[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64534-64535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25425]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-832]
Certain Ink Application Devices and Components Thereof and
Methods of Using the Same Commission Issuance of a Limited Exclusion
Order Against Infringing Products of Respondents Found in Default;
Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has issued a limited exclusion order against infringing
products of respondents T-Tech Tattoo Device Inc. of Ontario, Canada
(``T-Tech''), Yiwu Beyond Tattoo Equipments Co., Ltd. of Yiwu City,
China (``Yiwu''), and Guangzhou Pengcheng Cosmetology Firm of
Guangzhou, China (``Guangzhou Pengcheng''). The investigation is
terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on March 6, 2012, based on a complaint filed by MT.Derm GmbH of Berlin,
Germany and Nouveau Cosmetique USA Inc. of Orlando, Florida
(collectively ``Complainants'') alleging violations of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337), as amended (``section 337''),
in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ink
application devices and components thereof and methods of using the
same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
6,345,553 (``the '553 patent'') and 6,505,530 (``the '530 patent''). 77
FR 13351, Mar. 6, 2012. The Commission's Notice of Investigation
(``NOI'') named T-Tech, Yiwu, and Guangzhou Pengcheng as respondents.
The complaint was served on all named respondents on March 1, 2012. The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations was named as a party to the
investigation.
On April 16, 2012, Complainants filed a motion seeking a
determination that respondents T-Tech, Yiwu, and Guangzhou be found in
default based on their failure to respond to the Complaint and Notice
of Investigation. On May 1, 2012, the ALJ issued Order No. 5, ordering
the respondents to show cause by close of business on May 16, 2012, why
they should not be found in default. No response was filed, and on May
31, 2012, the ALJ issued an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No.
7), granting the motion for default pursuant to section 210.16(a)(1) of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.16(a)(1)).
On June 6, 2012, T-Tech submitted correspondence to the Commission
stating that it had not received any prior communication from the
Commission and arguing that the ID finding it in default should be
reviewed. On June 13, 2012, the IA filed a petition for review of Order
No. 7 as to the finding of default against T-Tech. On June 29, 2012,
the Commission determined not to review the portion of Order No. 7
finding Yiwu and Guanzhou Pengcheng in default pursuant to section
210.16 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.16), but reversed the finding of default against T-Tech. Notice
(June 29, 2012).
On March 20, 2013, Complainants filed a motion for summary
determination of violation of section 337 against T-Tech. On April 17,
2013, Complainants also filed a motion for an ID finding T-Tech in
default pursuant to Commission Rule 210.17(e). On April 19, 2013, the
ALJ issued Order No. 32, ordering T-Tech to show cause as to why it
should not be found in default for failing to comply with deadlines set
forth in the procedural schedule. On April 25, 2013, T-Tech filed a
response to Order No. 32. On April 29, 2013, the IA filed a response in
support of Complainants' motion requesting that T-Tech be found in
default. On July 17, 2013, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 35),
granting-in-part Complainants' motion for summary determination of
violation against T-Tech or, in the alternative, granting Complainants'
motion for an ID finding T-Tech in default pursuant to section 210.17
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.17). On
August 16, 2013, the Commission determined not to review the portion of
the ID finding T-Tech in default. 78 FR 52212-13, Aug. 22, 2013. The
Commission found the portion of Order No. 35 granting summary
determination of violation moot. Id. The Commission also requested
briefing from the parties and the public on the issues of remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. Id.
Complainants and the Commission investigative attorney (``IA'')
submitted
[[Page 64535]]
briefing responsive to the Commission's request on August 30, 2013.
Each proposed a limited exclusion order directed to the accused
products of respondents Yiwu, Guangzhou Pengcheng, and T-Tech.
Complainants stated that they do not seek entry of cease and desist
orders against any of the defaulting respondents. The IA recommended
allowing entry by all of the defaulting respondents under a bond of 100
percent of the entered value during the period of Presidential review.
Complainants requested a bond of 100 percent against respondent T-Tech,
but argued that respondents Yiwu and Guangzhou Pengcheng not be allowed
to import any of their infringing products during the period of
Presidential review because they were found in default under section
337(g)(1). In the alternative, Complainants requested that the
Commission set a bond of 100 percent of the entered value against
respondents Yiwu and Guangzhou Pengcheng. On September 6, 2013,
Complainants and the IA submitted reply submissions.
The Commission finds that the statutory requirements of section
337(g) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)) is met with respect to respondents Yiwu and
Guangzhou Pengcheng. Accordingly, pursuant to section 337(g)(1) (19
U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and Commission rule 210.16(c) (19 CFR 210.16(c)),
the Commission presumes the facts alleged in the complaint to be true
and finds that Yiwu and Guangzhou Pengcheng are in violation of section
337. The Commission further finds that T-Tech is in violation of
section 337 pursuant to section 210.17 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.17), which states that a failure to
participate in an investigation may provide a basis for a finding of
violation of section 337 under section 337(d)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)(1)).
The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief
in this investigation is a limited exclusion order prohibiting the
unlicensed entry of certain ink application devices and components
thereof that are manufactured abroad by or on behalf of, or imported by
or on behalf of, respondents Yiwu and T-Tech by reason of infringement
of one or more of claims 1-3, 7, 8, 19, and 20 of the `530 patent. The
Commission has also determined to issue a limited exclusion order
prohibiting the unlicensed entry of certain ink application devices and
components thereof that are manufactured abroad by or on behalf of, or
imported by or on behalf of, respondent Guangzhou Pengcheng by reason
of infringement of one or more of 1-3, 7-12 and 16-20 of the `530
patent and claims 1-4, 10, 12-14, 21-23, and 26-28 of the `553 patent.
The Commission has further determined that the public interest factors
enumerated in section 337(g)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1)) and section
337(d)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)) do not preclude issuance of the
limited exclusion order. Finally, the Commission has determined that
the bond for importation during the period of Presidential review shall
be in the amount of 100 percent of the entered value of the imported
subject articles of all defaulting respondents. The Commission's order
was delivered to the President and the United States Trade
Representative on the day of its issuance.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
Dated: October 23, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-25425 Filed 10-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P