[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29700-29702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12086]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-520-803]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United
Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2010-2011
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 7, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film (PET
Film) from the United Arab Emirates.\1\ This review covers two
producers/exporters of subject merchandise: JBF RAK LLC (JBF) and FLEX
Middle East FZE (FLEX). Based on our analysis of the comments received,
we have made changes to the preliminary results which are discussed
below. The final weighted-average dumping margins are listed below in
the section titled ``Final Results of Review.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from
the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 77 FR 73010 (December 7, 2012),
and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, or Gene Calvert, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4261, or (202) 428-3586, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Since the preliminary results, the following events have taken
place. The Department received timely case briefs from Mitsubishi
Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics (America), Inc.
(collectively, Petitioners) and JBF on January 14, 2013. Petitioners
filed a timely rebuttal brief with the Department on January 22, 2013.
On March 8, 2013, the Department released a post-preliminary
analysis memorandum of JBF which addressed Petitioners' targeted
dumping allegation.\2\ At that time, we invited interested parties to
comment on the Post-Preliminary Analysis.\3\ JBF submitted comments on
the Post-Preliminary Analysis on March 18, 2013, and Petitioners
submitted rebuttal comments on March 25, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, ``2010-2011 Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Post-
Preliminary Analysis and Calculation Memorandum of JBF RAK LLC''
(Post-Preliminary Analysis), dated March 8, 2013.
\3\ See id. at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Review
The period of review is November 1, 2010, through October 31, 2011.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw, pre-
treated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film (PET Film), whether
extruded or co-extruded. Excluded are metallized films and other
finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by
the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer
more than 0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is roller transport
cleaning film which has at least one of its surfaces modified by
application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR latex. Tracing and drafting film
is also excluded. PET Film is classifiable under subheading
3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised by parties in the case and rebuttal briefs, as
well as in the comments and rebuttal comments related to the Post-
Preliminary Analysis,
[[Page 29701]]
are addressed in the Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results'' (Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. A list of
the issues addressed in the Decision Memorandum is appended to this
notice. The Decision Memorandum is a public document and is available
electronically via Import Administration's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (IA ACCESS).
IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaacess.trade.gov
and is available in the Central Records Unit of the main Commerce
Building, Room 7046. In addition, a complete version of the Decision
Memorandum is also accessible on the internet at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made
adjustments to our margin calculations for JBF and FLEX. Specifically,
in response to Petitioners' targeted dumping allegation and consistent
with the Post-Preliminary Analysis, we have adopted the alternative
average-to-transaction methodology for JBF.\4\ Moreover, in response to
comments by Petitioners, we have made changes to the SAS programming to
correct certain clerical errors in FLEX's margin calculation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See id. at 2 and 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
As a result of this review, we determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2010,
through October 31, 2011:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer/exporter Weighted average margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JBF RAK LLC............................... 9.80 percent ad valorem.
FLEX Middle East FZE...................... 0.00 percent ad valorem
(i.e., de minimis.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We will disclose to interested parties the calculations performed
in connection with these final results within five days of the
publication of this notice, consistent with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review.\5\ The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of
these final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Department applied the assessment rate calculation
method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February
14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For assessment purposes, where the respondent reported the entered
value for its sales, we calculated importer-specific (or customer-
specific) ad valorem assessment rates based on the ratio of the total
amount of the dumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the
total entered value of those same sales. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
However, where the respondent did not report the entered value for its
sales, we have calculated importer-specific (or customer-specific) per-
unit assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for the examined sales and dividing this amount by
the total quantity of those sales. We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if
any importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results
of this review is above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.50 percent).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate,
without regard to antidumping duties, any entries for which the
assessment rate is de minimis.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003.\6\ This clarification applies to entries of subject
merchandise during the period of review produced by companies under
review in these final results for which the reviewed companies did not
know their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate non-reviewed entries at
the all-others rate of 4.05 percent from the investigation if there is
no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the
transaction.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
\7\ See id.; see also Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet,
and Strip From Brazil, the People's Republic of China and the United
Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab
Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 66596 (November 10, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final
results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act): (1) For the companies covered by this review, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate listed above in the section ``Final
Results of Review''; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a previous segment
of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published in the most recent final results in
which that producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this
proceeding, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be that
established for the producer of the merchandise in these final results
of review or in the most recent final results in which that producer
participated; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a
firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will be 4.05 percent, the all-others
rate established in the less than fair value investigation.\8\ These
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
[[Page 29702]]
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and in the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 13, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
Issues in the Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Targeted Dumping
Comment 2: Grade A and Grade B Sales
Comment 3: 15-Day Liquidation Policy
Comment 4: Correction of Certain Errors in FLEX's SAS Program
[FR Doc. 2013-12086 Filed 5-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P