[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11858-11865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03876]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Arts in Education Model Development
and Dissemination Program
AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Overview Information
Arts in Education Model Development and Dissemination Program
Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY)
2013.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.351D.
DATES: Applications Available: February 20, 2013.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: March 22, 2013.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: April 22, 2013.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: June 20, 2013.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Arts in Education Model Development and
Dissemination (AEMDD) program supports the enhancement, expansion,
documentation, evaluation, and dissemination of innovative, cohesive
models that are based on research and have demonstrated that they
effectively-- (1) Integrate standards-based arts education into the
core elementary and middle school curriculum; (2) strengthen standards-
based arts instruction in these grades; and (3) improve students'
academic performance, including their skills in creating, performing,
and responding to the arts. Projects funded through the AEMDD program
are intended to increase the amount of nationally available information
on effective models for arts education that integrate the arts with
standards-based education programs.
Priorities: This competition includes one absolute priority and
four competitive preference priorities that are explained in the
following paragraphs. Absolute priority 1 is from the notice of final
priority, requirements, and definitions for this program, published in
the Federal Register on March 30, 2005 (70 FR 16234). The competitive
preference priorities are from the notice of supplemental priorities
and definitions for discretionary grant programs, published in the
Federal Register on December 15, 2010 (75 FR 78486), and corrected on
May 12, 2011 (76 FR 27637) (Supplemental Priorities).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2013 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition,
this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we
consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
This priority supports projects that enhance, expand, document,
evaluate, and disseminate innovative, cohesive models that are based on
research and have demonstrated their effectiveness in (1) integrating
standards-based arts education into the core elementary or middle
school curriculum, (2) strengthening standards-based arts instruction
in the elementary or middle school grades, and (3) improving the
academic performance of students in elementary or middle school grades,
including their skills in creating, performing, and responding to the
arts.
In order to meet this priority, an applicant must demonstrate that
the model project for which it seeks funding (1) serves only elementary
school or middle school grades, or both, and (2) is linked to State and
national standards intended to enable all students to meet challenging
expectations and to improve student and school performance.
Note: National standards are the arts standards developed by the
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations or another
comparable set of national arts standards. The standards developed
by the
[[Page 11859]]
Consortium outline what students should know and be able to do in
the arts. These are not Department standards.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2013 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from
this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional
10 points to an applicant that meets Priority 1, up to an additional 10
points to an applicant that meets Priority 2, up to an additional 5
points to an applicant that meets Priority 3, and up to an additional 5
points to an applicant that meets Priority 4. Therefore, the maximum
number of competitive preference points that an application can receive
under this competition is 30 points, depending on how well the
application meets one or more of these priorities.
When using these priorities to give competitive preference to an
application, we will review the applications using a two-stage review
process. In the first stage, we will review the applications without
taking the competitive preference priorities into account. In the
second stage, we will review the applications rated highest in the
first stage of the process to determine whether they will receive the
competitive preference priority points. We will consider awarding
competitive preference priority points only to those applicants with
top-ranked scores based on the selection criteria. An applicant must
identify in the project narrative section of its application the
priority or priorities it wishes the Department to consider for
purposes of earning the competitive preference priority points.
These priorities are:
Priority 1--Building Evidence of Effectiveness (0 to 10 Points)
Projects that propose evaluation plans that are likely to produce
valid and reliable evidence in one or more of the following priority
areas: (a) Improving project design and implementation or designing
more effective future projects to improve outcomes. (b) Identifying and
improving practices, strategies, and policies that may contribute to
improving outcomes.
Under this priority, at a minimum, the outcome of interest is to be
measured multiple times before and after the treatment for project
participants and, where feasible, for a comparison group of non-
participants.
Priority 2--Supporting Programs, Practices, or Strategies for Which
There Is Strong or Moderate Evidence of Effectiveness (0 to 10 Points)
Projects that are supported by strong or moderate evidence.
A project that is supported by strong evidence (as defined in this
notice) will receive more points than a project that is supported by
moderate evidence (as defined in this notice).
Priority 3--Turning Around Persistently Lowest-Achieving Schools (0 to
5 Points)
Projects that are designed to address one or more of the following
priority areas:
(a) Improving student achievement (as defined in this notice) in
persistently lowest-achieving schools (as defined in this notice).
(b) Providing services to students enrolled in persistently lowest-
achieving schools (as defined in this notice).
Note: For the purposes of this priority, the Department
considers schools that are identified as Tier I or Tier II schools
under the School Improvement Grants program (see 75 FR 66363) as
part of a State's approved FY 2009, FY 2010, or FY 2011 applications
to be persistently lowest-achieving schools. A list of these Tier I
and Tier II schools can be found on the Department's Web site at
http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/index.html.
Priority 4--Technology (0 to 5 Points)
Projects that are designed to improve student achievement (as
defined in this notice) or teacher effectiveness through the use of
high-quality digital tools or materials, which may include preparing
teachers to use the technology to improve instruction, as well as
developing, implementing, or evaluating digital tools or materials.
Application Requirements: To be eligible for AEMDD funds,
applicants must propose to address the needs of low-income children by
carrying out projects that serve at least one elementary or middle
school in which 35 percent or more of the children enrolled are from
low-income families (based on data used in meeting the poverty criteria
in Title I, Section 1113(a)(5) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA)).
Definitions
The definitions for ``arts'' and ``integrating,'' as used in this
notice, are from the notice of final priority, requirements, and
definitions for this program, published in the Federal Register on
March 30, 2005 (70 FR 16234). The remaining definitions are from the
Supplemental Priorities published in the Federal Register on December
15, 2010 (75 FR 78486), and corrected on May 12, 2011 (76 FR 27637).
Arts includes music, dance, theater, media arts, and visual arts,
including folk arts.
Carefully matched comparison group design means a type of quasi-
experimental study (as defined in this notice) that attempts to
approximate an experimental study (as defined in this notice). More
specifically, it is a design in which project participants are matched
with non-participants based on key characteristics that are thought to
be related to the outcome. These characteristics include, but are not
limited to: (1) Prior test scores and other measures of academic
achievement (preferably, the same measures that the study will use to
evaluate outcomes for the two groups); (2) Demographic characteristics,
such as age, disability, gender, English proficiency, ethnicity,
poverty level, parents' educational attainment, and single- or two-
parent family background; (3) The time period in which the two groups
are studied (e.g., the two groups are children entering kindergarten in
the same year as opposed to sequential years); and (4) Methods used to
collect outcome data (e.g., the same test of reading skills
administered in the same way to both groups).
Experimental study means a study that employs random assignment of,
for example, students, teachers, classrooms, schools, or districts to
participate in a project being evaluated (treatment group) or not to
participate in the project (control group). The effect of the project
is the average difference in outcomes between the treatment and control
groups.
Integrating means (i) encouraging the use of high-quality arts
instruction in other academic/content areas, and (ii) strengthening the
place of the arts as a core academic subject in the school curriculum.
Interrupted time series design means a type of quasi-experimental
study (as defined in this notice) in which the outcome of interest is
measured multiple times before and after the treatment for program
participants only. If the program had an impact, the outcomes after
treatment will have a different slope or level from those before
treatment. That is, the series should show an ``interruption'' of the
prior situation at the time when the program was implemented. Adding a
comparison group time series, such as schools not participating in the
program or schools participating in the program in a
[[Page 11860]]
different geographic area, substantially increases the reliability of
the findings.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A single subject or single case design is an adaptation of
an interrupted time series design that relies on the comparison of
treatment effects on a single subject or group of single subjects.
There is little confidence that findings based on this design would
be the same for other members of the population. In some single
subject designs, treatment reversal or multiple baseline designs are
used to increase internal validity. In a treatment reversal design,
after a pretreatment or baseline outcome measurement is compared
with a post treatment measure, the treatment would then be stopped
for a period of time; a second baseline measure of the outcome would
be taken, followed by a second application of the treatment or a
different treatment. A multiple baseline design addresses concerns
about the effects of normal development, timing of the treatment,
and amount of the treatment with treatment-reversal designs by using
a varying time schedule for introduction of the treatment and/or
treatments of different lengths or intensity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moderate evidence means evidence from previous studies whose
designs can support causal conclusions (i.e., studies with high
internal validity) but have limited generalizability (i.e., moderate
external validity), or studies with high external validity but moderate
internal validity. The following would constitute moderate evidence:
(1) At least one well-designed and well-implemented (as defined in
this notice) experimental or quasi-experimental study (as defined in
this notice) supporting the effectiveness of the practice, strategy, or
program, with small sample sizes or other conditions of implementation
or analysis that limit generalizability;
(2) At least one well-designed and well-implemented (as defined in
this notice) experimental or quasi-experimental study (as defined in
this notice) that does not demonstrate equivalence between the
intervention and comparison groups at program entry but that has no
other major flaws related to internal validity; or
(3) Correlational research with strong statistical controls for
selection bias and for discerning the influence of internal factors.
Persistently lowest-achieving schools means, as determined by the
State: (i) Any Title I school in improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring that (a) is among the lowest-achieving five percent of
Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring or
the lowest-achieving five Title I schools in improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring in the State, whichever number of schools is
greater; or (b) is a high school that has had a graduation rate as
defined in 34 CFR 200.19(b) that is less than 60 percent over a number
of years; and (ii) any secondary school that is eligible for, but does
not receive, Title I funds that: (a) is among the lowest-achieving five
percent of secondary schools or the lowest-achieving five secondary
schools in the State that are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I
funds, whichever number of schools is greater; or (b) is a high school
that has had a graduation rate as defined in 34 CFR 200.19(b) that is
less than 60 percent over a number of years.
To identify the persistently lowest-achieving schools, a State must
take into account both: (i) The academic achievement of the ``all
students'' group in a school in terms of proficiency on the State's
assessments under section 1111(b)(3) of the ESEA in reading/language
arts and mathematics combined; and (ii) the school's lack of progress
on those assessments over a number of years in the ``all students''
group.
Quasi-experimental study means an evaluation design that attempts
to approximate an experimental study (as defined in this notice) and
can support causal conclusions (i.e., minimizes threats to internal
validity, such as selection bias, or allows them to be modeled). Well-
designed and well-implemented (as defined in this notice) quasi-
experimental studies include carefully matched comparison group designs
(as defined in this notice), interrupted time series designs (as
defined in this notice), or regression discontinuity designs (as
defined in this notice).
Regression discontinuity design study means, in part, a quasi-
experimental study design (as defined in this notice) that closely
approximates an experimental study (as defined in this notice). In a
regression discontinuity design, participants are assigned to a
treatment or comparison group based on a numerical rating or score of a
variable unrelated to the treatment such as the rating of an
application for funding. Another example would be assignment of
eligible students, teachers, classrooms, or schools above a certain
score (``cut score'') to the treatment group and assignment of those
below the score to the comparison group.
Strong evidence means evidence from previous studies whose designs
can support causal conclusions (i.e., studies with high internal
validity), and studies that in total include enough of the range of
participants and settings to support scaling up to the State, regional,
or national level (i.e., studies with high external validity). The
following are examples of strong evidence:
(1) More than one well-designed and well-implemented (as defined in
this notice) experimental study (as defined in this notice) or well-
designed and well-implemented (as defined in this notice) quasi-
experimental study (as defined in this notice) that supports the
effectiveness of the practice, strategy, or program; or
(2) One large, well-designed and well-implemented (as defined in
this notice) randomized controlled, multisite trial that supports the
effectiveness of the practice, strategy, or program.
Student achievement means--(a) For tested grades and subjects: (1)
a student's score on the State's assessments under the ESEA; and, as
appropriate, (2) other measures of student learning, such as those
described in paragraph (b) of this definition, provided they are
rigorous and comparable across schools.
(b) For non-tested grades and subjects: alternative measures of
student learning and performance, such as student scores on pre-tests
and end-of-course tests; student performance on English language
proficiency assessments; and other measures of student achievement that
are rigorous and comparable across schools.
Student growth means the change in student achievement (as defined
in this notice) for an individual student between two or more points in
time. A State may also include other measures that are rigorous and
comparable across classrooms.
Well-designed and well-implemented means, with respect to an
experimental or quasi-experimental study (as defined in this notice),
that the study meets the What Works Clearinghouse evidence standards,
with or without reservations (see http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/references/idocviewer/doc.aspx?docid=19&tocid=1 and in particular the
description of ``Reasons for Not Meeting Standards'' at http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/references/idocviewer/Doc.aspx?docId=19&tocId=4#reasons).
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7271.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80,
81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Education Department suspension
and debarment regulations in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The notice of final
priority, requirements, and definitions for this program, published in
the Federal Register on March 30, 2005 (70 FR 16234); (d) The notice of
final supplemental priorities and definitions for discretionary grant
programs, published in the Federal Register on December 15, 2010 (75 FR
78486), and corrected on May 12, 2011 (76 FR 27637).
[[Page 11861]]
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $2,047,326.
The Administration's budget request for FY 2013 does not include
funds for this program. In place of this program and several other,
sometimes narrowly targeted, programs focused on student achievement in
specific subject areas, the Administration has proposed to create,
through the ESEA reauthorization, a broader program, ``Effective
Teaching and Learning for a Well-Rounded Education,'' that would
support activities to improve student achievement and teacher
effectiveness in arts and other subject areas.
However, we are inviting applications to allow enough time to
complete the grant process before the end of the current fiscal year,
if Congress appropriates funds for this program.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2014 from the list of
unfunded applicants from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $275,000 to $325,000 for the first year
of the project. Funding for the second, third, and fourth years is
subject to the availability of funds and the approval of continuation
awards (see 34 CFR 75.253).
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $300,000.
Estimated Number of Award: 6.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 48 months (subject to availability of funds).
Note: The first 12 months of the project period may be used to
build capacity to effectively carry out the comprehensive activities
involved in the evaluation plan described in competitive preference
priority 1.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: (1) One or more local educational agencies
(LEAs), including charter schools that are considered LEAs under State
law and regulations, that may work in partnership with one or more of
the following:
A State or local non-profit or governmental arts
organization.
A State educational agency (SEA) or regional educational
service agency.
An institution of higher education.
A public or private agency, institution, or organization,
such as a community- or faith-based organization; or
(2) One or more State or local non-profit or governmental arts
organizations that must work in partnership with one or more LEAs and
may partner with one or more of the following:
An SEA or regional educational service agency.
An institution of higher education.
A public or private agency, institution, or organization,
such as a community- or faith-based organization.
Note: If more than one LEA or arts organization wishes to form a
consortium and jointly submit a single application, they must follow
the procedures for group applications described in 34 CFR 75.127
through 75.129 of EDGAR.
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not-
supplant funding requirements. Under section 5551(f)(2) of the ESEA,
the Secretary requires that assistance provided under this program be
used only to supplement, and not to supplant, any other assistance or
funds made available from non-Federal sources for the activities
assisted under the program.
This restriction also has the effect of allowing projects to
recover indirect costs only on the basis of a restricted indirect cost
rate, according to the requirements in 34 CFR 75.563 and 34 CFR 76.564
through 76.569. As soon as they decide to apply, applicants are urged
to contact the ED Indirect Cost Group at (202) 377-3840 for guidance
about obtaining a restricted indirect cost rate to use on the Budget
Information form (ED Form 524) included with the application package.
c. Coordination Requirement: Under section 5551(f)(1) of the ESEA,
the Secretary requires that each entity funded under this program
coordinate, to the extent practicable, each project or program carried
out with funds awarded under this program with appropriate activities
of public or private cultural agencies, institutions, and
organizations, including museums, arts education associations,
libraries, and theaters.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package:
You can obtain an application package via the Internet or from the
Education Publications Center (ED Pubs). To obtain a copy via the
Internet, use the following address: www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/grantapps/index.html. To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write, fax, or
call the following: ED Pubs, U.S. Department of Education, P.O. Box
22207, Alexandria, VA 22304. Telephone, toll free: 1-877-433-7827. FAX:
(703) 605-6794. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS),
toll free: 1-877-576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at
its email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application from ED Pubs, be sure to identify
this program or competition as follows: CFDA number 84.351D.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or compact disc) by contacting the person or team listed under
Accessible Format in section VIII of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this program.
Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to develop a
more efficient process for reviewing grant applications if it has a
better understanding of the number of entities that intend to apply for
funding under this program. Therefore, the Secretary strongly
encourages each potential applicant to notify the Department by sending
a short email message indicating the applicant's intent to submit an
application for funding. The email need not include information
regarding the content of the proposed application, only the applicant's
intent to submit it. This email notification should be sent to Diane
Austin at artsdemo@ed.gov.
Applicants that fail to provide this email notification may still
apply for funding.
Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. Applicants are strongly encouraged to limit the
application narrative (Part III) to the equivalent of no more than 50
single-sided pages, using the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the
[[Page 11862]]
application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes,
quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in charts,
tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part
IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the
resumes, the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the page
limit does apply to all of the application narrative section (Part
III).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: February 20, 2013.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: March 22, 2013.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: April 22, 2013.
Applications for grants under this program must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV. 7. Other Submission
Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice. Deadline for
Intergovernmental Review: June 20, 2013.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
5. We reference regulations outlining funding restrictions in the
Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, Central Contractor Registry, and System for Award Management:
To do business with the Department of Education, you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the Central
Contractor Registry (CCR)--and, after July 24, 2012, with the System
for Award Management (SAM), the Government's primary registrant
database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active CCR or SAM registration with current
information while your application is under review by the Department
and, if you are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one business day.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow 2-5 weeks for your TIN to become active.
The CCR or SAM registration process may take five or more business
days to complete. If you are currently registered with the CCR, you may
not need to make any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN
associated with your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will
need to update your registration annually. This may take three or more
business days to complete. Information about SAM is available at
SAM.gov.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov,
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp.
7. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this program must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an exception to this requirement
in accordance with the instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for Grants under the Arts in Education Model
Development and Dissemination program, CFDA number 84.351D, must be
submitted electronically using the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site
at www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be able to download a
copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload
and submit your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a
grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for the Arts in
Education Model Development and Dissemination program at
www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable application
package for this program by the CFDA number. Do not include the CFDA
number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.351, not
84.351D).
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply
with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application
because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application
[[Page 11863]]
deadline date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this program to ensure that you
submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov system.
You can also find the Education Submission Procedures pertaining to
Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5 system home
page at www.G5.gov.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms: the
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications.
You must upload any narrative sections and all other
attachments to your application as files in a PDF (Portable Document)
read-only, non-modifiable format. Do not upload an interactive or
fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than a read-only,
non-modifiable PDF or submit a password-protected file, we will not
review that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by email. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether
your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system;
and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevent you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Diane Austin, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W245,
Washington, DC 20202-5950. FAX: (202) 205-5630.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.351D), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand,
[[Page 11864]]
on or before the application deadline date, to the Department at the
following address: U.S. Department of Education, Application Control
Center, Attention: (CFDA Number 84.351D), 550 12th Street SW., Room
7041, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260 .
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 75.210. The maximum score for all the selection
criteria is 100 points. The maximum score for each criterion is
indicated in parentheses. Each criterion also includes the factors that
the reviewers will consider in determining how well an application
meets the criterion. The notes following the selection criteria are
guidance to help applicants in preparing their applications and are not
required by statute or regulations. The selection criteria are as
follows:
(1) Need for project (15 points).
The Secretary considers the need for the proposed project by
considering the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the proposed project will provide services
or otherwise address the needs of students at risk of educational
failure.
(b) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses.
(2) Significance (10 points).
The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed project by
considering the following factor:
The likely utility of the products (such as information, materials,
processes, or techniques) that will result from the proposed project,
including the potential for their being used effectively in a variety
of other settings.
(3) Quality of the project design (30 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project by considering the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the design of the proposed project reflects
up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practices.
(b) The extent to which the proposed project is part of a
comprehensive effort to improve teaching and learning and support
rigorous academic standards for students.
(c) The extent to which the proposed project is designed to build
capacity and yield results that will extend beyond the period of
Federal financial assistance.
(4) Quality of project personnel (10 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will carry
out the proposed project. In determining the quality of project
personnel, the Secretary considers the extent to which the applicant
encourages applications for employment from persons who are members of
groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race,
color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.
In addition, the Secretary considers the following factor:
The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of
key project personnel.
(5) Quality of the management plan (25 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the
proposed project by considering the following factors:
(a) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks.
(b) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed
project.
(c) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the proposed project.
(6) Quality of the project evaluation (10 points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed
project by considering the following factors:
(a) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible.
(b) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes.
Note: A strong evaluation plan should be included in the
application narrative and should be used, as appropriate, to shape
the development of the project from the beginning of the grant
period. The evaluation plan should include benchmarks to monitor
progress toward specific project objectives and also outcome
measures to assess the impact on teaching and learning, or other
important outcomes for project participants. More specifically, the
plan should identify the individual or organization that has agreed
to serve as evaluator for the project and describe the
qualifications of that evaluator. The plan should describe the
evaluation design, indicating: (1) What types of data will be
collected; (2) when various types of data will be collected; (3)
what methods will be used; (4) what instruments will be developed
and when these instruments will be developed; (5) how the data will
be analyzed; (6) when reports of results and outcomes will be
available; and (7) how the applicant will use the information
collected through the evaluation to monitor progress of the funded
project and to provide accountability information both about success
at the initial site and about effective strategies for replication
in other settings. Applicants are encouraged to devote an
appropriate level of resources to project evaluation.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
also requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Special Conditions: Under 34 CFR 74.14 and 80.12, the Secretary
may impose special conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is
not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management system
[[Page 11865]]
that does not meet the standards in 34 CFR part 74 or 80, as
applicable; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is
otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The Department has established the
following Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA)
performance measures for the Arts in Education Model Development and
Dissemination program: (1) The percentage of students participating in
arts model projects funded through the AEMDD program who demonstrate
proficiency in mathematics compared to those in control or comparison
groups and (2) the percentage of students participating in arts model
projects who demonstrate proficiency in reading compared to those in
control or comparison groups.
These measures constitute the Department's indicators of success
for this program. Consequently, we advise an applicant for a grant
under this program to give careful consideration to these measures in
conceptualizing the approach and evaluation for its proposed project.
Each grantee will be required to provide, in its annual performance and
final reports, data about its progress in meeting these measures.
5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.253, the extent to which a
grantee has made ``substantial progress toward meeting the objectives
in its approved application.'' This consideration includes the review
of a grantee's progress in meeting the targets and projected outcomes
in its approved application, and whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its approved application and
budget. In making a continuation grant, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Austin, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W245, Washington, DC 20202-
5950. Telephone: (202) 260-1280 or by email: artsdemo@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-
8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: February 14, 2013.
James H. Shelton, III,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2013-03876 Filed 2-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P