[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77662-77663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30569]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DoD-2013-OS-0209]
Notice of Availability (NOA) for General Purpose Warehouse and
Information Technology Center Construction (GPW/IT)--Tracy Site--
Environmental Assessment (EA); Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA) for General Purpose Warehouse and
Information Technology Center Construction (GPW/IT)--Tracy Site--
Environmental Assessment (EA) Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On October 31, 2013, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) published
a NOA in the Federal Register (78 FR 65300) announcing the publication
of the General Purpose Warehouse and Information Technology Center
Construction (GPW/IT)--Tracy Site--EA. The EA was available for a 30-
day public comment period which ended November 29, 2013. The EA was
prepared as required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
(1969). In addition, the EA complied with DLA Regulation (DLAR)
1000.22. No comments were received during the comment period. This
FONSI documents the decision of DLA to construct the GPW/IT at Tracy,
California. DLA has determined that the proposed action was not a major
federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment within the context of NEPA and that no significant impacts
on the human environment are associated with this decision.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Engelberger at (703) 767-0705
during normal business hours Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. (EST) or by email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) completed
an EA to address the potential environmental consequences associated
with the construction of a General Purpose Warehouse and Technology
Information Center at Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin,
California, Tracy Site. The FONSI incorporates the EA by reference and
summarizes the results of the analysis in the EA.
Purpose and Need for Action: The Proposed Action is needed to meet
the overall strategy for installation development and sustainment over
the short and long term, and to meet current and future mission
requirements and national security objectives associated with the DLA
Distribution Depot San Joaquin.
Proposed Action and Alternatives: Under the Proposed Action, DLA
would construct a GPW in fiscal year (FY) 2014 and an IT Center in FY
2015 at the Tracy Site. The GPW would be approximately 365,500 square
feet and would include a 360,000 square feet active bulk warehouse and
a 5,500 square feet annex. The active bulk warehouse would be composed
of four bays. The annex would include administrative offices;
restrooms; locker rooms; mechanical, electrical and communications
rooms; a multi-purpose room; and eight sprinkler riser annexes. The
proposed GPW would be constructed in an area that is bordered by Ennis
Drive to the north, 7th Street to the east, B Street to the south and
an existing parking lot to the northwest. The project area is currently
paved and serves as a trailer parking lot and laydown area (i.e.,
outside storage). As part of the Proposed Action, DLA would construct a
new trailer parking lot (approximately 295,000 square feet) and new
laydown area (approximately 240,000 square feet) at the Tracy Site. The
trailer parking lot would be constructed in an unimproved, open lot
that is bordered by C Street to the north, 5th Street to the east, D
Street to the south and 4th Street to the west. The laydown area would
be constructed in an unimproved, irregularly shaped open lot that is
intersected by 5th Street starting approximately 200 feet south of D
Street and continuing approximately 800 feet to the south. The project
area also includes approximately 100 feet to the west of 5th Street and
approximately 150 to 400 feet east of 5th Street, bound by Ennis Drive
to the southeast.
The proposed IT Center would be approximately 44,900 square feet
(31,400 square feet Information Systems facility and 13,400 square feet
electronic equipment storage area). The project would include a 48,200
square feet parking lot; computer/server rooms with raised flooring;
administrative offices; conference rooms; storage areas; break rooms;
restrooms and public access areas. The IT Center would be constructed
in the northwestern-most corner of the Tracy Site, north of Building
201 and A Street, and immediately west of West Street. The majority of
the project area for the proposed IT Center is currently paved and
serves as a personally owned vehicle (POV) parking lot.
The IT Center would house the Defense Automatic Addressing Center
(DAASC) and Joint Staff, Command and Control (J6) organizations and all
their computer/server equipment. The IT Center would also include
computer/server rooms with raised flooring; administrative offices;
conference rooms; storage areas; break rooms; restrooms and public
access areas. Supporting facilities for the GPW and IT Center would
include all utilities (i.e., potable water, sanitary server and
wastewater distribution, electricity and natural gas). Upon completion
of the Proposed Action, the total impervious surface area of the GPW,
trailer parking lot, laydown area, IT Center and POV parking lot would
be approximately 512,100 square feet. Because the entire project area
for the proposed GPW and the majority of the project area for the
proposed IT Center is currently paved
[[Page 77663]]
and improved, the overall increase in impervious surface area upon
completion of the Proposed Action would be minor.
Under the No Action Alternative, DLA would not construct the GPW or
IT Center. Modern facilities would not be provided and operational
conditions would not be improved. In general, implementation of the No
Action Alternative would require that DLA continue to operate under
substandard, inefficient, and in some cases, unsafe conditions. These
deficiencies would impair DLA's future ability to sustain current and
future national security objectives and other mission requirements
successfully. The No Action Alternative would not meet the purpose of
and need for the action.
Potential Environmental Impacts: Potential impacts from the
Proposed Action and No Action Alternative were analyzed for the
following environmental resources: Land use, noise, air quality,
geological resources, water resources, biological resources, health and
safety, utilities and infrastructure (including transportation),
hazardous materials and wastes, socioeconomic resources and
environmental justice, and cultural resources. Long-term, adverse
impacts on geology, soils and water resources would be expected from a
long-term increase in storm water runoff volume and velocity due to an
increase in impervious surface area. However, impacts would be minor
because the majority of the project areas are either currently paved or
previously disturbed. Once construction of the GPW and IT Center is
completed, there would be a long-term increase in demand for water,
wastewater treatment, electricity and natural gas. No significant
impacts on any of the aforementioned environmental resources would be
expected from the implementation of the Proposed Action.
Determination: DLA has determined that implementation of the
Proposed Action will not have a significant effect on the human
environment. Human environment was interpreted comprehensively to
include the natural and physical environment and the relationship of
people with that environment. Specifically, no highly uncertain or
controversial impacts, unique or unknown risk or cumulatively
significant effects were identified. Implementation of the Proposed
Action will not violate any federal, state or local laws. Based on the
results of the analyses performed during the preparation of the
environmental assessment, David Rodriguez, Director, DLA Installation
Support, concludes that construction of the GPW/IT project does not
constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment within the context of NEPA. Therefore, an
environmental impact statement for the proposed action is not required.
Dated: December 18, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-30569 Filed 12-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P