[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26712-26716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10698]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-970]
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 25, 2013, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published its Preliminary Results of the 2011-2012
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on multilayered
wood flooring (``MLWF'') from the People's Republic of China (``the
PRC'').\1\ This review
[[Page 26713]]
covers 76 companies. The mandatory respondents in this review are: (1)
Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. (``Armstrong''); (2) Fine
Furniture (Shanghai) Limited (``Fine Furniture''); and (3) Nanjing
Minglin Wooden Industry Co. Ltd. (``Minglin''). The period of review
(``POR'') is May 26, 2011, through November 30, 2012. We invited
interested parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the margin
calculations for these final results of the antidumping duty
administrative review. The final dumping margins are listed below in
the ``Final Results'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2011-2012, 78 FR 70267 (November 25, 2013) (``Preliminary
Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: May 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Martinelli, Lilit Astvatsatrian
or Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce,
14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482-2923, (202) 482-6412 or (202) 482-4162,
respectively.
Background
On November 25, 2013, the Department published its Preliminary
Results. On January 13, 2014, the Department received case briefs from
Armstrong, Fine Furniture, Minglin and Chinafloors Timber (China) Co.,
Ltd. On January 14, 2014, the Department received a case brief from the
Coalition for American Hardwood Parity (``CAHP'').\2\ On January 22,
2014, the Department received rebuttal briefs from Armstrong, CAHP,
Fine Furniture and Minglin. Between December 16, 2013 and December 23,
2013, the Department received requests for a hearing from Fine
Furniture, CAHP and Armstrong. All parties withdrew their requests for
a hearing between February 12, 2014 and February 19, 2014. On March 14,
2014, we extended the time period for issuing the final results of this
review by 30 days, until April 24, 2014. On April 23, 2014, we extended
the time period for issuing the final results of this review by an
additional seven days, until May 1, 2014. On April 23, 2014, the United
States Court of International Trade entered final judgments in Baroque
Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Company, Limited, et. al. v. United
States and Zhejiang Layo Wood Industry Co., Ltd. v. United States.\3\
As a result of these judgments, the Department is amending the amended
final less than fair value determination,\4\ and because the revised
weighted-average dumping margins for Zhejiang Layo Wood Industry Co.,
Ltd. and The Samling Group \5\ are de minimis, merchandise produced and
exported by Layo Wood and merchandise produced and exported by The
Samling Group is excluded from the antidumping duty order on MLWF from
the PRC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Coalition for American Hardwood Parity consists of the
following domestic producers of the like product: Anderson Hardwood
Floors, LLC, From the Forest, Howell Hardwood Flooring, Mannington
Mills, Inc., Nydree Flooring, and Shaw Industries Group, Inc.
\3\ These cases were formerly consolidated under Consol. Court
No. 12-00007, Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Company,
Limited, et. al. v. United States.
\4\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of
China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
and Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 76690 (December 8, 2011) (``MLWF
Amended Final Determination'').
\5\ The Samling Group consists of the following companies:
Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd, Riverside Plywood
Corporation, Samling Elegant Living Trading (Labuan) Limited,
Samling Riverside Co., Ltd, and Suzhou Times Flooring Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order includes MLWF, subject to
certain exceptions. \6\ Imports of the subject merchandise are provided
for under the following subheadings of the HTSUS: 4412.31.0520;
4412.31.0540; 4412.31.0560; 4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 4412.31.4040;
4412.31.4050; 4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4070; 4412.31.5125; 4412.31.5135;
4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 4412.31.6000; 4412.31.9100; 4412.32.0520;
4412.32.0540; 4412.32.0560; 4412.32.2510; 4412.32.2520; 4412.32.3125;
4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; 4412.32.3185;
4412.32.5600; 4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; 4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012;
4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; 4412.39.4051;
4412.39.4052; 4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069;
4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 4412.39.5050; 4412.94.1030; 4412.94.1050;
4412.94.3105; 4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 4412.94.3131; 4412.94.3141;
4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; 4412.94.4100; 4412.94.5100; 4412.94.6000;
4412.94.7000; 4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; 4412.94.9500; 4412.99.0600;
4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; 4412.99.3120;
4412.99.3130; 4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170;
4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; 4412.99.5710; 4412.99.6000; 4412.99.7000;
4412.99.8000; 4412.99.9000; 4412.99.9500; 4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000;
4418.72.2000; 4418.72.9500; and 9801.00.2500.\7\ While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the subject merchandise is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
dated concurrently with this notice, regarding ``Issues and Decision
Memorandum for Final Results of 2011-2012 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People's Republic of China,'' issued concurrently with this notice
for a complete description of the Scope of the Order (``Issues and
Decision Memorandum'').
\7\ On August 28, 2013, in consultation with CBP, the Department
added the following HTSUS classification to the AD/CVD module for
wood flooring: 9801.00.2500. See Letter to the File from Lilit
Astvatsatrian, Case Analyst, Enforcement and Compliance, Office IV,
regarding ``Multilayered Wood Flooring from the PRC, Modification of
the Case Reference File in ACE,'' (November 18, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
For these final results of review, we continue to find that
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd. (``Changzhou''); Dalian Jiuyuan Wood
Industry Co., Ltd. (``Jiuyuan''); Jiaxing Brilliant Import & Export Co.
Ltd. (``Jiaxing Brilliant''); Polywell Global Limited (``Polywell'');
and Vicwood Industry (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (``Vicwood'') had no shipments
during the POR.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Results, 78 FR at 70267, 70268, n.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties
in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that
parties raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
[[Page 26714]]
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties regarding our preliminary results, we made revisions
to the margin calculations for Armstrong, Fine Furniture and
Minglin.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
In our Preliminary Results, we determined that 13 separate rate
applicant companies and 55 separate rate certifier companies
demonstrated their eligibility for separate rate status.\10\ Subsequent
to the publication of the Preliminary Results, we clarified the names
of five companies eligible for a separate rate and also determined that
an additional company was no longer eligible for a separate rate and
would be placed in the PRC-wide entity.\11\ Additionally, the company
incorrectly identified in the Preliminary Results as Changbai Mountain
Development and Protection Zone Hongtu Wood Industry Co., Ltd. has been
corrected for the final results to Changbai Mountain Development and
Protection Zone Hongtu Wood Industrial Co., Ltd.\12\ Finally, we
determined that Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd. is the correct
name for the company that was also referred to in the Preliminary
Results, incorrectly, as Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\11\ See Memorandum to The File from James Martinelli,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD Enforcement, Office
IV, Enforcement and Compliance through Robert Bolling, Program
Manager, AD/CVD Enforcement, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
regarding ``Comments on Company Names in Preliminary Results''
(December 17, 2013); see also Memorandum to the File from James
Martinelli, International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD
Enforcement, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance through Robert
Bolling, Program Manager, AD/CVD Enforcement, Office IV, Enforcement
and Compliance, regarding ``Comments on Dunhua Jisheng Wood Industry
Co., Ltd.'' (December 17, 2013).
\12\ See Letter to the Department from Changbai Mountain
Development and Protection Zone Hongtu Wood Industrial Co., Ltd.,
regarding ``Request for Correction of Name'' (December 31, 2013).
\13\ See Memorandum to the File from Charles Riggle, AD/CVD
Enforcement, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, regarding
``2011-2012 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China''
(December 23, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the POR:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The following companies are collectively known as The
Fusong Jinlong Group (``Fusong Jinlong Group''): Dalian Qianqiu
Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd.;
Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.; and Fusong Qianqiu Wooden
Products Co., Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted- average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Ltd........... 0.00
Nanjing Minglin Wooden Industry Co. Ltd.............. 0.00
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited.................... 5.74
Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd................ 5.74
A&W (Shanghai) Woods Co., Ltd........................ 5.74
Baishan Huafeng Wood Product Co., Ltd................ 5.74
Benxi Wood Company................................... 5.74
Changbai Mountain Development and Protection Zone 5.74
Hongtu Wood Industrial Co., Ltd.....................
Chinafloors Timber (China) Co., Ltd.................. 5.74
Dalian Dajen Wood Co., Ltd........................... 5.74
Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., Ltd.............. 5.74
Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd................. 5.74
Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd.............. 5.74
Dasso Industrial Group Co., Ltd...................... 5.74
Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC................. 5.74
Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd.......... 5.74
Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd............. 5.74
Dunhua City Wanrong Wood Industry Co., Ltd........... 5.74
Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd............. 5.74
Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd........................ 5.74
Fujian Wuyishan Werner Green Industry Co., Ltd....... 5.74
Fusong Jinlong Group \14\............................ 5.74
GTP International.................................... 5.74
Guangdong Fu Lin Timber Technology Limited........... 5.74
Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd............. 5.74
Guangzhou Panyu Kangda Board Co., Ltd................ 5.74
Guangzhou Panyu Southern Star Co., Ltd............... 5.74
HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products, Ltd.................. 5.74
Hangzhou Hanje Tec Co., Ltd.......................... 5.74
Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry Co., Ltd......... 5.74
Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd....................... 5.74
Huzhou Fulinmen Imp & Emp. Co., Ltd.................. 5.74
Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd............................ 5.74
Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.................. 5.74
Jianfeng Wood (Suzhou) Co., Ltd...................... 5.74
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd..... 5.74
Jiangsu Simba Flooring Industry Co., Ltd............. 5.74
JiaShan FengYun Timber Company Ltd................... 5.74
Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., Ltd........ 5.74
Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd....................... 5.74
Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd 5.74
Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd............... 5.74
Karly Wood Product Limited........................... 5.74
[[Page 26715]]
Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.............. 5.74
Kunming Alston (AST) Wood Products Co., Ltd.......... 5.74
Kunshan Yingyi-Nature Wood Industry Co., Ltd......... 5.74
Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc.................... 5.74
Mudanjiang Bosen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.............. 5.74
Nakahiro Jyou Sei Furniture (Dalian) Co., Ltd........ 5.74
Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd....... 5.74
Puli Trading Limited................................. 5.74
Scholar Home (Shanghai) New Material Co. Ltd......... 5.74
Shanghai Eswell Timber Co., Ltd...................... 5.74
Shanghai Lairunde Wood Co., Ltd...................... 5.74
Shanghai Lizhong Wood Products Co., Ltd/The Lizhong 5.74
Wood Industry Limited Company of Shanghai...........
Shanghai New Sihi Wood Co., Ltd...................... 5.74
Shanghai Shenlin Corp................................ 5.74
Shenyang Senwang Wooden Industry Co., Ltd............ 5.74
Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd................... 5.74
Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.......................... 5.74
Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd..................... 5.74
Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd......................... 5.74
Yixing Lion-King Timber Industry Co., Ltd............ 5.74
Zhejiang Biyork Wood Co., Ltd........................ 5.74
Zhejiang Dadongwu Greenhome Wood Co., Ltd............ 5.74
Zhejiang Desheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd.............. 5.74
Zhejiang Fudeli Timber Industry Co., Ltd............. 5.74
Zhejiang Fuma Warm Technology Co., Ltd............... 5.74
Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.................. 5.74
Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd...................... 5.74
Zhejiang Tianzhen Bamboo & Wood Development Co., Ltd. 5.74
Zhejiang Yongyu Bamboo Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.......... 5.74
PRC-Wide Entity \15\................................. 58.84
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The following companies were named in the Initiation Notice
but did not submit a certification of no shipment, separate rate
application or separate rate certification; therefore the Department
has determined that they are part of the PRC-wide entity: Baiying
Furniture Manufacturer Co., Ltd.; Dazhuang Floor Co. (dba Dasso
Industrial Group Co., Ltd.); Dunhua Jisheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd.;
Fu Lik Timber (HK) Co., Ltd.; Furnco International (HK) Company
Limited; Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Group Co., Ltd.; Guangdong Jiasheng
Timber Industry Co., Ltd.; Guanghzhou Panyu Shatou Trading Co.,
Ltd.; Huzhou Fuma Wood Bus. Co., Ltd.; Jiazing Brilliant Import &
Export Co., Ltd.; Puli Trading Co., Ltd.; Sennorwell International
Group (Hong Kong) Limited; Shanghai Demeijia Wooden Co., Ltd.;
Shenyang Haobainian Wood Co.; Shenyang Sende Wood Co., Ltd.; Suzhou
Anxin Weiguang Timber Co., Ltd.; Yekalon Industry, Inc.; Zhejiang
AnJi XinFeng Bamboo & Wood Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Haoyun Wood Co.,
Ltd.; Zhejiang Jeson Wood Co., Ltd.; and Zhejiang Jiechen Wood
Industry Co., Ltd. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78
FR 6291 (January 30, 2013); see also Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 78 FR 13633 (February 28, 2013) (``Initiation
Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date
of these final results of this review, excluding any sales that entered
during the gap period.\16\ Where an assessment rate is above de minimis
(de minimis being less than 0.5 percent in a review), we will instruct
CBP to assess duties on all entries of subject merchandise for that
importer during the period from December 7, 2011 through November 30,
2012. For entries made during the provisional-measures period (i.e.,
May 26, 2011 through November 21, 2011), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the entries at the proper assessment rates, pursuant to
section 737(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''). In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or
customer-) specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to
this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the
Department will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the
importer's examined sales and the total entered value of sales.\17\ We
will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment
rate is above de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The gap period represents the period of time after the
expiration of the 180-day provisional measures period during the
original investigation, to the day prior to the publication in the
Federal Register of the U.S. International Trade Commission's final
determination. In the instant case, the gap period is November 22,
2011, to December 6, 2011.
\17\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies not selected for individual examination, we will
instruct CBP to apply the rates listed above to the entries of subject
merchandise exported by such companies and entered during the period
from December 7, 2011 through November 30, 2012. The rates were
obtained by averaging the above-de minimis cash-deposit rates
calculated for the companies selected for individual examination as
mandatory respondents. For entries made during the provisional-measures
period, we will instruct CBP to apply the lower of the rates assigned
to the companies as a result of the final
[[Page 26716]]
results of this review or the cash deposit rate collected as security
for an estimated dumping duty. The Department announced a refinement to
its assessment practice in non-market economy (``NME'') cases. Pursuant
to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in
the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined
during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines
that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject
merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's
case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the
NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of this practice, see Assessment
in NME Antidumping Proceedings.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment in
NME Antidumping Proceedings).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) Armstrong, Fine
Furniture, Minglin and the non-examined, separate rate respondents, the
cash deposit rate will be equal to their weighted-average dumping
margins established in the final results of this review, except if the
rate is zero or de minimis, then no cash deposit will be required; (2)
for Changzhou, Jiuyuan, Jiaxing Brilliant, Polywell and Vicwood, which
claimed no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from
their rate assigned in the most recently completed review of the
company; (3) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC
exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the existing exporter-specific rate; (4) for all PRC exporters of
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity
established in the final determination of the less than fair value
investigation (i.e., 58.84 percent); and (5) for all non-PRC exporters
of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed regarding these
final results within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to APO of
their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in
this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the
return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Issues and Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Differential Pricing
1.A Consideration of an Alternative Comparison Method
in Administrative Reviews
1.B Withdrawal of the Regulatory Provisions Governing
Targeted Dumping in Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations
1.C Differential Pricing Analysis
1.D Denial of Offsets with the Average-to-Transaction
Comparison Method
1.E Whether to Use the Targeted Dumping Analysis for
Armstrong
Comment 2: Financial Statements
Comment 3: Whether the VAT Calculation is Appropriate
Comment 4: Whether the Surrogate Value for B&H is Appropriate
Comment 5: Whether the Net Weight Should be Used to Calculate the
AUV
Comment 6: Surrogate Value for Non-Coniferous, Non-Tropical Face
Veneer
Comment 7: Surrogate Value for Wood Scrap By-Product
Comment 8: Surrogate Value for Melamine Formaldehyde Resin Adhesive
Comment 9: Surrogate Value for Core Veneer
Comment 10: Surrogate Value for Labor
Comment 11: Surrogate Value for Water
Comment 12: Surrogate Value for Electricity
Comment 13: Armstrong's Back Veneer Surrogate Value
Comment 14: Armstrong's Transportation Expenses for Market Economy
Purchases
Comment 15: Armstrong's International Freight
Comment 16: Armstrong's Miscellaneous and Energy Resources
Comment 17: Armstrong's Freight Revenue
Comment 18: Patriot's U.S. Indirect Selling Expenses
Comment 19: Armstrong's Ocean Freight
Comment 20: Armstrong's MEP Prices
Comment 21: Armstrong's Transportation Expenses for Market Economy
Distances
Comment 22: Armstrong's Hickory Veneer Valuation
Comment 23: Armstrong's Truck Freight
Comment 24: Fine Furniture's MEP Transportation Expenses
Comment 25: Fine Furniture's Plywood Value Not Included in NV
Calculation
Comment 26: Fine Furniture's Freight Revenue Calculation
Comment 27: Fine Furniture's B&H Calculation in the SAS Margin
Program
Comment 28: Fine Furniture's Unreported Sample Sales and Whether to
Apply Adverse Facts Available
Comment 29: Fine Furniture's Liquidation Instructions and Whether
they Should Include the Name of Its Affiliate Listed on the Import
Documentation Submitted to U.S. CBP
Comment 30: Fine Furniture's Face Veneer Surrogate Value
Comment 31: Minglin's Face Veneer Surrogate Value
Recommendation
Table of Shortened Citations
Litigation Cite Table
[FR Doc. 2014-10698 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P