specified in Section V of the
Pricing Schedule if a member organization qualifies for a Tier 2, 3 or
4 rebate if the Customer order is routed to away market other than BX
Options or NOM unless the away market transaction fee is $0.00 or a
rebate is paid by the away market, in which case $0.11 per contract
would be paid, is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the
Exchange assesses an $0.11 per contract fixed cost in addition to the
away market transaction fee to route to an away market other than NOM
or BX Options. The Exchange is offering a credit of $0.16 per contract
in those cases where there is an away market transaction fee or a
rebate is not offered by the away market. When no transaction fee is
assessed by the away market, the
[[Page 11920]]
Exchange would only assess the $0.11 per contract fixed fee and thus
the member organization would recoup the fee assessed by the Exchange.
If the away market pays a rebate to remove liquidity, the Exchange
assesses the member organization the fixed fee of $0.11 per contract,
the away market transaction fee and then credits the member
organization the rebate offered by the Exchange. In that case, the
Exchange would pay the reduced $0.11 per contract credit because the
member organization has the benefit of the rebate from the away market.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed credits are equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because any market participant that
transacts Customer orders may qualify for the credit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ BX Options pays a $0.32 per contract Customer Rebate to
Remove Liquidity in Penny Pilot Options, a $0.70 Customer Rebate to
Remove Liquidity in Non-Penny Pilot Options (other than IWM, QQQ and
SPY) and a $0.12 per contract Customer Rebate to Remove Liquidity in
IWM, QQQ and SPY. See Chapter XV, Section 2(1) of the BX Options
Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange believes that offering member organizations a
lower credit for Routing to NOM and BX Options as compared to other
away markets is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the
fixed cost associated with Routing Fees in Section V of the Pricing
Schedule are lower for a Customer order routed to NOM or BX Options
($0.05 per contract) as compared to the fixed cost to route to an away
market other than BX Options or NOM ($0.11 per contract).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The Exchange assesses a fixed fee of $0.11 per contract for
non-NASDAQ OMX exchanges and a $0.05 per contract fee for BX Options
and NOM. These fixed costs represent overall cost to the Exchange
for technical, administrative, clearing, regulatory, compliance and
other costs, which are in addition to the transaction fee assessed
by the away market. Also, market participants whose orders routed to
away markets are entitled to receive rebates offered by away
markets, which rebates would net against fees assessed by the
Exchange for routing orders. As explained in a previous rule change,
the actual cash outlays for the Exchange to route to BX Options and
NOM is lower as compared to routing to other non-NASDAQ OMX
exchanges. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 68213 (November
13, 2012), 77 FR 69530 (November 19, 2012) (SR-Phlx-2012-129) and
68698 (January 18, 2013), 78 FR 5530 (January 25, 2013) (SR-Phlx-
2013-04). See also Section V of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Amendments
The Exchange's proposal to amend certain rule text in the Pricing
Schedule to provide additional clarity, such as defining Common
Ownership in the Preface to the Pricing Schedule and adding and
amending other language to indicate the Monthly Market Maker Cap
applies to electronic and floor transactions, and clarifying that the
pricing specified in Section IV is in addition to other fees and
rebates in Section I, including Payment for Order Flow fees where
appropriate, is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because the amendments further clarify the Pricing Schedule.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to amend Section I of the Pricing Schedule to
add the words ``Complex Orders'' prior to the language discussing the
Pilot Program related to the $0.05 per contract fee differential for
Fees for Removing Liquidity for Specialists and Market Makers that
transact against a Customer order directed to them because the addition
of the words ``Complex Order'' further clarifies the Pricing Schedule.
Finally, the Exchange believes that amending Section IV to permit a
member or member organization under common ownership, defined as 75%
common ownership or control, with another member or member organization
that qualifies for a Customer Rebate Tier in Section A to receive
discounted PIXL fees is reasonable because the Exchange desires to
provide all market participants the ability to obtain discounted PIXL
pricing. The Exchange currently permits aggregation under common
ownership in Section IV for purposes of calculating the Threshold
Volume. The Exchange believes that permitting members and member
organizations that are affiliated and under common ownership to realize
discounted pricing by allowing one firm to qualify for a Customer
Rebate Tier and another affiliated member or member organization under
common ownership to realize the discount is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange would permit all market
participants the ability to aggregate the benefits of their trading
activity for purposes of the Customer Rebate, as is the case today,
even if certain members and member organizations chose to operate under
separate entities. The Exchange currently permits such aggregation in
the calculation of the Monthly Market Maker Cap and for purposes of
PIXL fees.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See supra note 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the
Customer Rebate Program will encourage Customer order flow to be
directed to the Exchange, which will benefit all market participants.
By incentivizing members to route Customer orders, the Exchange desires
to attract Customer orders which benefits all market participants by
increasing liquidity on the Exchange. All market participants are
eligible to qualify for a Customer Rebate. The Exchange believes these
pricing amendments do not impose a burden on competition but rather
that the proposed rule change will continue to promote competition on
the Exchange.
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market, comprised of
eleven exchanges, in which market participants can easily and readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or rebates to be inadequate.
Accordingly, the fees that are assessed and the rebates paid by the
Exchange described in the above proposal are influenced by these robust
market forces and therefore must remain competitive with fees charged
and rebates paid by other venues and therefore must continue to be
reasonable and equitably allocated to those members that opt to direct
orders to the Exchange rather than competing venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\19\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
[[Page 11921]]
Send an email to [email protected]. Please
include File Number SR-Phlx-2013-13 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-13. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-13 and should be
submitted on or before March 13, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-03821 Filed 2-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P