[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7603-7609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02722]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0807; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-191-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for all Airbus Model A318 series airplanes, and Model A319, A320,
and A321 series airplanes. The NPRM proposed identifying the part
number and serial number of each passenger oxygen container, replacing
the oxygen generator manifold of the affected oxygen container with a
serviceable manifold, and performing an operational check of the manual
mask release, and corrective actions if necessary. The NPRM was
prompted by reports of silicon particles inside the oxygen generator
manifolds, which had chafed from the mask hoses during installation
onto the generator outlets. This action revises the NPRM by adding
airplanes to the applicability, adding a new check for part numbers,
corrective actions if necessary, and reducing the compliance time for
certain actions. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct non-
serviceable oxygen generator manifolds, which could reduce or block the
oxygen supply and result in injury to passengers when oxygen supply is
needed. Since these
[[Page 7604]]
actions impose an additional burden over that proposed in the NPRM, we
are reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to
comment on these proposed changes.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 27, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For Airbus service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax
+33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; Internet
http://www.airbus.com. For B/E service information identified in this
proposed AD, contact B/E Aerospace Systems GmbH, Revalstrasse 1, 23560
Lubeck, Germany; telephone (49) 451 4093-2976; fax (49) 451 4093-4488.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1405; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0807;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-191-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with an earlier NPRM for the
specified products, which was published in the Federal Register on
August 16, 2012 (77 FR 49386). The NPRM proposed to require actions
intended to address the unsafe condition for the specified products.
Since the NPRM (77 FR 49386, August 16, 2012) was issued, we have
determined that Airbus Model A318-121 and A318-122 airplanes also are
affected by the identified unsafe condition of this AD, and therefore
we have added them to the applicability paragraph of this AD. We are
also making the following changes to the NPRM:
We have extended the compliance time for certain actions;
The affected part numbers specified by the NPRM (77 FR
49386, August 16, 2012) have been changed in this supplemental NPRM
(SNPRM); and
A new check for part numbers and a corrective action have
been added.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0083, dated May 16, 2012 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
During production of passenger oxygen containers, the
manufacturer B/E Aerospace detected some silicon particles inside
the oxygen generator manifolds. Investigation revealed that those
particles (chips) had chafed from the mask hoses during installation
onto the generator outlets. It was discovered that a defective mask
hose installation device had caused the chafing.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce or
block the oxygen supply, possibly resulting in injury to passengers
when oxygen supply is needed.
To address this potential unsafe condition, EASA issued AD 2011-
0167 [(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2011_0167_superseded.pdf/AD_2011-0167_1)] to require the identification and
modification of the affected oxygen container assemblies. That AD
also prohibited the installation of the affected containers on any
aeroplane as replacement parts.
Since that AD was issued, it was established that the Models
A318-121 and A318-122 were missing from the Applicability of the AD,
and clarification was necessary regarding the affected containers,
which are only those marked B/E Aerospace Systems on the equipment
data plate.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2011-0167, which is superseded, expands the
Applicability by adding two aeroplane models, and provides clarity
by providing a list of affected passenger oxygen containers.
Required actions also include replacing the oxygen generator manifold
of the affected oxygen container with a serviceable manifold, doing an
operational check of the manual mask release, and repairing the
passenger oxygen container if necessary.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating it in Docket No.
FAA-2012-0807.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to comment on the NPRM (77 FR
49386, August 16, 2012). The following presents the comments received
on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Remove Sentence
Airbus requested that we revise paragraph (h) of the NPRM (77 FR
49386, August 16, 2012) to remove the sentence, ``If the operational
check fails, before further flight, repair, using a method approved by
either the Manager, International Branch, ANM 116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (or its
delegated agent).'' Airbus explained that the sentence is already
covered by instructions for the repair that exist in standard
practices.
We disagree with the commenter's request to remove the sentence
that specifies accomplishing a repair if an operational test fails.
This SNPRM proposes that corrective actions must be done to ensure the
identified unsafe condition is addressed. Also, since each
[[Page 7605]]
operator may be using different instructions for doing a repair, we
cannot reference any particular instructions. We have not changed the
SNPRM in this regard.
Request To Correct Typographical Error
Airbus requested that we revise the NPRM (77 FR 49386, August 16,
2012) to correct a typographical error. Airbus explained that the NPRM
lists B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005, Revision 1,
dated December 15, 2012, but stated that the date of this service
bulletin is December 15, 2011.
We disagree to revise the SNPRM. Airbus has since confirmed that
the correct date for B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005,
Revision 1, is December 15, 2012, as referenced in the NPRM (77 FR
49386, August 16, 2012). We have not changed the SNPRM in this regard.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
In many FAA transport ADs, when the service information specifies
to contact the manufacturer for further instructions if certain
discrepancies are found, we typically include in the FAA AD a
requirement to accomplish the action using a method approved by either
the FAA or the State of Design Authority (or its delegated agent).
We have recently been notified that certain laws in other countries
do not allow such delegation of authority, but some countries do
recognize design approval organizations. In addition, we have become
aware that some U.S. operators have used repair instructions that were
previously approved by a State of Design Authority or a Design Approval
Holder (DAH) as a method of compliance with this provision in FAA ADs.
Frequently, in these cases, the previously approved repair instructions
come from the airplane structural repair manual or DAH repair approval
statements that were not specifically developed to address the unsafe
condition corrected by the AD. Using repair instructions that were not
specifically approved for a particular AD creates the potential for
doing repairs that were not developed to address the unsafe condition
identified by the MCAI AD, the FAA AD, or the applicable service
information, which could result in the unsafe condition not being fully
corrected.
To prevent the use of repairs that were not specifically developed
to correct the unsafe condition, this proposed AD would require that
the repair approval specifically refer to the FAA AD. This change is
intended to clarify the method of compliance and to provide operators
with better visibility of repairs that are specifically developed and
approved to correct the unsafe condition. In addition, we use the
phrase ``its delegated agent, or the DAH with the State of Design
Authority's design organization approval, as applicable'' in this
proposed AD to refer to a DAH authorized to approve required repairs
for this proposed AD.
Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM (77 FR
49386, August 16, 2012). As a result, we have determined that it is
necessary to reopen the comment period to provide additional
opportunity for the public to comment on this proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 22 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per U.S.
product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement (The average number of oxygen 3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $0 $255 $5,610
containers per airplane is 50). $255.
Operational Check......................... 3 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 255 5,610
$255.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection. We
have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
repairs:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair (from operational check)............... 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85 $0 $85
Repair (from part number check of the 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85 0 85
passenger oxygen container).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
[[Page 7606]]
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2012-0807; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-
191-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 27, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122
airplanes; A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes; A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes; A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer serial
numbers (MSN).
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 35, Oxygen.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of silicon particles inside the
oxygen generator manifolds, which had chafed from the mask hoses
during installation onto the generator outlets. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct non-serviceable oxygen generator manifolds,
which could reduce or block the oxygen supply, which could result in
injury to passengers when oxygen supply is needed.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Part Number and Serial Number Identification
Within 5,000 flight cycles, or 7,500 flight hours, or 24 months,
whichever occurs first after the effective date of this AD, identify
the part number and serial number of each passenger oxygen
container. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in
lieu of this identification if the part number and serial number of
the oxygen container can be conclusively determined from that
review.
(h) Replacement, Check, Repair
If the part number of the passenger oxygen container is listed
in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and the serial number of the
passenger oxygen container is listed in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD:
Within the compliance time specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, do
the actions specified in paragraphs (h)(3), (h)(4), and (h)(5) of
this AD, except as provided by paragraphs (i)(1) through (i)(7) of
this AD.
(1) (Type I: 15 and 22 minutes) 12C15LXXXXX0100,
12C15RXXXXX0100, 13C15LXXXXX0100, 13C15RXXXXX0100, 14C15LXXXXX0100,
14C15RXXXXX0100, 12C22LXXXXX0100, 12C22RXXXXX0100, 13C22LXXXXX0100,
13C22RXXXXX0100, 14C22LXXXXX0100, and 14C22RXXXXX0100; and (Type II:
15 and 22 minutes) 22C15LXXXXX0100, 22C15RXXXXX0100,
22C22LXXXXX0100, and 22C22RXXXXX0100.
Note 1 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD: The passenger emergency
oxygen container assemblies listed in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD
are products having the mark ``B/E AEROSPACE'' on the identification
plate.
(2) ARBA-0000 to ARBA-9999 inclusive, ARBB-0000 to ARBB-9999
inclusive, ARBC-0000 to ARBC-9999 inclusive, ARBD-0000 to ARBD-9999
inclusive, ARBE-0000 to ARBE-9999 inclusive, BEBF-0000 to BEBF-9999
inclusive, BEBH-0000 to BEBH-9999 inclusive, BEBK-0000 to BEBK-9999
inclusive, BEBL-0000 to BEBL-9999 inclusive, and BEBM-0000 to BEBM-
9999 inclusive.
(3) Replace the oxygen generator manifold of the affected oxygen
passenger container with a serviceable manifold, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
35A1047, dated March 29, 2011.
(4) Do an operational check of the manual mask release, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-35A1047, dated March 29, 2011. If the operational
check fails, before further flight, repair using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or
its delegated agent, or the Design Approval Holder with EASA's
design organization approval, as applicable). For a repair method to
be approved, the repair approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(5) Check if the part number of the passenger oxygen container
is listed in B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005,
Revision 1, dated December 15, 2012; or B/E Aerospace Service
Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, Revision 1, dated December 20, 2011. If
the part number is listed in B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 1XCXX-
0100-35-005, Revision 1, dated December 15, 2012; or B/E Aerospace
Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, Revision 1, dated December 20,
2011; within the compliance time specified in paragraph (g) of this
AD, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA (or
its delegated agent, or the Design Approval Holder with EASA's
design organization approval, as applicable). For a repair method to
be approved, the repair approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(i) Exceptions
(1) Oxygen containers that meet the conditions specified in
paragraph (i)(1)(i) or (i)(1)(ii) of this AD are compliant with the
requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD.
(i) Oxygen containers Type I having a part number listed in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and having a serial number listed in
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD, that have been modified prior to the
effective date of this AD, as specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005,
Revision 1, dated December 15, 2012.
(ii) Oxygen containers Type II having a part number listed in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and having a serial number listed in
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD, that have been modified prior to the
effective date of this AD, as specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003,
Revision 1, dated December 20, 2011.
(2) Airplanes on which Airbus Modification 150703 or Airbus
Modification 150704 has not been embodied in production do not have
to comply with the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD, unless
an oxygen container having a part number listed in paragraph (h)(1)
of this AD and having a serial number listed in paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD has been replaced since the airplane's first flight.
(3) Airplanes on which Airbus Modification 150703 or Airbus
Modification 150704 has been embodied in production and which are
not listed by model and MSN in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-35A1047,
dated March 29, 2011, are not subject to the requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, unless an oxygen container having
a part number listed in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD and having a
serial number listed in
[[Page 7607]]
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD has been replaced since the airplane's
first flight.
(4) Model A319 airplanes that are equipped with a gaseous oxygen
system for passengers, installed in production with Airbus
Modification 33125, do not have the affected passenger oxygen
containers installed. Unless these airplanes have been modified in-
service (no approved Airbus modification exists), the requirements
of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD do not apply to these
airplanes.
(5) Airplanes that have already been inspected prior to the
effective date of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-35A1047, dated March
29, 2011, must be inspected and, depending on findings, corrected,
within the compliance time defined in paragraph (g) of this AD, as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, as applicable, except as
specified in paragraph (i)(6) of this AD.
(6) Airplanes on which the passenger oxygen container has been
replaced before the effective date of this AD in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-35A1047,
dated March 29, 2011, are compliant with the requirements of the
paragraph (h) of this AD for that passenger oxygen container.
(7) The requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD apply
only to passenger oxygen containers that are Design A, as defined in
figure 1 to paragraph (i)(7) of this AD.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
[[Page 7608]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP10FE14.001
Note 1 to figure 1 to paragraph (i)(7) of this AD: Figure 1 to
paragraph (i)(7) of this AD contains the information specified in
Appendix 1 of EASA Airworthiness Directive 2012-0083, dated May 16,
2012.
(j) Parts Installation Limitations
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
oxygen container having a part number specified in paragraph (h)(1)
of this AD and having a serial number specified in paragraph (h)(2)
of this AD, on any airplane, unless the container has been modified
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of any of the
service bulletins specified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), or (j)(3)
of this AD, as applicable.
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-35A1047, dated March 29, 2011.
(2) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005, Revision
1, dated December 15, 2012.
(3) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, Revision
1, dated December 20, 2011.
[[Page 7609]]
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the service information specified in
paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD.
(1) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 1XCXX-0100-35-005, dated
March 14, 2011.
(2) B/E AEROSPACE Service Bulletin 22CXX-0100-35-003, dated
March 17, 2011.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1405; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer, use these actions if they
are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if
they were approved by the State of Design Authority (or its
delegated agent, or the Design Approval Holder with a State of
Design Authority's design organization approval, as applicable). For
a repair method to be approved, the repair approval must
specifically refer to this AD. You are required to ensure the
product is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2012-0083,
dated May 16, 2012, for related information. This may be found in
the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2012-0807.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. For B/E service information identified in this
proposed AD, contact B/E Aerospace Systems GmbH, Revalstrasse 1,
23560 Lubeck, Germany; telephone (49) 451 4093-2976; fax (49) 451
4093-4488. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 21, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-02722 Filed 2-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C