[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29680-29683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12030]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0320]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the Safety Zone for Chicago
Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL. This Zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of Chicago Harbor during fireworks
displays, races, and other marine events that occur throughout each
calendar year. The safety zone established by this proposed rule is
necessary to protect spectators, participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with these fireworks displays, boat races, and other
events.
DATES: Comments and related materials must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2013-0320 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Petty Officer Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan; telephone 414-747-7148, email
[email protected]. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0320) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
[[Page 29681]]
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0320) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``OPEN DOCKET FOLDER'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
Each year dozens of fireworks displays are launched from barges in
positions just south of the Navy Pier in Chicago. These fireworks
displays, along with other marine events, take place on a monthly and
sometimes weekly basis. The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, has
determined that these fireworks displays and other events such as races
or air shows pose a significant risk to public safety and property.
Such hazards include falling debris and collisions among spectator
vessels. To address these hazards, the Coast Guard established a
permanent safety zone for the protection of spectators during these
displays and events in 33 CFR 165.931. This year, however, the Coast
Guard was informed by Melrose Pyrotechnics that a new launch position
will be used for some of the fireworks displays. This new position
launches a display from a break wall south of the Navy Pier and would
impact portions of Chicago Harbor hundreds of feet beyond the
boundaries of the zone as it is currently listed. To address this new
launch position, and to ensure safety of spectators and vessels, this
rule proposes to extend the boundaries of the safety zone within 33 CFR
165.931.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, has determined that a
safety zone is necessary to mitigate the aforementioned safety risks.
Thus, this rule proposes to amend 33 CFR 165.931 to establish the
following area as a safety zone: The waters of Lake Michigan within
Chicago Harbor bounded by coordinates beginning at 41[deg]53'26.5'' N,
087[deg]35'26.5'' W; then south to 41[deg]53'7.6'' N, 087[deg]35'26.3''
W; then west to 41[deg]53'7.6'' N, 087[deg]36'23.2'' W; then north to
41[deg]53'26.5'' N, 087[deg]36'24.6'' W; then east back to the point of
origin (NAD 83).
This proposed rule will amend 33 CFR 165.931 and update the
permanent safety zone on Lake Michigan within Chicago harbor. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan will notify the public when the
safety zone in this proposed rule will be enforced. Consistent with 33
CFR 165.7(a), such means may include, among other things, publication
in the Federal Register, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to
Mariners, or, upon request, by facsimile (fax). Also, the Captain of
the Port will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying the public
if enforcement these safety zones in this section are cancelled
prematurely.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the proposed safety
zone during the period of enforcement is prohibited unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his designated
representative. The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his
designated representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security. We conclude that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies,
will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients,
and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The safety zone
established by this proposed rule will be enforced in short periods
immediately before, during, and after the time the displays and events
occur. Also, the safety zone is designed to minimize its impact on
navigable waters and has been designed to allow vessels to transit
unrestricted to portions of the waterways not affected by the safety
zones. Thus, restrictions on vessel movements within any particular
area are expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port. On the whole, the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the enforcement of this
safety zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners and
[[Page 29682]]
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in portions of
Chicago Harbor when this safety zone is being enforced.
This proposed safety zone will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons discussed in the above Regulatory Planning and Review section.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of safety zones and thus, is categorically
excluded under paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction. An environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination is available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 165.931 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.931 Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast,
Chicago, IL.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: The waters of
Lake Michigan within Chicago Harbor bounded by coordinates beginning at
41[deg]53'26.5'' N, 087[deg]35'26.5'' W; then south to 41[deg]53'7.6''
N, 087[deg]35'26.3'' W; then west to 41[deg]53'7.6'' N,
087[deg]36'23.2'' W; then north to 41[deg]53'26.5'' N,
087[deg]36'24.6'' W then east back to the point of origin (NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) ``Designated representative'' means any Coast Guard
Commissioned, warrant, or petty officer designated by the Captain of
the Port, Lake Michigan to monitor a safety zone, permit entry
[[Page 29683]]
into the zone, give legally enforceable orders to persons or vessels
within the zone, and take other actions authorized by the Captain of
the Port.
(2) ``Public vessel'' means vessels owned, chartered, or operated
by the United States, or by a State or political subdivision thereof.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
33 CFR 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan, or his designated representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, excepted as
may be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his
designated representative. All persons and vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his designated
representative. Upon being hailed by the U.S. Coast Guard by siren,
radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed.
(3) All vessels must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port
or his designated representative to enter, move within, or exit the
safety zone established in this section when this safety zone is
enforced. Vessels and persons granted permission to enter the safety
zone must obey all lawful orders or directions of the Captain of the
Port or a designated representative. While within a safety zone, all
vessels must operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe
course.
(d) Notice of enforcement or suspension of enforcement. The safety
zone established by this section will be enforced only upon notice of
the Captain of the Port. The Captain of the Port will cause notice of
enforcement of the safety zone established by this section to be made
by all appropriate means to the affected segments of the public
including publication in the Federal Register as practicable, in
accordance with 33 CFR 165.7(a). Such means of notification may also
include, but are not limited to Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local
Notice to Mariners.
(e) Exemption. Public vessels, as defined in paragraph (b) of this
section, are exempt from the requirements in this section.
(f) Waiver. For any vessel, the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or his designated representative may waive any of the requirements of
this section, upon finding that operational conditions or other
circumstances are such that application of this section is unnecessary
or impractical for the purposes of public or environmental safety.
Dated: May 3, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013-12030 Filed 5-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P