[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 248 (Thursday, December 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78508-78512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30821]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2014-1)]
Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.
ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Board has approved the first quarter 2014 rail cost
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of
American Railroads. The first quarter 2014 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 0.980.
The first quarter 2014 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.424. The first quarter 2014
RCAF-5 is 0.400.
DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: (800) 877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures, 1
I.C.C. 2d 207 (1984), the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) outlined
the procedures for calculating the all-inclusive index of railroad
input prices
[[Page 78509]]
and the method for computing the rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF).
Under the procedures, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) is
required to calculate the index on a quarterly basis and submit it to
the agency on the fifth day of the last month of each calendar quarter.
In Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures--Productivity Adjustment, 5
I.C.C.2d 434 (1989), aff'd sub nom. Edison Electric Institute v. ICC,
969 F.2d 1221 (D.C. Cir. 1992), the ICC adopted procedures that require
the adjustment of the quarterly index for a measure of productivity.
The provisions of 49 U.S.C. 10708 direct the Surface Transportation
Board (Board) to continue to publish both an unadjusted RCAF and a
productivity-adjusted RCAF. In Productivity Adjustment--Implementation,
1 S.T.B. 739 (1996), the Board decided to publish a second
productivity-adjusted RCAF called the RCAF-5. Consequently, three
indices are now filed with the Board: The RCAF (Unadjusted), the RCAF
(Adjusted), and the RCAF-5. The RCAF (Unadjusted) is an index
reflecting cost changes experienced by the railroad industry, without
reference to changes in rail productivity. The RCAF (Adjusted) is an
index that reflects national average productivity changes as originally
developed and applied by the ICC, the calculation of which is currently
based on a 5-year moving average. The RCAF-5 is an index that also
reflects national average productivity changes; however, those
productivity changes are calculated as if a five-year moving average
had been applied consistently from the productivity adjustment's
inception in 1989.
In EP 290 (Sub No. 5) (2013-1), served December 20, 2012, the Board
noted that AAR's proposed rebasing calculations were verified, and
complied with the statute. Because the revisions calculated by AAR
affected the fourth quarter 2012 basing factor, this decision contains
the revised 2012 fourth quarter basing factor, from 297.5 to 297.6. The
revised rebasing calculations are shown in Table C of the Appendix.
The index of railroad input prices, RCAF (Unadjusted), RCAF
(Adjusted), and RCAF-5 for the first quarter of 2014 are shown in Table
A of the Appendix to this decision. Table B shows the restated third
quarter 2013 index and the RCAF calculated on both an actual and a
forecasted basis. The difference between the actual calculation and the
forecasted calculation is the forecast error adjustment.
We have examined AAR's calculations and we find that AAR has
complied with our procedures, as well as the Board's November 27, 2013
decision directing AAR to restate the 2011, 2012, and 2013 RCAFs using
BNSF Railway Company's (BNSF) and Union Pacific Railroad Company's (UP)
revised R-1 reports. The restated RCAFs for the fourth quarter of 2011
through the fourth quarter of 2013 were recalculated as if AAR had made
the revisions in 2013 for the original filings.\1\ We find that the
first quarter 2014 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 0.980, an increase of 0.5% from
the restated fourth quarter 2013 RCAF of 0.975. The RCAF (Adjusted) is
calculated, in part, using the RCAF (Unadjusted) and a five-year moving
geometric average of productivity change for U.S. Class I railroads
from 2007-2011, which is 1.009 (0.9% per year). We find that the RCAF
(Adjusted) is 0.424, an increase of 0.2% from the restated fourth
quarter 2013 RCAF (Adjusted) of 0.423.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Table D.
\2\ The first quarter 2014 RCAF Adjusted (0.424) is calculated
by dividing the first quarter 2014 RCAF Unadjusted (0.980) by the
first quarter productivity adjustment factor of 2.3110. The first
quarter 2014 productivity adjustment factor is calculated by
multiplying the fourth quarter 2013 productivity adjustment of
2.3059 by the fourth root (1.0022) of the 2007-2011 annual average
productivity growth rate of 0.9%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Productivity Adjustment--Implementation, 1
S.T.B. at 748-49, the RCAF-5 for this quarter will use a productivity
trend for the years 2007-2011, which is 1.009 (0.9% per year). We find
that the RCAF-5 for the first quarter of 2014 is 0.400, an increase of
0.3% from the restated fourth quarter 2013 RCAF-5 of 0.399.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The first quarter 2014 RCAF-5 (0.400) is calculated by
dividing the first quarter 2014 RCAF Unadjusted (0.980) by the first
quarter productivity adjustment factor-5 (PAF-5) of 2.4480. The
first quarter 2014 PAF-5 is calculated by multiplying the fourth
quarter 2013 PAF-5 of 2.4426 by the fourth root (1.0022) of the
2007-2011 annual average productivity growth rate of 0.9%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This decision will not significantly affect the quality of the
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10708.
Decided: December 19, 2013.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Begeman, and
Commissioner Mulvey.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
Appendix
Table A--EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2014-1) All Inclusive Index of Railroad Input Costs \1\
[Endnotes following Table D]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fourth First
2012 quarter quarter
Line No. Index component Weights (in 2013 2014
percent) forecast forecast
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................... LABOR.................................. 31.3 387.1 386.2
2............................... FUEL................................... 22.4 399.6 377.9
3............................... MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES................. 4.9 261.4 265.9
4............................... EQUIPMENT RENTS........................ 5.6 207.7 208.7
5............................... DEPRECIATION........................... 11.9 221.0 217.8
6............................... INTEREST............................... 2.0 76.6 76.6
7............................... OTHER ITEMS \2\........................ 21.9 220.0 220.5
8............................... WEIGHTED AVERAGE....................... 100.0 311.1 306.0
9............................... LINKED INDEX \3\....................... ........... 297.8 292.9
10.............................. PRELIMINARY RAIL COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR ........... 100.1 98.4
\4\.
11.............................. FORECAST ERROR ADJUSTMENT \5\.......... ........... -0.026 -0.004
12.............................. RCAF (UNADJUSTED) (LINE 10 +LINE 11)... ........... 0.975 0.980
13.............................. RCAF (ADJUSTED)........................ ........... 0.423 0.424
14.............................. RCAF-5................................. ........... 0.399 0.400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 78510]]
Table B--EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2014-1) Comparison of Third Quarter 2013 Index Calculated on Both a Forecasted and
an Actual Basis\6\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third
2011 weight quarter Third
Line No. Index component (in 2013 quarter
percent) forecast 2013 actual
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................. LABOR................................ 31.4 391.3 391.3
2................................. FUEL................................. 22.6 375.6 376.0
3................................. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES............... 5.1 264.2 264.2
4................................. EQUIPMENT RENTS...................... 5.6 208.0 207.6
5................................. DEPRECIATION......................... 11.5 218.9 217.8
6................................. INTEREST............................. 2.3 87.3 87.3
7................................. OTHER ITEMS.......................... 21.5 221.4 218.8
8................................. WEIGHTED AVERAGE..................... 100.0 307.7 307.0
9................................. LINKED INDEX......................... ........... 294.4 293.1
10................................ RAIL COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR.......... ........... 98.9 98.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table C--Rebasing the Denominator of the RCAF to the Fourth Quarter 2012
Level (Restated)\7\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................... Fourth Quarter 2012 Linked 299.1
Index.
2....................... Second Quarter 2012 Linked 295.5
Index Calculated Using Actual
Data.
3....................... Second Quarter 2012 Linked 297.0
Index Calculated Using
forecasted Data.
4....................... Difference.................... -1.5
5....................... Rounding adjustment to force 0.0
1.000.
6....................... Fourth Quarter 2012 Linked 297.6
Index Adjusted for Second
Quarter 2012 Forecast Error
(Line 1 plus Line 4 plus Line
5).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 78511]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE13.089
[[Page 78512]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE13.090
[FR Doc. 2013-30821 Filed 12-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P