[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2013)] [Notices] [Pages 66780-66783] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2013-26504] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of September 23, 2013 through October 18, 2013. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles [[Page 66781]] produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and (3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) either-- (A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in-- (A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the date on which-- (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers' firm within-- (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82,723............... Glit Microtron, Continental Wrens, GA........... May 7, 2012. Commercial Products. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82,973............... DHX Media LTD., Formerly Known as Sherman Oaks, CA.... August 9, 2012. WildBrain. 82,976............... CQ Sourcing, Inc., General Parts, New Castle, IN...... August 12, 2012. Inc. [[Page 66782]] 82,983............... Parker Hannifin Corporation, Riverside, CA....... August 9, 2012. Medical Systems Division, Kimco Staffing. 82,999............... ATOS IT Solutions and Services, Mason, OH........... August 16, 2012. Inc., Billing and Collections Department. 83,016............... Fairchild Semiconductor, Product West Jordan, UT..... August 15, 2012. Development Group. 83,018............... Gamesa Wind US, LLC, Ebensburg, PA....... August 21, 2012. Gamesatechnology Corporation, Inc. 83,034............... West Point Products Acquisition, Valley Grove, WV.... August 28, 2012. LLC, Clover Technologies Group, LLC, Kelly Services. 83,036............... Manpower Group, Working On-Site at Camp Hill, PA....... August 28, 2012. IBM Corporation. 83,043............... Volcano Corporation, Rancho Cordova Rancho Cordova, CA.. August 29, 2012. Division, Aerotek Staffing, Oxford Staffing, etc. 83,075............... Power One Renewable Energy, Phoenix, AZ......... September 5, 2012. Renewable Energy Division, Power One, Inc. 83,083............... American Wyott Corporation, d/b/a Cheyenne, WY........ September 11, 2012. APW Wyott, Standex Int'l, Adecco, Express, SOS, Advance, and Aerotek. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W number Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 83,044............... Spirit Aerosystems, Inc., Zero Wichita, KS......... August 29, 2012. Chaos, Apollo, Butler, CTS, Foster Design, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W number Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82,927............... Honeywell, Aeronautics Division, Strongsville, OH.... July 16, 2012. Aerotek, Manpower, Nesco and PDS Tech. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W number Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82,681............... Star City Machine.................. Roanoke, VA......... 82,871............... Rafko Enterprises, Inc., Manpower, Lock Haven, PA...... Ruggieri Enterprises, Spherion Staffing. 82,985............... Von Hoffmann Corporation, RR Jefferson City, MO.. Donnelley and Sons, Jefferson City Plant, Employment Plus, Manpower. 83,002............... PVH Corp., Warehousing and Duncansville, PA.... Distribution Center. 83,002A.............. PVH Corp., Warehousing and Huntingdon, PA...... Distribution Center. 83,025............... Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Buffalo Grove, IL... Baxter International, Medical Products. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 83,017............................. Ryerson.................... Jenison, MI........... 83,116............................. Print Plus, Inc............ Santa Ana, CA......... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to [[Page 66783]] the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 83,037............................. BCforward.................. Indianapolis, IN...... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 83,078............................. TE Connectivity, Industrial Winston-Salem, NC..... Relays. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82,991............................. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, NY......... Bausch and Lomb Place Facility. 82,991A............................ Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, NY......... N. Goodman Street Facility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of September 23, 2013 through October 18, 2013. These determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/ taa--search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888- 365-6822. Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of October 2013. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2013-26504 Filed 11-5-13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P