[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 248 (Thursday, December 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 78424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30763]
[[Page 78424]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-71142; File No. TP 14-03]
Order Granting a Limited Exemption From Rule 102(a) of Regulation
M to Certain Business Development Companies Pursuant to Rule 102(e) of
Regulation M
December 19, 2013.
By letter dated December 19, 2013 (``letter''), as supplemented by
conversations with the staff of the Division of Trading and Markets
(``Staff''), counsel for C[Imacr]ON Investment Corporation
(``Company''), an unlisted business development company (``BDC''),\1\
requested on behalf of the Company that the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') issue an exemption from Rule 102 of
Regulation M.\2\ Specifically, the letter requests that the Commission
exempt the Company from the requirements of Rule 102(a) so that the
Company may conduct a periodic share repurchase program during the
course of the continuous offering of shares of the Company
(``Shares'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act of 1940
(``1940 Act'') (defining ``business development company'').
\2\ 17 CFR 242.102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 102(a) of Regulation M specifically prohibits issuers, selling
security holders, and any of their affiliated purchasers from directly
or indirectly bidding for, purchasing, or attempting to induce another
person to bid for or purchase a ``covered security'' until the
applicable restricted period has ended. As a consequence of the
continuous offering of the Shares, the Company will be engaged in a
distribution of the Shares pursuant to Rule 102. As a result, bids for
or purchases of Shares or any reference security by the Company or any
affiliated purchaser of the Company are prohibited during the
restricted period specified in Rule 102, unless specifically excepted
by or exempted from Rule 102. As the Company seeks to engage in
periodic repurchases of Shares during the applicable restricted period,
absent an exception these repurchases would violate Rule 102(a).
The request is similar to a number of requests from unlisted BDCs
for conditional exemptive relief from Rule 102 that were granted
pursuant to delegated authority.\3\ Like other BDC repurchase programs
that have been given exemptive relief from Rule 102, the repurchase
program is designed to provide a limited source of liquidity for the
Company's shareholders as there is no trading market for the Shares. In
addition, like other BDC repurchase programs, the repurchase program is
fully disclosed to shareholders in the prospectus so the existence of
the repurchase program should be known by investors, thus minimizing
potential manipulative effects. The relief requested is also similar to
that extended to unlisted real estate investment trusts to permit
similar repurchase programs.\4\ Based on our experience with these
prior requests, we believe that it is appropriate to extend exemptive
relief for all BDC repurchase programs that meet the same criteria.
Accordingly, we find that it is appropriate in the public interest and
is consistent with the protection of investors to grant a conditional
exemption from Rule 102(a) to permit any unlisted company, including
the Company, that has elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act
to engage in periodic repurchases of their shares during the applicable
restricted period, subject to the conditions described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See, e.g., Order Granting Business Development Corporation
of America a Limited Exemption from Rule 102(a) of Regulation M
Pursuant to Rule 102(e), Exchange Act Rel. No. 67620 (August 8,
2012); Order Granting FS Investment Corporation II a Limited
Exemption from Rule 102(a) of Regulation M Pursuant to Rule 102(e),
Exchange Act Rel. No. 67163 (June 7, 2012); and Letter from
Josephine J. Tao, Assistant Director, to Steven B. Boehm, Sutherland
Asbill and Brennan LLP regarding FS Investment Corporation (April
20, 2009).
\4\ Letter from James A. Brigagliano, Associate Director, to
Dennis O. Garris, Alston & Bird LLP regarding Class Relief for REIT
Share Redemption Programs (October 22, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the conditions to this exemptive relief, any BDC
seeking to rely on this exemption must terminate their repurchase
program should a secondary trading market for its common stock develop.
As a result, the repurchase programs being given exemptive relief in
this order should not have a manipulative effect on the applicable
distribution. This exemptive relief is further conditioned on the
repurchase program purchasing shares of common stock at a price that
does not exceed the then current public offering price of such
securities. This should help ensure that the repurchase programs being
extended relief in this order do not have a manipulative effect on the
price of such distributions as the purchases should not improve the
offering price.
Conclusion
It is hereby ordered, pursuant to Rule 102(e), that any unlisted
company that has elected to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act is
exempt from Rule 102(a) for the limited purpose of engaging in periodic
repurchases of their shares during the applicable restricted period,
subject to the following conditions:
Any company relying upon this exemption shall terminate
its repurchase program if a secondary market for the shares being
repurchased develops; and
Any repurchase pursuant to this exemption will be made at
a price that does not exceed the then current public offering price for
such securities.
This exemptive relief is subject to modification or revocation at
any time the Commission determines that such action is necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. In
addition, persons relying on this exemption are directed to the anti-
fraud and anti-manipulation provisions of the federal securities laws,
particularly Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5
thereunder. Responsibility for compliance with these and any other
applicable provisions of the federal securities laws must rest with the
persons relying on this exemption. This order should not be considered
a view with respect to any other question that the transactions may
raise, including, but not limited to the adequacy of the disclosure
concerning, and the applicability of other federal or state laws to,
such transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(6).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-30763 Filed 12-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P