[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14664-14665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

National Agricultural Statistics Service


Notice of Intent To Reinstate a Previously Approved Information 
Collection

AGENCY: National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the intention of the National Agricultural Statistics 
Service (NASS) to request the renewal, with changes, to a currently 
approved information collection, the Conservation Effects Assessment 
Project (CEAP) Survey. Revision to burden hours will be needed due to 
changes in the size of the target, sampling design, and/or 
questionnaire length.

DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by May 16, 2014 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number 0535-
0245, Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Survey, by any of 
the following methods:
     Email: [email protected]. Include docket number 
above in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: (202) 720-6396.
     Mail: Mail any paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions to: 
David Hancock, NASS Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 
Room 5336 South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20250-2024.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Hand deliver to: David Hancock, 
NASS Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 5336 South 
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph T. Reilly, Associate 
Administrator, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, (202) 720-4333. Copies of this information 
collection and related instructions can be obtained without charge from 
David Hancock, NASS Clearance Officer, at (202) 690-2388.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Survey.
    OMB Control Number: 0535--0245.
    Type of Request: To revise and extend a currently approved 
information collection for a period of three years.
    Abstract: The Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) was 
initiated by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 2003 
as a multi-agency effort to quantify the environmental effects of 
conservation practices on agricultural lands. As part of this 
assessment, the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) 
conducted on-site interviews with farmers during 2003-2006 to document 
tillage and irrigation practices, application of fertilizer, manure, 
and pesticides, and use of conservation practices at sample points 
drawn from the Natural Resources Inventory (NRI) sampling frame. These 
data were linked through the NRI frame to the Natural Resources 
Conservation Service (NRCS) soil, climate, and historical survey 
databases. The combined information was used to model the impact on 
soil and water resources and to estimate the benefits of conservation 
practices, including nutrient, sediment, and pesticide losses from farm 
fields, reductions of in-stream nutrient and sediment concentrations, 
and impacts on soil quality and erosion.
    USDA needs updated scientifically credible data on residue and 
tillage management, nutrient management, and conservation practices in 
order to quantify and assess current impacts of farming practices and 
to document changes. A pilot survey focused in the Chesapeake Bay 
Watershed was conducted for the 2011 crop year. In 2012 the target area 
was the Western Lake Erie Basin and the Des Moines River Watershed. In 
2013 the target area was the Sacramento River, San Joaquin and Tulare 
Lake basin watersheds. This group of surveys is referred to as the 
``NRI Conservation Tillage and Nutrient Management Survey'' (NRI-
CTNMS). The survey questionnaires are modeled after the 2003-2006 CEAP 
surveys and were administered through personal interviews of farm 
operators by trained National Association of State Departments of 
Agriculture (NASDA) enumerators. Under the current approval the sample 
sizes averaged less than 2,500 operators per year. In 2014 NASS will be 
conducting the survey in the St. Francis River Basin (Arkansas, 
Missouri and Mississippi). Approximately 1,200 farmers will be 
contacted for this region. In 2015 and 2016 the CEAP program will be 
expanded to the US level. The target sample size will be approximately 
15,000 farm operators each year.
    The data that is collected by the CEAP surveys, provide 
conservation tillage estimates and is used to model impacts of 
conservation practices on the larger environment. The summarized 
results of the survey are available in a web-based format to 
agricultural producers and professionals, government officials, and the 
general public.
    Authority: The Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS's) 
participation in this agreement is authorized under the Soil and Water 
Resources Conservation Act of 1977, 16 U.S.C. 2001-2009, as amended, 
Economy Act U.S.C. 1535. NRCS contracted with NASS to collect and 
compile this data for them. These data will be collected under the 
authority of 7 U.S.C. 2204(a). Individually identifiable data collected 
under this authority are governed by Section 1770 of the Food Security 
Act of 1985 as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2276, which requires USDA to afford 
strict confidentiality to non-aggregated data provided by respondents. 
This Notice is submitted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) and Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR part 1320.

[[Page 14665]]

    NASS also complies with OMB Implementation Guidance, 
``Implementation Guidance for Title V of the E-Government Act, 
Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 
2002 (CIPSEA),'' 72 FR 33362-01, Jun. 15, 2007.
    Estimate of Burden: Burden will be approximately 10 minutes for a 
first visit to verify the operator of the NRI point. The operators who 
did not screen out during the initial visit will be contacted at a 
later time to complete the survey. The second visit will take an 
estimated 60 minutes to complete the interview. (It may be possible to 
complete both during the same visit).
    Respondents: Farmers and Ranchers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10,400 annually.
    Frequency of Responses: Potentially, 2 times for each respondent.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 8,941 hours (based on an overall 
response rate of approximately 80%).

                                                             Estimated Burden for 2014-2016
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               Responses                             Non-response
                                             Sample            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Total
                  Survey                      size      Freq      Resp.    Freq x     Min./    Burden   Nonresp.   Freq. x    Min./     Burden   burden
                                                                  count     count     resp.     hours     count     count     nonr.     hours     hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1:
    CEAP--Identification Phase............     1,200         1       960       960        10       160       240       240         2         8       168
    CEAP--Survey Phase....................     1,000         1       800       800        60       800       200       200         2         7       807
    Pre-Survey Letter and Publicity            1,200         1       960       960         5        80       240       240         2         8        88
     Materials............................
Year 2:
    CEAP--Identification Phase............    15,000         1    12,000    12,000        10     2,000     3,000     3,000         2       100     2,100
    CEAP--Survey Phase....................    12,000         1     9,600     9,600        60     9,600     2,400     2,400         2        80     9,680
    Pre-Survey Letter and Publicity           15,000         1    12,000    12,000         5     1,000     3,000     3,000         2       100     1,100
     Materials............................
Year 3:
    CEAP--Identification Phase............    15,000         1    12,000    12,000        10     2,000     3,000     3,000         2       100     2,100
    CEAP--Survey Phase....................    12,000         1     9,600     9,600        60     9,600     2,400     2,400         2        80     9,680
    Pre-Survey Letter and Publicity           15,000         1    12,000    12,000         5     1,000     3,000     3,000         2       100     1,100
     Materials............................
                                           -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total.............................    31,200  ........  ........  ........  ........    26,240  ........  ........  ........       583    26,823
Annual Average............................    10,400  ........  ........  ........  ........     8,747  ........  ........  ........       194     8,941
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the proposed collection of information including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance 
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, technological or other forms of information 
technology collection methods.
    All responses to this notice will become a matter of public record 
and be summarized in the request for OMB approval.

    Signed at Washington, DC, February 27, 2014.
Joseph T. Reilly,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-05838 Filed 3-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-20-P