[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34986-34989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13816]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission, in Part, 2010/12
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is conducting
an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on aluminum
extrusions from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ The period
of review (``POR'') is November 12, 2010, through April 30, 2012. The
review covers two exporters of subject merchandise who are mandatory
respondents: Kromet International, Inc. (``Kromet''); and a single
entity comprised of Guang Ya Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd. (``Guang
Ya''), Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd. (``Guangcheng'')
(collectively ``Guang Ya Group''); Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co.,
Ltd., (``Zhongya''); and Foshan Nanhai Xinya (``Xinya'') (collectively
``Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya''). The Department preliminarily finds
that Kromet did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value and that Guang Ya Group/New Zhongya/Xinya failed to
demonstrate that it was eligible for a separate rate and thus is part
of the PRC-wide entity. Furthermore, the Department received separate
rate applications from 33 additional exporters, of which only four have
been preliminarily found to be eligible for a separate rate: Gold
Mountain International Development Limited; Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.;
Sincere Profit Limited; and Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Department initiated this review on July 10, 2012. See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 77 FR 40565 (July 10,
2012) (``Initiation Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Stolz or Demitrios
Kalogeropoulos, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4474 or (202) 482-2623, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order \2\ is aluminum extrusions
which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from
aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy
series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (``Order'').
\3\ See ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated
concurrently with this notice (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum'')
for a complete description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (``HTSUS''): 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71,
7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90,
7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20,
9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10,
7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30,
7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60,
8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60,
8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50,
8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65,
8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85,
8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00,
8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00,
8422.90.06.40, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80,
8503.00.95.20, 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8708.80.65.90,
9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85,
9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10,
9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80,
9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10,
[[Page 34987]]
9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80,
9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.30,
9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 9506.51.40.00,
9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10,
9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20,
9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80,
9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00,
9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50.
The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products
may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76
subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as
under other HTSUS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be
classifiable under HTSUS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60.
While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is
dispositive.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Rescission of Review
For those companies named in the Initiation Notice for which all
review requests have been timely withdrawn and which previously
received separate rate status in a completed prior segment of this
proceeding, we are rescinding this administrative review, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). These companies are Alnan Aluminium Co.,
Ltd., Changshu Changsheng Aluminum Products Co., Ltd., Pingguo Asia
Aluminum Co., Ltd., and Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum Extrusion Co.,
Ltd.
For those companies named in the Initiation Notice for which all
review requests have been withdrawn, but which have not previously
received separate rate status, the Department's practice is to refrain
from rescinding the review with respect to these companies at this
time. While the requests for review of these companies were timely
withdrawn, the companies remain a part of the PRC-wide entity.\5\ The
PRC-wide entity is under review for these preliminary results. Thus, we
are not rescinding this review with respect to these companies at this
time, but the Department will make a determination with respect to the
PRC-wide entity at the conclusion of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ These companies are: (1) Clear Sky Inc. (2) Foshan City
Nanhai Hongjia Aluminum Alloy Co., Ltd.; (3) Guangdong Nanhai
Foodstuffs Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; (4) Isource Asia Limited and
affiliates; (5) Kunshan Giant Light Metal Technology Co., Ltd.; (6)
Midea Air-Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd.; (7) Nidec Sankyo
Singapore Pte. Ltd.; (8) Nidec Sankyo (Zhejang) Corporation; (9)
Ningbo Coaster International Co., Ltd.; (10) Shanghai Dongsheng
Metal; (11) Shanghai Shen Hang Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; (12) Sihui Shi
Guo Yao Aluminum Co., Ltd.; (13) Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.; (14) Shandong Huasheng Pesticide Machinery Co.; (15) Tianjin
Gangly Nonferrous Metal Materials Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').
Export and constructed export prices have been calculated in accordance
with sections 772(a) and (b) of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-
market economy (``NME'') within the meaning of section 771(18) of the
Act, normal value has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c)
of the Act. Specifically, the respondent's factors of production have
been valued using, when possible, the Philippines as the surrogate
country. The Philippines is a market economy country that is
economically comparable to the PRC and is a significant producer of
comparable merchandise.\6\ To determine the appropriate comparison
method, the Department applied a ``differential pricing'' analysis and
has preliminarily determined to use the average-to average method in
making comparisons of export price and constructed export price to
normal value for Kromet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum to Eugene Degnan, ``Request for a List of
Surrogate Countries for an Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of
China, dated January 25, 2013 (``Surrogate Country Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
preliminary results, please see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file electronically via Import
Administration's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS''). IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
Internet at http://www.trade.gov/ia/. The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Separate Rates
In the Initiation Notice, we informed parties of the opportunity to
request a separate rate. In proceedings involving NME countries, the
Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies
within the NME country are subject to government control and, thus,
should be assigned a single weighted-average dumping margin. It is the
Department's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to
an administrative review involving an NME country this single rate
unless an exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent
so as to be entitled to a separate rate. Companies that wanted to be
considered for a separate rate in this review were required to timely
file a separate rate application (``SRA'') or a separate rate
certification to demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate. Separate
rate applications and separate rate certifications were due to the
Department within 60 calendar days of the publication of the Initiation
Notice.
In this review, ten exporters for which a review was requested did
not submit separate-rate information to rebut the presumption that,
like all companies within the PRC, they are subject to government
control.\7\ As further discussed in the Preliminarily Decision
Memorandum, we determine that these entities have not demonstrated that
they operate free from government control. Thus, we preliminary
determine that they part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ These companies are: (1) Activa International Incorporated;
(2) Changzhou Changfa Power Machinery Co., Ltd.; (3) Foshan Shunde
Aoneng Electrical Applicances Co., Ltd. (4) Foshan Yong Li Jian Alu.
Ltd. (5) Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products Co., Ltd.;
(6) Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products Co., Ltd.; (7) North China
Aluminum Co., Ltd. (8) Metaltek Metal Industry Ltd.; (9) Zhejuang
Zhengte Group Co., Ltd.; and (10) Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical
Equipment Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Twenty-seven separate-rate applicants still under review submitted
a SRA that did not demonstrate a sale/entry of subject merchandise
during the POR by means of a U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') entry summary form (CBP Form 7501) showing a suspended AD/CVD
entry.\8\ On May 14, 2013, the
[[Page 34988]]
Department issued a supplemental questionnaire to these 27 separate
rate applicants and requested an explanation as to why their respective
SRAs did not pertain to a suspended AD/CVD entry, and requested that
the separate-rate applicants submit documentation for the first sale of
suspended subject merchandise made during the POR.\9\ Therefore, for
these preliminary results, the Department is not able to make a
determination whether these companies are eligible for a separate rate,
or had reviewable entries of subject merchandise. However, we will
analyze the responses from these companies to our May 14, 2013,
supplemental questionnaire and will continue to consider this issue for
the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ These 27 companies are: (1) Acro Import and Export Corp.;
(2) Allied Maker Limited; (3) Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co.,
Ltd.; (4) Changzhou Tenglong Auto Parts Co., Ltd.; (5) Dongguan Aoda
Aluminum Co., Ltd.; (6) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial
Co., Ltd.; (7) Dynamic Technologies China Ltd.; (8) Global PMX
(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.; (8) Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai;
(10) Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (11)
Hangzhou Xingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd.; (12) Hanyung Alcobis Co.,
Ltd.; (13) Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (14)
IDEX Dinglee Technology (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.; (15) Jiangsu Changfa
Refrigeration Co., Ltd.; (16) Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co.,
Ltd.; (17) Justhere Co., Limited; (18) Metaltek Group Co., Ltd.;
(19) Midea International Trading Co., Ltd.; (20) Shanghai Tongtai
Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing Co., Ltd; (21) Shenzhen Hudson
Technology Development Co., Ltd.; (22) Suzhou New Hongji Precision
Part Co., Ltd.; (23) Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corp.; (24)
Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd. (25) Union Industry
(Asia) Co., Limited; (26) Xin Wei Aluminum Company Limited, Guang
Dong Xin Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd., and Xin Wei Aluminum Co.,
Ltd.; and (27) Zhejiang Xinlong Industry Co., Ltd.
\9\ See the Department's letter ``Aluminum Extrusions from the
People's Republic of China: Supplemental Questionnaire--Separate
Rate Application,'' dated May 14, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kromet International, Inc............................... 0.00
Sincere Profit Limited.................................. 32.79
Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd............. 32.79
Gold Mountain International............................. 32.79
Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd............................... 32.79
PRC-wide Entity\10\..................................... 32.79
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to the parties the calculations
performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after
the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\11\
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed no later than five days after the case briefs are filed.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The PRC-wide entity includes: (1) Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/
Xinya; (2) Foshan City Nanhai Hongjia Aluminum Alloy Co., Ltd.; (3)
Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (4) Guangdong
Nanhai Foodstuffs Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; (5) Isource Asia Limited
and affiliates; (6) Kunshan Giant Light Metal Technology Co., Ltd.;
(7) Midea Air-Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd.; (8) Nidec Sankyo
Singapore Pte. Ltd.; (9) Nidec Sankyo (Zhejang) Corporation; (10)
Ningbo Coaster International Co., Ltd.; (11) Shanghai Dongsheng
Metal; (12) Shanghai Shen Hang Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; (13) Sihui Shi
Guo Yao Aluminum Co., Ltd.; (14) Suzhou JRP Import & Export Co.,
Ltd.; (15) Tianjin Gangly Nonferrous Metal Materials Co., Ltd.; (16)
Activa International Incorporated; (17) Changzhou Changfa Power
Machinery Co., Ltd.; (18) Foshan Yong Li Jian Alu. Ltd. (19)
Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; (20)
Jiaxing Taixin Metal Products Co., Ltd.; (21) Metaltek Metal
Industry Ltd.; (22) Zhejuang Zhengte Group Co., Ltd.; (23) Clear Sky
Inc.; and (24) Zhuhai Runxingtai Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd.;
(25) Shandong Huasheng Pesticide Machinery Co.; and (26) North China
Aluminum Co., Ltd.
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of
publication of this notice.\13\ Hearing requests should contain the
following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to
be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made,
parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be
held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative review, which will include the
results of its analysis of issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Deadline for Submission of Publicly Available Surrogate Value
Information
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(ii) (2012), the deadline
for submission of publicly available information to value factors of
production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) is 20 days after the date of
publication of the preliminary results. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.301(c)(1) (2012), if an interested party submits factual
information less than ten days before, on, or after (if the Department
has extended the deadline), the applicable deadline for submission of
such factual information, an interested party may submit factual
information to rebut, clarify, or correct the factual information no
later than ten days after such factual information is served on the
interested party. However, the Department generally will not accept in
the rebuttal submission additional or alternative surrogate value
information not previously on the record, if the deadline for
submission of surrogate value information has passed.\15\ Furthermore,
the Department generally will not accept business proprietary
information in either the surrogate value submissions or the rebuttals
thereto, as the regulation regarding the submission of surrogate values
allows only for the submission of publicly available information.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See, e.g., Glycine from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Rescission, in Part, 72 FR 58809 (October 17, 2007), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2.
\16\ See 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department
will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review.\17\ The Department intends
to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each individually examined respondent whose weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent),
we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates
based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the
importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same
sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\18\ For duty assessment
rates calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess the
resulting ad valorem rate against the entered customs values for the
subject merchandise. If the weighted-average dumping margin for the
exporter is zero or de minimis, or the importer-specific assessment
rate is zero or de minimis, then the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department recently announced a refinement to its assessment
practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for
entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by
companies individually examined during this review, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide
[[Page 34989]]
rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that
exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by
the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping
duties, when imposed, will apply to all shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication of the final results of this administrative
review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) if Kromet;
Gold Mountain International Development Limited; Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co.,
Ltd.; Sincere Profit Limited; or Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai)
Co., Ltd., receive a separate rate in the final results of this
administrative review, then their cash deposit rate will be equal to
the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of
this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then the cash
deposit rate will be zero); (2) for any previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporter that is not under review in this
segment of the proceeding but that received a separate rate in a
completed prior segment, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be equal to the cash deposit rate for for
the PRC-wide entity, which will be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margin assigned to the PRC-wide entity in the final results of
this administrative review; \20\ and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of
China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 76 FR
18524 (April 4, 2011) (``Final Determination'') and Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing notice of these results in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 3, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
5. Affiliation and Collapsing
6. Non-Market Economy Country
7. Separate Rates
8. Separate-Rate Recipients
9. Rate for Separate-Rate Recipients
10. The PRC-wide Entity
11. Adverse Facts Available
12. Selection of an AFA Rate
13. Corroboration
14. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value Data
15. Surrogate Country
16. Economic Comparability
17. Significant Producers of Identical or Comparable Merchandise
18. Data Availability
19. Date of Sale
20. Comparisons to Normal Value
21. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
22. Export Price and Constructed Export Price
23. Normal Value
24. Factor Valuations
25. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act
26. Currency Conversion
27. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2013-13816 Filed 6-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P