[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 107 (Wednesday, June 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32282-32283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12918]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0386; FRL-9910-88]
Fipronil; Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemptions,
Solicitation of Public Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA has received specific exemption requests from the Oregon
Department of Agriculture to use the pesticide Fipronil (CAS No.
120068-37-3) to treat up to 600 acres of rutabaga and turnips to
control the cabbage maggot.
The applicant proposes uses which are supported by the
Interregional (IR)-4 program and has been requested in 5 or more
previous years, and a petition for tolerance has not yet been submitted
to the Agency. In accordance with 40 CFR 166.24(a)(7), EPA is
soliciting public comment before making the decision whether or not to
grant the exemption.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 19, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0386, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois Rossi, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
[[Page 32283]]
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the
pesticide(s) discussed in this document, compared to the general
population.
II. What action is the Agency taking?
Under section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136p), at the discretion of the EPA
Administrator, a Federal or State agency may be exempted from any
provision of FIFRA if the EPA Administrator determines that emergency
conditions exist which require the exemption. Oregon Department of
Agriculture has requested the EPA Administrator to issue specific
exemptions for the use of fipronil on turnip and rutabaga to control
the cabbage maggot. Information in accordance with 40 CFR part 166 was
submitted as part of these requests.
As part of these requests, the applicant asserts that an emergency
situation exists based upon three factors:
1. A severe increase in cabbage maggot populations;
2. Apparent increasing resistance of the maggot to the registered
alternative; and
3. Phytotoxicity of the registered alternative to emerging
seedlings.
The applicant states that significant economic losses will be
suffered without adequate control of the cabbage maggot in turnip and
rutabaga production. The applicant indicates that fipronil has been
shown to provide excellent crop safety, and overall provides better
control than the registered alternative.
The Applicant proposes to make no more than one application at 4.16
fluid oz. of product per acre, to a maximum of 600 acres of rutabagas
and turnips, for use of up to a potential maximum of 19.5 gallons of
product. Applications would potentially be made through September 30,
2014, in the Oregon counties of Clackimas, Marion, Multnomah, and
Umatilla.
This notice does not constitute a decision by EPA on the
applications themselves. The regulations governing FIFRA section 18
require publication of a notice of receipt of an application for a
specific exemption proposing a use which is supported by the Inter-
Regional Project Number 4 (IR-4) program and has been requested in 5 or
more previous years, and a petition for tolerance has not yet been
submitted to the Agency. The notice provides an opportunity for public
comment on the application.
The Agency, will review and consider all comments received during
the comment period in determining whether to issue the specific
exemptions requested by the Oregon Department of Agriculture.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.
Dated: May 22, 2014.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-12918 Filed 6-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P